City Council Meeting

AGENDA LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:00 AM JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 1 vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19 vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com. Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below. Telecommunication Relay Services Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user. What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs. Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability. For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 2 Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com. Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held. The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote. PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting. The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment. If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 3 information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 4 When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Wednesday, September 28, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (1) 21­1277 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) to designate the director of the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) within the Department of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 5 motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Wednesday, September 28, 2022 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (1) 21­1277 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) to designate the director of the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) within the Department of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. NOTE and FILE the July 29, 2022 Emergency Management Department report relative to opportunities to improve the network of cooling centers in the City. 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated August 19, 2022, adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the LAAC to designate the director of the CEMO within the Department of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 6 Community Impact Statement: Yes  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated August 19, 2022, adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the LAAC to designate the director of the CEMO within the Department of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Echo Park Neighborhood Council (2) 22­0840 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­010 of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners (Board) which approves the Arizona Nuclear Power Project (ANPP) Hassayampa Switchyard Interconnection Agreement. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Interconnection Agreement is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not subject to CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project. Section 15378(b)(5) states that organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not meet that definition. Therefore, approving the Interconnection Agreement is not subject to CEQA. 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No. 023­010, which approves the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard Interconnection Agreement among the Co­Owners of the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Agreement No. BP 21­011. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated July 21, 2022, approving the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard Interconnection Agreement, LADWP No. BP 21­011, by and among Arizona Public Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison, Wednesday Southern California28, - September Public 2022Power - Authority, the City, PAGE acting 7 by and through the LADWP; and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC; and,  Hassayampa Switchyard and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Agreement No. BP 21­011. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated July 21, 2022, approving the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard Interconnection Agreement, LADWP No. BP 21­011, by and among Arizona Public Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Mexico, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison, Southern California Public Power Authority, the City, acting by and through the LADWP; and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC; and, delegating to the Board authority to amend the Agreement. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no new or additional fiscal impact to the Power Revenue Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed action complies with the LADWP's Financial Policies in that funding is available for this purpose. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (3) 14­0737­S1 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­009 of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the South State Water Project (SWP) Hydropower Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Cost Sharing Agreement itself, is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15060(c) (3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not subject to CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project. Section 15378(b)(4) states that government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment do not meet the definition of a "project" under the CEQA Guidelines. 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No. 023­009, approving the SWP Hydropower FERC Project No. P­ 2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the City, acting by Wednesday and through the Los - September 28, Angeles 2022 - Department of Water PAGEand8 Power (LADWP), and the California Department of Water Resources as  CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project. Section 15378(b)(4) states that government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment do not meet the definition of a "project" under the CEQA Guidelines. 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No. 023­009, approving the SWP Hydropower FERC Project No. P­ 2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the City, acting by and through the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), and the California Department of Water Resources as co­licensees of the South SWP Hydropower Project, LADWP Agreement No. BP 21­001. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated August 4, 2022, approving the South SWP Hydropower FERC Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the City, acting by and through the LADWP, and the California Department of Water Resources as co­licensees of the South SWP Hydropower Project, LADWP Agreement No. BP 21­001; and, delegating to the Board limited authority to amend said Agreement. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that the proposed Cost Sharing Agreement will authorize on­going annual FERC license charges, and up to $43.13 million in additional new costs for implementation of the protection, mitigation, and enhancement (PM&E) measures identified. Approximately, $2,748,100 in funding is budgeted in the 2022­23 Power Revenue Fund Proposed Budget for the license charges and additional funding will be provided in subsequent budgets for the protection, mitigation, and enhancement measures. Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no impact on the City's General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (4) 22­0921 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­036 of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the Haynes Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: Wednesday 1. FIND -that in September 28, 2022 accordance - the California Environmental with PAGE 9 Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Haynes Unit 8 Retrofit  EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­036 of the Board of Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the Haynes Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Haynes Unit 8 Retrofit Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c) (2). In accordance with Section 15060(c)(2), an activity is not subject to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The approval of this Ordinance will authorize the use of the competitive sealed bid proposal method to let a contract, and will not result in any physical change in the environment; therefore, the proposed action is not subject to CEQA. 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of August 9, 2022, Resolution No. 023­036, approving the Haynes Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated August 25, 2022, authorizing the Board to award an agreement pursuant to a competitive sealed proposal method, permitting negotiations relating to the engineering, procurement, and construction of a wet cooling system consisting of a cooling tower and associated infrastructure, integration of new cooling system with existing equipment, addition of a station service voltage transformer, demolition of once­through­cooling piping and associated equipment, modernization of the existing stormwater and wastewater systems, and hazardous material abatement and disposal as required, as part of the Haynes Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water Cooling System Retrofit Project. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will not have a fiscal impact. However, the ensuing contract will result in a total expenditure estimated at $130 million. Funding will be provided from the Power Revenue Fund's Adopted Budget for this Project in subsequent years should it be approved. Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no impact on the City’s General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies. Community Impact Statement: None submitted Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 10  $130 million. Funding will be provided from the Power Revenue Fund's Adopted Budget for this Project in subsequent years should it be approved. Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no impact on the City’s General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (5) 20­1536 ORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to amending the Los Angeles Municipal Code to clarify the definition of outdoor advertising structure, and to exempt certain approved structures from the prohibition of outdoor advertising structures in the public right­of­way. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council West Hills Neighborhood Council Mar Vista Community Council Westwood Neighborhood Council Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council Against: Westside Neighborhood Council Hollywood United Neighborhood Council Boyle Heights Neighborhood Council Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council For if Amended: West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Del Rey Neighborhood Council Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood Council Sun Valley Area Neighborhood Council Neutral Position: Reseda Neighborhood Council (Public Works Committee report adopted at Council meeting of September 20, 2022) (6) 20­1426 CD 14 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan Amendment (GPA), and Zone Change (ZC) for the properties located at 5715 North Monterey Road; 5800­5814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 11 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL  (Public Works Committee report adopted at Council meeting of September 20, 2022) (6) 20­1426 CD 14 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan Amendment (GPA), and Zone Change (ZC) for the properties located at 5715 North Monterey Road; 5800­5814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the Negative Declaration, No. ENV­ 2021­8629­ND, and all comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; FIND the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; and, ADOPT the Negative Declaration. 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council. 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, as recommended by the Mayor and the LACPC, APPROVING a GPA to the Northeast Los Angeles Community Plan from Low Medium II Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for the subject properties. 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated May 26, 20222, to effectuate a ZC from RD1.5­1 to [Q}C4­1VL for the subject properties; the action is in response to Motion (de León – Price), Council file No. 20­1426, which requests that the General Plan Land Use and Zoning of these properties be corrected to reflect existing built conditions and to facilitate the reuse of existing commercial buildings in the Hermon neighborhood, the GPA and ZC does not involve the demolition, remodel, construction, or alteration of any structures, public facilities, or land; for the properties located at 5715 North Monterey Road; 58005814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol, subject to Conditions of Approval. 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action. 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.32 G: Wednesday . . . t h -e C o u September 28,a y2022 ncil m d e c- i d e t o i m p o s e a p PAGE 12a n e n t Q erm Condition...identified on the zone change map by the symbol Q in  at 5715 North Monterey Road; 58005814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol, subject to Conditions of Approval. 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action. 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.32 G: ...the Council may decide to impose a permanent Q Condition...identified on the zone change map by the symbol Q in brackets... There shall be no time limit on removal of the brackets around the [Q] Qualified designation nor on removal of the [T] Tentative designation. After the conditions of the permanent [Q] Qualified classification have been fulfilled, the brackets surrounding the Q symbol shall be removed. 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring. 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination filing. Applicant: City of Los Angeles Case No. CPC­2021­8627­GPA­ZC Environmental No. ENV­2021­8629­ND Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (7) 21­0245 CD 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ADDENDUM, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to an Amendment to the West Adams­Baldwin Hills­Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay District. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 13 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL  Community Impact Statement: None submitted (7) 21­0245 CD 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ADDENDUM, PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to an Amendment to the West Adams­Baldwin Hills­Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay District. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the decision­maker, after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the project was assessed in the previously certified EIR No. ENV­2008­ 478­EIR, certified on June 29, 2016; and pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164 and the Addendum, dated August 2020, that no major revisions to the EIR are required and no subsequent EIR, or Negative Declaration is required for approval of the project. 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC), as set forth in the LACPC report dated March 1, 2021 in the Council file, as the Findings of Council. 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying revised ORDINANCE, dated May 31, 2022, amending the West Adams­Baldwin Hills­ Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay District (Ordinance No. 184794, as subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 186401) to modify provisions in the Jefferson/La Cienega Transit Oriented District Subarea for Parcel Group E. 4. NOT PRESENT and ORDER FILED the draft Ordinance, dated April 20, 2022, attached to the Council file, inasmuch as the revised draft Ordinance dated May 31, 2022 is hereby being considered for adoption. Applicant: David McNaught, 5850 West Jefferson, LLC Representative: Francis Park, Park and Velayos LLP Case No. CPC­2019­4992­CPIOA­ZAD­SPR­WDI Environmental Nos. ENV­2008­478­EIR; SCH No. 2008021013 Related Case: ADM­2019­4994­CPIOC Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney nor the Wednesday LACPC. - September Neither the City28, 2022 - Administrative Officer nor thePAGE Chief14 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.  Representative: Francis Park, Park and Velayos LLP Case No. CPC­2019­4992­CPIOA­ZAD­SPR­WDI Environmental Nos. ENV­2008­478­EIR; SCH No. 2008021013 Related Case: ADM­2019­4994­CPIOC Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney nor the LACPC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (8) 20­1127­S1 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an Agreement between the City and Grey Wall Software LLC Veoci to provide additional situational awareness dashboard development, user training and licensing for the City’s Emergency Operations Center. Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to: a. Negotiate and execute a contract with Grey Wall Software LLC Veoci to provide additional situational awareness dashboard development, user training and licensing for a term of up to six months, within the grant performance period, in an amount not to exceed $146,735, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. b. Prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments, subject to approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations within this report will have no additional impact to the General Fund and will provide for the continued expenditure of the Fiscal Year 2020 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program grant award for grant­related projects. No matching funds are required for this grant. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations provided in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant­eligible activities. Wednesday Community-Impact Statement: September None 28, 2022 - submitted PAGE 15  General Fund and will provide for the continued expenditure of the Fiscal Year 2020 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program grant award for grant­related projects. No matching funds are required for this grant. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations provided in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant­eligible activities. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (Ad Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood Investment waived consideration of the above matter) (9) 21­1342 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility of implementing an ordinance that would codify the sale of electricity by commercial Electric Vehicle(EV) charging companies directly to consumers. Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz ­ De Leon): 1. INSTRUCT the Office of Finance, with the assistance of the City Attorney, to report in 30 days on the feasibility of implementing an ordinance that would codify the sale of electricity by commercial EV charging companies directly to a consumer, or by prepayments of electricity in the form of a subscription or service/membership plan with electric vehicle manufacturers/retailers, as a business activity that falls within the retail sales category of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), including, but not limited to, potential budget impact associated with the reclassification of the sale on non­distributed electricity by electric vehicle charging companies as retail transactions, pursuant to LAMC Section 21.44. 2. REQUEST the City Attorney to transmit a draft Ordinance in 30 days to codify the non­distributed sale of electricity by commercial electric vehicle charging companies as a retail transaction consistent with the retail sales category of the LAMC, including a December 31, 2027 sunset clause. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Westside Neighborhood Council Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 16  Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Westside Neighborhood Council (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the above matter) (10) 21­0268 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to artificial intelligence (AI) technology and services to provide accurate reporting and public disclosure of the City’s organization­wide greenhouse gas footprint. Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz ­ Bonin ­ Buscaino ­ Blumenfield): REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with the assistance of the Information Technology Agency, Bureau of Sanitation, Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles World Airports and the City Administrative Officer (CAO), to report on the feasibility of developing and/or procuring AI technology and services to provide accurate and regular reporting and public disclosure of the City's organization­wide greenhouse gas footprint, as well as metrics on the City’s progress toward achieving and exceeding the environmental goals presented in the 2019 Green New Deal Pathway. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (11) 20­0620 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to installed stationary natural gas and diesel­fueled distributed generation resources in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such resources. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz ­ Ryu): REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, with the assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), City Administrative Officer (CAO), and the City Attorney, to report on the number of installed Wednesday stationary natural gas­ and - September 28,diesel­fueled 2022 - distributed generation PAGE 17resources in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such  ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to installed stationary natural gas and diesel­fueled distributed generation resources in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such resources. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz ­ Ryu): REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, with the assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), City Administrative Officer (CAO), and the City Attorney, to report on the number of installed stationary natural gas­ and diesel­fueled distributed generation resources in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such resources. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (12) 22­0977 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to submitting a proposal to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail operations across the Metro transit system, in response to Proposal No. PS45017. Recommendation for Council action: AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department to submit a proposal to the Metro to provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail operations across the Metro transit system in response to Request for Proposal No. PS45017. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police Commissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (13) 22­1014 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to eight proposed Agreements with Abet Security Services, Inc., Absolute International Security, Allied Protection Services, Inc., Universal Protection Services (dba Allied Universal Security Services), Close Range International, Inc., The Gadite Group, Inc., GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI International, Inc. for as­needed security guard services at various City municipal facilities and sites. Recommendations for Council action: Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 18 (13) 22­1014 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to eight proposed Agreements with Abet Security Services, Inc., Absolute International Security, Allied Protection Services, Inc., Universal Protection Services (dba Allied Universal Security Services), Close Range International, Inc., The Gadite Group, Inc., GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI International, Inc. for as­needed security guard services at various City municipal facilities and sites. Recommendations for Council action: 1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to execute the proposed eight Agreements with Abet Security Services, Inc.; Absolute International Security; Allied Protection Services, Inc.; Universal Protection Services (dba Allied Universal Security Services); Close Range International, Inc.; The Gadite Group, Inc.; GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI International, Inc., (collectively Contractors) for a three­year term, retroactively beginning on February 21, 2022, with two one­year renewal options, for as­needed security guard services at various City sites and facilities, subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form. 2. INSTRUCT the LAPD, with assistance from the City Attorney, to revise Section 3 – Compensation and Method of Payment in future amendments and/or agreements to clarify that the maximum allowable compensation of $10 million is a Citywide aggregate ceiling for all Contractors providing security guard services, whereas the total shared expenditures shall not exceed $30 million over the three­year term. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that approval of the recommendations stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to enter into an agreement with eight security guard firms: 1. Abet Security Services, Inc.; 2. Absolute International Security; 3. Allied Protection Services, Inc.; 4. Universal Protection Services dba Allied Universal Security Services; 5. Close Range International, Inc.; 6. The Gadite Group, Inc.; 7. GSG Protective Services CA, Inc.; and, 8. RMI International, Inc., (collectively, Contractors). The term of each agreement is three­years beginning on February 21, 2022 and through February 20, 2025, with two one­year renewal options. The maximum allowable compensation is an aggregate ceiling that shall not exceed $10,000,000 annually, for a combined compensation of $30 million over three years. Funding is provided within the LAPD’s 003040 Contractual Services Account. Funding for subsequent years is subject to approval by the Mayor and Council. There is no additional impact to the General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations stated in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that one­time revenues will be used to support one­time expenditures. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 19 Community Impact Statement: None submitted  compensation is an aggregate ceiling that shall not exceed $10,000,000 annually, for a combined compensation of $30 million over three years. Funding is provided within the LAPD’s 003040 Contractual Services Account. Funding for subsequent years is subject to approval by the Mayor and Council. There is no additional impact to the General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations stated in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that one­time revenues will be used to support one­time expenditures. Community Impact Statement: None submitted TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022) Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration) (14) 22­4118­S9 CD 3 RESOLUTION (BLUMENFIELD – BUSCAINO) relative to designationg locations in Council District 3 for enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, as further detailed in Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18. Recommendations for Council action: 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to designate the following locations for enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, up to the maximum distance and effective for the maximum period of time prescribed, and further detailed in the LAMC: a. Independence Avenue and Osborne Street – Public Safety 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City department(s) with jurisdiction over the identified location to post appropriate notices of the above prohibitions at these locations, to begin enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting period. (15) 18­0005­S27 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case No. 718747), Assessor I.D. No. 5082­012­008, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 20 Recommendation for Council action:  jurisdiction over the identified location to post appropriate notices of the above prohibitions at these locations, to begin enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting period. (15) 18­0005­S27 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case No. 718747), Assessor I.D. No. 5082­012­008, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19, 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case No. 718747), Assessor I.D. No. 5082­012­008, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (16) 22­0005­S151 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 11512 South Avalon Boulevard (Case No. 682471), Assessor I.D. No. 6072­006­004, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19, 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 11512 South Avalon Boulevard (Case No. 682471), Assessor I.D. No. 6072­006­004, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (17) 22­0005­S152 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D. No. 2786­012­059, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 21 Recommendation for Council action:  financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (17) 22­0005­S152 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D. No. 2786­012­059, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19, 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D. No. 2786­012­059, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (18) 22­0005­S153 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 4212 South Degnan Boulevard (Case No. 738793), Assessor I.D. No. 5024­024­011, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19, 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 4212 South Degnan Boulevard (Case No. 738793), Assessor I.D. No. 5024­024­011, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (19) 22­0005­S154 CD 8 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No. 725696), Assessor I.D. No. 5040­006­020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 22 Recommendation for Council action:  financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (19) 22­0005­S154 CD 8 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No. 725696), Assessor I.D. No. 5040­006­020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19, 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No. 725696), Assessor I.D. No. 5040­006­020, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (20) 22­0005­S155 CD 1 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No. 752500), Assessor I.D. No. 5136­021­018, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP). Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19, 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No. 752500), Assessor I.D. No. 5136­021­018, from the REAP. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (21) 17­0957 MOTION (KREKORIAN ­ LEE) relative to reactivating and restoring Council file No. (CF) 17­0957 regarding the Land Use Operating Standards / Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance. Wednesday - September Recommendation 28, 2022 for Council - action: PAGE 23  financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (21) 17­0957 MOTION (KREKORIAN ­ LEE) relative to reactivating and restoring Council file No. (CF) 17­0957 regarding the Land Use Operating Standards / Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance. Recommendation for Council action: REACTIVATE the matter of the “Land Use Operating Standards / Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance,” as recorded under CF 17­0957, which expired per Council policy (CF 05­0553); and, RESTORE to its most recent legislative status as of the date of the CF’s expiration. (22) 22­1102 CD 5 MOTION (KORETZ ­ KREKORIAN) relative to funding for tree and landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts in Council District 5. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $100,000 in the Council District 5 portion of the Neighborhood Service Enhancements line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the Street Services Fund No. 100/86, Account No. 3040 (Contractual Services) for tree and landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts along Pico Boulevard as part of the Walk Pico! A Catalyst for Community Vitality project, coordinated by the Bureau of Street Services (BSS). 2. AUTHORIZE the BSS to prepare, process and execute the necessary documents with and / or payments to an appropriate vendor / contractor, or any other agency or organization, in the above amount for the above purpose, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. 3. AUTHORIZE the BSS to make any technical corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion. (23) 22­1105 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Tract No. 82324 located at 921 Battery Street and 906 Channel Street, westerly of Meyler Street. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 24  3. AUTHORIZE the BSS to make any technical corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion. (23) 22­1105 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Tract No. 82324 located at 921 Battery Street and 906 Channel Street, westerly of Meyler Street. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 82324, located at 921 Battery Street and 906 Channel Street, westerly of Meyler Street and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents. (Bond No. C­141419) Subdivider: ACJJ Investments, LLC; Surveyor: Christopher W. Vassallo Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (24) 22­1107 CD 2 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Tract No. 82621 located at 6065 North Hazelhurst Place, northerly of Oxnard Street. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 82621, located a 6065 North Hazelhurst Place, northerly of Oxnard Street and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents. (Bond No. C­141420) Subdivider: OPP Zone LLC; Surveyor: Taik Y. Kim Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 25 (25) 22­0962  Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (25) 22­0962 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KREKORIAN – O’FARRELL) relative to authorizing one Resolution Authority without funding for one Public Information Director II (Class Code 1800) for the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) from September 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023. Recommendation for Council action: AUTHORIZE, within the BOS, one Resolution Authority without funding for one Public Information Director II (Class Code 1800) from September 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, subject to position allocation by the Personnel Department and paygrade determination by the City Administrative Officer. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived consideration of the above matter) Items Called Special Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final. Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 26 Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final. Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000). Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 27