Plan and Design Commission

PUBLIC NOTICE In accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the next regular meeting of the Plan & Design Commission of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at the hour of 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois. Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may email Karl Burhop, Senior Planner, with the Community Development Department, at kburhop@cityhpil.com. All emails and comments submitted for the Commission will be made public. The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe or participate in this hearing, or who have questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005. The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for the eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com. At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items: City of Highland Park Regular Meeting of the Plan and Design Commission Highland Park City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue February 3, 2026 7:00 P.M. MEETING AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes a. Consideration of Plan and Design Commission Minutes i. Regular Meeting on Jan. 20, 2026 IV. Scheduled Business a. DES-2026-00085 for Design Review and Sign Package with Variations (172-178 Skokie Valley Rd.) b. DES-2026-00086 for Design Review and Sign Package with Variations (1849 Green Bay Rd.) V. Other Business a. Information Item: Administrative Design Review Update b. Next Meeting – Feb. 17, 2026, A Regular Meeting at City Hall c. Case Briefing VI. Business from the Public VII. Adjournment Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 47  1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING 2 PLAN AND DESIGN COMMISSION 3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS 4 5 6 MEETING DATE: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 7 8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL 9 10 CALL TO ORDER 11 At 7:01 p.m., Chairperson Kerch called the meeting to order. Staff was asked to call the roll. 12 13 ROLL CALL 14 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Fettner, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus 15 16 Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Henry 17 18 Councilmember Present: Ross 19 20 Student Council Absent: Fallas 21 22 Staff declared that a quorum was present. 23 24 Guests Present: Katie Jahnke Dale, Partner/DLA Piper 25 26 Staff Present: Fontane & Burhop 27 28 Others Present: Marcus Martinez, Corporation Counsel/Elrod Friedman LLP 29 Gale Cerabona/Recorder 30 31 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 32 Regular Meeting of the Plan and Design Commission – January 6, 2026 33 34 Commissioner Nanus moved to approve the January 6, 2026, PDC regular meeting minutes. Commissioner 35 Mantis seconded the motion. 36 37 Commissioner Moore amended, on Page 3, Line 11, that 80 square feet be replaced with 80,000 square feet. 38 39 Commissioners Nanus & Mantis accepted the amendment. 40 41 On a voice vote 42 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus 43 Voting Nay: None 44 Abstain: Commissioner Fettner 45 46 Chairperson Kerch declared that the motion passed 5-0. 47 48 SCHEDULED BUSINESS Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes January 20, 2026 - Page 1 Page 2 of 47  1 1. Public Hearing #PUD-2025-00041 for the following: (1) a public hearing for a Special Use Permit for an 2 Off-Street Parking Lot, Freestanding; (2) a public meeting for a Special Use Permit in the Nature of a Final 3 Planned Development with modifications from City Code; (3) a public meeting for Final Plat of Re- 4 subdivision with variations and waivers; and (4) a public meeting for Design Review for a 227 residential-unit 5 townhome development (1660 and 1700 Old Deerfield Road) 6 7 Senior Planner Burhop reviewed the proposal: 8 • Recommendation 9 • Project Summary 10 o 227 residential-townhome units 11 o widening Old Deerfield Road 12 o landscaping 13 o additional Off-Street Parking 14 • Site Plan 15 • Aerial View was shown 16 • Commission & City Council Considerations 17 • Changes 18 o Off-Street Parking Lot 19 o engineering, storm water management 20 o traffic, sound mitigation 21 o landscaping detail 22 • Special Use Permit, Off-Street Parking Lot, Freestanding 23 o RM1 zoning district (Conditional Use) 24 o 2.5’ landscaping strip 25 o sidewalk along Old Deerfield Road 26 • Final Engineering Plans & Final Plat (changes from January 9, 2026) 27 • Landscaping 28 • Exterior Lighting 29 • Devonshire Court – Ridge Road & Old Deerfield Road – RR Intersection Updates 30 o crosswalk now on south side 31 • Other New Items 32 o acoustics 33 o remediation schedule 34 o construction-site logistics plan 35 • City or Agency Comments 36 • Modifications – Subdivision with Changes 37 • Modifications – Zoning 38 • Modifications – Zoning with Changes 39 • Modifications – Zoning & Fence (Additional Relief) 40 • Conditions 41 • Recommendation 42 • Public Benefit 43 • Specific Conditions 44 • Variations 45 46 Chairperson Kerch swore in Ms. Katie Jahnke Dale, Partner with DLA Piper, who stated her team would 47 respond to questions. Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes January 20, 2026 - Page 2 Page 3 of 47  1 2 Some PDC comments are: 3 • Commissioner Nanus asked if the parking lot would still be their property. Ms. Jahnke Dale said yes. 4 • Commissioner Fettner asked, regarding the construction-traffic exhibit, if all access is through the 5 access road. Senior Planner Burhop said yes. 6 • Commissioner Ihnchak asked about wetland easement and maintenance. Senior Planner Burhop 7 said there was a Condition related to open space. He displayed, read, and explained same. He stated 8 the Applicant is responsible for maintenance. Ms. Jahnke Dale concurred, as they privately own it. 9 10 Chairperson Kerch asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak. The following came forward and was 11 sworn in: 12 • Laurie Broutman asked, regarding the environmental site, if other Applicants have done this. She 13 asked if remediation or clean-up was done by Solo Cup. Ms. Broutman asked if a plastics clean-up 14 was done, if water in storage will affect nearby homes, light pollution, environmental impact on 15 water quality of nearby homes, harm to wetlands, follows the Master Plan, etc. 16 17 Corporation Counsel Martinez stated what’s before the PDC (i.e. changes). 18 19 Chairperson Kerch stated many questions have been answered – remediation, etc. 20 21 Corporation Counsel said a no further remediation letter will come from the Illinois Environmental 22 Protection Agency/IEPA. He noted the IEPA hasn’t looked into it. Senior Planner Burhop said, 23 regarding environmental concerns, a letter of no remediation would be provided by the IEPA. 24 25 Commissioner Moore said this has been reviewed by storm water management, City Engineers. 26 Senior Planner Burhop said he verified that Lake County Storm Water Commission is reviewing this. 27 28 Chairperson Kerch said all of these things will be reviewed throughout this process. Senior Planner 29 Burhop reminded Ms. Broutman’s email is in the packet. He said anyone can contact him, and he 30 would review Ms. Broutman’s email with her. 31 32 • Martin Karp asked where the responsibility lies in the future if the traffic impact is underestimated. 33 Chairperson Kerch said the Petitioner will have to fund future traffic studies if necessary. Senior 34 Planner Burhop reminded this is a Condition and read same. 35 • Sandy Lurie said nearby residents believe the crosswalk is unnecessary. She wonders why the 36 location of the crosswalk changed. Ms. Lurie noted KLOA is making a measurement. The crosswalk 37 at Devonshire & Ridge is dangerous. Neighbors don’t want trees cut down. With the crosswalk on 38 the other side, one has less time. A sidewalk could be placed from the last house to Woodland Trail. 39 This sets up the community for danger. She stated this is not a public benefit. 40 41 Commissioner Fettner asked if it is a standard crosswalk or one with a light. Senior Planner Burhop 42 replied it’s a crosswalk with markings on the pavement. 43 44 • Ms. Lurie returned and asked if a stop sign could be placed; addresses safety issue. 45 46 Commissioner Nanus advised there is a Traffic Commission. Director Fontane said this issue was 47 already reviewed. Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes January 20, 2026 - Page 3 Page 4 of 47  1 2 Commissioner Moore moved to adopt Findings of Fact for the Final PUD, the SUP for the off-street parking 3 lot, freestanding, and the Final Plat, with 9 updates and modifications/Conditions 4 presented by Staff. Commissioner Mantis seconded the motion. 5 6 On a voice vote 7 Voting Yea Commissioners Fettner, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus 8 Voting Nay: Chairperson Kerch 9 10 Director Fontane declared that the motion passed 5-1. 11 12 Commissioner Moore moved to approve Design Review. Commissioner Fettner seconded the motion. 13 14 On a voice vote 15 Voting Yea Commissioners Fettner, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus 16 Voting Nay: Chairperson Kerch 17 18 Director Fontane declared that the motion passed 5-1. 19 20 OTHER BUSINESS 21 1. Information Item: Administrative Design Review Update 22 There were no updates. 23 24 2. Next Regular Meeting – February 3, 2026 25 The next regular meeting will be February 3, 2026, in City Hall at 7 p.m. 26 27 3. Case Briefing 28 Director Fontane advised City Council approved 734 Central Avenue. 29 30 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC 31 There was no Business from the Public. 32 33 ADJOURNMENT 34 Commissioner Nanus moved to adjourn at 8:15 p.m. Commissioner Mantis seconded the motion. 35 36 On a voice vote 37 Voting Yea Chairperson Kerch; Commissioners Henry, Ihnchak, Mantis, Moore, & Nanus 38 Voting Nay: None 39 40 Chairperson Kerch declared that the motion passed unanimously. 41 42 Respectfully Submitted, 43 44 Gale Cerabona 45 Recorder 46 47 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING ON JANUARY 6, 2026, WERE APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS. Plan and Design Review Commission Minutes January 20, 2026 - Page 4 Page 5 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION DATE REFERRED: for the February 3rd Plan and Design Commission (“Commission”) ORIGINATED BY: Department of Community Development SUBJECT: DES-2026-00085 for Design Review and Sign Package with Variations (172-178 Skokie Valley Rd.) SUBJECT PROPERTY Site Location: 172-178 Skokie Valley Road Current Zoning: B3 – Highway Commercial District Applicant: Bryan Rosenblum Property Owner: GTZ Properties DESCRIPTION The applicant Bryan Rosenblum, who is also the property owner, is seeking to create a new sign package for an existing three tenant commercial shopping center. The property occupies the addresses 172- 178 Skokie Valley Road, and is located on the west side of the street, north of Lake Cook Road. The property is located in the B3 – Highway Commercial District. This will be the first sign package created for this property. The property owner is proposing a new sign package in correlation with a proposed remodel of the property that involves façade improvements. There currently are three tenants. All three Figure 1: 172-178 Skokie Valley Road tenants will propose new signage for their respective spaces, should the Commission approve the proposed sign package. The applicant has provided a narrative in Attachment 1. The Commission is considering and is the decision-maker for the following:  Design Review for the exterior changes.  A new sign package. EXISTING SIGN PACKAGE There is currently no sign package for this property. However, the property is eligible for a sign package, per Sec. 150.2030(B)(2)(iii), “[…] any multiple tenant building for which an application has been submitted requesting approval of more than one sign on that building.” PROPOSED SIGN PACKAGE Page 1 of 5 Page 6 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION The proposed sign package will include three wall signs, one for each tenant space. The signs will be located above the primary entry way for each tenant space. In addition, the signs are proposed to be internally illuminated, which is allowed by right in the B3 zoning district, pursuant to the specific regulations in Sec. 150.2007(A)(3). The signs are shown on the rendering in Attachment 2. The Applicant proposes the following: 1. One 2’ x 10’ (20 Sq. Ft. in total area) externally illuminated wall sign. a. This sign is for the tenant at 172 Skokie Valley Road, will be located on the existing brick façade and will be externally illuminated by the existing goose neck light fixtures. 2. Two 2’ x 10’ (20 Sq. Ft. in total area) internally illuminated wall signs (one for each remaining tenant) a. These dimensions apply to the tenants at 174, 176, and 178 Skokie Valley Road respectively. i. 174 & 176 Skokie Valley Road are occupied by one tenant. 3. Three 2’x3’ (6 Sq. Ft in total area) non-illuminated informational window signs to be located on the doorway of each tenant (one for each tenant). 4. Total Changes: a. Total number of signs allowed: i. PROPOSED SIGN PACKAGE: In total, the sign package will allow 6 total signs, (3 wall signs and 3 window signs); all signs will include identification information for the tenants, ii. NOTE – Two wall signs are internally illuminated & one is externally illuminated. b. Total sign area allowed for the tenant space: i. TOTAL SIGN AREA: 78 Sq. Ft. (6 total signs)  WALL SIGN TOTAL AREA: 60 sq. ft. (3 Signs)  WINDOW SIGN TOTAL AREA: 18 Sq. Ft (3 Signs) Analysis to Code Allowance: The total allowed wall sign area by code per Sec. 150.2025(B)(2)(g) would be approx. 125 Sq. Ft., as that is the lesser amount than 15% of the horizontal area of the façade (which is 142 Sq. Ft.) Total window area allowed per Sec. 150.2025(B)(1) is, “Sign Area shall not exceed 10% of the total area of all windows or 6 square feet, whichever is greater.” SIGN PACKAGES & STANDARDS Sign packages are powerful tools because Section 150.2030 allows applicants to flexible design as part of a sign package proposal. Section 150.2030 of the Zoning Code establishes regulations for Sign Packages. They are a tool meant to “ensure that properties with multiple buildings, and buildings with multiple occupants or tenants, provide signage that is well designed and consistent throughout that building or property, while providing some flexibility in the design of the Signs that are approved through a Sign package.” Standards for Sign Packages The Code provides the following standards by which to evaluate Sign Package proposals: Page 2 of 5 Page 7 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION Section 150.2030(D): “No Sign package shall be approved by the Plan and Design Commission unless the Plan and Design Commission shall find that the Sign package incorporates Signage that is: 1. Unified and consistent throughout the building or property; and 2. Of a higher quality than would be otherwise required under the applicable Sign regulations; and 3. Compatible with the design and materials of the building or buildings, and consistent with the area surrounding the building or property. ILLUMINATION REVIEW Internal illumination is allowed by right in the B3 Zoning District, pursuant to the Sec. 150.2007 regulations. Per Sec. 150.2007(A)(3)(a),”[…] (a) Signs in the B3, HC, and I Districts may be internally illuminated, provided that only the lettering or logo, or both, on the Sign is internally illuminated; […]”. The other illumination requirements of Sec. 150.2007 also apply. Condition of Approval:  The sign plans must be notated that sign illumination will comply with Sec. 150.2007. FAÇADE IMPROVEMENTS As part of the proposal, the applicant is also proposing an exterior façade improvement. The applicant, who also owns the neighboring property to the north, will mirror the style of the façade on that property. The façade material will consist of James Harde artisan shiplap panel siding and will be painted a steel gray color. In addition to the added material, the proposed changes to the façade will increase the overall height of the structure by 1’3”. The previous height of the structure was 12’, the proposed height will be 13’3”. DESIGN REVIEW This project is subject to the provisions in Chapter 176 of the City Code, “Design Review.” These include the following: (A) Site Plan. (1) The site shall be planned to (a) provide a desirable transition from the streetscape, (b) meet the parking design requirements of Article VIII of Chapter 150 of this Code, and (c) meet the landscape planting and screening requirements of Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code. (2) Buildings shall be oriented so that the principal entry is visible and accessible from the primary street frontage. (3) Building configurations that tend to catch and accumulate debris, leaves, dirt, trash and rubbish shall be avoided. (4) Service yards, storage yards, exterior work areas, and utility meters shall either be (i) screened from view from public rights-of-way with dense planting or other materials harmonious with the building, or (ii) otherwise be located so as not to be visible from any public rights-of-way. Staff Comment & Review: The proposed changes to the façade and exterior storefronts do not hinder the visibility or accessibility. (B) Site Treatment. Page 3 of 5 Page 8 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION (1) Where natural or existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they shall be preserved and enhanced, subject to the requirements set forth in Article XVIII of Chapter 150 of this Code. (2) Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shall provide a safe and stable surface for walking. (3) Sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian pathways shall be distinguished from Vehicular Use Areas through the use of materials, such as curbs, pavers, and brick or brushed or scored concrete, in order to ensure pedestrian safety and comfort. (4) Newly installed utility services and service revisions necessitated by a modification to an Exterior Design Feature shall be place underground. Staff Comment & Review: Applicant has not proposed any changes to existing walkways, parking spaces, or plazas (C) Building Design. (1) Building mass, scale, and lines, including roof forms, shall be designed to be harmonious with the design of adjacent buildings. (2) Buildings shall be designed to avoid monotony with respect to roof line, windows, location and size of principal entry, location and orientation of garage entries, and cladding material and color. (3) Building materials shall be durable and conducive to easy maintenance and upkeep. (4) Mechanical or other utility equipment. (a) Mechanical and utility equipment located on the roof or exterior of a building shall either be: (i) screened from view from public rights-of-way with materials harmonious to the building; or (ii) located as to not be visible from public rights-of-way or residential zoning districts. (b) Ground-mounted mechanical or utility equipment shall comply with the screening requirements set forth in Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code. (5) Building additions and modifications shall maintain safe access and pathways, and allow for the functional use of spaces between buildings. Staff Comment & Review: The proposed façade improvements do increase the height of the structure, but maintain a similar structure to what is existing and comply with B3 height regulations. Thus, they avoid monotony with respect to all existing elements of the property. (D) Lighting. (1) Lighting fixtures shall be of a scale and finish, and shall be mounted at a height, that are appropriate to the building design and lighting function. (2) Light sources shall be shielded from view from public rights-of-way and residential districts. (3) Light poles located within a Vehicular Use Area shall be located between parking spaces. (4) Lighting levels and light fixture design shall meet the standards of Article VI of Chapter 150 of this Code. Staff Comment & Review: Applicant has indicated no changes, and all existing lighting shall remain as is. (F) Fences. Fences shall be constructed to meet the requirements of Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code and of Chapter 173 of this Code. Staff Comment & Review: Applicant has not proposed any new fences APPROVAL PROCESS Page 4 of 5 Page 9 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION The Plan & Design Commission has approval authority over the sign package proposal, per Sec. 150.2030. If appropriate a Certificate of Approval for the Proposed Sign Package has been drafted adopting the changes as proposed, in Attachment 71. A Certificate of Approval is attached, approving the sign package as presented, if appropriate. This is not a recommendation by Staff. RECOMMENDATION The Department of Community Development recommends that the Plan and Design Commission discuss the proposal per the standards above. The Commission can approve the plans, deny them, or recommend changes and continue the discussion to a future meeting. 1 The Cert. of Approval is not a recommendation by staff. The Commission may approve, modify, deny, or continue the request, and the Cert. of Approval is provided if the Commission finds it appropriate. Page 5 of 5 Page 10 of 47 1/7/2026 Department of Community Development City of Highland Park 1150 Half Day Road Highland Park, IL 60035 Subject: Facade Renovation Project at 172-178 Skokie Valley Road, Highland Park, IL To Whom This May Concern, On behalf of GTZ Properties, we are pleased to submit this proposal for a facade renovation at 172–178 Skokie Valley Road. This project includes updating the dilapidated facade for a new one that will enhance visibility from the street and future leasing potential. As part of this renovation, we will also be requesting new signage for the three tenant spaces. All signage will conform to our submitted plans and the City’s code requirements. We look forward to working closely with the City to ensure a successful and compliant execution of this project. Sincerely, Mitch Goltz Manager 210 Skokie Valley Road Suite A Highland Park, IL 60035 Page 11 of 47  LLC. PLANNERS 24, O FACADE RENOVATION I - D DESIGNERS U 2970 MARIA AVE., SUITE 202, NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062 172-178 SKOKIE VALLEY ROAD T 13' - 0" 12' - 0" S 9' - 3" BUILDING ELEVATIONS N - T/SLAB G ARCHITECTS HIGHLAND PARK, IL. 60035 0' - 0" I 1 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION @ #172-178 1/4" = 1'-0" E S METAL COPING UNA-CLAD, D COLOR CHARCOAL GRAY NOT PUBLISHED - ALL RIGHTS AND COPYRIGHTS RESERVED. DESIGN STUDIO 24, LLC, EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY EXISTING EXTERIOR JAMES HARDIE ARTISAN NOTES: UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE DRAWINGS LIGHT FIXTURES TO 51' - 3" 'SHIPLAP' PANEL SIDING AND NOTES. ANY AUTHORIZATION MUST REMAIN PAINTED W/ SW 9565 (FORGED BE IN WRITING. ADDITION AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE STEEL) - SEMI GLOSS, EXTERIOR OF THE EXISTING BUILDING VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC 10' - 0" 10' - 0" CAUTION: Contractor to verify all existing HORIZONTAL APPLICATION RIGHT OF WAY (I.E. AWNING, EXTERIOR/ROOF MOUNTED conditions, dimensions, etc. PRIOR to bid and EQUIPMENT, LIGHTING, PARAPET CONSTRUCTION, SIGNAGE, construction. Contractor to notify owner and ETC.), REQUIRES DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL. architect of any discrepancies. No plea of ignorance to existing conditions found to be different from drawings will be accepted. 2' - 0" 2' - 0" CAUTION: This drawing may have been AIR-IMPERMEABLE INSULATION WILL BE INSTALLED PER SECTION reproduced at a size different than originally 2' - 0" 1202.3.5.1.3. drawn. The owner and architect assume no responsibility for the use of incorrect scale. Drawings are NOT to be scaled. Not published. All rights reserved. Notify architect of any discrepancies. 13' - 3" 10' - 0" STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I have prepared, or caused to be prepared under my supervision, the attached plans and 9' - 3" specifications and state that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and to the extent of my contractural obligation, they are in compliance with the Codes and Ordinances of Highland Park, Illinois T/SLAB DATE Issue Date 0' - 0" REVISIONS EXISTING BOLLARDS NEW STOREFRONT 10.28.2025 ISSUED FOR PERMIT TO REMAIN TO MATCH EXISTING 2 PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION @ #172-178 1/4" = 1'-0" METAL COPING UNA-CLAD, COLOR CHARCOAL GRAY JAMES HARDIE ARTISAN 'SHIPLAP' PANEL SIDING PAINTED W/ SW 9565 (FORGED STEEL) - SEMI GLOSS, HORIZONTAL APPLICATION 4' - 0" SCALE DRAWN Agnes S. BY: MARK T. DiGANCI REG. ARCHITECT 13' - 3" 8' - 0" 9' - 3" 9' - 3" 1' - 0" T/SLAB 0' - 0" LICENSE EXPIRES: 11.30.2026 EXISTING STOREFRONT 4' - 0" 5' - 0" 4' - 0" 5' - 0" 3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 1 @ #172-178 1/4" = 1'-0" A5.0 Page 12 of 47  LLC. PLANNERS 24, O FACADE RENOVATION I - D DESIGNERS U 2970 MARIA AVE., SUITE 202, NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062 172-178 SKOKIE VALLEY ROAD T S PROPOSED 3D VIEWS N - G ARCHITECTS HIGHLAND PARK, IL. 60035 I 1 EAST ELEVATIONS E S D NOT PUBLISHED - ALL RIGHTS AND COPYRIGHTS RESERVED. DESIGN STUDIO 24, LLC, EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE DRAWINGS AND NOTES. ANY AUTHORIZATION MUST BE IN WRITING. CAUTION: Contractor to verify all existing conditions, dimensions, etc. PRIOR to bid and construction. Contractor to notify owner and architect of any discrepancies. No plea of ignorance to existing conditions found to be different from drawings will be accepted. CAUTION: This drawing may have been reproduced at a size different than originally drawn. The owner and architect assume no responsibility for the use of incorrect scale. Drawings are NOT to be scaled. Not published. All rights reserved. Notify architect of any discrepancies. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I have prepared, or caused to be prepared under my supervision, the attached plans and specifications and state that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and to the extent of my contractural obligation, they are in compliance with the Codes and Ordinances of Highland Park, Illinois DATE Issue Date REVISIONS 10.28.2025 ISSUED FOR PERMIT 2 NORTH-EAST VIEW SCALE DRAWN Agnes S. BY: MARK T. DiGANCI REG. ARCHITECT LICENSE EXPIRES: 11.30.2026 A5.1 3 SOUTH-EAST VIEW Page 13 of 47 Page 14 of 47  1 STORY BRICK LLC. BUILDING #210 PLANNERS 24, 260.15' N89°54'16"W O FACADE RENOVATION I - D DESIGNERS U 2970 MARIA AVE., SUITE 202, NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062 172-178 SKOKIE VALLEY ROAD T S EXISTING 1 STORY SITE PLAN - PROPOSED BRICK BUILDING N LOT 10 TO REMAIN - G ARCHITECTS HIGHLAND PARK, IL. 60035 EXISTING 1 STORY I ASPHALT DRIVE & PARKING AREA BRICK BUILDING TO REMAIN E S .93' D 76 NOT PUBLISHED - ALL RIGHTS AND COPYRIGHTS RESERVED. DESIGN COMMERCIAL SIGN STUDIO 24, LLC, EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY ARISING FROM ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE DRAWINGS AND NOTES. ANY AUTHORIZATION MUST BE IN WRITING. CAUTION: Contractor to verify all existing conditions, dimensions, etc. PRIOR to bid and construction. Contractor to notify owner and architect of any discrepancies. No plea of ignorance to existing conditions found to be different from drawings will be accepted. CAUTION: This drawing may have been ' .00 reproduced at a size different than originally 65 drawn. The owner and architect assume no responsibility for the use of incorrect scale. ' Drawings are NOT to be scaled. Not .82 published. All rights reserved. Notify architect of any discrepancies. 183 8"W STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I have prepared, or caused to be prepared under my (R) 9'1 supervision, the attached plans and specifications and state that, to the best of my knowledge and belief and to the extent of my 3 contractural obligation, they are in compliance 5°5 with the Codes and Ordinances of Highland Park, Illinois 3 TENANT #178 1800 SF DATE Issue Date REVISIONS LOT 11 10.28.2025 ISSUED FOR PERMIT 3 CONC. WALK ASPHALT DRIVE & PARKING AREA TENANT #174-176 AREA OF ASPHALT PARKING AREA 2700 SF EXISTING CONC. PROPOSED WALKWAY WORK 34' . 71 TOTAL BUILDING (7) AREA 6300 SF (7) SCALE DRAWN Agnes S. TENANT #172 (6) BY: 1800 SF MARK T. DiGANCI REG. ARCHITECT COMMERCIAL SIGN (5) CONC. RET. WALL (M)267.53' CONC. RET. WALL (R)267.45' N89°53'41"W 0 5 10 20 40 LICENSE EXPIRES: 11.30.2026 1 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED 1" = 10'-0" N A0.3 Page 15 of 47 Design Review Guidelines The Plan and Design Commission refers to the General Design Standards established in Chapter 176 of the City Code. The Standards provide a standardized set of criteria that applicants can use to shape their application. The following is a helpful summary of the criteria: 1) Site Plan a) Does the project provide an adequate transition from the existing streetscape? i) Yes, the renovation of the facade maintains the current streetscape rhythm while enhancing the appearance and function through reconfigured tenant spaces. The scale and layout remain consistent with the existing commercial corridor. b) Is the principle entrance visible and accessible from the street frontage? i) Yes, each of the tenant spaces will have a clearly visible and accessible entrance directly from the street frontage, improving pedestrian interaction and access. c) Appropriate building configuration? i) Yes, the configuration is efficient and flexible for commercial layouts, which will ultimately enhance tenant visibility and street presence. d) Appropriate screening for exterior storage, utility meters, refuse areas, etc? i) Yes, all utility meters and refuse areas will be screened per code requirements to minimize visual impact and maintain site aesthetics. 2) Site Treatment a) Has the existing topography been preserved as much as possible? i) Yes, the project maintains the existing topography, with no grading or elevation changes proposed. b) Do pedestrian walkways use pavers, curbs, or other distinguishing materials to maximize their visibility and safety? i) Yes, walkways will include defined paving materials and curbs to distinguish pedestrian areas and enhance safety. c) Has all new or improved utility infrastructure been placed underground? i) Yes, all new or improved utility infrastructure will be placed underground in accordance with city guidelines. 3) Building Design a) Are the building mass, scale, and roof forms harmonious with the design of adjacent buildings? i) Yes, the renovated facade will maintain a compatible scale, massing, and form with neighboring structures, supporting cohesive streetscape character. b) Does the building design make efforts to avoid monotony? i) Yes, the design will incorporate varied rooflines, distinct entrances for each tenant space, and diverse materials to avoid repetition and enhance architectural interest. ii) Roof line iii) Windows iv) Location and size of main entrance v) Location and orientation of garages vi) Cladding material and color Design Review Application Page 3 of 6 Page 16 of 47  c) Are the building materials durable and easy to maintain? i) Yes, high-quality, durable materials will be used for long-term maintenance and performance, appropriate for a commercial setting. d) Has mechanical equipment been adequately screened? i) Yes, all rooftop and ground-mounted mechanical equipment will be fully screened from view in compliance with city code. ii) Rooftop equipment iii) Ground-mounted equipment 4) Lighting a) Are the light fixtures appropriate in scale and finish to the building? i) Yes, all light fixtures will be selected to complement the building’s design and scale. b) Are light sources shielded from adjacent properties and rights-of-way? i) Yes, lighting will be fully shielded to prevent glare onto adjacent properties and rights-of-way. c) Do fixture heights, designs, and lighting levels comply with Chapter 150? i) Yes, fixture height, design, and intensity will comply with Chapter 150 standards. 5) Awnings, Fences, and Antennas a) These must all be constructed to comply with their respective Articles in Chapters 150, 173, & 170 i) Yes, any proposed awnings, fences, or antennas will meet all applicable codes and guidelines as outlined in the respective city chapters. Design Review Application Page 3 of 6 Page 17 of 47  Artisan® Siding with Lock Joint System FIGURE 24 Fastening to Furring (when siding installed vertically) Where James Hardie wall drainage guidelines require installation over furring, only a steel hat channel furring may be used. The steel furring must be 20 gauge (33 mil) minimum to 16 gauge (54 mil) maximum. The furring directly behind the Artisan siding shall be oriented horizontally and spaced at either 16 in or 24 in on center. • The wind resistance values for 16 in and 24 in o.c steel framing can be found in the relevant technical data sheet or product evaluation report are applicable to the horizontal furring Sealant is not required if ventilation is created behind the cladding. This can be achieved via a double-layer furring system (fig. 24) or single-layer furring with ventilation features. It is the responsibility of the design professional to design the furring system and its attachment to structural members such that the entire assembly can withstand all applicable loads (e.g. product and furring weight, wind loads, deflection limitations, thermal, etc.). FASTENER REQUIREMENTS • Do not nail within 2 in of the end of planks. • For proper fastener selection and wind load table, refer to the product Technical Data Sheet at www.aspyredesign.com BLIND NAILING FIGURE 25B FACE NAILING Place fastener Blind Nail 1 in FIGURE 26B Face Nail down from top 2 in from bottom of plank Place stack plank such that it fastener sets into the 2 in up plank below. water-resistive barrier from bottom of plank water- resistive 24 in o.c. max 24 in o.c. max barrier water-resistive barrier FIGURE 25A FIGURE 26A DIRECT FASTENING TO WSP Fastening directly to sheathing is allowed when James Hardie’s installation and water management requirements (refer to Table I) do not require the use of a rainscreen behind the siding. The requirements for this application are below: • A minimum 7/16 in Wood Structural Panel (WSP), attached per code, is available as the outer most layer directly behind the siding. • Siding is fastened directly to the minimum 7/16 in WSP over a standard Water Resistive Barrier (WRB) or drainable housewrap. ASP1838 P6/9 11/20 Page 18 of 47  CERTIFICATE OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL Date Approved: February 3rd, 2026 Project Address: 172-178 Skokie Valley Road (the “Property”) Applicant: Bryan Rosenblum (GTZ Properties) Project Name / Description: Design Review & Sign Package Amendment Application Summary The Plan & Design Commission approved the Design Review & Sign Package as specifically proposed in Attachment 2 of the packet. Conditions of Approval:  Must comply with size and method of internal illumination as stipulated in proposed Sign Package and Attachment 2 in the packet. • Applicant must notate in Attachment 2 that sign illumination must comply with Sec. 150.2007.  The changes for signage are only those identified in Attachments 2 and the staff report.  Applicant must obtain necessary building permits to proceed with installation of the signage shown in the attached sign plans. Approved Plans:  Approved Sign Plans & Elevations – per Attachment 2 in the posted packet for February 3, 2026 Approved Plans Attached. See next page for notes and signature. Page 1 of 2 Page 19 of 47 This is to verify that on this date, an approval was given by the Plan & Design Commission of the City of Highland Park, Illinois for this project. It is the responsibility of the Petitioner to ensure that all necessary permits are filed with the City. Plan & Design Commission approval does not imply that the project has met all code requirements of the City as subsequent approvals by the Building Division, Public Safety or Public Works may be required. Anthony Mistretta Planner I Community Development Page 20 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION DATE REFERRED: for the February 3rd Plan and Design Commission (“Commission”) ORIGINATED BY: Department of Community Development SUBJECT: Design Review with a Sign Package Amendment for 1849 Green Bay Road SUBJECT PROPERTY Site Location: 1849 Green Bay Road, STE 112 Current Zoning: B5 – Downtown Commercial District Applicant: Corey Glasson Property Owner: T RENAISSANCE IL LLC DESCRIPTION The applicant Corey Glasson, who will be occupying the tenant space (Suite 112) at Renaissance Place, is seeking to amend the existing sign package for Renaissance Place (the “Property”). Currently the tenant space is not occupied, however the applicant owns a business named Twinkle Twinkle Little One. The applicant plans to move into the tenant space and be fully operational this year. The tenant is proposing adding awnings and additional signage. Currently, there are no tenants at Renaissance Place with awning signage. Staff have provided photographs in Attachment 6 Figure 1: 172-178 Skokie Valley Road There is a sign package for the Property and the proposed signage will go beyond the maximum allowed signage for this tenant space. The applicant has provided a narrative in Attachment 1. EXISTING SIGN PACKAGE The existing sign package for the Property was originally approved with the original PUD in 1998. The sign package lays out a signage standard for the entire property which included 1850 Second Street as well. The sign package has been previously amended before on a tenant by tenant basis, as all of the amendments to the sign package have only been for individual tenant spaces. The 1998 sign package is included in Attachment 4. The tenant space is a corner tenant space, and has two pedestrian frontages. Because of this, the sign package allows for two wall signs by right for the tenant space. The sign package does not allow for internal illumination of signage; instead opting for external illumination of signage via mounted gooseneck lighting. For awning signage, the sign package allows awning signage in lieu of wall signage. For wall signage, the following design standards must be followed: Page 1 of 5 Page 21 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION 1. Pin set letters 2. Must only show the company/tenant name 3. Non illuminated 4. Letters must be between 10”-20” in height The sign package does not specify a specific amount for the maximum sign area, the limit on the letter height is the only size limit it provides. However this is an example provided that does show a total sign area of 12.8 Sq. Ft. PROPOSED SIGN PACKAGE AMENDMENT The proposed sign package amendment will only apply to the tenant’s unit, and not to any other tenant spaces in Renaissance Place. The applicant has received approval from the landlord for this amendment. In addition, the applicant intends on installing additional awnings to the façade. The signs and awnings are shown on the rendering in Attachment 2. All awnings are depicted as being 10’ in height from the bottom of the awning to the ground. The Applicant proposes the following: 1. Two 1.25’ x 25.3’ (31.6 Sq. Ft. in total area) externally illuminated wall signs. There will be one sign for each pedestrian frontage a. These signs would be allowed by right, and conform to the sign package. b. The external illumination is gooseneck lighting. 2. Two 3.25’ x 9.25’ (30.1 Sq. Ft. in total area) awning graphic signs. a. These will be situated along the northern pedestrian walkway. b. One of these graphics will be installed on a proposed new awning. c. The awnings are 69 and 50.2 sq. ft. in area. 3. One 3.25’x 11.1’ (36 Sq. Ft in total area) awning graphic sign. a. This will be situated on the middle awning of the northern pedestrian walkway. This is a new proposed awning. b. The awning will be 90.8 sq. ft. in area. 4. One 25.3’ x 3.25’ awning graphic sign (82.2 Sq. Ft. in total area) a. This will be situated on the existing awning along the western pedestrian walkway. b. The awning will be 90.6 sq. ft. There is 82.2 sq. ft. of signage proposed, as defined in code with a box drawn around all sign elements. However, this sign include considerable black blank space. 5. Total Changes: a. Total number signs allowed: i. PROPOSED AMENDMENT: In total, the sign package will allow 6 total signs, (2 wall signs and 4 awning graphic signs); all signs will include identification information for the tenants, ii. NOTE –The two wall signs will be externally illuminated via gooseneck light fixtures b. Total sign area allowed for the tenant space: i. WALL SIGN TOTAL AREA: 63.2 sq. ft. (2 Signs) Page 2 of 5 Page 22 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION  The total allowed wall sign area by code per Sec. 150.2025(B)(2)(g)would be 100 Sq. Ft. as that is the lesser amount than 15% of the horizontal area of the façade (approx. 160 Sq. Ft.). The same standard would apply for awning signage as well. ii. AWNING SIGN TOTAL AREA: 178.4 Sq. Ft (4 Signs) iii. TOTAL SIGN AREA: 241.6 Sq. Ft. (6 total signs) SIGN PACKAGES & STANDARDS Sign packages are powerful tools because Section 150.2030 allows applicants to flexible design as part of a sign package proposal. Section 150.2030 of the Zoning Code establishes regulations for Sign Packages. They are a tool meant to “ensure that properties with multiple buildings, and buildings with multiple occupants or tenants, provide signage that is well designed and consistent throughout that building or property, while providing some flexibility in the design of the Signs that are approved through a Sign package.” Standards for Sign Packages The Code provides the following standards by which to evaluate Sign Package proposals: Section 150.2030(D): “No Sign package shall be approved by the Plan and Design Commission unless the Plan and Design Commission shall find that the Sign package incorporates Signage that is: 1. Unified and consistent throughout the building or property; and 2. Of a higher quality than would be otherwise required under the applicable Sign regulations; and 3. Compatible with the design and materials of the building or buildings, and consistent with the area surrounding the building or property. PROPOSED AWNINGS The applicant is proposing two new awnings along the northern pedestrian walkway. 1. One 14’ x 3.6’ awning with black fabric to match surrounding store awnings 2. One 25.3’ x 3.6’ awning with black fabric to match the surrounding store awnings. The proposed awnings are shown in Figure 2. The tenant space currently has two existing awnings with one at the principal entry way along the northern pedestrian walkway, and one along the façade of the western pedestrian walkway. The proposed awnings will be installed with black fabric that will match the existing awnings. Figure 2: Proposed Awnings for tenant space Additionally, the new awnings are proposed to have graphics installed on them (as discussed in the Sign Package section of this report). Each awning will project out 3.5’ into the pedestrian walkway and a mounted height of 10’. Page 3 of 5 Page 23 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION DESIGN REVIEW – CHAPTER 176 STANDARDS OF REVIEW: This project is subject to the provisions in Chapter 176 of the City Code, “Design Review.” These include the following: (A) Site Plan. (1) The site shall be planned to (a) provide a desirable transition from the streetscape, (b) meet the parking design requirements of Article VIII of Chapter 150 of this Code, and (c) meet the landscape planting and screening requirements of Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code. (2) Buildings shall be oriented so that the principal entry is visible and accessible from the primary street frontage. (3) Building configurations that tend to catch and accumulate debris, leaves, dirt, trash and rubbish shall be avoided. (4) Service yards, storage yards, exterior work areas, and utility meters shall either be (i) screened from view from public rights-of-way with dense planting or other materials harmonious with the building, or (ii) otherwise be located so as not to be visible from any public rights-of-way. Staff Comment & Review: The principal entry way will remain visible from the right of way. Applicant is not proposing any changes to the entry way or pedestrian walkways (B) Site Treatment. (1) Where natural or existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they shall be preserved and enhanced, subject to the requirements set forth in Article XVIII of Chapter 150 of this Code. (2) Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shall provide a safe and stable surface for walking. (3) Sidewalks, plazas, and pedestrian pathways shall be distinguished from Vehicular Use Areas through the use of materials, such as curbs, pavers, and brick or brushed or scored concrete, in order to ensure pedestrian safety and comfort. (4) Newly installed utility services and service revisions necessitated by a modification to an Exterior Design Feature shall be place underground. Staff Comment & Review: Applicant is not proposing any changes to parking spaces, pedestrian walkways, or plazas. (C) Building Design. (1) Building mass, scale, and lines, including roof forms, shall be designed to be harmonious with the design of adjacent buildings. (2) Buildings shall be designed to avoid monotony with respect to roof line, windows, location and size of principal entry, location and orientation of garage entries, and cladding material and color. (3) Building materials shall be durable and conducive to easy maintenance and upkeep. (4) Mechanical or other utility equipment. (a) Mechanical and utility equipment located on the roof or exterior of a building shall either be: (i) screened from view from public rights-of-way with materials harmonious to the building; or (ii) located as to not be visible from public rights-of-way or residential zoning districts. (b) Ground-mounted mechanical or utility equipment shall comply with the screening requirements set forth in Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code. Page 4 of 5 Page 24 of 47  REQUEST FOR PLAN & DESIGN COMMISSION ACTION (5) Building additions and modifications shall maintain safe access and pathways, and allow for the functional use of spaces between buildings. Staff Comment & Review: Applicant is not proposing any new mechanical or utility equipment (D) Lighting. (1) Lighting fixtures shall be of a scale and finish, and shall be mounted at a height, that are appropriate to the building design and lighting function. (2) Light sources shall be shielded from view from public rights-of-way and residential districts. (3) Light poles located within a Vehicular Use Area shall be located between parking spaces. (4) Lighting levels and light fixture design shall meet the standards of Article VI of Chapter 150 of this Code. Staff Comment& Review: Applicant has indicated no changes, and all existing lighting shall remain as is. (D) Awnings. (1) Awnings are encouraged to be mounted with respect to the design of the building bays and windows, and so as to not detract from the window trim or other architectural features of the building. (2) Awning design and construction shall meet the standards set forth in Article XX of Chapter 150 of this Code and in Chapter 170 of this Code. Staff Comment & Review: The proposed awnings will be designed to match the projection and aesthetic of the existing awnings on the façade, as well as awnings that are installed throughout Renaissance Place. (F) Fences. Fences shall be constructed to meet the requirements of Article XXII of Chapter 150 of this Code and of Chapter 173 of this Code. Staff Comment & Review: Applicant is not proposing fencing. APPROVAL PROCESS The Plan & Design Commission has approval authority over the sign package proposal. If appropriate a Certificate of Approval for the Proposed Sign Package has been drafted adopting the changes as proposed, in Attachment 7 1. A Certificate of Approval is attached, approving the sign package as presented, if appropriate. This is not a recommendation by Staff. RECOMMENDATION The Department of Community Development recommends that the Plan and Design Commission discuss the proposal per the standards above. The Commission can approve the plans, deny them, or recommend changes and continue the discussion to a future meeting. 1 The Cert. of Approval is not a recommendation by staff. The Commission may approve, modify, deny, or continue the request, and the Cert. of Approval is provided if the Commission finds it appropriate. Page 5 of 5 Page 25 of 47 Project Narrative – Signage & Awning Exception Request Twinkle Twinkle Little One is requesting a signage and awning exception due to the unique nature of our new Highland Park location, which consists of two combined commercial spaces operating as one unified retail store. Under the current signage ordinance, a corner store like ours is permitted two name signs and a total of two logos. While this standard works well for a typical single-storefront configuration, it assumes one primary entrance and a more compact frontage. Our new location di ers in that it spans two adjacent storefronts, each with its own entrance, within a very large continuous retail footprint. Because of the width of the combined space, a single name sign does not clearly communicate to customers that both entrances belong to the same business. Without additional visual continuity, customers may reasonably assume the entrances serve separate tenants, which can create confusion and negatively impact wayfinding, accessibility, and the overall customer experience. To address this, we are requesting approval to include our logo on the awnings. The intent is not to increase visual clutter or advertising impact, but rather to clearly identify the space as one cohesive store, ensuring customers approaching from either direction immediately understand that both entrances serve Twinkle Twinkle Little One. While it is not common for a tenant to occupy two storefronts, this configuration is necessary for our next phase of growth. Twinkle Twinkle Little One has operated successfully at 461 Central Avenue for the past six years, building a strong customer base and deep ties to the Highland Park community. This expansion represents a thoughtful, long-term investment in the city and reflects the natural progression of our business. For the Highland Park location to be successful, it is essential that customers can easily recognize the store, understand the full extent of the space, and feel confident entering from either side. The requested exception supports clarity, consistency, and a positive streetscape experience, while maintaining the overall intent and spirit of the signage regulations. We appreciate the City’s consideration of this request and believe this solution balances regulatory intent with the practical realities of a unique storefront configuration. Page 26 of 47  Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States 168" 304" 231” 15" 111" 133" 111" 43" 39" 43" 39" 43" 39" 8" 8" 8" New Awning New Awning Recovery Awning 42”Projection 42”Projection 306" 42”Projection 10' 10' 10' Corey Children Store 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00 Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH Mansur Quadri Page 27 of 47 Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States 304" 15" 43" 38" 8" 304" Recovery Awning 42”Projection 10' Corey Children Store 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00 Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH Mansur Quadri Page 28 of 47  Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States 168" 231” 306" New Awning New Awning The logo will be printed on Recovery Awning 111" 133" banner material and sewn to the awning 111" 43" 39" 43" 39" 43" 39" 8" 8" 8" 42”Projection 42”Projection The letters on the bottom are painted 42”Projection Product Information Product Type New and Recovery Awning Color Black 4608-0000 Material Sunbrella Canvas Overall Size Left side awning (168”W x 43”H x 42”P) Center awning (306”W x 43”H x 42”P) Right side awning (231”W x 43”H x 42”P) Sunbrella Canvas Aluminum Awning Frame Installation Detail PVC Vinyl Banner Banner fabricated from heavy-duty PVC vinyl suitable for outdoor display. Material is UV and weather-resistant, with reinforced edges and metal grommets for secure mounting. Digitally printed using fade-resistant inks to provide long-lasting color and visibility. Designed for temporary signage applications such as promotions, wayfinding, and events, and intended to be removed at project completion. 304" 15" Product Information Product Type Cutout letters 1/4" Thick Aluminum Flat Cut Letters Color Black Overall Size Twinkle Twinkle Little One (304”W x 15”H) Existing wall 1/4" Thick Aluminum Flat cut dimensional letters fabricated from 1/4" (6mm) solid aluminum sheet, precision cut to shape for clean and accurate profiles. Letters are lightweight, durable, and corrosion-resistant, suitable for exterior signage applications. Finished with painted, powder-coated, or Stud brushed surface options as specified. Letters are mounted using studs or adhesive per installation requirements and provide a long-lasting, architectural- grade identity. Corey Children Store 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00 Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH Mansur Quadri Page 29 of 47 Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States 304" The logo will be printed on banner material and sewn to the awning Recovery Awning 43" 38" 8" 304" The letters on the bottom are painted 42”Projection Product Information Product Type Recovery Awning Color Black 4608-0000 Material Sunbrella Canvas Overall Size (304”W x 43”H x 42”P) Sunbrella Canvas Aluminum Awning Frame Installation Detail PVC Vinyl Banner Banner fabricated from heavy-duty PVC vinyl suitable for outdoor display. Material is UV and weather-resistant, with reinforced edges and metal grommets for secure mounting. Digitally printed using fade-resistant inks to provide long-lasting color and visibility. Designed for temporary signage applications such as promotions, wayfinding, and events, and intended to be removed at project completion. 304" 15" Product Information Product Type Cutout letters 1/4" Thick Aluminum Flat Cut Letters Color Black Overall Size Twinkle Twinkle Little One (304”W x 15”H) Existing wall 1/4" Thick Aluminum Flat cut dimensional letters fabricated from 1/4" (6mm) solid aluminum sheet, precision cut to shape for clean and accurate profiles. Letters are lightweight, durable, and corrosion-resistant, suitable for exterior signage applications. Finished with painted, powder-coated, or Stud brushed surface options as specified. Letters are mounted using studs or adhesive per installation requirements and provide a long-lasting, architectural- grade identity. Corey Children Store 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00 Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH Mansur Quadri Page 30 of 47  A. SIGN CRITERIA '1w The following outlines the basic sign criteria for all in-line retail tenants (not t includL·ig d;~partment stores or theaters). 1. Slgnage Requirements Cl a. Number of Signs Tenant shall identify the premises by instalfing one (1) non- t illuminated sign or other graphic treatment on the storefront elevation facing the arcade. VI/hen the premises is a comer store, an additional identification sign shall be required for frontages in ii excess of 15 feet In length and shall be subject to the criteria tor each elevation respectively. t b. • A uniform store identification sign shall be installed by tenant per landlord's specifications. Tenant shall not post additional signs in service areas. Letters are to be 3-inch high white vinyl applied directly to the outside face of the tenant's door. Wording shall be 'I limited to the tenanfs name and space number only. c. Postal Service Sign Street address identification (street number only) for postal delivery is required and must be placed in the lowest left hand comer of the I storefront glazing. Numbers to be 3 inch black vinyl mounted to the inside face of the glass. I d. Prohibited Signage i. No sign, advertisement, notice, or other lettering shall be exhibited, inscribed, painted, or affixed on any part of the I storefront(s) except store identification signs. ii. All signage shall be approved at the sole discretion of the I Landlofd and are subject to City of Highland Park DRC approval and local code autholity approvals. I I Page 31 of 47 ~·· I iii. The following types of signs and sign components shall not I be permitted. a. Internally illuminated. I b. c. Boxed or cabinet type. Clo1h, paper, cardboard and similar stickers, or deCals around or on surfaces exterior to the I d. premises. Freestanding. e. Moving or flashing. Noise or odor producing. 1 f. g. Exposed lamps. h. Exposed fastenings. i. Neon. j. Channel or reverse internally illuminated channel letter. k. No 1ele"llisicn or prcjedioo screens are permilted wilhin 10 feet from the lease Hne. I. Chaige card decals shall not be affixed to any part of the storefront, nor shall any charge card identification be immediately visible from the public space. iv. Sign company names or stamps shall be concealed and not be visible to public view. v. All signs and their installation shall comply with all local building and electrical codes. e. Time Clock . A seven calendar-day, 24-hour time clock shall be provided ~ Tenant to control illumination of Tenanfs storefronts, show windows, and signs during required hours designated by Landlord. 2. Mall Store Identification Sign Specifications a. Sign Type All tenants are required to provide metal non-illuminated letters. Letters are to be pin-set to the stone sign band or the tenant's storefront. Metal letters are to be of a dark color. Awning signage is to be silk screened or painted letters on the face of the awning. I ! I I Page 32 of 47 11 I b. Store Name ' Store identification signs shall be limited to the store name (d.b.a.). Wording of signs shall not indude the product sold except as part of Tenanfs trade name. The use of a crest, shield, logo, or other 'I c. established corporate insignia which has been customarily displayed or associated with the store name may be approved on an indiVidual basis by the Landlord at Landlord's sole discretion. Illumination ' Illumination of the signs is required. Tenant installed lighting to illuminate the tenant signage will be by stem mounted low voltage accent lights and must be per Landlord's specifications. All tenants 'I d. will be required to use the same lighting fixtures for their illumination. i. Storefront letters located 7'-0" or more above the mall I o· finished floor shall not be less than 1 nor more that 20" maximum letter size. I ii. Letters located less than 7'-0" above the finished floor shall not exceed six inches (6") high. I iii. A non-illuminated non-dimensional sign composed of letters having a maximum height of three to six (3" to 6") inches, applied directly to the inside face of the storefront glass of I gold or silver leaf, silk screened, painted or etched glass or other material may be permitted at the disaetion of the • · Landlord . • e. Sign Position No part of lettering or insignia shall be less than 1'-0" above the floor of the center, nor less than 6" from the top of the Tenant's storefront. No part of any sign shall extend beyond five inches (5") of the mall lease line (exceptforAwning signage). f. Awning Signage Slk screened or painted letters on the fai:e of the awning shall be between six to eight (6" to 8") inches high. Awnings are to be fabric material (i.e .. canvass). Page 33 of 47  Page 34 of 47 -_n -- ...< .a1 "' v..:J -J_j ,< ... <;! ~>. ""' ."";:.. LJ'°'! . / i ~[ ~8 ! =~ r::iB ==~ :;: Page 35 of 47 Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States N E S W Signage & Awning Location Green Bay Rd Corey Children Store 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00 Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH Mansur Quadri Page 36 of 47 Corey Children Store - 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 | Highland Park, IL 60035 United States N E S W Signage & Awning Location Green Bay Rd Corey Children Store 1849 Greenbay Rd Suite 112 & Suite 115 01-12-2026 01-12-2026_rev.00 Highland Park, IL 60035 United States NASH Mansur Quadri Page 37 of 47 Page 38 of 47 Page 39 of 47 Page 40 of 47 Page 41 of 47 Page 42 of 47 Page 43 of 47 Page 44 of 47 Page 45 of 47  CERTIFICATE OF DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL Date Approved: February 3rd, 2026 Project Address: 1849 Green Bay Road (the “Property”) Applicant: Corey Glasson (Twinkle Twinkle Little One) Project Name / Description: Design Review & Sign Package Amendment Application Summary The Plan & Design Commission approved the Design Review & Sign Package as specifically proposed in Attachment 2 of the packet. Conditions of Approval: • Must comply with size and method of internal illumination as stipulated in proposed Sign Package and Attachment 2 in the packet. No internal illumination is allowed. • The changes for signage are only the tenant space identified in Attachments 2 and the staff report. • The proposed awnings shall be installed to code, and should not stray away from the proposed alterations shown in the elevations in Attachment 2. • Applicant must obtain necessary building permits to proceed with installation of the signage shown in the attached sign plans. Approved Plans: • Approved Sign Plans & Elevations – per Attachment 2 in the posted packet for February 3, 2026 Approved Plans Attached. See next page for notes and signature. Page 1 of 2 Page 46 of 47 This is to verify that on this date, an approval was given by the Plan & Design Commission of the City of Highland Park, Illinois for this project. It is the responsibility of the Petitioner to ensure that all necessary permits are filed with the City. Plan & Design Commission approval does not imply that the project has met all code requirements of the City as subsequent approvals by the Building Division, Public Safety or Public Works may be required. Anthony Mistretta Planner I Community Development Page 47 of 47