Design Advisory Board

Design Advisory Board Tuesday, February 24, 2026, 3:00 PM Remote and In Person (at 645 Pine Street) Meeting Please click the link below to join the webinar: Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87155655137?pwd=ZEdGaGhxeFpRNDJQcFJrNWkvb1Vudz09 Webinar ID: 871 5565 5137 Passcode: 796731 Telephone: US: +1 312 626 6799 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 1. Agenda 1.1. Session I – 3:00 PM – 3:30 PM ZP-25-622; 37 Archibald Street (RM, Ward 2) Edith Rhoads Proposed conversion of existing single-family home into a triplex including a second-story rear addition. (Project Manager, Mary O’Neil) 1.2. Session II – 3:30 PM – 4:00 PM ZP-26-28; 45 Howard Street (RM, Ward 5) Sarah Schiesser / Thomas Wironen / Robert Hale Proposed construction of a 20’ x 24’ addition on the west side of existing home. Original historic home will be repainted and repaired in kind. (Project Manager, Mary O’Neil) 2. Adjournment 3. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements 3.1. The programs and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals who require special arrangements to participate are encouraged to contact the Department of Permitting & Inspections at least 72 hours in advance so that proper accommodations can be arranged. For information call 865-7188. Non-Discrimination The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political or religious affiliation, race, color, national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive status, crime victim status or genetic information. The City is also committed to providing Page 1 of 65 proper access to services, facilities, and employment opportunities. For accessibility information or alternative formats, please contact Human Resources Department at (802) 540-2505. Page 2 of 65 Department of Permiting and Inspections William Ward, Director Zoning Division Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner 645 Pine Street Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph Cava, Planning Technician www.burlingtonvt.gov/pz Collin Naheedy, Zoning Compliance Officer Phone: (802) 865-7188 Fax: (802) 865-7195 MEMORANDUM To: The Design Advisory Board From: Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner RE: ZP-25-622 Location: 37 Archibald Street Date: February 24, 2026 File: ZP-25-622 Location: 37 Archibald Street Zone: RM Ward: 2 Date application accepted: December 15, 2025 (incomplete) Applicant/ Owner: Edie Rhoads Request: Proposed change of use from existing single-family home to four one-bedroom residential dwelling units. [Application revised to convert SFR to three units.] Background: • Zoning Permit 08-342CA / 07-655; Replace 6 windows and 2 entry doors. Install white vinyl siding and insulation. October 2007. Overview: 37 Archibald Street appears on the 1889 Hopkins Map of Burlington, and identified within Burlington Land Records as a single-family home in 19111. It is not clear if the structure identified is the same building that exists today, although it is similarly set back from the street and was described as 1 ½ stories. This building is proposed to be converted to a triplex via a 2nd story addition. Article 6: Development Review Standards Part 1: Land Division Standards No subdivision is proposed. Not applicable. Part 2: Site Plan Design Standards Sec. 6.2.1 Applicability. These standards shall be satisfied for the approval of all development subject to the provisions of this ordinance found in Article 3, Section 3.4.2(1) – Site Plan Review. 1 City of Burlington Land Records, V112:151. The programs and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. For accessibility information call 865-7188 (for TTY users 865-7142). Page 3 of 65 Sec. 6.2.2 Review Standards (a) Protection of Important Natural Features: The submitted site plan reflects existing conditions, with no change to the landscaping or topography. Not applicable. (b) Topographical Alterations: No change to the topography is proposed within the submission materials. (c) Protection of Important Public Views: There are no protected public views from or through this property. Not applicable. (d) Protection of Important Cultural Resources: 37 Archibald Street is not listed on the state or National Register of Historic Resources. Not applicable. (e) Supporting the Use of Renewable Energy Resources: Nothing within this application precludes the use of wind, water, solar, geothermal or other renewable energy resource. (f) Brownfield Sites: 37 Archibald is not listed on the Department of Environmental Conservation’s Brownfields list. Not applicable. (g) Provide for nature's events: Special attention shall be accorded to stormwater runoff so that neighboring properties and/or the public stormwater drainage system are not adversely affected. All development and site disturbance shall follow applicable city and state erosion and stormwater management guidelines in accordance with the requirements of Art 5, Sec 5.5.3. Design features which address the effects of rain, snow, and ice at building entrances, and to provisions for snow and ice removal or storage from circulation areas shall also be incorporated. Per the provided site plan, no site alterations are proposed. Entry locations (and egress paths) are not identified. The existing first floor entry on the north façade is within a covered entryway. (h) Building Location and Orientation: The introduction of new buildings and additions shall be consistent with the intent of the district. New buildings and additions should be aligned with the front façade of neighboring buildings to reinforce the existing “street-edge,” or where necessary, located in such a way that complements existing natural features and landscapes. Buildings placed in mixed-use areas where high volumes of pedestrian traffic are desired 2 Page 4 of 65  should seek to provide sufficient space (optimally 12-15 feet) between the curbline and the building face to facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic. In such areas, architectural recesses and articulations at the street-level are particularly important, and can be used as an alternative to a complete building setback in order to maintain the existing street wall. Principal buildings shall have their main entrance facing and clearly identifiable from the public street. The existing entry on the façade is proposed to be retained. A new entry is illustrated on the west elevation; it has no canopy or protection from the elements. The site plan does not provide a footprint for the entry stairs, or measurement to the property line. (i)Vehicular Access: Curb cuts shall be arranged and limited in number to reduce congestion and improve traffic safety. A secondary access point from side roads is encouraged where possible to improve traffic flow and safety along major streets. The width and radius of curb cuts should be kept to the minimum width necessary, and sight triangles and sufficient turnarounds for vehicles shall be provided to reduce the potential for accidents at points of egress. No changes are proposed for the existing driveway, which is provided as 8’ x 30’deep. (j) Pedestrian Access: Pedestrians shall be provided one or more direct and unobstructed paths between a public sidewalk and the primary building entrance. Well defined pedestrian routes shall be provided through parking areas to primary building access points and be designed to provide a physical separation between vehicles and pedestrians in a manner that minimizes conflicts and improves safety. Where sidewalks and driveways meet, the sidewalk shall be clearly marked by differentiated ground materials and/or pavement markings. A walkway to the front door is illustrated on the site plan. There is no identified pedestrian path to the new side/west entry, which is required in order to separate pedestrians from vehicular circulation. 3 Page 5 of 65 (k) Accessibility for the Handicapped: Special attention shall be given to the location and integration of accessible routes, parking spaces, and ramps for the disabled. Special attention shall also be given to identifying accessible access points between buildings and parking areas, public streets and sidewalks. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) shall be used as a guide in determining the adequacy of the proposed development in addressing the needs of the disabled. ADA compliance is under the jurisdiction of the building official. (l) Parking and Circulation: To the extent possible, parking should be placed at the side or rear of the lot and screened from view from surrounding properties and adjacent public rights of ways. Attempts to link adjacent parking lots or provide shared parking areas which can serve neighboring properties simultaneously shall be strongly encouraged. Parking shall be laid out to provide ease in maneuvering of vehicles and so that vehicles do not have to back out onto city streets. Dimensions of spaces shall at a minimum meet the requirements as provided in Article 8. The perimeter of all parking areas shall be designed with anchored curb stops, landscaping, or other such physical barriers to prevent vehicles from encroaching into adjacent green spaces. All parking areas shall provide a physical separation between moving and parked vehicles and pedestrians in a manner that minimizes conflicts and gives pedestrians a safe and unobstructed route to building entrance(s) or a public sidewalk. Where bicycle parking is provided, access shall be provided along vehicular driveways or separate paths, with clearly marked signs indicating the location of parking areas. Where bicycle parking is located proximate to a building entrance, all shared walkways shall be of sufficient width to separate bicycles and pedestrians, and be clearly marked to avoid conflicts. All bicycle parking areas shall link directly to a pedestrian route to a building entrance. All bicycle parking shall be in conformance with applicable design & construction details as provided by the dept. of public works. No changes are proposed to the existing vehicular access and parking/drive area. An identified pedestrian path to the side entry is required. Bicycle parking will be required for the three residential units. Long term bike parking is calculated at 1 space/2 bedrooms. The applicant shall provide the bedroom count to finalize the bike parking requirement. (m) Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls: No fences or landscaping are proposed. Not applicable. (n) Public Plazas and Open Space: No public plazas or open space are required. Not applicable. 4 Page 6 of 65 (o) Outdoor Lighting: Where exterior lighting is proposed the applicant shall meet the lighting performance standards as per Sec 5.5.2. No lighting information has been provided. The applicant shall provide lighting fixture information with proposed light levels. (p) Integrate infrastructure into the design: Exterior storage areas, machinery and equipment installations, service and loading areas, utility meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall utilize setbacks, plantings, enclosures and other mitigation or screening methods to minimize their auditory and visual impact on the public street and neighboring properties to the extent practicable. Utility and service enclosures and screening shall be coordinated with the design of the principal building, and should be grouped in a service court away from public view. On- site utilities shall be place underground whenever practicable. Trash and recycling bins and dumpsters shall be located, within preferably, or behind buildings, enclosed on all four (4) sides to prevent blowing trash, and screened from public view. Any development involving the installation of machinery or equipment which emits heat, vapor, fumes, vibration, or noise shall minimize, insofar as practicable, any adverse impact on neighboring properties and the environment pursuant to the requirements of Article 5, Part 5 Performance Standards. Building elevations and/or the site plan do not define the location of meters, mechanical equipment, utility connections, mailboxes or trash/recycling facilities. All are required. Part3: Architectural Design Standards Sec. 6.3.2 Review Standards (a) Relate development to its environment: Proposed buildings and additions shall be appropriately scaled and proportioned for their function and with respect to the purpose of the zoning district. They should integrate harmoniously into the topography, and to the use, scale, and architectural details of existing buildings in the vicinity; however, such consideration shall not require building height to be more limited than otherwise allowed within an applicable zoning district or overlay zone per Article 4. The following shall be considered: 1. Massing, Height and Scale: While architectural styles or materials may vary within a streetscape, proposed development should maintain an overall scale similar to that of surrounding buildings, or provide a sensitive transition, where appropriate, to development of a dissimilar scale. In low and medium residential districts, the height and massing of existing residential buildings should be carefully considered when evaluating the compatibility of 5 Page 7 of 65  additions and infill development; however, no modifications by the DRB shall be made to projects which otherwise limit the allowable Principal Structure footprint, height, and number of units per building otherwise permitted by Tables 4.4.5-1 and 4.4.5-2. 37 Archibald is smaller in scale that the two buildings that abut it. The addition of a second story leans toward the multi-story character of abutting properties. Buildings should maintain consistent massing and perceived building height at the street level, regardless of the overall bulk or height of the building. Buildings should maintain a relationship to the human scale through the use of architectural elements, variations of proportions and materials, and surface articulations. Large expanses of undifferentiated building wall along the public street or sidewalk shall be avoided. The apparent mass and scale of buildings shall be broken into smaller parts by articulating separate volumes reflecting existing patterns in the streetscape, and should be proportioned to appear more vertical than horizontal in order to avoid monotonous repetition. (See also (d) Provide an active and inviting street edge below.) The design methodology here is a pop-top addition to add a new residential unit. Although new vinyl siding and vinyl windows are proposed, the sudden height lacks architectural transition to introduce the new volume to both the house and the street. The façade lacks any surface articulation that would ease the new massing into place. There is no reflection of existing patterns in the streetscape nor a clear architectural identity that warmly embraces the new residential units. 2. Roofs and Rooflines. New buildings should incorporate predominant roof forms and pitches within the existing neighborhood and appropriate to the context. Large expanses of undifferentiated roof forms shall be avoided. This can be achieved by incorporating dormers or some variation in the roof form to lessen the impact of the massing against the sky. While flat roofs can be a reasonable architectural solution, pitched roof forms and architectural elements that enhance the city’s skyline are strongly encouraged. Roof eaves, parapets, and cornices should be articulated as an architectural detail. Roof-top mechanicals shall be screened from view from the public street, and should be incorporated into and hidden within the roof structure whenever possible. The new second story is proposed to have a shed roof, continuing the design of the existing structure. This is an uncommon roofline for the neighboring buildings, usually reserved for entry canopies (23 Archibald), porches or dormer roofs (33 Archibald). The predominant roof form is a gable or flat roof, when associated with an Italianate style residence. 6 Page 8 of 65 3. Building Openings Principal entrances shall be clearly defined and readily identifiable from a public street whether by a door, a canopy, porch, or other prominent architectural or landscape features. People with physical challenges should be able to use the same entrance as everyone-else and shall be provided an “accessible route” to the building. Attention shall also be accorded to design features which provide protection from the affects of rain, snow, and ice at building entrances, and to provisions for snow and ice removal or storage. Window openings shall maintain consistent patterns and proportions appropriate to the use. The window pattern should add variety and interest to the architecture, and be proportioned to appear more vertical than horizontal. Where awnings over windows or doors are used, the lowest edge of the awning shall be at least eight (8) feet above any pedestrian way, and shall not encroach into the public right-of-way without an encroachment permit issued by the dept. of public works. Building elevations have only been provided for the north (streetfront) and west. An entry door is retained on the north; a new entry is proposed on the west. It is not clear if this leads to one or two residential units. Additional building elevations are required, as is an illustration of the entry steps on the site plan. Vinyl windows are proposed on the second story north. As the submission lacks additional building elevations, an assessment of the building openings is incomplete. The application should satisfy egress requirements as well. (b) Protection of Important Architectural Resources: 37 Archibald is not listed on the state or National Register of Historic Resources. Not applicable. (c) Protection of Important Public Views: There are no protected public views from or through this property. Not applicable. (d) Provide an active and inviting street edge: Building facades shall be varied along the street edge by the integration of architectural features, building materials, or physical step-backs of the façade along its length. Large expanses of undifferentiated building wall shall be avoided. This may be accomplished by incorporating fenestration patterns, bays, horizontal and vertical façade articulations, the rhythm of openings and prominent architectural features such as porches, patios, bays, articulated bases, stepping back an elevation relative to surrounding structures, and other street level details. The use of traditional facade components such as parapet caps, cornices, storefronts, awnings, canopies, transoms, kick plates, and recessed entries are highly encouraged. In areas where high volumes of pedestrian traffic are desired, the use of architectural recesses and articulations at the street-level are particularly important in order to facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic. 37 Archibald is uniquely set back from the front parcel line, about 18’ from the streetfront. Abutting properties both to the east and west are situated close to the sidewalk. This plan retains 7 Page 9 of 65 the orientation and arrangement of the façade, with the addition of a second story approximately 12’ from the front façade. A proposed building height has not been provided; however, the ordinance limits building height to 35’ or three stories. If the assumed scale is one square = 3’ (from site plan; perhaps different for building elevations) the submission defines a building façade in excess of allowable height. An accurate scale and height measurements are required. (e) Quality of materials: All development shall maximize the use of highly durable building materials that extend the life cycle of the building, and reduce maintenance, waste, and environmental impacts. Such materials are particularly important in certain highly trafficked locations such as along major streets, sidewalks, loading areas, and driveways. Efforts to incorporate the use of recycled content materials and building materials and products that are extracted and/or manufactured within the region are highly encouraged. Vinyl windows and doors are of limited durability but considered acceptable for new construction on non-historic structures. (f) Reduce energy utilization: New structures should incorporate the best available technologies and materials in order to maximize energy efficient design. All new construction shall meet the Guidelines for Energy Efficient Construction pursuant to the requirements of Article VI. Energy Conservation, Section 8 of the City of Burlington Code of Ordinances. New structures should take advantage of solar access where available, and shall undertake efforts to reduce the impacts of shadows cast on adjacent buildings where practicable, in order to provide opportunities for the use of active and passive solar utilization. The applicant will be required to provide Residential Building Energy Standards information prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. If retained, the south-facing shed roof would be an excellent candidate for solar installation. (g) Make advertising features complementary to the site: No signage is proposed. Not applicable. (h) Integrate infrastructure into the building design: See Section 6.2.2. (p), above. (i) Make spaces secure and safe: Spaces shall be designed to facilitate building evacuation, accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment, and, to the extent feasible, provide for adequate and secure visibility for persons using and observing such spaces. Building entrances/entry points shall be visible and adequately lit, and intercom systems for multi- family housing should be incorporated where possible, to maximize personal safety. 8 Page 10 of 65 No lighting plan has been provided, and is essential to understand adequate lighting at building entrances. Unit numbers shall be identified as per the direction of the fire marshal’s office, and clearly visible from the street. All required building and life safety code as defined by the building official and fire marshal shall apply. Items for the Board’s consideration: 1. The applicant shall provide lighting fixture information with proposed light levels. 2. The minimum dwelling unit size under the Neighborhood Code is 350 sq. ft. 3. The site plan shall be revised to include the footprint/area for the westerly entry stairs, and their setback from the property line. Any change in lot coverage shall be defined. 4. An identified pedestrian path shall be provided to each unit entrance. 5. Elevations shall be provided for the south and east elevations. 6. An entry canopy or similar for the new entryway shall be provided to shelter residents from inclement weather. 7. The applicant shall provide a final bedroom count to calculate required Long Term bike parking spaces @ 1/two bedrooms. 8. A letter of adequate water and sewer capacity shall be submitted from Burlington’s Water Resource Division. 9. A state waste water permit shall be required. This is the obligation of the applicant to secure prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Impact fees may be due within 30 days of issuance of the related building permit, as determined by the Water Resources Division and the Technical Services Division of the Department of Public Works based on water and wastewater flows and peak hour vehicle trip ends, respectively. 11. A revised estimated construction cost shall be provided to correct application fees. Per Section 3.2.4 (a): Application fees are based on the estimated fair market value of the construction costs for the type and scope of site improvements and construction being proposed. This is not the actual cost to the applicant. Applicants may be required by the administrative officer to document any fees calculated based on the estimated cost of construction in accordance with the most recent publication of the RS Means Construction Cost Estimation cataloque or equivalent. 12. Standard Permit Conditions 1-15. 9 Page 11 of 65 Page 12 of 65 Page 13 of 65 Page 14 of 65 Page 15 of 65 Page 16 of 65 Page 17 of 65 Page 18 of 65 Page 19 of 65 Page 20 of 65 Page 21 of 65 Page 22 of 65 Page 23 of 65 Page 24 of 65 Page 25 of 65 Page 26 of 65 Page 27 of 65 Page 28 of 65 Page 29 of 65 Page 30 of 65 Department of Permiting and Inspections William Ward, Director Zoning Division Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner 645 Pine Street Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph Cava, Planning Technician www.burlingtonvt.gov/pz Collin Naheedy, Zoning Compliance Officer Phone: (802) 865-7188 Fax: (802) 865-7195 MEMORANDUM To: The Design Advisory Board From: Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner RE: ZP-26-28 Location: 45 Howard Street Date: February 24, 2026 File: ZP-26-28 Location: 45 Howard Street Zone: RM Ward: 5 Date application accepted: January 23, 2026 Applicant/ Owner: Robert Hale, Wildbranch Builders / Sarah Schiesser and Thomas Wironen Request: Addition to existing single-family home. Background: • Zoning Permit 25-265; Construction of addition to existing residence including one additional bedroom, one additional half-bath, modifying an existing bathroom, and remodeling existing kitchen and garage. Application withdrawn July 2025. • Zoning Permit ZPF-23-29; Replacing Wired Fence with Wooden Fence and adding a fence across the yard. May 2023. The programs and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. For accessibility information call 865-7188 (for TTY users 865-7142). Page 31 of 65  • Zoning Permit n.n.; install a hearth and chimney to accommodate a wood stove. Chimney to extend above roofline approximately 4’. June 1982. • Zoning Permit 78-125; construct wire fence on 2 sides of property; rear line to match and connect to neighbor. October 1978. Overview: 45 Howard Street is an existing single-family home, constructed by noted local builder John Roberts and listed on the Vermont State Register of Historic Resources. The application proposes a westerly addition with no increase in unit count. As the addition is greater than 50% of the existing gross floor area, Development Review Board is required. Article 6: Development Review Standards Part 1: Land Division Design Standards Sec. 6.1.1 Applicability. These standards are enacted to apply to all development subject to the provisions of this ordinance found in Art. 10 – Subdivisions or Art. 11 – Planned Development involving the subdivision of land, or an adjustment or reconfiguration of lot lines. No change in existing lot lines, or subdivision of land is included. Not applicable. Part 2: Site Plan Design Standards Sec. 6.2.1 Applicability. These standards shall be satisfied for the approval of all development subject to the provisions of this ordinance found in Article 3, Section 3.4.2(1) – Site Plan Review. Sec. 6.2.2 Review Standards (a) Protection of Important Natural Features The landscape, existing terrain and any significant trees and vegetation shall be preserved in their natural state insofar as practicable in keeping with the objectives of the underlying zoning district. Development and site disturbance shall preserve watercourses, wetlands, steep slopes, flood-prone areas, rock outcroppings, wildlife habitat and travel corridors, specimen trees and contiguous stands of forest, and other sensitive ecological and geological areas insofar as practicable in keeping with the objectives of the underlying zoning district. Site plans shall provide suitable buffers from any proposed site improvements, and maintain continuity and contiguousness of greenspace while allowing reasonable development in support of the overall intent of the zoning district. Where any natural features are proposed to be removed or the topography altered, special attention shall be given to replace or mitigate the loss of such features. Any development occurring on parcels containing significant natural areas identified in the city’s Open Space Protection Plan shall avoid disturbance to these natural areas and establish appropriate buffers that protect their natural functions. While no landscaping plan has been provided, aerial imaging indicates a large westerly side yard where the addition is proposed. A mature Walnut tree will be retained. 2 Page 32 of 65 Sheet 1 of plans defines that landscaping is the obligation of the property owner; however, a landscaping plan is required for review. Additionally, any tree cutting shall be identified. (b) Topographical Alterations: Alteration to the natural contour of the site shall minimize grading, cut, and fill, and shall take necessary measures to protect against erosion and future instability. Any grade changes shall be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas. In areas where more intense levels of development are encouraged, development should seek to take advantage of topographical changes to hide and/or blend new construction into the landscape. Proposed design and construction details for any cut and fill, or retaining walls over 3-feet in height, or any height along the lakeshore, shall be subject to review and approval by the city engineer before receiving approval of the site plan. The site plan defines an area of approximately 780 sq. ft. of disturbance. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan is required for review and approval by the Stormwater Engineering division. Submittals define all finish grades shall be smooth and uniform. (c) Protection of Important Public Views: There are no important public views from or through this site. Not applicable. (d) Protection of Important Cultural Resources: Burlington’s architectural and cultural heritage shall be protected through sensitive and respectful redevelopment, rehabilitation, and infill. Archeological sites likely to yield information important to the city’s or the region’s pre-history or history shall be evaluated, documented, and avoided whenever feasible. Where the proposed development involves sites listed or eligible for listing on a state or national register of historic places, the applicant shall meet the applicable development and design standards pursuant to Sec. 5.4.8(b). See Section 5.4.8, below. (e) Supporting the Use of Renewable Energy Resources: Where feasible, the site plan should be so designed as to take advantage of the site’s inherent potential to utilize sources of renewable energy including direct sunlight, wind, or running water. The site plan should also incorporate site planning and landscaping decisions intended to minimize energy demand such as siting buildings to maximize solar access or the use of deciduous and coniferous trees to create shade and windbreak. Buildings should, where appropriate within the context of the neighborhood development pattern, maximize their solar exposure by being oriented to maximize natural light and 3 Page 33 of 65  heat gain during winter months, and to minimize casting shadows into ground floor living space of a building on an adjacent property. Although a corner lot, the existing building’s orientation is to the north. The new addition will have an entry/porch facing west which increases opportunities for natural solar gain. No part of the application precludes the use of wind, water, solar, geothermal or other renewable energy system. (f) Brownfield Sites: Where a proposed development involves a known or suspected brownfield, the site plan shall indicate areas of known or suspected contamination, and the applicant shall identify completed or planned remediation necessary to support the intended use(s). 45 Howard is not listed on the Department of Environmental Conservation’s list of Brownfield sites. Not applicable. (g) Provide for nature's events: Special attention shall be accorded to stormwater runoff so that neighboring properties and/or the public stormwater drainage system are not adversely affected. All development and site disturbance shall follow applicable city and state erosion and stormwater management guidelines in accordance with the requirements of Art 5, Sec 5.5.3. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan is required. Design features which address the effects of rain, snow, and ice at building entrances, and to provisions for snow and ice removal or storage from circulation areas shall also be incorporated. The westerly addition includes a covered porch that will provide a modicum of shelter from inclement weather. (h) Building Location and Orientation: The introduction of new buildings and additions shall be consistent with the intent of the district. New buildings and additions should be aligned with the front façade of neighboring buildings to reinforce the existing “street-edge,” or where necessary, located in such a way that complements existing natural features and landscapes. Buildings placed in mixed-use areas where high volumes of pedestrian traffic are desired should seek to provide sufficient space (optimally 12-15 feet) between the curbline and the building face to facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic. In such areas, architectural recesses and articulations at the street-level are particularly important, and can be used as an alternative to a complete building setback in order to maintain the existing street wall. Principal buildings shall have their main entrance facing and clearly identifiable from the public street. The development of corner lots shall be subject to review by the city engineer regarding the adequacy of sight distances along the approaches to the intersection. 4 Page 34 of 65 The principal entrance will remain as existing; facing Howard Street. This structural addition more than doubles the streetface, with the addition entry access facing west. (i)Vehicular Access: Curb cuts shall be arranged and limited in number to reduce congestion and improve traffic safety. A secondary access point from side roads is encouraged where possible to improve traffic flow and safety along major streets. The width and radius of curb cuts should be kept to the minimum width necessary, and sight triangles and sufficient turnarounds for vehicles shall be provided to reduce the potential for accidents at points of egress. The application does not define any change for the existing driveway. The site plan appears inaccurate, as street images illustrate the driveway extending beyond the porch (another vehicle is parked there). The site plan shall be corrected to accurately display the area and measurements of the surface parking. (j) Pedestrian Access: Pedestrians shall be provided one or more direct and unobstructed paths between a public sidewalk and the primary building entrance. Well defined pedestrian routes shall be provided through parking areas to primary building access points and be designed to provide a physical separation between vehicles and pedestrians in a manner that minimizes conflicts and improves safety. Where sidewalks and driveways meet, the sidewalk shall be clearly marked by differentiated ground materials and/or pavement markings. There are no existing pedestrian paths to the home. It would be assumed that residents walk up the driveway to access the home. A delineated pedestrian path to either entry should be presented in this plan. 5 Page 35 of 65 (k) Accessibility for the Handicapped: While not required for single family homes, “Visitability” standards are encouraged. ADA compliance is under the jurisdiction of the building official. (l) Parking and Circulation: To the extent possible, parking should be placed at the side or rear of the lot and screened from view from surrounding properties and adjacent public rights of ways. Attempts to link adjacent parking lots or provide shared parking areas which can serve neighboring properties simultaneously shall be strongly encouraged. Parking shall be laid out to provide ease in maneuvering of vehicles and so that vehicles do not have to back out onto city streets. Dimensions of spaces shall at a minimum meet the requirements as provided in Article 8. The perimeter of all parking areas shall be designed with anchored curb stops, landscaping, or other such physical barriers to prevent vehicles from encroaching into adjacent green spaces. Surface parking and maneuvering areas should be shaded in an effort to reduce their effect on the local microclimate, air quality, and stormwater runoff with an objective of shading at least 30% of the parking lot. The submission does not define any changes to the existing surface parking. As noted, it must be accurately reflected on the site plan. (m) Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls: No landscaping plan has been provided, and is required. (n) Public Plazas and Open Space: There is no requirement for a public plaza or open space. Not applicable. (o) Outdoor Lighting: Where exterior lighting is proposed the applicant shall meet the lighting performance standards as per Sec 5.5.2. While an electrical wiring plan has been provided, fixture information and light levels have not. Both are required to ascertain acceptable exterior light levels. (p) Integrate infrastructure into the design: Exterior storage areas, machinery and equipment installations, service and loading areas, utility meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall utilize setbacks, plantings, enclosures and other mitigation or screening methods to minimize their auditory and visual impact on the public street and neighboring properties to the extent practicable. Utility and service enclosures and screening shall be coordinated with the design of the principal building, and should be grouped in a service court away from public view. On- site utilities shall be place underground whenever practicable. Trash and recycling bins 6 Page 36 of 65  and dumpsters shall be located, within preferably, or behind buildings, enclosed on all four (4) sides to prevent blowing trash, and screened from public view. Any development involving the installation of machinery or equipment which emits heat, vapor, fumes, vibration, or noise shall minimize, insofar as practicable, any adverse impact on neighboring properties and the environment pursuant to the requirements of Article 5, Part 5 Performance Standards. Utility connections, mechanical equipment, meters, mailboxes, trash and recycling storage must be illustrated on the site plan and/or building elevations as appropriate. Screening may be required. Part 3: Architectural Design Standards Sec. 6.3.1 Applicability. These standards are enacted and shall be satisfied for the approval of all development subject to the provisions of this ordinance found in Article 3, Section 3.4.2(b) – Design Review. Sec. 6.3.2 Review Standards (a) Relate development to its environment: Proposed buildings and additions shall be appropriately scaled and proportioned for their function and with respect to the purpose of the zoning district. They should integrate harmoniously into the topography, and to the use, scale, and architectural details of existing buildings in the vicinity; however, such consideration shall not require building height to be more limited than otherwise allowed within an applicable zoning district or overlay zone per Article 4. The following shall be considered: 1. Massing, Height and Scale: While architectural styles or materials may vary within a streetscape, proposed development should maintain an overall scale similar to that of surrounding buildings, or provide a sensitive transition, where appropriate, to development of a dissimilar scale. In low and medium residential districts, the height and massing of existing residential buildings should be carefully considered when evaluating the compatibility of additions and infill development; however, no modifications by the DRB shall be made to projects which otherwise limit the allowable Principal Structure footprint, height, and number of units per building otherwise permitted by Tables 4.4.5-1 and 4.4.5-2. Buildings should maintain consistent massing and perceived building height at the street level, regardless of the overall bulk or height of the building. Buildings should maintain a relationship to the human scale through the use of architectural elements, variations of proportions and materials, and surface articulations. Large expanses of undifferentiated building wall along the public street or sidewalk shall be avoided. The apparent mass and scale of buildings shall be broken into smaller parts by 7 Page 37 of 65  articulating separate volumes reflecting existing patterns in the streetscape, and should be proportioned to appear more vertical than horizontal in order to avoid monotonous repetition. (See also (d) Provide an active and inviting street edge below.) The proposed addition introduces a new footprint more than half the existing building footprint (58%, excluding porches) resulting in a substantial structural extension. At the street front, the addition matches the historic home in height and orientation, with an increase in the actual exposed building plane fronting Howard Street. 2. Roofs and Rooflines. New buildings should incorporate predominant roof forms and pitches within the existing neighborhood and appropriate to the context. Large expanses of undifferentiated roof forms shall be avoided. This can be achieved by incorporating dormers or some variation in the roof form to lessen the impact of the massing against the sky. While flat roofs can be a reasonable architectural solution, pitched roof forms and architectural elements that enhance the city’s skyline are strongly encouraged. Roof eaves, parapets, and cornices should be articulated as an architectural detail. Roof-top mechanicals shall be screened from view from the public street, and should be incorporated into and hidden within the roof structure whenever possible. Dormers shall not exceed the height of the ridgeline of the roof to which they are attached, and shall be set back a minimum of 1-foot from the edges of the underlying roofline, Individual dog house dormers shall be limited to 33% of the horizontal eave length of the principal roofline. The plan attempts to mirror the roofline of the existing home, but extending it to a first-floor westerly porch. A dormer is introduced, offering views westerly towards Pine Street and the lake. The addition height is incorrectly recorded to the ridgeline, rather than to the mid-line of the rise of the (shed dormer) roof. In an event, it is compliant with height limitations of the zoning district. 8 Page 38 of 65 3. Building Openings Principal entrances shall be clearly defined and readily identifiable from a public street whether by a door, a canopy, porch, or other prominent architectural or landscape features. People with physical challenges should be able to use the same entrance as everyone-else and shall be provided an “accessible route” to the building. Attention shall also be accorded to design features which provide protection from the affects of rain, snow, and ice at building entrances, and to provisions for snow and ice removal or storage. Window openings shall maintain consistent patterns and proportions appropriate to the use. The window pattern should add variety and interest to the architecture, and be proportioned to appear more vertical than horizontal. Where awnings over windows or doors are used, the lowest edge of the awning shall be at least eight (8) feet above any pedestrian way, and shall not encroach into the public right-of-way without an encroachment permit issued by the dept. of public works. The existing front entry door will be retained. An additional access point is provided on the west. The south entry will remain as existing. Porches are provided on the north, west and south elevations; each with their own access stairs. (b) Protection of Important Architectural Resources: Burlington’s architectural and cultural heritage shall be protected through sensitive and respectful redevelopment, rehabilitation, and infill. Where the proposed development involves buildings listed or eligible for listing on a state or national register of historic places, the applicant shall meet the applicable development and design standards pursuant to Sec. 5.4.8. The introduction of new buildings to a historic district listed on a state or national register of historic places shall make every effort to be compatible with nearby historic buildings. See Section 5.4.8, below. (c) Protection of Important Public Views: There are no protected important public views from or through this site. Not applicable. (d) Provide an active and inviting street edge: Building facades shall be varied along the street edge by the integration of architectural features, building materials, or physical step-backs of the façade along its length. Large expanses of undifferentiated building wall shall be avoided. This may be accomplished by incorporating fenestration patterns, bays, horizontal and vertical façade articulations, 9 Page 39 of 65  the rhythm of openings and prominent architectural features such as porches, patios, bays, articulated bases, stepping back an elevation relative to surrounding structures, and other street level details. The use of traditional facade components such as parapet caps, cornices, storefronts, awnings, canopies, transoms, kick plates, and recessed entries are highly encouraged. In areas where high volumes of pedestrian traffic are desired, the use of architectural recesses and articulations at the street-level are particularly important in order to facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic. The plan is sensitive to the arrangement of windows, maintaining a consistency in alignment across each building elevation. The introduction of a belt course between the first and second floor, however, mixes architectural language and misunderstands the signature decorative treatment introduced by John Roberts. The appearance from Howard Street is, however pleasant if not architecturally contradictory. (e) Quality of materials: All development shall maximize the use of highly durable building materials that extend the life cycle of the building, and reduce maintenance, waste, and environmental impacts. Such materials are particularly important in certain highly trafficked locations such as along major streets, sidewalks, loading areas, and driveways. Efforts to incorporate the use of recycled content materials and building materials and products that are extracted and/or manufactured within the region are highly encouraged. Owners of historic structures are encouraged to consult with an architectural historian in order to determine the most appropriate repair, restoration or replacement of historic building materials as outlined by the requirements of Art 5, Sec. 5.4.8. The existing historic house will be repaired and painted. Red cedar shakes are proposed for the addition. While welcome for new construction, they, too are inconsistent with the material and style of the existing home. (f) Reduce energy utilization: New structures should incorporate the best available technologies and materials in order to maximize energy efficient design. All new construction shall meet the Guidelines for Energy Efficient Construction pursuant to the requirements of Article VI. Energy Conservation, Section 8 of the City of Burlington Code of Ordinances. New structures should take advantage of solar access where available, and shall undertake efforts to reduce the impacts of shadows cast on adjacent buildings where practicable, in order to provide opportunities for the use of active and passive solar utilization. No solar is proposed for the development. Shadow cast is not a concern as the addition, as orientated, will not impact neighboring properties. The applicant will be required to file the required Residential Building Energy Standards form relative to window and door installation as well as roof insulation. 10 Page 40 of 65 (g) Make advertising features complementary to the site: No signage is proposed. Not applicable. (h) Integrate infrastructure into the building design: See Section 6.2.2 (p) above. (i) Make spaces secure and safe: Spaces shall be designed to facilitate building evacuation, accessibility by fire, police or other emergency personnel and equipment, and, to the extent feasible, provide for adequate and secure visibility for persons using and observing such spaces. Building entrances/entry points shall be visible and adequately lit, and intercom systems for multi- family housing should be incorporated where possible, to maximize personal safety. Exterior lighting information is required. The applicant shall meet all building code and life safety standards as defined by the building official and/or fire marshal. Sec. 5.4.8 Historic Buildings and Sites The City seeks to preserve, maintain, and enhance those aspects of the city having historical, architectural, archaeological, and cultural merit. Specifically, these regulations seek to achieve the following goals: To preserve, maintain and enhance Burlington’s historic character, scale, architectural integrity, and cultural resources; To foster the preservation of Burlington’s historic and cultural resources as part of an attractive, vibrant, and livable community in which to live, work and visit; To promote a sense of community based on understanding the city’s historic growth and development, and maintaining the city’s sense of place by protecting its historic and cultural resources; and, To promote the adaptive re-use of historic buildings and sites. (a) Applicability: These regulations shall apply to all buildings and sites in the city that are listed, or eligible for listing, on the State or National Register of Historic Places. 45 Howard Street is listed on the Vermont State Register of Historic Resources. (b) Standards and Guidelines: The following development standards, following the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, shall be used in the review of all applications involving historic buildings and sites subject to the provisions of this section and the requirements for Design Review in Art 3, Part 4. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards are basic principles created to help preserve the distinctive character of a historic building and its site. They are a series of concepts about maintaining, repairing and replacing historic features, as well as designing new additions or making alterations. These Standards are intended to be applied in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. 11 Page 41 of 65 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The property was designed and built as a single-family residence; a use which is proposed to continue. 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 45 Howard Street is a signature residential model developed by a regionally well-known carpenter/builder named John Roberts. Any alteration or addition requires attentive examination to assure compatibility and sympathetic treatment. This proposal presents a proportionately large addition with significant exposure on the primary façade. The common side porch will be lost to the new structure. Aside from the massing, the addition is differentiated with dissimilar stylistic materials and details. The use of wood shingles and a beltcourse introduce Shingle Style features (1880-1900; correct time period for Roberts but divergent in architectural style.) The curvilinear west roofline is Dutch Colonial, far earlier than the Robert’s ornate Italianate style or Shingle examples. While the original house is proposed for repair and repainting, the historic character is somewhat challenged by the size and stylistic details of the proposed addition. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. While attractive, the addition is both proportionately and stylistically challenging to the existing Roberts house. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. None identified. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. See response to 2., above. The addition, while attractive, does not reflect an understanding of Robert’s distinctive ornamentation, use of materials, or massing. While differentiation between old and new is important, structural additions to historic properties are generally deferential, particularly in massing and orientation. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials recognizing that new technologies may provide an appropriate alternative in order to adapt to ever changing conditions and provide for an efficient contemporary use. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. The application proposes repair and painting of the original residence as part of this plan. 12 Page 42 of 65 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. No chemical treatments are proposed. 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. There have been no identified archaeological resources at this site. Not applicable. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale, and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. While the work is understandably differentiated from the historic structure, there is conflict in the massing, materials, and stylistic interpretation when contrasted with the Robert’s house. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. While it may be possible to remove the addition in the future, the surface contact forfeits the side porch and the details on the westerly side of the original home. Items for the Board’s consideration: 1. An Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan is required for review and approval by the Stormwater Engineering division. 2. A landscaping plan is required for review. Additionally, any tree cutting shall be identified. 3. All new construction is required to meet the Guidelines for Energy Efficient Construction pursuant to the requirements of Article VI. Energy Conservation, Section 8 of the City of Burlington Code of Ordinances. 4. A plan for exterior lighting shall be provided. 5. The site plan shall be corrected to accurately define the parking area/driveway, with measurements and a revised lot coverage calculation. 6. Standard Permit Conditions 1-15. 13 Page 43 of 65  RENDERING FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY ALL HISTORIC DETAILS ARE TO REMAIN. RESTORE OR REPLACE ANY DAMGED PORTIONS WITH EXACT REPRODUCTIONS ONLY. 5/4 X 4 FREIZE HISTORIC HOME TO HAVE UPGRADED WINDOWS & NEW PAINT SCHEME. SIDING AND TRIM ONLY TO BE REPAIRD AS NEEDED. 45 HOWARD STREET _____________________ Page 44 of 65 1"=12' Page 45 of 65  ALL HISTORIC DETAILS ARE TO REMAIN. RESTORE OR REPLACE ANY DAMGED PORTIONS WITH EXACT REPRODUCTIONS ONLY. 5/4 X 4 FREIZE HISTORIC HOME TO HAVE UPGRADED WINDOWS & NEW PAINT SCHEME. SIDING AND TRIM ONLY TO BE REPAIRD AS NEEDED. 1 X 8 FASCIA 5/4 X 6 DECK BOARDS 1 X 10 DECK WRAP Page 46 of 65 Page 47 of 65 Page 48 of 65 Page 49 of 65  ” ” ” ” ” ” Page 50 of 65  ” ” ” ” ” “ ” “ “ ” Page 51 of 65 Page 52 of 65  ROOF & FRAMING NOTES: ROOF & FRAMING PLAN 1. FRAMING IS FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY. ALL FRAMING SHALL BE INSTALLED & BRACED TO 1/4"=1' MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS 2. ALL TRUSSES OR TJI'S SHALL CARRY MANUFACTURER'S STAMP 3. TRUSSES OR TJI'S SHALL NOT BE FIELD ALTERED WITHOUT PRIOR ENGINEERING APPROVAL 4. ALL TRUSSES OR TJI'S SHALL HAVE DESIGN DETAILS & DRAWINGS ON SITE FOR FRAMING INSPECTION. 5. ALL CONNECTIONS OF RAFTERS, JACK OR HIP TRUSSES TO MAIN GIRDER TO BE PROVIDED BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER 6. ROOF JOIST TO BE TJI 560 OR EQUIVALENT 7. ALL ROOF FRAMING 24" O.C.UNO 8. ALL ROOF OVERHANGS 24" UNO 9. INSTALL ICE SHIELD AS REQUIRED 10. INSTALL POLYISOCYANURATE FOAM TYPE INSULATION AT FLOOR AND PLATE LINES, OPENINGS IN PLATES, CORNER STUD CAVITIES AND AROUND DOOR AND WINDOW ROUGH OPENING CAVITIES. 11. MIN. SNOW LOAD SHALL BE 25 LBs PER SQUARE FOOT 12. ROOF SHEATHING 15/32" OSB OR 1/2" PLYWOOD 32/16 APA RATED W/ 8d @ 6" O/C ALL SUPPORTED PANEL EDGES, 12" O/C FIELD 13. ROOF TRUSS OR TJI'S MANUFACTURER: _____________________________ ROOF FRAMING RENDER FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY NO SCALE Page 53 of 65  R-20 THERMAX CONTINUOS INSULATION 1/4"=1' 1/4"=1' Page 54 of 65 Page 55 of 65 Page 56 of 65 Page 57 of 65  R4 GFCI GFCI GFCI 3 R4 R4 R4 R4 R4 R4 3 R4 GFCI 3 3 R4 R4 R4 3 3 SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN 3/16"=1' Page 58 of 65 Front of House - West facing Side yard showing area of new addition Page 59 of 65 Side of home viewed from Hayward St. - North Facing Page 60 of 65 Rear/Side of home viewed from Hayward St. - Northeast Facing Page 61 of 65 Page 62 of 65 Page 63 of 65 Page 64 of 65 Page 65 of 65