Zoning Board of Adjustment
Regular MeetingNashua, NH · May 10, 2011
Minutes
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
A public hearing of the Zoning Board of Adjustment was held on
Tuesday, May 10, 2011 at 6:30 PM in the Auditorium at City Hall.
Rob Shaw, Chair, conducted the meeting.
Members present were:
Rob Shaw, Chair
Gerry Reppucci, Vice Chair
Jack Currier, Clerk
Ryan Williams
Rick Johnson
Carter Falk, AICP, Deputy Planning Manager/Zoning
Mr. Shaw explained the Board's procedures, including the points
of law required for applicants to address relative to variances
and special exceptions. Mr. Shaw explained how testimony will
be given by applicants, those speaking in favor or in opposition
to each request, as stated in the Zoning Board of Adjustment
(ZBA) By-laws. Mr. Shaw also explained procedures involving the
timing light.
Mr. Shaw introduced a new Member, Rick Johnson.
1. C. & E. Leger Irrev. Trust (Owners) 34 Nagle Street (Sheet
102 Lot 81) requesting variance to exceed major home
occupation square footage for an in-home day care approved
on 3-12-96, 420 square feet allowed – 484 square feet
requested. RB Zone, Ward 6.
Voting on this case:
Rob Shaw
Gerry Reppucci
Jack Currier
Ryan Williams
Rick Johnson
Claude Leger, 34 Nagle Street, Nashua, NH. Mr. Leger said it is
his wife’s daycare, and he did all the measurements for the
drawings that were submitted. He said that they are looking to
move her pre-existing daycare, which has been licensed for about
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 2
17 years, to move it into the garage. He said the daycare
operations will not be expanded, it is just being moved. He
said that she is licensed for nine children, and it won’t change
with this plan, they just want to give their daughters some more
room inside the house. He said that there will not be any more
kids or traffic going to the house.
Mr. Williams asked what time the children can go out and play.
Mrs. Leger said 10:00 am.
Mr. Williams said that they are compliant with the conditions of
the original special exception.
SPEAKING IN FAVOR:
No One.
SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OR WITH QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS:
No One.
MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to grant the special exception on behalf
of the owner. Mr. Reppucci stated that the variance is needed
to enable the applicant’s proposed use of the property, given
the special conditions of the property, and the benefit sought
by the applicant cannot be achieved by some other method
reasonably feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an
area variance, he said there was discussion that no one is
opposed to this, and it’s a minor incursion.
Mr. Reppucci stated that it’s within the spirit and intent of
the ordinance, it will not adversely affect the property values
of surrounding parcels, it is not contrary to the public
interest, and substantial justice will be done.
Mr. Reppucci said it is approved with all the previous
conditions that existed stay in force.
SECONDED by Mr. Williams.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0.
2. Hollis Crossing Condominium Association (Owner) Gary
Flaherty (Applicant) 250-296 Bartemus Trail (Sheet F Lot 4)
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 3
requesting special exception to work within the 40-foot
critical wetland of Bartemus Brook to remove approximately
twenty-seven trees. R40 Zone, Ward 1.
Voting on this case:
Rob Shaw
Gerry Reppucci
Jack Currier
Ryan Williams
Rick Johnson
Gary Flaherty, Hollis, NH. Mr. Flaherty said they would like to
remove 27 trees, of which 23 are pine trees. He said a lot of
the pines are multi-branched. He said that several winters ago,
during an ice storm, several branches came down, and one hit the
building. He said that a lot of children play outside, and the
reason for removing them is mainly for health and safety
concerns.
Mr. Shaw said that the case went before the Conservation
Commission, with four stipulations.
Mr. Flaherty said that the stipulations are fine.
Mr. Shaw went over the nine wetland special criteria.
Mr. Flaherty responded to the satisfaction of the Board members.
SPEAKING IN FAVOR:
David O’Sullivan, Hollis, NH. Mr. O’Sullivan said that he is in
favor of the request, it will clean up the land.
SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OR WITH QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS:
No One.
MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to grant the special exception on behalf
of the applicant. Mr. Reppucci said it is listed in the Table
of Uses, Section 190-112. He stated that it will not create
undue traffic congestion, or unduly impair pedestrian safety.
Mr. Reppucci said it will not overload public water, drainage or
sewer or other municipal systems, he said that the special
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 4
regulations are all fulfilled, it was approved by the
Conservation Commission with four stipulations that the
applicant said they have no problem complying with.
Mr. Reppucci stated that it will not impair the integrity or be
out of character with the neighborhood, or be detrimental to the
health, morals or welfare of the residents.
Mr. Reppucci said that for special conditions, the minutes of
the Conservation Commission meeting should be included in the
record.
SECONDED by Mr. Johnson.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0.
3. City of Nashua (Owner) AVSG, LP (Applicant) 9-11 Riverside
Street (Sheet 75 Lot 17) requesting use variance to allow a
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) station with associated site
improvements. PI Zone, Ward 5.
Voting on this case:
Rob Shaw
Gerry Reppucci
Jack Currier
Ryan Williams
Rick Johnson
Mike Manning, AVSG LP, Boston, MA. Mr. Manning said a year ago,
they began the process of working with the City. He said they
design, build and construct and install CNG stations. He said
it is the same gas that you use for heating, cooking, drying,
and it is being used as an automotive fuel. He said the Mayor
has been investigating using CNG for quite some time. He said
they will be transitioning the City’s fleet, beginning with the
trash trucks and the bus fleet. He said they’ve signed an
agreement with the City to construct this facility.
Mr. Manning said the gas is already in lines in the street. He
said his company has been doing this since 1992, they’ve built a
network of CNG stations throughout New England, primarily in
Massachusetts. He said they are one of six companies who do
this.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 5
Mr. Manning read his application, with the points of law, into
the record, to the Boards satisfaction.
Mr. Johnson asked how leaks are remediated.
Mr. Manning said that all the piping is seamless stainless steel
tubing throughout the station. He said the compressors have a
service life of about 15 years, and the chances of a leak are
fairly small. He said staff monitors the equipment on a regular
basis.
Mr. Johnson asked how it is remediated if it does leak.
Mr. Manning said they’d send a technician, usually it’s fixed
with a wrench on a fitting.
Mr. Johnson asked if the City has sufficient resources to handle
a leak.
Mr. Manning said it’s their responsibility, they are operating
the station independently of the City, even though it’s on City
property. He said they have a 15-year agreement with the City.
Mr. Reppucci asked how much noise the compressors make.
Mr. Manning said that the compressors do make noise, but the
compressors are in a package, and it’s in a closure with three
walls, and they will have sound compression in them. He said
the noise will be dampened.
Mr. Manning said that CNG stations are open 24/7, all year long,
and are unmanned. He said they’ve talked to the Fire Department
about the unmanned situation, and they don’t have any problems
with it. He said that all the drivers will be trained, and it’s
a safe process to use the fuel.
Mr. Manning said that CNG is much more economical fuel, and is
going to save the City a lot of money.
Mr. Reppucci said the City of Nashua Fire Department has the
ability to make the site safe immediately in an emergency with
their response.
Mr. Manning agreed, he said there will be a firefighter’s key
box on the outside of the equipment area. He said they could
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 6
open the gate, and shut down the system completely.
SPEAKING IN FAVOR:
No One.
SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OR WITH QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS:
No One.
MOTION by Mr. Williams to grant the variances on behalf of the
applicant. Mr. Williams stated that application will be within
the spirit and intent of the ordinance, it will have no adverse
affect on surrounding property values, it will not be contrary
to the public interest, and substantial justice would be done by
granting the variance, and, owing to the unique circumstances of
this property in relation to the other available sites within
the City, there are special circumstances that would make it a
hardship to not grant the application.
SECONDED by Mr. Reppucci.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. Murphy Drive, LLC, Unit 3 (Owner) Abbeyfeale Realty, LLC
(Applicant) 12 Murphy Drive (Sheet 140 Lot 60) requesting
use variance to allow a 6,500 sq.ft restaurant, with 140
seats and a 500 sq.ft wine boutique, in a space formerly
occupied by a furniture retail/showroom in a 97,100 sq.ft
multi-tenant building in the PI zone, where 75% of the
existing uses may not be listed under the “industrial and
manufacturing” category. PI Zone, Ward 9.
Voting on this case:
Rob Shaw
Gerry Reppucci
Jack Currier
Ryan Williams
Rick Johnson
Attorney Gerald Prunier, Prunier & Prolman, 20 Trafalgar Square,
Nashua, NH. Atty. Prunier said that this building was
originally going to be a two-story building for Teradyne, and
the second story got torn down, now, it is a multi-tenant
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 7
building. He said the proposed restaurant will be 6,500 square
feet, located in the front of the building, opposite the highway
side. He said the entire building is just under 100,000 square
feet, so they are using a little over 6% of the building. He
said the previous use was W.B. Mason, who recently moved out.
He said that the restaurant will have a wine-oriented
restaurant, it will have a 500 square foot area, where you can
take wine home.
Atty. Prunier said the whole area around Northeastern Boulevard
has changed, there are other eating establishments, such as TJ’s
Deli & Catering, Boston Billiards, Domino’s Pizza. He said that
this building has had a difficult time trying to get tenants in
there, it is off the main road. He said there are a mix of uses
in the building, there is a Holistic Care Center, GM Roth.
Atty. Prunier said that the use will not be contrary to the
ordinance, in that there are other eating establishments in the
area. He went over the other variance points of law.
Mr. Currier said he had a hard time with the hardship, as the PI
zone is supposed to be for park industrial uses. He said the
Board would be giving away park industrial space.
Atty. Prunier said that they wouldn’t be giving away park
industrial space, as it could still be used for park industrial
space in the future. He said they are providing a service in
the park industrial area. He said that it will still be zoned
PI, and the inventory of PI zoned land remains.
Mr. Johnson asked if we grant the variance, is it only for that
entity?
Mr. Williams said it runs with the land, but if the restaurant
goes out of business, another restaurant could use the space.
Mr. Falk said that if the restaurant goes away and another one
hasn’t moved in within a year, then the use variance would be
null and void.
Mr. Williams said the building is unique, in that it has so many
uses in it.
Atty. Prunier said they’re only using 6,500 square feet. He
said that most all park industrial users need over 10,000 square
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 8
feet, so, it’s a very small footprint that they are using. He
said it’s a good use of the building, and it will provide
services. He said a good restaurant in the zone will allow for
people to have some services right in the area, instead of
driving long distances.
Mr. Currier disagreed that a restaurant is needed in the Park
Industrial zone to feed employees.
Mr. Shaw asked about signage.
Atty. Prunier said they would have whatever signs are allowed in
the PI zone. He said it’s possible that a part of the off-
premises sign could be used as well.
Mr. Shaw said that it appears that many of the existing
electronic changing message signs do not meet the ordinance.
Atty. Prunier said that GM Roth has control of the sign.
Mr. Falk said that the restaurant can use a blank tenant panel
from the ground sign, or, if GM Roth allows it, they could have
a text message shown on the electronic changing sign for certain
times of the day.
SPEAKING IN FAVOR:
Richard Maynard, PE, Maynard & Paquette, East Pearl Street,
Nashua, NH. Mr. Maynard stated that the site was designed for a
two-story, 187,000 square foot building, but only one story
exists, so there is twice as many parking spaces as necessary.
He said the projected traffic is significantly less. He stated
that 25% of the building can be non-industrial type uses.
Mr. Reppucci asked if Staff determined the percentage of
industrial and manufacturing space in the building.
Mr. Falk said it was Staff’s opinion that less than 75% of the
building is made up of uses in the industrial and manufacturing
use.
Mr. Maynard said it’s rare to have an industrial use going into
6,500 square feet of space. He said there just aren’t a lot of
industrial users that would want this small space.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 9
Barb Tremlett, owner Holistic Health Care Center, 12 Murphy
Drive. Ms. Tremlett said it would be nice to have another
different use in the building, and this restaurant will offer a
high quality dining experience. She said there is a nice
variety of users in the building, and that this restaurant will
be a nice fit.
Christopher Riendo, Manchester, NH. Mr. Riendo said he’s the
general manager of the proposed restaurant. He said that their
concept is quite unique, and it will have a great relationship
with the existing wine-makers located all over the world.
SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OR WITH QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS:
No One.
Mr. Johnson asked what is going on in Unit 1.
Mr. Falk said it is vacant, there was a permit for an indoor
children’s recreational use, but they never went forward with
the plan. He said there are no permits submitted for another
use.
Mr. Currier asked, from the submitted chart, which uses are, or
are not, PI uses.
Mr. Falk said that Unit A is an office use, and doesn’t fit in,
as it’s an office use. He said the WB Mason is the subject
area. He said the Holistic Health Care is not, they came before
the Board for approval. He said that Vascular Technology is a
permitted use, and Unit D-1 is a permitted use. He said that
Bosch Articulating Papers possibly could be. He said that
Translucent Language writes software for different languages.
He said that the warehouse vacant space is unknown, and GM Roth
is a contractor’s shop with a retail showroom. He said that
Staff believed that about half of the building is made up of the
permitted uses.
Mr. Reppucci said that by having a full building gives a better
appearance, and makes the other businesses prosper. He said
that the people involved with the restaurant have put a lot of
money into the site.
Mr. Shaw said that the Board has already approved many non-PI
type uses in this area, and it’s been this way for the past
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 10
fifteen or more years. He said there is a lot of mixed usage in
the area.
Mr. Johnson said he didn’t see any abutter issues, or on any
residents, and didn’t see any noise issues, and thought it is
better that they are going on the front side rather than the
back side of the building. He said the restaurant, being
smaller in size, is not taking a lot of space where a permitted
PI use could go. He said the owner is trying to get industrial
in the building, but hasn’t had much success.
Mr. Currier said that no residences get notified of this use,
since none of them are abutters.
Mr. Reppucci said that all the abutting industrial uses did get
notified, and none of them came to the meeting with concerns,
either.
MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to grant the use variance on behalf of
the applicant. Mr. Reppucci stated that the zoning restriction
as applied interferes with a landowner’s reasonable use of the
property, considering the unique setting of the property in its
environment; no fair and substantial relationship exists between
the general purposes of the zoning ordinance and the specific
restriction on the property, and the variance would not injure
the public or private rights of others. He said the Board was
not unanimous, but a majority believed the hardship was met.
Mr. Reppucci stated that it meets the spirit and intent of the
ordinance, that area, by discussion on the Board, has expanded
out of PI use in many areas, and appears to be prospering by
allowing that.
Mr. Reppucci stated that it will not adversely affect the
property values of surrounding parcels, there was no testimony
one way or another on that, it is not contrary to the public
interest, and substantial justice will be done.
SECONDED by Mr. Williams.
MOTION CARRIED 4-1 (Mr. Currier)
MISCELLANEOUS:
REGIONAL IMPACT:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
May 10, 2011
Page 11
The Board unanimously did not see any cases of Regional Impact.
Mr. Falk said that Staff notified the Town of Merrimack for
Cases 3 and 4.
MINUTES:
April 26, 2011:
MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to approve the minutes as presented, and
to waive the reading, and place the minutes in the file.
Mr. Williams said for Case #3, he said that abutting properties
have changed to commercial use strikes at the heart of Fisher
vs. Dover.
Mr. Currier said on Page 3, he said that he and Mr. Reppucci
were in agreement on the garage being two stories, and that it
is very close to the abutting property and in the setback, yet
there was no testimony against that.
SECONDED by Mr. Williams.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 3-0 (Mr. Shaw and Mr. Johnson
abstained)
REHEARING REQUESTS:
None.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mr. Shaw called the meeting closed at 8:20 p.m.
Mr. Jack Currier, Clerk
CF
Taped Hearing
Agenda
City of Nashua
Planning Department Planning & Zoning 603 589-3090
Fax 603 589-3119
229 Main Street WEB www.nashuanh.gov
Nashua, New Hampshire 03061-2019
April 21, 2011
The following is to be published on ROP April 30, 2011,
under the Seal of the City of Nashua, Public Notice Format
65 MP 51.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing of the City of
Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment will be held on Tuesday,
May 10, 2011, at 6:30 PM at the Nashua City Hall
Auditorium, 3rd floor, 229 Main Street.
1. C. & E. Leger Irrev. Trust (Owners) 34 Nagle Street
(Sheet 102 Lot 81) requesting variance to exceed major
home occupation square footage for an in-home day care
approved on 3-12-96, 420 square feet allowed – 484
square feet requested. RB Zone, Ward 6.
2. Hollis Crossing Condominium Association (Owner) Gary
Flaherty (Applicant) 250-296 Bartemus Trail (Sheet F
Lot 4) requesting special exception to work within the
40-foot critical wetland of Bartemus Brook to remove
approximately twenty-seven trees. R40 Zone, Ward 1.
3. City of Nashua (Owner) AVSG, LP (Applicant) 9-11
Riverside Street (Sheet 75 Lot 17) requesting use
variance to allow a Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)
station with associated site improvements. PI Zone,
Ward 5.
4. Murphy Drive, LLC, Unit 3 (Owner) Abbeyfeale Realty,
LLC (Applicant) 12 Murphy Drive (Sheet 140 Lot 60)
requesting use variance to allow a 6,500 sq.ft
restaurant, with 140 seats and a 500 sq.ft wine
boutique, in a space formerly occupied by a furniture
retail/showroom in a 97,100 sq.ft multi-tenant
building in the PI zone, where 75% of the existing
uses may not be listed under the “industrial and
manufacturing” category. PI Zone, Ward 9.
OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Review of Motion for Rehearing:
2. Review of upcoming agenda to determine proposals of
regional impact.
3. Approval of Minutes for previous hearings/meetings.
"SUITABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE SENSORY IMPAIRED
WILL BE PROVIDED UPON ADEQUATE ADVANCE NOTICE."
229 Main Street – P.O. Box 2019 / Nashua, NH 03061-2019 / Telephone (603) 589-3250 / FAX (603) 589-
3259
Get email alerts for Nashua
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.