Muyni
← Back to Green Bay

Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board

Regular Meeting

Green Bay, WI · June 23, 2022

AgendaPacketMinutes

Minutes

MINUTES OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022, 2:00 PM Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom. A. ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION. 1. This item contains Zoom information, instructions, and a link to the Virtual Comment Form. B. ROLL CALL. 1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Josh Patchak, Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College; Brent Weycker, Citizen Member. Present: Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, Bob Mathews, Excused: C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. 1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2022, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Committee. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Brent Weycker to approve the agenda. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. 1. Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to approve the minutes. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. E. REGULAR BUSINESS. 1. Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance Districts in the City of Green Bay. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Bob Mathews to receive and place on file. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 2. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown. Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 3. Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street and East Mason Street to add eligible projects. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 4. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park. Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bob Mathews to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 5. Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the North Broadway corridor. Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 6. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Bob Mathews to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 7. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in the area north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one- half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 8. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in the area east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. Bob Matthews left the meeting at 3:00 p.m. Moved by Josh Patchak, seconded by Bradley Klingsporn to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 9. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally located in the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road, and north of Padi- Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one- half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. F. INFORMATIONAL. 1. Set next meeting date, time and format. The next meeting date will be confirmed, but is tentatively planned for August 18, 2022 or August 19, 2022. G. ADJOURNMENT. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Josh Patchak to adjourn. Motion Passed. Yes- Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Josh Patchak, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. VERBATIM MINUTES - Okay, agenda. - Here we go. - Call the Tax Incremental District joint review board for Thursday, June 23rd, 2022. We'll go through roll call. We have a Bradley Klingsporn. - Here. - Josh Patrick. - Patrick here. - Thank you, Bob Matthews. - He's there, I see him. - Yep. Thumbs up. He's here. Yep. - Matt Winker? Yep see him. Okay. And then Diana Ellenbecker. So all 5 are here. All right. Entertain a motion to approve this. - Motion to approve. - Second. - We have a motion by Bradley and second by Brent. All in favor? - [All] Aye. - Motion approved. I'll entertainment to take a motion to approve the minutes from June 23 2021. - Motion to approve. - Second. - Alright we have a motion and a second? - Second. - Third. - Aye. - Aye. - Thank you that passes. - Aye. - Thank you. Right. We'll move on regular business. The first one was consideration with annual report on the TFI for the city of green bay. Is it gonna be okay if I, mute you? Or if you want to mute, for some reason we have feedback from her. Thank you. Certainly can unmute as you have questions. As you seeing in front of you, we have enough that we try to put our TIDs down and we have enough of them. We try to put them on one spreadsheet to make it a little bit easier to look at what I'm gonna go through is a very, very high level of our 2021 annual report. However, you can stop, ask any questions or you can wait till the end, ask some questions. I don't wanna bore you with all our TID's, but as you see the way we pull it together, we have a TID on the left number, the type of TID we have the name, we have the creation date, the term date. We have the fund balance at the beginning of the year of 2021, that we kinda recap of where our different revenue sources are coming in. Most of them, the majority typically is tax increment. We have some interest, shared revenue is really, the term has changed, but it's really property tax. Personal property and or exempt computers that share a column. Then we have some developer agreements and then we have, if we borrowed or some other revenue source. So that is in that revenue section. And then we have expenditures. We have capital land purchases. We have debt in the interest that goes along with that. And we have some, either development finance and or PayGos that goes through that column. And then we have other payments that go out the door and that'll give you what, how we ended the 2021 year. Then you have the column of future project costs and the future revenues. Do you want me to go through each one and kind of talk about the highlights in those items? In each one of the TIDs, I'm really gonna talk about the financials. Neil's gonna talk a little about some of the things that are on the development side. Do I have any feedback, do you want me to go through at a very high level by TID? Or do, would you like to receive and place on file, or have questions? - Is there anything at risk Diana? - At risk? - Yeah. You're showing surplus in all of them, I'm just saying, is there anything that- it looks like you're pretty much working back to, to break even but is there anything that's that's of concern from the, from green based perspective on any of the TIDs out there? - No. What, what I would say is, as you're seeing our TID 13 is a negative fund balance, but what we're seeing by 2023 or 2024, we believe that TID 13 is gonna turn positive. So that is some really good news, that's a large TID. It's a large increment that is starting to come in for that TID. So again, looking negative, but in a couple years, it's working its way out. TID 14 right now also has a large negative fund balance. Hasn't really moved. That one, we need to get some more increment. TID 14 is your North Broadway, what we call Larson Green. Really it's the rail yard now. Projects are started they just haven't completed. We just haven't seen enough increment to really get this one moving in the right direction there. There has been a lot of development, but we just need more projects completed. That one, I don't think there's a concern. The projects have to keep moving forward. And then the other one is 22, which is our shipyard. And that is an area in which the city is investing quite a bit of money in it. We have some large developments that are happening in that area, not a concern. That's just gonna be a large investment from the city to really get that shipyard up and running. Otherwise, we've heard that before, that a lot of the TIDs go down before they come back up and we are really starting to see some of our TIDs coming back up. If they were in a negative spot or vice, you know, in the last 2 development directors, we have worked really hard in majority of our TIDs to just do PayGos and very few upfront grant. So it's really a, a switch in how we are doing. The years have gotten better that our downtown and some of our other areas have improved. So we have switched to a different kind of funding mechanism. Otherwise I think we really don't have any large concerns for any of our TIDs. - Thanks for me. It would help if you wanted to go and just talk about how many of these are kind of locked in? Meaning like, if I look at TID 4, I imagine those future project costs are debt, service payments, and maybe developer grants or something like that, that we've already agreed to. So nothing's gonna change there. We have a pretty good idea what future project costs are gonna be. And based on the increment, we have a pretty good idea what revenues are. So that's kind of locked in, but then when you look down further at shipyard and basically the shipyard and the legends maybe, those estimates are a whole lot more, "this is kind of how we're feeling about things" and not quite as concrete. Maybe if you could just say, all right, TIDs 4,5, etc are locked in. And we're pretty certain on those numbers. And then the ones where we're actively working on development and the numbers are just kind of our best guess. - Yep, I actually went through on to each one of them this morning. So I think we're gonna be fine. TID 4 passes the expenditures period out of the 2.9 and the 2.95511 million is debt. And then there is also about 1.9 million. What we are looking at is a proposed allocation to a TID 22 that is later in this deck. So right now 1 million is locked in of that 2.9. That's assuming that we have what is left of increment, the 2.2 million in increment that is assuming 4 years of increment, but again, 1 million is locked in at debt. If we go to TID 5, of that 12.7 million, we have development agreements about just under a million dollars, we have about 6 and a half million that's locked in at debt. We also have some projects that were started before the expenditure period ended, and that is improvements to our lake park. And that is about $5 million, but that's all the changes that you've seen to allow that cruise ship that just came in this past week. And then there's some additional enhancements that are already in the works for lake park. So in this case, that is really the 12, 7, 6, over 6 and a half is debt development agreements, a million and there's improvements to the park that have already been started. We'll continue on then. TID 7,8 and 9 were officially closed in 2021. So we have closed them officially, shut them down and have zeroed out those balances if there were any outstanding debt service, it will get moved to our debt service account. So those have officially been closed. When we get into TID 10, 4.2 million. In that case, the majority of that is future infrastructure needs. That is a corner of Main and Mason. We have a lot of flooding down there. So our director of public works is working on some projects to try to help reduce, not eliminate, of course we can't, but try to reduce, try to help curb some of the flooding down there. So at that point, those are future project costs. Those are truly infrastructure, project costs, no other dollars are actually obligated at this point. And that would be assuming still another 10 years, the increment side of 3.2, that is assuming 10 more years worth of increment at roughly, 250- $300,000. If we continue onto to TID 12, that expenditure period had ended in 2020. We still had some open projects for infrastructure near our nature's way. Their facility. At that point of the 10.575, that is still outstanding, 1.7 is still obligated for debt. We have an estimated 3.2 million for development agreements for really PayGo. And there is an allocation request or we'd be looking to potentially to do an allocation of 5.5 million to other TIDs. So really there's 5.5. That is probably unallocated for TID 12. That is assuming with 2022 and 2023 increment. We go onto TID 13 at 35 million. Large number, but 6.2 is estimated at the development agreements or PayGos. Point 3 is standing and the remaining 13.5 was intended to put toward ramp replacement downtown. So out of the 35.3 that you're seeing in TID 13, about 22 of it at is 0.5, we are looking forward to using that money toward a ramp replacement. That is an all incremented there that is assuming that this TID stays over the remaining 11 years. That makes up the 37.5 for revenue. I go to TID 14, that 13.3 outstanding development agreements is estimated about 5 million debt is about 6.3 million. And we assume that we have some additional project grants about 1.3 million in that, TID that makes up the 13 3 increment is assuming at 12 additional years makes up the 16.1. TID 16. $10 million is the future project cost development agreements. Just about 200,000. We have outstanding one, 5.1 million in debt. And the 4.7 is looking to pay for additional infrastructure in the military corridor. So that is unobligated the 4.5, but that's an additional project class that we're looking to do in the military corridor. And that is assuming increment for the next 13 years to make the 9.5 million. If we go into number 18, that one, I think we have a negative fund balance, we turn positive. We expect to turn positive in 2024 cash flow on number 18. That one, 27 million is a large number. Correct, outstanding. We have development agreements of about 9.8 million projected. And those are obligated. And we are looking at future project costs of 17 million in that TID, as Bradley did explain earlier. We are starting to get some of our newer TIDs. These are additional projects that, we were possibly anticipating, but there's none of those in the 5th 17.3 are locked in at this time. 19, another newer TID that started in 17. That is our east home mall area out of the 8.7 million, 1.5 is locked into development agreements for PayGos and future project costs of 7.5. That is assuming about 23 more years worth of increment to get you to your 8.9. - And future project costs on that. Are you looking at future development agreements or infrastructure type projects for us? - It would be a little bit of both, as you see, there's some things happening in the east town mall area. I see Neil shaking his head, he is actually gonna touch on that when he gets to the east town mall area. But I'll let Neil just speak to your question Bradley. - Yeah, probably a little both Brad, the one thing that I think that's unique about this one is we're kind of focusing on what we're calling in lot development. So you kinda see where the new bank buildings going up, kind of on the inside ring there, we're kind of working with the developer there to actually establish a kinda a new row of development on there. They're facing a lot of the current mall projects right now. You guys remember probably the recently the developer actually kinda rezoned the back half of that building to actually get a semi-industrial tenant in the back of that, to get that all fully occupied. We're having preliminary conversations with the owner of the Shopco building in terms of what may happen there. I think the really kind part of is to prove that this tool actually works is when I think when 19 was created, they actually left off the frontage, the parcels that were on the frontage of Mason street. And when we get to slides later, I'll show you that. So a couple of those new buildings, like the Chipotle that just opened a couple of those buildings, those are not in TIF 19. Those are actually fully on the tax roll. So obviously from a passerby, it just looks like it's entirely all east town mall, but those new developments right on Mason street are not in the TID and those are actually on the tax roll. But the investment that's happening on the inside, I think is definitely positively affecting the investment that's happening on the roadway there. So probably a little bit of both, we've got some, pedestrian improvements and some other things we wanna make to kind of help make that more of that area done in there. There's always some storm water improvements we can make to make that a little bit better, but we're anticipating, if those inline's continue, we probably have some development incentives to do to help with those as well. - Thank you. - We're getting close to the end and then you can ask any more questions again, that certainly then would be fine. TID number 20 on the Whitney park at about $6 million, about $2 million is locked in for development agreements that are ready in place. And that is assuming about 8 million for additional project costs. We do additional development agreements. Neil's gonna kind of explain some of the newer TIDs we're putting together, and we're making them smaller. So in this case, there still is some additional lots that are looking to be developed in our Whitney's park area. But at this point that would be either 3.8 million in future project costs and or into additional development agreements. And that 6.1 million is increment over 23 years Going to green made packaging. That one is the large number there, but out the 52 million for future project costs, 38 million is locked into a development agreement. We have a large PayGo with green bay packaging. So out of the 52, 38 million is locked in with the green bay packaging. That leaves about 14.3 million for future project grants. At this point I'm not anticipating additional development agreements, but certainly as if you've driven down those roads, there's certainly some infrastructure, railroads, streets; improvements that could be done over by green bay packaging. So again, not locked in the 14.3, but some future project cost. That's assuming additional 23 years worth of increment. 22 is our shipyard. That is the one. At this point, it looks like positive fund balance, and we continue as a positive fund balance, but that is because our borrowing is ahead of our expenditures at this point, that one is going to be, in cost, put in from, by the city. Out of the 63 million that is right now projected as future cost project cost to date that is locked in at just under $10 million for the development or PayGos development agreements with PayGos. We are anticipating about $27 million in debt, and that would still free up our future project costs. For additional enhancements in that area. And the reason 59.9 million is we assume additional borrowing of up to about 11 million. We are anticipating grants of about 7 million for the shipyard and the water feature. And then the balance is estimated increment for the next 25 years for this TID. And then we'll go onto the last one, which right now is our legends district. At that point, the 11.7 is locked in at estimated development agreements or PayGos of 5 million. Those are the items that are already locked in, and that would leave an allowance for about $6 million of project costs. Within that, we also have a lighting project that's going on. That's also in those future project costs. So far we haven't had a lot of development in that area. So I certainly can think that if we have more development, we'd have more allocation to development agreements or PayGos, but also we probably have increased increment, but that is not built in, but either way out of the 11.7, 5 million is locked in and then 6 million is for future project costs. That is assuming an increment of 24 over the next 24 years of projects that are already in the works or that we're aware of. Any questions from any of the members on the results from 2021? - I'm just gonna quickly zip through these, then. Diana covered a lot of the information. Oh, go ahead. - Hang on. We have these all separate items. So we really would have to entertain a motion to receive in place and file this report. - I guess, Diana, before we do that, I did have one financial related question for 13. There was a payment to Foxcon and I was just wondering what it was that they had done in TID 13 that justified the, the 54,952 paid to them. - That's an interesting one. The city of green bay is on the hook for the property tax bill for the parking ramp. That is the river ramp. It was an agreement prior to Foxcon that we thought we were going to be getting the parking ramp. So I'm not sure exactly how that all happened, but we have a development agreement slash parking agreement that we, the city maintains the building. There's some payments that go back and forth on the, on that parking ramp. But the 54,000 is actually really not a developer. It's really paying for the property tax bill on the river ramp. - OK. So that really didn't, it didn't go to them for doing anything. It just wiped out the property tax bill for the parking ramp? Yeah. - Essentially. Yes. - Unfortunately they haven't. Yes. They haven't done anything. So yes. We're not paying them for any services or any development that they have done. - But they do own that. Or they have some sort of. - They do still own the property, yes. - Okay. All right. Thank you. I'll have a motion to approve. - I'll second. - Alright we have a motion by Bradley, a second by Bob. Any other questions otherwise all in favor? - [All] Aye. - That passes. - Okay. - Then item number 2 consideration with possible action to adopt, or did you just wanna run down through the TIDs? - Yeah, yeah, absolutely. So just as again, I think Diana covered most of this, but this is in the annual port, but again, this is just kind of the general location of where all our districts are at. Here's TID 4. It's downtown, no significant development looking at possible allocation closes in 2025. TID 5 is kind a weird one, more Frankenstein shaped one. It kind of crosses the river goes both sides here, this is where certainly the light wall dock improvements that you mentioned was a big hit with the cruise ship. Second one I think is coming in on June 30th already. So that's a, a good sign. The company had a good experience with that. I did want make a note on the one Astra project that's in this area south of Mason has been delayed. So the developer's kind of working on getting some new financing and doing some things there. So we're hopeful that that comes back next year, but we're not positive exactly where that's gonna come from. And obviously the public market project and the private development project associated with that. That's within this district. However, if we were gonna do a deal that would certainly probably require a separate TID going in the future, probably in overlay in a separate development agreement, which is not in place, but have we have had preliminary discussions on that one, but certainly nothing, nothing in, in force at this point. So again, the expenditure period is done and it closes in 26. TID 10. Several smaller retail infield projects are being looked at in this area. the big expenditure again is Dianne is probably more storm water improvements, hopefully for this area, just because of the flooding that does happen in this area. Looking to close that in 31. TID 12. This is the I 43 business park. You know, the nature's way project infrastructure was the main thing that's driving that one right now. Latest closure on that one is 25. 10 district 13. This is important, certainly because not only it's existing area, but also because of the WPS site here in this area here. Part of this area is in for that we had just very preliminary discussions on that site. Really kinda just looking at preliminary land use concepts with, with the developer, as well as just kinda coming up with the plan for environmental mediation on the site. Definitely looking at this area for how to accommodate some parking in the future that has to do with certainly obligations with the main street ramp going away possibly, and then identifying another location for new parking. So the main street, specifically that actually goes to Schriber at their request within the next 10 to 12 years if they ask for it. Essentially we'd have to knock that building down and give them that site for future expansion. Last conversation we've had with them is they have no intention of exercising that right now, I think their office building is set up for 800 people. They've got about 500 on staff right now, about a hundred people actually on site. So they don't have a whole lot of need for the extra space right now, but that's certainly impacting our downtown. And we'd love to get a few more folks back in the offices to come out and have lunch during the day. Then that one closes in 32, here's TID 14, the rail yard working with them to do project financing for that project. We are in the middle of kinda renegotiating that development agreement. Project has received its WHEDA tax credits. So that's a great sign moving that one forward. Also working with them on active discussions on maybe a new corporate tenant for one of their buildings. So we are still seeing some good positive activity there. We haven't got the increment, we're working on getting that, moving forward, working very positively with the developer at this point, TID 16, Military avenue. I think the notable projects on this one is we got some outlaw development possibly at the former shop go site. HJ Martins also got a lot of development about lots kind of in these same areas where we're working on these. So we think we're very positive on the future of this district as well. Again, that closes in 34. TID 18. This is University avenue. This is the project, tuning properties. The folks remember it used to be TMD properties had a project here that kind of stalled and didn't go forward. We got a new development agreement in place with Tune-in properties to construct their side. They're going to be hopefully moving ground, hopefully this fall and then actually be under construction with their first phase in the spring. There's also a new vet clinic that's being evaluated for it, so a little bit more extra increment here in that area. We mentioned east town mall again here. I mentioned these white areas here, right on the frontage area. That's where some of the newer restaurants have built and located and are not within the tip district are coming fully on the tax roll, but I think are benefiting from the investment activity that's happening within the district, right on the other side of it. Some of those in lots, the façade improvements mentioned the adjusted retail development. We expect that to continue. We hope the developers continue to attract other investors hopefully for that area. The TID should close in 2044. Here's Wendy park. I think Diana mentioned there's a couple of more opportunities for a few town homes to be built in this area. But right now there's nothing in the docket. We're hopefully gonna be continuing discussions with that developer to keep those moving at some point. They have met their minimum requirement I believe for their agreement, but they still have an opportunity to continue that development. So we hope to talk them into doing that. Green bay packaging- whoop, go ahead. - Neil has the response to those properties been strong? I mean, do they have high occupancy? - I think there's half of them have done very, very well. And half of them have been a little slow and we think primarily it's just due to price point difference between the 2 developers who worked in this area, but we certainly are still seeing plenty of demand. So we're confident that maybe if we can get this one developer who's been very successful, but maybe acquire the rest of the space that's available. He might be the one then to pull it off and try to get some additional projects going on there. So mixed results. We think primarily based on price point for the housing units. - OK. Thank you. - I mentioned green bay packaging here and in the shipyard, obviously lots of news going on here, phase 1 improvements or contract has just been awarded. So we'll be actually doing the public improvements here in the next couple of weeks, we'll get those started. That includes all the waterfront amenities, the marina, the kayak launch, the bike trail, some of the other seating area, right on the waterfront, that will be underway really here in the next 30 to 60 days. Phase 2 is already being planned. We have been essentially notified of potential award from the national park service from a 5 million grant for phase 2. So we're excited to see that and hopefully get that fully implemented to moving forward. Our private development, some updates on those: the merge urban development project are currently kind of reworking some of their soils costs on site. They had made some assumptions in terms of what the soil compaction level was on the site and found that it was not what they thought it was. So we're kind of working through with them on how to get that taken care of. We're hopeful that they're just gonna change their phasing around a little bit and hopefully should be getting moving here in the spring. Impact 7 is actually on the Badger sheet metal site across the street on Broadway. They are actually looking at doing an affordable housing project as well. They have, received their tax credits as well. We are looking at trying to figure out exactly how that project moves forward. We're readily under a planning option, a preliminary term sheet with that developer, hopefully having a development agreement with them in the next 30, 60 days. So a lot going on in this particular district. So we're excited to see some things finally get moving here on this one. Then obviously the legends district, the last one. The good news was the hotel groundbreaking was just this past what couple weeks ago. So they're under construction and they're moving forward. We are looking at some, several pedestrian trail and lighting improvements, as Diana mentioned for that corridor, getting going in the summer, early fall, that one closes in 46. So does anybody have any questions on any of those? I know we just raced through a lot of territory in not a lot of time. So if anybody has any questions I may answer, certainly let me know if you have anything, even after this meeting, I'd be happy to follow up on any status of any projects in these areas. - On the shipyard, those 2 developments that you mentioned. You said that we were working through some changes. Do we have any commitments? Is there a chance that they both fall through? - The merge urban development is actually under development agreement. So we have an agreement with them in place. We're looking at just modifying, primarily modifying the timeframe for them, certainly with costs being what they are, construction costs. There's always a little concern with that, but right now they have not given us any indication that they plan on not moving forward with the project. They're simply working through maybe a little bit of a schedule, change. Impact 7 we're been kinda working through them with their numbers and their financial model of what they're trying to bring forward, but they have been very persistent in trying to accelerate their project. So right now we're still confident. We don't have any reason to believe that they're going to delay and hopefully we'll be in and have something moving forward with them either this fall again, or early spring. I celebrate when I actually see the bull moving dirt and we know they've got their financing and everything's moving forward. So certainly in this economy with interest rates and everything else, until they're actually moving, and even the project's actually done, there's always some degree of risk I think in this day and age. - I think that's it then. We're going to the next section Diana. - Business item, number 2: consideration with possible action to adopt an allocation amendment resolution and to amend the project plan for TID 4 downtown. - We don't have a whole lot of of details on these at this point, because these are primarily tax amendments and most cases on these, they're not substantial documents. So for TID 4, as we mentioned before, would simply be an allocation amendment of revenues from 4 into TID 22. At this point for these and really all the subsequent reports on shown on the screen. Right now, we're just gonna be asking for a hold till the next joint review board meeting. Obviously the TID 4 balance, we feel could be a safety net for what we're looking to get completed in TID 22 with the shipyard. That's the short version of that one. Anybody have any questions on that one? - Well, I do have a question. In your projections that you have built in, are those allocations assumed in your projections? - Yes, they are. In the future project costs, that was kind of what Bradley had asked earlier. When we went through TID 4, we have 2.9 million future project costs. We have 1 million outstanding for debt. And then that is about 1.9 million as a proposed allocation to TID 22. So that is already built in over the course of the next 4 years. - Any other questions? - How much is the allocation from TID 12 to TID 22, please. - For TID 12 have we pulled the number for that one yet Diana? I can't remember if we did or not. I think we're actually looking through our TID 22. We have L as our financial consultant reviewing the overall TID 22 financial picture. So by the time we get to the RDA version of this, there will be a much more sound projection on what that's going to be. But I think we may have had a preliminary number at this point. I don't know if we had one. Do you remember if we put one in for that or not? - Yes. Out of the 10.5 million. That's outstanding on that. We're looking at for future project costs for TID 12, 1.7 is locked in for debt, 3.2 is estimated for PayGo. And that leaves about 5.5 million that we were looking to do an allocation amendment to TID 22. Yes, that is what we had discussed. There are some options with that one. You know, affordable housing but that right now there's out of that 10.5, 5.5 is not obligated as in, as an allocation amendment. - Okay. Thank you. - I guess, to follow up on that. So a bit with both TID 4 and TID 12 It looks like, if we didn't do an allocation to TID 22, some of those could be terminated. - Yes. Early. - This year. like they'll have enough to cover future costs based on the increments and what the balance was at 12, 31, 21, that they could cover all their future costs by the end of 2022. - Yeah, I think, go ahead, Diana. - That, that would be correct. Based on the fund balance of 740, we get another 500, in and the 22 would go into, by the end of 20. Yes. Based on future probability yes. TID 4 could be terminated by the end of 22 and still have a a slight positive fund balance without allocation amendment. - I'm not proposing that, I'm just trying to show what the decision is is. Do we keep these open to the end of their term in 2025? And then we can allocate 1.7 from TID 4 and 5.5 from TID 12 to give 7.2 million to TID 22, reducing the borrowing, especially with borrowing costs, being higher on this new TID and improve the financial viability of it, or do we terminate those right away and get our TID increments? That's the decision that the taxing authorities need to make. Is that accurate? - Absolutely Brad. Exactly. I said we're still cautiously optimistic that the increment that will come in from the projects we're working on will sail, look great. And we're coming back to you guys in 2 years saying, "you know what, guys, we're good." We can move this and everything worked the way we thought it was going to, just the uncertainty around the things you exactly mentioned, Brad, is kinda why we're looking at at least having these I guess as a safety net, if you will, to kind of make sure that those projects are paid for. - You're just pushing dollars out that would be received in another 20 years. So I'd like to understand if TID 22 is truly at risk that you, to the tune of, you know, $7.4 million, because it's fairly early for you to be calling that risk out. So what changed in your assumptions? - Yeah, I think the main thing that we're looking at right now is obviously, we've just had all of our borrowing approved for phase 1. So that borrowing is in place and we're proceeding with that, for phase 2, even with the $5 million grant coming in for the federal, there's a dollar for dollar match for that requirement. So we're certainly looking at having those while we're bringing in 5 billion, we still need to show the investment, to match of what the rest of that could be there. So that's certainly a driving factor. And then obviously we're looking at still some of the uncertainty around some of the environmental in that particular area, is well in terms of getting that resolved and until we actually have buildings in the ground, that increment is actually coming in. Certainly we're a little hesitant to say it's all gonna be all smooth sailing at this point, but an absolute fair question. Ellers is actually performing kind of an updated analysis for us on TID 22. So we'll, we will have a full, detailed financial for that by the time the RDA takes a look at this. And we'll certainly be sharing that with the members here as well. - Okay. Thank you. - I guess that kind of brings up the question of the timing of the transfer. Do you need this funds for activities that you'll be paying out in 2023? And so the transfer needs to happen now in 22 for you to have the cash into 22 or is this something- oh, go ahead, Diane. - Oh, I apologize. What I would be projecting out of the 1.9, I would say in 2022, we would have $1 million balance that would be transferred. The resolution that I would work with Neil to bring forward would be a million dollars at this point in 2022, that could go to TID 22, which would reduce our borrowing in 22 to pay for the shipyard. Again, as Neil just said, we just awarded a construction contract that we will have enough to pay probably out this year, but by spring we would have to pay out the balance. So we would be looking at potentially a million now, and then I, I would the remaining balance, which would be roughly 900,000 projected cash flow would be really 2025. So we would really be looking to split it half now and half in 3 years. This is what we've projected out for the over the next couple years. - Okay. - Other questions on TID 4. At this point, there's certainly, there's no approvals at this point. It would simply be asking this to hold this item to the next joint review board meeting for when we have a full draft project plan available with including the full financial analysis. That's the one that Bob is referring to. - Yes so I'm going to make a motion to hold until the next RDA or really the next JRB meeting. - JRB meeting. We'll be sharing full information by the time the RDA meeting rolls around with the joint review board. But the actual action would not be until the next JRB meeting. - Including at actual resolution then. - Yes. And that will include an RDA resolution and council resolution, assuming that those are both supported. - Move to hold. - Second. - Okay. So we had a motion to hold by Joshua. And was that Bradley that second it? - Yes. - Thank you all in favor. - [All] Aye. - That motion passes. - Thank you. - I will go to the next item. Number 3 for consideration with possible action to amend the project plan for TID 10 main street and East Mason projects. - Yeah, right now, as we said, our director, Steve Greneer and public works department is essentially kind of developing an updated storm water management plan for this area. And that's where the primary investment is going to be for this in particular. We are not anticipating any other really new projects at this time that we believe that they are primarily storm. There may be a street project or something else associated with a storm water project, but the storm water addition spin will probably likely be the main addition for this area. And again, we'll have a detailed map of, of what those might be in a list. Certainly coming up here shortly. We have a very preliminary estimate from director Greneer but he's looking to kind of finalize a map location as well as some more detailed cost estimates. - Motion to hold to the next joint review meeting. - Second. - All right. We have a motion by Bradley and second by Joshua. Any other discussion all in favor? - [All] Aye. - That passes, next item. Number 4 consideration with possible action to adopt an allocation amendment resolution to amend the project plan for TID 12, I 43 industrial park. - Essentially, this is the same report we did for TID 4 and for the same purpose we called through and we kind of finalized the financial projections on this; we'll determine final need and hopefully, maybe confirm the amount needed, at least for being considered for this allocation event. - So in the, in the packet, it looks like there's a possibility. This could go to TID 14 or TID 22. Is that still on the table? - I think right now we're looking at primarily 22. Initially, we looked at it as possibly be being 14 of them. But because of the next item we're looking at here on this item, we're looking at this point just allocating to 22, depending on what happens with the action on TID 14. - Move to hold to the next JRD. - Second. - We have a, a motion by Joshua, I believe second by Bob. - Yes. - And any other discussion? All in favor? - [All] Aye. - Motion passes. Number 5 consideration with possible action to extend TID 14 by 3 years and adopt an allocation amendment resolution and amend the project plan for TID 14, the north Broadway corridor. - And again, I think similar to what we said previously, Josh, you mentioned on this one, I think right now we're really just looking at a project plan amendment for the extension of 3 years on this one. Obviously I think this is something that this board has looked at previously, but we were looking at essentially now this time in terms of the pandemic and delays and the change in project financing and the loss of essentially 2 years of increment. Since I think this was discussed previously, we're back in front of this. The developer has provided the city with a cash flow analysis, documenting why they think they need this extension. We preliminary look on it. The staff is preliminary agreement that we agree with their analysis, but we are going to ask Ellers to take a look at that full cash flow analysis and provide that essentially at the time of when this comes back before this body. Actually at the time of the RDA public hearing to have that analysis completed and available. - I apologize for being new if this is obvious to other people, but in the, the annual report is the future revenue estimated? Does that assume the 3 year extension? - It does not. The 16.1 million that is out that we chose is for future revenue is increment for 12 years. And I made myself a note that does not include an extension. So it would have the extension. Good question. - Yeah. - Yeah. It does not anticipate an extension, it's not built in at this point. - Would this change any of the development terms? If we had the extra 3 years of increment of one and a half million dollars going into that, would you want to then propose infrastructure or is this just to have a buffer in case anything goes wrong? Because right now you're projecting a $13 surplus. - But essentially this is looking at what would be owed to the developer under there in terms of the incentive directly to the developer. That does include some infrastructure responsibilities on their end, Brad. So we're assuming as part of that, there are also other agreements in the rail yard that certainly could potentially benefit from this. But at this point we're looking at primarily the Ford at the rail yard being the primary beneficiary of that extension. If and when that gets passed, we've told the developer that BDL would sit down with them and actually reevaluate the existing agreements on a one by one basis. But we not giving automatic 3 year extension on all their projects automatically. - Okay. I'll move to hold to the next JRB. - Second. - We have a motion by Joshua second by Bradley. Any other discussion? All in favor? - [All] Aye. Any neighs? Motion passes. Number 6 consideration with possible action to adopt an allocation amendment resolution and amend the project plan for TID 22, the shipyard. - And our understanding is actually discussing legal counsel. If we put this in there, I don't believe an allocation amendment action is actually required for a recipient for a donor TIF to be a recipient. However, to be on the safe side, we've gone ahead and added this on here just to cover our bases. So assuming the other actions would move forward, we would also proceed with just make sure that we're, we're legally covered with any action we might need to do for TED 22s project and accept any funds. Subjects to direction by the city attorney. - It's a little odd to have those as separate items. - Yeah I agree, and Brad, tell me if I'm wrong. In our experience with the department of revenue, they like things being very specific. We're being a little bit overly specific in terms of saying, "Hey, we're acknowledging these guys are donating and we're acknowledging this one is a recipient." So we're just trying to make sure we cover our legal bases that we've adequately noticed. That's the intent of what we wanna do, but I fully agree. - It's just possible for the donor to pass and then the recipient to fail, which would be awkward. - Absolutely. Yeah. So if we determine the legal counsels is not needed, we'll report that as such at, at the next meeting. - I was wondering if we could, with these allocations, when we have these for consideration at the next meeting, if we could have the amount that would be an immediate transfer this year as separate consideration for an intention of future transfers. And I just think that the idea of transferring to avoid some borrowing costs in the shipyard makes a lot of sense financially, but we don't want to get into what Bob was getting at before. We don't want it to look like we're bailing out this brand new TID, they need our financial help. And so to say that we're gonna transfer things in 2025 kind of presupposes the financial condition of the shipyard at that point. Is that something that we would need, you know, a separate action on or what do the other members think of that proposal? - Yeah, I agree. I think the thing is, once the dollars get transferred, they're hard to get out because it closes at the end. So if we treat it as a financing mechanism, I'm much more supportive. Just taking cash and moving it in for rainy day, Not as interested. - Yes, I would agree. Actually on my cash flow, I have let's say TID 4, I show an estimated 1 million coming in or sorry, 1 million going out in 2022. And then I didn't show them another transfer until 3 years later. So when we were gonna bring that resolution through, it would probably would've been an ask for $1 million and not for the full 1 9. But we certainly can have the resolution stating what we're asking for now. And then if there's an anticipated and a future date for a future resolution, we would let you know what that is. But we wouldn't be looking for action on that at the next JRB. - Great. Thank you. - Any motion on this one? Number 6. - I have a motion to hold until the next meeting. - Second. - All right. We have a motion by Bradley second by Bob. Any other's discussion if all in favor? - [All] Aye. - Motion passes. - Super. - Number 7 consideration with possible action to adopt a creation resolution to establish TID number 24 cherry street and adopt the project plan. You need me to continue the whole item? - Nope, I can go ahead and list that one here. Just start off on some notes on this one. Staff has been, I think Diana mentioned before, we're trying to kind of identify smaller districts at this point rather than go out and grab everything just to kind of mitigate any risks of valuation going down. Just in terms of trying to be a little bit more conservative in terms of how we know it is, this process to amend a boundary is fairly straightforward. It's similar to what we're doing right now. And if we decide there's a good project and need to do that, you know, again, we feel very confident that we could bring that forward and present that to you guys at that time. So we think this is a good call again, in addition, we're looking at mixed use districts because they are shorter duration, usually 20 years versus other ones, I'll address that later on, possibly being a more of a rehabilitation district to get that a little bit extra time, depending on the cash flow, but obviously mentioned construction pricing is slowing projects. It has not canceled them yet, but it's certainly slowing them down and causing delays. The good news is with the districts. We'll be talking about here shortly. There is an anchor project that's kind of set up to help create increment right off the bat. So we're excited about that. They are not overly speculative. They have projects ready to go. The downtown TID will certainly be PayGo to the extent we can on anything related to the developer incentive and the industrial TID we're gonna be reviewing may have some minimal upfront costs. If there's some infrastructure things we need to do to accommodate that. But the very first item in this agenda item is the cherry street project. So folks know this is the here's the cherry street parking ramp. This is this here's this Adam street parking lot, 221 Cherry street here, Shower and Schumacher buildings are right here. The confetti's building, the old Vic theater is right here. So this is in a relatively small district, but again, very specific in its purpose of what we wanna do. So we talk about these areas projects, essentially looking at initially. Also when the draft plan was attached, looking at about 11.8 million of costs. Right now, we've got about $8-11.5 million of revenue coming in. We haven't done any other projections unlimited. We don't have full projects or evaluations listed in there. So we believe that will come up enough to cover the cost anticipated by the incentives on that. But that has not been quite finalized. We are also working with elders essentially to come up with a cashflow analysis for this particular district. So it is very small. There is a project that is proposed right here at 222 Cherry street. This is the boss's building we call it in terms of the single story building that normally, if you walk by here, you would see a single story retail structure right here. It's being proposed to add 5 stories to the top of that at this point, subject to final architectural was that we have a development agreement in place to provide incentives to assist with the cost of actually redoing this building. Apparently, historically, I think it did have a 4 to 5 story building. There was apparently a fire sometime in the past that took all the top floors off it and they never added them back on. So we're hopeful that the, the foundations are still good enough to be able to support a new project. I understand that they're still going back and kinda confirming and verifying that. Best case scenario, they would be able to do that. Worst case scenario, They would probably have to actually do full demolition on the current site and put a new foundation in for that particular structure. - You know what the projected price points are on those apartments? - I think they are supposed to be market rates, depending on the bedroom unit account, I do actually have it in their development agreement. Bob, I can forward those over to you, but I think they're kind of looking at the 80 to 120% of the area median income was kind what they were talking. So more moderate range. They're not gonna be super luxury ones. Just out past the affordable range. Which is kind of what we're seeing is more of a gap. We're doing a lot of investment in the lower end, not as much in the higher end, but in terms of pricing and so forth, we are seeing some projects that are going that direction. What's missing is this kind of area in the middle in terms of folks who are just, they're not qualified for the lower income programs, but they're not, certainly can't afford the top of the line. So there's kinda this middle gap and we feel this project would actually fit that perfectly. I think it's mostly just one and 2 bedroom units if I recall correctly. So probably in more of that 800 to 1200 bucks a month rent. I'm assuming at this point. - So just real quickly, you said Whitney way, some were some were selling quickly and others weren't. Is it a price point issue or is it a price for the quality issue? - Well, I certainly don't know about that second part, Bob, but there's certainly a price point. I thought what we have heard at this point from other folks is just a general price condition. Although certainly I know the quality of the one developer is certainly the one who's doing pretty well. It does build a nice unit and I think has been pretty successful with that. I am not familiar with the other developer quite as much. - OK. Only I'm asking is if Whitney's not that far away and you're putting in similar price point, it's either I've got poor quality for the price or, you know, or that price point isn't as, as in demand. - Absolutely. Fair question. From all of our market data and research we're seeing is that there's still pretty high demand for housing units. So it's surprising to see unless something's really out of whack price wise. It is surprising to not see those moving a little bit faster because it is a good location. It's a great project spot right next to the park. It's close to downtown. It's a good spot. So, absolutely a fair question. I wish I had a, a better answer for you. - That's fine. We'll have a chance to talk about it again. I apologize. I have to leave at 3. I have another appointment. - Okay. Just if I jump off, that's the reason why I'm not upset. - Okay. Fair enough. Thanks Bob. So any, any questions on the proposed hit 24 here. otherwise, similar to the other ones, we'd ask for just a motion to hold this to the next JRB meeting. - The concept we saw there, is that 222 and 221. - No, this is just 222, 221 is just a parking lot across the street from this project that does not have an active project being proposed at this point. The city's owns that lot. So we're actually likely to go out for an RFP to try to attract a developer to do something on that site. - And same thing you're looking for mixed use multifamily. - Ideally, I think this is a good opportunity to get some density downtown and maybe support some of the, the downtown businesses by getting a few more heads down there, living downtown here. Absolutely. - And that would be on the side of the existing Adam street parking lot. - Yes. Correct. - Okay. - To, to hold to the next meeting. - Second. - All right. We have a motion by Joshua and we have a second by Bradley. Any other question? Any other discussion, If not, all approve. - [All] Aye. - Okay. Number 8, consideration with possible action to adopt a creation resolution to establish TID number 25 Monroe street and adopted project plan. - Okay. Solona here's this is an also one. We have a specific project, lots right here owned by our redevelopment authority right now the 200 north Monroe project folks have seen that pop up in the news here within the last year or so. So a relatively smaller district kind of in between some of our other districts in this immediate area. We, trying with the area, we're looking at in until such time as other projects may come about. So again, that's the area. So we are looking at about 25 parcels, kind of looking at it as a mixed use district. However, we look at our cash flow life. We were assuming kind of a 27 year life. So if that's the case, this will end up being a conservation or rehabilitation TID at end of the day. This project has been the specific project on that location has been really experiencing some difficulties with their construction estimates. We have assigned development agreements subjects to a, a TID being created for this one, working with them on about a $2 and a half million gap. They are not asking for more TIF assistance. This is the good news. However, we are trying to find other financing options for them to essentially close the gap and complete their project. So we do have some opportunity if we really wanted to. And Diane cover your ears, because I think we kind of are comfortable with really where it's at. And fortunately the developer has felt that he really wasn't comfortable asking for any additional, knowing what we, the city's other projects have been requested for the area. So most of them have been in the 70% increment range. This one's actually at 75, so it's a hair higher, but in terms of just overall cash flow, we do feel that there's other projects kind of north up. And this, this is where this project is. There's nothing pending on these projects, but we do think there have been some discussions where additional increment is very likely to occur. So we are confident that there there'll be substantial revenue to cover any expenditures at this point. And again, we'll also be kind of taking care of having elders run a formal cash flow analysis for us on this part as well. There's just a rendering what that project would look like. So again, kind of a nice up on the Monroe, the tower scale, the 5 stories here, first floor retail, including kind of a grocery market space, possibly UWGB leasing some space here and then scaling it down to kind of this 3 story building again, where there's more residential kind of on the side. So very unique design, underground parking for a lot of the project, this is because outdoor patio area. And then there some onsite parking for the retail customers. So a really very exciting project. We're excited. Got a little bit more work to do with them to show UPEN the pencil, to get across the finish line. But we believe TIF contribution is pretty much locked in at this point. - Is there anything to include the Monroe apartments? - Oh, right. This one right here. Just because we've heard the conditions that we're dealing with over there right now, they're pretty rough in terms of, we think there's likely to be some sort of project happening there sometime in the future. There's nothing pending that we're aware of, but there has been a lot of action in terms of our inspection departments and things kind of having to come over there and do work there. So we're familiar. We're very familiar with its prime for redevelopment, especially if there's some activity. We do know that there's a builder actively looking at this corner of Maine in Monroe that if something could happen here, that there might be some incentive to grabbing something here on this particular site. Plus the value of this building is low enough. It's not likely to go any lower it's. I hope not. - It's zero. - Yeah. Is it still zero at this point? We're just kinda looking at this as we do think that it is a redevelopment opportunity and obviously if it's zero, there was no risk in including it in terms of evaluation. Nothing specifically pending that we're aware of at this point. Just, just being a bit speculative that something, could happen there. Any questions on 25? - A motion. - To hold to the next meeting. - Second. - Alright we had a motion by Joshua 2nd by Bradley to hold any other discussion, hearing none all in favor. - [All] Aye. - That passes. - Okay. Thank you. - Let me read. The last one consideration with possible action to adopt a creation resolution, to establish TID number 26 grand new industrial park and adopt the project plan. - Great. Thank you, Diana. This is essentially here. If folks are familiar, we've had had recent discussions and development agreement approved with carnivore meat company here at green green bank located here, primarily on these parcels right here. These are essentially city owned parcels that we have acquired for purposes of industrial development. So this is the location of where that project would go. The other areas you've identified here, staff has actually been in communication with, with these owners and that they have expressed an interest in possibly moving forward on development. So at this point, this is reviewing this as our phase 1 area essentially, of the growth park of this particular industrial area. So the I 43 park is simply kind of just off the screen over here, off to the left. So these particular owners, we feel that's a strong potential for add additional industrial development going forward. We do have essentially a development agreement with the the initial landowner. We're conservatively, assuming that there would be kind of a mirrored project occurring on some of those properties, obviously with the amount of land here, there should be multiple projects, occurring infrastructure is largely to this area. There's some things we'll need to extend to the south and maybe a little bit out to the west to ensure that it's available for the next phase of expansion for this area. But for the most part that most of the infrastructure needed in this area will kind of be to the south and possibly a, a bit of it to the east and west to provide some sort of spur connection for future industrial development here. So again, right now we anticipate just on the first project, the industrial project that has been approved at this point was again, Phil was a very competitive project but a very, very, I think beneficial cash flow for the city in terms of what its projection in projected increment would be. So we do suspect there should be sufficient, even just on a very conservative approach. We feel there's gonna be some substantial valuation and increment made to help cover the costs that we're projecting at this point. We'll be doing a full formal financial cash flow analysis as part of the final project. And this is the car project a little bit tough to see it's a great big long building. So here's kinda the building footprint on that particular site. Here's the actual building structure that is as proposed. They would like to be under construction like in the next couple weeks. So they're not messing around. - It says here, the description of the district. This is 26, right? - Yep. It looks like I got the wrong. - That's for the last one. - Right. Mainstream road that should not be in there anymore. That's the wrong descriptions. North and south of Mason street and Finger road. And then with Grandview here in the middle. Thank you for pointing that out. - Yeah. - This would be a standard industrial TID I think 20 years, for this one. - I would entertain a motion. - Motion to hold to the next meeting. - Second. - All right. We have a motion by Bradley second by Joshua. Any other discussion? If not all in favor. - [All] Aye. The motion passes. - Thank you. And I think just as from a wrap up here, Diana, this is akin. We're kind of looking at RDA meeting and public hearing on August 1st and public city council meeting the next day on August 2nd, looking at probably tentatively in our to checking availability for members here on the 18th or 19th of August. So we are planning on having a full kind of working draft of all the project plans, ready to go and resolutions by the August 1st meeting. So those packets should include that. We'll be including that and sharing that with joint review board members as well in case there's any questions. - Any other discussion, or that would be our last item, motion to adjourn. - So moved. - Second. - Motion by Bradley second by Joshua. All in favor. - [All] Aye. - Thank you everybody.

Agenda

AGENDA OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022, 2:00 PM Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom. A. Zoom Meeting Information. 1. This item contains Zoom information, instructions, and a link to the Virtual Comment Form. B. Roll Call. 1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Josh Patchak, Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College; Brent Weycker, Citizen Member. C. Approval of the Agenda. 1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2022, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Committee. D. Approval of Minutes. 1. Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting. E. Regular Business. 1. Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance Districts in the City of Green Bay. 2. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown. 3. Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street and East Mason Street to add eligible projects. 4. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park. Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board June 23, 2022 Page 1 5. Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the North Broadway corridor. 6. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard. 7. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in the area north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. 8. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in the area east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. 9. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally located in the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road, and north of Padi-Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. F. Informational. Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board June 23, 2022 Page 2 1. Set next meeting date, time and format. G. Adjournment. 1) THIS MEETING IS RECORDED: THE VIDEO OF THIS MEETING AND MINUTES ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.greenbaywi.gov 2) ACCESSIBILITY: Any person wishing to attend who requires special accommodation because of a disability, should contact the City Safety Manager at 920-448-3125 at least 48 hours before the scheduled meeting time so that arrangements can be made. 3) QUORUM: Please take notice that a majority or quorum of the Common Council will attend this Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board meeting and will constitute a meeting of the Common Council for purposes of discussion and information gathering relative to this agenda. 4) REPRESENTATION: The party requesting the communication, or their representative, should be present at this meeting. Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board June 23, 2022 Page 1

Packet

AGENDA OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, JUNE 23, 2022, 2:00 PM Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom. A. Zoom Meeting Information. 1. This item contains Zoom information, instructions, and a link to the Virtual Comment Form. B. Roll Call. 1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Josh Patchak, Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College; Brent Weycker, Citizen Member. C. Approval of the Agenda. 1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2022, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Committee. D. Approval of Minutes. 1. Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting. E. Regular Business. 1. Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance Districts in the City of Green Bay. 2. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown. 3. Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street and East Mason Street to add eligible projects. 4. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park. Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board June 23, 2022 Page 1 5. Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the North Broadway corridor. 6. Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard. 7. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in the area north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. 8. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in the area east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. 9. Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally located in the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road, and north of Padi-Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. F. Informational. Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board June 23, 2022 Page 2 1. Set next meeting date, time and format. G. Adjournment. 1) THIS MEETING IS RECORDED: THE VIDEO OF THIS MEETING AND MINUTES ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.greenbaywi.gov 2) ACCESSIBILITY: Any person wishing to attend who requires special accommodation because of a disability, should contact the City Safety Manager at 920-448-3125 at least 48 hours before the scheduled meeting time so that arrangements can be made. 3) QUORUM: Please take notice that a majority or quorum of the Common Council will attend this Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board meeting and will constitute a meeting of the Common Council for purposes of discussion and information gathering relative to this agenda. 4) REPRESENTATION: The party requesting the communication, or their representative, should be present at this meeting. Agenda of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board June 23, 2022 Page 1 Virtual Meeting Instructions Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board Zoom Meeting Information Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84702439013?pwd=Wk53U21LYnlMWjBoK2Yrekw1ZHk3Zz09 Meeting ID: 847 0243 9013 Passcode: 261684 One tap mobile +13126266799,,84702439013# US (Chicago) +16468769923,,84702439013# US (New York) Dial by your location +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 646 876 9923 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 408 638 0968 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 847 0243 9013 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kctdzfcqhB Public Comments If you wish to speak at this public meeting or leave a comment, please fill out the online Comment Form prior to the meeting. Additional Information 1. Wisconsin Open Meetings Law still applies a. Persons interested in speaking to an item must state their name and address for the minutes. b. Committee/Commission/Board members will still follow Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised 12th edition. 2. Please log into the Zoom meeting at least 10 minutes before the meeting begins to ensure a proper connection and that your technology is working. a. If you are a Board Member, please log into CivicClerk with a computer, laptop, or tablet device. 3. Once you are in the meeting please mute yourself. a. You may unmute yourself when you are called upon to speak. 4. Waiting room a. When you call in or connect via web or Zoom app, you will be placed in a “waiting room.” b. The meeting host will then admit you to the meeting, and mute you upon entrance (you will still be able to hear and or otherwise observe the meeting). 5. Registering a. The host may ask you to register for the meeting. A registration link will be sent to you along with the invite. You’ll receive another email confirming that you’re registered for the meeting. b. If you’re using a phone, your registration will be tied to an email. 6. Raising your hand a. Committee/Commission/Board members—you can either use CivicClerk and request to speak or you can also utilize the “raise your hand” tool in the Zoom platform (you’d need to use a computer or tablet) to let the host know you would like to speak. You can also un-mute yourself and start speaking. b. Persons with items on the agenda or other interested parties —you can also utilize the “raise your hand” tool on the Zoom platform via computer or mobile device. You will be allowed to speak once the committee, commission, or board has moved to “open the floor for interested parties to speak.” Once discussion on your agenda item has concluded, the host will mute you, unless the committee opens the floor again. 7. What devices should I use? a. Smart phone (please see more detailed instructions on page 3) b. Land line c. Tablet— in advance of the meeting, please download the Zoom Meeting app by using either the Apple Store or the Play Store. You will be asked to input your name, to identify you for the meeting. d. Computer— you can access the meeting through a web browser by clicking on the meeting link, or through the Zoom Meeting app. If using the app, please download it in advance of the meeting. You will be asked to input your name, to identify yourself for the meeting. e. For tablet and computer users--if you download the app you may be asked to verify your email. 8. Zoom etiquette a. Muting yourself when you’re not speaking will prevent your background noise from interfering with others’ ability to listen to and participate in the meeting. b. If you’re using a telephone, please identify yourself with your phone number and state your name and address before you speak. Zoom meeting hosts can see only your telephone number and will ask you to identify yourself. 9. Closed session a. Persons in the Zoom meeting will be put into a waiting room while the committee/commission/board meets in Closed Session. Participants will be admitted back into the Zoom meeting once the committee reconvenes in Open Session. b. Persons watching a Common Council meeting live on YouTube will see a gray screen with the City logo during closed session. 10. Persons interested in attending anonymously or listening to the meeting may call in by dialing *67 followed by the phone number in the Zoom Meeting Information box. Calling into the Zoom meeting using a smartphone 1. Dial the phone number listed at the beginning of this document. 2. When prompted, enter the Meeting ID number followed by # 3. Once you are in the meeting, notify the meeting host that you are in and state your name. 4. If you do not wish to speak, please make sure your phone is on Mute a. If you’re using a smartphone, look at your screen and click the Mute button Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 AGENDA ITEM # D.1 Approval of the minutes from the June 23, 2021 meeting. BACKGROUND RECOMMENDATION FISCAL IMPACT ATTACHMENTS 1. JRB Minutes 06.23.2021 with Verbatim 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov MINUTES OF THE TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICTS JOINT REVIEW BOARD WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2021, 11:00 AM Virtual Meeting. Public may join via Zoom. A. ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION. 1. This item contains documents which provide call in information and instructions for the Zoom Meeting. B. ROLL CALL. 1. Members: Diana Ellenbecker, City of Green Bay; Bradley Klingsporn, Brown County; Peter Ross, Green Bay Area Public School District; Bob Matthews, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College; Brent Weycker, Citizen Member. Present: Peter Ross, Gina Van Egeren on behalf of Bob Mathews, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Bradley Klingsporn, Excused: None C. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. 1. Approval of the agenda for the June 23, 2021, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board. Moved by Brent Weycker, seconded by Peter Ross to approve the agenda for the June 23, 2021, meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. 1. Approval of the minutes from the April 8, 2021, meeting of the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Gina Van Egeren to approve the minutes from the April 8, 2021, meeting. Motion Passed. Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. E. REGULAR BUSINESS. 1. Review the Tax Incremental Districts annual reports. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Gina Van Egeren to receive and place on file the Tax Incremental Districts annual reports. Motion Passed. Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. 2. Staff report on the performance and status of each district governed by the Board. Neil Stechschulte presented the staff report. No action needed. F. INFORMATIONAL. 1. Set next meeting date, time and format. No action needed. G. ADJOURNMENT. Moved by Bradley Klingsporn, seconded by Peter Ross to adjourn. Motion Passed. Yes- Gina Van Egeren, Brent Weycker, Diana Ellenbecker, Peter Ross, Bradley Klingsporn, No- None, Abstain- None. VERBATIM MINUTES - That is, I think we're ready to go. Let's say, I guess, digitally are we all? Well, we have Lisa, we all good to go in terms of everything else for a minutes and recording, okay perfect. And Dave gives us the thumbs up too. I think we are good to go, Diana. - All right, sounds good. Well, call the meeting together for the tax increment district. The joint review board for June 23rd at 11:00 AM. We will take a roll call. Bradley Klingsporn? - Here. - Peter Ross? - Present. - Bob Matthews? - Actually, yeah. Gina is here on Bob's behalf today. - Okay, thank you. - Gina is here. And then we have Brent Wecker. - Yes. - And then Diana Ellenbecker from the city is here. - Excellent. - All right, so we'll move on to the approval of the agenda. - All right, we have a move by Brent, second by Peter all in favor. That's approved. We're down to the approval of the minutes from the meeting on April 8th, 2021. - I'll second. - All right, we had a motion by Bradley and second by Gina all in favor, that is approved. We'll move on to regular business. The item is review of the tax increment district annual reports. Obviously, there's a lot of information here. It's a large packet, as we've done in the past. We tried to take all that information, the DOR reports and we summarize it on one spreadsheet. I think that's a little bit easier as a snapshot. Do you have questions right from the beginning? Do you want me to go through a lot of detailed? How do you want to meet me to handle this? I can give you as much detail as little detail as you want, any suggestions? - I'm good with a 20,000 foot view. - Okay, well then we'll go over and very quickly very high level and please stop me. I will touch on every one real quick, but just, I don't even know if I have to catch them all, you know. Tip four is our oldest and still it has a term date of 2025. I'm good, that one is just running just smoothly. That's tid four, tid five there was a lot that happened in tid five in this past year that had a, that district got amended and we moved out the ship yard out of the tid five. So, we created tid 22 instead in the shipyard. So, there was a lot of movement of revenues and expenses and then projections. And, that also had there was money that was allocated to tid 9. So there was a lot of moving. So, you know, we started at 1.9 million at the beginning of the year, right? We went down to about $900,000. We still expect some large expenditures in this tid, tid five. But, we will need those years, last couple of years to finish out paying for those projects. But, again, lot happened in tid five. But, now that has been carved. All the shipyard has been carved out. Move on to seven, eight and nine. All three of them were closed in 2020. So if you looked at last year's projections of future costs and future revenues numbers have changed a lot because we have now closed out those TID's. We've had some allocations out of those TID's. So, shows very little movement or activity future activity for those TID's TID 10 is our next next one, main and mason. And that one is, not a lot of expenditures. At this point, we have just started working with our development team to work on some future projects for this TID, as we have income coming in, and not as many expenditures. So, we are working on projects to try to, this is mainly Mason. There's plenty of stormwater projects that we can use down and Maine and Mason. We move on to TID 12. This is a tid, also, there was quite a bit of activity that went on last year. And this year, the increment is over $2 million, but we also had a lot of projects going on mostly for one of our large development in the I-43 development. It was the nature's way. So, getting infrastructure into that TID. We continue to, it also had a allocation to TIF 9, that was approved last year. So, still some future costs that are being still worked on. And, were already obligated, with some future revenues coming through. We'll go onto TID 13. That one is our downtown TID. Have a lot of expenditures here, as you can tell. See, it's a negative fund balance. We do have more increment coming in then we do have show of future expenses. And we just show that this TID will turn positive in the about the next two years. So at this point, there's no new projects. I mean, no new infrastructure projects planned in here. We do have potential some new development going on downtown which will help our increment. But, the goal is still is within two to three years, that this one will turn positive. Go onto TID 14 which is our rail yard area that we're starting to see some nice improvement in the tax increment. We also had some large infrastructure projects in there. We also did some borrowing in this TID. So, it went from a negative fund balance of 3 million down, to about two five. And this one also based on projections, in about two years, we are looking to have this one as a positive fund balance. Again, we have a lot of activity going on in TID 14. And the Director will talk to you after we go through the annual reports of some of these additional new projects coming through. TID 16, which is our military avenue very little activity there at this point, starting to show off positive fund balance. Finally, in 2020 we rolled to a positive fund balance. And so we are looking at some future storm water projects in this TIF before closure. TIF 18 university avenue the festival foods now out on that side our JBS out on that side. Negative fund balance and that is partially because of a project that was started at JBS. We just haven't seen the increment to go with that project. We did have an upfront project grant of 1.5 million and that's why you're seeing a nick. But, the director also had some positive information on that TID, but we are seeing some positive movement on this TID. Then we get into East Towne Mall, as you know, we had high expectations of changes in East Towne Mall. But, we were lucky to get some change in the Cub foods. We have some changes going on there now, but so this one still remains very little activity. We haven't done any payouts other than some now pay goes for increment that's been created. So, it's still small positive fund balance looking for some bigger changes coming down the pipe. Whitney park, very new development. We haven't seen much increment yet. That will all be coming online for the one of 21 which will affect will be we'll see the increment really at the beginning of next year. Again, that one just has a negative fund balance but for a few administrative costs a few minor costs, same thing. Green bay packaging, green bay packaging has a by the time we ended the year we've had a negative fund balance of 31,000. But, one of 21, we do have incremental $1.6 million that came in from green bay packaging. This is our large pay-go. We do have a 90% pay-go that goes on to pre- med packaging. As we have very little infrastructure costs that we have so far put into this TID. So, right now it's looking negative 31, by next year we'll have a nice positive fund balance. And again, we'll start paying out a large 90% pay-go on this in this TID. We go onto the shipyard again, there was a lot of changes with a new TID that was created. We moved out all expenditures and all revenues that were brought in for the ship yard and that district that was removed out of TID 5. We had some new bonding in 2020 of $2 million. We transferred in about 1.5, 7 million from TID 5. So, started off very small because it was just a brand new TID. And at the end of the year we are sitting at about a $2.6 million fund balance. But again, the majority of that is because of borrowing, and for future projects at the shipyard. Phase one will be happening this fall. And then the director will talk to that. So, right now it looks positive. We just haven't spent down some of the money that we borrowed yet for that project. The legend district, a very new TID at this point, very little activity, but it will be receiving $850,000 in 2021 from our TIDs. That was a project that was started in TID 7. It was a pedestrian walkways that was not able to complete prior to us closing, so we got approval to allocate $850,000 from TID 7 to TID 23, which will be then able to be spent in this TID and improve that. Use that for infrastructure in this district. I know I flew right through it. Please let me know what questions you have. I got thumbs up from Peter. - I just want to clarify it was seven and it closed in 2020? - 7, 8, and 9 all closed in 2020, correct. - Okay. Thank you. - And I think, director had asked the question and should I steal his thunder? Between the three of them that we closed, they had increment value of $58,970,000. So overall our equalized value, our TID stats we're currently at 7.3% of the 12% that we can have open for TID's. These three that we closed are about a 0.8%. So, we go from about a 7.3% to about a 6.5%. So we drop our allowable TID's by closing these three TID's. Any other questions? Otherwise we would take a motion I guess this is just to receive and place on file. If there are no changes or questions, or recommendation, we had some spelling mistakes on our DOR reports. So, thank you to Bradley. We are going to be fixing those before we submit them to DOR. But, also changes we would be submitting them as presented in the packet. And again, this would be a receive and place on file then. - Before you do that, I have a question. So a couple, the next mandatory term dates there's a couple of 2025, 26's, and when you're going through, you were talking about if you had infrastructure projects that could be done. Is there any discussion on what's going to happen next? And whether, instead of doing the infrastructure project there now rather, A to terminate a couple of years early and create a new TID service there, I guess. Cause they're all ongoing effort to develop. You know what, I'm thinking what TID 5, TID 10. I'd imagine that in 2027, there's going to be a TID there. It just isn't going to be the same one that we created here. - We've believe I had some discussions. We, on a weekly basis, we meet with our development team. And TID five, as you know, as you were just mentioning TID five actually has an expenditure period that ends in December of 21 here. So we have been looking at some projects that still could be completed this year to make sure that we could use projects that are needed into TID five. So at this point we have not had any discussion of closing TID five early, as some of these expenditures will really take our fund balance down, and that will need a little bit of more future revenues to kind of bring it back up. But, at this point there was no discussion of closing that one early, and then that really the next one that has the next termination date would be yes, TID 10. And at this point our expenditure period doesn't end till 2026. So, again, the discussion and the plan at this point was to move forward and continue to have some projects up until 2026. We did not discuss closing this one down and then creating a new one, certainly up for discussion, certainly something, those are, you know, those are the two options, spend them up to your expenditure period or closing, create new. - And I would add Brad, certainly if we get a if we get a new project, certainly that needs that is going to be, we're going to need to probably, it's probably going to be in our interest to do that anyway because we're going to need the life of a new district to help out if, especially if it's a significant project. So that certainly remains a possibility. But I think something we haven't really made a determination on yet at this point. - Yeah, and just kind of, if you extend two period with the need to have the increment allow you to pay that off, then you can't really do anything in that, not expenditure period. Whereas, if you don't expand it, and you're able to close. Then, you have the flexibility to do more things in the future, so. - Absolutely. - Perfect, the other question I had was the agreement packaging legal agreement is that go through 2045 then I need a . - Give me a moment, I have to look up the I'm going to look at the spreadsheet real quick make sure I have right answer for you. - Not that any of us will care too much in 2044, but whether it was gonna be active is what I am curious. You know, cause it goes payload goes until 2045 then that's just locked in until 2045, and it just coasts. - A tax year of 2045, payable in 2046. Correct. - All right, well that one is gonna coast in there for the next 24 years. - Money in, money out, exactly, yeah exactly. But, they did just have their, their actual ribbon cutting for the plant here just about a month ago. So it was nice to see that they actually followed through on it, so. - Yeah, that sounds great. I will make a motion to receive. - We have a motion. Do we have a second? - Second by Gina? All in favor. - That passes. We'll move on to the second regular business items staff report on the performance and status of each district governed by the board and the director will take this one. - Yep, I'm going to kind of grace through some specific project updates some of the key ones, some of the districts. And we'll see if it just, again, want to see if you folks have any questions on that. So, hopefully projects update hopefully is coming up on the screen. - Yes. - All right, perfect. Great. Excellent. So we'll hop right in obviously here's our map of all of our districts. Certainly the 2021 map we'll remove seven, eight, and nine from this map, but they will no longer be on here again. I just kind of remind folks where the districts are at here throughout the city. Here at TID 14 in Washington apartments. I know our TID 4. I don't believe we had a whole lot of activity on this one. This is just a reminder of where this one is at again. So between Mason street and just past a little bit past Walnut street on the right on the river there. Similarly here's our TID 5 downtown. Again, this is one we have seen significant activity in. A recall there was a small property amendment. I believe some of this property was removed from TID five here and this right in this area here where the cursor is on the screen. That was our boundary minute that was done. So again, the area was taken out of that district. I think particular area that a focus going forward on the is certainly here for the, for this coming year two aspects of it, really the parking lot here in the close the near part of this, the photo here. Cities actively considering getting an RFP reissued for that particular lot for redevelopment on that site. However, we were also working with kind of some of the owners of the Bay Lake city center building there in terms of what the possible future use of that building may end up being. We're evaluating several concepts right now the original concept actually called for that building to be removed and some open space to be added here. The authenticity planted, folks remembered that. There's enough users in that building right now that are kind of proposing some new uses. So, we're still kind of evaluating and working with those property owners as to whether or not some sort of new mixed use may actually end up occurring in that Bay Lake building. And obviously that certainly impacts our ability. We think to RFP, the Adams street lot and get a development project on that side as well. But, again so what could be seeing some significant changes on this either one or both sites here. Certainly in the coming future here, so. A lot of work that we needed to make that happen, one way or the other, but again, certainly probably one of the most highest potential locations. I think for redevelopment, certainly in the city right now whether that's for use of the existing building or just, you know, a new project on the city's lot parking lot that they have right there, so. Stay tuned on this one. Hopefully we have some, some more information one way or the other on that one going forward. This is again, here's TID 10. The Maine and Mason TIF district and kind of reminding folks where that exactly. No real activity in that one at this point. TID 12, we mentioned certainly this is the I-43 business park. We've got a lot of interest in activities. Certainly staff is taking a very hard look at this in terms of expanding this, expanding the park here, certainly with the life of TID 12, being where it's at. Certainly that presents challenges in terms of being able to utilize the existing district to move that forward. So we'll talk a little bit about perhaps a future project. A future district need on what that might look like going forward here at some point. One project that is happening in that area by the bakery is a major daycare expansion project happening for the facility that's there in this particular area. I think we estimated this. You may bring up my notes here about a $12 million new clinics, about 130,000 square feet. So, a very nice project occurring. There is no direct assistance being added for that particular project. So, there is no TIF assistance. So, that's just new increment going into that particular site. So, we're certainly excited about that one. And that's, I believe they just broke ground on that one here. I believe here actually within the last month or so, I believe. TID 13, obviously this is one we see some significant activity possibly coming up here in the future. But, right now, no specific project. We mentioned the rail yard, certainly the one project that's here on this part. So here's the rail line, that's the river. You know, certainly the fort is probably the one project that's out there. Folks going to notice the elevator shafts that are up right now with not much other construction activity going on. The developers kinda lost part of their investment stack essentially. We're trying to re-establish really what their overall financing plans going to be at this point. They're certainly trying to work in adjust probably advancing and maybe going for some WEDA tax credits in terms of some affordable housing project in this area. Also, working with staff right now in terms of evaluating the mixed use status on the bottom floor of the building. I think the city's position has been, we've kind of want to see that commercial component really to kind of remain on that bottom part there, but that may be presenting some challenges for the developer. Specifically, with regard to financing the project. So we are currently kind of in negotiations for them. Ideally, if we get something worked out and we see some additional construction work happening here see at sometime this fall, if everything went perfectly, so. I mentioned the TID 16 military avenue district. This is here's the area here no specific real projects happening in that district to report on. The university avenue, project TID 18. This is a major one I think director did mention the project. These are the two buildings were constructed on the site, but then the developer after about a hundred, I think it was 1.5 million, Diana. did put in there for, for essentially for cleanup on the JBS site, I believe was the number. Got a couple of buildings started here, but the developers kind of had, again, unable to proceed with the project for financial aid at this point. We are in negotiations with a new developer to kind of present a similar, a different residential concept of kind of going from I think it was essentially there's 322 units at a value of about $21.9 million. So, we have a new developer proposing 209 units, but at the same valuation. So, a little bit at nicer, a little bit larger, a little bit bigger units, but the same value. So, we're excited, we're getting negotiations kind of getting that transferred over right now. We'd like to see that hopefully move forward here to both the RDA and city council. Hopefully within the next 30 to 60 days. So, there are some challenges in terms of getting the infrastructure lined up. If it was one developer they could kind of use a private drive. Since now there's going to be more than one owner. There, there probably needs to be some public street infrastructure that's going to be needed there as part of the project. So, we're kind of evaluating that, working with both developers to try to figure out exactly what that's going to end up looking like. But, excited to finally kind of see some progress on this one. I know our RDA has been kind of following up on this one and noting the lack of progress. Hopefully again, with the new developer we think we can get this jump started and get probably even a little bit nicer set of units on the site, even though the number's not quite as many units, but I think the quality of the unit and size of the unit will actually be a little bit better on this site. So, fingers crossed that proceeds here, this coming year. We mentioned the East Towne Mall project or East Towne Mall TIFF here. This is again the current reminder of where this is at. The structure here, that's going on here. We're kind of, this is a rather unique project that is happening here right now. American tent is actually being located in kind of the back half of these, these kind of giant buildings. So, it's gonna be kind of an industrial user, but in all of the commercial retail tenants are kind of being moved and relocated to the front of the building, so. For the outside perspective of folks, just driving by it's going to kind of look like a usual mall, but it's going to have a rather large industrial tenant in the back. A very fast growing company. American Tenant company is going to put one of their production space kind of back here in the back half of this building, so. A very unique combination of uses. And we're also seeing some interest in kind of generating some additional work on some of the out lots. Related to kind of the inner ring road. I guess we should call for lack of a better term and actually kind of making that inner road instead of just kind of a drive around the aisle of the mall actually being more of a functional public street access with actual businesses on both sides. So, we could be looking at adding some infill to these areas and obviously those parking lots are what they are there. There a large paved areas that don't generate a lot of increment. So, hopefully we can actually figure out a way to kind of update theirs. I think Dave Buck is on the line, and he said, there's more than a dozen planned unit developments I think on this particular site. So we're kind of, we're trying to work and try to get a kind of a master zoning re-established for the area that would kind of allow us to take a look at some of those things, including adding some of those additional infill developments possibly on some of these areas. Particularly like this main entrance here. We could see certainly billings occurring on both sides of that in kind of continuing this drive back to the main part of the mall. We similarly think there's some good opportunities there to kind of add some infill development to this particular area. I mentioned Whitney park. I think a lot of the updates a lot of the projects were completed. I think in this area last year were reported as a joint review board. And I think those were illustrated last year. Kind of working with them right now to kind of see exactly when they're going to receive their first payment. It was based on largely based on occupancy permit which I don't think they got until January 1. They just kinda missed the deadline. So, it kind of is delaying their, increment by it here. They were a little surprised by that. So we may be bringing an amendment back to the RDA to try to at least get something back to them this year for a subset based on the assessment based on the substantial completion of the project. So, that's probably coming forward to RDA here in July, we suspect. I mentioned Green Bay Packaging. Again, this was the largest. This is probably I think so looking back in the files this was apparently the first new paper mill constructed in Wisconsin in the last 30 years. So, pretty impressive project. Obviously they needed an enormous investment on the company's part, as well as from the TIFF standpoint. This is probably the largest project I'm anticipating. Seeing certainly for our foreseeable future, but again a great project in . The employer kind of retaining those jobs here, here in Green Bay, so. And plus that hopefully adding a few more when things normalize a little, so. It's shipyard is probably where we've seen the most excitement on here the last couple months. Again, this here's a map of the district. That's kind of the close-up of the area here. The reason that just remind folks, cause I certainly had to ask the reason this bizarre strip goes out here that is exactly what the parcel is, along the rail line. So, that we didn't have to in order to just keep, just take that parcel in. We actually had to go, this is actually one whole parcel this whole stretch out here. So, there's no projects or no increment obviously going to happen on that. It's just simply in the logistics of the map we had to have the, that was part of the parcel that was included down in this area. So, we simply had to include that strange stretch outbound the side there. So, I think the main project, obviously the shipyard here in general, here's the concept plan. The main project that was announced here earlier this year it was that we have a signed development agreement with Merge Urban Development. Their project is about 225 units of market rate housing. It's about $21 million project. I think it's going to be let's see how many buildings do we see. I think it's going to be two, four story buildings I believe is kind of what they're proposing on the site. A very unique design and that it keeps, maintains a visual access for most of the units to the river. So, they've actually done some kind of unique design aspects there to make that happen. Shortly after this was announced, we have a planning option has been pulled on the Badger sheet metal site kind of immediately adjacent to the site here. Impact seven is actually proposing and kind of currently evaluating a 238 unit project. That's actually at a more targeted rental rate for the 80 to 110% of the county median income. So, again, a little bit lower than market rate kind of in that middle median income number. Which is a unique aspect. This is our first project that's actually targeting kind of that center, that center income. So, you know, there's affordable and market rate. These are kind of are right in the middle it's we're kind of excited that they're filling a targeted need. We don't have a projected valuation on that. This is just a working on that, but really preliminary estimates are saying it's a 45 to $50 million construction costs. So, that'd be three, four story buildings. Is it going to be the massing on that site. So, a nice sized project there. So, we're excited to see some momentum kind of finally building here in the shipyard area. And then TID 23, this is the legends district. Again, the primary front check. This was, I think you guys have seen this one before. This is the legacy hotel project that's being proposed. We're currently working through with them. They actually did a relocation on their site from one side of the site to the other that affected some code questions and raise some issues to make that work. We're also thinking the valuation is probably largely going to remain the same. This is a $12 million five story building about 90,000 square feet would like to see hopefully get something worked out and updated development agreement completed with them here yet this summer and see some progress on the site here maybe even as early as this fall. So again, it could be a nice project over there by the, in the legends district close to Lambeau Field. I think Dr. Allen Becker already mentioned these. These were the actions that we took at the the joint review board meeting and the RDA here this earlier this year, just to remind everybody this is kind of what we went through the allocation amendments and the housing resolutions at least were all completed earlier this year. Just a quick reminder on that. We are looking at some possible new districts in terms of staff reviewing, you know when we might need to do these here we're looking at there's one for the one Astro project which I think everybody has probably seen before, but has been delayed for multiple reasons, coal piles being one of them, pandemic being another add, add to the list. As far as you go, if folks have driven by there they've actually seen the Fox River Trail actually being installed and actually going in on this site. So, some of the improvements have begun on the site. We're excited to see those, hasn't been officially dedicated on there. And I think we're already seeing several hundred people a day already going down the section of trail much to the private owners dismayed despite his efforts to block it off. So, folks are excited about it. They want to use the trail. The Monroe project that we're going to have it. It's a nice project. We'll kind of highlight that here shortly. And I mentioned previously, you know, kind of maybe an update for the pending business park expansion. And there is a blind elimination tip in Northeast neighborhood. We are taking a look at possibly as a staff to considering that as a possibility. So, we do know that we knew the one Astro project and the Monroe street project are going to require a new TIF district, for sure. We know eventually I-43 one will, as well. But, again, exactly what the timing of those are going to be is still a little bit up, up in the air. One of these could, you know, certainly they could move forward this year. We think probably one astor will probably need to move forward this year. So, we'll probably be reaching out to you guys, again, for a meeting on that particular district. Monroe, I think is it could be this year. It could be next year. I think we're evaluating with the developer exactly what their schedule is going to be. I-43, there's some other zoning, it's using several landowners out there that we're still doing some coordination on with that. And I think the planning staff is kind of evaluating this Northeast neighborhood areas still in terms of its potential to create a district. But, those are the ones that are at least on the radar screen right now, in terms of creating new ones. And this was the one Astro her project again. It's a four stories, a hundred units. I think it was estimated at about $13 million in value. So, again, that was the project that's kind of going on right there by the Mason street bridge. This would be what would be going on. I think ideally we get the agreement updated. They could be doing some site work and then actually had the trail exit trailed stations going in and actually see the project under construction as early as next spring. The one that's centering a lot of the excitement I think at least amongst staff, this is the former is the 200 north Monroe project being proposed. That is about, $22 million project. It's a three to five story building. You kind of see the difference in the height depending as the next architect actually lowered the height. As it goes to the residential neighborhood next to it. 172 units, a mixed use project. Not only are we excited about the, certainly the adding the residential units, it also includes expanding the main street Oriental market here and actually relocating across the street into the site, kind of expanding the grocery options downtown, which has been a major objective. The other one is we believe, I think there's negotiations going on possibly with UWGB to be at least tenant in this building and actually have get them to have a presence downtown, which is again, the city has been working on for quite some time. It would be pretty excited to have that. So, those projects all together, just to kind of give folks some perspective, we did kind of add that it looks like it's actually going to be a it could be about 200, if everything happens as currently anticipated, it's about $200 million in project valuation and about 1100, and almost just under 1200 residential units added. So pretty, pretty impressive numbers. We hope the pandemic stays away and takes care of things. And we're able to keep all these on track. And if so, should be seeing some significant investment private sector investment coming forward here in the next several years. So with that, I am certainly available to answer any questions folks may have. - What would be the procedure for the . You know, if they say, Hey, we really like to break ground. We have things ready. - Yeah, yeah, yup. Well, we have to have it depending on the timing. If we want this playing in place, we certainly have to have the agreement place. And I think we have to have the district. If we want to count the valuation as in one-one of this year, I think we have to have it done. Everything procedurally done before October 1st, I believe is the date. So, certainly that, if we need to know that, we need to know that pretty quick, because it sounds like, oh it's no problem. It's mid June, as well as that, that 90 days that kind of plus or minus it requires to actually create a district, that fills up pretty fast. So, we're kind of getting on the crunch. So, I'm assuming we're gonna know, probably make a determination on that Brad, probably within the next 30 days, I would think. We're going to have to have some discussions with, and as soon as we can come up with a new and really I think the key domino it falls that is getting an updated agreement with the developer. So, if we can agree on schedule and get everything ready to go. Now again, if he's not going to start construction until next spring, if he's definitely not doing anything, we'd probably have some options in terms of making it as available as of one, one next year. But again, it's just kind of figuring out, you know. What exactly is that going to be? So, hopefully we'll get that resolved here in the next 30 to 60 days, so. - All right, we're good. - Any other questions? - I have a question. This is Steve. I know I'm not part of the, at all. But, Diana had mentioned how much increment was going back into the tactical from our three closed earlier. And I just kinda missed it, update me. Was it like 58 million or something? - Let's see, hold on. What was that number? - That was the increment that is part of the three closed TIDS, remember. Two of them don't have affordable housing. And so there's one year of delay before those will go back to the texts and jurisdictions . It was a total of $58,970,700 worth of increment from those three TID's that we'll be going back to the taxing jurisdictions either this year or the following year. - Yeah, I just, I guess I just want it to kind of make, say these TID's are definitely performing. They're doing what they're supposed to and it's pretty exciting. That life is going against the rules within the next couple of years. - So he's showing off, that's what, that's what David was trying to do there. That's in case you guys missed that. That's what he was doing. So, we're excited about, and I guess to build on that obviously, you know, adding the prospect of an additional 200 million coming online with these additional districts obviously that's, we want to keep that trend going. That's, we're like seeing the private investment that is being generated by these districts. We are very happy with at this point, so. Any other questions? - If there are no other questions you know what we'll set the next meeting date as needed and there might be one coming this fall. If we're going to issue, set up a new TID. Otherwise I would take a motion for adjournment. - Motion adjourned. - Do we have a second? And was that you, Brad? - Pete. - Peter, okay. We have a motion by Bradley, second by Peter. All in favor. Alright, we're adjourned thanks guys. - Enjoy your vacations. - Thank. Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.1 Consideration with possible action on the 2021 Annual Report on Tax Increment Finance Districts in the City of Green Bay. BACKGROUND Staff will provide an overview of each district at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Receive and place on file. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact from the annual report. ATTACHMENTS 1. JRB final packet 2021 YE 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov TID ANNUAL REPORT (PE-300) SUMMARIZED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021 Revenues Expenditures Debt Fund TIF Creation Mandatory Fund balance Tax Shared Developers Other/ Capital & Service & Developers balance as Future Future Surplus or Dist TYPE NAME date term date as of 1/1/21 Increment Interest Revenue guarantees Borrowing Land Interest grants Other of 12/31/21 project costs revenue deficit Washington 4 Blight 1/20/1998 1/20/2025 414,209 541,571 620 1,071 - - - 200,000 - 13,400 744,071 2,955,050 2,216,521 5,542 Apartments 5 Blight Downtown 12/21/1999 12/21/2026 854,415 1,903,817 1,961 177,077 53,114 - 84,184 1,307,264 48,211 92,698 1,458,027 12,777,641 11,321,092 1,478 7 Blight Lombardi/Ashland 1/15/2002 1/15/2029 1,115,425 780,291 1,225 (3,459) - 6,082 - 229,462 13,891 1,656,211 - - - - 8 Blight Berger/Morrow 8/20/2002 8/20/2029 581,793 380,989 697 30,406 - 5,514 - 603,905 - 395,494 - - - - 9 Industrial University Heights 10/7/2003 10/7/2026 1,317,175 185,011 (11) 249 3,662 - - 1,167,070 - 339,016 - - - - 10 Blight Main/Mason 8/17/2004 8/17/2031 899,314 251,991 882 9,499 - - - - 21,507 23,088 1,117,091 4,273,012 3,226,960 71,039 12 Industrial I43 Industrial Park 9/6/2005 9/6/2025 1,985,227 2,454,267 3,333 442,140 - - 450,089 290,802 200,000 81,201 3,862,875 10,575,418 6,854,691 142,148 13 Reh/Cons Downtown 9/6/2005 9/6/2032 (3,024,709) 2,539,445 - 607,374 16,486 9,859 - 1,417,455 591,028 82,935 (1,942,963) 35,319,975 37,551,587 288,649 N Broadway/Larsen 14 Blight 9/16/2006 9/16/2033 (2,474,833) 523,604 3,311 4,623 208,376 168,234 1,095 724,469 490,447 53,420 (2,836,116) 13,270,454 16,106,583 13 Green 16 Blight Military Avenue 5/6/2007 5/6/2034 275,344 447,031 483 82,474 - - - 181,155 1,479 15,441 607,257 10,003,935 9,457,807 61,129 18 Reh/Cons University Avenue 10/6/2015 10/6/2043 (1,199,783) 463,192 - 15,678 - - - 1,131 184,948 20,520 (927,512) 27,502,855 28,497,801 67,434 19 Reh/Cons East Town Mall 9/19/2017 9/19/2044 174,473 211,258 271 - 75,900 - - - 105,816 18,704 337,382 8,681,090 8,967,153 623,445 20 Reh/Cons Whitney Park 9/25/2018 9/25/2045 (36,248) 116,140 52 - - - - - 34,664 16,917 28,363 6,018,876 6,132,934 142,421 21 Blight Green Bay Packaging 9/25/2018 9/25/2045 (31,009) 1,556,802 1,092 - - - - - - 23,988 1,502,897 52,424,742 51,172,340 250,495 22 Blight The Shipyard 9/25/2018 9/25/2045 2,597,454 - 2,145 - 500 2,007,200 349,166 77,048 - 48,595 4,132,490 63,687,304 59,952,712 397,898 23 Blight Legends District 9/17/2019 9/17/2046 (25,554) 13,664 106 - - 850,000 6,788 28 - 282,963 548,437 11,723,645 11,196,178 20,970 Totals 3,422,693 12,369,073 16,167 1,367,132 358,038 3,046,889 891,322 6,199,789 1,691,991 3,164,591 8,632,299 259,213,997 252,654,359 2,072,661 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 004 2 Washington Appartments 01/20/1998 01/20/2025 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $414,209 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $541,571 Investment income $620 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $1,071 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $543,262 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $7,687 Professional services $1,650 Interest and fiscal charges DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt $200,000 Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name N/A $0 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Name Personal Property Aid refund $3,913 Total Expenditures $213,400 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $744,071 Future costs $2,955,050 Future revenue $2,216,521 Surplus or deficit $5,542 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 005 2 Downtown 12/21/1999 12/21/2026 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $854,415 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $1,903,817 Investment income $1,961 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $177,077 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Developer name TOHO Platten Building $13,331 Developer name Washington St Inn $39,783 Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $2,135,969 Page 1 of 3 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures $84,184 Administration $70,076 Professional services $16,650 Interest and fiscal charges $276,539 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt $1,030,725 Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name Smet rebate historical train station $5,000 Developer name Bellin buidling parking PAYGO $14,429 Developer name TMJ Initiative One $10,000 Developer name Lorenzen Holdings $9,977 Developer name Historic Hibernia $8,805 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Name Utilities $5,822 Total Expenditures $1,532,357 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $1,458,027 Future costs $12,777,641 Future revenue $11,321,092 Surplus or deficit $1,478 Page 2 of 3 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 3 of 3 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 010 2 MAIN MASON 08/17/2004 08/17/2031 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $899,314 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $251,991 Investment income $882 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $9,499 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $262,372 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $20,288 Professional services $2,650 Interest and fiscal charges DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name GB Real Estate - 1901 M Street $21,507 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $44,595 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $1,117,091 Future costs $4,273,012 Future revenue $3,226,960 Surplus or deficit $71,039 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 012 5 I43 Industrial Park 09/06/2005 09/06/2025 12/31/2023 Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $1,985,227 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $2,454,267 Investment income $3,333 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $442,140 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $2,899,740 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures $450,089 Administration $67,585 Professional services $12,430 Interest and fiscal charges $56,447 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt $234,355 Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name Willow Creek Strategic Behavioral Health $200,000 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Name Utilities $1,036 Total Expenditures $1,022,092 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $3,862,875 Future costs $10,575,418 Future revenue $6,854,691 Surplus or deficit $142,148 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 013 3 Downtown 09/06/2005 09/06/2032 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $-3,024,709 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $2,539,445 Investment income Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $607,374 Sale of property $16,486 Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Source Lot Rent $9,859 Total Revenue (deposits) $3,173,164 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $75,237 Professional services $650 Interest and fiscal charges $426,236 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt $991,219 Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name Schreiber Foods $236,041 Developer name Associated Bank $154,978 Developer name Foxconn $54,952 Developer name Northland $145,057 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Name Utilities $6,898 Total Expenditures $2,091,418 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $-1,942,963 Future costs $35,319,975 Future revenue $37,551,587 Surplus or deficit $288,649 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 014 2 N Broadway Larsen Green 09/16/2006 09/16/2033 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $-2,474,833 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $523,604 Investment income $3,311 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $4,623 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Developer name SMET $208,376 Transfer from other funds Grants Source WEDC Grant $168,234 Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $908,148 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures $1,095 Administration $48,120 Professional services $5,150 Interest and fiscal charges $174,469 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt $550,000 Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name DDL Project Grant $490,447 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $1,269,431 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $-2,836,116 Future costs $13,270,454 Future revenue $16,106,583 Surplus or deficit $13 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 016 2 Military Avenue 05/06/2007 05/06/2034 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $275,344 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $447,031 Investment income $483 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $82,474 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $529,988 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $13,641 Professional services $1,650 Interest and fiscal charges $110,841 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt $70,314 Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name Burlington and Broadway Automotive $1,479 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $198,075 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $607,257 Future costs $10,003,935 Future revenue $9,457,807 Surplus or deficit $61,129 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 018 3 University Avenue 10/06/2015 10/06/2043 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $-1,199,783 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $463,192 Investment income Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue $15,678 Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $478,870 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $17,720 Professional services $2,650 Interest and fiscal charges $1,131 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name JBS project grant $0 Developer name Festival Foods paygo $184,948 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $206,599 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $-927,512 Future costs $27,502,855 Future revenue $28,497,801 Surplus or deficit $67,434 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 019 3 East Town Mall 09/19/2017 09/19/2044 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $174,473 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $211,258 Investment income $271 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Developer name Green Bay East LLC $75,900 Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $287,429 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $15,904 Professional services $2,650 Interest and fiscal charges DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name Green Bay East LLC $105,816 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $124,520 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $337,382 Future costs $8,681,090 Future revenue $8,967,153 Surplus or deficit $623,445 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 020 3 WHITNEY PARK 09/25/2018 09/25/2045 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $-36,248 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $116,140 Investment income $52 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $116,192 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $16,117 Professional services $650 Interest and fiscal charges $0 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name Whitney School Development LLC $34,664 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $51,581 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $28,363 Future costs $6,018,876 Future revenue $6,132,934 Surplus or deficit $142,421 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 021 2 GREEN BAY PACKAGING 09/25/2018 09/25/2045 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $-31,009 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $1,556,802 Investment income $1,092 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Total Revenue (deposits) $1,557,894 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures Administration $23,188 Professional services $650 Interest and fiscal charges DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name N/A $0 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $23,988 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $1,502,897 Future costs $52,424,742 Future revenue $51,172,340 Surplus or deficit $250,495 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 022 2 SHIPYARD 09/17/2019 09/17/2046 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $2,597,454 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $0 Investment income $2,145 Debt proceeds $2,000,000 Special assessments Shared revenue Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Developer name Impact Seven INC $500 Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Source Rental income $7,200 Total Revenue (deposits) $2,009,845 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures $346,745 Administration $21,605 Professional services $650 Interest and fiscal charges $77,048 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name NONE $0 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Name Purchase of Land $2,421 Name Utilities $26,190 Total Expenditures $474,809 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $4,132,490 Future costs $63,687,304 Future revenue $59,952,712 Surplus or deficit $397,898 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 1 - Municipality and TID Co-muni code Municipality County Due date Report type 05231 GREEN BAY BROWN 07/01/2022 ORIGINAL TID number TID type TID name Creation date Mandatory termination date Expected termination date 023 2 LEGENDS DISTRICT 09/17/2019 09/17/2046 N/A Section 2 - Beginning Balance Amount TID fund balance at beginning of year $-25,554 Section 3 - Revenue Amount Tax increment $13,664 Investment income $106 Debt proceeds Special assessments Shared revenue Sale of property Allocation from another TID Developer guarantees Transfer from other funds Grants Other revenue Source Transfer in from closed TID 7 $850,000 Total Revenue (deposits) $863,770 Page 1 of 2 Form PE-300 TID Annual Report 2021 WI Dept of Revenue Section 4 - Expenditures Amount Capital expenditures $6,788 Administration $13,866 Professional services $268,947 Interest and fiscal charges $28 DOR fees $150 Discount on long-term debt Debt issuance costs Principal on long-term debt Environmental costs Real property assembly costs Allocation to another TID Developer grants Developer name NONE $0 Transfer to other funds Other expenditures Total Expenditures $289,779 Section 5 - Ending Balance Amount TID fund balance at end of year $548,437 Future costs $11,723,645 Future revenue $11,196,178 Surplus or deficit $20,970 Section 6 - Preparer/Contact Information Preparer name Preparer title Stephanie Schmutzer Accountant Preparer email Preparer phone stephanie.schmutzer@greenbaywi.gov (920) 448-3409 Contact name Contact title DIANA ELLENBECKER FINANCE DIRECTOR Contact email Contact phone DIANA.ELLENBECKER@GREENBAYWI.GOV (920) 448-3025 Page 2 of 2 Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.2 Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Four (4) Downtown. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing that some funds from TID 4 be transferred to either 1) TID 14 to assist with infrastructure costs and the delay in new increment, and/or 2) TID 22 to aid in the lost revenue due to project delays related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost for projects in the Shipyard. Additional information will be provided at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A detailed fiscal impact will be provided along with the proposed amendment to the project plan. ATTACHMENTS None 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.3 Consideration with possible action to amend the Project Plan for TID Ten (10) Main Street and East Mason Street to add eligible projects. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing that some additional projects be added to the eligible projects list identified within TID 10. These projects were delayed or have increased in cost due to the pandemic. Additional information will be provided at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided with the formal amendment to the project plan. ATTACHMENTS None 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.4 Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and to amend the Project Plan for TID Twelve (12) I-43 Industrial Park. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing that some funds from TID 12 be transferred to either 1) TID 14 to assist with infrastructure costs and the delay in new increment, and/or 2) TID 22 to aid in the lost revenue due to project delays related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost for projects in the Shipyard. Additional information will be provided at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided with the amended project plan. ATTACHMENTS None 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.5 Consideration with possible action to extend TID Fourteen (14) by three years, and adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Fourteen (14), the North Broadway corridor. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing that TID 14 be extended three years to help recover lost revenue due to project delays related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost. Staff is also proposing that TID 14 be able to receive funds from other TIDs with a positive cash flow to recover these costs. Additional information will be provided at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided in the amended project plan. ATTACHMENTS None 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.6 Consideration with possible action to adopt an Allocation Amendment Resolution and amend the Project Plan for TID Twenty-Two (22), the Shipyard. BACKGROUND Staff is proposing that TID 22 be designated as a recipient of potential transfers from several other TID's to aid in the lost revenue due to project delays related to the pandemic, and the increase in materials cost for projects in the Shipyard. Additional information will be provided at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal analysis will be provided as a part of the amended project plan. ATTACHMENTS None 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.7 Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-four (24), Cherry Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 24 is generally located in the area north of E. Walnut Street, south of Northland Ave, west of N. Adams Street, and east of N. Washington Street. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. BACKGROUND Staff will provide an overview of the proposed TID 24 at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal impact will be included as part of the final project plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. TID 24 Project Plan Draft 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov City of Green Bay Department of Community and Economic Development Tax Increment District Twenty-Four (24) Cherry Street PROJECT PLAN City of Green Bay, Wisconsin June 17, 2022 PRELIMINARY DRAFT 100 North Jefferson Street, Room 608, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 (p) 920.448.3400 (f) 920.448.3426 greenbaywi.gov Key Dates: Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 23, 2022 Public Hearing Held: August 1, 2022 Approval by Redevelopment Authority: August 1, 2022 Adoption by Common Council: August 2, 2022 Approval by the Joint Review Board: August 18 or 19, 2022 (TBD) Executive Summary • Description of District: o Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 24 (“District”) is a proposed mixed-use district consisting of 13 parcels on approximately 4.5 acres bounded by N. Adams St., E. Walnut St., N. Washington St. and the northern boundary of the Adams Street parking lot owned by the Green Bay Redevelopment Authority. • Authority o The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105. • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($11.8 million) o Approximately $4.5 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at 222.Cherry Street. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Estimated $5 million in development incentives for a projected mixed-use or multi-family redevelopment project at 221 Cherry Street. o Estimated $500,000 in development incentives for potential mixed-use redevelopment projects at 217 E. Walnut, 227 E. Walnut, and 101 N. Adams. o Estimated $250,000 for Public Improvements to the Cherry Street Parking Ramp o Estimated $250,000 for Streetscape Improvements o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District o Estimated $1.2 million for Administrative costs (10%) • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Incremental Valuation ($29 million) o Approximately $13 million in improvements for a mixed-use project at 222 Cherry Street. o Approximately $15 million in improvements for a projected mixed-use or multi- family redevelopment project at 221 Cherry Street. o Approximately $1 million in improvements for potential mixed-use redevelopment projects at 217 E. Walnut, 227 E. Walnut, and 101 N. Adams. • Expected Termination of District o Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within Section 9 of this Plan, the City anticipates that the District will need to remain open for its entire 20 year life to generate sufficient tax increment to pay all Project Costs. page 2 of 12 City of Green Bay • Summary of Findings o As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan and the exhibits contained and referenced herein, the following findings are made: [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 3 of 12 Preliminary Map of Proposed District Boundary page 4 of 12 City of Green Bay Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions - Zoning 100% Downtown Two (D2) TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 5 of 12 Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Existing Land Use [TO BE COMPLETED] page 6 of 12 City of Green Bay Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Future Land Use Downtown (Purple), Park or Public Use (Green) TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 7 of 12 Improvement Map Area Parcel ID Location Owner Total Value Land Value Value (sq ft) 12-114 216 CHERRY ST TAJ ENTERPRISES LLC $ 775,600 $ 133,800 $ 641,800 15,892 12-118 109 N ADAMS ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 3,389 page 8 of 12 12-122 101 N ADAMS ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 1,472 12-121 217 E WALNUT ST AMERICAN HOLDINGS INC $ 281,900 $ 91,600 $ 190,300 10,868 12-120 225 E WALNUT ST LIZA RAE LLC $ 219,200 $ 19,600 $ 199,600 2,340 12-119 227 E WALNUT ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 6,652 12-353 211 E WALNUT ST WALNUT WASHINGTON LLC $ 347,400 $ 53,800 $ 293,600 50,486 12-354 102 N WASHINGTON ST 7878 BIG SKY LLC $ 791,900 $ 87,700 $ 704,200 50,486 12-355 126 N WASHINGTON ST NICOLET NATIONAL BANK $ 139,800 $ 44,100 $ 95,700 50,486 12-351 202 CHERRY ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 50,486 12-352 CHERRY ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 50,486 12-356 N WASHINGTON ST NICOLET NATIONAL BANK $ 5,700 $ 5,700 $ - 50,486 12-112 221 CHERRY ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 67,036 $ 2,561,500 $ 436,300 $ 2,125,200 410,567 Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis (as of 6/17/2022) City of Green Bay Equalized Value Test [TO BE COMPLETED] Statement Listing the Kind, Number and Location of All Proposed Public Works or Improvements Within the District [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 9 of 12 Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses [TO BE COMPLETED] page 10 of 12 City of Green Bay Detailed List of Estimated Project Costs [TO BE COMPLETED] o Approximately $4.5 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at 222.Cherry Street. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Estimated $5 million in development incentives for a projected mixed-use or multi-family redevelopment project at 221 Cherry Street. o Estimated $500,000 in development incentives for potential mixed-use redevelopment projects at 217 E. Walnut, 227 E. Walnut, and 101 N. Adams. o Estimated $250,000 for Public Improvements to the Cherry Street Parking Ramp o Estimated $250,000 for Streetscape Improvements o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District o Estimated $1.2 million for Administrative costs (10%) TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 11 of 12 Economic Feasibility Study, Description of the Methods of Financing Estimated Project Costs and the Time When Related Costs or Monetary Obligations are to be Incurred [TO BE COMPLETED] Annexed Property No parcels or other property or territory will be annexed. All parcels exist within the City of Green Bay. Estimate of Property to Be Devoted to Retail Business [TO BE COMPLETED] Proposed Changes of Zoning Ordinances, Master Plan, Map, Building Codes and City Ordinances No changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan are anticipated at this time. Statement of the Proposed Method for the Relocation of any Persons to be Displaced [TO BE COMPLETED] How Creation of the Tax Incremental District Promotes the Orderly Development of the City [TO BE COMPLETED] List of Estimated Non-Project Costs General reporting costs, audit, and review by the City’s financial consultant on an annual basis. Legal Opinion Advising Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with Wis. Stat. § 66.1105(4)(f) [TO BE COMPLETED] page 12 of 12 City of Green Bay Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.8 Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-five (25), Monroe Street, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 25 is generally located in the area east of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, west of N. Quincy Street, and north of Cherry Street, plus a portion west of N. Monroe Avenue, south of Main Street, and east of N. Madison Street. TID 25 will be classified as a mixed- use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. BACKGROUND Staff will provide an overview of the proposed TID 25 at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided with the final project plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. TID 25 Project Plan Draft 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov City of Green Bay Department of Community and Economic Development Tax Increment District Twenty-Five (25) Monroe Street PROJECT PLAN City of Green Bay, Wisconsin June 17, 2022 PRELIMINARY DRAFT 100 North Jefferson Street, Room 608, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 (p) 920.448.3400 (f) 920.448.3426 greenbaywi.gov Key Dates: Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 23, 2022 Public Hearing Held: August 1, 2022 Approval by Redevelopment Authority: August 1, 2022 Adoption by Common Council: August 2, 2022 Approval by the Joint Review Board: August 18 or 19, 2022 (TBD) Executive Summary • Description of District: o Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 25 (“District”) is a proposed mixed-use district consisting of 25 parcels on approximately 10.4 acres generally bounded by Main Street, N. Monroe Ave., Cherry Street, and Quincy St. • Authority o The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105. • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($13.6 million) o Approximately $10 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at 200 N. Monroe St. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Estimated $1 million in development incentives for future mixed-use redevelopment projects throughout the District. o Estimated $500,000 for Streetscape Improvements o Estimated $1 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.) o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs (17%) • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Incremental Valuation ($22 million) o Approximately $17 million in improvements for a mixed-use project at 200 N. Monroe. o Approximately $5 million in improvements for potential mixed-use redevelopment projects throughout the rest of the District. • Expected Termination of District o Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within this Plan, the City anticipates that the District will need to remain open for its entire 20 year life to generate sufficient tax increment to pay all Project Costs. page 2 of 12 City of Green Bay • Summary of Findings o As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan and the exhibits contained and referenced herein, the following findings are made: [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 3 of 12 Preliminary Map of Proposed District Boundary page 4 of 12 City of Green Bay Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions - Zoning Downtown one (D1) - Solid Brown, Downtown Two (D2) – Hatched Brown, Commercial One (C1) – Solid Red, Varied Density Residential (R3) – Solid Orange TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 5 of 12 Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Existing Land Use [TO BE COMPLETED] page 6 of 12 City of Green Bay Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Future Land Use Downtown (Purple), Medium Intensity Retail, Office or Housing (Pink) TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 7 of 12 Improvement Map Area Parcel ID Location Owner Total Value Land Value Value (sq ft) 11-160 616 PINE ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 35,014 11-91 420 N MONROE AVE GB REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC $ 500 $ 500 $ - 1,524 11-53 607 BODART ST MAY MARIE INC $ 235,300 $ 104,100 $ 131,200 17,518 page 8 of 12 11-55 406 N MONROE AVE RICOS PARKING LOT LLC $ 215,100 $ 78,300 $ 136,800 13,157 11-99 620 MAIN ST KUEHN LLC $ 150,000 $ 106,100 $ 43,900 12,510 11-156 227 N QUINCY ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 5,324 11-191 605 CHERRY ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 17,566 11-50 619 BODART ST KEVIN C KUEHN $ - $ - $ - 26,279 11-92 416 N MONROE AVE GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 11,235 11-95-A MAIN ST GREEN BAY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY $ - $ - $ - 2,045 11-100 417 N QUINCY ST KEVIN C KUEHN $ - $ - $ - 6,760 11-158 624 PINE ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 8,784 11-159 618 PINE ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 8,784 11-157 221 N QUINCY ST CITY OF GREEN BAY $ - $ - $ - 29,810 11-152 621-623 PINE ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 233,700 $ 74,700 $ 159,000 8,787 11-45 314 N MONROE AVE EDWARD M & RENEE J WINECK $ 144,200 $ 60,800 $ 83,400 7,978 11-47 618 BODART ST K B PROPERTIES LLP $ 102,200 $ 31,800 $ 70,400 4,185 11-46 610 BODART ST WAGNER ROBERT E & MELIDA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST $ 239,000 $ 112,400 $ 126,600 16,603 11-155 313 N QUINCY ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 56,300 $ 19,100 $ 37,200 5,325 11-48 622 BODART ST NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD $ - $ - $ - 22,177 11-153 625-627 PINE ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 184,800 $ 50,100 $ 134,700 5,893 11-149 310 N MONROE AVE MAIN ORIENTAL MARKET LLC $ 206,600 $ 145,700 $ 60,900 21,436 11-154 303 N QUINCY ST RUESCH PROPERTIES LLC $ 138,100 $ 38,000 $ 100,100 6,356 Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis (as of 6/17/2022) 11-44 BODART ST RENEE J & EDWARD M WINECK $ 54,400 $ 51,200 $ 3,200 6,691 11-66 411 N MONROE AVE MONROE PLAZA APARTMENTS LLC $ - $ - $ - 70,338 $ 1,960,200 $ 872,800 $ 1,087,400 372,080 City of Green Bay Equalized Value Test [TO BE COMPLETED] Statement Listing the Kind, Number and Location of All Proposed Public Works or Improvements Within the District [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 9 of 12 Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses [TO BE COMPLETED] page 10 of 12 City of Green Bay Detailed List of Estimated Project Costs [TO BE COMPLETED] o Approximately $10 million in development incentives for a mixed-use project at 200 N. Monroe St. (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Estimated $1 million in development incentives for future mixed-use redevelopment projects throughout the District. o Estimated $500,000 for Streetscape Improvements o Estimated $1 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.) o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs (17%) TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 11 of 12 Economic Feasibility Study, Description of the Methods of Financing Estimated Project Costs and the Time When Related Costs or Monetary Obligations are to be Incurred [TO BE COMPLETED] Annexed Property No parcels or other property or territory will be annexed. All parcels exist within the City of Green Bay. Estimate of Property to Be Devoted to Retail Business [TO BE COMPLETED] Proposed Changes of Zoning Ordinances, Master Plan, Map, Building Codes and City Ordinances No changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan are anticipated at this time. Statement of the Proposed Method for the Relocation of any Persons to be Displaced [TO BE COMPLETED] How Creation of the Tax Incremental District Promotes the Orderly Development of the City [TO BE COMPLETED] List of Estimated Non-Project Costs General reporting costs, audit, and review by the City’s financial consultant on an annual basis. Legal Opinion Advising Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with Wis. Stat. § 66.1105(4)(f) [TO BE COMPLETED] page 12 of 12 City of Green Bay Report to the Tax Incremental Districts Joint Review Board of the City of Green Bay MEETING DATE PREPARED BY June 23, 2022 Neil Stechschulte, Director AGENDA ITEM # E.9 Consideration with possible action to adopt a Creation Resolution to establish TID Number Twenty-six (26), Grandview Industrial Park, and adopt the Project Plan. TID 26 is generally located in the area east of Erie Road, south of E. Mason Street, west of S. Northview Road, and north of Padi-Wood Lane, plus a portion east of S. Grandview Road, north of Finger Road, and west of S. Northview Road. TID 24 will be classified as a mixed-use district based on the identification and classification of the property proposed to be included within the TID. Proposed projects include cash grants and loans to owners, lessees, or developers of property within the TID; road, pedestrian, bicycle, and other transportation improvements; potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure; environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public spaces and amenities; land acquisition, environmental remediation, structural rehabilitation, and new construction; and administration. The proposed costs include projects within the proposed boundary and within a one-half (1/2) mile radius of the proposed boundary of the TID. BACKGROUND Staff will provide a detailed overview of the project plan at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Hold until the next Joint Review Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT A formal fiscal impact analysis will be provided as part ot the final project plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. TID 26 Project Plan Draft 100 North Jefferson Street, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 greenbaywi.gov City of Green Bay Department of Community and Economic Development Tax Increment District Twenty-Six (26) Grandview Industrial Park PROJECT PLAN City of Green Bay, Wisconsin June 17, 2022 PRELIMINARY DRAFT 100 North Jefferson Street, Room 608, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-5026 (p) 920.448.3400 (f) 920.448.3426 greenbaywi.gov Key Dates: Organizational Joint Review Board Meeting: June 23, 2022 Public Hearing Held: August 1, 2022 Approval by Redevelopment Authority: August 1, 2022 Adoption by Common Council: August 2, 2022 Approval by the Joint Review Board: August 18 or 19, 2022 (TBD) Executive Summary • Description of District: o Tax Incremental District (“TID”) No. 26 (“District”) is a proposed industrial district consisting of 14 parcels on approximately 208.7 acres generally bounded by Main Street, N. Monroe Ave., Cherry Street, and Quincy St. • Authority o The City is creating the District under the provisions of Wis. Stat. § 66.1105. • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($17.1 million) o Approximately $3 million in development incentives for an industrial project at 3731 Finger Road (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Estimated $3 million in future development incentives for future industrial development projects throughout the District. o Estimated $10 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.) o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Incremental Valuation ($22 million) o Approximately $35 million in improvements for an industrial project at 3731 Finger Road (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Approximately $30 million in improvements for potential industrial development projects throughout the rest of the District. • Expected Termination of District o Based on the Economic Feasibility Study located within this Plan, the City anticipates that the District will need to remain open for its entire 20 year life to generate sufficient tax increment to pay all Project Costs. page 2 of 12 City of Green Bay • Summary of Findings o As required by Wis. Stat. § 66.1105, and as documented in this Plan and the exhibits contained and referenced herein, the following findings are made: [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 3 of 12 Preliminary Map of Proposed District Boundary page 4 of 12 City of Green Bay Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions - Zoning [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 5 of 12 Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Existing Land Use [TO BE COMPLETED] page 6 of 12 City of Green Bay Map Showing Existing Uses and Conditions – Future Land Use [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 7 of 12 Improvement Map Area Location Owner Total Value Land Value Value (sq ft) 3714 E MASON ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 179,363 page 8 of 12 3760 E MASON ST GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 134,728 3731 FINGER RD GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 1,002,454 3731 FINGER RD GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 768,727 S NORTHVIEW RD RRL LAND LLC $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ - 435,590 909 S GRANDVIEW RD RENTMEESTER ANTOINETTE L REVOCABLE TRUST $ 125,900 $ 55,000 $ 70,900 1,284,761 1020 S GRANDVIEW RD STUART E & CYNTHIA G FRANKOW $ 169,100 $ 47,400 $ 121,700 370,625 911 ERIE RD JOHN J BUNKER, ETAL $ 79,000 $ 79,000 $ - 111,540 ARLINE LN & & & & & PIERQUET FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP $ 6,400 $ 6,400 $ - 1,562,724 720 S GRANDVIEW RD PIERQUET ROSELLA REVOCABLE TRUST $ 300 $ 300 $ - 64,445 PADI WOOD LN PIERQUET FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP ETAL $ 5,100 $ 5,100 $ - 1,235,124 641 S GRANDVIEW RD GREEN BAY CITY OF $ - $ - $ - 102,400 S GRANDVIEW RD RENTMEESTER ANTOINETTE L REVOCABLE TRUST $ 4,700 $ 4,700 $ - 1,143,335 E MASON ST PIERQUET FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP ETAL $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - 697,864 $ 394,300 $ 201,700 $ 192,600 9,093,678 Preliminary Parcel List and Analysis (as of 6/17/2022) City of Green Bay Equalized Value Test [TO BE COMPLETED] Statement Listing the Kind, Number and Location of All Proposed Public Works or Improvements Within the District [TO BE COMPLETED] TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 9 of 12 Map Showing Proposed Improvements and Uses [TO BE COMPLETED] page 10 of 12 City of Green Bay Detailed List of Estimated Project Costs • Preliminary Projected/Estimated Project Cost Expenditures ($17.1 million) o Approximately $3 million in development incentives for an industrial project at 3731 Finger Road (Per approved development agreement contingent upon TIF creation.) o Estimated $3 million in future development incentives for future industrial development projects throughout the District. o Estimated $10 million for traditional public infrastructure (Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater management, sidewalks, streets, etc.) o Estimated $100,000 for Public Art within the District o Estimated $1 million for Administrative costs TID 24 Project Plan DRAFT page 11 of 12 Economic Feasibility Study, Description of the Methods of Financing Estimated Project Costs and the Time When Related Costs or Monetary Obligations are to be Incurred [TO BE COMPLETED] Annexed Property No parcels or other property or territory will be annexed. All parcels exist within the City of Green Bay. Estimate of Property to Be Devoted to Retail Business [TO BE COMPLETED] Proposed Changes of Zoning Ordinances, Master Plan, Map, Building Codes and City Ordinances No changes to zoning or the comprehensive plan are anticipated at this time. Statement of the Proposed Method for the Relocation of any Persons to be Displaced [TO BE COMPLETED] How Creation of the Tax Incremental District Promotes the Orderly Development of the City [TO BE COMPLETED] List of Estimated Non-Project Costs General reporting costs, audit, and review by the City’s financial consultant on an annual basis. Legal Opinion Advising Whether the Plan is Complete and Complies with Wis. Stat. § 66.1105(4)(f) [TO BE COMPLETED] page 12 of 12 City of Green Bay