Committee of the Whole
Regular MeetingGeneva, IL · July 22, 2013
Minutes
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES
JULY 22, 2013
PRESENT: Mayor Burns, Ald. Cummings, Jr., Flanagan, Kilburg, Maladra, Marks, Simonian, Singer,
Vogelsberg
McKittrick, Dawkins, Divita, Untch, Dinges, Buffington
ABSENT: Ald. Brown, Bruno
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by chairman at 7:19pm noting that Ald. Brown and Bruno were absent.
2. Consider Consent Agenda
Moved by Ald. Kilburg, second by Ald. Singer V/V: 8-0 Motion carried.
*3. Approve Committee of the Whole Minutes from July 8, 2013
Approved on Consent Agenda
4. Items of Business
a. Recommend Approval of Request by Geneva Lions for Use of Parking Spaces September 9-10,
2013 for Hearing Screen Bus Event.
Moved by Ald. Vogelsberg, second by Ald. Cummings, Jr.
Some of the council members noted the benefits of the screening bus and urged all to visit them.
V/V: 8-0 Motion carried.
b. Recommend Approval of Request by Knights of Columbus for Use of Right-of-Ways for Donation
Solicitation September 20-22, 2013.
Moved by Ald. Flanagan, second by Ald. Simonian V/V: 8-0
c. Recommend Draft Resolution Authorizing Execution of Illinois Dept. of Commerce & Economic
Opportunity Solar Grant in the Amount of $246,184.00.
Moved by Ald. Maladra, second by Ald. Simonian
Buffington described the unit and how much energy is produced at what cost to the city. The city receives
‘green credits’ - .2 megawatts – a small amount to sell back but worthwhile to have energy generating
during peak times. Ohio, Indiana communities are also using these technologies. Buffington stated that
Committee of the Whole Minutes – July 22, 2013 Page 1
without the grant, it would not be fiscally feasible to install. McKittrick noted that this project reflects the
council’s intent via the Strategic Plan for more diverse energy resources and shared costs.
Marks asked how many years it would take to recover our costs and Buffington explained that at 20 years
there would be avoidance for pass fees and transmission fees. McKittrick noted the city’s portion of the
costs would be approximately $370,000.00.
On a question from Ald. Kilburg, McKittrick stated that this specific use was not included in the Prairie
Green referendum question. Dir. Dinges noted that the space would still be ‘open space’. The City also has
two well sites on Prairie Green but intent is still open space. Dinges stated that the project does not deviate
from the referendum and intended use. Buffington also stated that this project would not deter from the
city’s normal electric infrastructure upkeep and operating budget.
Ald. Maladra was in support of the project in large part due to the possibility of diversifying the city’s energy
supply.
Roll Call: Ayes: 5 Nays: 3 Motion carried.
d. Recommend Draft Ordinance Amending Nicolaou PUD Postponing Demolition and Reduced
Parking Spaces at Me & Dad’s Toys – 700 & 720 E. State Street.
Moved by Ald. Maladra, second by Ald. Cummings, Jr.
Planner DeGroot reviewed the original PUD and the reasons to delay the next phase. DeGroot noted that
the toy store property demolition is to be postponed for two years and outdoor seating will be installed.
Discussion on timing and amount of parking (22 spaces total) when the project was completed was heard.
V/V: 8-0 Motion carried.
e. Recommend Draft Ordinance Amending Title 12 (Subdivision Ordinance) Related to Application
Fees and Deposit Requirements for Plan Commission Reviews.
Moved by Ald. Maladra, second by Ald. Simonian V/V: 8-0 Motion carried.
f. Recommend Amendment to Liquor Code (Title 4, Chapter 2), Related to Fencing Requirements.
Moved by Ald. Maladra, second by Ald. Kilburg
Ald. Simonian asked about specific fence heights. McKittrick noted 3 feet minimum was required. Ald.
Kilburg suggested that the code require 4 feet height requirement.
V/V: 7-1 Motion carried.
Committee of the Whole Minutes – July 22, 2013 Page 2
g. Operations Update on Prairie State Energy Campus.
Dir. Dinges provided an update on the new coal production facility in downstate Illinois. The plant is in the
process of testing the systems and it typically takes in excess of one year. Dinges noted that there have
been some unscheduled outages this summer which will result in an approximately 4% increase in power
cost adjustments in August utility bills. On average, a bill typically in 1000-kilowatt hours range is roughly
$135 bill, about $8.00 more than average.
Ald. Maladra stated that while he understood there would be outages during the testing process, he was
concerned that the financial implications were not addressed by Prairie State ahead of this part of the
process. Ald. Singer asked if there were ways to offset these additional costs. Dinges noted that yes, our
own generation facility was making up some of the costs, but the biggest piece of the energy puzzle is
Prairie State so there is only so much we can make up for.
5. New Business
Ald. Vogelsberg noted the upcoming Paul Ruby Fundraiser at the Arcada in St. Charles August 2nd.
6. Upcoming Meetings: Committee of the Whole: August 12, 2013
7. Adjournment
On a motion by Ald. Simonian, second by Ald. Cummings, Jr., the meeting was adjourned at 8:26pm.
Committee of the Whole Minutes – July 22, 2013 Page 3
Agenda
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Monday, July 22, 2013
Immediately Following Special City Council at 7pm
City Hall Council Chambers
109 James Street
Geneva, IL 60134
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Consider Consent Agenda
*3. Approve Committee of the Whole Minutes from July 8, 2013
4. Items of Business
a. Recommend Approval of Request by Geneva Lions for Use of Parking Spaces September
9-10, 2013 for Hearing Screen Bus Event.
b. Recommend Approval of Request by Knights of Columbus for Use of Right-of-Ways for
Donation Solicitation September 20-22, 2013.
c. Recommend Draft Resolution Authorizing Execution of Illinois Dept. of Commerce &
Economic Opportunity Solar Grant in the Amount of $246,184.00.
d. Recommend Draft Ordinance Amending Nicolaou PUD Postponing Demolition and
Reduced Parking Spaces at Me & Dad’s Toys – 700 & 720 E. State Street.
e. Recommend Draft Ordinance Amending Title 12 (Subdivision Ordinance) Related to
Application Fees and Deposit Requirements for Plan Commission Reviews.
f. Recommend Amendment to Liquor Code (Title 4, Chapter 2), Related to Fencing
Requirements.
g. Operations Update on Prairie State Energy Campus.
5. New Business
6. Upcoming Meetings: Committee of the Whole: August 12, 2013
7. Adjournment
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES
JULY 8, 2013
Present: Mayor Burns, Ald. Brown, Bruno, Cummings, Flanagan, Kilburg, Maladra, Marks, Simonian,
Singer
Absent: Ald. Vogelsberg
Also Present: McKittrick, Dawkins, Divita, Buffington, VanGyseghem, Dahl
1. Call to Order
Chairman Bruno called the meeting to order at 7:00pm noting that Ald. Vogelsberg was absent.
2. Consider Consent Agenda
Moved by Ald. Brown, second by Ald. Flanagan V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
*3. Approve Minutes from June 24, 2013
Approved on Consent Agenda
4. Items of Business
a. Recommend Approval of Request for City Services and City Right-of-Ways by Geneva Chamber of
Commerce for Festival of the Vine September 6-8, 2013.
Moved by Ald. Cummings, Jr., second by Ald. Flanagan
Chamber President Jean Gaines reviewed their application noting that nothing was changed from the previous
year and that they were still seeking volunteers to help with the event, in particular the wristband application
process at the wine tent.
V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
b. Recommend Approval of Class E-3 Special Event Liquor License and Waiving of Associated Fee for
Geneva Chamber of Commerce Festival of the Vine September 6-8, 2013.
Moved by Ald. Kilburg, second by Ald. Marks V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
c. Recommend Draft Ordinance Amending Title 4, Chapter 2 (Liquor Control) Establishing Class C-6
Liquor License for Onsite Brewery and Tasting Room.
Moved by Ald. Cummings, Jr., second by Ald. Brown
Eric Hobbs, representing Penrose Brewery, was present to answer questions. Discussion on the fee structure
was heard. Aldermen wished the applicant success on their new venture. V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
Committee of the Whole Minutes – July 8, 2013 Page 1
d. Recommend Draft Resolution Authorizing Execution of First Amendment to AEP Master Power
Purchase and Sale Agreement.
Moved by Ald. Flanagan, second by Ald. Marks
Supt. Buffington provided an overview of the agreement and the process on power purchasing.
V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
e. Recommend Draft Resolution Authorizing Easement Agreement for Underground Cable Replacement
at 703 E. State Street.
Moved by Ald. Marks, second by Ald. Cummings, Jr. V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
f. Recommend Draft Resolution Authorizing Extending Contract with Insituform Technologies USA, LLC
in the Amount of $76,622.20 for Additional Sewer Lining for 2013 CIPP Project.
Moved by Ald. Maladra, second by Ald. Simonian
Supt. VanGyseghem provided information on the need for additional lining in this year’s contract.
V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
g. Recommend Draft Resolution Approving FY2012-13 Budget Amendments.
Moved by Ald. Marks, second by Ald. Cummings, Jr. V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
h. Recommend Draft Resolution Approving FY2013-14 Budget Amendments.
Moved by Ald. Marks, second by Ald. Maladra V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
i. Recommend Draft Ordinance Establishing Prevailing Wages.
Moved by Ald. Kilburg, second by Ald. Maladra V/V: 9-0 Motion carried.
5. New Business
Ald. Singer congratulated Ald. Flanagan on her upcoming wedding anniversary.
6. Adjournment
On a motion by Ald. Marks, second by Ald. Flanagan, the meeting was adjourned by unanimous voice vote at
7:28pm.
Committee of the Whole Minutes – July 8, 2013 Page 2
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item: Geneva Lions Hearing Screening Van at Third & James, Sept. 10, 2013
Presenter & Title: Ellen Divita, Director of Economic Development
Date: July 15, 2013
Please Check Appropriate Box:
X Committee of the Whole Meeting Special Committee of the Whole Meeting
X City Council Meeting Special City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Other -
YES
Estimated Cost: Budgeted?
X NO
If NO, please explain how the item will be funded:
Executive Summary:
The Geneva Lions Club has requested permission to park the “Hearing Screening bus on James,
at the southwest corner of 3rd and James (easily described as "where Santa parks his house)." The
bus will be parked on James Street and is 35 feet long, 8 feet wide, and 12 feet high. The Lions
Club requests 1) the parking spaces be blocked off by Geneva Police on late Monday night
September 9, 2013 / early Tuesday September 10, 2013 to ensure no early birds park in the spaces
on Tuesday morning, and 2) that the Public Works Department provide electrical power in the
form of an electrical hookup of 220 volts with 50 amps service, non-gfi. The bus has a 100 foot
extension cord.
An aerial of the block is attached with the bus location marked. It is requested that 7 parking
spaces be barricaded off the evening prior, once the bus is parked, that amount will be reduced to
5 or 6 spaces. The Police Department does not have concerns over the blocked parking spaces.
The bus will arrive early Tuesday evening.
The City will be named on an insurance waiver, which is forthcoming. The electric utility is
prepared to connect the electric. The Lion’s Club has been advised that the City may need to
charge to cover the cost of City resources in next and future years.
Attachments: (please list)
Event Application
Location map
Recommendation / Suggested Action: (briefly explain)
Approve the Geneva Lions Club request to block parking spaces on City right-of-way at James
and Third Street, as so noted on the attached map from Monday evening September 9, 2013
through Tuesday evening September 10, 2013. Hearing Screening in the Lion’s Hearing Bus will
occur during the day on Tuesday September 10, 2013.
AGENDA I TEM E XECUTIVE SUMMARY
Agenda Item: Knights of Columbus Intellectual Disabilities Fund Drive Sept. 20-22, 2013
Presenter & Title: Ellen Divita, Director of Economic Development
Date: July 17, 2013
Please Check Appropriate Box:
X Committee of the Whole Meeting Special Committee of the Whole Meeting
X City Council Meeting Special City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Other -
YES
Estimated Cost: Budgeted?
X NO
If NO, please explain how the item will be funded:
Executive Summary:
The Knights of Columbus Columbian Council #2191 (Batavia/Geneva, IL) has requested permission to
hold their annual Knights of Columbus Fundraiser to benefit people with intellectual disabilities through
local charities such as Marklund, Associated Individual Developmental House, Valley Sheltered
Workshop, Special Camps for Special Citizens, and the local Northwest Valley Special Olympics. The
Knights will give out Tootsie Rolls to all donors and have stated that 90% of the funds raised will stay in
the local community. The Knights of Columbus is a non-profit organization of the Catholic Church; they
have provided documentation that they are currently registered with the Attorney General’s Charitable
Trust and Solicitations. In summary, the Knights of Columbus have indicated they wish to have
members at the following right-of-way locations on September 20-22, 2013:
• Starbucks on State Street at 3rd Street, 6AM – 6PM
• Post office 7AM – 6PM
Organizer Kevin Callahan has talked with owners of these businesses and received permission to solicit
on private property:
• Steve Davison, owner of the West State Street Geneva 7-11, 6AM – 6PM
• Ace Hardware Store at 617 W. State, 7AM – 6PM
• METRA and the Shodeen Companies for the Geneva Train Station (Friday 5:30-8AM)
No City services are requested. An Insurance Certificate is forthcoming. The attached special event
application has been routed to all Departments and none have expressed concern.
Attachments: (please list)
• Event Application
Recommendation / Suggested Action: (briefly explain)
Approve the Knights of Columbus Columbian Council #2191 request to collect charitable donations at
the places noted above on September 20-22, 2013 from the hours of 5:30 – 8 AM at the METRA station
on Friday, and varying hours of 6 AM to 7 PM Friday through Sunday as noted on the event application.
City of Geneva, Illinois
Special Event/Festival Application
_________________________________________________________________________
Kevin Callahan 630-235-6456
A. Name of Applicant______________________________________________Phone_______________________
Callahan@Reliablelabel.com
Email:________________________________________________________________________________________
P.O. Box 25 Batavia IL 60510
Address______________________________________City________________State_____Zip_________________
X
Are you conducting the activity on behalf of an organization? Yes________ No________
Knights of Columbus for Batavia / Geneva
Name of Organization____________________________________________________________________________
P.O. Box 25 Batavia IL 60510
Address________________________________________City_______________State____Zip__________________
630-235-6456
Phone_________________________________________ 630-620-8125
Fax____________________________________________
Social Security/Federal ID No.:____________________________________________________________________
B. Description of the proposed event:
The Knights of Columbus conduct their annual fund raiser to collect donations for the mentally handicapped within our community. In return for a donation we distribute Tootsie Roll Candies.
This is annual event that is coordinated and conducted state wide on the same weekend through out the entire state of Illinois.
Geneva Train Station, Ace Hardware, Starbucks Coffee, Post Office, Seven Eleven
C. Site of Proposed Event:___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
September 20th - 22nd
D. Date(s) of proposed event__________________________________________________________________________
6 am - 7 pm.
E. Time(s) of proposed event_________________________________________________________________________
50
F. Estimated maximum number of persons expected at the event each day:__________________________________
No Alcohol
G. Is alcohol going to be served or provided? YES| NO | MAYBE License applied for?______________________
H. Submit in writing a detailed explanation, including drawings, site plan, and diagrams where applicable, of your
plans to provide for the following –
1. Police/Security and Fire Protection
2. Food, water and electrical supply facilities
3. Health and sanitation facilities (supply copy of health department paperwork)
4. Medical facilities and services, including emergency vehicles and equipment (if required)
5. Vehicle access and parking facilities
6. Camping and trailer facilities, if overnight stays are anticipated
7. Illumination facilities
8. Communications facilities
9. Facilities for clean up and waste disposal
10. Noise control and abatement
11. Insurance and bonding arrangements (please attach Certificate of Insurance naming City of Geneva as
additional insured.
12. Clean up procedure
July 7, 2013
Date:________________________Signature of applicant__________________________________________
Kevin M. Callahan
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Consider Draft Resolution Authorizing City Administrator to
Agenda Item: Accept and Execute a Solar Grant from Illinois Department of
Commerce and Economic Opportunity in the amount of $246,184.
Dan Dinges, Director of Public Works
Presenter & Title:
Mike Buffington, Electric Superintendent
Date: July 20, 2013
Please Check Appropriate Box:
X Committee of the Whole Meeting Special Committee of the Whole Meeting
X City Council Meeting Special City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Other -
Estimated Cost: $369,276.00 YES
Budgeted?
X NO
If NO, please explain how the item will be funded: This solar project is slated for the
2014-15 Budget year. Estimated total project costs are $615,460, State Grant is for
$246,184 and Geneva’s match is $369,276.
Executive Summary:
The Geneva Staff is always looking for ways to leverage the capital budget vs. benefits to
the community. Grants are an opportunity to do this. As in any other project, whether it
is leveraged by a grant or other outside funding, the project must meet the needs and
wants of the Geneva. Staff applied for and received a grant from the Illinois Department
of Commerce and Economic Opportunity.
The memo contains cost vs. benefit analysis.
Attachments: (please list)
Resolution
Memo
Notice of Grant Award
Recommendation / Suggested Action: (briefly explain)
That the City Council authorize the City Administrator to Accept and Execute a grant
from Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity in the amount of
$246,184 for installation of 120 kw solar array.
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-__
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
SOLAR GRANT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GENEVA,
KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Administrator is to be authorized to execute, on behalf of
the City of Geneva, a grant from Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity in
the amount of $246,184 for installation of 120 kW solar array. This is in relationship to the
purchase and sale of energy.
SECTION 2: This Resolution shall become effective from and after its passage as in
accordance with law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Geneva, Kane County, Illinois, this 5th day of
August, 2013.
AYES: __ NAYS: __ ABSENT: __ ABSTAINING: __ HOLDING OFFICE: __
Approved by me this 5th day of August, 2013.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
July 15, 2013
Memo To: Mayor Burns and Committee of the Whole
From: Dan Dinges, Director of Public Works
Michael J. Buffington, Superintendent of Electrical Services
Re: Draft Resolution Authorizing City Administrator to Accept and Execute a Solar
Grant from Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity in the
amount of $246,184.
The Geneva Staff is always looking for ways to leverage the capital budget vs. benefits to the
community. Grants are an opportunity to do this. As in any other project, whether it is leveraged
by a grant or other outside funding, the project must meet the needs and wants of the Geneva.
Staff applied for and received a grant from the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic
Opportunity. The following is cost/project comparison, to the various power contracts and the
Geneva Generation Facility.
Current Power Costs vs. Solar with Grant
$/KWh Payback Years
WMRE 2014 contract $0.031 84
NextEra 2014 contract $0.040 30
GGF July 15, 2013 - market bid $0.056 26
Total Power Costs 2014 $0.070 23
Solar est. 20 yr avg $0.085
Note;
1. The NextEra 2014 contract is for energy only.
2. Total Power Costs include the current all-in estimated power costs, including debt service.
The solar project will produce 142,000 kWh of electricity per year, .04% of Geneva energy
requirements and will avoid an estimated 103 tons of C02, the equivalent of nearly 50 acres of
trees. The solar system will be tied to a robust and customizable web based monitoring system,
allowing the residents of Geneva to view the performance and effectiveness of the solar
generation.
Staff Recommendations;
That the City Council authorize the City Administrator to Accept and Execute a grant from
Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity in the amount of $246,184 for
installation of 120 kw solar array.
Cc: Mary McKittrick, City Administrator
Stephanie Dawkins, Asst. City Administrator
Jennifer Hilkemann, Manager of Distribution Construction and Maintenance
Hal Wright, Manager of Electric Operations
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Review and Consideration of Amendments to the Nicolaou Planned Unit
Development approved by Ordinances 2009-31 and 2010-13 to: 1) Enclose the
Agenda Item: outdoor seating deck of the Riganato restaurant; 2) Postpone the demolition
of the Me & Dad’s Toys building until March of 2017; and 3) Reduce the
required number of parking spaces from 26 to 22 at the end of Phase 2.
Dick Untch, Community Development Director
Presenter & Title:
David DeGroot, City Planner
Date: July 22, 2013
Please Check Appropriate Box:
X Committee of the Whole Meeting Special Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Council Meeting Special City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Other -
YES
Estimated Cost: $0 Budgeted?
NO
Executive Summary:
In November of 2009 the City Council approved a special use for a preliminary/final planned unit
development (PUD) for the property located at 700 & 720 E. State Street, now known as the Nicolaou
PUD. The PUD facilitated the redevelopment of the former Rib House Restaurant into what is now the
Riganato Restaurant. The PUD includes the restaurant building as well as the one-story Me and Dad’s
Toys retail building. The approved PUD included substantial renovation of the restaurant building,
demolition of the one-story retail building, reduction of the number access drives to the property, and
total reconstruction of the parking lot that combines the area that comprised the parking for the
former Rib House and Me & Dad’s Toys into one unified parking lot design. The property has been
improved in accordance with the approved plans, with the exception of the demolition of the Me &
Dad’s Toys building and completion of the parking lot (which are required to be completed by March
of 2015). Nick Nicolaou, the property owner, would like to enclose the outdoor seating deck located
on the south side of the building so that it can be used year-round and postpone demolition of the Me
& Dad’s Toys building until March of 2017. The applicant’s request requires amendments to the
approved development plans to enclose the outdoor seating deck, to postpone the demolition of the
Me & Dad’s Toys building, and to reduce the total number of parking spaces required for the
restaurant use. Please see the attached staff report for more details.
Attachments: (please list)
Staff Report Draft Ordinance Project Narrative Development Plans
Recommendation / Suggested Action: (briefly explain)
At its meeting on July 11, 2013 the Plan Commission recommended approval of the applicant’s
request to amend the approved Nicolaou PUD to: 1) enclose the first floor outdoor seating deck; 2)
postpone the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building until March of 2017; and 3) reduce the
number of parking spaces required from 26 to 22 spaces at the end of Phase 2. The recommendation
for approval was unanimous on items 1 and 3. Commissioners Mead and Erickson voted against the
request to postpone the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building. As shown at Exhibit “B” of the
attached draft ordinance, the Plan Commission made findings of fact on each of the nine (9) special
use standards set forth in Section 11-14-4(F) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Community Development Department Report
GENEVA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
PUD AMENDMENTS
JULY 22, 2013
NICOLAOU PUD (RIGANATO)
700 E. STATE STREET
Applicant & Property Owner
Nick Nicolaou
Location
700 E. State Street
Requests
Amendments to the Nicolaou
PUD to: 1) enclose the 1st
floor outdoor seating deck; 2)
postpone demolition of the
Me & Dad’s Toys building until
March of 2017; and 3) reduce
the required number of
parking spaces to 22 spaces at
the end of Phase 2.
Recommendation
At its meeting on July 11,
2013 the Plan Commission Figure 1. Location Map. Prepared by Geneva Planning Division, June 2013.
recommended approval of the
applicant’s requests
BACKGROUND
In November of 2009 the City Council approved a special use for a
Staff Liaison
preliminary/final planned unit development (PUD) for the property
David DeGroot located at 700 & 720 E. State Street, now known as the Nicolaou
City Planner PUD. The PUD was established to facilitate the redevelopment of
Phone: (630) 232-0814 the property for a restaurant use. It was formerly the site of the Rib
Email: ddegroot@geneva.il.us House Restaurant and is now the Riganato Restaurant. The
restaurant is located in the converted two-story house on the west
half of the property. The property is also improved with a second,
one-story retail building (Me & Dad’s Toys). The approved PUD
included substantial renovation of the restaurant building,
demolition of the one-story retail building, reduction of the number
access drives to the property, and total reconstruction of the parking
Page 2 of 5 Nicolaou PUD Amendments
lot that combines the area that comprised the
parking for the former Rib House and Me & Dad’s
Toys into one unified parking lot design.
The approved PUD is conditioned to a specific set of
development plans. The approved PUD plans were
amended in 2010 to include a lighting photometric
plan, a lighting fixture spec sheet, and a revised site
plan including additional fencing. The property has Figure 2. Riganato Restaurant, 700 E. State St.. June 2013.
been improved in accordance with the approved
plans, with the exception of the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building and completion of the
parking lot. The approved development plans included a phasing schedule for the demolition of the Me
& Dad’s Toys building. The building is to be demolished within 3 years of the date of occupancy for the
Riganato restaurant. The demolition of the building would make way for 4 additional parking spaces to
be provided on site for the restaurant. The Riganato received occupancy in March of 2012, therefore
the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building and the completion of the parking lot is required by
March of 2015.
Nick Nicolaou, the property and restaurant owner, would like to enclose the outdoor seating deck
located on the south side of the building so that it can be used year-round, rather than just during the
warm weather months. Doing so would allow him to generate additional income to help pay down the
loan taken out for the original redevelopment. Mr. Nicolaou would also like to postpone demolition of
the Me & Dad’s Toys building in order to maintain the rental income from that property, which he hopes
to use to pay the costs necessary to enclose the deck area.
Mr. Nicolaou’s proposal requires amendments to the approved development plans to enclose the
outdoor seating deck and to postpone the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building. It also requires
an amendment to the PUD to reduce the total number of parking spaces required for the restaurant use.
The required parking for the original PUD approval was calculated for Phase 1(restaurant & toy store)
and Phase 2 (restaurant only). The required parking for Phase 1 is 28 spaces. The approved PUD
allowed for 18 onsite parking spaces during Phase 1, provided the owner maintain an offsite parking
agreement to accommodate any unmet parking needs on the restaurant site. The required parking for
Phase 2 is 22 spaces. The approved PUD satisfied the required parking by providing 22 onsite parking
spaces at the end of Phase 2. The required parking calculation did not include the outdoor seating deck
because it cannot be used year round. The enclosure of the outdoor seating deck increases the parking
required for the restaurant to 26 spaces, which would leave a shortfall of 4 spaces at the end of Phase 2
when 22 spaces are provided on site. Please see Table 1 on the following page for a comparison of the
parking requirements for the approved PUD and for the proposed amendments to the PUD.
REQUESTS
Request to amend the Nicolaou Planned Unit Development (approved by Ordinances 2009-31 & 2010-
13) to:
1. Enclose the 1st floor outdoor seating deck.
Page 3 of 5 Nicolaou PUD Amendments
2. Postpone the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building until March of 2017.
3. Reduce the required number of parking spaces from 26 to 22 spaces at the end of Phase 2.
Table 1. Parking requirement comparison of the approved Nicolaou PUD and the proposed PUD amendments.
APPROVED PUD PROPOSED PUD AMENDMENTS
Phase 1
Number of parking spaces required 28 32
Number of parking spaces provide on site 18 18
Number of parking spaces provided off site 12 16
(through temporary parking lot rental
agreements)
Phase 2
Number of parking spaces required 22 26
Number of parking spaces provided on site 22 22
Number of parking spaces provided off site 0 0
(through temporary parking lot rental
agreements)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
As shown in Figure 1, the subject property is located at the southeast corner of E. State Street and
Sandholm Street. It has a lot area of approximately 20,919 square feet and is improved with 2 buildings,
a one-story retail building (Me & Dad’s Toys) with an area of 1,444 square feet located at the east edge
of the property, and a two-story restaurant building (Riganato) with an area of 2.929 square feet on the
western half of the property. There are currently 18 parking spaces on the property that are shared
between the 2 buildings. The site has 2 full access points, one on Sandholm Street and one on E. State
Street. The property is located in the B4 Business District and is designated “Neighborhood/Corridor
Commercial” in the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. Please see Table 2 below and Figures 3 and 4
for surrounding property information including existing zoning, existing land uses, and future land use
designations.
Table 2. Surrounding Property Information. Prepared by Geneva Planning Division, July 2013.
LOCATION ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Subject Property B4 Business District Commercial Retail Neighborhood/Corridor
Commercial
North B4 Business District Commercial Retail Neighborhood/Corridor
Commercial
South B4 Business District Single-Family Residence Single-Family Residential
East B4 Business District Commercial Retail Neighborhood/Corridor
Commercial
West B4 Business District Single-Family Residence Neighborhood/Corridor
Commercial
Page 4 of 5 Nicolaou PUD Amendments
Figure 3. Zoning Map of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area. Prepared by Geneva Planning Division, July 2013.
Niiicccooolllaaaooouuu
N
N
PPPU UUD DD
Figure 4. Future Land Use Designation of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area, based on the 2003 Comprehensive
Plan.
Page 5 of 5 Nicolaou PUD Amendments
REVIEW COMMENTS
Special Use – Findings of Fact
Staff evaluated the proposed amendments to the Nicolaou PUD in relation to the nine (9) special use
standards the Plan Commission uses in formulating it findings of fact, as set forth in Section 11-14-4(F)
of the Zoning Ordinance. The analysis incorporates the findings of fact made by the Plan Commission
and adopted by the City Council as part of the original PUD approval. After reviewing the information
and documents provided by the applicant and hearing testimony at the public hearing the Plan
Commission adopted staff’s analysis of the nine (9) special use standards as their findings of fact, as
shown in Exhibit “B” of the attached draft ordinance.
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At its meeting on July 11, 2013 the Plan Commission recommended approval of the applicant’s request
to amend the Nicolaou Planned Unit Development approved by Ordinances 2009-31 & 2010-13 to: 1)
enclose the first floor outdoor seating deck; 2) postpone the demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building
until March of 2017; and 3) reduce the number of parking spaces required from 26 to 22 spaces at the
end of Phase 2. The recommendation for approval was unanimous on items 1 and 3. Commissioners
Mead and Erickson voted against the requested amendment to postpone the demolition of the Me &
Dad’s Toys building. As shown at Exhibit “B” of the attached draft ordinance, the Plan Commission
made findings of fact on each of the nine (9) special use standards set forth in Section 11-14-4(F) of the
Zoning Ordinance.
REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS: NEXT STEPS*
1. August 5, 2013 – City Council consideration of request
*This timeline is provided for informational purposes only, exact dates are subject to change.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance
Project Description & Response to Special Use Standards
Off-site Parking Agreement & Support from Adjoining Property Owners
Demolition Plan, Architectural Elevations, Foundation & First Floor Plans, Electrical Plan
A copy of the minutes and transcripts from the Plan Commission meeting will be forwarded for your review under
separate cover.
ORDINANCE 2013-XX
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE NICOLAOU PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVED BY
ORDINANCES 2009-31 AND 2010-13 TO: 1) ENCLOSE THE OUTDOOR SEATING DECK; 2)
POSTPONE DEMOLITION OF THE ME & DAD’S TOYS BUILDING UNTIL MARCH OF 2017; AND
3) REDUCED THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED ONSITE PARKING SPACES AT THE END OF PHASE 2
FROM 26 TO 22
WHEREAS, an application was duly filed on the 16th day of May 2013, by Nick Nicolaou, as
owner of the real property described at Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter
referred to as “SUBJECT REALTY”) with the Plan Commission of the City of Geneva requesting
amendments to the Nicolaou Planned Unit Development to 1) enclose the outdoor seating deck; 2)
postpone demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building until March of 2017; and 3) reduced the number
of required onsite parking spaces at the end of Phase 2 from 26 to 22; and
WHEREAS, according to Ordinances 2009-31 and 2010-13 a Special Use for a preliminary/final
Planned Unit Development has been granted by the City; and
WHEREAS, in the manner and form provided with respect to Planned Unit Development
changes under Title 11 of the Geneva City Code (Zoning Ordinance) as amended, a public hearing was
held by the Plan Commission on Thursday, July 11, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers
located at 109 James Street, Geneva, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the application was presented to the Plan Commission at the public hearing and the
Plan Commission, at the public hearing, received testimony; and
WHEREAS, after due deliberation, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the
application and adopted the findings of fact which are attached hereto and made a part hereof as
Exhibit “B”; and
WHEREAS, the Committee of the Whole of the City Council has received the entire record of
the Plan Commission’s public hearing, the Plan Commission’s findings of fact, and the Plan Commission’s
recommendation for approval and considered the same on July 22, 2013, and made a recommendation
for approval of the application; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Geneva considered the entire record, the Plan
Commission’s findings of fact, and the recommendations of the Plan Commission and the Committee of
the Whole on August 5, 2013; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GENEVA, KANE
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION 1: AMENDMENTS TO THE NICOLAOU PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
A. Section 3(Preliminary and Final Development Plan Approval) of the Nicolaou Planned Unit
Development (Ordinances 2009-31 and 2010-13) is hereby amended by adding subsection G as
follows: “G.” Restaurant Deck Modification (Roof & Siding Addition), prepared by RDE &
Associates.
Ordinance 2013-XX 1
B. Group Exhibit “C” (Detailed Site Plan, Preliminary/Final Landscape Plans, Restaurant Renovation
& First Floor Plans, Civil Engineer Plan) of the Nicolaou Planned Unit Development (Ordinances
2009-31 and 2010-13) is hereby amended by adding the Restaurant Deck Modification (Roof &
Side Addition) plan set prepared by RDE & Associates, attached hereto at Exhibit “C”.
C. The phasing schedule shown on the Detailed Site Plan adopted by Ordinance 2009-31 shall be
amended to postpone demolition of the Me & Dad’s Toys building until March of 2017.
D. Section 4 (Deviations from the Zoning Ordinance Granted) of the of the Nicolaou Planned Unit
Development (Ordinances 2009-31 and 2010-13)is hereby amended by adding subsection H as
follows: “H.” A deviation from Section 11-11A-6 to allow a total of 22 parking spaces to be
provided onsite at the end of Phase 2 instead of the required 26 parking spaces.
SECTION 2: CONVEYANCES
Nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be construed to restrict or limit the right of the OWNER to sell
or convey all or any portion of the SUBJECT REALTY, whether improved or unimproved, and to transfer
or assign any or all of their respective rights and duties under this Ordinance, provided such sale,
conveyance, transfer and assignment is subject to the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3: PREAMBLES AND EXHIBITS
The preambles set forth at the beginning of this Ordinance, and the exhibits attached hereto, are
incorporated herein by reference and shall constitute substantive provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Geneva, Kane County, Illinois, this _____ day of _________,
2013.
AYES: _____ NAYS: _____ ABSENT: _____ ABSTAINING: _____ HOLDING OFFICE: _____
APPROVED by me as Mayor of the City of Geneva, Kane County, Illinois, this _____ day of __________,
2013.
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
City Clerk
Ordinance 2013-XX 2
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL ONE (720 E. STATE STREET): THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 39
NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE WEST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 1.92 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 5 1/2 DEGREES EAST, 7.75
CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 5 1/2 DEGREES EAST 331.30 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
5 1/2 DEGREES EAST 170.30 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF STATE STREET ROAD; THENCE NORTH 72
DEGREES, 0 MINUTES, 0 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 95.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 1/2
DEGREES WEST 208.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 DEGREES, 30 MINUTES, 0 SECONDS WEST 87.56 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE CITY OF GENEVA, KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PARCEL TWO (700 E. STATE STREET): THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 39
NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2; THENCE WEST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 1.92 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 5 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST
1013.1 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF STATE STREET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES EAST ALONG SAID
CENTER LINE 95.48 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES EAST ALONG SAID
CENTER LINE 54.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 DEGREES 30 MINUTES WEST 230.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH
84 DEGREES 30 MINUTES WEST 50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 5 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST 208.37 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE CITY OF GENEVA, KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
Ordinance 2013-XX 3
EXHIBIT B
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed use at the specified location is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The City of Geneva Comprehensive Land-Use Plan designates the subject property and the
properties to the north, east, and west as “Neighborhood/Corridor Commercial”, which are areas
along E. State Street planned for redevelopment aimed towards strengthening the commercial
nature of the Corridor and serving the surrounding neighborhood and community. Planned uses for
the area include retail, commercial service, and office uses. The proposed use and development of
the subject property is consistent with the Comprehensive Land-Use Plan for the subject property
and surrounding area.
2. The proposed building or use will not diminish the value of adjacent and nearby properties.
The proposed planned unit development amendments would make significant improvements to the
existing restaurant building. Under the current PUD a substandard parking area has been replaced
with a paved and striped parking lot, additional landscaping has been provided, and public sidewalks
along E. State Street and Sandholm Street have been installed. The proposed building
improvements would be a further upgrade to the subject property. The building improvements and
proposed parking management would not diminish the value of adjacent and nearby properties.
3. The proposed use at the specified location will not substantially or unduly increase traffic, traffic
congestion and on-street parking demand in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use and in the
area affected by traffic generated by the proposed use.
The existing planned unit development has reestablished a restaurant use in the existing two-story
building. The PUD plans also show removal of the existing one-story retail building, thereby
reducing the parking demand that previously existed for the property. The applicant has replaced a
substandard parking area with a paved and striped parking lot. The PUD plans provide for a total of
18 spaces initially (22 spaces ultimately). The Geneva Zoning Ordinance requires 15 parking spaces
per 1,000 square feet of floor area for restaurant uses. When applied to the development, a total of
28 parking spaces initially (22 ultimately) are required. In order to address the potential shortfall of
10 parking spaces initially, the applicant entered into a parking lot rental agreement with the owner
of the property located at 830 E. State Street which provides an additional 12 parking spaces. The
Plan Commission recommended a condition of approval requiring the applicant to maintain an
overflow parking area (by written agreement) in close proximity to the restaurant until Phase 2 of
the development is complete. Under the approved PUD plans completion of Phase 2 of the site
development would bring the site into conformance with the City’s parking space requirements.
The applicant has reduced the number of access points to the property from 4 to 2. The reduced
parking demand, the additional on-site parking provided, the overflow parking provided, and the
reduced number of access points have improved traffic flow and parking conditions on the site.
The calculation for the amount of parking required for the original PUD approval did not include the
outdoor seating deck because it cannot be used year round. The enclosure of the outdoor seating
deck would increase the required parking for Phase 1 (restaurant & toy store) to 32 spaces, a
Ordinance 2013-XX 4
shortfall of 14 spaces during the course of Phase 1. The approved PUD includes a condition
requiring the applicant to maintain a Parking Lot Rental Agreement for offsite parking until Phase 2
of the development is complete. The condition also states that if such agreement is not maintained
or if parking demand from the subject property results in parking along local residential streets in
the vicinity of the subject property, the special use for a planned unit development shall be subject
to revocation. The applicant has provided a copy of an agreement with the owner of the property
located at 830 E. State Street, which authorizes the use of 8 spaces for overflow parking from the
restaurant. The applicant has also provided a copy of an agreement with the property located at
637 E. State Street for an additional 8 spaces. The 16 off-site parking spaces should provide
adequate overflow parking until Phase 2 of the development is complete.
Although the enclosure of the outdoor seating deck would not increase the seating capacity of the
restaurant, it would increase the required parking for the restaurant based on the City’s Zoning
Ordinance regulations. Outdoor seating areas are not included when calculating parking demand
because they are not used year round. The enclosure of the outdoor seating deck would increase
the required parking for Phase 2 (restaurant only) to 26 spaces, which would leave a permanent
shortfall of 4 spaces at the end of Phase 2 when 22 spaces are provided on site. Riganato has been
open for 15 months and the City has not noticed nor received complaints regarding a lack of
available parking or parking overflowing onto nearby residential streets. The applicant has
submitted a petition with signatures of surrounding property owners stating that they have not
witnessed a parking problem. As stated in the applicant’s project narrative, the restaurant would
have a total of 15 tables. There is an average of 3.5 customers per table, and most customers are
coming together in one car as a family. At that rate, if all of the tables were full a total of 15 parking
spaces would be needed for customers. The restaurant employs a maximum of 7 people at one
time. At full capacity, the 22 onsite parking spaces that would be available at the end of Phase 2
should adequately serve the restaurant’s needs.
Therefore, the proposed amendments to the Nicolaou PUD should not substantially or unduly
increase traffic, traffic congestion and on-street parking demand in the immediate vicinity.
4. The proposed use has been designed to provide for adequate ingress and egress to minimize
potential vehicle conflicts and congestion in public streets.
The property had four substandard access points, two off E. State Street and two off Sandholm
Street. The applicant has removed one access point on each street which greatly reduced the
potential for vehicle conflicts and congestion on public streets. In addition, the two remaining
access points have been improved to full access points, which have provided adequate ingress and
egress to the site.
5. The proposed building or use will not adversely affect or change the character of the area in which it
is located.
The existing restaurant use is located in a converted residential structure, which was previously
operated as a restaurant use. The improvements the applicant has made to the exterior of the
building retain its residential appearance. The completed parking lot, landscaping, and lighting
improvements are consistent with the City’s East State Street Design Guidelines and recent
Ordinance 2013-XX 5
developments along the East State Street Corridor. The proposed building addition is compatible
with the character of the existing restaurant building and surrounding buildings. Therefore, the
proposed PUD amendments would not adversely affect or change the character of the area.
6. The proposed use at the specified location will not adversely affect the use and development of
adjacent and nearby properties in accordance with the regulations of the district in which they are
located. The location, size and height of proposed buildings and other structures, and the operation
of the use will not adversely affect the use and development or hinder the appropriate development
of adjacent and nearby properties.
The improvements the applicant has made have reduced the number of access points along both E.
State Street and Sandholm Street, provided public sidewalks along both street frontages, and
provided landscape buffers between adjacent commercial and residential uses. The proposed PUD
amendments will not adversely affect the use or development of adjacent properties. The adjacent
properties are currently developed without additional improvements contemplated at this time.
The building modifications will not appreciably change the restaurant building’s overall height or
size.
7. Adequate utility, drainage, parking and other necessary facilities to service the proposed use will be
provided and that such utility, drainage, parking and other necessary facilities will not adversely
affect the use, development and value of adjacent and nearby properties.
The site improvements plans made by the applicant have been reviewed and approved by the City’s
Public Works Department and by the City’s stormwater review consultants, WBK Associates. The
improvements replaced a substandard parking area with a paved and striped parking lot which
maximizes the number of parking stalls possible at the site. The plans also reduced the total
impervious area on the site by reducing the number of access points and providing landscape
setbacks. Enclosing the outdoor seating deck will require the new and existing portions of the
building to be have a fire sprinkler system installed, which will require a new water service to the
building. The applicant understands this requirement and will submit civil engineering plans for the
new water service if the PUD amendments are approved. Please see Standard 3 regarding the
adequacy of parking.
8. The proposed building, other structures and use comply with any and all regulations, conditions or
requirements of the city applicable to such building, structure or use.
The development does not comply with all of the minimum requirements applicable to such uses
under the City’s regulations. Specifically, the applicant was granted a deviation to temporarily allow
two buildings on one zoning lot and deviations in relation to parking lot setbacks, interior parking lot
landscaping, perimeter yard landscaping, transition yard landscaping requirements. As set forth in
Section 11-9-9 of the Geneva Zoning Ordinance, relief from such requirements may be granted for a
planned unit development if it is found that the requested relief serves the purpose of promoting an
integrated site plan no less beneficial to the neighboring property. The granted relief facilitated
improvements to the site, particularly to the parking area, that could not have been accomplished
under the bulk regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. The deviations were the minimum that were
required. The redevelopment of the property was a substantial improvement to the subject
property and is more beneficial to the neighboring properties than the previous condition.
Ordinance 2013-XX 6
Conversion of the existing, legal non-conforming porch to a full enclosed addition will require the
building to be brought up to current Fire Code including the installation of a fire sprinkler system
throughout the new and existing portions of the building. This will require a new water service to
the building. The applicant understands these requirements and will construct the addition
accordingly if the PUD amendments are approved. The enclosure does increase the required
parking for the property by 4 spaces, which are not being provided for. Please see Standard 3
regarding parking adequacy.
9. That the exterior architectural appeal and function of any proposed structure will not be so at
variance with either the exterior architectural appeal and functional plan of the structures already
constructed or in the course of construction in the immediate neighborhood or the character of the
applicable district to cause a substantial depreciation in property values in the neighborhood.
The restaurant is located in a converted residential structure, which is consistent with several
buildings along the E. State Street Corridor and is compatible with adjacent residential uses. The
proposed enclosure of the outdoor seating deck is consistent with the existing building and will not
substantially alter the structure’s appearance or architectural appeal. Therefore, the proposed PUD
amendments should not cause depreciation in property values in the neighborhood.
Ordinance 2013-XX 7
EXHIBIT C
RESTAURANT DECK MODIFICATION PLAN SET
Ordinance 2013-XX 8
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Review and consideration of increasing application fees and deposit requirements
for Plan Commission reviews pertaining to Title 12 (Subdivision Ordinance):
Including amendments Section 12-5-3 (Fees for Subdivisions and Annexations) of
Agenda Item:
Title 12 to eliminate explicit fee references and to instead state that the
subdivision and annexation requests be “accompanied by a nonrefundable fee
established from time to time by the City Council”.
Dick Untch, Community Development Director
Presenter & Title:
David DeGroot, City Planner
Date: July 22, 2013
Please Check Appropriate Box:
X Committee of the Whole Meeting Special Committee of the Whole Meeting
City Council Meeting Special City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Other -
YES
Estimated Cost: $0 Budgeted?
NO
Executive Summary:
On May 28, 2013, staff made a recommendation to the Committee of the Whole to raise the application
fee for Plan Commission reviews from $250 to $500. The $500 fee would cover 2 staff plan reviews and an
additional $100 fee would be required for each subsequent review. Staff also recommended requiring a
$500 deposit to cover third party costs incurred by the City for applications involving a public hearing, such
as the publication of legal notices and the preparation of public hearing transcripts. The Committee of the
Whole recommended approval of the proposed changes to the fee structure for Plan Commission
applications. On June 3, 2013, the City Council approved the changes for Special Use, Text Amendment,
Map Amendment, Site Plan Review, Sign Variation, and Planned Unit Development requests. The City
Council was able to approve the fee changes to these application types without a Plan Commission public
hearing because the procedures for each application type are found in Title 11 (Zoning Ordinance) of the
City Code which states that such applications “shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable application fee
established from time to time by the City Council.” Fees for Subdivision and Annexation requests are
explicitly stated in Title 12 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City Code and therefore require a public hearing
to amend. Staff recommended text amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance which would eliminate the
explicit fee references and instead state that subdivision and annexation requests shall be “accompanied
by a nonrefundable application fee established from time by the City Council”, thereby allowing the City
Council to establish fees for subdivisions and annexations without text amendments and a public hearing.
Attachments: (please list)
Staff Report Draft Ordinance
Recommendation / Suggested Action: (briefly explain)
Staff recommends raising the application fee for reviews pertaining to the Title 12 to $500, and
establishing an additional $500 deposit. The $500 fee would cover two staff reviews, with an additional
$100 fee to be charged for each subsequent review (if necessary). The $500 deposit is to cover the cost of
third party services for applications that require a public hearing. At its July 11, 2013 public hearing the
Plan Commission recommended approval of text amendments to Section 12-5-3 of the Subdivision
Ordinance to eliminate explicit fee references and allow the City Council to establish a fee for subdivisions
and annexations without future text amendments.
Community Development Department Report
GENEVA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
JULY 22, 2013
TEXT AMENDMENTS
PLAN COMMISSION FEES
Applicant
City of Geneva
BACKGROUND
Request Application fees for Plan Commission reviews were last updated in
1990. Planning Division staff worked with City Administrator’s Office
Amendments to Section 12-5-
and the Administrative Services Department to review the City’s Plan
3 (Fees for Subdivisions and
Commission application fees and ensure that the City is able to
Annexations) of the
recoup the costs incurred during the review of each application. On
Subdivision Ordinance to
May 28, 2013, staff presented its findings to the Committee of the
eliminate explicit fee
Whole and recommended changes to the fee structure. Staff
references and to instead
recommended raising the application fee from $250 to $500. The
state that subdivision and
$500 fee would cover 2 staff plan reviews and an additional $100 fee
annexation requests be
would be required for each subsequent review, if necessary. Staff
“accompanied by a
also recommended requiring a $500 deposit to cover third party
nonrefundable fee established
costs incurred by the City for applications involving a public hearing,
from time to time by the City
such as the publication of legal notices and the preparation of public
Council.”
hearing transcripts.
Recommendation
The Committee of the Whole recommended approval of the
At its meeting on July 11, proposed changes to the fee structure for Plan Commission
2013 the Plan Commission applications. On June 3, 2013, the City Council approved the
recommended approval of the changes for Special Use, Text Amendment, Map Amendment, Site
proposed text amendments. Plan Review, Sign Variation, and Planned Unit Development
requests. The City Council was able to approve the fee changes to
Staff Liaisons
these application types without a Plan Commission public hearing
David DeGroot, City Planner because the procedures for each application type are found in Title
Phone: (630) 232-0814 11 (Zoning Ordinance) of the City Code. The Zoning Ordinance states
Email: ddegroot@geneva.il.us that such applications “shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable
application fee established from time to time by the City Council.”
Fees for Subdivision and Annexation requests are explicitly stated in
Title 12 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the City Code and therefore
require a public hearing to amend. Staff is proposing text
amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance which would eliminate
the explicit fee references and instead state that subdivision and
Page 2 of 5 Text Amendments – Plan Commission Fees
annexation requests shall be “accompanied by a nonrefundable application fee established from time by
the City Council”.
SUMMARY OF COST AND FEE ANALYSIS
Existing Fees
Fees had been set at $250 for most development proposals requiring Plan Commission review since
1990. Exceptions included Preliminary Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments ($250 plus $1 per
acre), Final Subdivisions and Planned Unit Developments ($100 plus $1 per lot or dwelling unit), and Site
Plan Review ($0).
Staff Costs
Staff analyzed expenses related to Plan Commission requests to determine if the fees were sufficient to
cover the costs associated with each request. Staff provides a plan review by the 14-member
Development Staff team (which consists of representatives from the Police, Fire, Public Works, Planning,
Building, Economic Development, and Administrative Services departments). A summary of the tasks
performed by staff is provided below.
Pre-application
o Pre-application meeting to discuss the request and process with applicant(s) in detail
Development Staff Review
o Distribution of application, narrative, and plans to Development Staff
o Updating of the monthly Plan Commission report
o Adding the request to the Plan Commission application map on City’s website, which includes a
brief description, photograph, and Google Maps link
o Inclusion of the request on the Development Staff Meeting agenda
o Discussion of the request during the Development Staff Meeting
o Compilation of staff comments, which are then sent to the applicant for review
o Two Development Staff reviews are typical for most requests
Plan Commission
o Prepare public hearing notice and send to newspaper for publication
o Prepare notification letter and mail to property owners within 250 feet of subject site
o Place a public hearing sign on subject property
o Create and post Plan Commission meeting agenda, which are also forwarded to media, City
Staff, and other units of government
o Develop staff report and recommendation to the Plan Commission
o Prepare PowerPoint presentation for Plan Commission meeting, if necessary
o Attend meeting to provide staff support
Committee of the Whole and City Council
o Modify staff report and recommendation to include the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and highlight important discussion from Plan Commission meeting
o Prepare draft ordinance or resolution, including any findings of fact made by the Plan
Commission and necessary exhibits
o Prepare agenda item executive summary cover sheet for the Committee of the Whole packet
o Attend meetings to provide staff support
o Finalize ordinance or resolution by making any revisions suggested by the City Attorney or the
Committee of the Whole prior to the City Council meeting
Page 3 of 5 Text Amendments – Plan Commission Fees
After City Council
o Obtain a certified copy of the ordinance and record with Kane County, if necessary
The estimated cost for staff time is $48 per hour, which includes wages, benefits, and overhead. The
$250 application fee would be exhausted by staff costs alone in about 5 hours. The services provided by
staff and the review by the 14-member Development Staff team results in much more than 5 hours of
staff time per application.
Third Party Costs
In addition to costs incurred through staff time and department resources, Plan Commission requests
may also result in additional expenditures for third party services. Third party costs for review of
stormwater applications and for legal services are already covered by requiring applicants to submit a
deposit. Costs associated with public hearings for drafting meeting minutes, transcript preparation, and
the publication of legal notices were not covered by deposits. As seen in Table 1, third party costs for
requests that do not require a public hearing were small, averaging only $65. However third party costs
for requests that do require a public hearing are substantial, averaging $494. Table 2 provides a
breakdown of total and average third party costs by the type of service (minutes, transcripts, or legal
notices) since FY 2010-2011. As shown, the $250 application fee is not sufficient to cover the average
cost of these services.
Table 1. Summary of total third-party costs for Plan Commission applications per case.
Fiscal Year Application Type Average
Public Hearing Required $643.93
2010-2011
No Public Hearing $50.67
Public Hearing Required $389.40
2011-2012
No Public Hearing $71.25
Public Hearing Required $462.31
2012-2013
No Public Hearing NA
Public Hearing Required $494.02
TOTAL
No Public Hearing $65.37
Table 2. Third party costs for Plan Commission applications (requiring a public hearing) by third party type.
Average Per Case
Average
FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 (2010 - 2013)
Meeting Minutes $75.74 $51.57 $61.29 $62.67
Transcripts $374.91 $256.70 $290.37 $305.21
Public Notices $193.29 $81.13 $110.66 $126.15
Total Third Party $643.93 $389.40 $462.31 $494.02
Comparison of Fees to Other Communities
Page 4 of 5 Text Amendments – Plan Commission Fees
Staff also researched the Plan Commission application fees for 16 other municipalities in the area. For
each application type, the average fee was greater than the fee for the City of Geneva. Geneva’s fees
were usually the lowest or one of the lowest for each application type. For example: Geneva’s Map
Amendment fee of $250 was the second lowest, and the average Map Amendment fee was $501.
Several of the municipalities had additional fees or deposit requirements in place to defray third party
costs.
PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On May 28, 2013 the Committee of the Whole recommended raising all Plan Commission application
fees to $500 to cover the cost of the first 2 staff reviews, with an additional $100 to be charged for
subsequent staff reviews. The Committee of the Whole also recommended that the City institute a
$500 deposit requirement for Plan Commission applications that require a public hearing to cover the
cost of third party services (minutes, transcripts, legal notices). On June 3, 2013, the City Council
approved the changes for each of the Plan Commission application types found in the Zoning
Ordinance. The City Council was able to change the fees for applications found in the Zoning Ordinance
because it states that such applications “shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable application fee
established from time to time by the City Council.”
Fees for Subdivision and Annexation requests are explicitly stated in Subdivision Ordinance and
therefore require a public hearing to amend. At its meeting on July 11, 2013 the Plan Commission
recommended text amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance which would eliminate the explicit fee
references and instead state that subdivision and annexation requests shall be “accompanied by a
nonrefundable application fee established from time by the City Council”. The recommended text
amendments would allow the City Council to set fees for Subdivision and Annexations requests without
a public hearing for an amendment to the text of the Subdivision Ordinance. The specific amendments
to Section 12-5-3 (Fees for Subdivisions and Annexations) of the Subdivision Ordinance are shown
below. Deletions are struck through (delete) and additions are shown in bold font (addition).
12-5-3: Fees
A. Preliminary Plat Review Fee:
1. The fee for review and consideration of the preliminary plat by the plan commission and
the staff of the city shall be two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00), plus one dollar ($1.00)
per acre or part thereof included in the territory included in the preliminary plat. The
owner of the property, or a duly authorized representative of the owner, shall file an
application for review and consideration of the preliminary plat with the Community
Development Department. It shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee
established from time to time by the City Council. Said fee shall be paid at the time of
application for public hearing on the preliminary plat.
B. Final Plat Review Fee:
Page 5 of 5 Text Amendments – Plan Commission Fees
1. The fee for review of a final plat by the staff of the city shall be one hundred dollars
($100.00) plus one dollar ($1.00) per lot or dwelling unit included in the territory
platted. The owner of the property, or a duly authorized representative of the owner,
shall file an application for review and consideration of the final plat with the
Community Development Department. It shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable
fee established from time to time by the City Council. Said fees shall be paid at the
time of application for final plat approval.
C. Annexation Fee:
1. Annexations Without An Annexation Agreement: The fee for review and consideration
of an annexation by the city shall be two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00). The owner of
the property, or a duly authorized representative of the owner, shall file an
application for review and consideration of an annexation with the Community
Development Department. It shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee
established from time to time by the City Council. Said fee shall be paid at the time of
petition on said annexation.
2. Annexation With An Annexation Agreement: The application fee for review and
consideration of an annexation agreement shall be one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). In
addition, petitioner(s) by submitting a petition for an annexation agreement, agrees to
pay all reasonable costs incurred by the city for the review negotiation, processing and
preparation of documents related to the proposed annexation, including, but not
limited to: legal notice requirements, hearings and staff time. The method of payment
shall be established by binding agreement at the time of application.
REVIEW/APPROVAL PROCESS: NEXT STEPS*
1. August 5, 2013 – City Council consideration of request
*This timeline is provided for informational purposes only, exact dates are subject to change.
ATTACHMENTS
Draft Ordinance
A copy of the minutes and transcripts from the Plan Commission meeting will be forwarded for your review under
separate cover.
ORDINANCE 2013-XX
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING APPLICATION FEES FOR PLAN COMMISSION REVIEWS
PERTAINING TO TITLE 12 (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) OF THE GENEVA CITY CODE AND
AMENDING SECTION 12-5-3 OF TITLE 12 TO ELIMINATE EXPLICIT FEE REFERENCES
WHEREAS, the application fees for Plan Commission reviews pertaining to Title 12 of the
Geneva City Code (Subdivision Ordinance) have not updated since 1975; and
WHEREAS, Title 12, Section 12-5-3 establishes explicit fee requirements for annexation and
subdivision applications; and
WHEREAS, a change to the application fees set forth in Section 12-5-3 of Title 12 requires a
text amendment and public hearing before the Geneva Plan Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Geneva Plan Commission conducted a public hearing on July 11, 2013 in the
City Hall Council Chambers located at 109 James Street, Geneva, Illinois, and unanimously
recommended approval of text amendments to Title 12, Section 12-5-3, to eliminate the explicit fee
references for subdivision and annexation applications and to instead state that subdivision and
annexation requests be “accompanied by a nonrefundable fee established from time to time by the City
Council”; and
WHEREAS, City staff conducted an analysis of the City’s application fees for Plan Commission
reviews and presented the analysis to the Committee of the Whole of the City Council on May 28, 2013;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GENEVA,
KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:
SECTION 1: Title 12 of the Geneva City Code (Subdivision Ordinance), Section 12-5-3 (Fees), is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language:
12-5-3: Fees
A. Preliminary Plat Review Fee:
1. The owner of the property, or a duly authorized representative of the owner, shall file
an application for review and consideration of the preliminary plat with the Community
Development Department. It shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee established
from time to time by the City Council. Said fee shall be paid at the time of application
for public hearing on the preliminary plat.
B. Final Plat Review Fee:
1. The owner of the property, or a duly authorized representative of the owner, shall file
an application for review and consideration of the final plat with the Community
Development Department. It shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee established
from time to time by the City Council. Said fees shall be paid at the time of application
for final plat approval.
Ordinance 2013-XX Page 1 of 2
C. Annexation Fee:
1. The owner of the property, or a duly authorized representative of the owner, shall file
an application for review and consideration of an annexation with the Community
Development Department. It shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee established
from time to time by the City Council. Said fee shall be paid at the time of petition on
said annexation.
SECTION 2: Annexation, preliminary and final plat of subdivision application fees for Plan
Commission review are set as follows:
Request Nonrefundable fee Deposit
Annexation $500 for 2 reviews, $100 for $500
each additional review
Subdivision – Preliminary $500 for 2 plan reviews, $100 $500
for each additional review
Subdivision – Final $500 for 2 plan reviews, $100 -
for each additional review
Requests that require legal review - $1,000
Requests that require stormwater review $50 $2500
SECTION 3: The above application fees shall go into effect upon approval by the Geneva City
Council.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Geneva, Kane County, Illinois, this ____ day of
_______ 2013.
AYES:______NAYS:______ABSENT:______ABSTAINING:_____HOLDING OFFICE:_____
APPROVED by me as Mayor of the City of Geneva, Kane County, Illinois, this _____ day of
_______ 2013.
___________________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
City Clerk
Ordinance 2013-XX Page 2 of 2
AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Title 4, Business and License Regulations, Chapter 2, Liquor
Agenda Item:
Control, Sections 4-2-1 and 4-2-12 Code Amendment
Presenter & Title: Mary McKittrick, City Administrator
Date: July 17, 2013
Please Check Appropriate Box:
X Committee of the Whole Meeting Special Committee of the Whole Meeting
X City Council Meeting Special City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Other -
Estimated Cost: YES
Budgeted?
N/A NO
If NO, please explain how the item will be funded:
N/A
Executive Summary:
The following proposed text changes to the Liquor Code are a matter of housekeeping.
Staff suggests clarifying language as it relates to the details of the outdoor seating
licenses (for liquor establishments) and related required fencing. In an effort to clarify
acceptable fencing requirements, staff is suggesting that we amend the Code as follows:
4-2-1: Definitions:
Fencing:
A structure which encloses real property, wholly or partially, to control entry and exit to
the licensed premises which much be a minimum of three (3) feet tall and a maximum of
six (6) feet tall. Where required in this Code, such fencing may shall be permanent or
semi-permanent or temporary, subject to the following criteria:
1. Permanent fencing-Wrought iron fencing, wood fencing, stone, chain link, steel
or wire or plastic panels anchored in the ground on a permanent continuous basis
or other materials or styles as approved by the City.
2. Semi-permanent fencing-Plastic fencing or panels constructed of Wrought iron
fencing, wood fencing, stone, chain link, steel, wire, or plastic panels anchored
with sandbags in bases weighing no less than thirty pounds (30 lbs) each or
temporarily anchored in the ground, or other materials or styles as approved by
the City.
3. Temporary fencing-Plastic construction fence, snow fencing, or other materials
or styles as approved by the City (allowed for special events only).
4-2-12: Outdoor Seating License:
A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, it shall be unlawful for any
retail liquor licensee to serve alcoholic liquor at an outdoor seating area without
first obtaining a license, as provided herein.
B. An "outside seating area" means a privately owned outdoor location within the
property licensed for consumption on the premises, excluding any private parking
area, where alcoholic liquor may be sold and consumed subject to the provisions
governing outdoor seating licenses herein.
1. Such outdoor seating area may be allowed within a certain Class B, C, or
D licensed premises, as defined in this chapter, subject to the following
conditions: Any outdoor area where alcohol is sold or consumed shall be
enclosed or cordoned off by use of a fence which shall be not less than
three (3) feet in height nor more than six (6) feet in height, and provided
with required, unobstructed exits as prescribed by the fire prevention code.
Such outdoor seating area shall be clearly designated with a permanent or
semi-permanent fence and/or barrier consistent with the existing zoning
and building ordinances of the City Code.
Attachments: (please list)
Ordinance will be provided for formal City Council approval.
Recommendation / Suggested Action: (briefly explain)
Staff recommends amending Title 4, Business and License Regulations, Chapter 2,
Liquor Control, Sections 4-2-1 and 4-2-12 of the City Code of Ordinances as presented.