Subdivision Review Committee

Packet Page 1 of 33 Agenda Planning Commission - Subdivision Review Committee City and Borough of Juneau Paul Voelckers, Chairman May 19, 2015 Marine View Center 4th Floor Conference Room 404 12:00 PM I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. AGENDA TOPICS A. Proposed Subdivision: Tract D of US Survey 1369 B. Proposed Subdivision: Outer Point IV. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS V. ADJOURNMENT  Packet Page 2 of 33 Subdivision Review Committee Meeting - Tuesday May 19th 2015 Property Owner: Jon A. Reiswig Legal Description: Tract D of US Survey 1369 Parcel Code No.: 6-D12-0-109-004-0 Site Size: 506,603 square feet (11.63 acres) Zoning: RR, Rural Reserve Access: North Douglas Hwy. Existing Land Use: Garage/Barn building Surrounding Land Use: North – RR, Rural Reserve; CBJ Fish Creek Park South – RR, Rural Reserve; Single-Family Dwellings East – RR, Rural Reserve; Undeveloped CBJ & Private Land West – Water Body, Fritz Cove Background The property owners wish to subdivide their property to create a parcel on the Southern shoreline of the lot. The subject parcel is located in a Rural Reserve zone with following minimum lot size requirements. Minimum Lot size: 36,000 sq ft Minimum Lot width: 150 ft Minimum Lot depth: 150 ft The history of the lot is explained in the attached staff report reviewing an earlier proposed variance on this property (VAR2009-00019). The subject lot (from now Lot A) surrounds a smaller lot (from now Lot B). The smaller lot has no road frontage onto the Right of Way. Both lots are owned by the same owner and this renders the easement along the driveway access to Lot B redundant as a property owner can not have an easement agreement with themselves. This lack of road frontage would have to be corrected as part of any future subdivision to return it to a conforming situation. Lot A currently has just over 300ft frontage on to a Right of Way so two conforming, albeit very large lots, could be created with the minimum required width of 150ft. Access easements would be required if the current driveway were used for both lots.  Packet Page 3 of 33 Subject parcel  Packet Page 4 of 33 Subject Parcel - Lot A Lot B Current frontage just over 300ft Following recent discussion with Staff, the Realtor acting on behalf of the property owner has provided the subdivision proposals below: 1) The creation of two lots that don't meet minimum front lot line width requirements that may require a variance. The requirement of a variance would depend on the application of the Director’s discretion. The application of this Director’s discretion depends on the judgement as to whether there is difficult topography or other circumstances that render compliance impracticable. 49.15.460 (4) Lots Generally.  Packet Page 5 of 33 (i) Subdivision lots shall meet the minimum dimensional standards established by chapter 49.25, article IV, provided that in cases of difficult topography or other circumstances rendering compliance impracticable, the director may approve other configurations if the lot: (a) Meets the minimum lot size requirement; (b) As drawn, is capable of containing a rectangle having two sides equal in length to the minimum lot width requirement and two sides equal in length to the minimum lot depth requirement; (c) Has direct and practical access to a street maintained by an agency of government; and (d) Has at least one practical building location. Proposal 1  Packet Page 6 of 33 2) A dedicated Right of Way and the creation of two additional lots on the southerly portion of the property. As this is outside the Urban Service Boundary, and the Annual Daily Trips would be expected to be below 250, the roadway would be required to be a 24ft wide gravel surface road with 60ft Right of Way dedicated to the City. This could run along the current drive way alignment. This would allow the possibility of more lots having road frontage in future and would not require a variance. Feedback from DOT would be necessary. Additional lot in Wetlands Proposal 2 In both proposals presented, the existing, isolated Lot B would be expanded to include the accessory improvements currently situated on Lot A. Depending on the use this may be unnecessary since Storage in a Garage/Barn would be allowed as a use in its own right in a Rural Reserve zone according to the Table of Permissible Uses) if the storage is less than 10,000sq ft.  Packet Page 7 of 33 All proposed lots would provide a minimum 150-foot square within the lot boundaries. The Realtor has indicated that in the long term, the a road would be required to develop the large remainder parcel to the north because of the ratio of available land to available road frontage. However, at present, the owners preference would be for approval for the new lot along the southerly border without the expense of improving the current driveway i.e. they would wish for Proposal 1. Fire regulations may require some upgrade of this driveway. The Realtor has suggested that the extensive wetlands in the area at southeast corner of Lot A would likely be too expensive to sensibly develop that lot shown on Proposal 2. The owners are not overly concerned about losing the opportunity to create this additional lot. Staff also advises against creating a lot that is exclusively wetlands. Areas for consideration Staff has identified the following issues to be addressed as part of any proposal: • 150ft of road frontage would be required for lots in Rural Reserve (measured at the 25ft setback) for no variance or Director’s discretion to be required. • All lots are required to have 30ft of road frontage or a variance is required. • Variances and easements may be required depending on the number of lots being created as this affects the location of driveways and any lot width. • Existing Wetlands (see attached Wetlands Map) could make it difficult to construct on parts of the current Lot A. Understanding the scale of this cost and wetland management implications would aid a decision as to whether the Director’s discretion is applied or provide a supporting case for a variance. Staff recommends that not lots are created that are entirely wetlands. A wetlands delineation may be required to determine the actual location and extent of any wetlands. • The driveway configuration for both proposals should be described. Access to all lots via one driveway or Right Of Way on to N. Douglas Hwy is probably required by DOT. In both proposals access driveways may require fill permits unless the access proposal in the VAR20090019 is implemented. • For a variance to the minimum lot width to be unnecessary, the Director’s discretion, ‘minimum rectangle’ approach would have to apply. There should be a case presented that highlights ‘topographical or exceptional circumstances’ that prevents subdivision using a conforming configuration. • Depending on the existing uses on Lot B the owners may need to expand Lot B to encompass the barn and other accessory buildings as part of the subdivision? Storage in a building of less than 10,000sq ft is allowed on a lot in its own right in a Rural Reserve zone. Extract from 2009 Juneau Coastal Management Plan DW15 is Category B wetlands. Category B wetlands may be developed if there is no net loss of aggregate functional values in the Designated Important Wetland Habitat unit. One environmental function may not be substituted for another. However, to the extent practicable, individual environmental functions that are rated high or medium high in Appendix II-F will be retained within the Designated Important Wetland Habitat unit.  Packet Page 9 of 33 MEMORANDUM CITY /BOROUGH OF JUNEAU 155 South Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801 DATE: July 13, 2009 TO: Subdivision Review Committee ~ (/ FROM: Daniel J. Sexton, P l a n n e r ~ ~ Community Development~~ FILE NO.: VAR2009-00019 PROPOSAL: A Variance application to allow the subdivision of Tract D of U.S.S. 1369 into two lots, one of the new lots would not have frontage on a Right-of­ Way. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Jon A. Reiswig Property Owner: Jon A. Reiswig Legal Description: Tract D of US Survey 1369 Parcel Code No.: 6-D12-0-109-004-0 Site Size: 506,603 square feet (11.63 acres) Zoning: RR, Rural Reserve Access: North Douglas Hwy. Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Use: North - RR, Rural Reserve; CBJ Fish Creek Park South- RR, Rural Reserve; Single-Family Dwellings East - RR, Rural Reserve; Undeveloped CBJ & Private Land West - Water Body, Fritz Cove * CITY/BOROUCH OF JUNEAU ALASKA'S CAPITAL CITY  Packet Page 10 of 33 Subdivision Review Committee File No.: VAR2009-00019 July 13, 2009 Page 2 of 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow the creation of a lot without 30-feet of frontage on a dedicated Right-of-Way (ROW) (Attachment A). The property is a Rural Reserve zoning district on the north end of Douglas Island. The Rural Reserve zoning district is intended primarily for lands in public ownership to be used for conservation and development of natural resources and/or as future community growth; however, recreational cabins, lodges, and small seasonal recreation facilities may be allowed. This parcel is not identified as a remote parcel, per the 2006 Zoning Maps, Remote Subdivision Area - Map E (Attachment B). According to the applicant, there are physical features of the property that limit the design and layout of future lots, such as wetlands, a creek and gully. If this Variance application is approved, the lot without frontage on a ROW that is proposed to be created would be approximately 1.5 acres in size. BACKGROUND In 1971, during the North Douglas Highway Project, U.S.S. 1369 was bisected by the North Douglas Highway routing. The bisection created two lots that were identified as Fractions ofU.S.S. 1369. The larger Fraction ofU.S.S. 1369 was then further subdivided in 1976 with the creation of Tract A (SUB-W76-428). Tract A, a 1-acre tract of land was connected to North Douglas Hwy. by a 20-foot wide, 700-foot long tract of land. This created an early form of a panhandle subdivision. The platting of this lot was done with a subdivision waiver that had a condition for future subdivision activities, which stated: 3. That these lots not be subdivided further without the resubdivision of the total parcel. This requirement is based on the ordinance requirement that this waiver cannot be part of a future subdivision. In 1982, another subdivision application was submitted for the larger Fraction of U.S.S. 1369. During the review of that application (FP-5-82), a sketch plat was submitted showing a conceptual plan for a 20 lot subdivision created from the remaining portion of the Fraction of U.S.S. 1369; thus complying with condition #3 of SUB-W76-428 (Attachment C). This subdivision proposal only resulted in the creation of Tract B and C, but modified the 20-foot wide by 700-foot long tract of land that connected Tract A to North Douglas Hwy. into a 10-foot easement (Attachment D). ANALYSIS During the review of this variance application request, staff identified that aspects of this proposal and the associated subdivision would affect CBJ Land. Thus staff solicited comments from the CBJ Land & Resources Dept. and the General Engineering Dept. regarding the proposed application. In an e-mail dated June 22, 2009, Ms. Marlow, CBJ Land & Resource Manager, requested that this application be heard by the Subdivision Review Committee prior to proceeding to the Planning Commission (Attachment E). In an e-mail dated July 9, 2009, Mr. King, Chief Regulatory Engineer, also provided some  Packet Page 11 of 33 Subdivision Review Committee File No.: VAR2009-00019 July 13, 2009 Page 3 of 5 comments regarding the affect this application would have on access and surrounding wetlands (Attachment F). In accordance with the Land Use code all subdivision are required to comply with the following design standards, per CBJ§49.15.460 Design: (3) Topography. Consideration shall be given to design limitations imposed and opportunities presented by slope, waterways, and other topographic features. Scenic areas, sensitive areas and locations with important historical interest shall be taken into consideration during subdivision layout. (4) Lot. (A) Generally. (i) Subdivision lots shall meet the mznzmum dimensional standards established by chapter CBf§49.29, article IV, providing that in cases of difficult topography of other circumstances rendering compliance impracticable, the director may approve other configurations in the lot: (a) Meets the minimum Lot size requirements; (b) As drawn, is capable of containing a rectangle having two sides equal in length to the minimum lot width requirement and two sides equal in length to the minimum lot depth requirement; (c) Has direct and practical access to a street maintained by an agency of government; (d) Has at least one practical building location. (5) Rights-of-Way (A) All lots shall have at least 30 feet offrontage on a dedicated right-of-way, except that a lot located within a subdivision designated as a remote subdivision pursuant to section CBJ§49. 70.1110 shall be exempt from this requirement, upon a finding by the director or the commission, as appropriate, that ... ISSUES: Based on the information above and the contents of the application, staff identified the following issues this Variance request may have on the newly created lots and future subdivisions of this and adjacent properties. Therefore, staff is requesting guidance from the Subdivision Review Committee concerning the following items: 1. Access & Utility Service - If the creation of a lot is allowed to happen without meeting the subdivision design standard of frontage on a dedicated right-of-way, then access and utilities will need to be routed to the property by other means (i.e. an easement). According to the applicant, access and utilities could potentially be run through an existing access easement on Lot 2 of U.S.S. 3559, owned by the City & Borough of Juneau (Attachment A), and a proposed easement through Lot IA of U.S.S. 3281, privately owned. The authorization/development of those  Packet Page 12 of 33 Subdivision Review Committee File No.: V AR2009-00019 July 13, 2009 Page 4 of 5 easements would require a number of steps, such as: (1) getting authorization from the Lands Committee and the Assembly; and (2) getting authorization from the owner of Lot IA of U.S.S. 3281. At this time, the details for these easements are merely in the conceptual stage of development. Allowing properties to be accessed through privately maintained easements could result in limitations or problems for emergency personal to access said properties. Beach Drive in Downtown Douglas is a prime example of properties that are accessed and serviced through an easement. Those properties have encountered a number of issues over the years, such as: parking, building, drainage, snow removal and maintenance to name a few. 2. Future Development - The creation of a lot without frontage on a dedicated right-of-way as proposed has the potential to cause problems in the future for the further development of Tract D and for adjacent properties that may be affected by the proposed easements. The lot that could potentially be created, as a result of this Variance application, is a deviation from the conceptual plan for final build out of Tract D that was reviewed in 1982. According to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, lands adjacent to this property are designated as RLDR, Rural Low Density Residential. With the recent installation of municipal sewer to the Bayview Subdivision, sewer service may become available to Tract D in the future. This Variance proposal will cause conflicts as this property is further developed. At this time, the applicant has stated there is no intention of subdividing Tract D any further. However, when this property is eventually sold, future owners may wish to develop the parcel to its legal density. SUGGESTION: Based on the information above, staff has identified an alternative that would generally conform to the Subdivision Design Standards in the Land Use code. If the applicant chooses to pursue the use of an alternative access easement, a Variance would be required. Tract D could be subdivided in accordance with CBJ§49.15.420(h) Panhandle Lots (See diagram below). However, if the applicant wished to still use the easement as the primary access point for the new lot, a Variance would have to be granted varying the design standards of CBJ§49.15.420(h)(l)(C), which states: "Only one access to the public right-of way may be permitted for the two lots. Such access shall be designated on the plat. " Or, the applicant could move forward with the original final build out plans that were discussed back in 1982. Due to changes in the Land Use code, certain aspects of the 1982 sketch plat would have to be modified to meet current requirements. In conclusion, staff would ask that the Subdivision Review Committee provide a recommendation to the applicant, regarding this Variance application and any other subdivision options that may be discussed at the meeting.  Packet Page 13 of 33 Subdivision Review Committee File No.: V AR2009-00019 July 13, 2009 Page 5 of 5 DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CHORD ~ '09" 453,l6G 300.89 .J(J0.8.J Possible '40" 453J.66 1eo.:,u 180.24 N Panhandle Lot 'Sei" 41nJ.6'6 RSl96 ii'5l9.3 N Possible Access Easement Lot A, D, and XX. :::5!._0" &ASEMENT RITZ CO VE ,: ~--:> f:·t::~':;.- . ... , Not,t I, Trr.:r;t ~" w,u ~uhdivld,d br; Platting R~so/1./titm No. 4~8 1977. ' SECONOA!lY ••• ~ \ w.c. 35.7/ ~ .. ""1i111!10::SW ~wt _·-0 ;7,~~~,r w_;;,_:' ~ t , S 87~ Q.:J 26 I "'·. S87"4J' 23"W ~ $98.71' , , i"' ,. . - · S·.128/ ~2 S-J281 ./ /t?/,.  Packet Page 14 of 33 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION (APPLICANT - PLEASE FILL IN THE PROJECT/APPLICANT /NFORMA TION) Project Number VM.dh:> 11 CITY and BOROUGH of JUNEAU I 7-i.»IA q. Date Project Name Ret<,t-..,...tt \/'4/\J bVV(( - - ltr.itv Staff lo asslan name) .I Projei;t Description ~ /I , , £1 -fl, .; ~ 01-'tR _J. fl"' ... u ~ - p - ..4JL, 12-:J .- ;::c;, A ~ Ii II ~ I./ ~ I {J ,J; _,/I A _ _v /ti .-r- -.-,/IL,· 1,J,, --eJ~n iJ II (I PROPERTY LOCATION z srr:.A~ :l. No, DtJIJ(;..LA 5 J..1-vJ i.,' :Q,zip ~ AU VA.It=- 7180( 0 j:: Subd!Vlsion (If known) ·w.-a=-t) lfmlf!!Bu>ss 131i,e;· BIOck/Tnict frflmown) Lot frf known) < :E A~?Sst2~?c!J'q 5~0 0::: LANDOWNER/LESSEE 0 u. a; P:Icrty Owner's Name R. □ Conlactby E-Mail: /311/I R,/tA/C E. Pr@_f:C, i't1,.JI! -contact r;::t5on Work Phone No. CW ~ SV~AAJNF- F-IS\tJ IG,. :S-o ir';1:o"N~1 bOU&-LAS t-\w<r. 3 uAJEAlJ .4h;, o/7'30f H~honeNo. .., (o ;g~-,., '-1-~ 3 ?.k/-1- 2 FAX No. I- LANDOWNER/LESSEE CONSENT (Required for Planning pennils not needed on Building/Engineer permits) INITIAL ALL THAT MAY APPLY z APPLICATION TYPE OWNER'S INITIALS ~r; I am (we are) the owner(s) or Lessee of the property subject lo this application and I (we) consent as follows: < 0 A. This = n for a land use or activity review for development on my (our) property is made with my complete unde . g and pennission. ALLOWABLE USE :J Q. Q. < X B. I ( " ' . ' ~ n f o r ~ for oflhist7n. I otlhe,City and Borough of Juneau to inspect my property as needed , 6 / Lf - 0 ?' / = CONDl110NAL USE A J p~_J /'. .£.?a ' _ I J- ~ Date (LI :d i ~- c le ~ , 0 ~ 1-/ (J.IL - I- X ,J~wlrfi'll.essee ,; A ii, Signature • Lalldownel1L-Slgnature , A., 1 ~- NOTICE: The City and Borough of Juneau staff may need access to ' , Ui Date bject property during reqular business hours and will attempt VARIANCE DESIGN REVIEW I 0 to contact the landowner in addition lo the formal consent given above. Further, members of the Planning Commission I SUBDIVISION w -, may visit the property and may do so during the weekend before the scheduled public hearing - - OlHER: 0 APPLICANT (If same as OWNER, write "SAME" and sign and date at X below) 0::: Q. 0 Contact by E-Mail: ~/t/171::' Contact Person Work Phone No. Appllcan~\)\'er., 1b Mailing Add~,,.ff / 1· rVlc _ - I ~n~, F~t~ ~"1'f2,_ X (~ a 1(12., - ~ Aoolioanrs Signature 1 "~ _.,,...., J\,u £/.vfllOd,~-; ,,, rf-· 11 ' b/3//d 7 Date of Aoolication (16FFICE USE ONLY BELOW THIS LINE) V DATE C K PERMIT TYPE I RECEIVED APPLICATION NO. C K PERMIT TYPE DATE RECEIVED APPLICATION NO. ALLOWABLE WATER USE APPROVAL PERMIT CONDITIONAL SEWER USE APPROVAL PERMIT ti) -I }( 'VARIANCE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL MINOR MAJOR l'/.,,,o'I vAta4-t>l9 GRADING PERMIT DRIVEWAY PERMIT ~ SUBDMSION MINOR MAJOR RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT 0 PUD I u:: STREET PUB. FAC. lRANSMISS. Q. VACATION & EXCAV. PERMIT Q. SIGN LOCAlEO IN HISTORIC OIS1RICT'? OlHER-(Desclfbe) < APPROVAL □ YES D NO u. u. BUILDING PERMIT Permit Intake Initials ,,.,~,""'.';) ~ Zone ti) I Total Lot Area Required Setbacks Front Back Side Other COMMENTS: P~REV.~211819111l NOTE: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM MUST ACCOMPANY ALL OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS ATTACHMENT A  Packet Page 15 of 33 VARIANCE APPLICATIO N {APPUCANT PLEASE FILL !N SHADED AREAS AS A MINIMUM) Page 1 of 2 Project Number Project Name I VA- Numbt ..._ 0 l '1 VARIANCE TYPE: D Setback O Height OBulk :l;~ Other (Describe DESCRIPTION OF A TY WHICH REQ 'ARIAN CE: ,~ , . . PREVIOUS VARIANCE APPL/CA T/ONS: Jves No Date of Filing: _ _ _ _ _ __ Variance from which standards: Osetback OHeight O Bulk Was variance granted? . . . . . []Yes ONo EXISTING USE OF LAND OR BUILDING(S): ' ~ PROPOSED USE OF LAND OR BU/LDING(S): fdtrdlQ UTILITIES AVAILABLE WATER: (J'..eublic Oon Site SEWER: 0 Public DOn Site PROPOSED SETBACKS (If variance changes setbacks): Front ft. Rear ft. Side ft. Other _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ft. REVIEW APPROVALS VARIANCE FEES ~ .,.,, -~~';~ .._,.,n:n.,f'\ ,,.v. l"•Ov•:uH\. Buildings Application Fees s :3, ~)C>"- - - - - - - - - - - - 2.:11 a-t, Engineering Adjustment Planning Total Fee s --· s ,3,isc,~.£ VD zt<!ic C: NOTE: MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM  Packet Page 16 of 33 May 8, 2009 To: CBJ Dept of Planning: From: Jon A. Reiswig Re: Subdivision Dear Sirs: I am requesting a variance to subdivide a lot off of my property; tract D US Survey 1369, parcel #6Dl2010900 40, address 11260 N. Douglas Hwy. This is located at approximately 8.5 mile N. Douglas Hwy. The lot to be created would have about a 90 ft. to 130 ft. beach frontage and be about 1.5 acres. Per code, I would have to create a long rectangular or panhandle lot to access 30 feet on N. Douglas Hwy. This would have to cross a wetlands area and one creek. The variance I am requesting would provide a much shorter access from the adjac~nt property to the south owned by Mr. Dirk Lovig, lot 1 USS 3281, parcel #601201120010 at 11326 N. Douglas Hwy. Reasons for this variance: 1) To provide normal access from my property to the road (N. Douglas Hwy) requires an unusually long driveway as it has to come at,an angle from beach to the highway, i.e., in excess of 700 ft. This is due to the fact that a parcel of land, triangular in shape, lies between the proposed lot and the highway. This triangular lot is parcel #1421, fraction lot 2, beachside USS 3599. 2) To provide normal access on my existing property requires crossing a wetlands area and a creek - requiring, of course, a bridge. 3) The 30 ft. wide segment of the lot would have to cross my existing driveway at the highway requiring removal of my existing lighting and signage. 4) Immediately to the south crossing of both the city parcel and Mr. Lovig's parcel is a right-of-way, ADL #32871 of March 31, 1972, taken out by the previous owner Mary Maki. This access is listed as public access and is 120 feet in width. 5) By using the existing access to the proposed lot, the driveway would be a fraction of the normal required length and would not cross wetlands or creek. 6) Permission for easement across Mr. Lovig's property has been given orally to the proposed buyer, Gordon Bozarth. RECEIVED JUN O8 2009 PERMIT CENTER/ COD  Packet Page 17 of 33 May 8, 2009 To: CBJ Dept of Planning From: Jon A. Reiswig Re: Subdivision (cont'd) Page2 7) Optionally, an access could come across the city parcel direct to the piece I want to sell, but again, this requires crossing wetlands and a portion of the city parcel is a deep gully where it fronts on the highway Thank y:pu for your consideration. / . ,,./} ' / ,:ft/!,·'( '#- e.~~j..-.. _/,./"" ,K .. "-:· Jon A.-Reiswig · 11260 N. Douglas Hwy Juneau, AK 9980 I Ph: 907-586-3821 Fax: 907-463-2642 Email: entrancept@gci.net RECEIVED JUN O8 2009 PERMIT CENTER I CDD  I 3/::·:.'.:'5,? CURVE SCHEDULE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING 0 3Q4S'09" 4533,66 .300,88 300.8.3 N;J9'/.3'35"E 0. 2°16'40" 45.3.3.66 /80, 2.3 ,,, 180,,?4 NJ6Q//'07" E 0 3Q06'56" 4633.6'6 251.96 251.93 N.38°2.3'06 "£ ~ N TIDE i:.: . .s· .. / 6 .:? (i ~ FLATS VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1": I MILE ~ -l;l(C·II S·J559 STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP S·.3559 I {We) hereby certify Iha/ I am (we are) the owner(s) of lh6 properly shown and described hereon and !hot I (we) hereby odopl this plan of subdivision wilh my(our) fr8e consent and dtJdicote all streets, alleys, wallfs, parks o"ld other open spaces public or private use as noted. .... .... •'• \o ' D01,,lec/y /1: ,198C, .. , -:~ ::::• ,.. ~-,.t 'I) 11.dLL., .... ... "'~ Owner~ WifnfJSS ......• ...· . ,, r 'ot,v(. "Qi ½ 0 Owner~ -:::::... ~!0 11 £ASEMENT I I ~tness Ui/YIJ. FRITZ "~::-.... /' , r,t• 4J:" . ,, 0J'<>o '<'\ ½~ CO VE TR A C T D .;::: ,;_'b. / ti ;'" ;;, NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 506,980.Bsq ff. u ~ ~o-, /Q ~ () / / "~" C). / ~· <; 3 ~ :.;;: On lhis_r_.,._doy o f ~ 1 /982, before me,the under- signed, o notary pub/le In and for the State of Alaska, ::::.::-- ~o V~ / i '---· Note I: Trar:t MA~ wa, s1.1bdivlded ,: ~- ,.§' , 0t~ C, tesldln(J otd.tne#lj , pfJrsono/ly..,b11# i-&-r~ f~&,:11mown Dy Platting Rrsolut/on No. 428, ~ h. '"--- / O ~G' 0 ~ -to m• /9 be the per,on who executed the fo,ego,ng ce,(i(ido/e':, 1977, and ac1nowtedged to me that he executed said cerUl!Cote · '-'::::_ / <:) ':)!~'if- }'<j'!JtJ,.~' freely and volunlorl/y for the. U$6S ahd purposes the.rein SECONDARY .' ~ menfioned. MONUMENI 780 ,t__...!~=" .""'~l'.' 297.77' (ryP.) -.15,--58 .3 7 1 _... - .... NAIL 1N In witness whettJof, I have hereunto af~lxed my signature and officio/ seaflhtJ doy,_month,a ndyearln lhisCdrf;ficote "W/~~,<_"<- ✓✓• ? S 87° 0 ~63 / ' %'';559 (.~~°" Oest obove and /herein mention,d. ;a ~ '>',5,,:·:! m !_•• _ . ~ ..._,___, \"-..J ~ Note 2: Tract "C" .was c:r,at,d by Oept. of Hi~hWqf, Aio•ka Proje<I No, S·0959 NI North Oou9los, My CQmmlsslon axpirss:..1 /y~/~ 0 'I ~0 ,-d4; •heel 8/9, Oct, /3,1771. <Q m ..-_, ,,-._, 1 c. St/ ,..61287' , t,,U 1 -· / ;.---::.•, ,\'..:_ "\. S·32e1 •±>-c.7 . o,c ;,,oYEo B ~ / Cl;) I I -~~ S-3559 >6,!WAY / ~-\ } ' / ,,/ ~ , n t;} ~(. "-4~• ;{) () < -- ~ m h,) I \ \ SURVEYOR'S C4 s 328/ ~,.,___ , ' "w ' '1fe-/!,;\fi~~:!'\1/'~ s 35~9 C5 ,, 1'..._ '-. \...:..,'. ' SCALE• ..,,_.___..,., I INCH "' IDOFEET CERTIFICATE , / CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BOARD 0 / _her~by cttrfify that I am a professional Land Surveyor· regislere,1/ A PLAT OF: 0 I hereby cerllfy lhal fhe subdlvis/Qn plat shown hereon hos been In lh~ Slate of Alaska·, and Iha! thls pltJI repl'asents Ill~. Si.Jr~,Y made// fuund to CQmply wilh the subdivision re9ulatlons of the City and by me\ or under my direct ·supervislo_n, that all dimensiQ{'al /1nd _/,.., rt!/olivf bearings are correct and Illa. I corner mon'1men~s\ or'e s"t.Jn place ~nd noted upon this plat as present. Roroogh of o111/1e011, Alaska, and thOI said plot shown hereon has been approved by fhe Ploll/ng Boord by Piaf Resolution N o .~ ENT/RANCE POJN1 \ _ _ _ _ _ _ doled V4 # ~ go- · , , 1913.., apq thal lh6 SUIBDl!f/1/SJON Packet Page 18 of 33 plaf •hown hereon has 'bHn ·approved for recording in I the Qff1'ce LEGEN of the Dlsfricf R6cording Office, June,au, Ala~ka. RESUBD!V ISION OF U. S SuRVEY No. S B,L;M: Monument located this survey Doted }f-c ).0 ;_f}., , INTO TRACTS A, B, C AND D . /369 · • Secondary Monument set this survey 3/4 11 Rebar with Plastic Cop• ~ ~ ~>i l.Ah / Chairman, '.Plaf/ing Boord I...... __, I ---. ....-­ I JI/LY / 1 1987. · · _., ,. .. ·c,:tj . an,di 80(,!)_pgfl--of -'(_urreau, Alaslf_a W: , •. aMV£V0II .la. ~. .·. -. -r. ,J.l'fKll'USIOH"1 JDAH! ~ 41 -----■■------, ~ . Ji ·);jj~tk ± ..... 57 . . · " tZII ILACIPI HWY. ritrance Point Subd. copy #2 --~ . AJNEAll,ALAIKA. ltGT,_- J rn. ~~ ~,' j ·. ,. . .' . ' ~~ fl.ANNEII' .,, ·' L·1·SP,ANl!t ·'7,1s2 o, / /·  Packet Page 19 of 33 Form No. DL 72 (Revised Dec. 1967) STATE OF ALASKA DEPARl'MENT OF NATURAL.RESOUBCES DIVISION- OF LANDS RIGHT-OF-WAY PEBMIT .· THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 31st day of March , 19 72 , by and between the STATE OF AI.c\SKA, acting by and through the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Lands, hereinafter referred to as the grantor and MARY 1611 hereinafter referred to as the permittee. WITNESSETH, that in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 38.05.330, A.S •. and the rules and regulations prouulgated thereunder, the permittee having filed an applicatioll for a right-of-.wa-y for: _ __,Pub._....,l..i,,..c......,a..,c,ac,.e,.s,.s_________ ____ with the Division of Lands together with a map showing the definite location thereon of the.line ~fright-of-way which the permittee bas adopted and agrees to be Che ~pecific and definite location of the aforesaid right-of-way, and . WHEREAS , it is understood and agreed by the permittee herein that, as a con­ dition to the granting of the right-of-way applied for, the land covered by said right-of-way shall be used for no purpose other than the location, constr"1ction, operation and maintenance of the said right-of-way over and across the following described State lands, to wit: · running 124 (meciLm) feet in length and/or containing 0.34 acres, more or less and shall extend a width of 120.0 feet. TO HAVE AND TO BOLD the same until the above described ~nd shall no longer be used for the above-mentioned purpose and subject to conditions and reserva­ tions elsewhere set forth herein. The sketch map revealing the right-of-way gnnted herein shall be attached hereto and made a part hereof. In the event that the right-of-way herein granted shall in any manner con­ flict with or overlap a previously granted right-of-way the permittee herein shall use this right-of-way in such a manner as not to interfere with the peace­ ful use and enjoyment of the previously issued right•of-way and no improvements shall be constructed by the permittee herein upon the overlapping area unless the consent therefor bas first been obtained from the permittee under the pre~ist• ing right•.of•way. · The permittee in the exercise of the rights and privileges granted by this l'r-'- - - - - - - - - - - - . · :_;__/:;}.~;t,{,'.'"!f;.Z. .~::;:!t;~',"!i11f~!~•~:: RECEtVED :-- JUN 0 8 2009 PERMIT CENTER/ COO  -. Packet Page 20 of 33 -2- indenture shall comply with all regulations now in effect or as hereafter estab­ lished by the Division of Lands and all other Federal, State or municipal laws, regulations or ordinanc~s applicable to the area herein granted. Upon abandonment , terminat:ion , revocation or cancellatio n of this indenture, the permittee shall within 90 days remove all structures and improvements from the area herein granted, · except those owned by the grancor • and shall restore the area to the same or similar condition as the same was upon the issuance of this permit. Should the permittee fail or refuse to remove said structures or im­ provements, within the time allotted, they shall reve~ to and become the proper­ ty of the grantor. However, the permittee shall not be relieved of the cost of the removal of the structures, improvement s and/ or the cost of restoring t:he area. Provided funher, however, that the granter, in his discretion, may alter or modify the requirement s contained in this provision if it is to the best in­ terest of Alaska to do so. The permittee shall utilize the lands herein granted consistent with the purposes of the proposed use, as revealed by the .applic~tion therefor, and shall maintain the premises in a neat and orderly manner and shall adopt and apply such safety measures as shall b.e necsssary, proper and prudent with respect to the use to which the land is subjected. . The per::nittee shall take all reasonable precaution to prevent and suppress brush and forest fires. No material shall be distiosed of by burning in open fire during the closed season unless a permit therefor has first been obtained froa the agency empowered by law to issue such permits. Prior to any construction or development th.at will use, divert, obstruct, pollute or utilize any or the ·-atars or the State, the permi.t~ee shall first obtain approval therefor fn>m i:b.e Commissione r of the Depar1:ment of Fish and Giame and file an image copy thereof with the g;rantor. Any lands included in this permj,t which are sold under a contract to pur• chase shall be subject: t:o this permit. Upon issuance of title to the purchaser, this permit shall remain in effect until its date of expiration. In case the necessity for the right-of-wa y·shallno longer exist, or the per­ mittee should abandon or fail to use the same, then this permit shall terminate. The State of Alaska shall be forever wholly absolved from any liability ·for damages which might result to the pei:mit:t:ee bere:Ln en account: of th:Ls penrit: hav­ ing be.m call.Celled, forfeited, or terminated prior to the expiration of the full time for which it was issued. NOW TBEUFOR, in accordance with the provisiotlS of Sec. 38.05.330, A.S. and the ''!»1-..p;I.QJ!IIU ed thereunder and in accordance with the con-·· ditions hereto£, -------~ ched hereto and made a part hereof, the per• mittee herein i ¥~Jrfl'-@ locate, construct, operate · and maintain said right-of- lands herein described. IN WITNESS tor bas caused these presents to be signed in duplicate ----- has hereunto affixed his signature on the  Packet Page 21 of 33 dar and year first above written. IJEPAZ STATE OF ALASKA By:~ti(~4/ llArllllAL lll!SOOJU:ES 'Lands Officer. Division of Lands- ¼/hnf 1~ I Pemittee UNITED STATES OF 'AMERICA ) State of Alaska ) ss. :'(.'- - r-, ... \ This is to certify that on the , ~ _....,.. day of \ ·, >}9,-J. 19 ,,.,rz,, • be.fore me,. the undersigned Notary Public. personally appeared UNJfEDJ lie lfAJ«I,aACJ. . known to me and known by me to be the Cbief, J.epds section of tb.e Division of Lands of the Department of Natural Resoure1as, and· acknowledged to me that: he - executed the foregoing instrument for and on behalf of said State, freely and voluntarily for the use and purposes therein set forth. IN TEST:nf()HY 'WHEREOF• I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above witten. Notary Public in and'~r the State of Alaska ...)' My conmission expires <½} "'f -<, , $ \/J UNITED STAffS OF AMERICA ) State of Alaska ) 88 • ;o/" _/l This is to certify that on this 7Z2- day of /-leflL • 19 -?'2.. , before me, the undersigned Notary -Public. personally appeared MAXY MJI ------- to me personally known to be one of the perS9J1S described in and who executed the within instrument and the aaid __-....... MAR=X--=MAn====---------- acknowledged to me tbac he signed and executed the same freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposes therein mutioned. IN TESTIH>RY WIIEUOI', I have hereunto set my band and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate f i r s t • ~ ~ ~ - ~ Notary Public ill· and for the State of Alaska My colllllissiou expires RECEIVED JUN O8 2009 PERMIT CENTER/ CDD  Packet Page 22 of 33 Page 4 LIGAL DISCllIP.rIOB: .- .  Packet Page 23 of 33 ,,;- . -~ IS::,' .eJw ..e.ax/lRcO EXISTING <3eCK/ND -5eCTIOV Ll-.Ll P20POSED · LJCCESS eoAD TO L,OT 1- - USS :SZ/51 RECEIVED Engineering 61 Geological Consultants JUN O8 ·200-9 A..Nc"o"•-.tr ,.... ,,.e ... Nics ALASKA .iuNtr<!'u - DATE ::J-Z3-7Z SCA!.£ AS NOll:O OWN BY _//? CHK0 BY_//?  Packet Page 24 of 33 , MARMION Vu ISLAND Ordinance No. 2006-15 Adopted \ATTACHMENT B\  Packet Page 25 of 33 AT TA CH ME NT C  )J 3(::':'.~f:": CURVE SCHEDULE DELTA -- -- RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING w.c. 49.50··'· · 0 3"48'09" ' 4533.66 :JOD.88 300.8.J NJ9"/.3'3 5"E 0 2°16'40 " 4533.66 180.2.3 '•" 180.24 N 36'11'01 "'£ 0 3vo6'S6 " 4633,66 25/~6 251.93 NJ8'2.3 '06"£ S87' 0 00'oo"E ~99,00' N f :: I,•• 5', /t~ ..}8 ~ VICINITY MAP SCALE'. 1"= I M!LE ~ -O(C·/1 S·.1559 C·!O 5·-3559 STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP I (We) hereby cerllfy Iha! I am (we ore) the owne,(s) of the properly shown and described hereon and /hat I (we) hereby adopt this pion of subdivisiOn wilh my(our) free consent and dedicate al/ streets, alleys, walks, parks O'ld other open spaces public or privat6 use as noted, ..... :~-: = /4 "''h t DalNCf0 'i ,198C, -:~ :.::• '<> .. , '••,., ' .. (tz/L c . . . . - !) ......• ...· "~ Owner~ WifntJss ~ FRIT Z .;:-- --.__'-----. '--. ..... '--5 !O $AS£MEN T ,i, I I Owner~ ~/nm 2w,v(, QU//YIJ .......... '- ~:----.._J' 4.j ~1.J CO VE ' ~ ~~ ~ NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEOGEMENT CT ~~6A980,6 sq. fl, D ...._::::~o ..... ,"o.q, -;,, -..., ::::<:::_.,,.Oo 70. /"l'- () On this /4 day of J4'/7'. ,1982, before me, the und•r­ ' ~-~ signed, a notary public In ond for lh8 State of Alaska, Note I: Tract "A~ wa.s subdivide d . . . ~:i:::'· / residing at~nen 0 , personolty..J,,,1 i::&-,~ ,{,,~know n blJ Platting R,,olutlrm No. 4-2B, .to me t9 be the person who executed the foregoing ceq,p~aiii,. 1977. -----~:::_ : and oc~nowledged to me that he executed said cerfit/Co1e freely and voluntor/ly for !he,. U$6S ahd purposes therein SE%~tt~NI j!7,!.0.. mentioned, 29U 7 ' - /4_t / NAIL IN In witness whet,of, I hove hereunto affixed my and officio/ seal the day, month, and year In signature this Cdrfif/co/8 S 87° 43 1 23"W ,._. 398. 71' . I TRE.E first above and therein m11ntion11d. //_,/~/'.'. C-2 C-8 5 ·."J:?81 S-.1559 ·::.56:'{~i ··-;'/ (; ! ........ I Ns;;,12•:-, 985. -38' ) Note 2: Tract 't'" was cr.-att!'d Qy Oept. of lli~hwqy, Alaska Project 'I I .... ,.. - ' ~·•ii C·3 I··! ZI 00 W S·328I t'+..,,.···--:•.612.87' / - c.7··· ... 0EST~OYE D BY 'I- oP' No. S-0959 (,(-/ North Oouylas, •heet 8/9, Oct. /3,/nl . My commlssion explres:Jw f (</9.'f6 · :"• . 'l,\~~A0 / S-3559 ... Hl6HWAY i C-4~A\, / 5cALE, I SUFl,VEYOR'S CERTIFICATE S· 3281 r✓ -_.',._Jj_4_9.o, BasiSof Sur~y C,5 5.3559 'ii'-•--.-.-, I INCH= IOOFEer CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BOARD J her\by certify that I am o profession al Land Surveyor rt1qislered A PLAT OF: In t~ Slofe of A/Qskd, and !hot this pl9t represents I hereby certify thol the subdivision plot shown the Survey mode h11reon has been by me\ or under my direct suptJrvision, Iha/ found to comply with the subdivision re9ulot/ons o/1 dlmenslonol ond of fhe City and relotlVf bearln()s are correct and that corner mon'1ments place ({_nd noted upon this plot as present. are set In /=lorough of .Juneau, Alaska, and that said plat shown hereon hos been approved by the Ptotf/119 Boord by Piaf Resolulion No,H:J fl ENT RAN CE PO!! Nf _ _ _ _ _ _ doted Vt.tnL-- tr 1 19f"-<,a(l< I that the SUBDIV/IS/JON Packet Page 26 of 33 plal shown hereon has ·b1111n approved for recording ln I the office He'. LEGEN of the District Recording Offlctt, Juneau, Ala#a. RESUB DIVISID N OF U. S SuRvEY No. /369 ~ B,UM: Monument localed this survey J.O Doled ,19ll. INTO TRACT S A,B,C AND D. ~ • Secondar y Monument set this survey · 3/4 11 Rebar wifh Plastic Cap• ~Jl~ ~ _~ -r .:,. w. ·am·.&N,r :".'~--·-------·-1 / DATI. OIi 91.MWY Chairman, Planing Boord ..JULY I, ---- -- . City and BO(!!JJIJh of Juneau, Ala.sir.a I [9f2_2 · Ml l'IIOl'USI ON~ ~ trance Point Subd. Afle,<5__{Jj_ ~ ' ·· 9Zll LACIE! . HW'L -41 - 57 copy 112~,' j f2 z}; . . ~ ALASKA . 7977- atCIT .._. ' ,. . ~ - - PlAHNDt. . ~ A ~16 ·.'7~2 .., I I ATTACHMENT D  Page 1 of 1 Packet Page 27 of 33 Daniel Sexton From: Heather Marlow Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:53 PM To: Daniel Sexton Subject: RE: John Reiswig 11260 N. Douglas Hwy. Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Dan, As we discussed, it seems like there are options that allow for the subdivision and follow the code. I reviewed the statement covering the reasons for the variance request and am not sure that they will be sufficient to move the request forward. Accessing CBJ property will require an easement from the Lands Committee and the Assembly. Prior to scheduling those meetings it seems beneficial to send this to the Subdivision Review Committee for consideration. Having some detail on wetlands/forested wetland areas would also be beneficial for the review. Thanks, Heather From: Daniel Sexton Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:02 PM To: Heather Marlow Subject: John Reiswig 11260 N. Douglas Hwy. Afternoon Heather, Recently, Mr. Reiswig submitted a Variance application requesting that a lot be allowed to be subdivided without having: 1. Direct and Practical access to a street maintained by an agency of government (CBJ49.15.460(4)(c)); and 2. Does not have at least 30-feet of frontage on a dedicated right-of-way (CBJ49.15.460(5)(A)). Now as we discussed about a month ago, Mr. Reiswig is proposing to allow access to the newly created lot through an established easement on the USS 3559 Lot 2 Fraction Beachside, which is owned by the CBJ. Is this something that would be amenable to the CBJ to grant access for another lot through this easement? I've included copy of the application and original easement document for reference. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Daniel J. Sexton, Planner II CBJ Community Development Dept. 155 South Seward Street Juneau,AK 99801 Ph: (907) 586-0771 Fax: (907) 586-3365 E-mail: daniel_sexton@ci.juneau.ak.us 7/9/2009 ATTACHMENT E  Page 1 of 1 Packet Page 28 of 33 Daniel Sexton From: Ron King Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:05 AM To: Daniel Sexton Subject: RE: Whoops! There are several unanswered questions and other possible solutions for this case. I would be in favor of the CBJ disposing of the property and developing a minor subdivision plat, with all property owners involved, that dedicates legal access. Wetland determination and the need for a protective stream corridor for the creek also questions. My concern would be that this plat would open the door for other substandard subdivisions. From: Daniel Sexton Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:04 AM To: Ron King Subject: Whoops! Forgot to attach the information. Try number two. Daniel J. Sexton, Planner II CBJ Community Development Dept. 155 South Seward Street Juneau,AK 99801 Ph: (907) 586-0771 Fax: (907) 586-3365 E-mail: daniel_sexton@ci.juneau.ak.us 7/9/2009 ATTACHMENT F  . ~~~,-/--~:---r~---;#---:a~-:FT~~~~~~~~s~-.,...,...,~="=---- \ \ u.s.s. 1555 ,.;> cORJ I --;~ ( r./ r./ r./r./ [ ~\/ / ~ ' H., •~l l ~,_,., ~ ~~ ~e,~.r~. ~/' ! ,.,, co• .-., _, .,J!j ,-,~~ \ r' rJ....... -'\..COR .J \ (H.C.S. NO. 182) (jl"·c:P ,ii ,, Y ,,\'l: ,j,_ , , / ~~\ I-~ ~~ f ~ r/'rJ"c.••rJ" "'fi - .s ..-o0. . . . -678 - ,.,, \\ \ \ <jJ \6 ,,/ : ''ci\/ ~ l1. rJ" rJ° r-J°. ~ .......sf>_."J....... \A- ' ~, \ ,, \\ ,,1/JJi'~\\~ , II f, ~~II L rJ° / s z50· \ ' \ :, \ \ \\\\I\.- I \ \ \j,,, ' \~-J / \ \ COR 2 \\\~. \' \.:.· U.S.S. 1C96 I / / '~/ "> ' \ I /;:s / \ \,\ \ u s s 155;\.,_, t \ \ \\\: (H.E.S. NO. 7:) f c:j I I~ \ \ ,, \\\~ \,\~ i ti I .l.., , . , lf:_l ·u~ - 7.,l l-, /S )v I .~~ ;'~ /~ ' ~' ' , I . l<;., L l V Q:! '\\ \_ \ \ o' \\ (H.E.s." NO. 182) \ \\ 2 (Non- Tange ntial Curl/It) ~ ~ /r::i \ ~ l, L "' ~ / , 7)tL- l..,1,'-f:,{, ~ I\..:.. IQ! ~"''~, , 'J~dius 183.74 , ~ \\. 'b~ \ =C 364.6 0 J: , ~ 20 ~ ( .x! (!__,e---v--¼ cJ. tfl_ ·Y-b J \ ~\. ~ , , \ \ \ Central AfJJ}le 113"41''8• Chord J0T.6 6 .. / . r~/ ~/ Packet Page 29 of 33 \ \ \ \\\ IC,,ord OJ / ( 7 c)u3 , - , Jl§J L~ I 1 • \\ \v , ~, \ Bearing S 51°51'38" E 52 7 I SOURCE: L·V\.. \ \ \ --A-1 NB;j'07'19"E . / i 1l~ t~ij~l.Yl 1 _,I A \\ 't'tl-. \, \\ 'I),~ .g J~ \ l \ \:~,, ~-- I II N¢8 't6"E 67- ',,,~rt , U.S.G.S. QUAD JUN£AU B-2, B-.J 1974 V ~f7 n1 ~ L-l)1 /\ --fo L155 I.. \ \, J \ \ ~ t,, ' ------ -:...,--- --- ·;,42.79 / / / ~~ '\ \ , ,3..\r- ..i.G\""' / \ N73•3J'03 l_ / ·--l \ $I.J o~ -~~ w S,:.fa,/G"ffw.,--..J AN EASQ,IENT fO(? d.Y E&SUNCi' BWM t A., 'A 6.,,./4.,.Sio )>-­ ~ ( D£T,!/.L SURVEY NO. 1096, COUPRJSJNG A CORRIDOR A CERTAJN TRACT OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN US J../NE CENT£R DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : LANO TVENTY FEET ON £Aa-l SJDC OF A Ol SCALE: 1•-=200• A POINT ON THE COMMON BOUND ARY OF US SURIIE:Y 1096 (HES NO. 75) AND ,I',. BEGINNING AT CORNER ~-¥ y \\~ lJO'?!ii-1 ' 56034-'W. 41J.58 FE£T FROIJ ,,. ll) SURVEY NO. 1555 (HES NO. 182); SAJO POINT BEARS I I \ £AS7tRL Y CORNER OF US SURV£ Y NO. 1555; THENCE S18'45'1J'T. 531.0J FEET: 0, 71-1£ MOST NllAL CURVE TO THE LEFT. SAID CUI THENCE J64.60 FEET ALONG 71-IE 'ARC OF A NON TANG£ ~ "'e C) \,- "' '-1.1 \\\~ ~ r . ... "'6" \ \ HAVING A RADIUS OF 183.74 FEET AND A J07.66 FEET); THENCE cotmNutNG ON A NON TANGE THENCE N73'33'03•E. 142.79 FEIT; THENC RIGHT OF WAY OF THE NORTH DOUGLAS HIGHWAY. E CENTR NB6'0 AL ANGLE 7't9•E. SAID OF 52.0.J FEET IJORc OR LESS TO TH£ POINT 11:n1':JB• (a-lORD S51'51'J8i NTIAL COURSE NB218 't6·£. 67.16 FEET; BONG 0FFS£ T 80.0 FEET TO '"":::-.:.::----l \ \ - -- I 3.1, AND BEARIN G N45TJ1 '4-S•w, 1488..83 FE£T FROI.I 1 ~ N ~42+6 \ RIGHT OF CENTERUNE STATIO \ fb '" 4, TH£ MOST EASTERLY CORN£R, 'OF US SURVE Y NO. 1096. THIS CORRJDOR OF LANO CONT. ~ 49,861.48 SCJUME FEET. OR 1.14 ACRES. .(: \\ l40' £AS!! ,1£Nf LEGEND g. \ (Sff O£TAIL) 6 \ S PRIMARY 4/0NUMENT R£COV£R'ED g ~ \ \ \ SET BY £LM. soo· \ \ \ u.s.s. 109 6 (H.£.S. NO. 75) \ \ \ Ejj PRIMARY MONUMENT R£COl/£R?ED SET BY £,.0. T. 500' 0 Scale In feet ~ \ \ SUB.ECT 10 £ASEM£NTS 4 R£STRJC110NS OF R£c:al0 c:i C <'II). _ ....Of A( ,, ~" '"'' ''' ,, :..\~ ••••• •• ~,a. \ \ COR 4 PLAT OF ROAD WAY EASE MENT THRO UGH VEY OR ;',.\.'I:·.. ~ ~+- f. - CER T/FI CA TE OF REG ISTE RED t.AN D SUR t-5.~··~1-~~~~·---···~~ ·-r.i \ ~ ,,. A PQR TION Of' U.S . SUR VEY No. 1 0 \ ,_, ~ LAND SURVEYOR, REGISTERED IN \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL l£S£NTS A SURVEY MAD£ BY LOCA TED ON DOUG LAS ISLAN D \ . ""' ¢J ,/ n-1£ STA Tr OF ALASKA, AND THAT ME OR UNDER l,IY DIRECT SUPEUVISION THIS , PLAT AND R£PR THAT, , t;N TH£ BASIS OF MY IN THE CITY & BORO UGH OF JUNE AU. ALAS KA ~ ~ _. \' 65• ¢--' AND .~£LIEF, DETAILS D£Pi:C TED HEREON, INCLUDING ! ~ ~t-~ DOUGlAS FINLE1 -~~ ( ,).- ' KNOWLEDGE, INFORMA TION R£LA TIVE BEARINGS AND DISTA NCES AND OESCR IPTIC• iS OF MONUMENTS SET JUNE:A !.l.__AL ASKA RECOR DING _C>JSIR ll::'f' - \ ..J OR R£CO'IE:RED. ARE TRUE ANO CORRECT. DOU GLA S FINL EY LAN D SUR VEY ING ~ ~ '• •••~o. LS-627?•• - ~ ; -\~~ · ---·,~ ~~ COR .Y'' J. ~ s-2 .r-o z_ 820 61H STREE T - JUNEA U. ALASK A (907) 586-4 253 1 / o .,,,,, \\~~fSS!Oll~\.';._~ DOU~Y ts--277 DAT£ OAlE: 5/1 8/02 PRO.I.N o.: 02-42 8-845 5 I SCALE: 1•-500 • ,2[·tY3 -oClff,,.,L/o-o, . '1 )~ 3 £ y}1 i '1 if A !1 trac, hY1f)f'11 t A to 1irrt!6il/'f/,iJ ,-q,v.,( O:,e~{ V/..t, l•1~a-L<. 1~~~&-/9Ylt:f- r~~-02-➔ -,-<.A.., \ £ -~-~.sew\~·, Packet Page 30 of 33  Packet Page 31 of 33 City and Borough of Juneau Community Development Department Cit~ Borough of Juneau 155 South Seward Street ¾ Alaska's Capital City Juneau, Alaska 99801 Telephone: 586-0715 Facsimile: 586-3365 Project Name: North Douglas Outer Point Subdivision Case Number: PAC20150004 Project Description: Map amendment to place subject parcel in ‘Remote’ area of CBJ Remote Subdivision Map. Applicant: Gretchen Keiser et al. Property Owner: Gretchen Keiser et al. Property Address: 14010, 14020, 14030 and 14040 N Douglas Hwy Parcel Code Number: 3D1401070010, 3D1401070020, 3D1401070030, 3D1401070040, Site Size: 347609 sq ft, 348044 sq ft, 405108sq ft, 406850 sq ft Zoning: RR Existing Land Use: Single Family residential Conference Date: 10 February 2015, 1.30pm Report Issued: (Date) List of attendees Note: Copies of the Pre-Application Conference Report will be emailed, instead of mailed, to participants who have provided their email address below. Name Title Email address Jill Sandleben Applicant jillintheforest@gmail.com Marlyn Olson Applicant Marlin.olson@yahoo.com Bob Wild Applicant robertgwild@gmail.com Gretchen Keiser Applicant gekeiser@gmail.com Beth McKibben CDD Beth.mckibben@juneau.org Ron King CDD Ron.king@juneau.org Dan Jager Fire Dan.jager@juneau.org Eddie Quinto CDD Eddie.quinto@juneau.org Tim Felstead CDD Tim.felstead@juneau.org Neighborhood Association/Contact: (Neighborhood association name and contact info.) Revised 10/30/13  Packet Page 32 of 33 Pre-Application Conference Final Report Conference Summary Questions/issues/agreements identified at the conference that were not already identified in the attached reports. The following is a list of issues, comments and proposed actions, and requested technical submittal items that were discussed at the pre-application conference. 1. Zoning – Lot sizes are big enough for them to be subdivided. They could have two dwelling units per lot. Applicants hope to complete this within 1 year. The goal is to be able to subdivide the 4 parcels that currently exist together. Current code language prevents subdivision due to access being via an easement and a public Right of Way. The three options suggested by Laura Boyce (CDD) were discussed. a) Submit a map amendment request to be “remote” so they can do a remote subdivision. The four existing lots all have saltwater access but the proposed subdivision configuration would have some lots separated from the water. b) Take the request to the Subdivision Review Committee (SRC) to see what they think about subdivisions off of easements (there is currently a perpetual easement through the Goldbelt property). They have four lots total currently (in their subdivision) and they wish to ultimately do nine. No lot would be less than 3 acres. c) Work with the SRC as they consider a new type of hybrid remote subdivision. That will take time to develop and get into the Title 49 code though. A fourth option: d) Obtain public Right of Way from Goldbelt. Applicants are keen on Option 1 as it seemed to offer shortest timeline. The current Hidden Valley case before the CBJ Assembly is pertinent to the applicant’s case and should be followed. The case would give some guidance on remote subdivision when access via an easement. A map change to place the lots into the ‘remote’ area of the map would have to be made via the Planning Commission and the Assembly. Applicants felt the chances of Goldbelt selling public Right of Way were low. However, it would be beneficial to any of the first three options for the applicants to show they had attempted this solution. 2. Setbacks – Anadromous stream and eagle nest setbacks may apply when developing future subdivided lots and work on private roadway through lots. 3. Height – Not discussed but maximum height of buildings would be 45 ft. 4. Parking – Not discussed but parking for two cars per dwelling would be required following subdivision. 5. Landscaping – This was not discussed but there is no minimum vegetative cover requirement. 6. Building – Permissible uses for the lots can occupy a maximum of 10% of the lot and conditional uses a maximum of 20%. 7. Fire District – Fire assistance is not provided that far out the North Douglas Highway but Medical Response is even if classed ‘Remote’. This means the driveway should meet required standards of 20ft wide compacted, gravel surface with suitable turn around. A hammer head turnaround was recommended as it took up least amount of land and could be incorporated in the design of the individual lots driveways. Page 2 of 3  Packet Page 33 of 33 Pre-Application Conference Final Report Although not mandatory it was suggested that some sort of sprinkler system be installed. If not a remote subdivision a sprinkler system would be required. 8. Other - Permits from Army Corp of Engineers would be required for any fill in wetland area. The alignment of the road should be considered when subdividing lots. Easements may be required. Page 3 of 3