Planning Commission

Planning Commission City Attorney Joanna Smith Hoff Ashley Bertussi, Chairperson Jeffrey Chan, Vice-Chairperson Commission Secretary Sergio Lopez, Commissioner Angel Hernandez Andy Alvarez, Commissioner Aaron Popejoy, Commissioner http://cityofelcentro.org/ Jorge A. Perez, Commissioner Armando Muñoz, Commissioner AGENDA CITY OF EL CENTRO PLANNING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers 1275 Main Street El Centro, CA 92243 TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2026 AT 5:30 PM Any member of the public attending in person and wishing to make a comment is asked to complete a speaker slip and follow the “Notice to the Public” instructions below. Alternatively, any member of the public is invited to submit public comments in advance of the meeting to be answered at the meeting. Please email your questions to ecplanning@cityofelcentro.org or call (760) 337-4545. The public may participate and make public comments via the following Zoom link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81164635306?pwd=sYM5xv6hN9t9RbLf0SkYcXdwUbvWyR.1 Optional dial-in number: 1.669.900.6833 Meeting ID: 811 6463 5306 Passcode: 568811 Page 1 of 54  Public comments via zoom are subject to the same time limits as those in person. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC This is a public meeting. If there is a matter on the agenda on which you wish to be heard, please come forward to the microphone; address yourself to the commission, stating your name and address for the record. Persons wishing to address the Commission are not required to identify themselves (Gov’t Code § 54953.3); however, this information assists the Chairperson by ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Commission are recognized and it assists the Commission’s Secretary in preparing meeting minutes. The Chairperson reserves the right to place a time limit on each person asking to be heard. If you wish to address the Commission concerning any other matter within the Commission's jurisdiction, you may do so during the public comment portion of the agenda. * Any information provided on the “Speaker Slip” is voluntary and will be public record. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL CONSENT AGENDA Consent agenda items are approved by one motion. Commissioners or members of the public may pull consent items to be considered separately at a time determined by the Chairperson. 1. June 09, 2026, Planning Commission Minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Public Hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council on a 12-month extension for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map Rigid Electric, Inc. requests a one-year extension of the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map to August 5, 2027. The 213-acre site, located south of I-8 between La Brucherie Ave. and the Lotus Canal, is approved for the development of 547 single-family lots, 10.8-acre park, 16.5 acres of retention basin. Presently the site contains 44 single family homes, 200 acres of agriculture, and 100 acres of vacant land. The Planning Commission will consider a recommendation to the City Council. Presentation: Angel Hernandez, Community Development Director Recommendation: Recommend Approval of the 2nd 12-Month extension for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map 3. Public Hearing to consider approving Zoning Variance 26-01- 453 Commercial Avenue Fence. Manjit Toor, Representative of Imperial Valley Khalsa Diwan, submitted a request for a Zoning Variance to replace the existing legal-nonconforming chain-link fence with a six- foot-tall block wall featuring wrought iron ornamental fencing and 1-foot-tall dome features Page 2 of 54  on top of each column. The proposed fence would be located within the required front yard setback of the property at APN 053-047-003 also known as 453 Commercial Avenue. The Zoning Ordinance limits fences in the required front to a maximum of four feet in height for fences that are open and three feet tall for fences that are close. The Planning Commission will consider if a zoning variance will be appropriate at this project site. Presentation: Andrea Montano, Associate Planner Recommendation: Motion to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 26-__, approving Zoning Variance 26-01. 4. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25-01. Jorge Pacheco, on behalf of property owner Mario Alberto Otero, has submitted a request for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property located at 875 Glenwood Drive (APN 052-270-032). The proposal would subdivide the existing parcel into three (3) parcels, including two parcels of approximately 0.67 acres each and one parcel of approximately 0.75 acres. The purpose of the subdivision is to facilitate the future development of three single-family homes on property zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. Access to the proposed parcels would be provided through an extension of Glenwood Drive. Presentation: Andrea Montano, Associate Planner Recommendation: Open the public hearing and table this item to a later date. NEW BUSINESS 5. Community Development Department Report NON-ACTION INFORMATION ITEMS PUBLIC COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet will be available for public inspection at the Community Development Department-Planning & Zoning Division located at 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, California during normal business hours. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the Community Development Department- Planning & Zoning Division at (760) 337-4545. Notification of at least 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Page 3 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION Item: 1. City Hall Meeting: 7/14/2026 5:30 PM 1275 W. Main Street CONSENT AGENDA El Centro, CA 92243 JUNE 09, 2026, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES STAFF REPORT - ACTION ITEM: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 06.09.2026 Minutes Page 4 of 54  MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 2026 5:30 PM PLANNING COMMISSION ASHLEY BERTUSSI, CHAIRPERSON JEFFREY CHAN, VICE-CHAIRPERSON SERGIO LOPEZ, COMMISSIONER ANDY ALVAREZ, COMMISSIONER AARON POPEJOY, COMMISSIONER JORGE A. PEREZ, COMMISSIONER ARMANDO MUÑOZ, COMMISSIONER CALL TO ORDER: The El Centro Planning Commission convened in a regular session at City Hall Council Chambers, 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, California at 5:30 PM. Chairperson Ashley Bertussi presided over the meeting. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairperson Ashley Bertussi Vice-Chairperson Jeffrey Chan Commissioner Andy Alvarez Commissioner Aaron Popejoy Commissioner Jorge A. Perez Commissioner Armando Muñoz ABSENT: Commissioner Sergio Lopez STAFF ATTENDANCE: Community Development Director, Angel Hernandez Building Official, Frank Soto Associate Planner, Andrea Montaño Building Inspector, Virgilio Anguiano Staff Assistant, Poleth Lopez CONSENT AGENDA Consent agenda items are approved by one motion. Commissioners or members of the public may pull consent items to be considered separately at a time determined by the Chairperson. Page 5 of 54 1. Approval of March 3, 2026, Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Perez moved to approve, seconded by Commissioner Alvarez. Voting Yes: Commissioner Alvarez, Commissioner Perez, Chairperson Bertussi, Commissioner Popejoy, Vice-Chairperson Chan, Commissioner Muñoz Voting No: None Abstaining: None PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 25-01. Jorge Pacheco, on behalf of property owner Mario Alberto Otero, has submitted a request for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property located at 875 Glenwood Drive (APN 052-270-032). Presentation: Andrea Montano, Associate Planner Recommendation: Open the public hearing and move to continue this item to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission Meeting taking place on July 14, 2026. Associate Planner, Andrea Montaño, commenced her presentation on tentative parcel map 25-01, which proposes to subdivide a 1.6-acre property into three smaller lots north of Renaissance Homes on Glenwood Drive. Mrs. Montaño presented the staff report recommending an open public hearing but continuing it to the next meeting for further research on stormwater requirements and developer discussions. Mark Larson, a 40-year resident of the area, provided public comment raising concerns about infrastructure issues including unpermitted demolition of a house containing potential hazardous materials, underground septic systems and leach fields that would need proper abandonment, and the need for full road improvements including asphalt, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks to properly serve the new development. Commissioners discussed various technical aspects including lot sizes, road improvements, fire safety requirements, and the relationship to the adjacent Courtyard Villas development, ultimately voting unanimously to continue the item to the next scheduled planning commission meeting. Commissioner Perez moved to Table, seconded by Commissioner Popejoy. Voting Yes: Commissioner Alvarez, Commissioner Perez, Chairperson Bertussi, Commissioner Popejoy, Vice-Chairperson Chan, Commissioner Muñoz Voting No: None Abstaining: None NEW BUSINESS NON-ACTION INFORMATION ITEMS 3. Community Development Department Report No questions were asked about the Community Development monthly report. Page 6 of 54 PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were obtained. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:11 P.M. Page 7 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION Item: 2 City Hall Meeting: 07/14/2026 5:30 PM 1275 W. Main Street Public Hearing El Centro, CA 92243 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON A 12-MONTH EXTENSION FOR THE LOTUS RANCH TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP Project #: TSM 26-01 Lotus Ranch Location: South of Interstate 8, between La Tentative Subdivision Map – Time Brucherie Avenue and Lotus Canal Extension Applicant: Rigid Electric, LLC Project Type(s): Tentative Subdivision Map - Time Extension Staff Planner: Angel Hernandez, Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential Community Development Director PROJECT SUMMARY The Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision was approved by the El Centro City Council on September 6, 2016, and allows for the development of a 213-acre property into a single- family residential subdivision planned for 547 single-family homes, a 10.8-acre park, a school site, and a 16.5-acre retention basin (Refer to Attachment A - Lotus Ranch TSM Phasing Map). The project is intended to be developed in phases. Final Maps for Unit B1 and Unit B2 have already been recorded and the land subdivided. The applicant is currently completing construction of the 22 lots in Unit B2. Furthermore, they have submitted a Final Map to subdivide Unit B3, which is in the process of being reviewed for recordation. The current expiration date is based on the date when the last 12-month time extension expires, which is August 5, 2026. The applicant is now requesting an additional 12- month extension to August 5, 2027, subject to approval of the City Council, following a recommendation by the Planning Commission (Refer to Attachment B - Applicant Letter). If approved, this would be the second 12-month extension, and up to a total of six years of time extensions may be granted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE 2ND 12-MONTH EXTENSION FOR THE LOTUS RANCH TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP Page 8 of 54  Exhibit A - Project Location Map SITE INFORMATION The project consists of 213 acres located in the southwest portion of the City, generally located south of Interstate 8 and west of La Brucherie Avenue (Refer to Exhibit A - Project Location Map) above. Since it was approved in 2016, 22 homes have been constructed on Manzanita Drive and another 10 homes have been completed or are under construction on Chaparral Drive. Major public improvements that have been Page 9 of 54 constructed include Wake Avenue west of La Brucherie Avenue, the relocation of a sanitary sewer lift station, and a sanitary sewer main on Wake Avenue. Site Area Building Area Current Zoning General Plan 213 Acres Not Applicable R1-Single Low Density Residential Family LAND USE REVIEW The project site is zoned R1-Single Family and designated for Low Density Residential per the General Plan Land Use Map. No changes or modifications are being requested or considered for the project. Zoning Map General Plan Land Use Map TABLE 1: COMPARISON OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Vicinity Land Use Zoning Current Use Designation Subject Low Density R1-Single Family Vacant land, single-family Property Residential residential North N/A N/A Freeway East Low Density R1-Single Family and Low Density Residential, Residential, Master A-2-U (County) Agriculture Plan Mixed Use South Single-Family A-2-U (County) Hay processing and storage Residential West Single-Family A-2-U (County) Agriculture Residential ANALYSIS Page 10 of 54 The Lotus Ranch Subdivision Map was reviewed for conformance with the General Plan and the existing zoning ordinance. There have been no substantial changes to the General Plan affecting this area since the project was approved in 2016, and the project remains consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Also, the project was assessed for compliance with the existing residential development standards and was found to be consistent. PUBLIC NOTICING AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PUBLIC NOTICING A public hearing notice was distributed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site and published in the Imperial Valley Press on Friday, July 3, 2026. As of the date of preparation of this staff report, staff has not received any communications or comments regarding the project. If recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, staff will distribute and publish a second public hearing notice for the City Council public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Lotus Ranch EIR was certified by the El Centro City Council on September 6, 2016. There have been no changes to the previously approved project or surrounding conditions that would warrant additional environmental analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act. FINDINGS In determining the advisability of issuing a recommendation for the tentative subdivision map extension, the Planning Commission shall consider the findings set forth in Section 24-281 of the El Centro City Code used for approving the tentative subdivision map. Below are the findings with staff's recommended language in support of the findings: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with the City of El Centro General Plan. Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map was reviewed for consistency with the adopted General Plan at the time it was first approved in 2016. No changes have occurred to the General Plan that were found to make it inconsistent. 2. That the design or improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City of El Centro General Plan. Conditions of approval have been incorporated to ensure the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map No. 16-01 was designed in accordance with the goals and policies of the General Plan, as follows: LUE Policy 1.2: Protect and enhance existing residential neighborhoods by supporting safe, well-maintained housing, adequate parks and recreation facilities, and complete sidewalks and pedestrian/bike paths that connect to parks and recreation and neighborhood serving uses. The project includes the provision of sidewalks, pedestrian paths between cul-de-sacs, and bike facilities in compliance with the City's Mobility Element. Furthermore, the Page 11 of 54 inclusion of a park site and school site will allow for walking and biking to these daily destinations within the project site. LUE Policy 3.2: Direct and control growth within the City boundary and SOI in coordination with the provision of public facilities and services through the application of the City’s Urban Development Program (UDP). The project site is located within the City's current boundaries and has been studied for the provision of public facilities and services when it was first approved by the City in 2016. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The Lotus Ranch Subdivision is within City Limits on 213 acres of land just south of Interstate 8. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed residential development and has been reviewed to ensure consistency with the City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance density requirements. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The report found that all significant environmental impacts could be addressed through mitigation measures. Thus, the project or improvements associated with the project will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The Lotus Ranch Subdivision includes sidewalks and a public park to encourage an active lifestyle and will not cause serious public health problems. 6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The Lotus Ranch Subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large. The project would provide for adequate right-of-way dedications to be used by the public at large and necessary easements for the installation of maintenance of required utilities. NEXT STEPS If the Planning Commission recommends and the City Council approves the 12-month extension, the applicant will have until August 5, 2027, to either (1) record another final map for the project, or (2) request the third 12-month extension. The City Code and State Map Act allow the City to grant up to six 12-month extensions. OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION OPTIONS Page 12 of 54 The Planning Commission has the following options when considering action on this request: 1. Motion to recommend approval of a 12-month extension for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map subject to the adoption of the required findings for the proposal; or 2. Motion to recommend denial of a 12-month extension for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map subject to the adoption of the required findings for the proposal; or 3. Motion to continue the hearing for further study. RECOMMENDATION Overall, the project, with conditions, remains in compliance with the City’s development standards and General Plan. Furthermore, significant investment in public facilities has been made at the project site that facilitates continued single-family residential development in alignment with the original project approval, City development standards, and applicable plans. The staff recommendation is that the Planning Commission make the following motion: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 26-__ (Attachment C) to recommend approval of a 12-month extension for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map subject to the adoption of the required findings for the proposal. ATTACHMENTS 1. Attachment A - Lotus Ranch Phasing Map 2. Attachment B – Applicant Letter 3. Attachment C - Resolution Page 13 of 54 Dynamic PHASE 4 PHASE 3 NORTH CONSULTING PHASE 6 LOTUS TRAILS ENGINEERS PHASE 5 PHASE 2 PHASE 7 PHASE 1 PHASE 8 PHASE 1 PHASE 9 PHASE 2 LOTUS RANCH SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 Proposed Park Site RENAISSANCE SOUTH PHASE 4 PHASING MAP SCHOOL SITE ALTERNATINE Classrooms Administrative space South of Danenberg REPLACE 35 Lots. PHASE 3 ± 8.13 ACRES SCHOOL AREA PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 1 LOTUS VILLAGE PHASE 4 PHASE 5 LOTUS TRAILS RENAISSANCE SOUTH LOTUS VILLAGE PROJECT ENTRANCE MONUMENT G-MAC DEVELOPMENT Page 14 of 54 Page 15 of 54 Page 16 of 54 Page 17 of 54 Page 18 of 54 Page 19 of 54 Page 20 of 54 Page 21 of 54 Page 22 of 54 Page 23 of 54 Page 24 of 54 Page 25 of 54 Page 26 of 54 Page 27 of 54 Page 28 of 54 Page 29 of 54 Page 30 of 54 Page 31 of 54 Page 32 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 26- RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE 2nd TWELVE MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR THE LOTUS RANCH TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WHEREAS, the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2016, per Resolution No. 16-69; and WHEREAS, the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map proposes the division of 213 acres of land to create 547 single-family lots, a 10.8-acre park, and 16.5 acres of retention basin, on property generally located south of I-8 between La Brucherie Avenue and the Lotus Canal; and WHEREAS, the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision is scheduled to expire on August 5, 2026; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Rigid Electric, Inc., submitted an application for a time extension for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map on June 26, 2026, and said request was considered by the Planning Commission on July 14, 2026; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66452.6(e) and Section 24-30 of the El Centro Municipal Code allow the City Council to approve successive 12-month extensions of the tentative subdivision map, provided that such extensions do not exceed a period of six (6) years in total; and WHEREAS, the El Centro City Council has approved one (1) year of extensions and a remaining five (5) years of extensions are valid for issuance by the City Council; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the twelve-month time extension request for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision at a regular Planning Commission meeting on July 14, 2026, in the City Council Chambers, 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, California; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was advertised according to law; and WHEREAS, the applicant was present and heard; and WHEREAS, no one was present to object to the request, nor were any objections filed with the Commission; and WHEREAS, the proposed map remains consistent with applicable general and specific plans; and WHEREAS, the design or improvements of the proposed subdivision remain consistent with applicable general and specific plans; and WHEREAS, the site remains physically suitable for the type of development; and Page 33 of 54  WHEREAS, the site remains physically suitable for the proposed density of development; and WHEREAS, the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; and WHEREAS, the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; and WHEREAS, the design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 12-06 was previously prepared and considered for the proposal pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines of 1970, as amended; and WHEREAS, the proposed project would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of the community; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the second twelve-month time extension, to August 5, 2027, for the Lotus Ranch Tentative Subdivision Map, subject to compliance with City Council Resolution No. 16-69. PASSED AND ADOPTED on July 14, 2026 by the following vote: ROLL CALL: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstaining: CITY OF EL CENTRO PLANNING COMMISSION By_________________________________ Ashley Bertussi, Chairperson ATTEST: Page 34 of 54 By_________________________________ Angel Hernandez, AICP Secretary-Director Page 35 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION Item: 3 City Hall Meeting: 07/14/2026 5:30 PM 1275 W. Main Street Public Hearing El Centro, CA 92243 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVING ZONING VARIANCE 26-01- 453 COMMERCIAL AVENUE FENCE Project #: ZV 26-01 Location: 453 Commercial Ave (APN 053-047-003) Applicant: Imperial Valley Khalsa Project Type(s): Zoning Variance Diwan Staff Planner: Andrea Montaño, Existing Use: Religious Institution- Sikh Temple Associate Planner PROJECT SUMMARY Imperial Valley Khalsa Diwan, also known as the El Centro Sikh Temple (Gurdwara), has operated at 453 Commercial Avenue since 1947 after purchasing the property from the former Japanese Buddhist Temple following World War II. The Gurdwara is recognized as the second Sikh temple established in the United States and has served the Sikh community in Imperial Valley for nearly eight decades. Due to the age of the property, both the temple and its perimeter fencing are in need of rehabilitation. The existing perimeter fencing consists primarily of approximately seven-foot-tall chain- link fencing topped with barbed wire. The applicant proposes to remove the existing fencing and replace it with a six-foot-tall block wall with ornamental wrought iron fencing. Decorative architectural pillars would include one-foot-tall dome features consistent with traditional Sikh architectural elements. The proposed improvements would reduce the overall fence height from approximately seven feet to six feet, eliminate the existing barbed wire, and provide a more attractive and permanent perimeter treatment for the property. The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a Zoning Variance to allow the proposed six-foot-tall fence within the required front yard setback. The property is located within the R-3 Multiple-Family Residential Zone, where the El Centro Municipal Code limits fences within the required front yard to a maximum height of four feet for open fencing and three feet for solid fencing. Approval of the variance would allow the replacement fence to exceed these height limitations while improving the overall appearance of the site and maintaining security for the religious institution. The proposed fence would not expand the existing religious use of the property and is intended solely to replace the existing perimeter fencing with materials that improve aesthetics while maintaining site security. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE ZONING VARIANCE 26-01. Page 36 of 54 SITE INFORMATION The project site is located at 453 Commercial Avenue (APN 053-047-003) and consists of approximately 0.56 acres. The property is developed with the existing Imperial Valley Khalsa Diwan Sikh Temple (Gurdwara), including a 3,225-square-foot temple, a 5,227- square-foot community room, and an off-street parking area that serves the religious institution. The property is designated High-Medium Density Residential by the General Plan and is zoned R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential). The proposed project is limited to the replacement of the existing perimeter fencing and does not include any expansion of the existing religious use, buildings, parking facilities, or other site improvements. Page 37 of 54 Site Area Building Area Current Zoning General Plan .56 Acres 3,225 SF Temple R3- Multiple High- Medium Density 5,227 SF Community Family Residential Rooms Residential Exhibit B.1 - Photo of project site, south Exhibit B.2 - Photo of project site, west Exhibit B.3 Photo of Sikh Temple in the late 40’s LAND USE REVIEW The existing temple buildings are located along the western and southern portions of the property adjacent to the public alley, while the northeast portion of the site is developed as an off-street parking area serving the temple. The proposed project is limited to the replacement of the existing perimeter fencing and does not include an expansion of the existing religious use, buildings, or parking facilities. The surrounding area is characterized by a mix of residential, institutional, and commercial uses. Single-family residences are located to the north, east, and west of the project site. A public alley borders the property to the south and provides access to Page 38 of 54 vacant parcels and older commercial buildings, including Tuki's Place. The surrounding neighborhood also includes multi-family residential developments and commercial uses such as a transmission service station. General Plan Land Use (Existing) Zoning (Existing) TABLE 1: COMPARISON OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Vicinity Land Use Zoning Current Use Designation Subject High-Medium R3- Multiple Religious Institution Property Residential Family Residential North High-Medium R3- Multiple Single-family Residential Family Residential residences East High-Medium R3- Multiple Single Family Residential and Family Residential Residences and General and Transmission Service Commercial CG- General Station Commercial South Downtown CD-Downtown Public alley, vacant Commercial Commercial parcels, older commercial buildings (including Tuki's Place) West High-Medium R3- Multiple Single Family Residential Family Residential Residences, and Complexes. Page 39 of 54 ANALYSIS AESTHETICS The proposed project would substantially improve the visual appearance of the property by replacing the existing approximately seven-foot-tall chain-link fence topped with barbed wire with a decorative masonry wall and ornamental wrought iron fence. The proposed fence incorporates architectural elements, including ornamental metal panels and decorative domed pillars, that complement the character of the Sikh Temple and provide a more permanent and visually appealing perimeter treatment. While the proposed fence exceeds the maximum front yard fence height permitted by the El Centro Municipal Code, it reduces the overall height of the existing fence by approximately one foot and removes the barbed wire, which contributes to a less institutional appearance. The ornamental wrought iron sections preserve visibility into the property while the masonry base enhances durability and appearance. Overall, the proposed improvements represent a significant aesthetic enhancement over the existing perimeter fencing. BUILDING AND SAFETY The proposed fence replacement does not increase the intensity of the existing religious use or expand the existing buildings or parking areas. Construction of the new fence will require building permits and inspection by the City's Building and Safety Division to ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the California Building Code, California Residential Code, and all other adopted regulations. The proposed fence will replace an aging perimeter fence with a new structure designed to meet current building standards. The removal of the existing barbed wire also improves safety by eliminating a potentially hazardous feature while maintaining an appropriate level of security for the property. Staff has determined that the project will not obstruct visibility at adjacent intersections or driveways or adversely affect emergency access to the site. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY The project site has been occupied by the Imperial Valley Khalsa Diwan since 1947 and has remained an established part of the surrounding neighborhood for nearly eighty years. The proposed project does not introduce a new land use or expand the existing religious facility. Instead, it consists solely of replacing the existing perimeter fence with improved materials that are more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. OPERATIONAL NEEDS Religious institutions regularly accommodate assemblies, ceremonies, and community events that differ in scale and operation from surrounding residential uses. The Page 40 of 54 proposed fence is intended to provide a secure perimeter for congregants while replacing an aging fence with materials that better complement the neighborhood. FENCES AT RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS Staff conducted a visual review of perimeter fencing at religious institutions throughout the City to better understand how site design, building placement, and property size influence security needs and fencing configurations. The review found that fencing varies considerably among religious facilities and that many institutions are able to accommodate taller perimeter fencing outside of required front yard setbacks due to larger sites and greater building setbacks from the public right-of-way. For example, First Christian Church of El Centro, located on approximately two acres at the intersection of Waterman Avenue and Orange Avenue, has six-foot-tall perimeter fencing. However, the church buildings and parking areas are set back from the public streets, allowing the taller fencing to be located outside the required front yard while providing privacy and security for congregants. Christ Community Church, situated on approximately 1.92 acres at West Orange Avenue and Sixth Street, similarly utilizes its larger site to locate administrative offices and sanctuary buildings around interior walkways and gathering areas, reducing the need for perimeter fencing along the public streets. St. Mary's Church, located on approximately 12 acres, also demonstrates how larger religious campuses can utilize site design to address security concerns. The property includes a six-foot-tall fence along the eastern property line adjacent to the school and convent on Waterman Avenue, while the church frontage along La Brucherie Avenue consists of a four-foot-tall chain-link fence. The church buildings are located approximately 300 feet from the primary parking lot entrance and include a large multipurpose building and athletic field that provide secure interior spaces for religious services and community activities. Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, located on approximately 1.38 acres on East Brighton Avenue, has a site layout more comparable to the Sikh Temple. The property includes six-foot-tall perimeter fencing surrounding both chapel areas and approximately four- foot-tall fencing adjacent to the parking lot. Similar to the proposed project, the fencing provides security for the primary worship areas while maintaining a lower fence height adjacent to parking and circulation areas. The Imperial Valley Khalsa Diwan differs from many of these facilities due to the relatively compact size of the property and the location of the existing temple buildings near the front and side property lines. Unlike larger religious campuses that are able to create secure interior gathering areas through building placement and generous setbacks, the Sikh Temple has limited opportunities to provide separation between public sidewalks and areas used by congregants. As a result, the perimeter fence serves a more significant role in providing security and privacy for the religious institution than at many other religious facilities within the City. Page 41 of 54 PUBLIC NOTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PUBLIC NOTICING A public hearing notice was distributed to property owners 300-feet from the project site and published in the Imperial Valley Press on Friday, July 3, 2026. As of the date of preparation of this staff report, staff have not received any communications or comments regarding the project. If recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, staff will distribute and publish a second public hearing notice for the City Council public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed Variance (26-01) is approved by the Planning Commission would be found categorically exempt from pursuant to Section15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines related to existing structures. FINDINGS In considering the variance request, the Planning Commission must evaluate the proposal against the required findings set forth in Section 29-312 of the El Centro Municipal Code. Each finding must be satisfied in order for a variance to be granted. Based on staff’s review, the proposed project does not meet the required findings necessary to support approval of the variance. The following analysis provides staff’s reasoning in support of denial of the request: 1. Because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of this chapter would deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. Applicants Findings: The Sikh Temple is requesting an installation of 6 feet high fence to maintain privacy, security, and compatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The parking area is oriented towards the public street across from residential swelling which reduces privacy during onsite events. In addition, the Sikh Temple has been burglarized in the past. Staff finds that this finding can be made. The subject property is occupied by an established Sikh Temple that has operated at this location for several decades and was developed with its primary parking and gathering areas oriented toward the public street and adjacent residential properties. Unlike many other religious institutions within the City, the site provides limited opportunity to create interior gathering areas separated from the public right-of-way due to the placement of the existing buildings and parking areas. The existing seven-foot perimeter fence has been in place for many years, and the applicant is proposing to replace the existing fence rather than introduce a new site design feature. Staff's review of religious institutions throughout the City found that many facilities achieve privacy Page 42 of 54  and security through larger setbacks, building orientation, or six-foot perimeter fencing located outside required front yards. Due to the unique site layout and existing development pattern, strict application of the front yard fence height standard would limit the Temple's ability to maintain a level of privacy and security comparable to other religious institutions within the City. 2. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. Applicants Findings: The Sikh Temple is requesting for a variance for the reason mentioned above. Entering a Sikh Temple (Gurdwara), requires persons to observe religious observances such as refraining from alcohol, tobacco, drugs or intoxicants when on the property. When entering the Gurdwara, people are also expected to observe modest dress, covering of the head, removing shoes and behaving respectfully. Sikh Temple’s congregation and the leadership are concerned regarding bias-motivated incidents nationally that is generalized toward Middle Eastern or South Asian Communities. In the last year, there have 209 hate crimes against Sikh people. As such, there is a need for additional site security measures and controlled access at the Temple. Due to these operational and security considerations, the proposed six-foot fence is intended to improve controlled access, privacy and protection of congregants and visitors and is not considered a special privilege in consistent with surrounding properties. Staff finds that this finding can be made. The requested variance would not constitute a special privilege because it is intended to address the unique operational characteristics of an established place of worship rather than provide a development advantage over surrounding properties. The Temple accommodates regular religious services and community gatherings that require controlled access and privacy for congregants observing religious customs upon entering the Gurdwara. The applicant has expressed concerns regarding security in light of nationally documented bias-motivated incidents directed toward Sikh communities that is documented on federal law enforcement databases. The requested variance would allow replacement of an existing seven-foot fence with a decorative wrought iron fence that provides improved security while maintaining visibility from the public street. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare or injurious to property and improvements in the same vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. Page 43 of 54  Applicants Findings: The fence installed will be a wrought iron fence with pilasters which will allow visibility of pedestrians, vehicles, and other objects, on the outer side of the fence will not be an issue. Staff finds that this finding can be made. The proposed fence consists primarily of decorative wrought iron with masonry pilasters, allowing visibility through the fence and preserving sight distance between pedestrians, motorists, and the property. The fence will replace an existing six-foot fence that has been installed since the 40’s and will not intensify the existing use of the property or alter traffic circulation. Staff therefore concludes that approval of the variance will not be materially detrimental to public health, safety, convenience, or welfare or injurious to surrounding properties. 4. The granting of such variance will not adversely affect the general plan for the city. Applicants Findings: No, it will not adversely affect the general plan for the city. The variance would comply with Land Use Element Policy 5.8 as it encourages the incorporation of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. The wrought-iron fence would provide natural surveillance and natural access control. Please be advised, the existing fence is 6 feet high. Staff finds that this finding can be made. The proposed fence consists primarily of decorative wrought iron with masonry pilasters, allowing visibility through the fence and preserving sight distance between pedestrians, motorists, and the property. The fence will replace an existing six-foot fence and will not intensify the existing use of the property or alter traffic circulation. NEXT STEPS The decision and findings adopted by the Planning Commission, either approving, approving with conditions, or denying the variance will be filed with the City Council at the next available meeting. At that time, the City Council then may act to modify or deny the Planning Commission decision. Otherwise, the City Council may decide to take no action which would ratify the Planning Commission decision without changes. Below is a flowchart illustrating the process. Page 44 of 54 OPTIONS & RECOMMENDATION OPTIONS The Planning Commission has the following options when considering action on this request: 1. Move to adopt resolution to approve Zoning Variance 26-01 and required findings, to be filed with City Council; 2. Move to adopt resolution to deny Zoning Variance 26-01 and required findings, to be filed with City Council; or 3. Move to continue the hearing for further study. RECOMMENDATION Planning Division staff recommends that the Commission open a public hearing and allow input from all proponents and opponents of the proposed project. Because the proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the required findings for a variance can be made, staff recommends approval of the request. Therefore, it is staff’s recommendation that the project be approved by taking the following action: Move to adopt Resolution (See Exhibit B) to approve Zoning Variance 26-01 and required findings for the proposal. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Site Plan Exhibit B – Resolution Page 45 of 54 Page 46 of 54 Page 47 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 26-__ FOR ZONING VARIANCE NO. 26-01 WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a variance to allow the height of a fence in the required front yard to be six feet in height rather than four feet in height at 453 Commercial Avenue; and WHEREAS, the request would replace an existing six foot chain link fence with one foot of barbed wire that has been in place since 1947; and WHEREAS, the approval of Zoning Variance 26-01 is a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and qualifies for an exemption pursuant to Section of 15301 of CEQA Guidelines related to existing facilities; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the petition for Zoning Variance No. 26-01 at a regular Planning Commission meeting held on July 14, 2026 in the City Council Chambers at 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, California; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was advertised according to law: a legal notice was published on June 3, 2026 in the Imperial Valley Press, a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with City ordinance concerning Zoning Variance 26-01, and said notice was mailed to each property owner within a 300-foot radius of the project site in accordance with City ordinance; and WHEREAS, the staff provided a presentation and answered questions; and WHEREAS, the applicant was present and heard; and WHEREAS, Staff conducted necessary research and analysis in accordance with Section 29-312 of the Zoning Ordinance and after presentations at the meeting and discussions, the Planning Commission determined that the required findings to support the variance could be made; and WHEREAS, the property does contain special or physical characteristics that prevent compliance with the zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, approval of the variance would not grant any special privilege not enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district because there are other properties in the area with fences similar to that requested by the applicant; and WHEREAS, granting of the variance will be not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience or welfare or injurious to property and improvements in the same vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; and Page 48 of 54  WHEREAS, granting of such variance will not adversely affect the general plan for the city; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission therefore directs that their decision to approve Zoning Variance 26-01 and associated findings be filed with the City Council at the next available City Council meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Planning Commission approves Zoning Variance No. 26-01. PASSED AND ADOPTED on July 14, 2026 by the following vote: ROLL CALL Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstaining: CITY OF EL CENTRO PLANNING COMMISSION By_________________________________ Ashley Bertussi, Chairperson ATTEST: By_________________________________ Angel Hernandez, AICP Secretary-Director Page 49 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION Item: 4. City Hall Meeting: 7/14/2026 5:30 PM 1275 W. Main Street PUBLIC HEARINGS El Centro, CA 92243 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25-01. Project #: TPM 25-01 Location: 875 Glenwood Drive (APN 052-270-032) Applicant: Jorge Pacheco Project Type(s): Minor Subdivision Staff Planner: Andrea Montaño,Proposed Use: Single Family Residential Associate Planner PROJECT SUMMARY Jorge Pacheco, on behalf of property owner Mario Alberto Otero, is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 25-01 to subdivide a 1.66-acre property located at 875 Glenwood Drive (APN 052-270-032) into three residential parcels (Exhibit A- Project Location Map). The proposed subdivision would create Parcel 1 consisting of approximately 0.756 acres, Parcel 2 consisting of approximately 0.67 acres, and Parcel 3 consisting of approximately 0.67 acres. The purpose of the subdivision is to facilitate the future development of three single-family residences on property zoned R-1 (Single-Family Residential). The project site is bordered by residentially zoned properties to the north, south, and east, with Austin Road located along the western boundary. The property also includes portions of the Central Main Canal and Evergreen Canal. Access to the proposed parcels would be provided through an extension of Glenwood Drive south of the project site. As part of future development, roadway, utility, drainage, and street lighting improvements will be required to serve the proposed lots. Additionally, a masonry block wall will be required adjacent to the canal to provide noise attenuation from Austin Road and enhance privacy for future residents. A public hearing before the Planning Commission was scheduled for Tuesday, June 9, 2026. A public hearing notice was distributed to property owners 300-feet from the project site and published in the Imperial Valley Press on Friday, May 29, 2026. Staff previously requested that the Planning Commission open the public hearing and continue this item to July 14, 2026. However, this item is still pending corrections to be submitted and will be renoticed to a later date currently unknown. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TABLE THIS ITEM TO A LATER DATE. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 50 of 54  PLANNING COMMISSION Item: 5. City Hall Meeting: 7/14/2026 5:30 PM 1275 W. Main Street Category: Presentation El Centro, CA 92243 NEW BUSINESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT STAFF REPORT - INFORMATION ITEM: Active Transportation Program (ATP) Grant – Community Development staff, with the assistance of Public Works staff, prepared an ATP grant application for Segment C of the Imperial Avenue Complete Streets Plan. The application was submitted on June 22, 2026. Civic Center and Downtown Master Plan – Staff conducted interviews with four consultants during the week of April 18, 2026. Staff are currently evaluating proposals and reviewing cost estimates, with a consultant selection agreement anticipated to be brought before the City Council at the July 21, 2026 meeting. Safety, Open Space/Conservation, and Noise Element Update – A kick-off meeting was held on March 9, 2026. Consultants are currently gathering City information and noise and traffic data in support of the project. Downtown Residential Overlay – Staff are preparing a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment and General Plan Amendment to establish a Downtown Residential Overlay along Broadway Avenue between 4th Street and 8th Street. On Call Planning Consultant RFP – Community Development staff released a request for proposals for on-call planning consultant services. Staff is reviewing responses. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Active Planning and Zoning Projects_7-8-2026 Page 51 of 54 Planning and Zoning Projects Owner Project name Status Summary Project Type Status Description MyGov ID Countryside South Subdivision Map Modifications of COA for Countryside South Angel Hernandez Staff is meeting monthly with the applicant. TSM Paused 22-000007 Amendment TSM Approved by City Council on February 4, 2025. Annexation approved by LAFCo on 2/27/2025. Annexation recorded on 5/30/2025. The ICE Study TSM Willow Bend Subdivision Map was submitted to Caltrans for review on August 11, Andrea Montaño TSM In Progress 22-000008 Amendment 2025. Staff received comments from Caltrans on December 2, 2025. Staff sent revised ICE study to Amendment to Conditions of Caltrans on 5/14/2026. Staff to meet with Caltrans Approval of the Willowbend on July 2, 2026 TSM. LLA/LM 23-01 Lot Line Adjustment Dahm Planner is pending a beneficiary certificate to be Andrea Montaño LLA/LM In Progress 23-000009 1425 Cypress Drive submitted by the owner. Adjust lots between two residential parcels As of 12/16/24 applicant has resumed project. Staff is waiting for applicant to provide an updated preliminary title report. The project manager informed staff on 10/24/25 that the applicants LLA/LM 23-03 Maruti Cons. Lot Line were actively engaging with title holders to Andrea Montaño Adjustment WS Imperial Avenue b/t I-8 and LLA/LM Paused 23-000021 proceed with completions of the lot line. on Danenberg 2/3/26 staff issued a 30 day inactivity notice. As of 6/25/26 the applicant indicated they are attempting to obtain the necessary signatures from their lender. Lot line adjustment of parcels. The applicant received the comments on February 13, 2025 for the Tentative Subdivision Map, The Parkview project proposes a Tentative COZ 23-01, TSM 23-01, SP 23-01 Galey Specific Plan, and Traffic Study. Staff met with the CEQA COZ TSM Map, Specific Plan, Pre-Zoning and Andrea Montaño Kennedy Investment Parkview Single Family In Progress 23-000028 applicants consultant on November 21, 2025 to Specific Plan Annexation to allow for subdividing the Subdivision 1526 Clark discuss the anticipated resubmittal. Staff approximately 26-acre project into 114 lots reviewing the resubmittal from 6/22/26. for development with single family homes. Documents were approved by consultant surveyor on 4/2/24 . Staff is awaiting applicant to prepare LLA 24-03 LC Engineering Consultants, INC documents for recording. Staff provided updated Andrea Montaño LLA/LM Paused 24-000006 Hyundai Dealership-2202 Merrill Center Dr. recorded documents on 2/2/26. As of 6/18/26 the project manager informed staff the notarized signatures are still pending. Merge two properties into one. Vacant property that had an approved The map and addendum were provided to the tentative map that expired Request TSM 24-01 Dubose Design Group, Inc. utilities for comments due back on July 9, 2026. re-approval for 50 single family lots in a R-1 Andrea Montaño TSM Paused 24-000041 Courtyard Villas Subdivision The item is tentatively scheduled to go before the zoned parcel. Layout is the same as the Planning Commission at the August 8, 2026. previous TM approved, including 2.38 ac. Retention Basin and 10.57ac, Park that will Determination Letter sent on 5/12/2026. SPR 25-04 Roberto Tiznado Storage Yard Angel Hernandez Administrative Committee will consider appeal on SPR Done 25-000009 2099 Fairfield Ave. July 15, 2026. Proposed storage facility. Consultants began work on 2/4/26 for an Air Quality Study, Biological Study, and Traffic Studies. Andrea Montaño CUP 25-01 Ventura Transfer Company Traffic Study was completed. Air Quality Study is Freight Yard 605 N 3rd St. being reviewed by the Planner and the APCD. CUP Paused Expansion of freight yard. 25-000023 Letter of Incompleteness sent 10/16. Extension Request Approved on 4/21. Corrections due LLA 25-04 LC Engineering Lot Merger 290 10/10/26. Called and emailed applicant about Title Lots are being requested to be merged to Valeria Landeros Solano Ave. Reports 4/30. LLA/LM Paused become a legal lot. 25-000048 7/8/2026 1 Page 52 of 54 Planning and Zoning Projects Owner Project name Status Summary Project Type Status Description MyGov ID Letter of incompleteness sent 11/26. Corrections received 1/14. Additional corrections letter sent Construction of 18-unit apartment 1/30. Meeting with applicant 2/17. Corrections Valeria Landeros COZ SPR In Progress complex. General Plan Amendment 25-000056 General Plan Amendment COZ 25-01 SPR received 4/16. Additional corrections letter sent required. 25-20 Toma & Saco El Centro Apartment 4/22. Tribal letters sent 6/20. Corrections received Complex 1438 & 1448 Woodward Ave. 7/8. The item was scheduled before the Planning Commission on June 9, 2026. However the item TPM 25-01 Jorge Pacheco Split Parcel 875 S. was pulled for action before the meeting occurred One parcel to be subdivided into three Andrea Montaño TPM In Progress 25-000057 Glenwood Dr. in order for staff and the applicant to address parcels. additional items. The item was continued for July 14, 2026 but is expected to be continued. The applicant submitted the 4th review comments on 5/20/26. The applicant received additional TSM 25-01 Venking,LLC New comments from Engineering and they are 49- Condominium Units- parcel map waiver Andrea Montaño TPM In Progress 25-000059 Condominiums Waterman Avenue scheduling a meeting with the applicant. The item for tentative map. has potential to appear before the planning commission on August 11, 2026. Letter of incompleteness sent 12/18. Corrections received 1/22, 1/29 and 3/13. Corrections received CUP 25-05 Ernesto Vega Event Hall 1698 4/14. Additional corrections requested 4/22 and 300-person event hall, new building with Valeria Landeros CUP In Progress 25-000063 Main Street 4/30. Corrections received 5/22. Corrections 100 total parking spaces. requested 5/27. Corrections received 6/6. Department comments due 7/1. Project plans were distributed for SPR 25-23 Duggins Construction Metal New 55,590 sq. ft. metal structure and site Valeria Landeros interdepartmental review on June 24, 2026. SPR In Progress 25-000066 Structure 105 W. Commercial Ave. improvements for Peri & Sons Packing. Comments are expected by July 9, 2026. The project tentative map was approved on Proposed gated subdivision/PUD consisting GPA 25-01 COZ 25-02 CUP 25-06 3/13/2026. Staff is reviewing the Draft Addendum. GPA CUP COZ of 37 detached townhomes. Zone Change, Andrea Montaño Morningside Ventures, LLC Sunset Pointe Conditions of approval are being drafted. In Progress 25-000067 TSM General Plan Amendment, CUP and Subdivision 2003 W. Main St. Comments from the departments are expected Tentative Subdivision Map. back on 7/9. Zone Change to R-3 to allow the GPA 26-01 SPR 26-02 COZ 26-01 Arch development of multi-family apartments Andrea Montaño Atelier LLC New Multi Family Apartments Project incompletion notice was sent on 3/13/26. SPR GPA COZ In Progress 26-000011 with on-site parking and improvements 1445 W. Pico Ave. with General Plan density standards. Letter of Incompleteness sent 4/22. Corrections SPR 26-04 QE Design Consulting Multi received 5/11. Corrections requested 5/29. Valeria Landeros SPR In Progress 26-000024 Family Apartments Barbara Worth Dr. Meeting scheduled 6/3. Corrections received 6/12. Proposed 28-unit multi-family project. APN Corrections requested 7.8. 052-062-017 052-062-017 & 052-062-050 SPR 26-05 Fernando Villa Duplex 1298 N. Andrea Montaño Conditions of approval were provided 6/23/26. SPR Done 26-000025 12th Street Duplex with 2 ADUs SPR 26-06 Ricardo Villa Duplex 1252 N. Andrea Montaño Conditions of approval were provided 6/23/26. SPR Done 26-000026 12th St. Duplex with 2 ADUs SPR 26-07 Laura Varela Duplex 1206 N. Andrea Montaño Conditions of approval were provided 6/23/26. SPR Done 26-000027 12th St. Duplex with 2 ADUs CUP 26-02 Jose Ocejo Studio Apartments convert existing hotel into studio Andrea Montaño Intradepartmental Review to conclude on 7/22/26. CUP In Progress 26-000032 1425, 1445 & 1455 Ocotillo Drive. apartments. Split the property into two equal sized lots TPM 26-01 Manuel Yanez 641 Lincoln Valeria Landeros Corrections letter sent 6/17. TPM In Progress and build a new residence in the newly 26-000033 Avenue formed lot. AC 26-01 Roberto Tiznado Self Storage Adminstrative Commitee will consider appeal on Angel Hernandez Administrative Review Not start… 26-000034 Containers_2099 Fairfield July 15, 2026. Self Storage Containers 7/8/2026 2 Page 53 of 54 Planning and Zoning Projects Owner Project name Status Summary Project Type Status Description MyGov ID Operate a food truck at this location. THe applicant will be using the existing facility TUP 26-13 Jesse Gonzalez Mariscos Food Andrea Montaño Permit was issued on 6/16/26. TUP Done restrooms that are located 50 feet away 26-000035 Truck 1090 S. Dogwood Ave. from the food truck. The food truck will operate Monday-Saturday 11am-7pm. MVP 26-07 Jesse Gonzalez Mariscos Andrea Montaño Permit was issued on 6/16/26. Mobile Vendor Permit Done 26-000036 Calexico Food Truck Sell seafood dishes. Subdivision of one lot into two parcels and TPM 26-02 Troy Taylor Parcel Map Waiver Andrea Montaño Staff is preparing a project incompletion letter. . TPM In Progress provision of utilities to the new residential 26-000037 698 W. Pico Avenue lot to build a house and ADU. ZV 26-01 Sikh Temple 6 foot fence 453 Public Hearing before the Planning Commission is Zoning Variance for 6 foot fence in the Andrea Montaño Zoning Variance In Progress 26-000038 Commercial Ave. scheduled for 7/14/26. front. SPR 26-09 Manuel Yanez New Home with Site Plan Incomplete. Planner working on Valeria Landeros SPR In Progress 26-000039 an attached ADU at 182 W. State Street incompletion letter. Build a new home with an attached ADU. SPR 26-10 Loris Sanitation LLC Storage Incompletion letter expected to be mailed on Build a storage facility on 1164 N. 4th Andrea Montaño SPR In Progress 26-000040 facility 1164 N. 4th Street 7/8/26. Street, El Centro. 70 x 100 warehouse. The primary purpose of the LLA is to facilitate the construction of a new office building on one of the adjusted parcels LLA 26-01 Imperial Manor Skilled Nursing while ensuring that each resulting parcel Planner provided documents to Engineering for Andrea Montaño Lot Line Adjustment 1455 N. Imperial LLA/LM In Progress contains adequate parking spaces, 26-000041 review on 7/2/26. Avenue. circulation areas, and site access, Reconfigured parcel boundaries will allow for more efficient planning with zoning standards. LLA 26-02 Town Center Village, LLC. Lot Line Lot line adjust and parcel map waiver for Andrea Montaño Payment is Pending. LLA/LM Not start… 26-000042 Adjustment Cruickshank Drive. existing commercial parcels. The project consist of subdividing the TPM 26-03 David Wang Parcel Map Waiver Andrea Montaño Payment is Pending. TPM Not start… existing vacant lot into four parcels and one 26-000043 044-620-057 remainder parcel. TSM 26-01 Lotus Ranch TSM Extension Public hearing before the Planning Commission is Angel Hernandez TSM In Progress 26-000044 2026 scheduled for 7/14/26. Map Extension 2026 A conditional use permit for the continued operation of an existing wireless facility. AC 26-02 Vantage Point Solutions Andrea Montaño Staff is Reviewing Application. Administrative Review In Progress The facility is an existing 80' monopalm 26-000045 Monoplam Tree 2352 S. 4th Street tree. The facility is "unmanned" and operates 24/7. TUP 26-14 Mario Cortes Californitacos 1850 Operate food truck in Tractor Supply Valeria Landeros Staff is reviewing the application TUP In Progress 26-000046 Bradshaw Dr. parking lot. MVP 26-07 Mario Cortes Californitacos Valeria Landeros Staff is reviewing the application Mobile Vendor Permit In Progress 26-000047 1850 Bradsahw Dr. Operate a food truck. 7/8/2026 3 Page 54 of 54