Police Citizen Review Subcommittee

City of Portland Police Citizen Review Subcommittee AGENDA July 9, 2025 6:00 PM 1. Zoom information This meeting will take place remotely using Zoom pursuant to the Remote Meeting Policy adopted by the Police Citizen Review Subcommittee and as authorized under 1 M.R.S. § 403-B . Allow your computer to install the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to attend live, a recording will be available following the meeting. For public comment, you will need to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise your hand via the telephone, please hit *9. You will be unmuted by the host when it is time for public comment. https://portlandmaine- gov.zoom.us/j/81977688856?pwd=RYXb2BQoYVpOzxtaWTxzVOKb5QFFV5.1 Passcode: 304710 Phone one-tap: +13092053325,,81977688856# US +13126266799,,81977688856# US (Chicago) 2. Call to Order 3. Approval of the June 11, 2025 & June 23, 2025 meeting minutes a. Attachment b. Attachment 4. Update on the new Civil Police Review Board ordinance a. Attachment 5. Letter to City Council regarding Civilian Police Review Board ordinance a. Attachment 6. Training SOP Page 1  a. Attachment 7. Public comment on agenda items Executive session pursuant to 1 M.R.S. Sec. 405(6)(F) to discuss IA2025-008 (presented 8. by Rachel), IA2025-009 (presented by Keith, Kay as back-up), and IA2025-010 (presented by Walter, Kay as back-up) 9. Next meeting’s date and agenda topics a. Attachment 10. Adjourn Page 2  MINUTES POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE June 23, 2025 Meeting Held Remotely via Zoom Members present: Joey Brunelle, Vice-Chair; Rachel Schlein; Keith Bidwell; Xavier Botana; Randall Kilty; Walter Bihumugani Members absent: Kaylin Kerina, Chair. Staff present: Associate Corporation Counsel Rachel Millette and Tracy Boyd. 6:01 Call to order. Motion was made by Xavier and seconded by Rachel S. to approve 2024 annual Report. Passage 6-0. Discussion of letter to City Council regarding the new CPRB ordinance Joey explained that instead of drafting a letter to the City Council, Rachel S. and he created a list of topics regarding the ordinance for the subcommittee to discuss. The topics included: scope, eligibility criteria, complaint process, appeals process, staff/resources and budget. Rachel S. added the letter could include recommendations or just explain the subcommittee’s thoughts on a topic whether there is consensus or not on a particular recommendation. Xavier asked Rachel M. if had an idea of what direction the council was heading in regards to the ordinance. Rachel M. responded that she’d just received confirmation that the public workshop would be held on July 28, 2025, held via Zoom, but that she does not have a sense of what the council will decide on the different elements of the ordinance, or whether or not it get sent to a council committee. Rachel then gave the subcommittee a summary of the ordinance’s history. After a lengthy discussion the group narrowed down what to include in the letter. Joey and Rachel S. agreed to draft a letter for the subcommittee’s review. Rachel S. suggested creating a timeline for drafting and review of the letter: complete draft of letter by 7/2, agenda published with draft attached on 7/3, subcommittee feedback before the 7/9 PCRS meeting, final editing after the meeting, then send to the City Council by 7/21. No public comment was offered. 8:22 Motion was made by Randall and seconded by Keith to adjourn. Passage 6-0. Page 3  MINUTES POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE June 11, 2025 Meeting Held Remotely via Zoom Members present: Kaylin Kerina, Chair; Joey Brunelle, Vice-Chair; Rachel Schlein; Keith Bidwell (left meeting at 8:32); Xavier Botana; Randall Kilty; Walter Bihumugani (joined at 6:14). Members absent: none Staff present: Associate Corporation Counsel Rachel Millette; Chief Mark Dubois; Major Dan Hondo; Lieutenant Jacob Titcomb; and Tracy Boyd. 6:05 Call to order. Motion was made by Joey and seconded by Randall to approve the May 14, 2025 meeting minutes. Passage 5-0, with one abstention, Xavier. 2024 Annual Report update. Joey gave an overview of the 2024 Annual Report and posed some questions to the subcommittee. Joey ended the presentation by asking if members could pair off and work on areas to improve, including: offline collaboration/communication; documentation of the PCRS process and meeting structure; training/orientation; and complaint form accessibility and availability; and statistical analysis. Joey will finalize the Annual Report and the vote to approve it will take place at the next meeting. Update on the new Civil Police Review Board (CPRB) ordinance. Rachel M. explained that she doesn’t have a definitive date, but believes that the next City Council workshop meeting to discuss the ordinance may be at the end of July. Keith asked why the delay? Rachel gave a brief account of the history of the ordinance. Kay shared that it began with Charter Commission. The ordinance was passed in fall of 2022 and became effective in July of 2023. The first City Council workshop was in July of 2023. The subcommittee has sent to two letters regarding the new ordinance, one to the Charter Commission and the other to the City Council. Discussion of letter to City Council regarding the new CPRB ordinance Joey suggested that a two person team draft a letter and Randall suggested discussing the letter at the extra June Meeting. Joey and Rachel will work on a draft. No public comment was offered. Page 4 7:02 Motion was made to enter into Executive Session pursuant to 1 M.R.S. Sec. 405(6)(F) to discuss IA2025-002, IA2025-006, IA2025-008 and IA2025-009 by Keith and seconded by Xavier. Passage 7-0. 8:26 Out of Executive Session. Motion was made by Xavier to find that IA2025-002 was thorough; seconded by Joey. Passage: 7-0, IA2025-002 was found to be timely. Motion was made by Xavier to find that IA2025-002 was fair; seconded by Keith. Passage: 6-1, IA2025-002 was found to be fair, Xavier voted no. Motion was made by Keith to find that IA2025-002 was timely; seconded Joey. Passage: 7-0, IA2025-002 was found to be timely. Motion was made by Xavier to find that IA2025-002 was objective; seconded by Randall. Failed: 4-3, Randall, Xavier, Joey and Walter voted no, IA2025-002 was not found to be objective. Motion was made by Joey to find that IA2025-006 was thorough; seconded by Randall. Passage: 6-0, with Xavier abstaining, IA2025-006 was found to be timely. Motion was made by Keith to find that IA2025-006 was fair; seconded by Joey. Passage: 6-0, with Xavier abstaining, IA2025-006 was found to be fair. Motion was made by Joey to find that IA2025-006 was timely; seconded by Keith. Passage: 6-0, with Xavier abstaining, IA2025-006 was found to be timely. Motion was made by Joey to find that IA2025-006 was objective; seconded by Rachel S. Passage: 6-0, with Xavier abstaining, IA2025-006 was found to be objective. Joey expressed that he feels that the PCRS should follow up with PD when a case doesn’t pass any of the four criteria. Rachel S. concurred with Joey. Rachel M. explained that as long the complainant and the officer are not identified, the subcommittee should be able to provide feedback to PD either in the meeting or privately after. After much discussion, the PCRS decided to add a second meeting in June to discuss the letter to the City council regarding the new ordinance and approve the annual report. The regularly scheduled July meeting will include the three remaining cases and Rachel S.’s draft of a training/orientation outline. Kay would like to discuss the four criteria possibly in September. Rachel S. is trying to schedule a criminal procedure and IA process training for subcommittee members to attend. Topics for next meeting agenda. Approval of Annual Report Letter to City Council re: new ordinance 9:00 Motion was made by Xavier and seconded by Rachel to adjourn. Passage 6-0. Page 5  MINUTES POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE June 23, 2025 Meeting Held Remotely via Zoom Members present: Joey Brunelle, Vice-Chair; Rachel Schlein; Keith Bidwell; Xavier Botana; Randall Kilty; Walter Bihumugani Members absent: Kaylin Kerina, Chair. Staff present: Associate Corporation Counsel Rachel Millette and Tracy Boyd. 6:01 Call to order. Motion was made by Xavier and seconded by Rachel S. to approve 2024 annual Report. Passage 6-0. Discussion of letter to City Council regarding the new CPRB ordinance Joey explained that instead of drafting a letter to the City Council, Rachel S. and he created a list of topics regarding the ordinance for the subcommittee to discuss. The topics included: scope, eligibility criteria, complaint process, appeals process, staff/resources and budget. Rachel S. added the letter could include recommendations or just explain the subcommittee’s thoughts on a topic whether there is consensus or not on a particular recommendation. Xavier asked Rachel M. if had an idea of what direction the council was heading in regards to the ordinance. Rachel M. responded that she’d just received confirmation that the public workshop would be held on July 28, 2025, held via Zoom, but that she does not have a sense of what the council will decide on the different elements of the ordinance, or whether or not it get sent to a council committee. Rachel then gave the subcommittee a summary of the ordinance’s history. After a lengthy discussion the group narrowed down what to include in the letter. Joey and Rachel S. agreed to draft a letter for the subcommittee’s review. Rachel S. suggested creating a timeline for drafting and review of the letter: complete draft of letter by 7/2, agenda published with draft attached on 7/3, subcommittee feedback before the 7/9 PCRS meeting, final editing after the meeting, then send to the City Council by 7/21. No public comment was offered. 8:22 Motion was made by Randall and seconded by Keith to adjourn. Passage 6-0. Page 6 City of Portland, Maine Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec.2-22 rev. 1-6-10 Chapter 2 ADMINISTRATION* ---------- *Charter reference(s)--Powers and duties, art. I, § 2. Cross reference(s)--Ordinances promising or guaranteeing the payment of money for the city, or authorizing the issuance of any bonds in the city or any evidence of the city's indebtedness, or any contract or obligation assumed by the city saved from repeal, §1-4(1); ordinances making any appropriations saved from repeal, § 1-4(4); ordinances prescribing the number, classification or compensation of any city officers or employees saved from repeal, § 1-4(10); ordinances providing for retirement benefits saved from repeal, § 1-4(11); uniform procedure for collecting assessments, § 1-16; elections, Ch. 9; general assistance, Ch. 13; planning board, § 14-16 et seq.; administration and enforcement of zoning, § 14-461 et seq.; jurisdiction of board of appeals for zoning, § 14-471 et seq.; board of appeals, § 14-541 et seq.; historic preservation, § 14-600 et seq.; licenses and permits, Ch. 15; police, Ch. 20; special police, § 20-16 et seq.; administration and enforcement of traffic regulations, § 28-11 et seq.; traffic division, § 28 et seq.; traffic engineer, § 28-21 et seq.; parking division, § 28-41 et seq. ---------- Art. I. In General, §§ 2-1 —- 2-15 Art. II. Officers, §§ 2-16--2-30 Div. 1. Generally, §§2-16—2-20 Div. 2. Prohibition on Immigration Status Checks §§2-21—2-30 Art. III. Boards, Commissions, Committees, etc., §§ 2-31--2-40 Art. III-A. Portland Land Bank Commission; Fund, §§ 2-41—2-45 Art. IV. Civil Service, §§ 2-46--2-90 Div. 1. Generally, §§ 2-46 Div. 2. Civil Service Employment Commission, §§ 2-47--2-57 Div. 3. Employment SubcommitteeFire and Police Department Employment, §§ 2-58—2-75 Div. 4. Police Citizen Review Subcommittee, §§ 2-76—2-90 Art. IV-A. Civilian Police Review Board, §§ 2-76—2-90 Art. V. Employee Benefits, §§ 2-91--2-200 Div. 1. Generally, §§ 2-91--2-100 Div. 2. Retirement, §§ 2-101--2-200 Art. VI. Funds Due to City, §§ 2-201--2-300 Div. 1. Generally, §§ 2-201--2-220 Div. 2. Provisional Payments, §§ 2-221--2-229 Div. 3. Interest, §§ 2-230--2-300 Art. VII. Procurement and Contracting Procedures, §§ 2-301--2-400 Div. 1. Generally, § 2-301 Div. 2. Competitive Process for Contracts, §§ 2-302-2-312 Div. 3. Sale or Disposal of Real or Personal Property §§ 2- 313-2-400 Art. VIII. Civil Emergency Preparedness, §§ 2-401--2-415 Art. X. Exemption from Vehicle Excise Tax for Certain Military Personnel, §§ 2-436--2-437 * * * Page 7 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-3 Rev. 1-6-10 ARTICLE III. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, ETC.* ---------- *Cross reference(s)--Civil service commission, § 2-66 et seq.; planning board, § 14-16 et seq.; jurisdiction of board of appeals for zoning, § 14-471 et seq.; board of appeals, § 14-541 et seq.; historic preservation committee, § 14-603 et seq.; friends of the parks, § 18-10. ---------- Sec. 2-31. Oath of office. (a) All persons appointed by the City Council to membership on any board or commission of the City shall, prior to taking office as such member, be sworn to the faithful discharge of their duties by the City Clerk, Justice of the Peace, or Notary Public. (b) The form of such oath shall be as follows: I, ________, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and of this State, so long as I shall continue a citizen thereof, and that I will faithfully discharge, to the best of my abilities, the duties incumbent upon me as a member of ________, according to said Constitutions and the laws of this State and ordinances of this City. ____________ State of Maine County of Cumberland, ss. ____ I, ________, certify that ________ personally appeared before me on this day and took the above oath. _____________ City Clerk Justice of the Peace Notary Public (Code 1968, §§ 204.1, 204.2; Ord. No. 478-73, 7-16-73) Sec. 2-32. Limitation on term of service--Generally. (a) No person shall be appointed to, nor serve, more than three (3) consecutive full terms or nine (9) consecutive-years, whichever is greater, on the same board or commission of the city. (b) Except as otherwise specified in the Charter, Tthe foregoing limitation shall apply only to service as a regular voting member of the board or commission, and not to service as an alternate nor as a nonvoting member. (c) To the extent that this Code provides for a different limitation on the term of service for a specific board or commission, the limitation provided in this article shall apply. Page 8 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-5 Rev. 1-6-10 (Ord. No. 301-91, 4-1-91; Ord. No. 118-08/09, 12-1-08) Sec. 2-33. Applicability. (a) The above limitation on terms shall apply to the following boards and commissions: (1) Board of appeals; (2) Board of assessment review; (3) Reserved; (4) Cable television committee (CATV); (5) Civil service commission employment subcommitteecommission; (6) Civil service commission police citizen review subcommitteeCivilian police review board; (7) Community development block grant allocation committee; (8) Friends of the parkParks commission; (9) Historic preservation committee; (10) Land bank commission; (11) Planning board; and (12) Portland public art committee; (b) Except as otherwise specified in the Charter, Tthe above limitation on terms shall not be applied retroactively and shall apply to any person serving on one (1) of the above-named boards or commissions on the effective date of this section (5/1/91) beginning with the expiration of the term in which they are so serving. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the limitation on terms shall be applied to members serving on the boards and commissions identified in section 2-33, subsection (a), paragraphs 5,6,7 and 12, beginning with the expiration of the term of any sitting board or commission member following the passage of this amendment. --------- *Editor’s Note—In reference to Section 2-33(b) above, “passage of this amendment” refers to Council Order 118-08/09, passed on December 1, 2008. --------- (c) Nothing herein shall prevent consecutive appointment of any person to a different board or commission from that on which he or she has served the maximum consecutive time. (d) In the case of the board of harbor commissioners, such Page 9 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-6 Rev. 6-4-2018 limitation shall apply only to the two (2) members appointed by the City Council. (e) Any member on the above-named boards or commissions who completes the maximum years of service prior to the expiration of his or hertheir term shall be allowed to complete that term of service and to continue to serve after expiration of that term until a successor is appointed and qualified, provided such service shall not continue in excess of one hundred twenty (120) days after expiration of the term. (f) If an individual who served as a member of the police citizen review subcommittee is appointed to serve on the civilian police review board, the years that the individual served on the police citizen review subcommittee and the years served on the civilian police review board will count toward the nine-year limitation in section 2-32(a). (Ord. No. 301-91, 4-1-91; Substitute Ord. No. 233-99, §2, 4-5-99; Ord. No. 118-08/09, 12-1-08; Ord. No. 219-17/18, 6-4-2018) Sec. 2-34. Period of ineligibility. Any person who completes the maximum terms or years of service on a board or commission shall be ineligible for reappointment to that board or commission for a period of three (3) consecutive calendar years from the date of completion of such maximum terms or years of service. (Ord. No. 301-91, 4-1-91; Ord. No. 118-08/09, 12-1-08) Sec. 2-35. Reserved. Sec. 2-36. Reserved. Sec. 2-37. Reserved. Sec. 2-38. Reserved. Sec. 2-39. Reserved. Sec. 2-40. Tenure of Directors of the Board of the Greater Portland Transit District. Each Director of the board of the Greater Portland Transit District representing the City of Portland on the effective date of this amendment, or thereafter, shall be appointed annually for a term of one (1) year and until his or hertheir successor is appointed. Each Director so appointed shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. (Ord. No. 659-86, § 1, 6-16-86) * * * ARTICLE IV. CIVIL SERVICE* ---------- *Charter reference(s)--Mandate for civil service, Art. VI, § 3. *Cross reference(s)--Commissions generally, § 2-31 et seq. *Cross reference(s)--32 M.R.S.A. § 7166 (Limitation on use of polygraph in employment) Page 10 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-14 Rev. 1-6-10 *Editor's Note--The Civil Service Ordinance was substantially reorganized and revised by Council Order No. 89-02/03, 11-4-02. ---------- DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 2-46. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall having the meanings respectively ascribed to them unless the context otherwise indicates: Cause. In the case of a member, "cause" shall mean just cause and shall include any act or omission which constitutes legal cause and includes, but is not limited to: violation of any departmental rule or rules; incompetent or inefficient performance of duty; or inattention to or dereliction of duties; insubordination; discourteous treatment of the public or a fellow employee; violation of any provision of this article or the rules adopted thereunder, whether such violation may result in a forfeiture of office hereunder, or not; job suitability or physical unfitness to perform the normal duties of the position which the member holds; the use of intoxicating liquors, narcotics, or any other drug, liquid, or preparation on duty, or to such an extent that such use interferes with the efficiency or job suitability or physical fitness of the member, or prevents the member from properly performing the normal functions and duties of his or hertheir position; misconduct; the commission of any disqualifying criminal offense; failure to report to the appropriate superior; errors, incompetence, misconduct, inefficiency, neglect of duty, or any other form of misconduct or negligence of which the member has knowledge; and any other acts or omissions which would tend to directly discredit or injure the public service or would jeopardize the effective functioning of the department. In the case of a civil service employment commissioner or alternate, "cause" shall include any act or omission which constitutes legal cause, and includes but is not limited to: incompetent or inefficient performance of duty; unexcused absences from commission meetings; violation of any provision of this article or the rules adopted thereunder, whether such violation may result in a forfeiture of office hereunder, or not; the commission or conviction for any disqualifying criminal offense, or any action by the Civil Service Commissioner or alternate intended to affect or influence, or which could reasonably be expected to affect or influence any decision of the City Manager, the Chief of either department, or the City Council with respect to the department, or of any member of the department with respect to the performance of his or hertheir duty. Charge means a written statement to the member describing the act or omission constituting cause for action taken or proposed to be taken. 2-5 Page 11 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-15 Rev. 2-5-2018 Civil service commission means collectively the two independent subcommittees constituting the commission, i.e. the employment subcommittee and the police citizen review subcommittee. Demotion means any reduction in rank within the department but shall not include any economic layoff. Director of human resources shall mean the person designated by the City Manager to act as Director of Personnel for the City and his or hertheir designees (also referred to herein as the "Director"). Member means any firefighter, fire officer, police officer, or superior officer appointed hereunder to any rank within the fire or police departments, except the chiefs thereof. Promotion means any advancement in rank within the department, other than the rank of chief. Rank means the position classification of any member to which he or she has been appointed hereunder within the fire department or police department but shall not include any contractual or other pay differentials between functions or grades within each rank. Relative means grandfather, grandmother, father, mother, son, daughter, grandson, granddaughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, domestic partner, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, step-father, step-mother, step-son, step-daughter, step-brother, step-sister, half-brother, or half-sister, whether by half-blood or full blood, and whether by consanguinity or affinity. (Code 1968, § 201.1; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 433-82, § 1, 3-15-82; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 288-90, 4-2-90; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 4, 11-5-01; Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) DIVISION 2. CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION* Sec. 2-47. Created. There is hereby created a civil service employment commission, also referred to in this article as the commission. The commission shall consist of two separate and independent subcommittees as follows: the civil service employment subcommittee and the civil service police citizen review subcommittee. Commissioners shall be appointed to, and serve on, one of the two subcommittees only. (Code 1968, § 201.3; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 288-90, 4-2-90; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5-01) Sec. 2-48. Composition. 2-6 Page 12 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-47 Rev. 1-6-10 (a) The Civil Service Employment Subcommittee of the Civil Service Commission shall consist of three (3) commissioners and one (1) alternate who shall serve in the absence of any commissioner. (b) The police citizen review subcommittee shall consist of seven (7) commissioners who shall serve in the absence of any commissioner. (Code 1968, § 201.3; Ord. No. 89-80 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11- 5-01; Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-49. Qualifications. (a) Qualifications of commissioners. Every civil service employment commissioner and alternate shall be a resident of the City of Portland. In addition, the following persons shall not be eligible for appointment to, or service on the Commission: (1) Any present or former employee of the city or school department, who was employed by the city or school department within the previous one ten (10) year periods; (2) Any present or former member of the City Council or School Board, who has held that position in the previous one ten (10) years period; or (3) Any civil service employment commissioner who has completed three (3) consecutive full terms of three (3) years as provided in Chapter 2, Article III; (4) Any individual presently serving as a member of the civilian police review board; or. (5b) Any relative of a present member of the police or fire departments. Additional subcommittee eligibility requirements: (1) Employment subcommittee. The following persons shall not be eligible to serve on the employment subcommittee: any relative of a present member of the police or fire departments. (2) Police Citizen Review Subcommittee. In order to ensure an objective and unbiased audit of the police department’s internal affairs investigation process, any applicant for service on the citizen review subcommittee shall be disqualified from serving on said subcommittee if: a. any member of the applicant’s immediate family is or has been a Portland police officer in the previous ten (10) years; 2-7 Page 13 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-18 Rev. 2-5-2018 b. the applicant or any member of his or her immediate family has been arrested by any member of the Portland police department within the previous ten (10) years, or has had the final disposition of any criminal proceedings resulting from such an arrest within the previous ten (10) years, whichever is longer; c. his or her immediate family has filed a complaint with the internal affairs unit of the Portland police department within the previous ten (10) years; d. the applicant or any member of his or her immediate family has brought suit against the City of Portland, the Chief of Police, the police department or any individual police officer for a cause of action arising out of an officer’s performance of his or her duties; within the last ten (10) years, or has had such a suit finally disposed of within the previous ten years, whichever is longer; and e. “Immediate family” as used herein shall mean and include spouse, domestic partner, children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, and siblings. (bc) Failure to disclose any grounds for disqualification or falsification of any information in the application process shall disqualify the person from service on the commission and shall constitute “cause” within the meaning of section 2-46. (cd) Any civil service employment commissioner or alternate who becomes ineligible to serve during his or hertheir term shall resign, and failure to do so shall be "cause" within the meaning of section 2-46. A commissioner or alternate on the employment subcommittee who is a relative of any candidate for appointment under this article shall inform the secretary in writing of such relationship and shall not attend any meeting of the subcommittee commission dealing with such candidacy, nor participate in nor attempt to influence any action by the commission with respect to the position for which such relative has applied. (de) Reasonable efforts shall be made to ensure that the appointments to the civil service employment commission are diverse and representative of the community. (Code 1968, § 201.4; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299.86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 370-91, § 1, 6-5-91; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5-01; Ord. No. 118-08/09, 12-1-08; Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-50. Appointment. Civil service employment commissioners and the alternates shall be 2-8 Page 14 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-19 Rev. 1-6-10 appointed by the City Council. Such power of appointment shall be exercised only after the City Clerk has published a notice announcing such position or positions, describing the responsibilities thereof, and soliciting applications by qualified persons in a newspaper of general circulation within the city not less than fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of action by such council. Applications may be solicited whether or not there is a vacancy, and such applicants may be considered for any vacancy which occurs within one hundred eighty (180) days of the closing date for such applications. Such applicants may also be considered for appointment as a commissioner pro tem pursuant to section 2-55 below. Nothing herein shall limit the city's authority to solicit applications whenever the City Manager deems that it is necessary. (Code 1968, § 201.4; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 138-92, § 3, 10-19-92; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97) Sec. 2-51. Terms. (a) Term. Each civil service employment commissioner or alternate shall be appointed to a three-year term, unless appointed to fill a vacancy. Police citizen review subcommittee commissioners first appointed hereunder shall be appointed for one-, two- and three-year terms so that only two (2) are initially selected each year other than by reason of resignation, removal or death. A commissioner or alternate shall serve until his or hertheir successor is appointed and qualified, but in no case longer than one hundred twenty (120) days from the expiration of his or hertheir term. (b) Limitation on service. The term limitations of Chapter 2, Article IIIii shall apply to service on each of the subcommittees of the civil service employment commission. (c) Applicability. The limitation on terms provided by this amendment shall apply to any person serving on the civil service employment commission as of the effective date of this amendment (7/5/1991) and to any person appointed after said effective date. (Code 1968, § 201.3; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 275-83, 11-7-83; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 370-91, § 2, 6-5-91; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5-01; Ord. No. 118-08/09, 12-1- 08) Sec. 2-52. Compensation. Civil service commissioners shall serve without compensation, except that reasonable expenses incurred by any commissioner or alternate incidental to his or her duties under this article may be reimbursed. (Code 1968, § 201.4; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97) Sec. 2-53. Removal. Any civil service commissioner or alternate may be removed from 2-9 Page 15 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-22 Rev. 1-6-10 office by the City Council for cause, after notice and the opportunity to be heard. (Code 1968, § 201.4; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5- 01) Sec. 2-54. Officers. Each subcommittee of Tthe civil service employment commission shall annually elect one (1) of its members as the chair. Each The commissionsubcommittee may, at its option, also elect one (1) of its members as the vice chair, to serve in the absence of the chair. The Director of Human Resources or his or hertheir designee shall serve as secretary to the employment subcommitteecommission and shall furnish any necessary administrative assistance. The corporation counsel or his or her designee shall serve as secretary to the police citizen review subcommittee and shall furnish any necessary administrative assistance to that subcommittee. (Code 1968, § 201.3; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 288-90, 4-2-90; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5-01; Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-55. Commissioners pro tem. In the case of temporary absence from the city, temporary disability of the civil service employment commission members and alternate, or other circumstances, so that a quorum of a subcommitteethe commission cannot be constituted without such action, the City Council may appoint such commissioners pro tem as may be necessary to constitute a quorum. Commissioners pro tem shall be subject to the eligibility requirements of this division. A commissioner pro tem shall possess the powers and discharge the duties of a regular commissioner during the absence or disability for which he or she has been appointed; provided, however, that a commissioner pro tem shall have no authority with respect to rule-making by the commission and shall not participate in any action or decision where a quorum is otherwise present. (Code 1968, § 201.4; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97) Sec. 2-56. Meetings. (a) Calling of meetings. Meetings or hearings of either subcommittee of the Civil Service Employment Commission may be called at any time by its Chair, or in the absence from the city or disability of the Chair, by any member of the Subcommitteecommission. The Chair of a Subcommittee shall call a meeting upon request from any Subcommittee cCommissioner. (b) Quorum. A quorum of the Employment Subcommittee of the Civil Service Commission shall be two (2). The Subcommittee Alternate may attend any hearing or meeting, but shall participate as a Commissioner only during the absence or disability of any Commissioner 2-10 Page 16 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-25 Rev. 1-6-10 or whenever a vacancy on the Subcommittee Commission exists. A quorum of the Police Citizen Review Subcommittee shall be four (4). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the quorum shall be reduced to three (3) during any period when there is a vacancy on the Subcommittee, including a vacancy in the position of alternate. (Code 1968, § 201.5; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5- 01; Ord. No. 247-03/04, 6-21-04) Sec. 2-57. Prohibited practices. (a) Forfeiture of office. A determination by a court of competent jurisdiction of a practice, or facts necessarily constituting a practice prohibited by this section by any civil service employment commissioner, alternate, member of a department, or any other person shall result in the forfeiture of any office held by such person and shall be a permanent disqualification for any office existing under or governed by this article. (b) Nondiscrimination. No discrimination shall be exercised, promised, or threatened by any person, in connection with any action taken or to be taken under this article, in favor or against any applicant or member of a department because of his or hertheir religious beliefs, ancestry, national origin or veteran's status; race, sex, sexual orientation, or color; because of age or physical or mental disability, except where such requirements constitute a bona fide occupational qualification or failure to meet the requirements poses a safety hazard or cannot be reasonably accommodated; because the applicant or member of the department, or member of his or hertheir family, has or has declined to contribute to any political fund or to render political service; or because of any lawful union activity or membership. No person shall seek or attempt to use, nor shall the civil service employment commission give consideration to, any political endorsement, or any other factor prohibited by the preceding sentence. To the extent consistent with law and with this article, it is the policy of the city to encourage diversity in its work force and to use affirmative action in its recruitment of applicants for positions hereunder. (c) Falsification. No person shall make any false statement, certificate, mark, rating or report with respect to any test, certification or appointment made under any provisions of this article, or in any manner commit or attempt to commit any fraud preventing the impartial execution of this article and the rules and the regulations adopted hereunder, or to cheat, or attempt to cheat, or abet cheating on any examination. (d) Bribery. No person shall directly or indirectly give, render, pay, offer, solicit, or accept any money, service, or other valuable consideration for or on account of any appointment, proposed appointment, promotion, or proposed promotion to, or any advantage in a 2-11 Page 17 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-26 Rev. 1-6-10 position, or in an examination for a position, in the departments. (Code 1968, § 201.7; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 288-90, 4-2-90; Ord. No. 239-91, § 1, 2-20-91; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97) Cross reference(s)--Definitions and rules of construction generally, § 1-2. DIVISION 3. EMPLOYMENT SUBCOMMITTEEFIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYMENT Sec. 2-58. Applicability; duties. (a) In general. This division shall govern the appointment, reinstatement, promotion, demotion, layoff, suspension, resignation, or removal of members of the fire and police departments of the city, other than the chiefs thereof, except to the extent that the Maine Public Employees Labor Relations Law and any collective bargaining agreement made in accordance therewith provides to the contrary. (b) Duties. In addition to carrying out the duties described elsewhere in this article, it shall be the duty of the employment subcommitteecommission: (1) To establish a system of personnel administration for members of the departments based on competition, merit principles, and scientific methods, and to prevent unlawful discrimination based upon race or color, religion, age, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, ancestry or national origin, physical or mental disability, veteran status, genetic information, previous assertion of a claim or right under Maine’s Workers’ Compensation Act, previous actions taken protected under Maine’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act, or any other protected group status as defined by applicable law, or political affiliation; (2) To oversee the process of creating lists of names of persons eligible for specific appointments; and (3) To make suitable rules, from time to time, which rules shall not be inconsistent with this article, applicable statutes, or regulations. Proposed rules shall be submitted to the City Manager and shall become effective when approved by the City Manager. All such rules shall be recorded in the office of the City Clerk. (Code 1968, § 201.2; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, § 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Ord. No. 174-05/06, 3-6-06; Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59. Reserved. Sec. 2-59.1. Minimum qualifications for original appointment to the fire department. 2-12 Page 18 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-29 Rev. 1-6-10 (a) Standards required. Each candidate for original appointment to the fire department must meet the minimum requirements set forth in this subsection. The deadline by which these requirements must be met, the method of proving such requirements have been satisfactorily met, and any additional requirements shall be established by rule of the employment subcommitteecommission: (1) Age. Have reached the age of twenty-one (21), or have reached the age of twenty (20) with two years of post-high school education. (2) Good character. Be of good character; which includes a personal history of honesty, fairness, and respect for the rights of others and for state and federal law. No person shall be appointed who has a history which includes a disqualifying criminal offense or conviction. (3) Education and experience. Have a high school diploma or general equivalency diploma (GED); (4) Licensing. Possess a valid State of Maine Emergency Medical Technician license of EMT-B or higher; (5) Motor vehicle driver's license. Possess a valid motor vehicle driver's license for the three (3) years immediately preceding the date of application. If such license is from a state other than the State of Maine, the candidate must be qualified to receive a State of Maine driver's license; and (6) Citizenship or immigration status. Be a citizen of the United States or eligible to work in the United States. (b) Automatic disqualifiers. An applicant for original appointment will be automatically disqualified from the hiring process for any of the following characteristics, and as further established by rule of the employment subcommitteecommission: (1) Disqualified Individuals. Disqualification from participating in federal funded health care programs under the Social Security Act. (2) Criminal Convictions/Conduct. Disqualifying criminal conviction; (3) Protection Orders. An active Protection from Abuse or Protection from Harassment Order (temporary or permanent) served on the applicant; (4) Military Service. Dishonorable discharge from the military or a bad conduct discharge from the military; 2-13 Page 19 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-29 Rev. 1-6-10 (5) Tattoos or Body Art. Tattoos, branding, body art or body markings that (a) indicate a criminal gang affiliation, (b) depict sexually explicit art or nudity, (c) are associated with hate groups or supremacist groups such as swastikas, pentagrams, or (d) otherwise violate the rules promulgated by the Fire Chief. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59.2. Hiring process for original appointment to the fire department. (a) Fire department hiring process. All applicants for original appointment to the fire department shall satisfactorily complete the minimum requirements in this section. The employment subcommitteecommission may, by rule, establish processes and procedures to implement these requirements, may set minimum passing scores, and may impose additional requirements for original appointment. (1) Job-related aptitude capacity test. All applicants for original appointment must pass a job-related aptitude capacity test. (2) Physical fitness test. All applicants for original appointment must pass a physical fitness test. (3) Oral interview. All applicants for original appointment must satisfactorily complete an oral interview. The oral interview panel shall consist of one member of the employment subcommitteecommission and designees of the fire chief. No member of the panel may be a candidate for the position nor a relative of a candidate. (b) Conditional offer of employment. Upon successful completion of the job-related aptitude capacity test, the physical fitness assessment and the oral interview, the fire chief may evaluate the candidates and make a conditional offer of employment to qualified applicants, at his or hertheir discretion. The conditional employee must successfully complete the following requirements. Failure to do so will result in revocation of the conditional offer of employment. (1) Background check. All applicants for original appointment must satisfactorily complete a background check, including criminal history, driving record, and credit check. (2) Medical examination. The applicant must satisfactorily complete a medical exam to determine whether the applicant is physically capable of performing the essential functions of the job. (3) Job suitability assessment. The applicant must satisfactorily complete a job suitability assessment. 2-14 Page 20 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-30 Rev. 1-6-10 (c) Rehire of former fire department member. In the sole discretion of the fire chief, a fire department member who voluntarily terminated his or hertheir employment on satisfactory terms may be rehired to a vacant, entry-level position within one year of termination without completing the full process required by subsection (a) above. However, the member must satisfactorily complete a new medical examination and job suitability assessment, and must complete a new probationary period. (d) Transfer between public safety departments. Upon the written request of the employee to the chief of his or hertheir department, an employee in good standing within either department may be transferred from one department to the other to an entry level position, subject to the conditions and limitations established by rule of the employment subcommitteecommission and with the approval of both chiefs and the City Manager. Police officers requesting a transfer to the Fire Department must successfully complete the Candidate Physical Abilities Test (CPAT) and provide proof of a valid State of Maine Emergency Medical Technician license. The Chief of Police may waive the police entrance exam for firefighters. All other hiring requirements must be successfully completed. (e) Waiver. During periods of difficulty in recruitment, the employment subcommitteecommission may vary the requirements of this section by rule, which rule shall not be effective for more than one hiring cycle. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59.3. Disqualification and temporary withdrawal from fire application process. In accordance with rules promulgated by the employment subcommitteecommission, an applicant may be disqualified, or temporarily withdraw, from the application process as follows: (a) Disqualification. After notice and an opportunity to be heard, the employment subcommitteecommission or the fire chief may disqualify an applicant for original appointment. (b) Temporary withdrawal of applicants for original appointments. An applicant for original appointment may, for sufficient cause, temporarily withdraw from consideration for a limited period of time with the prior approval of the fire chief. During the period of temporary disqualification the applicant’s eligibility for appointment shall automatically expire 12 months after the date the applicant passed the aptitude capacity test. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59.4. Fire department promotional process. (a) Minimum qualifications. All candidates for promotion within the fire department shall satisfactorily complete the minimum requirements in this section. The employment subcommitteecommission 2-15 Page 21 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-32 Rev. 1-6-10 may, by rule, establish processes and procedures to implement these requirements, may set minimum passing scores, and may impose additional requirements for promotion. (1) Time in service. Promotional candidates must have the following amount of time in service to be eligible for a promotion: a. Six years of continuous service in the fire department for promotion from firefighter to lieutenant. b. One year of continuous service as a lieutenant for promotion from lieutenant to captain. (2) Training. Promotional candidates must possess the minimum amount of training, certification, and/or education for the rank to which he or she is seeking promotion. (3) Departmental officer candidate program. Promotional candidates must participate in and complete a fire department officer candidate program, which may include job-shadowing, mentorship, and similar requirements. (4) Assessment center exam. Promotional candidates must complete and pass an assessment center exam each year. (5) Oral interview. All promotional candidates must satisfactorily complete an oral interview. The oral interview panel shall consist of one member of the employment subcommitteecommission and designees of the fire chief. No member of the panel may be a candidate for the position nor a relative of a candidate. The president of the union, or histheir designee, shall have the right to observe, but not participate in, the interview. (6) Job suitability assessment. Candidates must undergo a job suitability assessment. Assessments within three (3) years from the date of examination may be used, or the fire chief may require an updated job suitability assessment at any time. Assessments may be taken into consideration in the promotional process. (b) Eligible promotion list. Promotional candidates shall be placed on a ranked certified promotional list. A separate list shall be made for each promotional rank. (1) The list shall be ranked based on a methodology established by the employment subcommitteecommission. (2) The employment subcommitteecommission shall also establish rules governing the validity of the list, including the minimum number of names required on the list, the duration and expiration of the list, and other requirements. 2-16 Page 22 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-32 Rev. 1-6-10 (c) Promoting from ranked certified promotional list. Promotions in the fire department shall be made from the ranked certified promotional list in their order of ranking, unless the candidate refuses the promotion, is disqualified for cause by the chief, or lacks the particular skill set required by the promotional vacancy. If the chief disqualifies a candidate for cause, he or she shall state the reasons for disqualification in writing. (d) Command staff. The employment subcommitteecommission may provide by rule for special procedures or different competitive examination for appointment to fire department command staff because such rank requires particular and exceptional qualifications of a scientific, managerial, professional, technical, or educational character and said rule may waive any requirement of this article in such cases. (e) Waiver. When the number of employees eligible for promotion to a particular vacancy is insufficient to permit meaningful competition, the employment subcommitteecommission may vary the requirements of this section by rule, which rule shall not be effective for more than one promotional cycle. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59.5. Disqualification during fire promotional process. After notice and an opportunity to be heard, the employment subcommitteecommission or the fire chief may disqualify a candidate from participating in the promotional process, or may remove a candidate for promotion from the ranked certified promotional list. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59.6. Fire department appeals and rights. (a) Appeals from decisions of the fire chief. Except as otherwise provided, an applicant, candidate for original appointment, or candidate for promotion shall have the opportunity to appeal any decision made by the fire chief under this division to the employment subcommitteecommission, pursuant to rules established by the subcommitteecommission. The subcommittee commission may, after hearing, uphold or overturn the fire chief’s decision. The subcommittee commission shall provide the fire chief and the appellant with written notice of its decision and the reasons therefor. (b) Appeals from decisions of the employment subcommitteecommission. An appeal of a decision of the employment subcommitteecommission under this section may be taken to the city council. The city council may, after hearing, uphold or overturn the employment subcommitteecommission’s decision. The council shall provide the subcommitteecommission, fire chief, and appellant with written notice of its decision and the reasons therefor. (c) Applicant rights. If a decision is overturned with respect to an applicant, the applicant shall continue through the remainder of the application process or be considered eligible for hire, as applicable. In the event an applicant is reinstated pursuant to this section, he 2-17 Page 23 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-34 Rev. 1-6-10 or she shall have no right or entitlement to be considered for any vacancy that exists at or prior to the date of said reinstatement. (d) Promotional candidate rights. If a decision is overturned with respect to a promotional candidate, that candidate shall 1) be allowed to continue through the promotional process; 2) be placed on or reinstated to the ranked certified promotional list; or 3) be promoted, as applicable. The decision maker shall specifically state the appropriate remedy. (e) Vested rights. No rights shall vest in any person who is deemed to be a qualified applicant or who is placed on the ranked certified promotional list, and no names shall be carried over from one eligible list to another, except as otherwise provided in this section. (f) Rulemaking. The employment subcommitteecommission may promulgate rules to implement this section, including forms and deadlines for appeal. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-59.7. Fire department probationary period. (a) Each member who is originally appointed to or rehired in the fire department, or who is promoted, pursuant to this division shall be a probationary employee for one (1) year from the date of appointment or promotion. This section shall not, however, apply to an employee who is recalled after layoff, so long as he or she completed the probationary period prior to layoff. (b) The fire chief may at any time during the probationary period reject any person appointed or promoted. The fire chief must state his or hertheir reasons for rejection in writing, and provide those reasons to the employee and the employment subcommitteecommission. (c) In the case of a promotional candidate, any candidate rejected by the fire chief shall revert to the rank and pay status from which he or she was promoted. (d) Any person rejected during the probationary period shall have no right of hearing or appeal under this division. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-60. Reserved. Sec. 2-60.1. Minimum qualifications for original appointment to the police department. (a) Standards required. Each candidate for original appointment to the police department must meet the minimum requirements set forth in this subsection. The deadline by which these requirements must be met, the method of proving that such requirements have been satisfactorily met, and any additional requirements shall be established by rule of the employment subcommitteecommission: 2-18 Page 24 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-38 Rev. 1-6-10 (1) Age. Have reached the age of twenty-one (21) by the date of appointment; (2) Good character. Be of good character; which includes a personal history of honesty, fairness, and respect for the rights of others and for state and federal law. No person shall be appointed who has a history which includes a disqualifying criminal offense or conviction. (3) Education and experience. Have a high school diploma or general equivalency diploma (GED) and meet the admission standards of the Maine Criminal Justice Academy. (4) Motor vehicle driver's license. Possess a valid motor vehicle driver's license for the three (3) years immediately preceding the date of application. If such license is from a state other than the State of Maine, the candidate must be qualified to receive a State of Maine driver's license. (5) Citizenship or Immigration status. Be a citizen of the United States or demonstrate a permanent right to work in the United States. (b) Automatic Disqualifiers. An applicant for original appointment will be automatically disqualified from the hiring process for any of the following characteristics, and as further established by rule of the employment subcommitteecommission: (1) Criminal Convictions/Conduct. Any conviction for a disqualifying criminal offense or engaging in conduct that qualifies as a disqualifying criminal offense as defined in Maine law and the entrance standards of the Maine Criminal Justice Academy, including having no convictions for or have engaged in any conduct which would constitute Murder, Class A, Class B, Class C, or Class D crimes, or any provision of the Maine Criminal Code, Chapters 15, 19, 25, or 45 which include Theft, Falsification in Official Matters, Bribery & Corrupt Practices, and Drugs. (2) Domestic Violence. Any conviction for a crime of domestic violence or any active Protection from Abuse Order (temporary or permanent) served on the applicant. (3) Drug Activities. The use, purchase, or possession of illegal drugs or controlled substances within the five (5) years prior to the date of application. The trafficking in and/or furnishing of marijuana, as defined in the Maine Criminal Code, is an automatic disqualifier from the hiring process. The use of marijuana is not an automatic disqualifier. The use of marijuana by an applicant will be 2-19 Page 25 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-38 Rev. 1-6-10 assessed on a case by case basis; including, but not limited to, the frequency and recency of the use. (4) Military Service. Dishonorable discharge from the military or a bad conduct discharge from the military. (5) Tattoos or Body Art. Tattoos, branding, body art or body markings that (a) indicate a criminal gang affiliation, (b) depict sexually explicit art or nudity, (c) are associated with hate groups or supremacist groups such as swastikas or pentagrams, or (d) are on the applicant’s face, neck or hands. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-60.2. Hiring process for original appointment to the police department. (a) Police department hiring process. All applicants for original appointment to the police department shall satisfactorily complete the minimum requirements in this section. The employment subcommitteecommission may, by rule, establish processes and procedures to implement these requirements, set minimum passing scores, and impose additional requirements for original appointment. (1) Job-related aptitude capacity test. All applicants for original appointment must pass a job-related aptitude capacity test. The aptitude capacity test may be waived for a police applicant who is a full-time employee with law enforcement duties and arrest authority in another jurisdiction at the time of application and is certifiable by the Maine Criminal Justice Academy. (2) Physical fitness assessment. All applicants for original appointment must pass meet the Maine Criminal Justice Academy’s physical fitness assessment standards prior to the oral interview. or Applicants may take the fitness test at the Portland Police Department or produce a current, valid letter from the Maine Criminal Justice Academy stating that the applicant has successfully completed the Academy’s physical fitness assessment. (3) Oral Board. An oral interview will be conducted with all applicants who have passed both the aptitude capacity test and the physical fitness assessment. (b) Conditional offer of employment. Upon successful completion of the job-related aptitude capacity test, the physical fitness assessment and the oral interview, the Police Chief may evaluate the candidates and make a conditional offer of employment to qualified applicants, at his or hertheir discretion. The conditional employee must successfully complete the following requirements. Failure to do so will result in revocation of the conditional offer of employment. 2-20 Page 26 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-39 Rev. 1-6-10 (1) Background check. A conditional employee must be fingerprinted and satisfactorily complete a background check, including, but not limited to, criminal history, prior substance abuse, driving record, and credit check. (2) Polygraph. A conditional employee, shall be required to submit to a polygraph examination to the extent such examination is permitted by law. (3) Medical examination. A conditional employee shall undergo a medical examination to determine whether the applicant is physically capable of meeting the standards established by the Maine Criminal Justice Academy. (4) Job suitability assessment. Candidates for police original appointment shall be given a post-offer job suitability assessment as required by the Maine Criminal Justice Academy. (b) Transfer between public safety departments. Upon the written request of the employee to the chief of his or hertheir department, an employee in good standing within either department may be transferred from one department to the other to an entry level position, subject to the conditions and limitations established by rule of the employment subcommitteecommission and with the approval of both chiefs and the City Manager. Police officers requesting a transfer to the Fire Department must successfully complete the Candidate Physical Abilities Test (CPAT) and provide proof of a valid State of Maine Emergency Medical Technician license. The Chief of Police may waive the police entrance exam for firefighters. All other hiring requirements must be successfully completed. Sec. 2-60.3. Disqualification and temporary withdrawal from police application process. In accordance with rules promulgated by the employment subcommitteecommission, an applicant may be disqualified, or temporarily withdraw, from the application process as follows: (a) Disqualification. After notice and an opportunity to be heard, the employment subcommitteecommission or the police chief may disqualify an applicant for original appointment. (b) Temporary withdrawal of applicants for original appointments. An applicant for original appointment may, for sufficient cause, temporarily withdraw from consideration for a limited period of time with the prior approval of the police chief. During the period of temporary disqualification the applicant’s eligibility for appointment shall automatically expire 12 months after the date the applicant passed the aptitude capacity test. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) 2-21 Page 27 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-40 Rev. 1-6-10 Sec. 2-60.4. Police department promotional process. (a) Minimum qualifications. All candidates for promotion within the police department shall satisfactorily complete the minimum requirements in this section. Promotional appointments shall be made from successive ranks. The employment subcommitteecommission may, by rule, establish processes and procedures to implement these requirements, may set minimum passing scores, and may impose additional requirements for promotion. (1) Time in service. Promotional candidates must have the following amount of time in service to be eligible for a promotion: a. Three (3) years of continuous service in the police department for promotion from officer to the rank of Sergeant. b. Twelve months of continuous service as a Sergeant in the police department for promotion to the rank of Lieutenant. (2) Selection Components a. An annual professional development course. b. A job-related aptitude capacity test. c. Consideration of the candidate's last completed performance evaluation immediately prior to the date of the aptitude capacity test. d. Seniority in the department as of the date of the aptitude capacity test. (3) Oral interview. All promotional candidates must satisfactorily complete an oral interview. The oral interview panel shall consist of one member of the employment subcommitteecommission, a member designated by the president of each of the affected unions and three (3) members appointed by the police chief. (4) Job suitability assessment. Candidates for the position of Sergeant must undergo a job suitability assessment. Assessments within three (3) years from the date of examination may be used, or the police chief may require an updated job suitability assessment at any time. Assessments may be taken into consideration in the promotional process. (b) Promotion list. Promotional candidates shall be placed on a certified promotional list. A separate list shall be made for each promotional rank. 2-22 Page 28 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-40 Rev. 1-6-10 (1) The list shall be prepared based on a methodology established by the employment subcommitteecommission. (2) The employment subcommitteecommission shall also establish rules governing the validity of the list, including the minimum number of names required on the list, the duration and expiration of the list, and other requirements. (c) Creation of certified list for promotional appointment. (1) When requested to do so by the Chief, the employment subcommitteecommission shall furnish a certified list of names from which a promotional appointment may be made. (2) There shall be one eligible list maintained for police promotion in weighted score order for each promotional rank and the certified list shall be made up from the eligible list in the weighted score order. The certified list for promotional appointment shall contain the names of a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) applicants on the eligible list with the highest, aggregate scores. (d) Command staff. The employment subcommitteecommission may provide by rule for special procedures or different competitive examination for appointment to a sworn, non-union command staff position in the police department because such rank requires particular and exceptional qualifications of a scientific, managerial, professional, technical, or educational character and said rule may waive any requirement of this article in such cases. (e) When the number of employees eligible for promotion to a particular vacancy is insufficient to permit meaningful competition, the employment subcommitteecommission may vary the requirements of this section by rule, which rule shall not be effective for more than one promotional cycle. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018 Sec. 2-60.5. Disqualification during police promotional process. After notice and an opportunity to be heard, the employment subcommitteecommission or the police chief may disqualify a candidate from participating in the promotional process, or may remove a candidate for promotion from the ranked certified promotional list. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-60.6. Police appeals and rights. (a) Appeals from decisions of the police chief. Except as otherwise provided, an applicant, candidate for original appointment, or candidate for promotion shall have the opportunity to appeal any decision made by the police chief under this division to the employment subcommitteecommission, pursuant to rules established by the subcommitteecommission. The subcommittee commission may, after hearing, uphold or overturn the police chief’s decision. The commissionsubcommittee shall provide the police chief and the 2-23 Page 29 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-42 Rev. 1-6-10 appellant with written notice of its decision and the reasons therefor. (b) Appeals from decisions of the employment subcommitteecommission. An appeal of a decision of the employment subcommitteecommission under this section may be taken to the city council. The city council may, after hearing, uphold or overturn the employment subcommitteecommission’s decision. The council shall provide the subcommitteecommission, police chief, and appellant with written notice of its decision and the reasons therefor. (c) Applicant rights. If a decision is overturned with respect to an applicant, the applicant shall continue through the remainder of the application process or be considered eligible for hire, as applicable. In the event an applicant is reinstated pursuant to this section, he or she shall have no right or entitlement to be considered for any vacancy that exists at or prior to the date of said reinstatement. (d) Promotional candidate rights. If a decision is overturned with respect to a promotional candidate, that candidate shall 1) be allowed to continue through the promotional process; 2) be placed on or reinstated to the ranked certified promotional list; or 3) be promoted, as applicable. The decision maker shall specifically state the appropriate remedy. (e) Vested rights. No rights shall vest in any person who is deemed to be a qualified applicant or who is placed on the ranked certified promotional list, and no names shall be carried over from one eligible list to another, except as otherwise provided in this section. (f) Rulemaking. The employment subcommitteecommission may promulgate rules to implement this section, including forms and deadlines for appeal. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-60.7. Police department probationary period. (a) Probationary period. A specified period of time during which the employee has no expectation of continued employment and may be removed from employment for any reason, with or without just cause. (b) Original appointment. Except as otherwise provided below for police lateral transfers, every person receiving an appointment as a police officer shall be a probationary employee for a period of two (2) years from the date of appointment. (c) Lateral transfers. A police lateral transfer who has two years of post-academy, full-time, continuous service as a police officer at the time of appointment shall be credited with up to twelve (12) months of service toward completion of the department’s two year probationary period. Eligibility for promotional appointment shall be the completion of three (3) years of service in the Portland Police 2-24 Page 30 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-43 Rev. 1-6-10 department. (d) Promotional appointments. Every person receiving a promotional appointment shall serve a probationary period of one (1) year while occupying the position to which he or she has been appointed. (e) Completion of probationary period. The police chief may at any time during the probationary period reject any person appointed or promoted to a position in the police department. The police chief must state his or hertheir reasons for rejection in writing, and provide those reasons to the employee and the employment subcommitteecommission. In the case of a promotional appointment, the officer shall revert to the rank and pay status from which he or she was promoted. (f) No hearing or appeal. Any person rejected during the probationary period shall have no right of hearing or appeal under this section. (Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-61. Reserved. Sec. 2-62. Reserved. Sec. 2-63. Reserved. Sec. 2-64. Reserved. Sec. 2-65. Reserved Sec. 2-66. Physical standards and background investigation for original appointment; Job suitability assessment for promotion, for police lateral transfer and for police original appointment. (a) Physical standards for original appointment. (1) Medical examination. All candidates on the eligible list for original appointment shall undergo a medical examination by a physician specified by the employment subcommitteecommission, said medical examination to be done only after a conditional offer of employment has been made to the candidate. The examining physician shall report his or hertheir findings in writing to the subcommittee commission with respect to whether the candidate is physically capable of meeting the standards established by rule of the subcommitteecommission. If the physician's report indicates a disqualification which can be corrected, the candidate's name shall be returned to the eligible list except that such person shall not be again considered for appointment until such time as he or she furnishes satisfactory evidence that the disqualifying condition has been corrected. If the physician's report indicates a disqualification which cannot be corrected and which prevents the candidate from performing an essential function of the position with or without reasonable accommodation, the candidate's name shall be permanently 2-25 Page 31 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-49 Rev. 1-6-10 removed from the eligible list pursuant to section 2-61 above. (2) Physical fitness standards. In addition to the medical examination, the employment subcommitteecommission shall establish by rule minimum standards and procedures for a physical fitness assessment of candidates for original appointment, which standards shall be determined by the subcommittee commission to be a bona fide occupational qualification or failure to meet them poses a safety hazard or cannot be reasonably accommodated in an individual case. Such physical fitness assessment shall be administered to each candidate by the department as provided in section 2- 65(a)(3) above, and the result thereof shall be provided to the chief. (b) Background investigation for original appointment. (1) Fingerprinting. Candidates for original appointment to either department shall be directed to the police department where they shall be fingerprinted. All candidates shall execute any necessary waivers for the background check. The fingerprints and records of each candidate shall be checked against the local police files, state police files and, if available, the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in order to determine whether the candidate has been convicted of a disqualifying criminal offense. (2) Polygraph. Candidates for original appointment to the police department shall be required to submit to a polygraph examination to the extent such examination is permitted by law. (c) Job suitability assessment for promotional appointments, for police lateral transfers and for police original appointments. (1) All candidates whose names appear on any certified list for promotional appointment may be required to be examined by a psychologist for job suitability, the results of which examination shall be used by the chief of the department and by the city manager. Examinations hereunder for promotional appointment shall be required every year, except that the chief may waive said requirement if such examination has been done within three years of the date of the candidate’s appearance on a certified list, and the results are available for use by the chief and the city manager. The extent of said examination shall be determined by a psychologist on an individual basis and may be either pre-offer or post-offer, depending upon the content of the assessment, the psychologist’s representation as to the purpose of the assessment and the department’s preference. 2-26 Page 32 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-49 Rev. 1-6-10 To the extent permitted by law, the chief of either department may request that candidates on an eligible list undergo the job suitability examinations prior to drawing up a certified list if (1) doing so would overcome scheduling difficulties for a candidate and the candidate agrees to such scheduling and (2) doing so is necessary to ensure a timely appointment process. Nothing herein shall change a candidate’s position on the eligible list or give him or her any vested rights therein. (2) Candidates for police lateral transfer shall be given a post-offer job suitability assessment. (3) Candidates for police original appointment shall be given a post-offer job suitability assessment as required by the Maine Criminal Justice Academy. (d) Failure to pass polygraph test or job suitability assessment for police original appointment or job suitability assessment for police lateral transfer or job suitability assessment for police or fire promotional appointment. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any candidate for police original appointment who fails to pass a polygraph test as required hereunder, or, in the case of a police original appointment, police lateral transfer or police or fire promotional appointment, who fails to meet the job suitability assessment pursuant to this section, shall be removed from any list on which the candidate appears pursuant to section 2-61 above, and shall not be eligible to retake the written test until two years from the date the eligible list from which the candidate was removed was made. (e) Failure to appear or complete hiring requirements. Any candidate who fails to appear for, or to complete, any component of the examination process, or any other requirement of the hiring procedure, shall be disqualified as a candidate and removed from any list on which he or she may appear. Such disqualification shall be reported to the employment subcommitteecommission by the Director. Upon request of the candidate, the employment subcommitteecommission may, in its discretion, waive the disqualification herein if: (i) the subcommittee commission finds that the candidate had sufficient excuse for such failure; and (ii) it finds that any rescheduling necessitated by such failure can be accomplished in a timely manner and with no disruption of the hiring process. Any candidate disqualified hereunder may reapply for any succeeding examination. (f). Temporary withdrawal of applicants for original appointments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a candidate for original appointment may, for sufficient cause, temporarily withdraw from consideration for a limited period of time upon the prior approval of the chief of the department. Any denial of a request for temporary withdrawal by the chief may be appealed to the subcommittee commission which may grant the request if (i) the subcommittee commission finds that the candidate had sufficient cause for such request; and (ii) it 2-27 Page 33 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-49 Rev. 1-6-10 finds that any rescheduling necessitated by request can be accomplished in a timely manner with no disruption of the hiring process. A candidate who is permitted to withdraw temporarily shall retain his or hertheir place on the eligible list but shall not be considered for hire, or in the case of promotional appointment, shall not be placed on any certified list requested during the period of temporary disqualification. “Sufficient excuse” or “sufficient cause” as used herein shall include, but not be limited to, death or serious illness of a family member; temporary illness or disability of the candidate; completion of an academic or training program, or similar excuse and cause. (g) Duration of certified list. The certified list shall be limited to the vacancy or vacancies for which it was requested. The names of persons not appointed shall be returned to the eligible list from which they were drawn. Each candidate for promotion who is not appointed shall be given, upon request, a statement by the chief of the department as to the reason or reasons why he or she was not recommended for appointment; or if he or she was recommended, a statement from the City Manager as to why he or she was not appointed. (Code 1968, § 201.12; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 288-90, 4-2-90; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97 Ord. No. 220-99, § 4, 3-1-99; Ord. No. 121-99, 12-20-99; Ord. No. 174-05/06, 3-6-06; Ord. No. 298-05/06, 6-19-06 emergency passage; Ord. No. 126-09/10, 1-4-10) Sec. 2-67. Working test period. (a) Except as otherwise provided below for police lateral transfers or as otherwise provided for re-hires under subsection 2- 59(e), every person receiving any appointment or transferring pursuant to section 2-59 above shall be tested for a working test period of one (1) year while occupying the position to which he or she has been appointed or transferred, except that the working test period for original appointees or transferees to the police department shall be two (2) years. The period of the working test shall begin immediately upon appointment or transfer. The City Manager may at any time during the working test period reject for reasons stated in writing any person appointed to a position in either department. The City Manager shall forthwith report to the employment subcommitteecommission in writing each rejection during such working test period, stating the date of the rejection and the reason for the rejection. (b) Any person rejected during the working test period shall have no right of hearing, or appeal under this article, and in the case of a promotional appointment, shall revert to the rank and pay status from which he or she was promoted. No original appointment shall be effective beyond the end of the working test period unless, within ten (10) days preceding the end of the working test period, the City Manager shall report to the employment subcommitteecommission in writing that in the opinion of the City Manager, the employee's work has been such as to indicate that he the employee is willing and able to perform theirhis duties in a satisfactory manner. Upon delivery of a 2-28 Page 34 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-50 Rev. 1-6-10 favorable report from the City Manager, the appointment shall become permanent. (c) A police lateral transfer who has prior service as a police officer at the time of appointment shall be credited with up to twelve (12) months of service toward completion of the department’s two year working test period, provided, however, that eligibility for promotional appointment shall continue to be completion of three (3) years in the Portland police department. (Code 1968, § 201.13; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Ord. No. 174-05/06, 3-6-06; Ord. No. 126- 09/10, 1-4-10) Sec. 2-68. Disciplinary action. (a) Action by chief of department. Unless otherwise governed by a collective bargaining agreement, the chief of the department may, for cause: (1) Suspend without pay any member for one (1) offense for a period of not more than fifteen (15) working days, resulting in the loss of not more than three (3) weeks' pay; (2) Issue a written reprimand to be included in the member's personnel file. Suspensions without pay shall not be for more than thirty (30) working days in aggregate in a calendar year. Upon imposition of any discipline, the chief shall immediately file with the employment subcommitteecommission a written statement of the disciplinary action taken and the reason therefor. A copy of the statement shall be delivered to the department member in person or by mail at the member's last and usual place of abode. Actions of the chief taken within this subsection shall be final and there shall be no appeal therefrom under this article. (b) Action by subcommitteecommission. The employment subcommitteecommission shall have the power and authority to demote, suspend with or without pay, and remove members of the police department and the fire department for cause and after presentation of charges and hearing. The subcommittee commission shall have the right to reinstate any such demoted, suspended or removed member of the police department or fire department after a hearing upon recommendation of the chief of the department to which the applicant seeks reinstatement, provided the City Manager joins in such recommendation for reinstatement. (c) Action by chief pending hearing. Pending a hearing before the employment subcommitteecommission, the chief of the department or the City Manager may, for the cause to be presented to the subcommitteecommission, suspend any member, without pay, until the next succeeding meeting of the subcommitteecommission; provided, however, 2-29 Page 35 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-51 Rev. 1-6-10 that no suspension without pay pending a hearing by the subcommittee commission shall be effective for more than fifteen (15) days; no suspension without pay shall be effective unless it is either preceded by a filing of charges with the subcommittee commission or such charges are filed within ten (10) days thereafter, Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays excepted; and if the subcommittee commission determines that no disciplinary action is warranted, it shall provide that any salary which should have been paid during such period of suspension shall be paid to the member. A member may elect to waive a hearing before the employment subcommitteecommission and accept disciplinary action determined by the chief of the department. Said waiver shall be made in writing prior to the implementation of the discipline. Prior to waiving a subcommittee commission hearing, the member shall be provided with written notice of the charges against him or her, a brief statement of the evidence against him or her, and an opportunity for a hearing before the chief. Said hearing shall be informal in nature and shall not be an adversarial hearing, but the member may have counsel and/or a union representative present. The member shall have the right to confer with said counsel and/or representative during the hearing and to have them speak on his or hertheir behalf. The hearing before the chief may be tape recorded upon the request of either party. (d) Notice; opportunity to respond. Prior to suspending any member without pay under subsection (c) above, the chief of the department shall provide the member with notice of the substance of the charges against him or her, a statement of the evidence, and an opportunity to respond to said charges and evidence. (e) Hearings without formal charges. Whether or not charges are filed with the subcommitteecommission, the subcommittee commission shall within thirty (30) calendar days schedule a hearing to determine whether disciplinary action should be taken against any member where: (1) The member fails or refuses to testify before the subcommittee commission at any disciplinary hearing; or (2) The member becomes the defendant in a pending criminal proceeding, the conviction in which proceeding would be a disqualifying criminal conviction. Either party may request a continuance of such hearing, which may be granted by the subcommittee commission upon such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate. If the continuance is requested by a city official, the member shall receive theirhis regular pay for the duration of the continuance. However, if a suspended member requests a continuance of the hearing, the member will not be paid for the duration of the continuance period requested by himthe suspended member. (f) No deferral of action. Disciplinary action by the 2-30 Page 36 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-51 Rev. 1-6-10 subcommittee commission for the same conduct which is the subject matter of a pending criminal proceeding shall not be deferred unless the subcommittee commission shall order such deferment at the request of the member charged, in which case the subcommittee commission may impose reasonable conditions, including but not necessarily limited to, a continuing suspension without pay. (g) Result of collateral criminal proceeding. The acquittal of the member on criminal or civil charges involving material allegations which are substantially similar to the material allegations made in the disciplinary proceeding shall not require abatement of a disciplinary proceeding by the Subcommitteecommission. A final judgment of conviction of a crime which is a disqualifying criminal offense shall operate as a disqualification from office, and, upon proof of such conviction to the subcommitteecommission, such member shall be removed. (h) Procedure at disciplinary hearings. All hearings of the subcommittee commission shall be deemed to be civil in nature and shall be informal in conduct. Such hearings shall be governed by this article and by any rules of practice and procedure adopted by the subcommitteecommission. In the conduct of such hearings, the subcommittee commission shall not be bound to the technical rules of evidence. No informality in any proceeding or hearing or in the manner of taking testimony before the subcommittee commission shall invalidate any decision of the subcommitteecommission. Disciplinary action shall be taken only upon a preponderance of the evidence. (i) Decision. After hearing, the subcommittee commission shall make written findings of fact with respect to any specific allegations and shall determine whether such facts constitute cause for disciplinary action, and if the subcommittee commission determines that cause for disciplinary action exists, the nature of the disciplinary action to be taken. Such decision may be appealed as provided by law. (j) Expenses. The subcommittee commission may, if it determines that charges made were without substantial justification, recommend to the City Council the payment of reasonable counsel and witness fees incurred by any member in the defense of such unjustified charges. (Code 1968, § 201.14; Ord. No. 89-80, 7-7-80; Ord. No. 299-86, 1-22-86; Ord. No. 288-90, 4-2-90; Ord. No. 117-95, 11-20-95; Ord. No. 184-97, 1-22-97; Ord. No. 174- 05/06, 3-6-06) Sec. 2-69. Reserved. Sec. 2-70. Reserved. Sec. 2-71. Reserved. Sec. 2-72. Reserved. Sec. 2-73. Reserved. Sec. 2-74. Reserved. Sec. 2-75. Reserved. 2-31 Page 37 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-59 Rev. 6-17-10 DIVISION 4. POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE Sec. 2-76. Functions and duties. (a) Duties. The duties of the police citizen review subcommittee are as follows: (1) To determine whether police investigations into citizens’ complaints by members of the public against police officers are thorough, objective, fair and timely by auditing the police department’s internal affairs’ unit investigative methods and procedures; (2) To report in writing to the City Manager periodically, but no less than annually beginning in January 2003, as follows: a. on the subcommittee’s determination as to the thoroughness, objectivity, fairness and timeliness of the police internal affairs’ investigation of citizen complaints against police officers; and b. any recommendations and/or proposals for improvements or modifications in the police internal affairs investigative process, policies or training, and for enhancing public confidence in the methods and process of investigation of citizen complaints against police officers. (3) To hold a public hearing at least annually to receive comments upon the police citizen complaint process. (4) Although it shall have access to individual internal affairs reports in order to review investigative methods and procedures, all reports of the subcommittee shall be done in such a manner that particular complainants, witnesses and officers are not personally identifiable. (5) Reports of the subcommittee shall be made available to the public to the extent consistent with the State Freedom of Access Act, 1 M.R.S.A. Sec. 401 et.seq. (6) To make suitable procedural rules, from time to time, for the conduct of its duties. Proposed rules shall be submitted to the City Council and shall become effective only when approved by the City Council. All such rules shall be recorded in the office of the City Clerk. (b) Complaints to be reviewed: The subcommittee shall review all completed internal affairs investigations of citizen complaints. (c) Timing of review. All subcommittee reviews of citizen complaints shall take place only after final disciplinary action has been taken and all appeals exhausted or the case has been finally 2-32 Page 38 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 closed with no disciplinary action taken. (d) Notification of review. The subcommittee shall notify the citizen complainant, in writing, of the subcommittee’s review and any findings made by the subcommittee regarding the thoroughness, objectivity, fairness and timeliness of the internal affairs investigation. (e) Scope of authority. The subcommittee shall conduct its duties solely to determine the thoroughness, objectivity, fairness and timeliness of the police department’s internal affairs’ methods and procedures in regard to citizen complaints against police officers, and the subcommittee shall have no power or authority to subpoena or call witnesses nor to impose or modify any disciplinary action, or lack of action, against any police officer. The subcommittee shall make no recommendations nor offer any findings or comments relative to any disciplinary action, or lack of action, against any officer. (f) Training. Prior to assuming their duties hereunder, subcommittee commissioners shall attend training by city staff as to the subcommittee’s duties and responsibilities, applicable state and local law and regulations, issues relevant to the conduct of the citizen review function, accepted police practices and the department’s internal affairs investigation process. Such training shall be provided by the city at no cost to the subcommittee members. (g) Resources. To facilitate the effectiveness and objectivity of the police citizen review subcommittee, the city shall make available to the subcommittee the services of a technical advisor, as needed by the subcommittee. The technical advisor may be used for the purposes of training; briefing the subcommittee on accepted police practices, applicable law and issues relevant to the discharge of the citizen review function; and educating the subcommittee on aspects of the internal investigation process. The advisor shall be retained by the City Manager after consultation with the Chief of Police, representatives of the police unions and the subcommittee chairperson. Any person who presently maintains any business or professional affiliation with the police department shall be disqualified from serving as technical advisor. The city shall further make available all internal affairs investigation reports and police documents relevant to such investigations which are necessary for the subcommittee to conduct its duties hereunder. In no case shall the subcommittee have access to police officers’ personnel records except to the extent that they are part of an internal affairs investigation report or are considered a public document under the state Freedom of Access law. (Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5-01; Ord. No. 143-17/18, 2-5-2018) Sec. 2-77. Confidentiality. Each member of the civil service commission is obligated to maintain the confidentiality of all information and documents either 2-33 Page 39 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 provided to or reviewed by them, in accordance with state law. Failure to maintain such confidentiality will be cause for removal from the commission. All reports and requests for disclosure of any information shall be referred to the corporation counsel for review prior to release. (Substitute Ord. No. 83-01/02, § 3, 11-5-01) Sec. 2-78 thru 2-90. Reserved. ARTICLE IV-A. CIVILIAN POLICE REVIEW BOARD Sec. 2-76. Created. Pursuant to Article IX of the Charter, there is hereby created a civilian police review board, the purpose of which is to increase public trust and confidence in the Portland Police Department. Sec. 2-77. Composition. The civilian police review board shall consist of ten (10) board members. Seven (7) of the board members shall be voting members, and three (3) of the board members shall be non-voting members. Sec. 2-78. Qualifications. (a) Qualifications of commissioners. Every board member shall be at least 18 years of age and a resident of the City of Portland for at least three (3) months prior to the start of their term. The following persons are not eligible to be members on the board: (1) Any present or former employee of the city or school department, who was employed by the city or school department in the previous five-year period; (2) Any present or former member of the City Council or School Board, who held that position in the previous five-year period; or (3) Any individual presently serving as a commissioner or alternate on the civil service employment commission; (4) In order to ensure an objective and unbiased audit of the police department’s internal affairs investigation process, any applicant for service on the civilian police review board shall be disqualified from serving on said board if: a. any member of the applicant’s immediate family is or has been a Portland police officer in the previous ten (10) years; b. the applicant or any member of their immediate family has been arrested by any member of the Portland police 2-34 Page 40 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-64 Rev. 1-6-10 department within the previous ten (10) years, or has had the final disposition of any criminal proceedings resulting from such an arrest within the previous ten (10) years, whichever is longer; c. the applicant or any member of their immediate family has filed a complaint with the internal affairs unit of the Portland police department within the previous ten (10) years; d. the applicant or any member of their immediate family has brought suit against the City of Portland, the Chief of Police, the police department or any individual police officer for a cause of action arising out of an officer’s performance of their duties within the last ten (10) years or has had such a suit finally disposed of within the previous ten (10) years, whichever is longer; and e. “Immediate family” as used herein shall mean and include spouse, domestic partner, children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, and siblings. (c) Failure to disclose any grounds for disqualification or falsification of any information in the application process shall disqualify the person from service on the board and shall constitute “cause” within the meaning of section 2-82. (d) Any board member who becomes ineligible to serve during their term shall resign, and failure to do so shall constitute "cause" within the meaning of section 2-82. (e) Reasonable efforts shall be made to ensure that the appointments to the civilian police review board are diverse and representative of the community. Sec. 2-79. Appointment. (a) Subject to the provisions of section 2-80, members of the civilian police review board shall be appointed as follows: (1) Six (6) voting members appointed by the City Council; (2) One (1) voting member appointed by the Mayor; and (3) Three (3) non-voting members appointed by the City Council. (b) Such power of appointment shall be exercised only after the City Clerk has published a notice announcing such position or positions, describing the responsibilities thereof, and soliciting applications by qualified persons in a newspaper of general circulation within the city not less than fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of 2-35 Page 41 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-64 Rev. 1-6-10 action by the city council. Applications may be solicited whether or not there is a vacancy, and such applicants may be considered for any vacancy that occurs within one hundred eighty (180) days of the closing date for such applications. Nothing herein shall limit the city's authority to solicit applications whenever the City Manager deems that it is necessary. Sec. 2-80. Terms. (a) Term. Each board member shall be appointed to a three-year term except as set forth in subsection (c) or unless appointed to fill a vacancy. A board member shall serve until their successor is appointed and qualified, but in no case longer than one hundred twenty (120) days from the expiration of their term. (b) Limitation on service. No person shall be appointed to, nor serve, more than three (3) consecutive full terms or nine (9) consecutive years, whichever is greater, on the board. (c) Initial Civilian Police Review Board. For the first civilian police review board appointed following its creation, the city council and mayor shall first select from the current members of the police citizen review subcommittee in making appointments to the board. Additional vacancies shall be filled in accordance with the process outlined in Section 2-79. On the first board, two (2) voting members appointed by the City Council shall serve for a one (1) year term, two (2) voting members appointed by the City Council shall serve for a two (2) year term; two (2) voting member appointed by the City Council shall serve for a three (3) year term; the one (1) voting member appointed by the mayor shall serve for a three (3) year term; one (1) non-voting member appointed by the City Council shall serve for a one (1) year term; one (1) non-voting member appointed by the City Council shall serve for a two (2) year term; and one (1) non-voting member appointed by the City Council shall serve for a three (3) year term. Sec. 2-81. Compensation. Civilian police review board members shall serve without compensation, except that reasonable expenses incurred by any member incidental to their duties under this article may be reimbursed upon prior approval of the city manager. Sec. 2-82. Removal. Any civilian police review board member may be removed from office by the city council for cause, after notice and the opportunity to be heard. "Cause" shall include any act or omission which constitutes legal cause, and includes but is not limited to: incompetent or inefficient performance of duty; unexcused absences from board meetings; violation of any provision of this article or the rules adopted thereunder, whether such violation may result in a forfeiture 2-36 Page 42 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 of office hereunder, or not; the commission or conviction for any disqualifying criminal offense, or any action by the board member intended to affect or influence, or which could reasonably be expected to affect or influence any decision of the city manager, the chief of police, or the city council with respect to the department, or of any member of the police department with respect to the performance of their duty. Sec. 2-83. Officers. The board shall annually elect one (1) of its members as the chair and one (1) of its members as the vice chair, to serve in the absence of the chair. Whenever possible, non-voting members of the board shall serve as the chair and vice chair. A member may not serve as chair for more than three (3) consecutive years. The City Manager’s designee shall serve as secretary to the civilian police review board and shall furnish any necessary administrative assistance to the board. Sec. 2-84. Meetings. (a) Calling of meetings. Meetings or hearings of the board may be called at any time by its Chair, or in the absence from the city or disability of the Chair, by any member of the board. The Chair shall call a meeting upon request from any board member. (b) Quorum. A quorum of the Civilian Police Review Board shall be a majority of the total number of voting members presently appointed to the board. The board shall act by a majority of voting members present and voting. Sec. 2-85. Functions and duties. (a) Duties. The duties of the civilian police review board are as follows: (1) To receive complaints of police misconduct by civilians and police as follows: a. Complaints received by the board, whether from civilians or police officers, shall be referred within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt to the police internal affairs department for investigation. When receiving complaints, the Board shall follow the police department’s standard operating procedures regarding interviewing the complainant and documentation requirements. b. To the extent that the police department receives a civilian complaint directly or through means other than referral by the board, the police department will provide the community liaison with a copy of the complaint within five (5) calendar days. 2-37 Page 43 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 c. The board will not accept any complaints from police officers or their representatives regarding disciplinary actions or personnel matters. d. For purposes of this Article, complaint shall have the same definition as outlined in the police department’s standard operating procedure. (2) To review all final investigation reports submitted by internal affairs and/or police command staff for due process issues, including but not limited to, issues of fairness, thoroughness, objectivity, and timeliness, for both the complainant(s)/civilian(s) involved in the matter and the officer(s); (3) To maintain the confidentiality of all information and documents provided to and/or reviewed by the board in accordance with state law; (4) To hold a public hearing at least annually to receive comments upon the complaint process and to engage the City residents as to the board’s purposes and goals. (5) To provide a written annual report to the Mayor, City Council, City Manager, and Chief of Police that includes, but is not limited to, the following: a. the board’s policy and funding recommendations concerning the police internal affairs process, police policies, practices and procedures, and the board’s functions and duties; and b. the number of complaints submitted to the board and the number of complaints resolved during the previous year. (6) To ensure that all reports of the board shall be prepared in such a manner that particular complainants, witnesses, and officers are not personally identifiable. (7) To ensure that its reports are made available to the public but only to the extent permitted by the State Freedom of Access Act, 1 M.R.S.A. Sec. 401 et. seq. and other applicable law. (8) To propose, from time to time, suitable rules governing the board’s administrative procedures and board member roles. Such proposed rules will become effective only when approved by the city council. (9) To request additional funding from the city manager as part of the city’s annual budget process and at such other times as it deems necessary, though nothing in this Article shall require the city manager or the city council to provide any 2-38 Page 44 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 particular amount of funding. (b) Timing of review. All board reviews of internal affairs investigations shall take place only after final disciplinary action has been taken and all appeals exhausted or settled or the case has been finally closed with no disciplinary action taken. The police department shall submit its report on the conclusions of any internal affairs investigation no more than fourteen (14) calendar days after the findings become final and after final disciplinary action has been taken and all appeals exhausted or settled or the case has been finally closed with no disciplinary action. (c) Notification of review. The board shall notify the complainant, in writing, of the board’s review and any findings made by the board regarding due process in the internal affairs investigation, including but not limited to, issues of fairness, thoroughness, objectivity and timeliness. (d) Scope of authority. The board shall have no power or authority to subpoena or call witnesses or to impose or modify any disciplinary action, or lack of action, against any police officer. The board shall make no recommendations or offer any findings or comments relative to any disciplinary action, or lack of action, against any officer. (e) Training. Prior to assuming their duties hereunder, board members shall attend training by city staff as to the board’s duties and responsibilities, applicable state and local law, ordinances, and rules and regulations, accepted police practices, the department’s internal affairs investigation process, including the rights of officers being investigated, and proper techniques for receiving internal affairs complaints, including the process utilized by the police department. Such training shall be provided by the city at no cost to the board members. (f) Resources. To facilitate the effectiveness and objectivity of the civilian police review board, the city shall make available to the board the services of a technical advisor, as needed by the board. The technical advisor may be used for the purposes of training; briefing the board on accepted police practices, applicable law and issues relevant to the discharge of the citizen review function; and educating the board on aspects of the internal investigation process. The technical advisor shall be retained by the city manager after consultation with the chief of police, representatives of the police unions and the chair of the board. Any person who presently maintains any business or professional affiliation with the police department shall be disqualified from serving as technical advisor. The City Manager shall designate a staff member to serve as the civilian police review board’s Community Liaison. The Community Liaison shall ensure that the public is aware of the methods for filing complaints, and shall assist the board with carrying out its duties, conducting outreach, and other duties as assigned by action of the 2-39 Page 45 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 board. The Police Department shall designate a staff member to serve as the civilian police review board’s Police Liaison. The Police Liaison shall be familiar with the police department’s standard operating procedures and shall assist the board with questions concerning the department’s standard operating procedures. The city shall further make available all internal affairs investigation reports and police documents relevant to such investigations which are necessary for the board to conduct its duties hereunder. In no case shall the board have access to police officers’ personnel records except to the extent that they are part of an internal affairs investigation report or are considered a public document under the state Freedom of Access law. Sec. 2-86. Confidentiality. Each member of the civilian police review board is obligated to maintain the confidentiality of all information and documents either provided to or reviewed by them, in accordance with state law. Failure to maintain such confidentiality will be cause for removal from the board. All reports and requests for disclosure of any information shall be referred to corporation counsel for review prior to release. Sec. 2-87. Appeals. (a) An individual aggrieved by the report on a complaint issued by the civilian police review board may submit a notice of appeal of the board’s due process determinations to the city council. Any such appeal must be in writing addressed to the mayor, must state the basis for the appeal, and must be filed with the mayor on or before the day that is thirty (30) days after the date of the board’s report. (b) Within sixty (60) days after receipt of a notice of appeal, the city council shall hold a hearing during which it shall review the board’s report, the internal affairs investigation materials, and the notice of appeal. After such hearing, the city council will provide an advisory opinion regarding due process issues of the internal affairs investigation, including, but not limited to, issues of fairness, thoroughness, objectivity, and timeliness, for both the complainant/civilian involved in the matter and the officer. The city council’s review shall be de novo and will occur in executive session where required by state law. The council’s advisory opinion will not be legally binding on the city, the police department, police officers, or individuals. The city council will have no power or authority to subpoena or call witnesses nor to impose or modify any disciplinary action, or lack of action, against any police officer. The city council’s hearing will not address, and its advisory opinion will make no recommendations nor offer any findings or comments relative to any disciplinary action, or lack of action, against any officer or any other personnel matter. The city council’s advisory opinion on any appeal will be final and not appealable. 2-40 Page 46 City of Portland Administration Code of Ordinances Chapter 2 Sec. 2-76 Rev. 2-5-2018 (c) All such appeals to the City Council are subject to the same confidentiality requirements that are applicable to members of the police civilian review board. All reports or decisions of such appeals and requests for disclosure of any information related to an appeal shall be referred to corporation counsel for review prior to release. Sec. 2-88. Reserved. Sec. 2-89. Reserved. Sec. 2-90. Reserved. 2-41 Page 47  June 30, 2025 City Councilors & Mayor Dion, We, the Portland Citizen Review Subcommittee (PCRS), have some feedback regarding the draft ordinance to establish a new Civilian Police Review Board (CPRB). As you know, the purpose of that Charter amendment, passed by voters in November 2022, is to replace the PCRS with a more robust oversight body.1 In their final report, the Charter Commission wrote that “citizen oversight should be in the Charter to elevate the status of the existing board in order to mitigate the potential for harm and to build broader public trust between civilians and police.”2 We are pleased by some of the aspects of the new draft ordinance, and also have some significant concerns that we want to bring to your attention: (1)We believe the development of this ordinance should follow your standard process, and be sent to committee for discussion with all stakeholders. Though we are approaching three years since the Charter Amendment was passed by voters, we believe that the City Council should follow its normal legislative process and send this ordinance to committee. To date, there have been no City Council public hearings regarding this new ordinance, no stakeholders have been formally engaged, and no experts have been consulted. We believe that skipping this critical step will result in a weaker ordinance that has less buy-in from stakeholders and the public. Full-Council workshops are limited in what they can accomplish: they usually top out at around two hours, individual councilors only get so much time to speak, and public comment is not taken. In a committee context, a panel could be called that includes experts in police oversight (such as experts from NACOLE or members of oversight boards in other cities), Charter Commissioners or members of the Racial Equity Steering Committee, representatives from 1 Charter Commission Final Report, 2022, https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/7cae899c-8d25-4e45- 9e93-152ebc91be67 [Page 79] 2 Charter Commission Final Report, 2022, https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/7cae899c-8d25-4e45- 9e93-152ebc91be67 [Page 10] Page 48 organizations who work with marginalized individuals, members of the Police Department’s administration and IA Unit, and others. The public could be engaged and their comments invited. The committee would have the time and space to get into the nuance and detail of this complex issue. The end result of following your normal process and sending this to committee would be an ordinance that has been more thoroughly vetted, and more thoroughly socialized with the public and stakeholders. The purpose of the new board is to increase public trust. That starts with you, and the process you use to create the ordinance that will enable that new board. We would remind the Council of former Councilor Duson’s oft-heard refrain of “Process, process, process!” (2)There continues to be no mechanism for following up with board recommendations. The draft ordinance says that the CPRB is empowered to “make policy recommendations to the mayor, the city council, and the chief of police.” The Charter says that the CPRB may make recommendations to the City Council regarding “the police internal affairs investigative process, policies or training, and for enhancing public confidence in the methods and process of investigation of citizen complaints against police officers." However, if making recommendations is intended to increase public trust in our police department, we believe that there must be some kind of follow-up or response to those recommendations. Historically when the PCRS has made recommendations, whether and how the City Manager, Police Chief, or City Council respond has been inconsistent. Sometimes a response is verbal, sometimes it’s in an executive session, sometimes it’s a letter, and sometimes there’s no response at all. We believe that it is important to formalize and standardize this process, and require a written response to formal Board recommendations. One idea we had was to mandate that the City Manager or their designee formally respond to any formal recommendations from the CPRB within 60 days, but we are open to other methods of accomplishing this. (3)The ordinance imposes eligibility restrictions far beyond what the Charter intended and required, and have actually been expanded since the last draft seen before bargaining. Page 49 The Charter amendment passed by voters only requires that CPRB members be 18 years or older, and have been residents of Portland for at least 3 months. This was intentional: in their final report, they stated that “removing eligibility restrictions for board membership” was one of the “enhancements” they were making.3 They did not specifically stipulate that restrictions could be added, but all the PCRS restrictions they were trying to remove have been added to the draft ordinance nevertheless. Removing restrictions had been a main recommendation of the Racial Equity Steering Committee in 2020-2021. They wrote in their final report, “RESC recommends an oversight committee that welcomes all community participants, regardless of their experiences with law enforcement, the criminal justice system, or their employment. The committee is firm in their belief that the current disqualifications attached to the PCRS stigmatize and punish people who have been arrested and/or who have been incarcerated.” 4 Despite all this, the draft ordinance bans: ● Anyone who was employed by the City or School Department in the last 5 years. (This would actually disqualify one of the current members of the PCRS - Xavier Botana - from serving on the new board.) ● Anyone who has been a City Councilor or School Board member in the last 5 years. ● Anyone who has been arrested by the Portland Police Department in the last 10 years, as well as their spouses, domestic partners, children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, and siblings. ● Anyone who has submitted a complaint to the Portland Police Department in the last 10 years, as well as their spouses, domestic partners, children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, and siblings. Note that the first two have been increased from 1 year (the Council’s stated desire after much discussion in the 2023 workshops) to 5 years after bargaining with the police unions. Why should a former janitor at Portland High School, retired teacher from Reiche, or former Parks Department landscaper be disqualified from serving on the CPRB? 3 Charter Commission Final Report, 2022, https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/7cae899c-8d25-4e45- 9e93-152ebc91be67 [Page 11] 4 Racial Equity Steering Committee Final Report, 2021, https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/41c75af1- d867-4dc0-b4af-39af4a6470d8 [Page 11] Page 50 Why should the grandchild of someone arrested during the Obama Administration be disqualified from serving on the CPRB? Why should someone whose family member submitted a complaint be themselves disqualified from serving for a full decade? Both the Racial Equity Steering Committee and the Charter Commission discussed the issue of these disqualifications at great length, and they both wanted to remove them. The Charter Commission thought it had accomplished that with its amendment language. While we strongly recommend that you revisit the disqualifications that have been added back in, and reasonably adjust them to increase the diversity of perspectives on the new board, we also acknowledge that the CPRB will be reviewing sensitive matters and confidential material, and decreasing the risk of potential bias is a complex consideration. (4)The two non-voting members should not be the Chair & Vice Chair. The Charter requires two non-voting members, but it does not require that they be the Chair and Vice Chair, as currently written in the draft ordinance. This clause was added after a comment from a former councilor in one workshop two years ago. These non-voting seats were intended to function like they do on the School Board, for example as youth representatives or representatives from local organizations with helpful perspectives on the matters the board will discuss. Requiring that the Chair and the Vice Chair be non-voting is not only extremely unusual, it would hamper the ability of the Board to function properly. We would like to see this removed. We also wish to highlight some of the positive changes that have been made to the draft ordinance: ● As required by the Charter, the new board will be able to receive complaints from the public and send them to the Police Department for review. ● The new board will be able to review internal Police Department complaints, not just external (i.e. initiated by the public). Page 51  ● The new board is able to review IA investigations for due process issues beyond the four criteria in the PCRS ordinance (fairness, objectivity, timeliness, and thoroughness). ● The new board will have the ability to request a budget and staff from the City Manager; this will also include opportunities for the CPRB to have conversations about budgetary needs with the City Manager. For more information, we suggest watching the replay of our June 23 meeting where we discussed the new ordinance in some detail.5 That 2-hour discussion on a 95-degree day was the basis for this letter. We did our best to examine the new ordinance in the larger context, but we acknowledge that we are just volunteers and none of us are experts in this topic – which is why we believe this must be sent to committee for a fuller discussion with a broader circle of stakeholders and experts. Thank you for your time, Joey Brunelle Vice Chair Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Rachel Schlein Member Police Citizen Review Subcommittee 5 PCRS June 23 Meeting, https://portlandme.portal.civicclerk.com/event/8149/media Page 52  Doc #: WI-XXXX Standard Operating Procedure Rev #: ### Effective Date: dd-MMM-yyyy Title: Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Training Procedures 1.​ PURPOSE and INTRODUCTION All Police Civilian Review Subcommittee (PCRS) members must receive initial and ongoing training to execute their responsibilities in an effective and legitimate manner, and to fulfill the mandates of their positions. Training includes PCRS policies and procedures on their local law enforcement agency, the basics of civilian oversight, and the authority and responsibilities associated with their role as a subcommittee member. 2.​ SCOPE This procedure applies to all PCRS members, and their responsibilities around initial and ongoing training while currently active as subcommittee members. 3.​ ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES Role Responsibilities PCRS Chair or ●​ Will provide initial orientation of newly appointed PCRS Designee members. ●​ Will identify and disseminate ongoing training opportunities to PCRS members. ●​ Will keep a record of PCRS member training completion. ●​ To the extent available, will provide initial orientation of newly appointed City of Portland PCRS members. Legal Representativee ●​ To the extent available, will support ongoing training needs of PCRS members as applicable. ●​ To the extent available, will provide initial orientation and training to newly Portland Police appointed PCRS members. Department ●​ As applicable, and to the extent available, will provide continuing Representativee education opportunities for PCRS members, including ride-alongs. ●​ Will complete all initial and ongoing required training. PCRS Members 4.​ PROCEDURE 4.1​ Initial Training and Orientation 4.1.1​ Within 30 days of appointment, and ideally prior to first meeting attendance, new PCRS members will meet with the PCRS chair or their designee, and will go over the following: 4.1.1.1​ Outline of orientation training expectations. Page 53  Doc #: WI-XXXX Standard Operating Procedure Rev #: ### Effective Date: dd-MMM-yyyy Title: Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Training Procedures 4.1.1.2​ PCRS model of civilian oversight; history of PCRS; any relevant charter, ordinance, and/or municipal codes; community and local government expectations of PCRS. 4.1.1.3​ Important documents, including ordinances, SOPs, definitions, annual reports, letters to the public, and where to find them. 4.1.1.4​ Investigative procedures and practices; meeting procedures; case review, presentation, and findings. 4.1.1.5​ Policies and best practices for communication during and between meetings. 4.1.2​ Within 30 days of appointment, and prior to first meeting attendance, new PCRS members will meet with a City of Portland legal representative, to the extent available, and will go over the following: 4.1.2.1 Public records and public meeting laws, and applicability to PCRS. 4.1.2.2 Confidentiality requirements. 4.1.2.3 City of Portland resources/supports available to PCRS members. 4.1.3​ Within 60 days of appointment, new PCRS members will meet with a Portland PD representative, to the extent available, and will go over the following: 4.1.1.6​ A tour of the police station. 4.1.1.7​ Discussion of the PD’s current and past relationship to PCRS. 4.1.1.8​ Introduction to the Internal Affairs department, and overview of its processes. 4.1.1.9​ Discussion and expectations of training the PD offers to PCRS. 4.1.4 Within the first 6 months of PCRS appointment, new members will attend the following trainings at Portland PD, which the PD will offer to the extent available: 4.1.4.1 Criminal Procedures 4.1.4.2 Virtual Reality simulation training 4.1.4.3 Behavioral Health Unit 4.1.4.4 Ride-alongs 4.1.4.5 Any additional specialty areas of interest to PCRS members and agreed upon by PPD (for example, Criminal Investigations Division, K-9, Community Policing, etc.) 4.2​ Ongoing Training 4.2.1​ PCRS members are required to participate in annual training. The chair or their designee will keep PCRS members informed of training opportunities. Training will be available at no cost to PCRS members. Page 54  Doc #: WI-XXXX Standard Operating Procedure Rev #: ### Effective Date: dd-MMM-yyyy Title: Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Training Procedures 4.2.1.1​ The chair or a designee will identify and disseminate information on annual training. It is the responsibility of individual members to sign-up and participate in training individually and/or to organize them collectively for the group. Individual members are also encouraged to identify and participate in relevant training in their interest areas. 4.2.1.2​ The chair or their designee will keep track of member training participation. It is the responsibility of individual members to notify the chair or designee of what training they have completed. •​ Attached form, “Training Attendance Form for PCRS Members,” may be utilized by PCRS members to keep track of their individual and group training attendance; use of the form is optional. 4.2.1.3​ Training can be defined as classes or training offered online or in person, and can also include activities such as informational meetings with relevant organizations. 4.2.1.4​ PCRS members will complete a minimum of 2 hours of continuing education a year. 4.2.1.5​ Ongoing training will include an annual minimum of at least one ride-along with a PPD officer per each PCRS member, to the extent the PPD is available. 4.2.2​ Consider the following organizations as resources for ongoing training, as examples: 4.2.2.1​ National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE) 4.2.2.2​ National Alliance for Mental Illness (NAMI) 4.2.2.3​ Through These Doors 4.2.2.4​ American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) 4.2.2.5​ Preble Street Resource Center 4.2.2.6​ Mayor/City Manager Offices 4.2.2.7​ District Attorney's Office 4.2.2.8​ Maine Criminal Justice Academy 4.2.2.9​ Cumberland County Jail 4.2.2.10​Longcreek Youth Development Center 4.2.2.11​Medical Examiner 4.2.2.12​Cumberland County Sheriff's Office Page 55  Doc #: WI-XXXX Standard Operating Procedure Rev #: ### Effective Date: dd-MMM-yyyy Title: Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Training Procedures 5.​ SUPPORTING FORMS Forms Title Form 1 Training Attendance Form for PCRS Members 6. APPENDIX Appendix Title Appendix 1 Links to Training Resources and Documents 7. REVISION HISTORY Revision Changes / Rationale Number Page 56  Doc #: WI-XXXX Standard Operating Procedure Rev #: ### Effective Date: dd-MMM-yyyy Title: Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Training Procedures Appendix 1 Links Relevant to PCRS Training Training Resources: PCRS Website PCRS Training Presentation (9-13-2024) Freedom of Access Act (FOAA) Frequently Asked Questions Maine Laws National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE) Training Resources NACOLE “Civilian Oversight Basics” Important Documents: PCRS Ordinance PCRS Annual Reports PCRS Suggested Guidelines for Evaluating Internal Affairs Investigations PPD Commendation or Complaint Form in English (also available on PCRS website in Arabic, Portuguese, French, Spanish, and Somali) PCRS Letters to Complainants PCRS Results from the Community Survey of Police Oversight, Spring 2021 Where to Find City of Portland Meeting Minutes Portland Police Department Standard Operating Procedures Page 57  Doc #: WI-XXXX Standard Operating Procedure Rev #: ### Effective Date: dd-MMM-yyyy Title: Police Citizen Review Subcommittee Training Procedures Form 1 Training Attendance Form for PCRS Members Name of PCRS Member: Date Description of Training Length (in hrs) Page 58 2025 PCRS Work Plan 1.​ Offline Collaboration/Communication i.​ Rachel ii.​ Randall 2.​ Documentation of Our Process & Meeting Structure (w/ recommendations) i.​ Randall ii.​ Keith 3.​ Orientation/Training i.​ Rachel ii.​ Walter 4.​ Complaint Form Availability/Accessibility & Community Engagement i.​ Joey ii.​ Kay 5.​ Statistical Analysis i.​ Randall ii.​ Xavier 6.​ New Ordinance i.​ Rachel ii.​ Joey iii.​ Xavier & Kay (advisory) Page 59