Planning & Zoning Commission
Regular MeetingDeKalb, IL · October 17, 2018
Minutes
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
October 17, 2018
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a Meeting on October 17, 2018 at the City of
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 S. Fourth St., DeKalb, Illinois. Chair Christina Doe called
the meeting order at 6:03 PM.
A. ROLL CALL
Recording Secretary, Christine Wang, called the roll. Planning and Zoning
Commission members present were Chair Christina Doe, Katharina Barbe, Vicki
Buckley, and David Castro. Commissioners Jerry Wright and Max Maxwell were
absent.
City staff present were Principal Planner, Dan Olson, Community Development
Director, Jo Ellen Charlton, City Attorney, Dean Frieders, and Recording
Secretary, Christine Wang.
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)
Chair Christina Doe requested a motion to approve the October 17, 2018 agenda
as presented. Ms. Barbe motioned to approve the agenda as presented. Ms.
Buckley seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous voice
vote.
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
September 19, 2018 – Ms. Buckley motioned to approve the minutes, Ms. Barbe
seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous voice vote
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
None
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing – Amendment to the City of DeKalb 2005 Comprehensive Plan
to approve a sub-area plan for the neighborhoods located in the northwest
corner of the City along both sides of Annie Glidden Road – Annie Glidden
North (AGN) Revitalization Plan.
Community Development Director Jo Ellen Charlton provided an overview of
the Annie Glidden North (AGN) Revitalization Plan and the identified needs for
the community. Ms. Charlton noted that the task force identified by the Mayor
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 2 of 15
and City Council and the consultant hired by the City, Camiros, had numerous
meetings with members of the community. She mentioned the feedback taken
was used to formulate the plan as presented. Ms. Charlton noted that there
were forty-five total projects, broken into four categories of Transportation,
Infrastructure, and Open Space; Community Services; Neighborhood Safety
and Security; and Housing and Commercial Development. Ms. Charlton stated
that the need for a public hearing on the Plan by the Planning and Zoning
Commission is required because it is considered a sub-area plan and would be
adopted as an amendment to the City’s 2005 Comprehensive Plan. Ms.
Charlton also stated that if the Plan is adopted, only the parts of 2005
Comprehensive Plan that are in conflict to specific elements of the AGN Plan
would be amended.
Ms. Charlton noted that there were ten key projects identified by the task force
that were most important to the AGN area. Ms. Charlton noted that these
recommendations were establishing a food and education center; the creation
of a Community Development Corporation (CDC); safety improvements; local
transportation improvements; the creation of a Community Center Program;
access to health care; creation of a Hillcrest/Blackhawk Focus Area; physical
improvements to the Greek Row Area; creation of a Lucinda Focus Area; and
a redesign of Welsh Park.
Ms. Charlton said that the public comment period is open until October 19, 2018
and the public comment meeting held at University Village on October 10, 2018
was well attended. Ms. Charlton stated that the attendees at the meeting noted
the Safe Streets Initiative has had an impact on crime in the nearby area. Ms.
Charlton also noted she attended the Northern Illinois University Student
Association Senate and they expressed their concerns about safety and
continued integration of students in the planning and implementation process.
Ms. Charlton stated that both groups were concerned that this plan may be
used as a tool for gentrification. Ms. Charlton stated that any public comments
regarding the AGN plan will be collected and given to City Council to consider.
Chair Doe opened to public comment.
Herb Rubin of 131 E. Alden Place said that he chaired the AGN Task Force
and there was great community discussion and feedback. He also stated that
the plan is to be utilized as a list of projects that would be helpful for the
neighborhood and if a project receives funding, that project will move forward.
Mr. Rubin said that what happens in the AGN neighborhood reflects the
reputation of the community and of the university, and that while the focus is
on AGN, the improvement of this specific community will benefit the entire City.
Bessie Chronopoulos of 423 Gayle Ave stated that this project is ambitious,
and echoed Mr. Rubin’s comments that the improvement of AGN will help the
entire community. Ms. Chronopoulos stated that another look should be taken
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 3 of 15
at the 2005 Comprehensive Plan and the UDO and that these should be
tweaked to prevent any adverse effects.
David Hedin of 1151 Fox Hollow said that the problems in the AGN
neighborhood are not restricted to the lowering of NIU’s enrollment. He stated
that he was not asked for input and his neighbors were not contacted regarding
the Plan. Mr. Hedin stated that it was important to not only ask the residents
of AGN for input, but also the people who live adjacent to the neighborhood.
Commissioner Castro said that in previous discussions he highlighted the need
to look at the Comprehensive Plan. He stated he is a member of the AGN Task
Force and noted that 25% of the population of DeKalb lives in the AGN corridor
study area. He said that this Plan not only impacts the AGN community, but
also the entire City. He stated that though the AGN Plan is not perfect, it is a
good document and he is in support of approval. Commissioner Barbe said
that the Plan was well-written and commented that the use of similar
communities helped to provide context for laypersons. Chair Doe stated that
the Plan was well-written and well-constructed and easy for a layperson to
understand. She said the Plan is a good start and thanked everyone who
participated in the AGN Task Force and in the City for their work in the creation
of the Plan.
Chair Doe gave one more opportunity for the public to speak. There was none,
and the public hearing was closed.
Chair Doe asked if the Commissioners had any more questions or comments.
There was none.
Mr. Castro made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of an
amendment to the City of DeKalb 2005 Comprehensive Plan to approve the
Annie Glidden North (AGN) Revitalization Plan dated October 2018. Seconded
by Ms. Buckley.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Barbe – yes, Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Castro –
yes, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passed 4-0-2. Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Wright were
absent.
2. Public Hearing – Petition by the City of DeKalb for text amendments to
Chapter 23 “Unified Development Ordinance” of the Municipal Code to amend
Article 5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District of the UDO to establish a
procedure and criteria for allowing single family attached dwellings having a
common wall along a lot line be permitted with the approval of a special use
permit.
Principal Planner Dan Olson went through the staff report dated October 12,
2018 and stated the reason for the text amendment is to establish a procedure
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 4 of 15
and criteria in the “RC-1” Residential Conservation District to allow single family
attached dwellings having a common wall along a lot line be permitted with the
approval of a special use permit. He stated this procedure currently exists in
the Two-Family Residential District and the Multiple Family Residential District.
Mr. Olson stated that when the RC-1 District was created in 2007, this
procedure was possibly overlooked. The proposed amendments set forth
certain criteria for qualifying properties if a special use permit were to be
submitted.
Chair Doe opened to public comment. There was none.
Ms. Buckley asked if a duplex is considered as a single-family dwelling. Mr.
Olson responded that there were two dwelling units in a duplex. Mr. Castro
asked for clarification on the extent of the areas in the City zoned RC-1. Mr.
Olson responded that there are two areas of the City that are currently zoned
as RC-1, including to the north and south of the downtown. Mr. Castro asked
what properties around the RC-1 district may be affected by this text
amendment. Mr. Olson stated that are some duplexes in the RC-1 district that
would qualify for this type of procedure, and other districts (TFR and MFR)
already have this procedure. Mr. Castro asked what can be done to ensure
that this procedure works for everyone. Mr. Olson responded that this is a
special use permit and that there are extensive criteria that need to be adhered
to. Chair Doe asked for clarification regarding a statement in the proposed
amendment that an “Owners Association shall be created.” Mr. Olson
responded that the two separate owners of the duplex would have to create an
Owner’s Association that would cover how things are maintained in terms of
the common wall and other provisions. Chair Doe asked who would monitor
that. Mr. Olson stated that the document would have to be reviewed by the
City and recorded, however it would be a private agreement between the two
parties.
Chair Doe gave one more opportunity for the public to speak. There was none,
and the public hearing was closed.
Chair Doe asked for further questions/comments by Commissioners. There
were none.
Ms. Barbe motioned based upon the submitted petition and testimony
presented to recommend to City Council approval of text amendments to
Chapter 23 “Unified Development Ordinance” of the Municipal Code to Amend
Article 5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District of the UDO to establish a
procedure and criteria for allowing single family attached dwellings having a
common wall along a lot line be permitted with the approval of a special use
permit as indicated on Exhibit A of the staff report. Seconded by Mr. Castro.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Barbe – yes, Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Castro –
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 5 of 15
yes, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passed 4-0-2. Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Wright were
absent.
3. Public Hearing – Petition by Fant Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson,
for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential
Conservation 1 zoned lot into two single-family attached lots located at 801-
803 S. 2nd St; Final Plat of Fant’s First Division.
Gary Lothson of 17852 S. First St said that the Fant’s, who own a two-family
duplex lot on the subject site would like to divide the lot into two single-family-
attached zero-lot-line lots.
Mr. Olson went over the staff report dated October 12, 2018 and stated the
proposed special use complies with all provisions of the application regulations
off the RC-1 District. He added the proposed resubdivision would create two
lots that will meet the 25-foot minimum lot width and the 3,500 square-foot
minimum lot size requirements of the RC-1 District. Mr. Olson stated that the
proposed special use is compatible with the residential uses found in the
surrounding neighborhood and will not dominate the immediate area. Mr.
Olson noted a nearby resident, Alberta Berkes of 726 S 2nd Street, contacted
the City and indicated her support for the proposal. He noted the owner also
obtained several signatures from neighbors indicating their support of the
request and they are provided in the Commissioner’s packet.
Chair Doe gave one more opportunity for the public to speak. There was none,
and the public hearing was closed.
Chair Doe asked if the Commissioners had any more questions or comments.
Mr. Castro asked for clarification regarding the reference to the City Attorney’s
“review” in item 1 in Exhibit A. It was noted the language should be to “approve”
instead of “review”.
Mr. Castro made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of a
special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential
Conservation District zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in
accordance with Article 5.14.07 of the Unified Development Ordinance for the
property located at 801-803 S. 2nd St. and approval of the Final Plat of Fant’s
Second Division dated June 12, 2018 subject to the conditions as indicated on
Exhibit A of the staff report. Seconded by Ms. Barbe.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Barbe – yes, Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Castro –
yes, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passed 4-0-2. Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Wright were
absent.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 6 of 15
4. Public Hearing – Petition by Fant Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson,
for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “TFR” Two-Family
Residential zoned lot into two single-family attached lots located at 722-724
Grove St.; Final Plat of Fant’s Second Division.
Gary Lothson of 17852 S. First St said that the Fant’s, who own a two-family
duplex lot on the subject site would like to divide the lot into two single-family-
attached zero-lot-line lots in order to allow the individual sale of each unit.
Mr. Olson went over the staff report dated October 12, 2018 and stated the
subject property is zoned “TFR” Two-Family and the proposed special use
complies with all provisions of the application regulations off the TFR District.
He added the proposed resubdivision would create two lots that will meet the
25-foot minimum lot width and the 3,500 square-foot minimum lot size
requirements of the TFR District. Mr. Olson stated that the proposed use is
compatible with the residential uses found in the surrounding neighborhood and
not dominate the immediate area. He noted citizen response forms from Mark
Wilson of 730 Grove St. and Joseph and Dora Casurella of 716 Grove St. were
received and both indicated their support of the request. Mr. Olson noted the
owner also obtained several signatures from neighbors indicating their support
of the request and they are provided in the Commissioner’s packet.
Mr. Castro asked if this property was a corner lot. Mr. Olson responded that it
was not.
Chair Doe gave one more opportunity for the public to speak. There was none,
and the public hearing was closed.
Ms. Buckley made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of a
special permit to allow the resubdivision of a “TFR” Two-Family Residential
zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance with Article 5.03.06
of the Unified Development Ordinance for the property located at 722-724
Grove St. and approval of the Final Plat of Fant’s First Division dated June 6,
2018 subject to the conditions as indicated on Exhibit A of the staff report.
Seconded by Ms. Barbe.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Barbe – yes, Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Castro –
yes, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passed 4-0-2. Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Wright were
absent.
5. Public Hearing – Petition by Pete Occhipinti, represented by Mark Johnson,
and West Suburban Bank, as Trustee under Trust no. 12128, owner, for
approval of a special use permit for residential apartments over a ground floor
commercial use in the “LC” Light Commercial District for property located at
1015 Blackhawk Road.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 7 of 15
Mark Johnson, law office located at 321 W. State St., #1200 in Rockford, IL,
stated that he was representing the property owners, Pete Occhipinti. He
summarized that the request for a special use for 22 dwelling units to be
approved over existing commercial and commented that the staff report (dated
October 12, 2018) outlining all the issues were received a few days ago. Mr.
Johnson stated that he believes, based on the application, that his applicant
was only required to provide schematic plans. He stated that he had requested
pre-application meetings with the City and had been denied an opportunity to
meet. Mr. Johnson indicated he had been granted a meeting, but that the
meeting was pointless because the City had no questions for them. He stated
that he asked to have another meeting leading up to the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting so that he could discuss what comments that might be
on the plans but instead only received the comments five days before the
meeting. Mr. Johnson requested that the Commission continue the hearing to
another date so that the architect would have an opportunity to address the
comments in the staff report. Mr. Johnson also noted that some of the
comments were silly, specifically noting that the comment about the lack of a
fence detail on the plans was a minor issue and could be easily amended on
the plans. Mr. Johnson reiterated his request that the Commission continue
the hearing.
City Attorney Dean Frieders stated that the City received a very similar plan
that was reviewed by the Commission in 2016, which included the same,
similar, or identical deficiencies as the current plan. He indicated this shows a
lack of intent by the applicant to address deficiencies in the current plan. Mr.
Frieders mentioned that the applicant did request a meeting in June 2018,
which the City Attorney, Community Development Director, Principal Planner,
and Economic Development Planner made available and attended. The
meeting was also attended by the applicant, his attorney, realtor, and architect.
Mr. Frieders said at the meeting, the applicant was given an opportunity to
present the project, and that City staff asked questions about the plans,
including the ability of the structure to support additional floors of development
above a faulty first floor. The applicant and his architect disagreed on the level
of modification to the building that would be necessary to support the residential
portion on the upper level. Mr. Frieders stated that the City did not persist with
questions after that disagreement.
Mr. Frieders stated that the accusation that numerous requests for meetings
had been rejected is incorrect, as in addition to the earlier meeting. He stated
he received an e-mail requesting a meeting on October 2, 2018 from Mr.
Johnson. Mr. Frieders added that he responded in less than two hours asking
what Mr. Johnson and Mr. Occhipinti would like to meet about and when. Mr.
Frieders stated that there was no response from Mr. Johnson until Friday
(October 12, 2018), when an intent to request to continue was stated. Mr.
Frieders noted that the requirements for a special use are clearly outlined in
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 8 of 15
the UDO and it is the applicant’s responsibility to provide documentation that
shows the project meets the minimum requirements. He stated that it is not the
responsibility of City staff to correct plans for an applicant or to go through the
UDO to advise how the plans would need to be updated. Mr. Frieders advised
that the Commission has the ability to consider granting a continuation and
noted that although this case was based on its own merits, the Commission
made findings on a very similar proposal in the past, and that many of the same
deficiencies exist in the current plan. Mr. Frieders recommended that the
Commission should not grant the continuation and noted that the petitioner
clearly stated in the application that there were no variations needed.
Community Development Director Jo Ellen Charlton went through the staff
report dated October 12, 2018 and stated that the subject property has suffered
a partial roof collapse on the south end of the building and has been vacant for
several years. She added that the City has requested documentation regarding
the load-bearing capacity of the structure and has not yet been provided with
that documentation. Ms. Charlton noted that the building is non-conforming in
several respects including the northwestern corner of the building, which is not
greater than 30 feet from the adjacent residential zoned property. Additionally,
the eastern setback is not greater than 40 feet from Blackhawk Road as
required by the UDO. Ms. Charlton noted that while the UDO does allow for
expansion of buildings, however it must still conform to the requirements of the
UDO and must not expand any dimensional nonconformity.
Ms. Charlton stated that the building setback is measured to a part of the
building that is west of the portico in the plans submitted, but the setback should
instead be measured to the face of the portico. She said that the actual building
footprint, layout, and related plans clearly show that the second and third floors
extend over the portico and into the required setback area and therefore
violates the UDO. Ms. Charlton also stated that when a lot abuts a residential
district, a 30-foot minimum setback is required, and the existing building
setback in that area are as little as 11.9 feet according to the applicant’s plat.
She noted that regarding maximum site coverage, the information was not
provided and therefore staff cannot determine compliance. Ms. Charlton said
that the south elevation building height shows 45 feet and 4 inches, which
exceeds the 45-foot maximum building height in the UDO. Ms. Charlton stated
that according to the UDO, the “LC” Light Commercial District conditions state
that a principal building may not exceed 25,000 square feet in gross floor area
and that the plans submitted contain almost double that amount. She noted
that no variations were requested by the applicant and the landscape plan was
insufficient to meet provisions of the code and that the screening requirement
for commercial next to residential was not met. Ms. Charlton noted that the
screening requirement regarding rooftop mechanicals and garbage dumpsters
was also not met as details were not provided to show compliance.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 9 of 15
Ms. Charlton explained to the Commission that the parking was not in
compliance as the plan does not reflect pavement setbacks and therefore it is
not possible for staff to determine where adequate parking can be provided in
accordance with the UDO regulations. She mentioned the parking setback
along Hillcrest Dr. is not a minimum of 10 feet in accordance with the UDO and
a 30-foot minimum buffer between the parking lot and the west property line is
not shown. Ms. Charlton also stated the proposed parking lot is smaller than
the minimum requirements in the UDO. She added that no loading spaces are
shown on the plan which is needed for a grocery store or light commercial use,
and therefore not possible to determine compliance. Ms. Charlton noted that
the compact vehicle space requirement is met, but the setback does not meet
the UDO requirement and therefore staff cannot adequately determine if there
is compliance. She noted that the submitted photometric plan shows a different
parking layout, and the light standards are shown in locations that would
interfere with proposed drive aisle and parking spaces.
Ms. Charlton also said that the frontage does not meet the UDO requirements
for landscaping adjacent to Blackhawk Rd. and Hillcrest Dr. She stated the
landscaping shown for the interior parking lot areas are not in compliance with
the UDO. Additionally, the central north/south islands and some of the end
islands in the existing plan are not a minimum of nine feet as required and
therefore not compliant. Ms. Charlton noted that the parking layout was not
compliant as additional aisle width and turning radii are required for emergency
vehicles. She also mentioned the plan provides only one way for south and
west bound traffic movements around the east and south sides of the building.
She said that this would be difficult for emergency vehicles entering the site
and maneuvering.
Ms. Charlton stated that other details were not provided for staff to determine
compliance for requirements such as bicycle parking and shopping cart corrals.
Additionally, she noted that with the non-compliant parking lot design staff
cannot determine if minimum parking requirements are being met. She also
stated that according to the UDO, non-conforming buildings may be maintained
but cannot be expanded unless the expansion conforms to the UDO
requirements. She added as the second and third floor addition extend up at
the same non-conforming setbacks on the east and west sides of the building,
the plan does not comply with the UDO. She said that the City’s Chief Building
Official reviewed the plans and some of the variations to the code included
providing no lobby or other means for accessing the other retail uses
designated in what was previously the theater areas, a lack of corridors and
bathrooms, and that there was no elevator shown.
Ms. Charlton stated in the examination of the special use standards the
proposal does not comply with all the provisions of the applicable district
regulations. She said that as the application stands, it does not meet the UDO
requirements. She also noted that it cannot be determined if the proposed
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 10 of 15
special use will not have a detrimental effect to the value of other properties
and pointed out that the existing building has suffered long-term neglect and a
roof collapse. Ms. Charlton noted that the proposed use of materials is not
consistent with the building and character of the surrounding area, and the
location and size of the special use is not compatible with the neighborhood.
She also stated that the proposed special use is non-conforming in relation to
setbacks to the adjacent residential property. She continued by noting the
special use standard regarding adequate utility, drainage, and other such
necessary facilities was not met as the plan did not provide these details nor
did the applicant verify any of them. She mentioned the proposed plan does
not prove the project can be constructed in accordance to the setback and
parking requirements of the UDO. Ms. Charlton stated that the staff was not
provided professionally prepared signed and sealed reports to verify the safety
and security of the building and again noted the extended vacancy and lack of
maintenance of the building.
Ms. Charlton went over the history of the property and noted that the City had
passed a text amendment in 2013 to “LC” District to require dwelling units over
the ground level to be a special use. The applicant had filed a lawsuit against
the City regarding the text amendments claiming they were not property notified
of the change, however the lawsuit was dismissed based on the applicant’s
failure to satisfy administrative remedies. She said that in 2017, the applicant
filed a second lawsuit and alleged that he did not receive procedural due
process regarding his property. Ms. Charlton said that it was dismissed in
Circuit Court and that the Court had ruled the applicant had received full due
process. The appellate court affirmed the Circuit Court ruling and the LC
zoning of the property was properly entered. Ms. Charlton noted that a third
lawsuit against the City is currently pending and that the applicant alleges that
the City bears responsibility for damage to the structure that accrued while the
roof collapse was open, but she also noted that this was not related to the
zoning of the property. Ms. Charlton stated that City staff’s time and money
were used to process this application and recommended that “be denied”
should be added to the end of the sample motion provided in the staff report.
Chair Doe opened the hearing to public comment. There was none.
Public comment – none.
Ms. Barbe noted that this property was mentioned in the Annie Glidden North
Revitalization Plan and agreed that the property is blighted and is disappointed
that the owner did not take advantage of the opportunity to redevelop the site.
She questioned whether the applicant could submit another application that
met the criteria. Ms. Charlton explained the UDO does not have a waiting
period for submittal of new applications if denied. Ms. Buckley stated that she
wants the community to be business-friendly but was disappointed by the plan
at this point and that the applicant had not provided everything that was
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 11 of 15
needed. She said that she would love to see something happen on this
property but understood that this was not possible if all the information was not
provided. Mr. Castro noted that there was a discrepancy between Mr.
Johnson’s testimony about requesting meetings multiple times and the City
Attorney’s response. Mr. Frieders reiterated that he responded to Mr.
Johnson’s request to meet on October 2nd within two hours but did not hear
back from Mr. Johnson until this past Friday (October 12th). Mr. Frieders also
noted that the two of them had talked about this property as part of the currently
ongoing court proceedings, and that because of those meetings, there was no
ongoing request to meet.
Mr. Castro further questioned whether it was fair to deny a continuation of the
hearing. Mr. Frieders responded further by noting that as a part of the Principal
Planner’s ongoing requests to get better documentation, the applicant informed
the City that he was not going to provide additional documentation. For
example, in response to providing a document showing the location and
condition of public utilities, the applicant provided an aerial printout from the
City’s GIS site. He added that when the City requested more detailed
documentation or verification, the applicant stated he was not going to submit
further documents. Mr. Frieders also noted the City questioned whether the
applicant wanted to apply for any variations and was told that the he was not
seeking any variations, even though the plans were similar to the plans
submitted two years ago and those plans had included variations.
Chair Doe asked for clarification regarding the phrase “no relief” in the staff
report. Ms. Charlton stated that the applicant did not request any variances
and that a special use with variances is sometimes referred to as “relief”. Mr.
Frieders also stated that applications are submitted under the assumption of
compliance with the UDO.
Mr. Johnson responded that when he requested the meeting on October 2nd,
he had not received any feedback at that time and did not know whether plans
were satisfactory or not. He stated that had he known the concerns as outlined
in the staff report, they could have worked with the architect to remove the
portico, increase setbacks and do other things to address the concerns raised.
Mr. Johnson said that his client wants to see something happen on this property
and wants to invest and build a nice project. He noted that the
recommendations of the AGN Plan showed a proposal that was denser than
his client’s proposal. He commented that no one has ever approached his
client about any planning efforts and reiterated his request that the matter be
continued so plans can be revised and resubmitted.
Ms. Buckley asked whether it is incumbent on an applicant to go through the
UDO to identify compliance. Mr. Frieders responded that where staff has an
applicant who submits a petition and plan, this is the procedure that is followed.
He noted that in this case, the applicant was clear that he was submitting for a
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 12 of 15
special use, and did not request any variations, despite the plans being similar
to the previous plans submitted which included several variations. He
commented that a better approach, given the complexity of the project, would
be to request planned development zoning. Mr. Frieders and Ms. Charlton
noted that given the unwillingness of the owner to even provide structural
details on the stability of the roof and a special use application that indicated
no variations, staff went forward with what was submitted. Ms. Buckley asked
what the disadvantage would be to not grant a continuance. Mr. Frieders
responded that even if an effort was made to revise the plans, there would still
be multiple variations that could not be addressed. He added that any plans
that would come back would likely be more than what a special use permit
could authorize. Mr. Frieders stated that a new plan would likely require a new
application, revised plans, and a new public hearing.
Chair Doe questioned what would happen if the Commission recommended
denial, but the City Council wanted to recommend approval. Mr. Frieders
stated that the Council could direct the petition back to the Commission or the
Council could make their own conditions of approval. He further commented
that if the Council wanted to approve the project, the applicant would need to
provide or request amending the findings of fact that would be consistent with
an approval. Ms. Buckley asked for clarification regarding the procedure for
resubmission. Mr. Frieders indicated that it would likely come as a petition for
rezoning. Mr. Castro indicated that he would recommend denial of the petition.
Chair Doe gave one more opportunity for the public to speak. There was none,
and the public hearing was closed.
Ms. Barbe asked if the denial of this petition would mean that this issue is
closed. Ms. Charlton responded that the applicant can choose to work with the
staff to re-file the application and a redo of the process. Chair Doe stated that
this property needs something to happen but that procedures need to be
followed. She stated that the property was a good place when it was occupied
but is vacant now and needs to be redeveloped correctly and that safety is the
primary concern. Ms. Buckley stated that if this petition is denied and if the
Council denies this petition, she encourages the applicant to resubmit and
complete all required documentation. Mr. Occhipinti indicated he believed the
petition was complete. Chair Doe reiterated that she needs safety assured and
that she does not want to endanger the public or the owner. She further
encouraged the owner to submit a proper application that takes everything into
consideration. Chair Doe stated that the Commission cannot in good
conscience approve an application does not have complete documentation.
Mr. Castro made a motion based on the submitted petition, staff report, and
testimony presented that the Planning and Zoning Commission adopt the
findings for special uses enumerated in the October 12, 2018 staff report to the
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the Special Use Permit for
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 13 of 15
1015 Blackhawk Road and recommend to the DeKalb City Council that the
requested special use permit be denied. Seconded by Ms. Buckley.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Barbe – yes, Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Castro –
yes, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passed 4-0-2. Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Wright were
absent.
6. Item for Public Discussion – Petition by MCJ Investments-Green Circuit for
approval of a special use permit for a solar garden proposed to be located in
unincorporated DeKalb County and within the City of DeKalb’s 1 ½ mile
planning jurisdiction for the site located along the south side of Twombly Road,
approximately 1,300 feet west of Annie Glidden Road with an address of 1400
Twombly Road (Suburban Apartments)
Brett Robinson with Green Circuit stated that he worked with the City on the
deficiencies in their plan and noted that it was not unreasonable and that the
City was easy to work with. He stated that this was a nice project that would fit
into the AGN plan and is within the purview of the City.
Ms. Charlton went through the staff report dated October 12, 2018 and stated
staff recommends support for the project subject to the conditions listed in the
report. She said that Mr. Robinson indicated agreement with the conditions
that the City is recommending, including a re-platting of the site per the City’s
request. Ms. Charlton stated that while the location of the existing storm sewer
is not provided, the applicant agreed to grant an easement if it does not fall
within the 80 feet right of way to be dedicated along the west property line. She
also noted that if the existing drainage easement exists, it may be necessary
to extend the easement to the far south property line if it falls outside the 80
feet right-of-way to be dedicated. Regarding the platting language, Ms.
Charlton said that the property will remain unincorporated unless future actions
by the owner or the City necessitate annexation.
Ms. Charlton also stated that an agreement between the owner and the City is
necessary that stipulates the owner will remain responsible for maintenance of
the right-of-way and will need to provide liability until such time as the City
improves the right-of-way with roadway improvements. The applicant
confirmed that they would continue to maintain the property. Ms. Charlton also
stated appropriate signage and a barrier will be provided at the south end of
the eastern right-of-way dedication. She added that while the water and fire
hydrants do not connect to city water service, the DeKalb Fire Department does
provide service. She stated the Department determined that there was
adequate water flow and pressure at the site. Regarding access, Ms. Charlton
said that hard surface pavement instead of gravel should be used for access
anywhere outside the fenced area, which the applicant has agreed to provide.
Inside the fenced area, she mentioned gravel access will be provided for the
low-intensity use and will include a T-Type turn around at the west end.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 14 of 15
Ms. Charlton stated that staff had asked for verification that the amount and
pattern of drainage will not be altered on the site, and the applicant confirmed
there would be no substantial changes due to the use of permanent plantings
and maintenance of the existing drain tiles. She also said that the setback on
the west side of the solar facility should be no closer to the new 80-foot right-
of-way than the County’s setback requirement or 25 feet, which the applicant
agreed to. Finally, Ms. Charlton stated that staff requested additional screening
in two areas, which the applicant has agreed to and will augment with
evergreen plantings.
Mr. Castro thanked staff for working out the remaining issues with the applicant.
Ms. Barbe stated that she was glad this project is coming to the City and that
there is a need for more renewable energy. Chair Doe asked about potential
additional landscape screening and asked where the landscaping would go.
Ms. Charlton responded that it would be within 80 feet and the evergreens
would be in the 25-foot setback area. She stated the trees would be in the
parkway of the 80-foot right-of-way. Chair Doe stated that this was a good
opportunity to work alongside the County and appreciated the fact that the
County gave additional time to the City to work out issues with the applicant.
Chair Doe asked if the Commissioners had any more questions or comments.
Ms. Barbe made a motion based on the applicant’s submittal and agreement
to enter into a binding agreement with the City of DeKalb that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council that the City Council
recommend to the DeKalb County Hearing Officer and County Board that the
applicant’s request for a solar farm as outlined in DeKalb County Case DK 18-
32 be approved, subject to the owner’s execution of an agreement with the City
of DeKalb that requires conformance to the “Conditions of Approval” as outlined
in Section IV “Conclusions and Recommendations” of the staff report for the
Planning and Zoning Commission’s October 17, 2018 meeting. Seconded by
Ms. Buckley.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Barbe – yes, Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Castro –
yes, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passed 4-0-2. Mr. Maxwell and Mr. Wright were
absent.
F. REPORTS
Mr. Olson mentioned the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting will be
Wednesday, November 7th, and there are three public hearings scheduled. He
stated that the special use permit for the digital sign for the Hillcrest Covenant
Church and the rezoning for Adventure Works along Sycamore Road were passed
at the October 8th City Council meeting. Mr. Olson thanked the Commission for
their time and attention to the petitions tonight recognizing it was a long agenda.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
Page 15 of 15
G. ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Barbe motioned to adjourn, Ms. Buckley seconded the motion, and the motion
was approved by unanimous voice vote. The meeting adjourned at 8:33 pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Christine Wang, Recording Secretary
Minutes were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 19, 2018.
Agenda
DeKalb Municipal Building
Council Chambers
200 S. Fourth St., 2nd Floor
DeKalb, IL 60115
AGENDA
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 17, 2018
6:00 PM
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Additions or Deletions)
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. September 19, 2018
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing – Amendment to the City of DeKalb 2005 Comprehensive Plan
to approve a sub-area plan for the neighborhoods located in the northwest
corner of the City along both sides of Annie Glidden Road - Annie Glidden North
(AGN) Revitalization Plan.
2. Public Hearing – Petition by the City of DeKalb for text amendments to
Chapter 23 “Unified Development Ordinance” of the Municipal Code to amend
Article 5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District of the UDO to establish a
procedure and criteria for allowing single family attached dwellings having a
common wall along a lot line be permitted with the approval of a special use
permit.
3. Public Hearing – Petition by Fant Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson,
for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential
Conservation 1 zoned lot into two single-family attached lots located at 801-
803 S. 2nd St; Final Plat of Fant’s First Division.
4. Public Hearing – Petition by Fant Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson,
for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “TFR” Two-Family
Residential zoned lot into two single-family attached lots located at 722-724
Grove St.; Final Plat of Fant’s Second Division.
5. Public Hearing – Petition by Pete Occhipinti, represented by Mark Johnson,
and West Suburban Bank, as Trustee under Trust No. 12128, owner, for
approval of a special use permit for residential apartments over a ground floor
commercial use in the “LC” Light Commercial District for property located at
1015 Blackhawk Road.
6. Item for Public Discussion - Petition by MCJ Investments-Green Circuit for
approval of a special use permit for a solar garden proposed to be located in
unincorporated DeKalb County and within the City of DeKalb’s 1 ½ mile
planning jurisdiction for the site located along the south side of Twombly Road,
approximately 1,300 feet west of Annie Glidden Road with an address of 1400
Twombly Road (Suburban Apartments).
F. REPORTS
G. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
CITY OF DEKALB
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
September 19, 2018
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a Meeting on September 19, 2018 at the City
of DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 S. Fourth St., DeKalb, Illinois. Chair Christina Doe
called the meeting to order at 6:02PM.
A. ROLL CALL
Recording Secretary, Linda Odom called the roll. Planning and Zoning
Commission members present were Chair Christina Doe, Katharina Barbe, Vicki
Buckley, Max Maxwell, and Jerry Wright. Commissioner David Castro was
absent.
City staff present were Principal Planner, Dan Olson and Recording Secretary,
Linda Odom.
B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA (Additions/Deletions)
Chair Christina Doe requested a motion to approve the September 19, 2018
agenda as presented. Ms. Buckley motioned to approve the agenda as presented.
Mr. Maxwell seconded the motion, and the motion was approved by unanimous
voice vote.
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Olson noted the minutes from the September 5, 2018 Commission meeting
will be presented for approval at the next meeting on October 3rd.
D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (Open Floor to Anyone Wishing to Speak on Record)
None
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Public Hearing – Petition by Banner-Up Signs, applicant, and Hillcrest
Covenant Church, owner, for a special use permit for a church in order to
approve a waiver to Article 13.03.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance to
allow an electronic changeable copy sign (digital display sign) on the subject
property located at 1515 North 1st Street.
Chair Doe opened the meeting to the petitioner John Kuhn of Banner-Up Signs in
Sycamore and Jen Zerby, Pastor at Hillcrest Covenant Church. Ms. Zerby talked
about the church history mentioning that the congregation is around 150 people
Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 2018
Page 2 of 3
and their current sign is about 25 years old. She said they would like to replace
the sign with an electronic readerboard sign. Mr. Kuhn provided a slide
presentation explaining what the new sign would look like. He said the only thing
that lights up will be the letters, the message center is amber in color and the
church can control everything on the sign. He mentioned the church plans to have
the sign on from 6am-11pm.
Mr. Olson went through the staff report dated September 14, 2018 stating that the
church is asking for a special use permit for an electronic changeable copy sign
(digital display sign). He noted the UDO prohibits electronic changeable copy
signs, however a waiver can be granted with a special use permit. He reported the
sign will not be flashing and there are currently no restrictions when the existing
sign can be on. Mr. Olson mentioned the proposed sign should not be detrimental
to the neighborhood and is surrounded by single family homes with the closest one
about 125’ away. He noted the sign will be on the corner of Ridge Dr. and N. 1st
St. He said the City received Citizen Response Forms from Sharon Pflaumer of
1623 Margaret Lane, Vickie Novak and Sonya Wiley of 1701 Judy Lane indicating
they do not support the proposal. Mr. Olson also mentioned that a Citizen
Response Form from Dennis & Wanda Sabin of 1501 N. 1st St., Elaine Licking
representing 104 Ridge Dr. and an email from Linda Lahey of 1527 Margaret Lane
were received all noting their support of the request. Mr. Olson concluded there is
a sample motion recommending approval in the Commissioner’s packet.
Chair Doe gave the public a chance to speak.
Randy Bourdages representing Trinity Lutheran Church noted their support of the
request. He mentioned the church requested a similar sign 15 years ago and it
didn’t go through, however someday they would like to try again.
Chair Doe opened up the discussion to the Commissioners for comments or
questions. Mr. Maxwell asked about the lighting intensity restrictions (e.g. 500 nits)
in the recommendation. Mr. Kuhn from Banner Up Signs said the church can
control the intensity and brightness and there are sensors that make it dimmer
during the day and brighter at night. Mr. Wright asked if the sign could be
animated. Mr. Kuhn said yes it could be programmed for that. Ms. Buckley asked
if they would be open to turning it off an hour earlier at 10:00pm. The church
indicated they could. Ms. Barbe asked about the color of the letters. Mr. Kuhn
responded they will be orange (amber). Mr. Kuhn said there will be no movement
in the sign only changes in the message. Ms. Buckley asked how the prosed sign
compares with the digital display sign at Bemis Toyota (Sycamore Road) regarding
brightness. Mr. Olson said they have the same restrictions as recommended for
the church but is not sure on the intensity of the Bemis sign. He noted it can be
programmed to change. Chair Doe asked if the blue will be lit in the sign. Mr. Kuhn
said no it will only be lit behind the letters. Mr. Kuhn said the top portion would
only be on when it is dark out and the bottom electronic portion would be on if they
Planning and Zoning Commission
September 19, 2018
Page 3 of 3
choose the times of 6am-11pm. He added that the top portion is controlled
separately from the bottom portion of the sign.
Chair Doe gave the public one more chance to speak. There was none. Chair Doe
asked the Commissioners if they had any more questions. There was none.
Mr. Wright moved that based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented,
the Planning and Zoning Commission forward its findings of fact and recommend
to the City Council approval of a Special Use Permit for a church in order to
approve a waiver to Article 13.03.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance to allow
an electronic changeable copy sign (digital display sign) as shown on the sign
details and site plan received on August 15, 2018 prepared by Banner Up Signs
labeled as Exhibit A and per the conditions as indicated on Exhibit B. Ms. Buckley
seconded. Ms. Barbe made a motion to amend the original motion to restrict the
time the sign could be on from 6:00am to 11:00pm. There was no second to the
amended motion. Mr. Wright did not agree to the amended motion.
A roll call vote was taken. Ms. Buckley – yes, Mr. Maxwell – yes, Mr. Wright – yes,
Ms. Barbe – no, Chair Doe – yes. Motion passes 4-1-1. Mr. Castro was absent.
F. REPORTS
Mr. Olson mentioned the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting will be
Wednesday, October 3, 2018. There will be one hearing for 209 W. Hillcrest for a
garage addition that encroaches in the front and rear yard setbacks. He reported
at the September 10th City Council meeting they did pass the first reading for the
Home2 Suites hotel and the 2nd reading will be in front of the Council next Monday
night, September 24th. Mr. Olson reported the Mayor received a resignation from
Commissioner Deborah Nier and hopefully the vacancy will be filled soon. Chair
Doe stated she would like to thank Deb for her service and she was a great asset
to the team.
G. ADJOURNMENT
Ms. Barbe motioned to adjourn, Mr. Maxwell seconded the motion, and the
motion was approved by unanimous voice vote. The meeting adjourned at
6:28pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Linda Odom, Recording Secretary
Minutes were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 17, 2018.
TO: DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Dan Olson, Principal Planner
Jason Michnick, Economic Development Planner
DATE: October 12, 2018
RE: Amendment to the City of DeKalb 2005 Comprehensive Plan to approve
the Annie Glidden North Revitalization Plan
I. General Information
On August 14, 2017, City Council approved a contract with urban planning firm, Camiros,
to lead an effort of creating a sub-area plan for the neighborhood colloquially referred to
as Annie Glidden North (AGN). The subject area is located along the east and west sides
of Annie Glidden Road between Lucina Avenue and the County Health Department
building. A map of the subject area is included in the draft document on the page prior to
the Executive Summary.
The decision to engage in the creation of the AGN Revitalization Plan (the Plan) came
from recognizing the long-term shift in demographics in the neighborhood, and the
present challenges for residents, such as persistent crime, a lack of access to resources,
connectivity, and neighborhood identify. The AGN neighborhood is the most densely
populated area of the City, with roughly 23% of DeKalb residents residing in the area that
is predominately multifamily rental housing.
The development of the neighborhood took place between the 1960’s and early 2000’s
as a response to growing enrollment at Northern Illinois University (NIU). The
neighborhood was designed and planned for students and faculty at the university. Over
the past ten years, enrollment at NIU has declined from a high of approximately 26,000
to 17,169 in the current academic year. The substantial loss of students resulted in a
temporary surplus of rental units in the market, especially in the AGN area. The availability
of affordable market rate housing has resulted in an influx of low-income families now
residing in the area. The neighborhood was built for students that largely relied on the
university for services and resources, which is a cause for many of the challenges for
families that now live there.
The purpose of the Plan was to develop a vision for the neighborhood and address the
systemic issues leading to many of the challenges that are present. Given the diversity of
stakeholders and residents, a robust community engagement strategy was critical to the
process of developing the Plan. Following the approval of a contract with Camiros, the
Page |1
Mayor appointed a special task force specifically for the Plan. The 30-person AGN Task
Force includes community leaders, representatives from various social service agencies
and governmental units, and student and non-student residents of AGN.
During early conversations of the AGN Task Force, it became evident that there were
specific themes emerging. As a result, the AGN Task Force split into four separate sub-
committees. The format of the Plan, especially the Recommended Projects and Initiatives
section is based off of the four subcommittees that were formed. The projects fall into the
following four categories:
A. Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space
B. Community Services
C. Neighborhood Safety and Security
D. Housing and Commercial Development
A total of 45 projects and initiatives have been identified in the Plan and prioritized based
on feedback from the AGN Task Force, as well as their perceived impact on the
neighborhood. Ten of the projects have been called out as being the most
transformational and are identified on page four of the Plan. Greater detail on the projects,
as well as supporting case studies for how those types of projects have been implemented
in other parts of the country are also included.
In addition to the AGN Task Force’s work on identifying the projects and prioritizing them,
several public meetings were held in order to get input and feedback from residents of
the neighborhood. Summaries of the community meetings are included in the Community
Engagement section of the Plan. Additionally, the Plan is available on the City’s website
and the public is also able to provide feedback to staff via email. The formal public
comment period ends on October 17, 2018, but the public will have additional
opportunities to provide feedback during future public City Council meetings.
A public hearing on the Plan is required because it is considered a sub-area plan and
would be adopted as an amendment to the City’s 2005 Comprehensive Plan. Should the
Plan be adopted, it would only amend the parts of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan that are
in conflict with specific elements of the Plan. Within the Plan are recommendations for
further modifications to the City’s Unified Development Ordinance as well as other zoning
changes. Further action would be required to adopt those recommendations if the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council determine they are desirable. These
recommendations are included in the section Zoning Review that begins on page 69.
Other potential further action that would be required in relation to the Plan would be if
specific development/redevelopment projects that are called for in the Plan are brought
forward for consideration. The Plan does call for further investigation and efforts to attract
mixed-use developments in the areas of Blackhawk Drive and Hilcrest Drive, and Lucinda
Avenue and Annie Glidden Road. The development of a community center that is
constructed in a manner to provide maximum flexibility for programming and service
delivery is also called for in the Plan.
Page |2
The most critical component of the Plan, should it be adopted, will be the implementation
of the projects and initiatives called for. It is important to consider that the Plan is visionary
document, and there will be instances where opportunities present themselves that do
not fit with a specific element of the plan but do fit within the ideals and general vision of
the Plan. When opportunities/investments do present themselves, the Plan provides a
tremendous value in that it provides confidence that the project or opportunity would be
supported because it fits the vision that the community has agreed upon. In fact, the Plan
although not yet adopted, has already helped staff in multiple occasions such as applying
for grants or requesting designation for the area to be an Opportunity Zone.
Also, similar to the City’s other sub-area plans, it should not be expected that all of the
projects will be executed in an expedited timeframe. Many of the projects required
substantial resources or rely on private party transactions, which the City does not have
control over. The changes that have occurred in the AGN neighborhood have not
occurred overnight, and achieving the vision outlined in the Plan will take considerable
time and effort. Continued collaboration between governmental units, residents, and
community stakeholders will be necessary if a meaningful improvement to the quality of
life for residents in the AGN area is to be achieved.
II. Citizen Response/Comments
Citizen comments related to the draft Plan have been collected via email and also during
community meetings. A consolidation of the comments from community meetings and
those sent by email will be provided to the Commission at the time of the Public Hearing
and entered into the record.
III. Conclusion and Recommendations
The Plan was created through a considerable amount of public engagement and
collaboration by a diverse group of community stakeholders that served on the AGN Task
Force. Robust conversations that address the neighborhood’s challenges, needs, and
opportunities took place over the past 13 months. Based on the amount of community
engagement that took place, and the level of support from the public on the Plan, it is
recommended that the Plan be moved forward to City Council with a positive
recommendation.
IV. Sample Motion
I move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council
approval of an amendment to the City of DeKalb 2005 Comprehensive Plan to approve
the Annie Glidden North (AGN) Revitalization Plan dated October 2018.
Page |3
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning
and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 6:00
p.m. in the DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois, on a City
initiated amendment to the City of DeKalb 2005 Comprehensive Plan to approve a sub-
area plan for the neighborhoods located in the northwest corner of the City along both
sides of Annie Glidden Road. The Annie Glidden North (AGN) Revitalization Plan is a
community-led, collaborative effort that describes the strategies to improve the quality of
life for residents, with a focus on identifying specific projects for the AGN neighborhood.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed
above. Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on the
Plan to the City of DeKalb, Community Development Department, 200 South Fourth
Street, DeKalb, Illinois, 60115 by 5:00 p.m. by Wednesday, October 10, 2018. Further
information regarding the petition is available from the Community Development
Department at (815) 748-2060 or (815) 748-2096 or on the City of DeKalb’s web page
at https://www.cityofdekalb.com/
Christina Doe, Chairperson
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
Prepared for:
The City of DeKalb, Illinois
Prepared by:
Camiros, Ltd.
OCTOBER 2018 DRAFT
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would also like to thank the organizations that have been involved with this project and who will continue to
contribute to its implementation.
• Morgan Brickley • Christie Krupp
AGN TASK FORCE
Associate Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Krupp and Krupp, LLP
• Michelle Bringas • Mohammad Labadi
Director of Asian American Resource Center President, Islamic Center of DeKalb
• Deanna Cada • Dr. Leroy Mitchell
DeKalb County Community Action Department Retired Pastor, New Hope Missionary Baptist Church
• David Castro • Michael Newman
Planning and Zoning Commission Member Hope Haven Coordinator
• Jamie Craven • Shelly Perkins
DeKalb School District Interm Superintendent DeKalb County Housing Authority
• Bill Finucane • Patti Perkins
City Council Liaison DeKalb Park District
• Rudy Galvan • Mike Pittsley
Owner, Burritoville Owner, Pittsley Realty
• Joe Gastiger, • Valerie Redmond
Pastor, United Church of Christ Children Home and Aide / Former UV Resident
• Chad Glover • Glenn Roby
Director of Jobs PLUS Board Treasurer of Phi Sigma Kappa Alumni Association
• Rachel Jacob, President • Herb Rubin
NIU Student Association Retired NIU Professor
• Will Heinisch • Ecila Scaife
DARA President NIU Child Development Supervisor
• Derek Hiland • Gip Seaver
DeKalb County Community Development Director Retired NIU Deputy Provost
• Tiara Huggins • Kurt Thurmaier
University Village Tenants Association President Chair of Public Administration Department
• Dan Kenney • Ellingsworth Webb
DeKalb County Community Gardens President Property Manager of Eden’s Garden
• David Jacobson • Denise Weinmann
City Council Liaison RVG Commercial Developer
• Andrew John Knox
Student Member of Greek Community
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN
• 4-C: Community Coordinated Child Care
• DeKalb Businesses
• DeKalb County Health Department
• DeKalb Park District
• DeKalb Property Owners and Managers
• First United Methodist Church
• Immanuel Lutheran Church
• Kishwaukee United Way
• Northern Illinois University – All Departments
• Northwestern Medicine Kishwaukee Hospital
• Westminster Presbyterian Church
AGN REVITALIZATION EFFORTS
The Annie Glidden North
Neighborhood will be attractive,
walkable and bikeable, with
abundant green amenities. It will
include safe and clean blocks that
are inviting and livable for a vibrant
mix of businesses, students, and
all residents alike.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ......................................................... 1
Recommended Projects and Initiatives ............................. 5
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space .......... 11
Community Services..................................................... 27
Neighborhood Safety and Security .............................. 39
Housing and Commercial Development ...................... 45
Market Study Summary ................................................. 59
Community Engagement ................................................ 61
Community Feedback .................................................... 65
Zoning Ordinance Review .............................................. 71
Implementation ............................................................. 79
PROJECT AREA
The area of Suburban
Apartments is
unincorporated and DEKALB COUNTY
is not within the HEALTH DEPARTMENT
jurisdiction of the
City of DeKalb. The
plan recommends
that the City, DeKalb
EDEN’S County, property
GARDEN owners, and partner
organizations
collaborate to include
unincorporated areas
bordering the AGN
neighborhood in
Garden of initiatives whenever DRESSER RD
Eden Park possible. It is the
intent to increase
the quality of life and
living standards for
TWOMBLY RD all of the City and
surrounding areas
SUBURBAN through the initiatives
APARTMENTS that take place as a
result of this Plan. WEST AMBER
RIDGE MANOR
RIDGE DR
SUBURBAN
APARTMENTS RIDGEBROOK
BLACKHAWK DR GREEK ROW
Boardman
Park COLLEGE
NORMAL RD
PARK
ANNIE GLIDDEN AVE
HILLCREST DR GR
EEK ROW
Pappas
Park
FOTIS DR
VARSITY BLVD
VARSITY UNIVERSITY
SQUARE HEIGHTS
RUSSELL RD
UNIVERSITY
VILLAGE
Welsh
Park
CRANE DR
UNIVERSITY
PLAZA
LUCINDA AVE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Many of the issues identified in studies conducted in prior years that gave
cause to this planning effort, are ones that can only truly be addressed by PURPOSE
This Plan serves two main purposes:
focusing on systemic root causes rather than the symptoms they produce
1. Describes the AGN Revitalization
such as crime. The goal of the Annie Glidden North Revitalization Plan is to Plan process to provide a historical
create a visionary guiding document that sets forth the strategic direction background of the planning process
for revitalization of the AGN Neighborhood through addressing root causes underwent that led to the creation
of this plan, and the projects and
of the issues that have led to its decline. This Plan provides guidance for
recommendations included as a result.
initiatives that can transform the AGN Neighborhood into a desirable area to
reside in or visit. 2. Lists specific initiatives and goals that
have been recommended by members
of the community, the Task Force, the
The issues that brought about the need for this Plan did not arise in a short
City and partner organizations, and the
span of time just as it will take significant time and effort to realize the planning consulting tasked with leading
positive change that is the hope of those invested in the community, who live the process and building the Plan,
in or near the neighborhood, and/or who are affected by its condition. The Camiros.
residents of the AGN Neighborhood make up 23% of the total population of
the City of DeKalb. The wellbeing of this area is tantamount to the overall
health of the entire City. If actions are organized and carried through in the
short-term, long-term commitment is made, public-private partnerships are
leveraged, and significant efforts are contributed by all community members
and stakeholders invested in the success of this Plan, revitalization of the
AGN Neighborhood can occur.
This Plan is a community led, collaborative effort that describes strategies
to improve the quality of life for residents. The intent of this Plan is to chart a
course for achieving the community vision for the AGN neighborhood while
encouraging reinvestment. Successful implementation of Plan initiatives are
dependent on strong commitments from and close collaboration among
Executive Summary AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 1
all partners. Stakeholders, including Northern Illinois University (NIU),
OUTCOMES property owners, developers, other units of government, and local
The intended outcomes of this Plan are many residents have their own sets of interests and goals for community
but to assist the reader understand more improvement that often align with each other. The Plan builds on these
specifically what is meant by transformation and
synergies.
revitalization, intentions for AGN Revitalization
efforts can be summarized into the following
statements for the community as a whole: Development of the Plan has been directed by several goals including
improving safety and security, generating commercial redevelopment,
1. We intend to create an environment that
developing high quality rental units for a mix of incomes, attracting
can provide residents with a foundation to
thrive economically as long-term members greater investment toward improving existing properties, improving
of the community existing assets, and establishing better connections to jobs and
services. The Plan has also been guided by comments received during
2. We intend to make the neighborhood a safe
the planning process, such as the need to address lifestyle conflicts
and inviting place for both students and
non-student residents who are seeking to between families and NIU students, lack of housing diversity and issues
live productive and positive lives and want with current zoning regulations. In order to advance the vision of the
to enjoy the area they live in. community and address these issues, the Plan outlines and prioritizes
a suite of proactive and reactive neighborhood initiatives and policy
3. We intend to attract and retain property
owners that genuinely care about the recommendations based on both local understanding and national best
wellbeing of their residents and the practice case studies, which are included within the Recommended
community. The types of property owners Projects and Initiatives section.
that we will strive to work with and open
our community to are those who will
proactively comply with city building This Plan includes project descriptions that are intended to be adopted
codes, make necessary investments in by agencies and community partners who will then organize actions
their property to provide quality standard to take during the implementation stage after the final approval of this
living conditions to tenants regardless
document. The many projects listed in this Plan vary widely in size and
of unit rates or resident demographics,
and be responsive to the needs of scope but all of them are strategic in their purpose to effect positive
the neighborhood and community as change through initiatives involving community services, safety and
revitalization actions begin. We will not security, infrastructure improvements, beautification, redesign of parks
be amenable to property owners and
and open space, and housing and commercial development. The Core
managers who do not have a vested
interest in the vitality of this neighborhood Transformational Projects that are listed on page 4, were designed and
and the entire community. selected as catalysts to create positive change through interconnection
of new services and physical improvements for the AGN Neighborhood
4. We intend to reintegrate the area into
and all residents of DeKalb.
the community and make the AGN
neighborhood a desirable destination
for any person to live in or visit through
improvement and addition of transit
services, parks, trails, retail shopping,
attractive, safe, and affordable housing
options, entertainment and events,
place making, and beautification of the
environment.
2 Executive Summary AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
STRENGTHENING TOWN-GOWN RELATIONSHIPS
Surrounding the Northern Illinois University campus are The AGN Plan establishes priorities for community
neighborhoods of renters and homeowners, families service, volunteerism, and investments that will strengthen
and single professionals, students, and seniors. These town-gown bonds and make the area a better place to live.
residents are proud of the campus, just as they are proud By utilizing the AGN Plan as a roadmap for future changes,
and protective of their streets, yards, and homes. NIU, students, faculty, staff, property owners, and full-time
City of DeKalb, and local neighborhood organizations residents can enjoy and look forward to the work they
are encouraged to work together to promote a safe, will do together and engage in making their community
sustainable and livable community. A primary issue facing stronger as a whole.
town-gown communities such as the AGN Neighborhood
is the ability for students, higher education professionals,
and community members to establish healthy, “neighborly”
relationships.
Is this the place to raise my
family? Should I stay after I
Can I retire here? graduate? Am I welcomed here?
How safe is my
neighborhood?
Executive Summary AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 3
core transformational projects
The Plan recommends that the community consider ten primary projects as the highest These projects were
priorities for the implementation agenda. The Core Transformational Projects were designed chosen to change
and specifically selected as catalysts for creating positive activity through interconnection the status of the
neighborhood from
of new services and uses for the AGN Neighborhood and surrounding community. These
“Surviving to Thriving”
are projects that have the potential to stimulate the revitalization of the AGN area and trigger
positive momentum for quality improvements and renewal.The Core Transformational Projects
reflect each of the four key initiatives of the Plan and should be initiated within the next one to
four years in order to advance implementation. Project descriptions begin on page 17.
B1 D1 C1 A1 B2
Establish a Consider creation Implementation Identification Create a
Community Food of a Community of safety of local Community
and Education Development improvements transportation Center Program
Center Corporation focused on improvements
(CDC) to focus on improved and direct
implementation lighting and integration with
of revitalization surveillance DSATS Study
efforts
Recommended Implementation Priorities
B3 D3 A3 D2 A2
Work with local Create a Develop Create a Lucinda Redesign Welsh
health care Hillcrest/ streetscape Focus Area, Park as a local
providers, to Blackhawk Focus and gateway prioritizing and regional
establish a Area, prioritizing improvements redevelopment destination
walk-in clinic mixed-use for the Greek through a
or urgent care development Row area in potential
facility through a order to help public/private
potential improve its partnership
public/private identity and
partnership perception
4 Executive Summary AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
RECOMMENDED
PROJECTS AND
INITIATIVES
CORE GOALS
As part of the Listening and Learning phase of the Plan, • Growing the local tax base with new residents
Core Goals were developed by the project Task Force.
These goals were used to develop the Project Reference • Create an environment that provides residents with
Map and Implementation Projects and include: a foundation to thrive economically as long-term
members of the community
• Developing a stronger sense of cohesion internally
• Improving the return on investment for property
and with the rest of the City
owners
• Reduce crime
• Increasing access to healthy food as a tool for
• Ensuring that AGN is a “high choice” area for empowerment
living that university and employers can use for
• Addressing the deficiencies of the neighborhood in
recruitment
terms of social services in order to fill the gaps with
• Enhancing the overall college experience viable solutions
• Making the area more pedestrian friendly • Ensuring that various stakeholders have ownership
and pride in the AGN Revitalization Plan
• Developing a deeper understanding of those who
live in poverty and their challenges • Changing the direction of AGN from surviving to
thriving
DRAFT ALTERNATIVES
Prior to development of the Plan, Draft Alternatives incorporate feedback from Community Meeting 2, as well
were created in Spring 2018 to reflect community as additional comments received from the Task Force
feedback on potential improvements to the AGN area. and other stakeholders. Elements of the Draft Alternatives
The Draft Alternatives, shown on the following pages, were incorporated into the Plan.
were intended to illustrate a vision for the future and
Recommended Projects and Initiatives AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 5
inspiration for the future
New multi-use path
leading to campus Mixed-use
development with
student-oriented
amenities
Running path
and other park Student-related
Redeveloped services &
enhancements
commercial node facilities
with night life Multi-Family
establishments Rehab or
redevelopment
Access
point
Enhanced
Multi-Family Intersection
Access Multi-use path
Rehab or New mixed-use connecting to
point redevelopment development & Welsh Park
green square
replacing
relocated
ail parking lot
Ne w tr Relocated
creek
University Plaza
parking lot
Enhanced
Intersection
Student
apartments
Mixed-use
development To campus
ANNIE GLIDDEN NORTH
REVITALIZATION PLAN DRAFT ALTERNATIVE - “CAMPUS COMMUNITY” camiros
DEKALB, IL
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY APRIL2018
DRAFT ALTERNATIVE - “CAMPUS COMMUNITY”
The “Campus Community” Alternative was oriented around the idea of strengthening the AGN neighborhood as a
student-oriented community and creating stronger linkages with Northern Illinois University (NIU). The Alternative
focused on public improvements including a new creek trail, pathways and improved pedestrian crossings, that would
coincide with private mixed-use and commercial redevelopment at the Annie Glidden / Lucinda and Annie Glidden /
Hillcrest intersections. A student-related service hub was suggested for the Blackhawk/Hillcrest area while a strong
focus for residential reinvestment was on apartment areas west of Normal Road and immediately south of Varsity
Boulevard.
6 Recommended Projects and Initiatives AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
inspiration for the future
High school
ball fields
New single-family
DeKalb County
neighborhood
Health Services
New
commercial
node To High School
and Downtown
Improved multi-modal New single-family
infrastructure neighborhood
To Downtown
Redeveloped
commercial node Family
Dog park with improved services
building configuration
Community gardens
on vacant parcels
To Downtown
Improved
basketball
court
Rezone parcels to redevelop
for single-family
Improved
Improved path to Path to New multi-use path
new creek trail new creek trail
Enhanced
Intersections
New park space &
New community center/
Mixed-Use Park Facility
New multi-unit facul-
ty/staff housing with
reconfigured parking
lot to rear
Plaza
Commercial To Downtown
development
ANNIE GLIDDEN NORTH
REVITALIZATION PLAN DRAFT ALTERNATIVE - “HEALTHY HOME” camiros
DEKALB, IL
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY APRIL2018
DRAFT ALTERNATIVE “HEALTHY HOME”
The “Healthy Home” Alternative focuses on ensuring that the AGN Area becomes a more attractive and livable
community for families. New lower-density redevelopment would help to fill in vacant property, along with a
strong emphasis on the development of services and amenities that were oriented towards families. Commercial
redevelopment was focused on the west side of the Annie Glidden / Hillcrest intersection, as well as at the corner of
Annie Glidden / Lucinda. Parks and open spaces, including Welsh Park and Boardman Park would be redesigned to be
more usable for children and teens. Community gardens would be incorporated on vacant or underutilized properties.
Family services would be anchored at the the Blackhawk / Lucinda intersection, as well as at the 912 Edgebrook
Property. Pedestrian and bicycle connections would be strengthened to the DeKalb County Health Services campus as
well as to DeKalb High School.
Recommended Projects and Initiatives AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 7
PROJECT REFERENCE MAP
D5
B3
D1
B7
D4
W DRESSER ROAD
A8
TWOMBLY ROAD Potential Street
Connections
Low to Medium
C1
Density Infill
N ANNIE GLIDDEN ROAD
Residential
Potential Street
RIDGE DRIVE
Connection
D2
B2
A4
W HIlLCREST DRIVE
A3
A6
A1
VARSITY BOULEVARD
B4
D7 A5
C2 B1
A2
CRANE DRIVE
D6
NORMAL DRIVE
RUSSELL ROAD
D3
A6
B5
LUCINDA AVENUE
A6
B6
HIGHER AND MEDIUM PRIORITY PROJECTS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
8 Recommended Projects and Initiatives AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
PLAN PRIORITIES
The Plan outlines overall priorities for the AGN Project complexity is determined by evaluating the
Neighborhood, reflecting stakeholder and Task Force following foreseeable criteria: Project time and value,
comments and feedback generated through the team size and composition, project urgency, schedule,
community engagement process. The Plan is organized cost and scope flexibility, clarity of the problem and
according to the following four priorities. These solution, stability of requirements, strategic importance,
four priorities were initially determined through prior stakeholder influence, level of organizational and
studies that eventually led to the inception of the AGN commercial change, and external constraints and
Revitalization Plan process. Each priority includes a dependencies.
range of public and private implementation projects. The
descriptions listed below for each priority are summaries
of the desired outcomes that the AGN Task Force working
groups developed.
TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN SPACE
A Ensure efficient transit service is available to neighborhood residents and Annie Glidden Road
is safe for both motorists and pedestrians. Street trees should be plentiful, shading residents
and beautifying the neighborhood. Efficient, safe, and well-located off-street parking should be
provided. Improved lighting will allow residents to safely enjoy the neighborhood. Redesign Welsh
Park and other available green space for all ages, to accommodate passive and active uses. Make
AGN a desirable area for the entire community to visit or live in by providing quality living
standards, adding useful park and recreation space, and creating interconnectivity between the
neighborhood and the rest of the City.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
B Foster increased civic participation by neighborhood residents. Increase local daycare services
and alternatives to help current families and attract new families. Promote greater awareness
of community-focused services already in place. Ensure AGN residents are able to access
employment opportunities and resources. Build and link partnerships between organizations that
are located and/or operate in the neighborhood.
NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY AND SECURITY
C Reduce crimes by ensuring greater incorporation of crime-free housing. Add cameras and lighting
while ensuring improved property maintenance. Create better communication between property
owners, City government, tenants, and NIU along with a network of neighborhood associations.
Increase enforcement of minor quality of life infractions and the Safe Streets initiative. Continue to
support cooperation between the City of DeKalb and NIU police.
HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
D Create a neighborhood with a vibrant and managed mix of students, families, and Greeks. Create
efficient and well-located off-street parking. Promote well-maintained and managed properties.
Develop a blend of retail and entertainment / nightlife options attractive to students, local residents
and visitors. Ensure that public and private investment are aligned and coordinated.
Recommended Projects and Initiatives AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 9
- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
TRANSPORTATION
Make AGN a desirable area for the
INFRASTRUCTURE AND entire community to visit or live in
by providing quality living standards,
adding useful park and recreation
space, and creating interconnectivity
OPEN SPACE between the neighborhood and the
rest of the City.
INTRODUCTION DESIRED OUTCOMES
Transportation, infrastructure and open space elements Desired Outcomes were developed by the Transportation,
of the Plan are intended to foster public investments that Infrastructure and Open Space working group at the initial
can improve the quality of life for local residents while also brainstorming session and include the following:
helping to incentivize improved private redevelopment.
Projects in this section focus heavily on achieving the • Ensure efficient transit service is available to
following Plan goals: neighborhood residents and Annie Glidden Road is
safe for both motorists and pedestrians.
• Developing a stronger sense of cohesion internally • Street trees should be plentiful, shading residents and
and with the rest of the City beautifying the neighborhood.
• Efficient, safe, and well-located off-street parking
• Ensuring that AGN is a “high choice” area for should be provided.
living that university and employers can use for • Improved lighting will allow residents to safely enjoy
recruitment the neighborhood.
• Redesign Welsh Park and other available green space
• Making the area more pedestrian friendly
for all ages, to accommodate passive and active uses.
• Make AGN a desirable area for the entire community
• Changing the direction of AGN from surviving to
to visit or live in by providing quality living standards,
thriving
adding useful park and recreation space, and creating
interconnectivity between the neighborhood and the
rest of the City.
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 11
HIGHER PRIORITY PROJECTS
IDENTIFICATION OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION which are based on stakeholder feedback and reflect
A1
IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECT INTEGRATION fundamentals of effective transit service:
WITH DSATS STUDY
Community and stakeholder feedback indicates a • Increase frequency
strong desire to ensure that area families are well- • Increase span of service
connected to essential services, shopping and • Simplify routing to increase directness
employment centers. As redevelopment occurs, • Reduce overlapping service
transportation improvements including transit routing • Simplify schedules and standardize service periods
may also need to be revised. The Plan recommends organizations
incorporation of these goals in future updates to the
DeKalb Sycamore Area Transportation Study (DSATS). The central element of the proposed service options,
DSATS is the Metropolitan Planning Organization referred to as the Core Network, combines portions
(MPO) for the DeKalb Illinois Metropolitan Area. of existing routes to create a network of 30-minute
service for much of the day, operating seven days per
In 2017, DSATS completed the most recent update week. Under the proposed service options, the current
of its Transit Development Plan (TDP). The purpose Huskie Line routes that focus primarily on access
of the update was to review and evaluate the existing to campus will continue with minor modifications;
operations of NIU Transit Services and TransVAC, the TransVAC deviated fixed routes, serving the community
two primary transit services in the DeKalb-Sycamore more broadly, are also modified. In terms of significant
region; investigate the costs and benefits of a more service expansion, a new flex route in Sycamore is
integrated intra-community transit service among the proposed, and four new shorter community fixed
two primary transit services; and consider options routes are proposed, to be introduced in the mid- and
for improving intercommunity transit connections. long-term. Options for service to Elburn are also
Major trip generators contribute to the feasibility of presented.
enhancing existing transit service and support new
transit service. Some of the major trip generators Complexity Lower
identified by stakeholders and DSATS members that Estimated Cost $0-$50k
are located within the AGN Area include the NIU DSATS, TransVAC, Huskie
Campus, University Village Apartments, Eco Park Potential Lead Partners Line, City of DeKalb, Northern
Apartments, Suburban Apartments, Amber Manor Illinois University,
Apartments, and DeKalb County Human Services. The
DSATS Plan outlines the following service principles,
12 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
WELSH PARK REDESIGN
CR
AN
E
DR
IV
E OA D
LR
SEL
RUS
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
A2 REDESIGN WELSH PARK AS A LOCAL AND • Shaded seating near basketball area
REGIONAL DESTINATION • More open shelter areas
• Installation of a splash pad or other water feature
Community residents strongly agreed that
• Replacement of playground, consider locating closer
neighborhood parks and recreational facilities to existing shelter
positively contribute to quality of life. As part • Installation of free Wi-Fi in the Park
of an integrated green space improvement and • Creation of pathways connecting directly to University
Village apartments
integration plan for the area, the redesign of Welsh
• Amphitheater area for outdoor performances and
Park has the potential to greatly improve the AGN movies
neighborhood while creating a local and regional • Crosswalk and colored paving at Russell Road and
destination. Currently, the park is underutilized and Moraine Terrace to improve connections between
northern and southern sections of the park
provides limited value as an amenity to surrounding
• Installation of landscaping, seating and pedestrian-
residents. A redesign could greatly improve access, scaled lighting along paths
activity and appearance of the space, while providing • Planting additional trees along paths
a public anchor for surrounding private residential • Decorative fencing along park perimeter
• Reimagining of enclosed hockey rink area to
redevelopment. By creating a park that is well-used and
accommodate new uses including skateboarding or
well-loved, potential residents will value proximity to gaga ball
this space. The Plan recommends close coordination, • Public art and sculpture through collaboration with
led by the DeKalb Park District, to evaluate and NIU and local arts programs
• Additional park programs to help activate space
implement the following proposed changes that
during daytime and evenings
can appeal to both families, the surrounding student
population, and all of DeKalb:
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 13
CASE STUDY: MARVIN GAYE PARK -
WASHINGTON D.C.
Marvin Gaye Park in Washington, D.C. illustrates the life cycle associated with
many urban parks, because the conditions and subsequent use of the park follows
the variations in the economy and the available funds for maintenance and
improvements. It was Marvin Gaye Park where the National Recreation and Park
Association (NRPA) launched its initial community revitalization initiative, Parks
Build Community Phase I. In the 1970s, the District’s limited funds led to the gradual
disrepair of the park: it fell victim to illegal dumping and criminal activity. It became
known as “Needle Park,” reflecting the drug sales and use within its boundaries.
Renamed in honor of musician Marvin Gaye, who frequented the banks of the
stream while writing his music, the park remained in disrepair and misuse. Enter
Washington Parks & People, a nonprofit citizens’ organization that spearheaded an
effort to clean up the land and restore the park. Over a five-year period beginning
in 2001, this volunteer effort resulted in a multimillion dollar rejuvenation of the
park, during which 24,000 volunteers removed more than 3.5 million pounds of
trash. Beginning in 2007, as part of it’s first urban park project, NRPA partnered
with Washington Parks & People and the DC Department of Parks and Recreation.
This initial undertaking by NRPA resulted in improvements to Marvin Gaye Park—
providing further evidence that the health of a park is directly connected to the health
and beauty of its surrounding neighborhoods. Marvin Gaye Park, the former Watts
Branch Stream Valley Park, was officially reopened in 2009 and featured state-of-
the-art playground equipment, permanent mosaics honoring community heroes, and
rebuilt hiking and biking trails.
The story of a park renovation project intended to revitalize a
neighborhood does not stop with a successful dedication. More changes
and improvements were on the horizon, due to continued involvement
by Washington Parks & People and the strong community leadership
developed as part of this effort. The renovated and reopened park led to
positive changes in a newly revitalized neighborhood, including:
• The closing of a nearby methadone clinic that attracted drug users to
the area
• More people, young and old, visiting the park
• Visitors staying longer in the park
• Youths being more active physically while visiting the park
• Adults recalling childhood memories they recaptured by spending time
in the park
• People speaking about how the park has broken down barriers among
residents
Source: Rejuvenating Neighborhoods and Communities Through Parks—A Guide To Success
www.nrpa.org/uploadedFiles/nrpa.org/Publications_and_Research/Research/Papers/Rejuvenating-Neighborhoods-White-Pa-
per.pdf
14 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
These improvements should be coupled with a focus DEVELOP BICYCLE ROUTE TO HIGH SCHOOL AND
A3
on development of new medium-density housing HEALTH DEPARTMENT UTILIZING NORMAL AND
and parking at the vacant property on Crane Drive DRESSER ROADS
and Russell Road to take advantage of the enhanced DeKalb High School is a major destination that
amenity. The DeKalb Park District currently has limited currently remains out of reach for recreational
funds to begin Welsh Park improvements. This funding cyclists, including youth. The Plan recommends the
should be leveraged with grants through organizations evaluation and design of bicycle facilities on Normal
such as the National Recreation and Park Association, and Dresser Roads to accommodate and promote
KaBOOM! - which provides funding for playground active Transportation. These recommendations should
improvements, as well as the National Endowment be incorporated into the DSATS Active Transportation
for the Arts, which provides resources and grants for Plan, currently in development.
placemaking and neighborhood improvements.
Complexity Lower
Complexity Medium Estimated Cost $50k - $100k
Estimated Cost $100k and above DeKalb Park District, City of
DeKalb Park District, City of DeKalb, NIU, Live Healthy
Potential Lead Partners
DeKalb, NIU Potential Lead Partners DeKalb County, Live Healthy
DeKalb County, DeKalb
School District
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 15
A4 DEVELOP SIDEWALK CONNECTION TO HEALTH
DEPARTMENT UTILIZING ANNIE GLIDDEN AND Complexity Lower
DRESSER ROADS Estimated Cost $50k - $100k
The DeKalb County Health Department is a major DeKalb Park District, City of
destination that is currently disconnected from the DeKalb, NIU, Live Healthy
pedestrian network of the community. The Plan Potential Lead Partners DeKalb County, Live Healthy
recommends the evaluation and design of sidewalks DeKalb County, DeKalb
and other streetscape amenities on Annie Glidden School District
Road north of Dresser Road and west of Normal
Road to promote walkability. These recommendations
should be incorporated into the DSATS Active
Transportation Plan, currently in development.
MEDIUM PRIORITY PROJECTS
DEVELOP STREETSCAPE AND GATEWAY term residents, and representatives from various
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE GREEK ROW AREA IN nationalities add to its vibrance. The Plan recommends
A5
ORDER TO HELP IMPROVE ITS IDENTITY AND the following physical improvements to the Blackhawk
PERCEPTION / Hillcrest area:
Greek Row is a unique location within the City of
DeKalb that currently lacks a cohesive aesthetic or • Gateway signage at the northeast corner of
identity. This project proposes a set of comprehensive Blackhawk / Hillcrest
streetscape and gateway improvement features which • Pedestrian crosswalks across Hillcrest Drive from
will help improve the overall appearance of the Greek Blackhawk
Row area. The distinctiveness of the Greek Row area • Landscaped medians along both Blackhawk Road
is a result of a youthful vitality, proximity to Northern and Hillcrest Drive
Illinois University, and uniformity of the neighborhood • Investigate a potential intersection reconstruction
through its shared educational experience. Embedded of Hillcrest Drive and Greenbrier Road, including a
in rich tradition, the Pan-Hellenic organizations potential landscaped traffic circle
located in the Greek Row area provide its name • Street trees on the west side of Blackhawk Drive,
and the institutional framework. In addition to these in conjunction with redevelopment of the vacant
organizations, scholarship-oriented societies, long- movie theater property.
16 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
• Increased pedestrian-scaled lighting along A6 REDESIGN NIU NURSING SCHOOL GREEN SPACE
Blackhawk / Hillcrest AS NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AND INCORPORATE
INTO OPEN SPACE NETWORK
These improvements should coincide with additional The NIU School of Nursing is housed in the former
housing and commercial development and safety Elementary School at the corner of Ridge Drive and
and security projects as outlined in the Plan. Sources Normal Road. The NIU Nursing School is a desirable
of funding for improvements could come from the tenant for this space and this project. NIU owns the
establishment of a tax-increment financing district open land that is south of the nursing school building.
(TIF) or through other state and federal sources such The Plan recommends stakeholders work with
as the Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program community partners such as the Park District and /
(ITEP). ITEP is a federally funded program that requires or DeKalb County Community Gardens to develop
local matching funds from an eligible project sponsor. proposals for utilizing the open space to improve the
The purpose is to provide funding for community neighborhood. A project for this open space could be
based projects that expand travel choices and enhance leveraged with the positive potential that this facility
the transportation experience by improving the cultural, along with the NIU Nursing School program could
historic, aesthetic and environmental aspects of our provide. This project seeks to redesign and activate the
transportation infrastructure. The program focuses school grounds as a small neighborhood park, which
on providing alternate modes of transportation where can serve residents from the surrounding apartment
the scope of transportation projects goes beyond and single-family areas. In tandem with Welsh Park
the traditional accommodations for cars, trucks and improvements, the school grounds can provide much-
transit. needed playground and athletic field space for local
children and sports leagues. Any improvements
Complexity Medium should be installed close to Normal Road to ensure a
Estimated Cost $100k and above high degree of visibility. Sources of funding for open
City of DeKalb, NIU - space improvements could include NIU as well as state
Potential Lead Partners Fraternity & Sorority Life, NIU and federal sources such as KaBOOM! - which provides
Student Association funding for playground improvements, MLB’s Baseball
Tomorrow Fund and the Cal Ripken Sr. Foundation.
Complexity Medium
Estimated Cost $100k and above
NIU School of Nursing,
Potential Lead Partners DeKalb Park District, City of
DeKalb
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 17
CREATE A DEDICATED PEDESTRIAN PATH FROM A8 IMPROVE AND ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN
A7
THE END OF HIGH TERRACE CROSSINGS AT ANNIE GLIDDEN ROAD AND
Ensuring that a redesigned Welsh Park has full LUCINDA AVENUE, HILLCREST DRIVE AND
access from surrounding residential areas is a key LINCOLN DRIVE
goal of the Plan. This project proposes that the City DSATS is currently updating its Active Transportation
acquire the right-of-way through a vacant parcel Plan. Active transportation includes any form of non-
connecting Russell Road and High Terrace to create motorized transportation, such as walking, bicycling,
a pedestrian connection. This route is already used or using a wheelchair. This project, to be integrated in
as an informal walking path by students and other the Active Transportation Plan, focuses on improving
residents. By creating a formal path with lighting and pedestrian safety at the key intersections of Annie
other features, safety can be improved and Welsh Glidden Road and Lucinda Avenue, Hillcrest Avenue
Park can become better utilized. In addition to the and Lincoln Drive. Improvements could include the
path, the site could also function as a community following design features:
garden to provide an additional amenity for local
residents. In addition, sidewalks should be installed • Pedestrian crossing lights
along High Terrace where they are currently lacking. • Handicap ramps
Funding for this improvement would likely come from • Decorative paving patterns
the City of DeKalb‘s general fund or other State and • Bumpouts to shorten crossing distance
Federal sources such as the Illinois Transportation
Enhancement Program (ITEP). Funding for this improvement would likely come from
the City of DeKalb‘s general fund or other State and
Complexity Lower Federal sources such as the Illinois Transportation
Estimated Cost $50k - $100k Enhancement Program (ITEP).
City of DeKalb, DeKalb
Potential Lead Partners County Community Gardens, Complexity Medium
DSATS, DeKalb Park District Estimated Cost $100k and above
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb, NIU
18 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
A9 REDUCE DENSITY WHEN OPPORTUNITIES
ARISE AND ENSURE THAT PLANS FOR NEW
OR REDEVELOPED PROPERTIES INCLUDE
PROVISIONS FOR INCREASED PARKING AND
OPEN SPACE
Project Task Force members have expressed a strong
interest in having the City develop a policy that would
help reduce density within portions of the AGN area
while increasing open space and creating more
well-located and efficient parking areas. The Plan
recommends that the City evaluate the following policy
approaches:
• Evaluation of vacant properties within the AGN
area for future City purchase in order to create
additional open space or trail connections.
• Development of shared parking standards to
ensure that existing and future lots are better
utilized, especially at different times of the day or
week, an example would be church parking lots.
that are typically used only one or two days a week
• Potential rezoning of some MFR-2 (Multi Family
Residential 2) areas to MFR-1 (Multi-Family
Residential 1) or TFR (Two Family Residential).
Complexity Higher
Estimated Cost $100k and above
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 19
CASE STUDY: HOCKHOCKING
ADENA BIKEWAY – ATHENS, OH
The Hockhocking Adena Bikeway stretches 18 miles from Nelsonville
through downtown Athens past Ohio University. The City of Athens says the
path is a well-utilized resource in the community. “Families love it. Like I said,
tourists love it. It gets really well used by our university students. As much
as we can, we contribute to projects that encourage walking and biking.
That’s also a positive in the health spectrum,” says Athens County Planner
Miranda Kridler. The bikeway has many points of interest along the way.
There are also several places for users to rent a bike.
The City of Athens is set to begin construction on the third and final phase
of a bike spur extending the Hockhocking Adena Bikeway from Armitage
Road to University Estates housing development near Ohio Route 682.
Ninety-five percent of the project (up to about $312,000) is funded by a grant
from the Ohio Department of Transportation’s transportation alternatives
program; the remaining 5 percent will come from City funds. Athens Mayor
Steve Patterson said that extension of the bike path to University Estates
was envisioned in the original development agreement the City entered into
with University Estates in 2000. ODOT also announced about $1.5 million in
grant funding for extension of the bikeway to Chauncey. City Engineer Andy
Stone said that much of the design of the Athens bike spur extension project
already has been completed, although he said he didn’t expect construction
to get underway until mid-summer into late fall 2018, or possibly early
spring 2019. “What this means is people who live up at University Estates
will now be able to get onto this new spur and ride it all the way into the City
of Athens without having to go onto Ohio Rt. 682,” the mayor said. Patterson
noted that the City has been seeing more development taking place in and
around University Estates in recent years, and said he hoped that the bike-
path extension will help encourage further development in the area. In order
to create connections to the Bikeway, the City is now looking at adding bike
lanes “strategically” to certain roads in the city, including East State Street.
The City is also looking at adding “sharrows,” or shared-lane markings
reminding drivers that they must share the road with bikers, to certain roads.
Source: www.athensnews.com/news/local/bike-path-to-be-extended-to-university-estates-chauncey/article_041a7aee-829e-
11e7-b5b1-9fa420415c32.html
20 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
LOWER PRIORITY PROJECTS
A10 DEVELOP HIKE / BIKE TRAIL ALONG CREEK FROM eligible units of government to acquire, construct, and
LUCINDA AVENUE TO LORUSSO LAGOON AND rehabilitate public, non-motorized bicycle paths and
REGENT DRIVE directly related support facilities. Grants are available
The Hike-Bike Trail project utilizes an existing creek and to any local government agency having statutory
public right-of-way as an asset to begin to develop a authority to acquire and develop land for public bicycle
recreational corridor and trail that can benefit current path purposes. The federal Recreational Trails Program
and future AGN residents. This project recognizes the (RTP) provides funding assistance for acquisition,
need for facilities that encourage active transportation development, rehabilitation and maintenance of both
and support neighborhood beautification and motorized and non-motorized recreation trails. By law,
restoration of the natural environment. The creek 30% of each states’ RTP funding must be earmarked
that primarily runs northwest to southeast from for motorized trail projects, 30% for non-motorized
Lorosso Lagoon into the NIU campus offers a great trail projects and the remaining 40% for multi-use
opportunity to co-locate a Hike-Bike Trail along its (diversified) motorized and non-motorized trails or a
course, providing a route that connects residential combination of either.
areas with local amenities. As part of this project, a Complexity Medium
“friends of the trail” volunteer team could be created Estimated Cost $100k and above
to help clean, maintain, and promote the corridor. The DeKalb Park District, City of
friends of the trail should collaborate, promote, and Potential Lead Partners DeKalb, NIU, Live Healthy
educate the community on the purpose for the hike- DeKalb County
bike trail while providing organizational and fundraising
capacities to supplement and lessen the burden on
the City. The City should acquire needed right-of-ways
and develop a detailed design for the trail. The Illinois
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) administers
grant programs that can provide funding assistance to
acquire, develop and, in some cases, maintain trails for
a variety of public recreation uses. The Illinois Bicycle
Path Grant Program was created to financially assist
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 21
A11 RECOMMEND CONNECTIONS TO CITY PARKS A12 REDESIGN UNIVERSITY PLAZA PARKING LOT
OUTSIDE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THROUGH AS NEIGHBORHOOD SQUARE AND RELOCATE
DSATS STUDY. PARKING TO SHARED LOT ON CRANE DRIVE AND
Through conversations with residents and RUSSELL ROAD
stakeholders, it became clear that some families feel The Plan recommends that the owner of University
isolated from the recreational amenities that exist Plaza evaluate a redesign of their property to shift
throughout the City and County including Prairie parking to Crane Drive and Russell Road. Doing so
Park and the PA Nehring Forest Preserve. The Plan would open up a prime site on Annie Glidden Road
recommends incorporation of transit and bicycle for commercial or mixed-use redevelopment while
connections to these regional amenities in future providing the opportunity to create a semi-public
updates to the DeKalb Sycamore Area Transportation open space amenity for University Plaza residents.
Study (DSATS). The property owner should work directly with the
City to evaluate the feasibility of this proposal and a
Complexity Lower potential public-private partnership. Funding for these
Estimated Cost $0 - $50k improvements could come through the implementation
DSATS, VAC, Huskie Line, City of a tax-increment financing district (TIF) as well as
Potential Lead Partners
of DeKalb, NIU other sources. New parking at Crane Drive and Russell
road could be utilized as a shared lot for Welsh Park
activities through a partnership with the DeKalb Parks
District.
Complexity Higher
Estimated Cost $100k and above
Private (University Plaza
Potential Lead Partners ownership), City of DeKalb,
DeKalb Park District
22 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
A13 DISTRIBUTE AND POST TRANSIT ROUTE MAPS A14 IMPROVE BOARDMAN AND PAPPAS PARKS
TO BROADEN VISIBILITY OF SYSTEM WITH RUNNING PATHS CIRCLING DETENTION
In an effort to encourage greater use of local transit PONDS, CREATING MORE USABLE SPACES FOR
systems, NIU Transit Services/Huskie Line and RESIDENTS
TransVAC should post a single service map featuring On the west side of the AGN area, Boardman and
routes of both systems. Service map should be posted Pappas Parks represent underutilized open spaces that
at each bus stop, as well as in highly visable areas could be greatly enhanced with walking and running
including local businesses, parks, schools and larger paths, picnic areas, additional landscaping, lighting
apartment complexes. In the future, when real-time and seating. In addition, signage and wayfinding to
arrival information is made available, stops should also the parks should be greatly improved, especially from
include digital sign boards showing the arrival times of Annie Glidden Road. Currently, the parks have very low
local buses. visibility to those who live outside of the immediate
area. These parks have the potential to anchor the
Complexity Lower surrounding residential uses, similar to how Welsh
EstimatedCost $0 - $50k Park can become a desirable amenity on the east side
DSATS, TransVAC, Huskie of the neighborhood. The Dekalb Park District has
Potential Lead Partners Line, City of DeKalb, Northern a current Comprehensive Master Plan that calls for
Illinois University, improvements to these parks Future potential DeKalb
Park District funding should be leveraged with grants
through organizations such as the National Recreation
and Park Association and other sources.
Complexity Medium
Estimated Cost $100k and above
DeKalb Park District, City of
Potential Lead Partners
DeKalb, NIU
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 23
A15 DEVELOP COMMUNITY GARDENS ON VACANT A16 CREATE NEW STREET CONNECTION FROM
PARCELS AT GREENBRIAR AND RUSSELL ROADS TWOMBLY ROAD TO W HILLCREST DRIVE
Vacant properties along Greenbriar and Russell The AGN neighborhood currently suffers from a lack of
Roads provide the opportunity to initiate community street connectivity. Planned in conjunction with project
garden programs as interim or long-term uses of A12, this project would help create vehicular, bicycle
the sites. The establishment of community gardens and pedestrian access from the termination of Regent
can help bring neighbors and stakeholders together Drive north to Twombly Road. This corridor would
to beautify the neighborhood, while also potentially help connect the isolated Eden’s Garden, Suburban
providing fresh fruit and vegetables for local residents. Apartments and New Hope Missionary Baptist Church
The City should work with local property owners to to Boardman Park and the Hillcrest Drive Area, enabling
assess the availability of these sites, and promote the a north-south traffic route separate from Annie Glidden
initiative with local partners including DeKalb County Road. Some right-of-way acquisition may be necessary
Community Gardens, and local Greek Organizations. in order to create this new street connection. Funding
for the project would come primarily through the City’s
Complexity Lower general fund.
Estimated Cost $50k - $100k
City of DeKalb, DeKalb Complexity Higher
Potential Lead Partners County Community Gardens, Estimated Cost $100k and above
Greek Organizations Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb
24 Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
A17 DEVELOP NEW STREET NETWORK BETWEEN W
DRESSER ROAD AND RIDGE DRIVE TO FACILITATE
INFILL DEVELOPMENT
In order to provide a framework for new development,
a new street network should be planned between
Dresser Road and Ridge Drive. This network should
be segmented to create a walkable grid of streets, and
should connect to Annie Glidden Road and Blackhawk
Road. The City should consider connecting the design
of the public street environment (complete streets)
to zoning approvals through the zoning ordinance
and subdivision regulations. This would facilitate the
establishment of regulations to coordinate on-site
design requirements addressing vehicular and bicycle
parking; and bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular access.
It will also facilitate coordination of site-based signage
and landscape requirements with public way signage
and landscaping. This would enable a site plan review
process to consider both on-site and off-site aspects
affecting the relationship of new development to the
public way.
Complexity Higher
Cost $100k and above
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb
Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 25
- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
COMMUNITY SERVICES
INTRODUCTION DESIRED OUTCOMES
The Community Services initiative of the Plan is intended Desired Outcomes were developed by the Community
to connect residents to existing resources, and to Services working group at the initial brainstorming session
identify new services where needed in order to enhance and include the following:
opportunity. This initiative focuses on health, economic
development, and education projects. Each of these areas • Foster increased civic participation by neighborhood
address critical gaps and needs identified throughout our residents
planning process. Projects in this section focus heavily on • Increase local daycare services and alternatives to
achieving the following Plan goals: help current families and attract new families
• Promote greater awareness of community-focused
• Developing a stronger sense of cohesion internally services already in place
and with the rest of the City • Ensure AGN residents are able to access employment
opportunities and resources
• Developing a deeper understanding of those who • Build and link partnerships between organizations that
live in poverty and their challenges are located and/or operate in the neighborhood
• Increasing access to healthy food as a tool for
empowerment
• Addressing the deficiencies of the neighborhood
in terms of social services to fill gaps with viable
solutions
• Ensuring that various stakeholders have ownership
and pride in the Plan
• Changing the direction of AGN from surviving to
thriving
Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 27
HIGHER PRIORITY PROJECTS
B1 ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FOOD AND benefit from counselors, financial literacy courses, GED
EDUCATION CENTER classes, prenatal instruction, and much more within a
DeKalb County Community Gardens has presented a bright, clean, and welcoming environment in the middle
proposal of a large coalition that has the potential to of a lush soothing greenspace.
address several of the AGN Neighborhood needs in one
project. The Community Food and Education Center Combining many services and needs with multiple
project has the potential to impact hundreds of lives revenue streams, establishes a path toward
in and outside the neighborhood. Few projects offer sustainability for the project. At a time when federal
such a strong possibility for ending the marginalization and state funding is often constrained, it is important
of the residents of AGN. There are many opportunities for nonprofits to have a variety of revenue generating
in this project for members of the neighborhood to programs to advance their mission. The center will
feel welcomed and engaged in the wider community serve needs of different nonprofit organizations in one
as residents from outside the neighborhood and location, thereby saving capital costs and increasing
City come into the neighborhood to experience food, services offered. Also a collaborative effort addressing
beauty, and experiences they cannot have anywhere many needs in one central location will appeal to local
else. The Community Food and Education Center is the funders and attract more capital to make it financially
type of neighborhood service location that will displace viable. This project should be aligned with project D3,
negative activity by attracting positive activity. Create a Hillcrest/Blackhawk Focus Area.
The Community Food and Education Center could also Complexity Higher
stimulate additional commercial development. As part Estimated Cost $100k and above
of the project, a farm-to-table restaurant with a focus DeKalb County Community
on delicious, creatively presented local food, wine, Gardens, City of DeKalb,
beer, and spirits will be especially attractive to young DeKalb County Health
professionals as the local food movement continues Potential Lead Partners Department, DeKalb
to gain in interest. The Center could also provide a County Community Action,
variety of jobs and job training opportunities for local Northwestern Medicine
residents. By combining a grocery store and restaurant Kishwaukee Hospital, NIU
with a strong local focus along with a community
shared use kitchen, food hub, greenhouse, and urban
farm, there will be a variety of training experiences.
classrooms, shared workspaces, and offices will
28 Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
CASE STUDY: ARTHOUSE: A SOCIAL
KITCHEN - GARY, IN
in 2016, ArtHouse: A Social Kitchen opened a culinary incubator/art gallery in
downtown Gary in hope of creating more food-related entrepreneurs. Gary, IN is a
city of 76,000 with just 30 restaurants, many of which are fast-food joints that line
Broadway and Grant Street. City officials credit the center, which has already hosted
more than 100 programs, with sparking new life along the Fifth Avenue corridor. Now
it’s expanding to a vacant lot across the street in what’s being heralded as a “major
milestone.”
ArtHouse: A Social Kitchen unveiled the new ArtHouse Patio, an outdoor area that
includes a public sculpture by acclaimed South Side Chicago artist Theaster Gates,
ArtHouse’s founder. The sculpture consists of three shingled walls that resemble
gabled roofs, with a mulch floor on a newly sodded lot. The patio addition is meant
to be a public gathering spot that will be incorporated into ArtHouse’s outdoor
programing, which have included festivals, grilling sessions and movie screenings.
ArtHouse also plans to plant gardens and add more public sculptures.
ArtHouse has clearly brought residents from across the city together and energized
downtown. ArtHouse has also provided business and professional development
training to more than 30 entrepreneurs. Legacy Foundation President Carolyn
Saxton said ArtHouse has been a catalyst for change in downtown Gary, where
the sponsor, the John L. and James S. Knight Foundation, has also funded the City
Methodist Church Ruins Garden and Steel City Salvage’s reclaimed building material
warehouse.
“We see this as a first step to the redevelopment of Gary, Indiana,” she said. “We want
to be a major partner to help it flourish and grow in the future.” Gary Mayor Karen
Freeman-Wilson said some questioned private foundations pumping $1 million into
an arts center downtown when the city has many other needs, but contends it has
helped bring Fifth Avenue back to life with new investments at 504 Broadway, the
U.S. Steel Yard and the former Calumet Township site.
“It was the result of the catalyst created by ArtHouse: A Social Kitchen,” Mayor
Freeman-Wilson said. “That’s what development is all about. If you are able to get
someone to be the first in, you find others who are willing to get involved, and to
invest their money or time.”
Gates, who had the vision for the community center to regularly host business
seminars, cooking classes, yoga and visual art exhibits, said he wanted to ensure
that the resources that came into the Steel City would have an impact, proclaiming
“I’m proud to say the investments that have come have touched lives in Gary.”
Sources: http://arthousegary.com/
https://www.nwitimes.com/business/lake-newsletter/arthouse-heralded-as-downtown-gary-catalyst-expands/
article_1e9a3986-b288-510e-a126-0d2c927c03ad.html
Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 29
POTENTIAL COMMUNITY CENTER E
R IV
O KD
B RO
GE
ED
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
B2 CREATE A COMMUNITY CENTER PROGRAM include the development of a program of uses, size
Community Center Programming should be requirements and parking needs for a new building.
investigated and planned to propose services that If the City decides to retain the building (following a
could be offered in the neighborhood if a building structural analysis), partners should be identified to
or site for a community center is identified. Plans provide funding and management. More likely, the City
for the Community Center program should include will look to clear the site and encourage community
participating agencies, funding sources, staffing uses through the Planned Development process,
requirements, volunteer recruitment options, and as the Zoning Ordinance does not currently have a
other imminent resources that would need to be designation for community facilities. New development
identified in order to pursue development. Planning should reflect the neighborhood character by orienting
efforts should be conducted in cooperation with social the building towards Blackhawk Road with landscaping
service agencies such as those already engaged with and screened parking along the eastern portion of the
University Village. site.
EVALUATION OF 912 EDGEBROOK Complexity Higher
912 Edgebrook is one potential location for a Estimated Cost $100k and above
new Community Center. The 47-unit building was City of DeKalb, DARA,
condemned in 2014 because of multiple safety DeKalb Park District, NIU,
violations and was later purchased by the City. Due University Village Tenants
to its central location, the property provides an Association, Hope Haven,
opportunity to create a mixture of uses including NIU Child Development NIU
Potential Lead Partners
community services, neighborhood gathering space, Administration, Family Services
and shared parking for surrounding residents. The Agency, Illinois Work Net,
Plan recommends that the City work directly with Kishwaukee College, DeKalb
potential partners to evaluate the viability of the County, Northwestern Medicine
site as a Community Center. This evaluation should Kishwaukee Hospital
30 Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
CASE STUDY: FOWLER CENTER -
BETHLEHEM, PA
Located in the heart of Southside Bethlehem, near Lehigh Universtiy, the Fowler
Center is a community hub offering a wide range of educational opportunities for
30,000 people every year. Northampton Community College (NCC) purchased the
building, formerly housing offices for Bethlehem Steel, in 2005. At the time, NCC was
taking a big gamble on the distressed Third Street corridor.
Over the years, the building’s uses have morphed as the community’s needs have
evolved. Featured programs currently include the Hospitality Career and Leadership
and Executive Development Institutes, and programs in public safety, healthcare,
adult literacy and workforce training. The Fowler Center is home to numerous non-
credit classes that can be taken for enrichment and pleasure. The Center boasts art
studios equipped for jewelry and glass-making, dance studios, and a theatre-style
demonstration kitchen. Designers and entrepreneurs can take advantage of the 3-D
fabrication studio (known as The Fab Lab) to develop prototypes and push the limits
of their creativity. The Center also offers clinical services and community programs
including dental care, literacy training, and learning how to plan a fundraiser.
A $5 million renovation of the 30,000-square-foot center is slated to open in the fall
of 2018. Modeled after tech companies, the design of the center seeks to maximize
collaboration with open concept work spaces, incubation areas for brainstorming,
private meeting rooms, and a prototyping facility.
“Having a community college make a commitment to the revitalization, as the first
entity, was a very big deal. It’s easy now, 10 years later, not to think much of it, but
it was the first institution or company to take a leap of faith and was a catalyst to
make things happen in South Bethlehem,” said Don Cunningham, president and CEO
of the Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corp.
The Center has spurred reinvestment in surrounding properties, including
Five10Flats — a $20 million residential and retail building. Under construction directly
across the street. The five-story Five10Flats is the first of three mixed-use buildings
envisioned by the builder, Peron Development and includes 95 one- and two-
bedroom units and commercial space.
Sources: www.mcall.com/entertainment/restaurants/blog/mc-ent-starbucks-first-retail-tenant-five10flats-south-bethlehem-
20180718-story.html
northampton.edu/admissions/campus-locations/fowler-center.htm
Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 31
B3 WORK WITH LOCAL HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS TO Federal regulations.
ESTABLISH A WALK-IN CLINIC OR URGENT CARE • The new or expanded health clinic has met
FACILITY WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD all aforementioned requirements on or before
Residents and Task Force members expressed a December 31, 2019.
strong desire to increase health care offerings within
the AGN area. As a recommendation, the City may wish Ideal locations for a health clinic could include the
to stimulate the opening of a heath clinic within the City-owned property at 912 Edgebrook, the NIU
project area by offering a small start-up subsidy to an School of Nursing, or other central, walkable areas
organization that meets the following criteria: of the neighborhood. Clinic operators can potentially
• The operator is establishing or expanding a receive funding through charities, fundraising, federal
Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Existing or state grants and local events. Clinics should
health centers in the AGN area may become a determine eligibility for funding from sources like the
FQHC to meet this requirement. Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) or the National
• The health clinic operates on a full-time basis (a Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC).
minimum of 35 hours per week), in perpetuity.
Existing health centers in the AGN area operating Complexity Medium
less than 35 hours per week may expand their Estimated Cost $100k and above
operational hours to a minimum of 35 hours per City of DeKalb, Northwestern
week to meet this requirement. Kishwaukee, Hope Haven,
• The new or expanded health clinic is licensed by Potential Lead Partners NIU School of Nursing,
the State of Illinois. DeKalb County Health
• The new or expanded health clinic is operating Department
in compliance with all applicable local, State and
32 Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
MEDIUM PRIORITY PROJECTS
B4 PROMOTE ENROLLMENT IN TENANTS By first making the role of the Association clear to
ASSOCIATIONS THROUGHOUT THE residents, they can be encouraged to attend meetings
NEIGHBORHOOD and participate in community events. In addition, the
This project is intended to improve communication Association can also take a proactive role in advocating
between residents, tenants, and local landlords for, planning and implementing smaller projects that
by promoting enrollment in the local Tenants can improve the quality of life for tenants and nearby
Associations. Often times it takes the action of an residents. Projects with greater visibility will encourage
organized group of tenants to make their voices greater participation and enrollment in the Association.
heard. If organized, tenants can use collective political,
economic, and social pressures to overcome recurring
problems. A Tenants Association can collectively exert Complexity Lower
more pressure for their views than an individual tenant Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
can on their own. Tenants can work together for a University Village Tenants
common goal, to make their lives and living situations Association, other apartment
Potential Lead Partners
better. Some common rental housing issues that can tenant associations, local
be addressed through the Association include: churches
• Shared repairs issues among neighbors
• Emergency repairs: loss of essential services such
as running water, hot water, electricity, or sanitary
facilities
• Loss of heat or inadequate heating
• Utility shutoffs due to landlord nonpayment
• Poor management; bad record-keeping, abusive
and retaliatory behavior by management, privacy
violations
• Threat of loss of affordable housing
Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 33
B5 INVENTORY WORKFORCE TRAINING PROGRAMS B6 WORK WITH NIU, LOCAL CHURCHES AND OTHER
AND EMPLOYERS LINKED TO THOSE PROGRAMS. PARTNERS TO IDENTIFY PROGRAMS THAT
SURVEY RESIDENTS TO GENERATE A FEEDBACK PROVIDE DAYCARE, HEALTH CARE, AND OTHER
LOOP ON PROGRAMS’ EFFECTIVENESS COMMUNITY SERVICES. DEVELOP A PACKET
Linking residents to potential job opportunities in the OF RESOURCES, SERVICES, AND TOOLS, AND
City and County is seen as a important goal by the DESIGN A PROGRAM TO MARKET SERVICES
AGN Task Force. This project would identify partners Connecting the dots between residents and available
and create an updated inventory of workforce training daycare, health care and other community services
programs and local employers with job openings in will help create greater utilization of existing resources
the area. This inventory could then be used to identify while preventing overlap between providers. This
needed skills and gaps in existing training programs. inventory should be summarized in a packet or
AGN residents that are already participating in local brochure that can be distributed to residents at
training programs should be identified and surveyed community events, churches and other gathering
to help gauge overall effectiveness and participation places in order to promote services. NIU students
rates. NIU students could help lead the initial inventory could help lead the initial inventory effort as part of
effort as part of related academic work. related academic work.
Complexity Medium Complexity Medium
Estimated Cost $50k - $100k Estimated Cost $100k and above
NIU Jobs PLUS, DeKalb NIU, local churches, DeKalb
County Community County Health Department,
Development, Illinois Potential Lead Partners DeKalb Park District, City
Potential Lead Partners
Worknet, local staffing of DeKalb, Voluntary Action
agencies, Kishwaukee Career Center
Planning
34 Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
B7 REACH OUT TO NON-PROFIT GROUPS TO The Plan recommends developing an inventory of
OFFER AFTER-SCHOOL ACTIVITIES FOR local programs and activities for kids and utilizing the
NEIGHBORHOOD KIDS inventory to help promote available programs. NIU
An after-school activity is any organized program students could help to lead the initial inventory effort
that youth can participate in outside of the traditional as part of related academic work.
school day. Some programs are run by a primary or
secondary school, while others are run by externally Complexity Lower
funded non-profit or commercial organizations. After- Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
school youth programs can occur inside a school NIU, local churches, DeKalb
building or elsewhere in the community, such as a School District 428, City of
Potential Lead Partners
community center, church, library, or park. Benefits of DeKalb, Voluntary Action
after-school activities can include: Center, DeKalb Park District
• Positive use of time
• Academic growth
• Behavioral growth
• Closing the achievement gap
LOWER PRIORITY PROJECTS
HOLD A JOB FAIR WITHIN ANNIE GLIDDEN NORTH Complexity Lower
B8
TO PROMOTE LOCAL HIRING. Cost $0k - $50k
A job fair, also referred commonly as a career fair or NIU, DeKalb County
career expo, is an event in which employers, recruiters, Community Development, IL
Potential Lead Partners
and schools give information to potential employees. Worknet, Kishwaukee Career
Job seekers attend these while trying to make a good Planning, NIU Jobs Plus
impression to potential coworkers by speaking face-
to-face with one another, filling out résumés, and
asking questions in attempt to get a good feel for the
work needed. In order to provide additional exposure
for local employers and to connect residents to job
opportunities, the Plan recommends quarterly job fairs
at a convenient location within the AGN area.
Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 35
B9 INSTALL KIOSKS AND/OR COMMUNITY BULLETIN B10 PROVIDE VOTER REGISTRATION SERVICES IN
BOARDS TO ADVERTISE SOCIAL EVENTS THE AGN NEIGHBORHOOD AND LINK RESIDENTS
The lack of neighborhood communication is seen as an TO CLOSEST POLLING PLACES. ENSURE THE
issue in the AGN area. Different groups communicate 2020 US CENSUS INCLUDES A FULL COUNT OF
and take in public information in different ways, with ALL STUDENTS AND OTHER RESIDENTS
students most likely to use online tools and older Civic engagement—best exemplified by voting—is
residents used to more traditional means. Bulletin dependent upon an engaged and informed citizenry.
boards serve an important community building Too often, the voting process undermines lower
function. Posted fliers advertise services, events and income community of color, affecting proper
people’s interests, and invite community members to representation at all levels of government. Another
communicate, participate, interact and transact. The factor is that individuals living below the poverty line
Plan recommends the strategic installation of digital are more likely to move requiring an extra step of
kiosks or bulletin boards to help improve neighborhood paperwork to register, before even arriving to the polls.
communication. These displays should be unobtrusive This Plan recommends assisting AGN tenants with
and located in areas with a high volume of local registration and guidance to the nearest polling places,
pedestrian traffic. Funding for these installations can so that registered and non-registered voters can have a
potentially be derived from discreet advertising, catered better opportunity for civic engagement. In addition the
to local businesses. Leadership Conference on Civil Rights has produced
a series of fact sheets and data tables to encourage
Complexity Medium an accurate record of people most often missed by
Estimated Cost $0k - $50k the decennial count which includes communities of
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb color, residents of rural areas, immigrants and young
children. These tools are designed to help advocates
and communities understand and bring attention to the
factors that create persistent underrepresentation of
certain groups in the census.
Complexity Lower
Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
DeKalb County Clerk and
Potential Lead Partners
Recorder
36 Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
B11 ESTABLISH A LEGAL AID OFFICE IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD
Legal aid is the provision of assistance to people
otherwise unable to afford legal representation and
access to the court system. Legal aid is regarded
as central in providing access to justice by ensuring
equality before the law, the right to counsel and the
right to a fair trial. A legal aid office is often a law
school program providing hands-on-legal experience
to law school students and services to various clients.
Legal aid offices typically do pro bono work in a
particular area, providing free legal services to clients.
The Plan recommends the establishment of a legal aid
office within the AGN area, in partnership with NIU.
Complexity Medium
Estimated Cost $50k-$100k
Potential Lead Partners NIU
Community Services AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 37
- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
NEIGHBORHOOD Safety and security were identified
by residents as one of the highest
SAFETY AND SECURITY priorities for neighborhood
improvement.
INTRODUCTION DESIRED OUTCOMES
Concerns over safety and security potential solutions Desired Outcomes were developed by the
were discussed in community meetings, youth Neighborhood Safety and Security working group at the
meetings and working group sessions. Residents initial brainstorming session and include the following:
proposed strategies and projects to create a safer
environment including: reducing crime, promoting • Reduce crimes by ensuring greater incorporation
community policing, building trust between residents of crime-free housing.
and the Dekalb Police Department, discussing code • Add cameras and lighting while ensuring improved
enforcement to address vacant lots and buildings, and property maintenance.
improving lighting. Projects in this section focus heavily • Improve communication between property owners,
on achieving the following Plan goals: City government, tenants, NIU, and network of
neighborhood associations.
• Developing a stronger sense of cohesion • Increase enforcement of minor quality of life
internally and with the rest of the City infractions and build upon the Safe Streets
initiative.
• Reducing crime • Continue to support cooperation between the City
of DeKalb and NIU police.
• Ensuring that AGN is a “high choice” area for
living that university and employers can use for
recruitment
• Enhancing the overall college experience
Many of the other Plan strategies outlined in this document are
intended to increase economic opportunity, which will have a
• Changing the direction of AGN from surviving to direct effect on reducing future crime rates.
thriving
Neighborhood Safety and Security AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 39
Pictured, Dwell DeKalb Property Owner Dave Grant, Security Camera
Tech Jacob Santos, and DeKalb Police Chief Gene Lowery
HIGHER PRIORITY PROJECT
C1 IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS areas first lets police figure out how best to place
FOCUSED ON IMPROVED LIGHTING AND cameras and monitor them before going to scale.
SURVEILLANCE. • Consider location - While camera locations should
Security cameras—when actively monitored— can be be guided by high-crime hot spots, practical
effective at cutting down crime. Research shows that concerns will also play a role—such as how close
the savings and benefits of fewer crimes generally the camera needs to be to a power source and
outweigh the costs of the surveillance system. what natural and manmade barriers will have to be
Police, policymakers, and others involved in criminal accommodated.
justice largely viewed the cameras as a useful tool for • Consider investing in live monitoring - Actively
preventing crimes, aiding in arrests, and supporting monitoring allows police to zoom into a scene to
investigations and prosecutions. Guidelines for positive capture important details of a crime that may be
application of security cameras include: missed if the camera is simply programmed on an
automated tour, panning back and forth.
• Balance utility with privacy - When deciding how to • Prioritize training - Detectives and prosecutors
monitor the cameras, the Police Department must need to be trained on how to use camera footage
balance privacy and utility—guidelines that are too and how to retrieve it.
restrictive can limit what the system can do, but
residents must be protected against invasion of A variety of grants are available to help Police
privacy. Departments with technology needs. Many of the
• Involve the community at the onset - Developing major law enforcement grant funding opportunities
and disseminating written policies on how the come from either the Department of Homeland
footage will be used and secured can go a long Security (DHS) or the Department of Justice (DOJ).
way toward building public support.
• Don’t underestimate costs - The cost of installation, Complexity Higher
maintenance, and monitoring is typically much Estimated Cost $100k or above
higher than the cost of the cameras themselves. DeKalb Police Department,
Potential Lead Partners
• Anticipate technology upgrades - Camera NIU
technology is constantly evolving, offering greater
resolution and more useful features with each new
version. Plan and budget for such upgrades.
• Start small - Installing cameras in one or two
40 Neighborhood Safety and Security AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
CASE STUDY: SECURITY CAMERA
INSTALLATION IN HUMBOLDT PARK -
CHICAGO, IL
Chicago leveraged federal and state funds and committed their own resources to
support a multimillion-dollar surveillance program with more than 8,000 cameras,
including police, transit, and public school cameras. The Justice Policy Center of
the Urban Institute focused on a subset of the 2,000-some cameras (called police
observation devices, or PODs) operated by the Chicago Police Department in the
Humboldt Park neighborhood. In August 2003, when the cameras were installed in
Humboldt Park, the area experienced a brief spike in crime, with nearly 500 reported
incidents in a single month. The crime rate dropped 20 percent the next month
and stayed low on average. To weed out other factors that affect crime trends,
the Justice Policy Center compared Humboldt Park with a similar neighborhood
(matched on historical crime rates, demographics, and land use) and determined
that the cameras alone were likely responsible for a nearly 12 percent drop in the
crime rate. Average monthly crime counts for drug-related offenses and robberies
fell by nearly a third (or over 30 fewer drug-related offenses and three fewer
robberies per month). Violent crime was down 20 percent, with six fewer incidents
per month on average. The numbers suggest that the cameras did their job in
controlling crime, with no signs that criminals moved elsewhere as a result.
Humboldt Park had a high concentration of cameras (about 53 per square mile),
which could have influenced officers’ ability to interrupt crimes in progress, intervene,
make arrests, and deter potential offenders. The crimes prevented in Humboldt Park
saved the city $4.30 for every dollar spent on the surveillance system. Even taking
the victims’ costs out of the calculation, the benefits of the cameras far outweighed
the costs, with $2.81 in savings for every dollar spent.
Two particular lessons from Chicago’s experience stand out. First, get public input.
Officials involved in setting up the surveillance system said they could have benefited
from early input from the mayor, law enforcement, and the community. Second, train
prosecutors and defense attorneys on how to use and present camera footage as
evidence in court.
Source: www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/27546/412401-Evaluating-the-Use-of-Public-Surveillance-Camer-
as-for-Crime-Control-and-Prevention-A-Summary.PDF
Neighborhood Safety and Security AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 41
MEDIUM PRIORITY PROJECT
CREATE A GRADING SYSTEM AND DATABASE times based on these grades, landlords would have
C2
FOR RENTAL PROPERTIES, ASSESSING SAFETY an incentive to maintain their buildings to a superior
AND SECURITY OF APARTMENTS level. By awarding high ratings for well-maintained
The City’s Crime Free Housing and Inspections properties, the City could extend inspection time
Program is designed to form a partnership between frames to as long as five (5) years. This could reduce
law enforcement and the residents and owners/ inspection costs for well-maintained properties and
managers of rental properties in an effort to keep allow inspectors to focus on problem properties.
drugs and other illegal activity off their property. This Additionally, properties with higher grades could be
is an honest, direct, solution-oriented program that used in the landlords’ marketing plans to hopefully
has proven to be an effective way to reduce crime in entice better tenants. The Plan also supports the
residential rental properties in other communities. implementation of the Police2Citizen Software
The City currently requires every landlord to register Program, which is intended to provide up to date
its rental property annually. The Plan recommends public access to Police Records of reported incidents.
that these programs be evaluated as a potential Training or educational aspects of existing or
starting point in creating a grading system for the restructured programs, should be focused on informing
condition and security of rental properties. The City tenants of their rights and City codes regarding rental
may wish to investigate such a system in an effort to properties.
entice or provide an incentive to landlords to achieve Complexity Medium
highest level of maintenance in their rental properties. Estimated Cost $50k - $100k
By grading buildings and associating re-inspection Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb, DARA
LOWER PRIORITY PROJECTS
ARRANGE MEETINGS FOR SAFETY EXPERTS TO gathering feedback and comments.
C3
ADDRESS RESIDENTS OF ANNIE GLIDDEN NORTH
Officers from the DeKalb Police Department have Complexity Lower
made a particular effort to reach out to Annie Glidden Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
North residents at community events and maintaining City of DeKalb Police
a high visibility in the neighborhood. This project is Department, City of DeKalb,
Potential Lead Partners
designed to continue to strengthen these connections NIU, University Village
by educating residents on current safety initiatives and Tenants Association
42 Neighborhood Safety and Security AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
C4 RESEARCH AND, IF POSSIBLE, IMPLEMENT C5 ENCOURAGE PROPERTY OWNERS WITH
COST-EFFECTIVE BACKGROUND SEARCHES FOR CAMERAS TO MAKE LIVE FEEDS AVAILABLE TO
PROSPECTIVE RENTAL TENANTS THE DEKALB POLICE DEPARTMENT
Several online tools are available to help landlords In order to augment project C1, the Plan recommends
provide background searches for prospective rental connecting local property and business owners to
tenants. Background searches can help landlords the DeKalb Police Department in order to potentially
secure their investment and prevent evictions while make live feeds of private security cameras available
identifying responsible tenants who will pay rent to law enforcement. In addition, it is recommended
consistently on time, not break their lease and not that the City create a Camera Registry Program (CRP)
damage property. to allow residents and business owners to register the
locations of their video surveillance systems with the
A background check will show a tenant’s criminal City. When a crime occurs, police will be able to identify
record, if they’re a registered sex offender, if they’ve the locations of nearby video cameras and enlist the
ever damaged any property, and whether if they assistance of the community to help officers collect
paid rent on time. Under the FCRA, landlords must video evidence and follow up on leads.
use an approved Consumer Reporting Agency to
obtain a background check on a potential tenant. The Through the program, DeKalb Police will be able to
Consumer Finance Protection Bureau has compiled directly contact CRP registrants who are using video in
a list of approved CRAs for tenant screening. Tenant an area where a crime occurred. Police would ask CRP
background checks can run anywhere from $20 to registrants to check their video surveillance system
$50, depending on the items selected. Landlords can for a specific date and time for video that may show
request tenants to pay an application fee that will cover activity involved with a crime, and identify getaway cars
the cost of the background and credit checks. This or the direction that a person of interest was headed.
project would promote online tools for use by local
Complexity Medium
landlords and help to advocate for their use. A list of
Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
approved Consumer Reporting Agencies is available
City of DeKalb Police
at: files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201604_cfpb_list-of-
Potential Lead Partners Department, DeKalb Area
consumer-reporting-companies.pdf
Renters Association
Complexity Medium
Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
Potential Lead Partners DARA
Neighborhood Safety and Security AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 43
C6 ASSIGN DEKALB STAFF TO MONITOR C7 SUPPORT DEKALB AREA RENTAL ASSOCIATION
NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY AND SECURITY, AND (DARA) BY ENCOURAGING ETHICAL BEHAVIOR
SERVE AS LIAISON BETWEEN NEIGHBORHOOD BY MEMBER PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSOCIATIONS DARA is a nonprofit, educational organization
To help create and strengthen community connections, representing rental housing units in DeKalb and its
the Plan recommends that a City staff member be immediate area, striving to provide the rental housing
assigned as a liaison between local neighborhood public with quality service based upon high standards
groups and tenants associations. This individual would of honesty and integrity. DARA Members agree to:
have the responsibility of disseminating important
information to residents while also receiving feedback • Promote, employ and maintain a high standard of
from residents and connecting local partners with one integrity
another. The role of the liaison would be to: • Maintain and operate rental properties with fair and
honorable standards of competition
• Report environmental safety issues like lighting, • Promote education
landscaping, and property design to the City and • Provide better values
landlords. • Establish a high ethical standard of conduct
• Make contact with residents to educate, promote • Maintain properties in accordance with the
neighborhood safety, and available community appropriate governmental authorities
resources. • Provide the public with a convenient means of
• Work on a camera campaign with the City, contacting landlords
landlords, and NIU. • Ensure full compliance with Fair Housing Laws
• Help with neighborhood watch groups.
• Visit and support businesses in the neighborhood. The City of DeKalb and other local partners should
support DARA in encouraging positive and ethical
As part of recommendation D1, this Liaison may behaviour by member property owners, and also
also serve as part of a Community Development promote the organization to other landlords that are
Corporation Steering Committee. not currently members.
Complexity Medium Complexity Lower
Estimated Cost $0k - $50k Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb, DARA
44 Neighborhood Safety and Security AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
HOUSING AND
COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
INTRODUCTION DESIRED OUTCOMES
Housing and Commercial Development elements of the Desired Outcomes were developed by the Housing and
Plan are intended to identify areas and actions related Commercial Development working group at the initial
to physical reinvestment of private property within the brainstorming session and include the following:
neighborhood. Projects in this section focus heavily on
achieving the following Plan goals: • Create a neighborhood with a vibrant and managed
mix of students, families, and Greeks
• Developing a stronger sense of cohesion internally • Create efficient and well-located off-street parking
and with the rest of the City • Promote well-maintained and managed properties
• Develop a blend of retail and entertainment / nightlife
• Ensuring that AGN is a “high choice” area for options attractive to students, local residents and
living that university and employers can use for visitors
recruitment • Ensure that public and private investment are aligned
and coordinated.
• Enhancing the overall college experience
• Making the area more pedestrian friendly
• Growing the local tax base with new residents
• Creating an environment that provides residents
with a foundation to thrive economically as long-
term members of the community
• Improving the return on investment for property
owners
• Changing the direction of AGN from surviving to
thriving
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 45
HIGHER PRIORITY PROJECTS
D1 CONSIDER CREATION OF A COMMUNITY • Economic Development - CDCs create jobs and
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (CDC) TO FOCUS entrepreneurship opportunities, build individual
ON IMPLEMENTATION OF REVITALIZATION and community wealth, and attract capital to
EFFORTS disinvested communities.
• Community Engagement - Through local
The likelihood for success of Plan initiatives depends engagement, residents can take ownership of their
on setting up an organization or agency that will community and make lasting changes through
be responsible for the long term implementation of grass roots efforts.
projects. The Plan recommends consideration for a • Financial Empowerment - CDCs provide
Community Development Corporation (CDC), which education and asset building tools so low- and
could serve as a mechanism to provide programs, offer moderate-income families can become financially
services, and engage in other activities that promote independent, improve credit, reduce debt and
and support redevelopment of AGN. foreclosure risk, and contribute to community
stability.
CDCs in Illinois have empowered communities to • Food Access - CDCs strengthen local food
take local action to generate economic opportunities systems to improve access to healthy foods--
and improve the quality of life in underserved benefiting the community, the local economy, and
neighborhoods. These non-profits provide a wide the environment.
range of programs that have revitalized and stabilized
disadvantaged communities throughout the state. To initiate a CDC, the following steps should be taken:
These initiatives include:
1. Form a steering committee that includes key
• Affordable Housing - CDCs revitalize distressed neighborhood stakeholders. This steering
communities by building, rehabilitating and committee could include various representatives
preserving affordable, safe homes and rentals of the AGN Task Force and help identify specific
for Illinois families, senior citizens and veterans. such as marketing, communications, real estate
Housing development and counseling help development, advocacy, legal and financial
families and communities become more stable assistance, etc.
and attract new jobs and businesses to allow the
neighborhoods to thrive. 2. Define the community need, geographic
boundaries, and initial focus areas envisioned to be
46 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
addressed by the new CDC. Create a working name local supporters can have a voice in community
for the CDC. development decisions, keep their funds close to
home, and share in the positive results.
3. Discuss and refine a “statement of need” and
preferred focus areas. 9. Utilize the City Attorney to do some early work
establishing the CDC.
4. Identify any existing organizations working on
similar issues in the region and consider joining 10. Recruit and name an initial board of directors.
efforts or expanding their services, geography or
focus areas. If this is not a viable option, continue Guiding AGN renewal will require a full time, focused
with efforts to create a new CDC. effort. If implemented, the proposed CDC should
coordinate directly with the City and NIU, and should
5. Contact the National Alliance of Community include representation from both entities on the
Economic Development Associations (www. Steering Committee, but for administrative and
naceda.org) or the Community Law Project (www. financial reasons, should be separate from either
clccrul.org) for potential technical assistance entity.
in setting up the organization. The Law Project
specifically offers training in Chicago for new Local banks have obligations for community
nonprofit startups. reinvestment under the Community Reinvestment Act
and could help jump start the creation of a CDC. Local
6. Share the CDC vision informally with key foundations could also be heavily involved in funding
community-wide stakeholders and incorporate this effort.
their comments and priorities.
Complexity Medium
7. Provide a forum in which interested individuals Estimated Cost $10k - $50k
are invited to learn the vision of the steering AGN Task Force, Local
committee. Potential Lead Partners Banks, Regional Foundations,
City of DeKalb, NIU
8. Estimate the funds needed to complete one or two
early projects. By investing in local CDC projects,
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 47
CASE STUDY: CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION AND THE GENESIS
PROJECT - DAYTON, OH
For over 40 years, the CityWide Development Corporation has served as a non-profit
Community Development Corporation (CDC) with a mission to strengthen Dayton
through strategic economic and community development. The Genesis Project
is a cooperative effort of public and private organizations with a common goal of
rebuilding and enhancing Dayton’s Fairgrounds Neighborhood and the adjacent
Brown‐Warren Business District. Deteriorating physical conditions in the Fairgrounds
Neighborhood surrounding the University of Dayton had led to the perception that
the community was not safe. Residents, Miami Valley Hospital, the University and
the City all shared the common concern that, without a stabilization plan, continued
disinvestment would occur. This common concern led these major stakeholders
to come together to form the Genesis Project. With leadership and management
provided by CityWide, a vision for rebuilding and enhancing the Fairgrounds
Neighborhood was launched.
To effectively develop a strategy to improve the neighborhood’s civic and social
environment the stakeholders developed a Neighborhood Life Team. Led by
CityWide, the neighborhood life team included two community based police officers,
a social worker employed by Miami Valley Hospital, a city housing inspector, a
credit counselor to assist people in financially preparing for homeownership, and
two community organizers from the Family Service Association’s Neighborhood
Development program. One of the signature achievements of this effort was the
formation of a formal neighborhood organization, which helped shape the long range
plans for the neighborhood.
Since the mid 1990’s over $14M has been invested in the neighborhood. In the first
phase of the project, 68 residential and commercial properties were acquired and 41
demolished, 11 single - family homes were rehabilitated, and 23 new single-family
units were constructed. Additionally, to spur interest in the housing that was planned,
Miami Valley Hospital launched an employee benefit program called “homestead
assistance,” which encouraged their employees to buy homes in the Fairgrounds
Neighborhood by providing them with a $7,500 down payment assistance grant.
This package proved very appealing and 14 Miami Valley Hospital employees
purchased homes in the Fairgrounds neighborhood during the Genesis Project and
many more joined a waiting list for future opportunities. The growth and success of
the Fairgrounds neighborhood also led to significant private investment along the
Brown-Warren Street corridor, as private sector developers were willing to risk their
own capital in business development. Seven new townhouses were completed in
2012 and an 100,000 square feet of commercial space was added. The area is now a
lively retail destination with a mix of both locally-owned retail shops and restaurants,
and national chains such as Panera Bread, Chipotle, and Starbucks.
Source: www.citywidedev.com/projects/community-development/genesis/
48 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
LUCINDA REDESIGN AND CREEKWALK
LU C I N
DA AV
ENUE
NIU CAMPUS
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
D2 CREATE A LUCINDA FOCUS AREA, PRIORITIZING a maximum build-out of three-story commercial/
REDEVELOPMENT THROUGH A POTENTIAL mixed use developments, or three-story multi-family
PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP. residential developments. Compared to existing built
Investment in the area of Lucinda and Annie Glidden structures, this is not a significant departure from what
North adjacent to the NIU campus could greatly currently exists.
improve neighborhood vitality and walkability, while
providing a model for contemporary mixed-use The Plan recommends the creation of a public plaza or
development that may be applicable in other parts of square at the center of the redevelopment, serving as
the neighborhood. Near-term reinvestment within the a unique gathering place and gateway to the proposed
Focus Area should be dedicated to redevelopment of creek walk heading north along the existing stream.
the commercial area in order to strengthen this key Framing the plaza would be three to four-story mixed
node as a campus gateway and to provide a center for use buildings to the west and east. These buildings
student retail, housing and services. should include flexible first-floor spaces that can be
utilized for a variety of active retail, restaurant, service
The Lucinda Focus Area is currently zoned LC (Light or community functions. Upper stories could include
Commercial) and MFR-2 (High Density, High Bulk residential or office uses. Parking for the developments
Multiple Family Residential District). Existing uses should be located to the rear of the sites, and accessed
on Lucinda include two-story commercial structures, from Lucinda Avenue. Due to its central location within
two to three-story multi-family residential structures, easy walking distance to campus and other amenities,
and parking. Current zoning regulations allow for on-site residential parking should be limited.
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 49
Redevelopment of these properties would provide a D3 CREATE A HILLCREST/BLACKHAWK FOCUS
vibrant and attractive gateway to the Annie Glidden AREA, PRIORITIZING MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
Road corridor, while also greatly enhancing the THROUGH A POTENTIAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE
northern edge of the NIU campus and creating new PARTNERSHIP
spaces and places for both students and other local The Hillcrest/Blackhawk area provides a potential
residents to congregate. location for a significant mixed-use redevelopment
that can help provide shopping, services, and other
In order to initiate redevelopment efforts in the area, community amenities to both surrounding families
the Plan recommends the creation of a public-private and the local student population. Currently, Hillcrest/
partnership and joint development agreements Blackhawk has a blighted appearance, due to large
between major stakeholder organizations and a surface parking lots, poor sidewalks and infrastructure,
selected developer. If created as considered and single story commercial structures and the large
outlined in project D1, a local Community Development vacant Campus Theaters that dominate the area. The
Corporation could also play a key role in reinvestment Plan recommends focused reinvestment in this area
of this area in a way that will catalyze additional to make it significantly more attractive, walkable and
improvements in surrounding blocks. supportive of businesses and services that can benefit
area residents.
Complexity Higher
Estimated Cost $100k or above The Hillcrest/Blackhawk Focus Area is zoned LC (Light
City of DeKalb, NIU, Local Commercial). Current zoning allows for significantly
Potential Lead Partners
Property Owners higher densities compared to existing built structures.
Zoning regulations allow for a maximum of three-
story commercial/mixed use developments, which is
a significant density increase over the existing built
environment on Blackhawk and Hillcrest.
Due to the focus area’s location and densely populated
surroundings, it is recommended that the City focus
investment in public service infrastructure, including
transportation, health care services, and enhanced
security.
50 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
HILLCREST / BLACKHAWK REDESIGN
R OA D
WH WK
ILL C KHA
CRE
ST BLA
DRI
VE
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
The Plan envisions a two to three-story mixed Complexity Higher
use building anchoring the corner of Hillcrest and Estimated Cost $100k or above
Blackhawk with flexible ground floor space geared City of DeKalb, NIU, Local
Potential Lead Partners
towards community and entertainment uses. North of Property Owners
this development, attached townhomes could provide
attractive medium-density development for the area
and help strengthen Greek Row. West of the Campus
Cinema’s property, the existing strip mall could be
reinvisioned as a “main street” environment with single-
story retail or mixed-use buildings adjacent to Hillcrest
Drive and parking to the rear of the site.
If created as considered and outlined in project D1, a
local Community Development Corporation could play
a key role in reinvestment of this area in a way that
will catalyze additional improvements in surrounding
blocks. This project should be aligned with project B1,
Establish a Community Food and Education Center
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 51
MEDIUM PRIORITY PROJECTS
D4 EXPLORE BENEFITS AND PROMOTE D5 EXPLORE THE CREATION OF A TAX INCREMENT
D4
OPPORTUNITY ZONE DESIGNATION FINANCING (TIF) DISTRICT COVERING ONE OR
The AGN neighborhood has recently been designated BOTH OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
an Opportunity Zone by the Internal Revenue Service. In order to facilitate changes in the two Focus Areas
An Opportunity Zone is an economically-distressed identified in D2 and D3, the City should explore the
community where new investments, under certain creation of a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District.
conditions, may be eligible for preferential tax DeKalb currently has two TIF Districts, the Central
treatment. Opportunity Zones are designed to spur TIF District and the TIF 2 District. TIF is an economic
economic development by providing tax benefits development tool that helps local governments
to investors. First, investors can defer tax on any restore run-down and blighted areas and/or jump-
prior gains until the earlier of the date on which an start economically challenged parts of town. TIFs can
investment is sold or exchanged, or December 31, help finance public infrastructure improvements and,
2026, so long as the gain is reinvested in a Qualified in certain circumstances, residential rehabilitation.
Opportunity Fund. Second, if the investor holds the Payments derived from the increased assessed value
investment in the Opportunity Fund for at least ten of any improvement to real property beyond its base
years, the investor would be eligible for an increase in amount are deposited in a separate fund to finance the
basis equal to the fair market value of the investment construction of public infrastructure or provide other
on the date that the investment is sold or exchanged. assistance as defined within the TIF legislation. Local
A Qualified Opportunity Fund is an investment vehicle jurisdictions seeking to establish a TIF district must:
that is set up as either a partnership or corporation for
• Establish the proposed redevelopment project area
investing in eligible property located in an Opportunity
meets the statutory eligibility requirements
Zone and utilizes the investor’s gains from a prior • Determine that redevelopment through private
investment for funding the Opportunity Fund. investment is most likely to occur without public
intervention
• Set forth redevelopment plan goals, a general land use
Complexity Medium
plan and a project budget
Estimated Cost Low - $50k • Assess the potential financial impact on other taxing
City of DeKalb, Local districts
Potential Lead Partners
Property Owners • Meet other statutory requirements
Complexity Medium
Estimated Cost Low - $50k
City of DeKalb, Local
Potential Lead Partners
Property Owners
52 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
CASE STUDY: EDDY STREET
COMMONS - SOUTH BEND, IN
Eddy Street Commons is part of a “College Town” development program immediately
adjacent to the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana. Built in an area
owned by the University, the project grew out of a robust community planning
process that identified Eddy Street as a good candidate to foster a brand new,
mixed-use community designed for a variety of tenants and retailers serving the
University, the Northeast Neighborhood, and the surrounding area. The project
is a key component to a larger vision for the neighborhood, involving an intimate
collaboration between the University, the City, and other stakeholders to improve
Northeast through strategic investments in “education, housing, and infrastructure.”
Phase I of Eddy Street Commons opened during the aftermath of the 2008 recession
and was able to weather that period which is now currently 100% leased. This phase
boasts numerous features, including 170,000 square feet of retail/restaurant/office
space, 266 apartment units, 123 condos, 78 row/townhomes, and a parking garage
with 1,276 spaces. Also located on site are two hotels with over 280 rooms.
Phase II has recently been approved for construction. The design has incorporated
feedback from the University, the City, nearby businesses, and residents. Phase II
will add 8,500 square feet of restaurant space, 433 apartment units, 22 single-family
homes, a community center, a grocery store, and 17 “flex” units. The flex units have
been designed to accommodate either residential or commercial uses depending on
the demand. Their inclusion is a response to requests for more retail/office space for
local businesses.
Per data from Notre Dame, the two phases represent nearly $300 million in
investment for the Northeast Neighborhood.
Phase I
• 170,000 square feet of retail/restaurant/office space
• 266 apartment units
• 123 condo units
• 78 row/townhomes (100% leased)
• 1,276-vehicle multi-level parking garage
• 119-room Fairfield Inn & Suites
• 164-room Embassy Suites
Phase II
• $90 million mixed-use project
• 8,500 square feet of restaurant space
• 17 “flex” units
• Modest street-level units that can be adapted for commercial or residential use
depending on demand
• Small, local specialty shops, small cafes or coffee shops or insurance or law
offices
• 433 apartment units
• 22 single-family homes
• Robinson Community Learning Center
• Stand-alone grocery store
• Source: news.nd.edu/news/kite-notre-dame-break-groundS-on-eddy-street-commons-phase-ii/
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 53
D6 FOCUS ON ENFORCEMENT OF BUILDING AND D7 RELOCATE UNIVERSITY PLAZA’S PARKING LOTS
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODES TO EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY, CONVERTING TO A
The City of DeKalb operates in compliance with locally COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE
adopted codes that are designed to maintain a healthy, As outlined in project A10, the Plan recommends that
safe, and clean environment and to preserve the quality the owner of University Plaza evaluate a redesign
of life that residents and businesses enjoy in the of their property to shift parking to Crane Drive and
community. Safety is achieved through proper design Russell Road. Doing so would open up a prime site
and construction practices, issuance of permits, and on Annie Glidden Road for commercial or mixed-use
inspections that verify compliance with building codes. redevelopment while providing the opportunity to
The Building and Code Enforcement Division currently create a semi-public open space amenity for University
has several duties including: Plaza residents. The property owner should work
directly with the City to evaluate the feasibility of this
• Inspecting construction work proposal and a potential public-private partnership.
• Issuing building permits Funding for these improvements could come through
• Providing technical assistance to residents and the implementation of a tax-increment financing
contractors district (TIF) as well as other sources. New parking
• Reviewing building permit applications at Crane Drive and Russell Road could be utilized
• Enforcing local Property Maintenance codes as as a shared lot for Welsh Park activities through a
well as responding to citizen concerns. partnership with the DeKalb Parks District.
The Plan recommends a focus of additional City Complexity Higher
resources on enforcement of building and property Estimated Cost $100k or above
maintenance codes. Improvements for further Private, City of DeKalb,
Potential Lead Partners
evaluation include dictating more frequent exterior DeKalb Park District
inspections for multi-family dwellings, increasing
the use of technology to improve and streamlining
inspection processing and communication, and
potentially hiring an additional inspector if needed.
Complexity Lower
Estimated Cost $50k - $100k
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb
54 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
D8 EVALUATE THE LONG-TERM VIABILITY OF OLDER units. The prices are representative of the “going rate”
APARTMENT COMPLEXES WHILE ENCOURAGING in the rehab field as of June 2012. The cyclical nature
MIXED-INCOME REDEVELOPMENT AND THE of the construction industry, the fluctuation of energy
CREATION OF NEW OPEN SPACES AND PARKING prices, varying costs of commodities with time, and
In order to evaluate the long-term viability of older the specific conditions present in a specific building
apartment complexes, the Plan recommends that will determine whether actual costs will be higher or
property owners consult The Rehab Checklist - An lower.
Apartment Building Owner’s Guide by the Community
Investment Corporation(CIC) (www.cicchicago. If a building owner finds that costs for improvement
com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RehabChecklist. are too high, and is not interested in pursuing
English.2013.pdf). The Checklist includes rough cost redevelopment, the Plan recommends they begin
estimates for many of the components in a rehab conversations with the City regarding potential sale
project and can help an owner decide whether it and acquisition of the property for open space and or
makes sense to improve, redevelop or sell a property shared parking.
that may be in need of repairs. The costs attached to
Complexity Medium
the items represent averages or ranges that CIC sees
Estimated Cost $0k - $50k
in contractors’ proposals for buildings of five or more
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb, DARA
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 55
LOWER PRIORITY PROJECTS
D9 EMPLOY ACTIVATION AND PLACEMAKING The Plan recommends that the City dedicate a
STRATEGIES TO CREATE EXCITEMENT AND small portion of funding to implement a micro-grant
ENTHUSIASM WHILE STRENGTHENING placemaking program (less than $5,000/grant) for
CONNECTIONS AMONG THE COMMUNITY the AGN area. Funds distributed through this program
Placemaking is a multi-faceted approach to the can provide local organizations and neighborhood
planning, design and management of public spaces. groups with empowerment and financial support for
Placemaking capitalizes on a local community’s activities that promote citizen engagement, enhance
assets, inspiration, and potential, with the intention of neighborhood beautification, improve safety, encourage
creating public spaces that promote people’s health, economic development and/or address neighborhood
happiness, and well being. It is political due to the needs and aspirations. This can be integrated with NIU
nature of place identity. Placemaking is both a process Arts engagement programs and augmented by other
and a philosophy that makes use of urban design grant opportunities including the National Endowment
principles. It can be either official and government led, for the Arts - Our Town Grant or a National Association
or community driven. A grass roots tactical urbanism of Realtors (NAR) - Placemaking Micro-Grant.
approach can include extending sidewalks with chalk,
paint, and planters, or hosting an open streets events. An example placemaking project, Build a Better Park
Good placemaking makes use of underutilized space Event, could be held at Welsh Park to activate and bring
to enhance the urban experience at the pedestrian attention to the potential of the space while engaging
scale. the community in a series of conversations about long-
term park improvements.
Complexity Lower
Cost $0k - $50k
City of DeKalb, NIU Office
of Student Engagement,
Potential Lead Partners
Community Education Food
Center
56 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
D10 ENCOURAGE NIU TO DEVELOP FACULTY / STAFF D11 PRIORITIZE MIXED-INCOME SINGLE-FAMILY
HOUSING ON PARKING LOT AT ANNIE GLIDDEN OR TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT TO CREATE
ROAD AND CRANE DRIVE A LARGER AND MORE DIVERSE RESIDENTIAL
In order to increase the supply of faculty and staff POPULATION
housing within the AGN area, the Plan recommends As apartment buildings in the AGN reach the end of
that NIU consider developing the parking lot at Annie their lifespan, the Plan recommends shifting residential
Glidden Road and Crane Drive known as Lot X. This site investment to lower and medium-density building types
is strategically located along the proposed creek walk compatible with traditional neighborhood development
and contains frontage along Annie Glidden that could (TND) principles and townhome and small-lot single
be attractive to retail or services. Future development family building types. TND refers to the development
of this site should be urban and pedestrian-oriented of a complete neighborhood or town using traditional
in character with parking at the rear of buildings and town planning principles. To qualify as a TND, a project
complete with wide sidewalks for pedestrians. should include a range of housing types, a network of
well-connected streets and blocks, public spaces, and
Complexity Higher have amenities such as stores, schools, and places
Estimated Cost $100k or above of worship within walking distance of residences.
Potential Lead Partners NIU This strategy may also include the potential rezoning
of some MFR-2 (Multi Family Residential 2) areas to
MFR-1 (Multi-Family Residential 1) or TFR (Two Family
Residential)
Complexity Higher
Estimated Cost $100k or above
Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb
Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 57
D12 AS REDEVELOPMENT OCCURS, BRAND THE • AGN: A Global Neighborhood
ANNIE GLIDDEN NORTH NEIGHBORHOOD TO • Annie Glidden Fields
HELP IMPROVE PERCEPTION • Credence Quarter
Any successful community needs to have a positive • Varsity Heights
image among its current and potential residents, and • Northern Heights
building a strong, positive image for a neighborhood is • Doorstep Heights
often critical to its success. Image means two different
things: Rebranding should only happen after tangible positive
changes begin to occur in the community. This effort
• The visual impression of the neighborhood from may be led by a local Community Development
residents and visitors. Corporation as outlined in project D1, in collaboration
• The neighborhood’s “brand” – the idea of the with the City of DeKalb and local residents and property
neighborhood that people have in their heads. owners.
Both images feed off and reinforce one another. As Complexity Medium
part of the revitalization effort, the Plan recommends Cost $100k or above
evaluating and potentially rebranding the AGN area to Potential Lead Partners City of DeKalb
promote positive changes that are occurring. When
asked to create a name for the area at Community
Meeting 2, attendees submitted the following ideas:
• DeKalb Village
• Campus Heights
• Glidden Square
• The Village
• Northern Commons
• Huskey Gate
• University North
• Annie Glidden North
• Annie Glidden Horizons
• Glidden Glen
• West Welsh Park
• Uptown
• Communiversity North
58 Housing and Commercial Development AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
MARKET STUDY
SUMMARY
OVERVIEW
As part of the AGN Plan, a Market Study was prepared to • Most of the businesses’ annual revenues and
to profile the residential and commercial market within the employment numbers are declining
project area and to identify opportunities for development • Declining revenues and employment are linked to
and redevelopment. The planning team reviewed a variety limited sales/revenue and a lack of clients, specifically
of data, including demographics, household expenditures, a declining student consumer base
NIU enrollment, commercial properties for sale or lease • AGN’s workforce is predominantly composed of part-
and zoning. The team also conducted a local business time workers
survey. • Top recommendations for how the City of DeKalb
could improve the AGN business environment are
The planning team analyzed demographic data for AGN increasing area safety, planning events for large
and compared it to the City of DeKalb. The total area of groups, increasing the visual marketing of NIU events,
AGN is 0.86 square miles compared to 14.81 square miles and engaging with businesses to offer guidance on
for the City of DeKalb. Despite the relatively small total improvements.
area, AGN has an estimated 2017 population of 9,893,
approximately 23% of DeKalb’s total population of 43,445. The planning team identified commercial properties
1,758 residents in this area are enrolled at NIU. AGN’s for sale and lease in the AGN area and analyzed zoning
2017 median household income is $17,689 compared for potential redevelopment opportunities. AGN is
to $39,643 for DeKalb. The average amount spent predominately zoned Light Commercial (LC), which allows
annually per AGN household in 2017 was $27,036. The a variety of retail and commercial uses, including grocery
top expenditures include housing (32.9%), food (13.1%), stores, restaurants, general retail stores, among others.
transportation (12.0%), and health care (6.2%).
BUSINESS SURVEY
The team researched AGN’s business community and
conducted a business survey with the City of DeKalb.
AGN contains 28 businesses: 43% retail, 39% restaurant,
11% real estate, and 7% service. Of the 28 businesses, 13
businesses (46%) responded to the business survey. Key
survey results included the following points:
Market Study Summary AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 59
RECOMMENDATIONS
Key recommendations of the Market Study have been
incorporated into the AGN Plan and include:
• Separate AGN into two distinct commercial sub-
markets for redevelopment, including the Lucinda
Ave corridor and the Hillcrest/Blackhawk zone.
• Prioritize the commercial property in the Lucinda
Ave corridor for potential redevelopment.
• A planned development or upzoning parcels should
be considered along the Lucinda Ave corridor
to attract higher density development. Explore
investment from NIU in this area.
• Invest in public service infrastructure, such as
transportation, health care, and security, in the
Hillcrest/Blackhawk zone.
• Explore the creation of a Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) District
• Prioritize the redevelopment of commercial
property within the Hillcrest/Blackhawk focus area.
• Launch business engagement programming to
connect the City of DeKalb with businesses on a
regular basis to support business development
and address business owners’ needs.
• Develop a customer attraction strategy, such as
a shop local campaign to create awareness and
generate new customers for AGN’s businesses.
60 Market Study Summary AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
The AGN Plan process began in August 2017 and has central to the planning process were structured to break
included participation of local residents and stakeholders. down barriers and build trust so that entities responsible
A primary goal was to ensure that all participants had for project implementation are prepared to succeed. A
the tools and information needed to actively participate. timeline of the planning process is shown below and
Conversations and community engagement activities described on the following pages.
KICK OFF
VISIONING
FOR THE
FUTURE
LISTENING
+ LEARNING
AGN
REVITALIZATION
PLAN
STRATEGIES
PROGRAMS +
PROJECTS
W O
RK S
IN NG
GG TI
ROUP MEE
Community Engagement AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 61
TASK FORCE MISSION
The AGN Task Force was created consisting of • Generate and vet ideas in order to prioritize the
community residents, property owners and managers, strategies and projects that merit consideration for
local business representatives, service providers, inclusion in the AGN Plan
educational leaders and public officials who are all • Review deliverables and provide comments and
stakeholders in the improvement of the Annie Glidden feedback before they go to the larger community
North neighborhood. The role of the Task Force was to: • Help identify potential partners and guide post Plan
implementation
• Identify resources regarding conditions within the • Provide overall Plan recommendations to City
neighborhood Council
• Provide information regarding conditions within the
neighborhood Task Force members were asked to review
• Assist in promoting larger Community Meetings to materials provided to them and attend meetings
a broad range of community members to discuss the issues raised in these materials by
• Provide information about agencies, businesses the planners and by other Task Force members
or other entities that could assist in neighborhood in order to provide direction to Plan development.
improvement Meetings of the Task Force are working meetings
• Reflect concerns and issues from neighborhood to address issues of planning implementation, data
and citywide residents, businesses and collection, and Plan development.
stakeholders
• Identify project recommendations Task Force proposals and directions are considered as guidance •
to the City and planning team in the development of the Plan,
but are not binding upon the final content of the Plan.
PROJECT INITIATION - KEY PERSON INTERVIEWS
The initial phase of the planning process included departments of NIU, the Dekalb County Housing
interviewing stakeholders, creating a project Task Authority, New Hope Baptist Church, the DeKalb Police
Force, and reviewing base materials and previous Department, and many others. These sessions were
plans. Key person interviews involved selected designed to gain local insights into the project area,
agencies and service providers, such as various its history, existing conditions, planned improvement
62 Community Engagement AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
initiatives, and other topics to be addressed in the through those discussions. Attendees were then asked to
development of the AGN Plan, and to begin to build local identify the City’s assets, issues, and opportunities. For the
support for implementation. This phase helped establish final activity, audience members proposed potential early
the community context, and provided the Planning action projects to be completed during the AGN planning
Team important information on the assets, issues, and process.
opportunities present in DeKalb.
NIU STUDENT MEETING
COMMUNITY MEETING 1 University students are often underrepresented in
The first community meeting was held on September traditional planning processes. The AGN Plan was
27, 2017. The Planning Team introduced themselves, structured to include student engagement, including
provided an overview of the AGN Plan schedule of tasks, representation on the Task Force. The Planning Team was
and had attendees vote on a logo for the project. The invited to a City / Student Leadership meeting to engage
Team explained the purpose of the AGN Plan and its students on the Plan. Results from that meeting showed
relationship to previous planning efforts. The Planning that students are concerned about crime as well as the
Team summarized their own observations of the project lack of entertainment and nightlife amenities in the local
area and interviews with people from key agencies and area. The majority of attendees believe that students and
organizations, highlighting issues that were identified families can co-exist in the neighborhood.
VISIONING
The Visioning phase involved working with neighborhood the results of the first community meeting. Attendees
residents and stakeholders to define a broad outlook for were then asked to think about the future of the AGN
the future of the community. Neighborhood and the ways its improvement could
manifest over the next 10-15 years. The visioning exercise
COMMUNITY MEETING 2 identified five smaller areas within the larger project
Community Meeting 2 took place on November 2, area that generated discussion about more targeted
2017 and provided an analysis of assets, issues, and improvements. These “focus areas” exemplify challenges
opportunities identified at Community Meeting 1, within their immediate context, and attendees were asked
highlighting common themes for each category and to offer their vision for each through a visual preference
specific examples that showed up repeatedly. The concept survey.
of early action projects was reintroduced and community
members ranked 10 options that were developed from
Community Engagement AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 63
STRATEGIES PROGRAMS + PROJECTS
The strategies, programs and projects phase involved
the creation of four Working Groups from the Task
Force focused around the following topics:
• Transportation, Infrastucture and Open Space
• Community Services
• Neighborhood Safety and Security
• Housing and Commercial Development
Each Working Group met three or more times over
spring 2018, identifying desired outcomes and defining
specific project ideas. Results from the Working
Groups were brought back to the Task Force for
summary, review and refinement.
COMMUNITY MEETING 3
Community Meeting 3 took place on April 16,
2018 and focused on providing local residents and
stakeholders a summary of Working Group ideas, as
well as a review of Draft Alternatives as described in
the Recommended Projects and Initiatives section.
Feedback from the meeting was used to refine the
projects of each initiative, and to create the Project
Reference Map for the AGN area.
64 Community Engagement AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
COMMUNITY
FEEDBACK
ASSETS / OPPORTUNITIES / ISSUES
As an initial step in development of the AGN Plan, community members
identified specific assets, issues, and opportunities for consideration at
Community Meeting 1. The elements listed on the following pages reflect the
feedback received at that meeting and established a starting point for crafting
neighborhood strategies. A timeline of the planning process is shown below.
2nd
Community Draft of
Meeting 3 Plan
1st
Key Person Task Force Task Force Task Force Draft of Task Force
Interviews Meeting 2 Meeting 3 Meeting 4 Plan Meeting 5
2017 2018
Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov
Project Community Community Working Draft Final
Kickoff Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Group Plan Plan
Meetings Review
Task Force Student
Meeting 1 Meeting
Community Feedback AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 65
ASSETS / OPPORTUNITIES What we heard from the community
A community asset is anything that can be used to improve the quality of community life. Once assets are identified,
they can be nurtured into opportunities through a combination of community support, dedicated resources, and
strategies structured to enhance their transformative properties. The following were identified by residents and
stakeholders as assets of the AGN Neighborhood:
GREEK ORGANIZATIONS
The presence of Greek organizations and their homes is highly regarded. Some even
considered them and Greek row as a stabilizing force for the neighborhood. Attendees
noted that they have a long tradition of volunteering for good causes, which could assist
in addressing some of the issues in the neighborhood.
NIU
NIU is the anchor institution, contributing much to the neighborhood: resources,
employment, and a student population. They are also heavily invested in the health of
neighborhood and the success of the larger community as that allows them to attract
more students, a better workforce, and elite faculty.
DIVERSITY
A major asset of the Annie Glidden North is the variety of residents with different
backgrounds living within such a small area. This diversity is appreciated by many and
should be maintained and harnessed to improve neighborhood conditions.
PLACES OF WORSHIP
The faith community provides many resources in addition to spaces for worship,
including community facilities, social services, and programming that engages a variety
of residents. The faith community is a fixture that supports many residents in need and
helps provide a mission for those residents that want to serve the community.
VACANT MOVIE THEATER
While also regarded as an issue, Campus Cinemas was seen as a major opportunity
by many residents. It is currently vacant and centrally located for residents, including
both Greek and non-Greek students. Many are excited about the potential reuse of this
building and see it as a catalyst for additional development.
66 Community Feedback AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
The Annie Glidden North Neighborhood was recently
designated as an Opportunity Zone by the Internal
What we heard from the community
Revenue Service. This designation is seen as a major
opportunity for revitalization and is summarized in
project D4.
ROOM FOR GROWTH
The neighborhood is large and is able to accommodate additional development that can
meet resident needs and could add diversity to the existing housing stock. Others see
an opportunity to transition to a lower-density environment that could result in a more
livable neighborhood.
YOUNG POPULATION
Students and other young residents contribute a youthful energy to the area.
They support existing businesses, help stabilize the community, and offer unique
perspectives alongside established residents and homeowners.
PARKS
Parks and open space areas are highly valued. They offer opportunities for youth
recreation as well as opportunities for relaxation and respite for other residents. They
could be used as an organizing force for neighborhood improvements and a venue for
residents to gather. If nurtured with expanded recreational facilities, they could be a
major asset to attract and maintain residents.
COMMUNITY GARDENS
Community gardens provide numerous benefits to residents. They not only offer
residents access to fresh produce, they are also great venues for interacting, physical
exercise, and may be a source of income for some residents. Community gardens are
also viewed as a potential beautifying element for the neighborhood.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
The DeKalb County Health Department is identified as a major asset for the
neighborhood. In addition to providing necessary health care, it also offers high quality
employment and could act as an anchor for the north side for the community.
Community Feedback AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 67
ISSUES What we heard from the community
An issue represents a liability that is lowering the community’s quality of life. If left unabated for too long, its impact can
grow and adversely impact the larger city or region. The following were identified by residents and stakeholders as the
most critical issues to address in the AGN Plan:
CRIME
Crime and or the perception of the lack of safety is a major concern of neighborhood
residents. Some residents have direct experience, others are reacting to news and
community discussions. Safety concerns are highest over weekend nights.
TRANSPORTATION/TRANSIT SERVICE
Transportation within the community and between neighborhoods is difficult for
many, which is designed for auto owners over those that rely on other modes of
transportation. This condition is especially difficult for those with limited means to
access employment opportunities and grocery stores, the latter being the hardest to
access on weekends.
PEDESTRIAN/BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE
The pedestrian environment needs improvement throughout the area, with specific
areas exhibiting unique challenges. Sidewalk conditions along Russell Road were
highlighted as being particularly distressed. Attendees noted that Annie Glidden Road is
a very unwelcoming pedestrian and biking environment, with limited crossings, high-
speed/volume traffic, and multiple lanes to cross. There is little bike infrastructure for a
young student/resident population with limited means of transportation.
VACANT MOVIE THEATER
This vacant building at West Hillcrest Drive and Blackhawk Road blights the immediate
area and is an eyesore for residents and students.
LACK OF ENTERTAINMENT/NIGHT LIFE AMENITIES
In addition to the vacant Campus Cinemas, many criticized the lack of entertainment
options and night life amenities within the neighborhood, particularly those suited to the
student population.
68 Community Feedback AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
What we heard from the community
LACK OF HEALTH AND RECREATION FACILITIES
There are a limited number of health and recreation facilities that appeal to students
and other younger adults. Students would prefer a fitness facility that is more accessible
than what is available on the NIU campus. Other residents expressed concern about the
lack of health care facilities, including medical and dental clinics available within or near
the neighborhood.
INADEQUATE ACCESS TO FRESH HEALTHY FOOD
Fresh food is hard to access because large grocery retailers are not located in the
neighborhood and there are no small fresh produce sellers in the area. Because of this
limited access to fresh food, poorer residents with limited mobility options are especially
burdened, compromising their quality of life and limiting them to patronize fast food
establishments and convenience stores on Annie Glidden.
POOR PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Some properties are blighted, which adversely impacts the greater neighborhood area
and supports its negative perception. Some attendees noted positive momentum
with the rehabilitation of University Village, but think more work is needed for other
properties. Some suspected that code enforcement is too lax in adequately addressing
overcrowding in residential units. Some residents, lamented the lack of internet
infrastructure within buildings.
POOR LIGHTING
Lighting is seen as inadequate, which is contributing to unsafe conditions in certain
parts of the neighborhood. Some residents noted that trees were not being properly
maintained and this neglect was obscuring existing lighting.
NO SPACES FOR SOCIALIZING
With such a large population that is young (including 1,758 students living in AGN
neighborhood), there is a notable lack of spaces for residents to meet and socialize
with one another. This condition may feed into the perception of isolation within the
neighborhood and contribute to tensions between homeowners, renters, and students.
Community Feedback AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 69
- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
ZONING REVIEW
INTRODUCTION This analysis – informed by both an independent review
of the relevant regulatory documents in January 2018,
as well as by staff comments – is intended to suggest
This review focuses upon current conditions within the a series of actions that the City may take to modify
Annie Glidden North neighborhood and is intended to current zoning requirements in an effort to improve
provide a broad review of the current regulatory structure quality of life and ensure the long-term viability of the
impacting development within the neighborhood. As such, economic and built environment of Annie Glidden North.
parcel-specific recommendations are not included here, Though recommendations made here are specific to the
though specific rezoning actions are recommended as conditions and issues identified within the Annie Glidden
part of the larger Annie Glidden North Revitalization Plan North neighborhood, some suggested actions may have
where appropriate. larger applicability within the community and should be
evaluated for their usefulness in light of the manner in
which specific districts and regulations are applied City-
wide.
DEFINITIONS
Any adjustment of the zoning ordinance should contain • “Density” - Staff have suggested that adjusting density
a careful assessment of the range of current definitions, calculations to include a per-bedroom standard may
modifications to existing terms, or inclusion of new terms be desired as a means to more closely regulate actual
to ensure consistency and clear applicability. In focusing population densities. We would recommend against
on the Annie Glidden North neighborhood, it is critical this approach. Most modern ordinances have moved
that housing types be well defined and any terms used to away from per-bedroom standards, as these types
calculate permitted housing are carefully evaluated and of standards are not necessarily any more accurate
clarified where needed to ensure the effective application than per-unit standards. This is because bedrooms
of the ordinance. This review has identified a number of are often a poor indicator of occupancy; a two
preliminary areas where adjustment may be needed: bedroom unit may be occupied by three people, or a
three bedroom unit may be occupied by only one or
Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 71
two people. Switching to per-bedroom standards recommended that the definition be adjusted to a
can also create additional complications in terms unified standard. There are also questions as to the
of calculating and recalibrating additional items legality of defining household differently within the
such as required open space (where applicable), same municipal boundaries. Zoning regulations
and parking. Rather than switching to a per- should be applied consistently across the City.
bedroom standard, the City may want to evaluate
and recalibrate the permitted densities based
upon required lot area in the current districts • “Rooming House” - Similar to the “household”
mapped within the AGN neighborhood. Often these definition, “rooming house” is defined in two
standards, paired with adjusted bulk and setback different ways based upon geography. There are
regulations, parking, open space, and landscape two conflicting definitions of “rooming house:”
requirements can be the simplest, most effective one within the zoning ordinance, and one within
tool to control density. chapter 14 of the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter 14
defines a “rooming house” as a single dwelling unit
occupied by no more than three or four unrelated
• “Household” - The current definition of household individuals. The zoning code does not specify
is split into two thresholds based upon geography. a single unit but allows four or five unrelated
The intent of this “split” approach would appear to individuals based upon geography. Further, the
regulate density differently in the areas in proximity City should consider revising the definition of
to Northern Illinois University; a goal which may “rooming house” to remove any stipulations on
be more effectively achieved by evaluating and unrelated individuals, as this creates conflicts or
fleshing out definitions for other housing types inconsistencies with the definition of “household”
permitted in these areas. This geographically split and definitions for types of dwellings that
approach is uncommon, and may unintentionally should not be defined by occupancy. It may also
create a lack of consistency or clarity in terms unintentionally allow increased occupancy by
of how it is applied across the ordinance. It is virtue of a relation.
72 Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
ZONING DISTRICTS
An initial review of the zoning districts within the AGN in the multi-family districts. The scale of development
neighborhood yields a few areas in which strategic within the multi-family districts, particularly the
adjustments may benefit future development and bring MFR2 district, may warrant this type of adjustment.
the physical form of the neighborhood closer in line Standards for site design, such as for required building
with the City’s goals. separation, site landscape, the location of building
entrances, driveways and parking can help to alleviate
GENERAL STANDARDS concerns related to multiple structures on a lot.
It is recommended that the City evaluate current Further, new residential development will continue
development standards within the base districts to be subject to the site plan review standards in
currently mapped to the AGN neighborhood to the current ordinance, allowing the City to review all
verify where inconsistencies between the regulatory relevant aspects of the development for functionality
requirements and the built environment exist. If there and compliance with the ordinance.
are a high number of substandard lots, this may
indicate that district standards need adjustment, BASE ZONING DISTRICTS VS. PLANNED
or that new districts are needed to accommodate DEVELOPMENT
development and redevelopment within the Generally, it is recommended that the City adjust
neighborhood. Often, when lot sizes and widths permitted densities within current districts (if
are built out-of-sync with the requirements of the appropriate) or create new base districts to
zoning districts, it can lead to a ripple effect in terms accommodate the desired uses and development
of accommodating other site elements such as forms within the AGN neighborhood. This approach
required setbacks, parking, common open space, and would yield the greatest amount of predictability
landscape. Evaluating and adjusting these standards for future development within the neighborhood,
where needed can help to ensure a rational and and would allow the City to craft new regulations
effective combination of bulk and area standards specifically to achieve the future vision for the
that may help to alleviate some of the difficulties neighborhood. Further, per the current site plan review
encountered with physical development in the requirements, the City would still have a level of
neighborhood. review to ensure quality new development within the
neighborhood.
Additionally, the City may want to consider allowing
more than one principal structure per lot without the Focusing new development on the PD process
need to move through a planned development process can often become burdensome on staff and
Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 73
the development community, and can lead to a or redevelopment would be required to come in
development environment where property owners through the PD process to allow for smaller projects,
have a diminished ability to predict what uses or or those with fewer impacts to occur by-right. Such a
building forms might locate adjacent to them--as requirement might read as follows:
all development coming into the neighborhood is
essentially negotiated from the ground up, and not “Planned development is prohibited in Single-Family
occurring within a predetermined set of parameters Residential Districts in all circumstances. In all other
“by-right.” It can also create administrative issues over districts, any development of 20,000 square feet
time for staff, as each PD becomes its own individual or more in gross floor area that requires relief from
zoning district requiring city staff and enforcement zoning regulations is required to go through the
officers to remember which unique rules apply to each planned development process. In all other districts, any
PD. development with a minimum of 10,000 square feet
and up to 20,000 square feet in gross floor area that
Planned Development is best used as a tool to requires relief from zoning regulations has the option,
encourage innovative and creative development at the applicant’s request, to undergo the planned
or redevelopment, by allowing for flexibility in the development process.”
use and development of land and the design of
structures that may not be achievable through a strict Such a provision would require that larger projects
application of the ordinance. As such, it is typically undergo the Planned Development process when
reserved for unique or innovative development types requiring relief from zoning regulations and would
that may need relief from certain requirements of provide the option for smaller developments to
the zoning ordinance, and which the City is willing to undergo the process if desired.
offer in exchange for high-quality amenities or other
community benefits. The DeKalb County complex east ROOMING HOUSES
of Annie Glidden Road may be the best example of The City has identified a number of issues related
such a development within the neighborhood, offering to rooming houses as a use within the AGN
a mixture of uses and densities that would not be neighborhood, focused primarily upon the density that
achievable through strict application of the district such uses create, as well as their potential conversion
requirements. to other types of residential units. In addition to the
issues identified with the definition of the use above,
If the City wishes to pursue an approach that Chapter 14 of the City’s Municipal Code contains
prioritizes Planned Development within the AGN specific square footage regulations for rooming houses
neighborhood, it is recommended that a sensible based upon occupancy, with thresholds at 20, 30, 40
threshold be established, at which, new development and 50 residents. These square footage requirements
74 Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
seem to be aimed toward ensuring that there is enough “Residential conversions of rooming houses into multi-
area both within the structure and subsequently on family dwellings within the ___ Districts are permitted,
a lot to accommodate the density of occupants that and must meet the following standards. Residential
such uses create. However, these thresholds seem conversions require approval of a special use permit.
quite high given the impacts that these types of uses Construction drawings and plans that describe the
can have on the surrounding neighborhood. proposed conversion are required as part of the
application.
Currently, any rooming house with greater than 50
residents requires a special use permit from the City. It (a) The existing rooming house must be a minimum
is recommended that the City should consider revising of 3,000 square feet or more in gross floor area. This
the existing square footage thresholds in Chapter gross floor area calculation does not include any
14 and lower the number of rooms/occupants that basement area.
triggers a special use permit. Currently, the MFR1
District limits the number of residential units within (b) Upon conversion, the unit mix must meet or exceed
any building to a maximum of eight, which may be a the gross floor area as calculated by the unit types
logical place to start thinking about a new threshold for below:
rooming house occupancy. Eight to ten units should be
permitted without the use of a special use permit, but i. Efficiency Unit: 500 square feet
the City may want to carefully evaluate the impacts of
any new rooming house with a number of occupants ii. One Bedroom: 800 square feet
that is higher than ten.
iii. Two Bedroom: 1,000 square feet
Further, conditions for residential conversions of
rooming houses should be evaluated to ensure that iv. Three or More Bedroom: 1,250 square feet
these types of uses are allowed to convert where it
makes sense, and that the requirements for conversion (c) The building must conform to the applicable
are simple and reasonable. The City should consider dimensional standards for the district in which the
revising standards for residential conversions to building is located.
allow for a variety of unit types, with square footage
requirements for each, and may want to consider (d) No residential conversion may violate any
specific standards to ensure the integrity or original occupancy regulations.”
appearance of the structure and its relation to the
public environment in the neighborhood is maintained
or improved. Such a set of standards may look like the
following:
Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 75
NONCONFORMITIES PARKING + LANDSCAPE
The City should evaluate how nonconforming A review of current parking and landscape regulations
situations are handled within the ordinance, to ensure for the districts within the Annie Glidden North
rational, clear triggers for when developments must neighborhood is needed. The density of residential
be brought into conformance with current ordinance uses within the neighborhood appears to be creating
requirements, and in what cases they may be exempt. a situation where the amount of off-street parking
The City’s current ordinance contains provisions for required by the ordinance is often unable to be
nonconforming lots of record, nonconforming uses of accommodated on individual development sites.
lots, nonconforming uses of buildings and structures, This generally indicates that ordinance requirements
and nonconforming buildings and structures. However, may be out of sync with the practical realities of the
more modern ordinances often include a range of development pattern within the neighborhood. Given
nonconforming situations (including nonconforming this situation, the City may want to pursue one the
uses, nonconforming lots, nonconforming structures, following directions:
nonconforming site elements, and nonconforming
signs) with specific requirements for each. With 1. Adjust dimensional standards such as required
particular attention toward the current number of setbacks and buffering to make more room for
nonconforming parking lots in the AGN neighborhood, additional parking on-site, and increase required
the City may want to move to an approach that parking amounts (such as to 2 spaces per dwelling
treats such lots as nonconforming site elements, unit for multi-family or 1.5 spaces per occupant for
with specific requirements for when conformance rooming houses).
is required. Such an approach typically allows for
normal maintenance and incidental repair of the 2. Require fewer parking spaces for development
nonconforming lot, but would require it to come into within the neighborhood to reduce the number
conformance when: of nonconforming situations. New development
and redevelopment will continue to provide
• The existing principal structure is demolished and the amount of parking deemed necessary, but
a new one is constructed. the ordinance should not require amounts that
• A new principal structure is constructed on the lot. cannot be realistically accommodated within the
• The existing principal structure is increased in neighborhood. As part of this strategy, the City
building footprint by 30% or more. may consider a provision that would allow both
• When the parking lot is fully reconstructed or residential and nonresidential uses to count on-
repaved, or when the lot is expanded by 50% or street parking spaces located in front of their sites
more. toward required off-street parking amounts.
76 Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
3. Leave parking requirements as-is and consider residential development within the neighborhood. The
the creation of a tool such as an administrative standards should be evaluated and revised to ensure
variation that would allow the Community that the following elements are addressed relative to
Development Director to adjust ordinance new residential structures within the neighborhood.
dimensional and parking requirements by up to
10%. This would give the City the flexibility to either • Building orientation and massing (orient buildings
administratively reduce the amount of required toward streets, not parking lots)
parking for sites that do not need it and are unable • Principal entry location (buildings should contain a
to provide it, or to reduce required setbacks and principal entry from the street)
landscape on sites that may need to provide more • Fenestration (multi-family buildings can require a
parking but cannot do so and continue to meet minimum transparency on the ground floor and
these standards. upper stories if desired)
• Building articulation / blank wall area (ensure that
The current ordinance’s landscape requirements recesses and projections, changes in material,
should also be evaluated to ensure that a pleasant and inset or projected windows, awnings, canopies,
walkable pedestrian environment is maintained within balconies, and other architectural features are
the neighborhood. Many residential developments are utilized to provide a rhythm and visual interest to
currently providing surface parking lots immediately the façade)
adjacent to the right-of-way with no screening or • Roof design (rooflines in excess of 75 feet should
separation from existing sidewalks and the public require an element of variation in height or a
right-of-way. Further, the threshold for requiring interior prominent repeated design element)
parking lot landscape may need to be lowered from 60 • Driveway design and access should be
spaces. A typical threshold for this type of landscaping addressed, particularly for duplex and townhouse
requirement is 20-30 spaces. developments that currently provide access to
individual garages from the street.
DESIGN • Building materials may also be addressed, to
The City’s current set of residential design standards ensure high-quality, durable materials are used in
should be evaluated to ensure they are effectively new development or significant exterior alterations.
improving the appearance of the neighborhood as
redevelopment occurs. The current set of design
standards seems to be heavily oriented toward
ensuring residential compatibility for new single-
family homes, but may not be adequately addressing
design issues specific to multi-family or other types of
Zoning Review AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 77
- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
IMPLEMENTATION
• The CDC or other organization potentially leads the
INTRODUCTION
process and adjusts the implementation agenda
Successful neighborhood plan implementation is typically
over time in response to new development, market
the result of strong municipal leadership combined
changes, and community feedback.
with other stakeholders fulfilling important roles. In
• The City enact development regulations customized
implementing community plans, the municipality has the
for neighborhood redevelopment.
broadest perspective and interest, which is to improve
• The City undertakes public improvements within
the community and enhance public welfare. Other
the AGN area to enhance the attractiveness of
stakeholders, such as property owners, developers, other
development sites.
units of government and nearby residents each have
• The City provides financial incentives to encourage
their own sets of interests and goals for neighborhood
developers to build desired projects while
improvement.
safeguarding community values and resources.
• Landowners understand and support the land use/
The AGN Revitalization Plan was undertaken to chart a
development policies of the Plan, and value their land
course for achieving the community vision for the Annie
consistent with these policies and current market
Glidden North area. This Plan represents the initial step in
conditions.
realizing that vision. Implementation is a fluid process that
• Developers recognize the potential of the AGN area
requires adapting to a range of changing conditions.
as a unique neighborhood within the City, and act to
maximize the appeal and value of building sites within
While the City of DeKalb should ultimately oversee
the neighborhood.
revitalization efforts, successful implementation of the
• The financial sector, including community
AGN Plan will likely require consideration for the creation
development financial institutions (CDFIs), is willing
of a Community Development Corporation (CDC) or
to invest in new and different forms of development,
similar organization to drive the process. This organization
which at least initially, are not represented in the local
should posses an understanding of the respective
market and reflect a higher level of risk.
interests and roles of all stakeholders. These interests
• Local residents, businesses and community
include:
organizations make a commitment to stay informed
and participate in public forums to make sure their
values and priorities are included in neighborhood
planning and project reviews.
Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 79
• Innovative and “out of the box” strategies for • Local partner agencies identify programmatic gaps
building design, parking, public amenities and and begin working together to implement projects
financing are often part of successful projects. related to community services and neighborhood
Partnerships involving the public and private safety and security.
sectors, including Northern Illinois University make
these new approaches possible.
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION FORMATION
In addition to consideration for the development of a CDC or similar organization, the Plan recommends the formation
of a local neighborhood group or association to represent the AGN community. Neighborhood groups play a vital role
in representing the interests of residents and enhancing the local community. A well-organized neighborhood can
wield powerful influence when addressing the needs and problems of local residents. Steps to create a neighborhood
association or group are listed below.
1. Define the issues. Using the AGN Plan as a 4. Hold core group meetings. The core group acts
starting point, talk to residents to find out what as the temporary steering committee until the
they think the important issues are and what general membership meeting is held. When
should be done. the core group meets, it should come up with
ideas for projects to kick off the organizing
2. Research the community. Define the geography drive.
of the community and identify if there is a
particular grouping — tenants, homeowners, 5. Plan a general meeting. Leaders should decide
students, parents — who are most concerned on a time, date and place that are convenient
and most likely to join the organization? for people in the neighborhood. When an
agenda is prepared for the first general
3. Build a core group. Leaders should recruit meeting, the goal should be to come out of the
a handful of people to help launch the meeting with an agreement on the issues and
organization. A group has more credibility than priorities that the organization will take on.
an individual and one individual cannot do all
the work. Candidates can be found for the core 6. Reach out to the community. Getting the word
group by talking to neighbors and looking for out is crucial to create a well-balanced, fully
people who are committed to the community. representative organization.
80 Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
- PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -
TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN SPACE
A Ensure efficient transit service is available to neighborhood residents and Annie Glidden Road
is safe for both motorists and pedestrians. Street trees should be plentiful, shading residents
and beautifying the neighborhood. Efficient, safe, and well-located off-street parking should be
provided. Improved lighting will allow residents to safely enjoy the neighborhood. Redesign Welsh
Park and other available green space for all ages, to accommodate passive and active uses.
Make AGN a desirable area for the entire community to visit or live in by providing quality living
standards, adding useful park and recreation space, and creating interconnectivity between the
neighborhood and the rest of the City.
Projects are further detailed in the Transportation, Infrastructure and Open Space Chapter, on Page 11
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Identification of local
transportation improvements
A1 Higher Lower $0k - $50k
and direct integration with X X X
DSATS Study.
Redesign Welsh Park
$100k and
A2 Higher Medium
above
as a local and regional X X
destination.
Develop bicycle route to
A3 Higher Lower $50k - $100k High School utilizing Normal X
and Dresser Roads.
Develop sidewalk connection
to Health Department
A4 Higher Lower $50k - $100k
utilizing Annie Glidden and X
Dresser Roads.
Develop streetscape and
gateway improvements for
$100k and
A5 Medium Medium
above
the Greek Row area in order X X X
to help improve its identity
and perception.
Redesign NIU Nursing
School green space as
$100k and
A6 Medium Medium
above
neighborhood park and X X
incorporate into open space
network.
Create a dedicated
A7 Medium Lower $50k - $100k pedestrian path from the end X X X
of High Terrace.
Improve and enhance
pedestrian crossings at
$100k and
A8 Medium Medium
above
Annie Glidden Road and X
Lucinda Avenue, Hillcrest
Drive and Lincoln Drive
Reduce density when
opportunities arise and
$100k and ensure that plans for new
A9 Medium Higher
above
or redeveloped properties X X X X
include provisions for
increased parking and open
space.
82 Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Develop hike / bike trail
$100k and along creek from Lucinda
A10 Medium Medium
above Avenue to Lorusso Lagoon X X X X
and Regent Drive.
Recommend connections
to City parks outside of
A11 Lower Lower $0k - $50k
the neighborhood through X
DSATS Study.
Redesign University Plaza
parking lot as neighborhood
$100k and
A12 Lower Higher
above
square and relocate parking X X X
to shared lot on Crane Drive
and Russell Road.
Distribute and post transit
A13 Lower Lower $0k - $50k route maps to broaden X
visibility of system.
Improve Boardman and
Pappas Parks with running
$100k and
A14 Lower Medium
above
paths circling detention X X
ponds, creating more usable
spaces for residents.
Develop community
gardens on vacant parcels
A15 Lower Lower $50k - $100k
at Greenbriar and Russelll X X
Roads.
Create new street
$100k and
A16 Lower Higher
above
connection from Twombly X
Road to W Hillcrest Drive.
Develop new street network
$100k and between W Dresser Road
A17 Lower Higher
above and Ridge Drive to facilitate X
infill development
Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 83
COMMUNITY SERVICES
B Foster increased civic participation by neighborhood residents. Increase local daycare services
and alternatives to help current families and attract new families. Promote greater awareness
of community-focused services already in place. Ensure AGN residents are able to access
employment opportunities and resources. Build and link partnerships between organizations that
are located and/or operate in the neighborhood.
Projects are further detailed in the Community Services Chapter, on Page 27.
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
$100k and Establish a Community Food
B1 Higher Higher
above and Education Center X X X
$100k and Community Center Program
B2 Higher Higher
above Planning X X X
Work with local health
care providers to establish
$100k and
B3 Higher Medium
above
a walk-in clinic or urgent X X X
care facility within the
neighborhood.
Promote enrollment in
Tenants Association
B4 Medium Lower $0k - $50k
throughout the X X
neighborhood.
Inventory workforce training
programs and employers
linked to those programs.
B5 Medium Medium $50k - $100k
Survey residents to X X
generate a feedback loop on
programs' effectiveness.
Work with NIU, local
churches and other partners
to identify programs that
provide daycare, health
$100k and
B6 Medium Medium
above
care, and other community X X X X
services. Develop a packet
of resources, services, and
tools, and design a program
to market services.
Reach out to non-profit
groups to offer after-school
B7 Medium Lower $0k - $50k
activities for neighborhood X X X
kids.
84 Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Hold a job fair within Annie
B8 Lower Lower $0k - $50k Glidden North to promote X X X
local hiring.
Install kiosks and/or
B9 Lower Medium $0k - $50k community bulletin boards X X
to advertise social events.
Provide voter registration
services in the AGN
Neighborhood and link
residents with closest
B10 Lower Lower $0k - $50k
polling places. Ensure the X
2020 US Census includes a
full count of all students and
other residents.
Establish a legal aid office in
B11 Lower Medium $50k - $100k
the neighborhood. X X
Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 85
NEIGHBORHOOD SAFETY AND SECURITY
C Reduce crimes by ensuring greater incorporation of crime-free housing. Add cameras and lighting
while ensuring improved property maintenance. Create better communication between property
owners, City government, tenants, and NIU along with a network of neighborhood associations.
Increase enforcement of minor quality of life infractions and upon the Safe Streets initiative.
Celebrate cooperation between the City of DeKalb and NIU police.
Projects are further detailed in the Neighborhood Safety and Security Chapter, on Page 39.
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Implementation of safety
$100k and improvements focused
C1 Higher Higher
above on improved lighting and
X X X
surveillance.
Create a grading system
and database for rental
C2 Medium Medium $50k - $100k
properties, assessing safety
X X X X
and security of apartments.
Arrange meetings for safety
C3 Lower Lower $0k - $50k experts to address residents X X
of Annie Glidden North.
Research and, if possible,
implement cost-effective
C4 Lower Medium $0k - $50k
background searches for
X X
prospective rental tenants.
Encourage property owners
with cameras to make live
C5 Lower Medium $0k - $50k
feeds available to the DeKalb
X X X
Police Department.
86 Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Assign DeKalb staff to
monitor neighborhood
C6 Lower Medium $0k - $50k safety and security, and X X
serve as liaison between
neighborhood associations.
Support DeKalb Area
Rental Association (DARA)
C7 Lower Lower $0k - $50k
encouraging ethical behavior
X X X
by member property owners.
Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 87
HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
D Create a neighborhood with a vibrant and managed mix of students, families, and Greeks. Create
efficient and well-located off-street parking. Ensure annual increases in local property values.
Promote well-maintained and managed properties. Develop a blend of retail and entertainment /
nightlife options attractive to students, local residents and visitors. Ensure that public and private
investment are aligned and coordinated.
Projects are further detailed in the Housing and Commercial Development Chapter, on Page 45.
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Consider creation of a
Community Development
D1 Higher Medium $0k - $50k Corporation (CDC) to focus X X X
on implementation of
revitalization efforts.
Create a Lucinda Focus Area,
$100k and prioritizing redevelopment
D2 Higher Higher
above through a potential public/
X X X
private partnership.
Create a Hillcrest/Blackhawk
Focus Area, prioritizing
$100k and
D3 Higher Higher
above
mixed-use development X X
through a potential public/
private partnership.
Explore benefits and
D4 Medium Medium Low - $50k promote Opportunity Zone X X X
designation.
Explore the creation of a Tax
Increment Financing (TIF)
D5 Medium Medium Low - $50k
District covering one or both
X X X
of the redevelopment areas.
Focus on better enforcement
D6 Medium Lower $50k - $100k of building and property X
maintenance codes.
Relocate University Plaza’s
parking lots to east side of
D7 Medium Higher $0k - $50k
property, converting to a
X
commercial frontage.
88 Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT
PRIORITY COMPLEXITY EST COST PROJECT POTENTIAL LEAD PARTNERS
Commun
Govt Private Neigh
Orgs
Evaluate the long-
term viability of older
apartment complexes while
D8 Medium Medium $0k - $50k encouraging mixed-income X
redevelopment and the
creation of new open spaces
and parking.
Employ activation and
placemaking strategies
to create excitement
D9 Lower Lower $0k - $50k
and enthusiasm while
X X X
strengthening connections
among the community.
Encourage NIU to develop
$100k and faculty / staff housing on
D10 Lower Higher
above parking lot at Annie Glidden
X
Road and Crane Drive.
Prioritize mixed-income
single-family or townhome
$100k and
D11 Lower Higher
above
development to create a X
larger and more diverse
residential population.
As redevelopment occurs,
$100k and brand the Annie Glidden
D12 Lower Medium
above North Neighborhood to help
X X X X
improve perception.
Implementation AGN Neighborhood Plan DRAFT 89
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
October 12, 2018
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Members
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Dan Olson, Principal Planner
RE: Petition for Text Amendments to Chapter 23 “Unified
Development Ordinance” of the Municipal Code to Amend
Article 5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District of
the UDO to Establish a Procedure and Criteria for Allowing
Single Family Attached Dwellings Having a Common Wall
Along a Lot Line be Permitted with the Approval of a
Special Use Permit.
I. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The City is initiating text amendments to Chapter 23 “Unified Development Ordinance” of the
Municipal Code to amend Article 5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District of the UDO
to establish a procedure and criteria for allowing single family attached dwellings having a
common wall along a lot line be permitted with the approval of a special use permit. This
procedure is currently allowed in the ‘TFR” Two-Family Residential District and the “MFR1”
MFR-1 Multiple Family Residential District (see attached Article from the UDO for the TFR
District). The TFR and MFR1 Districts were amended in 1994 to allow this special use permit
process. The City has approved ten special use requests for this procedure in the TFR District
since 2001. The RC-1 District was created in 2007 and may have been overlooked regarding
the allowance for this procedure. There are several properties in the RC-1 District that could
potentially qualify to be subdivided in a similar fashion to properties in the TFR and MFR1
Districts. Staff is proposing the same criteria and conditions that are part of the language for
the special use permit in the TFR and MFR1 Districts be adopted in the RC-1 District.
II. RECOMMENDATION
Sample Motion:
Based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented, I move that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of text amendments to Chapter
23 “Unified Development Ordinance” of the Municipal Code to Amend Article 5.14 “RC-1”
Residential Conservation District of the UDO to establish a procedure and criteria for allowing
single family attached dwellings having a common wall along a lot line be permitted with the
approval of a special use permit as indicated on Exhibit A.
EXHIBIT A
5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
5.14.01 Purpose and Intent
Within the City of DeKalb there are unique and distinctive older residential neighborhoods which contribute
significantly to the overall character and identity of the City and are worthy of preservation and protection.
As a matter of public policy, the City aims to preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate the value of these
residential neighborhoods through the establishment of a Residential Conservation District.
The following is the purpose of a Residential Conservation District in older City residential neighborhoods
or commercial districts:
1. to promote and provide for economic revitalization and/or enhancement;
2. to protect and strengthen desirable and unique physical features, design characteristics, and
recognized identity, charm and flavor;
3. to protect and enhance the livability of the City;
4. to reduce conflict and prevent blighting caused by incompatible and insensitive development, and to
promote new compatible development;
5. to enhance property values;
6. to encourage and strengthen civic pride; and
7. to encourage the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth and redevelopment of the City.
5.14.02 Designation Criteria
To be designated a Residential Conservation District; the area must meet the following criteria:
1. The area must contain a minimum of one block face (all the lots on one side of a block);
2. The area must have been platted or developed at least twenty-five (25) years ago;
3. At least seventy-five (75) percent of the land area in the proposed district is presently improved; and
4. The area must possess one or more of the following distinctive features that create a cohesive
identifiable setting, character or association;
a. scale, size, type of construction, or distinctive building materials;
b. lot layouts, setbacks, street layouts, alleys or sidewalks;
c. special natural or streetscape characteristics, such as creek beds, parks, gardens or street
landscaping;
d. land use patterns, including mixed or unique uses or activities; or
e. abuts or links designated historic landmarks
5. The area must be predominantly residential in use and character.
5-
This section contains the district regulations of the “RC-1” Residential Conservation District. These
regulations are supplemented and qualified by additional regulations appearing elsewhere in this Ordinance,
which are incorporated as part of this Article by reference.
5.14.03 Permitted Land Uses and Developments of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
The principal type of land use and development intended for this district is:
Single family detached dwellings.
Original Residential Uses defines in part as: any lawfully established single-family dwellings, two-family
dwellings, or multiple-family dwellings, but excluding rooming house dwellings units on lots that are less
than seven thousand (7,000) square feet, and subject to the terms of this Article.
Additional permitted land uses and developments include:
Accessory uses;
Passive Park facilities owned by the Park District or private entity;
Day care homes;
Home occupations;
5.14.04 Special Land Uses and Developments of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
The following land uses and developments may be permitted upon the issuance of a special use permit in
accordance with the procedures and standards contained in Article 14, “Permits.”
Two-Family Units;
Multi-Family Units;
Bed and breakfasts;
Churches;
Converted Dwellings;
Day Care Centers in buildings constructed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, where said
buildings were designed and clearly intended for non-residential uses;
Active Parks
Public buildings used by any department of the City, School District, Library District, Park District,
County, State, or Federal governments; except for vehicle maintenance, raw material storage and other
similar type facilities.
Public utility facilities, excluding communication towers. Any installation other than poles and equipment
attached to the poles, shall be:
adequately screened with landscaping, fencing, or walls, or any combination thereof, or
placed underground, or
5-
enclosed in a structure in such a manner so as to blend with and complement the character of the
surrounding area.
All plans for screening these facilities shall be submitted as a part of the special use permit application;
Parking facilities within 300 feet of principal ancillary use;
Community Centers (2008-051).
5.14.05 Density and Dimensional Regulations of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
1. Minimum Lot Size:
a. The minimum lot size for permitted and special land uses in the RC-1 District shall be as follows:
Use Minimum Lot Size
Community Residence (Small) 8,000 sq. ft.
Community Residence (Large) 11,000 sq. ft.
Day Care Homes 6,000 sq. ft.
Group Day Care Homes 9,000 sq. ft.
Dwellings, Single Family 6,000 sq. ft.
Dwellings, Two-Family 7,000 sq. ft.
Dwellings, Multi-Family 3,500 sq. ft./unit
b. For uses other than those listed above, the lot area shall be adequate to provide the building
setbacks required by this Section and the parking, as required by Article 12, “Off-Street Parking
and Loading Requirements,” but in no instance shall a lot be created that is less than six thousand
(6,000) square feet (except for public utility facilities).
c. Any lot of record in existence, on the effective date of this Ordinance, which contains less than
six thousand (6,000) square feet of land area, may be used as a site for one (1) single-family
detached dwelling together with accessory structures and uses, provided the location of such
dwelling satisfies the minimum setback requirements identified in paragraph 2 below.
d. Lots created for public utility facilities may be less than six thousand (6,000) square feet,
provided that such lots or tracts shall not be used for any other use, except that in the event the
public utility facility use terminates and where the lot or tract is combined with an adjacent parcel
or parcels to equal or exceed six thousand (6,000) square feet, then said lot may be used by
any allowable use in the RC-1 district.
e. In this RC-1 Zoning District, the minimum required zoning lot area shall be six thousand (6,000)
square feet per single-family detached dwelling. For “original residential uses” (SEE BELOW),
encompassing existing two-family dwellings and existing multiple-family dwellings the minimum
required lot area shall be the original lot area at the time the land use was lawfully established or
the minimum required lot area at the time the land use was lawfully established, whichever is
greater and constitutes the zoning lot area on the effective date of this Article. In the case where
the existing dwelling unit is rebuilt, a replacement deadline of one year will be enforced,
otherwise replacement with a single family dwelling is the only permissible option.
2. Building Setback Requirements: Except as provided for in Article 7, “Supplementary District
Regulations,” the following setback requirements apply to principal buildings in the RC-1 district.
a. Front Yard: No principal building shall be allowed within twenty-five (25) feet of any front lot line
or a street right-of-way line.
5-
b. Side Yard: No principal building shall be allowed within five (5) feet of any side lot line or within
a distance of any side lot line equal to ten (10) percent of the average width of the lot, whichever
is less, except that no side yard shall have a width of less than three (3) feet.
c. Rear Yard: No principal building shall be allowed within thirty (30) feet of the rear lot line or
within a distance measured from the rear lot line that is equivalent to twenty (20) percent of the
total lot depth, whichever is less.
3. Building Height Limitations: No building shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35)
feet in height, except for non-residential structures; this may be waived as part of the approval of
the Special Use Permit.
4. Design Requirements: Principal structures constructed after the date of this Ordinance shall comply
with the provisions of Article 7.14, Design Requirements for New Residential Construction.
5.14.06 Other Development Regulations for the “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
The following references the appropriate Articles in this Ordinance which specify the other regulations
governing development in this district.
1. “Overlay District Regulations”: Article 6
2. “Supplementary District Regulations”: Article 7
3. “Streets, Sidewalks and Subdivision Design”: Article 9
4. “Utilities”: Article 10
5. “Floodways, Floodplains, Stormdrainage and Erosion”: Article 11
6. “Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements”: Article 12
7. “Signs”: Article 13
5.14.07 Conditions of Use of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
1. Use: Not more than one (1) principal building shall be located on a zoning lot.
2. Conversions: In no event shall existing dwellings be converted to more units, partially or otherwise,
except as specifically provided for in this district by Planning and Zoning Commission approval
subject to the Special Use Requirements, however converting to fewer units is permissible by right,
provided the total number of bedrooms is also reduced. Restrictions on number of bedrooms shall
not apply to single family residences.
3. Reconstruction: The reconstruction of dwellings will be permitted for “original residential uses”
pending no additional residential dwelling units are created. All other permitted uses will be subject
to Special Use Approval.
4. Parking Requirements: Any change in use or conversion (I.E. new development, building additions
or conversions of use required by this Ordinance) shall provide required Off-Street Parking Areas in
accordance with the following regulations.
a. Existing Parking Areas: Off-Street Parking Areas shall not be reduced below the minimum
requirement for such use as required by this Ordinance. Any Off-Street Parking Areas existing
prior to the effective date of this Ordinance which were already below the standards established
by this Ordinance shall not be further reduced.
5-
b. Location of Parking Areas: Off-Street Parking Areas shall be located on the same Lot or within
three hundred (300) feet of the Building, Structure or use served by the Off-Street Parking Area.
Off-Street Parking for any use shall be located within a zoning District which permits the use for
which the Off-Street Parking is required per Article 12.
5. Lot combinations / Subdivision: Any combination or subdivision of an existing lot of record would
require that the new zoning lot(s) created conform to all applicable zoning regulations, except as
allowed with a Special Use Permit outlined in Article 5.14.07(7). A Final Plat shall be prepared and
submitted in accordance with Article 15.07, Final Plats.
6. The following rules shall govern the transition from the provisions of the former Zoning Ordinance to
the provisions of this Article or to the provisions of any subsequent amendment hereto:
a. Permitted Uses Rendered Special: Where a property is used for a purpose which was classified
as a “permitted use” in the zoning district in which it was located prior to mapping of this District,
or prior to any subsequent amendment hereto, and such use is classified by this Article as a
“Special Use” in this zoning district, such use is hereby deemed a lawful existing Special Use,
subject to the provisions of subsection D below..
b. Existing Special Use: Where a property has become a lawful Special Use pursuant to
subsection A, above, or where a property has been granted a Special Use prior to the effective
date of this Article, or prior to any subsequent amendment hereto, such use shall be considered
a lawful Special Use if the use is classified by this Article as a Special Use.
1) If the passage of the ordinance granting such Special Use was subject to one or more
conditions, those conditions shall remain in full force and effect, as may be amended from
time to time, subject to the provisions of this Article.
2) All Special Uses shall be subject to the provision that they shall expire if not established
within one year from the date of passage of the ordinance granting the Special Use. No
Special Use shall be reestablished subsequent to abandonment through a
discontinuation of use for three hundred sixty-five (365) consecutive days, regardless of
any reservation of intent to reestablish such Special Use.
c. Changes To Existing Special Use: Where a property has been granted a Special Use prior to the
effective date of this Article, or where a property has been granted a Special Use pursuant to the
provisions of this Article, a change to such Special Use shall be allowed provided that the desired
change was explicitly approved in the ordinance passed granting the Special Use. Any other
change to such an existing Special Use shall be subject to the provisions this Chapter or others,
as applicable. However, changes involving accessory structures may be made to existing Special
Uses, subject to the site design regulations of the zoning district in which it is located, and
provided that there is no change to the function, operation, or traffic characteristics of the
existing Special Use. Any change in a lawful Special Use shall be required to comply with the
provisions of this Article.
c.
7. Single family attached dwellings having a common wall along a lot line may be permitted in the
“RC-1” Residential Conservation District provided the City Council approves a Special Use Permit
(see Article 14, “Permits”) meeting the following criteria:
a. Not more than one dwelling unit shall be constructed on a lot.
b. Not more than one dwelling unit shall be attached to another dwelling unit.
c. The side yard setback from the lot line on which the common wall will be placed shall be abated
entirely. All other setback requirements of the “RC-1” district shall be adhered to.
5-
d. A dwelling unit on a lot with an abated side yard setback from the lot line on which the common
wall will be placed shall share said common wall with a dwelling unit on an adjacent lot which
shall also have an abated side yard setback from the same lot line.
e. All common wall construction standards, whether existing or proposed, shall be in conformance
with all building, electrical, plumbing, and other applicable codes and ordinances.
f. Each dwelling unit shall be serviced with its own water line, sanitary sewer line, sump pump
line, and all other utility lines and extensions.
g. A minor subdivision plat shall be prepared in accordance with Article 15, “Subdivision of Land”
and approved subject to a Minor Plat application. The plat shall reference a recorded common
wall agreement, and shall include a note stating that the construction on the proposed lots shall
be limited to “common wall construction only.”
1) Individual lots shall have an area of not less than 3500 square feet and shall have a width
of not less than twenty-five (25) feet.
2) All other setback and dimensional requirements of this Ordinance shall be adhered to.
h. Covenants, Conditions and Deed Restrictions (CCR’s), shall be prepared and recorded
simultaneously with the Final Plat and Common Wall Agreement. An Owners Association shall
be created, in accordance with Article 15.07, either through the CCR’s or in a separate
document, which shall also be recorded simultaneously with the other required documents and
plat.
Any change in a lawful Special Use shall be required to comply with the provisions of this
Article.
5.14.08 Definitions
Original Residential Use: The initial use of a zoning lot for the purpose of a dwelling, as such initial dwelling
was originally designed and intended, encompassing any lawfully established single-family dwellings, two-
family dwellings, or multiple-family dwellings, but excluding rooming house dwellings.
Change in Use: A change in the use of a zoning lot from one land use specifically enumerated in the lists
of permitted uses and special uses to another land use specifically enumerated in the lists of permitted uses
and Special Uses. For multiple-family dwellings, an increase or decrease in the number of dwelling units
shall be considered a change in use.
5-
TFR District
5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
5.14.01 Purpose and Intent
Within the City of DeKalb there are unique and distinctive older residential neighborhoods which contribute
significantly to the overall character and identity of the City and are worthy of preservation and protection.
As a matter of public policy, the City aims to preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate the value of these
residential neighborhoods through the establishment of a Residential Conservation District.
The following is the purpose of a Residential Conservation District in older City residential neighborhoods
or commercial districts:
1. to promote and provide for economic revitalization and/or enhancement;
2. to protect and strengthen desirable and unique physical features, design characteristics, and
recognized identity, charm and flavor;
3. to protect and enhance the livability of the City;
4. to reduce conflict and prevent blighting caused by incompatible and insensitive development, and to
promote new compatible development;
5. to enhance property values;
6. to encourage and strengthen civic pride; and
7. to encourage the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth and redevelopment of the City.
5.14.02 Designation Criteria
To be designated a Residential Conservation District; the area must meet the following criteria:
1. The area must contain a minimum of one block face (all the lots on one side of a block);
2. The area must have been platted or developed at least twenty-five (25) years ago;
3. At least seventy-five (75) percent of the land area in the proposed district is presently improved; and
4. The area must possess one or more of the following distinctive features that create a cohesive
identifiable setting, character or association;
a. scale, size, type of construction, or distinctive building materials;
b. lot layouts, setbacks, street layouts, alleys or sidewalks;
c. special natural or streetscape characteristics, such as creek beds, parks, gardens or street
landscaping;
d. land use patterns, including mixed or unique uses or activities; or
e. abuts or links designated historic landmarks
5. The area must be predominantly residential in use and character.
5-
This section contains the district regulations of the “RC-1” Residential Conservation District. These
regulations are supplemented and qualified by additional regulations appearing elsewhere in this Ordinance,
which are incorporated as part of this Article by reference.
5.14.03 Permitted Land Uses and Developments of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
The principal type of land use and development intended for this district is:
Single family detached dwellings.
Original Residential Uses defines in part as: any lawfully established single-family dwellings, two-family
dwellings, or multiple-family dwellings, but excluding rooming house dwellings units on lots that are less
than seven thousand (7,000) square feet, and subject to the terms of this Article.
Additional permitted land uses and developments include:
Accessory uses;
Passive Park facilities owned by the Park District or private entity;
Day care homes;
Home occupations;
5.14.04 Special Land Uses and Developments of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
The following land uses and developments may be permitted upon the issuance of a special use permit in
accordance with the procedures and standards contained in Article 14, “Permits.”
Two-Family Units;
Multi-Family Units;
Bed and breakfasts;
Churches;
Converted Dwellings;
Day Care Centers in buildings constructed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, where said
buildings were designed and clearly intended for non-residential uses;
Active Parks
Public buildings used by any department of the City, School District, Library District, Park District,
County, State, or Federal governments; except for vehicle maintenance, raw material storage and other
similar type facilities.
Public utility facilities, excluding communication towers. Any installation other than poles and equipment
attached to the poles, shall be:
adequately screened with landscaping, fencing, or walls, or any combination thereof, or
placed underground, or
5-
enclosed in a structure in such a manner so as to blend with and complement the character of the
surrounding area.
All plans for screening these facilities shall be submitted as a part of the special use permit application;
Parking facilities within 300 feet of principal ancillary use;
Community Centers (2008-051).
5.14.05 Density and Dimensional Regulations of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
1. Minimum Lot Size:
a. The minimum lot size for permitted and special land uses in the RC-1 District shall be as follows:
Use Minimum Lot Size
Community Residence (Small) 8,000 sq. ft.
Community Residence (Large) 11,000 sq. ft.
Day Care Homes 6,000 sq. ft.
Group Day Care Homes 9,000 sq. ft.
Dwellings, Single Family 6,000 sq. ft.
Dwellings, Two-Family 7,000 sq. ft.
Dwellings, Multi-Family 3,500 sq. ft./unit
b. For uses other than those listed above, the lot area shall be adequate to provide the building
setbacks required by this Section and the parking, as required by Article 12, “Off-Street Parking
and Loading Requirements,” but in no instance shall a lot be created that is less than six thousand
(6,000) square feet (except for public utility facilities).
c. Any lot of record in existence, on the effective date of this Ordinance, which contains less than
six thousand (6,000) square feet of land area, may be used as a site for one (1) single-family
detached dwelling together with accessory structures and uses, provided the location of such
dwelling satisfies the minimum setback requirements identified in paragraph 2 below.
d. Lots created for public utility facilities may be less than six thousand (6,000) square feet,
provided that such lots or tracts shall not be used for any other use, except that in the event the
public utility facility use terminates and where the lot or tract is combined with an adjacent parcel
or parcels to equal or exceed six thousand (6,000) square feet, then said lot may be used by
any allowable use in the RC-1 district.
e. In this RC-1 Zoning District, the minimum required zoning lot area shall be six thousand (6,000)
square feet per single-family detached dwelling. For “original residential uses” (SEE BELOW),
encompassing existing two-family dwellings and existing multiple-family dwellings the minimum
required lot area shall be the original lot area at the time the land use was lawfully established or
the minimum required lot area at the time the land use was lawfully established, whichever is
greater and constitutes the zoning lot area on the effective date of this Article. In the case where
the existing dwelling unit is rebuilt, a replacement deadline of one year will be enforced,
otherwise replacement with a single family dwelling is the only permissible option.
2. Building Setback Requirements: Except as provided for in Article 7, “Supplementary District
Regulations,” the following setback requirements apply to principal buildings in the RC-1 district.
a. Front Yard: No principal building shall be allowed within twenty-five (25) feet of any front lot line
or a street right-of-way line.
5-
b. Side Yard: No principal building shall be allowed within five (5) feet of any side lot line or within
a distance of any side lot line equal to ten (10) percent of the average width of the lot, whichever
is less, except that no side yard shall have a width of less than three (3) feet.
c. Rear Yard: No principal building shall be allowed within thirty (30) feet of the rear lot line or
within a distance measured from the rear lot line that is equivalent to twenty (20) percent of the
total lot depth, whichever is less.
3. Building Height Limitations: No building shall exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35)
feet in height, except for non-residential structures; this may be waived as part of the approval of
the Special Use Permit.
4. Design Requirements: Principal structures constructed after the date of this Ordinance shall comply
with the provisions of Article 7.14, Design Requirements for New Residential Construction.
5.14.06 Other Development Regulations for the “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
The following references the appropriate Articles in this Ordinance which specify the other regulations
governing development in this district.
1. “Overlay District Regulations”: Article 6
2. “Supplementary District Regulations”: Article 7
3. “Streets, Sidewalks and Subdivision Design”: Article 9
4. “Utilities”: Article 10
5. “Floodways, Floodplains, Stormdrainage and Erosion”: Article 11
6. “Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements”: Article 12
7. “Signs”: Article 13
5.14.07 Conditions of Use of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
1. Use: Not more than one (1) principal building shall be located on a zoning lot.
2. Conversions: In no event shall existing dwellings be converted to more units, partially or otherwise,
except as specifically provided for in this district by Planning and Zoning Commission approval
subject to the Special Use Requirements, however converting to fewer units is permissible by right,
provided the total number of bedrooms is also reduced. Restrictions on number of bedrooms shall
not apply to single family residences.
3. Reconstruction: The reconstruction of dwellings will be permitted for “original residential uses”
pending no additional residential dwelling units are created. All other permitted uses will be subject
to Special Use Approval.
4. Parking Requirements: Any change in use or conversion (I.E. new development, building additions
or conversions of use required by this Ordinance) shall provide required Off-Street Parking Areas in
accordance with the following regulations.
a. Existing Parking Areas: Off-Street Parking Areas shall not be reduced below the minimum
requirement for such use as required by this Ordinance. Any Off-Street Parking Areas existing
prior to the effective date of this Ordinance which were already below the standards established
by this Ordinance shall not be further reduced.
5-
b. Location of Parking Areas: Off-Street Parking Areas shall be located on the same Lot or within
three hundred (300) feet of the Building, Structure or use served by the Off-Street Parking Area.
Off-Street Parking for any use shall be located within a zoning District which permits the use for
which the Off-Street Parking is required per Article 12.
5. Lot combinations / Subdivision: Any combination or subdivision of an existing lot of record would
require that the new zoning lot(s) created conform to all applicable zoning regulations, except as
allowed with a Special Use Permit outlined in Article 5.14.07(7). A Final Plat shall be prepared and
submitted in accordance with Article 15.07, Final Plats.
6. The following rules shall govern the transition from the provisions of the former Zoning Ordinance to
the provisions of this Article or to the provisions of any subsequent amendment hereto:
a. Permitted Uses Rendered Special: Where a property is used for a purpose which was classified
as a “permitted use” in the zoning district in which it was located prior to mapping of this District,
or prior to any subsequent amendment hereto, and such use is classified by this Article as a
“Special Use” in this zoning district, such use is hereby deemed a lawful existing Special Use,
subject to the provisions of subsection D below..
b. Existing Special Use: Where a property has become a lawful Special Use pursuant to
subsection A, above, or where a property has been granted a Special Use prior to the effective
date of this Article, or prior to any subsequent amendment hereto, such use shall be considered
a lawful Special Use if the use is classified by this Article as a Special Use.
1) If the passage of the ordinance granting such Special Use was subject to one or more
conditions, those conditions shall remain in full force and effect, as may be amended from
time to time, subject to the provisions of this Article.
2) All Special Uses shall be subject to the provision that they shall expire if not established
within one year from the date of passage of the ordinance granting the Special Use. No
Special Use shall be reestablished subsequent to abandonment through a
discontinuation of use for three hundred sixty-five (365) consecutive days, regardless of
any reservation of intent to reestablish such Special Use.
c. Changes To Existing Special Use: Where a property has been granted a Special Use prior to the
effective date of this Article, or where a property has been granted a Special Use pursuant to the
provisions of this Article, a change to such Special Use shall be allowed provided that the desired
change was explicitly approved in the ordinance passed granting the Special Use. Any other
change to such an existing Special Use shall be subject to the provisions this Chapter or others,
as applicable. However, changes involving accessory structures may be made to existing Special
Uses, subject to the site design regulations of the zoning district in which it is located, and
provided that there is no change to the function, operation, or traffic characteristics of the
existing Special Use. Any change in a lawful Special Use shall be required to comply with the
provisions of this Article.
c.
7. Single family attached dwellings having a common wall along a lot line may be permitted in the
“RC-1” Residential Conservation District provided the City Council approves a Special Use Permit
(see Article 14, “Permits”) meeting the following criteria:
a. Not more than one dwelling unit shall be constructed on a lot.
b. Not more than one dwelling unit shall be attached to another dwelling unit.
c. The side yard setback from the lot line on which the common wall will be placed shall be abated
entirely. All other setback requirements of the “RC-1” district shall be adhered to.
5-
d. A dwelling unit on a lot with an abated side yard setback from the lot line on which the common
wall will be placed shall share said common wall with a dwelling unit on an adjacent lot which
shall also have an abated side yard setback from the same lot line.
e. All common wall construction standards, whether existing or proposed, shall be in conformance
with all building, electrical, plumbing, and other applicable codes and ordinances.
f. Each dwelling unit shall be serviced with its own water line, sanitary sewer line, sump pump
line, and all other utility lines and extensions.
g. A minor subdivision plat shall be prepared in accordance with Article 15, “Subdivision of Land”
and approved subject to a Minor Plat application. The plat shall reference a recorded common
wall agreement, and shall include a note stating that the construction on the proposed lots shall
be limited to “common wall construction only.”
1) Individual lots shall have an area of not less than 3500 square feet and shall have a width
of not less than twenty-five (25) feet.
2) All other setback and dimensional requirements of this Ordinance shall be adhered to.
h. Covenants, Conditions and Deed Restrictions (CCR’s), shall be prepared and recorded
simultaneously with the Final Plat and Common Wall Agreement. An Owners Association shall
be created, in accordance with Article 15.07, either through the CCR’s or in a separate
document, which shall also be recorded simultaneously with the other required documents and
plat.
Any change in a lawful Special Use shall be required to comply with the provisions of this
Article.
5.14.08 Definitions
Original Residential Use: The initial use of a zoning lot for the purpose of a dwelling, as such initial dwelling
was originally designed and intended, encompassing any lawfully established single-family dwellings, two-
family dwellings, or multiple-family dwellings, but excluding rooming house dwellings.
Change in Use: A change in the use of a zoning lot from one land use specifically enumerated in the lists
of permitted uses and special uses to another land use specifically enumerated in the lists of permitted uses
and Special Uses. For multiple-family dwellings, an increase or decrease in the number of dwelling units
shall be considered a change in use.
5-
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning
and Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 6:00
p.m. in the DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois, on City
of DeKalb initiated text amendments to Chapter 23 “Unified Development Ordinance” of
the Municipal Code to amend Article 5.14 “RC-1” Residential Conservation District of the
UDO to establish a procedure and criteria for allowing single family attached dwellings
having a common wall along a lot line be permitted with the approval of a special use
permit.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed
above. Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on the
proposal to the City of DeKalb, Community Development Department, 200 South Fourth
Street, DeKalb, Illinois, 60115 by 5:00 p.m. by Wednesday, October 10, 2018. Further
information regarding the petition is available from the Community Development
Department at (815) 748-2361 or on the City of DeKalb’s web page at
http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings
Christina Doe, Chairperson
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
October 12, 2018
TO: DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Dan Olson, Principal Planner
RE: Petition for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential
Conservation District zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance
with Article 5.14.07 of the Unified Development Ordinance; Final Plat of Fant’s
Second Division (801-803 S. 2nd St.) (Fant Family, LLC)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Purpose Approval of a Special Use Permit to allow the
resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential
Conservation 1 zoned lot into two single-family
attached lots
B. Location/Size 801-803 S. 2nd St./.26 acres – 11,532 sq. ft.
C. Petitioner Fant Family LLC represented by Gary Lothson
D. Existing Zoning “RC-1” Residential Conservation District
E. Existing Land Use Two-Family Residential (Duplex)
F. Proposed Land Use Two Single-Family-Attached (zero-lot-line) Lots
G. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North: RC-1; Two-Family Residential
South: RC-1; Single-Family Residential
East: RC-1; Two-Family Residential
West: RC-1; Single-Family Residential
H. Comprehensive Plan Designation Medium Density Residential
II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting approval of a special use permit and an accompanying final plat to
resubdivide a two-family (duplex) lot at 801-803 S. 2nd St. into two single-family-attached (zero-
lot-line) lots. The property is zoned “RC-1” Residential Conservation District and a proposed
amendment to the RC-1 District will allow the resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation
1 zoned lot into two single-family attached lots with the approval of a special use permit. The
subject property is 11,532 square feet in size. The surrounding properties include mostly single-
family dwelling units with some two-family dwelling units.
The applicant proposes to resubdivide the property along the common wall of an existing two-
family (duplex) residential structure constructed in 2007. The resubdivision would create two lots,
with one residential unit on each of the new lots. Lot 1 would be 5,614 sq. ft., Lot 2 would be
5,303 sq. ft. and the alley would be 615 sq. ft. The resulting resubdivision would allow each of the
units and the lots on which they are located to be owned or sold individually.
The proposed resubdivision must meet the requirements proposed with the text amendments to the
Page 2 of 6
RC-1 District, which stipulates the conditions under which a RC-1 zoned lot can be resubdivided.
If the resubdivision is approved, the resulting lots will meet the 25-foot minimum lot width and
the 3,500 square-foot minimum lot size requirements. The applicant has provided a Declaration
of Cross Easements, which will be recorded with the final plat and would govern the maintenance
of and liability for the common wall shared by the two units. Covenants, Conditions and Deed
Restrictions (CCR’s) will be required to be submitted and recorded with the Final Plat and
Declaration. The City’s Chief Building Official has reviewed the plans and inspected the common
wall in the building and has indicated the wall meets all the applicable building codes. The City
has approved ten similar special use requests in the “TFR” Two- Family Residential District since
2001. The TFR and MFR1 Districts were amended in 1994 to allow this special use permit process.
The two-family unit on the subject property is served by separate water services extending from
the water main located along S. 2nd St. and by separate sanitary services extending from the main
along the alley. The UDO requires that each dwelling unit must be serviced with its own water
line, sanitary sewer line, sump pump line and all other utility lines and extensions.
III. STANDARDS OF A SPECIAL USE
1. The proposed special use complies with all provisions of the applicable district
regulations.
The proposed resubdivision conforms to the applicable district regulations. The proposed
resubdivision would create two lots that will meet the 25-foot minimum lot width and the 3,500
square-foot minimum lot size requirements in the RC-1 District. Only one dwelling unit will be
located on each lot, and the structures comply with the applicable setback requirements.
2. The proposed special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to the value of other
property in the neighborhood in which it is to be located or to the public welfare at large.
The proposed use is compatible with the residential uses found in the surrounding neighboring.
The proposed special use permit would allow the resubdivision of the property into two lots, each
of which can be owned or sold individually. The applicant has indicated that once these lots are
subdivided they will be sold. It is intended that the generally agreed that homeownership is
preferable to a rental arrangement. The proposed resubdivision would not be expected to have a
negative impact on the adjacent properties’ values.
3. The location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity of the operation
involved in or conducted in connection with it, and the location of the site with respect to
streets giving access to it are such that the special use will not dominate the immediate
neighborhood so as to prevent development and use of neighboring property in accordance
with the applicable zoning district regulations.
The special use will not dominate the immediate area and will not prevent development on the
Page 3 of 6
neighboring properties. The existing structure is in scale with the surrounding neighborhood,
which includes mostly single-family and some two-family residential structures. No changes to
the existing structure will result from the approval of the special use permit or the accompanying
final plat.
4. Adequate utility, drainage and other such necessary facilities have been or will be
provided.
The UDO requires that each dwelling unit must be serviced with its own water line, sanitary sewer
line, sump pump line and all other utility lines and extensions. The two-family unit is served by
separate water services extending from the water main located along S. 2nd St. and by separate
sanitary services extending from the sanitary main along the alley.
5. The proposed use, where such developments and uses are deemed consistent with
good planning practice, or can be operated in a manner that is not detrimental to the
permitted developments and uses in the district; can be developed and operated in a manner
that is visually compatible with the permitted uses in the surrounding area; shall in all other
respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located; and is
deemed essential or desirable to preserve and promote the public health, safety and general
welfare of the City of DeKalb.
It is in the public’s interest to provide a variety of housing types to meet the needs of DeKalb’s
citizens. The approval of the special use permit would positively affect the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of DeKalb as it would allow the ownership and occupancy of each separate
unit, which is generally accepted as a having a positive influence on the community and the
surrounding neighborhood.
IV. CITIZEN RESPONSE/COMMENTS
The owner gathered several resident support letters that were forwarded to the City and will be
made part of the record at the hearing. Alberta Berkes of 726 S. 2nd St. did contact the Community
Development Department mentioning she could not attend the hearing but wanted to note she was
in support of the request.
V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Sample Special Use Permit Motion:
Based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented, I move that the Planning and Zoning
Commission forward its findings of fact and recommend to the City Council approval of a special
use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “RC-1” Residential Conservation District zoned lot into
two single-family attached lots in accordance with Article 5.14.07 of the Unified Development
Ordinance for the property located at 801-803 S. 2nd St. and approval of the Final Plat of Fant’s
Page 4 of 6
Second Division dated June 12, 2018 subject to the conditions as indicated on Exhibit A.
Page 5 of 6
Exhibit A
1. The Declaration of Cross Easements shall be revised per the City Attorney’s review
prior to final action by the City Council.
2. Covenants, Conditions, and Deed Restrictions (CCR’s) shall be prepared and
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded simultaneously with the
Final Plat.
3. No sales of the dwelling units shall occur on the property until all conditions are met
and all documents are received, reviewed and recorded and on file with the City
Clerk’s Office.
4. The Owner’s Certificate and School District Certificate should be separate on the
Final Plat.
5. The Planning and Zoning Commission Certificate on the Final Plat should be revised
to reflect the correct name for the Commission.
6. The City Clerk’s name shall be corrected to Lynn Fazekas on the Final Plat.
Page 6 of 6
TFR District
September 24, 2018
Dear Property Owner:
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will consider a request on a petition by Fant
Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson, for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of
a “RC-1” Residential Conservation 1 zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance
with a proposed text amendment to Article 5.14 the Unified Development Ordinance to allow such
a procedure. The subject property is located at 801-803 S. 2nd St., DeKalb, IL 60115 zoned “RC-
1” Residential Conservation 1 District.
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will review this request and hold a public hearing
at its meeting on Wednesday, October 17th, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be at the DeKalb
Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois. As a property owner within 250
feet of the above-mentioned property, you are encouraged to attend this meeting to learn about and
comment on the proposal.
You are also welcome to submit any written comments you may have on the proposal no later than
Wednesday, October 10, 2018. You may submit written comments regarding the request on the
enclosed comment sheet by mail to the address listed above, or by e-mail to
dan.olson@cityofdekalb.com. All comments will be shared with the Commission and included in
the public record. Additional information regarding the public hearing and request can be found
on the City of DeKalb’s web page at http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the Community
Development Department at (815) 748-2361.
Sincerely,
Dan Olson
Principal Planner
Enclosures
CC: Mayor
City Council
Interim City Manager
Planning and Zoning Commission
801-803 S. 2nd St. – Special Use Permit
Page 2 of 4
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning and
Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 17, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois, on the petition by Fant
Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson, for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of
a “RC-1” Residential Conservation 1 zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance
with a proposed text amendment to Article 5.14 the Unified Development Ordinance to allow
such a procedure. The subject property is located at 801-803 S. 2nd St., DeKalb, IL 60115 zoned
“RC-1” Residential Conservation 1 District and has a Parcel Identification Number (PIN) of 08-
22-477-053.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed above.
Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on the proposal to the City of
DeKalb, Community Development Department, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois,
60115 by 5:00 p.m. by Wednesday, October 10, 2018. Further information regarding the petition
is available from the Community Development Department at (815) 748-2361 or on the City of
DeKalb’s web page at http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings
Christina Doe, Chairperson
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 of 4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
October 12, 2018
TO: DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
Dan Olson, Principal Planner
RE: Petition for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “TFR” Two-Family
Residential zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance with Article
5.03.06 of the Unified Development Ordinance; Final Plat of Fant’s First Division
(722-724 Grove St.) (Fant Family, LLC)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Purpose Approval of a special use permit to allow the
resubdivision of a “TFR” Two-Family Residential
zoned lot into two single-family attached lots;
Approval of Final Plat of Fant’s First Division
B. Location/Size 722-724 Grove St. /.23 acres/10,344 sq. ft.
C. Petitioner Fant Family, LLC represented by Gary Lothson
D. Existing Zoning TFR – Two Family Residential District.
E. Existing Land Use Two-Family Residential (Duplex)
F. Proposed Land Use Two Single-Family-Attached (zero-lot-line) Lots
G. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North: LC and SFR2; Single-Family
Residential and Commercial
South: TFR; Two-Family Residential
East: TFR: Two-Family Residential
West: SFR2; Single-Family Residential
H. Comprehensive Plan Designation Medium Density Residential
II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting approval of a special use permit and an accompanying final plat to
resubdivide a two-family (duplex) lot at 722-724 Grove Street into two single-family-attached
(zero-lot-line) lots. The property is zoned “TFR” Two-Family Residential and the UDO requires
the approval of a special use permit before allowing the resubdivision of two-family lots in this
zoning district. The subject property is 10,344 square feet in size and located just off the southwest
corner of S. 8th St. and Grove St. The surrounding properties include a mix of single-family, two-
family and multiple-family residences with some commercial uses to the north.
The applicant proposes to resubdivide the property along the common wall of an existing two-
family (duplex) residential structure built in 2006. The resubdivision would create two lots, with
one residential unit on each of the new lots. Lot 1 would be 5,332 sq. ft. and Lot 2 would be 5,012
Page 2 of 7
sq. ft. The resulting resubdivision would allow each of the units and the lots on which they are
located to be owned or sold individually.
The proposed resubdivision must meet the requirements in the UDO (Article 5.03.06), which
stipulates the conditions under which a TFR-zoned lot can be resubdivided (provided in packet).
If the resubdivision is approved, the resulting lots will meet the 25-foot minimum lot width and
the 3,500 square-foot minimum lot size requirements. The applicant has provided a Declaration
of Cross Easements, which will be recorded with the final plat and would govern the maintenance
of and liability for the common wall shared by the two units. Covenants, Conditions and Deed
Restrictions (CCR’s) will be required to be submitted and recorded with the Final Plat and
Declaration. The City’s Chief Building Official has reviewed the plans and inspected the common
wall in the structure and has indicated the wall meets all the applicable building codes. The City
has approved ten similar special use requests in the “TFR” Two- Family Residential District since
2001. The TFR and MFR1 Districts were amended in 1994 to allow this special use permit process.
The two-family unit on the subject property is served by separate water services extending from
the water main located along Grove St. and by separate sanitary services extending from the main
also along Grove St. The UDO requires that each dwelling unit must be serviced with its own
water line, sanitary sewer line, sump pump line and all other utility lines and extensions.
III. STANDARDS OF A SPECIAL USE
1. The proposed special use complies with all provisions of the applicable district
regulations.
The proposed resubdivision conforms to the applicable district regulations. The proposed
resubdivision would create two lots that will meet the 25-foot minimum lot width and the 3,500
square-foot minimum lot size requirements in the TFR District. Only one dwelling unit will be
located on each lot, and the structures comply with the setback requirements for TFR-zoned
properties.
2. The proposed special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to the value of other
property in the neighborhood in which it is to be located or to the public welfare at large.
The proposed use is compatible with the residential uses found in the surrounding neighboring.
The proposed special use permit would allow the resubdivision of the property into two lots, each
of which can be owned or sold individually. The applicant has indicated that once these lots are
subdivided they will be sold. It is intended that the generally agreed that homeownership is
preferable to a rental arrangement. The proposed resubdivision would not be expected to have a
negative impact on the adjacent properties’ values.
Page 3 of 7
3. The location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity of the operation
involved in or conducted in connection with it, and the location of the site with respect to
streets giving access to it are such that the special use will not dominate the immediate
neighborhood so as to prevent development and use of neighboring property in accordance
with the applicable zoning district regulations.
The special use will not dominate the immediate area and will not prevent development on the
neighboring properties. The existing structure is in scale with the surrounding neighborhood,
which includes a mix of single-family, two-family and multi-family residential structures with
some commercial. No changes to the existing structure will result from the approval of the special
use permit or the accompanying final plat.
4. Adequate utility, drainage and other such necessary facilities have been or will be
provided.
The UDO requires that each dwelling unit must be serviced with its own water line, sanitary sewer
line, sump pump line and all other utility lines and extensions. The two-family unit is served by
separate water services extending from the water main located along Grove St. and by separate
sanitary services extending from the sewer main also along Grove St.
5. The proposed use, where such developments and uses are deemed consistent with
good planning practice, or can be operated in a manner that is not detrimental to the
permitted developments and uses in the district; can be developed and operated in a manner
that is visually compatible with the permitted uses in the surrounding area; shall in all other
respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located; and is
deemed essential or desirable to preserve and promote the public health, safety and general
welfare of the City of DeKalb.
It is in the public’s interest to provide a variety of housing types to meet the needs of DeKalb’s
citizens. The approval of the special use permit would positively affect the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of DeKalb as it would allow the ownership and occupancy of each separate
unit, which is generally accepted as a having a positive influence on the community and the
surrounding neighborhood.
IV. CITIZEN RESPONSE/COMMENTS
We have received Citizen Response Forms from Mark Wilson of 730 Grove St. and Joseph and
Dora Casurella of 716 Grove St., all indicating their support of the request. A copy of the forms
are in your packet and will be made part of the record at the hearing. The owner gathered several
resident support letters that were forwarded to the City and will also be made part of the record at
the hearing.
Page 4 of 7
V. RECOMMENDATION
Sample Special Use Permit Motion:
Based upon the submitted petition and testimony presented, I move that the Planning and Zoning
Commission forward its findings of fact and recommend to the City Council approval of a special
use permit to allow the resubdivision of a “TFR” Two-Family Residential zoned lot into two
single-family attached lots in accordance with Article 5.03.06 of the Unified Development
Ordinance for the property located at 722-724 Grove St. and approval of the Final Plat of Fant’s
First Division dated June 6, 2018 subject to the conditions as indicated on Exhibit A.
Page 5 of 7
Exhibit A
1. The Declaration of Cross Easements shall be revised per the City Attorney’s review
prior to final action by the City Council.
2. Covenants, Conditions, and Deed Restrictions (CCR’s) shall be prepared and
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded simultaneously with the
Final Plat.
3. No sales of the dwelling units shall occur on the property until all conditions are met
and all documents are received, reviewed and recorded and on file with the City
Clerk’s Office.
4. The Owner’s Certificate and School District Certificate should be separate on the
Final Plat.
5. The Planning and Zoning Commission Certificate on the Final Plat should be revised
to reflect the correct name for the Commission.
6. The City Clerk’s name shall be corrected to Lynn Fazekas on the Final Plat.
Page 6 of 7
TFR District
September 24, 2018
Dear Property Owner:
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will consider a request on a petition by Fant
Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson, for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of
a “TFR” Two-Family Residential zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance with
Article 5.03.06 of the Unified Development Ordinance for the property is located at 722-724 Grove
St., DeKalb, IL 60115 zoned “TFR” Two-Family Residential District.
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will review this request and hold a public hearing
at its meeting on Wednesday, October 17th, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be at the DeKalb
Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois. As a property owner within 250
feet of the above-mentioned property, you are encouraged to attend this meeting to learn about and
comment on the proposal.
You are also welcome to submit any written comments you may have on the proposal no later than
Wednesday, October 10, 2018. You may submit written comments regarding the request on the
enclosed comment sheet by mail to the address listed above, or by e-mail to
dan.olson@cityofdekalb.com. All comments will be shared with the Commission and included in
the public record. Additional information regarding the public hearing and request can be found
on the City of DeKalb’s web page at http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the Community
Development Department at (815) 748-2361.
Sincerely,
Dan Olson
Principal Planner
Enclosures
CC: Mayor
City Council
Interim City Manager
Planning and Zoning Commission
722-724 Grove St. – Special Use Permit
Page 2 of 4
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning and
Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 17, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois, on the petition by Fant
Family, LLC, represented by Gary Lothson, for a special use permit to allow the resubdivision of
a “TFR” Two-Family Residential zoned lot into two single-family attached lots in accordance
with Article 5.03.06 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The subject property is located at
722-724 Grove St., DeKalb, IL 60115 zoned “TFR” Two-Family Residential District and has a
Parcel Identification Number (PIN) of 08-23-338-004.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed above.
Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on the proposal to the City of
DeKalb, Community Development Department, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois,
60115 by 5:00 p.m. by Wednesday, October 10, 2018. Further information regarding the petition
is available from the Community Development Department at (815) 748-2361 or on the City of
DeKalb’s web page at http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings
Christina Doe, Chairperson
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 of 4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
October 12, 2018
TO: DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
RE: Special Use Permit for 1015 Blackhawk Road
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Purpose Obtain a Special Use Permit in order to
allow the construction of 22 residential units
on two floors to be constructed above
existing first floor space designed and
previously used as an indoor theater that’s
been vacant for several years
B. Address 1015 Blackhawk Road
C. Access One on Blackhawk and one on Hillcrest
D. Size 105,863 Square feet or roughly 2.4 acres
E. Existing Zoning “LC” Light Commercial District
F. Existing Land Use Vacant Theater and paved parking area
G. Proposed Land Use Same as above but with a two-floor addition
with each floor having 11 units (22 units
total)
H. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North – LC, PDR Parking lot, restaurant
and apartment uses.
South – MFR-2, Apartments and rooming
houses.
East – MFR-2, Apartments and rooming
houses.
West – LC, PDR, 2-story mixed used
development, retail uses and
apartment complexes.
I. Floodplain Not in the floodplain
J. Comprehensive Plan Designation Commercial
II. APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The Applicant requests approval of a special use permit for a proposed two-story addition
above the existing Campus Cinema building to accommodate 22 new dwelling units. The
Campus Cinema building has been vacant for several years. Additional horizontal
expansions at the northeast and southwest corners of the building are proposed to
accommodate entrance and exiting requirements for the new upper residential uses.
Other than the special use identified above, the application included no other requests for
variations or relief from the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) or other City Codes.
The following documents, attached to this report, were submitted by the applicant as part
of the special use request and have been reviewed by staff. Comments within this report
are based on these documents:
1. Colored Site Plan, not labeled, not dated, not dimensioned.
2. Aerial photo, not labeled, not dated, not identified.
3. Aerial photo, showing City GIS utility layers, not labeled, not dated, not identified.
4. Document entitled “GKC Theaters, Inc.” prepared by Survey-Tech consisting of 1
sheet and dated August 2, 2016.
5. Photometric Plan, prepared by U.S. Architectural/Sun Valley Lighting, dated
5/9/2016.
6. Sheet T-1, entitled The Campus Apartments, prepared by LaPage Architects, Ltd,
dated 6-7-2018.
7. Sheet L1, entitled Landscape Plan and Schedule, prepared by LaPage Architects,
Ltd., dated 05-30-2018.
8. Sheet A1, entitled Exterior Elevations, prepared by LaPage Architects, Ltd., dated
6-07-2018
9. Sheet A2, entitled Ground Floor Plan, prepared by LaPage Architects, Ltd., dated
05-30-2018.
10. Sheet A3, entitled 2nd Floor Plan, prepared by LaPage Architects, Ltd., dated 05-
30-2018.
11. Sheet A4, entitled 3rd Floor Plan, prepared by LaPage Architects, Ltd., dated 05-
30-2018.
Page 2 of 14
III. CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING LAND
USES AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS
As shown in the picture to the right, the subject
property is located on the northwest corner of
Hillcrest Drive and Blackhawk Road. It currently
contains a one-story building with roughly 15,200
square feet of space that previously operated as
Campus Cinema Theaters, before closing and
remaining vacant for the last several years. Late
last year, the building suffered a roof collapse on
the south end of the building, and although
emergency repairs have been completed to close
the open holes in the roof, the owner has not
submitted any structural evaluation of the building
to determine bearing capacity of the existing walls,
foundations and trusses.
The property has non-conforming building
setbacks on both the west and east sides of the Subject Property
building. On the west side, a portion of the building
(roughly the northern half of the building) is not greater than 30’ from the residential
property located west of the west property line as required by Section 5.07.04 (2b) of the
UDO. Additionally, the building has a setback from Blackhawk right-of-way of less than
40’ and has existing non-conforming parking pavement setbacks from the property lines.
Note that the Survey document submitted with the application shows a greater than 40’
setback from Blackhawk drawn to a building line that is west of the true building line,
which is on the east side of what is labeled “sidewalk” on the Plat. This sidewalk is actually
a roof covered portico as shown in the picture below. This setback should be measured
to the portico as it does not meet the exception criteria for encroachment into a yard as
defined in the UDO. Additionally, as will be described later in this report, the plans
(although inconsistent) show the proposed two-story addition extends up from the setback
of the non-conforming portico.
Page 3 of 14
An adjoining parking lot and the Fanatico Italian restaurant are both located to the north.
The parking lot used to be owned by the applicant until he sold it to a nearby multiple
family building so they could meet their parking requirement. Multiple family and campus
housing is located to the east and south, and a shopping center and a residential planned
development abuts the west property line of the Subject Property.
IV. ANALYSIS
The application submitted by the applicant includes a request for a special use as required
by 5.07.01 to allow for the construction of 22 dwelling units in a proposed second and
third floor addition over the existing building in the LC Zoning District. The application
includes no requests for variations, although variations have been identified as part of
staff review and are outlined in this report.
Section 5.07 of the UDO allows “dwelling units when located above the ground floor, with
an allowed commercial use on the ground floor” as a special use in the LC Zoning District.
It is important to note that even if a use is listed as a specical use, it is not permitted “by
right” as part of any expansion unless the proposed use or uses are or can be constructed
to comply with all other provisions of associated City regulatory codes, and unless the
development meets the special use standards as required by Article 14 of the UDO.
The submittal documents referenced in Section II of this report were reviewed for
conformance with the UDO and requirements for special use approval. Analysis on the
following topics is provided below:
1. Expansion of a Non-Conforming Building
2. Proposed Plan’s Non-Conformance with UDO Requirements
3. Building Code Review
4. Examination of the Special Use Standards.
5. Additional Historical Information
1. Expansion of a Non-Conforming Building
Section 19.04.1 of the UDO provides that structures with non-conforming setbacks
can be expanded only if the expansion “conforms to the requirements of the Ordinance
and does not expand any dimensional nonconformity.” As shown on the Plat, the
existing building has setbacks along the west property line that are less than 30’, which
is the required building setback in an LC Zoning District next to residential uses as
required by 5.07.04 (2b) of the UDO. Therefore, although non-conforming provisions
of the UDO would allow the existing building to remain, the proposed two-story
addition violates Section 19.04.1 of the UDO because an expansion cannot expand
any dimensional nonconformity.
Page 4 of 14
The Plat also shows a building setback along the east property line of 49.36’, that is
measured to a part of the building that is west of that part of a building defined as a
portico. The setback should instead be measured to the face of the portico. The
setback to the face of the portico is not dimensioned, but is believed to be less than
required 40’ setback as required by 5.07.04 (2a) of the UDO. This assumption is
based on a width (east/west) dimension provided on the applicant’s drawing for the
second and third floor floorplans of 125.33’. That dimension plus the west setback
dimension shown of the plat of 12.5’ is 137.83’. A building setback of 38.39’ from the
east property line is estimated by subtracting the 137.83’ from the 176.22’ lot width
shown on the applicant’s plat document. Furthermore, based on the difference
between the east west dimensions between the first and upper floors (116’ on the first
floors as shown on Sheet A2, and 125’4” on the upper floors as shown on Sheets A3
and A4), it appears the new residential units are intended to continue at the 38.39’
setback and not the 49.36’ setback. This is inconsistent with the north and south
elevation drawings on Sheet A1, which show the arched portico with no addition above
it. However, the actual building footprint, layout and related plans clearly show that
the second and third floors extend over the portico and into the required setback area.
Similar to the western setback, this eastern building setback with new residential
construction continuing at a non-conforming setback also violates Section 19.04.1 of
the UDO because an expansion cannot expand any dimensional nonconformity.
2. Proposed Plan’s Non-Conformance with UDO Requirements
The table below provides a quick reference to how the proposed plan is not compliant
with the UDO. In some cases, the last column will reference where to find additional
details in this report.
UDO Section Description Detail of Requirement Discussion of non-compliance
5.07.04 (1) Minimum Lot Area None, except lot This report outlines multiple
dimensions shall be occurrences of non-compliance with
sufficient to meet Article 12 of the UDO.
requirements of Article
12 Off-Street Parking
and Loading
Requirements
5.07.04 (2a) Building Setback 40’ is required East building setback (including upper
Requirements (Front level expansion) from Blackhawk
Yard), including setback estimated at 38.39’ when measured
from any street right-of- to the face of the portico, as
way line. described in more detail in Section 1
above.
Page 5 of 14
5.07.04 (2b) Side Yard Building None, except for a lot Part of the existing building adjoins
setback abutting a residence residential property to west. Existing
district, where 30’ is building setbacks in that area are as
required little as 11.9’ according to the
applicant’s plat. Although the
existing one-story construction
enjoys non-conforming rights to
continue, upper story expansions are
required to conform to the setback.
5.07.04 (3) Maximum Site Coverage May not exceed 70 Information not provided. Can’t
percent determine compliance.
5.07.04 (4) Building Height 3 stories 45 feet in The south elevation on Sheet A1
Limitations height shows 45’ 4”, which exceeds the 45’
requirement.
5.07.06 (2) Conditions of Use in the A principal building, in With 49,785 square feet of space as
LC District which one or more uses indicated in the applicant’s submittal,
may locate, shall not the total square footage in the
exceed twenty-five proposed development exceeds this
thousand (25,000) restriction.
square feet in gross floor
area
7.05 (1a) Screening Requirements Landscape for Screening between parking and west
Commercial Next to property line adjoining residential is
Residential requires 1, not compliant.
2.5” tree every 30’ of
common property line
and other vegetation
having a height not less
than six feet at time of
planting.
7.05 (1b) Screening Requirements Fencing Requirements Not Provided.
for Commercial Next to
Residential must be
“neat, clean and
maintained sight-proof
fence…six feet”
7.05 (3) Screening Requirements Rooftop Mechanicals Details not provided
7.11 Screening of Rubbish, No details provided. Location of dumpster is shown, but
Garbage and Dumpster Requires 6’ wall that no details provided to show
conforms to principal compliance.
building in material,
type and design of
construction, finish and
color.
Page 6 of 14
12.02 (1) Parking Requirement When a use is expanded Based on data provided in plans, the
Applicability or changed, accessory uses require 121 parking spaces,
off-street parking and while the plan indicates 136 spaces
loading shall be are provided. The plans, however, do
provided in accordance not comply with pavement setbacks
with the regulations and other requirements as outlined
herein for the area or below, therefore it is not possible to
capacity of such know where adequate parking can be
expansion or change. provided in accordance with
regulations.
12.03 (5a) Setbacks of parking 5’ interior and rear Hillcrest setback is not 10’
facilities pavement. 10’ road
setbacks
12.03 (5a) Setbacks of parking “In no instance shall a A 30’ buffer area is required between
facilities parking lot be located in the parking lot and the west property
a required buffer area.” line. The proposed parking lot is
largely 29’2”, with a small section
that is closer than 29’2”, but not
dimensioned.
12.03 (5b) Setbacks of parking “No loading space...shall No loading space is shown on the
facilities be close than 50’ to any plans, which would be difficult for a
property in a residential grocery store or light commercial
district unless use.
completely enclosed by
a building or extension
of the building wall.
12.03 (6) Compact Vehicle Not more than 25% Plan shows 10 compact vehicle
Parking 7’ 6” wide x 17’ deep spaces (11 allowed), but in a location
where the pavement setback does
not meet the required 10’ setback
from Hillcrest.
12.03 (7) Lighting The submitted photometric plan
shows plan for different parking
layout. Light standards are shown in
locations that would interfere with
proposed drive aisle and parking
spaces.
12.04 (3) Landscaping Adjacent 1 tree and 4 shrubs/30 Blackhawk frontage requires 19
Streets feet. shade trees and 76 shrubs.
Hillcrest frontage requires 6 shade
trees and 24 shrubs. Neither
frontage meets the requirement.
Page 7 of 14
12.04 (4) Landscaping for Side Superseded by Article 7 See 7.05 (1a) above.
and Rear Yards
12.05 Landscaping 20 square feet/per Given that parking layout is not
Requirements for parking space. compliant, the number of spaces that
Interior Parking Lot Minimum width of 9’. 1 can be accommodated is unknown,
Areas tree for every 300 therefore this calculation cannot be
square feet. made. The central north/south island
and some of the end islands in the
existing plan are not 9’ in width as
required.
12.06 (1) Parking Table “Additional aisle width The plans show a one way south and
and turning radii may be west bound traffic movement around
required to the east and south sides of the
accommodate fire building. Given this area “serves as
vehicles or where the the principal means of access” to the
aisle serves as the building, a minimum two-way aisle
principal means of of 24’ is required on the east and
access to on-site south sides of the building, while also
buildings or structures, meeting other pavement setback
drive up or loading requirements. Aisle widths are not
areas. provided on the east and south sides
of the building, but scale to less than
24’ in areas.
12.05 (9) Bicycle Parking Required with 3 or more Not provided.
units or parking lots
having 20 or more stalls
12.05 (10) Shopping Cart Corrals required for parking lots None provided
with greater than 100
stalls
12.08.01 Parking Requirements Grocery Store 1/200 sqft Required parking is 121 spaces based
1 BR: 1.5 spaces/unit on applicant’s designation of retail
2 BR: 2.5 spaces/unit grocery. Can’t determine compliance
because of faulty parking lot design
that does not comply with the
ordinance.
19.04 Non-Conforming Non-conforming The second and third floor addition
buildings buildings may be extends up at the same non-
maintained but not conforming setbacks on the east and
“enlarged, expanded, west sides of the building
extended or altered,
unless expansion
conforms.
Page 8 of 14
The applicant, his attorney, architect and realtor conducted a development review
meeting with City staff several months ago and City staff received the applicant’s
comments regarding the plans. Several weeks before the public hearing, the
applicant’s attorney contacted City staff and requested an additional pre-hearing
meeting with staff. Staff responded that same day and the applicant’s attorney did not
reply until the Friday that the agenda packet for the Planning and Zoning Commission
was released.
3. Building Code Review.
As a building that has been vacant for several years, the structure has been subject
to prolonged neglect where lack of heat, air and proper ventilation, and other factors
led to roof failure on the south end of the building. On multiple occasions, a structural
evaluation to determine bearing capacity of the existing walls, foundations, and
trusses has been requested of the owner/applicant. In response to that request, the
applicant has provided responses from its architect indicating that the building could
be modified to accommodate the upper floors, but no details of how that would be
accomplished were known. That information was provided at the working meeting
discussed above. During the meeting, the applicant and his architect disagreed over
whether the building modifications would require additional load bearing walls at the
first floor, or whether truss modification was necessary. The architect felt that both
additional load bearing walls and reinforced trusses would be required, and the
applicant disagreed with his architect’s assertions. Furthermore, no documentation
has been provided as part of this special use request to address whether the addition
can be supported by the existing structure or what new structures would need to be
provided to support the added resident units above.
DeKalb Chief Building Official reviewed submitted documents and notes the following
concerns:
• Sheet A2: This plan shows retail use across the entire Blackhawk frontage, with
additional retail uses behind. There is no lobby or other means for accessing the
other retail uses designated in what was previously the theater areas. Additionally,
no travel distances have been provided to indicate normal egress from this
space. No bathrooms are shown for these retail developments. If set up with a
common access corridor, a bank of bathrooms to support the total occupant load
of the retail spaces would need to be added. Separate entrances for the retail
spaces will be required as the only apparent entrance now is the retail
development near the portico. The plan also does not show methodology for
complying with the Illinois Energy Code with regard to the various tenancies. In
addition, no information on provisions made for tenant buildout has been
provided.
Page 9 of 14
• Sheets A3/A4: There is not an elevator located on the plan. An elevator must be
added and minimum 5% of resident units constructed and designated as handicap
accessible. ADA units to be dispersed across the building between the 2nd and
3rd floors. Elevator plans must include location of elevator on first floor, plans for
elevator pit and elevator machine room. Given that the footprint has been
established consistent with the drawings, the elevator may be need to be
constructed outside of the building footprint, which could increase the dimensional
nonconformity.
4. Examination of Special Use Standards
Section 14.03.05 of the UDO states that in making a recommendation to approve a
special use, the Plan Commission shall consider and adopt findings in each of the
following listed standards. Each standard is listed below in bold, and is followed by a
finding that the Planning and Zoning Commission may consider based on staff’s
review and either modify or adopt in its recommendation.
a. The proposed special use complies with all provisions of the applicable
district regulations.
The staff report prepared for the October 17, 2018 public hearing conducted by
the Planning and Zoning Commission for the applicant’s requested special use
identified more than a dozen instances where the proposed plan does not
comply with the provisions of the applicable regulations of the UDO, and for
which no relief from those requirements was requested by the applicant.
Rather, Exhibit C of the applicant’s submission erroneously indicates that the
plans comply with the UDO.
b. The proposed special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to the
value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is to be located or
to the public welfare at large.
The staff report prepared for the October 17, 2018 public hearing conducted by
the Planning and Zoning Commission for the applicant’s requested special use
outlined conditions whereby the proposed plan is detrimental to the public.
These include inadequate circulation around the south and east sides of the
building to accommodate safe and reasonable traffic circulation and access by
emergency vehicles, parking pavement that does not meet required setbacks
on the south and west sides of the lot, and the absence of verifiable
documentation from a structural engineer and health experts that the existing
building, which has suffered long-term neglect, and a roof collapse, is capable
of accommodating a two-story addition.
Additionally, the proposed use of materials on the exterior of the building are
not consistent within the development nor with the character of building
materials used in the surrounding area. The image on the left below shows the
existing exterior building materials used on the first floor. Note that there are 2
Page 10 of 14
distinct materials and colors used. The proposed plans call for both split face
CMU block and aluminum siding, both of which are different from existing
materials. This use of materials is also not consistent with the existing
character of the nearby properties which utilize common materials and design
technique on all four building elevations as shown in the image on the right
below. The proposed exterior elevations would be completely incompatible
with surrounding uses.
c. The location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity of the
operation involved in or conducted in connection with it, and the location
of the site with respect to streets giving access to it are such that the
special use will not dominate the immediate neighborhood so as to
prevent development and use of neighboring property in accordance with
the applicable zoning district regulations. In determining whether the
special use will so dominate the immediate neighborhood, consideration
shall be given to:
(1) The location, nature and height of buildings, structures, walls and
fences on the site; and
(2) The nature and extent of proposed landscaping and screening on the
proposed site.
The proposed plans are not compatible with the neighborhood. The location of
the existing building is non-conforming both in its proximity to the existing
residential property to the west, and its proximity to the east property line.
Rather than address these non-conformities, the proposed expansion further
encroaches on the neighborhoods by extending the new second and third floors
straight up from the existing non-conforming setbacks.
The buffer yard between the parking lot and the adjoining residential property
to the west is slightly less than then 30’ required by ordinance, and no variations
were requested. Additionally, the proposed landscape plan is not compliant
with several sections of the UDO as outlined in the staff report prepared for the
Page 11 of 14
October 17, 2018 public hearing conducted by the Planning and Zoning
Commission for the applicant’s requested special use
d. Adequate utility, drainage and other such necessary facilities have been
or will be provided.
The applicant did not submit any plans to determine whether there is adequate
water, sanitary, and drainage facilities on the property to accommodate the
needs of the proposed addition. Despite repeated requests for accurately
located and surveyed utilities on a plan, the applicant repeatedly instructed his
consultants to only provide copies of the City’s GIS maps, which are not always
accurately located and up-to-date. With the addition of 22 new dwelling units,
water and sanitary need increase over existing conditions, so it is vitally
important to ensure that adequate utilities are provided so as not to negatively
impact the neighborhood or the City.
The applicant also did not provide cross section elevation information for
existing or proposed conditions, noting that the elevation of Lot 70 will remain
as it is today. To the contrary, modifications to the parking lot are required,
including the addition of curbs, so drainage patterns are impacted by this
development. It is imperative that these modifications to topography and
drainage be evaluated as a condition of this special use approval to ensure that
the proposed modifications will not alter drainage patterns or create flooding
issues in other areas.
e. The proposed use, where such developments and uses are deemed
consistent with good planning practice, can be operated in a manner that
is not detrimental to the permitted developments and uses in the district;
can be developed and operated in a manner that is visually compatible
with the permitted uses in the surrounding area; shall in all other respects
conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located;
and is deemed essential or desirable to preserve and promote the public
health, safety and general welfare of the City of DeKalb.
The applicant has not provided plans or documentation to prove that this project
can be constructed compliance with setbacks and parking requirements. The
applicant has also not demonstrated that the structure is capable of safely
accommodating the structural load of a two-story addition, particularly given
that the extended vacancy, lack of maintenance within the existing building,
and recent roof collapse, could have created a breeding ground for mold and
other conditions that would not structurally support this addition or could
otherwise pose a threat to the public health, safety and general welfare of the
City. Professionally prepared signed and sealed reports should be provided
for the City’s review to determine the safety and security of the building, and its
capacity to structurally accommodate a two-story addition before the City
considers any favorable action on any addition to this building.
Page 12 of 14
5. Additional historical information.
The Commission may recall that this Property has been in front of the Commission
on previous occasions in the past two years. In 2013, the City approved a text
amendment to the LC zoning district, changing upper floor residential use from a
permitted use to a special use, after legally required notices and public hearing. In
2015, the applicant filed a lawsuit against the City, challenging that text
amendment. That lawsuit was dismissed based on the applicant’s failure to satisfy
administrative remedies. Shortly thereafter, the applicant filed for a special use
permit and went through the Commission and City Council; his request was
denied, ironically largely on the basis of nonconformities similar to those identified
herein.
In 2017, the applicant filed a second lawsuit against the City, now alleging that he
had exhausted administrative remedies and was entitled to challenge the 2013
zoning text amendment. His allegations were premised on a claim that he had not
received procedural due process with regard to his property. Accordingly, the City
initiated a zoning map amendment for the subject property, to give the applicant
full procedural due process with regard to the appropriate zoning. The applicant
appeared at the hearing on that map amendment and declined to comment on the
appropriate zoning. The 2017 lawsuit was dismissed in the Circuit Court (on the
City’s motion) based upon the applicant having received full due process. The
applicant filed an appeal to the Second District Appellate Court, and after the filing
of briefs by the applicant and the City, the Appellate Court affirmed the Circuit
Court’s ruling, entering judgment in favor of the City. The current judicial decision,
then, is that the current LC zoning of the property was properly entered after giving
the applicant full procedural due process.
The applicant has now filed this present petition for a special use. Of note, while
this claim is pending, the applicant has also filed a third lawsuit against the City,
now alleging that the City bears responsibility for damage to the structure that
accrued while the roof collapse was open. The third (pending) lawsuit does not
relate to the zoning of the property.
VI. CITIZEN INPUT
No public comments have been received on this application.
Additional citizen input is made possible via the public hearing to be held by the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is unfortunate that this is the applicant’s second time requesting special use approval
of a plan that is mostly similar to the plan that was rejected two years ago. Rather than
amend the plan or pursue a different process to request relief from certain provisions of
the code, the applicant chose to proceed with basically the same request. This application
was fully reviewed by staff and reviewed on its own merits. The results of that review are
Page 13 of 14
provided in this report and conclude that the proposal does not meet the standards of a
special use as outlined in Article 14 of the UDO.
A mixed-use development on this site is possible if designed correctly and a proper
application is filed. The applicant has not met the burden of providing documentation
that the proposed special use meets the requirements or standards outlined in the UDO,
nor have any variations or relief been requested for the City’s consideration. Unless the
applicant withdraws the application and requests permission to start with a new
application and provide new plans for review, staff recommends the Plan Commission
recommend denial of the requested special use. Staff recommends the Planning and
Zoning Commission approve the following sample motion:
Based on the submitted petition, staff report, and testimony presented, I move that
the Planning and Zoning Commission adopt the findings for special uses
enumerated in the October 12, 2018 staff report to the DeKalb Planning and Zoning
Commission regarding the Special Use Permit for 1015 Blackhawk Road and
recommend to the DeKalb City Council that the requested special use permit.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jo Ellen Charlton
Page 14 of 14
INDEX OF DRAWINGS:
T1 TITLE SHEET: SITE PLAN, PROJECT INFORMATION
L1 LANDSCAPE PLAN & SCHEDULE
A1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2 GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A3 2nd FLOOR PLAN
A4 3rd FLOOR PLAN
c
951 West Liberty Drive Professional Design Firm
Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Architect Corporation
Phone: (630) 665-0006 Fax: (630) 665-0886 184-006116
www.lapagearchitects.com Expires: 04-30-19
Plant Material List
c
951 West Liberty Drive Professional Design Firm
Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Architect Corporation
Phone: (630) 665-0006 Fax: (630) 665-0886 184-006116
www.lapagearchitects.com Expires: 04-30-19
CAMPUS
APARTMENTS
c
951 West Liberty Drive Professional Design Firm
Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Architect Corporation
Phone: (630) 665-0006 Fax: (630) 665-0886 184-006116
www.lapagearchitects.com Expires: 04-30-19
c
951 West Liberty Drive Professional Design Firm
Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Architect Corporation
Phone: (630) 665-0006 Fax: (630) 665-0886 184-006116
www.lapagearchitects.com Expires: 04-30-19
c
951 West Liberty Drive Professional Design Firm
Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Architect Corporation
Phone: (630) 665-0006 Fax: (630) 665-0886 184-006116
www.lapagearchitects.com Expires: 04-30-19
c
951 West Liberty Drive Professional Design Firm
Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Architect Corporation
Phone: (630) 665-0006 Fax: (630) 665-0886 184-006116
www.lapagearchitects.com Expires: 04-30-19
Housing Profile
1015 Blackhawk Rd, Dekalb, Illinois, 60115 2 Prepared by Esri
1015 Blackhawk Rd, Dekalb, Illinois, 60115 Latitude: 41.94730
Ring: 0.5 mile radius Longitude: -88.77000
Population Households
2010 Total Population 5,747 2018 Median Household Income $17,460
2018 Total Population 5,760 2023 Median Household Income $18,102
2023 Total Population 5,855 2018-2023 Annual Rate 0.72%
2018-2023 Annual Rate 0.33%
Census 2010 2018 2023
Housing Units by Occupancy Status and Tenure Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total Housing Units 2,266 100.0% 2,285 100.0% 2,303 100.0%
Occupied 2,105 92.9% 2,138 93.6% 2,182 94.7%
Owner 170 7.5% 153 6.7% 155 6.7%
Renter 1,935 85.4% 1,985 86.9% 2,027 88.0%
Vacant 161 7.1% 146 6.4% 121 5.3%
2018 2023
Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Number Percent Number Percent
Total 149 100.0% 151 100.0%
<$50,000 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
$50,000-$99,999 2 1.3% 1 0.7%
$100,000-$149,999 12 8.1% 9 6.0%
$150,000-$199,999 46 30.9% 41 27.2%
$200,000-$249,999 53 35.6% 55 36.4%
$250,000-$299,999 27 18.1% 33 21.9%
$300,000-$399,999 9 6.0% 12 7.9%
$400,000-$499,999 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
$500,000-$749,999 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
$750,000-$999,999 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
$1,000,000-$1,499,999 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
$1,500,000-$1,999,999 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
$2,000,000+ 0 0.0% 0 0.0%
Median Value $213,679 $222,273
Average Value $216,107 $225,331
Census 2010 Housing Units Number Percent
Total 2,266 100.0%
In Urbanized Areas 2,266 100.0%
In Urban Clusters 0 0.0%
Rural Housing Units 0 0.0%
Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.
July 19, 2018
©2018 Esri Page 1 of 2
Housing Profile
1015 Blackhawk Rd, Dekalb, Illinois, 60115 2 Prepared by Esri
1015 Blackhawk Rd, Dekalb, Illinois, 60115 Latitude: 41.94730
Ring: 0.5 mile radius Longitude: -88.77000
Census 2010 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Mortgage Status Number Percent
Total 169 100.0%
Owned with a Mortgage/Loan 115 68.0%
Owned Free and Clear 54 32.0%
Census 2010 Vacant Housing Units by Status
Number Percent
Total 157 100.0%
For Rent 131 83.4%
Rented- Not Occupied 2 1.3%
For Sale Only 3 1.9%
Sold - Not Occupied 0 0.0%
Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use 6 3.8%
For Migrant Workers 0 0.0%
Other Vacant 15 9.6%
Census 2010 Occupied Housing Units by Age of Householder and Home Ownership
Owner Occupied Units
Occupied Units Number % of Occupied
Total 2,104 169 8.0%
15-24 1,206 4 0.3%
25-34 474 17 3.6%
35-44 140 29 20.7%
45-54 130 44 33.8%
55-64 84 35 41.7%
65-74 43 23 53.5%
75-84 17 12 70.6%
85+ 10 5 50.0%
Census 2010 Occupied Housing Units by Race/Ethnicity of Householder and Home Ownership
Owner Occupied Units
Occupied Units Number % of Occupied
Total 2,103 169 8.0%
White Alone 1,030 151 14.7%
Black/African American 755 8 1.1%
Alone
American Indian/Alaska 6 0 0.0%
Alone
NativeAlone
Asian 157 5 3.2%
Pacific Islander Alone 0 0 0.0%
Other Race Alone 110 3 2.7%
Two or More Races 45 2 4.4%
Hispanic Origin 216 7 3.2%
Census 2010 Occupied Housing Units by Size and Home Ownership
Owner Occupied Units
Occupied Units Number % of Occupied
Total 2,105 170 8.1%
1-Person 576 26 4.5%
2-Person 771 68 8.8%
3-Person 375 28 7.5%
4-Person 246 26 10.6%
5-Person 88 14 15.9%
6-Person 31 4 12.9%
7+ Person 18 4 22.2%
Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1.
July 19, 2018
©2018 Esri Page 2 of 2
September 19, 2018
Dear Property Owner:
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will consider a request on a petition by Pete
Occhipinti represented by Mark Johnson, and West Suburban Bank, as Trustee under Trust No.
12128, owner, for approval of a special use permit for residential apartments over a ground floor
commercial use in the “LC” Light Commercial District on the subject property commonly
described as 1015 Blackhawk Road, DeKalb, IL 60115. No waivers or variance are requested to
the Unified Development Ordinance for the proposed development.
The DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission will review this request and hold a public hearing
at its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. The meeting will be at the
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois. As a property owner
within 250 feet of the above-mentioned property, you are encouraged to attend this meeting to
learn about and comment on the proposal.
You are also welcome to submit any written comments you may have on the proposal no later than
Wednesday, October 10, 2018. You may submit written comments regarding the request on the
enclosed comment sheet by mail to the address listed above, or by e-mail to
dan.olson@cityofdekalb.com. All comments will be shared with the Commission and included in
the public record. Additional information regarding the public hearing and request can be found
on the City of DeKalb’s web page at http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings.
If you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the Community
Development Department at (815) 748-2361.
Sincerely,
Dan Olson
Principal Planner
Enclosures
CC: Mayor
City Council
Interim City Manager
Planning and Zoning Commission
1015 Blackhawk Road – Special Use Permit
Page 2 of 4
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held before the DeKalb Planning and
Zoning Commission at its regular meeting on Wednesday, October 17, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the
DeKalb Municipal Building, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois, on the petition by Pete
Occhipinti represented by Mark Johnson, and West Suburban Bank, as Trustee under Trust No.
12128, owner, for approval of a special use permit for residential apartments over a ground floor
commercial use in the “LC” Light Commercial District on the subject property commonly
described as 1015 Blackhawk Road, DeKalb, IL 60115 and has a Parcel Identification Number
(PIN) of 08-15-151-011. No waivers or variance are requested to the Unified Development
Ordinance for the proposed development.
All interested persons are invited to appear and be heard at the time and place listed above.
Interested persons are also encouraged to submit written comments on the proposal to the City of
DeKalb, Community Development Department, 200 South Fourth Street, DeKalb, Illinois,
60115 by 5:00 p.m. by Wednesday, October 10, 2018. Further information regarding the petition
is available from the Community Development Department at (815) 748-2361 or on the City of
DeKalb’s web page at http://www.cityofdekalb.com/1103/Public-Hearings
Christina Doe, Chairperson
DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 4 of 4
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
October 12, 2018
TO: DeKalb Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Jo Ellen Charlton, Community Development Director
RE: Discussion and Recommendation regarding DeKalb County Case DK-18-32
requesting special use approval for a solar garden on properties located on
Twombly Road, approximately 1300 feet west of Annie Glidden Road, in DeKalb
Township (PINS 08-16-200-013 and 08-16-200-035)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Purpose Discussion and Recommendation for a special use
to allow a solar garden located in DeKalb County,
but within the City of DeKalb’s 1.5 mile planning
jurisdiction.
B. Location/Size 20 Acre Vacant/Farmed site located immediately
south of Suburban Estates Apartments
C. Petitioner MCJ Investments
D. Existing Zoning DeKalb County PDR
E. Existing Land Use Mostly Farmed
F. Proposed Land Use 2.0 MW Community Solar Garden
G. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use North: County Zoning; Suburban Estates
Apartments
South: City of Dekalb “PDR” Planned
Development Residential; multiple family
East: County Zoning; Suburban Apartments
West: County Zoning; Farm Field
H. Comprehensive Plan Designation Medium Density Residential (4-8 DU/Acre)
II. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Background
Suburban
Suburban Apartments and Suburban Estates are Estates
two multiple-family projects located on the
southwest corner of Twombly and Annie
Glidden Road, and shown in the picture to the Solar Suburban
right. They are located on a commonly owned Garden Site Apartments
assembly of approximately 80 acres and are
immediately adjoining the City of DeKalb’s
northwest boundary. The entire 80 acres is
unincorporated. Suburban Estates has direct
access to Twombly, and Suburban Apartments
has direct access to Annie Glidden Road. The
common ownership also contains two, twenty-
acre parcels of vacant farmed land in the
southwest and northeast corners of the property.
A 20-acre solar garden is proposed in the
southwest quadrant of the 80-acre ownership
parcel, just south of Suburban Estates. County
ordinance requires these to be approved by
Special Use.
Located immediately south of the subject property are multiple family dwellings located within
the City of DeKalb, with addresses on Aspen Court and Regent Drive. The proximity of this
DeKalb County project within 1.5 miles of the City’s boundaries is within the City’s “planning
jurisdiction”, which affords the City an opportunity for review and comment. The Planning and
Zoning Commission reviewed this request at its September 5, 2018 meeting and recommended to
the City Council that a request be made to the DeKalb County Hearing officer to grant additional
time for evaluation. Council agreed, and the County Hearing Officer granted the request and
continued the hearing in order to allow staff time to meet with the applicant to address concerns,
and to present the findings and outcomes of those meetings to the PZC and Council. The items
enumerated below summarize issues discussed with and resolved with the applicant as part of this
process.
1. Platting/Right-of-Way Dedication. The entire site should be re-platted as four lots, with
two 80’ rights-of-way on the west and east side of the west half of the 80-acre site. As
indicated in the last staff report, this dedication is necessary to accommodate the
Comprehensive Plan’s recommendation that these dedications are important connections
for streets located south of the subject property to the south to connect with Twombley.
The applicant agreed that as a condition of approval, they would agree to re-plat the site
Page 2 of 6
per the City’s request. Note: As this property is unincorporated, the re-platting process
will be completed under the County’s jurisdiction.
There was some discussion as to platting the eastern right-of-way to 70’ instead of 80’ to
match the City’s right-of-way dimensions for ?? street to the south, however, given the
extensive amount of utilities in the immediate area, the City’s engineering staff has
recommended the 80’ of right-of-way be dedicated on this site.
A dedication of 80’ will be provided along the west property line, and will be expanded at
the north end near Twombley in order to allow proper alignment of Rosenow. It is
recommended that the right-of-way dedication to allow for this transition be subject to
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the plat by DeKalb County.
2. Existing Storm Sewer. The existing storm sewer along the west side of the site should be
identified on the plans. The purpose this request is to determine whether the existing line
is located within the to be dedicated right-of-way. If it is not, an easement will need to be
granted.
The exact location of the storm sewer has not yet been provided, but the applicant agrees
to grant an easement if it does not fall within the 80’ right-of-way to be dedicated along
the west property line.
3. Drainage Easement. If an existing “Drainage Easement” exists along the west property
line, the document granting that easement must be provided. If necessary, extend easement
to far south property line if it doesn’t already exist and the line falls outside the 80’ right-
of-way to be dedicated.
4. Platting Language. Formal platting by the County should designate the 80’ rights-of-way
as “Hereby Dedicated to the City of DeKalb.”
The applicant was concerned that the dedication of right-of-way should not constitute
future annexation of property into the City of DeKalb. Staff explained that the property
will remain unincorporated unless future actions by the owner or the City necessitate
annexation.
5. Agreement between Owner and City. It will be necessary to enter into an agreement that
stipulates the owner will remain responsible for maintenance and will need to provide
liability on the right-of-way until such time as the City improves the right-of-way with
roadway improvements. The City’s attorney will include this language in an agreement
that will be drafted and forwarded to the County for their consideration in the applicant’s
request.
Page 3 of 6
The applicant confirmed that they would continue to maintain the property in the same
manner it has been maintained.
6. End of Road Barrier. At the south end of the eastern right-of-way dedication, provide a
USTM approved end-of-road barrier and signage for the width of the driving surface facing
Regent Drive to the south.
7. Water/Fire Hydrants. The applicant was asked to coordinate with the City’s Fire
Department to confirm there was adequate flow and pressure in the private well water
system on site to accommodate fire service.
The Fire Department conducted this test on ??, and determined there was adequate flow
and pressure for the low demand/consumption needs of the proposed use. Higher demand
uses (if desired by the owner) will require improvements.
8. Access. Hard surface pavement (instead of gravel) should be used for access anywhere
outside the fenced area.
The applicant has agreed to provide this hard surface area in all drives outside the fenced
area.
The applicant has also agreed to provide a 20’ gravel drives may be used inside the fenced
area, and to include a “T-Type” turn around at the west end.
Sliding gates instead of swinging gates equipped with Knox boxes to allow access by the
Fire Department will be provided.
9. Drainage/Grading. Staff asked for verification that the amount and pattern of drainage
will not be altered on the site.
The applicant confirmed there would be no substantial changes and that the cfs will be less
due to the use of permanent plantings and maintenance of the existing drain tiles.
10. Setbacks. The setback on the west side of the solar facility should be no closer to the new
80’ right-of-way than the County’s setback requirement or 25’.
The applicant agreed to this stipulation.
11. Screening. Additional screening was requested in two areas. First, evergreen landscape
screening that grows to maximum height of 10’ in setback area between east line of west
right-of-way and array fence was requested so that future development of the farm field
property to the west would have established screening in the future. Second, additional
Page 4 of 6
tall evergreen screening along the south property line to provide continuous consistent
screening was requested to provide visual relief to DeKalb residents living immediately to
the south.
The applicant agreed to augment the existing screening with evergreen plantings, although
no plan has been provided. Landscape screening requirements will be included in the
agreement being drafted by the attorney. It is recommended that materials be placed south
of the proposed fence and in a manner where horizontal screening would be achieved in
five years along the south property line.
III. CITIZEN RESPONSE/COMMENTS
A public hearing on this case was opened by the DeKalb County Hearing officer on September 13,
2018 at 1:30 in the DeKalb County Administrative Center Conference Room. The hearing officer
continued that hearing until the end of October.
The City mailed letters to surrounding property owners within 250’ and added properties beyond
that distance to the south to include all properties to Hillcrest. These owners were advised of the
Planning and Zoning Commission’s meeting on October 17, in order to provide an opportunity for
additional public comment. It is expected that the Planning and Zoning Commission will forward
a recommendation to the City Council, who will forward a recommendation to the County.
IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
For unincorporated properties within 1.5 miles of a municipal boundary, state statutes provide
communities with the opportunity to impact County zoning decisions. If the Planning and Zoning
Commission is satisfied that the applicant has addressed all issues, a sample motion is provided
below that incorporates the following conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Property owner for the proposed solar garden that is the subject of a DeKalb County public hearing
for case number DK 18-32 agrees to execute an agreement with the City of DeKalb that requires
the following requirements as a condition precedent to the County’s authorization of any permit:
1. Owner shall file and obtain approval of a four-lot subdivision for the 80-acre parcel, which
shall include 80’ right-of-way dedications indicating “Hereby Dedicated to the City of
DeKalb” along the west property line, and along the east side of the solar site extending
north to Twombley. If the City’s existing storm sewer does not fall within the land to be
dedicated, an easement shall be provided to the City covering that utility.
2. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance and liability on the dedicated right-of-way
until such time as the City improves the right-of-way with roadway improvements.
3. Owner will install a USTM approved end-of-road barrier and signage for the width of the
Page 5 of 6
driving surface facing Regent Drive to the south prior to issuance of any permits for the
solar farm.
4. Access drives outside the fenced area will be improved with hard surface pavement instead
of gravel.
5. A 20’ wide gravel drive will be provided along the south edge of the solar array, and will
include a “t-type” turn around at the west end.
6. Sliding gates, equipped with knox boxes, will be utilized at all access points into the solar
array.
7. A minimum setback of 25’ or any greater setback required by DeKalb County shall be
provided between the new east right-of-way line of the west right-of-way dedication and
the fence.
8. Landscape Screening shall be augmented along the south property line between the
property line and the array fence, and shall achieve a year-round screening effect within
five years of planting. Landscape Plan must be approved by DeKalb Community
Development Department Director prior to approval of any permits by the County and
installation shall be completed within the same timeframe as all other landscaping required
by the County.
The sample motion is as follows:
Based on the applicant’s submittal and agreement to enter into a binding agreement with
the City of DeKalb, I recommend the City Council recommend to the DeKalb County
Hearing Officer and County Board that the applicant’s request for a solar farm as outlined
in DeKalb County Case DK 18-32 be approved, subject to the owner’s execution of an
agreement with the City of DeKalb that requires conformance to the “Conditions of
Approval” as outlined in Section IV “Conclusions and Recommendations” of the staff report
for the Planning and Zoning Commission’s October 17, 2018 meeting.
Page 6 of 6