City Council Meeting

AGENDA LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, September 21, 2022 10:00 AM JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19 Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 1 vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19 vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com. Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below. Telecommunication Relay Services Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user. What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs. Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability. For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 2 Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held. The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote. PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting. The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment. If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 3 information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 4 When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Wednesday, September 21, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items Noticed for Public Hearing (1) 22­0950 CD 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for alley purposes on alley northwesterly of Mayfield Avenue and northeasterly of Bundy Drive ­ Right of Way No. 36000­10223 (Dedication). Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that the Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Wednesday Environmental Quality - September 21, Act 2022of -1970 pursuant to Article III, Class PAGE 5 5(19) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Wednesday, September 21, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items Noticed for Public Hearing (1) 22­0950 CD 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for alley purposes on alley northwesterly of Mayfield Avenue and northeasterly of Bundy Drive ­ Right of Way No. 36000­10223 (Dedication). Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that the Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(19) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. ACCEPT the petitioner's offer for the Dedication, substantially as shown on the Exhibit Map of the August 3, 2022 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file. 3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works to acquire the Dedication. 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Council action on this project to the Bureau of Engineering, Real Estate Division for processing. Wednesday Fiscal Impact Statement:21, - September The2022 City -Engineer reports thatPAGE a $3,416.51 6 fee for processing this report was paid pursuant to Sections 7.3 and 7.41.1 of  3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works to acquire the Dedication. 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Council action on this project to the Bureau of Engineering, Real Estate Division for processing. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a $3,416.51 fee for processing this report was paid pursuant to Sections 7.3 and 7.41.1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (2) 22­0452 CD 15 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCES relative to the dedication of City­owned real properties as public street lying on Beacon Street between 7th Street and 11th Street, and Harbor Boulevard and Miner Street between 7th Street and 11th Street ­ Right of Way No 36000­10257. A. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER DATED MARCH 29, 2022: Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that this Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, under Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. DEDICATE, ACCEPT and ESTABLISH the City­owned real property lying on Beacon Street between 7th Street and 11th, as shown on the Exhibit Map of the City Engineer report dated March 29, 2022, attached to the Council file, as part of Beacon Street, a public street of said City. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated March 23, 2022, authorizing the dedication, acceptance and establishment of certain real property owned by the City of Los Angeles as part of Beacon Street between 7th Street and 11th Street, all public streets of said City. 4. FIND that this dedication, acceptance, and establishment, of City­owned real property as public street is in substantial conformance with the purpose, intent, and provisions of the General Plan, pursuant to Section 556 of the City Charter. Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 7  dated March 23, 2022, authorizing the dedication, acceptance and establishment of certain real property owned by the City of Los Angeles as part of Beacon Street between 7th Street and 11th Street, all public streets of said City. 4. FIND that this dedication, acceptance, and establishment, of City­owned real property as public street is in substantial conformance with the purpose, intent, and provisions of the General Plan, pursuant to Section 556 of the City Charter. B. REVISED COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER DATED MAY 2, 2022: Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that this Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, under Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. DEDICATE, ACCEPT and ESTABLISH the City­owned real property lying on Harbor Boulevard and Miner Street between 7th Street and 11th Street, as shown on the Exhibit Map of the City Engineer report dated May 2, 2022, attached to the Council file, as part of Harbor Boulevard and Miner, as public street of said City. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying REVISED ORDINANCE dated March 23, 2021, authorizing the dedication, acceptance and establishment of certain real property owned by the City of Los Angeles as part of Harbor Boulevard and Miner Street between 7th Street and 11th Street, all public streets of said City. 4. FIND that this dedication, acceptance, and establishment, of City­owned real property as public street is in substantial conformance with the purpose, intent, and provisions of the General Plan, pursuant to Section 556 of the City Charter. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (3) 22­0862 CD 14 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for turnaround Wednesday purposes on- September 6561 East Pickwick 21, 2022Street - ­ Right of Way No. PAGE36000­10288 8 (Dedication).  City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (3) 22­0862 CD 14 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for turnaround purposes on 6561 East Pickwick Street ­ Right of Way No. 36000­10288 (Dedication). Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that the Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. ACCEPT the petitioner's offer for the Dedication, substantially as shown on the Exhibit Map of the July 20, 2022 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file. 3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works to acquire the Dedication. 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Council action on this project to the Bureau of Engineering, Real Estate Division for processing. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a $3,416.51 fee for processing this report was paid pursuant to Sections 7.3 and 7.41.1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (4) 22­0854 CD 14 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for sanitary sewer purposes lying on 5555 East Valley Boulevard ­ Right of Way No. 36000­ 10151 (Dedication). Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that the Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 9  ENGINEER relative to an offer to dedicate an easement for sanitary sewer purposes lying on 5555 East Valley Boulevard ­ Right of Way No. 36000­ 10151 (Dedication). Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that the Dedication is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. ACCEPT the petitioner's offer for the Dedication, substantially as shown on the Exhibit Map of the July 20, 2022 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file. 3. AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works to acquire the Dedication. 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Council action on this project to the Bureau of Engineering, Real Estate Division for processing. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a $3,416.51 fee for processing this report was paid pursuant to Sections 7.3 and 7.41.1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (5) 22­0852 CD 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the quitclaim of a portion of the 2­foot wide easement for sanitary sewer purposes lying on 556 Catalonia Avenue ­ Right of Way No. 36000­2373 (Quitclaim). Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the Quitclaim, as shown on the Exhibit Map on the July 12, 2022 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Wednesday Group- of the September 21, of Bureau 2022 - PAGE Engineering (BOE) with 10 to the respect payment of the document recording fee.  1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the Quitclaim, as shown on the Exhibit Map on the July 12, 2022 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Group of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated July 19, 2022 authorizing the Quitclaim, which has been approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney. 4. INSTRUCT the Real Estate Division of the BOE record and deliver the necessary quitclaim deed or deeds to the persons legally entitled thereto. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (6) 22­1027 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the termination of covenant and agreement regarding Tentative Tract No. 43946 located at 1661 South Crescent Avenue ­ Right of Way No. 36000­ 2365. Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that the termination of covenant and agreement regarding Tentative Tract No. 43946 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to the categorical exemptions included in the City of Los Angeles Guidelines under Article III, Class 5(22). 2. APPROVE the petitioner's request for the termination of covenant and agreement recorded as document No. 92­127628, regarding the covenant and agreement related to Tentative Tract No. 43946, as shown on Exhibit A of the City Engineer report dated September 1, 2022, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner makes satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 11 Division (RED) of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to  exemptions included in the City of Los Angeles Guidelines under Article III, Class 5(22). 2. APPROVE the petitioner's request for the termination of covenant and agreement recorded as document No. 92­127628, regarding the covenant and agreement related to Tentative Tract No. 43946, as shown on Exhibit A of the City Engineer report dated September 1, 2022, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition: That petitioner makes satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Division (RED) of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of document recording fee. 3. AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to execute and record a suitable release from the covenant and agreement recorded as Document No. 92­127628. 4. FIND, pursuant to Section 96.5(5) of the City Charter, that the release of the existing covenant and agreement is in substantial conformance with the purpose, intent and provisions of the General Plan. 5. INSTRUCT the BOE, RED to record the necessary termination document. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (Public Works Committee waived consideration of the above matter) Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (7) 22­0678 CD 13 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of Hollywood Home Savings and Loan, located at 1500 ­ 1518 North Vine Street, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments. Recommendations for Council action: 1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 12 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to (7) 22­0678 CD 13 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of Hollywood Home Savings and Loan, located at 1500 ­ 1518 North Vine Street, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments. Recommendations for Council action: 1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the definition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of Hollywood Home Savings and Loan, located at 1500 – 1518 North Vine Street, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments, as modified by the PLUM Committee on September 2, 2022 to exclude the adjacent parking lot, as recommended in the communication from the Council District 13 Office dated September 2, 2022, attached to the Council file. Applicant: Brian Curran, Hollywood Heritage Owners: JP Morgan Chase Bank C/O JPMC Lease Administration and Home Savings & Loan Association Case No. CHC­2021­10737­HCM Environmental No. ENV­2021­10738­CE Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CHC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration) (8) 21­1189 Wednesday - September COMMUNICATION 21, THE FROM 2022CITY - PAGE to ATTORNEY relative 13finding in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 361 Section 3(e)(1)(B) whether  financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration) (8) 21­1189 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY relative to finding in accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 361 Section 3(e)(1)(B) whether meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees because of the continuing state of emergency related the Covid­ 19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020; and related actions. Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND in accordance with AB 361 Section 3(e)(3) that, while the state of emergency due to the Covid­19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, remains active and/or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds for City Council, including its advisory Committees, that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person and/or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. 2. FIND in accordance with AB 361 Section 3(e)(3) that, while the state of emergency due to the Covid­19 pandemic, as originally proclaimed by the Governor on March 4, 2020, remains active and/or state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, the City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency and finds for all City Brown Act bodies that the state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person and/or state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. 3. INSTRUCT the Clerk to place on the agenda for a Council meeting not more than 30 calendar­days after Council adopts these findings and recommendations an item entitled “Findings to Continue Teleconference Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 and Related Actions” and include these same recommendations for adoption by Council; and, instruct the Clerk to continue to do so on the agenda for a Council meeting not more than 30 calendar­days after each time Council adopts these findings and recommendations, until Council instructs the Clerk to cease doing so. Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 14  3. INSTRUCT the Clerk to place on the agenda for a Council meeting not more than 30 calendar­days after Council adopts these findings and recommendations an item entitled “Findings to Continue Teleconference Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 and Related Actions” and include these same recommendations for adoption by Council; and, instruct the Clerk to continue to do so on the agenda for a Council meeting not more than 30 calendar­days after each time Council adopts these findings and recommendations, until Council instructs the Clerk to cease doing so. Community Impact Statement: Yes Neutral: Reseda Neighborhood Council (9) 22­0882 RESOLUTION relative to the Declaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor, dated August 2, 2022, wherein the Mayor declared the existence of a local emergency due to the spread of the monkeypox virus, pursuant to provisions of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section 8.27. Recommendations for Council action: ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to: 1. Resolve that a local emergency continues to persist within the City of Los Angeles, within the meaning of LAAC Section 8.21, et seq., and the continuance of the Mayor’s August 2, 2022, Declaration of Local Emergency through 30 days from the adoption of this Resolution is therefore necessary. 2. Direct, in accordance with the LAAC, Section 8.21 et seq., all appropriate City departments, agencies, and personnel shall continue to perform all duties and responsibilities to represent the City of Los Angeles in this matter for the purpose of abating the emergency, and for the receipt, processing and coordination of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain whatever State and Federal assistance that may become available to the citizens of Los Angeles who may be affected by the emergency. 3. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management Department, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need for extension of this Declaration of Local Emergency as may be required. 4. Instruct the City Clerk to place on the City Council’s agenda the continuation of the state of local emergency not more than 30 calendar days after adoption of this Resolution and then not more than 30 calendar days after every subsequent adoption that Wednesday - September continues the 21, 2022 declared state- of emergency, untilPAGE such 15 time as the Council votes not to continue the state of emergency or rescinds this  3. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management Department, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need for extension of this Declaration of Local Emergency as may be required. 4. Instruct the City Clerk to place on the City Council’s agenda the continuation of the state of local emergency not more than 30 calendar days after adoption of this Resolution and then not more than 30 calendar days after every subsequent adoption that continues the declared state of emergency, until such time as the Council votes not to continue the state of emergency or rescinds this instruction. 5. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution to the Governor of the State of California, the Director of the Office of Emergency Services of the State of California, and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (10) 20­0291 RESOLUTION relative to the Declaration of Local Emergency by the Mayor, dated March 4, 2020, wherein he declared that conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen both internationally and within the United States as a result of the introduction of the novel coronavirus (COVID­19), pursuant to the provisions of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section 8.27. Recommendation for Council action: ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to: a. Resolve that a local emergency continues to persist within the City of Los Angeles, within the meaning of Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 8.21, et seq., and the continuance of the Mayor’s March 4, 2020, Declaration of Local Emergency through 30 days from the adoption of this Resolution is therefore necessary. b. Direct, in accordance with the LAAC, Section 8.21 et seq., all appropriate City departments, agencies and personnel shall continue to perform all duties and responsibilities to represent the City of Los Angeles in this matter for the purpose of abating the emergency and for the receipt, processing and coordination of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain whatever State and Federal assistance that may become available to the citizens of Los Angeles who may be affected by the emergency. Wednesday c. Instruct the General21, - September Manager, 2022 - Emergency Management PAGEDepartment, 16 to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need for extension of  b. Direct, in accordance with the LAAC, Section 8.21 et seq., all appropriate City departments, agencies and personnel shall continue to perform all duties and responsibilities to represent the City of Los Angeles in this matter for the purpose of abating the emergency and for the receipt, processing and coordination of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain whatever State and Federal assistance that may become available to the citizens of Los Angeles who may be affected by the emergency. c. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management Department, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need for extension of this Declaration of Local Emergency as may be required. d. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution to the Governor of the State of California, the Director of the California Office of Emergency Services, and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (11) 22­0991 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving the First Amendment to Contract DA­5383 with Woods Bagot Architects, PC, to extend the term through September 2, 2025, covering design services for the Midfield Satellite Concourse South Project at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action does not require review under CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168, as it does not include any changes to the LAX Midfield Satellite Concourse (MSC) Program that would result in significant impacts not already disclosed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the LAX MSC (State Clearinghouse No. 2013021020), which was certified by the Board on July 21, 2014 (Resolution 25478), and certified and adopted by the Los Angeles City Council on August 20, 2014, and found that this action is, therefore, within the scope of the prior MSC EIR. 3. APPROVE the First Amendment to Contract DA­5383 with Woods Wednesday Bagot- September Architects, 21, PC,2022 to extend - the term through PAGESeptember 17 2, 2025, covering design services for the MSC South Project at LAX.  Concourse (MSC) Program that would result in significant impacts not already disclosed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the LAX MSC (State Clearinghouse No. 2013021020), which was certified by the Board on July 21, 2014 (Resolution 25478), and certified and adopted by the Los Angeles City Council on August 20, 2014, and found that this action is, therefore, within the scope of the prior MSC EIR. 3. APPROVE the First Amendment to Contract DA­5383 with Woods Bagot Architects, PC, to extend the term through September 2, 2025, covering design services for the MSC South Project at LAX. 4. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 21, 2022, by Resolution No. 27546, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los Angeles World Airports, to execute said First Amendment to Contract DA­5383 with Woods Bagot Architects, PC. Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022) (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the matter) (12) 20­0960­S1 ADMINISTRATIVE AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving the Fifth Amendment to five contracts, DA­ 5216 with Burns Engineering Inc.; DA­5217 with Faith Group LLC, DA­ 5218 with Ross & Baruzzini; DA­5219 with IDM Groups LLC; and DA­5220 with Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc.; to extend the term by twelve months and increase the individual contract authorities, for combined total increase not to exceed $13,355,295, covering information technology project management and technical support services for Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article ll, Section 2(f) and Article lll, Class 1(2) of the Los Angeles Wednesday City CEQA Guidelines. - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 18  combined total increase not to exceed $13,355,295, covering information technology project management and technical support services for Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article ll, Section 2(f) and Article lll, Class 1(2) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the Fifth Amendment to Contracts DA­5216 with Burns Engineering Inc.; DA­5217 with Faith Group LLC; DA­5218 with Ross & Baruzzini; DA­5219 with IDM Groups LLC; and DA­5220 with Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc.; to extend the term by 12 months and increase the individual contract authorities, for combined total increase not to exceed $13,355,295, covering information technology project management and technical support services for LAWA. 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 21, 2022, by Resolution 27549, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, LAWA, to execute the Fifth Amendment to said five contracts. Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no General Fund impact. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022) (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the matter) (13) 22­1001 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving the Lease with Delta Air Lines, a Delaware company, covering the property located at 11101 Aviation Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90045 within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt Wednesday from -the September California21, 2022 - Environmental PAGE 19 Qualtiy Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.  CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving the Lease with Delta Air Lines, a Delaware company, covering the property located at 11101 Aviation Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90045 within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Qualtiy Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the two­year Lease with Delta Air Lines, a Delaware Company, covering the property located at 11101 Aviation Boulevard within LAX. 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 21, 2022, by Resolution 27541, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World Airports, to execute said Lease with Delta Air Lines, a Delaware Company. Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no General Fund impact. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022) (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the matter) (14) 22­0990 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving the Lease with DHL Express (USA), Inc., covering the property located at 5701, 5791, and 5795 West Imperial Highway, Los Angeles, CA 90045 within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 20 2. APPROVE the five­year Lease with DHL Express (USA), Inc.,  5701, 5791, and 5795 West Imperial Highway, Los Angeles, CA 90045 within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Recommendations for Council action: 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. APPROVE the five­year Lease with DHL Express (USA), Inc., covering the property located at 5701, 5791, and 5795 West Imperial Highway within LAX. 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 21, 2022, by Resolution 27540, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World Airports, to execute said Lease with DHL Express (USA), Inc. Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no General Fund impact. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022) (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the matter) (15) 22­1069 MOTION (BUSCAINO ­ LEE) relative to funding for services in connection with the Mayor’s special recognition on September 8, 2022 for the life and legacy of Queen Elizabeth II. Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Mayor’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration & Special Events line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Service Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with the Mayor’s special recognition on September 8, 2022 for the life and legacy of Queen Elizabeth II, including the illumination of City Hall. (16) 22­1060 Wednesday - September COMMUNICATION 21, 2022 FROM THE- COMMUNITY PAGE 21 INVESTMENT FOR FAMILIES DEPARTMENT (CFID) relative to the exemption of four  TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Mayor’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration & Special Events line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Service Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with the Mayor’s special recognition on September 8, 2022 for the life and legacy of Queen Elizabeth II, including the illumination of City Hall. (16) 22­1060 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FOR FAMILIES DEPARTMENT (CFID) relative to the exemption of four positions for the CIFD from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(d)(4). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the exemption of the following grant­funded positions for the CIFD pursuant to Charter Section 1001(d)(4): No. Class Code Title 3 1538 Senior Project Coordinator 1 1577 Assistant Chief Grants Administrator Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CFID. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived consideration of the above matter) (17) 12­1791 CD 8 COMMUNICATION FROM THE MUNICIPAL FACILITIES COMMITTEE (MFC) relative to a second amendment to the lease between the City and the new property owner, HAAS BHCP Property Owners, LLC, to continue use of the property located at 4125 Crenshaw Boulevard, Unit 193 for the Los Angeles Police Department, South Traffic Division. Recommendation for Council action: AUTHORIZE the Department of General Services to negotiate and execute a second amendment to C­122349 with HAAS BHCP Property Owners, LLC, for the continued use of property located at 4125 Crenshaw Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90043 under the terms and conditions substantially outlined in the MFC report dated August 25, 2022, attached to the Council file. Wednesday - September Fiscal Impact Statement:21, The2022 MFC- reports that there is PAGEno22additional General Fund impact anticipated at this time beyond monies budgeted for  Recommendation for Council action: AUTHORIZE the Department of General Services to negotiate and execute a second amendment to C­122349 with HAAS BHCP Property Owners, LLC, for the continued use of property located at 4125 Crenshaw Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90043 under the terms and conditions substantially outlined in the MFC report dated August 25, 2022, attached to the Council file. Fiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no additional General Fund impact anticipated at this time beyond monies budgeted for the Citywide Leasing portfolio (Fund No. 100/64) and any incremental impact to address the three percent annual cost escalation will be addressed through the 2023­24 City Budget process. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (Information, Technology, and General Services Committee waived consideration of the above matter) Items Called Special Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Closed Session (18) 22­1004 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Claudia Villar v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV08193. (This matter arises from a fall that occurred on October 18, 2020 at or near 12754 Vessemer Street, Los Angeles, CA 91606.) (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (19) 22­0996 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Stephan Gray v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV28111. (This matter arises from a fall into an empty tree well that occurred on March 11, 2019 at or near southwest corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Pico Boulevard near the Pico Bouelvard bus stop in Los Angeles.) Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 23 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in  Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (19) 22­0996 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Stephan Gray v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV28111. (This matter arises from a fall into an empty tree well that occurred on March 11, 2019 at or near southwest corner of Sepulveda Boulevard and Pico Boulevard near the Pico Bouelvard bus stop in Los Angeles.) (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (20) 22­1013 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Farzaneh Mahboobian v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 18STCV08745. (This matter arises from a trip and fall that occurred on March 24, 2017 at 1423 South Sherbourne Drive in the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (21) 22­1005 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Charf Lloyd, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court Case No. CV21­06229 FMO (JDEx). (This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on June 2, 2020 in Los Angeles, California.) (Budget and FInance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (22) 22­1006 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Vincent Albano v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV35354. (This matter arises from Plaintiff’s claims of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and failure to accommodate.) (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (23) 22­0878 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Shibani Balsaver and Sheilanee Sen v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court Case No. 2:21­CV­02326­SB­KES. (This is a police tort case against the City of Los Angeles.) Wednesday (Budget - September and Finance21, 2022 - considered PAGE 24 the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022)  (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) (23) 22­0878 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Shibani Balsaver and Sheilanee Sen v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Court Case No. 2:21­CV­02326­SB­KES. (This is a police tort case against the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget and Finance considered the above matter in Closed Session on September 12, 2022) Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final. Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000). Wednesday - September 21, 2022 - PAGE 25