Administrative Policy Committee

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2025 The Administrative Policy Committee will conduct a meeting on Tuesday, October 28, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. at City Hall (Mayor’s Conference Room), 1737 Main Street, Columbia, SC 29201. Members of the public may view the meeting online at www.columbiasc.gov. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (803)545-3045 or cityclerk@columbiasc.gov if you have questions regarding the meeting. The Honorable Edward H. McDowell, Jr., Chair The Honorable Aditi Bussells, At-Large ▪ The Honorable Peter M. Brown, District IV CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 17, 2025 Administrative Policy Committee Meeting Minutes COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 2. Honorary Street Naming Application in honor of Brian DeQuincey Newman 3. Honorary Site Naming Application in honor of William Fincher 4. Honorary Site Naming Application in honor of Joyace and Don Jackson 5. Honorary Site Naming Application in honor of Annette H. Boette 6. Design Development Review Commission Configuration - Ms. Lucinda Statler, Planning Administrator / Planning & Development Services Department 7. Special Event Fees - Mr. Harold Reaves, Special Events Coordinator ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 1  1 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: June 17, 2025 Administrative Policy Committee Meeting Minutes FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: ATTACHMENTS: • #a: APC_MN_061725 (DOCX) Updated: 10/16/2025 2:46 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 2  1.a ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2025 CALL TO ORDER The Administrative Policy Committee conducted a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at City Hall (Mayor’s Conference Room), 1737 Main Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. The Honorable Edward H. McDowell, Jr., Chair called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m. and the following members were present: Attendee Name Title Status Edward H. McDowell Chair Present Aditi Bussells Member Absent Peter M. Brown Member Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 15, 2024 Administrative Policy Committee Meeting Minutes – Approved Upon a motion made by Mr. Brown and seconded by Mr. McDowell, the Committee voted unanimously to approve the October 15, 2024 Administrative Policy Committee Meeting Minutes. COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 2. Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals - Ms. Pamela Benjamin, CPM, Assistant City Manager for Administrative Services and Ms. Ashley Jenkins, MPA, Special Projects Coordinator – Endorse for City Council Consideration. Mr. Todd Beirs, Commercial Plans Examiner/ Planning and Development Services explained that the purpose of the Building Board of Appeals and the Building Board of Property Maintenance Appeals is to review cases related to interpretations of building codes. Both contractors and homeowners may bring matters before these boards. He clarified that the Building Board of Appeals cannot override or disregard the building code. The Building Board of Appeals focuses on construction, life safety, fire, and structural concerns. The Property Maintenance Board of Appeals hears appeals on decisions made by the Housing Official or notices of violations of the International Property Maintenance Code, primarily focusing on how buildings are maintained. He recommended keeping the boards separate, noting that overlapping cases are rare and the individuals that lead these boards have expertise in vastly separate fields. Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 3  1.a ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2025 There was discussion about the process of reviewing cases submitted to the boards; previous Council discussion about board combination; and the requirements for the boards’ existence. There was consensus of the committee to reestablish the Building Board of Appeals; endorse recommendations for the appointment of current applicants; and advertise for vacancies through the current process. 3. Renaming the Minority Business Advisory Council - Ms. Ayesha Driggers, Director of the Office of Business Opportunities – Endorsed for City Council Consideration. Ms. Ayesha Driggers, Director of the Office of Business Opportunities provided an overview of two advisory councils: the Minority Business Advisory Council (MBAC), established in 2013 to collaborate with OBO on procurement, training, and small business issues and the Mentor Protégé Advisory Council (MPAC), established in 2012 to review goals and make recommendations for the Mentor Protégé Program. OBO additionally recommended merging MPAC with the newly named council and to fill two MBAC vacancies with members of a current Mentor Protégé team. There was consensus of the committee to endorse the renaming of the Minority Business Advisory Council to the Mayor’s Small Business Advisory Council and to merge Mentor Protégé Advisory Council with the Small Business Advisory Council. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:19 a.m. Respectfully submitted: Erika D. Moore Hammond, CMC City Clerk Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 4  2 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: Honorary Street Naming Application in honor of Brian DeQuincey Newman FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: Updated: 10/27/2025 4:43 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 5  3 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: Honorary Site Naming Application in honor of William Fincher FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: Updated: 10/23/2025 3:59 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 6  4 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: Honorary Site Naming Application in honor of Joyace and Don Jackson FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: Updated: 10/23/2025 4:03 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 7  5 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: Honorary Site Naming Application in honor of Annette H. Boette FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: Updated: 10/23/2025 4:05 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 8  6 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: Design Development Review Commission Configuration - Ms. Lucinda Statler, Planning Administrator / Planning & Development Services Department FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: ATTACHMENTS: • #a: Memo_DDRC_Reconfig (PDF) • #b: DDRC_Bylaws Update Draft_LSS (DOC) • #c: TA-2025-0015_DDRCSplit_PC (PDF) Updated: 10/27/2025 4:43 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 9  6.a TO: Administrative Policy Committee of Council, and Erika Hammond, City Clerk FROM: Lucinda Statler, Planning & Development Services RE: Reconfiguration of the DDRC into two boards DATE: 20 October 2025 The Downtown Strategic Plan, adopted June 24, 2025, recommended that the current Design Development Review Commission be split into two boards, one focusing on Historic Preservation, and the other on Urban Design (p.77 in Plan document). This change would provide greater clarity to the purview of each board, increase efficiency for the review of cases for each board, and will allow for appointed members to serve on a board that reflects their specific interests or expertise. The UDO amendment for the new board configuration received a positive recommendation from Planning Commission and is scheduled to go to ZPH on November 18th, with second reading Dec. 2. Given the schedule, we do need to advertise the new positions in advance of the amendment’s final adoption. The new Downtown Design Guidelines, also adopted on June 24th, 2025, are scheduled to go into effect on January 5, 2026, which is why we would like to get the future board appointments advertised in advance of the ordinance adoption. The proposed HP/DRC (Historic Preservation Design Review Commission) will have seven (7) members, with the following qualifications: • One shall be an architect registered in SC • One shall be an architect with historic preservation experience • One shall be a contractor of craftsperson with hands-on experience working on historic structures • One shall be a person with demonstrated preservation experience • The remaining 3 shall be persons who, by reason of other experience or education, shall be qualified for service on the HP/DRC (this language is carried over from the current DDRC), and typically is pretty open. • The HP/DRC will meet on the 3rd Thursday of every month (same schedule as current DDRC) City of Columbia | Planning & Development Services Department Planning Division | 1401 Main Street, Third Floor, Columbia, SC 29201 803.545.3222 | planninganddevelopment.columbiasc.gov Packet Pg. 10  6.a The proposed U/DRC (Urban Design Review Commission) will consist of five (5) members, with the following qualifications: • One member will be an architect registered in the State of SC • One member shall be an urban planner • One member shall be a landscape architect or urban design professional, • One member shall be a real estate developer of licensed real estate broker • The remaining member is an open seat without specific qualifications. • The U/DRC will meet on the 4th Thursday of every month. Meetings that have shifted due to holidays will be scheduled on a different day of the week. We would like for current DDRC members to have the opportunity to apply to either board (depending on their qualifications) and continue their current terms, so that the appointments expire at different times and have a staggered replacement schedule. Packet Pg. 11  6.b RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMISISON—HP/UD COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA Article I - Organization Section 1 Rules. These Rules and Regulations are adopted pursuant to S.C. Code 6-29-870 and City of Columbia Section 17-2.3 for the City of Columbia Design Review Commission— HP/UD, which consists of no less than five, no more than seven members appointed by City Council. Section 2 Officers. The Commission shall have as officers a chair and vice-chair elected for one-year terms at the first meeting of the Commission in each calendar year. The Planning and Development Services Director shall appoint a member of staff of the City of Columbia to serve as secretary of the Commission. Section 3 Chair. The chair shall be a voting member and shall: a. Call meetings of the Commission; b. Preside at meetings and hearings; c. Sign documents for the Commission; d. Appoint Subcommittees; and e. Perform other duties approved by the Commission. Section 4 Vice-Chair. The vice-chair shall exercise the duties of the chair in the absence, disability, or disqualification of the chair. In the absence of the chair and the vice-chair, the members present shall elect an acting chair. Section 5 Secretary. The secretary shall be appointed by the Planning & Development Services Director and shall: a. Provide and publish notice of appeals and meetings; b. Assist in the preparation of agenda; c. Keep recordings and minutes of meetings and hearings; d. Maintain Commission records as public records; e. Serve Commission decisions on parties; f. Attend to Commission correspondence; and g. Perform other duties normally carried out by a secretary. Page 1 1/23/2004; rev. 2025 Packet Pg. 12  6.b Article II - Meetings Section 1 Time and Place. Regular meetings of the –HP /DRC shall be held on the third Thursday of each month. Regular meetings of the -UD/DRC Commission shall be held on the fourth Thursday of each month. Each meeting shall be held at 4:00 P.M. in Council Chambers at City Hall (third floor). In the case of a holiday, the meeting shall be re-scheduled for the first available date in Council Chambers after the holiday. The Commission may elect to hold work sessions at a date and time agreed to by the members with notice given to the public of such meetings. The chair, upon 24 hours notice posted and delivered to all members and local news media, may call special meetings at which business may be conducted. Section 2 Cancellation. Whenever there are no applications to be considered, and there appears to be no other business to be transacted by the Commission at any regular meeting, the chair may dispense with such meeting. Section 3 Open to the Public. All regular meetings shall be open to the public, except that the Commission may go to into executive session in accordance with provisions of the South Carolina Freedom of Information Act. Section 4 Quorum. A minimum of four members currently appointed to the Commission shall constitute a quorum. A quorum shall be present before any business is conducted other than rescheduling the meeting. Section 5 Attendance. Commissioners may submit a written request in advance of a meeting to be excused due to a scheduling conflict. If this request is received prior to the meeting, the absence will be excused and will not be counted as an absence. If a member of the Commission is absent from two (2) consecutive regular meetings with no prior notice, the secretary will advise the member that a third (3) absence may result in automatic termination. If a member of the Commission does not attend fifty (50) percent of meetings within a six month period or is absent from three consecutive meetings without notice, they may be removed based upon City Council terms of office for board and commission members. Section 6 Rules of Order. Roberts Rules of Order shall govern the conduct of the meetings except as otherwise provided by these Rules of Procedure. The Chair shall decide all points of procedure unless otherwise directed by a majority of Commissioners in session at the time. Section 7 Recusals. If at any time a Commissioner has a conflict of interest based upon familial relationship, potential financial impact, or ex parte communications, that Commissioner should recuse himself/herself and file a recusal form with the secretary to be made part of the minutes. Page 2 1/23/2004; rev. 2025 Packet Pg. 13  6.b Upon recusal, the Commissioner should leave the room once the project is called and may return only after presentations, deliberations, and motions related to the project are complete. Section 8 Abstentions. Abstentions are not permitted. Section 9 Subcommittees. The Chair may appoint sub-committees to study issues and make recommendations to staff, the Commission, or other bodies concerning cases before the Commission, policy initiatives, or other topics identified as necessary. The public may attend but may not participate in subcommittee meetings. Article III - Applications and Appeals Procedures Section 1 Form. Applications for Design Approval as well as appeals of administrative decisions must be filed on forms provided by DDRC staff. The Commission may require that information be supplied in sufficient detail so as to afford a clear understanding and considered action by the Commission may be made. The failure to submit adequate information may be grounds for dismissal or deferral. Applications for Certificate of Design Approval shall be made either by the property owner or the owner’s agent. An application filed by an agent shall be accompanied by written designation of the agent signed by the property owner or party in interest. See ‘Hearing Procedure’ for information on appeals to DDRC decisions. Section 2 Time for Administrative Appeals. An appeal from an administrative decision must be filed within thirty (30) days after actual notice of the decision by delivery of the approved appeal form to the secretary of the Commission who shall notify the official appealed from. Section 3 Withdrawal. Any appeal or application may be withdrawn by written notice by an applicant or their agent delivered to the secretary prior to the action by the Commission or in person at a DDRC meeting. An appeal from an administrative decision which is withdrawn may not be refiled after the fifteen (15) day time period for appeal has expired. Section 4 Continuances. The hearing of an appeal or application may be continued up to three times by the Commission for cause shown. Section 5 Deferrals. The Commission may defer an application for good cause shown upon its own motion or at the request of an applicant or commission member. Should an applicant provide new information to the Commission during the meeting, the Commission reserves the right to defer the case to a subsequent meeting so that the new information may be given appropriate consideration. Page 3 1/23/2004; rev. 2025 Packet Pg. 14  6.b Section 6 Notice. Public notice of a hearing of the Commission shall be published in a local newspaper of general circulation and posted on or adjacent to the property no less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. The notice shall contain a description of each matter to be heard and identify the property affected. Article IV Hearing Procedure Section 1 Appearances. The applicant or any party in interest may appear in person or by agent or attorney. The Commission may postpone or proceed to dispose of a matter on the records before it in the absence of an appearance on behalf of an applicant. Section 2 Witnesses. Parties in interest appearing before the Commission shall be required to be placed under oath. Witnesses may be compelled to attend by subpoena requested at least (10) days prior to a hearing and signed by the chairman. The Board may call its own witnesses when deemed appropriate. Section 3 Evidence. Relevant documents, photographs, maps, plans, drawings, etc., will be received in the record without authentication in the form of legible copies. Relevant testimony, which is not cumulative or hearsay will be received. The chair will rule on evidentiary matters. Evidence may be placed in the record with an objection noted. Section 4 Conduct. The normal order of hearing, subject to modification by the Chair, shall be: a. Introduction of case to be heard (chair or staff); b. Presentation by applicant (10 minute limit); c. Public comment (2 minute limit per speaker); a neighborhood association representative may have up to 10 minutes to speak. d. Presentation by official appealed (10 minute limit) e. Rebuttal by applicant (3 minute limit); f. Deliberation by the Commission; g. The Commission may question participants at any time in the hearing. Parties in interest shall direct their statement and arguments to the Commission and shall not direct them to their opponents Section 5 Disposition. The final disposition of any application or appeal shall be in the form of a motion either granting, denying, varying, deferring, or modifying the application or dismissing the application for lack of jurisdiction or prosecution. Such motion may show the reason or reasons for the Commission’s determination. All actions of the Commission shall Page 4 1/23/2004; rev. 2025 Packet Pg. 15  6.b require the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present. A tie vote represents a failed vote. Section 7 Conditions. Whenever the Commission recommends any variation or imposes any restriction with respect to an application so as to carry out the intent and purpose of the Design/Development ordinance, such variation and condition shall be specifically stated in the motion and summarized in the zoning permit. Any motion made by the Commission remains valid for one year after the date of the decision after which, if construction has not begun, the applicant must return to the Commission for review of the project with notation made if changes have been made to the project. Section 8 Appeal of Commission Decisions. Decisions of the Commission may be appealed to a court of competent jurisdiction within a period of 30 days following the date of determination of the action they wish to appeal. Decisions made by the Commission which are appealed to Circuit Court are valid and actionable until a court of competent jurisdiction overturns the decision. Section 9 Rehearing. The Commission may grant a rehearing of an application which has been dismissed or denied upon written request filed by a party in interest with the secretary within fifteen (15) days after delivery of the decision accompanied by new evidence which could not have reasonably have been presented at the hearing, or evidence of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact affecting the outcome. If a motion to grant a rehearing receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present, the case shall be put on a subsequent agenda for a rehearing. Section 10 Re-submittals. A project which was denied may only be re-submitted to the Commission one (1) calendar year after its original hearing; however, new information or substantive changes will be required for its consideration. Article V Records Section 1 Minutes. The secretary shall have prepared minutes of each meeting for approval by the Commission. Minutes shall be maintained as public records. Page 5 1/23/2004; rev. 2025 Packet Pg. 16  6.b Section 2 Documents. The secretary shall assist in the preparation of orders, certificates and other documentation of the Commission. Copies of all notices, correspondence, documentary evidence, orders and forms shall be maintained as public records. Article VI Adoption and Amendment Section 1 Adoption. These rules were adopted by a majority vote of the members of the Commission at a regular meeting on _________. Section 2 Amendment. These rules may be amended at any regular meeting of the Commission by a majority vote of the members present provided notice in writing thereof has been given to each member of the Commission at least five days prior to such meeting, or provided such amendment was read at the last preceding meeting of the Commission. The suspension of any rule of procedure may be ordered at any meeting by a vote of not less that four members of the Commission. Page 6 1/23/2004; rev. 2025 Packet Pg. 17  6.c PLANNING COMMISSION October 9, 2025 at 4:00 P.M. City Hall, 3rd Floor, Council Chambers, 1737 Main Street, Columbia, S.C., 29201 AMENDMENT TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE Reconfigure Design Development Review Commission Proposal: Amend the Unified Development Ordinance, Chapter 17- Article 2: Administration, Sec. 17-2.3 Advisory and Decision-Making Bodies and Persons (e.) Design Development Review Commission; Section 17-2.5 Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards, Article 3: Zoning Districts, Sec.17-3.7 Overlay Districts; Article 5: Development Standards, Sec.17-5.10 Signs; Article 9: Definitions and Rules of Measurement, Sec. 17-9.4 Definitions as related to the reconfiguration of the Design Development Review Commission (DDRC). Applicant: Andrew Livengood, Zoning Administrator Staff Recommendation: Staff Sponsored PC Recommendation: Pending DETAILS The adoption of the Downtown Strategic Plan in June 2025 recommended that the Design Development Review Commission (DDRC), which has served as the City’s single Board of Architectural Review be divided into two separate boards. The current DDRC of nine members hears a wide variety of cases ranging from detailed proposals for the renovation of historic buildings to large-scale new construction projects in urban design districts. The proposed Historic Preservation Design Review Commission (HP/DRC) would consist of seven (7) members, and would hear cases related to historic districts and landmarks. The Urban Design Review Commission (U/DRC) would consist of five (5) members and would hear cases related to urban design districts. Each board would have a number of members with expertise specific to the case types they consider. In anticipation of this change, advertisement for positions on both boards would begin in advance of the ordinance adoption. Current DDRC members would have the opportunity to apply to continue their current term on one of the new boards, depending on their qualifications and/or interest. Packet Pg. 18  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.2. Summary Table of Development Review Responsibilities (d) Approved Applications TABLE 17-2.2: SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES D = DECISION R = RECOMMENDATION A = APPEAL <> = PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS – PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SITE PLAN REVIEW TEAM DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL CITY ENGINEER APPLICATION TYPE REVIEW COMMISSION ADMINISTRATOR FORM-BASED CODES DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS Text Amendment <D> R R Zoning Map Amendment <D> R R[1] R Planned Development <D> R R Special Exception Permit <D> Development Agreement <D> <R> HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks Minor <A> D Major <D> R Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts Minor <A> D Major <D> R Bailey Bill <D> LAND DEVELOPMENT Site Plan Minor A D R Major D R Subdivision Minor Subdivision – Final A D Plat Major Subdivision Sketch Plan A D Preliminary Plat D R R Final Plat A D Street or Road Name Change <D> R PERMITS Conditional Use Permit <A> D Tree Removal Permit <A> D Forestry Permit <A> D Sign Permit <A> D Temporary Use Permit <A> D Zoning Permit <A> D August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-2 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 19  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.3. Advisory and Decision-Making Bodies and Persons (a) City Council TABLE 17-2.2: SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES D = DECISION R = RECOMMENDATION A = APPEAL <> = PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS – PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SITE PLAN REVIEW TEAM DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL CITY ENGINEER APPLICATION TYPE REVIEW COMMISSION ADMINISTRATOR FORM-BASED CODES RELIEF Administrative Adjustment <A> D Variance – Zoning <D> <D>[2] Variance – Land Development <D> (Subdivision and Site Plan) Appeal – Zoning <A> <A>[3] Appeal – Land Development A (Subdivision and Site Plan) INTERPRETATIONS Interpretation – Zoning <A> <A>[3] D Interpretation – Land Development (Subdivision <A> D and Site Plan) NOTES: [1] Review and recommendation by the Design Development Review Commission is required only for a Zoning Map Amendment application that involves a Historic Districts and Landmarks Designation or a Design District Designation. [2] The Board of Zoning Appeals – Form-based Codes, hears and makes decisions on applications for Variance – Zoning from requirements specific to an adopted Form-based Code, such as the Bull Street PUD. [3] The Board of Zoning Appeals – Form-based Codes, hears and decides appeals from decisions of the Zoning Administrator in administering, enforcing, or interpreting provisions of this Ordinance specific to an adopted Form-based Code, such as the Bull Street PUD. Sec. 17-2.3 Advisory and Decision-Making Bodies and Persons (a) City Council To exercise its authority in accordance with State law, the City Council shall have the following powers and duties under this Ordinance: a. To review and decide the following: 1. Text Amendments (Sec. 17-2.5(b)); 2. Zoning Map Amendments (including Historic Districts and Landmarks Designations and Design Districts Designations) (Sec. 17-2.5(c)); Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-3 Packet Pg. 20  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.3. Advisory and Decision-Making Bodies and Persons (e) Design Development Review Commission 5. The Chair, or, in the Chair’s absence, the acting Chair, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses by subpoena. 6. The Board of Zoning Appeals—Form-based Codes shall keep minutes of its proceedings in accordance with State law, showing, for each question, the vote of each member and any member that is absent or fails to vote. The Board shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the office of the Zoning Administrator and shall be a public record. (e) Design Development Review Commission A Two boards of architectural review, both of which which shall be under the umbrella known as the Columbia Design and DevelopmentDesign Review Commission (abbreviated "DDRCDRC" in this Ordinance), is established in accordance with State law under this Ordinance. “HP/DRC” refers to the Board established for matters involving Historic Districts and Landmarks, and “U/DRC” refers to the Board established for matters involving Urban Design Districts. Where only “DRC” (or “DDRC” as it has previously been known) is referenced, the provision will apply to both boards. (1) Powers and Duties The DDRCDRC shall have the following powers and duties under this Ordinance: a. To review and make recommendations to the City Council on the following: 1. Zoning Map Amendments involving Historic Districts and Landmarks Designations or Design Districts Designations (Sec. 17-2.5(c)); b. To review and decide applications for the following: 1. HP/DRC Major Certificates of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks (Sec. 17-2.5(g)(5)) and 2. U/DRC Major Certificates of Design Approval – Design District (Sec. 17- 2.5(h)(5)). c. To hear and decide appeals from decisions of the Zoning Administrator on the following: 1. HP/DRC Minor Certificates of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks (Sec. 17-2.5(g)(4)) and 2. U/DRC Minor Certificates of Design Approval – Design District (Sec. 17- 2.5(h)(4)). d. Plan and direct continuing studies of areas, physical features and improvements in the City relating to urban design, historic preservation, beautification, civic improvement and other considerations in furtherance of this Ordinance. In doing so, the DDRCDRC shall properly coordinate such plans and studies with the various departments and agencies of the City. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-10 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 21  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.3. Advisory and Decision-Making Bodies and Persons (e) Design Development Review Commission e. Engage in educational activities related to promoting appropriate urban design, historic preservation, and the conservation of historic or aesthetic features of the City. f. Advise and assist the City Council, at the Council’s request, to further the purposes of this Ordinance. (2) Membership and Terms a. Number, Appointment, and Qualifications 1. The HP/DDRCDRC shall consist of nine seven members, and the U/DRC shall consist of 5 members, all appointed by the City Council. No member shall hold any other public office or position in the City or County. (i) Of the members appointed to the HP/DDRCDRC, at least one shall be an architect registered in the State, at least one shall be a lawyer admitted to practice before the South Carolina Supreme Court, at least one shall be an individual with demonstrated preservation experience , at least one shall be a contractor or crafts person with hands-on experience working on historic structures, experienced as a city planner, at least one shall be a real estate developer or licensed real estate broker, one shall be an architect with historic preservation experience, and the remainder, if any, shall be persons who, by reason of other experience or education, shall be qualified for service on the DDRCDRC. (i)(ii) Of the members appointed to the U/DRC, at least one member shall be an architect regiested in the State of SC, at leat one shall be an urban planner, at least one shall be a landscape architect or urban design professional, and at least one shall be a real estate developer or licesnsed real estate broker. b. Terms Members shall be appointed for three-year terms. Members may continue to serve until their successors are appointed. c. Current Members Members of the HP/DDRCDRC and the U/DRC on January 1, 2026 who have been appointed to continue serving from the 2025 DDRC on August 30, 2021 shall continue to serve at the pleasure of the City Council until their respective terms expire according to the rules in place when they were appointed, unless they are removed in accordance with subsection d below. d. Removal The City Council may remove a member of the DDRCDRC for cause, after written notice and a public hearing. Cause may include, but is not limited to, nonattendance at meetings. Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-11 Packet Pg. 22  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.3. Advisory and Decision-Making Bodies and Persons (f) Zoning Administrator e. Vacancies Vacancies, for whatever reason, shall be filled by the City Council for the balance of an unexpired term. (3) Officers, Rules of Proceeding, and Meetings a. Officers 1. The DDRCDRC shall elect one of its members Chair and another Vice- Chair, each for a term of one year. b. Rules of Proceeding The DDRCDRC shall adopt rules for the conduct of business. c. Meetings 1. Meetings of the DDRCDRC shall be held at the call of the Chair and at such other times as the DDRCDRC may determine. 2. Public notice of meetings of the DDRCDRC shall be provided in accordance with State law and this Ordinance. 3. A majority ofFour members of the DDRCDRC shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of business. 4. The Chair shall preside over all DDRCDRC meetings. The Vice-Chair shall serve as acting chair and preside over DDRCDRC meetings in the absence of the Chair. If both the Chair and Vice-Chair are absent, the DDRCDRC shall vote to determine who shall serve as acting Chair for the meeting. 5. The Chair or, in the Chair’s absence, the acting Chair, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses by subpoena. 6. The DDRCDRC shall keep minutes of its proceedings in accordance with State law, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or if absent or failing to vote, indicating that fact. The DDRCDRC shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be filed within a reasonable time in the office of the Zoning Administrator. The records of the DDRCDRC shall be a public record. (f) Zoning Administrator The Zoning Administrator, abbreviated as “ZA” in this Ordinance, is designated by the City Manager to administer and enforce all provisions of this Ordinance, except Article 6: Land Development (Subdivision) Standards. The Zoning Administrator may delegate any administrative, decision, or review authority under this Ordinance to any professional-level City staff. Any such delegation shall be specified in the Procedures Manual. (1) Powers and Duties The Zoning Administrator shall have the following powers and duties under this Ordinance: August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-12 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 23  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.4. Standard Review Procedures (h) Decision-Making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision Conditions of approval must relate in both type and extent to the anticipated impacts of the proposed development. (h) Decision-Making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision If an application is subject a final decision by the City Council, the Planning Commission, the Board of Zoning Appeals, the Board of Zoning Appeals – Form-based Codes, or the Design Development Review Board Commission in accordance with Sec. 17-2.2, Summary Table of Development Review Responsibilities, such decision- making body shall review and make a final decision on the application in accordance with the requirements in this subsection. (1) General The decision-making body shall hold any required public hearing on the application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.2, Summary Table of Development Review Responsibilities. At the hearing, the decision-making body shall consider the application, relevant support materials, staff report, any advisory body recommendations, and any public comments. It shall then make one of the decisions authorized for the particular type of application, based on the review standards applicable to the application type, as set forth in Sec. 17-2.5, Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards. a. Statement of Basis The decision-making body shall clearly state the basis or rationale for the decision. b. Timing The decision-making body shall take action as promptly as reasonably possible in consideration of the interests of the applicant, affected parties, and citizens of the City. (2) Remand Before making its decision, the decision-making body may remand the application to the advisory body or to the ZA or LDA, as applicable, for further consideration of any issue. (3) Conditions of Approval If permitted for the particular type of application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5, Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards, approval of an application may be with conditions. Conditions of approval must relate in both type and extent to the anticipated impacts of the proposed development. (4) Effect of Approval Approval of a development application in accordance with this Ordinance authorizes only the particular use, plan, or other specific activity approved, and not any other development requiring separate application and approval. In the event that one development approval or permit is a prerequisite to another development approval or permit (e.g., variance approval prior to a site plan Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-27 Packet Pg. 24  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.4. Standard Review Procedures (i) Notification to Applicant of Decision approval), development may not take place until all required approvals or permits are obtained. Approval of one development application does not necessarily guarantee approval of any subsequent development application. (5) Lapse of Approval a. Development approvals and permits shall expire as provided in Sec. 17-2.5, Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards, for each type of development approval or permit. If no expiration period is provided for the specific type of development approval or permit, and if no expiration period is imposed as part of the approval by the decision-making body or person, the development approval or permit shall expire if a Zoning Permit authorizing the approved development is not obtained within two years. b. Subsection a above shall not apply where a vested right has been established in accordance with Sec. 17-1.9, Vested Rights. c. A change in ownership of the land that is the subject of a development approval or permit shall not affect the established expiration time period for the development approval or permit. (i) Notification to Applicant of Decision Within a reasonable period of time after a final decision on a development application, the ZA or LDA, whichever received the application, shall notify the applicant of the decision in writing in accordance with the requirements of State law and shall make a copy of the decision available to the public at either the ZA’s office or LDA’s office, as applicable, during normal business hours. (j) Appeal (1) An appeal from a final decision by the City Council, the Planning Commission, the Board of Zoning Appeals, the Board of Zoning Appeals – Form-based Codes, or the Design Development Review Board Commission shall be to a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with requirements of State law. (2) Unless otherwise provided in Sec. 17-2.5, Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards, an appeal from an order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the ZA in the review of a development application or the enforcement of this Ordinance shall be in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(u), Appeal – Zoning. (3) Unless otherwise provided in Sec. 17-2.5, Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards, any appeal from an order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the LDA in the review of a development application shall be in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(v), Appeal – Land Development (Subdivision). August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-28 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 25  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (c) Zoning Map Amendment (v) The ZA in accordance with a motion adopted by the City Council or the Planning Commission; or (vi) The owner of the property that is the subject of the application or an authorized agent of the owner. 2. The property that is the subject of the application must have a minimum land area of at least two acres or must be extending an existing district boundary c. Determination of Application Completeness Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(d), Determination of Application Completeness). d. Staff Review and Action Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(e), Staff Review and Action). e. Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(f), Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification). f. Advisory Body Review and Recommendation Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(g), Advisory Body Review and Recommendation). 1. Within 30 days from the date that an application is referred to it, the Planning Commission shall submit its report and recommendation to the City Council. The recommendation of the Planning Commission shall be advisory only. If the Planning Commission does not submit its report within the prescribed time, the City Council may proceed to act on the proposed amendment without further awaiting the recommendations of the Planning Commission. 2. The Planning Commission’s recommendation shall address: (i) Whether the application complies with Sec. 17-2.5(c)(4), Zoning Map Amendment Decision Standards; (ii) The need and justification for the change; (iii) The effect of the change, if any, on the property and on surrounding neighborhoods; and (iv) The relationship of the proposed zoning map amendment to the purposes of the general planning program, with appropriate consideration as to whether the proposed change will further the purposes of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 3. If the proposed zoning map amendment involves the establishment or a change in the boundaries of a design district in which the standards and procedures in Sec. 17-2.5(h), Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts, apply, the Design Development Review Commission U/DRC shall, prior to the Planning Commission’s review of the proposed August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-34 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 26  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (c) Zoning Map Amendment amendment, if practicable, review the application and prepare a report that includes: (i) A recommendation for the design district boundary location; and (ii) A recommendation for general standards for urban design control and other regulatory standards for the design district consistent with the purposes of this Ordinance. 4. If the proposed zoning map amendment involves the establishment or a change in the boundaries of the Historic Preservation Overlay district, the Design Development Review Commission HP/DRC shall, prior to the Planning Commission’s review of the proposed amendment, if practicable, review the application and prepare a report that includes: (i) A recommendation for the location of the overlay district boundary; and (ii) A recommendation for general standards for urban design, historic preservation control, and other regulatory standards, consistent with the general purpose of the Historic Preservation Overlay and the differences in significance and purpose between landmarks, landmark districts, architectural conservation districts, historic commercial districts, and protection areas, as set forth in Sec. 17-3.7(i), OV-HP: Historic Preservation Overlay District. g. Decision-making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(h), Decision-Making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision). 1. The City Council shall review and make a decision on the application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(c)(4), Zoning Map Amendment Decision Standards, within 180 days after the public hearing on the application. If no action is taken by the City Council within 180 days after the public hearing, the proposed amendment shall be considered disapproved. The City Council’s decision shall be one of the following: (i) Adopt by ordinance the proposed zoning map amendment; (ii) Adopt by ordinance a revised zoning map amendment, only if the revisions are first submitted to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation in accordance with State law; or (iii) Deny the proposed zoning map amendment. 2. If the City Council’s adoption of the zoning map amendment involves the establishment or a change in the boundaries of a design district in which the standards and procedures in Sec. 17-2.5(h), Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts, apply, or the establishment or a change in the boundaries of the Historic Preservation Overlay district, any corresponding establishment or amendment of the standards and Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-35 Packet Pg. 27  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (c) Zoning Map Amendment design guidelines for the district that are recommended by the DDRCHP/DRC shall be adopted by the City Council by ordinance, concurrently with the zoning map amendment, as an amendment to the text of this ordinance. Such amendment to the text of this Ordinance shall incorporate the standards and design guidelines in whole or by reference and may include other provisions determined by the City Council to be appropriate. h. Notification to Applicant of Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(i), Notification to Applicant of Decision). i. Appeal Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(j), Appeal). j. Designation on Official Zoning Map If a zoning map amendment is adopted by the City Council, the ZA shall place the amendment on the Official Zoning Map within a reasonable period of time after its adoption. (4) Zoning Map Amendment Decision Standards The advisability of amending the Official Zoning Map is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one factor. In determining whether to adopt or disapprove a proposed zoning map amendment, the City Council may consider many factors, including but not limited to whether, and the extent to which, the proposed amendment: 1. Is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable plans and planning documents adopted by the City; 2. Would allow a range of uses that are compatible with the uses allowed on other property in the immediate vicinity; 3. Is appropriate for the land; 4. Addresses a demonstrated community need; 5. Is consistent with the overall zoning program as expressed in future plans for the City; 6. Would avoid creating an inappropriately isolated zoning district unrelated to adjacent and surrounding zoning districts; 7. Would allow the subject property to be put to a reasonably viable economic use; 8. Would result in development that can be served by available, adequate, and suitable public facilities (e.g., streets, potable water, sewerage, stormwater management); 9. Would avoid creating significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, stormwater August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-36 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 28  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks (i) Repairs to individually designated landmarks which utilize large quantities of replacement material; (ii) Major alterations which alter the exterior appearance or materials of individually designated landmarks and contributing historic buildings in landmark districts, architectural conservation districts, historic commercial districts, and protection areas; (iii) New construction in the Historic Preservation Overlay district which is visible from the street; (iv) Signage for all individually designated landmarks; (v) Demolition of all contributing historic buildings and all individually designated landmarks, except that listed in subsection a above; (vi) Site improvements for individually designated landmarks; (vii) Relocation of contributing buildings and landmarks; and (viii) Development identified as requiring review by the DDRCHP/DRC in the applicable adopted standards and guidelines. (viii)(ix) Change to an approved design which substantially changes a feature or features reviewed and approved by the HP/DRC. (4) Procedure for Minor Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks Figure 17-2.5(g)(4) identifies the standard review procedures from Sec. 17-2.4, Standard Review Procedures, that apply to applications for a Minor Certificate of Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-53 Packet Pg. 29  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks. Additions or modifications to the standard review procedures are identified in this subsection. Figure 17-2.5(g)(4): Summary of Minor Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks Procedure 17-2.4(b) Pre-Application Conference Optional 17-2.4(c) Application Submission To ZA Determination of Application Staff Processing, Review, ZA determination 17-2.4(d) Completeness 17-2.4(e) Staff Review and Action ZA review and decision Notification to Applicant ZA notifies applicant and Decision 17-2.4(i) of Decision 17-2.4(j) Appeal Optional (to DDRCHP/DRC) a. Pre-Application Conference Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(b), Pre-Application Conference). b. Application Submission Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(c), Application Submission). c. Determination of Application Completeness Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(d), Determination of Application Completeness). d. Staff Review and Action Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(e), Staff Review and Action). The ZA shall review and make a decision in whole or in part on the application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(g)(6), Decision Standards for Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks. The decision shall be one of the following: (i) Approve the application as submitted; (ii) Approve the application subject to conditions of approval; or (iii) Deny the application. e. Notification to Applicant of Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(i), Notification to Applicant of Decision). August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-54 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 30  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks f. Appeal Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(j), Appeal). 1. Appeal to Design Development Review CommissionHP/DRC Any appeal of the ZA’s decision to approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny an application for a Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks or portion thereof shall be to the Design Development Review Commission (DDRCHP/DRC). 2. Notice of Appeal Within 30 days of receipt of notice of the ZA’s decision, any party aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision by submitting a notice of appeal to the ZA specifying the grounds of the appeal. 3. Transmittal of Record and Scheduling of Public Hearing Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the ZA shall forthwith transmit the notice of appeal and all papers constituting the record upon which the decision was made to the DDRCHP/DRC and schedule a public hearing in accordance with Sec. 17-2.4(f), Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification. 4. Hearing and Decision (i) The DDRCHP/DRC shall conduct a public hearing, review the application and all relevant materials and testimony, and make one of the following decisions within a reasonable time: (a) Affirm the decision being appealed (in whole or in part); (b) Modify the decision being appealed (in whole or in part); (c) Reverse the decision being appeals (in whole or in part); or (d) Remand the matter to the ZA if the DDRCHP/DRC determines that the record is insufficient for review. (ii) The DDRCHP/DRC’s final decision shall be in writing, with findings of fact and conclusions of law separately stated. 5. Rehearing on a Remanded Matter If the DDRCHP/DRC remands the matter to the ZA, it must at the same time set a rehearing on the remanded matter without further public notice for a time certain within 60 days unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The DDRCHP/DRC must maintain a list of persons who express an interest in being informed when the remanded matter is set for rehearing, and notice of the rehearing must be mailed to these persons prior to the rehearing. The DDRCHP/DRC’s rehearing shall be in accordance with subsection 4 above. Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-55 Packet Pg. 31  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks 6. Further Appeal Appeal from the DDRCHP/DRC’s decision on an appeal from the ZA’s decision shall be to the County circuit court in accordance with S.C. Code § 6-29-900 et seq. (5) Procedure for Major Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks Figure 17-2.5(g)(5) identifies the standard review procedures from Sec. 17-2.4, Standard Review Procedures, that apply to applications for a Major Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks. Additions or modifications to the standard review procedures are identified in this subsection. Figure 17-2.5(g)(5): Summary of Major Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks Procedure 17-2.4(b) Pre-Application Conference Optional 17-2.4(c) Application Submission To ZA Determination of Application ZA determination 17-2.4(d) Completeness Staff Processing ZA review and recommendation 17-2.4(e) Staff Review and Action (staff report) ZA schedules public hearing for Scheduling of Public Hearing DDRCHP/DRC meeting, provides 17-2.4(f) and Public Notification notice Decision-Making Body DDRCHP/DRC holds public hearing, 17-2.4(h) Hearing, Review, and Decision makes decision Notification to Applicant ZA notifies applicant 17-2.4(i) of Decision 17-2.4(j) Appeal Optional a. Pre-Application Conference Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(b), Pre-Application Conference). b. Application Submission Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(c), Application Submission). c. Determination of Application Completeness Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(d), Determination of Application Completeness). August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-56 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 32  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks d. Staff Review and Action Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(e), Staff Review and Action). e. Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(f), Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification). f. Decision-making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(h), Decision-Making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision). The Design DevelopmentDesign Review Commission (DDRCHP/DRC) shall review and make a decision in whole or in part on the application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(g)(6), Decision Standards for Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks. In its review of the application, the DDRCHP/DRC shall examine the architectural design, the exterior surface treatment, the arrangement and location of buildings and structures on the site in question and their relation to other buildings and structures within the district involved, and other pertinent factors affecting the appearance and efficient functioning of the district. The DDRCHP/DRC’s decision shall be one of the following: (i) Approve the application as submitted; (ii) Approve the application subject to conditions of approval; or (iii) Deny the application. g. Notification to Applicant of Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(i), Notification to Applicant of Decision). h. Appeal Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(j), Appeal). An appeal from the DDRCHP/DRC’s decision may be made by any person having a substantial interest in the decision, or any officer or agent of the City, to the County Circuit Court in accordance with State law. The appeal shall be filed within 30 days after the affected party receives actual notice of the decision of the DDRCHP/DRC. The decision of the DRC is valid and actionable until it is overturned by a court of competent jurisdiction. (6) Decision Standards for Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks The ZA or the DDRCHP/DRC, as applicable, shall approve any application for a Certificate for Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks that complies with the standards in this subsection. a. General 1. No proposed building or structure shall be approved, separately or in relation to its premises as proposed to be arranged, landscaped or constructed, which would adversely affect the primary character of the district involved or the setting of public or quasi-public historical Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-57 Packet Pg. 33  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks buildings or landmarks on which public or private monies have been or are proposed to be spent. 2. No application shall be approved unless a determination is made that, considering the exterior appearance and arrangement of buildings, structures and premises in the district involved, approval of the application is consistent with the following purposes: (i) To enhance the attractiveness and functioning of the district in keeping with its purpose and intent; (ii) To encourage the orderly and harmonious development of the district; and (iii) To enhance and protect the public and private investment and general value of lands and improvements within the district. 3. If, consistent with the standards in this subsection, the DDRCHP/DRC finds it desirable to impose less restrictive requirements on development than would otherwise apply in accordance with any other provision of this Ordinance, such deviation shall be referred to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for review as a Special Exception Permit. b. Standards for Structure and Site Design 1. General The decision on a Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks application shall be based upon the requirements set forth in the standards or design guidelines adopted by the City Council for the applicable Architectural Conservation District, Historic Commercial District, Protection Area, Landmark District, or Landmark. 2. Landmarks, Districts Lacking Established Standards, and Specified Districts If the City Council has not established standards or design guidelines for the district involved, or if the application pertains to individual landmarks, the Governor's Mansion Protection Area, Elmwood Park Architectural Conservation District, or the Landmark District, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended and listed below (the "Standards"), shall serve as the basis for the DDRCHP/DRC’s decision, taking into account the designation level of the landmark or district. (a) For landmark districts and individual landmarks, the historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (b) In architectural conservation districts and protection areas, the historic character of a district shall be retained and August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-58 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 34  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (g) Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks (c) The estimated market value of the property in its current condition; after demolition, after renovation of the existing property for continued use, and with proposed redevelopment; (d) An estimate from an architect, developer, real estate consultant, appraiser, or other real estate professional experienced in rehabilitation as to the economic feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the existing structure(s) on the property; (e) In a request for a demolition of a landmark, a detailed feasibility study of the property may be required that may include, but is not limited to, a market analysis, estimates for renovation by historic preservation specialists, a study for potential reuse alternatives, etc. (f) Specific written substantiation of any current negotiations to sell, rent, or lease property, including all efforts to market and/or sell the property, how long it was listed, the price at which it was listed, and comparables in the market. (g) All appraisals obtained within the previous two (2) years by the owner or applicant in connection with the purchase, financing or ownership of the property. (iii) The DDRCHP/DRC or its staff may require the applicant to provide additional information dealing with the standards or the required application materials in this subsection. d. Standards for Relocation Like a demolition, the relocation of a historic building should be an action of last resort. When a structure is moved, the community loses a part of its history, which cannot be replaced. Accordingly, such requests are reviewed very deliberately and require detailed information. (i) A decision on a Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks application for the relocation of a building, structure, or object shall be based the following standards: (a) A landmark or a contributing building, structure, or object shall not be relocated unless the DDRCHP/DRC finds: (a) Demolition of the building, structure, or object would be approved in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(g)(6)c, Standards for Demolition, were it not for the relocation; or (b) The applicant demonstrates the existence of the building, structure, or object is threatened by a severe environmental hazard. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-62 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 35  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (h) Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts (b) Relocation of a noncontributing building, structure, or object shall be approved or disapproved in accordance with the standards in Sec. 17-2.5(g)(6)c, Standards for Demolition. (c) The relocation of a building, structure, or object into the Historic Preservation Overlay district is permitted only if it is determined that the relocated building, structure, or object will be in accordance with the guidelines that apply to new construction in the new location and will be appropriate for the proposed context. e. Standards for Driveway and Vehicular Parking Area Design The decision on a Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks application that involves construction or alteration of a driveway or other vehicular parking area that is located within a base residential zoning district along the primary frontage or secondary frontage of a lot shall be based on the following standards: (i) Unless a showing of extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the piece of property can be shown, the amount of allowable area paved for the use of a driveway or a vehicular parking area shall be limited to a width of 12 feet measured with a straight line that runs parallel to the front or secondary front lot line. (ii) The designated vehicular parking area or driveway shall be placed so as to minimize its visual impact on the primary structure. (iii) Driveways and vehicular parking areas shall be compatible with the existing building and the site and setting of the historic district, taking into account the level of designation. Unless other materials are approved by the DDRCHP/DRC after a finding of fact that the materials in question are historically correct for the subject property, materials shall be limited to: (a) In a protection area: brick pavers, concrete pavers, granite, concrete, asphalt, sand, gravel, or crushed stone. (b) In an architectural conservation district: brick pavers, granite and concrete. (c) In a landmark district or for individual landmarks: brick pavers, granite and concrete.. (h) Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts (1) Purpose The purpose of this subsection is to establish a uniform mechanism for ensuring that proposed changes to exterior architectural features or attachments of appurtenances to structures within any design district is consistent with the standards that are specific to the district. Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-63 Packet Pg. 36  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (h) Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts (c) Site improvements consisting of any change to the paving, steps, fencing or masonry walls; (d) Change in roof pitch; (e) Change in exterior materials; or (f) Addition of or modification to signage. b. Major Certificate An application for a Major Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts shall be reviewed and decided in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(j)(5), Procedure for Major Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts, for any activity that requires a Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(h)(2) above that is not listed in subsection a above and, within the OV-NMC district, for any project involving the granting or establishment of a special exception, variance, or planned development. and any change to an approved design which results in a substantial change to a feature that was reviewed and approved by the U/DRC. (4) Procedure for Minor Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts Figure 17-2.5(h)(4) identifies the standard review procedures from Sec. 17-2.4, Standard Review Procedures, that apply to applications for a Minor Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts. Additions or modifications to the standard review procedures are identified in this subsection. Figure 17-2.5(h)(4): Summary of Minor Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts Procedure 17-2.4(b) Pre-Application Conference Optional 17-2.4(c) Application Submission To ZA Determination of Application Staff Processing, Review, ZA determination 17-2.4(d) Completeness 17-2.4(e) Staff Review and Action ZA review and decision Notification to Applicant ZA notifies applicant and Decision 17-2.4(i) of Decision 17-2.4(j) Appeal Optional (to U/DDRCDRC) Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-65 Packet Pg. 37  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (h) Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts a. Pre-Application Conference Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(b), Pre-Application Conference). b. Application Submission Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(c), Application Submission). c. Determination of Application Completeness Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(d), Determination of Application Completeness). d. Staff Review and Action Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(e), Staff Review and Action). The ZA shall review and make a decision in whole or in part on the application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(h)(6), Decision Standards for Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts. The decision shall be one of the following: (i) Approve the application as submitted; (ii) Approve the application subject to conditions of approval; or (iii) Deny the application. e. Notification to Applicant of Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(i), Notification to Applicant of Decision). f. Appeal Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(j), Appeal). Any appeal of the ZA’s decision to approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny an application for a Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts shall be to the Design Development Review Commission (U/DDRCDRC). 1. Notice of Appeal Within 30 days of receipt of notice of the ZA’s decision, any party aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision by submitting a notice of appeal to the ZA specifying the grounds of the appeal. 2. Transmittal of Record and Scheduling of Public Hearing Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the ZA shall forthwith transmit the notice of appeal and all papers constituting the record upon which the decision was made and schedule a public hearing in accordance with Sec. 17-2.4(f), Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification. 3. Hearing and Decision (i) The U/DDRCDRC shall conduct the public hearing, review the application and all relevant materials and testimony, and make one of the following decisions: (a) Affirm the decision being appealed (in whole or in part); (b) Modify the decision being appealed (in whole or in part); (c) Reverse the decision being appeals (in whole or in part); or August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-66 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 38  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (h) Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts (d) Remand the matter to the ZA if the U/DDRCDRC determines that the record is insufficient for review. (ii) The U/DDRCDRC’s final decision shall be in writing, with findings of fact and conclusions of law separately stated. 4. Rehearing on a Remanded Matter If the U/DDRCDRC remands the matter to the ZA, it must at the same time set a rehearing on the remanded matter without further public notice for a time certain within 60 days unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The U/DDRCDRC must maintain a list of persons who express an interest in being informed when the remanded matter is set for rehearing, and notice of the rehearing must be mailed to these persons prior to the rehearing. The U/DDRCDRC’s rehearing shall be in accordance with subsection 4 above. 5. Further Appeal Appeal of the U/DDRCDRC’s decision on an appeal from the ZA’s decision shall be to the County circuit court in accordance with S.C. Code § 6-29-900 et seq. (5) Procedure for Major Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts Figure 17-2.5(h)(5) identifies the standard review procedures from Sec. 17-2.4, Standard Review Procedures, that apply to applications for a Major Certificate of Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-67 Packet Pg. 39  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (h) Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts Design Approval – Design Districts. Additions or modifications to the standard review procedures are identified in this subsection. Figure 17-2.5(h)(5): Summary of Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts (Major) Procedure OV-DC Required. 17-2.4(b) Pre-Application Conference All others optional 17-2.4(c) Application Submission To ZA Determination of Application ZA determination 17-2.4(d) Completeness Staff Processing ZA review and recommendation 17-2.4(e) Staff Review and Action (staff report) ZA schedules public hearing for Scheduling of Public Hearing U/DDRCDRC meeting, provides 17-2.4(f) and Public Notification notice Decision-Making Body U/DDRCDRC holds public hearing, 17-2.4(h) Hearing, Review, and Decision makes decision Notification to Applicant ZA notifies applicant 17-2.4(i) of Decision 17-2.4(j) Appeal Optional a. Pre-Application Conference OV-DC Required. All others optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(b), Pre-Application Conference). b. Application Submission Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(c), Application Submission). c. Determination of Application Completeness Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(d), Determination of Application Completeness). d. Staff Review and Action Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(e), Staff Review and Action). e. Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(f), Scheduling of Public Hearing and Public Notification). August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-68 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 40  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (i) Site Plan f. Decision-making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(h), Decision-Making Body Hearing, Review, and Decision). The Design Development Review Commission (U/DDRCDRC) shall review and make a decision in whole or in part on the application in accordance with Sec. 17-2.5(h)(6), Decision Standards for Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts. The U/DDRCDRC’s decision shall be one of the following: (i) Approve the application as submitted; (ii) Approve the application subject to conditions of approval; or (iii) Deny the application. g. Notification to Applicant of Decision Required (see Sec. 17-2.4(i), Notification to Applicant of Decision). h. Appeal Optional (see Sec. 17-2.4(j), Appeal). An appeal from the U/DDRCDRC’s decision may be made by any person having a substantial interest in the decision, or any officer or agent of the City, to the County circuit court in accordance with S.C. Code § 6-29-900 et seq. The appeal must be filed within 30 days after the affected party receives actual notice of the decision of the U/DDRCDRC. (6) Decision Standards for Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts An application for a Certificate of Design Approval – Design Districts shall be approved upon a finding that the proposed activity is in accordance with the design guidelines adopted by the City Council for the design district in which the proposed activity is located, either the Downtown Columbia Design Overlay, North Main Corridor Design Overlay, or Five Points Design Overlay. (i) Site Plan (1) Purpose The purpose of this subsection is to establish a uniform mechanism to ensure that the layout and general design of proposed development complies with the standards of this Ordinance and all other applicable City regulations. (2) Applicability a. The procedures and standards in this subsection apply to the review of and decision on applications for Site Plan approval. b. Site Plan approval is required prior to the issuance of a Zoning Permit for any development, unless exempted in accordance with subsection c below. c. The following is exempted from the requirements of this subsection: 1. Development on a single-family residential lot; and Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-69 Packet Pg. 41  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (y) Bailey Bill – Special Tax Assessment Created (y) Bailey Bill – Special Tax Assessment Created (1) Purpose It is the purpose of this division to: a. Encourage the restoration of historic properties; b. Promote community development and redevelopment; c. Encourange sound community planning; and d. Promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. (2) Eligible Properties In order to be eligible for the special tax assessment, historic properties must received preliminary and final certification. a. To receive preliminary certification a property must meet the following conditions: (i) The property has received historic designation. (ii) The proposed rehabilitation work receives approval from the Design/Development Review Commission (HP/DRCDDRC). b. To received final certification, a property must have met the following conditions: (i) The property has received preliminary certification. (ii) The minimum expenditures for rehabilitation were incurred and paid. (iii) The completed rehabilitation received approval from the secretary to the HP/DDRCDRC as being consistent with the plans approved by HP/DDRCDRC as part of preliminary certification August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-116 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 42  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (y) Bailey Bill – Special Tax Assessment Created features to protect the historic integrity of the historic property and its environment. (viii) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. b. Work to be reviewed: (i) Repairs to the exterior of the designated building. (ii) Alterations to the exterior of the designated building. (iii) New construction on the property on which the building is located. (iv) Alterations to interior primary public spaces. (v) Any remaining work where the expenditures for such work are being used to satisfy the minimum expenditures for rehabilitation. c. Minimum expenditures for rehabilitation means the owner or the owner's estate rehabilitates the building, with expenditures for rehabilitation exceeding 20 percent of the fair market value of the building. Fair market value means the appraised value as certified to the HP/DDRCDRC by a real estate appraiser licensed by the State of South Carolina, the sales price as delineated in a bona fide contract of sale within 12 months of the time it is submitted, or the most recent appraised value published by the Richland County Tax Assessor. d. Expenditures for rehabilitation means the actual cost of rehabilitation relating to one or more of the following: (i) Improvements located on or within the historic building as designated. (ii) Improvements outside of but directly attached to the historic building which are necessary to make the building fully useable (such as vertical circulation) but shall not include rentable/habitable floorspace attributable to new construction. (iii) Architectural and engineering services attributable to the design of the improvements. (iv) Costs necessary to maintain the historic character or integrity of the building. e. The special tax assessment may apply to the following: (i) Structure(s) rehabilitated. (ii) Real property on which the building is located. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-118 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 43  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (y) Bailey Bill – Special Tax Assessment Created f. To be eligible for the special tax assessment, rehabilitation must be completed within two years of the preliminary certification date. If the project is not complete after two years, but the minimum expenditures for rehabilitation have been incurred, the property continues to receive the special assessment until the project is completed or until the end of the special assessment period, whichever shall first occur. (5) Process a. There is a fee of $150.00 required for final certification for each application for review of rehabilitation work of single-family and/or duplex structures and $300.00 for all other structures. Fees are payable to the City of Columbia, and final certification will not be given without payment of this fee. b. Owners of property seeking approval of rehabilitation work must submit a rehabilitation historic property application with supporting documentation and application fee prior to beginning work. c. Upon receipt of the completed application, the proposal shall be placed on the next available agenda of the HP/DDRCDRC to determine if the project is consistent with the standards for rehabilitation. After the HP/DDRCDRC makes its determination, the owner shall be notified in writing. Upon receipt of this determination the owner may: (i) If the application is approved, begin rehabilitation; (ii) If the application is not approved, he may revise such application in accordance with comments provided by the HP/DDRCDRC. d. Once preliminary certification is granted to an application, substantive changes must be approved by the HP/DDRCDRC. Unapproved substantive changes are conducted at the risk of the property owner and may disqualify the project from eligibility. Additional expenditures will not qualify the project for an extension on the special assessment. e. Upon completion of the project, the project must receive final certification in order to be eligible for the special assessment. The secretary to the HP/DDRCDRC will inspect completed projects to determine if the work is consistent with the approval granted by the HP/DDRCDRC. Final certification will be granted when the completed work meets the Standards and verification is made that expenditures have been made. Upon receiving final certification, the property will be assessed for the remainder of the special assessment period on the fair market value of the property at the time the preliminary certification was made or the final certification was made, whichever occurred earlier. f. For the remainder of the special assessment period after final certification, the property owner shall notify the HP/DDRCDRC of any additional work, other than ordinary maintenance. The HP/DDRCDRC will review the work at a regularly scheduled hearing and determine whether the overall project is Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 2-119 Packet Pg. 44  6.c Article 2: Administration Sec. 17-2.5. Application-Specific Review Procedures and Decision Standards (y) Bailey Bill – Special Tax Assessment Created consistent with the standards for rehabilitation. If the additional work is found to be inconsistent the property owner may withdraw his request and cancel or revise the proposed additional work. g. When the property has received final certification and has been assessed as rehabilitated historic property, it remains so certified and must be granted the special assessment until the property becomes disqualified by any one of the following: (i) Written notice from the owner to the HP/DDRCDRC and the auditor requesting removal of the preferential assessment; (ii) Removal of the historic designation by City Council; or (iii) Rescission of the approval of rehabilitation by the HP/DDRCDRC because of alterations or renovation by the owner or the owner's estate which causes the property to no longer possess the qualities and features which made it eligible for final certification. h. The City shall, upon final certification of a property, notify the Richland County Assessor, Auditor and Treasurer that such property has been duly certified and is eligible for the special tax assessment. i. If an application for preliminary or final certification is filed by May 1 or the preliminary or final certification is approved by August 1, the special assessment authorized herein is effective for that year. Otherwise, it is effective beginning with the following year. (i) The special assessment only begins in the current or future tax years as provided for in this section. In no instance may the special assessment be applied retroactively. j. Once the HP/DDRCDRC has granted the special property tax assessments authorized herein, the owner of the property shall make application to the Richland County Auditor for the special assessment provided for herein. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2-120 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 45  6.c Article 3: Zoning Districts Sec. 17-3.7. Overlay Districts (k) OV-CCP: Community Character Protection Overlay District Figure 17.3.7(l)(3)e: Maximum Height (4) Limits to Demolition a. General 1. The City shall not issue a demolition or relocation permit for any structure fifty (50) years old or more within any geographic area to which this overlay applies without prior review and approval by the design Design development review Review commission Commission [MA14](HP/DDRCDRC). 2. The following demolitions and relocations are exempt from this section: (i) Structures deemed noncontributing by City staff as determined by criteria in c.2(i) below. (ii) Partial demolitions where City staff determines that the portion of the structure to be demolished does not contribute to the design integrity of the structure. (iii) The structure poses an immediate threat to the public safety as determined by the Building Official. 3. The age of the structure shall be established by the records maintained by the Richland County Assessor’s Office. If the age of the structure cannot be established by the records maintained by the Assessor’s Office, the applicant for a demolition or relocation permit shall present other documentation to the City to establish the age of the structure. b. Public Notice Requirement The property upon which the structure is located shall be posted with notice of the application to demolish or relocate at least 15 days prior to the consideration by the HP/DDRCDRC. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 3-100 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 46  6.c Article 3: Zoning Districts Sec. 17-3.7. Overlay Districts (k) OV-CCP: Community Character Protection Overlay District c. Review by HP/DDRCDRC 1. The HP/DDRCDRC shall approve a request for demolition or relocation only if it finds one or more of the following: (i) The physical integrity of the structure is compromised to such a degree that it is no longer salvageable and/or represents a hazardous or unsafe condition. (ii) The structure does not contribute to the historical architectural character of the district. (iii) The structure or property cannot be put to any reasonable economic beneficial use for which it is or may otherwise be adapted without approval of demolition. 2. For applications to demolish or relocate a structure, the HP/DDRCDRC shall apply the following criteria for review: (i) Determination of the architectural significance and whether it contributes to the character of the district. The Commission shall consider the structure in relation to the street and the district as a whole. The architectural significance is defined by being fifty (50) years or older and meeting at least one of the following critieria: (a) Individually listed in or has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. (b) Contributes to a Historic District listed in the National Register of Historic Places. (c) A building which exemplifies an architectural style or type characterized by innovation, rarity, uniqueness, or overall quality of design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship. (d) An excellent example of a style or type of building which is rare within Columbia or its historic context. (e) The significant work of an architect or builder of local, regional, or national importance. (ii) The existing structural condition as assessed by a licensed engineer or architect with experience in historic rehabilitation projects. (iii) A determination of the building use and economic viability. The applicant shall submit information, prepared by qualified professionals, sufficient to demonstrate the following: (a) The current use does not generate a reasonable economic return; (b) The appropriate and reasonable alternate uses in the building could not generate a future reasonable economic return; and Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 3-101 Packet Pg. 47  6.c Article 3: Zoning Districts Sec. 17-3.7. Overlay Districts (m) OV-HSV: Height and Setback View Corridor Protection Overlay District (m) OV-HSV: Height and Setback View Corridor Protection Overlay District (1) Purpose: The purpose of the Height and Setback View Corridor Protection Overlay (OV- HSV) District is to support the goals of the area plans with regard to compatible height and setbacks as identified through area plans. (2) Applicability a. The standards and requirements in this section apply to development located in the OV-HSV District. b. The OV-HSV District consists of two types of sub-districts: height overlay sub- districts (Height Districts) and setback overlay sub-districts (Setback Districts). (3) Height Overlay Sub-districts (Height Districts) The requirements of this section have resulted from a contextual study of building height and architectural patterns in the mapped height overlay sub-district (Height District). The requirements of this section reflect the predominant building height trends of the areas to which they are applied, and reinforce the principles cited in the adopted plans for each area. The requirements of this section are intended to clarify acceptable heights of buildings in areas of the City that have been assigned a Height District. The Design Development Review Commission(HP/DDRCDRC) may adjust heights in defined Height Districts in limited circumstances when based on architectural merit. a. General Requirements 1. A Height District shall have heights measured in stories or feet, as specified. 2. For maximum height specified in feet, the measurement shall be taken from the highest curb elevation adjacent to the site to the highest point of the structure. For maximum height specified in stories, the measurement shall be taken from the main floor finished elevation. 3. Where heights are specified in stories or feet, the measurement shall be from finished floor to finished floor. 4. Any area under a structure in excess of six feet shall be counted as a story. 5. The HP/DDRCDRC is empowered to require a downward adjustment of one-half story in the number of stories based on the number of stories of structures that predominate in the structure's immediate surroundings. 6. Floors shall be measured in the following manner: (i) The maximum height of any residential floor shall be 12 feet, unless otherwise specified. Any dimension above this shall August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 3-104 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 48  6.c Article 3: Zoning Districts Sec. 17-3.7. Overlay Districts (m) OV-HSV: Height and Setback View Corridor Protection Overlay District constitute a second floor. The HP/DDRCDRC may grant a waiver up to 14 feet on the first or second floor, based on architectural merit and context. (ii) The minimum height of any residential floor shall not be less than 10 feet; however, there is no minimum height for floors in a single family residence, duplex or townhouse. (iii) The maximum height of any nonresidential first floor shall be 20 feet, unless otherwise specified. Any dimension above this height shall constitute a second floor. The Design Development Review Commission may grant a waiver up to 25 feet on the main floor based on architectural merit and context. (iv) The minimum height of any nonresidential floor shall not be less than 14 feet, unless otherwise specified. 7. The HP/DDRCDRC is empowered to require downward adjustments to floor heights, based on context of the structure with its immediate surroundings. 8. Appurtenances to a building shall not be permitted to exceed the maximum height, unless otherwise specified. 9. If any portion of a structure subject to the jurisdiction of the HP/DDRCDRC is within 50 feet of a designated landmark, such portion of that structure shall not exceed the height of such existing structures unless approved by the HP/DDRCDRC based on architectural merit and context. 10. Mechanical equipment on a roof shall be visually screened from the street with parapets or other types of visual screens of the minimum height necessary to conceal the same. The equipment shall be screened from view from surrounding streets within 1,000 feet of the equipment. 11. Parking garages shall not exceed the height of the principal building on the site. Parking garages shall not be constrained by floor to floor height requirements, but stand-alone and integrated parking garages shall appear from the street to conform to the number of stories permitted in the height district in which it is located. 12. In a Height District where additional height may be awarded on the basis of architectural merit and context, if the property is not subject to the jurisdiction of the HP/DDRCDRC through other sections of this Ordnance, the owner requesting the additional height must submit the plans to the HP/DDRCDRC. An applicant seeking modification based upon architectural merit and context shall provide studies and drawings as requested by the HP/DDRCDRC. 13. Communication towers shall not exceed the maximum building height limits of Height Districts that include a maximum height limit in feet, or Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 3-105 Packet Pg. 49  6.c Article 3: Zoning Districts Sec. 17-3.7. Overlay Districts (m) OV-HSV: Height and Setback View Corridor Protection Overlay District a height limit equal to 10 feet per story for Height Districts that do not specify a maximum height in feet. 14. "Architectural merit" means a project that reflects exemplary architectural and urban design, utilizes the highest level of materials and finishes and contributes to the public realm. b. OV-HSV H80/30: Height District 80/30. 1. In all areas mapped with this Height District, the following standards apply: (i) There shall be no structure, including appurtenant parts of a structure, except for elevator penthouses or mechanical penthouses, exceeding a height of 80 feet, nor shall any structure fronting on any street be lower than the height of 30 feet. (ii) All portions of a structure above the 55 foot level shall be set back at least 25 feet from all street right-of-way lines. (4) Setback Overlay Sub-districts (Setback Districts). The requirements of this section have resulted from a contextual study of building setbacks and urban design goals in the mapped setback overlay sub-district (Setback District). The requirements of this section reflect the predominant setback trends of the areas and urban design principles cited in the adopted plans for each area. The requirements of this section are intended to clarify acceptable setbacks and build to lines of buildings in areas of the City that have been assigned a Setback District. The U/DDRCDRC may adjust setbacks in defined Setback Districts in limited circumstances when based on architectural merit. a. General requirements: 1. The U/DDRCDRC is empowered to require an adjustment of ½ the maximum requirement based upon analysis of the immediate surroundings and Architectural merit. 2. "Architectural merit" means a project that reflects exemplary architectural and urban design, utilizes the highest level of materials and finishes and contributes to the public realm. b. OV-HSV S8/10: Setback District 8-10 In order to encourage a well defined public realm and to provide a buffer for pedestrians between the curb line and the sidewalk zone of not less than 8 feet, the follow standards apply in the OV-HSV S8/10 Setback District: 1. No structure, including appurtenant parts of a structure, except for balconies and Juliet balconies, shall be placed within eight feet the property line fronting Huger Street, and no structure shall be place more than ten feet from the property line fronting Huger Street. 2. Minimum front yards shall be used for wider sidewalks, trees, and other amenities coordinating with urban design standards of the district. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 3-106 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 50  6.c Article 5: Development Standards Sec. 17-5.10. Signs (c) Standards the HP/DDRCDRC issues a Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks, finding that the sign conforms to at least one of the guidelines for retaining historic signs listed within "The Preservation of Historic Signs" Preservation Brief, issued by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. (6) Permanent Signs a. General Standards for Permanent Signs 1. Maximum Total Display Surface Area Unless otherwise expressly stated in this Section, the total maximum display surface area of all permanent signs shall be as listed in Table 17- 5.10(c)(6)a.1: Total Maximum Display Surface Area of Permanent Signs, for the zoning district in which the lot is located. TABLE 17-5.10(C)(6)A.1: TOTAL MAXIMUM DISPLAY SURFACE AREA OF PERMANENT SIGNS ZONING DISTRICT AND LOT CONFIGURATION MAXIMUM DISPLAY SURFACE AREA Any Residential base district On each street frontage: 20 square feet [1] O-I, NAC, MU-1 Lot containing multiple For each storefront: one square foot for each linear foot establishments and of building frontage of the principal building occupied by multiple storefronts the storefront Any other lot On the lot: 150 square feet plus one square foot for each linear foot of building frontage of the principal building in excess of 150 feet that has a principal entrance MU-2, GC, DAC, MC, CAC, Lot containing multiple For each storefront: two square foot for each linear foot RAC any Institutional and establishments and of building frontage of the principal building occupied by Campus district multiple storefronts the storefront Any other lot On the lot: 300 square feet plus two square feet for each linear foot of building frontage of the principal building in excess of 150 feet that has a principal entrance Any Industrial district Lot containing multiple For each storefront: one square foot for each linear foot establishments and of building frontage of the principal building occupied by multiple storefronts the storefront Any other lot On the lot: 500 square feet plus 1.5 square feet for each linear foot of building frontage of the principal building in excess of 500 feet that has a principal entrance NOTES: [1] For each street frontage, an additional 20 square feet of display surface area is allowed for a sign containing changeable copy. 2. Maximum Number of Signs The maximum number of permanent signs permitted for each street frontage for each business located on a lot shall be as listed in Table 17- 5.10(c)(6)a.2: Maximum Number of Signs Per Street Frontage. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 5-110 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 51  6.c Article 9: Definitions and Rules of Measurement Sec. 17-9.4. Definitions (b) Interpretation of Unlisted Uses CRITICAL ROOT ZONE, NET In urban environments where root zones may sometimes be obstructed with barriers, i.e. roads and building foundations, etc., the root zone may be reduced in size. The reduced root zone after impact is called the Net Critical Root Zone and is used to determine whether a tree is saved or lost. In order for a tree to be preserved, the net critical root zone may be no greater than 20 percent. CUL-DE-SAC A street having one end open to traffic and the other end terminated by a vehicular turnaround; a dead-end street. DAMAGE OR ABUSE (TO VEGETATION) Any intentional or negligent act that endangers survivability of a tree or other plant material, including but not limited to, such damage inflicted upon the root system of a tree by application of toxic substances, the operation of machinery, the change of natural grade by excavation or filling above the root system or around the trunk of a tree, pruning, damages from injury or fire inflicted on trees that result in or permit pest infestation, or actual cutting of the tree. DATUM The term "the datum" used in Sec. 17-3.7(c), OV-A: Airport Safety Overlay District OV-A: Airport Safety Overlay District , shall mean sea level elevation unless otherwise specified. DBH See “Diameter-at-Breast-Height (DBH)” DDRCDRC See “Design Development Review Commission.” Formerly known as the “DDRC” or Design Development Review Commission. HP/DRC August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 9-48 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 52  6.c Article 9: Definitions and Rules of Measurement Sec. 17-9.4. Definitions (b) Interpretation of Unlisted Uses Historic Preservation/Design Review Commission for Historic Districts and Landmarks (see Sec. 17-2.3(e)). U/DRC Urban Design Review Commission for Urban Design Districts (see Sec. 17-2.3(e)). DECIDUOUS A plant which sheds its foliage at the end of each growing season. Not evergreen. DECORATIVE LIGHTING Light fixtures used for decorative effects, like accent lights for buildings. DEMOLITION The razing of any exterior architectural feature or structure, including its ruin by neglect of necessary maintenance or repairs, or either. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMISSION The Design Development Review Commission of the City of Columbia, South Carolina (see Sec. 17-2.3(e)). to be superceded by the DRC when adopted. DEVELOPER Any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking development. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT See Sec. 17-2.5(f), Development Agreement. DEVELOPMENT LOT AS A WHOLE The entire parcel proposed for a two-family or townhouse development, containing all parcels proposed to be owned in common and all proposed individual lots under two-family or townhouse units. DHEC The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. DIAMETER-AT-BREAST-HEIGHT (DBH) The diameter of a tree measured in inches 54 inches above the ground. If the tree splits into multiple trunks at a height below 54 inches, but above the ground, the diameter is measured at the narrowest point beneath the split. DISPLAY AREA An outdoor area for storage or display of merchandise for sale or lease, whether permanent or temporary, containerized or openly displayed. DISPLAY SURFACE AREA That area of a sign including the entire area within a regular geometric shape or combination of regular geometric shapes enclosing all of the elements of informational or representational matter displayed, including blank masking or any surface shape intended to convey ideas, information or meaning. Sign support structures not bearing informational Columbia, South Carolina August 20, 2019 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Page 9-49 Packet Pg. 53  6.c Article 9: Definitions and Rules of Measurement Sec. 17-9.4. Definitions (b) Interpretation of Unlisted Uses MARQUEE A permanent roofed structure attached to and supported by a building. MASONRY WALL A wall constructed of brick, stone or stucco. MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE No feasible or practical alternative exists, as determined by the decision-maker, and all possible efforts to comply with the standards or regulation to minimize potential harmful or adverse impacts have been undertaken by an applicant. Economic considerations may be taken into account but shall not be the overriding factor in determining “maximum extent practicable.” MINOR ALTERATION A change to a building or site that does not qualify as a major alteration, as determined by the Design Development Review Commission or the Land Development Administrator. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT A tract of land or structure developed for both residential and nonresidential uses. Such uses may be vertically integrated within a multi-story building or horizontally integrated within a single story building or on a lot or development site. MOBILE HOME A movable or portable dwelling unit over 32 feet in length and over eight feet in width, constructed to be towed on its own chassis, designed without a permanent foundation, and capable of supporting year round occupancy, which may include one more components that can be retracted for towing purposes and subsequently expanded, or which may consist of two or more units separately towable but designed to be joined into one integral unit. The term "mobile home" shall not include prefabricated, modular or unitized dwellings placed on permanent foundations, nor shall it include travel trailers, campers or similar units designed for recreation or other short term uses. MODEL SALES HOME/UNIT A dwelling, dwelling unit, or other marketable unit of a new development that is used for real estate sales or leasing activities associated with the development pending construction of the development and the initial sales of homes or units in the development. MONOPOLE COMMUNICATION TOWER A ground-mounted, pole-shaped, self-supporting tower that supports wireless communication antenna. MULCH A protective covering consisting of organic materials (layer of wood chips, pine straw, hay or other material) placed on the surface of the soil around plants to retain moisture, inhibit weeds growth, impede erosion, shield roots from freezing and aid in plant growth. NATIVE SPECIES A plant that is a part of the balance of nature that has developed over hundreds or thousands of years in a particular region or ecosystem. This includes species that are August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 9-60 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 54  6.c Article 9: Definitions and Rules of Measurement Sec. 17-9.4. Definitions (b) Interpretation of Unlisted Uses PUBLIC BICYCLE-SHARING SERVICE A system operated under the auspices of a program administered and/or approved by the City of Columbia whose function is to provide the general public with opportunities to rent bicycles on a short-term basis for use within the city or region. PUBLIC BICYCLE-SHARING STATION A bicycle sharing facility placed or constructed by a Public Bicycle-Sharing Service on public or private property where bicycles are stored and from which members of the publc may rent bicycles as part of a Public Bicycle-Sharing Service including objects or equipment necessary for or appurtenant to its operation. PUBLIC HEARING A meeting that is open to the public and advertised in advance as required by the S.C. Code and this Ordinance, at which members of the public are allowed to speak on the subject of the public hearing. Advisory and decision-making bodies are required to conduct public hearings before a decision is made on certain applications. QUORUM The minimum number of City Council, Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, Board of Zoning Appeals – Form-based Codes, or Design Development Review Commission members that must be present in order to conduct official business or take official action. RAINWATER CISTERN OR BARREL A catchment device to capture rain water from a roof or other surface before it reaches the ground, which may be either above or below ground level. RECYCLING DROP-OFF STATION A location providing designated containers (commonly known as drop-off stations) for the collection of recyclable materials. Materials are stored in containers temporarily until they are transported to a separate processing facility. REGISTER OF DEEDS The Register of Deeds for Richland County, South Carolina, or the Register of Deeds for Lexington County, South Carolina. May be abbreviated ROD. REGULARLY For purposes of Sec. 17-4.2(c)(3)d.5, Sexually-Oriented Businesses, the consistent and repeated doing of an act on an ongoing basis. REGULATORY FLOOD A flood that is expected to occur in the future and cause damage, based on past flooding events. REGULATORY FLOOD PROTECTION ELEVATION The elevation of the regulatory flood, which can be influenced by topography, anticipated hydraulic conveyance capacity, and encroachment into areas subject to flooding. RELOCATION For purposes of Sec. 17-2.5(g), Certificate of Design Approval – Historic Districts and Landmarks, the moving of a building, structure, or object on the same lot or to another lot. August 20, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Page 9-66 Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Regulations Packet Pg. 55  7 MEETING DATE: October 28, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk FROM: Erika Hammond, City Clerk SUBJECT: Special Event Fees - Mr. Harold Reaves, Special Events Coordinator FUNDING SOURCE & ORIGINAL BUDGET: ATTACHMENTS: • #a: Special Event Permit Processing Fees (DOCX) Updated: 10/23/2025 3:38 PM Page 1 Packet Pg. 56  7.a City of Columbia Fee Schedule Special Event Permit Processing Fees1 Event Application Deadline Permit Fee Major Festival or Event2 May include: Outdoor entertainment, sale of food/beverages, service of alcohol, and/or generate revenue Expected attendance greater than 1,000 Festival or Event2 May include: Outdoor entertainment, sale of food/beverages, 90 days prior to the event $100.00 service of alcohol, and/or generate revenue Expected attendance less than 1,000 Parade, Procession, March, Road Race, Bicycle Race Includes the restriction or closure of roadway Private or Public Gathering2 May include: Sale or service of food/beverages, outdoor 60 days prior to the event $50.00 entertainment, and /or the service of alcohol Neighborhood Gatherings, Block Party or Walk 30 days prior to the event $25.00 Includes the restriction of sidewalk or residential street Road Closures Permit Processing Fees3 Road Closure Request – City Center: Area bound by Elmwood to Blossom and Pickens to the Congaree River Includes closure for crane operations, road work, where the road is closed Full Road Closure 15 days prior to event $1,000 per day4 Lane Closure 15 days prior to event $500 per day4 Road Closure Request –anywhere other than City Center and neighborhood/residential areas: Includes closure for crane operations, road work, etc. Full Road Closure 15 days prior to event $500 per day4 Lane Closure 15 days prior to event $250 per day4 Road Closure Request – Neighborhood & Residential areas Areas designated as residential base zoning districts by the Unified Development Ordinance in Chapter 17 of City of Columbia Ordinances: Includes closure for crane operations, road work, etc. Full Road Closure 15 days prior to event $50 per day4 NOTES: 1) Fees are for permits only. Refer to Special Event City Services Fees for associated fees where applicable. 2) Events that include alcohol to be consumed on public property require approval by City Resolution. 3) Road Closure fees do not apply to approved Special Events Permits 4) A day is defined as 24 hours from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. the following day. Approved by Ordinance 2023-064 v2 Packet Pg. 57  7.a City of Columbia Fee Schedule Special Event City Services Fees Additional Service Rate Effective Date** Information Public Works Delivery and pick up from site $20.00 per cart Effective January 1, 2024 Roll Carts Includes disposal after pick up. Public Works Employee $32.00 an hour per Will handle the emptying of Onsite to Service Roll Effective January 1, 2024 employee roll carts during event. Carts Includes delivery and pick up $10.00 per barricade from event. Public Works for first 50 barricades Number of barricades needed will Effective January 1, 2024 Barricades $7.50 per barricade be determined between CPD and for 51+ barricades the event coordinator to ensure public safety. Public Works Street Arranged as needed and/or $50.00 per hour Effective January 1, 2024 Sweeping requested Public Works Blower $20.00 per hour per Arranged as needed and/or Effective January 1, 2024 Operator employee requested Public Works Traffic $60.00 per hour per Arranged as needed and/or Effective January 1, 2024 Electrician employee requested Electricity Box Hookup $20.00 per box As needed and/or requested Effective January 1, 2024 Water Tap Hookup $10.00 per tap As needed and/or requested Effective January 1, 2024 Police Officer $50.00/hour per officer Minimum of three hours Effective July 1, 2023 Number of officers needed will be determined between CPD and the event coordinator. Fire Marshal $50.00/hour per Marshal Minimum of three hours Effective July 1, 2023 12% of total invoice for Administration Fee 12% of total invoice Effective January 1, 2024 Administrative Fee **NOTE: These prices will go into effect January 1, 2024 for all events regardless of date event permit was submitted Approved by Ordinance 2023-064 v2 Packet Pg. 58