Muyni
← Back to Mission Hills

Architectural Review Board (ARB)

Regular Meeting

Mission Hills, KS · July 28, 2026

Agenda
Add to calendar

Agenda

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD AGENDA July 28, 2026 3:00 p.m. Pre-meeting to begin at 2:30 p.m. #1 Merrie & David Costello Changes to previously approved project 5910 Oakwood Road #2 R&B Restore Changes to previously approved project 6455 Overbrook Road #3 James & Lauren Sotos New patio; 5820 Oakwood Road fire pit, outdoor kitchen #4 Chris & Kristine Schoemann Garage second-floor addition & rear addition; 6536 High Drive New covered patio & open second patio #5 C.S. Leroy Trust* New generator 6629 Overhill Road * Variance required The Mission Hills Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) provides that the BZA shall determine whether or not an ARB decision was reasonable based upon the evidence presented to the ARB and the record of the ARB proceedings. Testimony at the BZA hearing will be limited to a discussion of the evidence presented to the ARB. No new evidence will be considered. #1 Consent Agenda A. Merrie & David Costello 5910 Oakwood Road The Costellos are returning to the ARB with changes to their previously approved project. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Neighborhood Estates • Location of Common Green Space: Front • Any Special Frontages: None Summary of Project: At the July 15, 2025, ARB meeting, the ARB approved an addition at the rear of the Costello’s home. The original approval had a fireplace centered on the rear gable with windows flanking each side. They are now proposing to place the fireplace off-center with smaller flanking windows. Ordinance Compliance: A variance for the project was previously granted. The proposed changes do not affect it. Design Guideline Review: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Design Guidelines. July 28, 2026 #2 R&B Restore LLC 6455 Overbrook Road The owners are returning to the ARB with changes to their previously approved project. The changes include a new deck and new garage doors. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Traditional • Location of Common Green Space: Front • Any Special Frontages: None Summary of Project: The original approval was primarily for window replacements. The new deck is located at the rear and sides of the house. The supports and railings are not clear in provided drawings. Clarification is required. An existing window will be converted to a pair of French doors. The proposed garage doors are simple flat panel doors. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Design Guideline Review: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Design Guidelines. July 28, 2026 #3 James & Lauren Sotos 5820 Oakwood Road The owners are proposing a new back patio with a fire pit and outdoor kitchen. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Neighborhood Estates • Location of Common Green Space: Front • Any Special Frontages: None Summary of Project: Their existing patio is a free form shape that connects the pool deck to the back of the house. The proposed patio will replace that patio in approximately the same location, only slightly smaller. The material of the proposed patio will be bluestone. A new gas fire pit is proposed near the center of the patio and a new outdoor kitchen with bar seating is proposed at the eastern end. The fire pit and kitchen are proposed as brick with cast stone caps. As part of the project, a new stone retaining wall is proposed near the rear of the property where a second existing patio is being removed. Approximately 900 sq. ft. of patio space is being removed collectively. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Greenspace Review SF Lot Area: 29,459 Existing House: -2,945 Existing Driveway, & Walkway: -7,440 Existing HVAC Pads: -38 Revised Patio: -1,245 Pool & Pool Deck: -2,230 Stepping Stone Walkway: -164 Misc. Walls: -128 Shed: -75 Remaining Greenspace: 15,194 = 51.58% Design Guideline Review: Section 2.7.3.A on page 106 recommends that LS-3, 4 and 5 properties have a greenspace no less than 65% of the lot area. This recommendation has not been met; however, the project increases the greenspace on the property. Lot Information Zoning: R-1(20)/LS-4 Lot Area: 29,459 Ordinance Allowable/Required by Ord Proposed Patio Minimum Side Yard: 20’ 20’ Patio Minimum Rear Yard: 20’ >100’ Minimum Greenspace: 65% = 19,148 sf 15,194 sf = 51.58% (Delta 3,954) July 28, 2026 #4 Chris & Kristine Schoemann 6536 High Drive The Schoemanns are proposing a new second-floor addition over their garage and a single-story addition behind the garage. They are also proposing a rear covered patio and large open patio. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Traditional Neighborhood • Location of Common Green Space: Front • Any Special Frontages: None Lot Coverage Review SF Existing House: 1,863 Rear Addition: 260 Total Lot Coverage: 2,123 Summary of Project: The second-floor addition over the garage is proposed to be set back from the face of the garage. This allows for an eyebrow roof to be maintained over the doors. The depth of the addition is relatively shallow. The addition at the rear of the garage aligns with the side of the garage and extends to align with an existing rear wing. The addition has a flat roof that will be an accessible roof deck. Since the addition is on a wing, it does not affect the visibility of the main mass of the house. The proposed covered porch is a simple shed roof supported by columns and pilasters at the back of a rear wing. New French doors are proposed to replace an existing window. A new second floor window is proposed over the new porch. An existing bay window is being removed, and a new extension with French doors is proposed with an eyebrow roof. The brick patio is proposed to replace a smaller brick patio in the same area. To the side of the garage, a new bin storage shed is proposed. It is constructed to match the house with three large doors for access. Ordinance Compliance: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Code of Ordinances. Greenspace Review SF Lot Area: 12,888 Lot Coverage: -2,123 Driveway & Walkway: -1,035 Rear Addition: -260 Covered Porch: -112 New Patio: -600 Bin Shed: -42 Remaining Greenspace: 8,716 = 67.63% Design Guideline Review: There are no conflicts between the proposed project and the City of Mission Hills Design Guidelines. July 28, 2026 Lot Information Zoning: R-1(10)/ LS-1 Lot Area: 12,888 sf Lot Width: 98.0’ Ordinance/Design Guideline Allowable/Required Provided Maximum Height: 35’ 23’-10” (At addition) Minimum Side Yard (Left): 10’ 5’-5” (Existing) Minimum Side Yard (Right): 19’-2” (House) 10’ 15’-2” (Shed) Minimum Combined Side Yards: 25% = 24.5’ 29’-3” Minimum Rear Yard: (At closest point) 20% = 27.0’ 43’ Patio Minimum Side Yard: 15’ 15’ Patio Minimum Rear Yard: 15’ 38’ Maximum Lot Coverage: 11,385 sf 7,173 sf Minimum Greenspace: 60% = 7,732 sf 8,716 sf = 67.63% Drainage Study Required if any answer below is “Yes” Yes/No Is the project adding 1,000 sq. ft. or more of impervious surface? No Will the project cause the greenspace to be less than recommended by the Design Guidelines? No EXCEPT NO STUDY REQUIRED IF: 1) replacing existing impervious surface in approximately same footprint, and No 2) project will not decrease existing greenspace on site Yes Is there a documented drainage issue for this property? No *See the Mission Hills website for drainage study requirements – www.missionhillsks.gov *The Architectural Review Board may require the drainage study be submitted before they act on the proposed project. July 28, 2026 #5 C S Leroy Trust * 6629 Overhill Road The owners are proposing a new whole-house generator at the side of their home. Summary of Property: • Character Area: Neighborhood Estates • Location of Common Green Space: Front & Side • Any Special Frontages: None Summary of Project: The owners propose to locate the generator on the right/south side of the house. Since they have extensive landscaping along that side of the house, they propose to locate the generator several feet away from the house. An exact dimension has not been provided. Ordinance Compliance: The project is in violation of a platted setback. There is a 25-foot platted setback along 67th street. The proposed generator will be entirely within the setback area. A variance of approximately 10 feet is required. Design Guideline Review: The Design Guideline recommends all projects adhere to all zoning regulations. * A variance is required from the Board of Zoning Appeals. July 28, 2026

Get email alerts for Mission Hills

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting