City Council Meeting

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding Wednesday, May 20, 2026 - Thursday, May 21, 2026 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM (For further details see Official Council Files) (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum) Opening Roll Call on Wednesday, May 20, 2026 Members Present: Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hutt, Jurado, Lee, Nazarian, Price Jr., Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (10); Absent: Hernandez, McOsker, Padilla, Park, Raman (5) Approval of the Minutes Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED Multiple Agenda Item Comment Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items Noticed for Public Hearing - PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED (1) 26-0600 PRESENTATION OF REPORT BY THE BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE relative to the Mayor's proposed 2026-27 Budget for the City of Los Angeles, related Motions and Resolutions. Community Impact Statement: Yes For: Harbor City Neighborhood Council Pacoima Neighborhood Council Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council NoHo Neighborhood Council Thursday - May 21, 2026 - PAGE 1  Del Rey Neighborhood Council West Los Angeles Sawtelle Neighborhood Council Greater Toluca Lake Neighborhood Council Glassell Park Neighborhood Council Greater Toluca Lake Neighborhood For, If Amended: Harbor Gateway North Neighborhood Council Tarzana Neighborhood Council Historic Highland Park Neighborhood Council Against: Eagle Rock Neighborhood Council Against, Unless Amended: Community and Neighbors for Ninth District Unity Neighborhood Council PLEASE NOTE, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WILL ONLY BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 2026, FOR ITEM 1, COUNCIL FILE NO. 26-0600. Budget and Finance Committee Report, Exihibit H and Budget Motions (1-28 and A-B) Adopted as Amended Forthwith See Budget Recap on Council file number 26-0600 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Jurado, Hutt, Lee, Nazarian, Padilla, Raman, Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: Park (1); Absent: McOsker, Price Jr. (2) (2) 26-0160-S11 CD 2 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non- compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 5034 North Vineland Avenue. Recommendation for Council action: HEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 5034 North Thursday - May 21, 2026 - PAGE 2  Vineland Avenue. (Lien: $10,279.85) (Continued from Council meeting of April 21, 2026.) Adopted Item to Continue to June 17, 2026 (Vote taken on May 20, 2026) Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Jurado, Hutt, Lee, Nazarian, Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent: McOsker, Raman (2) (3) 26-0160-S12 CD 2 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non- compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 5036 North Vineland Avenue. Recommendation for Council action: HEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 5036 North Vineland Avenue. (Lien: $15,959.64) (Continued from Council meeting of April 21, 2026.) Adopted Item to Continue to June 17, 2026 (Vote taken on May 20, 2026) Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Jurado, Hutt, Lee, Nazarian, Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent: McOsker, Raman (2) (4) 26-0160-S26 CD 6 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non- compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 8504 North Katherine Avenue. Recommendation for Council action: Thursday - May 21, 2026 - PAGE 3  HEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 8504 North Katherine Avenue. (Lien: $3,806.10) (Continued from Council meeting of April 21, 2026.) Adopted Item as Amended by Motion (Padilla – Rodriguez) (Vote taken on May 20, 2026) - SEE ATTACHED Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Jurado, Hutt, Lee, Nazarian, Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent: McOsker, Raman (2) (5) 26-0160-S14 CD 9 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS to Building and Safety Department report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non- compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 4120 South Normandie Avenue AKA 4122 South Normandie Avenue. Recommendation for Council action: HEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to proposed lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non-compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC and CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 4120 South Normandie Avenue AKA 4122 South Normandie Avenue. (Lien: $31,740.60) (Continued from Council meeting of April 21, 2026.) Adopted Item to Continue to June 23, 2026 (Vote taken on May 20, 2026) Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Jurado, Hutt, Lee, Nazarian, Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent: McOsker, Raman (2) Thursday - May 21, 2026 - PAGE 4  Items Called Special Motions for Posting and Referral Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings Adjourning Motions Council Adjournment ENDING ROLL CALL Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, Lee, Nazarian, Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez, Soto-Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (14); Absent: McOsker (1) Whereupon the Council did adjourn. ATTEST: Patrice Y. Lattimore, CITY CLERK By Council Clerk PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL Thursday - May 21, 2026 - PAGE 5  COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME Lee Rodriguez Sierra Canyon School Basketball Programs Lee Blumenfield Detective Sharon Kim Blumenfield Lee Childhood Cancer Awareness Month September 2026 Park Padilla Jonathan Laguna  RULES, ELECTIONS, INTERGOVERNMENT,4L REL~T!O~S MOTION Los Angeles is synonymous with Hollywood. For well over a century, the City has served as the backdrop for the development of the film and television industry, from •the nascent days of Charlie Chaplin and Mary Pickford, to the modern era of summer blockbusters and digital streaming. As the film and television industry has grown hand-in-hand with Los Angeles over the past hundred years, the industry's success is integral to the continued health of the City. The City has a long history of supporting production efforts. Permitting for filming is coordinated by FilmLA, a non-profit organization contracted by the City, and further supported by many City_ Departments, including Public Works bureaus, the Department of Recreation and Parks, ·. Police, Fire, Transportation, and more. Additionally, the City Council has successfully advocated for enhanced State tax credits that have encouraged productions to stay in California and support our local economy. The industry has experienced a steep decline in production over the last several years, driven by macroeconomic trends and aggressive national and international competition. These changes have a measurable impact on our local economy, small businesses, job market, tax base, and tourism. City processes that were once sufficient for film activities now require revision to meet modem standards and needs. Council ha_s worked to mitigate challenges faced by the industry, and as it explores additional actions and legislation, it would be beneficial to have these considered by a committee dedicated to film, television, and creative industry issues. I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council hereby resolve to create an Ad Hoc Committee on Film, Entertainment, and Creative Industry to review and coordinate all matters related to film, television, and creative content production, including but not limited to policy, regulation, development, and stimulus of associated activities, such as permitting, location filming, use of City facilities, post-production, streamlining of City processes, initiatives governing industry and community relations, green production initiatives, departmental oversight and film contract oversight, marketing Los Angeles as an entertainment hub, protection of public safety, and inter-agency policy collaboration; with said Committee to include up to three members. I FURTHER MOVE that the City Clerk be instructed to re-refer all current pending files related to film and television production to the new Ad Hoc Committee.  MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON 0 Councilmember, 8th District ~  AD HOC COMMITTEE ON THE 2028 OLYMPIC AND PARAOLYMPIC GAMES MOTION Los Angeles has long been considered one of the most successful Olympic host cities in history because of the way it combined financial success and lasting community impact. The city first hosted the Summer Olympics in 1932 during the Great Depression and impressed the world with innovations such as the first modem Olympic Village for athletes. It was the 1984 Summer Olympics that trnly transformed Los Angeles's reputation. Unlike many Olympic Games that left host cities with large debts, the 1984 Games generated a surplus of more than $200 million through private funding, sponsorships, and television rights deals. Organizers relied heavily on existing stadiums and infrastructure instead of building expensive new venues, creating a model that many later Olympic cities attempted to follow and became the blueprint for the 2028 Olympic Games. The success of the Los Angeles Olympics also extended beyond finances. The 1984 Games boosted tourism, showcased the city's global image, and helped expand youth sports programs through the creation of the LA84 Foundation, which continues to fund athletic opportunities for children across Southern California. These achievements were why Los Angeles was awarded the 2028 Summer Olympics, making it one of the few cities to host the Games three times. The decision reflected confidence in the city's proven ability to organize large international events efficiently while creating a positive long-term legacy. Hosting the Olympic games comes with a great risk to cities. Before hosting the 1984 Summer Olympics, voters in Los Angeles approved a ballot measure that limited the financial risk to taxpayers and helped make the Games possible. Many Los Angeles residents were concerned about public spending on the Olympics. In response, organizers agreed that no city tax money would be used to cover potential losses from the Games unless voters approved it. The ballot played an important role in securing support for the 1984 Olympics and became one of the reasons the Games were later viewed as a major financial success. It is critical that the residents of Los Angeles are protected from any over spends as part of the 2028 Olympic Games. To ensure that the 2028 Olympic Games are a financial success and for future generations to have a blueprint if the games shall ever return to Los Angeles it is critical that an independent audit of LA28 is completed by a neutral 3rd party prior to LA28 being dissolved. I THEREFORE MOVE that Council directs the Chief Legislative Analyst, with the assistance of the City Administrative Officer, to bid and award an independent 3rd party auditor to conduct a fiscal audit of the LA28 organization in 2026 and prior to the dissolution of the organization. I FURTHER MOVE that Council directs LA28 to finance the independent audit. PRESENTED BY: SECONDED BY: 0 ~~vtd~;~c, Councilwoman, 7th District z MAY2 ~ > ~  MOTION In 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 969 (Wiener), which significantly expands the authority of cities to designate Entertainment Zones, which are areas where, under specific conditions set by the local jurisdiction, people can purchase alcohol from licensed businesses and consume it outdoors within a defined zone in the public right of way (e.g., on streets or plazas). In practice, cities typically limit it to specific hours or tie it to special events such as game days, community festivals or designated activation periods. Under SB 969 any city, county, or city and county may establish an Entertainment Zone by ordinance. The bill outlines clear safeguards, including: • Requiring cities to notify and solicit feedback from local law enforcement on the zone's boundaries, hours of operation, and safety measures. • Requiring all persons in possession of alcoholic beverages in the zone to be readily identifiable as 21 years of age or older. • Mandating that cities review the operation of each zone every two years and provide reports to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) upon request. This legislation enables local governments to stimulate economic development and cultural vibrancy by creating regulated outdoor social environments. This new authority presents a timely opportunity for the City to support small businesses, tourism, nightlife, and cultural events, particularly in Downtown Los Angeles, where the strong hospitality and tourism networks have experienced significant economic hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation, and declining foot traffic. I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council instruct the Planning Department in consultation with the Transportation Department, Bureau of Street Services, Bureau of Engineering, the Department of Building and Safety, and the City Attorney, and State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to report within 60 days with the following: • An analysis and report on SB 969 (Wiener) enacted into law in 2024, including its requirements,. limitations, and potential regulatory controls relative to Entertainment Zones, which are areas set by local jurisdictions, wherein people can purchase alcohol from licensed businesses and consume it outdoors within a defined zone in the public right of way (e.g., on streets or plazas); and • Recommendations for the establishment of one or more Entertainment Zones within Downtown Los Angeles, consistent with the provisions of SB 969. I FURTHER MOVE that the Council instruct the Planning Department in consultation with the Transportation Department, Bureau of Street Services, Bureau of Engineering, the Department of Building and Safety, and the City Attorney, and State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to conduct the necessary public hearing(s) that include Council District 14 stakeholders, small businesses, hospitality specialists, cultural organizations, Business Improvement Districts, and Neighborhood Councils, to shape the Entertainment Zone program and ensure it reflects community priorities, and incorporate the public hearing(s) feedback into the requested report and recommendations. SECONDEDBY: ~c:z:-e:, · ~i.J:I  GY I ENVIRONMENT BUDGET & FINAMCE MOTION Urban forests serve as essential green infrastructure that help combat the urban heat island effect, reduce air pollutants, and manage stormwater runoff while enhancing community well-being. For twenty years, the City has maintained a strategic partnership with City Plants, a small nonprofit organization to assist in convening and coordinating across a network of nonprofit partners that provide tree-related programming to help us mitigate climate change. City Plants has functioned as a primary liaison for City staff, helped develop unified materials and messaging, convened local expertise to advance pilot programs, secured funding, and managed key research efforts and reports. City Plants was originally created through a partnership with Community Partners in 2006 to support the Million Trees LA initiative and reaffirmed through a subsequent Memorandum of Understanding with Community Partners, rebranding the program to serve broader urban forestry efforts. While the City continues to rely on this partnership, the organization has experienced persistent financial volatility and structural uncertainty. Consequently, the functions executed by City Plants remain vital to the City, but may require a different structure to ensure long-term sustainability. Analysis is needed to identify a structure that would be more appropriate to best improve the tree planting needs for the City of Los Angeles. I THEREFORE MOVE that the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), with support from the Department of City Planning's Office of Forest Management and the City Attorney, report back with an analysis of options to in-source, contract, and/or otherwise sustainably fund the functions currently performed by City Plants, including recommendations for a more efficient and streamlined structure to support the City's urban forest goals. MAY 2 0 2026