Early Childhood Council
Regular MeetingNorwalk, CT · February 4, 2010
Minutes
Early Childhood Council 2-4-10 Minutes (Final)
CITY OF NORWALK
EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
FEBRUARY 4, 2010
ATTENDANCE: Betsy Bain, Chair; Linda Wilock, Youth Services Director; Hyla
Crane, Stepping Stones Museum; Cathy DeCesare, United
Way Coastal Fairfield County; Dona Ditrio, Community
Representative; Adele Gordon, Norwalk Smiles Director;
Dr. Sally Grose, Community Representative; George
Hensinger, Community Representative; Curtis Law, Norwalk
Housing Authority Executive Director; Ligia Masilamani,
Family & Children’s Agency Maternal Child Program Director;
Marie-Angie Nicolas, NCC Parent Representative; Mary
Oster, Naramake Family Resource Center Director; Joan
Parris, NCC Early Childhood Program Director; Rovitta
Paul, The Children’s Playhouse Preschool Director; Lynn
Sadlon Moritz, Fox Run Family Resource Center Director;
Victoria Schilling, Norwalk Health Department Coordinator;
Jo-Ann Stabler, NEON/Head Start Early Childhood Director
STAFF: Barbara Smart, Rosalie Witt
OTHERS: Sonja Ahuja, Graustein Memorial Fund; Nancy Owens, Room to
Grow Providers; Joyce Abate, Carousel, Mary Windt, Under One
Roof, Mary Caldwell
CALL TO ORDER
Ms. Bain called the meeting to order at 9:38 a.m. Ms. Bain said that she was turning over
the chairman of this particular meeting to Ms. DeCesare because she would like to make
a motion of approval regarding the proposed structure.
FUTURE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
A. Discussion of School Readiness Administrative Funds
Ms. DeCesare said that she understood that the providers had a meeting yesterday and
opened the floor to comments about the provider discussion. One suggestion was that the
Council look at the $25,000 and reduce all the programs accordingly. Ms. Smart said that
Ms. Adams had spoken with her and that Ms. Adams had some suggestions about this.
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 1
Mr. Hensinger asked for clarification on what the purpose of the $25,000 was. Ms.
Wilock said that she personally thought it would cover basically the same items such as
bookkeeping and other tasks. Ms. Bain said that the funds would be coming from the
School Readiness Program and for the staff support. Mr. Hensinger asked if this would
include the monitoring of the program. He also said that he understood it was a no bid
contract. Ms. Bain said that the portion of funding for monitoring had been decreasing
over the years as staff salaries and other costs went up. Ms. Bain then went on to explain
the history of the monitoring position and how it developed over the years. Ms. Wilock
said that originally, CES was paying for the position, but over the years, the State reduced
and then cut the funding. Ms. DeCesare said that she though Mr. Hensinger was asking
how the funds could be spent more economically. Mr. Hensinger agreed.
** MS. DITRIO THAT THE EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL APPROVES THE
USE OF THE $25,000 FOR THE SCHOOL READINESS FUND FOR THE
ASSOCIATED COSTS AND WILL CONSIDER THE SUGGESTIONS OF THE
PROVIDERS IN THE ALLOCATION OF THE FUNDING.
** MR. LAW SECONDED.
** THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. Discussion of Management Structure
** MS. BAIN MOVED TO APPROVE THE ORGANIZATION CHART THAT
HAS BEEN DEVELOPED BY THE SUBCOMMITTEE AS SUBMITTED.
** DR. GROSE SECONDED.
Ms. Schilling then read the following statement into the record:
“Good Morning! I am speaking from my perspective as Coordinator and
co-chair of the Norwalk Healthy Families Collaborative Health Partners
Committee of the Council, and member of the Management Structure
Committee. I encourage us all to keep our primary focus today, and as
we moved forward, on the well-being of children (from the pre-natal
period to age 8), sustaining and strengthening our quality School
Readiness and family support programs, moving ahead with implementing
the Early Childhood Action Plan strategies, evaluating our progress and
developing the next 2-3 year plan, base on that evaluation. The NECC has
so many excellent early childhood programs in place, School Readiness,
Brookside, Brighter Futures, to name a few, and we are very fortunate and
excited to have the opportunity to establish the Child FIRST program in
Norwalk, to support the healthy development of Norwalk’s most
vulnerable babies and young children. I would like to encourage us all to
keep the NECC vision, as stated in Snapshots of Success, first and
foremost, “Norwalk children, birth to 8, are healthy, ready to learn, and
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 2
succeed in school and in life.” What I had planned to say was that Linda
will now present the Structure Committee’s report and resolution, which
are the result of many hours of hard, sustained and successful
deliberations.”
Ms. Wilock said that she and Mr. Law had a meeting with the Mayor earlier in the day.
Mr. Law said that the Mayor had indicated he had met with Ms. Bain months ago that he
believed that the Early Childhood Coordinator would report to him. Mr. Law said that he
was not happy with the amount of time and effort spent working on the structure of the
Early Childhood Council only to be told that the City had made the decision already. He
said that the proposed structure before the Council was incorrect because the Early
Childhood Council staff would report directly to the Mayor. Ms. Schilling said that if a
decision had been already made, Ms. Bain should have reported this to the Council. Ms.
DeCesare said that if this is what has occurred, then the Council needs to consider it. Mr.
Law said that the Mayor had said he would be more than happy to come to the meeting.
Several people suggested that someone check to see if the Mayor was available to attend
the meeting.
Ms. Bain said that she had known that the Mayor had made this decision, she would not
have brought up the conversation at the January 13th meeting. There were discussions
and alternative decisions were considered. She said that she had not heard anything
definitive until this past Tuesday. Part of the purpose plan was to get the Council
members’ approval to start discussions with the school system for clarification on the
staff positions. She said that if the Council felt that that her position and her actions were
unacceptable, she was willing to step down as chair. Ms. Wilock said that during the
meeting with the Mayor earlier, it was the first time she had heard that there were
discussions with the Personnel Department about this issue.
Ms. Budrawich said that she had attended one of the meeting, and after the discussion,
she had left that meeting with no indication as to the fact that a decision had been made.
Dr. Grose said that she was present at the Structure Committee meetings, and the group
felt that there was something blocking progress. Dr. Grose said that she had some
questions about why the Mayor made this decision, who was involved in the decision and
what prompted this.
Mr. Hensinger asked Ms. Bain if she recommended that the Early Childhood Coordinator
report to him. Ms. Bain then reviewed the key points of the discussions with the Council
and mentioned that having the Coordinator report to the Mayor had been mentioned. The
discussion then moved whether or not the Office of Early Childhood Education had been
discussed at the January meeting.
Mr. Law said that when he spoke with the Mayor about this, the Mayor told him and Mr.
Haselkamp that the position of the Early Childhood would be reporting to him before the
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 3
Mayor had even seen the structure of the Council. Ms. Budrawich suggested that the
Council vote on their proposed structure and then bring that to the Mayor.
Ms. DeCesare said that she thought it would be important to have the reasons why the
Council objected to having the Early Childhood Coordinator report to the Mayor. Ms.
Sadlon said that she saw age discrimination because the staff member who had been
working on Early Childhood had her position eliminated and then a new position was
created. She said that she personally did not want to be part of pushing people out to
pasture.
Ms. Schilling said that Ms. Bain and others had taken it upon themselves to go to the
Mayor without notifying with the rest of the Council. Ms. Schilling said that there was
no written policy or procedures about this and this should be done for the future. She
said that this was disrespectful to people’s time and work to have this done in this
manner. This was not a democratic process.
Mr. Hensinger said that he had always been an advocate of the Early Childhood, but he
did not want to arrive at this point in this manner and felt that the process was broken.
Ms. DeCesare said that the Council could put on the record that this was their
recommendation and let the Mayor decide how he will handle it.
It was pointed out that half of the people present were part of the Structure Committee
and it would help to hear from those who were not on the Structure Committee.
Ms. Ditrio expressed some concerns regarding the Steering Committee and that several of
the members appeared to be paid positions. This could lead to the employees making
decisions for the Council. She thought that one of the goals was moving back toward
having the members of the Council dictating the direction of the program. Ms. Wilock
said that she could speak to the bylaws and gave a brief overview of those bylaws to the
Council members. She indicated that several of those listed positions were paid
employee but they were not paid from Early Childhood Council. Ms. Ditrio said that this
brought the Council back to the employees deciding for the Council. Ms. Ditrio said that
the bylaws need to be looked at. Discussion followed about the various positions on the
Steering Committee.
Mr. Hensinger pointed out that there had been lengthy discussion about the structure, but
little discussion about the Steering Committee. He suggested that the box remain, but
read that it would be determined since the bylaws would trump the decision made by the
Council regarding who was on the Steering Committee.
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 4
Ms. Bain said that she would like to hear some thoughts on how the Council would tackle
some of the issues and the roles and responsibility of the various positions. Ms.
DeCesare said that she appreciated this but would like to hold that for a moment.
Ms. Sadlon said that there was some discussion about the fact that Parent Coordinator
was not included in the chart. She then explained her understanding of the term “Parent
Coordinator” and said that she believed the term should have been “Family Support
Coordinator”. She said that the Family Support would be Goal 3 and the Health
Coordinator would be Goal 2. Discussion followed.
Ms. DeCesare asked if the Structure Committee discussion had considered whether the c
current committee structure was the best support for the Council. Ms. Schilling said that
there had been discussion and a complicated chart developed, but it was not included in
the current proposal.
Ms. DeCesare said that in the January 13th meeting there had been a discussion on the
Brighter Futures program and there was no funding from the Early Childhood funds for
the program. Ms. Budrawich said that there never had been any funding from the Early
Childhood program for Brighter Futures. Ms. Sadlon said that the program was a
strategy for Goal 1, but the Early Childhood Council never had any leadership or funding
in the program. When asked, Ms. Budrawich said that the programs were independent of
the Council. Discussion followed about the strategies that the Council has and how the
programs that support the strategies are linked to the Council. Ms. Bain said that there
was never an intent to tell the programs that support the strategies how to run their
programs or take ownership of the programs.
RECESS
A recess was called at 10:45 a.m. the Council reconvened at 10:55 a.m.
** THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED MANAGEMENT
STRUCTURE WITH THE DISCUSSED CHANGES TO THE STEERING
COMMITTEE, HEALTH COORDINATOR, AND ONE TYPOGRAPHICAL
CORRECTIONS ON THE SR PROVIDERS PASSED WITH FIFTEEN IN
FAVOR (BAIN, CRANE, DECESARE, DITRIO, GORDON, GROSE,
HENSINGER, LAW, MASILAMANI, OSTER, PARRIS, PAUL, SADLON,
SCHILLING AND STABLER) – AND THREE ABSTENTIONS (WILOCK,
NICOLAS AND BUDRAWICH)
Ms. Ditrio asked how the City and the School District would advertise the positions. Ms.
Wilock reviewed the details of how the City advertises and interviews the candidates.
Ms. Ditrio asked about whether the Council member would be able to participate in the
interviews. Ms. Budrawich said that there had been Council Members involved in the
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 5
past. Ms. Ditrio pointed out that people do not normally check websites. Ms. DeCesare
said that she would like to have this put forward for further discussion.
Ms. Schilling said that she would like to see the Structure Committee approach the
Mayor with the new structure. Ms. Bain said that she felt she would not be comfortable
being part of this . Mr. Law, Mr. Hensinger and Ms. Ditrio will speak to the Mayor as
soon as possible and report back to the full Council. Discussion followed about how this
issue would be approached.
C. Approval to Submit Graustein Grant based on decision on management
structure
Ms. DeCesare said that the deadline for this grant was February 26th. Ms. Bain said that
the grant application requires the signatures of the Mayor, the Superintendent of Schools,
the Health Department and the Early Childhood Council for submission. Discussion
about which options should be selected followed.
Ms. Ahuja said that what she was hearing from the discussion was that the Mayor was
very invested in the Early Childhood Council and he supports the concept. She said that
she believed that the Council was already 80% down the pathway. The ideas that were
raised today included the community support of the plan and the idea that the Council
was looking at a birth to 8 agenda, which are the kinds of items that the Council will need
to be clear about on the application.
Ms. Schilling said that her understand of the Discovery initiative was that Graustein Fund
supports the communities in developing their path. She said that she heard it was okay to
be moving towards the Office of Early Childhood rather than having arrived. Ms. Ahuja
agreed and said that there are issues, but it would be important to deal with them because
they have come to the surface. This is where many collaborative have problems. It will
be important to have the various voices acknowledged as time goes on.
Ms. Ahuja said that many of the issues she was hearing were from the self-assessment
that the Council did back in August or September. It would be good to revisit the
assessment. She also asked the Council members to consider what the eight elements of
the plan really mean. One piece is oversight and accountability and the second part was
the financing.
Ms. Sadlon asked who had the self-assessment information. Ms. Wilock said that she
believed she had a copy. Copies will be sent to all Council members.
The discussion then moved to who would write the grant. Ms. Peniston wrote the grant
application last year. Ms. Wilock said that she had planned to write the grant, but a few
days ago, she had stepped back because of other considerations. Ms. Ditrio said that she
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 6
did not recall any meeting where someone had said there was no one to write the grant.
Ms. Budrawich recounted her recollection of various conversations that took place at a
Steering Committee retreat in July and the Structure Committee meetings where it was
pointed out that Ms. Peniston was no longer available to write the grant. Ms. Wilock
pointed out that the Graustein RFP had not arrived until two days after the January
meeting. At the second Structure Committee meeting, Ms. Wilock said that this had been
discussed. Ms. Bain said that when Ms. Peniston’s position was cut, she had spoken with
Ms. Pytlesky, the City grant writer, who had graciously offered to help. She said that the
Council had not needed Ms. Pytlesky’s assistance before, but might need her assistance
now.
** MS. SADLON MOVED HAVE COPIES OF THE GRANT APPLICATION
FORWARDED TO COUNCIL MEMBERS WHEN IT IS NEAR COMPLETION
TO INSURE TRANSPARENCY.
The discussion moved forward without a second or a vote being taken.
Ms. Wilock said that there were a number of issues that needed to resolved before the
grant could be written. Asking for an extension was also briefly discussed.
** MS. BAIN MOVED THAT THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE HER TO SIGN
THE GRANT APPLICATION, WHICH WILL BE SUBJECT TO
RATIFICATION BY THE COUNCIL AT THE MARCH MEETING.
** MS. DITRIO SECONDED.
Ms. Sadlon said that Ms. Cauldwell, who is a free lance grant writer, was present in the
room. Ms. Caldwell said that she was not a free lance grant writer per say, but had
worked on grant applications in the past.
** THE MOTION TO AUTHORIZE MS. BAIN TO SIGN THE GRANT
APPLICATION, WHICH WILL BE SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION BY THE
COUNCIL AT THE MARCH MEETING PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT
** MS. PARRIS MOVED TO ADJOURN.
** MR. HENSINGER SECONDED.
** THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
The meeting adjourned at 11:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 7
Sharon L. Soltes
Telesco Secretarial Services
City of Norwalk
Early Childhood Council
Special Meeting
February 4, 2010
Page 8
Agenda
Early Childhood Council 2-4-10 Agenda (Final)
NORWALK EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL SPECIAL
MEETING
Wednesday, February 4, 2010
9:30 A.M. – 11:30 A.M.
Norwalk City Hall
Room A300 – 3rd Floor
AGENDA
I. Meeting Call to Order
II. Future Management Structure
A. Discussion of School Readiness Administrative Funds
B. Discussion of Management Structure
C. Approval to Submit Graustein Grant based on decision
on management structure
III. Other
IV. Adjournment
If you are unable to attend this meeting, please contact Barbara Smart at 854-7785