Economic Development Commission
Regular MeetingDeKalb, IL · March 3, 2017
Minutes
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
MARCH 3, 2017
The Economic Development Commission (EDC) held a regular meeting on Friday, March
3, 2017 in the Council Chambers of the DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth
Street, DeKalb, Illinois.
Chair O’Flaherty called meeting to order at 8:07 a.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present were Trixy O’Flaherty (Chair), Mark Sawyer, Mohammad Labadi, David
Barrow, Tom DeVries, Vernese Edghill-Walden.
Also present were City Manager, Anne Marie Gaura, Economic Development Planner,
Jason Michnick, Alderman Bob Snow, Matt Duffy (DeKalb Area Chamber of Commerce),
Mim Evans (NIU Center for Governmental Studies), and Melissa Henriksen (NIU Center
for Governmental Studies).
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
A motion to approve the agenda was made by Mr. Labadi with Mr. DeVries seconding the
motion. The motion passed by voice vote.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion to approval minutes from last meeting was made by Mr. Sawyer with Mr. Barrow
seconding the motion. The motion passed by voice vote.
BUSINESS
1. Summary of Session One (Feb 3, 2017 meeting)
Ms. Henriksen and Ms. Evans reviewed the results for the survey completed the
Commissioners regarding the possible 2025 projects. Discussion followed. The survey
results varied regarding priorities among the Commissioners. Both Ms. Henriksen and
Ms. Evans said it was helpful for them and provided an insight into the group.
Economic Development Commission
March 3, 2017
Page 2 of 2
2. Overview of EDC Project Scoring Survey Results
Following the discussion, the notes from the first session were reviewed and some
discussion and clarification of some issues were covered. Mr. Barrow asked about
national trends regarding college freshmen class sizes. It was confirmed that the national
trend was towards smaller incoming freshmen class sizes.
3. Discussion of economic development strategies
The EDC moved on to a more detailed review of the prioritization of the development
strategies that resulted from our survey answers, i.e., why certain ones rose to the top
and others did not. This discussion resulted in a loose consensus that the downtown
should be at or near the top of the list. Mr. Barrow also raised the point that the Northwest
Corridor should also be near the top.
4. Additional information on high scoring projects & Evaluate/Prioritize Projects
At this point, the Commission had a working break, at which time the Commissioners
started combining all of the items on the list into groups of like projects. This continued
and transitioned into a discussion regarding “strategy into action” planning. Two groups
were formed. After a short time, they came back with basically the same focus for action:
a streetscape plan visually connecting downtown to campus.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Sawyer moved to adjourn, as time had run out, and it was seconded by Mr. Labadi
and the meeting was adjourned at 11:05 am.
Respectfully submitted,
Jason Michnick, Economic Development Planner
Minutes approved by the Economic Development Commission on April 7, 2017
Agenda
DeKalb Municipal Building
PLEASE NOTE LOCATION
Council Chamber, Second Floor
200 South Fourth Street
DeKalb, Illinois 60115
AGENDA
Economic Development Commission
March 3, 2017
8:00 a.m.
A. Roll Call
B. Approval of Agenda – Additions / Deletions
C. Approval of Minutes – February 3, 2017 Meeting
D. Public Participation
E. New Business
1. Summary of Session One (February 3, 2017)
2. Overview of EDC Project Scoring Survey Results
3. Discussion of economic development strategies
4. Additional information on high scoring projects
5. Evaluate and prioritize projects as a group
6. Next steps
F. Adjournment
Working Draft-Not for Distribution 3-25-17
DeKalb EDC 2025 Plan-Economic Development Strategies Prioritization-Summary Scoring 3-25-17
Project Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Score 5 Total (Out of 135)
Market City owned vacant properties 24 18 27 27 18 114
Develop pipeline of skilled employees 24 24 21 24 18 111
Market the airport 27 18 27 21 18 111
Identify retail, commercial & service needs 24 24 18 18 24 108
Develop living wage jobs 27 18 21 24 18 108
Residential growth 21 21 21 21 21 105
New commercial development 21 21 18 24 18 102 Additional Projects Suggested Score
NIU/DeKalb collaboration 21 24 18 15 24 102 Food, beverage and entertainment focused on 24
Support business owner initiatives 21 18 18 18 24 99 Beautifying downtown and adding attractions 18
Recruitment and retention strategies 21 18 24 15 18 96 More events, concerts, markets, etc with marketing 18
Arts, Culture and Entertainment Corridor (ACE) 24 27 12 12 21 96 Long term vision for Peace Rd 15
Communication channels using social media 0
Streetscape/NIU Connector 21 21 9 18 21 90
Revitalize S. 4th St. & E. Lincoln corridors 24 18 15 18 12 87
Virtual Incubator 27 9 18 12 15 81 Additional Comments
NIU/DeKalb technology initiative 24 21 12 12 12 81 Project Comments
Co-working Space 18 12 21 12 15 78 Support business owner initiatives Consider expanding the effort to businesses outside of the downtown area.
Egyptian Theatre 21 15 15 6 21 78 Streetscape/NIU Connector With emphasis on development west of 1st to convo center
STEAM Learning Center 18 18 9 12 21 78 Egyptian Theatre Puplic attraction,
Great cost is
attraction, we needconcern
such attractions for residents and visitors to energize local
Traditional Small Business Incubator 18 12 12 15 12 69 STEAM Learning Center economy
Hotel/Conference Center 15 15 12 9 9 60 Arts, Culture and Entertainment Corridor (ACE) That ACE area is very vital and can be a great attraction to visitors and businesses alike.
Traditional Small Business Incubator Cost can vary greatly.
CRITERIA SCORE VALUE Co-working Space Costs?
Is the project/program doable? 0 points: none of the criteria are reasonably attainable Egyptian Theatre Costs?
Is this a low cost project relative to other projects on the 3 points: one or two of the criteria are reasonably attainable Hotel/Conference Center Costs?
Can it be funded? 6 points: three or four of the criteria are reasonably attainable STEAM Learning Center Costs?
Can significant progress be made in the next 12 months? 9 points: all of the criteria are reasonably attainable Revitalize S. 4th St. & E. Lincoln corridors Costs?
Is the talent available? Residential growth Can't force it
Do regulations allow it?
What is the economic impact? 0: not measurable or impact assessable
IsIf itnot
measurable?
measurable, is there another way to know if we 3: non-quantifiable impact can be determined
succeeded? 6: somewhat quantifiable
9: clearly quantifiable
Is
Arethere City and
leaders community
willing to actively support?the 0: weak support from both City and community
project/program? 3: moderate to strong support from either City or community
Is there leadership to take ownership of it? 6: moderate support from both City and community
Is there significant opposition? 9:strong support from both City and community
Is it inclusive?