Planning & Zoning Commission
Regular MeetingDeKalb, IL · April 12, 2017
Minutes
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
April 12, 2017
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a Meeting on April 12, 2017 at the City of
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 S. Fourth St., DeKalb, Illinois.
Chair Atherton called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
A. ROLL CALL
Natalie Nelson called the roll. Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission
present at roll call: Katharina Barbe, Matthew Crull, Deborah Nier, Jerry Wright,
and Chair Christina Atherton. Members absent were Vicki Buckley and David
Castro.
At 6:02 PM, Chair Atherton noted for the record that Commissioner Jerry Wright
joined the meeting.
City staff present were Community Development Director Jo Ellen Charlton,
Principal Planner Dan Olson, City Attorney Dean Frieders and Administrative
Assistant Natalie Nelson.
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)
Chair Atherton requested a motion to approve the April 12, 2017 agenda as
presented. M. Crull motioned to approve the agenda, D. Nier seconded the motion,
and the motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
None.
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. March 15, 2017
Chair Atherton requested a motion to approve the March 15, 2017 minutes as
presented. K. Barbe motioned to approve the minutes as presented, M. Crull
seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
E. OLD BUSINESS
None
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 2 of 9
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public hearing on a petition by the City of DeKalb to approve a Zoning Map
Amendment to the “LC” Light Commercial District for the property located at 1015
Blackhawk Road.
PETITIONER PRESENTATION / STAFF REPORT
Principal Planner Dan Olson presented on behalf of the petitioner, City of DeKalb.
He stated the rezoning request is for the property located at 1015 Blackhawk Road,
which is currently zoned “LC” Light Commercial, and includes a vacant commercial
building, formerly Campus Cinemas, and the associated parking lot that surrounds
the building. Mr. Olson reported that this rezoning request has been made in
response to the property owner’s claim he was not given adequate due process of
notice of a text amendment, which the City approved in 2013. This text amendment
to the UDO changed residential uses above first floor commercial uses from a
permitted use to a special use in both the Light Commercial and General
Commercial zoning districts.
Mr. Olson stated that on March 27, 2017, in response to the property owner’s
concerns, the City Council approved a motion to initiate a petition to rezone the
subject property to the Light Commercial district to allow the property owner an
opportunity to speak about the appropriateness of LC zoning for the subject site.
Mr. Olson reported that as required by the UDO, a notice of public hearing was
published in the Daily Chronicle on March 25, 2017, and notification letters were
mailed to the owners within 250 feet of the subject property. He added the owner
of the subject site was mailed the notice via certified mail, and the City received
the signed receipt card confirming delivery.
Mr. Olson displayed a map of the subject property and pointed out the surrounding
properties’ zoning designations. He referred to the findings of fact for Standards of
Rezoning as discussed in the staff report. He stated that staff determined the “LC”
Light Commercial zoning category is appropriate for the subject property based
upon the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Unified Development Ordinance, and the
“LaSalle Factors,” as discussed in the staff report.
Pete Occhipinti, owner of 1015 Blackhawk, arrived at 6:10 PM.
Mr. Olson stated the subject property is vacant due to the property owner’s
decision to close the commercial movie theater and not improve the property to
provide another commercial service needed in the area.
Mr. Olson concluded that the staff recommends the Planning and Zoning
Commission forward to the City Council the findings of fact presented and a
recommendation to approve the proposed zoning map amendment.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 3 of 9
At 6:14 PM, Chair Atherton opened the public hearing.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Pete Occhipinti, owner of the subject property located at 1015 Blackhawk Road,
the former Campus Cinema, questioned the necessity for a rezoning hearing when
the zoning is not changing. He stated his attorney was not present but instructed
him to ask for a continuance. He stated he is involved in a lawsuit with the City
because requiring a special use permit to place residential development on his
property negatively affects the value of his property. Mr. Occhipinti noted his
objection to any zoning restriction that would require a special use permit to place
residential development on the site. He stated he had recently submitted a building
permit to the City.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Chair Atherton asked City staff to clarify why the hearing is necessary.
Commissioner Crull added that he and his fellow commissioners would also benefit
from a short explanation.
Attorney Frieders explained that the property owner has asserted on numerous
occasions that he should be able to use his property under the LC zoning
standards in 2012, and he was not afforded due process in 2013 when the City
approved a zoning text amendment that changed the permitted and special uses
in the LC and “GC” General Commercial districts. Mr. Frieders reported that, in
response to the property owner’s concern, the City explored offering another
opportunity to consider in a public forum the appropriateness of the subject
property’s zoning designation.
Mr. Frieders further explained that the hearing is for a zoning map amendment,
which differs from the 2013 text amendment, because zoning map amendments
require more due process under Illinois law, including publishing a public notice
and mailing a notice to each property owner within 250 feet of the subject property.
He stated that Mr. Occhipinti and his attorney received the mailed notice over a
week and a half ago. Mr. Frieders stated that the hearing provides the property
owner an opportunity to present evidence, information, or testimony in a public
forum.
Mr. Frieders reported that City staff considered all possible zoning classifications
for the subject property, including the LC and GC districts. The Community
Development Director and Principal Planner concluded that, based upon the
property’s attributes, LC was the appropriate zoning designation as it existed in
2012 and as the LC zoning designation exists today. He explained that this hearing
allows the Planning and Zoning Commission the opportunity to consider whether
they agree with staff’s determination that LC is the appropriate zoning designation.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 4 of 9
He added that the City Council will also consider at a public meeting the
appropriateness of the LC zoning designation for the subject property.
M. Crull asked if the purpose of the hearing is to review City staff’s evaluation and
any new evidence presented at this hearing to determine if the property’s zoning
designation should remain LC.
Attorney Frieders responded that the Commission can consider recommending
any zoning designation if they determined it was more appropriate.
D. Nier also confirmed that the intent of the hearing is to determine if the LC zoning
designation is appropriate for the subject property.
J. Wright asked if maintaining the LC zoning designation will prevent residential
development on the subject property.
Mr. Frieders replied that residential development is allowed in the LC district if a
property owner obtains approval for special use permit and submits a fully
developed set of plans. He added that the owner of LC zoned property could also
request rezoning to the PD-R or PD-C districts or another designation that allows
residential use.
M. Crull confirmed that if the property remained zoned LC, the property owner
could still pursue a special use permit if he so chose.
K. Barbe questioned the effect of reconfirming the zoning.
Attorney Frieders replied that a zoning map amendment is an opportunity to
evaluate the highest and best use of a property and to determine the most
appropriate zoning designation, according to guidelines set by City code and the
courts. He stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission is tasked with
recommending to the City Council the appropriate zoning designation for the
property. The City Council will then consider the recommendation at a public
meeting and can enact an ordinance for the zoning of the property.
K. Barbe asked what would change for the owner if the property remains zoned
LC.
Attorney Frieders replied that he could not speak for the property owner. He
explained that the owner of the subject property criticized the due process used
when the text amendment was approved even though the City followed state law.
The City sought to address his concerns by petitioning for a zoning map
amendment, which requires the highest level of due process possible.
At 6:24 PM, Chair Atherton invited further comments.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 5 of 9
Mr. Occhipinti stated that if apartments had not been a permitted use in the LC
district when he purchased the subject property, he would not have done so. He
stated he planned for 10 years to build 50 residential units on his property. He
asserted the City does not want more apartments in the area. He said his property
is the only one that can accommodate apartments in the area. He noted that while
the litigation is ongoing, the rezoning hearing should not have been held. He said
he was not given the chance to submit a permit before the hearing. He stated that
apartments will be built on the subject property eventually by him or a future
property owner.
D. Nier stated that the hearing is acting to reaffirm zoning that has been in place
since 2012. She noted that the property owner may place residential development
on his property through a special use permit.
Attorney Frieders stated Ms. Nier was correct. He reported that residential
development in the immediate area has occurred recently. He noted that a petition
for residential development nearby will be considered at the next Commission
meeting.
At 6:27 PM, Chair Atherton closed the public hearing.
Hearing and seeing no further comments, Chair Atherton requested a motion.
MOTION
M. Crull motioned that, based upon the submitted petition and testimony
presented, he recommended that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward
its findings of fact and recommend to the City Council approval of a Zoning Map
Amendment from the “LC” Light Commercial District to the “LC” Light Commercial
District for the subject property located at 1015 Blackhawk Road.
D. Nier seconded the motion.
Chair Atherton requested a roll call vote
VOTE
A roll call vote was taken. Yea – K. Barbe, M. Crull, D. Nier, J. Wright, and Chair
Christina Atherton. Nay – none. The motion passed with a vote of 5-0-2.
2. Public hearing on a petition by Kishwaukee Country Club, Inc. to approve a Zoning
Map Amendment, upon annexation, from the “SFR1” Single-Family Residential
District and the “SFR2” Single-Family Residential District to the “PD-R” Planned
Development – Residential District for the property located at 1901 Sycamore Road
to allow for the construction of a new clubhouse, pro shop, and associated
improvements.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 6 of 9
PETITIONER PRESENTATION
Steve Irving of 4 Arrowhead Lane and president of the Kishwaukee Country Club
introduced Kishwaukee Country Club board members Terry Bishop, Pat Delaney,
and Roger Hopkins; Golf Pro Dave Paeglow; and members Mark Carpenter and
Bob Clark.
Mr. Irving attested that for nearly 40 years, he has found City staff to be very
cooperative in every instance. He praised City staff for their dedication, notably Jo
Ellen Charlton, Dan Olson, Dean Frieders, fire department staff, water department
staff, building department staff, and engineering department staff.
Chair Atherton thanked Mr. Irving for sharing his experience.
Mr. Irving provided a history of the Kishwaukee Country Club, which began over
100 years ago, and predates Hopkins Park and the former DeKalb Sanitarium. He
reported that the current building has significant problems, including flooding, poor
handicap accessibility, and a dysfunctional building layout. The proposed new
clubhouse will be a one-story structure that will house the pro shop and the
clubhouse, with golf car storage in the basement. A new roadway will allow fire
truck access to the front of the building. Handicapped parking will be located next
to the front door. Public utilities are already in place, including water and sanitary.
A storm water retention pond will be placed where the current clubhouse is located.
Mr. Irving stated that the Kishwaukee Country Club allows complimentary golf
course use for golf teams from DeKalb High School and NIU, and many community
events take place at the facility.
Mr. Irving stated that the Kishwaukee Country Club is not seeking any financial
incentives from the City to fund the project.
Mr. Irving displayed images of the proposed project, including renderings of the
exterior, a proposed site plan, and proposed floor plans. He noted the simple
architectural design, building materials, the covered front entryway, and the
covered back patio.
STAFF REPORT
Principal Planner Dan Olson provided background on the proposed project. He
reported that the existing clubhouse and about 15 acres of the facility are currently
within the City limits and zoned SFR-2. The proposal will annex about 52 acres to
the City, rezone the annexed property from SFR-1 to PD-R, and rezone the
property currently in the City from SFR-2 to PD-R. He reported that staff approves
of the plans to reconfiguring the drive up to the clubhouse, to add approximately
16 new parking spaces, and to reduce the semi-circular drive-aisle width from 24
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 7 of 9
feet to 20 feet, as long as fire trucks can safely maneuver and City fire department
staff approves.
Mr. Olson listed the UDO requirement waivers requested and stated that staff does
not object to these waivers:
• Remove the requirement for landscaping islands on the north end of the
parking lot
• Remove the requirement for curbs and gutters around the parking lot to
allow golf carts and maintenance equipment to maneuver freely
• Remove the requirement for subdivision platting at this time, but it will be
required if future redevelopment occurs
• Allow continued use of an existing well water system to water the golf
course and the “half way house” only.
Mr. Olson stated that the plans presented are preliminary but detailed enough that
the final plans need not to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
He referred again to the staff report, which lists how the proposal meets the
Standards of Rezoning.
Mr. Olson reported letters in support for the proposal were received from the
owners of 116, 124, and 132 Greenwood Acres Drive, and 1926 Sycamore Road.
He noted that another letter of support was received just before the start of the
meeting from the owner of 205 Greenwood Acres Drive.
Mr. Olson stated that City staff supports recommending approval of the proposal.
He reported that staff reviewed the preliminary plans, provided comments, and
awaits receipt of the revised plans. He referred to Exhibit A, which accompanies
the staff report and lists the submitted plans and the development standards,
including the UDO waivers, permitted uses, and prohibited uses. He also referred
to Exhibit B in the staff report, which lists the conditions that must be met prior to
final review by the City Council. He indicated that a response letter from the
petitioner agrees to address these items.
At 6:45 PM, Chair Atherton opened the public hearing. She noted there was no
one in the audience who chose to speak. She invited the Commission to comment.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
K. Barbe asked for a timeline for the project.
Mr. Irving replied that revised drawings will be submitted in the next couple of
months, and site work could begin in June or July. However, starting after Labor
Day would be preferable to avoid the facility’s busy summer months. He said the
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 8 of 9
major construction phase may take about six months or more, and he anticipated
opening in about a year.
Mr. Olson noted the existing clubhouse will be used until the new clubhouse is
ready to be occupied.
Chair Atherton asked for clarification of the parking plans.
Mr. Irving replied that the building size and capacity have not been firmly decided,
so parking spaces may be adjusted to meet the UDO’s ratio requirement. He
added that the handicapped parking spaces are required to be located as near to
the entrance as possible.
Mr. Olson clarified that the dark gray parking spaces on the plans will be new.
Attorney Frieders referred to page 45 of the staff report on which the parking
spaces along the east edge will be new pavement. Mr. Olson explained further that
the number of parking spaces have been reduced in the most recent plan due to
reduced capacity of the clubhouse.
Chair Atherton announced a final opportunity for citizen to comment on the
proposal. Attorney Frieders stated that six members of the public in the audience
represent Kishwaukee Country Club and are present to support the proposal.
At 6:50 PM, seeing and hearing no further comments, Chair Atherton closed the
public hearing.
Chair Atherton requested further comments or questions from the Commission or
a motion. D. Nier commented that the proposal was fine and commended the
petitioner and staff for working together effectively to develop the proposed plan.
MOTION
D. Nier motioned that, based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented,
she moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward its findings of fact
and recommend to the City Council approval of a Zoning Map Amendment, upon
annexation, from the “SFR1” Single-Family Residential District to the “PD-R”
Planned Development – Residential District for the property described in Legal A
and approval of a Zoning Map Amendment from the “SFR2” Single-Family
Residential District to the “PD-R” Planned Development – Residential District for
the property described in Legal B to permit a new clubhouse and pro shop and
associated improvements for the property located at 1901 Sycamore Road per the
Planned Development Plans and standards listed on Exhibit A and subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit B.
J. Wright seconded the motion.
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
Page 9 of 9
VOTE
A roll call vote was taken. Yea – K. Barbe, M. Crull, D. Nier, J. Wright, and Chair
Christina Atherton. Nay – none. The motion passed with a vote of 5-0-2.
G. REPORTS / ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Principal Planner Olson announced the next meeting is scheduled for April 26,
2017, at which a public hearing will be held, regarding a petition to rezone 1114
Blackhawk Road to establish a new fraternity house. He reported the City Council’s
approval of the revised meeting schedule. Therefore, the new schedule will begin
with a meeting on May 3rd, which means it is possible the Commission will meet
two weeks in a row.
I. ADJOURNMENT
Seeing and hearing no further comments, Chair Atherton requested a motion to
adjourn. Barbe motioned to adjourn, D. Nier seconded the motion, and the motion
was unanimously approved by voice vote. The meeting adjourned at 6:54 PM
Respectfully Submitted,
Natalie Nelson, Administrative Assistant
Minutes were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 26, 2017.
Agenda
Council Chambers
200 South Fourth Street
DeKalb, IL 60115
AGENDA
Planning and Zoning Commission
April 12, 2017
6:00 PM
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Additions or Deletions)
C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. March 15, 2017
E. OLD BUSINESS
None
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public hearing on a petition by the City of DeKalb to approve a Zoning Map
Amendment to the “LC” Light Commercial District for the property located at
1015 Blackhawk Road.
2. Public hearing on a petition by Kishwaukee Country Club, Inc. to approve a
Zoning Map Amendment, upon annexation, from the “SFR1” Single-Family
Residential District and the “SFR2” Single-Family Residential District to the
“PD-R” Planned Development – Residential District for the property located at
1901 Sycamore Road to allow for the construction of a new clubhouse, pro
shop and associated improvements.
G. REPORTS/ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
H. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 15, 2017
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a Meeting on March 15, 2017 at the City of
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 S. Fourth St., DeKalb, Illinois.
Chair Atherton called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
A. ROLL CALL
Natalie Nelson called the roll. Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission
present at roll call: Vicki Buckley, David Castro, Matthew Crull, and Chair Christina
Atherton. Members absent were Katharina Barbe, Deborah Nier and Jerry Wright.
City staff present were Community Development Director Jo Ellen Charlton,
Principal Planner Dan Olson, and Administrative Assistant Natalie Nelson.
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)
Chair Atherton requested a motion to approve the March 15, 2017 agenda. M. Crull
motioned to approve the agenda, V. Buckley seconded the motion, and the motion
was approved by unanimous voice vote.
C. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
None.
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. February 15, 2017
Chair Atherton requested a motion to approve the February 15, 2017 minutes. V.
Buckley motioned to approve the minutes as presented, D. Castro seconded the
motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous voice vote.
E. OLD BUSINESS
None.
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public hearing on a petition by the DeKalb Sanitary District for a zoning map
amendment from the “SFR2” Single Family Residential District to the “PD-R”
Planned Development - Residential District, amendment to Ordinance No. 06-
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 15, 2017
Page 2 of 7
74, approval of Planned Development preliminary and final plans and other
approvals as required for the subject property to allow for the expansion of the
DeKalb Sanitary District Facility located on 51.84 acres along Hollister Avenue
and Sycamore Road.
PETITIONER PRESENTATION
Mark Eddington, District Manager of the DeKalb Sanitary District, located at 303
Hollister Avenue, presented on behalf of the District before the Commission. He
stated that the current plan is for Phase 1B improvements, which is the second
and final stage of regulatory upgrades that will be required by law in the near future.
He said the proposed improvements will allow the facility to meet the community’s
wastewater treatment needs for the next 100 years. He reported the Phase 1A bio-
solids treatment rehab improvements were completed in 2012. Since that time, the
District has acquired 19 properties on Hollister Avenue and designed the Phase
1B improvements. He said the proposed intergovernmental agreement will be
consolidating and rezoning the properties, vacate the Parkside Oaks Townhomes
Planned Development from 2006, vacate the Hollister Avenue right-of-way, and
dedicate easements for relocation of a water main.
Mr. Eddington provided a history of the District, which was established in 1928 and
located at then-current northern edge of DeKalb, separate from any residential
neighborhoods. He explained that the District is regulated by the Federal EPA and
has been upgraded several times due to increase population and to meet more
stringent regulatory standards. He displayed on the screen map images of the
past, current, and the proposed expansion of the Sanitary District’s operations.
Mr. Eddington stated that proposal will comply with upcoming regulatory
requirements, including EPA mandated improvements in processing of ammonia,
removing phosphorus, and new treatment during wet weather. It will also
modernize the operation, as some of the equipment dates back to the 1930s. He
stated that no new capacity is proposed with this project. The hydraulic equipment
will be improved to be more efficient. The consolidated properties will allow
expansion within the new facility’s footprint. The updated equipment will allow the
facility to create its own power from the sewage, rendering it energy-independent
by 2030. The property improvements will increase safety and site security through
lighting, fencing, and gates.
Mr. Eddington stated that moving an entire water treatment facility is complex and
often requires installation of temporary equipment to meet the ongoing permit
limits. He discussed alternative sites that were considered, including:
• Fifty-two acres on South First Street near the tollway is owned by the
Sanitary District. This location would require re-laying all sewer pipes to
route them to the south side of town, construction of new buildings, and
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 15, 2017
Page 3 of 7
installation of 30-foot high towers to provide necessary hydraulics. The
estimated cost for this option was more than $100 million.
• The land to the southwest of the existing facility was also considered. The
low-lying land and wetland conditions would require construction of 30-foot
high towers to provide necessary hydraulics, and a nearby creek would
need to be rerouted, which would also be expensive.
• The land to the northeast of the existing facility, including the Hollister
Avenue properties, is comprised of 35 acres and was determined to be the
most economical option.
Mr. Eddington listed a number of reasons the expansion of the current site is
preferable. Land features allow for improved hydraulics without building towers.
Current operations can easily transferred to the new facility when it is complete,
and the old tanks can be repurposed for wet weather water treatment. Future facility
expansion would be possible without purchasing additional property. Safety and
security would be improved with fencing around the working facility with a separate
administration building accessible to the public. Existing and additional greenspace
buffers will shield neighboring homes and businesses. In addition, the Sanitary
District’s new tanks will produce excavated material that the Park District will use to
build a new sledding hill.
Mr. Eddington provided an overview of the layout of the proposed improved site.
He pointed out the locations of new primary and secondary treatment, excess flow
capacity, and a new administration building located near Sycamore Road. He
added that the new facility will have the ability to capture methane created during
solids processing for use to fuel generators and provide heat and electricity to the
entire facility, saving money and improving the environment.
Mr. Eddington reported that, just before this hearing, the bids were opened. He
stated a final cost of $46 million was cited in the bids, which was about 10% lower
than the projected estimates. He stated that this project will not increase user rates
any more than inflation, expected to be less than 3% per year.
Mr. Eddington addressed neighborhood concerns:
• Odor – This past summer, odor was measured and found to be
undetectable a few feet away from the tank. Since the users are not
expected change, the nature of the waste will not change, so the odor will
not change. If an unexpected odor arises, safeguards will be in place,
including a chemical treatment to neutralize odors immediately. If odor
neutralization becomes frequent and expensive issue, the tanks are
constructed so that covers could be added and if necessary, captured air
would be filtered.
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 15, 2017
Page 4 of 7
• Appearance – Mr. Eddington reported that Sanitary District intends to
maintain the natural beauty and respect the existing wildlife of the area. The
Sanitary District has consulted property owners who have requested robust
natural landscape buffers with the new facility’s fencing placed inside the
tree line. Mr. Eddington displayed images of current landscaping near Krpan
Court homes, Hopkins Park, and Parkside Apartments. The Sanitary District
has consulted property owners for their preferences for types of new trees
and locations for additional landscaping. He noted that neighboring
businesses on Sycamore Road have existing fencing with existing trees
behind them. The Sanitary District plans to add additional trees where
necessary and install the new fencing inside the tree line.
• Noise – Mr. Eddington stated that larger equipment with motors will be
placed inside buildings and the smaller motors will have noise levels similar
to a conversation, at approximately 70 decibels. He said the new equipment
will be quieter than the existing equipment.
• Lighting – Mr. Eddington stated that the facility is not normally staffed at
night. Some lighting will be installed along the drive from the Sycamore
Road entrance and in the administration building parking lot. All exterior
lighting will be dark sky compliant. The existing lighting along Hollister
Avenue is brighter than the proposed new lighting.
• Security/safety – Mr. Eddington stated that the current site’s entrance is not
ideal, through a residential neighborhood without sidewalks and into a
working wastewater treatment plant. Proposed improvements will improve
security and safety. Hollister Avenue will be straightened, the new entrance
will lead directly to the administrative building, and the parking lots will allow
visitors to park near the front of the building and staff to park and enter
behind the building within the security fence.
Mr. Eddington provided an overview of the projected schedule:
• Late January 2017 – request for bids was released
• March 15, 2017 – bids were opened (today)
• April 2017 – project will be awarded
• June 2017 – secure loan commitment from EPA and begin demolition of 20
homes on Hollister, which the DeKalb Police and Fire Departments are
using for training purposes
• July/August 2017 – begin construction
• Summer 2020 – complete construction (3 years)
Mr. Eddington expressed understanding for the sensitive nature of the project,
changing the nature of the neighborhood and demolishing homes. He thanked the
City for working with Sanitary District to develop and execute the project.
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 15, 2017
Page 5 of 7
STAFF REPORT
Before opening the public hearing, Chair Atherton asked City of DeKalb Principal
Planner Olson if he had received a public comment by phone today. He confirmed
he did receive a phone call and referred also to the written Citizen Response Form
received, included in the meeting packet materials (page 36). He noted that the
staff report recommends approving a continuance of the public hearing due to
outstanding issues to be resolved.
Mr. Olson summarized the petition, which includes rezoning the site from SFR-2
to PD-R, amendment to the ordinance from 2006 for a townhome development
that was not built, and approval of the preliminary and final plans and final plat with
re-subdivision to allow the Sanitary District to expand its facility. He reported that
staff and Strand Associates, the City’s engineering consultant, have reviewed the
petitioner’s plans and provided responses. He stated that further discussion
occurred after the petitioner received the responses, and some revisions are
necessary, which the petitioner will complete for consideration at the Commission’s
next meeting on March 29, 2017.
Mr. Olson stated for the record that Laura Bird and John Schaeffer of 207 Tilton
Park Dr. submitted a written Citizen Response Form, and Jean Rosen of 633
Krpan Ct. called the City to voice her concerns, including the relocation of Hollister
Avenue, which will run along the back of her property, dust, lighting, and safety.
Mr. Olson reported that Ms. Rosen acknowledged the necessity of the project and
appreciated the Sanitary District’s efforts to communicate with its neighbors.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
At 6:35 PM, Chair Atherton invited members of the public to comment on the
proposal.
Barry Wolf of 1221 Sycamore Road addressed the Commission. He stated that his
home is the only home left, located at the corner of Hollister Avenue and Sycamore
Road. He asked why the Sanitary District did not seek to purchase his property
along with the others.
Mr. Eddington responded that the Sanitary District sent letters to every property
owner and received no response from him.
Mr. Wolf acknowledged he might have missed the letter. He stated he does not
want to be the sole house left, and he is interested in selling his property. He asked
how the proposed plan would affect his property value if he stayed, and he asked
if the proposed plan would affect the groundwater.
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 15, 2017
Page 6 of 7
Mr. Eddington responded that groundwater would not be affected, and he
suggested that they speak after the meeting. He added the Sanitary District’s
Board of Trustees would need to consider this matter.
Chair Atherton noted that two other individuals in the audience chose not to speak.
Chair Atherton posed Ms. Rosen’s questions to Mr. Eddington.
Mr. Eddington responded that Hollister Avenue will be an access road only for
employees and visitors to the Sanitary District facility. Since residential traffic will
be eliminated, fewer vehicles will be using the road. He acknowledged that it will
be in close proximity to Ms. Rosen’s property and provided assurances the
Sanitary District is committed to providing robust screening. Mr. Eddington
acknowledged that dust during the project is possible and stated that the
construction agreements will require water trucks to be onsite to water down the
houses during demolition and during construction.
Hearing and seeing no further citizen comments, Chair Atherton noted the public
hearing remains open.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
D. Castro asked for clarification regarding Ordinance No. 06-74. Planner Olson
responded that in 2006 Parkside Oaks Townhome subdivision was approved and
the property was zoned PD-R, but no building occurred. The ordinance must be
removed to allow for the current project.
D. Castro asked if visits to the site can be arranged. Mike Holland, District Engineer
of the Sanitary District, responded that tours occur frequently. He invited
individuals and groups to call to schedule a tour and welcomed visitors to come
learn about wastewater treatment.
Chair Atherton asked for clarification of outstanding items. D. Olson responded the
plans are being revised according to the recommendations from staff and Strand
Associates. After the revised plans are submitted and reviewed, a final staff report
will be prepared with a recommendation to the Commission.
MOTION
M. Crull moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission continue the public
hearing for this case to the March 29, 2017 meeting with direction to the applicant
to finalize plans as indicated in the staff report and as directed pursuant to the
finalization of reviews still pending, and direction to staff to finalize necessary
findings of fact and any conditions of approval to be incorporated into the
Development Agreement.
Planning and Zoning Commission
March 15, 2017
Page 7 of 7
V. Buckley seconded the motion.
VOTE
Chair Atherton requested a roll call vote. Yea – V. Buckley, D. Castro, M. Crull,
and Chair Atherton. Nay – none. The motion passed 4-0-0.
G. REPORTS / ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Planner Olson reported that at the next meeting on March 29, 2017, the Sanitary
District public hearing will be continued and a petition for a Special Use Permit and
Site Plan Review for a Mobile Gas Station on the southeast corner of North First
Street and Hillcrest Drive will be heard.
Mr. Olson also reported that the City Council approved the Planning and Zoning
Commission’s recommendations for principal use video gaming establishments
with one revision; they would be allowed as special uses only, not permitted uses,
in the General Commercial zoning district. He noted that the City Council also
approved an amendment to the City’s Liquor Code to limit the licenses for principal
use video gaming establishments to the current number, which is seven.
Mr. Olson advised the Commission that City staff will propose to the City Council
a revised Planning and Zoning Commission meeting schedule for meetings to be
held on the Wednesdays before City Council meetings. This will provide more time
for staff to prepare for City Council meetings and less time between Planning and
Zoning Commission recommendations and City Council consideration. The
present commissioners voiced approval for the schedule change. Staff will poll
absent commissioners for their preferences. If the City Council approves the
revised meeting schedule, the change will start in May, with meetings on May 3rd
and May 17th.
I. ADJOURNMENT
Seeing and hearing no further comments, Chair Atherton requested a motion to
adjourn. D. Castro motioned to adjourn, M. Crull seconded the motion, and the
motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. The meeting adjourned at 6:51
PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Natalie Nelson, Administrative Assistant
Minutes were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on .
STAFF REPORT
April 7, 2017
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Dan Olson, Principal Planner
RE: 1015 Blackhawk Road – Zoning Map Amendment to the “LC” Light
Commercial District
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Purpose Approval of a Zoning Map Amendment
from the “LC” Light Commercial District to
the “LC” Light Commercial District
B. Owner/Applicant West Suburban Bank Trust #12128/City
of DeKalb
C. Location and Size 1015 Blackhawk Road; 2.43 acres
D. Existing Zoning and Land Use “LC” Light Commercial District/vacant
commercial building and associated
parking lot
E. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North– “LC” District; Restaurant
South – “MFR2” Multiple Family
Residential District; Apartments,
Greek Housing
East – “MFR2”; Greek Housing,
Apartments
West – “LC” and “PD-R”; Various
commercial uses, Apartments
F. Comprehensive Plan Designation Commercial
II. APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant for this petition is the City of DeKalb. The subject site located at 1015
Blackhawk Drive is 2.43 acres in size and currently contains a vacant commercial building
with an associated parking lot. On March 27, 2017 the City Council approved a motion
initiating a re-zoning of the subject property to the “LC” Light Commercial District.
II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The subject site currently contains a vacant one story commercial building that was the
former Campus Cinemas. The site is presently zoned “LC” Light Commercial and has
been zoned that classification for many years. The movie theater was closed by the
owner of the property several years ago. In 2013, the City approved a text amendment
Page 2 of 8
to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) that changed second-floor residential
uses from being a permitted use to a special use in the “LC” and “GC” General
Commercial Districts. That text amendment was undertaken following the provision of
public notice in accordance with the requirements of the Illinois Municipal Code and the
conduct of a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. The current
property owner initiated a lawsuit against the City in 2015 alleging that they had not
received adequate due process and notice of that zoning text amendment. The City
followed all procedures as outlined in the UDO and state law in approving the text
amendments, and the 2015 lawsuit was subsequently dismissed by the Court, on the
City’s Motion. In 2016, the owner applied for a special use permit for apartments above
the ground floor for the subject site and the request was denied by the City due to the
owner’s failure to comply with multiple provisions of the UDO. A significant deficiency in
the application was a failure to design the correct number of parking spaces to
accommodate the proposed use and addition with a design that complied with the UDO,
or to request relief from the provisions of the UDO that were not in compliance. The
property owner has re-filed a lawsuit against the City, again asserting that they did not
receive adequate due process and notice when the 2013 text amendments to the UDO
were approved.
The City has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, again based on compliance with all
legal requirements. However, the present matter involves a property owner asserting
that he did not receive adequate notice or process. Accordingly, as an accommodation
to the property owner, on March 27, 2017 the City Council initiated a petition to re-zone
the property to the “LC” Light Commercial District. This proceeding is designed to give
the owner personal notice and a public hearing at which he can present evidence or
testimony regarding what he believes to be the appropriate zoning for the property.
The zoning map amendment would re-zone the property to the “LC” District under the
current provisions of the UDO, including second-floor residential dwelling units as a
special use. The re-zoning request and resulting public hearing will provide due process
to the property owner and allow them to speak regarding the appropriateness of the “LC”
zoning on the subject property.
Page 3 of 8
Zoning Map of Area
III. STANDARDS OF REZONING (ARTICLE 20.04.04 OF UDO)
1. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, or
conditions have changed to warrant the need for different types of land uses in
that area. The proposed rezoning is appropriate considering the length of time
the property has been vacant, as originally zoned, and taking into account the
surrounding areas trend in development.
Page 4 of 8
The 2005 Comprehensive Plan recommends the subject site for commercial uses. The
Greek Row Neighborhood Revitalization Plan approved by the City in October, 2002
revealed there was a lack of adequate businesses within walking distance to serve the
needs of the neighborhood residents. The Plan recommended that new commercial
development in the area should be neighborhood focused to take advantage of the
college-orientated market. The “LC” Light Commercial zoning is most suited for those
types of uses. The “LC” Light Commercial Zoning is appropriate for the site and meets
the intent of the City’s Comprehensive Planning documents.
Development trends in the area include recent improvements to existing commercial
properties such as the Casey’s General Store (zoned “LC” Light Commercial) at the
northwest corner of Annie Glidden Road and Hillcrest Drive. A new restaurant/sports
bar recently opened in an existing commercial building at the southwest corner of Annie
Glidden Road and Hillcrest Drive.
The adjoining property to the north accommodates a successful up-scale Italian
restaurant. The adjoining property to the west is presently improved with a two-story
mixed use building with commercial on the first floor and residential units above on a
site that provides a code compliant number of parking spaces.
2. The proposed rezoning conforms to the intent and purpose of the Unified
Development Ordinance.
The Unified Development Ordinance indicates the “LC” Light Commercial District is
intended to be located in areas adjacent to collector streets and designed to
accommodate the retail and limited service needs of a larger consumer population than
is typically serviced by the “NC” Neighborhood Commercial District. The subject site is
located at the northwest corner of Blackhawk Road and Hillcrest Drive, which is a
designated collector street. Light Commercial (LC) zoning is the most appropriate
zoning classification for the subject site and would allow for development that meets the
intent and purpose of the UDO.
3. The proposed rezoning will not have a significantly detrimental effect on
the long-range development of adjacent properties or adjacent land uses.
Much of the surrounding area is already developed. Properties directly to the north and
west are zoned “LC” Light Commercial. Permitted uses in the “LC” District are
compatible with the land uses in the surrounding area. The multi-tenant commercial
building directly to the west along Hillcrest Drive is zoned “LC” Light Commercial and
has uses that serve the immediate area. The proposed zoning of “LC” will not have a
detrimental effect on the adjacent properties or land uses as it entitles the subject
property to commercial uses that are complementary with existing and adjacent land
uses along Hillcrest Drive and Blackhawk Road.
4. The proposed rezoning constitutes an expansion of an existing zoning
district that, due to the lack of undeveloped land, can no longer meet the demand
Page 5 of 8
for the intended land uses.
The subject property is proposed for “LC” Light Commercial District zoning. The “LC”
District will allow the property to be used for commercial uses that will be compatible
with the surrounding area.
5. Adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided.
Adequate public services are provided to the subject property. A 184 space parking lot
is located adjacent to the building and full access drives exist to both Hillcrest Drive and
Blackhawk Road. Bus stops also exist along Hillcrest Drive and Blackhawk Road.
IV. ADDITIONAL FACTORS (“LASALLE” FACTORS)
In addition to the factors enumerated in the City’s Unified Development Ordinance, the
Planning and Zoning Commission may wish to evaluate those factors identified under
Illinois law as being relevant to the consideration of an appropriate zoning classification
for a given parcel of land. Commonly referred to as the “LaSalle” factors based upon
the Illinois Supreme Court case LaSalle National Bank v. County of Cook, 12 Ill.2d 40
(1957), the factors are as follows:
1) The existing uses and zoning of nearby property.
This factor is analyzed in this report, and favors the implementation of LC zoning as
described.
2) The extent to which property values would be diminished by the zoning
requested.
There is no indication that the property value of the subject site would be diminished by
the zoning requested, in comparison to any other presently available zoning
designation. The property is presently improved with a commercial building, and the
denial of a commercial zoning designation would render the existing building useless,
which would substantially impair property values. There is no indication that imposition
of an alternate commercial zoning designation, such as General Commercial (GC)
would benefit the property’s value, and under the UDO, GC is not appropriate for a
property served by streets of the nature serving the property.
3) The extent to which destruction of property values benefits the health,
safety or welfare of the public.
Again, there is no indication that there is any destruction of property value through the
LC zoning. The LC zoning appears to be the zoning that maximizes the value and utility
of the property. Of note, in the 2015 litigation, the Owner submitted information to the
Court suggesting that the LC zoning for the property maximized its value, suggesting
that the Owner agrees with this conclusion.
Page 6 of 8
4) The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship on the
individual owner.
As noted in this report, the City’s studies of the area suggest that there is a need for
commercial properties and commercial services in the area. The City is presently
considering the completion of an Annie Glidden North project study to further explore
this commercial need. The public would benefit from quality commercial uses being
provided at the property. As noted above, the implementation of LC zoning would not
have any hardship on the property owner, in comparison to any other available zoning
classification.
5) The suitability of the property for the zoned purpose.
The property has commercial properties contiguous to it as noted in this report. It
presently is improved with a commercial building. The property has a large parking
area that could be reconfigured to comply with applicable requirements of the UDO.
The shape and size of the property are highly suitable for commercial use as a LC
zoned parcel, and the location of the property is ideal to provide commercial services to
nearby commercial properties. The property, as LC, provides an orderly transition
between commercial and residential uses.
6) The public need for the proposed purpose.
As noted in this report, City studies have concluded for over 15 years that there is
extensive need for commercially zoned properties in the area, and need for commercial
services from such properties. The public need for LC zoned properties and
commercial services is great.
7) The thoroughness with which the City has planned and zoned its land use.
The City has completed both comprehensive plans and neighborhood-specific studies
to comprehensively plan and zone land uses in the area of the property. As referenced
in this report, there are a number of studies that have been completed and which are
presently under consideration, that bear out the thoroughness of this planning.
8) The time period during which the property has remained vacant as zoned.
As the property is presently zoned LC, this factor would not seem to be applicable.
However, the vacancy of the property appears to relate more to the owner’s decision to
discontinue the commercial movie theater on the property, and the owner’s decision to
refrain from reconfiguring the property to provide the commercial services needed in the
area.
Page 7 of 8
V. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented, I recommend that the
Planning and Zoning Commission forward its findings of fact and recommend to the City
Council approval of a Zoning Map Amendment from the “LC” Light Commercial District to
the “LC” Light Commercial District for the subject property located at 1015 Blackhawk
Road.
Page 8 of 8
STAFF REPORT
April 7, 2017
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Dan Olson, Principal Planner
RE: Annexation, Zoning Map Amendment from the “SFR1” Single-Family
Residential District and the “SFR2” District to the “PD-R” Planned
Development – Residential District; Approval of Planned Development
Plan – 1901 Sycamore Road (Kishwaukee Country Club)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Purpose Annexation and approval of a Zoning Map
Amendment from the “SFR1” and “SFR2”
Single-Family Residential Districts to the
“PD-R” District; Approval of Planned
Development Plan
B. Owner/Applicant Kishwaukee Country Club, Inc.
C. Location and Size 1901 Sycamore Road; Currently annexed
15.83 acres; Proposed to be annexed
51.76 acres; Total acres – 67.59 acres
D. Existing Zoning and Land Use “SFR2” and unincorporated; Golf course
with clubhouse and associated buildings
E. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North– “SFR2” Single-Family
Residential; single-family homes
South – “GC” General Commercial and
“LI” Light Industrial; commercial
East – Unincorporated and “GC”;
single-family homes and
commercial
West – “SFR2”; single-family homes
and park
F. Comprehensive Plan Designation Parks and Recreation
II. APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The City has received an annexation petition, rezoning application and associated plans
from the Kishwaukee Country Club in order to annex 51.76 acres adjacent to a 15.83 acre
parcel that is already in the City and which contains their clubhouse. The Club would like
to construct a new clubhouse and pro shop and associated improvements. Waivers are
being requested to the Unified Development Ordinance for landscaping, parking lot
design, subdivision platting requirements and the continued use of the well water system.
III. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The Kishwaukee Country Club is located along the west side of Sycamore Road and
contains about 180 acres over 18-holes. The Club has been in operation at its present
location for well over 100 years. The entire golf course is in unincorporated DeKalb
County, except for 15.83 acres that contain the clubhouse, a few accessory structures
and a small portion of the course. The applicant would like to annex the remainder of the
“front nine” of the course totaling 51.76 acres. The Club is proposing to construct a new
one story clubhouse and pro shop and associated improvements. The clubhouse would
Page 2 of 12
be built just to the west of the current facility and contain about 8,500 sq. ft. of space.
The current clubhouse is about 16,000 sq. ft. The main level of the new clubhouse will
contain a 150 seat dining and bar area, kitchen, men’s and women’s lockers, offices and
the pro shop. The lower level will be accessible for golf carts on the north end of the
building and will contain storage for just over 60 carts and will also include general
storage area. There will also be a covered outdoor patio area to the west of the
clubhouse.
The proposed clubhouse will be constructed of asphalt roof shingles, LP Smartside
Siding (engineered wood), clad windows and wood trim. The applicant is indicating the
construction of the clubhouse will be complete by the spring of 2018. The existing
clubhouse will remain open until completion of the new clubhouse and then will be
demolished.
The existing access off of Sycamore Road will be maintained. The new driveway will
loop in front of the clubhouse and the parking lot will be slightly re-configured to
accommodate the proposed improvements. The number of required parking spaces
based upon the number of seats in the clubhouse and employees will be 120 spaces.
The number of provided parking spaces will be 124. Sixteen new parking spaces will be
added to the east side of the existing parking lot to meet the number of spaces required.
The applicant has requested the drive-aisle width for the semi-circle be reduced on the
plans from 24 feet to 20 feet (not reduced in the parking lot). The applicant indicates that
the drive is private and will be seldom used and they are concerned about the aesthetics
of a wider drive. The existing drive from Sycamore Road is about 20 feet in width. The
Fire Department has asked that the plans be revised showing the fire truck turning
templates on the 20 foot drive width to ensure that trucks can safely maneuver through
the semi-circle drive. The applicants will be revising the plans to show the turning
templates. The staff does not object to the reduction as long as fire trucks can safely
move through the site.
A staff request for consideration of pedestrian connections between the parking lot and
the clubhouse was rejected by the applicant, who indicated the proposed driveway can
be used by pedestrians. They also note any additional pavement would interfere with
existing trees and distract from the aesthetics of the location.
Waivers to the UDO
The applicant is requesting waivers to the UDO regarding landscaping, parking lot
design, subdivision platting requirements and the continued use of the well water system
to water the golf course.
The UDO requires landscape islands at the end of parking aisles and one additional
island for every 20 parking spaces. The plans show landscape islands to be added to the
ends of most of the parking aisles and at intermediate areas except for a few on the
north end of the parking lot. The areas on the north end of the parking lot will not be
Page 3 of 12
heavily traveled and the staff supports the waiver. The new landscape islands will
include shade trees and shrubs.
The UDO requires curb and gutter at the perimeter of parking lots and around landscape
islands. The applicant is proposing not curbing the parking lot except for areas around
the handicap parking spaces and the new landscape islands at the south end of the
parking area. The waiver is necessitated to allow golf carts and maintenance equipment
to maneuver from the parking lot, clubhouse, pool and golf course without being limited
by curb and gutters. The staff supports this waiver.
The applicant is requesting not to subdivide the property in conjunction with the project at
this time. The property will remain under one ownership and there are no new
easements or dedications required so the staff does not object to this waiver. One of the
conditions in the recommendation is that if the property is redeveloped in the future, the
property shall be required to be fully platted in accordance with then-current
requirements.
The applicant is requesting to continue to use the well water system to water the golf
course and the “halfway house”. The UDO puts limitations on existing water wells. All
potable, fire suppression and domestic water use for the structures, other than the “half
way house”, will be through the City owned water system. City staff does not object to
this waiver.
Planned Development Plans
The applicant is requesting the plans submitted be approved on a preliminary level.
There will be no final plat required or final plans reviewed by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. The plans have been reviewed by staff and the latest comments are
provided in the packet. The applicant is in the process of revising the plans and did
provide a response letter, which is included in the packet. The comments are minor in
nature and will not alter the layout of the site.
IV. STANDARDS OF REZONING
1. The proposed rezoning conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, or
conditions have changed to warrant the need for different types of land uses in
that area. The proposed rezoning is appropriate considering the length of time
the property has been vacant, as originally zoned, and taking into account the
surrounding areas trend in development.
The 2005 Comprehensive Plan recommends the subject site for Parks and Recreation.
The proposed annexation will bring an additional 52 acres into the City and will allow for
consistent zoning for the clubhouse, pro shop and associated structures and for the
“front nine” holes of the golf course. Staff believes that the proposed development
meets the intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Page 4 of 12
2. The proposed rezoning conforms to the intent and purpose of the Unified
Development Ordinance.
Re-zoning of the subject site to the PD-R District will allow the project to comply with the
regulations of the UDO except for waivers to the Unified Development Ordinance for
landscaping, parking lot design, subdivision platting requirements and the continued use
of the well water system. The exceptions to the UDO are justified based upon the nature
of the use and the need to maintain an open space setting and aesthetically pleasing
appearance of the facility.
3. The proposed rezoning will not have a significantly detrimental effect on
the long-range development of adjacent properties or adjacent land uses.
The proposed rezoning, and associated annexation, will bring the golf course under
more unified control. The remainder of the golf course is to the north, Hopkins Park is
to the south, single family residential to the west and east and commercial to the
southeast along Sycamore Road. The proposed rezoning should not have a detrimental
effect on the adjacent properties or land uses.
4. The proposed rezoning constitutes an expansion of an existing zoning
district that, due to the lack of undeveloped land, can no longer meet the demand
for the intended land uses.
The subject property is proposed for “PD-R” Planned Development - Residential zoning.
The “PD-R” District will allow the property to be used for uses that will be compatible
with the surrounding area.
5. Adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided.
Existing utilities already serve the site. The existing access off of Sycamore Road will be
maintained and a new drive and improved parking area will be added. An existing water
well will remain and will be used to water the golf course and the “halfway house”.
V. CITIZEN INPUT
To date, letters of support from 116, 124 and 132 Greenwood Acres Drive and 1926
Sycamore Road (R.P. Lumber Company) have been received and are made part of the
record.
VI. RECOMMENDATION
Sample Motion:
Based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented, I move that the Planning and
Zoning Commission forward its findings of fact and recommend to the City Council
Page 5 of 12
approval of a Zoning Map Amendment, upon annexation, from the “SFR1” Single-Family
Residential District to the “PD-R” Planned Development – Residential District for the
property described in Legal A and approval of a Zoning Map Amendment from the “SFR2”
Single-Family Residential District to the “PD-R” Planned Development – Residential
District for the property described in Legal B to permit a new clubhouse and pro shop and
associated improvements for the property located at 1901 Sycamore Road per the
Planned Development Plans and standards listed on Exhibit A and subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit B.
Page 6 of 12
Exhibit A
Planned Development Plans
• Preliminary Building Layout, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared CES Inc. dated 3/3/17
• Tributary/Pond/Fire Turning Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared CES Inc. dated
3/3/17
• Main Level Plan and Lower Level Plan dated 2/28/17
• Schematic Typical Section, Sheet A 4.0, prepared by Mark Zinni Construction,
dated 3/7/17
• East Elevation Plan, Sheet A3, prepared by Mark Zinni Construction, dated
3/6/17
• Course Side Elevation Plan, prepared by Mark Zinni Construction
• Landscape Details, 2 sheets, prepared by Steve Irving dated 3/7/17
• US Architectural Lighting Details, 4 sheets.
• Wall Sign Elevation Detail dated 3/27/17
Development Standards
1) Development of the subject site shall meet those standards as set forth in the UDO
except as provided below:
a) The City shall not require the submission of a plat of resubdivision, however if the
property is redeveloped in the future, the property shall be required to be fully platted in
accordance with then-current requirements.
b) The City shall not require landscape islands at the end of parking
aisles and one additional island for every 20 parking spaces, except as shown on
the Planned Development Plans.
c) The City shall not require curb and gutter at the perimeter of
parking lots and around landscape islands, except as shown on the Planned
Development Plans.
d) The City shall allow the continued use of the well water system to water
the golf course and the “halfway house”.
2) Permitted Uses
a) The construction and maintenance of a golf course facility, golf course
country club (including recreational, restaurant and banquet use of said facility),
use of ancillary improvements as depicted on the Planned Development Plans
(including but not limited to swimming pools and recreational areas) and the
operation of a retail Golf Club Pro Shop.
Page 7 of 12
b) The conduct of indoor and outdoor banquet and special entertainment
events.
c) The construction and maintenance of one or more buildings to house and
repair country club golf carts and maintenance / groundskeeping equipment.
3) Prohibited Uses:
a. Any use which is not expressly authorized as a Permitted or Special Use.
b. Any residential use.
c. Community residences.
d. Group homes.
e. Parking lots, as a principal use (and more specifically, any lease, rental or
otherwise offering use of on-site parking by any party other than a resident or
employee of the Property).
f. Outdoor storage of any form not expressly authorized herein.
g. Sales or construction trailers, intermodal shipping containers, van trailers or
similar items used for storage or office purposes, temporary structures or similar
appurtenances used for office, work or storage purposes. Any such item shall be
deemed to be used for office, work or storage purposes if it remains on the
Property in one exterior location for more than twenty-four (24) hours at any
given time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section shall not apply during any
time when there is a building or demolition permit outstanding.
h. Adult oriented uses; adult bookstores or other establishment displaying, leasing,
trading, or selling pornographic materials or any similar use as defined in the
UDO, whether as a principal use or accessory to an allowed principal use (the
foregoing not prohibiting a general audiences bookstore with not more than 1%
of its merchandise being adult-oriented).
i. Animal boarding.
j. Fire, bankruptcy sale, wholesale, overstock auction house or their equivalent
(except that a Court-Ordered bankruptcy sale of less than thirty days duration
shall be permitted).
k. Massage parlor or other similar massage establishment.
l. "Head shop", marijuana dispensary, hookah bars, or establishments that
specialize primarily in the sale of tobacco, tobacco paraphernalia, glass pipes,
implements utilized to burn or concentrate a substance for the purpose of
permitting the smoke, fumes or vapor therefrom to be inhaled, or drug
paraphernalia.
m. Cemeteries and mausoleums.
n. Funeral homes and mortuaries.
o. Automobile, truck, motorcycle, ATV, motor-scooter or motor vehicle/recreational
vehicle/implement repair, service, sales, rentals, parts or components sales or
installation, or maintenance.
p. Contractor offices associated with onsite storage of vehicles, supplies or
equipment, building material or equipment sales, building or equipment service or
Page 8 of 12
maintenance offices, or the equivalent (except that temporary contractor offices
present during demolition or construction activities on the Property shall be
permitted).
q. Warehouses, whether accessory to a retail use, or self-service storage.
r. Tattoo parlor, massage parlor, psychic reading / tarot card shop.
s. Church or religious uses.
t. Gas or fuel station or any form of car wash or auto detailing center.
u. A dollar store or a discount department store or wholesale establishment.
v. A second-hand store.
w. A cash for gold store.
x. A full service, FDIC-insured bank, credit union, retail bank, consumer banking
institution or savings and loan.
y. Currency exchange, money wiring, check cashing facility or equivalent (as a
primary use).
z. Auto title loan or post-dated check or payday loan facility or equivalent, unless
associated with a full-service federally-insured bank, credit union or savings and
loan.
aa. Pawn shops.
bb. Fitness clubs or workout facilities (other than as permitted subordinate to the
residential use described above).
cc. Drive-thru facilities.
Page 9 of 12
Exhibit B
Prior to final review by the City Council, the following comments should be addressed.
1) Since two-way traffic will be maintained with the new layout, consideration should
be given for directional signage as you come into the site indicating areas to the parking
lot and the clubhouse.
2) Revise the plans to show the truck turning templates on the 20 foot drive width to
ensure that fire trucks can safely maneuver through the semi-circle drive. If safe
movements cannot be accomplished, as determined by the Fire Department, the drive
width shall revert back to 24 feet.
3) Provide a typical parking space and drive aisle detail with dimensions. Minimum
size per the UDO is 9’ x 19’ for parking spaces and 24‘ for the drive-aisle.
4) The Parking Requirements table on Sheet 1 of 1 indicates 225 seats and 23
employees. The Main Level Floor Plan detail indicates about 135 seats. Please verify
the number of seats proposed and employees and modify the table as needed.
5) The Landscape Plan indicates a 10’ high SNTS-254-11-2 single head light
fixture, however the detail provided notes this model has a pole height of 25 feet.
Please clarify.
6) Please add the light fixture detail to the Landscape Plan Sheet, with the height
noted.
7) The UDO has lighting standards that contain a minimum average foot candle
level of 1.5 and a maximum level of 2 for residential zoning districts (Article 10.05 of the
UDO). A Photometric Plan was not provided, however we would accept a note on the
plan indicating the lighting will meet the requirements of Article 10.05 of the UDO.
8) A detail should be provided on the Landscape Plan indicating how the existing
trees proposed to be preserved will be protected. Fencing should extend to the drip line.
9) Please provide the square footage of the wall signs (KCC logo and Duffer’s)
proposed for the clubhouse. The square footage includes the entire area within a single
continuous rectilinear perimeter of the lettering and any background (UDO Article
13.02.02).
10) Define the stormwater basin control structure size, location and type. Due to the
small diameter orifice anticipated a manhole structure above the HWL with debris
control is required.
11) The stormwater basin side slopes adjacent to uncurbed parking appears to be
1:1 or steeper. It is preferred if slopes are 3:1 or less to accommodate maintenance. If
a wall is anticipated, consider a curb adjacent to parking.
Page 10 of 12
Legal A
THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,
PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12,
PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 AND
PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, ALL
IN TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 45
OF ASSESSORS LOTS OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG
THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF GREENWOOD ACRES, 1424 FEET TO THE
CENTER LINE OF S.B.I. ROUTE 23; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID
CENTER LINE, 1387 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 81-02179; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG
SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, 918.4 FEET TO A SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 357175; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG A SOUTH
LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, 558.1 FEET TO A SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG AN EAST LINE OF SAID PROPERTY,
366 FEET TO A NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE WESTERLY,
ALONG A NORTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, 1409.5 FEET; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG A NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY 300 FEET,
MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE KISHWAUKEE RIVER, AS
ORIGINALLY LOCATED; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID CENTER LINE,
TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY,
ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 140 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 44 OF SAID ASSESSORS LOTS OF SECTION 12; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 44 AND 45, A
DISTANCE OF 225.5 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF SAID
GREENWOOD ACRES; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
LOT 45, A DISTANCE OF 577.8 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING
THEREFROM THAT PART OF SAID S.B.I. ROUTE 23 PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED, ALL
IN DEKALB TOWNSHIP, DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
Page 11 of 12
Legal B
A PART OF SECTION 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH, RANGE 4, EAST OF THE
THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 20 OF JOHN W.
TILTON’S THIRD ADDITION TO TILTON PARK; THENCE NORTH 33 DEGREES 43’
EAST ALONG THE SOUTH- EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 20, A DISTANCE OF
315.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 24 OF TILTON’S
FOURTH ADDITION TO TILTON PARK; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 24, A DISTANCE OF 5.0 FEET TO THE SOUTH-
EAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 24; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES, 52’EAST
ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 24, A DISTANCE OF 231.0
FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF BLOCK 29 OF TILTON’S FIFTH
ADDITION TO TILTON PARK; THENCE NORTH 49 DEGREES 39’ EAST ALONG THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 29, A DISTANCE OF 319.53 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 29; THENCE SOUTH 68 DEGREES 08’
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 523.7 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES
01’EAST TO DISTANCE OF 1409.5 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE,
59’ WEST, A DISTANCE OF 366.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 38 DEGREES 01’ WEST,
A DISTANCE OF 538.1 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY
LINE OF THE DEKALB COUNTY TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM PROPERTY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, A
DISTANCE OF 97.6 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF ; THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SANITARIUM PROPERTY, A
DISTANCE OF 29 ½ FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY PROPERTY
LINE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
SANITARIUM PROPERTY AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PROPERTY OF
THE DEKALB PARK DISTRICT, KNOWN AS HOPKINS PARK, A DISTANCE OF 992.4
FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARK DISTRICT
PROPERTY, A DISTANCE OF 165 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT IN THE
CENTER LINE OF THE KISHWAUKEE CHANNEL AS THE SAME ORIGINALLY
EXISTED BEFORE RE- LOCATION: THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY
ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE ORIGINAL CHANNEL OF THE KISHWAUKEE
RIVER TO A POINT WHICH POINT IS A COMMON CORNER BETWEEN PARCEL “B”
AND PARCEL “C” OF THE ELLWOOD FARM PLAT; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES
17’ WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL “B” A DISTANCE OF
291.4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
DEKALB AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, SAID PROPERTY BEING A PORTION OF
THE KISHWAUKEE COUNTRY CLUB AND SOME LAND ADJACENT THERETO.
Page 12 of 12
March 24, 2017
Dear Property Owner:
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will consider a request on a petition by
Kishwaukee Country Club, Inc. for approval of a Zoning Map Amendment, upon annexation,
from the “SFR1” Single-Family Residential District to the “PD-R” Planned Development –
Residential District and from the “SFR2” Single-Family Residential District to the “PD-R”
Planned Development – Residential District for 67.59 acres located at 1901 Sycamore Road to
allow the construction of a new clubhouse and pro shop and associated improvements.
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will review these requests and hold a public
hearing at its regular meeting on Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be at
the DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois. As a property owner
within 250 feet of the above-mentioned property, you are encouraged to attend this meeting to
learn about and comment on the proposal.
You are also welcome to submit any written comments you may have on the proposal no later than
Wednesday, April 5, 2017. You may submit written comments regarding the request on the
enclosed comment sheet by mail to the address listed above, or by e-mail to
dan.olson@cityofdekalb.com. All comments will be shared with the Commission and included in
the public record.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the Community
Development Department at (815) 748-2060.
Sincerely,
Dan Olson
Principal Planner
Enclosures
CC: Mayor
City Council
City Manager
Planning and Zoning Commission
Applicant
Kishwaukee Country Club – Rezoning from the “SFR1” and “SFR2” Single Family
Residential Zoning Districts to the “PD-R” Planned Development - Residential District –
1901 Sycamore Road
Page 2 of 5
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning and
Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, April 12, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. in the
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois, on the petition by
Kishwaukee Country Club, Inc. represented by Steve Irving for approval of a Zoning Map
Amendment, upon annexation, from the “SFR1” Single-Family Residential District to the “PD-
R” Planned Development – Residential District for the property described below in Legal A and
approval of a Zoning Map Amendment from the “SFR2” Single-Family Residential District to
the “PD-R” Planned Development – Residential District for the property described below in
Legal B. The request is to allow for the Kishwaukee Country Club to construct a new clubhouse
and pro shop and associated improvements and consideration to approve waivers to the Unified
Development Ordinance for landscaping, parking lot design and subdivision platting
requirements.
Legal A
THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,
PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, PART OF
THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 AND PART OF
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, ALL IN TOWNSHIP
40 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 45 OF ASSESSORS
LOTS OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF GREENWOOD ACRES, 1424 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE
OF S.B.I. ROUTE 23; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, 1387
FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT
NO. 81-02179; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE,
918.4 FEET TO A SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 357175;
THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG A SOUTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, 558.1 FEET TO A
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG AN EAST
LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, 366 FEET TO A NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
PROPERTY; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG A NORTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY,
1409.5 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG A NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
PROPERTY 300 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE KISHWAUKEE
RIVER, AS ORIGINALLY LOCATED; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID
CENTER LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE
SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 140 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 44 OF SAID ASSESSORS LOTS OF SECTION 12;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 44 AND
45, A DISTANCE OF 225.5 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF SAID
GREENWOOD ACRES; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT
45, A DISTANCE OF 577.8 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING
THEREFROM THAT PART OF SAID S.B.I. ROUTE 23 PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED, ALL IN
DEKALB TOWNSHIP, DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
Page 4 of 5
Legal B
A part of Section 13 and 14, Township 40 North, Range 4, East of the3 Third Principal Meridian,
DeKalb County, Illinois, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Block 20 of
John W. Tilton’s Third Addition to Tilton Park; thence North 33 (degrees) 43’ East along the
South- Easterly line of said Block 20, a distance of 315.0 feet to a point on the South line of
Block 24 of Tilton’s Fourth Addition to Tilton Park; thence Southeasterly along the Southerly
line of said Block 24, a distance of 5.0 feet to the South-East corner of said Block 24; thence
North 41 (degrees), 52’East along the Southeasterly line of said Block 24, a distance of 231.0
feet to the Southeasterly corner of Block 29of Tilton’s fifth Addition to Tilton Park; thence
North 49 (degrees) 39’ East along the Southeasterly line of said Block 29, a distance Of 319.53
feet to the Northeast corner of said Block 29; thence South 68 degrees-08’ East, a distance of
523.7 feet to a point; thence South 88 degrees-01’East to distance of 1409.5 feet to a point;
thence South 1 degree, 59’ West, a distance of 366.0 feet; thence North 38 (degrees) 01’ West, a
distance of 538.1 feet to a point, said point being on the Easterly line of the DeKalb County
Tuberculosis Sanitarium property; thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said property, a
distance of 97.6 feet to the Northeast corner thereof ; thence Westerly along The Northerly line
of said Sanitarium property, a Distance of 29 ½ feet to an angle point in said Northerly property
line; thence Southwesterly Along the Northerly line of said Sanitarium Property and along the
Northerly line of property Of the DeKalb Park District, known as Hopkins Park, a distance of
992.4 feet to an angle point In the Northerly line of said park district Property, a distance of 165
feet, more of less, to a point in the center line of the Kishwaukee channel as the same originally
existed before re- location: thence Southwesterly and Westerly along the center line of the
original channel of the Kishwaukee River to a point which point is a Common corner between
Parcel “B” and Parcel “C” Of the Ellwood Farm Plat; thence North 56 (degrees) 17’ West along
the Southerly line of said Parcel ”B” A distance of 291.4 feet to the point of begin-ning, situated
in the County of DeKalb and the State of Illinois, said property being a portion of the
Kishwaukee Country Club and some land adjacent thereto.
The aforementioned legal descriptions are comprised of Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN) 08-
11-477-001, 08-12-353-001, 08-12-353-009, 08-13-101-009, 08-14-226-001, 08-14-226-002,
and 08-14-226-003 and commonly known as 1901 Sycamore Road, DeKalb, IL 60115.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed above.
Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on these proposals to the City
of DeKalb, Community Development Department, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois,
60115 by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 5, 2017.
Further information is available from the Community Development Department, (815) 748-2060.
Christina Atherton, Chairman
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 5 of 5
relocated 5' dia. 12" h lettering
logo & add 12" h
lettering below
Duffer's Bar &
Grill
EXISTING TREE
TO REMAIN (TYP.)
PROPERTY LINE
EXCESS FILL
(TYP)
48"
SHAPE & SEED 408'
870
869.35
1
PROPOSED SWALE AWAY
FROM BUILDING ENTRANCE
434' 466'
87
872
PROPOSED TRENCH GRATE
RIM = 869.80
167' OUTD
PROP
OSED
8,500 BUILDING
OOR (F.F. 87 S.F.
INV = 868.84 12" W/ FLAP GATE CO
1,300 VERED
PORC
8.00)
S.F.
874.0 870.70
H
871.35 PROPOSED 12"
STORM SEWER 18"
EX. BUILDING
TO BE REMOVED
869.65
3 120' PROPOSED BUILDING
20"
9.8 CART PATH TO
869.80 86
0
BASEMENT LOCATED WITHIN
869.90
15" 87
BUILDING ENVELOPE
869.90
2.9
0 30"
869.80
869.80 3.0
0 10" PROPOSED STORM SEWER
56.00 87
1
MANHOLE 12 646'
87 RIM = 872.09
34.00 PROPOSED FIRE 872 INV = 868.44 12"
EXISTING LIFT STATION
8" HYDRANT 36"
7
PROP 45" 18
OSED
6.00
4.00 87
2 EXISTING SANITARY
EXISTING WELL 6.9
MANHOLE
OUTD
PROPOSED 12"
8,500 BUILDIN
22.00 30"
12" STORM SEWER RIM = 868.58
873 877.4
TOTAL ACREAGE
OOR
G
6
877.0
(F.F. 8 S.F.
8.4
3" 878.00 87
24'
869.6
0
= 25.24 ACRES N
COV
81' 87 EXISTING SANITARY
78.00
878.00 7.0 6.5
6" 6 6
SEWER
)
300 S ERED PO
MAIN
1
874
,
87
ENTRY 36" 7.5 BOTTOM STM = 867.72
26
6 87
0 877.52 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED BUILDING 150.0 877.22
0.0 0 TOP SAN.=866.50
(TO BE RELOCATED)
88.00
E
ENVELOPE
.F. RCH
BOTTOM W.M= 868.68 878.00 16'
PAVEMENT REMOVED
E
E
TOP SAN.= 868.16 EXISTING SANITARY
22 L.F. CASING PIPE MANHOLE FOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND
3 36" RIM = 869.19 (TYP.)
INV = 866.12 5
8
TOP OF EX WM = 869.09
BOTTOM STORM = 872.3
EXISTING TREE
5 24'
EXISTING SANITARY 2
TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) 87 877.39 SERVICE TO BE REMOVED HWL 869.5 0 100' 200' 400'
14.00 24" 18"
PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE EXISTING POND OUTLET
877.03 @ 1.0% MIN. SLOPE ELIPT RCP 15" x 20" @
876.73 3 PROPOSED HANDICAP SIGNS 866.57
876 86
56.00
EXISTING BUILDING 8
868 871 6
24" FINISHED FLOOR = 877.90 869 INV = 867.54 12"
(TO BE REMOVED) 872
7
87
7.4
873
15
48" SERV
35" ENTR ICE PROPOSED ROOF PROPOSED DETENTION
874
Y DRAINS
18" 877.92
2 877.7 30
2 877.5
35" 4
877.4
.07 8 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO
W
878
PROPOSED FIRE BE REMOVED
875
T
C
877.9
0
HYDRANT
35" 35"
877
877.4
0 88669
VERIFY CROSS SLOPES 876 869 9
875 871
870
CONFORM TO ADA 869 871
REQUIREMENTS. REMOVE & 870
REPLACE AS NEEDED ALONG
ROUTE TO POOL HOUSE .25
877 EXISTING FIRE 24'
HYDRANT
EXCESS FILL
EXISTING 8" WATER SHAPE & SEED
MAIN 24'
24'
24'
5
3 PROPOSED STOP SIGNS NOTES:
LEGEND CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WATER
SOURCE FOR DUST CONTROL DURING
DEMOLITION.
EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT
134 TOTAL PARKING STALLS INCLUDING 5
HANDICAP STALLS
PROPOSED HMA PAVEMENT
BASEFLOOD ELEVATION = 839.50
EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVE CONCRETE SLABS BELOW TO AN
REMOVED ELEVATION BELOW THE BASE MATERIALS
ON THE PROPOSED PAVEMENTS
100 YEAR OVERFLOW
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 89,848 S.F.
PARKING REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 99,781 S.F.
USE REQUIREMENT TOTAL N
I N G SERVIC
GOLF CLUB 4/HOLE + 1/EMP. MAX SHIFT 72 SPACES FOR 18 HOLES ER E Date Revision By
18 HOLES, 10 EMPLOYEES 10 SPACES FOR 10 EMPLOYEES E S
2-7-17 RESUBMIT FOR REVISIONS KRL
V I L E NG I N
82 TOTAL FOR GOLF CLUB 2-8-17 RESUBMIT FOR REVISIONS KRL
RESTAURANT/BAR/BANQUET 1/3 SEATS + 1 EMPLOYEE MAX SHIFT 75 SPACES FOR 225 SEATS 3-3-17 ADD DETAILS JAB
ASSUME 225 SEATS AND 23 23 SPACES FOR 23 EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYEES 98 SPACES / 2
49 TOTAL SPACES FOR RESTAURANT CI Kishwaukee Country Club
INC.
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 131 SPACES Preliminary Building Layout
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 134 SPACES 0 15' 30' 60'
700 WEST LOCUST ST., BELVIDERE, IL 61008 CHECKED BY: KCB DRAWN BY: KRL
(815)-547-8435 FAX:(815)-544-0421 DATE: 2/8/17 DATE: 2/8/17 Sheet
ILLINOIS DESIGN FIRM NO. 184-001260 G:\FILES\DEKALB COUNTY\DEKALB\4227 Kishwaukee Country
Club\CURRENT PROJECT\4227 BASE.dwg 1 of 1
G:\FILES\DEKALB COUNTY\DEKALB\4227 Kishwaukee Country Club\CURRENT PROJECT\4227 BASE.dwg, 3/3/2017 1:19:21 PM, 1:1
870
1
87
872
EX. BUILDING
TO BE REMOVED 3
1
12
87
872
7
PROP 18
OSED
OOR 8,500 BUILDIN
873
G
C (F.F. 8 S.F.
1,300 OVERED P
78.00
)
S.F. ORCH
874
26
E
E
E
3
OUTD 5
5 2
87
876 868
868 871 6
869
872 873
15
874
2 30
W
875
T
C
877
88669
876 875 871 869 9
870
869 871
870
FIRE TRUCK 46.2' TOTAL LENGTH WITH A
WHEEL BASE OF 22.8'
±3.5 ACRES
5 TRIBUTARY AREA
N
I N G SERVIC
ER E Date Revision By
E S
2-7-17 RESUBMIT FOR REVISIONS KRL
V I L E NG I N
2-8-17 RESUBMIT FOR REVISIONS KRL
3-3-17 ADD DETAILS JAB
CI Kishwaukee Country Club
INC.
Tributary/Pond/Fire Turning Exhibit
0 15' 30' 60'
700 WEST LOCUST ST., BELVIDERE, IL 61008 CHECKED BY: KCB DRAWN BY: KRL
(815)-547-8435 FAX:(815)-544-0421 DATE: 2/8/17 DATE: 2/8/17 Sheet
ILLINOIS DESIGN FIRM NO. 184-001260 G:\FILES\DEKALB COUNTY\DEKALB\4227 Kishwaukee Country
Club\CURRENT PROJECT\4227 BASE.dwg 1 of 1
G:\FILES\DEKALB COUNTY\DEKALB\4227 Kishwaukee Country Club\CURRENT PROJECT\4227 BASE.dwg, 3/3/2017 1:19:24 PM, 1:1
SNTS 4"
4"
HEIGHT
4 " SQU A R E S T R AI G HT ST EEL
SPECIFICATIONS
SHAFT: 4 " S Q U A R E , F A B R I C A T E D F R O M H I G H G R A D E S T R U C T U R A L S T E E L T U B E . S H A F T
CONFORMS TO ASTM-A-501-68 SPECIFICATIONS. MEETS OR EXCEEDS MINIMUM YIELD
STRENGTH OF 46,000 P.S.I. WALL THICKNESS 11 GA. (.120 WALL)OR 7 GA. (.180 WALL)
AS SPECIFIED, REINFORCED HAND HOLE IS FURNISHED WITH COVER, SHAFT IS
F U R N I S H E D W I T H G R O U N D L U G L O C A T E D I N S I D E P O L E O N W A L L O P P O S I T E H A N D H O L E.
BASE PLATE: F A B R I C A T E D F R O M S T R U C T U R A L Q U A L I T Y H O T R O L L E D S T E E L . M E E T S O R E X C E E D S
MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH OF 36,000 P.S.I. BASE TELESCOPES AND IS CIRCUMFERENTIALLY
WELDED TO POLE SHAFT. SLOTTED BOLT HOLES PROVIDE 1" FLEXIBILITY ON EITHER
SIDE OF BOLT CIRCLE CENTERLINE.
ANCHORAGE: ( 4 ) A N C H O R B O L T S F A B R I C A T E D F R O M H O T R O L L E D S T E E L B A R , M I N I M U M Y I E L D
STRENGTH OF 50,000 P.S.I. BOLTS HAVE "L" BEND ON ONE END AND ARE THREADED ON
THE OTHER END. BOLTS ARE FULLY GALVANIZED AND ARE FURNISHED WITH TWO NUTS
AND TWO WASHERS.
BASE COVER: F A B R I C A T E D F R O M H E A V Y G A U G E Q U A L I T Y C A R B O N S T E E L . T W O P I E C E C O V E R
CONCEALS BASE.
FINISH: P O L Y E S T E R P O W D E R C O A T . T H E M E T A L S U R F A C E I S P R E T R E A T E D B Y S A N D B L A S T
PROCESS FOR MAXIMUM PAINT ADHESION. ELECTROSTATICALLY APPLIED POLYESTER
POWDER TOPCOAT IS BAKED AT 400˚ TEMPERATURE FOR MAXIMUM HARDNESS AND
EXTERIOR DURABILITY.
U.S. ARCHITECTURAL 660 WEST AVENUE O, PALMDALE, CA. 93551
(661) 233-2000
LIGHTING FAX NO. (661) 233-2001 F1-1
www.usaltg.com REV. 5 / 02
SNTS SERIES
ENGINEERING DATA 4"
Maximum EPA - Square Feet
Catalog Maximum 100 MPH 90 MPH 80 MPH 70 MPH HAND
Number Fixt. wgt. 18" HOLE
SNTS 104-11 400 16.7 20.5 26.1 33.4
SNTS 124-11 400 12.2 16.1 20.4 25.8
HEIGHT
8"- 11" DIA.
SNTS 144-11 400 9.9 12.8 16.1 20.2 BOLT CIRCLE
SNTS 154-11 400 8.9 11.4 14.4 17.9
SNTS 164-11 400 7.9 10.1 12.8 15.9 BOLT
PROJECTION
SNTS 184-11 400 6.2 8.2 10.1 13.8
SNTS 204-11 400 4.8 6.2 7.9 11.6
SNTS 204-7 450 8.8 11.3 14.0 17.4
SNTS 254-11 350 1.6 3.2 5.5 8.8
BOLT PROJECTION
ABOVE GRADE
SNTS 254-7 450 4.3 6.1 9.1 11.2
MINIMUM.........3¼"
MAXIMUM........3¾"
All above design calculations are based on sustained wind forces
plus additional 1.3 wind gust
(Example: Pole rated at 80 MPH withstands 104 MPH gusts)
ORDERING INFORMATION
MODEL POLES MOUNTING FINISH OPTIONS
NO. :
SNTS 204-11 PT23 1 8019-S
MODEL
NO. : POLES MOUNTING FINISH OPTIONS
POLE WALL BOLT ANCHORAGE STANDARD DUPLEX RECEPTACLE
S HEIGHT THICKNESS CIRCLE
2 3/8"X4" TENON
PT23
SMOOTH FINISH
BLACK
DUP
104-11 10' 11 9" 3/4"X18"X3" GFI RECEPTACLE
N 124-11 12' 11 9" 3/4"X18"X3"
2 7/8"X4" TENON
PT27
RAL-9005-S
WHITE
GFI
RAL-9003-S 3 WAY ADAPTER
T 144-11
154-11
14'
15'
11
11
9"
9"
3/4"X18"X3"
3/4"X18"X3" OTHER TENON MT _____ GREY
T3120
RAL-7004-S
S 164-11 16' 11 9" 3/4"X18"X3"
DRK BRONZE
184-11 18' 11 9" 3/4"X18"X3" DRILL MOUNT RAL-8019-S
204-11 20' 11 10" 3/4"X24"X3" 1............ 3-90.... GREEN
RAL-6005-S 1/2'' COUPLING
204-7 20' 7 11" 3/4"X30"X3" CPLN1/2
2-180.. 4-90.... OPTION:
254-11 25' 11 11" 3/4"X24"X3"
PRIME PAINT 3/4'' COUPLING
254-7 25' 7 11" 3/4"X30"X3" PP CPLN3/4
2-90........ 3-120...
GALVANIZED
GLV 2'' COUPLING
3-120 CPLN2
THERMOSET
REQUIRES POLYESTER (SPECIFY COUPLING LOCATION)
PT27 POWDER
AND PDR
T3120
ADAPTER
SEE ACCESSORIES SECTION
FOR OTHER OPTIONS.
CONSULT FACTORY
FOR CUSTOM
COLORS
U.S. ARCHITECTURAL 660 WEST AVENUE O, PALMDALE, CA. 93551
(661) 233-2000
F1-2 LIGHTING FAX NO. (661) 233-2001
www.usaltg.com
March 31, 2017
Mr. Steve Irving, President
Kishwaukee Country Club
1901 Sycamore Road
DeKalb, IL 60115
Re: Kishwaukee Country Club – Zoning Map Amendment, Annexation and Planned Development
Plans - 1901 Sycamore Road
Dear Steve,
We are in receipt of the zoning and annexation petition, supporting documents and plans for the
proposed project at the Kishwaukee Country Club and would forward the comments below as a
follow up to the letter provided to you by the City dated February 21, 2017. The comments are
based upon:
• Preliminary Building Layout, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared CES Inc. dated 3/3/17
• Tributary/Pond/Fire Turning Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared CES Inc. dated 3/3/17
• Main Level Plan and Lower Level Plan dated 2/28/17
• Schematic Typical Section, Sheet A 4.0, prepared by Mark Zinni Construction, dated
3/7/17
• East Elevation Plan, Sheet A3, prepared by Mark Zinni Construction, dated 3/6/17
• Course Side Elevation Plan, prepared by Mark Zinni Construction
• Landscape Details, 2 sheets, prepared by Steve Irving dated 3/7/17
• US Architectural Lighting Details, 4 sheets.
• Wall Sign Elevation Detail dated 3/27/17
1) Since two-way traffic will be maintained with the new layout, consideration should be given
for directional signage as you come into the site indicating areas to the parking lot and the
clubhouse.
2) Pedestrian paths from the parking lot to the clubhouse should be considered. With the new
clubhouse further away from the parking lot, safe pedestrian movements to the clubhouse
will be needed. It appears the only areas to walk would be along the drive.
3) Provide a typical parking space and drive aisle detail with dimensions. Minimum size per the
UDO is 9’ x 19’ for parking spaces and 24‘ for the drive-aisle.
4) The Parking Requirements table on Sheet 1 of 1 indicates 225 seats and 23 employees. The
Main Level Floor Plan detail indicates about 135 seats. Please verify the number of seats
proposed and employees and modify the table as needed.
5) The Landscape Plan indicates a 10’ high SNTS-254-11-2 single head light fixture, however the
detail provided notes this model has a pole height of 25 feet. Please clarify.
6) Please add the light fixture detail to the Landscape Plan Sheet, with the height noted. This
will make it easier for approval of the plans.
7) The UDO has lighting standards that contain a minimum average foot candle level of 1.5 and
a maximum level of 2 for residential zoning districts (Article 10.05 of the UDO). A Photometric
Plan was not provided, however we would accept a note on the plan indicating the lighting
will meet the requirements of Article 10.05 of the UDO.
8) A detail should be provided on the Landscape Plan indicating how the existing trees proposed
to be preserved will be protected. Fencing should extend to the drip line.
9) Please provide the square footage of the wall signs (KCC logo and Duffer’s) proposed for the
clubhouse. The square footage includes the entire area within a single continuous rectilinear
perimeter of the lettering and any background (UDO Article 13.02.02).
10) The submitted “Plat and Certificate of Survey” should be re-named to “Plat of Annexation”.
11) The following comments require resolution prior to recommendation for preliminary
approval of the plans.
a) Define the stormwater basin control structure size, location and type. Due to the small
diameter orifice anticipated a manhole structure above the HWL with debris control is
required.
b) The stormwater basin side slopes adjacent to uncurbed parking appears to be 1:1 or
steeper. It is preferred if slopes are 3:1 or less to accommodate maintenance. If a wall is
anticipated, consider a curb adjacent to parking.
12) The following comments will need to be addressed when preparing final engineering plans in
addition to prior comments.
Page |2
a) Identify the pond outlet pipe route though the site and overflow weir location, type and
elevation.
b) Provide calculations supporting storm sewer pipe sizing.
c) Include a tributary areas exhibit that provides enough topography to clearly define the
tributary area and adjacent “off-site” topography.
d) If a basement is proposed for the building we continue to recommend positive pitch from
the building to the pond from the trench drain and to consider an emergency sump pit
should the basin reach HWL.
Please revise the plans and provide six full size copies back to the City with an electronic version
and a response letter on how the comments were addressed.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Dan Olson
Principal Planner
cc: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Greg Chismark, Acting City Engineer
Page |3