Committee of the Whole
Regular MeetingMount Prospect, IL · April 14, 2026
Agenda
Village of Mount Prospect
Committee of the Whole
Meeting Agenda
50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056
April 14, 2026 Village Hall - 3rd Floor Board Room 6:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
4. JOINT WORKSHOP with the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - MP2040
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Review and Discuss the DRAFT Vision, Goals and Objectives Prepared by Staff
for the MP2040 Comprehensive Plan.
5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
5.1. Review and Discussion of draft resolution in opposition to State Preemption of
Local Zoning Authority (The BUILD Act HB 5626)
5.2. Evaluation of Zoning Code Text Amendments to Promote Single-Family
Residential Neighborhoods
6. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
6.1. As submitted
7. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
8. ADJOURNMENT
ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY
OR NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE
MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327
Packet
Village of Mount Prospect
Committee of the Whole
Meeting Agenda
50 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056
April 14, 2026 Village Hall - 3rd Floor Board Room 6:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
4. JOINT WORKSHOP with the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - MP2040
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Review and Discuss the DRAFT Vision, Goals and Objectives Prepared by Staff
for the MP2040 Comprehensive Plan.
5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
5.1. Review and Discussion of draft resolution in opposition to State Preemption of
Local Zoning Authority (The BUILD Act HB 5626)
5.2. Evaluation of Zoning Code Text Amendments to Promote Single-Family
Residential Neighborhoods
6. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
6.1. As submitted
7. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
8. ADJOURNMENT
ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY
OR NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE
MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327
Page 1 of 126
Item Cover Page
Subject Review and Discuss the DRAFT Vision, Goals and Objectives
Prepared by Staff for the MP2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Meeting April 14, 2026 - MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Fiscal Impact N/A
Dollar Amount
Budget Source
Category JOINT WORKSHOP with the PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION - MP2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AND
DISCUSSION
Type Presentation
Information
The Village is currently updating its Comprehensive Plan through the MP2040 planning
process. The Comprehensive Plan establishes the long-term vision for Mount Prospect and
provides a policy framework to guide growth, reinvestment, land use, and capital decisions
through the year 2040. It addresses major topic areas including land use, housing and
neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas, community facilities, transportation and
mobility, and parks and environment.
The Vision, Goals, and Objectives (VGO) Report, attached for review, summarizes the
foundational direction of the plan. It serves as the basis for the plan document that will be
drafted by staff. The VGO Report is organized around an overall vision statement, topic-
specific goals and objectives, and a Future Land Use Plan with nine proposed land use
categories that will guide future zoning, development review, and reinvestment decisions.
The content of the VGO Report is largely based on input received over the course of the
MP2040 community engagement process. Staff conducted a multiphase outreach effort that
included a statistically valid community survey, pop-up engagement stations at Village events,
stakeholder interviews, focus groups with institutional partners, and a series of public
workshops. An interactive project website provided additional opportunities for residents to
share input throughout the process. The feedback gathered through these efforts shaped the
vision statement, informed the goals and objectives across each topic area, and directly
influenced the Future Land Use Plan presented in the attached report.
This joint workshop with the Planning and Zoning Commission provides an opportunity for
both bodies to review the direction of the plan together before staff drafts the chapters, and
we move toward adoption.
Discussion
Page 2 of 126
This workshop is intended as a working discussion. Staff is seeking feedback from the Village
Board and Planning and Zoning Commission on the following:
1. Vision and Overall Direction: Does the vision statement and the overall framework of
the VGO Report reflect the Village's long-term priorities?
2. Goals and Objectives by Topic Area: Within each topic area (land use, housing,
commercial/industrial, community facilities, transportation, parks), do you agree with
the proposed goals? Should anything be added or removed? Are there policy directions
that warrant additional emphasis or clarification?
3. Future Land Use Plan: Do the proposed land use categories and their application
across the Village align with Board and Commission expectations for where growth,
investment, and stability should be directed? Are there specific areas warranting further
discussion?
4. Next Steps: Staff will incorporate feedback from this workshop into the draft plan
document, which will return to the Planning and Zoning Commission for formal review
and recommendation prior to Village Board consideration of adoption this summer.
Alternatives
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Attachments
1. MP2040_Vision, Goals & Objectives Report_April 2026
Page 3 of 126
Vision, Goals and Objectives Report
The Vision Goals and Objectives Report describes the long-term vision for Mount Prospect
and provides a framework to guide growth, reinvestment, and decision-making through the
year 2040. Built on extensive community input, technical analysis, and coordination with
partner agencies, the plan identifies the Village’s key strengths, challenges, and
opportunities. It establishes clear goals, objectives, and policies across major topic
areas—land use, housing, economic development, transportation, parks, community
facilities, and placemaking—to ensure future decisions are thoughtful, coordinated, and
aligned with community priorities. Together, these elements form a practical roadmap to
help Mount Prospect protect what residents value most while preparing for change and
long-term success.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 1
Page 4 of 126
Vision Statement
In 2040… Mount Prospect will continue to embody the very best of
suburban living as a forward-thinking, community-centered village that sets
the standard for quality of life in the region. We will have beautiful
neighborhoods, vibrant commercial districts, and abundant parks and
cultural spaces. The Village will be well-connected by safe streets, trails, and
transit, where residents of every age can access parks, services, housing
choices, and community spaces that support healthy, active lives. We will
pursue sustainable and resilient practices that balance economic opportunity
with environmental stewardship, ensuring long-term viability for both public
and private investment. Community facilities will be inclusive, active hubs
that bring people together and support daily life across all ages. Our economy
will cultivate modern commercial areas and a strong local identity that
attracts unique businesses and positions the Village as a regional destination.
Together, these elements will define Mount Prospect as a competitive,
business-friendly community with a strong local identify – a place where
people of all ages can live, work, and thrive at every stage of life.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 2
Page 5 of 126
Goals and Objectives
What Is the Difference Between Goals and Objectives?
Goals and objectives describe the policy direction Mount Prospect will pursue as it
implements the MP2040 Plan. Together, they reflect the insights gained through past
planning efforts, stakeholder engagement, community feedback, and an understanding of
current and future conditions.
Goals
Goals are broad, aspirational statements describing what the Village seeks to preserve,
enhance, or achieve over the long term. They articulate Mount Prospect’s desired future but
are not intended to be specific or measurable. While some goals may not be fully realized
within the timeframe of this plan, they provide a clear sense of direction and a shared
foundation for decision-making.
Objectives
Objectives are the strategies, policies, or actions that support and advance the goals.
Some are intentionally high-level, while others offer more detailed guidance. They do not
carry fixed timelines and may evolve as conditions, resources, and opportunities change.
Objectives serve as the bridge between long-range vision and practical implementation,
allowing the MP2040 Plan to remain both grounded and adaptable.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 3
Page 6 of 126
Land Use
Overall Goal
Guide community growth and improvement in a coordinated manner that strengthens
Mount Prospect’s neighborhoods, supports economic vitality, and improves quality of life.
Goals and Objectives
1. Protect Neighborhoods while Focusing Development in Targeted Areas
a. Preserve the character, scale, and stability of established residential
neighborhoods.
b. Direct higher-intensity development to appropriate locations such as
Downtown, Randhurst, major corridors, transit areas, and identified
opportunity sites.
c. Encourage compatible transitions between differing land uses to minimize
conflicts and improve livability.
2. Promote Mixed-Use, Walkable, and Connected Development Patterns
a. Support mixed-use development that integrates housing, employment,
services, and public spaces in walkable environments.
b. Strengthen land use patterns that support walking, biking, and transit
access.
c. Encourage compact development that makes efficient use of land and
existing infrastructure.
d. Coordinate land-use decisions with existing and planned transit investments
to support transit-oriented development patterns.
3. Support Economic Vitality and Reinvestment
a. Align land use policies with economic development goals to attract new
businesses, support job creation, and encourage reinvestment in aging
commercial and industrial areas.
b. Promote flexibility in land use designations and development formats to
adapt to changing market conditions and emerging industries.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 4
Page 7 of 126
c. Encourage redevelopment of underutilized and obsolete sites to maximize
community benefit.
4. Integrate Sustainability and Resilience into Land Use Decisions
a. Incorporate environmental considerations, stormwater management, and
climate resilience into land use planning and site design.
b. Promote development patterns that reduce environmental impacts and
support long-term infrastructure efficiency.
c. Protect and enhance natural areas and open spaces.
5. Strengthen Compatibility Between Residential, Commercial, and Industrial
Areas
a. Support the improvement of aging industrial areas with a mixture of light-
industrial, commercial and residential uses where appropriate.
b. Improve buffering, design standards, and mobility connections at
industrial/residential edges.
c. Continually improve regulations meant to minimize noise, traffic, and
operational impacts on nearby neighborhoods.
6. Coordinate Land Use with Infrastructure, Facilities, and Services
a. Align land use planning with capital improvements, utilities, transportation
investments, and community facilities.
b. Ensure development occurs in locations that can be adequately served by
public infrastructure and services.
7. Evaluate Annexation of remaining unincorporated areas around the Village
a. Research the costs and benefits of annexation, including potential changes
to service levels, tax revenue projections, and the feasibility of infrastructure
investment in these areas.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 5
Page 8 of 126
Housing & Neighborhoods
Overall Goal
Ensure Mount Prospect’s neighborhoods remain strong, accessible, and well-connected by
expanding housing choices, supporting infill and reinvestment, and strengthening the
character, safety, and livability of every residential area.
Goals and Objectives
1. Uphold Neighborhood Character and Quality
a. Maintain the attractive tree-lined streets, pedestrian scale, and other
distinguishing qualities of Mount Prospect’s existing residential
neighborhoods.
b. Promote high standards of building design and construction that are
consistent with the Village’s historic character, scale, and charm for all
development within the Village.
c. Improve neighborhood public spaces through thoughtful design, streetscape
upgrades, and pedestrian-oriented development.
d. Invest in sidewalks, street trees, lighting, public art, and stormwater
improvements along key corridors to strengthen neighborhood livability and
identity.
e. Coordinate with utility companies to move overhead utilities underground to
reduce interference with natural elements and to enhance service
predictability, improve aesthetics, and protect the Village’s tree canopy.
f. Beautify community gateways with special signage, landscaping, and other
entry design features.
g. Research additional neighborhood area signage to help distinguish Mount
Prospect’s various community areas from each other.
h. Sponsor programs, activities, events, and celebrations that stimulate public
involvement and participation, foster a strong and unified community spirit
and identity, and bring together residents from the various neighborhoods on
a regular basis.
i. Improve and expand existing community gathering spaces in Downtown to
better host events.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 6
Page 9 of 126
2. Expand Senior-Oriented Housing
a. Encourage the development of accessible, age-friendly housing near
healthcare, transit, Downtown amenities, and community facilities.
b. Support investment in both age-restricted senior oriented community
facilities, and non-restricted market-rate housing that meets the needs of
seniors (for example, new condos with minimal maintenance, townhomes
with accessible infrastructure, etc.)
c. Facilitate aging-in-place through zoning reforms, universal design, and
walkability improvements.
3. Expand Entry-Level Housing Aimed at Young Professionals and Growing
Families
a. Encourage a broader range of entry-level and “missing middle” housing
options through targeted zoning refinements and design standards in areas
near Downtown and transit corridors, while maintaining neighborhood
character.
b. Support incremental increases in housing opportunities within a half-mile
walking distance to the Metra stations by prioritizing infill development,
redevelopment, and adaptive reuse of underutilized properties.
c. To minimize “housing mismatch,” update zoning to allow greater flexibility
and predictability in housing types, densities, and mixed-use formats,
particularly in walkable areas and designated reinvestment corridors,
without imposing uniform density increases.
d. Evaluate fiscally responsible funding tools and incentive programs that help
offset rising construction and financing costs while protecting the Village’s
long-term stability.
e. Capitalize on available land in South Mount Prospect by supporting more
housing south of Golf Road that would relieve some housing demand and
complement local businesses.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 7
Page 10 of 126
4. Support Quality, Safety, and Management in existing Multifamily and Townhome
Housing Areas
a. Encourage rehabilitation and modernization of aging multifamily housing
stock by supporting upgrades to building systems, accessibility, and site
design.
b. Develop strategies to improve building maintenance, management practices,
and public safety in multifamily developments experiencing higher call
volumes or operational challenges.
Commercial & Industrial Areas
Overall Goal
Support active, resilient, and well-connected commercial and industrial districts that
sustain a diverse economy, attract investment, strengthen Mount Prospect’s identity, and
provide services, jobs, and amenities for residents and businesses.
Goals and Objectives
1. Strengthen Downtown as the Village’s Primary Economic and Social Hub
a. Reinforce Downtown’s role as a dining, shopping, entertainment, and residential
hub through infill development, upper-floor activation, attractive streetscapes,
and incremental development of neighboring parcels.
b. Prioritize and encourage active, publicly oriented first-floor uses - such as
restaurants and experiential retail to facilitate walkability, vitality, and a lively
Downtown experience.
c. Upgrade pedestrian infrastructure, lighting, parking access, and wayfinding to
foster all-day commercial activity.
2. Cultivate Distinct and Walkable Secondary Activity Centers
a. Transform Randhurst into a more walkable mixed-use entertainment destination
through investments in residential development and a redesign of the parking
fields to support walkability.
b. Establish a new walkable district at the intersection of Wolf Road and
Kensington Road utilizing greenfield sites in the area.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 8
Page 11 of 126
c. Consider mixed-use and limited industrial redevelopment as an alternative to
aging office buildings in South Mount Prospect.
3. Beautify Commercial Districts
a. Upgrade streetscapes with wider sidewalks, greenery, shade, lighting, bike
amenities, and pedestrian-focused design.
b. Integrate public art, plazas, outdoor dining areas, and seasonal programming to
activate commercial districts.
4. Investigate the Feasibility of Neighborhood-Scale Corner Stores
a. Evaluate targeted regulatory approaches – such as overlays, conditional uses, or
pilot programs – at select residential street corners to determine whether small-
scale, neighborhood-serving retail can be introduced in a manner compatible
with surrounding homes.
b. Develop context-sensitive design, operational, and performance standards,
including building scale, site layout, hours of operation, and noise or lighting
controls, to ensure compatibility with residential neighborhoods.
c. Assess on-site and shared parking strategies, as well as walkability and access
considerations, to minimize traffic and parking impacts on nearby streets.
5. Rejuvenate Industrial Areas and Improve Compatibility
a. Attract investment in industrial districts through infrastructure upgrades and
improved site access.
b. Increase the number of businesses with larger employment counts and higher
incomes, such as technology and engineering firms.
c. Revitalize South Mount Prospect with new investments in infrastructure, land
use requirements, and incentives.
d. As the suburban office market evolves, continually transition the Kensington
Business Center into a mixed-use business area.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 9
Page 12 of 126
6. Revitalize Aging Retail Centers and Corridors
a. Target reinvestment and redevelopment in aging or underperforming commercial
corridors and big-box centers to induce modern retail formats, mixed-use
development, and new employment opportunities.
b. Introduce housing, plazas, trails, and public spaces in commercial opportunity
areas such as Randhurst, Golf Road, and Route 83.
c. Leverage economic incentives to stimulate redevelopment and site
improvements.
7. Diversify the Village’s Business Base
a. Recruit unique restaurants, specialty retail, entertainment venues, multicultural
businesses, and family-friendly destinations to fill market gaps.
b. Promote flexible commercial space models such as incubators, coworking, pop-
ups, and start-up retail environments.
8. Advance Mount Prospect’s Economic Identity and Branding
a. Building on the recently adopted marketing strategy, investigate creating an
updated Village economic brand that upholds Mount Prospect as a regional
destination.
b. Evaluate updating the Village logo and branding.
c. Maintain consistent branding, signage, district markers, and corridor design
standards to unify commercial and industrial areas.
9. Champion Business Retention and a Strong Investment Climate
a. Continually streamline permitting and development processes to provide clarity
and predictability for investors in the Village.
b. Use incentives, including grants, TIF, Special Service Areas (SSAs), sales tax
incentives, and low-interest financing to create catalytic projects that would not
be possible otherwise.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 10
Page 13 of 126
c. Reinforce communication and partnerships with business owners, developers,
and regional economic organizations.
10. Leverage Regional Assets and Major Developments
a. Prepare for opportunities created by nearby regional investments, including the
potential Chicago Bears stadium, by activating hospitality, dining,
entertainment, and service-sector growth.
b. Support transportation connections to major commercial and employment
nodes around the region, such as new bus services to regional destinations and
increased frequencies on “game day”.
Community Facilities
Overall Goal
Sponsor high-quality, accessible, and resilient public facilities, utilities, and services that
meet the evolving needs of Mount Prospect’s residents and advance safety, sustainability,
and long-term community well-being.
Goals and Objectives
1. Modernize Critical Infrastructure
a. Upgrade aging water, sewer, roadway, and stormwater systems.
b. Mitigate flooding through green infrastructure, targeted capital projects, and
systemwide reinvestment.
c. Align infrastructure upgrades with opportunity areas and capital planning efforts.
2. Strengthen Public Safety Services and Facilities
a. Provide staffing, training, and equipment for Police and Fire to sustain high
service levels.
b. Address emerging risks and growing mental health needs through updated
policies and facility improvements.
c. Continue to support interagency communication for coordinated responses and
long-term planning.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 11
Page 14 of 126
3. Revitalize Community Facilities
a. Expand community connections center programming and capacity for
multigenerational recreation, health, and social amenities in South Mount
Prospect.
b. Improve ADA accessibility across all Village-owned facilities, parks, schools, and
public spaces.
c. Modernize schools and learning environments through collaboration with local
districts.
4. Increase Access to Free, Welcoming Community Gathering Spaces, Especially
for Children and Teenagers.
a. Introduce year-round indoor and outdoor spaces, including teen lounges, youth
activity rooms, and flexible community gathering areas, within both public
facilities and new private developments.
b. Close the gap left by the decline of traditional commercial gathering places
(such as free-to-enter indoor Malls) by supporting drop-in, no-cost social
spaces where young people can spend free time without the expectation of
spending money.
c. Integrate public amenities such as plazas, open spaces, and community rooms
into redevelopment projects (especially in Downtown, Randhurst, and along
mixed-use corridors) through design standards, partnership agreements, and
development incentives, where appropriate.
d. Partner with the Mount Prospect and River Trails Park Districts, the MP Public
Library, and local school districts, to activate community spaces through regular
programming - such as events, leagues, and drop-in activities - that give
residents, especially youth, consistent reasons to gather.
5. Advance Sustainability and Resilience in Public Facilities
a. Incorporate energy-efficient systems, renewable energy, and sustainable design
practices into new and renovated facilities.
b. Incorporate environmentally responsible building and site design practices
where feasible at Village-owned buildings and properties.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 12
Page 15 of 126
6. Catalyze Partnerships and Communication
a. Collaborate with park districts, schools, public safety agencies, and regional
partners to align long-term capital planning and facility needs.
b. Diversify community outreach tools, event notifications, emergency alerts, and
multilingual communication strategies.
7. Boost Community Growth Through Strategic Investment
a. Ensure that facility planning reflects demographic trends, including the needs of
seniors, youth, families, and diverse populations.
b. Leverage redevelopment opportunities to incorporate new or improved civic
facilities in key districts.
Transportation & Mobility
Overall Goal
Create a safe, connected, and multimodal transportation network that facilitates mobility
for all users, reduces congestion, and ensures access to destinations throughout Mount
Prospect.
Goals and Objectives
1. Address Safety for All Roadway Users
a. Implement street design improvements that reduce vehicle speeds and enhance
visibility at high-risk intersections and corridors.
b. Incorporate pedestrian safety features such as more visible crossings, refuge
islands, curb extensions, Pedestrian Flashing Beacons, and lighting.
c. Continue Safe Routes to School initiatives, addressing circulation, pickup/drop-
off conflicts, and bike/pedestrian access near school campuses.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 13
Page 16 of 126
2. Invest in Multimodal Transportation Options to Access Neighborhood
Amenities and Daily Needs Throughout the Village
a. Develop a protected on-street bicycle network that safely connects
neighborhoods to schools, parks, and commercial areas.
b. Expand off-street trails and pedestrian infrastructure, including multi-use paths
and wider sidewalks, to improve access between residential areas, parks, retail,
transit, and services.
c. Fill sidewalk gaps and construct accessible pathways throughout the Village.
d. Streamline last-mile connections between neighborhoods, Metra stations, Pace
service, and key destinations.
3. Champion Public Transit Access and Reliability
a. Reinforce Metra’s and Pace’s efforts to increase service frequency, expand
weekend service, and refresh stations.
b. Promote Pace’s “Pulse” bus service along Golf Road, Elmhurst, and other
corridors to connect Mount Prospect residents to surrounding communities.
c. Update transit stops with improved shelters, seating, lighting, and real-time
arrival information.
d. Align land-use decisions with transit improvements to encourage transit-
supportive development patterns.
4. Reduce Congestion and Modernize Traffic Operations
a. Pursue adaptive signal technologies and corridor-wide timing updates to
maintain traffic flow.
b. Target efficiency, queuing, and safety interventions for congested intersections.
c. Ensure circulation within and around commercial districts, schools, and event
areas.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 14
Page 17 of 126
5. Champion Emerging Mobility and Sustainability Practices
a. Foster electric vehicle charging infrastructure in public, commercial, and
redevelopment areas.
b. Plan for autonomous vehicle readiness through pickup/drop-off zones, and
updated regulations.
c. Reinforce walking, biking, and transit to reduce emissions and congestion
6. Rejuvenate Wayfinding, Connectivity, and Travel Experience
a. Expand the village wayfinding system for easier navigation to parks,
neighborhoods, transit, and commercial districts.
b. Construct lighting, signage, and public-realm amenities along major pedestrian
and bicycle corridors.
c. Build regional connectivity through partnerships with IDOT, Cook County, Metra,
Pace, and neighboring communities.
Parks & Environment
Overall Goal
Maintain and revitalize parks, open spaces, and environmental systems to build equitable
access, ecological health, climate resilience, and a high quality of life for all Mount
Prospect residents.
Goals and Objectives
1. Improve Access to Parks, Open Space, and Recreation
a. Explore land acquisition, redevelopment partnerships, and new pocket parks in
underserved areas.
b. Link parks, schools, neighborhoods, and commercial areas through trail,
sidewalk, and wayfinding networks.
c. Sponsor year-round and all-ages recreation opportunities, including indoor and
outdoor amenities that respond to evolving community needs.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 15
Page 18 of 126
2. Rejuvenate Park Facilities
a. Partner with and support local park districts in the planning and enhancement of
park amenities, such as restrooms, water stations, lighting, seating, shade
structures, and accessible pathways to improve user experience and
accessibility.
b. Coordinate with park districts and other public partners to support the
reinvestment in aging park infrastructure, including playgrounds, athletic fields,
aquatic facilities, and recreation centers, as part of broader community
improvement efforts.
c. Support catalytic transformational capital projects with partner organizations,
such as school, library, and park districts.
3. Add Natural Amenities and Passive Recreation
a. Assess opportunities to introduce or enhance nature trails, quiet zones, gardens,
and other passive recreation spaces that support wellness, environmental
education, and ecological function.
b. Evaluate the feasibility and naturalization of trail improvements along Weller
Creek, including environmental benefits, access, maintenance considerations,
and coordination with relevant agencies.
c. Identify and prioritize opportunities to improve public access to water features
and natural amenities, such as rivers, creeks, and wetlands, through targeted
reforestation, edge treatments, or access improvements where feasible.
d. Explore interpretive and educational strategies, including signage,
environmental storytelling, and partnerships with schools, park districts, or
environmental organizations, to strengthen connections between residents and
local ecosystems.
4. Position Parks as Community Destinations and Cultural Assets
a. Coordinate with park districts and community partners to support the use of
parks as venues for community events, seasonal programming, performances,
and cultural celebrations.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 16
Page 19 of 126
b. Collaborate with park districts and other public partners to explore opportunities
for public art, placemaking elements, and identity-focused features into major
parks and green spaces, where appropriate.
c. Work with park districts and leverage development and reinvestment efforts to
identify opportunities for new or enhanced green spaces, plazas, and gathering
areas that contribute to neighborhood vibrancy and community identity.
5. Support environmental stewardship, climate resilience, and sustainable
development practices across the Village
a. Encourage green infrastructure—including bioswales, permeable paving, rain
gardens, and naturalized stormwater systems – where feasible and appropriate.
b. Preserve and expand the Village’s tree canopy by protecting existing trees,
planting new trees, and incorporating native landscaping and habitat restoration
in parks, public spaces, and development areas where feasible and consistent
with maintenance and operational considerations.
c. Support and explore sustainability initiatives such as conservation programs,
composting, renewable energy integration, and environmentally responsible
maintenance practices as capacity and resources allow.
d. Encourage sustainable site design and building practices, including green
infrastructure, energy efficiency, water conservation, in commercial and
industrial redevelopment where appropriate.
a. Evaluate opportunities for adaptive reuse of existing buildings to reduce
demolition waste when consistent with economic viability and redevelopment
objectives.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 17
Page 20 of 126
Future Land Use Plan
The Future Land Use Plan outlines how different parts of the Village are intended to grow
and change over time. It provides a clear framework for where housing, businesses, mixed-
use development, and community spaces are most appropriate, while reinforcing the
protection of established neighborhoods. This section introduces the Future Land Use
categories and accompanying map, which together serve as a guide for policy decisions,
zoning updates, redevelopment efforts, and long-term investment aligned with the Village’s
overall vision.
Proposed Future Land Use Categories
1. Community Residential (Most Residential Areas)
o Primary: SF Homes, Townhomes, Duplexes, Triplex/Quadplex
o Supporting: Senior Housing, Religious Uses, Parks and Open Space, Pocket
commercial uses or corner stores
2. Multifamily (Variety of MF developments around the Village)
o Primary: 3+ story MF Buildings, Townhomes, Duplexes, Triplex/Quadplex
o Supporting: Retail, Parks, Professional Offices
3. High Density Commercial Mixed Use (Downtown, Randhurst)
o Primary: 2-6 story mixed use buildings, Retail, Restaurants + Outdoor Dining
o Supporting: Townhomes, Community Gathering Spaces, Parks + Open Space
4. Neighborhood Center (Secondary commercial areas)
o Primary: Business offices, small-scale retail, restaurants, daycares,
professional services, and other commercial uses, residential above
commercial.
o Supporting: Townhomes, small apartment buildings, senior housing, health
services, community amenities, plazas, squares, pocket parks, and other
community gathering spaces.
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 18
Page 21 of 126
5. Corridor Mixed Use (Big Box Centers and strip malls)
o Primary: Large Format Retail, car-oriented uses
o Supporting: High Density Residential, Medical, Entertainment, Hotel, Office,
public gathering spaces.
6. Business & Industrial Mixed Use (KBC, South MP)
o Primary: Commercial office, light industrial, manufacturing, research, solid
waste handling, warehousing uses
o Supporting: Recreational uses, health services, hotel, civic uses,
restaurants, and screened outdoor storage.
7. Institutional
o Primary: Village Buildings, Schools
8. Parks & Open Space
o Primary: Parks, Recreational facilities, Golf Courses
9. Utility/ROW
o Primary: Metra ROW, Electrical Substations
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 19
Page 22 of 126
MP2040 Vision, Goals and Objectives Report 20
Page 23 of 126
Item Cover Page
Subject Review and Discussion of draft resolution in opposition to State
Preemption of Local Zoning Authority (The BUILD Act HB 5626)
Meeting April 14, 2026 - MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Fiscal Impact N
Dollar Amount
Budget Source
Category DISCUSSION ITEMS
Type Presentation
Information
The attached draft resolution affirms the Village of Mount Prospect’s support for maintaining
local control over zoning and land use decisions. It reiterates the Village’s responsibility to
regulate land use in a manner that protects public health, safety, and welfare, while ensuring
compatible development patterns, protecting property values, managing traffic impacts, and
coordinating infrastructure. The resolution also emphasizes that zoning decisions are best
made at the local level by officials familiar with the community’s unique conditions and
planning goals.
Adoption of the resolution would formally communicate the Village’s position to the Illinois
General Assembly and Governor, urging preservation of municipal zoning authority without
additional state-imposed limitations. A copy would also be transmitted to the Illinois Municipal
League as part of broader advocacy efforts.
Discussion
The Build Illinois Act is proposed state legislation aimed at addressing housing affordability
and supply by limiting local zoning authority in certain circumstances. While the Act is
intended to increase housing production, particularly higher-density and affordable housing, it
would do so by preempting or restricting municipal control over zoning regulations such as
density, permitted uses, parking requirements, and approval processes near transit or in
designated areas.
In practice, the legislation could reduce the Village’s ability to evaluate development proposals
based on local impacts, including compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, traffic
generation, school capacity, infrastructure demands, and overall community character. While
increasing housing supply is a shared goal, the Act shifts decision-making from local
governments to the state, potentially limiting the Village’s ability to plan proactively and
Page 24 of 126
respond to site-specific conditions.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution to formally express the Village’s support for
maintaining local zoning and land use authority while continuing to participate in regional and
statewide discussions on housing policy solutions.
Alternatives
Staff Recommendation
If there is general support for the draft resolution to formally express the Village’s support for
maintaining local zoning and land use authority while continuing to participate in regional and
statewide discussions on housing policy solutions, then the resolution will be presented at
a future Village Board meeting for approval.
Attachments
1. In support of Maintaining Municipal Local Zoning and Land Use Authority
Page 25 of 126
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT IN SUPPORT OF MAINTAINING
MUNICIPAL LOCAL ZONING AND LAND USE AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has the responsibility to promote public health, safety, and
general welfare by regulating land use, density, and development standards within the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes that municipal authority of land use and zoning is a
means to address separating incompatible land uses, protecting property values, managing traffic flow,
ensuring adequate infrastructure and guiding orderly community growth; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect reiterates that community-led policies for land use and zoning
are not causing a crisis of housing affordability or availability; and
WHEREAS, land use and zoning decisions are appropriately made at the local level by municipal officials
familiar with the unique characteristics of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the existing
municipal authority for land use and zoning is essential for the continuing community vitality of the Village
of Mount Prospect.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED/RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the foregoing recitals shall be and are hereby incorporated as findings of
fact as if said recitals were fully set forth herein.
SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect urges the Illinois General Assembly and Governor to
preserve municipal authority for land use and zoning in its current form without additional restrictions on
municipal government and the communities they serve.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Illinois Municipal
League.
SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect after passage and approval as
required by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of April, 2026.
Paul Wm. Hoefert Mayor
ATTEST:
Karen M. Agoranos, Village Clerk
Page 26 of 126
Item Cover Page
Subject Evaluation of Zoning Code Text Amendments to Promote
Single-Family Residential Neighborhoods
Meeting April 14, 2026 - MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Fiscal Impact (Y/N) N
Dollar Amount
Budget Source
Category DISCUSSION ITEMS
Type Presentation
Information
Planning staff is proposing comprehensive text amendments to Chapter 14 of the Village Code
intended to modernize and clarify zoning regulations affecting single-family residential
neighborhoods. The proposed amendments are designed to eliminate unnecessary regulatory
obstacles, improve administrative efficiency, and better align the Zoning Ordinance with
current development patterns, community expectations, and adopted Village policy direction.
Discussion
Purpose and Background
The proposed amendments implement an Action Item identified under Goal 3 of the Village’s
2024–2029–2039 Strategic Plan and continue work listed as “In Progress” under the 2025–2030–
2040 Strategic Plan, including the evaluation of zoning regulations to promote single-family
residential neighborhoods and to establish policy and address monotony for new detached single-
family residential developments.
Planning staff was directed to conduct a comprehensive review of the Zoning Ordinance and
prepare text amendments aimed at providing greater flexibility for property owners in single-
family residential districts by eliminating unnecessary regulatory barriers. As part of this initiative,
staff also evaluated opportunities to delegate final decision-making authority to the Planning and
Zoning Commission and/or the Director of Community Development for certain zoning
applications, thereby streamlining the review process and reducing the number of matters
requiring Village Board consideration, ultimately providing better customer service to Village
residents.
Summary of Proposed Amendments:
• Introduce architectural diversity standards for new, detached single-family residential
dwellings;
• Add a cross-reference between the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance for the use
stucco and engineered stucco systems (EIFS);
Page 27 of 126
• Increase the maximum size of detached garages from 672 square feet to 720 square
feet;
• Increase the maximum size of gazebos, pergolas, greenhouses, sheds and other similar
accessory structures from 2% of the lot area to 200 square feet;
• Permanent attachments to a garage or shed to be considered as extensions of these
structures and count towards the maximum size of the garage or shed;
• Clarity on the prohibition of using accessory structures (garages and sheds) as
residential living quarters;
• Accessory structures considered as part of principal structures for single-family
residential districts only (not applicable to commercial or industrial properties);
• Increase the width of driveways serving 1- and 2- car attached or detached garages
from 26' to 30' and taper to 26' at property line;
• Increase the width of driveways serving 3-car attached garages from 33' within the first
18' of garage's front elevation and taper to 26' within the first 18' of garage's front
elevation to 33' and taper to 26' at property line;
• Increase the width of driveways serving 3-car detached garages from 33' within the first
18' of garage's front elevation and taper to 26' within the first 30' of garage's front
elevation to 33' and taper to 26' at property line;
• Increase the width of driveways serving side load garages from 26' to 30' and taper to
26' at property line;
• Rename "Minor Variations" to "Administrative Variations" to include Parking
Requirements For Uses in Excess of 2,500 SF in the B-5/B-5C Districts;
• Introduce "Administrative Conditional Uses" to include Existing Nonconforming
Accessory Structures;
• Change all fence petitions in single-family residential districts from variations (PZ Final)
to conditional uses (PZ Final);
• Change all relief requests related to accessory structures in single-family residential
districts from variations (PZ or VB Final) to conditional uses (PZ Final);
• Introduce a new application process and submission requirements for administrative
variation and administrative conditional use requests;
• Introduce the administrative hearing procedure for administrative variation and
administrative conditional use requests;
• Modify the Land Use Table 1 to include: 1) relief requests for accessory structures in the
R-X, R-1 and R-A single-family residential zoning districts, except for existing
nonconforming accessory structures that are eligible for administrative conditional use
approval (PZ Final); 2) relief requests for fences in the R-X, R-1 and R-A single-family
residential zoning districts (PZ Final); and 3) existing nonconforming accessory
structures as administrative conditional uses (CD Director Final);
• Add definitions of accessory structure, administrative variation, administrative
conditional use and permitted obstruction;
• Corrections of scrivener’s errors and internal inconsistencies within the zoning
ordinance.
Table 1: Final Authority Responsibility Matrix Under Current Zoning Code
Final Authority
Director of Planning Village
Community & Zoning Board
Development Commission
VARIATIONS
Any Chapter 14 Zoning requirement, except - ≤25% >25%
for fences
Page 28 of 126
Fences - All -
Signs - All -
Minor variations: All - -
• Existing nonconforming accessory
structures meeting
certain requirements
• Parking requirements for uses in
excess of 2,500 SF in the B-5 and B-
5C districts
CONDITIONAL USES
Setback reductions in all required yards in - ≤25% >25%
single-family residential zoning districts
Table 2: Final Authority Responsibility Matrix Under Proposed Amendments
Final Authority
Director of Planning Village Board
Community & Zoning
Development Commission
VARIATIONS
Administrative Standard Standard
Parking Requirements for Uses in
Excess of 2,500 square feet in the All - -
B-5/B-5C Districts1
Fences in Nonsingle-Family
Residential Districts All
Signs
- All -
All Other Chapter 14 Zoning
requirements - ≤25% >25%
CONDITIONAL USES
Administrative Standard Standard
Existing Nonconforming Accessory
Structures2 All - -
Relief from Accessory Structure
Requirements in Single-Family - All -
Residential Districts
Page 29 of 126
Setback Reductions in Required
Yards in Single-Family Residential - ≤25% >25%
Districts
Fences in Single-Family Residential
Districts - All -
1. No change from what is currently under the purview of the community development
director’s authority as a minor variation.
2. Applicable structures shall: (i) be replaced with the same type of structure, (ii) do not
exceed a total of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record, (iii) extend into no more
than forty percent (40%) of the required interior side yard setback, and (iv) extend into no
more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard setback.
Standards for Text Amendments
Staff finds that the proposed text amendments meet the standards contained in Section
14.203(D) of the Zoning Ordinance and are consistent with adopted Village plans and policies.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the standards and findings of fact outlined in
Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the
findings. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall use the findings of fact to guide their
recommendation to the Village Board.
Public Comment
As of this writing, staff has not received public comment pertaining to the proposed text
amendments.
Public Hearing
The proposed text amendments were presented to the Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Commission on
February 26, 2026, as Case PZ-01-26. Director Shallcross provided an overview of the proposed
changes to Chapter 14. The P&Z Commission discussed concerns about how accessory structures
count toward lot coverage, the potential impact of allowing two accessory structures on smaller
lots, and whether accessory buildings could be used as living quarters, which staff clarified is
already prohibited by Section 14.312 of the Village's Zoning Code. The P&Z Commission also
debated a proposal to increase the maximum driveway width from 26 feet to 30 feet to allow
three vehicles to park side-by-side; commissioners raised concerns about front yards becoming
overly paved or creating continuous concrete areas between neighboring properties, though staff
emphasized that tapering at the property line and existing lot coverage limits would maintain
neighborhood character. The P&Z Commission further considered amendments to streamline
zoning review procedures, including creating administrative conditional uses for certain routine
requests and shifting some approvals from the P&Z Commission to the Director of Community
Development when cases are typically approved anyway. After discussion and clarification of
safeguards, the P&Z Commission supported the amendments as practical updates to the zoning
code and voted 5-0 to recommend approval to the Village Board.
Alternatives
Staff Recommendation
Attachments
Page 30 of 126
1. PZ-01-26 Staff Report
2. PZ-01-26 Administrative Content
3. PZ-01-26 Ordinance
4. PZ-01-26 (50 S Emerson St) Minutes
5. A_Chapter 14 Article 2 Sections 14.201-14.203_Redline
6. B_Chapter 14 Article 3 Section 14.304.1 Design Standards_Redline
7. C_Chapter 14 Article 3 Section 14.306 Accessory Structures_Redline
8. D_Chapter 14 Article 6 Zoning Districts Land Use Table 1
9. E_Chapter 14 Article 22 Section 14.2204 Residential Driveways_Redline
10. F_Chapter 14 Article 24 Section 14.2401 Definitions_Redline
Page 31 of 126
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056
STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development
Jason C Shallcross, AICP, CEcD Ann Choi
Director of Community Development Development Planner
DATE: February 19, 2026
CASE NUMBER PETITIONER / PROPERTY OWNER
PZ-01-26 Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLIC HEARING DATE PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION
February 26, 2026 50 S. Emerson Street
BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The purpose of this memo is to discuss proposed code amendments to Chapter 14 of the Village Code.
The motivation for the proposed code amendments, a summary of the proposed changes, and their
potential impacts are described below.
APPROVE APPROVE WITH
STAFF RECOMMENDATION DENY
CONDITIONS
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL
The “Evaluation of the Current Zoning Regulations to Promote Single-Family Residential
Neighborhoods” is listed as an Action Item under Goal 3 of the Village of Mount Prospect’s 2024-2029-
2039 Strategic Plan. The “Common Residential Zoning Conflicts (Accessory Structures, Driveways,
Relief Process) Text Amendments”, the completion of “Current Zoning Regulations to Promote Single-
Family Residential Neighborhoods” and “Monotony for New Detached Single-Family Residential
Policy” are all listed as Action Items in Progress under the Village’s 2025-2030-2040 Strategic Plan.
Planning staff was directed to conduct a comprehensive review of the Zoning Ordinance and prepare
text amendments aimed at providing greater flexibility for property owners in single-family residential
districts by eliminating unnecessary regulatory barriers. As part of this initiative, staff also evaluated
opportunities to delegate final decision-making authority to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and/or the Director of Community Development for certain zoning applications, thereby streamlining
the review process and reducing the number of matters requiring Village Board consideration.
The proposed text amendments include revisions to administrative procedures and final decision-
making authority for certain zoning requests, expanded eligibility for conditional uses, increases to the
permitted size of select accessory structures, modifications to driveway width standards, new
architectural diversity standards, and corrections to scrivener’s errors and internal inconsistencies
within the Zoning Ordinance. A summary and discussion of the proposed text amendments are
provided below.
Organization of Discussion and Proposed Text Amendments
• Architectural Diversity Standards
• Changes to Accessory Structure Size Requirements
• Accessory Structures Considered Principal Structures For Single-Family Residential Properties
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 1
Page 32 of 126
• Changes to the Driveway Widths
• Current Process for Conditional Uses, Variations and Minor Variations
• Changes to Administrative Functions Affecting Single-Family Residential Properties
o New Administrative Variations (CD Director Final)
o New Administrative Conditional Uses
Existing Nonconforming Accessory Structures (CD Director Final)
• Standard Conditional Uses Expanded to Include:
o Accessory Structures in Single-Family Residential Districts (PZ Final)
o Fences (PZ Final)
• Clarify the Difference Between an Accessory Structure and a Permitted Obstruction
ARCHITECTURAL DIVERSITY STANDARDS
Proposed Changes
14.304.1: DESIGN STANDARDS
Planning staff has historically required non-monotony conditions of approval for detached single-
family residential subdivision requests to prevent repetitive building patterns, promote visual variety,
and avoid a “cookie-cutter” appearance within new residential developments. The proposed
architectural diversity standards would formalize this practice by requiring that no two detached
single-family residential homes located within two (2) lots of each other on the same street be
substantially similar in appearance.
For purposes of these standards, homes would be considered “similar in appearance” if they share
three (3) or more of the following key design characteristics: roof type or height, front massing or
silhouette, window arrangement, garage design, and primary exterior materials. Minor variations,
standing alone, such as differences in color, decorative details, mirrored floor plans, or small
variations of less than five percent (5%), would not be sufficient to distinguish homes as dissimilar.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits within a residential subdivision consisting of detached
single-family homes, the proposed standards would require the developer to submit building
elevations and a streetscape plan demonstrating compliance with the architectural diversity
requirements. The Director of Community Development would review and approve the submitted
materials to ensure that architectural diversity is maintained.
Rather than continuing to impose non-monotony requirements on a case-by-case basis through
conditions of approval, staff is recommending that these standards be codified within the Zoning
Ordinance to provide consistent requirements for future subdivision developments consisting of
detached single-family homes.
The regulations would apply to dwellings constructed within a residential subdivision or to dwellings
constructed as new principal residential construction on an individual lot after the effective date of the
ordinance. They would not apply to additions to existing homes, exterior remodels, or to existing
homes.
Section 14.304.1 would also be amended to include a cross-reference to Section 21.229 of the
Building Code, which regulates the use of stucco and engineered stucco systems for residential and
nonresidential applications. This Building Code provision is intended to limit the use of engineered
stucco systems, such as EIFS, in order to reduce long-term maintenance concerns, moisture
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 2
Page 33 of 126
intrusion, and building durability issues. The Building Code prohibits engineered stucco systems on
residential buildings due to documented performance and water-management concerns, while
allowing limited use on nonresidential buildings only when strict design, placement, installation, and
inspection standards are satisfied. These standards are intended to ensure proper water management,
protect vulnerable lower wall areas, and prevent premature or widespread façade deterioration.
Staff recommends incorporating this cross-reference into the Zoning Code to ensure that prohibited or
limited exterior building materials are identified and addressed early in the zoning and design review
process, rather than later during building permit review, to provide greater clarity for developers.
CHANGES TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SIZE REQUIREMENTS
Accessory structures such as detached garages, gazebos, sheds, and pergolas are subject to size
restrictions. These bulk requirements ensure that the accessory structures are compatible with the
size and scale of the existing buildings in a residential neighborhood. Additionally, the code defines
garages and sheds as structures designed for the storage of vehicles, equipment, and household
items.
Staff frequently requires residents to revise plans for accessory structures because the proposed
structures exceed the current code limits for size. For detached garages and sheds, residents often
cite the need for more storage space for vehicles and personal items. During and after the pandemic,
there was a wave of investment in outdoor entertaining spaces shaded by large gazebos and pergolas.
Smaller accessory structures, such as sheds, pergolas, and gazebos, are available to purchase in
standard sizes as DIY kits from big box retailers. Staff is proposing code changes that will meet the
demand for larger accessory structures while maintaining an appropriate scale for residential districts.
Proposed Changes
14.306: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Table 1 shows the proposed changes for several accessory structures. The proposed size increase for
detached garages to 720 SF is consistent with sizes permitted in other nearby municipalities. The
proposed size increase for gazebos, pergolas, and sheds to 200 SF is consistent with standard sizes
available for prefabricated models. Residents would still need to meet the lot coverage requirements
for their zoning district, which will preclude large accessory structures from being built on smaller lots.
To further limit oversized accessory structures, gazebos, pergolas, and other similar improvements
permanently attached to a garage or shed are considered extensions of the garage or shed and count
towards the maximum area for the garage or shed.
Garages and sheds will continue to be restricted to storing vehicles, equipment for maintaining the
home, and personal property.
Table 1: Accessory Structure Size
Accessory Structure Current Proposed Change
Detached Garage 672 SF 720 SF 48 SF (+7%)
Maximum Area
Gazebo / Pergola / Shed 2% lot area or 200 SF, 200 SF 200 SF is standard
Maximum Area whichever is smaller
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 3
Page 34 of 126
Exhibit B of the staff report provides a comparison of maximum sizes of detached garages among
neighboring communities. The proposed changes are in line with Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, Park
Ridge and Prospect Heights.
Accessory Structures Considered as Principal Structures for Single-Family Residential Districts
In addition to recommending increases to the permitted areas for certain detached accessory
structures, staff is proposing a clarification to the zoning code to address a gap related to accessory
structures in nonsingle-family zoning districts. Currently, the zoning code treats any accessory
structure that is permanently attached to a principal structure as an extension of the principal
structure, rather than as a standalone accessory structure. As a result, these attached structures are
subject to the bulk requirements of the zoning district for principal structures, unless otherwise
specified as a permitted obstruction. This provision was originally intended to apply exclusively to
single-family residential properties in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts, and not to commercial and
industrial properties, which have their own set of bulk requirements for accessory structures. The
proposed amendment seeks to close this loophole for nonsingle-family properties as the original
intent of this requirement was to allow homeowners of single-family residential properties to build
larger pergolas and gazebos.
Clarifying language has also been added to ensure that any structure permanently attached to an
accessory structure will be considered part of the accessory structure and shall meet the bulk
requirements for accessory structures, unless otherwise listed as a permitted obstruction in Section
14.319 Permitted Obstructions. This was added to address the scenarios where people are extending
the roofs of the detached garages over patio areas or creating makeshift car ports. Once the structure
is attached to the garage, the whole structure is subject to size and height limits of detached garage. If
it is a detached accessory structure such as a shed, pergola or gazebo, then it will subject to its own
standards in the code. Additional language has been added to restrict the use of accessory structures
for residential living quarters.
CHANGES TO RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY WIDTH
Current Practice
The driveway requirements are designed to maintain open, green space in front of homes rather than
an abundance of hard surfaces for the parking of vehicles. Driveways serving 1- and 2-car garages are
allowed a maximum width of 26’. Driveways serving 3-car attached garages may be the same width as
the garage, not to exceed a maximum width of 33' within the first 18' of the garage’s front elevation, and
shall be tapered to a width no greater than 26' within 18’ of the garage's front elevation. Driveways
serving detached 3-car garages may be the same width as the garage not exceed a maximum width 33'
within the first 18' of the garage's front elevation, and shall be tapered to a width no greater than 26’
within 30' of the garage's front elevation. All single-family residential districts have a maximum “front
lot coverage” between 35% and 50%. Driveways in front of homes cannot encroach more than 3’
beyond the garage towards the front plane of the house. Depending on the type of lot (corner vs.
interior), orientation of the home and garage, and other structures built on the property, the driveway
may be restricted in size or location.
Reasons for Changes
Staff frequently requires residents to revise plans for driveways because the proposed driveways do
not meet the current code limits for width and location. Residents cite the need for more driveway
space to be able to park all their household vehicles on their property, as they are not allowed to park
overnight on the public right-of-way. Car ownership has steadily increased over time. US Census data
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 4
Page 35 of 126
reveals that only 2% of 1960 households owned 3 or more vehicles; in 2010, the share was almost
20%. Staff is proposing code changes that will meet the demand for more parking on residential lots
while maintaining an appropriate balance of open, green space in residential areas.
Proposed Changes
14.2204(A): RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS, DRIVEWAYS
Table 2 summarizes the proposed changes for maximum driveway widths, from 26’ to 30’ for 1- and 2-
car garages, and taper to a width of 26’ at the property line. Additionally, staff is proposing to clarify
driveway encroachment in front of homes. Driveways in front of homes shall not encroach more than
3’ beyond the attached garage, and in the case of detached garages, no more than 3’ along the closest
plane of the principal structure. Staff is not proposing changes to the front lot coverage requirement,
which ranges from 35% to 50% in single-family residential districts. The goal is to maintain a minimum
amount of green, open space in front of homes, rather than paved or hard surfaces for the parking of
vehicles.
Exhibit C of the staff report provides a comparison of driveway width requirements among neighboring
communities. The proposed changes to the Village of Mount Prospect’s driveway widths are most
aligned with Palatine’s driveway width requirements.
Table 2: Driveway Width
Driveway Type Current Proposed Change
Serving 1- and 2-car 26’ 30’, taper to 26’ at property 4’ (+15%)
attached or detached line
garage
Serving 3-car attached 33’ within first 18’ of 33’, taper to 26’ at property 4’ (+15%)
garage garage’s front elevation, line
taper to 26’ within first 18’
of garage’s front elevation
Serving 3-car detached Same width as garage not 33’, taper to 26’ at property 4’ (+15%)
garage to exceed width of 33’ line
within the first 18’ of
garage’s front elevation,
taper to 26’ within first 30’
of garage’s front elevation
Serving Sideload 26’ 30’, taper to 26’ at property 4’ (+15%)
Garages line
Circular and Dual 26’ 26’ No change
Frontage Driveway
Aprons Not to exceed 26’ at Not to exceed 26’ at No change
property line property line
CURRENT PROCESS FOR CONDITIONAL USES, VARIATIONS AND MINOR VARIATIONS
The planning and zoning commission currently hears and decides as final administrative authority, all
petitions for fence and sign variations, variations which do not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of any
requirement of the zoning code, and conditional uses for setback reductions that do not exceed
twenty-five percent (25%) of the required setback in all required yards in the R-X, R-1 and R-A zoning
districts. For variation and conditional use requests that exceed 25%, final authority rests with the
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 5
Page 36 of 126
Village Board. The director of community development has the authority to grant a minor variation after
holding an administrative hearing.
Variations
Standards for variations are generally difficult to meet as applicants must prove a zoning hardship
related to the physical characteristics of the property. Variations run with the land in perpetuity and
permanent zoning relief is typically not granted if the variation standards are not met. Approval for
variations also have a time limit. A variation will become null and void if a building permit is not issued
and substantial work has not commenced within one year of approval. For example, a variation
allowing increased lot coverage for a patio will be voided, meaning the patio could not be installed, if a
permit is not issued and installation has not begun within the required timeframe.
Conditional Uses
A conditional use is applied for certain uses that require more scrutiny and review because of the
impacts it may have on the surrounding area – the zoning code states that conditional uses, because
of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any particular zoning district without
consideration of the impact of those uses upon adjoining properties and their impact on the
neighborhood in general.
In contrast to variations whose standards are based on zoning hardships caused by the physical
constraints of a property, standards for conditional uses are easier to meet because zoning relief
would be supported based on the impact of the use upon its neighbors. Conditional use approval may
be revoked if the use is not established or commenced within one year and is not completed within 18
months. Additionally, a conditional use expires if the use ceases for more than 12 months. For
instance, a conditional use permit granted for a setback reduction for a detached garage would be
revoked, meaning the detached garage could not be constructed, if a building permit is not obtained or
construction does not begin within 18 months. If the garage was lawfully constructed but later
demolished and is not reconstructed within one year, the conditional use would expire, and the
property owner would need to reapply for conditional use approval before seeking a building permit.
Minor Variations
Section 14.203(C)(11) currently grants the director of community development final administrative
authority to hear and decide all petitions for minor variations. The following are currently eligible for
minor variation requests:
1. Existing nonconforming accessory structures that meet the following requirements:
a. Will be replaced with the same type of structure,
b. Do not exceed a total of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record,
c. Extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of the required interior side yard setback,
d. Extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard setback, or
e. Where the applicable lot coverage does not exceed the maximum permitted for that zoning
district by more than ten percent (10%).
2. Parking requirements for uses in excess of two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in
floor area located in the B-5 central commercial district and B-5C core central commercial
district.
Upon receipt of an application for a minor variation, all property owners within one hundred feet (100’)
of the subject property will be mailed a public notice and a notice sign will be posted on the subject
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 6
Page 37 of 126
property no more than thirty (30) days nor less than seven (7) days prior to the administrative hearing.
After the administrative hearing has taken place and a decision has been made by the director of
community development, any individual may file an appeal of the decision with the planning and
zoning commission within five (5) calendar days of the director’s decision. Standards for minor
variations must be met and vary based on the type of minor variation request. These standards are
found under Section 14.203(C)(11). Table 3 outlines the final authority for standard variations, minor
variations and standard conditional uses.
Table 3: Final Authority Responsibility Matrix Under Current Zoning Code
Final Authority
Director of Planning
Village
Community & Zoning
Board
Development Commission
VARIATIONS
Any Chapter 14 Zoning requirement, except for fences - ≤25% >25%
Fences - All -
Signs - All -
Minor variations: All - -
- Existing nonconforming accessory
structures meeting certain requirements
- Parking requirements for uses in excess of
2,500 SF in the B-5 and B-5C districts
CONDITIONAL USES
Setback reductions in all required yards in single-family - ≤25% >25%
residential zoning districts
CHANGES TO ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS
New Administrative Variations
Staff proposes to rename all instances of “Minor Variations” to “Administrative Variations” to better
reflect the entitlement being requested and to remove existing nonconforming accessory structures as
an eligible request. Existing nonconforming accessory structures will be changed to a new
administrative conditional use and is further discussed below. As proposed, the only request that
would be eligible for an administrative variation is to vary parking requirements for uses in excess of
two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in floor area located in the B-5 central commercial
district and B-5C core central commercial district, which the Director of Community Development
already serves as the administrative authority over. The standards for an administrative variation would
remain the same as the standard for a minor variation. The Director of Community Development would
have administrative authority over administrative variations.
New Administrative Conditional Uses and Existing Nonconforming Accessory Structures
Staff proposes a new administrative process that would authorize the Director of Community
Development to assume final administrative authority over certain conditional use requests. Public
noticing and administrative hearings for an administrative conditional use would be identical to the
current minor variation (proposed administrative variation) process. Any decision made by the Director
of Community Development for an administrative conditional use would be appealable to the Planning
and Zoning Commission. The new standards for administrative conditional uses are proposed below
and would be easier to meet than the administrative variation standards. No administrative conditional
use shall be granted by the Village unless the administrative conditional use:
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 7
Page 38 of 126
• Is so designed, located, and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and
welfare will be protected.
• Will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood in
which it is located.
• That in all other respects, the administrative conditional use conforms to the applicable
regulations of the district in which it is located.
Staff proposes to change the relief mechanism for certain existing nonconforming accessory
structures, from a minor variation to an administrative conditional use. Under this change, an existing
nonconforming accessory structure is eligible for an administrative conditional use if the accessory
structure meets the existing criteria under minor variations.
An example of when administrative conditional use approval for an existing nonconforming accessory
structure might be sought is when a homeowner replaces an existing nonconforming patio that
exceeds the maximum permitted lot coverage with a new patio that reduces the existing lot coverage
but still exceeds the allowable limit by not more than 10%.
Standard Conditional Uses to Include Fences and Accessory Structures
Fences
In the past seven years, there have been a total of nine fence variation requests. See Table 4 below.
Out of these nine requests, the Planning and Zoning Commission denied only one fence variation
request (PZ-07-23) and disagreed with staff’s recommendation to approve a fence variation on another
case (PZ-12-18). Since the Planning and Zoning Commission has historically approved most of these
requests, staff proposes to change all fence requests in single-family residential districts to
conditional uses. This would remove the burden on homeowners to prove a zoning hardship since the
conditional use standards are easier to attain. The proposed change would meet the strategic plan
goal of enabling property owners in single-family residential districts to improve their properties by
eliminating unnecessary obstacles to such improvements. Fence petitions for nonsingle-family
residential properties would remain as variations. Final authority for all fence petitions would remain
with the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Table 4: Fence Variation History in the Last 8 Years
Zoning Address Request Staff Rec. P&Z Decision
Case No.
PZ-16-17 101 Horner Ln Fence Height: 11’ tall Approve 5-0 Approved
Fence Location: Front Yard
PZ-12-18 15-19 N. Elmhurst Rd Fence Height: 8’ tall Approve 0-6 Denied
PZ-09-19 1 S. Busse Rd Fence Location: Exterior Side Yard Approve 5-0 Approved
PZ-12-20 2004 W. Lonnquist Bl Fence Location: Front Yard Approve 4-0 Approved
PZ-07-21 1650 Dempster St Fence Height: 11’ tall with an Approve 5-0 Approved
additional 12” of Y-shaped barbed
wire atop and four 16’ tall fence
posts
PZ-03-22 1650 Greenbriar Dr Fence Location: Front Yard Approve 5-0 Approved
PZ-07-23 902 Willow Ln Fence Location: Exterior Side Yard Deny 4-0 Denied
PZ-08-23 900 Emerson Ct Fence Location: Front Yard Approve 4-0 Approved
PZ-10-23 201 W. Council Trl Fence Location: Front Yard Approve 4-0 Approved
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 8
Page 39 of 126
New Accessory Structures
Currently, any relief request to increase the size, height and location of accessory structures requires a
variation. If the request is 25% or less of the zoning requirement, approval from the Planning and
Zoning Commission is required; if it exceeds 25%, it requires approval from the Village Board. Table 5
on the following page shows that in the last 20 years, the Village Board had final authority on only three
variation requests out of thirteen requests related to accessory structures in single-family residential
districts and that these requests were approved. Staff proposes to change all relief requests related to
accessory structures in single-family residential districts to conditional uses for the same reasons
stated under fences. The standards for conditional uses are easier to attain and would align with Goal
3 of the strategic plan. This change would not apply to existing nonconforming accessory structures,
which were addressed previously and are proposed as administrative conditional uses and approved
by the community development director.
The Planning and Zoning Commission would have final authority over all conditional use petitions for
accessory structures.
Table 5: Accessory Structure Variation History in the Last 20+ Years
Zoning Address Request Size (SF) Staff P&Z Rec./ VB
Case No. Rec. Decision Decision
PZ-11-02 306 N. Owen St 770 Deny 6-0 Denied N/A
PZ-24-02 915 S. Owen St Detached 768 Deny 4-0 Approved N/A
PZ-46-04 1310 Burning Bush Ln Garage Size 750 Deny 4-3 Denied N/A
PZ-28-07 1030 Linneman Rd 840 Deny 4-0 Approved N/A
PZ-25-08 1504 Larch Ln Shed Height 12’-0” Deny 6-0 Denied N/A
PZ-27-12 903 Ironwood Dr Detached 13’-3” Deny 7-0 Approved N/A
Garage (to midpoint
Height of roof)
PZ-07-13 2008 Hopi Ln Shed In easement Approve 7-0 Rec. 5-0
Location Approval Approved
PZ-08-16 214 N. Emerson St Detached 12’-10” to Deny 7-0 Approved N/A
Garage midpoint of
Height roof
PZ-13-20 300 E. Evergreen Av Detached 1047 Deny 2-2 Denied 6-0
Garage Size & Approved
Height
PZ-05-21 707 See Gwun Av Shed Size & 192 SF & Approve 3-2 Approved N/A
Height 12’-3.5”
PZ-26-21 122 N. Emerson St Detached 838 SF & Approve 4-0 Approved N/A
Garage Size & 18’-3.375”
Height
PZ-04-23 1306 Pima Ln Detached 792 Deny 5-0 Denied N/A
Garage Size
PZ-12-24 2004 W. Lonnquist Bl Shed In front yard Approve 4-0 Rec. 5-0
Location Approval Approved
Table 6 on the following page outlines the proposed final authority for both variations and conditional
uses.
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 9
Page 40 of 126
Table 6: Final Authority Responsibility Matrix Under Proposed Amendments
Final Authority
Director of Planning
Community & Zoning Village Board
Development Commission
VARIATIONS Administrative Standard Standard
Parking Requirements for Uses in Excess of All - -
2,500 square feet in the B-5/B-5C Districts1
Fences in Nonsingle-Family Residential All
Districts
Signs - All -
All Other Chapter 14 Zoning requirements - ≤25% >25%
CONDITIONAL USES Administrative Standard Standard
Existing Nonconforming Accessory All - -
Structures2
Relief from Accessory Structure - All -
Requirements in Single-Family Residential
Districts
Setback Reductions in Required Yards in - ≤25% >25%
Single-Family Residential Districts
Fences in Single-Family Residential - All -
Districts
1 No change from what is currently under the purview of the community development director’s authority as a minor
variation.
2 Applicable structures shall: (i) be replaced with the same type of structure, (ii) do not exceed a total of two (2)
accessory structures per lot of record, (iii) extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of the required interior side
yard setback, and (iv) extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard setback.
14.201: ORGANIZATION (and in all other instances in the Zoning Code)
Change all instances of “Minor variations” to “Administrative variations” and add “Administrative
conditional uses”.
14.203: PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS
Staff proposes to create separate categories for administrative variations and administrative
conditional uses under this section and to modify the list of eligible requests provided under the
existing minor variations (now administrative variations) subsection to remove “existing
nonconforming accessory structures”. Relief requests for existing nonconforming accessory
structures meeting certain requirements will be eligible as administrative conditional uses rather than
as minor variations under this amendment. Additionally, staff proposes a separate application process
and submission requirements for administrative variation or administration conditional use requests.
New standards for administrative conditional uses are also proposed. The administrative hearing and
appeals process for administrative variations and administrative conditional uses will also be outlined
in this section.
14.604: LAND USE TABLE 1
The following land uses have been added as conditional uses to Section 14.604 Land Use Table 1 in the
appropriate alphabetical locations: 1) relief requests for accessory structures in the R-X, R-1 and R-A
single-family residential zoning districts, except for existing nonconforming accessory structures that
are eligible for administrative conditional use approval; 2) relief requests for fences in the R-X, R-1 and
R-A single-family residential zoning districts; and 3) existing nonconforming accessory structures as
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 10
Page 41 of 126
administrative conditional uses. The planning and zoning commission will have final authority over
items 1) and 2), and the director of community development will have final authority over item 3).
14.2401: PURPOSE
Staff proposes to add definitions of ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, ADMINISTRATIVE VARIATION,
ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE and PERMITTED OBSTRUCTION in the appropriate alphabetical
order.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ZONING CODE
Staff is proposing a comprehensive update to the zoning code. The following attachments contain the
redlined code sections:
• Attachment A: Chapter 14, Article 2 – Administration and Enforcement
• Attachment B: Chapter 14, Article 3 – Section 14.304.1 Design Standards
• Attachment C: Chapter 14, Article 3 – Section 14.306 Accessory Structures
• Attachment D: Chapter 14, Article 6 – Section 14.604 Land Use Table 1
• Attachment E: Chapter 14, Article 22 – Section 14.2204 Residential Driveways
• Attachment F: Chapter 14 Article 24 – Section 14.2401 Definitions
The proposed text amendments are contained in the attached documents. Modifications to each of
the chapters are indicated as deletions and additions.
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the standards and findings of fact outlined in
Exhibit A and 1) accept them without changes, 2) accept them with changes, or 3) reject the findings.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall use the findings of fact to guide their recommendation to
the Village Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The proposed text amendments meet the standards contained in Section 14.203(D) of the Zoning
Ordinance. Staff requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff’s
findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the
following motion:
1. “To adopt the text amendments to Chapter 14 of the Mount Prospect Village Code.”
The Village Board’s decision is final.
ATTACHMENTS: ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT PLANS OTHER
(Supplemental Information,
(Zoning Request Application, Responses to (Plat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.) Public Comments Received,
Standards, etc…) etc…)
I concur:
____________________________________
Jason C Shallcross, AICP, CEcD
Director of Community Development
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 11
Page 42 of 126
Exhibit A
Standards and Findings of Fact
TEXT AMENDMENT STANDARDS
Section 14.203.D.8.b of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance provides that when a text
amendment is proposed, the planning and zoning commission shall make findings based upon the
evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters:
1. The degree to which the proposed amendment has general applicability within the village at large
and not intended to benefit specific property.
2. The consistency of the proposed amendment with the objectives of this chapter and the intent of
the applicable zoning district regulations.
3. The degree to which the proposed amendment would create nonconformity.
4. The degree to which the proposed amendment would make this chapter more permissive.
5. The consistency of the proposed amendment with the comprehensive plan.
6. The degree to which the proposed amendment is consistent with village policy as established in
previous rulings on petitioners involving similar circumstances.
Staff’s Findings: The proposed text amendments have general applicability to the single-family
residential districts within the Village of Mount Prospect at large and are not intended to benefit a
specific property. The proposed text amendments are in line with the Village requirement that the
Planning and Zoning Commission and the Village Board review the effectiveness of the Village’s Zoning
Ordinance on an annual basis. The proposed changes are intended to reflect current Village objectives
as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments further implement an Action Item
identified under Goal 3 of the Village’s 2024–2029–2039 Strategic Plan and continue work listed as “In
Progress” under the 2025–2030–2040 Strategic Plan, including the evaluation of zoning regulations to
promote single-family residential neighborhoods. “Common Residential Zoning Conflicts (Accessory
Structures, Driveways, Relief Process) Text Amendments”, the completion of “Current Zoning
Regulations to Promote Single-Family Residential Neighborhoods” and “Monotony for New Detached
Single-Family Residential Policy” are all listed as Action Items in Progress under the Village’s 2025-2030-
2040 Strategic Plan. The proposed text amendment are intended to modernize and clarify zoning
regulations affecting single-family residential neighborhoods, eliminate unnecessary regulatory
obstacles, improve administrative efficiency, and better align the Zoning Ordinance with current
development patterns, community expectations, and adopted Village policy direction.
Based on the foregoing, staff finds that the proposed amendments satisfy the standards as required in
Section 14.203(D) of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends approval of the text amendments.
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 12
Page 43 of 126
Exhibit B
Size of Detached Garages
Comparison of Neighboring Municipalities
Maximums for Detached Garage Height Area
Mount Prospect 15’ 672 SF (32’ x 21’)
Arlington Heights 15’ 720 SF
Elk Grove Village 15’ 600 SF, no side may exceed 25’
Des Plaines 15’ 720 SF
Park Ridge 18’ 720 SF
>15’ requires appeal to
appearance commission
Prospect Heights 15’ 720 SF
Wheeling Cannot exceed height of 800 SF
principal structure, up to 24’
Palatine 15’ to midpoint of roof
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 13
Page 44 of 126
Exhibit C
Driveway Width
Comparison of Neighboring Municipalities
Width of Driveway Requirements in Neighboring Communities
1-car garage 2-car garage 3-car garage Setback from Apron Width
Property Line
Mount Prospect 26’ 26’ As wide as 0’ As wide as
garage up to driveway at
33’, taper to 26' property line
Palatine 30’, taper to 25’ 30’, taper to 25’ 35’, taper to 25’ 2’
Arlington Heights 22’ 22’ 32’, taper to 22’ >70’ lot –
setback 3’
Prospect Heights 22’ at property 22’ at property 22’ at property 28’
line line line
Elk Grove Village 20’ 30’ 30’ 26’ (single) or
36’ (2- or 3-car
garage);
Min. 2’ and max.
3’ flare at curb
Des Plaines 20’ 23’ 26’ 2’ Match driveway
Park Ridge Detached – as wide as garage for 20’, then taper down to 12’
Attached – as wide as garage
Wheeling No wider than garage, plus a 4’ walkway
Recommendation 30’ 30’ 30’ 0
H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2026\Staff Reports\PZ-01-26 50 S Emerson Street (Text Amendments).docx 14
Page 45 of 126
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
50 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone: (847) 818-5328
Zoning Request Application
Official Use Only (To be completed by Village Staff)
Case Number: P&Z 01 26
-_______-_______ Date of Submission: 08/01/2024
_________________ Hearing 02/26/2026
Date:_______________
Project Name/Address: ZONING CODE UPDATES
__________________________________________________________________________
I. Subject Property
Address(es): 50 S. EMERSON STREET, MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056
__________________________________________________________________________________
N/A
Zoning District (s): _____________________________ N/A
Property Area (Sq.Ft. and/or Acreage): _______________
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN(s): N/A
__________________________________________________________________
II. Zoning Request(s) (Check all that apply)
Conditional Use: For _________________________________________________________________________
Variation(s): To _____________________________________________________________________________
Zoning Map Amendment: Rezone From ________________________ To _______________________________
Zoning Text Amendment: Section(s) Chapter 14
____________________________________________________________
Other: _____________________________________________________________________________________
III. Summary of Proposal (use separate sheet if necessary)
See attached memo.
IV. Applicant (all correspondence will be sent to the applicant)
Name: Jason C. Shallcross Corporation: Village of Mount Prospect
Address: 50 S. Emerson Street
City, State, ZIP Code: Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Phone: 847-818-5328 Email: comdev@mountprospect.org
Interest in Property: Director of Community Development
(e.g. owner, buyer, developer, lessee, architect, etc…)
1
Page 46 of 126
V. Property Owner
Check if Same as Applicant
Name: N/A Corporation:
Address:
City, State, ZIP Code:
Phone: Email:
In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is
requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the
owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount
Prospect and their agent’s permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of
the subject property.
I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant: Date: 8/01/2024
(Signature)
Jason C. Shallcross
(Print or Type Name)
If applicant is not property owner:
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this
application and the associated supporting material.
Property Owner: N/A Date:
(Signature)
(Print or Type Name)
2
Page 47 of 126
Affidavit of Ownership
COUNTY OF COOK )
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
N/A
I, __________________________________________, under oath, state that I am
(print name)
the sole owner of the property
an owner of the property
an authorized officer for the owner of the property
N/A
commonly described as
(property address and PIN)
N/A
and that such property is owned by _______________________________________________ as of this date.
(print name)
____________________________________
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this __________ day of
________________, 20____.
___________________________________
Notary Public
3
Page 48 of 126
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 “ZONING” OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a home rule municipality as
defined by Article VII, § 6 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect desire to make certain amendments to the Village Code of Mount
Prospect as set forth below; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted under the Illinois
Municipal Code and in accordance with home rule authority granted to home
rule municipalities, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect approve the amendments as set forth below.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION 1: Section 14.202, “Organization,” of Article II,
“Administration and Enforcement,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount
Prospect Village Code shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:
The administration of this chapter is hereby vested in the following
elected and appointed boards and professional staff:
1
Page 49 of 126
Village board of trustees
Planning and zoning commission
Director of community development
The administrative functions of this chapter are as follows:
Zoning compliance reviews
Issuance of certificates of occupancy
Variations
Text and map amendments
Appeals
Conditional uses
Public hearings
Fees and penalties
Administrative variations
Administrative conditional uses
SECTION 2: Subsection A (1) of Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies
and Specific Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
1. Receive recommendations from the planning and zoning
commission concerning all text and map amendments, certain
conditional use permits, certain variations and to approve or
disapprove any such recommendation from the planning and zoning
commission.
SECTION 3: Subsection B (1) of Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies
and Specific Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
2
Page 50 of 126
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
1. To hear petitions for certain variations, certain conditional use
permits, map and text amendments and prepare recommendations to
the village board regarding such petitions.
SECTION 4: Subsection B (2) of Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies
and Specific Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
2. To hear and decide as final administrative authority, all petitions for
fence variations, all conditional use petitions for fences in the R-X, R-1,
and R-A zoning districts, conditional use petitions for accessory
structures in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts, and conditional uses
for residential setback reductions in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning
districts which do not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of any
requirement of this chapter. The planning and zoning commission shall
also hear and decide variations which do not exceed twenty five percent
(25%) of any requirement of this chapter. The planning and zoning
commission shall not hear and decide as final administrative authority
any petitions for administrative variations and/or administrative
conditional uses.
SECTION 5: Subsection C (2) of Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies
and Specific Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
3
Page 51 of 126
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
2. Forward to the planning and zoning commission all applications for
appeals; variations, except for administrative variations; conditional
uses, except for administrative conditional uses; map or text
amendments; or other matters on which the planning and zoning
commission is required to review under this chapter.
SECTION 6: Subsection C (4) of Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies
and Specific Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
4. Maintain possession of appropriate records and files pertaining to
the zoning ordinance, including, but not limited to, zoning maps,
amendments, conditional uses, administrative conditional uses,
variations, administrative variations, and appeals.
SECTION 7: Subsection C (9) of Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies
and Specific Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
9. Conduct administrative hearings and make final determinations on
administrative variations and administrative conditional uses.
4
Page 52 of 126
SECTION 8: Section 14.202, “Administrative Bodies and Specific
Duties,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to Chapter 14,
“Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to add
subsection (D) as follows:
[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
5
Page 53 of 126
D. TABLE OF ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES AND SPECIFIC DUTIES:
Final Authority
Director of Planning
Village
Community & Zoning
Board
Development Commission
VARIATIONS Administrative Standard Standard
Parking requirements for uses
All - -
in excess of 2,500 square feet
in the B-5/B-5C districts
Fences in nonsingle-family - All -
residential districts
Sign variations - All -
All other Chapter 14 zoning - ≤25% >25%
requirements
CONDITIONAL USES Administrative Standard Standard
Existing nonconforming All - -
accessory structures1
Relief from accessory - All -
structure requirements in
single-family residential
districts
Setback reductions in - ≤25% >25%
required yards in single-family
residential zoning districts
Fences in single-family - All -
residential districts
1 Applicable structures shall: (i) be replaced with the same type of structure, (ii) not exceed a total
of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record, (iii) extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of
the required interior side yard setback, and (iv) extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the
rear yard setback.
6
Page 54 of 126
SECTION 9: The heading of Subsection C of Section 14.203,
“Procedures For Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and
Enforcement,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code
shall be amended to read as follows:
C. Variations and Administrative Variations:
SECTION 10: Subsection C (1) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
1. Intent: Variations shall be granted or recommended for approval
only where the planning and zoning commission, or in the case of
administrative variations, the director of community development,
makes findings of fact in accordance with the standards set forth in this
chapter, and further finds that the regulations of this chapter will
impose practical difficulties or particular hardships on the petitioner in
carrying out the strict letter of the regulations of this chapter.
SECTION 11: Subsection C (2) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
2. Authority: The director of community development may, after an
administrative hearing, grant an administrative variation as provided in
7
Page 55 of 126
this chapter. The planning and zoning commission may, after a public
hearing, grant or recommend for approval a variation in harmony with
the general purpose and intent of this chapter.
SECTION 12: Subsection C (3) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
3. Initiation: An application for an administrative variation or variation
may be made by any person, firm, other entity, corporation, or by any
governmental entity requesting or intending to request application for a
building permit.
SECTION 13: Subsection C (4) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
4. Filing Of Applications: An application for an administrative variation
or variation shall be filed with the director of community development
on forms obtained from the community development department. Such
form shall include all information necessary for processing the request,
including, but not limited to, a statement on specific hardship, the
extent of variation requested, legal description of subject property,
survey, site plan, appropriate proof of ownership, or proof of authority.
The application form may be revised from time to time. The application
shall be filed with the appropriate fee in an amount established by the
board of trustees.
8
Page 56 of 126
SECTION 14: Subsection C (5) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
5. Public Hearing: Public hearings for variations and administrative
variations shall be held in compliance with state statutes and
provisions of this chapter as described in subsection G or subsection H
of this section.
SECTION 15: Subsection C (6) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
6. Action By Planning And Zoning Commission: The planning and
zoning commission shall hear and decide as final administrative
authority, all petitions for fence variations in nonsingle-family
residential districts and variations which do not exceed twenty five
percent (25%) of any requirement of this chapter.
The planning and zoning commission shall make recommendations to
the village board on all variations which are more than twenty-five
percent (25%) of any requirement of this chapter.
In all petitions for variations, the planning and zoning commission shall
make findings of fact based on the standards listed in subsection C9 of
this chapter. In all petitions for administrative variations, the planning
9
Page 57 of 126
and zoning commission shall make findings of fact based on the
standards listed in subsection C11c of this chapter.
SECTION 16: Subsection C (11) of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
11. Administrative Variations:
a. Action By Director Of Community Development: The director of
community development shall consider the following
administrative variations and may either administratively approve
or remand to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further
action. The following types of relief are eligible as administrative
variations, and requests that are not included in this eligibility list
may apply for a standard variation:
(1) Parking requirements for uses in excess of two
thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in floor area
located in the B-5 central commercial district and B-5C
core central commercial district.
b. Filing of Application: All applications for administrative
variations shall be made on an appropriate application form
provided by the Village. The application for administrative
variations shall be filed and processed in the manner prescribed for
variations and shall be accompanied by the following information:
(1) Said application shall contain the following information:
(A) Zoning Request Application / Petition for Hearing;
(B) Affidavit of Ownership;
10
Page 58 of 126
(C) Proof of Ownership;
(D) Paid receipt of the most recent tax bill;
(E) Responses to applicable standards;
(F) Plat of Survey;
(G) Site plan;
(H) Building elevation(s), existing and proposed, if
applicable;
(I) Floor plans, if applicable;
(J) Preliminary engineering plans, if applicable;
(K) Legal description of the subject property;
(L) Any other information deemed necessary by the
Village.
c. Standards for Administrative Variations:
(1) For an administrative variation request considering a
reduction in the minimum number of required parking spaces
in the B-5 central commercial district and B-5C core central
commercial district, the director of community development
shall make findings of fact based on the petition and public
input according to the following standards:
(A) Whether the requested relief will be out of
character with the neighborhood.
(B) Whether there are other properties within the
same zoning district, which have received a variation from
the same regulation.
(C) Whether there is public parking available within
one thousand feet (1,000').
(D) Whether there is public transit (e.g., train station)
available within one thousand feet (1,000').
11
Page 59 of 126
(E) Whether there are adjacent land uses with
different peak parking demand periods based on the hours
of operations.
(F) Whether there is a shared parking
agreement/valet service provided.
d. Hearings: Administrative hearings shall be held for
administrative variations in compliance with the provisions as
described in subsection H of this section.
e. Administrative Approvals: Administrative variations adhering to
the application submittal requirements and ordinance
requirements may be administratively approved as follows:
(1) After the administrative variation application is
submitted and reviewed by the various Village departments,
the director of community development will indicate if the
applicant may proceed forward with seeking approval of the
requested relief with the sign-off approval of the surrounding
property owners.
(2) In all cases where the director of community
development grants an administrative variation, an
authorizing determination shall be prepared that may set
forth the terms for operation of the conditional use. The
village clerk shall record the authorizing determination with
the county recorder of deeds.
f. Appeal Of Director Of Community Development Decision: Any
individual may file an appeal of the decision of the director of
community development regarding an administrative variation with
the planning and zoning commission. Such appeal shall be filed
12
Page 60 of 126
with the director of community development within five (5)
calendar days of the director's decision.
12. Additional Restrictions: In the granting of a variation or
administrative variation, additional conditions and restrictions may be
placed upon the premises, which are necessary to comply with the
standards listed above and the objectives of this chapter.
13. Revocation: Where a variation or administrative variation has been
granted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, such approval shall
become null and void unless a building permit is issued and work is
substantially under way within twelve (12) months of the date of the
variation, unless the variation approval is extended by the planning and
zoning commission or the administrative variation approval is extended
by the director of community development.
14. Effect Of Denial Of Proposal: No application for a variation which
has been denied by the planning and zoning commission or village
board or for an administrative variation which has been denied by the
director of community development shall be resubmitted for a period of
one year from the date of the denial, except on grounds of new evidence
or proof of change of condition found to be valid by the director of
community development.
SECTION 17: Subsection F of Section 14.203, “Procedures For
Administrative Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in
its entirety to read as follows:
F. Conditional Uses and Administrative Conditional Uses:
13
Page 61 of 126
1. Intent And Applicability: The development and administration of
this chapter is based upon the village being divided into zoning districts within
which the use of land and buildings and the bulk and location of buildings and
structures is substantially uniform. However, it is recognized that there are
certain uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be
properly classified in any particular zoning district without consideration of
the impact of those uses upon adjoining properties and their impact on the
neighborhood in general. Such conditional uses fall into two (2) categories:
a. Uses publicly operated or uses traditionally promoting a public
interest or benefit.
b. Uses entirely private in character but of a nature that their
operation may present a different impact upon adjoining properties or the
neighborhood in general.
2. Authority: Except as otherwise provided in subsection F10 of this
section, the planning and zoning commission shall convene a public hearing
on a conditional use application. The planning and zoning commission shall
prepare findings of fact based on evidence presented addressing required
standards, and submit a recommendation on an application to the village
board for their review and final decision.
3. Initiation: Any person, firm, corporation, office or other legal entity
having ownership interest in land, or a contractual interest that may become
an ownership interest, may file an application with the consent of the property
owner.
4. Filing Of Application: An application for a conditional use shall be
filed with the director of community development on forms obtained from the
community development department. Except as otherwise provided in
subsection F10 of this section, the director shall, upon receiving a complete
application for a conditional use, forward the application, along with other
14
Page 62 of 126
data considered important by the director, to the planning and zoning
commission for their review and recommendation to the village board.
5. Public Hearings: Public hearings for conditional uses and
administrative conditional uses shall be held in compliance with state
statutes and provisions of this chapter as described in subsection G or
subsection H of this section.
6. Recommendation By The Planning And Zoning Commission: Except
as otherwise provided in subsection F10 of this section, the director of
community development shall submit the written recommendation of the
planning and zoning commission on an application for a conditional use to
the village board within thirty (30) days of conclusion of the public hearing.
Extension of this time period may be allowed by mutual consent of the
applicant and the director of community development.
For petitions for conditional uses involving any of the following in the R-
X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts:
a. Residential setback reductions in any yard that do not exceed
twenty-five percent (25%) of the applicable setback requirements of this
chapter;
b. Relief from the accessory structure requirements; and
c. Fence petitions;
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hear and decide such
petitions as the final administrative authority. The planning and zoning
commission shall make recommendations to the village board on all
conditional uses involving residential setback reductions in all yards in the R-
X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts that exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the
setback requirement(s) of this chapter.
15
Page 63 of 126
7. Action By The Village Board:
a. The village board shall not act upon a proposed conditional use
until it has received a written report and recommendation from the planning
and zoning commission provided by the director of community development.
b. The village board may approve a conditional use by ordinance,
deny, or refer back to the planning and zoning commission for further review.
The village board may establish such conditions and restrictions upon the
establishment, location, construction, maintenance, and operation of the
conditional use, as is deemed necessary for the protection of adjoining
properties and the neighborhood in general and the public interest.
c. In all cases where the village board permits a conditional use,
the authorizing ordinance shall specifically set forth the terms for operation of
the conditional use.
d. Any conditional use which fails to receive a favorable
recommendation from the planning and zoning commission shall not be
granted by the village board unless there is a concurring vote of five (5) if all
seven (7) members of the corporate authorities are present and voting, and a
concurring vote of four (4) if less than seven (7) members of the corporate
authorities are present and voting.
8. Standards For Conditional Uses: Except as otherwise provided in
subsection F10 of this section, no conditional use shall be recommended for
approval by the planning and zoning commission unless it finds:
a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the
conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health,
safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare;
b. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and
enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already
16
Page 64 of 126
permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the
neighborhood in which it is to be located;
c. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede
the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding
property for uses permitted in the district;
d. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or
necessary facilities have been or will be provided;
e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide
ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public
streets;
f. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the
objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the village; and
g. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to
the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such
regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the
recommendations of the planning and zoning commission.
9. Conditions And Guarantees: Except as otherwise provided in
subsections F6 and F10 of this section, in all cases where conditional uses
are granted, and conditions regulating the use are established as described in
subsection F8 of this section, the village board shall require such evidence
and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that the conditional use
complies with all regulating conditions.
10. Administrative Conditional Uses.
a. Action By Director Of Community Development: The director of
community development shall consider the following administrative
conditional uses and may either administratively approve or remand to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for further action. The following types of
relief are eligible as administrative conditional uses:
17
Page 65 of 126
(1) Existing nonconforming accessory structures:
(A) Applicable Structures:
(i) Will be replaced with the same type of structure,
(ii) Do not exceed a total of two (2) accessory structures per
lot of record,
(iii) Extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of the
required interior side yard setback,
(iv) Extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard
setback, or
(v) Where the applicable lot coverage does not exceed the
maximum permitted for that zoning district by more than ten percent (10%).
b. Filing of Application: All applications for administrative
conditional uses shall be made on an appropriate application form provided
by the Village. The application for administrative conditional uses shall be
filed and processed in the manner prescribed for conditional uses and shall
be accompanied by the following information:
(1) Said application shall contain the following information:
(A) Zoning Request Application / Petition for Hearing;
(B) Affidavit of Ownership;
(C) Proof of Ownership;
(D) Paid receipt of the most recent tax bill;
(E) Responses to applicable standards;
(F) Plat of Survey;
(G) Site plan;
(H) Building elevation(s), existing and proposed, if applicable;
(I) Floor plans, if applicable;
18
Page 66 of 126
(J) Preliminary engineering plans, if applicable;
(K) Legal description of the subject property;
(L) Any other information deemed necessary by the Village.
c. Standards for Administrative Conditional Uses. No
administrative conditional use shall be granted by the Village unless the
administrative conditional use:
(1) Is so designed, located, and proposed to be operated that the
public health, safety and welfare will be protected.
(2) Will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other
property in the neighborhood in which it is located.
(3) That in all other respects, the administrative conditional use
conforms to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located.
d. Administrative conditional uses adhering to the application
submittal requirements and ordinance requirements may be administratively
approved as follows:
(1) After the administrative conditional use application is
submitted and reviewed by the various Village departments, the director of
community development will indicate if the applicant may proceed forward
with seeking approval of the requested relief with the sign-off approval of the
surrounding property owners.
(2) In all cases where the director of community development
grants an administrative conditional use, an authorizing determination shall
be prepared that may set forth the terms for operation of the conditional use.
The village clerk shall record the authorizing determination with the county
recorder of deeds.
e. Appeal Of Director Of Community Development Decision: Any
individual may file an appeal of the decision of the director of community
19
Page 67 of 126
development regarding an administrative conditional use with the planning
and zoning commission. Such appeal shall be filed with the director of
community development within five (5) calendar days of the director's
decision.
11. Effect Of Denial Of Application: No application for a conditional
use which has been denied by the village board shall be resubmitted for a
period of one year from the date of denial, except on the grounds of new
factual evidence, or a change in conditions which would alter the concept or
intent of the request. Such changes may include reductions in density or
building height, changes in land use and road standards and alignment, or
conditions which would have a positive effect on surrounding property, and
serve to address the circumstances of the denial of the original application.
Such change or new evidence must be reviewed and acknowledged by the
director of community development before a new application can be
submitted for a public hearing.
12. Revocation:
a. In any case where the construction of an approved conditional
use is not substantially under way, or if a use is not established or
commenced in the building within one year from the date of granting thereof,
and completed within eighteen (18) months, then, without further action by
the village board, the conditional use or authorization thereof shall be null
and void.
b. A conditional use may be revoked if conditional use as
established or constructed on the site does not conform to the established
conditions for approval. The director of community development will be
responsible for advising the village board of any violations and the village
board may then authorize the planning and zoning commission to schedule a
public hearing to consider revoking the conditional use permit. After
conducting the public hearing, the planning and zoning commission shall
20
Page 68 of 126
then prepare a written report and recommendation to submit to the village
board. Upon receipt of the planning and zoning commission report, the village
board shall then render a final judgment regarding rescinding the conditional
use permit and accompanying ordinance.
13. Expiration And Transferability: The conditional use shall expire if
the conditional use shall cease for more than twelve (12) months for any
reason. However, the ownership of an authorized conditional use may be
changed if the use remains unchanged.
14. Modification Or Intensification: Any modification or intensification
of a conditional use which alters the essential character or operation of the
use in a way not intended at the time the conditional use was granted shall
require a new conditional use permit. Such conditional use permit shall be
applied for prior to any modification of the use or property. The director of
community development shall determine whether the proposed modification
or intensification represents an alteration in the essential character of the
original conditional use as approved. The operator of the conditional use shall
provide the director of community development with all the necessary
information related to the conditional use to render this determination.
SECTION 18: Section 14.203, “Procedures For Administrative
Functions,” of Article II, “Administration and Enforcement,” to Chapter 14,
“Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended by adding a
new subsection H and the heading of the existing subsection H of Section
14.203, “Procedures For Administrative Functions,” of Article III,
“Administration and Enforcement,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount
Prospect Village Code shall be amended and shall read as follows:
21
Page 69 of 126
H. Administrative Hearing Procedures:
(1) Upon receipt of an application for an administrative variation
or an administrative conditional use, the director of community
development shall review the application for completeness and assign
a case number to the request.
(2) For all applications for administrative variations or
administrative conditional uses, the department of community
development shall provide a list of all owners of record of property lying
within one hundred feet (100'), exclusive of right of way width, of the
parcel subject to the public hearing. The director of community
development shall cause a copy of the public notice to be mailed to all
property owners on the list no more than thirty (30) days nor less than
seven (7) days prior to the hearing.
(3) An administrative notice shall contain the case number
assigned to the application, the address of the property, a brief
statement on the nature of the administrative variation or
administrative conditional use, the name and address of the property
owner, the petitioner and their legal representative, and the date, time
and location of the administrative hearing.
(4) For all applications for an administrative variation or
administrative conditional use, the director of community development
shall also cause one or more signs to be posted on the property, which
is the subject of the administrative hearing.
(5) The number and location of signs shall be determined by the
director of community development.
22
Page 70 of 126
(6) The sign must be a minimum of thirty inches by thirty inches
(30" x 30") in size, having letters a minimum of two inches (2") high, and
contain the following information:
(A) The fact that an administrative hearing that affects the
subject property will be held, with direction to interested
members of the general public to call the office of the community
development director for further information concerning date,
time and place and subject matter of said administrative hearing.
(B) Any interested person may appear and be heard at the
hearing and such appearance may be made in person, by agent (if
a corporation), or in writing.
I. Administrative Site Plan Review:
SECTION 19: Subsection B of Section 14.304.1, “Design Standards,” of
Article III, “General Provisions,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount
Prospect Village Code shall be amended by adding a new sub-subsection (3)
and new sub-subsection (4) as follows:
3. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid
repetitive building patterns, no detached single-family dwelling constructed
within a residential subdivision approved after the effective date of this
ordinance, or constructed as new principal residential construction on an
individual lot, shall be similar in appearance to any other detached single-
family dwelling located on the same street within a distance of two (2) lots in
either direction of the subject lot.
23
Page 71 of 126
For purposes of this subsection, the term “constructed” shall mean the
erection of a new principal detached single-family dwelling and shall not
include:
• Additions to an existing dwelling;
• Exterior renovations or façade modifications to an existing dwelling;
or
• Interior remodeling.
This subsection shall not apply retroactively to dwellings legally existing
as of the effective date of this ordinance.
a. Definition of “Similar in Appearance”: For purposes of this
subsection, two detached, single-family dwellings shall be considered
similar in appearance if they are identical or nearly identical with
respect to any three (3) or more of the following architectural
characteristics:
(1) Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type
(gable, hip, mansard, gambrel, flat, or combination):
(2) Roof height, measured from finished grade to the peak,
within a tolerance of +/- 2 feet;
(3) Front-facing massing, defined as the approximate
height and width of the primary front wall plane closest to the
front lot line;
(4) Overall front-elevation form, including the predominant
silhouette and massing as viewed from the street;
(5) Fenestration pattern, including the relative location,
arrangement, and size of windows on the front elevation;
24
Page 72 of 126
(6) Garage configuration, including the location,
orientation, and dimensions of garage doors visible from the
street; and
(7) Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation
wall planes (e.g., brick veneer, horizontal siding, board-and-
batten, shakes, or similar materials).
b. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following
characteristics, standing alone, shall not be deemed sufficient to
establish dissimilarity between dwellings:
(1) Variations in color;
(2) Variations in roofing material;
(3) Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements
(including, but not limited to, dormers, cupolas, bay windows,
belt courses, fan lights, chimneys, or ornamental features);
(4) Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand
orientation);
(5) Variation in window styles; and
(6) Variations in height, width, or length measurements of
less than five percent (5%), unless otherwise specified herein.
c. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of
any building permit within a subdivision, the applicant shall submit:
(1) A proposed set of building elevations for all planned
home models; and
(2) A streetscape diagram or lot assignment plan
demonstrating compliance with the spacing requirement
established in this subsection.
25
Page 73 of 126
The Director of Community Development shall review the
submitted elevations and lot assignments for compliance with the
requirements of this subsection. Approved elevations and lot
assignments shall be binding upon subsequent building permit reviews.
4. Stucco or engineered stucco systems shall comply with the
regulations stipulated in section 21.229 of the building code.
SECTION 20: Subsection A of Section 14.306, “Accessory Structures,”
of Article III, “General Provisions,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount
Prospect Village Code shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:
A. General Requirements: The following restrictions on accessory
buildings, structures and uses apply to all zoning districts, unless otherwise
provided for in this chapter:
1. Time Of Construction: No accessory building or structure shall
be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of a principal
building.
2. Yard Requirements: No accessory building, structure or use
shall be located in a required front yard, required side yard or exterior
side yard, unless otherwise provided for in this chapter.
3. Height Requirements:
a. Residential And Commercial Districts: No detached
garage or gazebo shall exceed a maximum height of fifteen feet
(15’). No other accessory building/structure shall exceed ten feet
(10') in height.
26
Page 74 of 126
b. Industrial, Office Research And Conservation
Recreation Districts: No accessory building/structure shall
exceed twenty feet (20') in height.
4. Separation Between Buildings:
a. A detached accessory building or structure shall be
located no closer to the principal building than three feet (3').
Detached garages located between three feet (3') and ten feet
(10') from a principal building shall be provided with a five- eighths
inch (5/8") drywall finish on the interior walls and ceiling.
b. For single-family residential properties in the R-X, R-1
and R-A zoning districts only, any structure permanently attached
to the principal structure is no longer considered an accessory
structure pursuant to article XXIV of this chapter and shall meet
the bulk requirements of the zoning district for principal
structures, unless otherwise listed as a permitted obstruction in
section 14.319 of this article.
c. For single-family residential properties in the R-X, R-1
and R-A zoning districts only, any structure permanently attached
to an accessory structure is considered part of the accessory
structure and shall meet the bulk requirements for accessory
structures, unless otherwise listed as a permitted obstruction in
section 14.319 of this article.
d. Aboveground swimming pools are permitted to attach to
a deck if all required rear and side yard setbacks are met and the
deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool and
access is provided to the yard from the deck.
e. Pergola support columns shall be located no closer to
the principal building than three feet (3').
27
Page 75 of 126
5. Number Of Accessory Structures: The maximum number of
accessory structures shall not exceed two (2) such structures per
zoning lot. Swimming pools and structures listed as permitted
obstructions in section 14.319 of this article are exempt from the total
number of accessory structures.
6. Shed and Garage Restrictions:
a. A shed shall not be utilized to store motor vehicles or as
office, work or living space. The storage of household items,
equipment to maintain the property and small recreational
equipment is permitted.
b. A detached garage shall not be utilized as office, work or
living space. The storage of motor vehicles, household items,
equipment to maintain the property and small recreational
equipment is permitted.
7. Roof Pitch: No accessory structure shall have a roof pitch of
less than three to twelve (3:12). Pergolas, arbors, and accessory
structures in the I-1 Limited Industrial and C-R Conservation
Recreation zoning districts shall be exempt from this
requirement.
8. No accessory structure shall be used for residential living
quarters.
SECTION 21: Subsection B (1) of Section 14.306, “Accessory
Structures,” of Article III, “General Provisions,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the
Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended in its entirety to read as
follows:
28
Page 76 of 126
B. Restrictions In Residential Districts:
1. Maximum Size:
a. A detached private garage may be no larger than seven
hundred twenty (720) square feet.
b. A shed, gazebo, pergola, greenhouse, or other similar
accessory structure may be no larger than two hundred (200)
square feet).
SECTION 22: Land Use Table 1: “Residential and Recreational Zoning
Districts” of Section 14.604, “Land Use Tables,” of Article VI, “Zoning
Districts,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall
be amended to add “Existing nonconforming accessory structures” as an
administrative conditional use in the R-X, R-1 and R-A zoning districts, “Relief
from accessory structure requirements, except for certain existing
nonconforming accessory structures” and “Relief from fence requirements”
as new conditional uses in the R-X, R-1 and R-A zoning districts, and a new
footnote 3 in the Notes section below Land Use Table 1:
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
29
Page 77 of 126
Land Use C- R- R- R- R- R- R-
R X 1 A 2 3 4
Existing nonconforming accessory structures C 3 C 3 C3
Applicable structures:
(i) Will be replaced with the same type
of structure,
(ii) Do not exceed a total of two (2)
accessory structures per lot of record,
(iii) Extend into no more than forty
percent (40%) of the required interior
side yard setback,
(iv) Extend into no more than ten
percent (10%) of the rear yard setback,
or
v) Where the applicable lot coverage
does not exceed the maximum
permitted for that zoning district by
more than ten percent (10%).
Relief from accessory structure C C C
requirements, except for certain existing
nonconforming accessory structures
Relief from fence requirements C C C
Notes:
1. Permitted in limited circumstances. A conditional use shall be required if the following circumstances
apply:
a. A residential dwelling unit is being converted to the proposed use so as to be the principal use of
the structure; or
b. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property less than 40,000 square feet not
currently in use for the proposed use.
2. Residential setback reductions below 5 feet may trigger additional building code requirements
including, but not limited to, fire-rated walls, limitation on projections, and opening in walls. Any zoning
relief granted through the conditional use shall adhere to Chapter 21 Building Code of the Municipal Code.
3. Administrative conditional use approval is required.
SECTION 23: Subsection A (6) through A (9) of Section 14.2204,
“Residential Driveways,” of Article XXII, “Off Street Parking and Loading,” to
30
Page 78 of 126
Chapter 14, “Zoning” to the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to
read as follows:
6. Attached Garages: Driveways serving attached garages shall not
exceed thirty feet (30’) in width unless otherwise regulated elsewhere in this
chapter and shall taper to a width no greater than twenty-six feet (26’) at the
property line.
a. Driveways In Front Of Houses: The portion of a driveway located in
front of the house shall not extend more than three feet (3') beyond the point
where the garage meets the house, measured along the front plane of the
house. Circular driveways, dual-frontage lots, and driveways serving side-
loaded garages are exempt from this requirement.
b. Driveways serving three (3) car attached garages may be the same
width as the garage, not to exceed a maximum width of thirty-three feet (33')
and shall taper to a width no greater than twenty-six feet (26’) at the property
line.
7. Detached Garages: Driveways serving detached garages shall not
exceed thirty feet (30’) in width unless otherwise regulated elsewhere in this
chapter and shall taper to a width no greater than twenty-six feet (26’) at the
property line.
a. Driveways In Front Of Houses: The portion of a driveway located in
front of the house shall not extend more than three feet (3') beyond the
closest plane of the house, measured along the front plane of the house.
b. Driveways Serving Three Car Detached Garages: Driveways serving
three-car detached garages may be the same width as the garage not to
exceed a maximum width of thirty-three feet (33') and shall taper to a width no
greater than twenty-six feet (26') at the property line. Maximum measurement
shall be taken from garage's edge farthest from the side lot line, running
parallel to the garage facade.
31
Page 79 of 126
8. Vehicle Turnaround Pads: Driveways fronting onto a major arterial
street, as defined in the Village's comprehensive plan, may provide a vehicle
turnaround pad no larger than twelve feet (12') in depth as measured parallel
to the front lot line, and ten feet (10') in width as measured perpendicular to
the front lot line. The vehicle turnaround pad shall be located entirely on the
property, perpendicular to the driveway, and at least fifteen feet (15') from the
principal structure. The turnaround pad may be in addition to the overall
permitted driveway width.
9. Driveways Serving Side Load Garages: Driveways serving side load
garages shall not exceed thirty feet (30’) in width and shall taper to a width no
greater than twenty-six feet (26’) at the property line. Measurements for
driveway width shall be taken parallel to the front lot line, no closer to the
right of way than two feet (2') from the required front yard setback line.
SECTION 24: Section 14.2401, “Purpose,” of Article XXIV,
“Definitions,” to Chapter 14, “Zoning,” to the Mount Prospect Village Code
shall be amended to modify the existing definition of “ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE” and to add the new definitions of “ADMINISTRATIVE
CONDITIONAL USE”, “ADMINISTRATIVE VARIATION” and “PERMITTED
OBSTRUCTION” in the appropriate alphabetical locations as follows:
ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE: A category of conditional use for
single-family residential zoning districts which may be approved
administratively by the Village of Mount Prospect, in conjunction with a
submitted application, site plan, and all of the necessary requirements as
required by the zoning ordinance and with required consent or determination
of no objection from adjacent property owners.
32
Page 80 of 126
ADMINISTRATIVE VARIATION: A category of variation which may be
approved administratively by the Village of Mount Prospect, in conjunction
with a submitted application, site plan, and all of the necessary requirements
as required by the zoning ordinance and with required consent or
determination of no objection from adjacent property owners.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: A subordinate structure detached from but
located on the same lot as the principal structure, the use of which is
incidental and accessory to that of a principal structure. Said structures may
include, but are not limited to, detached garages, gazebos, pergolas,
greenhouses, sheds, trash enclosures, parking lots, outdoor storage tanks,
swimming pools, fences, and certain permitted obstructions including central
air conditioning units, generators and similar mechanical equipment,
driveways, parking pads, open stoops and canopies, patios, balconies,
decks, service walks, sidewalks, steps, handicap ramps, sports courts,
unenclosed porches and window wells, as further defined by this Code.
PERMITTED OBSTRUCTION: An accessory structure that is allowed to
encroach into a required yard as long as it meets certain size and location
requirements set forth by this Code.
SECTION 25: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval, adoption and publication in the manner provided
by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
33
Page 81 of 126
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of March 2026, by the Village Mayor of
the Village of Mount Prospect, and attested by the Village Clerk, on the same
day.
_____________________________________
Paul Wm. Hoefert
Village Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Karen Agoranos
Village Clerk
34
Page 82 of 126
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CASE NO. PZ-01-26 Hearing Date: February 26, 2026
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 50 S. Emerson Street
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 2026
REQUEST: Text Amendments Chapter 14 of the Village Code
(Evaluation of the Current Zoning Regulations to
Promote Single-Family Residential Neighborhoods)
MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly
William Beattie
Walter Szymczak
Richard Rogers
Fay Costa
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ewa Weir
Donald Olsen
Michael Fricano
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Antonia Lalagos – Development Planner
Jason Shallcross – Director of Community & Economic
Development
INTERESTED PARTIES: Village of Mount Prospect, Petitioner
Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:03 PM. Vice Chairman Beattie made a
motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting on January 8, 2026. The minutes were approved 4-0
(Commission Rogers abstained).
After hearing three items of New Business, Chairman Donnelly introduced case number
PZ-01-26 for text amendments to Chapter 14 of the Village code.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 83 of 126
2
Staff Presentation
Director Shallcross presented the proposed text amendments to Chapter 14 of the Village
Code, explaining that the amendments respond to strategic planning directives prioritized
by the Village Board in the previous year. The amendments address two primary objectives:
(1) establishing architectural diversity standards for new single-family subdivisions and (2)
evaluating existing zoning regulations affecting single-family residential properties to
reduce common barriers residents encounter when making improvements to their homes.
Director Shallcross explained that the architectural diversity standards would prevent
repetitive housing patterns in new subdivisions. Under the proposed regulations, a new
single-family home could not be similar in appearance to homes located within two lots on
either side along the same street. Similarity would be determined based on characteristics
such as roof form, front elevation massing, fenestration patterns, garage configuration,
primary exterior materials, and wall planes. If three or more of these characteristics were
substantially similar, the homes would be considered monotonous and would require
revision. The proposal would also require submission of home model building elevations
and streetscape diagrams to ensure compliance with these standards.
Director Shallcross also explained that existing restrictions on stucco and EIFS (synthetic
stucco) for residential construction are currently located in the Building Code. The
amendment would cross-reference these restrictions within the Zoning Code to make
them easier for staff to identify during review. Director Shallcross noted that the Village
prohibits these materials on residential applications due to durability and maintenance
concerns but allows limited use as accent materials on non-residential buildings with
specific restrictions.
Vice Chairman Beattie asked for clarification on EIFS and stucco materials. Director
Shallcross explained that EIFS and stucco are engineered exterior systems composed of
layered waterproof materials applied over a backing and finished with a sprayed coating.
Director Shallcross noted that these materials are not highly durable and tend to
deteriorate over time, which can lead to significant maintenance issues. For this reason,
the Village does not permit their use on residential homes. However, they are commonly
used as accent materials on non-residential buildings, such as commercial strip centers,
and are therefore allowed in those applications subject to limitations on how and where
they may be used.
Commissioner Rogers asked about the difference between stucco and Dryvit and whether
Dryvit would be permitted. Director Shallcross explained that both materials are treated
the same under Village regulations. Dryvit would not be permitted on single-family homes,
which is the Village’s existing policy. Director Shallcross clarified that the proposed
amendment does not change this rule but simply cross-references the restriction in the
Zoning Code for clarity.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 84 of 126
3
Director Shallcross explained transitioned the discussion from architectural design
standards to proposed amendments affecting single-family zoning districts. Director
Shallcross noted that staff evaluated common challenges residents face when applying for
permits and reviewed practices in other communities to identify potential amendments
that could reduce obstacles and make it easier for homeowners to make improvements to
their properties. Director Shallcross discussed several amendments affecting accessory
structures in single-family districts. One change clarifies that accessory structures
attached to a principal structure will be treated as part of the principal structure only in
residential districts, preventing potential misuse of this provision in commercial or
industrial districts. Another amendment would treat multiple attached accessory
structures, such as a detached garage with an attached pergola, as a single accessory
structure to prevent the creation of oversized or combined structures that exceed intended
limits. Additional language reinforces existing prohibitions on using accessory structures
as residential living quarters or office space.
Commissioner Costa expressed concern about accessory structure regulations appearing
in multiple sections of the code and asked how the Village prevents inconsistencies if
amendments are made in one section but not another. Director Shallcross responded that
staff monitors the zoning code for inconsistencies as part of their regular responsibilities.
Director Shallcross noted that some provisions are cross-referenced by section number
while others are repeated in full text to make them more visible during review. Director
Shallcross added that staff continually reviews the zoning code and maintains a list of
potential amendments, typically addressing updates on an annual basis, and that a future
comprehensive zoning code rewrite could further reconcile any inconsistencies.
Chairman Donnelly added that the Village adopts the International Building Code by
reference, meaning updates to the code are automatically incorporated into the Village’s
regulations. However, certain provisions may not always align with the Village’s
preferences. The provision being discussed allows the Village to review and approve
specific building code changes before they are implemented, providing protection against
unintended changes that could occur when the code is updated.
Commissioner Rogers asked whether the Village had recently approved a shed to be used
as living quarters for a young woman. Director Shallcross clarified that the approved
structure was not considered formal living quarters because it did not include a bathroom
and was not classified as a habitable space. Director Shallcross added that the structure
could not legally be leased or rented as a dwelling unit.
Director Shallcross then presented proposed revisions to accessory structure size
standards. The amendment would increase the maximum size of detached garages from
672 square feet to 720 square feet (7% increase), allowing garages to be 2 to 4 feet deeper
to accommodate larger vehicles and storage needs, but maintaining the maximum height
at 15 feet. The proposal also replaces the current formula for accessory structures such as
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 85 of 126
4
sheds and pergolas with a simpler maximum of 200 square feet Village-wide, eliminating
granular calculations based on lot area.
Chairman Donnelly sought clarification on whether the proposed regulations would limit
properties to one accessory structure. Director Shallcross explained that the code
currently permits up to two accessory structures per lot and that no changes to this limit
are being proposed. Chairman Donnelly expressed concern about smaller lots potentially
accommodating multiple accessory structures, such as two 200-square-foot structures,
which could significantly reduce usable yard space. Director Shallcross responded that
most lots in the Village are larger, typically around 7,500 square feet, and noted that lot
coverage requirements would still regulate the amount of development on a property.
Director Shallcross further clarified how different accessory structures are counted toward
lot coverage. Structures such as sheds and patios count toward lot coverage, while
pergolas are treated differently because they are open structures; generally, only the posts
supporting a pergola are counted. As a result, a pergola placed over an existing patio would
not typically increase lot coverage beyond the patio itself.
Director Shallcross presented the proposed text amendment to increase the maximum
driveway width from 26 feet to 30 feet. Director Shallcross explained that the
recommendation follows a comprehensive review of driveway standards across
municipalities in the northwestern suburbs, where staff found that several communities
already allow wider driveways. Director Shallcross noted that residents frequently request
wider driveways due to increasing numbers of household vehicles and the Village’s
prohibition on overnight street parking. Director Shallcross stated that the proposed
change is intended to allow residents to comfortably park three vehicles side-by-side,
since a typical parking space is approximately nine feet wide, meaning three vehicles
require roughly 27 feet of width. While three vehicles can technically fit within the current
26-foot limit, it is tight and often leads to complaints from residents.
To maintain neighborhood character, Director Shallcross emphasized that the driveway
must still taper to 26 feet at the property line, meaning the widening would occur only on
the private portion of the driveway closer to the house. Director Shallcross explained that
this approach avoids creating larger driveway aprons at the street and limits the visual
impact along the public right-of-way. Director Shallcross further explained that the
proposal also does not apply to circular driveways, which are already permitted only on
larger lots (minimum 75 feet wide) and already allow significant driveway area.
Chairman Donnelly asked several clarifying questions about driveway dimensions,
setbacks, and how the change would function in practice. Director Shallcross explained
that most homes in the Village have a 30-foot front setback, meaning the typical driveway
length is approximately 30 feet from the property line to the garage. Vehicles are not
allowed to park across sidewalks or in the driveway apron, so many households currently
struggle to fit multiple vehicles fully within the driveway area. Director Shallcross indicated
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 86 of 126
5
the change may help reduce situations where cars are parked partially over sidewalks or in
the grass.
Vice Chairman Beattie expressed concern that allowing wider driveways could lead to front
yards appearing overly paved or resembling parking lots, particularly when homes already
have two-car garages and additional driveway space. Director Shallcross responded that
the amendment represents only a four-foot increase beyond what is already permitted and
noted that many homeowners already attempt to create additional parking areas through
informal solutions such as gravel strips, brick pavers, or parking on grass, which the Village
must then address through code enforcement.
Commissioner Costa asked whether driveways could extend all the way to the property
line. Director Shallcross confirmed that the Village does not currently have a driveway
setback requirement from side property lines, meaning driveways can extend to the
property boundary. Commissioner Rogers noted that because many homes have 7.5- to
10-foot side yards, expanding driveways could result in large continuous paved areas when
neighboring homes both place driveways along their property lines. Director Shallcross
acknowledged this possibility and stated that the Commission could recommend a
setback requirement if desired.
Ms. Lalagos clarified existing safeguards, including restrictions that prevent driveways
from extending more than three feet beyond the front of the house toward the street. The
Commission also discussed existing lot coverage limits that regulate how much of a
property, specifically the front yard, can be covered by impervious surfaces. These
standards would continue to apply and prevent properties from being entirely paved over.
Overall, the amendment is proposed as a modest adjustment intended to address resident
parking needs while maintaining existing limits on driveway placement and lot coverage.
Director Shallcross presented a proposed set of text amendments to Chapter 14 of the
Zoning Code intended to adjust how certain zoning requests are categorized and who has
final decision-making authority over those requests. Director Shallcross explained that the
goal of the amendments is to streamline the review process, reduce unnecessary hearings
for routine matters, and create a new category of administrative requests that can be
handled at the staff level when appropriate.
Director Shallcross explained that the Village currently allows “minor variations,” which
are administrative approvals handled by the Director of Community Development. These
minor variations presently apply to two situations:
1. Existing legal nonconforming accessory structures, and
2. Parking requirement reductions for downtown uses larger than 2,500 square feet.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 87 of 126
6
Under the proposed amendments, Director Shallcross explained that the Village would
eliminate a minor variation request and restructure the approval system. Specifically:
1. Requests involving existing legal nonconforming accessory structures would no
longer be processed as minor variations. Instead, they would become
Administrative Conditional Use requests.
2. The only remaining Administrative Variation would be parking reductions for certain
downtown uses over 2,500 square feet.
Director Shallcross also presented the existing “Final Authority Matrix,” which identifies
which body has decision-making authority over different zoning requests. Currently:
1. The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) is the final authority for:
a. Fence petitions
b. Sign requests
c. Zoning variations under Chapter 14 that are less than 25% of the required
standard
d. Conditional uses for setback reductions under 25%
2. The Director of Community Development is the final authority for minor variations.
The proposed changes would adjust the matrix while largely keeping the Planning and
Zoning Commission’s authority intact. Key proposed changes include:
1. Fences in residential districts would shift from being reviewed as variations to
conditional uses, meaning they would be evaluated under conditional use
standards rather than under hardship criteria.
2. Requests for relief from accessory structure requirements in single-family districts
would become conditional uses with the Planning and Zoning Commission as the
final authority.
3. Existing legal nonconforming accessory structures would become administrative
conditional uses decided by the Director.
4. Setback reductions under 25% would remain unchanged.
Director Shallcross explained that the shift from variations to conditional uses changes the
evaluation standard. Variations require demonstrating a unique hardship tied to the
property, whereas conditional uses are evaluated based on impacts on adjacent
properties, neighborhood character, and public welfare, making them somewhat easier to
review for common situations. Director Shallcross also clarified that administrative
conditional uses would still require public notice, including:
1. Mailed notices within 100 feet of the property
2. A posted notice sign on the property for 7–30 days
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 88 of 126
7
3. A formal recorded decision tied to the property
Director Shallcross stated that the approval criteria would focus on public health, safety,
welfare, and neighborhood compatibility, and further noted that if an administrative
request is denied by staff, the applicant may appeal to the Planning and Zoning
Commission, and Commission decisions may be appealed to the Village Board, with
further appeal possible through the court system.
Director Shallcross also described new definitions that would be added to the zoning code,
including definitions for the following: Administrative Conditional Use, Administrative
Variation, Accessory Structures (modification to existing definition), Permitted
Obstructions.
Finally, Director Shallcross stated that the amendments support the Village’s strategic
planning goals, including improving zoning processes and making it easier for homeowners
to undertake property improvements.
Discussion
Chairman Donnelly asked clarifying questions about how the proposed administrative
conditional use category would apply to existing nonconforming accessory structures and
specifically asked whether the category would apply only to structures that were originally
built legally but later became nonconforming due to changes in zoning regulations.
Director Shallcross confirmed that this is correct.
Chairman Donnelly emphasized the distinction between legal nonconforming structures
(originally permitted but now inconsistent with current regulations), and illegal structures
(built without permits). Chairman Donnely asked if illegal structures would not qualify for
the administrative conditional use process.
Chairman Donnelly also asked about how accessory structures are counted. When he
noted that items such as generators, air-conditioning units, and sheds might technically be
considered structures, Ms. Lalagos clarified that the accessory structure limit only applies
to certain accessory structures, not mechanical equipment.
Chairman Donnelly expressed support for the proposed approach and noted that similar
adjustments had been made in the past—such as delegating authority for certain routine
requests like circular driveways because the Commission frequently approved them
anyway. Chairman Donnelly stated that when requests are consistently approved, it can
make sense to delegate authority to staff to streamline the process. Chairman Donnelly
commented that the types of requests being shifted to administrative review are generally
ones the Commission would typically approve, meaning the change simply removes
unnecessary hearings.
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 89 of 126
8
Motion and Vote
Vice Chairman Beattie thanked Director Shallcross for the diligent work. Director
Shallcross acknowledged planning staff and Ms. Choi for her contributions.
Hearing no further comments or questions, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and
asked for a motion. Vice Chairman Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner
Szymczak to approve the following motion:
“To adopt the text amendments to Chapter 14 of the Mount Prospect Village Code.”
UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Szymczak, Beattie, Rogers, Costa, Donnelly
NAYS: None
The Planning and Zoning Commission gave a positive recommendation (5-0) for the next
Village Board meeting to be held on March 17, 2026. REVISED MEETING DATE: This
meeting has been rescheduled to March 16, 2026 due to a recently passed
amendment to the Open Meetings Act.
After hearing no additional items of new business, Chairman Donnelly asked if there were
any citizens to be heard.
Hearing no further discussion, Chairman Donnelly made a motion, seconded by Vice
Chairman Beattie, and the meeting was adjourned at 8:43 PM.
Ann Choi, Development Planner
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – February 26, 2026 PZ-01-26
Page 90 of 126
ATTACHMENT A
Modifications to each of the chapters are indicated as deletions and additions.
ARTICLE II
ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT
14.201: ORGANIZATION:
The administration of this chapter is hereby vested in the following elected and appointed
boards and professional staff:
Village board of trustees
Planning and zoning commission
Director of community development
The administrative functions of this chapter are as follows:
Zoning compliance reviews
Issuance of certificates of occupancy
Variations
Text and map amendments
Appeals
Conditional uses
Public hearings
Fees and penalties
MinorAdministrative variations (Ord. 5173, 3-6-2001; amd. Ord. 5219, 11-6-2001)
Administrative conditional uses
14.202: ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES AND SPECIFIC DUTIES:
A. Village Board Of Trustees: The board of trustees shall have the following duties and
responsibilities with regard to this chapter:
1
Page 91 of 126
1. Receive recommendations from the planning and zoning commission concerning all
text and map amendments, certain conditional use permits, certain variations and to
approve or disapprove any such recommendation from the planning and zoning
commission.
2. All decisions and findings by the village board of trustees shall in all instances be the
final administrative decision and shall be subject to judicial review as may be provided by
law. In the case where decisions made by the village board are done so by ordinance, the
authorizing ordinance shall provide the final administrative decision and shall be subject to
judicial review as may be provided by law.
3. The village board shall convene an annual meeting with the planning and zoning
commission to review the effectiveness of this zoning ordinance.
B. Planning And Zoning Commission: The planning and zoning commission of the village,
as described in section 5.500 of this code, has the authority and duties described below:
1. To hear petitions for certain variations, certain conditional use permits, map and
text amendments and prepare recommendations to the village board regarding such
petitions.
2. To hear and decide as final administrative authority, all petitions for fence variations
and variations which do not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of any requirement of this
chapter, except for minor variations as described in this chapter. To hear and decide as
final administrative authority, all petitions for fence variations, all conditional use
petitions for fences in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts, conditional use petitions
for accessory structures in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts, and conditional uses
for residential setback reductions in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts which do
not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of any requirement of this chapter. The planning
and zoning commission shall also hear and decide variations which do not exceed
twenty five percent (25%) of any requirement of this chapter. The planning and zoning
commission shall not hear and decide as final administrative authority any petitions
for administrative variations and/or administrative conditional uses.
3. To hear appeals from any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by
the director of community development.
C. Director Of Community Development: The position of the director of community
development has been established by the village. This is a department head position,
reporting to the village manager. The duties and authority of the director of community
development, or duly appointed employees of the community development department,
shall be as follows:
1. Provide public information on the provisions of the zoning ordinance.
2. Forward to the planning and zoning commission all applications for appeals,
variations, conditional uses, map or text amendments, or other matters on which the
2
Page 92 of 126
planning and zoning commission is required to review under this chapter.Forward to the
planning and zoning commission all applications for appeals; variations, except for
administrative variations; conditional uses, except for administrative conditional
uses; map or text amendments; or other matters on which the planning and zoning
commission is required to review under this chapter.
3. Review and prepare recommendations on all matters going before the planning and
zoning commission.
4. Maintain possession of appropriate records and files pertaining to the zoning
ordinance, including, but not limited to, zoning maps, amendments, conditional uses,
administrative conditional uses, variations, administrative variations, and appeals and
minor variations.
5. Conduct inspections of buildings, structures, and land to determine appropriate
compliance with the regulations of this chapter.
6. Issue notice of violations and citations for violations of the regulations of this
chapter. Notices shall require compliance within fifteen (15) days and advise violators of
their right to appeal.
7. Issue "stop work" orders for any construction or work that is not in compliance with
the regulations of this chapter.
8. Approve certificates of occupancy and zoning for any structure or use of land in the
village.
9. Conduct administrative hearings and make final determinations on
minoradministrative variations and administrative conditional uses.
10. Review and make final determinations for projects that require administrative site
plan review. (Ord. 4590, 9-21-1993; amd. Ord. 5173, 3-6-2001; Ord. 5219, 11-6-2001; Ord.
5426, 4-20-2004; Ord. 5639, 7-17-2007; Ord. 6246, 5-17-2016; Ord. 6583, 9-5-2021)
3
Page 93 of 126
D. TABLE OF ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES AND SPECIFIC DUTIES:
Final Authority
Director of Planning
Community & Zoning Village Board
Development Commission
VARIATIONS Administrative Standard Standard
Parking requirements for uses in
excess of 2,500 square feet in the B- All - -
5/B-5C districts
Fences in nonsingle-family All
residential districts
Sign variations - All -
All other Chapter 14 zoning - ≤25% >25%
requirements
CONDITIONAL USES Administrative Standard Standard
Existing nonconforming accessory All - -
structures1
Relief from accessory structure - All -
requirements in single-family
residential districts
Setback reductions in required - ≤25% >25%
yards in single-family residential
zoning districts
Fences in single-family residential - All -
districts
1 Applicable structures shall: (i) be replaced with the same type of structure, (ii) do not exceed a total
of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record, (iii) extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of
the required interior side yard setback, and (iv) extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear
yard setback.
14.203: PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
The procedures regarding all administrative functions of this chapter are set forth as
follows:
4
Page 94 of 126
A. Review For Zoning Compliance: No permit pertaining to the use of land or buildings,
existing or proposed, shall be issued by any officer, employee or department of the village
unless the application for such permit has been reviewed and approved by the director of
community development or duly appointed employee of the community development
department. Such approval shall be by written authorization certifying the proposed use
complies with all provisions of this chapter. In certifying this zoning compliance, the village
authorizes that the specific land or building can be occupied or used for its intended
purpose, provided that any new construction or remodeling conforms to the approved
plans and all applicable regulations of the village. Any permit issued in conflict with the
provisions of the zoning ordinance, or without proper authorization, shall be null and void.
B. Approval Of Occupancy: No building shall be used for any purpose until the director of
community development or duly appointed employee of the community development
department has provided written authorization for approval of the occupancy in
accordance with section 15.703 of this code.
C. Variations and Administrative Variations:
1. Intent: Variations shall be granted or recommended for approval only where the
planning and zoning commission, or in the case of minoradministrative variations, the
director of community development, makes findings of fact in accordance with the
standards set forth in this chapter, and further finds that the regulations of this chapter will
impose practical difficulties or particular hardships on the petitioner in carrying out the
strict letter of the regulations of this chapter.
2. Authority: The director of community development may, after an administrative
hearing, grant a minoran administrative variation as provided in this chapter. The planning
and zoning commission may, after a public hearing, grant or recommend for approval a
variation in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter.
3. Initiation: An application for a minoran administrative variation or variation may be
made by any person, firm, other entity, corporation, or by any governmental entity
requesting or intending to request application for a building permit.
4. Filing Of Applications: An application for a minoran administrative variation or
variation shall be filed with the director of community development on forms obtained
from the community development department. Such form shall include all information
necessary for processing the request, including, but not limited to, a statement on specific
hardship, the extent of variation requested, legal description of subject property, survey,
site plan, appropriate proof of ownership, or proof of authority. The application form may
be revised from time to time. The application shall be filed with the appropriate fee in an
amount established by the board of trustees.
5. Public Hearing: Public hearings for variations and administrative variations shall
be held in compliance with state statutes and provisions of this chapter as described in
subsection G or subsection H of this section.
5
Page 95 of 126
6. Action By Planning And Zoning Commission: The planning and zoning commission
shall hear and decide as final administrative authority, all petitions for fence variations in
nonsingle-family residential districts and variations which do not exceed twenty five
percent (25%) of any requirement of this chapter.
The planning and zoning commission shall make recommendations to the village board on
all variations which are more than twenty five percent (25%) of any requirement of this
chapter.
In all petitions for variations, the planning and zoning commission shall make findings of
fact based on the standards listed in subsection C9 of this chapter. In all petitions for
administrative variations, the planning and zoning commission shall make findings of fact
based on the standards listed in subsection C11c of this chapter.
7. Action By Village Board: The village board shall make a final decision on an
application for a variation after receiving the recommendation of the planning and zoning
commission. Any variation which fails to receive a favorable recommendation from the
planning and zoning commission shall not be granted by the village board unless there is a
concurring vote of five (5) if all seven (7) members of the corporate authorities are present
and voting, and a concurring vote of four (4) if less than seven (7) members of the corporate
authorities are present and voting.
In the case of a written protest against any proposed variation, signed by the owners of
twenty percent (20%) of the frontage proposed to be altered, or by the owners of twenty
percent (20%) of the frontage immediately adjacent or across an alley, or by the owners of
twenty percent (20%) of the frontage directly opposite the frontage proposed to be altered,
is filed with the village clerk, the proposed variation shall not be passed except by the
voting requirements in the preceding paragraph.
8. Appeal Of Planning And Zoning Commission Decision: Any individual may file an
appeal of any decision of the planning and zoning commission with the village board. Such
appeal shall be filed with the director of community development within five (5) calendar
days of the planning and zoning commission decision.
9. Standards For Variations: A variation from the regulations of this chapter shall not be
granted or recommended for approval by the planning and zoning commission unless
findings of fact based on evidence are made in each specific case that affirm the following
standards:
a. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical
conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result,
as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be
applied;
b. The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to
the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other
property within the same zoning classification;
6
Page 96 of 126
c. The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase
financial gain;
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this chapter and has not been
created by any person presently having an interest in the property;
e. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is
located;
f. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the
neighborhood; and
g. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or
increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on
adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood.
10. Restrictions On Variations: The following restrictions shall apply to all variations:
a. No variation shall be authorized that would modify any definition;
b. No variation shall be authorized that would vary uses between zoning districts,
except use exceptions approved in a planned development; and
c. No variation shall be authorized that would result in a density increase from that
permitted in a zoning district except in conjunction with a planned development.
11. MinorAdministrative Variations:
a. Action By Director Of Community Development: The director of community
development shall hear and decide as final administrative authority, all petitions for minor
variations for the following:The director of community development shall consider the
following administrative variations and may either administratively approve or
remand to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further action. The following types
of relief are eligible as administrative variations, and requests that are not included in
this eligibility list may apply for a standard variation:
(1) Existing nonconforming accessory structures:
(A) Applicable Structures:
(i) Will be replaced with the same type of structure,
(ii) Do not exceed a total of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record,
(iii) Extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of the required interior side yard
setback,
7
Page 97 of 126
(iv) Extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard setback, or
(v) Where the applicable lot coverage does not exceed the maximum permitted
for that zoning district by more than ten percent (10%).
(21) Parking requirements for uses in excess of two thousand five hundred (2,500)
square feet in floor area located in the B-5 central commercial district and B-5C core
central commercial district.
b. Filing of Application: All applications for administrative variations shall be
made on an appropriate application form provided by the Village. The application for
administrative variations shall be filed and processed in the manner prescribed for
variations and shall be accompanied by the following information:
(1) Said application shall contain the following information:
(A) Zoning Request Application / Petition for Hearing;
(B) Affidavit of Ownership;
(C) Proof of Ownership;
(D) Paid receipt of the most recent tax bill;
(E) Responses to applicable standards;
(F) Plat of Survey;
(G) Site plan;
(H) Building elevation(s), existing and proposed, if applicable;
(I) Floor plans, if applicable;
(J) Preliminary engineering plans, if applicable;
(K) Legal description of the subject property;
(L) Any other information deemed necessary by the Village.
c. Standards for Administrative Variations:
(B) Standards: For minor variations consisting of existing nonconforming accessory
structures, the director of community development shall make findings of fact based on
the petition and public input according to the following standards:
(i) Whether the regulation from which relief is sought was in existence when the
applicant either purchased or improved the property.
(ii) Whether the applicant changed the property in some way so as to create the
nonconformity.
(iii) Whether the requested relief will be out of character with the neighborhood.
(iv) Whether there are other structures within the same zoning district, which
either violate or have received a variation from the same regulation.
(v) Whether the negative impact on the applicant, in not being able to use the
property in the specific manner requested, substantially outweighs any negative impact on
the adjacent properties if the variation is granted.
8
Page 98 of 126
(vi) Whether the request is the minimum necessary to use the property in a
manner reasonably similar to other uses in the neighborhood.
(vii) Whether a reasonable alternative is consistent with the expressed terms of
the zoning ordinance.
(1) For an administrative variation request considering a reduction in the
minimum number of required parking spaces in the B-5 central commercial district
and B-5C core central commercial district, the director of community development
shall make findings of fact based on the petition and public input according to the
following standards:
(A) Whether the requested relief will be out of character with the
neighborhood.
(B) Whether there are other properties within the same zoning district, which
have received a variation from the same regulation.
(C) Whether there is public parking available within one thousand feet (1,000').
(D) Whether there is public transit (e.g., train station) available within one
thousand feet (1,000').
(E) Whether there are adjacent land uses with different peak parking demand
periods based on the hours of operations.
(F) Whether there is a shared parking agreement/valet service provided.
(2) Parking requirements for uses in excess of two thousand five hundred (2,500)
square feet in floor area located in the B-5 central commercial district and B-5C core
central commercial district.
(A) Standards: For minor variations consisting of parking requirements for uses in
excess of two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in floor area located in the B-5
central commercial district and B-5C core central commercial district, the director of
community development shall make findings of fact based on the petition and public input
according to the following standards:
(i) Whether the requested relief will be out of character with the neighborhood.
(ii) Whether there are other properties within the same zoning district, which have
received a variation from the same regulation.
(iii) Whether there is public parking available within one thousand feet (1,000').
(iv) Whether there is public transit (e.g., train station) available within one
thousand feet (1,000').
(v) Whether there are adjacent land uses with different peak parking demand
periods based on the hours of operations.
9
Page 99 of 126
(vi) Whether there is a shared parking agreement/valet service provided.
b.d. Hearings: Administrative hearings shall be held for minoradministrative
variations only and in compliance with the provisions as described in this subsection H of
this section.
(1) Upon receipt of an application for a minor variation, the director of community
development shall review the application for completeness and assign a case number to
the request.
(2) For all applications for a minor variation, the department of community
development shall provide a list of all owners of record of property lying within one
hundred feet (100'), exclusive of right of way width, of the parcel subject to the public
hearing. The director of community development shall cause a copy of the public notice to
be mailed to all property owners on the list no more than thirty (30) days nor less than
seven (7) days prior to the hearing.
(3) An administrative notice shall contain the case number assigned to the
application, the address of the property, a brief statement on the nature of the minor
variation, the name and address of the property owner, the petitioner and their legal
representative, and the date, time and location of the administrative hearing.
(4) For all applications for a minor variation, the director of community development
shall also cause one or more signs to be posted on the property, which is the subject of the
administrative hearing.
(5) The number and location of signs shall be determined by the director of
community development.
(6) The sign must be a minimum of thirty inches by thirty inches (30" x 30") in size,
having letters a minimum of two inches (2") high, and contain the following information:
(A) The fact that an administrative hearing that affects the subject property will be
held, with direction to interested members of the general public to call the office of the
community development director for further information concerning date, time and place
and subject matter of said administrative hearing.
(B) Any interested person may appear and be heard at the hearing and such
appearance may be made in person, by agent (if a corporation), or in writing.
e. Administrative Approvals: Administrative variations adhering to the
application submittal requirements and ordinance requirements may be
administratively approved as follows:
(1) After the administrative variation application is submitted and reviewed by
the various Village departments, the director of community development will indicate
if the applicant may proceed forward with seeking approval of the requested relief
with the sign-off approval of the surrounding property owners.
10
Page 100 of 126
(2) In all cases where the director of community development grants an
administrative variation, an authorizing determination shall be prepared that may set
forth the terms for operation of the conditional use. The village clerk shall record the
authorizing determination with the county recorder of deeds.
c.f. Appeal Of Director Of Community Development Decision: Any individual may file
an appeal of the decision of the director of community development regarding a minoran
administrative variation with the planning and zoning commission. Such appeal shall be
filed with the director of community development within five (5) calendar days of the
director's decision.
12. Additional Restrictions: In the granting of a variation or administrative variation,
additional conditions and restrictions may be placed upon the premises, which are
necessary to comply with the standards listed above and the objectives of this chapter.
13. Revocation: Where a variation or administrative variation has been granted
pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, such approval shall become null and void
unless a building permit is issued and work is substantially under way within twelve (12)
months of the date of the variation, unless the variation approval is extended by the
planning and zoning commission or the administrative variation approval is extended by
the director of community development.
14. Effect Of Denial Of Proposal: No application for a variation which has been denied
by the planning and zoning commission or village board or for an administrative variation
which has been denied by the director of community development shall be
resubmitted for a period of one year from the date of the denial, except on grounds of new
evidence or proof of change of condition found to be valid by the director of community
development.
F. Conditional Uses and Administrative Conditional Uses:
1. Intent And Applicability: The development and administration of this chapter is
based upon the village being divided into zoning districts within which the use of land and
buildings and the bulk and location of buildings and structures is substantially uniform.
However, it is recognized that there are certain uses which, because of their unique
characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any particular zoning district without
consideration of the impact of those uses upon adjoining properties and their impact on
the neighborhood in general. Such conditional uses fall into two (2) categories:
a. Uses publicly operated or uses traditionally promoting a public interest or benefit.
b. Uses entirely private in character but of a nature that their operation may present a
different impact upon adjoining properties or the neighborhood in general.
2. Authority: Except as otherwise provided in subsection 14.316F10 of this
chaptersection, the planning and zoning commission shall convene a public hearing on a
conditional use application. The planning and zoning commission shall prepare findings of
11
Page 101 of 126
fact based on evidence presented addressing required standards, and submit a
recommendation on an application to the village board for their review and final decision.
3. Initiation: Any person, firm, corporation, office or other legal entity having ownership
interest in land, or a contractual interest that may become an ownership interest, may file
an application with the consent of the property owner.
4. Filing Of Application: An application for a conditional use shall be filed with the
director of community development on forms obtained from the community development
department. Except as otherwise provided in subsection F10 of this section, Thethe
director shall, upon receiving a complete application for a conditional use, forward the
application, along with other data considered important by the director, to the planning
and zoning commission for their review and recommendation to the village board.
5. Public Hearings: A public hearing shall be conducted by the planning and zoning
commission on the conditional use application. Notice shall be as provided in subsection
G of this section, and in compliance with state statutes. Public hearings for conditional
uses and administrative conditional uses shall be held in compliance with state
statutes and provisions of this chapter as described in subsection G or subsection H
of this section.
6. Recommendation By The Planning And Zoning Commission: The director of
community development shall submit the written recommendation of the planning and
zoning commission on an application for a conditional use to the village board within thirty
(30) days of conclusion of the public hearing. Extension of this time period may be allowed
by mutual consent of the applicant and the director of community development. For all
petitions for conditional uses involving residential setback reductions in all yards in the R-
X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts, which do not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the
setbacks requirement(s) of this chapter, the planning and zoning commission shall hear
and decide as final administrative authority. The planning and zoning commission shall
make recommendations to the village board on all conditional uses involving residential
setback reductions in all yards in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts which are more
than twenty five percent (25%) of the setback requirement(s) of this chapter.
6. Recommendation By The Planning And Zoning Commission: Except as otherwise
provided in subsection F10 of this section, the director of community development
shall submit the written recommendation of the planning and zoning commission on
an application for a conditional use to the village board within thirty (30) days of
conclusion of the public hearing. Extension of this time period may be allowed by
mutual consent of the applicant and the director of community development.
For petitions for conditional uses involving any of the following in the R-X, R-1, and R-A
zoning districts:
a. Residential setback reductions in any yard that do not exceed twenty-five
percent (25%) of the applicable setback requirements of this Chapter;
12
Page 102 of 126
b. Relief from the accessory structure requirements; and
c. Fence petitions;
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall hear and decide such petitions as the final
administrative authority. The planning and zoning commission shall make
recommendations to the village board on all conditional uses involving residential
setback reductions in all yards in the R-X, R-1, and R-A zoning districts that exceed
twenty five percent (25%) of the setback requirement(s) of this chapter.
7. Action By The Village Board:
a. The village board shall not act upon a proposed conditional use until it has received
a written report and recommendation from the planning and zoning commission provided
by the director of community development.
b. The village board may approve a conditional use by ordinance, deny, or refer back
to the planning and zoning commission for further review. The village board may establish
such conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction,
maintenance, and operation of the conditional use, as is deemed necessary for the
protection of adjoining properties and the neighborhood in general and the public interest.
c. In all cases where the village board permits a conditional use, the authorizing
ordinance shall specifically set forth the terms for operation of the conditional use.
d. Any conditional use which fails to receive a favorable recommendation from the
planning and zoning commission shall not be granted by the village board unless there is a
concurring vote of five (5) if all seven (7) members of the corporate authorities are present
and voting, and a concurring vote of four (4) if less than seven (7) members of the corporate
authorities are present and voting.
8. Standards For Conditional Uses: Except as otherwise provided in subsection
F10c of this section,No no conditional use shall be recommended for approval by the
planning and zoning commission unless it finds:
a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not
be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare;
b. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially
diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located;
c. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and
orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in
the district;
13
Page 103 of 126
d. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities
have been or will be provided;
e. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress
so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets;
f. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current
comprehensive plan for the village; and
g. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable
regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each
instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the planning and zoning
commission.
9. Conditions And Guarantees: Except as otherwise provided in subsections F6 and
F10 of this section,In in all cases where conditional uses are granted, and conditions
regulating the use are established as described in subsection F8 of this section, the village
board shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that
the conditional use complies with all regulating conditions.
10. Administrative Conditional Uses.
a. Action By Director Of Community Development: The director of community
development shall consider the following administrative conditional uses and may
either administratively approve or remand to the Planning and Zoning Commission for
further action. The following types of relief are eligible as administrative conditional
uses:
(1) Existing nonconforming accessory structures:
(A) Applicable Structures:
(i) Will be replaced with the same type of structure,
(ii) Do not exceed a total of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record,
(iii) Extend into no more than forty percent (40%) of the required interior side
yard setback,
(iv) Extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard setback, or
(v) Where the applicable lot coverage does not exceed the maximum
permitted for that zoning district by more than ten percent (10%).
b. Filing of Application: All applications for administrative conditional uses shall
be made on an appropriate application form provided by the Village. The application
for administrative conditional uses shall be filed and processed in the manner
prescribed for conditional uses and shall be accompanied by the following
information:
14
Page 104 of 126
(1) Said application shall contain the following information:
(A) Zoning Request Application / Petition for Hearing;
(B) Affidavit of Ownership;
(C) Proof of Ownership;
(D) Paid receipt of the most recent tax bill;
(E) Responses to applicable standards;
(F) Plat of Survey;
(G) Site plan;
(H) Building elevation(s), existing and proposed, if applicable;
(I) Floor plans, if applicable;
(J) Preliminary engineering plans, if applicable;
(K) Legal description of the subject property;
(L) Any other information deemed necessary by the Village.
c. Standards for Administrative Conditional Uses. No administrative conditional
use shall be granted by the Village unless the administrative conditional use:
(1) Is so designed, located, and proposed to be operated that the public health,
safety and welfare will be protected.
(2) Will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the
neighborhood in which it is located.
(3) That in all other respects, the administrative conditional use conforms to the
applicable regulations of the district in which it is located.
d. Administrative conditional uses adhering to the application submittal
requirements and ordinance requirements may be administratively approved as
follows:
(1) After the administrative conditional use application is submitted and
reviewed by the various Village departments, the director of community development
will indicate if the applicant may proceed forward with seeking approval of the
requested relief with the sign-off approval of the surrounding property owners.
(2) In all cases where the director of community development grants an
administrative conditional use, an authorizing determination shall be prepared that
may set forth the terms for operation of the conditional use. The village clerk shall
record the authorizing determination with the county recorder of deeds.
e. Appeal Of Director Of Community Development Decision: Any individual may
file an appeal of the decision of the director of community development regarding an
administrative conditional use with the planning and zoning commission. Such appeal
shall be filed with the director of community development within five (5) calendar
days of the director's decision.
15
Page 105 of 126
10.11. Effect Of Denial Of Application: No application for a conditional use which has
been denied by the village board shall be resubmitted for a period of one year from the date
of denial, except on the grounds of new factual evidence, or a change in conditions which
would alter the concept or intent of the request. Such changes may include reductions in
density or building height, changes in land use and road standards and alignment, or
conditions which would have a positive effect on surrounding property, and serve to
address the circumstances of the denial of the original application. Such change or new
evidence must be reviewed and acknowledged by the director of community development
before a new application can be submitted for a public hearing.
11.12. Revocation:
a. In any case where the construction of an approved conditional use is not
substantially under way, or if a use is not established or commenced in the building within
one year from the date of granting thereof, and completed within eighteen (18) months,
then, without further action by the village board, the conditional use or authorization
thereof shall be null and void.
b. A conditional use may be revoked if conditional use as established or constructed
on the site does not conform to the established conditions for approval. The director of
community development will be responsible for advising the village board of any violations
and the village board may then authorize the planning and zoning commission to schedule
a public hearing to consider revoking the conditional use permit. After conducting the
public hearing, the planning and zoning commission shall then prepare a written report
and recommendation to submit to the village board. Upon receipt of the planning and
zoning commission report, the village board shall then render a final judgment regarding
rescinding the conditional use permit and accompanying ordinance.
12.13. Expiration And Transferability: The conditional use shall expire if the conditional
use shall cease for more than twelve (12) months for any reason. However, the ownership
of an authorized conditional use may be changed if the use remains unchanged.
13.14. Modification Or Intensification: Any modification or intensification of a
conditional use which alters the essential character or operation of the use in a way not
intended at the time the conditional use was granted shall require a new conditional use
permit. Such conditional use permit shall be applied for prior to any modification of the use
or property. The director of community development shall determine whether the
proposed modification or intensification represents an alteration in the essential character
of the original conditional use as approved. The operator of the conditional use shall
provide the director of community development with all the necessary information related
to the conditional use to render this determination.
G. Public Hearing Procedures:
16
Page 106 of 126
1. Upon receipt of an application for a variation, amendment, conditional use or
appeal, the director of community development shall review the application for
completeness and assign a case number to the request.
2. Not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date an
application is to be considered, the director of community development shall cause notice
thereof to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation within the
village.
3. Not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing, the
director of community development shall cause a copy of the public notice to be mailed to
all property owners within two hundred fifty feet (250'), exclusive of right of way width, of
the parcel subject to the public hearing. The director shall cause the notice to be mailed
according to the following:
a. For all applications for map amendment, conditional use, variation, or appeal
requests concerning a single-family residential property, the community development
department shall be responsible for mailing the notice.
b. For all applications for map amendment, conditional use, variation, or appeal
requests concerning a nonsingle-family residential property, the applicant shall be
responsible for mailing the notice. Upon delivery of the notice, the applicant shall attest in
writing to the community development department indicating the date the notice was
mailed and the list of property owners to whom the notice was mailed.
4. All published and mailed notices shall contain the case number assigned to the
application, the common address of the property, or in the event that there is no common
address, an appropriate description of the location of the property, a brief statement on
the nature of the public hearing, the name and address of the property owner, the
petitioners and their legal representative, and the date, time and location of the public
hearing.
5. For all applications for map amendment, conditional use, variation, or appeal, the
director of community development shall also cause one or more signs to be posted on the
property which is the subject of the public hearing.
a. The number and location of signs shall be determined by the director of community
development.
b. The sign must be a minimum of thirty inches by thirty inches (30" x 30") in size,
having letters a minimum of two inches (2") high, and contain the following information:
(1) The fact that a public hearing will be held to affect the subject property, with
direction to interested members of the general public to call the office of the community
development director for further information concerning date, time and place and subject
matter of said public hearing.
17
Page 107 of 126
6. Any interested person may appear and be heard at the hearing held concerning any
such application for variation, amendment or conditional use, and such appearance may
be made in person, by agent (if a corporation), or by attorney.
H. Administrative Hearing Procedures:
(1) Upon receipt of an application for an administrative variation or an
administrative conditional use, the director of community development shall review
the application for completeness and assign a case number to the request.
(2) For all applications for administrative variations or administrative
conditional uses, the department of community development shall provide a list of all
owners of record of property lying within one hundred feet (100'), exclusive of right of
way width, of the parcel subject to the public hearing. The director of community
development shall cause a copy of the public notice to be mailed to all property
owners on the list no more than thirty (30) days nor less than seven (7) days prior to the
hearing.
(3) An administrative notice shall contain the case number assigned to the
application, the address of the property, a brief statement on the nature of the
administrative variation or administrative conditional use, the name and address of
the property owner, the petitioner and their legal representative, and the date, time
and location of the administrative hearing.
(4) For all applications for an administrative variation or administrative
conditional use, the director of community development shall also cause one or more
signs to be posted on the property, which is the subject of the administrative hearing.
(5) The number and location of signs shall be determined by the director of
community development.
(6) The sign must be a minimum of thirty inches by thirty inches (30" x 30") in
size, having letters a minimum of two inches (2") high, and contain the following
information:
(A) The fact that an administrative hearing that affects the subject property will
be held, with direction to interested members of the general public to call the office of
the community development director for further information concerning date, time
and place and subject matter of said administrative hearing.
(B) Any interested person may appear and be heard at the hearing and such
appearance may be made in person, by agent (if a corporation), or in writing.
H.I. Administrative Site Plan Review:
1. Action By Director Of Community Development: Prior to the issuance of a building
permit, the director of community development shall review and decide as final
18
Page 108 of 126
administrative authority, all applications for administrative site plan review for the
following:
a. Construction Of New Buildings: Construction of new buildings within the
downtown as defined in section 14.304.1 of this chapter.
b. Additions To Existing Buildings: Additions to existing buildings within the downtown
as defined in section 14.304.1 of this chapter.
c. Exceptions: Any construction within the downtown which requires a variation,
conditional use, or planned unit development shall be exempt from administrative site
plan review.
2. Authority: The director of community development may, after an administrative
review, grant or deny any proposed site plan, with or without conditions of approval, or may
refer it to the village board for further consideration.
3. Initiation: An application for administrative site plan review may be made by any
person, firm, other entity, corporation, or by any governmental entity requesting or
intending to request application for a building permit. Preapplication meetings are
available to discuss a proposed application and are encouraged.
4. Filing Of Applications: An application for administrative site plan review shall be filed
with the director of community development on forms obtained from the community
development department. Such form shall include all information necessary for
processing the request, including, but not limited to, a statement of the proposed use,
legal description of subject property, survey, site plan, building elevations, landscape plan,
appropriate proof of ownership, or proof of authority. The application form may be revised
from time to time.
5. Standards: No site plan shall be administratively approved unless the director of
community development finds the application meets the following standards:
a. The submitted site plan conforms to all applicable village ordinances.
b. The proposed improvements support the goals and objectives stated in adopted
village plans, including the comprehensive plan.
c. The site plan is reflective of the downtown design guidelines of section 14.304.1 of
this chapter.
6. Appeals: The applicant may file an appeal of any administrative site plan review
decision of the director of community development. Such appeal shall be filed with the
director of community development within ten (10) business days of the decision.
a. Authority: The village board shall hear and decide appeals from any administrative
order, requirement, decision or determination made by the director of community
development or other authorized official concerning administrative site plan review.
19
Page 109 of 126
b. Filing Of Application: An application for an appeal shall be filed with the director of
community development, on forms obtained from the community development
department, who shall forward such appeal to the village board for their review and
decision.
c. Public Hearing: A public hearing shall be conducted by the village board on the
appeal application. Notice shall be as provided in subsection G of this section, in
compliance with state statutes.
d. Decisions On Appeals: Any decisions by the village board on a site plan review
appeal application shall be in all instances the final administrative determination and shall
be subject to judicial review only in accordance with applicable statutes of the state.
7. Schedule Of Construction: A site plan approval shall become null and void in the
following circumstances:
a. The applicant fails to apply for a building permit within one year from the date of
site plan approval.
b. A new application for administrative site plan approval has been received by the
community development department for the same subject property. (Ord. 4590, 9-21-
1993; amd. Ord. 5113, 6-6-2000; Ord. 5173, 3-6-2001; Ord. 5219, 11-6-2001; Ord. 5253, 5-
21-2002; Ord. 5289, 11-19-2002; Ord. 5639, 7-17-2007; Ord. 5751, 8-4-2009; Ord. 6112,
12-17-2013; Ord. 6246, 5-17-2016; Ord. 6583, 9-5-2021)
20
Page 110 of 126
ATTACHMENT B
Modifications to the text are indicated as deletions and additions.
14.304.1: DESIGN STANDARDS:
A. Downtown Design Guidelines:
1. Purpose: The downtown design guidelines contained herein shall serve the built
environment within the downtown by promoting the use of high quality materials;
supporting a unified pedestrian oriented environment, a mix of land uses, and thriving
public spaces; and promoting and enhancing the character of the downtown. The
downtown design guidelines shall be in addition to code requirements found elsewhere in
this chapter. For the purposes of this section, the "downtown" shall be defined as:
a. Properties located in the B-5 and B-5C zoning districts.
b. Properties located along Prospect Avenue from Central Avenue to William Street.
c. Properties located along East Lincoln Street from Maple Street to William Street.
2. Applicability: The downtown design guidelines shall be applicable to the following
projects within the downtown:
a. Construction of new buildings.
b. Additions to existing buildings.
c. Facade improvements to existing buildings. Facade improvements solely
consisting of replacement of windows and doors of like size and location are exempt from
the guidelines of this section.
3. Building Design: The architectural design and details of the building shall meet the
following objectives:
a. Linear Massing: Facades fifty feet (50') or greater in length facing a front or exterior
side lot line shall vary the depth of the structure, by way of recesses and projection within
the building's architecture. These details shall break up the massing of the structure in
addition to any windows and building entrances along the facade.
b. Access: All buildings with a total width greater than fifty feet (50') shall have a
minimum of one entryway at the front of the building, defined as the facade of the building
which faces the front or exterior side lot line. Buildings constructed on a corner lot may
choose the building's orientation; access may be from either the front or the exterior side.
1
Page 111 of 126
c. Windows And Doors: The first floor of buildings shall have a minimum of twenty five
percent (25%) of the facade area facing a front or exterior side be devoted to glass windows
and/or doors. Windows and doors should be used as an opportunity to provide
architectural interest which breaks up building massing and supports a pedestrian friendly
environment. If solid, windowless walls are necessary to the building's function,
architectural details shall be included to add visual interest.
d. Rooflines: The roofline of a building should include architectural details which add
to its overall design, such as cornices, dormers, or parapet walls.
e. Materials: Durable, high quality building materials which do not require frequent
maintenance, such as brick, stone, and glass, shall be used for facades which are visible
from the street. Materials located along a single facade shall be harmonious in design and
color.
f. Vertical Massing Of Multi-Story Buildings: Multi-story buildings shall be visually
divided using architectural details such as differing building materials or stepbacks to
reduce the sense of mass and highlight the first floor to a pedestrian scale.
4. Site Design:
a. Building Setbacks And Parking Lots: Building setbacks shall conform to section
14.905 of this chapter when applicable. Where possible, parking lots shall not be located
between the street and the building's front facade.
b. Landscaping: Sites shall comply with the landscape provisions found in article XXIII
of this chapter. The use of landscape planters, decorative fencing and similar treatments
shall be encouraged in all outdoor areas where public gathering is desired, such as patio
dining or other outdoor seating areas.
c. Pedestrian Access: All buildings shall have clear pedestrian access from a public
walkway to the entrance(s) of the building. Sidewalks located on private property, to be
utilized by the public, shall be a minimum of seven feet (7') in width.
d. Streetscape Improvements: Areas located immediately adjacent to Village right of
way shall blend into the Village's existing streetscape improvement program where
applicable.
e. Bicycle Facilities: Properties which incorporate parking lots shall also provide
bicycle racks on site. Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum amount of ten
percent (10%) of the vehicle parking provided on site. U-shaped racks, similar to those
installed by the Village, are the preferred design.
B. Additional Design Standards: The following design standards are applicable to the
entire Village:
2
Page 112 of 126
1. Visual Expanse: Any structure over two hundred feet (200') in length shall be
designed so as to stagger the building facades which face a right of way, parking lot, or
adjacent residential property, in order to break up the visual expanse of the structure.
2. Screening Of Mechanical And Utility Equipment:
a. When feasible, mechanical equipment should be located within the principal
structure in order to minimize exterior visual impacts.
b. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be hidden when viewed from ground level
as viewed from the public right of way or property line of any adjacent residentially zoned
property. If screening is required, it shall be a continuous, permanent, sound attenuating
and noncombustible screen of a color compatible with the principal structure. For new
construction, the screen should be designed as an architectural component of the
structure in the form of a parapet wall. The addition or modification of rooftop equipment
on existing buildings shall be screened to the extent that is feasible, as determined
appropriate by the community development director. If structural modifications are
required to accommodate screening of mechanical equipment, it shall comply with the
building code in effect at the time modifications are made.
c. All ground mounted mechanical and utility equipment that is six feet (6') or less in
height shall be screened from view utilizing landscaping which will grow to the height of the
ground based utility. Ground mounted mechanical and utility equipment taller than six feet
(6') in height that is visible from the right of way or adjacent residential property shall be
screened from view with an enclosure that is constructed to be consistent with the
material of the principal structure, as determined appropriate by the community
development director.
d. Screening of mechanical equipment shall be required when new equipment is
installed. Screening shall not be required when replacing an existing, non-screened
rooftop mechanical unit in the same place with a new unit that is either as tall as, or
shorter than the existing unit. Normal maintenance of mechanical equipment shall not
mandate the screening requirement. (Ord. 6286, 12-6-2016; amd. Ord. 3528, 9-2-2020)
3. Architectural Diversity: To promote architectural diversity and avoid repetitive
building patterns, no detached single-family dwelling constructed within a residential
subdivision approved after the effective date of this ordinance, or constructed as new
principal residential construction on an individual lot, shall be similar in appearance
to any other detached single-family dwelling located on the same street within a
distance of two (2) lots in either direction of the subject lot.
For purposes of this subsection, the term “constructed” shall mean the erection of a
new principal detached single-family dwelling and shall not include:
• Additions to an existing dwelling;
• Exterior renovations or façade modifications to an existing dwelling; or
3
Page 113 of 126
• Interior remodeling.
This subsection shall not apply retroactively to dwellings legally existing as of the
effective date of this ordinance.
a. Definition of “Similar in Appearance”: For purposes of this subsection, two
detached, single-family dwellings shall be considered similar in appearance if they
are identical or nearly identical with respect to any three (3) or more of the following
architectural characteristics:
(1) Primary roof form, including the dominant roof type (gable, hip, mansard,
gambrel, flat, or combination):
(2) Roof height, measured from finished grade to the peak, within a tolerance of
+/- 2 feet;
(3) Front-facing massing, defined as the approximate height and width of the
primary front wall plane closest to the front lot line;
(4) Overall front-elevation form, including the predominant silhouette and
massing as viewed from the street;
(5) Fenestration pattern, including the relative location, arrangement, and size
of windows on the front elevation;
(6) Garage configuration, including the location, orientation, and dimensions of
garage doors visible from the street; and
(7) Primary exterior siding materials on the front elevation wall planes (e.g.,
brick veneer, horizontal siding, board-and-batten, shakes, or similar materials).
b. Characteristics Not Constituting Dissimilarity: The following characteristics,
standing alone, shall not be deemed sufficient to establish dissimilarity between
dwellings:
(1) Variations in color;
(2) Variations in roofing material;
(3) Addition or deletion of minor decorative elements (including, but not limited
to, dormers, cupolas, bay windows, belt courses, fan lights, chimneys, or ornamental
features);
(4) Reversal of plan orientation (right-hand/left-hand orientation);
(5) Variation in window styles; and
(6) Variations in height, width, or length measurements of less than five percent
(5%), unless otherwise specified herein.
4
Page 114 of 126
c. Submission and Approval Requirements: Prior to issuance of any building
permit within a subdivision, the applicant shall submit:
(1) A proposed set of building elevations for all planned home models; and
(2) A streetscape diagram or lot assignment plan demonstrating compliance
with the spacing requirement established in this subsection.
The Director of Community Development shall review the submitted elevations and
lot assignments for compliance with the requirements of this subsection. Approved
elevations and lot assignments shall be binding upon subsequent building permit
reviews.
4. Stucco or engineered stucco systems shall comply with the regulations
stipulated in section 21.229 of the building code.
5
Page 115 of 126
ATTACHMENT C
Modifications to the text are indicated as deletions and additions.
14.306: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES:
A. General Requirements: The following restrictions on accessory buildings, structures
and uses apply to all zoning districts, unless otherwise provided for in this chapter:
1. Time Of Construction: No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on
any lot prior to the time of construction of a principal building.
2. Yard Requirements: No accessory building, structure or use shall be located in a
required front yard, required side yard or exterior side yard, unless otherwise provided for
in this chapter.
3. Height Requirements:
a. Residential And Commercial Districts: No detached garage or gazebo shall exceed
a maximum height of fifteen feet (15’). No other accessory building/structure shall exceed
ten feet (10') in height.
b. Industrial, Office Research And Conservation Recreation Districts: No accessory
building/structure shall exceed twenty feet (20') in height.
4. Separation Between Buildings:
a. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the
principal building than three feet (3'). Detached garages located between three feet (3') and
ten feet (10') from a principal building shall be provided with a five- eighths inch (5/8")
drywall finish on the interior walls and ceiling.
b. For single-family residential properties in the R-X, R-1 and R-A zoning districts
only, Aany structure permanently attached to the principal structure is no longer
considered an accessory structure pursuant to article XXIV of this chapter and shall meet
the bulk requirements of the zoning district for principal structures, unless otherwise listed
as a permitted obstruction in section 14.319 of this article.
c. For single-family residential properties in the R-X, R-1 and R-A zoning districts
only, any structure permanently attached to an accessory structure is considered part
of the accessory structure and shall meet the bulk requirements for accessory
structures, unless otherwise listed as a permitted obstruction in section 14.319 of this
article.
1
Page 116 of 126
c. d. Aboveground swimming pools are permitted to attach to a deck if all required
rear and side yard setbacks are met and the deck is designed with a gate between the deck
and pool and access is provided to the yard from the deck.
d. e. Pergola support columns shall be located no closer to the principal building
than three feet (3').
5. Number Of Accessory Structures: The maximum number of accessory structures
shall not exceed two (2) such structures per zoning lot. Swimming pools and structures
listed as permitted obstructions in section 14.319 of this article are exempt from the total
number of accessory structures.
6. Shed and Garage Restrictions:
a. A shed shall not be utilized to store motor vehicles or as office, work or living
space. The storage of household items, equipment to maintain the property and small
recreational equipment is permitted.
b. A detached garage shall not be utilized as office, work or living space. The
storage of motor vehicles, household items, equipment to maintain the property and
small recreational equipment is permitted.
7. Roof Pitch: No accessory structure shall have a roof pitch of less than three to twelve
(3:12). Pergolas, arbors, and accessory structures in the I-1 Limited Industrial and C-R
Conservation Recreation zoning districts shall be exempt from this requirement.
8. No accessory structure shall be used for residential living quarters.
B. Restrictions In Residential Districts:
1. Maximum Size:
a. A detached private garage may be no larger than six hundred seventy twoseven
hundred twenty (672720) square feet.
b. A shed, gazebo, pergola, greenhouse, or other similar accessory structure may be
no larger than two hundred (200) square feet). the smaller of the following:
(1) Two percent (2%) of the lot area; or
(2) Two hundred (200) square feet.
2. Bulk Restrictions:
a. On lots fifty five feet (55') in width or less, detached accessory structures shall be
set back three feet (3') from any interior side or rear lot line.
b. On lots greater in width than fifty five feet (55'), detached accessory structures
shall be set back five feet (5') from any interior side or rear lot line.
2
Page 117 of 126
c. No accessory structure shall be placed on any right of way or village utility or
easement without prior consent from the director of community development.
d. All solid roofed accessory structures, including gazebos, shall be included in any
Floor Area Ratio calculation.
3. Lot Coverage: Accessory structures shall be included in any maximum lot coverage
calculation. Swimming pools are exempt from the maximum lot coverage calculation.
C. Restrictions In Business And Industrial Districts:
1. Maximum Area: Detached accessory building(s) or structure(s) shall occupy no more
than thirty percent (30%) of the area of a required yard.
2. Yard Requirements: Accessory structures shall be set back six feet (6') from any side
or rear lot line. No accessory structure shall be placed on any right of way or village utility
or easement without prior consent from the director of community development.
D. Regulations For Specific Accessory Structures And Uses:
1. Garbage Dumpsters And Recycling Containers:
a. Required: All multi-family buildings utilizing centralized solid waste services shall
provide a garbage dumpster and recycling container area which meets the minimum
standards which have been established by the solid waste coordinator.
b. Location: Outdoor designated garbage dumpsters and recycling containers shall
maintain the same setbacks as parking lots. Dumpsters and containers that are located
within covered parking areas shall be designed so that they do not conflict with required
parking spaces or access drives.
c. Screening:
(1) Nonresidential Districts: Such dumpsters and containers shall be screened on
all sides by a solid wood fence or equivalent screening material to a height not less than six
feet (6').
(2) Residential Districts: Multiple-family residential developments shall provide
screening on no less than three (3) sides by a solid wood fence or equivalent screening
material to a height not less than six feet (6').
2. Accessory Commercial Uses Within Multi-Family Residences: Accessory
commercial uses including restaurants, drugstores, retail food shops, valet services,
beauty and barber shops, and physical fitness or health facilities shall be permitted within
multi-family buildings provided that the accessory uses must be accessible to the public
only through the lobby of the building; and no advertising or display related to the
accessory use shall be visible from outside the building.
3
Page 118 of 126
3. Accessory Uses Within Office Buildings: Accessory uses located within office
buildings including cafeterias, restaurants, gift shops, flower shops, snack bars,
drugstores, barbershops, beauty parlors, banks, daycare centers, and office supply stores
(excluding sales of office machinery and furniture) shall be permitted provided that said
accessory uses are conducted for the convenience of the employees, patients, patrons, or
visitors. Said accessory uses shall be designed and located totally within the confines of
the principal building and the primary access to any accessory retail use shall be from
within the principal building.
4. Off Street Parking Facilities: Parking lots and drive aisles shall not be subject to the
restrictions of this subsection, but shall be subject to the requirements within articles XXII
and XXIII of this chapter.
5. Signs: Signs shall not be subject to the restrictions of this subsection but shall be
subject to the requirements of chapter 7 of this code.
6. Swimming Pools: The regulations of this subsection shall not apply to any pool
having at every point a depth less than twenty five inches (25").
No out of doors swimming pool for the use of members and their guests of nonprofit club
or organization, or limited to house residents of a multiple-dwelling unit, a block, a
subdivision, neighborhood, or other community shall be permitted in an R-1, R-A or R-X
district.
a. Location: Swimming pools shall not be permitted in any required front, side or
exterior side yards. Pools are permitted to encroach into the rear yard provided a minimum
of fifteen feet (15') is maintained from the rear property line to the edge of the structure.
b. Construction: All swimming pools shall be constructed according to the
requirements of this code.
7. Donation Boxes: The following restrictions shall apply to all donation boxes located
within the Village:
a. Location Requirements:
(1) Donation boxes are permitted as an accessory use to an institutional or nonprofit
use only.
(2) Donation boxes shall not be located in a required parking space.
(3) Donation boxes shall not be located in a required front yard, required side yard or
exterior side yard and shall be located to minimize visual impact when viewed from a
street.
b. Number Allowed: No more than one donation box shall be located on any lot.
c. Size: A donation box shall not exceed six and one-half feet (6.5') in height. The box
footprint shall be no greater than twenty five (25) square feet.
4
Page 119 of 126
d. Maintenance Requirements: Donation boxes shall be maintained in good condition
with no structural damage, holes, rust or graffiti. All boxes shall be emptied and serviced
regularly to prevent overflow of collections and be kept free of debris.
e. Signage: The name, address and phone number of the donation box operator shall
be posted on the box. Information shall be provided on the box as to whether the operator
is a for profit or not for profit organization. Total signage on the donation box shall not
exceed five (5) square feet or as approved by the director of community development.
f. Placement: All donation box placement shall be in accordance with all additional
state or county law. (Ord. 6286, 12-6-2016; amd. Ord. 3528, 9-2-2020; Ord. 6583, 9-5-
2021; Ord. 6590, 11-16-2021)
5
Page 120 of 126
ATTACHMENT D
Modifications to the text are indicated as deletions and additions.
Add the following land uses to Section 14.604 Land Use Table 1 in the appropriate alphabetical
locations.
14.604: LAND USE TABLES:
LAND USE TABLE 1
RESIDENTIAL AND RECREATIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Land Use C- R- R- R- R- R- R-
R X 1 A 2 3 4
Existing nonconforming accessory structures 3 3 3
C C C
Applicable structures:
(i) Will be replaced with the same type of
structure,
(ii) Do not exceed a total of two (2) accessory
structures per lot of record,
(iii) Extend into no more than forty percent (40%)
of the required interior side yard setback,
(iv) Extend into no more than ten percent (10%) of
the rear yard setback, or
v) Where the applicable lot coverage does not
exceed the maximum permitted for that zoning
district by more than ten percent (10%).
Relief from accessory structure requirements, except for C C C
certain existing nonconforming accessory structures
Relief from fence requirements C C C
Notes:
1. Permitted in limited circumstances. A conditional use shall be required if the following
circumstances apply:
a. A residential dwelling unit is being converted to the proposed use so as to be the principal
use of the structure; or
1
Page 121 of 126
b. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property less than 40,000 square feet
not currently in use for the proposed use.
2. Residential setback reductions below 5 feet may trigger additional building code
requirements including, but not limited to, fire-rated walls, limitation on projections, and opening
in walls. Any zoning relief granted through the conditional use shall adhere to Chapter 21 Building
Code of the Municipal Code.
3. Administrative conditional use approval is required.
2
Page 122 of 126
ATTACHMENT E
Modifications to the text are indicated as deletions and additions.
14.2204: RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS:
A. Driveways: All single-family and attached single-family driveways shall conform to the
following requirements:
1. Requirements: A minimum of two (2) parking spaces shall meet the required
setbacks of the specific zoning district. Driveways shall lead to an off street parking
space(s) or parking pad and shall cross the required front or exterior side yard in a manner
essentially perpendicular to the street pavement. Circular or dual frontage driveways, or
driveways serving side load garages are exempt from this requirement.
2. Minimum Driveway Width: Minimum driveway width shall be eight feet (8').
3. Parking Strips: Parallel paving strips shall be permitted as alternatives to paved
driveway surfaces. Driveway width measurements shall be made from the pavement's
outside edge and shall include the width between strips of pavement.
4. Driveway Width: Driveway width shall be calculated by including all abutting parallel
sidewalks and patios for driveways located within a required front or required exterior side
yard.
5. Unobstructed From Encroachments: All driveways shall be unobstructed from any
encroachment such as chimneys, fireplaces, and bay windows.
6. Attached Garages: Driveways serving attached garages shall not exceed twenty six
thirty feet (26' 30’) in width unless otherwise regulated elsewhere in this chapter., and
shall taper to a width no greater than twenty-six feet (26’) at the property line.
a. Driveways In Front Of Houses: No driveway shall encroach more than three feet (3')
beyond the garage toward the front plane of the house, with exception of circular or dual
frontage driveways and driveways serving side load garages as permitted per code. The
portion of a driveway located in front of the house shall not extend more than three
feet (3') beyond the point where the garage meets the house, measured along the front
plane of the house. Circular driveways, dual-frontage lots, and driveways serving side-
loaded garages are exempt from this requirement.
b. Driveways serving three (3) car attached garages may be the same width as the
garage, not to exceed a maximum width of thirty three feet (33') within the first eighteen
feet (18') of the garage’s front elevation, and shall be tapered to a width no greater than
1
Page 123 of 126
twenty six feet (26') within eighteen feet (18') of the garage's front elevationat the property
line.
7. Detached Garages: Driveways serving detached garages shall not exceed twenty six
thirty feet (26' 30’) in width unless otherwise regulated elsewhere in this chapter., and
shall taper to a width no greater than twenty-six feet (26’) at the property line.
a. Driveways In Front Of Houses: No driveway shall encroach more than three feet (3')
beyond the garage toward the front plane of the principal structure (house).The portion of
a driveway located in front of the house shall not extend more than three feet (3')
beyond the closest plane of the house, measured along the front plane of the house.
b. Driveways Serving Three Car Detached Garages: Driveways serving three-car
detached garages may be the same width as the garage not to exceed a maximum width of
thirty three feet (33') within the first eighteen feet (18') of the garage's front elevation, and
shall tapered to a width no greater than twenty-six feet (26') within thirty feet (30') of the
garage's front elevationat the property line. Maximum measurement shall be taken from
garage's edge farthest from the side lot line, running parallel to the garage facade.
8. Vehicle Turnaround Pads: Driveways fronting onto a major arterial street, as defined
in the Village's comprehensive plan, may provide a vehicle turnaround pad no larger than
twelve feet (12') in depth as measured parallel to the front lot line, and ten feet (10') in
width as measured perpendicular to the front lot line. The vehicle turnaround pad shall be
located entirely on the property, perpendicular to the driveway, and at least fifteen feet
(15') from the principal structure. The turnaround pad may be in addition to the overall
permitted driveway width.
9. Driveways Serving Side Load Garages: Driveways serving side load garages shall not
exceed twenty-six thirty feet (26' 30’) in width and shall taper to a width no greater than
twenty-six feet (26’) at the property line. Measurements for driveway width shall be taken
parallel to the front lot line, no closer to the right of way than two feet (2') from the required
front yard setback line.
10. Circular And Dual Frontage Driveways: Circular or dual frontage driveways for lots
with a lot width of seventy five feet (75') or greater shall meet these minimum
requirements:
a. Minimum Turning Radius: The circular drive portion of the driveway shall have a
minimum turning radius of fifteen feet (15');
b. Width: The circular drive portion of the driveway shall have a minimum width of
twelve feet (12') and a maximum allowable driveway width of twenty six feet (26'), as
measured both at the lot line and at the entrance to the garage.
B. Parking Pads:
1. Parking pads are subject to the following requirements:
2
Page 124 of 126
a. Parking pads shall be accessible via a driveway serving an attached garage and
may encroach into required yards.
b. Parking pads shall be a minimum of eight feet (8') in width and shall not exceed two
hundred (200) square feet in area. All adjacent flatwork (sidewalks, patios) shall be
calculated into the parking pad's total area.
c. Parking pads shall be included in any maximum driveway width calculation,
measured at the point where the parking pad meets the driveway.
C. Driveways Serving Multi-Family Residential Lots: Driveways serving multi-family
residential lots shall be considered drive aisles and shall meet the parking lot design
standards of this Code. (Ord. 6286, 12-6-2016; amd. Ord. 6528, 9-2-2020)
3
Page 125 of 126
ATTACHMENT F
Modifications to the text are indicated as deletions and additions.
Add the definitions of “Administrative Conditional Use”, “Administrative Variation” and
“Permitted Obstruction” to Section 14.2401 in the appropriate alphabetical locations.
Modify the definition of “Accessory Structure” to be more specific.
14.2401: PURPOSE
ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE: A category of conditional use for single-family
residential zoning districts which may be approved administratively by the Village of
Mount Prospect, in conjunction with a submitted application, site plan, and all of the
necessary requirements as required by the zoning ordinance and with required
consent or determination of no objection from adjacent property owners.
ADMINISTRATIVE VARIATION: A category of variation which may be approved
administratively by the Village of Mount Prospect, in conjunction with a submitted
application, site plan, and all of the necessary requirements as required by the zoning
ordinance and with required consent or determination of no objection from adjacent
property owners.
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE: A subordinate structure detached from but located on the
same lot as the principal structure, the use of which is incidental and accessory to that of a
principal structure. Said structures may include, but are not limited to, detached garages
and, gazebos, pergolas, greenhouses, sheds, trash enclosures, parking lots, outdoor
storage tanks, swimming pools, fences, and certain permitted obstructions including
central air conditioning units, generators and similar mechanical equipment,
driveways, parking pads, open stoops and canopies, patios, balconies, decks, service
walks, sidewalks, steps, handicap ramps, sports courts, unenclosed porches and
window wells, as further defined by this Code.
PERMITTED OBSTRUCTION: An accessory structure that is allowed to encroach into
a required yard as long as it meets certain size and location requirements set forth by
this Code.
1
Page 126 of 126