General
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · June 24, 2026
Agenda
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
City Hall - Council Chambers
June 24, 2026
6:30 PM
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of
Highland Park, a Special Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour of 6:30 PM on Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at
City Hall - Council Chambers, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois, during which
meeting it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The Historic Preservation Commission has elected to conduct the meeting entirely in-
person, and without opportunity for virtual viewing or participation. Please contact the
Department of Community Development – Planning Division at (847) 432-0867 for up-to-
date information on the conduct of the meeting.
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email the Staff Liaison Maddy
Markle at mmarkle@cityhpil.com. Comments and emails received prior to the Thursday before
the scheduled meeting will be included in the meeting packet. Public comments received by 4:30
PM the day of the meeting will be read under Business from the Public. Any comments received
during the meeting will be held until the end of the meeting. Individuals who wish to have their
comments read into the public record are limited to 200 words or less. Public comments should
be emailed and contain the following information:
• In the subject line, identify, “HPC (Date of Meeting)”
• Name
• Address (optional)
• City
• Phone (optional)
• Organization, agency representing, if applicable
• Topic or agenda item number of interest
All emails received will be acknowledged. Individuals with no access to email may leave a voice
message with Maddy Markle at 847.926.1856.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in
this hearing, or who have questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, email the
City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub or call at 847.926.1005.
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
IV. Scheduled Business
V. Discussion Items
A. Place of Remembrance Design Concept
VI. Business from the Public (Individuals wishing to be heard regarding items not listed
on this agenda)
VII. Other Business
A. Next Regular Meeting to Occur July 9, 2026
VIII. Staff Report
IX. Adjournment
Packet
Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
City Hall - Council Chambers
June 24, 2026
6:30 PM
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of
Highland Park, a Special Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of
Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour of 6:30 PM on Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at
City Hall - Council Chambers, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois, during which
meeting it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The Historic Preservation Commission has elected to conduct the meeting entirely in-
person, and without opportunity for virtual viewing or participation. Please contact the
Department of Community Development – Planning Division at (847) 432-0867 for up-to-
date information on the conduct of the meeting.
Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email the Staff Liaison Maddy
Markle at mmarkle@cityhpil.com. Comments and emails received prior to the Thursday before
the scheduled meeting will be included in the meeting packet. Public comments received by 4:30
PM the day of the meeting will be read under Business from the Public. Any comments received
during the meeting will be held until the end of the meeting. Individuals who wish to have their
comments read into the public record are limited to 200 words or less. Public comments should
be emailed and contain the following information:
• In the subject line, identify, “HPC (Date of Meeting)”
• Name
• Address (optional)
• City
• Phone (optional)
• Organization, agency representing, if applicable
• Topic or agenda item number of interest
All emails received will be acknowledged. Individuals with no access to email may leave a voice
message with Maddy Markle at 847.926.1856.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in
this hearing, or who have questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, email the
City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub or call at 847.926.1005.
Page 1 of 85
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
IV. Scheduled Business
V. Discussion Items
A. Place of Remembrance Design Concept
VI. Business from the Public (Individuals wishing to be heard regarding items not listed
on this agenda)
VII. Other Business
A. Next Regular Meeting to Occur July 9, 2026
VIII. Staff Report
IX. Adjournment
Page 2 of 85
Staff Report
Meeting Date: June 24, 2026
Staff Contact: Emily Taub, Assistant City Manager
Jazmin Alejandro, Social Services Specialist
Maddy Markle, Planner I
Zubin Coleman, Senior Planner
Amanda Bennett, Communications Manager
Department: City Manager's Office
Title: Place of Remembrance Design Concept
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission discuss the relationship between the
Place of Remembrance unified design concept and the locally landmarked Rose Garden site.
Policy Consideration:
Background
In 2023, the City Council established a Working Group to guide the planning process for the
permanent Place of Remembrance for the Highland Park shooting. The Place of Remembrance
has three primary objectives:
• Create an accessible public place for reflection, remembrance, and solace;
• Pay tribute to the memories of Katie Goldstein, Irina McCarthy, Kevin Michael
McCarthy, Jacki Lovi Sundheim, Stephen Straus, Nicolas Toledo, and Eduardo Uvaldo;
• Honor the community's resiliency, especially those who were injured.
The Working Group has been meeting regularly since November of 2023, with all meeting notes
and related documents available online at hpremembrance.org/meetings. Key milestones for the
Working Group include:
• Potential location brainstorm and development of the location shortlist (Port Clinton
Square, the southwest corner of St. Johns & Central, the Rose Garden): February 27,
2024 & April 3, 2024
• RFP process for location feedback focus group & survey consultants: August 27,
Page 3 of 85
2024 (firm recommendation); October 15, 2024 (Council approval)
• Location feedback public engagement process: November 2024 - January 2025; March
31, 2025 (Working Group presentation); April 14 & April 25 (Committee of the Whole
presentation); Full downloadable report recommending a prominent, primary Place of
Remembrance at the Rose Garden and a subtle, secondary location at Port Clinton Plaza
• RFQ process for design services, a multi-phase process: April 30, 2025 (RFQ
issued); June 18, 2025 (shortlist developed for interviews & representative
designs); August 27, 2025 (Working Group recommendation); October 6,
2025 (Committee of the Whole discussion and selection of SWA Group); December 15,
2025 (Committee of the Whole update and budget determination); January 12,
2026 (approval of agreement with SWA Group)
Design Process Overview
In January, 2026, the City entered into an agreement with SWA Group for the design of the
permanent Place of Remembrance, including the prominent primary location at the Rose Garden,
and the subtle, secondary location at Port Clinton Plaza. The design and construction process is
divided into five phases discussed in detail, with milestones, on the City's website.
The first phase, Ideation, represented an opportunity for the design team to meet the community
and hear feedback on potential design elements through a comprehensive public engagement
strategy developed by SWA Group's partner consultant, All Together. Working in partnership
with City staff, SWA Group and All Together implemented a tiered approach to this phase of
community engagement in line with that of the Location Feedback Survey (2025; see below) and
the Place of Remembrance communications plan (see Attachment 6). Feedback during the
Ideation phase focused on mood boards and open-ended questions to help the team actively
develop ideas and concept designs from community feedback (see Attachment 7). This phase
entailed ideation listening sessions from victims' families, individuals who were injured, and first
responders, focus groups with various stakeholders, including parade participants, government
and resource partners and others who assisted with the shooting response, including City staff, a
listening session at the Committee of the Whole (February 23, 2026), a community workshop,
and a public survey. This phase also included an initial joint conversation between the
Committee of the Whole and the Historic Preservation Commission, with respect to
considerations pertaining to the historic landmark at the Rose Garden on March 9, 2026.
The Ideation phase resulted in the three design concepts that were presented at a public meeting
of the Working Group on May 7, 2026 and at the Council design concept listening session at the
Committee of the Whole on May 11, 2026. The engagement report summarizing quantitative and
qualitative feedback received is available on the City's website.
The second phase, Design Concepting, began in May and will continue throughout June. During
Design Concepting, the design team presented the three concept designs informed by the public
engagement from the Ideation phase to the community to receive feedback on the concepts.
Individual outreach to victims' family members and people who were injured was conducted by
the Resiliency Division and in person listening sessions were held with the design team. Public
Page 4 of 85
workshops were held on May 9 and May 11 in addition to multiple opportunities to view the
concepts at City Hall, the Highland Park Senior Center, and Moraine Township to reach and
receive input from the community. A community wide survey was also conducted online and in
paper format.
An engagement report summarizing the information shared by victims and the community is
available on the City’s website. The comprehensive feedback informed the development of a
single unified design concept which was shared with the City Council on June 8 (see Attachment
8).
Subsequent design phases will include Design Development (anticipated July - September 2026),
Construction Documentation (anticipated September - December 2026), and Construction
(anticipated 2027 - completion) – information on these phases is available on the City's website.
The construction timeline will be developed after the final design is determined and a
construction manager has been onboarded. RFP responses for construction manager services
were due June 5, 2026.
Previous Commission Discussion
The March 9, 2026 Joint Special Meeting of the Committee of the Whole and the Historic
Preservation Commission included a review of the historic elements of the Rose Garden. The
report and meeting the history, historic landmarking process, and current status of the site. At
that meeting, the Committee of the Whole and the Historic Preservation Commission discussed
considerations pertaining to the Place of Remembrance and the Rose Garden.
Site History
Laurel Park, the location of the Rose Garden, was acquired by the Park District in 1930. The
Men’s Garden Club of Highland Park engaged notable landscape architect Marshall J. Johnson,
who was the son-in-law of Jens Jensen, to design Gardeners Memorial on the site of Laurel Park.
Upon completion in 1942, Gardeners Memorial was presented to the City. The garden was
designed as a commemoration of three Highland Park citizens who were instrumental in the
development of Highland Park’s landscape heritage. The park design has three main components
which relate to the principles of the man it honors: the rose garden in honor of William C. Egan,
Highland Park’s first rosarian; a wildflower garden at the northeastern third of the park to honor
Jessie Lowe Smith, a naturalist and local educator; and Players Hill at the southeastern section of
the park in honor of Jens Jensen, naturalist and landscape architect. The site was designated a
Local Landmark in 1992 (see Attachment 1).
Staff has investigated the historic record and visited the site to determine which historic site
elements are still intact. Staff concludes the site once resembled the 1942 Marshall Johnson Plan
(see Attachment 2) but has been gradually altered over time. The following is an analysis of the
three primary components of Gardeners Memorial.
William Egan Rose Garden – Central Portion of Lot
The Rose Garden was implemented as depicted by the Marshall Johnson plan and has largely
retained its layout. However, many of the original roses planted in the garden did not adapt well
to the climate through the years and have been replaced with hardy varieties. There was once a
Page 5 of 85
pool of water at the center of the Rose Garden, but the pool was filled in between 1942 and 1988.
In 2008 a rain garden was installed in front of the Rose Garden.
Jesse Lowe Smith Wildflower Garden – Northeast Portion of Lot
This portion of the site is marked by a stone that reads “Jesse Lowe Smith Native Garden.” The
wildflower garden was originally intended to include a sizeable pool and council ring. However,
the council ring was never implemented. According to the 1988 Landscape Survey
(see Attachment 4), Johnson installed a stone sundial bench in place of the council ring. The
pool was implemented but filled in between 1942 and 1988. An original stone retaining wall
marks where the pool once stood. In 1959, Forest King, created by artist Abbott Pattison, was
installed above the 1942 retaining wall.
Jen Jensen’s Player’s Hill – Southeast Portion of Lot
This portion of the site is marked by a stone that reads “Jens Jensen Native Garden.” The original
design was not maintained, and as a result, the Player’s Hill retains little integrity of design.
Staff concludes the site’s remaining historic features are the Rose Garden in its entirety, the stone
sundial bench, and the stone retaining wall. The Rose Garden, sundial bench and stone retaining
wall are confirmed to have existed in 1992. These features were known to the Historic
Preservation Commission at the time of the Landmark Designation. The other site features
depicted in the Marshall Johnson plan were either never implemented or do not retain sufficient
integrity of design.
Next Steps
Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission discuss the interaction between the
Place of Remembrance design concept and the locally landmarked Rose Garden site. SWA will
give a presentation explaining the relationship between the design and the history of the site. The
City will submit an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness ("COA") in the Fall, once
construction documents are drafted.
Core Priorities:
Fiscal Stability
The engagement of Do Tank for the location feedback survey and focus group facilitation was
$45,000.
The cost of the first stage of SWA's service agreement (project administration; listening,
discovery, and community engagement; schematic design) is $262,500 plus up to $21,000 in
reimbursable expenses (8% of the costs). The estimate provided by SWA for the second stage
(design development; construction documentation; construction administration) is $700,000 -
$1,250,000. The final determination on stage two costs is being refined following the unified
design and is anticipated to be presented to City Council on June 29, 2026.
The City Council supported a preliminary budget of $2 million for construction of the Place of
Remembrance. At the June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole meeting, the City Council
supported an updated budget of $2.3 - $2.8 million for the Rose Garden site with Port Clinton
costs under development. Although Council direction was not to pursue active fundraising due to
Page 6 of 85
the broad impact of the shooting on the community, the City has received several donations to
support this project, most notably a restricted gift of $1 million from Jon & Mindy Gray among
other similarly directed gifts for the Permanent Place of Remembrance.
Public Safety
The design concepts incorporate best practices for public safety and accessibility, including
preservation of sightlines and hardscapes that support visitors who may be using mobility
devices or pushing strollers.
Infrastructure Investment
The permanent Place of Remembrance will incorporate a primary installation at the Rose Garden
and a subtle, secondary installation at Port Clinton Plaza. While the scale and nature of the
designs will be different, each represents a significant infrastructure undertaking given the
presence of existing structures at or adjacent to the site.
Environmental Sustainability
The design concepts take the City's commitment to environmentally sustainable practices into
consideration through recommendations for native plantings and seasonality.
Attachments:
1. Attachment 1. Laurel Park Gardeners Memorial Park Landmark Information
2. Attachment 2. Marshall Johnson Plan
3. Attachment 3. 1986 Survey
4. Attachment 4. 1988 Historic Landscape Survey
5. Attachment 5. Rose Garden Existing Conditions
6. Attachment 6. Place of Remembrance Communication Plan April 3, 2024
7. Attachment 7. Ideation Engagement Summary May 7 2026
8. Attachment 8. Unified Design Concept Presented at June 8 Special COTW
Page 7 of 85
Highl&nd Park Historic PreseivaUon O:nrul.68lon
•
1'107 St. Jdwl ~venue
H19hland Park, 1111.noi& 60035
MUNITY OEVfLOPM[HT
Lmi&rut JbdnaUon rom C1TY Of HIGHLAND rARK
oa te 1_...;3;.:..l.:..;16~/.;.:92=-·_
1) Nne of Pro~rty (original u kno,m) 1 Laurel Park & Gardener Memorial
2) sueet Addresai494 Laurel/1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL 60035
3) Legal descri~CI\ or P. I.N. (Pecnanent Index Nlltber frca 'lwnahJp
AeeesW>r' 1 Office, 600 [Aurel Ave, , Bicjlland Pad:) ,,_ _ _ _ _ _ __
PIN 16-23-413-018 16-23-413-019
4) Name and Address of. Property Omer(a) (Fran Assessor's Offioe) ,_ __
Park District of Highland Park
636 Ridge Road, Highland Park, IL 60035
5) Present Oser___P-=a~r=k_ _ _ _ _6) Put Oset__P_a_rk_ _ _ _ _ __
7) Architect: Marshall Johnson 8) ~te of. O:mstrucUons 1942
9) Wdtten statsnent describing property ard setting forth reasons lt 1s
el i9ible for Landnark designations
Laurel Park and Gardeners Memorial was presented to the City by the Men's
•
Garden Club in 1942. It was designed by Johnson, Jens Jensen's son-in-law,
e o a ree citizens who were instrumental in the development of
Highland Park's landscape heritage; Jessie Lowe Smith, natura st and
_eAucator, William Eaan. Highland Park's 1st rosarian, and Jens Jensen,
.naturalist and landscape architect. Each part of the park relates to the
principles of the man lt honors.
10) ~ et.ruct.urt 1a tl1¢bl•
for c5ea1pticn en the tas.11
of the follatlng criteria
(eee rwerse pqeJ 1
1, 3, 5, 7, 8
11) ~Cs) and Adress(es) of
~kant(e)a
Naine(a)a Ralph Cianchetti
s
Address(es 1 636 Ridge Road
•
Hig land Park, Il 6003S
12) Afflliat1Cll (0:mDSMion Med:ier. CAimer, City o:>mcil, Preservation
~,tt-e~~ Board of Park Commissioners, Park District of Highland Park
Please ~ete ard return th1a fom to the Bighland Parlt Pre.eervat!cn
Q:mn1BS1r.n 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, nu.nots 60035
Page 8 of 85
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING HIGHLAND PARK LANDMARKS
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Highland
Park, pursuant to Section 24 .025 of "The Highland Park Code of 1968", as
amended, did conduct a public hearing on April 16, 1992, pursuant to proper
notice; and
WHEREAS, following said hearing, the said Historic Preservation
Commission passed Resolution No. 05-92 (a copy of which resolution is attached
hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit I), which resolution contains the
report of the Commission as well as a recommendation to the City Council of
the City of Highland Park that Laurel Park and Gardeners Memorial Park
( hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property") be designated Highland Park
Landmarks; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the designation of the
Subject Property will be consistent with the planning policies and objectives of
the City, will promote the welfare of its residents, and will not adversely
affect the value, use, or enjoyment of any adjacent or nearby property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Highland Park believes it to be
in the best interests of the residents of the City of Highland Park that the
Subject Property be designated as Landmarks;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HIGHLAND PARK, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That, pursuant to Section 24.025 of "The Highland Park
Code of 1968", as amended, the following described properties be and the same
are designated hereby as Landmarks:
Laurel Park 494 Laurel Avenue 16-23-413-018
Gardeners Memorial Park 1707 St. Johns Avenue 16-23-413-019
and as such shall be subject hereafter to the provisions of Chapter 24 of "The
Highland Park Code of 1968", as amended.
SECTION TWO: That, as notice of the action of this City Council, the City
Clerk shall forward certified copies hereof to those who nominated the
aforedescribed properties as Landmarks, to the owner of record of the
aforementioned Landmarks, and to the Building Department of the City of
Highland Park.
SECTION THREE; That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by
law.
AYES: Mayor Pierce and Councilmen Blane, Brenner, Weiss,
O'Keefe and Koukos
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Councilman Geraci
PASSED: May 26, 1992
APPROVED: May 26, 1992
PUBLISHED: June 4, 1992
ORDINANCE NO: 16-92
ATTEST:
City C l e ~ , t ) , / J ~
Page 9 of 85
Regular Meeting - City Council
May 26, 1992
-7-
5. Mr. Bob Sanders, 1852 Park Avenue West, inquired about special
assessments for storm sewer installation, storm sewer connection, and
the culvert on Park Avenue West.
OMNIBUS VOTE
The Council unanimously consented to take a single vote by yeas and nays on
several items grouped together for voting purposes under the designation
"omnibus vote".
Councilman Weiss moved approval of Items 13, 14 and 15.
Councilman Koukos seconded the motion.
Upon roll call: Yeas: Mayor Pierce and Councilmen Blane, Brenner,
Weiss, O'Keefe and Koukos
Nays: None
The Mayor declared that the motion carried.
13. Ordinance - Designating Highland Park Landmarks
a. 892 Burton Avenue
Adoption of an Ordinance (No. 14-92), designating 892 Burton Avenue as a
Highland Park Landmark.
Omnibus Vote
b. Rosewood Park
Adoption of an Ordinance (No. 15-92), designating Rosewood Park, located at
the foot of Roger Williams Avenue at Lake Michigan, as a Highland Park
Landmark.
Omnibus Vote
c. Laurel Park/Gardeners Memorial Park
Adoption of an Ordinance (No. 16-92), designating Laurel Park, 494 Laurel
Avenue, and Gardeners Memorial Park, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, as Highland Park
Landmarks.
Omnibus Vote
14. Ordinance - Establishing "W" Parking Permits
Adoption of an Ordinance (No. 17-92) entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
TRAFFIC REGULATIONS OF "THE HIGHLAND PARK CODE OF 1968", AS AMENDED",
providing for a "W" parking permit; and prohibiting parking at all times on
the west side of Midlothian Avenue between Glenview and Onwentsia Avenues.
Omnibus Vote
Page 10 of 85
Regular Meeting - City Council
May 26, 1992
-8-
15. Ordinance - Granting a Non-Exclusive Special License to Bojan's Auto Body
of Highland Park. Inc.
Adoption of an Ordinance (No. 18-92) entitled "AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A NON-
EXCLUSIVE SPECIAL LICENSE TO BOJAN'S AUTO BODY OF HIGHLAND PARK, INC. FOR THE
PREMISES LOCATED AT 2058 FIRST STREET", permitting the awnings to encroach 2'
over the public right-of-way at 2058 First Street.
Omnibus Vote
16. Release of Easements - Highland Lakes Subdivision
Councilman O'Keefe moved to table this Item to a future City Council Meeting.
Councilman Brenner seconded the motion.
Upon roll call: Yeas: Mayor Pierce and Councilmen Blane, Brenner,
Weiss, O'Keefe and Koukos
Nays: None
The Mayor declared that the motion carried.
OTHER BUSINESS FROM STAFF
There was no other busines from staff this evening.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to conduct, Councilman Koukos moved to adjourn. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Brenner and passed by acclamation. The
Council adjourned its meeting at 10:25 p.m.
City Clerk
Page 11 of 85
Owner Consent Form
• for
Highland Park Landmark NomlnaUon
Date: March 23, 1992
The undersigned owner of the property located at 494 Laurel Ave. /1707 St. Johns Ave.
(Laurel Park & Gardener Hemorial Park) (address), in the city of Highland Park.
Illinois, hereby
tt approves consent for the above property to be nominated by the Highland Park
H{storic Preservation CommJssJon for designation as a Highland Park Landmark
( ) disapproves consent for the above property to be nominated by the Highland Park
Historic Preservation Commission for designation as a Highland Park Landmark.
•
(Please place an "X" 1n the appropriate space.)
Print Name(s) Jerome c, Eel J
Address 636 Ridge Road, ll!P, IL
Phone# 831-3810
•
Page 12 of 85
,
/ ft
-
• CITY Of HIGHLAND PARK
.:. ·, '""a! i ~~.; $'
- .: .. ~-c :;;::-.
: •: I .:~:-:e:(
March 25, 1992
Jor ... s A,e°'~e
"",C ! :-:t:::.
Ms. Connie SkJbbe
Director of Parks & Recreation
Park District of Highland Park
636 Ridge Road
Highland Park, IL 60035
Dear Conrue: •
1111s letter is to inform you that the Highland Park Historic Preservation Commission
will hold a publlc hearing on Thursday, Aprtl 16, 1992, to make an official
recommendation to the Cfty Council that Laurel Park & Gardener Memorial be
designated as a H1ghland Park landmark. A public noUce will be publlshed 1n the
Pioneer Press not more than 30 days nor less than 7 days prior to the heartng.
• The meeUng will commence at 7:30 PM. It Is not required that you attend, but you are
welcome if you so desire. Please call me if you have any questions.
The Historic Preservation CommJss1on thanks you for your participation 1n the local
landmarks program.
Sincerely,
unity Development
MJK:aaw
:·cc: Irv Wagner. Chairman Historic Preservation CommJssion
•
Page 13 of 85
Page 14 of 85
Page 15 of 85
Page 36
For a short period, in 1934-35 Jensen and Johnson became partners. When
Jensen retired to the Clearing in Door County, Wisconsin in 1935, Marshall
Johnson established his own practice. He used the hawthorn tree logo, and
continued to work for many of Jensen's private clients including the Fords
in Michigan and the Florsheims in Highland Park.
Johnson's designs combined Jensen's Prairie style with the more
traditional and formal design elements. In addition, he successfully
adapted the designs to the smaller lot sizes and modern needs of his
clients. He continued his practice into the late 1960's.
Women's Club, L-1991 Sheridan Rd., D- 1936, A-, LA- Fritz Bahr/ Marshall
Johnson, Des - no
According to Highland Park By Foot or Frame the Women's Club landscape
was designed by Fritz Bahr in 1936. However, there is an original plan
dated 1937 by Marshall Johnson for this property. The siting of the
building is consistent with the Johnson drawing. The present plantings give
no indication whether or not Johnson's plan was executed.
Laurel Park/ Gardener's Memorial L- St. Johns Avenue between Hazel Ave. and
Laurel Ave., D- 1942, A-, LA- Marshall Johnson, Des- NR District, LL
Laurel Park/ Gardener's Memorial was designed by Marshall Johnson for
the Men's Garden Club of Highland Park to commemorate three highly regarded
local naturalists: William C. Egan, Jesse Lowe Smith, and Jens Jensen. This
landscape is an example of Johnson's ability to incorporate formal and
naturalistic styles successfully into a unified design plan. When the Park
was finished and dedicated in 1942, Jensen came back to Highland Park from
"The Clearing" to attend the ceremony.
The formal section of the Park is the rose garden, which was a
collaboration between Johnson and Eugene Pfister, president of the Men's
Garden Club. This section was created in honor of William C. Egan because
he was the first rosarian in the area (see pp. 16 and 21). A wildflower
garden at the northeastern third of the Park was meant to honor Jessie Lowe
Smith, naturalist and local educator who fostered a love for nature in his
students (seep. 21). Players Hill, an area at the southeastern section of
the Park is a reminder of Jens Jensen and his many contributions to Highland
Park.
Currently plans are being developed by the Park District and the
Historic Preservation Commission to restore Laurel Park/ Gardener's
Memorial. The original configuration and shape of the rose beds are almost
Page 16 of 85
Page 37
exactly intact. Many of the original roses planted in the garden did not
adapt well to the climate and through the years they have been replaced with
alternate variaties. Clayton Sandel, an early member of the Men's Garden
Club is currently evaluating the roses to determine the best possible
cultivars which combine hardiness and original design intent. The Rose
Garden once had a round pool in the center which is now filled and planted
with flowers, but will be reinstated to its original use.
The tall hedge buckthorn enclosing the Rose Garden is now sparse and
shabby in appearance. When the garden was planned that cultivar was new and
popularly received. Since then it has been found to have many disease
problems which ruin its appearance and shorten its life. A search is now
being made to find a similar but healthier plant.
The two natural sections, the Native Wildflower Garden and Players Hill
are more difficult to evaluate and research is still being conducted. The
sundial bench and the rocky ledge pool in the Wildflower Garden are intact,
though the pool has been filled in. The sundial is actually not included
in the original plan. It appears that it was used as an alternative to a
council ring which was included at approximately the same location on the
plan.
Koretz House, L-2365 Egandale Rd., D- 1948, A-, LA- Marshall Johnson, Des-
no
This small residential landscape is still owned by Johnson's original
client, Mr. Robert Koretz. A copy of the original Johnson plan for this
property was made available for the survey. The O'ri:ginal plan primarily
reflects the Prairie style, but the landscape has undergone some changes
over the years. Today it is an eclectic statement, combining the Prairie
style with English features.
Originally, the property had a curving stone path leading to the front
door and a stonework area beneath the front portico. The front entranceway
was changed in 1956. At this time, the stone path was replaced with a brick
path, and the stonework portico area was removed. An English style country
dooryard perennial garden was also added in front of the house at that time.
An original brick path leads to one side of the house and widens as it nears
the backyard. This stonework is well intact. The backyard is similar to
the original plan only in feeling. It still appears to be a carved out
space. However, most of the plant materials specified in the original plan
no longer exist except for sumac, some viburnum and crab. The council ring
campfire which was previously at the rear of the backyard has also been
removed. Some of the other original stone paths at the back of the house
also still exist.
Herman Wren House, C- Seven Gables, L- 2020 Partridge Lane, A- Robert
Arnold, LA- Marshall Johnson, D- 1963, Des- no
This property illustrates the point that Johnson was far more pragmatic,
and willing to incorporate formal design into his overall plans than Jensen.
In addition, it might be speculated that Johnson was more willing to deviate
Page 17 of 85
Page 18 of 85
Planning for a Permanent Place of
Remembrance: Communications Plan
April 3, 2024
Page 19 of 85
Values
The following are the City of Highland Park Community Values as the
City prepares for a place of remembrance following the shooting that
took place on July 4, 2022. The working group’s approach will be
trauma-informed, and meetings and discussion should serve as a
safe space for ongoing discussions.
Community Values
Inclusion
Transparency
Respect and value all opinions
The outcome will last for decades into the future
2
Page 20 of 85
Purpose
A communications plan includes objectives that align with the overall
project, identifies key stakeholders and communications channels,
sets timelines and allocates resources, outlines strategies to
address potential communication risks, and includes ongoing
evaluation to ensure objectives are being met.
The process of planning for a place of remembrance is just beginning.
This presentation focuses on:
– Objectives
– Stakeholders
– Channels
– General Timelines
3
Page 21 of 85
Guiding Principles for Communications
• Do No Harm: consider as carefully and as thoroughly as possible
the potential and inadvertent consequences of the words and
images we use
• Opt-In: as much as possible, give individuals the opportunity to
decide how and when to engage with content
• Trauma-Informed: work to avoid re-traumatization by using victim-
centered language, being cognizant of the potential for inadvertent
harm, and practicing transparency and open communication
• Individualized: consider many experiences of trauma, including
within stakeholder groups, when planning the frequency and
modality of communications
4
Page 22 of 85
Objectives
1. Keep the community informed of the activities of the working
group and milestones in the planning process.
2. Tailor messaging to the needs of each stakeholder group.
3. Maintain two-way communication and facilitate community
engagement.
4. Ensure transparency by promoting meetings and providing
resources and documents related to the planning process.
5. Enhance accessibility by providing materials in multiple
languages and formats to meet the diverse communication needs
of individuals impacted by the shooting.
5
Page 23 of 85
Objective 1: Keep the Community Informed
The City uses multiple communications platforms to share
information regarding the planning process:
– Website: hpremembrance.org
– Facebook: facebook.com/HighlandParkIL
– Weekly eNews: cityhpil.com/signup
– Dedicated email list: email remembrance@cityhpil.com to sign up
– The Highlander: bimonthly print newsletter
6
Page 24 of 85
Objective 1: Keep the Community Informed
Additional communications modalities:
– Public meetings
• Working group meetings open to the public
• Updates at City Council meetings
• Neighborhood meetings
• Forthcoming community engagement meetings
– Partner organizations
• Resource partners
• Government partners
• Business community
• Clergy
– Media outreach
7
Page 25 of 85
Objective #2: Tailor Messaging to Stakeholders
• Identify core messages and adapt delivery based on the needs
of different stakeholder groups:
– Next-of-kin Family Members
– Individuals Present & Injured
– Individuals Present & Uninjured
– Highland Park Community
– Community Beyond Highland Park
– Government/Resource Partners & Clergy
• Establish a cadence to set consistent expectations for the
frequency, volume, and type of communication
• Create an archive of communications so that community members
can opt in or out without fear of missing important information
8
Page 26 of 85
Objective #3: Facilitate Community Engagement
• Work with a professional consultant to design, manage and
analyze community feedback in a trauma-informed manner
• Provide multiple ways to share feedback
• Offer structured and unstructured opportunities for feedback
9
Page 27 of 85
Objective #4: Ensure Transparency
• Promote public meetings of the working group
• Provide periodic public updates from the working group at City
Council meetings and in City communications
• Maintain an archive of meeting notes, documents and
presentations at hpremembrance.org so that people who are
unable to attend meetings can still participate
10
Page 28 of 85
Objective #5: Enhance Accessibility
• Enhance language accessibility by:
– Using an embedded website translation tool
– Providing materials in Spanish, Russian, and other languages as requested
– Offering simultaneous interpretation (including ASL) for events
• Enhance website accessibility by:
– Optimizing website design for assistive technology
• Remove barriers to participation in engagement activities by:
– Offering opportunities to connect or share feedback through a variety of different
modalities
– Working with resource partners to meet people where they are
• Apply trauma-informed principles by:
– Making people aware of when to expect communications
– Ensuring communications are always available for reference
– Providing advance notice of potentially re-traumatizing topics
– Collaborating with community partners so they are aware of the communications plan and
able to assist clients
– Including reminders of Resiliency Division services
11
Page 29 of 85
Setting Expectations: Type & Frequency
What to Expect How Often
Meeting Notices (eNews, FB, Week prior to meeting Note:
website, email) Information will be
Meeting Summary (eNews, eNews immediately following archived at
website, email) most recent meeting hpremembrance.org
Bimonthly Update (Highlander) Each issue
Individuals may opt-
Focus group or other event Week prior to event out (or opt back in)
(eNews, FB, website, email) at any time
Community surveys (eNews, Announcement, periodic
FB, website, email) reminders during survey period,
reminder before close)
12
Page 30 of 85
Setting Expectations: Use of Images & Graphics
What image or graphic? Where is it used?
Together Highland Park Unidos Social media, email blasts, Note:
Logo signage, website, print The City is
Photos of the temporary Website, social media (for intentional about the
memorial social media, only the two use of imagery or
entrance plaques) graphics. These are
the only types of
Photos of victims Temporary memorial only
images you can
Generic “stock” photos: City Social media, occasionally print expect the City to
Hall, lakefront, candles, etc. use in relation to
FUTURE: design renderings, Website, social media, print, planning for a
prototypes, maquettes email blasts, signage (at permanent place of
events) remembrance.
13
Page 31 of 85
Contact Information
Feedback regarding communications:
Ghida S. Neukirch Amanda Bennett
City Manager Communications Manager
gneukirch@cityhpil.com abennett@cityhpil.com
Information regarding the Resiliency Division:
Emily Taub Madeline Kati, LCSW
Assistant City Manager Resiliency Manager
etaub@cityhpil.com mkati@cityhpil.com
14
Page 32 of 85
Questions?
Page 33 of 85
Highland Park
Place of Remembrance
Phase 1 | Public Engagement Summary
May 7, 2026
Page 34 of 85
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Overarching Themes 7
Site-Specific Themes 14
Design Character Preferences 19
In Closing 35
Page 35 of 85
Introduction
The City of Highland Park, in partnership with SWA Group and All Together, is undertaking a
trauma-informed process to create a permanent place of remembrance to pay tribute to the
memory of the seven victims of the Highland Park shooting, create space(s) for reflection and
remembrance, and honor the community’s resiliency, especially those who were injured. This
process entails multiple phases described in detail at hpremembrance.org/timeline.
This report, prepared by All Together, synthesizes all community input gathered during Phase
1: Design Ideation of the Highland Park Place of Remembrance design process. This included
a multi-tiered survey, individual and group listening sessions, and a community workshop, all
conducted between February and April 2026.
Feedback gathered throughout Phase 1 will inform high-level design features and the overall
feel of the permanent Place of Remembrance, providing the foundation for concept designs
developed in Phase 2: Design Concepts, which will include additional opportunities for
community engagement.
Page 36 of 385
Our Design Ideation Timeline
Phase 1 builds on a prior location study, with Do Tank, which concluded in January 2025 with
a recommendation for a two-site approach: a prominent primary Place of Remembrance at the
Rose Garden and a subtle, secondary Place of Remembrance at Port Clinton. The City Council
supported the recommendation in April 2025. This first round of engagement gave the design
team, SWA Group and All Together, the opportunity to learn about victims and their loved ones,
understand which design elements matter most, and gather open-ended input to inform early
concept development.
Multi-Tiered Engagement
This engagement process started with those most closely connected and expanded out to the entire Highland Park
community and our neighbors. Every voice we heard was valuable in shaping this summary of engagement and furthering
design concepts. For this document, references to each tier include but are not limited to the following:
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
Next of kin, present and injured, first Present not injured, parade Community members and
responders (Police, Fire, EMS, and participants, community leadership, organizations at large
others who provided direct on-scene resource partners, businesses,
care and response), and healthcare volunteers, first responders, donors,
workers and others who provided support
as part of the initial response and
emergency management efforts,
and those who live and work in
proximity to either site
Page 37 of 485
How We Engaged
February March April
One-on-one Committee Small group Initial Historic Ideation Survey Community Community
with Tier 1 of the Whole sessions with Preservation for Tier 1 and Ideation Ideation
(February, Listening Tier 1 and Tier 2 Commission Tier 2 (March Survey for Tier Workshop,
March, and April) Session (March and April) Consideration and April), offered 3 (Throughout offered in English
(February) (March) in English and March and April), and Spanish
Spanish offered in English (April)
and Spanish
Page 38 of 585
Communications Strategy
The Phase 1 communications plan included differentiated outreach to each tier, including email,
telephone, and written outreach as appropriate to the needs of each tier. Updates and promotions
were included in the Highlander, the City eNews, and social media, and were co-promoted by
government and community partners, including a live video interview on the Highland Park Public
Library’s Caminando Juntos livestream. The Resiliency Division also offered direct engagement
through tabling events at the Highland Park Public Library and personal outreach to Tier 1.
Who We Heard From
Phase 1 engagement resulted in 179 voices: 124 survey respondents and 55 additional
participants across listening sessions and the workshop.
22 102 55 179
Tier 1 Survey Community Survey Listening Session + Total Voices
Respondents Respondents Workshop Participants
Page 39 of 685
Overarching
Themes
Across all engagement formats (surveys, individual listening sessions, group listening sessions,
and the community workshop), six themes emerged with the greatest consistency. These are the
threads that ran through nearly every conversation.
Page 40 of 85
Name the seven whose lives were taken.
Acknowledge all who were harmed.
The most universally held position across all
engagement: names of those whose lives
were taken should appear in the design, given
prominence, and clearly Additional feedback
acknowledged. “How can the individuality of each suggested including the
person who died come across in 48 individuals who were
Names of the seven the design, in a way that is intimate physically injured and
without being overt?” acknowledgment to the
whose lives were taken
Tier 1 Listening Session Participant broader population whose
were a consistent and
emotionally significant lives were changed without
request from Tier 1 voices, particularly from visible wounds; both should be reflected in
those who survived with injuries. the space in some form. Many stakeholders
indicated this should be done discreetly,
without naming, but still meaningfully. Language
acknowledging being ‘forever changed’ was
suggested.
Overarching 41 of 885
Themes
Page
Honor the people and communities that showed up.
Participants across all groups described a community that sheltered and cared for people who
were injured, organized mutual aid, and came together to provide support. That story of ordinary
people doing extraordinary things was named as something the design should carry forward.
“So many heroes and people, you can’t even account for all of
the heroic actions. The community cares and showed up, and
there’s a lot that future generations can take from that.”
Tier 2 Listening Session Participant
“Heroism” across first responders, healthcare workers, institutions, and communities was
specifically named as something that should be reflected in the design. Mutual aid from surrounding
communities was specifically raised as something worth acknowledging beyond Highland Park
alone. The design offers an opportunity to honor that broader community of care.
Overarching 42 of 985
Themes
Page
Tell the story of the full community, not only
what happened.
When participants were asked what they
hoped future generations would understand
“A story of a community
when visiting the Place of Remembrance,
their answers were consistent: that Highland
that remembers with care,
Park is a community that cares deeply for
stands together in the face
one another. Several participants framed of loss, and balances grief
resilience as a statement around community with everyday life.”
and relationships. The parade has always been
Tier 1 Survey Respondent
a multi-generational event that, for decades,
brought the entire community (and surrounding
areas) together. Families, friends, and neighbors chose to care for one another throughout the event
and long after. The shooting does not define who this community is, but how people showed up
for each other in its wake does. The design and the stories it tells should hold both what was taken
and what this community proved itself to be.
Overarching 43 of 10
Themes
Page 85
Design for remembrance in every season.
Year-round vitality was the most consistent design request across all formats and groups.
Participants did not want a space that looks grey and barren for six months of the year. They
described a place that holds up in winter through evergreen plantings, materials that age with
dignity, and design that does not rely solely on flowers or foliage to carry meaning.
In many sessions, participants described that “Pretty and well-taken care
the seasonality of the Place of Remembrance
could reflect the process of grief, life, and new
of regardless of the season.
beginnings. Native plants that thrive in Chicago
This is especially tough
conditions were specifically preferred. Several during winter.”
participants also raised the symbolic dimension Tier 1 Survey Respondent
of seasonality: spring as renewal, winter as quiet
persistence. The design should hold meaning
year-round, not only in bloom.
Overarching 44 of 11
Themes
Page 85
Hold space for cultural
diversity with intention.
The majority of those whose lives were taken
were Latino and/or Jewish. Multiple participants
asked that the design honor
those specific communities, “Butterflies and hummingbirds are important for the Latino
not as an afterthought but as community. They symbolize transformation — a visit of the
a core design responsibility. soul from a loved one.”
Participants offered concrete, Tier 2 Workshop Participant
specific ideas: marigolds
and Mexican sunflowers as culturally significant Several participants named the risk of design
plants; butterflies and hummingbirds as symbols that gestures broadly toward the community
of transformation; a place for pilgrimage as is without honoring anyone in particular. The
Jewish tradition, and a place for a celebration of request was to be specific: to name the
life after death as is the Latino/Christian tradition, communities, to include their symbols, to
and that the Spanish language be included in design with enough cultural knowledge that the
any physical signage or inscriptions that may be references are legible to those for whom they
incorporated into the design. carry meaning, and discoverable for those who
want to learn more.
Overarching 45 of 12
Themes
Page 85
Let people choose when, and whether, to engage.
Participants expressed a consistent and deeply felt need: the ability to choose when, how, and
whether to engage with the Place of Remembrance. This came from many directions and people
with varied experiences. Some are grieving and want to intentionally seek out the space. Others
need to be able to move through downtown Highland Park, go to work, bring their kids to events
at Port Clinton, or simply have lunch without being pulled into a somber experience they are not
ready for. First responders and other city staff who worked the day of the shooting, throughout
the investigation, and
continuing to the present, “Some people will come to grieve, some to remember, some
described the emotional simply to sit. The space should hold all of that without telling
weight of regular proximity anyone how to feel.”
to reminders of the event. Tier 3 Survey Respondent
Community members who
live and work near both sites asked that the design not make grief unavoidable. The same request
came from those who spend time near both sites in their daily lives: the design should allow people
to step in when they choose to, and step past when they need to. This principle has implications for
both sites and for the connection between them. At the Rose Garden, it means clear entry and exit
points, a space that holds meaning without imposing it on those working or walking nearby. At Port
Clinton, it means a presence that is intentional, that celebrates this community while acknowledging
what happened and creating conditions where people retain agency over their own experience.
Overarching 46 of 13
Themes
Page 85
Site-Specific
Themes
Across all engagement formats (surveys, individual listening sessions, group listening sessions, and
the community workshop), participants found common ground around how they’d like each site
to feel.
Page 47 of 85
The Rose Garden
The Rose Garden carries the broadest support as the primary, dedicated site for remembrance.
Agreement on this designation holds across all tiers of engagement and is consistent with Do
Tank’s findings in 2025.
What the Space Should Include
• Acknowledgment of the seven lives taken and • Full ADA accessibility, including smooth, even
those injured pathways; no gravel; and snow- and salt-clearable
• Comfortable seating, including benches with • Cultural sensitivity with elements that honor
backs, shaded, and designed to invite reflection Jewish and Latino traditions
• Living plantings with year-round color • Sensory elements that ground you in the space
• A water feature for emotional regulation and through color, texture, and sound are woven
sensory engagement (note: Participants noted throughout
that design constraints around maintenance and • Intentional plant selection where species names
cost should be considered) and symbolism are considered
• Clear sightlines throughout, because visibility • Presence beyond the garden’s edge, including
supports safety and agency for trauma survivors subtle connections to the roadway so the space
• Multiple entry/exit points, including preserved isn’t hidden or invisible to passersby
access from the City Hall rear parking lot • Meaning to future generations who were not
• Design elements that honor the site’s existing present
history as a landmark
Site-Specific 48 of 15
Themes
Page 85
What The Rose Garden Should Feel Like
Contemplative
Natural
Peaceful
Private
Reflective
Serene
Site-Specific 49 of 16
Themes
Page 85
Port Clinton Plaza
Port Clinton Plaza is the heart of downtown and the site of the shooting. It serves as an actively used public space in
Highland Park, hosting 20–25 events, businesses, and numerous other activations each year. This subtle, secondary site
for the Place of Remembrance will give us an opportunity to acknowledge the lives taken and resilience of the community
while also being respectful of this premiere destination, place of business, primary residence, and public space.
What Port Clinton Should Feel Like
What the Space Should Include
• Acknowledgment that the shooting happened here,
Everyday
honoring the lives taken while also affirming the lives
that continue Dynamic
• Elements that foster its continued function as
downtown’s heart, and a multi-functional space that
welcomes everyday life, businesses, and special events Layered
• Plants and natural elements to soften the brick-heavy
plaza, signaling care without requiring engagement with
the memorial Vibrant
• Symbolism honoring the seven victims whose lives were
taken through plantings or other design elements
• Structurally significant enough that people don’t walk or
Resilient
play on it, but that it doesn’t distract from the everyday
experience at Port Clinton
Welcoming
Site-Specific 50 of 17
Themes
Page 85
Connections between the Sites
Most participants expressed that the two sites should feel related without being literally linked. A
physical path or breadcrumb trail between them was specifically flagged as inappropriate. Instead,
participants described something quieter: a shared element that speaks between the sites without
announcing itself. A symbolic or visual echo was the most consistent request, with participants
suggesting shared color, plant species, artwork, or material that appears at both sites and carries
meaning without explanation.
Page 51 of 18
85
Design Character
Preferences
During Phase 1: Design Ideation, participants engaged with mood boards that included
representative images of different design elements and aesthetic directions that could be
incorporated into the Place of Remembrance at the Rose Garden or Port Clinton. Images were
grouped to represent these different directions, and participants shared where their preferences
fell along the spectrum. This feedback helped the design team to identify areas of consensus and
where opinions varied.
Page 52 of 85
Community Ideation Results
Tier 1 Tier 2-3 Workshop /
Dimension Options Survey Avg Survey Avg Listening Sum of Preference
(Scale: 1-3) (Scale: 1-3) Sessions
Movement 1. Informal: Loose, 1.85 1.83 Preference for Semi-formal; curvilinear;
Open, Naturalistic option 2 meditative flow
2. Semi-Formal:
Curvilinear, Organic,
Flowing
3. Formal: Linear,
Direct, Hard
Material 1. Soft, Loose, Natural, 1.82 1.77 Preference for Natural, accessible; no
Dynamic, Atmospheric options 1 gravel
and 2
2. Defined but Natural,
Rough Edges
3. Hard, Clean, Crisp,
Clear
Page 53 of 20
Design Character Preferences 85
Community Ideation Results
Tier 1 Tier 2-3 Workshop /
Dimension Options Survey Avg Survey Avg Listening Sum of Preference
(Scale: 1-3) (Scale: 1-3) Sessions
Color 1. Naturalistic, Softer, 1.96 1.92 Preference for Midpoint; outlier tension
Earthier options 2 and
3
2. Quiet, Cool, Relaxed
3. Bright, Cheerful,
Exuberant
Night 1. Soft Accents, 1.70 1.68 Preference for Quiet at Rose Garden;
Presence Atmospheric, Ambient option 1 at expressive at Port Clinton
Rose Garden
2. Defined, Strong, and option 3
Bold at Port Clinton
3. Dynamic, Sculptural
Page 54 of 21
Design Character Preferences 85
Community Ideation Results
Tier 1 Tier 2-3 Workshop /
Dimension Options Survey Avg Survey Avg Listening Sum of Preference
(Scale: 1-3) (Scale: 1-3) Sessions
Nature 1. Ecological, Dynamic, 2.12 2.06 Preference for Curated/naturalistic —
Informal option 2 strongest consensus
2. Curated but
Dynamic, Naturalistic,
Sculptural
3. Formal,
Architectural, Familiar
Memory 1. Simple, Minimal, 1.81 1.75 Preference for Simple to narrative; keep
Reserved options 1 and the ‘7’
2
2. Narrative Driven,
Informative
3. Abstract,
Representative
Page 55 of 22
Design Character Preferences 85
Movement Directions
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
✓
1 3
Informal Semi-Formal Formal
Page 56 of 23
Design Character Preferences 85
DIMENSION 1 OF 6
Movement
TIER 1 1.85
TIER 2−3 1.83
1− Informal 2—Semi-Formal 3—Formal
WORKSHOP / SESSION PREFERENCE Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Key Takeaways
• Curved paths, spirals, and a more flowing layout
I like the idea of mindfulness in this
• The act of walking as meditative, including movement and paths
space. Walking along rocks, feeling
that take you somewhere without feeling rushed or directed
that sensory moment, and using
• Plantings that move a visitor through the sense of place, using
the landscape itself as a guide
that as a way to meditate/process
privately.
• No large solid walls to avoid feeling “boxed in” but easy to find a
private space as you move through Tier 1 Listening Session Participant
• Railings for those who need support, smooth walkways for
those with walkers or canes, lighting for the days when it gets
dark early
Page 57 of 24
Design Character Preferences 85
Material Directions
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
✓ ✓
1 3
Soft/Natural Defined Hard/Crisp
Page 58 of 25
Design Character Preferences 85
DIMENSION 2 OF 6
Material
TIER 1 1.82
TIER 2−3 1.77
1− Soft/Natural 2—Defined 3—Hard/Crisp
WORKSHOP / SESSION PREFERENCE Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Key Takeaways
• Natural materials overall, including wood, textured stone, and When you think of material,
organic forms
accessibility is the first thing that
• Elements that age gracefully and signal care
comes to my mind. Whatever
• Accessibility as the primary driver when considering material, direction we go with this — ADA
which should include non-slip surfaces, clear-able from snow
and salt, wheelchair- and walker-compatible
friendly and inviting.
• Regional materials, including stone native to this geography Tier 1 Listening Session Participant
• Material choices that don’t create climbable elements
• Seasonal plant material
Page 59 of 26
Design Character Preferences 85
Color Directions
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
✓ ✓
1 3
Earthy Quiet/Cool Bright
Page 60 of 27
Design Character Preferences 85
DIMENSION 3 OF 6
Color
TIER 1 1.96
TIER 2−3 1.92
1− Earthy 2—Quiet/Cool 3—Bright
WORKSHOP / SESSION PREFERENCE Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Key Takeaways
• Some participants expressed a preference for a quieter, ecological Despite what happened, this
palette, including pale pinks, purples, whites, and natural tones community has so much joy.
• Some participants expressed a preference for vibrant, culturally-specific color I think colors are beautiful
incorporated through plantings of meaningful varieties such as marigolds and
and important. They bring us
Mexican sunflowers
• A naturalistic palette can include vibrant colors through living material that
natural joy.
reads as quiet from a distance and specific up close Tier 1 Listening Session Participant
• Kaleidoscope/reflected light as a way to introduce color through material
and light
• Color infused through non-plant materials as an alternative to plant color alone
• Seasonality is considered, so color is present even when plants are dormant
Page 61 of 28
Design Character Preferences 85
Night Presence Directions
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
✓ ✓
1 3
Soft/Ambient Bold Dynamic/Sculptural
Page 62 of 29
Design Character Preferences 85
DIMENSION 4 OF 6
Night Presence
TIER 1 1.70
TIER 2−3 1.68
1− Soft/Ambient 2— Bold 3—Dynamic/Sculptural
WORKSHOP / SESSION PREFERENCE
Rose Garden Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Port Clinton Plaza Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Key Takeaways
• Light that feels intentional and used for accessibility and safety Light could be used not only
• (Rose Garden at night): Softer, more atmospheric accents. Concerns as an accent, but as part of
about dark-sky compliance were raised because the space is near the the memorial.
ravine ecosystem and visible from residential properties
Tier 1 Survey Respondent
• (Port Clinton at night): Expressive and experiential use of light that is
interactive, kid-friendly and engaging
Page 63 of 30
Design Character Preferences 85
Nature Directions
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
Nature Directions
✓
1 3
Ecological Curated Formal
Page 64 of 31
Design Character Preferences 85
DIMENSION 5 OF 6
Nature
TIER 1 2.12
TIER 2−3 2.06
1− Ecological 2—Curated 3—Formal
WORKSHOP / SESSION PREFERENCE Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Key Takeaways
• Curated, organic, and flowing It is important for it to feel
• The meaning behind plant choices (cultural, symbolic, seasonal) should organic and not overly
be intentional and communicated through an appropriate modality planned. People want to feel
• Participants shared the idea of layering elements and experiences, comfortable and welcoming
including more private areas for respite and purposeful but not overly
• Native plants that thrive in Chicago conditions and create a sense of life structured.
year-round
Tier 2 Listening Session Participant
• Plants that attract pollinators serve both ecological and cultural purposes,
including butterflies, which carry meaning in the Latino community
Page 65 of 32
Design Character Preferences 85
Memory Directions
OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3
✓ ✓
1 3
Ambient Bold Dynamic/Sculptural
Page 66 of 33
Design Character Preferences 85
DIMENSION 6 OF 6
Memory
TIER 1 1.81
TIER 2−3 1.75
1−Simple/Minimal 2—Narrative 3—Abstract
WORKSHOP / SESSION PREFERENCE Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Key Takeaways
• Names of the seven victims whose lives were taken in a I don’t know her favorite
simple yet profound approach flower, but I know she loved
• Keep the seven as a recurring motif and as a symbolic anchor to make the world more
of design beautiful.
• Abstract elements as an alternative to literal memorial forms Tier 2 Listening Session Participant,
speaking about a family member lost in
the shooting
Page 67 of 34
Design Character Preferences 85
In Closing
This summary was prepared by All Together as part of the Highland Park Place of Remembrance
design engagement process. All Together partnered with SWA Group, the project’s lead design
firm, to facilitate Phase 1 engagement, synthesize community input, and translate the full range of
voices heard across surveys, listening sessions, and the community workshop into themes and
direction that can meaningfully guide SWA Group’s concept development in Phase 2.
The perspectives gathered here represent 179 voices across all tiers of engagement, and they carry
the weight of lived experience, ongoing grief, and deep investment in how this community chooses
to remember. It is our collective responsibility as designers, engagement partners, and stewards of
this process to honor what was shared with care and with fidelity as we move into the next phase
of this work.
Page 68 of 35
85
Questions?
Visit hpremembrance.org for more information,
or contact remembrance@cityhpil.com
Page 69 of 85
Woven Together
A naturalistic garden framed by seven
‘Remembrance Niches’ is tied together
with a gently meandering path and a
babbling through-line of water.
Page 70 of 85
LIBRARY
COUNCIL RING 48 MAPLES
SCREENING HEDGE
ENTRY SIGN AND
ASPEN GROVE
PICNIC GREEN
ST JOHNS AVE
RAVIN
E
NAME PLAQUES
REFLECTION SPACE
WOVEN GARDEN
ADA ACCESS
REMEMBRANCE
CITY HALL N
NICHES - 7 TOTAL 0’ 8’ 16’
Woven Together: Rose Garden Site Plan
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 71 of 85
Woven Together (+ Water Feature)
Page 72 of 85
LIBRARY
COUNCIL RING WATER FEATURE 48 MAPLES
SCREENING HEDGE
ENTRY SIGN AND
ASPEN GROVE
PICNIC GREEN
ST JOHNS AVE
RAVIN
E
NAME PLAQUES
REFLECTION SPACE
WOVEN GARDEN
ADA ACCESS
REMEMBRANCE
CITY HALL N
NICHES - 7 TOTAL 0’ 8’ 16’
Woven Together: Rose Garden Site Plan + Water Features
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 73 of 85
Approach and Context
• The design is set back from St Johns
but connected by a gentle, accessible
path connecting to the street and City
Hall.
• Upright maples and low screening
hedges frame the Place of
Remembrance to ensure low visual
impact between the space and
adjacent uses.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 74 of 85
Entry Grove
• Aspen and lush understory act as a cool
and calming threshold. Serene colors and
foliage that responds playfully to the wind
help visitors to relax.
• Stone entry signage welcomes visitors
into the space.
• Planting compliments existing rainwater
garden usage.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 75 of 85
Entry Grove - Winter
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 76 of 85
The Council Ring
• The first space maintains the dimensions
and formality of the historic Rose Garden.
• Narrative walls tell the story of Highland
Park’s resilience, the bravery of first
responders and acknowledges the impact
of the tragedy.
• The Council Ring allows for small scale
gathering and honors the legacy of Jens
Jensen who implemented similar elements
to foster community.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 77 of 85
The Council Ring - With Water
• A reflection pool in the center invites
visitors to sit before entering the garden
beyond. The pool is similar to the original
water feature installed in the Rose Garden
and later removed.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 78 of 85
The Reflection Garden
• The Reflection Garden features a walking
loop and garden dedicated to the seven
victims who lost their lives, framed by 48
upright maple trees representing those
injured.
• Garden paths in the center weave the
space together and allow visitors to feel
immersed in planting.
• 7 niches extend off the path, inviting
visitors to gather and reflect.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 79 of 85
The Reflection Garden - With Water
• In addition to the niches and symbolic
trees, the walking loop could be
accompanied by a water feature framing
the central garden and running towards
the end of the space. The sound of water
follows visitors like a companion walking
along side them.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 80 of 85
• Each niche features a stacked limestone
table in the center. Small alcoves or
High Back Bench
shelves within the table allow light from
ADA Companion Seating a fixture within to pour out in a radial
pattern.
4’
5’ • Brick pavers on the main path sprial off
into each niche, evoking an eddy on the
6’
side of a stream.
• A high-backed wood bench creates a
Stone Light Table feeling of comfort and enclosure.
• The nearby water feature fills each
space with calming sound.
Woven Together: Niche Design
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 81 of 85
Reflection and Connection
• A wood clad bench with a high back
embraces the end of the space, and
allows visitors to sit and reflect, look out
across the length of the garden.
• The names of the victims are inscribed on
limestone panels againts the backdrop of
beautiful nature.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 82 of 85
Reflection and Connection - With Water
• The water feature broadens at the low
end of the loop into a calm reflecting
pool, where limestone coping will host the
names of the seven victims.
Woven Together: Walkthrough
Highland Park Place of Remembrance | Refined Concept Design | 06.08.2026
Page 83 of 85
Page 84 of 85
Page 85 of 85