Zoning Board of Appeals
Regular MeetingHighland Park, IL · November 6, 2025
Minutes
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Thursday, November 6, 2025
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 7:31 p.m., Chairperson Bay called the meeting to order. This Commission meeting takes place on-site.
12 Staff was asked to call the roll.
13
14 ROLL CALL
15 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
16 Zaransky
17
18 Councilmember Present: Center
19
20 Student Council Absent: Duenow
21
22 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
23
24 Guests Present: Megan Coyle, Architect/Roll Studio LLC
25 Howard Dardick, CEO/Tip Top Builders
26
27 Staff Present: Hoffmann
28
29 Others Present: Gale Cerabona, Recorder
30
31 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
32 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals – October 16, 2025
33
34 Commissioner Yablon moved to approve the October 16, 2025, regular meeting minutes as drafted.
35 Commissioner Weisberg seconded the motion.
36
37 On a roll call vote
38 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
39 Zaransky
40 Voting Nay: None
41
42 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
43
44 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
45 There was no Business from the Public.
46
47 OLD BUSINESS
48 There was no Old Business.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
November 6, 2025 - Page 1
1
2 NEW BUSINESS
3 1. #VAR-2025-00056
4 Property: 2789 Oak Street Appellant: Megan Coyle, Founder & Architect, Roll Studio LLC
5 Zoning District: R4 & R5 Address: 606 W. Aldine Avenue, 3W, Chicago, IL 60657
6
7 The petitioner, Megan Coyle of Roll Studio LLC, at 606 W. Aldine Avenue, 3W, Chicago, IL 60657, on behalf of
8 the owners Rachel & David Chaimovitz, of 2789 Oak Street, Highland Park, IL 60035, requests by authority of
9 Section 173.030 of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision of Section 173.010(C), to exceed
10 the maximum allowable 4’ fence-height requirement within a required front yard.
11
12 Planner Hoffmann reviewed the proposal:
13 • Project Background
14 o R4 & R5
15 o new single-family home
16 • Site Location (corner lot along the lake; two frontages)
17 • Plat of Survey
18 • Property Photos
19 • Proposed Work
20 o proposing a 6’ fence when 4’ is allowed per code
21 • Fence elevations and materials were shown
22 • Other Comments
23 o two neighbor comments
24 • Review
25
26 Chairperson Bay asked about if this were not a corner lot. Planner Hoffmann said if this was an interior lot,
27 the 6’ fence would be allowed.
28
29 Chairperson Bay swore in Megan Coyle, Founder & Architect from Roll Studio LLC, who introduced the team
30 and explained the need for the variance. She noted Walker Avenue doesn’t function as a normal street. It
31 has a parking lot with a chain-link fence adjacent to and abutting this site. There is a private access drive to
32 Highwood’s water-treatment facility. A landscaping buffer and a wall is not being requested. A 4’ fence is
33 not high enough; would like privacy. Regarding the standards, this is not detrimental, it doesn’t endanger
34 safety or diminish property values. This won’t alter the character, is in harmony with the neighborhood, etc.
35
36 Some ZBA comments are…..
37 • Chairperson Bay:
38 o asked if this fence is uniform all the way around. Ms. Coyle responded not in height due to
39 topography. The style is stone that faces Oak Street then transitions to wood near the
40 Steep Slope Zone/SSZ
41 o asked where the driveway/gate is. Ms. Coyle said an auto gate will be there for vehicle
42 access.
43 o said the fence appears to be a wall. Ms. Coyle noted it is opaque/solid, and they believe it
44 meets code.
45 o asked Staff how it’s measured. Planner Hoffmann said it’s measured from where it’s
46 installed.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
November 6, 2025 - Page 2
1 • Commissioner Yablon asked why a 6’ fence is needed rather than landscaping. Ms. Coyle said for
2 safety and privacy reasons. She noted this family has small children.
3 • Commissioner Chase asked if this is a private drive to the north (east of parking lot). Planner
4 Hoffmann said there is a fence, so people can’t access the water-treatment facility. He illustrated
5 and explained same.
6
7 Chairperson Bay swore in Howard Dardick, CEO of Tip Top Builders, who said if this is not granted, the fence
8 would drop down to 4’.
9
10 More ZBA comments are…..
11 • Chairperson Bay:
12 o asked if the Petitioner has spoken with the neighbors. Ms. Coyle said she has, and feedback
13 is the limitation of use. She said her team believes the views would be enhanced; view
14 should be the same. Open space and trees will be present. The stone fence is being called a
15 wall. It is a unique circumstance and unusual condition.
16 o asked about the first standard. Ms. Coyle said it is compatible with existing structures on the
17 property rather than a chain-link fence.
18 o asked if this is in Highwood or Ft. Sheridan. Planner Hoffmann said this is still Highland Park.
19 o asked if notice had to be provided to neighbors in Highwood. Ms. Coyle said yes, in
20 Highwood and Lake County Forest Preserve Staff.
21 • Commissioner Yablon asked if any portion of the wood fence has been built yet. Ms. Coyle said just
22 the footings.
23
24 Chairperson Bay asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. The following came
25 forward and were sworn in:
26 • Julie Gartner said she lives across the street and expressed it is allowed to be back 40’. Mr. Dardick
27 concurred.
28
29 • Meno Passini said the parking lot next door is owned by the City of Highland Park. Visitors to the
30 park have been parking everywhere. He doesn’t have an issue with the 6’ fence along Walker
31 Avenue. Other neighbors abut parks and have a 6’ fence to keep people out. Mr. Passini has no
32 objections to this being a wall; it is nothing unusual. He noted, when the Temple expanded, a wall
33 was suggested. This is desirable, as they want to keep the neighborhood having single-family homes.
34 Mr. Passini would appreciate it if the ZBA would offer relief to this Petitioner.
35
36 Final ZBA comments are…..
37 • Commissioner Zaransky said this makes a lot of sense; goes with the character. The hardship is the
38 unusual lot. There are a lot of municipal vehicles there. It is a functioning side yard.
39 • Commissioner Aronoff said the variance is only 2’. He supports this.
40 • Commissioner Weisberg concurred.
41 • Commissioner Chase:
42 o asked if this is a fence. Planner Hoffmann confirmed it is 1’ or less and is allowed. He stated
43 there are no design standards for single-family homes.
44 o believes the standards have been met. Neighbors believe it fits in. She is in favor.
45 • Commissioner Treshansky believes the standards have been met. Neighbors are okay with it.
46 • Commissioner Yablon said the standards have been met. The 6’ fence would be in perpetuity.
47 • Chairperson Bay appreciates the presentation. There is no opposition. He would support this.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
November 6, 2025 - Page 3
1
2 Commissioner Yablon moved to adopt the variance as drafted. Commissioner Treshansky seconded the
3 motion.
4
5 On a voice vote
6 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
7 Zaransky
8 Voting Nay: None
9
10 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
11
12 STAFF REPORT
13 1. 2026 Meeting Resolution
14 Planner Hoffmann advised the April 3, 2026, meeting has been removed from the schedule.
15
16 Commissioner Chase moved to approve the 2026 Meeting Resolution. Commissioner Weisberg seconded
17 the motion.
18
19 On a voice vote
20 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
21 Zaransky
22 Voting Nay: None
23
24 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
25
26 MISCELLANEOUS
27 There are no Miscellaneous items.
28
29 ADJOURNMENT
30 Commissioner Zaransky moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:11 p.m. Commissioner Yablon seconded the
31 motion.
32
33 On a voice vote
34 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
35 Zaransky
36 Voting Nay: None
37
38 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
39
40 Respectfully Submitted,
41
42
43 Gale Cerabona
44 Recorder
45
46 MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 2025, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
November 6, 2025 - Page 4
Agenda
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the
next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at
the hour of 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, November 6, 2025, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park,
Illinois, during which meeting it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its
government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for
the eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Public Hearing
Thursday, 11/06/2025 - 7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois
AGENDA
1) Call to Order
2) Approval of Minutes:
a) 10/16/2025 Zoning Board of Appeals Draft Minutes
3) Business from the Public
4) Old Business
5) New Business
a) #VAR-2025-00056 Appellant: Megan Coyle
Property: 2789 Oak St Address: 606 W Aldine Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657
Zoning District: R4 & R5
The petitioner Megan Coyle of Roll Studio LLC at 606 W Aldine Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657 on behalf of the
owners Rachel and David Chaimovitz, of 2789 Oak St, Highland Park, IL 60035, requests by authority of
Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Code, variation of provision of Section 173.010(C), to exceed the
maximum allowable four feet fence height requirement within a required front yard.
6) Staff Report
a) 2026 Meeting Resolution
7) Miscellaneous
8) Adjournment
Page 1 of 1
Packet
PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the City of Highland Park, the
next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park is scheduled to be held at
the hour of 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, November 6, 2025, at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park,
Illinois, during which meeting it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who
require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at
etaub@cityhpil.com or 847.926.1005.
The City encourages individuals to sign-up for its eNews for important information from the City and its
government partners. The City updates its web site daily and also posts on social media daily. To sign-up for
the eNews, visit www.cityhpil.com.
At the meeting, it is anticipated that there will be a discussion of the following items:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Public Hearing
Thursday, 11/06/2025 - 7:30 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, Highland Park, Illinois
AGENDA
1) Call to Order
2) Approval of Minutes:
a) 10/16/2025 Zoning Board of Appeals Draft Minutes
3) Business from the Public
4) Old Business
5) New Business
a) #VAR-2025-00056 Appellant: Megan Coyle
Property: 2789 Oak St Address: 606 W Aldine Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657
Zoning District: R4 & R5
The petitioner Megan Coyle of Roll Studio LLC at 606 W Aldine Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657 on behalf of the
owners Rachel and David Chaimovitz, of 2789 Oak St, Highland Park, IL 60035, requests by authority of
Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Code, variation of provision of Section 173.010(C), to exceed the
maximum allowable four feet fence height requirement within a required front yard.
6) Staff Report
a) 2026 Meeting Resolution
7) Miscellaneous
8) Adjournment
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 31
1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS COMMISSION
3 OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
4
5
6 MEETING DATE: Thursday, October 16, 2025
7
8 MEETING LOCATION: Council Chambers, City Hall, 1707 St. Johns Avenue, Highland Park, IL
9
10 CALL TO ORDER
11 At 7:30 p.m., Chairperson Bay called the meeting to order. This Commission meeting takes place on-site.
12 Staff was asked to call the roll.
13
14 ROLL CALL
15 Commissioners Present: Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
16 Zaransky
17
18 Councilmember Present: Center
19
20 Student Council Absent: Duenow
21
22 Staff declared that a quorum was present.
23
24 Guests Present: Cal Bernstein, Attorney/Samuels & Bernstein
25 Michael Hershenson, Principal Architect/Michael Hershenson Architects
26 Andrew Venamore, CEO/H.G.B.
27 Deborah Goldberg, Petitioner (via telephone)
28
29 Staff Present: Hoffmann
30
31 Others Present: Gale Cerabona, Recorder
32
33 Chairperson Bay introduced Jeffrey Aronoff, new ZBA Commissioner, who shared he has lived in Highland
34 Park for 25 years.
35
36 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
37 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals – August 21, 2025
38
39 Commissioner Yablon moved to approve the August 21, 2025, regular meeting minutes as drafted.
40 Commissioner Zaransky seconded the motion.
41
42 On a roll call vote
43 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
44 Zaransky
45 Voting Nay: None
46
47 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
48
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
October 16, 2025 - Page 1
Page 2 of 31
1 Councilperson Center arrived at 7:32 p.m.
2
3 BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC
4 There was no Business from the Public.
5
6 OLD BUSINESS
7 1. #VAR-2025-00047
8 Property: 175 Prospect Avenue
9 Zoning District: R4/LFOZ
10 Appellant: 175 Prospect, LLC
11 Address: 1319 Stratford, Deerfield, IL 60015
12
13 The petitioner and owner, 175 Prospect, LLC of 1319 Stratford, Deerfield, IL 60015 for the property 175
14 Prospect Avenue, Highland Park, IL 60035, requests by authority of Section 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland
15 Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section 150.711 to construct a new primary structure that will
16 encroach into the Established Building Setback/EBS.
17
18 Planner Hoffmann reviewed the proposal (continued from the June, 2025, ZBA meeting):
19 • Project Background
20 o R4 zoning district
21 o meeting was re-noticed
22 • Site Location
23 • Aerial View
24 o Steep Slope Zone/SSZ
25 • Plat of Survey
26 o demolishing existing building and building a new home
27 • Property Photos
28 • Proposed Work
29 o proposed and required setbacks were identified
30 • Established Building Setback/ESB – 68.5’
31 • Typography was illustrated
32 • Elevations were displayed
33 • Historic Preservation Commission/HPC
34 o demolition delay expires on February 14, 2026
35 • Other Comments
36 o tree preservation will be addressed during permitting
37 o two letters of support in packet
38 o one letter from neighbor who is present this evening
39 • Review
40
41 Some ZBA questions for Staff are…..
42 • Chairperson Bay asked, and Planner Hoffmann said more details have now been provided.
43 • Commissioner Weisberg said this house will be demolished. Planner Hoffmann said yes, on February
44 14, 2026.
45 • Commissioner Yablon asked, regarding the letters of support, how far away those houses are from
46 the Petitioner’s. Planner Hoffmann will review same.
47
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
October 16, 2025 - Page 2
Page 3 of 31
1 Mr. Cal Bernstein, Attorney with Samuels & Bernstein, who was previously sworn, said the neighbors who
2 wrote support letters live approximately one block away from Petitioner. He explained the owners recently
3 purchased the house and will demolish it after the expiration of the delay. Mr. Bernstein advised the sale
4 occurred. Members of this LLC were born and raised in Highland Park and are returning home. He noted this
5 is a corner lot and explained the established front-yard setback history. Both of the lots at 175 Prospect and
6 203 Prospect are much shorter. This is affected by the ravine, in part, and is driving this request. The lot
7 slants and is pie-shaped. Currently, there is heavy vegetation in the parkway. The house doesn’t have a
8 functioning backyard. The new home will be closer to the street and offer a true backyard. The owner of 203
9 Prospect would not be affected. Currently an $11,000 square-foot house could be built. The new home will
10 be 6,800 square feet.
11
12 Some ZBA comments are…..
13 • Chairperson Bay recalled this request was suggested to be less of an ask.
14 • Commissioner Treshansky asked if adjacent neighbors were spoken to. Mr. Bernstein said yes. That
15 is the neighbor who stated he wouldn’t be affected.
16
17 Mr. Michael Hershenson, Principal Architect with Michael Hershenson Architects and who was previously
18 sworn, advised if the house is pushed back, one couldn’t back out of the garage and would be in the setback
19 of the ravine. With the new house, the bulk of the house would be 5’ further back. They tried to move the
20 house back. This is a traditional home with some transitional elements; fits in with the neighborhood; won’t
21 affect anyone.
22
23 Chairperson Bay asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. There was no one.
24
25 More ZBA comments are…..
26 • Chairperson Bay asked what percentage would be set back. Mr. Hershenson replied 60%.
27 • Commissioner Yablon said on the west side, room is needed not to be in the SSZ. She asked why not
28 flip the house. Mr. Hershenson commented the garages would be facing Lake Avenue. Planner
29 Hoffmann noted there is a restriction on garage doors; however, they could face a street. Mr.
30 Hershenson believes they would receive pushback from neighbors.
31
32 Mr. Bernstein said the trend is not to have garage doors face the street. He shared the new home is
33 two stories and would comply with the height. The existing home is three stories. This would
34 mitigate bulk in the front yard.
35
36 Regarding standards, the owner will not sell the home and cannot get a reasonable return without
37 obtaining a variance. An 11,000 square-foot house could be built which wouldn’t be in keeping with
38 the neighborhood. This will also have a functioning backyard. If the house was made smaller, there
39 wouldn’t be a material difference, as a functioning backyard is needed. The house lines up with the
40 homes to the west. This is a two-lot block. The site context is creating the hardship. There are large
41 lots on this block. The variance will preserve the block, existing streetscape. Houses to the east are
42 10,000 square feet. The lots are vastly different.
43
44 • Commissioner Weisberg said some public members were against this. Mr. Bernstein concurred, and
45 said one neighbor is present tonight.
46 • Commissioner Chase asked, based on the site plan, if there is a swimming pool in the back with a
47 deck. Mr. Hershenson said there is a standard 20x40 pool with a patio. He noted, when exiting the
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
October 16, 2025 - Page 3
Page 4 of 31
1 house on the first floor, it is 4’ above grade. Mr. Hershenson reiterated the setback prohibits pulling
2 out of the garage; doesn’t have anything to do with the patio.
3
4 Mr. Bernstein concluded this is a difficult lot. They only need one variance regarding the EBS.
5
6 Chairperson Bay asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. The following was sworn in:
7 • Lauren Wood said she lives across the street, and expressed the ZBA should support the Strategic
8 Plan. Variances undermine the character of the neighborhood. She, too, lives in a Howard Van
9 Doren Shaw home and had to revise her plan several times before being granted a variance. A 25’
10 variance is large. Neighbors weren’t in favor before or now. Ms. Wood explained setbacks on the
11 block. She stated they are very interested in preserving the block. The current garage faces Lake
12 Avenue, and there is no issue now. A four-car garage is excessive. Ms. Wood believes things could
13 be shifted.
14
15 Chairperson Bay asked, and Ms. Wood replied other neighbors could not attend this evening. He
16 asked what her major objection is. Ms. Wood stated the setback, as there is no privacy now. The
17 current house is an eyesore. New neighbors should be respectful and fit in with the community; too
18 encroaching on their yard.
19
20 Final ZBA comments are…..
21 • Commissioner Yablon asked about the four-car garage and space needed to back out. Mr.
22 Hershenson said the owner wants a four-car garage. The back-up space is 24’ which is typical. The
23 current garage faces the ravine rather than Lake Avenue. A three-car garage could tweak things (to
24 the west and back).
25 • Chairperson Bay asked how many feet that would be. Mr. Hershenson said approximately 4’ back.
26 Planner Hoffmann said the house at 203 Prospect is 55’ from the front property line.
27 • Commissioner Treshansky believes all of the standards have been met. Is the ask too big? He is
28 inclined to support it and understands the neighbor’s concern.
29 • Commissioner Weisberg said he would support this, as the standards have been met.
30 • Commissioner Chase is not certain that standard #1 has been met. It’s a big ask and setback. It’s a
31 large building with a large garage.
32 • Commissioner Zaransky supports this. The ESB is a silly arbitrary number, as houses are 30’ setback
33 from the street. It won’t impact the neighborhood.
34 • Commissioner Aronoff believes the standards have been met; will not cause a negative impact.
35 • Commissioner Yablon appreciates the detail, plans, and return to the ZBA. She has a hard time with
36 standard #1 being met.
37 • Chairperson Bay noted, since opposing neighbors aren’t in attendance, he is more in favor and
38 supports this.
39
40 Commissioner Zaransky moved to approve the variation as presented. Commissioner Treshansky seconded
41 the motion.
42
43 On a roll call vote
44 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Treshansky, Weisberg, & Zaransky
45 Voting Nay: Commissioners Chase & Yablon
46
47 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed 5-2.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
October 16, 2025 - Page 4
Page 5 of 31
1
2 NEW BUSINESS
3 1. #VAR-2025-00055
4 Property: 71 Indian Tree Drive
5 Zoning District: R5
6 Appellant: Deborah Goldberg
7 Address: 71 Indian Tree Drive, Highland Park, IL 60035
8
9 The petitioner, Andrew Venamore of H.G.B. at 602 Academy Drive, Northbrook, IL, on behalf of the owner,
10 Deborah Goldberg of 71 Indian Tree Drive, Highland Park, IL 60035, request by authority of Section
11 150.1204(A)(1) of the Highland Park Zoning Code, a variation of provision Section 150.703 to construct a
12 new garage that will encroach into the required side-yard setback.
13
14 Planner Hoffmann reviewed the proposal:
15 • Project Background
16 o R4 zoning district
17 o built in 1949
18 • Site Location
19 o corner lot
20 • Aerial View
21 • Plat of Survey
22 • Property Photos
23 • Proposed Work
24 o relief is for 1’ into the setback for the garage
25 • Other Comments
26 o tree preservation will be addressed during permitting
27 • Review
28
29 Planner Hoffmann advised the homeowner is in attendance via telephone.
30
31 Chairperson Bay swore in Mr. Andrew Venamore, CEO with H.G.B., who advised they are building a
32 detached garage on the rear of the property. The current attached one-car garage is tight. If the garage was
33 relocated, two trees would be lost, etc. This allows the least impact on neighbors.
34
35 Chairperson Bay asked:
36 • if there is a little bit of space between the house and garage. Mr. Venamore said yes, there is 3’. He
37 stated a fence might be placed. Planner Hoffmann said if this was reduced to 2’, a different variation
38 would be needed.
39 • if the neighbors had comments. Mr. Venamore said the owner hasn’t received any. Ms. Goldberg,
40 the homeowner via phone, was sworn in, and advised the neighbors are pleased.
41
42 Chairperson Bay asked if anyone in the audience wishes to speak on this matter. There was no one.
43
44 Some ZBA comments are…..
45 • Commissioner Aronoff is in favor.
46 • Commissioner Chase said the standards have been met. She is in favor.
47 • Commissioner Zaransky thanked the Petitioner for a great presentation. He is in favor.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
October 16, 2025 - Page 5
Page 6 of 31
1 • Commissioner Weisberg is in favor.
2 • Commissioner Treshansky is in favor.
3 • Commissioner Yablon believes the standards have been met. She is in favor.
4 • Chairperson Bay concurred.
5
6 Commissioner Chase moved to accept the draft order as presented. Commissioner Weisberg seconded the
7 motion.
8
9 On a roll call vote
10 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
11 Zaransky
12 Voting Nay: None
13
14 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
15
16 STAFF REPORT
17 1. 2026 Meeting Resolution
18 Planner Hoffmann asked for comments. Commissioner Chase said April 2 is the second night of Passover.
19 Chairperson Bay concurred. Planner Hoffmann will review an alternate meeting date for April.
20
21 2. 2026 ZBA Work Plan
22 Planner Hoffmann said this is informational for the budget and ZBA operations.
23
24 MISCELLANEOUS
25 There are no Miscellaneous items.
26
27 ADJOURNMENT
28 Commissioner Zaransky moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:44 p.m. Commissioner Yablon seconded the
29 motion.
30
31 On a voice vote
32 Voting Yea Chairperson Bay; Commissioners Aronoff, Chase, Treshansky, Weisberg, Yablon, &
33 Zaransky
34 Voting Nay: None
35
36 Chairperson Bay declared that the motion passed unanimously.
37
38 Respectfully Submitted,
39
40
41 Gale Cerabona
42 Recorder
43
44 MINUTES OF AUGUST 21, 2025, WERE APPROVED WITHOUT CORRECTIONS.
Zoning Board of Appeal Minutes
October 16, 2025 - Page 6
Page 7 of 31
Memorandum
Date: November 6, 2025
To: Chair Jami Bay & Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”)
From: Patrick Hoffmann, Planner II & Staff Liaison
Subject: 2789 Oak St, Application Summary
________________________________________________________________________________________
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
The petitioner Megan Coyle of Roll Studio LLC at 606 W Aldine Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657 on
behalf of the owners Rachel and David Chaimovitz, (the “Applicant”) of 2789 Oak St, Highland
Park, IL 60035, Highland Park, IL 60035, (the “Property”) request by authority of Section
173.030 of the Highland Park Zoning Code, variation of provision Section 173.010(C) to exceed
the maximum allowable 4 feet fence height. The subject property is located within the R4 & R5
zoning district and is currently under construction.
The Applicant seeks relief from Section 173.010(C) by authority of Section 173.030:
(i) To exceed the maximum allowable fence height of 4 feet while within the required
front yard by 2 feet for a total of 6 feet;
The applicant is proposing a fence going
around the property at a height of 6 feet.
The fence is compliant along the
southern and western (Oak St) sections
as the fence is located 40 feet back from
Oak St, however, the fence continues
into the northern front yard
requirement adjacent to the Walker Ave
Parking lot. Being a zoning required
front yard adjacent city right of way a
fence is only allowed to be at a height of
4 feet.
In the event the variation is approved,
the Applicant is required to get a
building permit before construction.
This is a request for Chapter 173 Fence
Code Standards of Approval.
NEIGHBOR & CITY COMMENTS:
• One neighborhood comment was received and is attached below.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map & Copy of Legal Notice
• Applicant’s Packet
• Draft Approval Order 1
1 All Approval Orders are to be considered drafts and are not a recommendation by City Staff. The Board may approve, approve with
conditions, deny, or continue an application.
1
Page 8 of 31
Zoning Application - 2789 Oak St
Legend
Zoning and Development
Zoning
R4: Low to Moderate Density
R5: Moderate Density
myGIS Layers
Spot Elevation Points
Community Sourced 1’ Contours
Index Contour
Index Depression
Intermediate Contour
Intermediate Depression
0 150 300 Print Date: 11/3/2025 Notes
ft
Disclaimer: The GIS Consortium and MGP Inc. are not liable for any use, misuse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is for general information purposes only. Although the information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may
exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering design. A Registered Land Surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground.
Page 9 of 31
LEGAL NOTICE - Lake County News-Sun – 10/22/2025
PUBLIC NOTICE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held at City Hall, 1707 St Johns Avenue, in the City of
Highland Park, Lake County, Illinois, on Thursday, November 6, 2025, at 7:30 P.M. Said Public Hearing will
be conducted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for variation of provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of 1997,
being Chapter 150 of the Highland Park Code, as amended.
VAR-2025-00056
Petitioner: Megan Coyle
Zoning District: R4 & R5
Subject Property: 2789 Oak Street
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
The petitioner Megan Coyle of Roll Studio LLC at 606 W Aldine Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657 on behalf of
the owners Rachel and David Chaimovitz, 2789 Oak St, Highland Park, IL 60035, requests by authority of
Section 173.030, of the Highland Park Code, variation of provision of Section 173.010(C), to exceed the
maximum allowable four feet fence height requirement within a required front yard.
The subject property commonly known as 2789 Oak St, Highland Park, Illinois, is legally described as follows:
LOT 1 IN FARPOINT RESUBDIVISION, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 IN
CONGREGATION B’NAI TORAH CONSOLIDATION, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 2019 AS DOCUMENT
7607463, IN LAKE COUNTY ILLINOIS.
PIN: 16-14-401-027-0000
If you have questions about the application, public hearing, or any other questions, you may contact Patrick
Hoffmann, Planner II, with the Community Development Department, by email at phoffmann@cityhpil.com or by
phone at 847.926.1612.
At the public hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeals will accept and consider all testimony and evidence pertaining
to the application, and will consider any zoning actions or relief that may be necessary or convenient to allow
development of the type described in this notice, or development that is less dense than the type described in this
notice, including, without limitation, special use permits, variations, map or text amendments, or other special
approvals.
Any person who also desires to appear as an "interested party" with the right to cross-examine others at the hearing
must complete and file an appearance form with the Highland Park City Clerk at the Highland Park City Hall, 1707
St Johns, Highland Park, Illinois, no later than three business days before the date of the hearing. Appearance forms
are available at the Finance Department on the first floor of the Highland Park City Hall, 1707 St Johns, Highland
Park, Illinois, during regular business hours.
The City, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities who require
certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this hearing, or who have questions about
the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the City’s ADA coordinator Emily Taub at etaub@cityhpil.com or
847.926.1005.
Zoning Board of Appeals
Jami Bay, Chairman
Page 1 of 1
Page 10 of 31
October 1, 2025
Page 11 of 31
Megan Coyle, AIA
Roll Studio LLC
606 W Aldine Avenue 3W
Chicago, Illinois 60657
503.269.3404
October 1, 2025
City of Highland Park - Department of Community Development & Planning
1150 Half Day Road
Highland Park, IL 60035
Re: Zoning Variance Request – 2789 Oak Street, Highland Park, Illinois 60035
Dear Members of the Zoning Board,
On behalf of the property owners at 2789 Oak Street, I respectfully submit this letter in support of our zoning variance application. We are
requesting approval to allow the portion of fence located within the north front yard setback along Walker Avenue to be constructed at a six-
foot height, consistent with the remainder of the site fencing.
As background, this parcel is zoned R4/R5 and is currently under construction for a new single-family residence (Permit #BSFE-23-05286).
During prior consultation with the City’s planning staff, it was determined that this lot is considered a corner lot, with front yard setbacks
required along both Oak Street and Walker Avenue. While we understand and respect the intent of the City’s zoning code, we believe there
are unique site conditions that present a genuine hardship if the variance is not granted.
1. Walker Avenue is not an active roadway. The portion adjacent to the subject property is used exclusively as a public parking lot
for Open Lands visitors and as a private access route to the City of Highwood’s Water Supply & Treatment Facility. Unlike
traditional street frontage, it lacks common pubic right-of-way elements such as sidewalks, planting strips, or landscape buffers that
typically transition a roadway from a private yard. As a result, the property directly abuts parking lot and utility access functions,
creating conditions not contemplated by a typical corner lot designation.
2. The existing parking lot extends directly to the property line. Without adequate screening, the family’s private yard is fully exposed
to both parked cars and daily public activity. A four-foot fence in this location would not provide meaningful separation or privacy
and would fail to address the unusual adjacency.
3. Safety and security for a young family. The property owners have small children, and a six-foot opaque fence along the frontage is
critical to ensuring their safety, privacy, and ability to enjoy their yard. Without this relief, the family would face daily hardship,
unable to achieve the basic expectation of security that other single-family residences in Highland Park enjoy.
We note that the approved fence plan already adheres to City standards in all other locations. The only portion requiring relief is within the
north front hard setback adjacent to Walker Avenue and the public parking lot. This request is narrowly tailored, respects the character of
the neighborhood, and will not have negatively impact on surrounding properties or the public realm. On the contrary, granting this variance
would establish an appropriate and sensitive buffer between private residential use and public parking/utilities.
For these reasons, we respectfully request your approval of this variance. We are confident it represents a fair and reasonable solution
given the unique site conditions, and it will enable the property owners to complete their home in a safe, family-friendly, and contextually
appropriate manner.
Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. We greatly appreciate the City’s partnership and guidance throughout this process.
Respectfully submitted,
Megan Coyle, AIA
On Behalf of the Owners, 2789 Oak Street
Page 12 of 31
September 24, 2021 - 14:56 Dwg Name: P:\Fpdhpil01\dwg\Surv\Final Drawings\Plat of Survey\Lot 1\01-FPDHPIL01-SU-LOT 1.dwg Updated By: EVesely
DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. MGR.:
LOT 1 IN FARPOINT RESUBDIVISION
PROJ. ASSOC.:
TM
OF SHEET HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
1 2 PLAT OF SURVEY
Page 13 of 31
June 14, 2021 - 13:29 Dwg Name: P:\Fpdhpil01\dwg\Surv\Final Drawings\Plat of Survey\Lot 1\02-FDPHPIL01-SU-LOT 1.dwg Updated By: AShaver
Note: Commercial Building & School Improvements Were Removed In 2023.
Site Is Currently In Construction: New Single Family Home : Permit #BSFE-23.
DATE REVISIONS DRAWN BY
DATE:
SCALE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. MGR.:
LOT 1 IN FARPOINT RESUBDIVISION
PROJ. ASSOC.:
TM
OF SHEET HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS
2 2 PLAT OF SURVEY
Page 14 of 31
Open Lands Parking Lot
Edge Of Parking Lot Fence Within Front Yard Setback
Open Lands Pedestrian Security Fence Abuts Property Line
Entrance with Open Gate Previously Permitted To 4 Ft Height.
Request For 6 Ft Height Approval Within Front Yard Setback Adjacent To North Property Line
Security Gate (@ Red)
Existing Public Right Of Way Private Drive To City of Highwood's
OH
<< WALKER AVE >> << Walker Avenue >> Water Supply & Treatment Building
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
6' - 0" OH
OH OH
OH OH OH OH Proposed Planting Zone
PROPERTY LINE 659 65
8 65
6
65
4 652
660
40' - 0"
653
661 65 655
7 651
8' - 10" 652
Front Setback
660
658
40' FRONT SETBACK
Existing Trees To Remain (Green) OH 653
40' FRONT SETBACK
Sport
Court
Fence Beyond Front Yard Setbacks 658 656
654
6 Ft Height Previously Permitted
660
655
659 657
No Change Requested (@ Blue) 2
66
662
OH
200' - 6"
NE
BLUFF ZO
<< OAK STREET >>
ND
TABLELA
2789 OAK STREET
662
Single Family Residence
663
653
653
"
40' - 0
"
10' - 0 Setba
ck
Slope
OH Steep
663 ck
Setba
Driveway Addt'l
663
662
662 654
655
662 660 659 658 657 656 4
65
661 661 659
9' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE
12' - 0"
40' - 0"
OH
Front Setback Setback R-5 Setback R4
140' - 0" +/- 172' - 6"
R-5 Zoning Area R4 LFOZ Zoning Area / Tableland Portion
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: SITE PLAN
OAK STREET RESIDENCE October 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.01
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 15 of 31
Scale: 1" = 40'-0"
Drive Entrance To
Parking Lot & Access
Drive
Temporary Construction
Fencing
Open Lands Pedestrian
Trail Entrance Tree Protection Around
Existing Street & Site
Trees
Temporary Construction
Curb Cut; To Be
Removed & Repaired As
Part of Construction
Public Sidewalks Completion
Public Roadway
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: View From Walker Avenue Looking Toward Public Parking Lot
OAK STREET RESIDENCE October 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.02
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 16 of 31
Scale: n/a
Restricted Access Gate
& Signs; Access Path
To City of Highwood's
Water Supply &
Treatment Facility
Fort Sheridan Forest
Preserve / Open Lands
Parking Lot
Fence w/ Gate To
Larger Parking Lot.
Public Parking Lot
Handicap Parking Area
Previous Trash Access
Path To Previous School
Trash Area
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: View Of Adjacent Public Parking Lot Area
OAK STREET RESIDENCE October 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.03
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 17 of 31
Scale: n/a
Single Family Residence
In Construction
Adjacent Public Parking Property Line (Dashed) 6 Foot Tall Temporary Construction Fence Example Proximity of Parked Cars.
Asphalt Surface Lot Running Along Property Line. At A Fence Height of 4 Feet, Visitors Can Sit In Cars & Observe
Children Playing In Yard. 6 Foot Height Would Obstruct A Portion
Proposed Fence Location Is Setback of Their View Into The Yard.
From Parking Lot By +/- 6 Feet.
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: View From Adjacent Public Parking Lot
OAK STREET RESIDENCE October 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.04
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 18 of 31
Scale: n/a
Stone Top Cap
Stone Masonry
Height Of Wall
Height Of Wall
6' - 0"
6' - 0"
Partial Elevation - Proposed Stone Fence Image of Proposed Stone Specifications - To Match Building
1
3/8" = 1'-0"
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: Proposed Fence Material Facing Oak Street & Walker Parking Lot
OAK STREET RESIDENCE November 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.06
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 19 of 31
Scale: n/a -
76 Walker Avenue Home
Building Foundation: 667' Elevation
5 Ft Higher Than Grade At Fence In NW Corner (662')
76 Walker
2789 Oak
2776
Oak
2787 Oak
2756
Oak
2776 Oak Street Home
Building Foundation: 666' Elevation
4 Ft Higher Than Grade At Fence In NW Corner (662')
2756 Oak Street Home
Building Foundation: 668' Elevation
6 Ft Higher Than Grade At Fence In NW Corner (662')
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: Topographic County Map
OAK STREET RESIDENCE November 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W
Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.07
Chicago, Illinois 60657
4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
503.269.3404 6 Foot Height Requested.
roll-studio.com Page 20 of 31
Scale: n/a -
The Highland Park Code of 1968
Title XV - Land Usage
Chapter 150 - Zoning Code
Article XXII. - Landscape Planting & Screening
Section 150.2201.-Intent
The Mayor and City Council recognize that the visual and environmental setting of the City has an effect upon the welfare of the citizens of Highland Park
and that the promotion and control of landscaping can preserve and enhance the public health, safety and welfare of the City by: conserving natural
resources; minimizing noise, air, water, wind, heat and visual pollution; preventing soil erosion; providing shade and pervious surface and other
environmental benefits; promoting the pedestrian environment; improving the appearance of off-street parking and other vehicular use areas; minimizing the
impact of dissimilar uses on adjacent or nearby properties; regulating the appearance of property abutting public right-of-ways; and protecting and preserving
the appearance, character, and property values of the community. The standards set forth in this Article are not intended to inhibit or discourage innovative
design proposals that may be beyond the scope of this Article. As the standards provide the minimal framework for landscape proposals, it is anticipated that
they will foster and encourage creativity, innovation, and add to the natural beauty of Highland Park.
Section 150.2202. - Scope
The regulations of this Article shall govern the landscape planting and screening requirements for new construction, building expansions, vehicular use
areas, perimeter landscape design, areas adjacent to waterways and Planned Unit Development detention and retention facilities, ground-mounted
mechanical or utility equipment, refuse containers and ground signs, all in the manner as more specifically set forth in this Article. The regulations of this
Article shall be in addition to the provisions of the City Code applicable to the exterior design of building sites and structures, including, without limitation,
Article VIII of this Chapter and Chapters 93, 94, 173, and 176 of the City Code.
Section 150.2205. - Approval Required.
(B)New or Expanded Off-Street Parking and Loading Facilities. All new and expanded off-street parking and loading facilities, except those facilities
that serve lots improved exclusively with single-family residential structures, shall require approval of a Landscape Planting and Screening Plan in
accordance with this Article, which Plan must, at a minimum, comply with the Vehicular Use Area landscaping requirements set forth in Section
150.2220 of this Article.
Section 150.2220 - Vehicular Use Area Landscaping.
Vehicular Use Area landscape planting shall be required in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Section 150.2220.
(A)Vehicular Use Areas Adjacent to a Residential Zoning District. All lots that are improved with a Vehicular Use Area, of which any newly-constructed
portion is located within 25 feet of a Residential District, shall be further improved with the following:
(1) A landscaped open space area abutting the perimeter of that newly-constructed portion of the Vehicular Use Area that is located within 25
feet of a Residential District, which landscaped open space area shall be not less than five feet in depth, exclusive of any vehicle overhang
permitted pursuant to Section 150.2220(G) of this Article; and
(2) Solid fence or wall along those portions of all lot lines of the lot that are located within 25 feet of a Residential District and that abut a lot
used for residential purposes, which fence or wall shall be constructed to the maximum height allowed pursuant to the provisions set forth in
Chapter 173 of the Code.
Title XVII - Building Regulations
Chapter 173 - Fences And Flagpoles
Section 173.001. - Definitions
(C)A "fence" is hereby defined as a structure forming a barrier at grade between lots, between a lot and a street or an alley, public or private, or between
portions of a lot or lots, such structures being independent of any other, and is classified as one of the following types:
(1)A "solid" type fence is so constructed that less than 60 percent of the superficial area thereof consists of regularly distributed apertures.
(2)An "open" type fence is so constructed that at least 60 percent of the superficial area thereof consists of regularly distributed apertures.
(D)A "functional front yard" is hereby defined as a front yard (as defined Section 150.202 of the Zoning Code) of the property in which the primary entrance
and front façade of the principal structure on the property is located.
Section 173.010. - Maximum Heights For Fences
(D)A solid type or open type fence may be erected to a height not exceeding eight feet in any of the following instances:
(2)Along the lot line of residential property which separates such property from any business or industrial district or from any property being used
for a non-conforming use which is permitted in only a business or industrial district.
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: Supporting Information
OAK STREET RESIDENCE November 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.05
Chicago, Illinois 60657
4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 21 of 31
Scale: n/a -
Page 22 of 31
Page 23 of 31
VAR-2025-00056 – 2789 Oak St
Variance Approval Order
After recording, please return to:
City of Highland Park
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
1150 Half Day Road
Highland Park, IL 60035
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS.
COUNTY OF LAKE )
BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF
RACHEL & DAVID CHAIMOVITZ APPEAL NO. ZBA VAR-2025-00056
FOR VARIATION
VARIANCE APPROVAL ORDER
This order (“Order”) concerns the application of Megan Coyle of Roll Studio LLC at 606 W Aldine
Ave #3W, Chicago IL 60657 on behalf of the owners Rachel and David Chaimovitz, 2789 Oak St, Highland
Park Highland Park, Illinois 60035 (the “Applicant”) for the variation described herein for the property
described herein. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park (“Board”), being duly advised
in the premises, DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Property that is the subject of this Order is commonly known as 2789 Oak St, Highland
Park, IL 60035 and legally described on Exhibit A attached to this Order (“Property”).
2. The Property is currently improved as a single-family home.
3. The Property is located within the R4 & R5 Zoning District of the City, as established by “The
City of Highland Park Zoning Ordinance of 1997,” as amended (“Zoning Ordinance”).
4. The Applicants sought the following variation from Section 173.010(C) of the City Code
(“Variation”), in order to construct a six feet high gate within a required front yard.
a. To exceed the maximum allowable fence height of 4 feet while within the required front
yard by 2 feet for a total of 6 feet;
5. Notice of the meeting was served upon the adjacent and adjoining property owners or
occupants, in accordance with Section 173.030(B)(2) of the City Code, and applicable law.
-1-
Page 24 of 31
VAR-2025-00056 – 2789 Oak St
Variance Approval Order
6. The application was heard by the Board at a public meeting of the Board on November 6, 2025.
7. The Board has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 173.030 of the City Code, to hear and determine
the Applicants’ request for the Variation.
8. The Applicants entered into the record sufficient evidence of their ownership of the Property.
9. After the conclusion of the public meeting, the Board found that the requested Variation satisfy
the standards set forth Section 173.030(C), to the extent required.
10. After the conclusion of the public meeting the Board granted the application for the Variation,
by a vote of the majority of the members of the Board.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
A. Subject to and contingent upon the conditions, restrictions, and provisions set forth in
Section B of this Order, the Applicants’ request for the Variation for the Property shall be, and is hereby,
approved for the reasons set forth in this Order. The Applicants will be allowed:
i. To exceed the maximum allowable fence height of 4 feet while within the required
front yard by 2 feet for a total of 6 feet;
B. Notwithstanding any use or development right that may be applicable or available pursuant
to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, or any other rights the Applicants may have, the variation granted
in Section A of this Order shall be, and are hereby, expressly subject to and contingent upon the
construction, use, and maintenance of the Property in compliance with each and all of the following
conditions:
i. The construction, development, use, operation, and maintenance of the Property
shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances, as the same have been or
may be amended from time to time, except to the extent specifically provided otherwise in this Order.
ii. Except for minor changes and site work approved by the Director of Community
Development or the City Engineer (for matters within their respective permitting authorities) in accordance
with all applicable City standards, the construction, development, use, operation, and maintenance of the
Property shall substantially comply with the following plans:
a. Site Plan for 2789 Oak St by Roll Studio, dated October 1, 2025, page
SKA-1.01,
b. Proposed Fence Materials Facing Oak Street & Walker Parking Lot for
2789 Oak St by Roll Studio, dated November 1, 2025, page SKA-1.06;
C. The Applicants shall permit a copy of this Order to be recorded against the Property in the
office of the Lake County Recorder of Deeds. This Order and the privileges, obligations, and provisions
contained herein shall inure solely to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Applicants and their heirs,
personal representatives, successors and assigns.
D. This Order shall be valid for a period not to exceed 12 months from the date hereof, unless,
within such period and in accordance with this Order, the Applicant commences either (i) erection or
alteration of a building or structure, pursuant to a valid building permit for construction on the Property, or
-2-
Page 25 of 31
VAR-2025-00056 – 2789 Oak St
Variance Approval Order
(ii) the use contemplated by this Order. In the event that the Applicants obtain a building permit in
furtherance of the Variation granted pursuant to this Order, the Applicants shall prosecute all work
authorized by the building permit to completion without unnecessary delay.
E. Upon the failure or refusal of the Applicants to comply with any or all of the conditions,
restrictions, or provisions of this Order, in addition to all other remedies available to the City, the Variation
granted pursuant to this Order shall, at the sole discretion of the Board, by order duly adopted, be revoked
and become null and void; provided, however, that the Board may not so revoke such Variation unless it
shall first provide the Applicants with two months advance written notice of the reasons for revocation and
an opportunity to be heard at a regular meeting of the Board. In the event of revocation, the development
and use of the Property shall be governed solely by the applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance.
Order approved November 6, 2025 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS
By:
Jami Bay, Chairman
# 5146803_v2
-3-
Page 26 of 31
VAR-2025-00056 – 2789 Oak St
Variance Approval Order
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The subject property commonly known as 2789 Oak St, Highland Park, Illinois, is legally described as
follows:
LOT 1 IN FARPOINT RESUBDIVISION, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 IN
CONGREGATION B’NAI TORAH CONSOLIDATION, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 2019 AS DOCUMENT
7607463, IN LAKE COUNTY ILLINOIS.
PIN: 16-14-401-027-0000
Page 27 of 31
VAR-2025-00056 – 2789 Oak St
Variance Approval Order
EXHIBIT B
[PLANS]
Page 28 of 31
Open Lands Parking Lot
Edge Of Parking Lot Fence Within Front Yard Setback
Open Lands Pedestrian Security Fence Abuts Property Line
Entrance with Open Gate Previously Permitted To 4 Ft Height.
Request For 6 Ft Height Approval Within Front Yard Setback Adjacent To North Property Line
Security Gate (@ Red)
Existing Public Right Of Way Private Drive To City of Highwood's
OH
<< WALKER AVE >> << Walker Avenue >> Water Supply & Treatment Building
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
6' - 0" OH
OH OH
OH OH OH OH Proposed Planting Zone
PROPERTY LINE 659 65
8 65
6
65
4 652
660
40' - 0"
653
661 65 655
7 651
8' - 10" 652
Front Setback
660
658
40' FRONT SETBACK
Existing Trees To Remain (Green) OH 653
40' FRONT SETBACK
Sport
Court
Fence Beyond Front Yard Setbacks 658 656
654
6 Ft Height Previously Permitted
660
655
659 657
No Change Requested (@ Blue) 2
66
662
OH
200' - 6"
NE
BLUFF ZO
<< OAK STREET >>
ND
TABLELA
2789 OAK STREET
662
Single Family Residence
663
653
653
"
40' - 0
"
10' - 0 Setba
ck
Slope
OH Steep
663 ck
Setba
Driveway Addt'l
663
662
662 654
655
662 660 659 658 657 656 4
65
661 661 659
9' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE
12' - 0"
40' - 0"
OH
Front Setback Setback R-5 Setback R4
140' - 0" +/- 172' - 6"
R-5 Zoning Area R4 LFOZ Zoning Area / Tableland Portion
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: SITE PLAN
OAK STREET RESIDENCE October 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.01
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 29 of 31
Scale: 1" = 40'-0"
Stone Top Cap
Stone Masonry
Height Of Wall
Height Of Wall
6' - 0"
6' - 0"
Partial Elevation - Proposed Stone Fence Image of Proposed Stone Specifications - To Match Building
1
3/8" = 1'-0"
ROLL STUDIO Sheet Title: Proposed Fence Material Facing Oak Street & Walker Parking Lot
OAK STREET RESIDENCE November 1, 2025
2789 Oak Street
Roll Studio LLC Highland Park, IL 60035
606 W Aldine Avenue #3W Issue: Zoning Variance Application: Fence Height In North Front Yard Setback
SKA-1.06
Chicago, Illinois 60657 4 Foot Height Allowable By Zoning Code & Previously Permitted (Permit #BSFE-23-05286)
6 Foot Height Requested.
503.269.3404
roll-studio.com Page 30 of 31
Scale: n/a -
A RESOLUTION SETTING THE SCHEDULE OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK
WHEREAS, Act 120 of Chapter 5, Illinois Compiled Statutes, requires the Zoning Board of Appeals to
give public notice of its schedule of regular meetings at the beginning of each calendar or fiscal year;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF
HIGHLAND PARK, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT:
SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park, Lake County, Illinois,
adopts hereby the public notice of its regular meetings in the following form:
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park will convene at 7:30 p.m. at 1707 St
Johns Ave., Highland Park, Illinois, to conduct its regular meetings during the calendar year 2026
on the following dates:
January 15
February 5 February 19
March 5 March 19
April 16
May 7 May 21
June 4 June 18
July 16
August 6
September 3 September 17
October 1 October 15
November 5 November 19
December 17
SECTION TWO: That the Secretary of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Highland Park be
and is directed hereby to post a copy of the Public Notice contained in this Resolution in the City Hall
Administrative Offices and to supply copies of this Notice as and in the manner provided by law.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by law.
_____________________________________
Jami Bay, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Patrick Hoffmann, Secretary
Page 31 of 31