Muyni
← Back to Portland

Green Building Incentive Task Force

Regular Meeting

Portland, ME · March 24, 2011

AgendaPacketMinutes

Minutes

MINUTES Green Building Incentive Task Force March 24, 2011 City Hall, Room 209, 12:00 PM Introductions The Task Force took a moment to reintroduce fellow members and others present at the meeting. 1. Review and approve of GBITF minutes from March 24, 2011. The minutes were summarized by Councilor Marshall. The minutes were unanimously approved by the Committee. 2. Review of Green Building Programs in Boston and San Diego County. Houseal summarized the memo submitted to the Committee on the survey of Boston’s and San Diego County’s green building programs. Boxer asked if Portland has a similar permits and fees format to San Diego? Planning Director Alex Jaegerman stated that there are certain fees for building permits and cost varies by project. The format seems similar or comparable. 3. Further Discussion on Development of a Green Building Incentive and the Current Green Building Ordinance. Councilor Marshall wanted to know from the committee what they felt would work better for promoting green building. He also asked if the committee should be considering all aspects of green building including resource conservation, building performance, and waste water. Getz wanted to focus on building performance. Pulaski was interested in the whole building performance because just energy performance could result in a poorly performing building such as air quality. Belleau was interested in the reduction of oil usage. O‐Neil said that Portland’s natural gas usage is higher proportionally then the rest of the state. Marshall stated that city buildings are converting to Natural gas from fuel oil. Pitman asked if at the previous meeting there was discussion of what sectors the Committee is trying to address? Marshall stated that the current ordinance specifies 10,000 sf and above $250,000. Boxer felt that it is important in the Committee’s discussion to bring developers who are on the fence about a high performance building to actually construct one. 5% of developers are already constructing green. Marshall asked about third party review related to the current green building ordinance. Pulaski wanted to know how we were going to go to the next level whether it was charging a fee, or abatement, or a density bonus and what would work best to promote developers on the fence to actually construct a green building. Pulaski wanted to know what options there were available for incentivizing green building. Jaegerman stated that there was an affordable housing bonus used to incentivize affordable housing construction. Shinberg asked if anybody could explain the performance difference between MUBEC and LEED. Pulaski responded that MUBEC requires ASHRAE 90.1 and LEED requires that minimum certification is 10% better than ASHRAE 90.1. Belleau mentioned using energy performance scores for buildings particular residential and new construction as well as renovations. Pitman mentioned for existing buildings that incentives could be applied by energy performance change rather than targets so that new owners could benefit from the incentive down the road. Marshall added that it was important to include renovations in the discussion. Getz liked the idea of incremental change versus a standard. Pulaski also added the importance of focusing on existing buildings. Boxer wanted to know what the potential options were for offering incentives whether it included permits and tax abatements. Houseal stated that the City did not have control over the tax assessments. Getz added that he also wanted to know the world of options for incentivizing: monetary and non‐monetary. O’Neil asked for the state programs that are available to make sure the Committee is not being redundant. Marshall said that there might need to be multiple approaches to different sectors. 4. Confirm Date for Next Meeting: The next meeting is currently scheduled for April 28, 2011. 5. Adjourn

Packet

MEMORANDUM To: Green Building Incentive Task Force From: Ian Houseal, Sustainability Coordinator Date: March 24, 2010 Re: Incentive Task Force Program Survey At the February Green Building Incentive Task Force there was discussion of the administrate review process of green building certification programs administered by other local governments nationwide including Boston, Massachusetts and San Diego County, California. Further research was requested on these programs: Boston The City of Boston requires all large projects (over 50,000 square feet) to be LEED Certifiable (in Article 37 and as amended in Article 80) as demonstrated by the submission of a LEED checklist using the “most appropriate LEED rating system” (LEED ND must meet a minimum LEED Silver certification level) during construction documentation review. The LEED checklist must be stamped by a licensed engineer or architect or LEED professional (qualifications determined by the Boston Redevelopment Authority.) A second certification statement by the licensed engineer or architect must be submitted to receive the Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. Boston has highlighted additional credits for attaining a “certifiable” level including groundwater recharge, historic preservation, and Transportation Demand Management inclusion in the project. 50,000 square feet was chosen as the threshold for the standard because 50,000 square feet triggers delegated review for large projects of State environmental regulations and is a convenient threshold to trigger the green building standard. In addition, all municipal buildings in Boston must be LEED Silver certified. Staff review involvement is minimized since the standard requires a licensed professional to demonstrate compliance with the standard: Staff’s review is for verification purposes during construction review and issuance of the C.O. Boston’s ability to require buildings over 50,000 square feet to be LEED certifiable buildings is unique and not applicable to Portland’s case; however, some aspects of the review requirements may be applicable to Portland’s current ordinance. San Diego County The County of San Diego offers expedited plan review and a 7.5% plan check fee and building permit fee reduction for applications that meet the requirements of their ordinance. A project must either: • Energy Conservation: Exceed the California Energy Standard by 15% for residential and 25% for commercial and industrial developments; • Natural Resource Conservation: Straw bale construction or 20% post-consumer recycled material content (see ordinance); or • Water Conservation: Installation of a gray water system. San Diego County staff reports that more residential applicants use the incentive than commercial or industrial applicants since “it is the County” and is primarily residential. More customers are seeking expedited review. San Diego staff anecdotally estimates that approximately 5% of applicants qualify for the incentive. Most applicants receive the incentive for Energy Conservation. Staff review time is funded by ARRA EECBG grant funding. Special attention is paid applicants that qualify for, but did not submit for an incentive. Staff seeks out applications that qualify and then notifies applicant that they are receiving an incentive. Revenue reductions in offering the incentive are absorbed in the budget; however, given the volume of permits reviews in San Diego County, the effect is minimal according to San Diego County staff. ^ARTICLE 37 GREEN BUILDINGS (^Article inserted on January 10, 2007) SECTION 37-1. Statement of Purpose. The purposes of this article are to ensure that major building projects are planned, designed, constructed, and managed to minimize adverse environmental impacts; to conserve natural resources; to promote sustainable development; and to enhance the quality of life in Boston. SECTION 37-2. Definitions. For the purposes of this article only, the following words and phrases when capitalized shall have the meanings indicated. 1. “Applicant”, any person or entity having a legal or equitable interest in a Proposed Project subject to the requirements of this article, or the authorized agent of any such person or entity. 2. “Boston Green Building Credits”, Credits identified in this article that may be included in the calculation toward achieving a LEED Certifiable project under the provisions of this article. 3. “Boston Interagency Green Building Committee”, an interdisciplinary committee consisting of at least one (1), but not more than two (2) representatives of city agencies including but not limited to, the Boston Redevelopment Authority, the Boston Environment Department, the Boston Transportation Department, the Inspectional Services Department and the Mayor’s Office. Such Committee will advise the Boston Redevelopment Authority on Proposed Project’s compliance with the provisions of this article. 4. “LEED Certifiable”, a structure that is planned, designed and constructed to achieve the level “certified” using the LEED building rating system most appropriate for the Proposed Project. 5. “Proposed Project”, the erection, extension, rehabilitation, alteration, or substantial demolition of any structure or part thereof, or the change of use of any structure or land, for which the Applicant is required to obtain a building or use permit. SECTION 37-3. Applicability. Any Proposed Project which is subject to or shall elect to comply with Section 80B of this Code, Large Project Review, shall be subject to the requirements of this article. The following Proposed Projects, however, shall be exempt from the provisions of this article: 1. Any Proposed Project for which application to the Inspectional Services Department for a building or use permit has been made prior to the first notice of hearing before the Zoning Commission for adoption of this article and for which no Zoning Relief is required. 2. Any Proposed Project for which appeal to the Board of Appeal for any Zoning Relief has been made prior to the first notice of hearing before the Commission for adoption of this article, provided that such Zoning Relief has been or is thereafter granted by the Board of Appeal pursuant to such appeal. 3. Any Proposed Project or site for which application for approval of a development impact project plan or planned development area development plan, has been submitted to the Boston Redevelopment Authority prior to the first notice of hearing before the Commission for adoption of this article, provided that such development impact project plan or planned development area development plan, has been or is thereafter approved by the Boston Redevelopment Authority pursuant to such application, whether or not such application or such development impact project plan or planned development area development plan is thereafter modified or amended. SECTION 37-4. Green Building Requirements. Any Proposed Project subject to the provisions of this article shall be LEED Certifiable under the most appropriate LEED building rating system. Up to four (4) of the required points may be obtained from the Boston Green Building Credits identified in Appendix A. SECTION 37-5. Procedures. Any Applicant subject to the provisions of this article shall provide to the Boston Redevelopment Authority a completed LEED scorecard, including any Boston Green Credits that the Proposed Project will achieve. The Applicant shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project will meet the requirements of this article with appropriate supporting documentation and by certification from a LEED Accredited Professional and/or other expert recognized by the Boston Redevelopment Authority. The submissions shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 80B. Within five (5) days of its receipt of a completed LEED submission, the Boston Redevelopment Authority shall transmit a copy of the submission to Boston Interagency Green Building Committee. SECTION 37-6. Regulations. The Boston Redevelopment Authority may promulgate regulations to administer this article. SECTION 37-7. Enforcement. The Commissioner of Inspectional Services shall not issue any building permit or use permit for a Proposed Project that is subject to the provisions of this article unless the Director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority has issued a Certification of Compliance pursuant to Section 80B-6. SECTION 37-8. Severability. The provisions of this article are severable, and if any such provision or provisions shall be held invalid by any decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not impair or otherwise affect any other provision of this article. APPENDIX A to ARTICLE 37 Boston Green Building Credits Any Proposed Project subject to the provisions of this article may obtain a maximum of four (4) of the required points from the Boston Green Building Credits which will be included in the calculation toward achieving a LEED Certifiable project under this article. One point may be awarded for each of the following four categories: Modern Grid; Historic Preservation; Groundwater Recharge; and Modern Mobility. In order to be eligible for the Boston Green Building Credits, a plan must be submitted to the Boston Redevelopment Authority to meet the following Boston Public Health Commission prerequisites: a. Retrofit of all diesel construction vehicles, from the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved retrofit technologies, as applicable, or contribution of a comparable amount to the Air Pollution Control Commission Abatement Fund; b. An outdoor construction management plan including provisions for wheel washing, site vacuuming, truck covers and anti-idling signage; and, c. Integrated pest management plan. 1. Modern Grid One point will be awarded if a Proposed Project qualifies as a Distributed Generation/Combined Heat and Power (DG/CHP) project that provides useful “congestion relief” in locations where the Boston Redevelopment Authority and Boston Environment and Energy Services determine that electricity distribution load constraints exist. In order to earn this point the Proposed Project must include an on-site combined electrical power and heat generation system that provides for ten percent (10%) or more of the total building energy use. Eligible systems include combustion engine driven generators, fuel cells and micro turbines that utilize clean fuels including natural gas and biodiesel. This provides value in reducing both transmission and distribution- level costs. 2. Historic Preservation This point will be awarded if a Proposed Project involves the historic renovation of an existing structure and recognizes the importance of preserving Boston’s historic assets. In order to earn this point the Proposed Project must include the historic renovation of an existing structure which complies with the applicable historic preservation regulations and design guidelines including building and site materials and features. Structures must be located in a historic district or listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the State Register of Historic Places, or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth. 3. Groundwater Recharge a. In areas subject to Article 32, Groundwater Conservation Overlay District, one point will be awarded for Proposed Projects that provide fifty percent (50%) greater recharge than required under Article 32-6 (i.e., capturing within a suitably-designed system a volume of rainfall on the lot equivalent to no less than 1.5 inches across that portion of the surface area of the lot to be occupied by the Proposed Project); or b. For Proposed Projects in areas not governed by Article 32 and located in areas of filled land, one point will be awarded for Proposed Projects that capture a volume of rainwater on the lot equivalent to no less than one inch across that portion of the surface area of the lot to be occupied by the Proposed Project, or provide measures that otherwise result in on-site infiltration of rainwater including landscape irrigation. Applicants must demonstrate how combined building systems will meet this standard including area absorption/retention calculations. 4. Modern Mobility This point will be awarded for Proposed Projects that meet all of the Transportation Demand Management (“TDM”) Prerequisites and implement the required actions from the menu of TDM Options as set forth below: a. Prerequisites. The following prerequisites must be met for all Proposed Projects. The Applicant must specify commitment to these measures prior to the filing of the Project Notification Form: (1) Designate an On-Site Transportation Coordinator in the management office; (2)Post information about public transportation and car-sharing options; (3)Provide transit, bike and pedestrian access information on building website; (4)Provide on-site, external bicycle racks for visitors and covered secure bicycle storage for building occupants. The capacity is to be sized as follows: fifteen percent (15%) or more for residential buildings and five percent (5%) or more for all other building uses; (5)Comply with Boston Transportation Department district parking ratios; and (6) join a Transportation Management Association (for commercial, hotel and mixed use projects). b. TDM Options (1) For residential projects (meet at least three): (a) Provide a fifty percent (50%) subsidy for monthly T pass purchases, one for each dwelling unit for the tenants first full year of occupancy. (b) Provide preferred parking spaces for a car-sharing service capable of serving 1% of the building occupants. (c) Provide shuttle service to public transit stations (applicable to projects located more than ¼ mile from a public bus or rail station). (d) Price and allow the purchase of deeded parking spaces separately from dwelling units. Parking spaces required by zoning may only be purchased and used by building tenants/unit owners. (e) On-site electric charging plug-in stations for plug- ins capable of serving one percent (1%) of the building occupants. (f) On site ATM, dry cleaning drop-off/pick-up & other amenities that reduce short car trips. (2) For educational or medical institutions (meet at least eight): (a) Provide on-site sales of semester T passes for students. (b) Pre-tax payroll deduction and distribution for T passes for all on-site employees. (c) Fifty percent (50%) transit pass subsidy for all on- site employees. (d) Provide garage occupancy information by installing electronic monitors at entry/exits. (e) Provide parking cash out program for employees using public transit (f) Provide covered secure bicycle storage with convenient changing/shower facilities for five percent (5%) or more of building occupants. (g) Provide shuttle service to public transit stations (applicable to projects located more than ¼ mile from a public bus or rail station). (h) Provide preferential parking spaces for carpools and vanpools capable of serving five percent (5%) of the building occupants. (i) Provide preferential parking for alternative fuel or high efficiency vehicles capable of serving one percent (1%) if the building occupants. (j) On-site electric charging plug-in stations for plug- ins capable of serving one percent (1%) of the building occupants. (k) Provide an on-site ATM and direct deposit of paychecks (3) For office or retail projects (meet at least one high-value and four basic): (a) High-value (meet at least one): 1. Provide shuttle service to public transit stations (applicable to projects located more than ¼ mile from a public bus or rail station). 2. Parking cash out program for employees using public transit. 3. Fifty percent (50%) transit pass subsidy for all on-site employees. (b) Basic (meet at least four): 1. Provide garage occupancy information by installing electronic monitors at entry/exits. 2. Pre-tax payroll deduction and distribution for T passes for all on-site employees. 3. Provide covered secure bicycle storage with convenient changing/shower facilities for five percent (5%) or more of building occupants. 4. Provide an on-site ATM and direct deposit of paychecks. 5. Provide preferential parking spaces for carpools and vanpools capable of serving five percent (5%) of the building occupants. 6. Provide preferential parking for alternative fuel or high efficiency vehicles capable of serving one percent (1%) if the building occupants. 7. On-site electric charging plug-in stations for plug-ins capable of serving one percent (1%) of the building occupants. 4. For hotels (meet at least three): (a) Fifty percent (50%) transit pass subsidy for all on- site employees. (b) Free weekend or multi-day pre-loaded T-passes for hotel guests. (c) Provision of transit and pedestrian information to guests before arrival. (d) Pre-tax payroll deduction and distribution for T passes for all on-site employees. (e) Provide garage occupancy information by installing electronic monitors at entry/exits. (f) Parking cash out program for employees using public transit. (g) Provide covered secure bicycle storage with convenient changing/shower facilities for five percent (5%) or more of building occupants. (h) On-site car rental service. (i) On-site electric charging plug-in stations for plug- ins capable of serving one percent (1%) of the building occupants. (5) For mixed use projects (meet at least three from each of the appropriate use categories above) County of San Diego Green Building Program San Diego County Code of Administrative Ordinances Article XX Fees and Charges SEC. 362.1. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE Item d(4) http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll?f=templates&fn=default.htm&vid=amlegal:sandiegoco_ca_mc http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/greenbuildings.html http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/DPLU273.pdf 4. FEE REDUCTION FOR BUILDINGS USING SUSTAINABLE BUILDING PRACTICES. For building permit applicants who voluntarily participate in the County of San Diego Green Building Program, as established by Board of Supervisors Policy F-50, the plan check and permit fees shall be reduced by 7.5%. To qualify for this fee reduction, the project shall use one of the following sustainable building practices: Energy Conservation The project shall exceed California Energy Commission Standards by 15% or more for residential and 25% or more for commercial and industrial developments. Natural Resource Conservation The project shall incorporate straw bale construction for all exterior walls or use recycled content in the building system. To be eligible for the fee reduction by using recycled content, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Building Official that 20% or more of the primary materials being used in the building system contain 20% or more post-consumer recycled content. Any reused materials will be found to satisfy the 20% post-consumer recycled content requirement. A fee reduction may also be approved when the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Building Official that at least one primary building material (e.g. roofing material) is 50% or more post-consumer recycled content. Water Conservation The project shall include the installation of a graywater system. A permit is required from the Department of Environmental Health for the graywater system in addition to the building permit issued by Department of Planning and Land Use.