Village Board
Regular MeetingGlen Ellyn, IL · May 18, 2026
Minutes
Minutes
Village of Glen Ellyn
Village Board Workshop Meeting
Monday, May 18, 2026
7:00 PM
Glen Ellyn Civic Center, Galligan Board Room
A. Call to Order – 7:01 P.M.
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Roll Call
Upon roll call by Deputy Clerk Cannova, President Burket and Trustees Bhagwakar,
Christiansen, Duncan, Simon, and Thompson answered “Present.” The Board allowed Trustee
Kalinich to join the meeting via phone.
Also in attendance: Village Manager Franz, Village Attorney Stephanides, Public Works Director
Hubsky, Community Development Director Henaghan and Management Analyst Barrett.
D. Audience Participation
Lucas Van Witzenburg, resident, spoke about the safety of Flock camera systems.
Trustee Kalinich commented that she had received information on this topic and would be
happy to share it with the rest of the Board.
Village Attorney Stephanides agreed to send specific sections cited from the Illinois Vehicle
Code to the Board for review.
E. Presentation
1) Presentation and Discussion of Current Village Demolition Permit Fees (Community
Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline: 7:00 PM - 7:30 PM)
Management Analyst Barrett reviewed the current fee structure. He stated that staff
sought direction on restructuring of fees.
Trustee Duncan commended Trustee Christiansen for the questions she had raised
earlier in the day, stating that this gave the Board a better starting point for the
evening’s conversation. He then asked if it was correct that approximately 16 home
demolitions per year have been permitted since 2020. Community Development
Director Henaghan replied.
Trustee Duncan asked for a rundown of how many staff hours are needed to review
each demolition application. Community Development Director Henaghan replied.
Trustee Kalinich added that this is a topic that the Historic Preservation Commission
has discussed extensively. The Commission’s thought was that fees could be a source of
funding the incentive grants.
1
Trustee Simon thought this could be considered as a decision of policy in that this
particular cost is not prohibitive for a developer. She felt that if the goal is to protect the
historic nature of the Village, the fee imposed needs to be much larger.
Trustee Christiansen agreed with Trustee Simon, continuing with relevant data
regarding past teardowns. She also felt the housing study needs to be looked at
again. Discussion ensued.
Trustee Bhagwakar thought that the Village did not want to discourage families
from moving into the Village and investing in and improving properties.
Trustee Kalinich thought if the preservation program was to be successful, people
needed to know about it and how to access it, and it needed to be well-funded. Trustee
Kalinich also felt that it needed to be linked to fees. Discussion ensued.
Trustee Thompson asked where the fees are placed within the Village budget.
Village Manager Franz replied. Trustee Thompson thought the budget needed to be
increased for the current historic housing preservation program. He also agreed the
fees should increase.
Trustee Bhagwakar didn’t think the fees should be increased so complacently and
that the Board needs to be cognizant of representing all residents of the Village.
Trustee Christiansen pointed out that the Board is there to represent the Village
overall and that 12% of the housing stock has been lost. And if the historical charm
is going to be maintained, something needs to be done.
Trustee Kalinich added that the Village portion of the tax bill is a fraction of its
total, and that the concept of a fee versus a tax is that a fee applies to the individual
user rather than the whole community. She added that currently the Preservation
Grants are funded by the whole community.
Trustee Bhagwakar replied to this and then asked about other fees paid by
homeowners. Staff replied.
President Burket asked how the comparable communities were chosen.
Management Analyst Barrett replied. Village Manager Franz added to the response.
Discussion continued about how to restructure the fee schedule and the best way to
discourage teardowns to preserve the historic charm of the Village. Discussion
included the rights of private property owners, as well as the relationship between
fees and the historic grant preservation program.
.
The Board’s direction to staff was to increase the demolition permit fee. The
increase will not be gradual and will be made in conjunction with other permit fees
being increased this year.
Norris Eber, resident, asked what the demolition ordinance would say in regard to a
house that suffers a fire and needs partial or full demolition to be rebuilt. The Board
responded they would take this into consideration as a possible carveout in the
ordinance.
Anne Gould, resident, spoke about the possibility of addressing the percentage of
property that can be built upon versus raising the fee if the goal is to preserve
2
historic homes. Trustee Kalinich replied.
2) Presentation and Discussion of Fees for Work Without a Permit (Community
Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline: 7:30 PM - 8:00 PM)
Community Development Director Henaghan opened the topic by reviewing current
fees for work without a permit and zoning variances for such work.
Trustee Simon asked how many violations the Village has per year for work without a
permit. Community Development Director Henaghan replied.
Trustee Kalinich asked for clarification regarding the timeline for zoning variance
application. Community Development Director Henaghan replied.
Trustee Thompson asked how permit violations could be charged to a contractor
versus a homeowner. Community Development Director Henaghan replied.
Trustee Kalinich brought up the review of the zoning regulations, which she felt should
be part of the fee restructuring process.
Community Development Director Henaghan reviewed her recommendations for
restructuring both fee schedules. The Board asked questions regarding the
recommendations and the fee process.
Trustee Simon wondered if a contractor should be the one to pay penalty fees.
Community Development Director Henaghan replied.
Trustee Thompson asked about registering contractors as a requirement to work in the
Village and whether a fee was involved. Community Development Director Henaghan
replied.
Trustee Bhagwakar asked for clarification of the zoning fee options before the Board.
Community Development Director Henaghan replied. Discussion ensued.
The Board gave direction of fee revisions. The construction necessitated variation fee
should be triple the cost of the standard application fee. The work without a permit fee
should be double the standard application fee.
3) Presentation and Discussion of Village Regulations Regarding the Preservation of
Trees Located on Private Property (Public Works Director John Hubsky) (Tentative
Timeline: 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM)
Christy Truitt, Chairperson of the Environmental Commission, gave a presentation
on the importance of preserving oak tree canopy in the Village. It included relatively
new information and as well as historical data. Ms. Truitt reviewed actions the
Village could take to preserve trees, whether on private or public property.
Trustee Thompson wanted to know methods to encourage and incentivize tree
preservation rather than just imposing fines for cutting down trees on private
property. Chairperson Truitt replied.
Trustee Thompson asked if the required commercial landscaping plans include tree
3
type requirements in the Code. Chairperson Truitt replied.
Trustee Thompson commented on the tree evaluation at Village Links and the
possible recommendations for replanting.
Trustee Christiansen commented on possible incentives such as a Heritage Tree
Preservation Program. She felt this could help to preserve trees on private property.
Discussion ensued.
Trustee Kalinich asked about former changes in tree removal regulations in the
Village. Village Manager Franz replied.
Management Analyst Barrett reviewed the five goals regarding the preservation of
trees and recommendations to achieve these goals. Staff also requested guidance on
whether the Village should have tree removal permits, the permit cost for such
permits, and enforcement.
Trustee Thompson asked about the circumstances in which a developer is hired by
a property owner, does the contractor have discretion on which trees are allowed to
be removed. Village Manager Franz replied. Forestry Superintendent Brown added
to this reply. Discussion ensued.
Trustee Kalinich reemphasized that the Historic Preservation Commission is deeply
interested in this subject and would be willing to help with mapping trees in the
Village. Trustee Christiansen suggested a volunteer reporting system could help in
this effort.
President Burket asked if satellite imagery was helpful in identifying types of trees or
if the canopies in such imagery were indistinguishable. Forestry Superintendent
Brown replied.
Chris English, resident, expressed his support of a tree removal permit, especially
considering how trees affect water mitigation issues. He felt such a permit would
strengthen the tree canopy.
Trustee Thompson asked what the timing of any action would be. Village Manager
Franz replied. Trustee Thompson felt that the Board should get a progress report
from staff by September of this year. Discussion ensued.
F. Reminders
G. Adjourn – 9:15 P.M.
Adjourn to closed executive session for the purposes of discussing the appointment,
employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific
employees of the Village pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) and pending litigation
pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(11), not to return to open session
Trustee Simon moved and Trustee Thompson seconded to adjourn and go into Closed
Executive Session. Unanimous vote of approval.
4
Agenda
Agenda
Village of Glen Ellyn
Village Board Workshop Meeting
Monday, May 18, 2026
7:00 PM
Glen Ellyn Civic Center, Galligan Board Room
Meeting Procedures Statement
Visitors are most welcome to attend all meetings of the Village Board and can find copies of the Agenda in the
meeting room or online at www.glenellyn.org prior to the meeting. Any individual with a disability requiring a
reasonable accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact The Village of Glen Ellyn ADA
Coordinator, 630-469-5000, at least five (5) business days in advance of the next scheduled meeting. All matters on
the Agenda may be discussed, amended, and acted upon.
A. Call to Order
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Roll Call
D. Audience Participation
1) Open:
Members of the public are welcome to speak to any item not specifically listed on
tonight's agenda for up to (3) three minutes. For those items which are on tonight's
agenda, the public will have the opportunity to comment when the item is
discussed. Please complete the Audience Participation form and turn it in to the
Village Clerk. It is requested that one spokesperson for a group be appointed to
provide comment for the entire group. When recognized, please step to the
microphone and state your name and provide your comment. Individuals wishing to
address the Board shall exercise proper decorum and respect for the proceedings
and the business of the Village Board, and shall refrain from abusive demeanor and
language. The practice of ceding time to other speakers shall be prohibited, except
in the discretion of the presiding officer of the meeting. Public officials are not
obligated to respond to questions.
E. Presentation
1) Presentation and Discussion of Current Village Demolition Permit Fees
(Community Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline: 7:00 PM - 7:30
PM)
2) Presentation and Discussion of Fees for Work Without a Permit (Community
Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline: 7:30 PM - 8:00 PM)
3) Presentation and Discussion of Village Regulations Regarding the Preservation of
Trees Located on Private Property (Public Works Director John Hubsky) (Tentative
Timeline: 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM)
F. Reminders
Civility Pledge - In the interest of civility, I pledge to promote civility by listening, being respectful of others,
acknowledging that we are striving to support and improve our community, and understanding that we each may have
different ideas for achieving that objective.
Village Board Agenda
May 18, 2026
Page 2
1) Village Board Meeting Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 7 pm
G. Adjourn to closed executive session for the purposes of discussing the appointment,
employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific
employees of the Village pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) and pending litigation
pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(11), not to return to open session
Village of Glen Ellyn
Packet
Agenda
Village of Glen Ellyn
Village Board Workshop Meeting
Monday, May 18, 2026
7:00 PM
Glen Ellyn Civic Center, Galligan Board Room
Meeting Procedures Statement
Visitors are most welcome to attend all meetings of the Village Board and can find copies of the Agenda in the
meeting room or online at www.glenellyn.org prior to the meeting. Any individual with a disability requiring a
reasonable accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact The Village of Glen Ellyn ADA
Coordinator, 630-469-5000, at least five (5) business days in advance of the next scheduled meeting. All matters on
the Agenda may be discussed, amended, and acted upon.
A. Call to Order
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Roll Call
D. Audience Participation
1) Open:
Members of the public are welcome to speak to any item not specifically listed on
tonight's agenda for up to (3) three minutes. For those items which are on tonight's
agenda, the public will have the opportunity to comment when the item is
discussed. Please complete the Audience Participation form and turn it in to the
Village Clerk. It is requested that one spokesperson for a group be appointed to
provide comment for the entire group. When recognized, please step to the
microphone and state your name and provide your comment. Individuals wishing to
address the Board shall exercise proper decorum and respect for the proceedings
and the business of the Village Board, and shall refrain from abusive demeanor and
language. The practice of ceding time to other speakers shall be prohibited, except
in the discretion of the presiding officer of the meeting. Public officials are not
obligated to respond to questions.
E. Presentation
1) Presentation and Discussion of Current Village Demolition Permit Fees
(Community Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline: 7:00 PM - 7:30
PM)
2) Presentation and Discussion of Fees for Work Without a Permit (Community
Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline: 7:30 PM - 8:00 PM)
3) Presentation and Discussion of Village Regulations Regarding the Preservation of
Trees Located on Private Property (Public Works Director John Hubsky) (Tentative
Timeline: 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM)
F. Reminders
Civility Pledge - In the interest of civility, I pledge to promote civility by listening, being respectful of others,
acknowledging that we are striving to support and improve our community, and understanding that we each may have
different ideas for achieving that objective.
Page 1 of 32
Village Board Agenda
May 18, 2026
Page 2
1) Village Board Meeting Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 7 pm
G. Adjourn to closed executive session for the purposes of discussing the appointment,
employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific
employees of the Village pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) and pending litigation
pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(11), not to return to open session
Village of Glen Ellyn
Page 2 of 32
Glen Ellyn Village Board Meeting 5/18/2026 7:00 PM
535 Duane Street Department: Administration
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Department Head: Jennifer Henaghan
Category: Presentation
Prepared By: J.D. Barrett
AGENDA ITEM (ID # 2026-370) DOC ID: 2026-370
Presentation and Discussion of Current Village Demolition Permit
Fees (Community Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative
Timeline: 7:00 PM - 7:30 PM)
Statement of the Issue:
Staff recommends review of the Village's current demolition permit fee structure to ensure that the
fees align with the Village's policy goals.
Analysis:
This item seeks Village Board input on the Village's residential demolition permit fees compared to
peer communities and whether the current structure meets the Village's policy objectives. The
presentation highlights the following policy questions for the Board to consider:
o Whether fees should be used to discourage teardowns or remain neutral?
o Whether any portion of revenue should support preservation programs?
o Whether the demolition tax should be consolidated with the general permit fee?
Section 3-32-6 ("Demolition Contractor Tax") of the Village Code is included for reference as part
of this agenda item. Also included is the PowerPoint presentation that will be given at the
Workshop.
Budget Impact:
Altering the demolition fee structure would have an impact, either positive or negative, and would
depend on the scope of the requested change.
Contribution to Strategic Plan
Strategic Priority: Financial Stability; Initiative: Maintain financial stability and create a financial
decision-making framework
Action Requested:
Staff requests Board feedback regarding the Village's current demolition permit fee structure and
whether the structure should be changed.
Attachments:
1. Presentation
Page 3 of 32
2. Demolition Contractor Tax section of Village Code
Page 4 of 32
Demolition Permit Fees Presentation
Page 5 of 32
Purpose and Context
• Evaluate Glen Ellyn’s residential
demolition permit fees relative to
peer communities.
• Assess whether current fees align with
cost recovery, policy goals, and market
positioning.
• Discuss potential adjustments to fee
structure.
Page 6 of 32
Current Fee Structure – Demolition Permits
Structure under 1,000 square feet $625
(including detached garage)
Structure 1,000-4,000 square feet $775 + $550 Demolition Tax
(including detached garage)
Structure over 4,000 feet $2,100 + $550 Demolition Tax
*Excluding other applicable fees
Page 7 of 32
Demolition Contractor Tax
•Demolition Tax Requirement: A $550 demolition contractor tax is charged in
addition to standard permit fees and is due at the time the demolition permit is
issued.
•When the Tax Applies: The tax applies to full or partial demolition when a
building or structure:
Ø Exceeds 1,000 square feet, or
Ø Exceeds 45 feet in height, or
Ø Involves structural alteration of more than 50% of the exterior wall and roof
area.
•Additional Applicability Threshold: Even if the above thresholds are not met,
the tax also applies when:
Ø The structure contains more than 500 square feet of interior area, and
Ø More than 50% of the exterior walls are demolished.
Page 8 of 32
Other Applicable Fees
Service Disconnection Fee ($275) – charged when water or sewer service must
be disconnected.
Hydrant Meter Fee – required for nearly all demolitions (except accessory
structures), since water must be used for dust and debris control.
Ø $70 hydrant meter fee
Ø $500 water usage deposit
Ø Deposit may be partially refunded, or additional charges may apply
based on actual water consumption.
Page 9 of 32
Comparable Communities
Rank Municipality Base Fee
1 Lombard $236
2 Geneva $300
3 Barrington* $420
4 Downers Grove $710
T-5 Highland Park $750
T-5 Northbrook $750
7 Glen Ellyn (1,000-4,000 sqft.) $775
T-8 Western Springs $1,000
T-8 La Grange $1,000
T-8 Wheaton $1,000
11 Naperville $1,045
12 Elmhurst $2,416
13 Wilmette $4,500
14 Clarendon Hills $8,750
15 Hinsdale $9,756
*Barrington – $0.08/sqft. + $300 plan review fee for a home 1,001 to 3,000 sqft.
Page 10 of 32
Fees range widely from $236 to
$9,756
Glen Ellyn: $775 (lower tier of
Quick
peer communities)
Analysis Median fee: $1,000
Mean fee: $2,227 (skewed by
high-fee communities)
Page 11 of 32
Policy Considerations
Cost Recovery: Are fees covering staff time and administrative burden?
Fee Consolidation: Should we combine the demo tax with the general fee?
Behavioral Impact: Should fees discourage teardowns or remain neutral?
Market Position: Alignment with neighboring communities
Equity: Does the Village dedicate any portion of the demo tax/fee revenue to preservation programs?
Page 12 of 32
End Slide
Questions
Page 13 of 32
3-32-6. - Demolition contractor tax.
(A) Tax imposed: In addition to any other payment required for the procurement of a permit to
demolish or partially demolish any building or structure in the Village when the building or
structure, or part thereof exceeds 1,000 square feet in area, or exceeds 45 feet in height, or more
than 50 percent of the exterior wall and roof area is structurally altered, any building demolition
contractor shall pay a tax of $550.00, which shall be payable at the time of the issuance of a
permit, into the special programs fund. In the absence of the above referenced alteration or
demolition standards, this section shall apply to any demolition or partial demolition of a
structure containing more than 500 square feet of interior area where more than 50 percent of
the exterior walls of a building or structure are demolished.
(B) Definitions: A "demolition contractor" is hereby defined as a person, firm, corporation, or other
entity which accepts a fee or contract sum, or provides services without charge, resulting in the
partial or complete demolition of any building or structure within the Village when the building or
structure, or part thereof exceeds 1,000 square feet in area, or exceeds 45 feet in height, or more
than 50 percent of the exterior wall and roof area is structurally altered. In the absence of the
above referenced alteration or demolition standards, a "demolition contractor" is hereby defined
as a person, firm, corporation, or other entity as described above which provides services
resulting in the demolition or partial demolition of a structure containing more than 500 square
feet of interior area where more than 50 percent of the exterior walls of a building or structure
are demolished.
(C) Penalty: Any person, firm, corporation, or other entity which undertakes a full or partial
demolition of such an aforesaid building or structure in the Village without paying the demolition
tax shall be subject to the payment of the tax and, upon conviction of a failure to pay the tax,
shall pay a fine of $250.00 for a first offense and $500.00 for each offense thereafter.
(Ord. 5996, 1-30-2012, eff. 3-1-2012; Ord. 4733, 7-12-1999, eff. 8-1-1999)
Page 14 of 32
Glen Ellyn Village Board Meeting 5/18/2026 7:00 PM
535 Duane Street Department: Community Development
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Department Head: Jennifer Henaghan
Category: Presentation
Prepared By: Jennifer Henaghan
AGENDA ITEM (ID # 2026-373) DOC ID: 2026-373
Presentation and Discussion of Fees for Work Without a Permit
(Community Development Director Henaghan) (Tentative Timeline:
7:30 PM - 8:00 PM)
Statement of the Issue:
Staff recommends review of the Village's current fees associated with construction activity
undertaken without a building permit.
Analysis:
Currently, the "Fee and Deposit Schedule" contained in Section 4-1-4 of the Village Code has three
fees associated with work that is performed without first receiving a building permit, two of which
are for building permits and one of which applies to non-permitted work that does not comply with
the Zoning Code.
Building Permits
When construction activity is found to have begun or is completed prior to the issuance of a
building permit, there are two fines that could be added to the standard permit fee. Work that is
started without a permit is assessed an additional fee of 200% of the original permit fee, with a
minimum of $260. Work that exceeds the scope of permitted work is assessed an additional fee of
300% of the original permit fee, with a minimum of $520.
As an example, the permit fee for a deck is $295. If a deck is constructed without a permit, the
applicant is charged that $295 deck permit fee plus a $590 work without a permit fee, for a total of
$885. If a deck is built beyond the scope of what was included on an approved permit, the applicant
is charged the $295 deck permit fee plus an $885 work without a permit fee for a total of $1,180.
Zoning Variations
Typical zoning variation applications are subject to a $685 fee. When a variation application is
submitted post-construction, the application fee is increased to $1,145.
Budget Impact:
An increase in permit fees for work initially begun without a permit could increase permit revenue
unless the increased fees end up encouraging property owners to obtain permits prior to beginning
construction activity.
Contribution to Strategic Plan
Strategic Priority: Financial Sustainability; Initiative: Maintain financial stability and create a financial
Page 15 of 32
decision-making framework
Action Requested:
Staff requests Board feedback regarding the Village's current fees associated with work performed
without a building permit, and whether the fee structure should be changed.
Attachments:
Page 16 of 32
Glen Ellyn Village Board Meeting 5/18/2026 7:00 PM
535 Duane Street Department: Administration
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Department Head: Mark Franz
Category: Presentation
Prepared By: J.D. Barrett
AGENDA ITEM (ID # 2026-371) DOC ID: 2026-371
Presentation and Discussion of Village Regulations Regarding the
Preservation of Trees Located on Private Property (Public Works
Director John Hubsky) (Tentative Timeline: 8:00 PM - 9:00 PM)
Statement of the Issue:
The Village's Environmental Commission has discussed the Village's current regulations regarding
the preservation of trees located on private property and has recommended that the Village Board
adopt amendments to the Village's regulations. Placing this item on this current workshop agenda is
meant to foster discussion and gain Village Board direction on the subject.
Analysis:
The intent of this item is to obtain the Village Board's input and direction regarding the Village's
current regulations regarding the preservation of trees located on private property. The
Environmental Commission adopted a motion at its April 21, 2026 meeting requesting this topic be
presented at the May 18, 2026 Village Board Workshop. The Environmental Commission asks the
Board to discuss the following items regarding the current regulations:
o Unclear required tree protection measures such as fencing, with minimal penalties;
o Tree injury during construction due to movement of protection fences;
o Clear-cutting;
o Loss of heritage trees; and
o Loss of tree canopy.
Included with this agenda item is Section 4-8-1 of the Village Code which contains the Village's
current regulations governing tree preservation located on private property. Also included is the
PowerPoint presentation that will be given at the Workshop. Staff seeks Village Board feedback and
direction on proposed amendments to the current regulations before proceeding further.
Budget Impact:
To be determined.
Contribution to Strategic Plan
Strategic Priority: N/A
Initiative: N/A
Page 17 of 32
Action Requested:
Staff requests Village Board feedback regarding the Village's current regulations regarding the
preservation of trees located on private property and whether specific amendments should be
proposed and adopted.
Attachments:
1. Current Private Tree Preservation Regulations
2. Presentation
Page 18 of 32
Chapter 8 - TREE PRESERVATION
4-8-1. - Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to enhance the private property portion of the community forest by
assuring the preservation and protection of protected trees. Title 8, chapter 4, "Forestry
Management", of this Code is applicable to the public property portion of the community forest.
These chapters complement each other to enhance the total community forest in Glen Ellyn. It is
the stated public policy of the Village to add to the tree population within the Village, where
possible, and to maintain, to the greatest extent possible, existing trees within the Village. The
planting of additional trees, preservation of existing trees, and proper maintenance of trees in the
Village will improve the quality of life in Glen Ellyn.
(Ord. 5961, 9-26-2011)
4-8-2. - Definitions.
As used within this chapter and title 8, chapter 4 of this Code, the following terms shall have the
meaning set forth in this section:
ARBORICULTURAL SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL: A manual prepared and updated by the Village
forester and incorporated into an ordinance passed and amended from time to time by the Village
Board, which more specifically carries out the enforcement provisions and intent of this Code and
contains regulations and standards for the preservation, planting, maintenance, and removal of
trees, shrubs, and other plants upon Village property and regulated trees on private property.
COMMUNITY FOREST: The entire tree population in the Village of Glen Ellyn, including trees on
private and public property.
COMPREHENSIVE FORESTRY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: The five year plan for the improvement of
the Village of Glen Ellyn community forest and approved by the Village Board.
CRITICAL ROOT ZONE: The area inscribed by an imaginary line on the ground beneath a tree having
its center point at the center of the trunk of the tree and having a radius equal to one foot for every
inch of dbh but not less than six feet from the trunk of the tree.
CROWN: Parts of a tree above the trunk including leaves, branches, and scaffolds.
DEVELOPMENT: All new planned unit developments and subdivisions in the Village of Glen Ellyn.
Any manmade change to improved or unimproved property including, but not limited to, the
construction, addition, alteration, or replacement of buildings or structures, excavation, fill,
Page 19 of 32
grading, paving, underground irrigation, or utility work on the property that exceeds 300 square
feet of disturbed site area except the following:
(A) Replacement pavement in the same footprint as existing pavement,
(B) Decks supported on individual spaced concrete piers,
(C) Fences supported on spaced posts,
(D) Replacement detached garages in the same footprint as the existing garage with no more
than an additional 20% of garage area, or
(E) Grading on private property that disturbs less than 1,500 square feet of site area.
DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT (Hereinafter Called dbh): The diameter of the trunk of the tree
measured in inches at a point four and one-half feet above ground line. This point of measurement
is used for established and mature trees.
DRIP LINE: A line drawn on the ground surface directly beneath and perpendicular to the maximum
radius of the crown of an existing tree but not less than six feet from the trunk, whichever is
greater.
LANDSCAPE: Any shrubs, flowers, grass, or ground covers.
LOT: A zoning lot as defined in the Glen Ellyn zoning and subdivision code.
PUBLIC NUISANCE: Any tree, shrub, or other plant, or breeding place which harbors infectious
insects or diseases which reasonably may be expected to injure or harm other trees or which could
cause a safety hazard affecting the general public.
PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL OR WORK PERMIT: The permit required by this Code issued in order to
remove or do any work on any public tree within the corporate limits of the Village or a Village
Parkway.
REGULATED PUBLIC UTILITY: Any utility certified by the Illinois Commerce Commission to provide
service to any customer within the corporate limits of the Village of Glen Ellyn or any other entity
with a franchise issued by the Village or any other entity which has the right to extend pipes, wires,
cables or lines on public property within the Village. The effect of this chapter with regard to any
public utility is intended to be the maximum regulation permitted by law or under the terms of a
franchise or similar agreement.
REMOVE OR REMOVAL: The causing or accomplishing of the actual physical removal of a tree or the
effective removal through damaging, poisoning, or other direct or indirect action resulting in, or
likely to result in, the death of a tree.
SCAFFOLDS: Primary structural branches of the crown.
Page 20 of 32
TREE: Any self-supporting, woody plant with its root system, growing upon the earth usually with
one trunk or a multistemmed trunk system supporting a definitely formed crown, achieving a
minimum of at least eight feet in height.
TREE, ADJACENT PROPERTY: Any tree with a four inch dbh or greater on an adjoining private
property and located within 15 feet of the lot line. These trees are protected trees unless the owner
of the tree designates them as nonprotected.
TREE, BORDER: Any tree, the trunk of which lies at least one-fourth on Village owned property and
three-fourths on private property, determined as the distance of the diameter measured at right
angles to the public right-of-way, determined by the Village forester. These trees are protected
trees unless the Village forester designates them as nonprotected.
TREE, IMPACTED: Any tree shown on a tree preservation plan, that would otherwise be a protected
tree, that will be adversely affected by construction. This tree is not a removed tree or a protected
tree.
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: A written plan having text and/or graphic illustrations indicating the
methods which are to be used to preserve a public tree, significant tree, adjacent property tree,
impacted tree, or protected tree during construction and shall include a tree survey, application,
plan submittal checklist, and action plan. The document shall be coordinated with and, if possible,
made a part of a site grading plan or drainage plan.
TREE, PRIVATE: Any tree on privately owned property within the Village.
TREE, PROTECTED: Any tree in the Village shown on a tree preservation plan as being retained after
development with a ten inch dbh or greater, or a multibranch tree which has an aggregate
diameter of 16 inches dbh or greater.
TREE, PUBLIC: Any tree or border tree on public property or within a public right-of-way in the
Village. These trees are protected trees unless the Village forester or his/her designee designates
them as nonprotected.
TREE, REMOVED: Any tree shown on a tree preservation plan that would otherwise be a protected
tree, as being removed after development.
TREE, REPLACEMENT: A nursery grown certified tree properly balled and burlapped and satisfying
the standards established for nursery stock and installation thereof set forth by the American
Association of Nurserymen.
Page 21 of 32
TREE, SIGNIFICANT: All hickory, oak, or walnut species in the Village measuring five inches dbh or
greater. These trees are protected trees unless the owner of the tree designates them as
nonprotected.
TREE SURVEY: A graphic display of all protected, border, public, significant, impacted, removed, and
adjacent property trees including their location, condition, species and size. All existing trees that
are required to be shown on the tree survey must be identified by number. The survey shall show
the location of protective fencing and other protective measures to be placed on the lot. The
survey shall also show the location of any tree, which would otherwise be a protected tree, which
was removed in the prior one year period.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS: All vegetation, woody or otherwise, except lawn and flowers
less than 24 inches high.
(Ord. 5961, 9-26-2011)
4-8-3. - General regulations; private property involving development.
(A) Tree preservation plan required: Development on private property shall require the filing of a tree
preservation plan along with other permit application materials required by this section upon
application for a building permit.
Trees which the owner designates on the plan as being susceptible to potential damage due to
their location or condition may be designated as impacted trees. After the initial tree protection
fencing or other protective methods have been put in place these impacted trees shall not be
subject to additional regulation provided the required tree fencing or other protective methods
are maintained. The Village forester, or his/her designee, may suggest that trees on the property
not shown as impacted or protected trees should be shown as being in those categories, but the
final decision shall rest with the applicant.
All work to preserve protected, adjacent, significant, and impacted trees shall be according to the
"Arboricultural Specifications Manual". The tree survey shall be drawn to a scale not less than one
inch to 20 feet so that the location of each tree required to be shown on the plan can be
identified. The tree preservation plan shall include the following:
1. A "tree survey" as defined above. The Village forester, or his/her designee, may exclude the
tree survey requirement on those portions of the site which he/she determines will not be
affected by the development activity. The survey may be prepared by a registered land
surveyor or certified arborist or may be prepared by or under the direction of the owner if it
Page 22 of 32
accurately reflects all required tree information. The Village forester or his/her designee shall, if requested,
assist without charge in the identification and size of tree species on those properties that do not require
an ISA certified arborist review and approval.
2. The name and contact information of the parties responsible for the construction, erection,
and maintenance of temporary fencing or other physical barrier around protected trees.
3. The location, shape, and spatial arrangement of all existing and proposed buildings, walls,
improvements, and structures and the excavation limits required to construct proposed
improvements.
4. The location, shape and spatial arrangement of all permanent driveways and parking areas
and temporary material storage sites and accessways.
5. All existing or new utility services including water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, gas, electric,
telephone, and cable TV.
6. The Village forester, or his/her designee, may expand or partially retract the critical root zone
depending on the tree species and site specific situations so as to improve the chances that
trees will not be damaged during construction and to permit construction to take place. In
such cases, the Village forester, or his/her designee, may request additional precautions in
order to preserve the health of trees.
7. Existing and proposed grading of the development area showing elevations with contour lines
at one foot intervals if a grading plan is required by some other provision of this Code.
8. A tree preservation plan for a new home shall be reviewed and approved by a certified
arborist for the purpose of evaluating the protective measures proposed on the plan.
(B) Building permit required: No building permit shall be issued for development until the tree
preservation plan has been approved by the Village Board (for planned unit developments or
subdivisions) or the Village forester or his/her designee. In reviewing the tree preservation plan,
the Village forester, or his/her designee, can offer advice and suggest modifications which will
better protect existing trees, but the tree preservation plan shall be approved if it otherwise is in
conformity with Village ordinances. The Village shall process the tree preservation plan in no
more time than shall be needed to process a building permit unless the application does not
fulfill the requirements of this chapter. Appeals regarding the tree preservation plan or a decision
of the Village forester shall be first submitted to the Public Works Director. A subsequent appeal
shall be submitted to the Village Manager. The following steps shall be followed to assure
conformance to the approved tree preservation plan and the tree protection requirements in the
"Arboricultural Specifications Manual" prior to the issuance of a building permit.
1. Tree preservation fencing must be installed and inspected for all protected, significant,
impacted, border, public, and adjacent property trees prior to the issuance of a building
permit. Tree preservation measures must be installed per the approved tree preservation
Page 23 of 32
plan and remain in place during the entire construction period. Fencing shall not be removed or relocated
unless authorized in writing.
2. For a new principal structure an approved tree preservation plan shall be posted on the
building site within five feet of the front property line before a building permit is issued and
shall remain in place throughout the entirety of the construction of the project. This sign must
be posted as shown in the "Arboricultural Specifications Manual". The permit applicant shall
be responsible for notifying all other contractors working on the property of the tree
preservation plan.
3. The applicant shall notify all adjacent property owners of the proposed construction project
and that a tree preservation plan has been prepared and is available for review at the
Community Development Department of the Village of Glen Ellyn. A copy of such notification
along with a list of addresses it was delivered to must be submitted to the Community
Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(C) Precautions during construction: During construction, all reasonable steps necessary to prevent
the destruction or damaging of protected trees shall be taken, including, but not limited to, the
following:
1. No construction activity, movement, and/or placement of equipment or material or spoils
storage shall be permitted within the critical root zone of any protected tree or significant tree
on the tree preservation plan unless shown on the approved tree preservation plan. No
excess soil, additional fill, liquids, or construction debris shall be placed within the critical root
zone of any protected tree or significant tree.
2. Per the "Arboricultural Specifications Manual", appropriate protective fencing shall be
installed and maintained for the protection of protected, adjacent property, significant, and
impacted trees.
3. No attachments, fences, or wires, other than those approved for bracing, guying, or wrapping,
shall be attached to protected trees or significant trees during the construction period.
4. Branch pruning, root feeding, and root pruning of protected trees, significant trees, and
adjacent property trees directly affected by construction shall be conducted by the property
owner if suggested by the Village forester, or his/her designee, and must be completed
following the "Arboricultural Specifications Manual". On-site inspections must be scheduled
with the Village forester or his/her designee to ensure this requirement is met.
5. Unless otherwise shown on the approved tree preservation plan, no soil is to be added to or
removed from within the critical root zone of any protected, significant, or adjacent property
tree that is to remain, unless shown on the approved tree preservation plan.
6.
Page 24 of 32
Regulated public utilities, to the extent permitted by law, shall be responsible for adhering to said tree
preservation plan during installation of necessary utility service lines. A property owner or contractor shall
not be responsible for damages caused by the action of a public utility unless that person directed the
location and manner of work of the utility.
(D) Fee schedule for tree preservation plan review:
1. Plan review fee for single-family lots. For projects where more than one of the projects listed
below occurs, the higher fee shall apply.
Unit cost for each:
a. Garage/pool/other .....$250.00
b. Addition .....250.00
c. Demolition/new house .....330.00
d. New house .....330.00
e. Site improvements/grading/landscaping .....250.00
f. Work in public right-of-way .....330.00
2. Plan review fee for subdivisions, special use projects, and planned unit developments or lots
with any use other than single-family residences: .....
a. Cost to review documents submitted in compliance with tree preservation ordinance
.....$100.00 per hour by consultant.
3. Fees for additional field inspections and violations: .....
a. Field inspection responding to complaint (verified violation) .....$100.00
b. Tree fence violation .....100.00
(E) Work must be according to approved tree preservation plan: It shall be unlawful for any person,
firm, or a corporation to fail to abide by the terms of any tree preservation plan pursuant to
which a building permit has been issued, including all regulated public utilities.
(F) Stop work order authorized for noncompliance with tree preservation plan: If the Village forester,
or his/her designee, or a Building Inspector observes the precautions specified in the tree
preservation plan were not undertaken before construction commenced or not maintained
during construction, a stop work order may be issued. The stop work order shall remain in place
until the permittee complies with the approved tree preservation plan and/or corrects the issues
stated in the stop work order.
(G) Amendment to tree preservation plan and removal of protected trees: An application can be
made to the Village forester to amend a tree preservation plan. No amendment shall be
permitted where the provisions of the approved plan have not been followed. An application shall
be approved where changed facts and circumstances not within the control of the applicant
Page 25 of 32
create an undue hardship in complying with the plan. Where a protected tree has been damaged such that
its removal is required, the forester shall approve its removal after adequately documenting any violations
of this chapter which have caused or contributed to the removal of a protected tree.
(Ord. 5961, 9-26-2011; Ord. 6075, 9-24-2012; Ord. 6603, 5-29-2018; Ord. 6674, 2-25-2019; Ord. 6750, 1-27-
2020)
4-8-4. - Interference with the Village forester.
It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person to unreasonably hinder, prevent, delay, or
interfere with the Village forester, Building and Zoning Official, or their agents while engaged in the
execution or enforcement of this chapter.
(Ord. 5961, 9-26-2011)
4-8-5. - Violation and penalty.
Any person who violates any provision of this chapter or who fails to comply with any notice issued
pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, upon being found guilty of violation, shall be subject to a
minimum fine of $250.00 and a maximum fine of not to exceed $750.00, depending on severity of
violation, for each separate offense. Each day during which any violation of the provisions of this
chapter shall occur or continue shall be a separate offense.
In addition to the issuance of a fine, the Village may also request the court, upon a determination
that any provision of this chapter has been violated, to enjoin the person, through an affirmative or
mandatory injunction, to cease a violation of this chapter or to require the actions mandated within
this chapter to be performed.
(Ord. 5961, 9-26-2011)
Page 26 of 32
Tree Preservation Regulations Presentation
Page 27 of 32
Purpose and Context
• Overview of current tree preservation
regulations for private property.
• Solicit Board feedback on the
appropriate scope and level of
restrictions regarding the preservation
of trees on private property.
Page 28 of 32
Current Private Tree Regulations
Scope of the regulations
• Guides homeowners on how to protect the trees they want to save during
construction projects
• Guides homeowners on how to protect their neighbors’ property line-adjacent trees
during construction
Environmental Commission feedback regarding the regulations
• Unclear restrictions for tree protection such as fencing, with minimal penalties
• Tree injury during construction due to movement of protection fences
• Clear-cutting
• Loss of heritage trees
• Loss of tree canopy
Page 29 of 32
Goal Matrix
COMMON GOAL ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROACH
RECOMMENDED APPROACH
Clarify tree Add Tree Protection language directly to the Amend/add definitions to clarify tree
protection ordinance protection
guidelines
Effectively Specify chain link (vs. orange plastic) protection Recommend orange “snow” fence. Chain link
protect trees fencing becomes cost prohibitive for applicant
during
construction
Eliminate clear- Require a tree removal permit (scope to be Initial staff recommendation does not include
cutting defined) the requirement of a tree removal permit
Protect heritage Require a tree removal permit, establish Define “heritage tree” and establish language
trees disincentives (to be defined), and establish the that heritage trees must be protected unless
in direct conflict with project. Additionally,
role of a Village Tree Preservation Officer and/or a
tightened definition of “protected tree”
“Tree Board”
Restore lost Require a tree removal permit, a tree fund, and Initial staff recommendation does not include
canopy replacement trees (to be defined) the requirement of a tree removal permit
Page 30 of 32
Policy Considerations
Require a permit: Decide whether the Village will require a tree removal permit for private
property removals.
Permit triggers: Define triggers such as heritage trees, trees above a certain diameter at
breast height (DBH) size, removals tied to demolition or new construction.
Permit cost: Consider administrative fee or a tiered fee by tree size/number.
Staff and operational impact: Anticipate added workload for plan review, site inspections,
and enforcement; can current staff absorb the work, or will additional staff be needed?
Enforcement: Evaluate in‑house inspections, third‑party certified arborist inspections, or a
hybrid approach; each option has different cost, expertise, and response‑time implications.
Page 31 of 32
End Slide
Discussion & Questions
Page 32 of 32