City Council Meeting

Please Note That This Agenda Includes a Call​­in Option for Public Comment. Public Comment Will Thus Be Taken Both In​­Person in the Council Chamber And Also via Teleconference. Instructions for the Public to Listen to and Offer Remote Public Comment at the Meeting Appear on Page 2 of this Agenda. AGENDA LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL Friday, March 3, 2023 10:00 AM JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com President EUNISSES HERNANDEZ, First District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District President Pro Tempore KATY YAROSLAVSKY, Fifth District CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District VACANT, Sixth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District Assistant President Pro Tempore HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District VACANT TRACI PARK, Eleventh District JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District HUGO SOTO­MARTÍNEZ, Thirteenth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District TIM MCOSKER, Fifteenth District PUBLIC COMMENT AND LIVE BROADCAST The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.gov/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. Friday - March 3, 2023 - The City Council will take public comment from members of the public in the Council chamber and also by PAGE 1 teleconference. Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council via teleconference  JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District HUGO SOTO­MARTÍNEZ, Thirteenth District KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District TIM MCOSKER, Fifteenth District PUBLIC COMMENT AND LIVE BROADCAST The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.gov/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­ CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel. The City Council will take public comment from members of the public in the Council chamber and also by teleconference. Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council via teleconference should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting, press *9 to request to speak. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com. Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below. Telecommunication Relay Services Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user. What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs. Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability. For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.gov or lacouncilcalendar.com. Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some Friday items on the agenda may be approved - March 3, any without 2023 - discussion, however, any item mayPAGEbe 2called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website. SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.gov or lacouncilcalendar.com. Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held. The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote. PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting. The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment. If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 3 information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­ 1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes. A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter. VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 4 When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council. When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter. The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Friday, March 3, 2023 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (1) 22­1585 CD 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of the Verbin Residence, located at 1335 North Shadybrook Drive, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments. Recommendations for Council action:​ 1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt Friday from the -California March 3, Environmental 2023 - Quality Act (CEQA), PAGEpursuant 5 to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay. RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda. Los Angeles City Council Agenda Friday, March 3, 2023 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM Roll Call Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held (1) 22­1585 CD 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of the Verbin Residence, located at 1335 North Shadybrook Drive, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments. Recommendations for Council action:​ 1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the definition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Verbin Residence, located at 1335 North Shadybrook Drive, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments.​ Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 6 Applicant: Adrian Scott Fine, Los Angeles Conservancy  Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Verbin Residence, located at 1335 North Shadybrook Drive, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments.​ Applicant: Adrian Scott Fine, Los Angeles Conservancy Owners: Marie McInnes, Doris Verbin Pepper, Trustee, Doris Verbin Pepper, and Jeffrey Balton, Doris Verbin Pepper Living Trust Case No. CHC­2022­6899­HCM Environmental No. ENV­2022­6900­CE Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CHC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (2) 22­1510 CD 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of the Silberberg Building, located at 7274 ­ 7290 West Beverly Boulevard and 180 ­ 182 North Poinsettia Place, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments. Recommendations for Council action:​ 1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the definition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Silberberg Building, located at 7274 ­ 7290 West Beverly Boulevard and 180 ­ 182 North Poinsettia Place, in the list Friday - March 3,Monuments.​ of Historic­Cultural 2023 - PAGE 7  Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Silberberg Building, located at 7274 ­ 7290 West Beverly Boulevard and 180 ­ 182 North Poinsettia Place, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments.​ Applicants: Save Beverly Fairfax c/o Nora Wyman and Dale Kendall and Art Deco Society of Los Angeles c/o Margot Gerber Owner: Maurice and Susan Mazur, Trustees, Mazur Family Trust Case No. CHC­2022­5941­HCM Environmental No. ENV­2022­5942­CE Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CHC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (3) 22­0561 CD 9 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of the Hoffman Candy Company, located at 6600 South Avalon Boulevard, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments. Recommendations for Council action:​ 1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the definition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Hoffman Candy Company, located at 6600 South Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 8 Avalon Boulevard, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments.​  2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the definition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. 3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council. 4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Hoffman Candy Company, located at 6600 South Avalon Boulevard, in the list of Historic­Cultural Monuments.​ Applicant: Margot Gerber, Art Deco Society of Los Angeles Owner: 6600 Avalon Properties, LLC Case No. CHC­2022­795­HCM Environmental No. ENV­2022­796­CE Financial Policies Statement: None submitted by the CHC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (4) 21­0014 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to modifying the Special Memorandum of Understanding on commute options and parking. Recommendation for Council action: APPROVE the proposed Letter of Agreement modifying the Special Memorandum of Understanding on Commute Options and Parking providing terms and conditions for temporarily suspending employee parking fees for eight pay periods. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Personnel Department. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (5) 23­0154 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE relative to hiring process related to the Park Gate Closure Program under the Security Services Division (SECSD). Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 9 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker –  Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (5) 23­0154 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE relative to hiring process related to the Park Gate Closure Program under the Security Services Division (SECSD). Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker – Rodriguez): DIRECT the Personnel Department and Los Angeles Police Department to report with an overview of the hiring process related to the Park Gate Closure Program under the SECSD with said report to include any barriers to hiring, recommendations to expedite hiring, and potential alternatives to park closure in lieu of deploying security officers. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (6) 19­0059 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an audit of the City's Disaster Service Worker (DSW) Program. Recommendations for Council action: 1. RECEIVE and FILE the November 10, 2022 Controller report relative to an audit of the City's DSW Program. 2. I N S T R U C T t h e P e r s o n n e l D e p a r t m e n t a n d E m e r g e n c y Management Department to report on compliance with the requirements of the DSW Program and lessons learned from the deployment of DSWs during the COVID­19 pandemic that may be applicable during future activations of the DSW Program. Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Controller. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 10 (7) 20­0313­S15  Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Controller. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (7) 20­0313­S15 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the status of Phases 1 and 2 of the Human Resources and Payroll (HRP) Project. Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (McOsker – Krekorian): INSTRUCT the Information Technology Agency, Personnel Department, and City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, REQUEST the City Controller, to report within 30 days on Phases 1 and 2 of the HRP Project to include: a. Knowledge gained from Phase 1 b. Current status of Phase 2 implementation c. Impacts of the HRP Project's implementation on hiring d. Resources needed to accelerate the timeline to complete the HRP Project. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (8) 17­0600­S45 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to implementation, benchmarks, and hiring goals for the Targeted Local Hiring (TLH) Program and Strategic Workforce Development Task Force. Recommendation for Council action: RECEIVE and FILE the November 11, 2022 Personnel Department report relative to implementation, benchmarks, and hiring goals for the TLH and Strategic Workforce Development Task Force. Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 11 (8) 17­0600­S45 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND HIRING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to implementation, benchmarks, and hiring goals for the Targeted Local Hiring (TLH) Program and Strategic Workforce Development Task Force. Recommendation for Council action: RECEIVE and FILE the November 11, 2022 Personnel Department report relative to implementation, benchmarks, and hiring goals for the TLH and Strategic Workforce Development Task Force. Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (9) 23­0042 CDs 1 & 13 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to the establishment of Preferential Parking District (PPD) No. 294 in the Westlake and Belmont Neighborhoods. Recommendations for Council action: 1. FIND that: a. The parking challenges created by surrounding developments cause adverse parking impacts on the adjacent residential blocks around the Westlake and Belmont neighborhoods, from which the residents deserve immediate relief. b. The establishment of PPD No. 294, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 80.58.d, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, under Article III.1.a.3 of the 2002 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines. 2. ADOPT the accompanying Resolution establishing the boundaries of PPD No. 294, pursuant to the City Council’s March 16, 2016, “Rules and Procedures for Preferential Parking Districts,” to include the blocks within the residential area bounded by the centerline of the following streets (unless specified otherwise): a. Southbound US­101 Freeway between Alvarado Street and Glendale Boulevard b. Glendale Boulevard between southbound US­101 Freeway and Beverly Boulevard Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 12 c. Lucas Avenue between Beverly Boulevard and 3rd Street  the blocks within the residential area bounded by the centerline of the following streets (unless specified otherwise): a. Southbound US­101 Freeway between Alvarado Street and Glendale Boulevard b. Glendale Boulevard between southbound US­101 Freeway and Beverly Boulevard c. Lucas Avenue between Beverly Boulevard and 3rd Street d. Third Street between Lucas Avenue and Alvarado Street e. Alvarado Street between Third Street and southbound US­101 Freeway 3. AUTHORIZE the following parking restrictions for use on the residential portions of all streets in PPD No. 294: a. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 294 PERMITS EXEMPT b. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM, 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 294 PERMITS EXEMPT c. NO PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 294 PERMITS EXEMPT d. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 294 PERMITS EXEMPT 4. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) to initiate the necessary procedures for preparing and selling parking permits to residents within PPD No. 294, as specified in LAMC Section 80.58. 5. DIRECT the LADOT to: a. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions on the residential portions of the street segments enumerated in Recommendation No. 2, except for areas where parking is currently prohibited in the interest of traffic flow or public safety. b. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions upon receipt and validation of petitions containing signatures from Friday - March at least 3, 2023of 75 percent - the dwelling units covering PAGEmore 13 than 50 percent of the developed frontage on a street segment  5. DIRECT the LADOT to: a. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions on the residential portions of the street segments enumerated in Recommendation No. 2, except for areas where parking is currently prohibited in the interest of traffic flow or public safety. b. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions upon receipt and validation of petitions containing signatures from at least 75 percent of the dwelling units covering more than 50 percent of the developed frontage on a street segment requesting installation or removal of the parking restrictions set forth in Recommendation No. 3, after the establishment of this PPD, without further action by the City Council. Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Transportation Commissioners reports that revenue from the sale of permits will cover the cost of implementing, administering, and enforcing PPD No. 294. Violations of the posted parking restrictions may result in citation fines deposited into the General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (10) 23­0137 CD 4 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending the Los Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit the parking of vehicles displaying a “For Sale” sign or placard advertising the private sale of vehicles on Franklin Avenue from Tamarind Avenue to North Bronson Avenue. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman – Hutt): REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance amending Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 87.55(a), which establishes regulations for the parking of vehicles displaying a “For Sale” sign or placard advertising the private sale of vehicles on certain City streets or public lands, to prohibit the parking of such vehicles on Franklin Avenue from Tamarind Avenue to North Bronson Avenue. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (11) 22­1476 PUBLIC WORKS and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEES’ REPORTS relative to reporting on Friday recommendations to reform - March the -Waiver of Dedication and/or 3, 2023 PAGEImprovement 14 (WDI) process as well as the initial requirement process.  Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (11) 22­1476 PUBLIC WORKS and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEES’ REPORTS relative to reporting on recommendations to reform the Waiver of Dedication and/or Improvement (WDI) process as well as the initial requirement process. A. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris­ Dawson for Raman – Bonin ­ Blumenfield ­ Price): 1. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering (BOE), in consultation with the Department of City Planning (DCP), the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), DCP's Urban Design Studio, and any other relevant departments, to report within 60 days with: a. Recommendations to reform the WDI process as well as the initial requirement process to achieve the following objectives: 1. Preserve consistent roadway widths and curb lines on each block (eliminate spot road widenings). 2. Prioritize consistent pedestrian experience with no or minimal sidewalk meandering, context­ appropriate sidewalk and parkway width, and consistent interfaces with street­facing building entrances on each block face. 3. Prioritize pedestrian safety and visibility by minimizing crossing distance at intersections and other crosswalks; ensuring alignment between pedestrian paths of travel, crosswalks, and curb ramps; minimizing curb radii to the greatest extent feasible (including retaining historic curb radii); and promoting curb extensions where feasible and appropriate. 4. Protect existing trees and parkways and create opportunities for planting new and larger shade trees. 5. Incorporate green infrastructure elements where Friday - March 3, 2023 -and appropriate. feasible PAGE 15  feasible (including retaining historic curb radii); and promoting curb extensions where feasible and appropriate. 4. Protect existing trees and parkways and create opportunities for planting new and larger shade trees. 5. Incorporate green infrastructure elements where feasible and appropriate. 6. Ensure accessibility for people with disabilities. b. A checklist of public benefit findings that must be made through an administrative process prior to requiring a street dedication and/or improvement that results in a roadway widening, including: i. Specific and articulable traffic safety or mobility benefits, such as closing a bike lane gap or eliminating a pinch point, at the request of LADOT. ii. Specific and articulable pedestrian realm or urban design benefits, at the request of DCP. c. Any revisions to street design standards needed to accomplish the above objectives and allow context­ sensitive application of street standards. d. Any revisions needed to Los Angeles Municipal Code 12.37 and/or other policies and regulations to accomplish this direction. e. Any other recommendations to implement street design best practices in the development process. B. PLUM COMMITTEE REPORT: Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Harris­ Dawson for Raman ­ Bonin ­ Blumenfield ­ Price): 1. CONCUR with the action of the Public Works Committee in adopting the recommendations contained in Motion (Harris­ Dawson for Raman ­ Bonin ­ Blumenfield ­ Price). 2. INSTRUCT ​​​​the BOE, in consultation with DCP, LADOT, and relevant departments, to include in their report: Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 16 a. Information about the impacts the current WDI process  Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Harris­ Dawson for Raman ­ Bonin ­ Blumenfield ­ Price): 1. CONCUR with the action of the Public Works Committee in adopting the recommendations contained in Motion (Harris­ Dawson for Raman ­ Bonin ­ Blumenfield ­ Price). 2. INSTRUCT ​​​​the BOE, in consultation with DCP, LADOT, and relevant departments, to include in their report: a. Information about the impacts the current WDI process has on affordable housing projects (e.g., projects utilizing streamlined development review pathways such as those created by SB 35, AB 2161, Mayor Bass’ Executive Directive 1, etc.). b. Recommendations for removing the cost and time delays on affordable housing projects presented by the City’s current dedication and waiver process. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Los Feliz Neighborhood Council Elysian Valley Riverside Neighborhood Council Mid City WEST Neighborhood Council Hollywood United Neighborhood Council United Neighborhoods Neighborhood Council (12) 17­1071­S1 CDs 2, 3, 4 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending the Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan to streamline signage reviews and other simple cases; to update and modify the language of the Specific Plan to reflect recently adopted ordinances; and to update the language of the Specific Plan to broaden Plan Review Board (PRB) membership. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman ­ Blumenfield ­ Yaroslavsky): INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, with support from the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and all relevant agencies, to expeditiously amend the Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan to streamline signage reviews and other simple cases such as changes of use to assist local businesses; to update and modify the language of the Specific Plan to reflect recently adopted ordinances; and Friday - March 3,of2023 to update the language - the Specific Plan to broadenPAGE 17 PRB membership to ensure socioeconomic and demographic diversity, to allocate PRB  Plan Review Board (PRB) membership. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman ­ Blumenfield ­ Yaroslavsky): INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, with support from the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and all relevant agencies, to expeditiously amend the Ventura/Cahuenga Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan to streamline signage reviews and other simple cases such as changes of use to assist local businesses; to update and modify the language of the Specific Plan to reflect recently adopted ordinances; and to update the language of the Specific Plan to broaden PRB membership to ensure socioeconomic and demographic diversity, to allocate PRB appointments to achieve equitable representation based on communities rather than Council District, to clarify administrative duties to properly run PRB meetings, and to clarify term limits and standardize processes for terms ending, among other things. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (13) 22­1489 CD 6 TRADE, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Van Nuys Airport (VNY) covering topics including, but not limited to, list of projects and awards, community engagement, the 2005 VNY Master Plan, environmental impacts, a proposal for future community engagement, and the recordation of VNY Citizens Advisory Council meetings. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman ­ et al. – Bonin): INSTRUCT the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) to report back to Council within 90 days on the following: 1. List of Projects and Awards – A complete list of all redevelopment projects with corresponding Request for Proposal documentation and project award details at VNY including, but not limited to, infrastructure improvements to the airfield and common air support facilities, hangar and fixed based operators facility redevelopments for jets, propeller planes, and helicopters, and any educational or auxiliary support facilities for the airport since January 2017. 2. Community Engagement – For the aforementioned list, details regarding the community engagement plan LAWA undertook to ensure the public was made aware of these projects and their potential impacts to the community. This should include all major stakeholder groups engaged for each project like neighborhood councils, homeowners associations, the VNY Citizens Advisory Friday Council, -chambers of commerce, March 3, 2023 - business improvement PAGE 18 districts (BID), council offices, and the mayor’s office. It should also include a  facilities, hangar and fixed based operators facility redevelopments for jets, propeller planes, and helicopters, and any educational or auxiliary support facilities for the airport since January 2017. 2. Community Engagement – For the aforementioned list, details regarding the community engagement plan LAWA undertook to ensure the public was made aware of these projects and their potential impacts to the community. This should include all major stakeholder groups engaged for each project like neighborhood councils, homeowners associations, the VNY Citizens Advisory Council, chambers of commerce, business improvement districts (BID), council offices, and the mayor’s office. It should also include a description of the documentation and briefings that were provided to these stakeholders on a per­project basis. 3. Compliance with the 2005 VNY Master Plan – A detailed description of the compliance or noncompliance of the aforementioned projects with the 2005 Van Nuys Airport Master Plan. 4. Environmental Impacts – An accounting of the environmental review of these projects, including which projects had detailed California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)­compliant Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), which projects sought and obtained CEQA exemptions, which projects had detailed National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)­compliant EIRs, which projects sought and obtained NEPA exemptions, and which projects had ground source emissions impacts detailing any oversight from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 5. Proposal for Future Community Engagement – A detailed description of LAWA’s plans for future community engagement for all VNY projects, covering how LAWA will engage impacted communities via community meetings, the Board of Airport Commissioners, neighborhood councils, homeowners associations, the VNY Citizen’s Advisory Council, chambers of commerce, BIDs, council offices, and the Mayor’s office. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council Lake Balboa Neighborhood Council Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 19 (14) 22­1127  Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council Lake Balboa Neighborhood Council Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council (14) 22­1127 CD 6 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to preparing a Specific Plan and/or other land use tools for the Van Nuys airport to replace the Van Nuys Airport Plan and zoning ordinance. Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Martinez – Blumenfield): 1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning, in consultation with the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), to prepare a Specific Plan and/or other land use tools for the Van Nuys airport to replace the Van Nuys Airport Plan and Zoning Ordinance 177327. This plan should: a. Look at mitigating noise and other impacts from the airport on the surrounding area; including a barrier between the airport and nearby homes, additional hangar space, tree planting, and setbacks. b. Establish a community benefit program for the surrounding area. c. Explore how land covered by the plan can continue to be an economic generator by luring new commercial activity. d. Have extensive engagement with airport stakeholders and local residents. 2. INSTRUCT the LAWA and the City Attorney to report on what the City can and cannot do in terms of regulating activity at Van Nuys Airport. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Friday Community - March 3, Impact 2023 - Statement: Yes PAGE 20  2. INSTRUCT the LAWA and the City Attorney to report on what the City can and cannot do in terms of regulating activity at Van Nuys Airport. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes For if Amended: North Hills West Neighborhood Council For if Amended: Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council (15) 23­0156 CD 15 TRADE, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the green shipping corridors framework at the Port of Los Angeles. Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker – Yaroslavsky): REQUEST the Port of Los Angeles to report with any updates to the green shipping corridors framework, including a discussion of success metrics associated with the green shipping corridors. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted (16) 23­0182 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS relative to a non­monetary donation, valued at $32,000, to cover the registration costs for 160 Los Angeles Police Department employees to attend the Los Angeles Women Peace Officers and Associates 27th Annual Symposium from the Los Angeles Police Foundation. (Public Safety Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted (17) 23­0206 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT relative to the implementation of a Fast Track Solutions Friday - March Loan Program for 3, 2023 approved - affordable housing projects.PAGE 21  will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted (17) 23­0206 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT relative to the implementation of a Fast Track Solutions Loan Program for approved affordable housing projects. (Housing and Homelessness Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted (18) 21­1186­S4 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FOR FAMILIES DEPARTMENT relative to amending the 48th Program Year 2022­23 (PY 48) Housing and Community Development Consolidated Plan. (Economic and Community Development Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted. (19) 22­0436 RULES, ELECTIONS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS (REIR) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the expansion of live Spanish interpretation for City Council Committee meetings. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. APPROVE Recommendation Nos. 1 through 5 of the City Clerk report dated November 10, 2022, attached to the Council file, with amendments to focus on the new Committee room, the Board of Public Works room, and the Council Chambers. 2. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, the Information Technology Agency, and Friday - Marchof3,General the Department 2023 - Services, to report with PAGE 22 at the an update next REIR meeting in March.  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. APPROVE Recommendation Nos. 1 through 5 of the City Clerk report dated November 10, 2022, attached to the Council file, with amendments to focus on the new Committee room, the Board of Public Works room, and the Council Chambers. 2. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, the Information Technology Agency, and the Department of General Services, to report with an update at the next REIR meeting in March. 3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to report with an analysis on bringing translation services in house. 4. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report back on potential funding sources for Recommendation Nos. 1 through 5 of the City Clerk report dated November 10, 2022. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports approval of the recommendations in the November 10, 2022 report will have a General Fund impact of $501,415. There is a potential offset of up to $70,000 to address eligible costs, utilizing Municipal Improvement Corporation of Los Angeles monies budgeted for the Citywide Space Optimization program. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Reseda Neighborhood Council (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee waived consideration of the above matter) (20) 23­0131 COMMUNICATION FROM THE L.A. FOR KIDS STEERING COMMITTEE relative to the 11th Funding Cycle Request for Proposals including funding sources from Proposition K, Categories 3 and 8, and the Health Alternatives to Smoking Trust Fund, for Fiscal Years 2024­25, 2025­26 and 2026­27. (Neighborhoods and Community Enrichment Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 23  relative to the 11th Funding Cycle Request for Proposals including funding sources from Proposition K, Categories 3 and 8, and the Health Alternatives to Smoking Trust Fund, for Fiscal Years 2024­25, 2025­26 and 2026­27. (Neighborhoods and Community Enrichment Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted (21) 20­0841­S31 STATUTORY EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15269(c), PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE (PRC) SECTION 21080(b)(4), and PRC SECTION 21080.27 (AB 1197); COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER and THE BUREAU OF ENGINEERING relative to the lease extension for continued use of the Crisis and Bridge Housing at 407 North Beacon Street (previously 515 North Beacon Street); and the 16th report regarding COVID­19 Homelessness Roadmap funding recommendations; and related matters. (Housing and Homelessness Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.) (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.) Community Impact Statement: None submitted Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration) (22) 23­0209 CD 11 MOTION (PARK ­ YAROSLAVSKY ­ ET AL.) relative to funding for services in connection with the Council District 11 special recognition for International Women’s Day 2023. Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events­Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 11 special recognition for International Women’s Day 2023 at City Hall on March 8, 2023, including the illumination of City Hall. Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 24  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events­Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 11 special recognition for International Women’s Day 2023 at City Hall on March 8, 2023, including the illumination of City Hall. (23) 21­1177­S1 CD 8 MOTION (HARRIS­DAWSON ­ RAMAN) relative to securing funds for the Manchester Urban Homes Development at 8721­8765 South Broadway Avenue, Los Angeles, Caifornia 90003 in Council District 8. Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 1. DIRECT the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) to commit up to $7 million from Fund No. 59T ­ City of Los Angeles Housing Impact Trust Fund as a deferred payment loan with the terms and conditions approved by Council in the Affordable Housing Managed Pipeline guidelines (Council file No. 22­0876) 2. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report within 90 days on the final amount of the loan and all funding sources. (24) 23­0210 CD 11 MOTION (PARK ­ BLUMENFIELD) relative to funding for services in connection with Council District 11 special recognition for Bulgarian National Liberation Day 2023, including the illumination of City Hall. Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events­Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with Council District 11 special recognition for Bulgarian National Liberation Day 2023 at City Hall on March 3, 2023, including the illumination of City Hall. Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 25  TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events­Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with Council District 11 special recognition for Bulgarian National Liberation Day 2023 at City Hall on March 3, 2023, including the illumination of City Hall. Items Called Special Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Closed Session (25) 23­0125 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Richard Foster v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV17464. (This matter arises from a motorcycle accident that occurred on January 10, 2020, on Riverside Drive.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered the matter in Closed Session on February 13, 2023) (26) 12­0303­S2 CD 13 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the cases entitled La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS138369, Fix the City v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS138580, and Savehollywood.org v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS138370. (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered the matter in Closed Session on February 13, 2023) (27) 23­0071 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Jonathan Tom, et al. v. City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Friday Police Revolver- March and Athletic 3, 2023Club, - Los Angeles Superior Court PAGE 26Case No. 22STCV00224. (This is a police employment case against the City of Los  Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS138370. (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered the matter in Closed Session on February 13, 2023) (27) 23­0071 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Jonathan Tom, et al. v. City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Police Revolver and Athletic Club, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 22STCV00224. (This is a police employment case against the City of Los Angeles.) (Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee considered the matter in Closed Session on February 13, 2023) Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final. Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000). Friday - March 3, 2023 - PAGE 27