Zoning Board of Adjustment
Regular MeetingNashua, NH · January 22, 2013
Minutes
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING
January 22, 2013
A public hearing of the Zoning Board of Adjustment was held on
Tuesday, January 22, 2013 at 6:30 PM in the Auditorium at City
Hall.
Rob Shaw, Chair, conducted the meeting.
Members present were:
Rob Shaw, Chair
Gerry Reppucci, Vice Chair
Jack Currier, Clerk
J.P. Boucher
Carter Falk, AICP, Deputy Planning Manager/Zoning
Mr. Shaw explained the Board's procedures, including the points
of law required for applicants to address relative to variances
and special exceptions. Mr. Shaw explained how testimony will
be given by applicants, those speaking in favor or in opposition
to each request, as stated in the Zoning Board of Adjustment
(ZBA) By-laws. Mr. Shaw also explained procedures involving the
timing light.
1. Alan B. Ferman (Owner) 52 Fairmount Street (Sheet 127 Lot
48) requesting variance to maintain additional driveway
width, 24 feet allowed, 41 feet existing. RB Zone, Ward 4.
Voting on this case:
Rob Shaw
Gerry Reppucci
Jack Currier
J.P. Boucher
Alan Ferman, 52 Fairmount Street, Nashua, NH. Mr. Ferman said
that the driveway was put in a couple years ago. He said he was
not aware that he exceeded the maximum driveway width. He said
he contacted the paving company, and they didn’t do anything
about it. He said he’s talked to all his neighbors, and they
are fine, he said he has some letters of support.
Mr. Ferman said that the house is a corner lot, the streets in
the neighborhood are narrow, without sidewalks. He said when
company comes over, there is nowhere to park, except on either
the lawn, or the street.
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 2
Mr. Currier asked if the driveway connects around to the other
one, like a drive-thru.
Mr. Ferman said it’s just lawn, but in the winter, he drives
through from one side to another on the snow.
Mr. Currier asked if driveways get added in towards the open
space calculation.
Mr. Falk said that driveways do count against the open space
percentage, because it is a man-made object, and is not
permeable.
SPEAKING IN FAVOR:
Letters in favor from the following neighbors:
Sandra Belknap, 40 Fairmount Street, Nashua, NH
Michael Livingston, 4 Carver Street, Nashua, NH
Richard Lindof, 52 Fairmount Street, Nashua, NH
Gerard Ouellette, 54 Fairmount Street, Nashua, NH
Joseph Swetkla, 51 Fairmount Street, Nashua, NH
Mr. Reppucci asked how this request came before the Board.
Mr. Ferman said that as far as he knows, he got a certified
letter from the City stating that there is a violation, and a
variance must be applied for. He said he thinks they got it
from a GIS overhead photo.
SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OR WITH QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS:
No one.
MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to grant the request on behalf of the
owner. Mr. Reppucci stated that the variance is needed to
enable the applicant’s proposed use of the property, given the
special conditions of the property; and the benefit sought by
the applicant cannot be achieved by some other method reasonably
feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area
variance.
Mr. Reppucci stated that the request is within the spirit and
intent of the ordinance, it will not adversely affect the
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 3
property values of surrounding parcels, the abutters that did
respond did so positively, it is not contrary to the public
interest, and substantial justice is served.
SECONDED by Mr. Boucher.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 4-0.
2. Gary E. & Kathleen H. Nelson (Owners) S.W.L.C., Inc., d/b/a
World Academy (Applicant) 138 Spitbrook Road (Sheet B Lot
76) requesting the following variances: 1) to exceed
maximum allowed number of identification signs, 1
permitted, 2 proposed; 2) to exceed identification sign
area, 12 sq.ft allowed, 56 sq.ft proposed; 3) to allow an
identification sign to be located within the City right-of-
way, the other identification sign is proposed within the
25-foot required front yard setback; 4) to exceed maximum
number of wall signs, 1 permitted, 2 proposed; 5) to exceed
maximum wall sign area, 6 sq.ft allowed in lieu of a ground
sign, 112.75 sq.ft proposed, at 79.75 and 33 sq.ft; 6) to
exceed maximum size of directional signs, 6 sq.ft allowed,
6.875 sq.ft proposed; and, 7) to exceed corporate
logo/symbol area on 5 proposed directional signs, 33
percent allowed, 50 percent proposed. R18 Zone, Ward 8.
Voting on this case:
Rob Shaw
Gerry Reppucci
Jack Currier
J.P. Boucher
Attorney Thomas J. Leonard; Welts, White and Fontaine, P.C., 29
Factory Street, Nashua, NH. Atty. Leonard passed out a package
for the Board members, and two letters in support from abutters.
Mr. Boucher stated that Atty. Leonard is on the Board of
Directors for Pennichuck, and he works for Pennichuck. He said
that he didn’t feel like he had any conflict of interest.
The Board members agreed, and said it is ultimately Mr.
Boucher’s call to sit on the case.
Mr. Boucher said he felt comfortable voting on the case.
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 4
Atty. Leonard described the location of the World School, which
is located in the R18 zone, and some of the surrounding uses and
signs nearby. He stated that the school is from 6-week old
infants through 8th graders. He said they’ve worked with an
architect to get a master scheme of signage, to be coordinated
throughout the site.
Atty. Leonard said that the property has a very unusual right-
of-way area, as identified on the map. He said that the
difficulty is that this area, being in a residential zone, the
allowed size is a problem. He said that two previous variances
have been granted, one for setbacks and one for square footage.
He said when Spitbrook Road was expanded, they straightened out
the right-of-way, which took it away from the World School
property, so it causes the World Academy property to be eighty
feet from the pavement.
He said that the “G-2” sign will be located on the World Academy
property. He said that the “G-1” sign is not on their property,
it would be in the land owned by the City. He said that the
Department of Public Works has agreed to allow the sign in the
right-of-way, and a written agreement will be signed. He said
there will ultimately be two ground signs, at a reasonable size
and distance from the street. He said that should the City ever
need to work within the area of the right-of-way, the owners
would be required to remove or relocate the signs at their
expense.
Atty. Leonard said that the size of the logo exceeds the 33%
requirement, and the proposed logo is 50%. He said that only
one of the four proposed signs will even be visible from the
public street.
Atty. Leonard said on page 4, it shows the proposed building
wall signs, one is over the entrance to the building, it’s 79.75
square feet, and the second one is on page 5, it identifies the
gymnasium and theater arts. He said that this sign is comprised
of 12-inch letters.
Atty. Leonard stated that the setback they are asking for is 0,
and in the area where World School owns the property, there is a
need for a 0 foot setback because the distance from the
pavement.
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 5
Atty. Leonard went through the required five points of law for a
variance.
Mr. Reppucci asked what circumstances would cause the City to
expand Spitbrook Road.
Atty. Leonard stated that they do have space to move it back
somewhat, and that is their agreement with the City.
Mr. Currier asked what variances have been approved for signs at
this location in the past.
Atty. Leonard said there was a variance granted in 2010 for a
ground sign that was never installed, it would have been right
in the middle of the lot. He said that some Board members even
stated that they believed that wasn’t the best solution, and
that there should be two signs, at the entrance and exit. He
said there was an earlier variance granted that allowed for the
presently existing sign, which is at the entrance area, it was
for setback and the area.
Atty. Leonard said that all of the existing signage is being
replaced by the new scheme.
Mr. Currier asked about the height of the directional signs.
Atty. Leonard said the lettering is 36 inches off the ground, to
allow for landscaping and snow storage. He said the sign itself
starts there, and goes up another 30 inches. He said the total
height is 102 inches. He said he was puzzled why they’re asking
for 8½ feet, it seems excessive.
Atty. Leonard said that the signs are narrow. He said the
height is not an issue, it’s only when they’re seen from a
public right-of-way. He said the design fits in with the
overall scheme for the property, and this is what the architects
came up with.
Mr. Falk said that the height is ok for the directional signs,
as the sign ordinance does not have a maximum height.
Mr. Boucher asked about the height of the ground signs.
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 6
Atty. Leonard said the proposed height is less than what the
code maximum is, and a variance is not being requested for the
height.
Mr. Falk said it looks as if they’re six or seven feet tall, he
said the text is 16 inches tall, and the poles look to be about
four times that. He said that the signs are 28 square feet in
area.
Mr. Shaw said that he is concerned about the size of the text
for the “exit only” and the “main entrance”, he asked if it is
big enough.
Atty. Leonard said that they discussed and considered the size
of these two signs, he said it was a balancing, he said that
they knew they were over on the square footage, so they tried to
minimize the size of them, and the architect designed it.
SPEAKING IN FAVOR:
Richard Cane, The John Flatley Company. Mr. Cane stated that
they own the Nashua Technology Park, as well as Tara Commons.
He said that Tara Commons has similar problems, when the State
widened Spitbrook Road, and created a very wide right-of-way
through there, for the amount of pavement that was constructed.
He said many years ago, they were before the Board for relief
for the Technology Park, to bring the sign right up to the
property line, and were granted that because it was a unique and
unusual condition, and a similar situation exists with the World
Academy, it’s a school use in a single-family zone. He said the
sign regulations are for a single family residential use, but
with the school use here, it’s not possible.
Letter of support from the Huntington, Christine Hallock
Letter of support from Grace Lutheran Church
Letter of support from Esther Ross, 8 Strawberry Bank Road.
SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION OR WITH QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS:
No one.
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 7
MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to grant the request on behalf of the
owner and applicant. Mr. Reppucci said that there are 7
different pieces to this application, and they are considered in
totality. Mr. Reppucci stated that the variance is needed to
enable the applicant’s proposed use of the property, given the
special conditions of the property; and the benefit sought by
the applicant cannot be achieved by some other method reasonably
feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area
variance. He said it’s the Board’s opinion that these
exceptions are appropriate for the area where this property is.
Mr. Reppucci stated that the request is within the spirit and
intent of the ordinance, it will not adversely affect the
property values of surrounding parcels, it is not contrary to
the public interest, and substantial justice is served.
SECONDED by Mr. Boucher.
AMENDED MOTION by Mr. Reppucci to add that a special condition
is that the encroachment agreement regarding sign “G1” will be
negotiated and complied with as testified to, between the City
of Nashua and the applicant.
SECONDED by Mr. Boucher
MOTION CARRIED 3-1 (Mr. Currier, to the “G2” sign)
MISCELLANEOUS:
REGIONAL IMPACT:
Mr. Falk said that there is an extra week in the scheduling, so
the next agenda is not ready yet.
REHEARING REQUESTS:
None.
MINUTES:
None.
ELECTIONS:
Zoning Board of Adjustment
January 22, 2013
Page 8
The Board decided to wait until all the members are present, as
only full-time members can vote on officers.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mr. Shaw called the meeting closed at 7:46 p.m.
Submitted by: Mr. Currier, Clerk.
CF
Taped Hearing
Agenda
City of Nashua
Planning & Zoning 603 589-3090
Planning Department Fax 603 589-3119
229 Main Street WEB www.nashuanh.gov
Nashua, New Hampshire 03061-2019
January 7, 2013
The following is to be published on ROP January 12, 2013,
under the Seal of the City of Nashua, Public Notice Format
65 MP 51.
Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing of the City of
Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment will be held on Tuesday,
January 22, 2013, at 6:30 PM at the Nashua City Hall
Auditorium, 3rd floor, 229 Main Street.
1. Alan B. Ferman (Owner) 52 Fairmount Street (Sheet 127
Lot 48) requesting variance to maintain additional driveway
width, 24 feet allowed, 41 feet existing. RB Zone, Ward 4.
2. Gary E. & Kathleen H. Nelson (Owners) S.W.L.C., Inc.,
d/b/a World Academy (Applicant) 138 Spitbrook Road (Sheet B
Lot 76) requesting the following variances: 1) to exceed
maximum allowed number of identification signs, 1
permitted, 2 proposed; 2) to exceed identification sign
area, 12 sq.ft allowed, 56 sq.ft proposed; 3) to allow an
identification sign to be located within the City right-of-
way, the other identification sign is proposed within the
25-foot required front yard setback; 4) to exceed maximum
number of wall signs, 1 permitted, 2 proposed; 5) to exceed
maximum wall sign area, 6 sq.ft allowed in lieu of a ground
sign, 112.75 sq.ft proposed, at 79.75 and 33 sq.ft; 6) to
exceed maximum size of directional signs, 6 sq.ft allowed,
6.875 sq.ft proposed; and, 7) to exceed corporate
logo/symbol area on 5 proposed directional signs, 33
percent allowed, 50 percent proposed. R18 Zone, Ward 8.
OTHER BUSINESS:
1. Review of Motion for Rehearing:
2. Review of upcoming agenda to determine proposals of
regional impact.
3. Approval of Minutes for previous hearings/meetings.
"SUITABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE SENSORY IMPAIRED
WILL BE PROVIDED UPON ADEQUATE ADVANCE NOTICE."
Get email alerts for Nashua
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.