Historic Preservation Commission

Preservation Commission Meeting Agenda August 27, 2025 - 5:30 PM City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3rd Floor, 1528 Third Avenue, Rock Island, IL 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Comment 4. Minutes a. Approval of the June 25, 2025 Meeting Minutes Motion: Move to approve the June 25, 2025 Meeting Minutes VV Voice vote is needed. 5. Public Hearing a. Public Hearing 2025-01: Landmark Application for 516 23rd Street Motion: Motion whether or not to approve the application and designate the Joseph Cameron House at 516 23rd Street a local landmark subject to the Preservation Ordinance. RC Roll Call vote is needed. 6. Other Business/New Business a. Recommendation on contract award for the Historic Design Guidelines. Motion: Motion whether or not to recommend that the City Council award the contract to McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $15,492.00. RC Roll Call vote is needed. b. Upcoming Historic Preservation Commissioner Training Series 7. Adjourn This agenda may be obtained in accessible formats by qualified persons with a disability by making appropriate arrangements from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (309) 732-2010 or visiting in person at: 1528 Third Avenue, Rock Island, IL 61201. Page 1 of 138  Rock Island Historic Preservation Commission Minutes City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor 1528 3rd Avenue June 25,2025 5:30 PM Voting Members Present Diane Oestreich Alan Carmen Jeff Dismer Addison Kimmel Mark Schwiebert Bruce Peterson Estlin Fiegley Voting Members Absent Linda Anderson Zach Campbell Staff Present Eunice Amissah-Mensah Tanner Osing Call to Order and Roll Call Chair Oestreich called the meeting to order at 5:31 PM. Public Comment None Approval of the Previous Meeting Minutes Schwiebert moved to approve the meeting minutes for March 26, 2025. Kimmel seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7 to 0. Other Business/ New Business Workshop Discussion Staff informed the Commission that the City was awarded an $18,200 CLG grant to update historic design guidelines for residential and commercial properties. Staff discussed the process and timeline for the project. Staff also informed Commissioners that the City Council approved the River Edge Zone, which includes significant incentives for historic preservation. Staff and the Commission also discussed the new Port District and an upcoming webinar hosted by the National Alliance for Preservation Commissions. Commissioners raised concerns over outdated landmark lists and missing links on the City’s website. Staff acknowledged this as a known issue, and something that they are working to update. Page 2 of 138 The Commission also discussed various topics, including landmark nominations for Rock Island City Hall and the Rock Island County Office Building; a RIPS tour of the Argus Building; the statuses of the Best Building and Old Rock Island-Milan School District Admin Building; and the Centennial Bridge project. Adjournment Chair Oestreich called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. Schwiebert moved to adjourn the meeting. Fiegley seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at 6:33 PM. Minutes submitted by Eunice Amissah-Mensah. Page 3 of 138 Memorandum To: Rock Island Preservation Commission From: Subject: Public Hearing 2025-01: Landmark Application for 516 23rd Street Motion: Motion whether or not to approve the application and designate the Joseph Cameron House at 516 23rd Street a local landmark subject to the Preservation Ordinance. RC Roll Call vote is needed. Date: August 27, 2025 Introduction and Background Information: An application to designate the Joseph Cameron House at 516 23rd Street was submitted by Diane Oestreich to the Rock Island Historic Preservation Commission. The nomination notes that the house is an excellent example of the classic front-gabled Italianate. The home is typically Italianate with ornate windows and doors and its original walnut staircase. Additional architectural details, both exterior and interior, are explained in the nomination. The applicant argues that the building should be designated a landmark under criteria 2, 3 and 5 described in the Preservation Ordinance. As a structure associated with an important person, exhibits a distinguished architectural style, and possesses a unique location and physical characteristics, it proves to be significant. The application provides more detail on those three points. The Preliminary Determination Subcommittee met on July 2 and reviewed the application. They determined that the application is complete and further recommended that the Preservation Commission vote to approve the application, thus designating the Joseph Cameron House a local landmark subject to the City's Preservation Ordinance. The owner, Thomas Hergert, has approved the proposed designation. Previous Council Action (if any): Budget Impact: Additional Information as applicable (i.e. provide alternative options, community or staff input, staffing impact; resident impact; etc.): Council Goal (if applicable): Recommendation: The Community Development Department recommends that the Preservation Commission approve the landmark application and designate the Joseph Cameron House at 516 23rd Street a locally designated landmark property subject to the Rock Island Preservation Ordinance. Page 4 of 138 Submitted by: Eunice Amissah-Mensah, Urban Planner Approved by: Page 5 of 138  1 516 23rd Street Thomas Hergert 516 23rd Street. Rock Island IL X O— O— O— Diane Oestreich Rock Island Preservation Society, P.O. Box 3261, RockIsland 61204 816 22nd Street, Rock Island, 61201 309-788-1845 blueskies78900@yahoo.com Page 6 of 138  2 Legal Description (REF 1) Page 7 of 138  3 Nomination Criteria The Joseph Cameron House at 516 23rd Street is worthy of landmark designation based on three criteria in the Rock Island Preservation Ordinance. Criteria 2: Associated with an important person or event in national, state or local history. Joseph Cameron and his immediate family spent most of their adult lives in Rock Island, many in this home. He was born near Newcastle, PA, in 1823 and came to Rock Island in 1844. Although once a farmer, he changed careers when he came here, and became a millwright and later a carpenter specializing in ship and bridge building. That may have led to his employment in the late 1860s as a riverboat captain. In March, 1880, he replaced Capt. Marcus Henderson as captain of ferryboat Rock Island. He headed a se- ries of Rock Island-based ferry boats as well as other navigation on the Mississippi. He was the first cap- tain of the ferry J. W. Spencer. He would remain a ship captain until his retirement in 1895. Criteria 3: Representative of the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural …...style inherently valua- ble for the study of a period, style, craftsmanship, method of construction or use of indigenous materials and which retains a high degree of integrity. The Cameron House is a classic front-gabled Italianate, which is rare nationally, but well represented in Rock Island. The construction date is estimated based on City Directory and Census information, but the date is clearly within Rock Island’s Italianate era. It has a very high degree of integrity as well. Moreover, it is reflective of the work of Isaac Holmes, architect, who is documented to have designed some of our other front-gabled brick Italianates. Although reportedly built by Peter Farrell, a mason, John Volk, a contractor who is credited with other Italianates, Farrell may have been a subcontractor, as Volk was pri- marily noted for carpentry. Although the actual workmen are not documented, this home reflects masterful accomplishments of skilled craftsmen, both inside and out. This mid 1870s construction changed the face of this city for many decades and the front gabled Italianate is one of the most beautiful residential contri- butions. Criteria 5: Identifiable as an established and familiar visual feature in the community owing to its unique location or physical characteristics. Surrounded as it is by three Rock Island landmarks (Beardsley House, 536 23rd Street; Haverstick House, 544 23rd Street; White House, 605 23rd Street), the home next door listed on the Significant Structures list (Speidel House, 524 23rd Street), as well as another important home the S. S. Davis house at 541 23rd Street, this clearly contributes to the context of one of the most important architectural blocks in the Broad- way Historic District and in the City of Rock Island. Page 8 of 138  4 Contents Legal Description 2 Nomination Criteria 3 Contents 4 Illustrations 5 Property History 6 Joseph Cameron & Construction 7 Architecture 10 Context 13 References 15 Addendum—Isaac Holmes, Architect 16 Page 9 of 138  5 Illustrations Title Page Figure 1. Plat Map from Abstract, 1853.…………………… 6 Figure 2. 1886 Sanborn Map…..……………….…………… 8 Figure 3. 1892 Sanborn Map……….…………………………. 8 Figure 4. 1898 Sanborn Map………………………………... 8 Figure 5. 1906 Sanborn Map…………… …………………. 9 Figure 6. 1957 Sanborn Map………………...…….…………. 9 Figure 7. 1969 Sanborn Map ………..…………………….... 9 Figure 8. Front (East) of House …..……………………….… 10 Figure 9. Front Door …………………………………………… 10 Figure 10. North side ……………………………………………. 10 Figure 11. South, View from Southeast ………………………... 11 Figure 12. West Side, Back…………………………………….. 12 Figure 13. Garage, Yard Side..………...………………………... 12 ….. Figure 14. Garage, Alley Side ……..……………………………. 12 Figure 15. Staircase…. ……..…………..………………………... 13 Figure 16. Newel Post……………. ………..……………………. 13 Figure 17. Mantel ……. ………………………………………... 13 Page 10 of 138  6 Property History (REF 1, REF2) This area was entered as US territory in 1836, but it wasn’t until 1841 that President John Tyler sold 126 acres to John and Roswell Spencer. Roswell immediately sold half of the acreage to his brother John who, with wife Eliza, turned around and sold 29 acres to Jonah Case, who then sold the land, in 1853, to Wm Bai- ley and James Boyle. All of these names are recognizable as early settlers in the county. In 1853, Spencer, Bailey, and Boyle sold .85 acres to Joseph L. Cameron and, in 1855, that area was subdi- vided and platted. Note the use of historic street names. The lot where 514 would be built is identified as Outlot 8 on Broadway (23rd Street). Joseph and wife, Lucinda, would sell off parts of these lots, but retained Outlot 8. Cameron also acquired more land along Dock (22nd) Street so that the lots would ex- tend from Broadway to Dock. The property history of 514 shows little activity—no sales, mortgages, etc., until 1890 when a Special Assess- ment was levied by the city for “improvement” of 23rd Street. Whether this means the initial paving is not clear. Often construction dates can be inferred by mortgages or sales. However in this case, it is impossible to determine when the house was built from that information. The con- struction date will be discussed later in this nomination. Joseph Cameron died in 1909, and his estate was passed to his nine children, six from his first marriage to Lucinda Wakefield, and three from his second marriage to Clara Hardy. Clara received the house which led to some disa- greements with his six older children who did not wish to sign off on the estate disposition. Fig. 1. Plat Map from Abstract, 1855 Eventually Clara and the will prevailed, and Clara remained in the house until her death in 1935. At that time the only heirs were Clara’s family, none Joseph’s children from his first marriage. The second owners of the house were Russell and Margery Cook who added rental apartments. Margery died in 1970 and Russell died in 1980. His estate was not formally closed until 1986 although the house was sold to a McDonnell family. At this time there were multiple apartments and the interior had been seriously compromised with little sensitivity to the historic character. Finally, in 1992, the current owner made an offer to purchase, which was accepted. Restoration, inside and out, has been ongoing since that time and has resulted in the beautiful home we see today. Page 11 of 138  7 Joseph Cameron & Construction (Sanborn Maps Ref 3) According to his obituary (REF 4), Joseph C. Cameron was born near Newcastle, PA, in 1823 and came to Rock Island in 1844. Although he had been a farmer, he changed careers when he moved west to the pioneer area of Rock Island. Here, he became a millwright and later a carpenter specializing in ship and bridge build- ing. That may have led to his employment in the late 1860s as a riverboat captain. In March, 1880, he re- placed Capt. Marcus Henderson as captain of ferryboat Rock Island. He headed a series of Rock Island-based ferry boats as well as other navigation on the Mississippi. He was the first captain of the ferry J. W. Spencer. He would remain a ship captain until his retirement in 1895. Cameron was also active in the community and even became an alderman. His first wife, whom he wed shortly after coming to Rock Island, was Lucinda Wakefield. She died on No- vember 10, 1880 (REF 5) at age 58, leaving six surviving children. Her funeral was from their home. On March 9, 1882, Joseph “quietly” married Clara Hardy, and, at the time of Joseph’s death on November 11, 1909, they had three surviving children together. Clara lived in this house until her death, June 26, 1935 (REF 2, REF 6). One interesting happening occurred a few years after Clara and Joseph’s marriage. The Argus of January 5, 1886, reported that, “A handsomely dressed baby was left on the doorstep of the Cameron house on 23rd Street last night about 6 pm. A note said it (sic) had been born on December 29.” The Cameron’s reportedly had “given it to the postmaster.” Several newspaper notes, especially from the Rock Island Daily Union, mention Joseph Cameron constructing buildings on his properties. In his earliest days, City Directories 1867-1873 show him living on the east side of Dock Street (22nd) in the 500 block. His brother, Allen, also a carpenter, lived with him. By 1876, the City Directory lists Joseph at 76 Broadway, or 23rd Street. The Daily Union of May 11, 1871 has Jos. Cameron “making improvements on his Dock Street property.” This may be a now-demolished house directly behind his future 23rd Street home. By December 16, 1873, the Union noted that Cameron “was planning to put up a new residence on Broad (sic) Street.” The same pa- per reported that Thomas Plummer was planning a new residence on the corner of Broadway and Highland (5th Avenue) that would be near Cameron’s new dwelling. Through 1874, the Union kept tabs on Cameron’s construction noting, on February 26, 1874 that teams were hauling rock from Mrs. Barnes’ quarry for the foundation. In June it was reported that Cameron had a new residence on Broadway—but on August 11, it was stated that, “Peter Farrell has begun work on Joe Camer- on’s new residence on Broadway.” That same issue said that Charles Hansgen was having a new residence built on Madison Street (20th Street). This is today’s 848 20th Street. On October 1, it was restated that Joe Cameron, ship carpenter, is building a new brick home on Broadway between Highland and Cable (6th Ave- nue) . Although there are seeming inconsistencies in what was built and when, it is clear that a construction date of 1874 can be accurately ascribed to 516 23rd Street. I Page 12 of 138  8 Fig. 2. 1886 Sanborn Map The 1886 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map above, the earliest available, shows the completed block between 22nd (bottom) and 23rd (top) Streets with 5th Avenue on the left and 6th Avenue on the right. It is believed that Cameron owned both 514 and 516 23rd as well as the 22nd Street lots directly behind them. The pink color on Sanborns indicates masonry construction (brick in this case) while the number of stories is written on the top. 516 has two stories in front and a single story at the back Behind 516 is another small dwelling— indicated here as 516 1/2. Note the home at 524 23rd Street. This a frame (yellow color on Sanborns) front- gable Italianate and dates to at least 1873 when owner Conrad Speidel appears in City Directories. Fig. 3. 1892 Sanborn Map Fig. 4. 1898 Sanborn Map By 1892 (left) the structure at the back of the lot at 516 has been replaced by a 1-1/2 story frame barn (barns are indicated by the X), and a full-width en- closed porch has been added at the rear. (dotted lines indicate open porches; closed porches are solid lines.) The 1898 Sanborn (right) shows that 516 is the same but 514, which Cameron apparently owned, has been greatly expanded or newly constructed. Perhaps the small brick structure was demolished first. This ex- pansion occurred before 1894 when the November 15 Argus reported that Rob- ert Wagner had wed Thekla Klug and they would live in the “recently construct- ed handsome dwelling of Capt. Joseph Cameron on 23rd Street…....which has been handsomely furnished throughout by the groom.” This is, of course before Wagner would build his own landmark home at 904 23rd Street. Page 13 of 138  9 The 1906 Sanborn map at left is identical to the 1898 one except that a small open porch or storage area had been added to the barn. Fig. 5. 1906 Sanborn Map Fig. 6. 1957 Sanborn Map By 1957, right, the barn is gone and garages have been added to both 514 and 516. Fig. 7. 1969 Sanborn Map The map updated to 1969 (right) shows both homes unchanged. Page 14 of 138  10 Architecture The Cameron House is an excellent example of the front-gabled Italianate style. Because it is the most com- mon form of Italianate in Rock Island, we tend to take the style for granted. However nationally the style is rare, representing only about ten percent of Italianate homes. More typical are box-like with various combina- tions of hipped roofs. It’s said that the front-gabled subtype was especially popular on narrow lots in large cit- ies. (REF 6) Yet in Rock Island, we find many of these brick front-gabled homes on nicely sized lots. We can only assume that it was popular here because it was so attractive. Fig. 8. Front of House The front of the house is typical in its simplici- ty, but features outstanding detail. A wide ga- ble with massive brackets interspersed with correspondingly large dentils frame a circular attic window. Stone window lintels are formed in a drapery effect. The original win- dows are double-hung throughout and have been rebuilt by the owner, who has also creat- ed new wood storm windows. The front double doors are framed by a shallow, rounded roof portico that is supported by massive brackets. The doors themselves each have long double windows with four panels beneath. They were recreated by the owner because the original doors, although present, were too deteriorated to be reused. These are identical. The brick exterior has never been painted, and the trim paint is complementary gold, green, and red. Fig. 9. Front Door Fig. 10. North Side The north side has a mostly blank brick wall at the front that accommodates the interior stair- way. That wall is then interrupt- ed by a gable identical to the one on the front with a round attic window and paired windows be- neath. The massive brackets continue. The low stone foundation is apparent in this view. To- ward the rear, a one-story wing can be seen. Page 15 of 138  11 Fig. 10. South Side from back On both the north and south, the cross gables top a small ex- tension of the main building. The south side of the house is similar to the north in its highly ornamented gable with brackets and a round window. However the front section on the south contains windows instead of a plain brick wall and the gabled portion features two windows on the second story and a three-sided bay on the south. The single story rear wing has one window on the south. The west side (back) once again has a detailed gable with round window at the roof. Below, the single story wing has a gabled roof with angles parallel to the top gable, but this lower roofline is unornamented. It contains a single double hung window at the second story level and three windows and a door at the first floor. Fig. 11. West Side, Back A back porch runs the full width of the wing. The porch has square chamfered columns decorated with Victorian-style brackets and a sawn wood balustrade. This porch has been reconstructed and is not original to the house, according to the 1886 Sanborn, but a full width back porch did appear on Sanborn maps by 1892. When purchased by the current owner, the porch had been enclosed with only the shed roof and floor being vintage. He removed the walls, reo- pened it, and added appropriate to the period col- umns and balustrade. Note that the foundation extends completely under this porch. Page 16 of 138  12 Fig. 12. Garage, yard side Behind the house, there is a four car garage of concrete block. The gabled roof has shingles in the upper portion and includes a round vent added by the owner. The blocks are plain with a smooth surface. The owner has begun to cover them with brick to match the house. There are two modern garage doors on the north alley side and four short windows and a door are on the yard side. Throughout its history, Sanborn maps show an outbuilding in this location. However the current configuration is newer, probably dating from the apartment use. Fig.13. Garage, alley side (left) Fig.14. Staircase (right) The interior of the house, alt- hough not protected by Land- mark status has been largely restored after decades of changes to accommodate rent- al units. The original walnut staircase is typical of Italianate homes of the era. Balusters are octagonal rather than turned as is the newel post, although both fea- ture turned areas. The staircase gracefully winds to the second floor, following a curved wall and incor- porating trapezium stair treads. As is typical, the stair treads and risers are not walnut. Fig.15. Newel Post (left) The hallway flooring incorporates stripes of walnut and possibly butternut, a lighter color wood. Fig. 16. Fireplace Mantel (right) The fireplace mantel, too, is typical of Italianate homes of the era. It is con- structed of gray marble, then faux painted to create a black and reddish brown marble surface. The top is curved and the fire box is arched. As common, the firebox is small, indicating the house was heated by stoves—or even a central boiler fed by wood or coal. Page 17 of 138  13 Context All of Rock Island’s front-gabled Italianates that have been documented date from the mid 1870s and all are red brick, most never painted. The brick may be why they have endured with minimal changes—there may have been more front-gabled Italianate frame homes but they have become unidentifiable because of siding and window changes. A notable exception is the frame front-gabled home next door at 524 23rd Street. After the 1870s, front-gabled frame homes with similar floor plans that can be considered Italianate-influenced were popular, but without the extensive detailing that is seen in our 1870s homes. Despite their seeming similarities—certainly in massing—stylistic characteristics of our front-gabled brick homes vary. Some have with massive brackets, often paired, beneath the roofline. Some homes have orna- mental frieze boards. Fretwork gable decorations exist, too. Originally these would have a matching finial extending from the top of the gable peak. Window headers have distinctive shapes, usually a segmented arch, but circular and flattened arches can be seen. The ornamental headers can be stone, colored brick, or even just painted brick. Attic gable windows typically have a distinctive shape. Front elevations are asymmetric with the main entrance, often containing paired doors, to one side. Except for some corner lots, this door is toward the north. In some cases, there may be a wide but narrow front porch with decorative chamfered columns and brackets. Much smaller but equally ornate porches are more common, and ornate hoods, as at the Cameron home, are also a frequently seen feature. Who is responsible for designing and building these brick homes? The only architect practicing in Rock Island and Moline at that time was Isaac Holmes, who opened his office in 1869 and died in 1881. (See addendum for more info on Holmes). We know that he designed the Star Block and the original Bengston Block (now gone) in Rock Island, and perhaps the Model Printers building in Moline. However the few homes that can be definitely ascribed to Holmes, primarily based on Rock Island Daily Un- ion one-line notices, have disappeared. The only remaining home is the landmarked Sweeney House (816 20th Street), which Holmes reportedly designed in 1874. However the nearly identical and also landmarked Hansgen House (848 20th Street) did not have an architect, based on private communication with a Hansgen direct descendent, Madeline Isaacson, circa 1984. She did, however, say that contractor John Volk was the builder and used “day labor.” Did the various skilled contractors and their workmen simply copy each others designs with different decora- tive effects? Or did Architect Holmes design many of these homes, by modifying a basic plan? Since his plans don’t exist and since, with rare exceptions, the only information is one-line newspaper notes, it’s impos- sible to say. According to an Rock Island Residential Neighborhoods, 1835-1899, published 1999, by Jim Jacobsen (REF 8), Rock Island contains the following front gabled Italianates: 2305 12th Street 2345 12th Street 533 30th Street 602 18th Street 544 30th Street 816 20th Street 1210 4th Avenue 848 20th Street 2607 13th Avenue Page 18 of 138  14 Brick Front Gable Italianates, from Google Maps 602 18th Street 533 30th Street 816 20th Street 848 20th Street 544 30th Street 1210 4th Avenue 2607 13th Avenue 2305 12th Street 2345 12th Street Page 19 of 138  15 References REF 1. Abstract for 516 23rd Street REF 2. Various Rock Island City Directories REF 3. Rock Island Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps; Library of Congress OR University of Illinois Archives REF 4. Argus, November 11, 1911 REF 5. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/187318916/lucinda_marcella-cameron REF 6. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/126846165/clara_h-cameron REF 7. McAlester, Virginia & Lee, “A Field Guide to American Houses,” Alfred A. Knopf; 1996 REF 8. https://rigov.org/846/Residential-Neighborhoods-1835-1955 REF 9. From Janet Pease’ index of newspapers at RICHS Page 20 of 138  16 Addendum—Isaac Holmes, Architect (REF 9) From 1876 Hollands City Directory (from Star Block Landmark nomination) Star Block built in 1874 from plans by I. N. Holmes. He was also the architect for the Harper House hotel across the street. In an ad he is credited with Masonic Temple, (presumably RI), Moline H. S. and Methodist church in Galesburg and German Methodist church in Pekin, IL. Note: Before ‘new” temple, since 1875, the Masonic Temple had been located on the third floor of a bank building on 18th Street at Second Avenue. From 1876 Hollands directory: He remodeled Judge Lynde’s on Buffalo & Orleans St. (16ST, 3 Ave); his assistant is Ben Gartside. Also did Bengston Block, Moline H. S., Galesburg Methodist Church, German Methodist church in Pekin, Daily Union, 25 Mar 1870: I. N. Holmes is arch. for Alfred Williams on Moline bluff (10thAve east of 8th St) (hospital area, gone?) Daily Union, 30 Mar 1870: Gregory Brown of Zuma twp will build new home; Holmes is arch. RI & Moline Daily Union, 25 Mar 1869 : I. N. Holmes of La Porte, an architect, has rented an office on Illinois Street RI & Moline Daily Union, 14 Aug 1869: New residence of Mrs. James Boyle on lot at the corner of Broadway (23 rd St) and Highland(5th Ave) immediately at head of Moline Ave. Holmes is architect; W.F. Gilmore is contractor. (Note – in 1881 CD, James Boyle lived at about 422 23rd Street; house now gone) RI & Moline Daily Union, 15 Dec 1869: I. N. Holmes is architect of new Trinity Church rectory. Holmes office is near Orleans (3rd Avenue) and Buffalo (16th Street) Daily Union 8 April 1871: Mrs. Mary Holmes opened a boarding house on Illinois Street (2nd Ave) between Buffalo (16th St) and Eagle (17th St). Daily Union, 5 Oct 1871: Description of brick residence of Capt. Wm. Henderson on Washington Street; Holmes was architect and J. D. Taylor was contractor. (Henderson lived at 79 Washington (619 18th St) in 1878 CD; house gone for many years) Argus, 25 Apr 1872: H. E. West will build new brick home soon, architect is I. N. Holmes (West lived at 1211 4th Ave in 1878 CD). In 1876, West lived at 74 W. Rock River (4th Ave)) (Argus ”Looking Back,” 28 April 1997 (1872): West of RI is building a fine home in the Franco American architectural style. Will be heated by a furnace, have hot and cold water in the rooms, bathrooms and all the other latest appendag- es) Union, 5 May 1872: I. N. Holmes is the architect for Moline house on the bluff for R. K. Swan (a 5 acre lot) Union, 7 May 1872: Holmes finished with drawings for H. E. West ; house on corner of Ontario (8th St) and Rock Riv er (4th Ave) (West lived at 1211 4th Avenue in 1878 CD) Daily Union, 1872: Holmes is preparing plans for Chas Atkinson for lot near Congregational Church in Moline Daily Union, 23 Aug 1872: Holmes has completed plans for R. K. Swan near the Moline High School Argus, 24 Aug 1872: Man dies at boarding house of I. N. Holmes (some details about the man) Union, 25 Feb 1973: I. N. Holmes is visiting friends in LaPorte and Angola IN Daily Union, 3 Apr 1874: Holmes is designing houses for Baker, Sinnett and Sweeney (Joseph Baker lived at 734 23rd Street; the back part of the house is what Holmes would have designed; the front part is newer) Daily Argus, 10 Aug 1874: E. D. Sweeney is building a house on Madison Street. Daily Union, 11 Aug 1874: Charles Hansgen is having a new residence built (no architect mentioned) Daily Union, 27 Sept 1874: Sweeney’s new residence almost completed. (1 Dec; Sweeney’s twin boys died, 1 month 26 days) Daily Union, 9 Nov 1875: C. S. Harrison married Miss Clara M.E. Russell, daughter of Mrs. I. N. Holmes at Holmes residence. Daily Argus ,14 Jan 1876: I. N. Holmes plans to build a hotel for Mr. Harper at the corner of Illinois and Buffalo (2 nd St & 16th Ave) (Note: This would have been the Harper Opera House, now demolished) Daily Argus, 28 Nov 1876: New residence of S. J. Keator on 7th Ave & 23rd Street described; Holmes is architect (Demolished ca 1966) Daily Argus, 29 Nov 1876: New residence of Henry Burgower on 18th St. between 6th & 7th Avenue; Holmes is archi tect. Daily Argus, 7 Dec 1876: Mrs. Murphy is building a tenement on 7th Avenue and 22nd Street. She erected another building on 4th Avenue and 23rd Street this season. The architect for that was I. N. Holmes. Daily Argus, 19 Mar 1877: New residence of Ben Harper described; architect is I. N. Holmes. Daily Argus, 10 April 1877: Holmes has contract for new Methodist Church in Rapids City Page 21 of 138  17 Daily Argus, 17 May 1877: Holmes planning two houses in Port Byron for L. E. Gaylord and D. S. Metzgar Daily Argus, 17 Mar 1877: Geo. D. Moore of Port Byron building a Holmes house Daily Argus, 17 July 1877: Holmes is architect for Henry Stoddard in Edgington Daily Argus,16 Sept , and Daily Union, 25 Sept 1877: Henry Sudlow is building a new home in Coal Valley; Holmes is architect. 1878 CD: I. N. Holmes architect since 1869, residence and work at 1608 2nd Avenue. RI Daily Union, 1 April 1881: Mr. Holmes is severely ill at his residence, 1422 3rd Avenue, from taking cold. He has been more or less ill for three months. RI Daily Union, 2 April 1881: We regret to announce the death of I. N. Holmes at 7:30 last night at his home at 1422 3rd Avenue of kidney disorder. He came here from Mansfield OH 12 years ago. Age 54 at time of death. His Masonic brethren were notified immediately. Mrs Holmes said last night her husband’s re mains would be taken to La Port, IN for burial. . ——————————————————————————————————————————————- Conversation with Barbara Scott at RICHS, ca 2005: Holmes had a son, Morris Grant Holmes who was also an archi- tect who studied in Chicago. From Highland Park library website The Chicago architectural firm of Holmes and Flinn (Morris Grant Holmes and Raymond W. Flinn) designed the original modified Gothic style structure built of Wisconsin limestone with Indiana limestone trim. The new library was dedicated on Sept. 20, 1931. (Note earlier firm’s name was Patton, Holmes & Flinn) Page 22 of 138 Page 23 of 138 Memorandum To: Rock Island Preservation Commission From: Eunice Amissah-Mensah, Urban Planner, Tanner Osing, Planning & Zoning Manager Subject: Recommendation on contract award for the Historic Design Guidelines. Motion: Motion whether or not to recommend that the City Council award the contract to McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $15,492.00. RC Roll Call vote is needed. Date: August 27, 2025 Introduction and Background Information: The City has successfully secured a new Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to fund a vital Historic Design Guideline project for the City. This project is essential for amending and updating the existing design guidelines for historic properties, a need identified in the City's 2016 City Heritage Resources Plan. The current guidelines, last published in 1993, have a limited geographic scope, lack detailed illustrations, and require updates regarding alternative materials and the treatment of non-contributing properties. The primary objective of this project is to draft comprehensive design guidelines that cover all geographic areas, current and future designated historic resources, and all building typologies (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial, cultural), and provide consistent design standards that are context-sensitive and reflect the recommendations from the 2016 Heritage Resources Plan. An invitation to bid was put out for the month of August. At the end of the bidding period, staff had received five (5) bids. The bidders all meet the required federal professional qualification standards, demonstrate relevant experience, and exhibit a clear commitment to historic preservation. The bidders and the costs for their services are as follows. Consutlant Bid Amount McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. $15,492.00 AltusWorks, Inc. $18,000.00 JLK Architects $18,000.00 Designing Local Limited $18,000.00 Studio GWA $18,200.00 Having reviewed all the bids, staff recommend awarding the contract to McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. is an architectural firm in Evanston, Illinois with special expertise in historic preservation projects. MIA brings a comprehensive knowledge of Rock Island's history and architectural legacy, derived from their previous collaborations with the City on three of its historic districts: the Downtown Rock Island Historic District (2020), the Broadway Historic District (2023), and the United States Housing Corporation Historic District (2024). Their comprehensive proposal and proven track record make them the ideal consultant for developing the updated Historic Design Guidelines. Staff is confident that McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. can execute the City's project on budget and in a timely fashion. Page 24 of 138 Previous Council Action (if any): N/A Budget Impact: The direct costs of the project are funded entirely through a Certified Local Government grant. The city will match 20% of the funding through staff time. Additional Information as applicable (i.e. provide alternative options, community or staff input, staffing impact; resident impact; etc.): N/A Council Goal (if applicable): N/A Recommendation: The Community Development Department recommends that the Preservation Commission pass a recommendation to the City Council to award the contract to McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc for an amount not to exceed $15,492.00. Submitted by: Eunice Amissah-Mensah, Urban Planner Approved by: Page 25 of 138  Request for Proposals (RFP) Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island INTRODUCTION The City of Rock Island, Illinois (2020 population of 37,108) is the seat of Rock Island County and is located in the Quad Cities, a metropolitan region situated on the Iowa- Illinois border along the Mississippi River. Rock Island is currently home to three National Register Historic Districts, one local historic district, and 47 individual local landmarks. The Preservation Commission, established in the 1980s, currently examines and rules on design review requests for external renovations/repairs and additions for homes/properties designated as local landmarks or located within a locally designated historic district. Rock Island is a Certified Local Government (CLG). PROJECT BACKGROUND The City’s existing design guidelines for historic properties are dated and do not cover all geographic areas. The existing residential design guidelines were originally printed in 1993 with only minor updates since then. Further, the City has design guidelines for the downtown, but not other commercial or industrial areas. The City’s Heritage Resources Plan (2016) mentions the need to update the guidelines as a goal. The plan notes that the existing guidelines lack illustrations and photos, language on alternative materials, and discussion on the treatment of non-contributing properties in historic districts. The plan also indicates that the commercial guidelines could benefit from stronger recommendations on signage, storefront rehabilitation, material preservation, and energy efficiency. Recognizing the need for a unified and updated approach, the City seeks to integrate existing plans and policies into a clear, city-wide framework. The new guidelines should provide consistent design standards that are context sensitive and reflect the recommendations from the 2016 Heritage Resources Plan. SCOPE OF SERVICES The selected consultant will create a comprehensive set of design guidelines to reflect current practices and technologies in the treatment of historic properties. The guidelines should be more than a document used for design review purposes by also including practical resources for historic property owners seeking to invest in their properties from small-scale maintenance concerns to larger, adaptive use projects where incentives may be sought. The design guidelines should incorporate the following at a minimum. • Line drawings that show characteristic features and elements of a particular architectural style. Page 26 of 138  • Photos as well as images. • Locations where new additions should be placed in regards to scale, materials, and compatibility for properties of particular architectural styles. • Materials that could be replaced in-kind and acceptable replacement materials. • Maintenance and preservation of key architectural details. • Energy efficiency and alternative energy generating equipment (i.e. solar panels, wind turbines, etc.) • Design issues related to all architectural styles and properties of Mid-Century vintage. • Best practices for historic property maintenance. Additionally, the new guidelines should accomplish the following objectives. • Assist staff and the Preservation Commission in design review. • Serve as a tool for property owners and developers by offering a clear, user- friendly resource that aligns with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards. • Make preservation projects more approachable thus protecting more historic resources. • Strengthen the City’s commitment to preservation through increased awareness and education. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The Community Development Department will assist the selected consultant in managing the operational aspects of the project and coordinating work with the relevant parties. The department will provide overall support for project tasks. The City’s Urban Planner will serve as the lead liaison for the project, although other support staff may be involved from time to time. The consultant will hold progress meetings with the City (in-person or virtually) as often as necessary (approximately once per month) until a final document is recommended for approval by the Preservation Commission and adopted by the City Council. City staff may schedule progress meetings, as necessary, at key times during project development. The consultant shall also provide progress reporting throughout the project as deemed necessary by the liaisons APPROACHING THE SCOPE OF SERVICES Please note that these are the general services required and are considered to be the minimum required to complete the project. The consultant is given latitude toward its approach of the scope outlined in the prior sections and is encouraged to propose additions/edits that lend to the best process. Following the selection process, a meeting will be held with the selected consultant to negotiate the final scope of work and a contract for services. Therefore, the City reserves the right to revise the final scope of work. CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL • Proposed project budget not to exceed $18,200 (including line item costs) • Proposed timeline Page 27 of 138  • Qualifications statement • Bidders approach to addressing the Scope of Services • Standard contract for services (not yet executed) CONTENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENT Bidders are encouraged to be concise and submit only the following information. 1. Consultant Qualifications: Provide a biography describing the consultancy’s members’ individual qualifications and history, years in business, location(s), legal structure, ownership, organizational structure, and key staff that would be committed to this project. Consultant qualifications should meet the Professional Qualification Standards shown in Appendix A as listed in the CLG Grants Manual FFY 2022. 2. Prior Experience: Provide examples of the consultant’s previous experience with comparable projects, specifically the development of historic design guidelines. Examples of projects should be from the last five (5) years and include descriptive information such as the character of these projects, the scope of the consultant’s involvement, methodology, and locations of the projects. Experience working with local governments and developing publicly accessible documents is highly relevant. 3. References: Provide a list of at least three (3) references who have worked with the consultant in the past five (5) years who have relevant knowledge concerning the consultant’s ability to complete such a project, specifically related to design guideline development or similar planning/preservation projects. Names, affiliations, addresses, current telephone numbers, and email addresses of all references must be provided. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Submissions must be received no later than August 21, 2025 at 4:00 PM. Proposals may be delivered in person or sent via mail with a tracking service. All submissions must be in sealed envelopes that include the following information on the outside cover: Community Development Department 1528 3rd Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 ENCLOSED: Response to RFP – Historic Design Guidelines AWARDING CONTRACTS The City shall not accept any proposals after the submission deadline. Proposals shall be reviewed for pricing, experience, previous work history, references, approach to addressing the scope of services, State Licenses, State Registration, insurances, bonds, subcontractors, equipment owned, equipment rented, operator experience, and financial stability. The City at its sole discretion shall decide after a review which consultant, if any, is responsive to the RFP. All bidding and award procedures undertaken by the City regarding this project shall be consistent with the City’s adopted procurement procedures. Incomplete proposals shall not be accepted. Consultants who do not demonstrate relevant professional qualifications and experience in developing Page 28 of 138 design guidelines shall not be considered. The lowest bid shall not automatically guarantee that the consultant will be awarded the contract. A submitted price for services shall remain valid for 90 days after submission deadline. Additionally, all qualifications shall be evaluated using the following criteria and through consideration of the proposed budget. 1. Demonstrate Relevant Experience: a. Good: The consultant demonstrates superior experience in providing services. The qualifications demonstrate a wide depth of experience with five (5) or more similar projects, and prior experience working with municipalities. Project work samples are of outstanding quality in content and technical presentation. b. Fair: The consultant demonstrates the required experience in providing services. The qualifications demonstrate an adequate depth of experience with between three (3) and five (5) similar projects, and prior experience working with municipalities. Project work samples are of good quality in content and technical presentation. c. Poor: The consultant fails to demonstrate the required experience in providing services. The qualifications include fewer than three (3) similar projects, and limited prior experience working with municipalities. Project work samples are of inadequate quality in content and technical presentation. 2. Exhibit Commitment to Historic Preservation: a. Good: The consultant demonstrates a superior approach to the subject material, a high degree of understanding of the historic and cultural resources involved, and a commitment to carry out the project in a way that meets the objectives of the SHPO and the U.S. Department of the Interior. All references confirm the above. b. Fair: The consultant demonstrates an adequate approach to the subject material, a basic understanding of the historic and cultural resources involved, and a willingness to carry out the project in a way that meets the objectives of the SHPO and the U.S. Department of the Interior. A majority of references confirm the above. c. Poor: The consultant fails to demonstrate an adequate approach to the subject material, does not understand the historic and cultural resources involved, and is unwilling to carry out the project in a way that meets the objectives of the SHPO and the U.S. Department of the Interior. A majority of references cite a lack of commitment to historic preservation. 3. Indicate Financial Wherewithal: Consultants should provide verification of their financial ability to develop such a project. Financial information need not be overly explicit, but sufficient for the City to ascertain whether the consultant is capable in this regard. The proposed budget shall not exceed $18,200.00. BIDDER RESPONSIBILITY Bidders shall keep the bidding process confidential. Each bidder shall be fully acquainted with conditions relating to the scope of services, any current government Page 29 of 138 regulations pertaining to the work, and restrictions associated with acceptable execution of requested work. Failure or omission of the bidder to acquaint themselves with conditions shall in no way relieve them of any obligation with respect to their bid or subsequent contract. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REPORTING COMPLIANCE The bidder shall provide financial and programmatic information as required by the City of Rock Island to comply with all Federal, State, and local law reporting requirements. The bidder shall also adhere to all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations. PROJECTED SELECTION PROCESS SCHEDULE After the deadline to receive proposals has passed, City staff shall review qualifications and select a consultant to recommend to the Preservation Commission. The Commission shall review the qualifications and make a recommendation to the City Council. Once the Council awards the contract, City staff shall contact said consultant with an executed contract. August 21, 2025 at 4:00pm Deadline to receive proposals August 27, 2025 Preservation Commission makes a recommendation. September 8, 2025 City Council awards contract. CONTACT INFORMATION The primary contact person for this project is listed below. All questions regarding this RFP should be directed to this contact. Eunice Amissah-Mensah, Urban Planner Community Development Department 1528 3rd Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 Email: amissah-mensah.eunice@rigov.org; Phone: (309) 732-2902 Page 30 of 138  APPENDIX A 36 CFR PART 61 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS STANDARDS In the following definitions, a year of full-time professional experience need not consist of a continuous year of full-time work but may be made up of discontinuous periods of full-time or part-time work adding up to the equivalent of a year of full-time experience. A. History. Minimum professional qualifications in history are a graduate degree in history or closely related field; or a bachelor's degree in history or closely related field plus one of the following: 1. At least two years of full-time experience in research, writing, teaching, interpretation or other demonstrable professional activity with an academic institution, historical organization or agency, museum, or other professional institution; or 2. Substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of history. B. Archeology. Minimum professional qualifications in archeology are a graduate degree in archeology, anthropology, or closely related field plus: 1. At least one year of full-time professional experience or equivalent specialized training in archeological research, administration or management. 2. At least four months of supervised field and analytic experience in general North American archeology; and 3. Demonstrated ability to carry research to completion. (In addition, to these minimum qualifications, a professional in prehistoric archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the prehistoric period. A professional in historic archeology shall have at least one year of full-time professional experience at a supervisory level in the study of archeological resources of the historic period.) C. Architectural History. Minimum professional qualifications in architectural history are graduate degree in architectural history, art history, historic preservation, or closely related field, with coursework in American architectural history; or a bachelor's degree in the above specialties or closely related field plus one of the following: 1. At least two years of full-time experience in research, writing, or teaching in American architectural history or restoration architecture with an academic institution, historical organization or agency, museum, or other professional institution; or 2. Substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of American architectural history. Page 31 of 138 D. Architecture. Minimum professional qualifications in architecture are a professional degree in architecture plus at least two years of full-time professional experience in architecture; or a state license to practice architecture. E. Historic Architecture. Minimum professional qualifications in historic architecture are a professional degree in architecture or State license to practice architecture, plus one of the following: 1. At least one year of graduate study in architectural preservation, American architectural history, preservation planning, or closely related field; or 2. At least one year of full-time professional experience on historic preservation projects. Such graduate study or experience shall include detailed investigations of historic structures, preparation of historic structures research reports, and preparation of plans and specification for preservation projects. Page 32 of 138 Page 33 of 138  BID TALLY RELEASE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Request for Proposal (RFP) for Historic Design Guidelines DATE: 8/25/2025 Please note that the bidding period is closed and five (5) qualifying bids were received. Consultant Bid Amount: McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. $15,492.00 Altus Works Inc. $18,000.00 JLK Architects $18,000.00 Designing Local Limited $18,000.00 Studio GWA $18,200.00 MOST RESPONSIBLE AND REASONABLE BIDDER: McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. CONTRACT TO BE AWARDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON 9/8/2025 FOR THE PROPOSED BID AMOUNT. Page 34 of 138  Request for Proposal s Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. 1330 Sherman Avenue Evanston, IL 60201 Page 35 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning August 21, 2025 CI T Y OF R OC K I SL AN D Eunice Amissah-Mensah | Urban Planner Community Development Department 1528 3rd Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 Re: Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island Dear Ms. Amissah-Mensah, The City of Rock Island (City) has requested this proposal from McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. (MIA) to prepare Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island. MIA proposes to provide the Scope of Services described below and as indicated in the Request for Proposals dated July 25, 2025. The City identified the need to amend and update the existing design guidelines for historic properties, last published in 1993, as an objective to advance the goal of preserving and protecting Rock Island’s historic resources in its 2016 City Heritage Resources Plan. The existing design guidelines cover a limited geographic area of the City, with a focus on the residential and downtown historic districts, and lack detailed illustrations and photographs. The City also wishes to establish a unified and consistent approach by integrating the design guidelines with existing plans and policies to develop a city-wide framework. MIA’s proposed approach and scope of services will support these goals, and the City’s commitment to preservation, by providing illustrated and comprehensive design guidelines that address not only all geographic areas which cover the city’s current and future designated historic resources, but also address all building typologies (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial, cultural, etc.) and context-specific character-defining features (e.g., storefronts and signage for commercial properties) and architectural styles from the the mid- nineteenth century through the latter quarter of the mid-twentieth century. The guidelines will reflect current best practices and preservation technologies, as outlined in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment for Historic Properties, in an accessible and approachable format for property owners. The guidelines will also assist City staff and the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) in streamlining the review process for the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness, currently required for work undertaken at a designated local landmark (either individually or within a historic district). The guidelines will also support property owners interested in preserving their historic properties through increased awareness and education by providing a list of resources and references to advise appropriate repair, maintenance, and restoration work while enabling them to take advantage of available financial incentives to offset costs. The design guidelines will also encourage appropriate new construction on vacant or non-contributing sites, as well as additions to historic properties. MIA is a women-owned architectural firm (WBE and DBE-certified) specializing in historic preservation. All staff members meet the National Park Service’s Professional Qualifications Standards as required per the grant agreement. MIA is committed to maintaining the procedural and professional requirements outlined in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. MIA brings a comprehensive knowledge of the history and architectural legacy of Rock Island through our previous work with the City of Rock Island on three of the four historic districts in the community, including the Page 36 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning Downtown Rock Island Historic District, the Broadway Historic District, and the United States Housing Corporation Historic District. Our team also brings a wealth of expertise through our work on several design guideline-specific projects. Recent and relevant projects are showcased in the enclosed project profiles. MIA also has an extensive history of previously completed projects for governmental clients as part of Certified Local Government (CLG) grant programs. Previous design guidelines and/or relevant projects include: - Design Guidelines for the Milwaukee Avenue Special Character Overlay District, Chicago, IL, 2023. - Design Guidelines for the City of Stoughton Historic Downtown District, Stoughton, WI, 2022. - Neighborhood Conservation Districts Zoning Amendment and Pilot Design Guidelines, Chicago, IL, 2020. - Kinzie Industrial Multiple Property Evaluation and Corridor Design Guidelines, Chicago, IL, 2019. - Bryn Mawr Avenue, Uptown Square, and West Argyle Street Historic Districts Preservation Plans and Design Guidelines, Chicago, IL 2017. - Preservation Consulting to the Village of Orland Park for Certificate of Appropriateness Review, Orland Park, IL, 2013 to present. - Citywide Aurora Design Guidelines, Aurora, IL, 2001. Enclosed are additional firm qualifications, project staffing, key personnel resumes, and project profiles with references. We look forward to assisting the City of Rock Island in your efforts and are happy to clarify any questions you may have regarding this proposal. Sincerely, McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Erica Ruggiero, Associate AIA Principal 847.328.5679 ext. 5 / erica@miarchitects.com Page 37 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning SCOPE OF SERVI CES I: Su r ve y an d Re sear ch A. Project kick-off meeting with the City to review goals, process, deliverables, and schedule. B. Review existing documentation on Rock Island’s currently designated historic resources, including but not limited to existing National Register of Historic Places nomination forms, existing Landmark Designation Reports, applicable regulations/ordinances, zoning information, and previously undertaken surveys and studies. C. Visit and make a visual survey of Rock Island’s currently designated historic resources to document the existing historic fabric, changes to historic buildings, vacant lots, and new construction. D. Photograph Rock Island’s historic districts and individually designated historic resources to document existing conditions, character-defining features and elements, architectural styles, building types, streetscapes, and other features as necessary to develop and illustrate the design guidelines. MIA will take specific note of defining and unique development patterns. E. Prepare a Summary of Findings that will direct the format and contents of the design guidelines. With the Summary of Findings, MIA will also prepare a draft outline (table of contents) for the design guidelines for review and comment by the City. II: D e ve lop m en t o f Des i gn Gu id e lin es A. Upon completion of the survey and research, MIA will prepare illustrated design guidelines for the City of Rock Island’s historic resources to guide the rehabilitation of existing buildings while preserving contributing and significant buildings and features. In addition to preserving historically designated properties, the guidelines will advise on the appropriate and compatible new construction for infill lots, as well as additions or the replacement of non-contributing/non-historic resources. The design guidelines will follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and for Preservation Planning, as well as the Rock Island Preservation Ordinance. The design guidelines will include, but are not limited to: i. Introduction ii. Purpose of the Design Guidelines - Project Methodology - Community Engagement Process - Principles and Goals iii. Identification and Description of the City of Rock Island’s Designated Historic Individual Properties and Districts iv. Description of the Certification of Appropriateness and Permit Review Process v. Brief narrative on the history and development of the City of Rock Island vi. Architectural Description (in narrative and graphic form) of the City’s historic built environment - Character-defining features - Neighborhood patterns of development - Architectural styles - Building typologies/forms - Existing conditions/changes over time vii. Design Guidelines - Illustrated guidelines for rehabilitation and restoration, including maintenance, repair, and replacement materials for contributing/significant and non-contributing/new properties. - Guidelines for how to address common changes over time when planning work for a historic property. - Guidelines for appropriate new construction and replacement of non- contributing/non-historic properties, to be based on the existing historic fabric and Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 1 Page 38 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning presented in both narrative and graphic form. These guidelines will promote well- designed new construction that enhances the character of Rock Island’s historic built environment. - Guidelines for additions to contributing properties, to be based on the existing historic fabric and presented in both narrative and graphic form. - Guidelines for retrofitting a historic property for energy efficiency. - Specific guidelines for unique development patterns, context-specific character- defining features(e.g., storefronts and signage for commercial buildings), and building typologies (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) identified during the Survey and Research Phase, including site/public realm features. - Map of the designated historic districts and individual resources with a key that notes the existing condition of each lot, vacant, historic building (contributing and non- contributing), new construction, etc., with reference to the appropriate treatment for each. viii. Appendices - Suggested resources (e.g., financial incentives). - Historic standards and guidelines for use as reference for these specific guidelines (e.g., National Park Service Preservation Briefs and Preservation Tech Notes). - Pre-COA submittal checklist and Design Guideline Review Checklist. B. Deliverables i. A summary of findings from the Survey and Research Phase, with an outline (table of contents) for the design guidelines, will be provided to the City, in Microsoft Word, for review and approval before beginning the complete text draft. ii. A complete text draft of the design guidelines will be provided to the City for review in Microsoft Word. iii. A complete illustrated layout draft of the design guidelines in Microsoft Word will be provided to the City, which incorporates all previous edits and comments made by the City during the review of the text draft. iv. The final illustrated design guidelines, incorporating edits and comments provided by the City during the review of the complete illustrated layout draft. The City will be provided with three (3) bound copies, in addition to a digital copy provided in an interactive PDF format. v. Presentation materials for meetings, as identified below. vi. MIA will provide progress reports to the City of Rock Island in accordance with the reporting requirements outlined in the CLG grant agreement. II I. M eet in g s an d Co m m u n it y E n ga g em en t A. MIA will attend up to four (4) virtual working meetings with the City: i. Meeting 1: Kick-off meeting to review the project timeline, confirm project expectations and goals, discuss changes/revisions to the existing design guidelines, and tour the study areas. ii. Meeting 2: Review Summary of Findings from the Survey and Research Phase, and proposed design guideline report outline/table of contents. iii. Meeting 3: Presentation and review of text draft of design guidelines and photograph/illustration mock-ups. iv. Meeting 4: Presentation and review of the completed illustrated layout draft. B. MIA will attend up to two (2) public Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) meetings at key milestones within the project to present findings and solicit feedback: 1) Introduce the project, the history of Rock Island’s designated historic resources, and available incentives to the public and solicit feedback and input. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 2 Page 39 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning 2) Present the final design guidelines to the public and share resources and references for property owners interested in undertaking any work at a property located within the study area. FEE PROPOSAL McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. proposes to provide the services described in the Request for Proposals, dated July 25, 2025, and as described above, for a Lump Sum Fee of $15,492, including reimbursables. A fee breakdown with line items is provided below. SUBTOTALS Hours Fee 1.00 SURVEY AND RESEARCH 1.01 Review of existing documentation. 4 $476 1.02 Survey / Documentation of the Study Area 24 $2,460 1.03 Summary of Findings / Report Outline 16 $1,640 Phase Subtotal 44 $4,576 2.00 DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN GUIDELINES Hours Fee 2.01 Development of design guidelines 112 $9,488 Phase Subtotal 112 $9,488 3.00 MEETINGS + COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Hours Fee 3.01 Four (4) virtual meetings with City staff 4 $476 3.02 Two (2) presentations to the HPC 8 $952 Phase Subtotal 12 $1,428 TOTAL HOURS & FEES 168 $15,492 Invoices will be submitted on an agreed-upon schedule. Payments will be made per the requirements/procedure outlined within the grant agreement between the City and the State Historic Preservation Office / National Park Service. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 3 Page 40 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE We anticipate developing the project timeline with considerable input from the City. It is anticipated that the project will take approximately 21 weeks to complete, with an approximate start date of the week of September 8, 2025. Provided below is a proposed project schedule. HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY OF ROCK ISLAND McGuire Igleski & Associates (MIA) Action City of Rock Island (City) Action TASK DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PROJECT START DATE w/o September 8 x Working Meeting 1 / Kick-off w/o September 8 x Review existing documentation on the City of Rock Island's designated historic resources 1 week Survey, Building, and Streetscape Documentation 2 weeks Prepare the Summary of Findings and the proposed outline for the Design Guidelines 2 weeks Submit the Summary of Findings and outline for review by the City w/o October 6 x Working Meeting 2 / Reviewing Summary of Findings and proposed outline w/o October 6 x Presentation to the HPC on the Summary of Findings and proposed outline w/o October 27 x Prepare the text draft of the Design Guidelines 5 weeks Submit the text draft of the Design Guidelines to the City for review w/o November 17 x City review of the Design Guidelines text draft 3 weeks Working Meeting 3 / Review of complete text draft Design Guidelines w/o December 8 x Prepare a complete illustrated layout draft of the Design Guidelines with revisions 6 weeks Submit the complete illustrated layout draft of the Design Guidelines for review by the City w/o December 22 x City review of illustrated layout draft 2 weeks Working Meeting 4 / Review illustrated Design Guidelines w/o January 5 x Revise the illustrated layout draft of the design guidelines per City review 2 weeks Submit final illustrated Design Guidelines to the City w/o January 26 x Presentation to the HPC on the final Design Guidelines w/o January 26 x END OF PROJECT w/o January 19 x Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 4 Page 41 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning ORG AN IZ A TI ON AN D SE RVI CE S Established in 2001, McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. is an architectural firm offering the full range of professional services with special expertise in historic preservation. Our skilled staff includes five full-time architects and historic preservation specialists, giving us a wide base of knowledge for working with all building types. The firm is a Women-owned S corporation with Amy Gauen, Sarah Haas, Mark Igleski, and Erica Ruggiero as principals and owners. Our office is located in Evanston, Illinois. Ser v ice s in c lu d e: - Evaluation, Analysis, Planning, and Design - Existing Conditions Assessments - Building Restoration, Rehabilitation, and Adaptive Reuse - Compatible Additions to Existing Buildings - Historic Structure Reports and HABS/HAER Documentation - Preservation Consulting & Planning; Historic Surveys & Design Guidelines McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. is a member of the USGBC with LEED Accredited Professionals on staff. We integrate the needs of the modern user, providing state-of-the-art design and technology solutions while respecting the building traditions, historic materials, and qualities of the past, which contribute to the historic character of the building or site. Pr oj ect s in c lu d e: - Architectural and historic preservation services for Restoration and Adaptive Reuse projects, including the Old Post Office Lobby and Hotel Florence. - Design Guidelines for municipalities, including the Milwaukee Avenue Special Character Overlay District and the Kinzie Industrial Corridor for the City of Chicago, and Downtown Design Guidelines for the City of Stoughton. - Preservation consulting for projects for private and public clients, including National Register nominations, Historic American Building Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) recordation packages, and Section 106 regulatory review and mitigation. - Renovation projects, including restoration, repair, preservation planning, ADA and life safety upgrades, adaptive use, and additions. - Historic Resource Surveys, including recent projects of the Lincoln Highway, McHenry County Rural Structures Survey, the Village of Frankfort, and the Potawatomie Neighborhood in St. Charles. - Historic Building Conditions Assessments and Preservation Planning for cultural and educational facilities, including the St. Joan of Arc Chapel, Shedd Aquarium, and Northwestern University. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 5 Page 42 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PROJECT STAFFING McGuire Igleski & Associates (MIA – WBE/DBE) will perform the scope of services described above with Erica Ruggiero, as project manager and lead historic preservation specialist, coordinating the City and MIA staff, overseeing survey work, research, and writing of the design guidelines. Below is a list of key project staff with titles. Resumes and project profiles are attached. All staff meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards under CFR Part 61. City of Rock Island Eunice Amissah-Mensah Urban Planner McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Erica Ruggiero, Associate AIA Project Manager/Lead Historic Preservation Specialist McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. London Hainsworth Production Staff Historic Preservation Specialist Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 6 Page 43 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning E RIC A RU GG IE R O, A S S O CI ATE A I A , M S HP Erica is a historic preservationist specialist and architectural historian with experience in preservation planning, building surveys, feasibility study reports, rehabilitation and adaptive reuse design, façade restorations, Historic American Building Survey, and building condition assessments. With degrees in both historic preservation and interior design, Erica has a demonstrated understanding of maintaining the authenticity, integrity, and character of a time and place, while adapting it for more modern uses. EDUCATION Master of Science/Historic Preservation SELECTED PROJECTS School of the Art Institute of Chicago ▪ Historic Preservation Plans. Primary preparer for preservation planning Chicago, IL documents for the Bryn Mawr Avenue, West Argyle Street, and Uptown Square Historic Districts. Historic Preservation Plans document existing Master of Science/Interior Design conditions of a district, complex, or campus, through field survey and Florida State University evaluation, development of historical context, and definition of architectural Tallahassee, FL or visual features. Plans provide recommendations, including prioritized Graduate Certificate: Urban Design preservation goals and design principles/guidelines that encourage preservation and appropriate adaptive reuse or new development per the P R O F E S SI O N A L A F F I L I A T I O N S Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Preservation Planning. Landmarks Illinois ▪ Historic Downtown District, Stoughton, WI. Preparer of a local landmark Chicago Women in Architecture designation for Stoughton’s Historic Downtown District and associated Society for Architectural Historians comprehensive, illustrated design guidelines. The design guidelines provide American Planning Association information on the architectural and historical significance of the district to American Institute of Architects serve as a planning tool and guide property owners and businesses for the preservation of their historic property. They also encourage appropriate new P R O F E S SI O N A L A C T I V I T I E S infill construction and additions to historic properties, guided by the district’s Chicago for Chicagoans: history, pattern of development, and rich architectural character, while Presenter providing available financial incentives and preservation recommendations. Chicago History 101: Railroads & Highways, ▪ Milwaukee Avenue Urban Identity Study, Chicago, IL. Co-lead the creation Chicago, IL, January 2018 of a comprehensive set of design guidelines for existing and new construction for the Milwaukee Avenue Special Character Overlay District (SCOD). Work Presenter included a thorough analysis of existing conditions of the built environment, McKinley Park Neighborhood Tour, the creation of illustrated design guidelines, and an extensive community and Chicago, IL, June 2017- Present stakeholder engagement process. ▪ Harlem Avenue Visioning Study, Chicago, IL. Primary preparer for the Conference on Illinois History: analysis of the existing conditions of the built environment. The analysis Presenter supported recommendations for public realm, streetscape, and architectural Researching Illinois’ Rural Resources improvements to strengthen Chicago’s northwest side Italian community. Springfield, IL, October 2019 Assisted with the identification of focus areas and development sites at key opportunity sites along the two-mile corridor. Lastly, helped lead a robust Presenter community engagement process to define an implementation framework for History of the Early Chicago Steel Industry the proposed improvements. from 1855-1905, ▪ Kinzie Industrial Corridor, Chicago, IL. Primary preparer of a Multiple Springfield, IL, October 2016 Property Evaluation (MPE) Report and Design Guidelines for the City of Chicago Kinzie Industrial Corridor. The project included a resource survey of National Register of Historic Places: 800 properties in the corridor, including National Register (NR) and City of Garfield Farm and Garfield Tavern Chicago (COC) Landmark evaluation, research to determine date of Amendments and Boundary Extension construction and historic use/name, and identification of character-defining Campton Hills, IL February 2016 features, architectural style, building typology, and alterations/changes over time. Upon completion of the survey, MIA prepared an MPE which provided a Central Manufacturing District: Original East description of the survey area and methodology, narrative on the history and District, Chicago, IL October 2015 (Amended development of the corridor, architectural description of the corridor, a for Statewide Significance, February 2017) comprehensive identification of industrial building typologies, and recommendations for the preservation of the corridor, including design Central Manufacturing District: Pershing guidelines to promote the rehabilitation of character buildings. Road Development, Chicago, IL June 2015 Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 7 Page 44 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning LON D ON H A IN S WO RT H London Hainsworth is a historic preservation specialist and architectural conservator with experience in historic resource surveys, historic structure reports, building conditions assessments, conservation planning, and preventative conservation. With degrees in art history and historic preservation, London has demonstrated understanding of the way buildings function and weather over time, allowing for proper planning, treatment, and adaptation of use. EDUCATION SE L E C T E D P R O J E C T S Master of Science ▪ McHenry County Rural Structures Survey, McHenry County, Illinois. Historic Preservation Assisting with the completion of a survey update, originally completed School of the Art Institute of Chicago in 1998 for McHenry, Algonquin, Nunda, and Grafton Townships. Chicago, IL Completed fieldwork and documentation, independent research on each property, and helped prepare the illustrated survey report which Bachelor of Art included a written historic context statement on McHenry County, the Art History townships, and rural crossroad communities, as well as an architectural Brigham Young University narrative on the residential and agricultural building typologies and Provo, Utah architectural styles identified. ▪ Historic Architectural Impact Study (HAIS), Winnetka, IL. Preparer of a P R O F E S SI O N A L A F F I L I A T I O N S HAIS report for 445 Sheridan Road in Winnetka, IL. The report Association for Preservation documents the existing conditions of the residence and the known Technology history of the property and owners, neighborhood context, and American Institute for Conservation biographical data for the architects prior to its demolition. As part of Vernacular Architecture Forum the study, an evaluation of the property’s historical and architectural integrity was completed, as well as an evaluation of the impact the demolition of the property would have on neighborhood character per the National Register “Criteria for Evaluation” established by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service and by the “Evaluation of landmarks” established in Title 15, Chapter 15.64, Section 15.64.030 of the Winnetka Village Code (1999). ▪ Section 106 Reviews, Chicago, IL. Preparer of Section 106 reviews and documentation for the City of Chicago as part of its lead water service pipe replacement and small accessible repair programs for seniors. ▪ Historic American Engineering Record (HAER), Statewide, IL. Preparer of HAER documentation for the Chapel 2 building located at Scott Air Force Base in St. Clair County, Illinois; included recordation of existing conditions, preparation of drawings, and a report documenting the historical narrative and contexts of the building. ▪ Downtown Joliet Historic District, Joliet, IL. Co-preparer of the Historic Resources Survey forms for Downtown Joliet—including information regarding materiality, form, and architectural detailing. The district is the original city center for residential development, commerce, transportation, education, government, and recreation on the east side of the Des Plaines River, and, with the arrival of key infrastructure improvements, it transformed into the heart of the City of Joliet. The survey area encompassed over 300 structures, constructed between 1858 and 2025, with a variety of properties, including earlier single- family dwellings and later apartment buildings; one and two-part commercial blocks; social halls; theaters; educational facilities; auto garages and service stations; transportation infrastructure, including train depots and railroad bridges, early and mid-twentieth century hotels; and government buildings. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 8 Page 45 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project Milwaukee Avenue Special Character Name Overlay District Location Chicago, IL Firm’s Creation of Milwaukee Avenue Urban Contribution Identity Design Guidelines Completion Date 2023 Client/Contact Carmen Martinez City of Chicago Dept. of Planning and Development 121 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 744.5920 MIA teamed with Site Design Group, Ltd. (prime, SDG), Goodman Williams Group, and Borderless Studio to complete Urban Identity Design Guidelines for the Milwaukee Avenue Special Character Overlay District. Together, MIA and SDG created a unique set of design Guidelines for the corridor which built off of previous planning efforts and responded to the distinct characteristics of the corridor through design strategies that embrace the historic nature of the built environment, guide rehabilitation work at character buildings, and promote appropriate and compatible new construction on infill lots or when replacing non-character buildings. For the Milwaukee Avenue corridor, the design guidelines consider key character-defining features and development patterns that contribute to the identity of the corridor, as well as address the community’s concerns about the rehabilitation of existing character buildings and increasing affordable housing. To ensure the community’s concerns and needs are met, team included a robust, and bilingual, community engagement process, which listened and integrated the community’s response and input throughout the process into the final design guidelines. De s ign Gu id e l in e s ar e a va i lab le h er e . Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 9 Page 46 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project Design Guidelines for the Name Historic Downtown District Location Stoughton, WI Firm’s Development of design guidelines Contribution for general maintenance, rehabilitation, additions, and new construction Completion 2022 Date Client/Contact Michael Stacey City of Stoughton Zoning Administrator 207 S. Forrest Street Stoughton, WI. 53589 (608) 646.0421 MStacey@cityofstoughton.com The design guidelines for Stoughton’s Historic Downtown District were prepared by MIA to serve as a planning tool and to provide guidance for property owners and businesses for the preservation of their historic property. The guidelines also encourage appropriate new infill construction and additions to historic properties, guided by the district’s history, pattern of development, and rich architectural character. The guidelines provide information on the architectural and historical significance of the district, available financial incentives, and preservation recommendations and best practices for the repair, restoration, and maintenance of contributing buildings located within the district. The district is significant for its role in the regional commerce, trade, and transportation, and locally for architecture, government, and education between 1860 and 1947. During this period, Stoughton developed as a regionally significant mercantile center for southern Dane and northern Rock counties, providing the region with extensive De s ign Gu id e l in e s ar e a va i lab le h er e . retail, financial, and professional services. These historical uses continue today and are reflected in the district’s diverse built environment and unique streetscape. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 10 Page 47 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project Broadway Historic District Name Location Rock Island, IL Firm’s Amendments to National Contribution Register Nomination Form with funding provided by a CLG Matching Grant Completion Date 2023 Client/Contact Tanner Osing Planning & Zoning Manager City of Rock Island 1528 Third Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 (309) 732.2901 The City of Rock Island selected MIA to complete amendments to the Broadway National Register Historic District. First listed in 1998, the amendments focused on providing an updated resource inventory and identification of contributing and non-contributing resources. A revised narrative summary was also included in the amendment to document the minimal physical changes to the Broadway Historic District. The district is comprised of approximately 168 acres with 660 contributing resources and 185 non- contributing resources. The existing contributing resources were constructed between ca. 1854 and 1973 and are predominantly composed of historic single-family residences with only four commercial properties interspersed throughout the interior of the district. The nomination form was also amended to extend the Period of Significance, currently circa 1854 -1948, to 1973. The extension of the Period of Significance reflects the district’s local architectural significance and encompasses those contributing resources that depict Rock Island’s architectural heritage and transition from late nineteenth-century and early twentieth- century revival styles to the Modern Movement during the mid-twentieth century. An introductory contextual history on the founding of the City of Rock Island was also added. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 11 Page 48 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project Downtown Rock Island Name Historic District Location Rock Island, IL Firm’s Preparation of a National Contribution Register Historic District nomination form. Completion Date 2020 Client/Contact Miles Brainard, CED Director City of Rock Island 1528 Third Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 (309) 732.2900 Brainard.miles@rigov.org MIA was selected by the City of Rock Island to prepare a National Register of Historic Places nomination form for the Downtown Rock Island Historic District. As part of the nomination process, MIA completed a resources survey and prepared a digital building database to aid in the completion of the narrative description as part of the National Register nomination, as well as historic context statement and architectural significance narrative. The district encompasses 82.3 acres with 108 contributing buildings, two contributing structures, five contributing parking lots, nine contributing objects, 27 non-contributing buildings, one non-contributing site, 15 non-contributing parking lots, and five properties previously individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The District is the original city center for Rock Island and endures as a locally significant commercial district and the heart of Rock Island County government, society, and local community culture for the City of Rock Island since its founding in 1841. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 12 Page 49 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project The United States Housing Name Corporation Historic District Location Rock Island, IL Firm’s Preparation of a National Contribution Register Nomination Form Completion Date 2024 Client/Contact Linda Anderson Rock Island Preservation Society 1718 21st Street Rock Island, IL 61201 lwickerrph@aol.com The Rock Island Preservation Society selected MIA to prepare a National Register of Historic Places nomination form for The United States Housing Corporation Historic District. The district is composed of two discontiguous units. It consists of 184 contributing buildings and 35 non-contributing buildings, of which 14 were constructed as part of the housing collection but have suffered a loss of integrity, and the remaining 21 buildings were built as standard residential development within the area and not by the U.S.H.C. There are 23 contributing secondary resources (e.g., garages) and 151 non-contributing secondary resources. The Rock Island District of the United States Housing Corporation (USHC) is nationally significant as the first instance of the federal government becoming directly involved in building non-military, permanent housing for civilians. Just 37 of the 60 nationwide projects continued after Armistice Day in 1918. Save for projects at Vallejo, California and Bremerton, Washington, the Rock Island District was the westernmost completed USHC project. It was the largest of the four Midwest projects and its house designs directly reflected regional architectural tract house design and popular tastes. While multi-unit designs, including dormitories and hotels, dominated other project sites, the Rock Island District differed from the beginning because it valued the single-family detached house and a commitment to homeownership as the best means of securing good citizenship. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 13 Page 50 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project Kinzie Industrial Corridor Name Location Chicago, IL Firm’s Multiple Property Evaluation and Contribution Resources Survey Completion 2019 Date Client/Contact Erika Sellke City of Chicago Dept. of Planning and Development 121 N. LaSalle Street, Rm 1006 Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 744.9146 Erika.sellke@cityofchicago.org MIA was selected by the City of Chicago to prepare a Multiple Property Evaluation (MPE) Report for the Kinzie Industrial Corridor. The project included a resource survey of the 800 properties in the corridor, including National Register (NR) and City of Chicago (COC) Landmark evaluation, research to determine date of construction and historic use/name, and identification of character- defining features, architectural style, building typology, and alterations/changes over time. Upon completion of the survey, MIA prepared an MPE which provided a description of the survey area and methodology, narrative on the history and development of the corridor, architectural description of the corridor, a comprehensive identification of industrial building typologies, and recommendations for the preservation of the corridor including NR listing and COC Landmark designations. Located in the Near West Side Community area, the Kinzie Industrial Corridor is one of Chicago’s first industrial areas. Development was spurred by the arrival of Chicago’s first railroad, the Galena & Chicago Union, and Chicago’s first stockyards, Bull’s Head, in 1848. National industrial companies which established plants in the corridor included firms like the H.J. Heinz Company, Dixie-Vortex Company, and Kraft Foods Company. Today, the Kinzie Industrial Corridor remains a center for manufacturing and industry and represents Chicago’s industrial heritage from the mid-to-late nineteenth century to present day. De s ign Gu id e l in e s ar e a va i lab le h er e . Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 14 Page 51 of 138 MIA McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. Architecture, Preservation, Planning PR OJ E C T P RO F ILE Project Neighborhood Conservation Name Districts Zoning Amendment and Pilot Design Guidelines Location Chicago, IL Firm’s Character Building Survey and Contribution Design Guideline Completion Date 2020 Client/Contact Cindy Roubik City of Chicago Dept. of Planning and Development 121 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 744.0012 cynthia.roubik@cityofchicago.org McGuire Igleski & Associates, Inc. (MIA) teamed with Site Design Group, Ltd. (prime) to complete Design Guidelines for the Bronzeville and Englewood study area of the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) Pilot Project. MIA’s role in the NCD Pilot Project included the completion of a neighborhood windshield survey of each pilot area to identify those character-defining features and buildings which represent the neighborhood. The focus of the survey was on existing architectural styles, principal elevation features, landscaping/streetscape, massing, materials, use, site/setting, scale, building orientation, and building typologies to define the identity of each neighborhood’s built environment and serve as a basis for the neighborhood specific design guidelines. MIA also provided services for the development of the design guidelines with a focus on the adaptive reuse of existing buildings to encourage the preservation of neighborhood character and development patterns, while promoting appropriate contemporary architecture on infill lots or the redevelopment of non-character buildings. Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Page 15 Page 52 of 138  Community Development Department 1528 3rd Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 ENCLOSED: Response to RFP – Historic Design Guidelines Page 53 of 138  AltusWorks Proposal for the City of Rock Island: Historic Design Guidelines August 21, 2025 Table of Contents: 1. Qualifications Statement A. Key Staff Resumes B. Related Experience 2. Approach to Addressing Scope of Services A. Proposed Timeline B. Proposed Budget 3. Standard Contract for Services (not yet executed) Page 54 of 138 August 21, 2025 City of Rock Island Attn: Eunice Amissah-Mensah, Urban Planner Community Development Department 1528 3rd Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 Re: RFP – Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island Qualifications Statement AltusWorks is pleased to submit our proposal to provide professional services for the City of Rock Island’s Historic Design Guidelines. AltusWorks is an architectural firm in Chicago, Illinois that has specialized in the preservation, restoration, and adaptive reuse of existing and historic structures since our founding in 2003. We are a certified women-owned business enterprise that operates as an S corporation. Our adept team of 14 professionals consists of licensed architects, cultural resource specialists, historic preservation architects and designers, experienced façade inspectors, and an accredited building enclosure commissioning authority. All of our production staff meet the Secretary of the Interior’s professional qualifications standards in architectural history, architecture, and/or historic architecture, with multiple decades of expertise in developing and applying design standards that align with the Secretary of the Interior’s guidelines. Key staff that will be committed to this project are: • Founding Principal and Preservation Architect Ellen F. Stoner, AIA, CxA+BE, LEED AP will oversee project execution. Ellen has decades of experience in the management of complex projects, and historic preservation experience in the areas of research, assessment, report preparation, reuse studies and presentation, as well as peer review and stakeholder engagement. Ellen will be active in all aspects of project delivery and management. • Cultural Resource Specialist and Planner Anney Grish will carry out the research, assessment, and documentation required for the successful completion of this project. Anney has years of experience in cultural resource management and preservation planning work across the country, and is skilled at marrying the complexity of preservation policy with contextuality and organized research. Resumes detailing the relevant experience of these key staff members are included in the following pages. Page 55 of 138 Prior Experience Our team at AltusWorks has a great depth of experience in the preparation of preservation planning documents. We understand the importance of providing municipalities and agencies with clear, practical tools that balance consistency in design review with accessibility for property owners. Our approach emphasizes integrating existing planning policies, aligning with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and incorporating illustrative graphics and examples to create guidelines that are both technically sound and user-friendly. Our work on related projects has included the development of preservation planning documents for governments and agencies across the Midwest. These efforts required close collaboration with local governments and adherence to federal and state preservation standards, ensuring that the resulting documents could serve as effective resources for both staff and the public as needed. Detailed descriptions of selected projects from the past five years are included in the following pages, along with references and their contact information. Page 56 of 138  RESUMÉ Ellen Farlow Stoner Founder, Principal, Architect Ellen leads a diverse restoration and rehabilitation team. Through her profound understanding of historic and new building materials, technologies and systems, AltusWorks excels at problem solving related to the complexities of working with existing and historic structures. Her expertise facilitates the implementation of a variety of projects from historic structures reports and program management to additions, building renovation and restoration, envelope repair and re-cladding, and adaptive reuse. Summary of experience Over 30 years practicing architecture, historic preservation and restoration Professional Registration Secretary of the Interior’s Education Professional Qualifications Illinois Registered Architect Master of Architecture, Architectural History Historic Preservation Option, NCARB Registered Architect University of Illinois at Architecture LEED Accredited Urbana-Champaign, 1991 Professional, 2009 Historic Architecture Bachelor of Science Chicago Self-Certified in Architectural Studies, Architect University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988 Project experience Experience and expertise across a range of historic preservation-related projects. Historic Preservation Chicago Union Station Mail Platform Renovation, Metra NEPA Master Agreement, Section 106 Section 106 Consulting Chicago, IL 2019-present | Consulting Chicago, IL 2021-present | Preparing Preparing National Historic Preservation Act National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Section 106 documents for the incorporation of a documents for the implementation of various new waiting room on the historic mail platform and infrastructure improvement projects. the addition of new egress stairs through, and Metra 115th Rock Island District Branch Station adjacent to, the Old Post Office. Rehabilitation, Section 106 Consulting Chicago, IL Mill Race Inn, Adaptive Reuse Study Geneva, IL 2021-2022 | Performed historic research and 2022 | Preservation Architect; prepared a prepared National Historic Preservation Act feasibility study for the adaptive reuse of the 1840s Section 106 documents identifying the eligibility Settlement Era vernacular structure, a local and effects to historic resources for the Geneva Landmark. replacement of existing station facilities. Chicago Transit Authority, Historic Illinois Building Metra Grand Avenue Grade Separation, Section Survey/Historic American Engineering Record 106 Consulting Elmwood Park, IL 2020-present | Chicago, IL 2017 | Researched and document the Preparing historic assessment and National Historic riveted construction of the elevated train track Preservation Act Section 106 documents for grade structure along CTA’s North Mainline and the separation between vehicular and rail traffic. historic Vautravers Building that sits within the Connect Transit Downtown Bloomington Transit Newport Historic District as a term of the Section Center, Section 106 Consulting Bloomington, IL 106 Memorandum of Agreement. 2021-2023 | Performed historic research and Metra 59th/60th Street Station, Section 106 prepared National Historic Preservation Act Consulting Chicago, IL 2017-present | Preparing Section 106 documents identifying the eligibility National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 and effects to historic resources for the documents mitigating negative effects to historic construction of a new public transit terminal. resources in the replacement of the existing station. view more at altusworks.com Page 57 of 138  RESUMÉ RÉSUMÉ Ellen Farlow Stoner Project experience continued Experience and expertise across a range of historic preservation-related projects. Historic Preservation Preservation Architecture Planning Now - Chatham Multiple Resource District Moline Multi-Modal Station, O’Rourke Building Landmark Designation Report Chicago, IL 2017 | Moline, IL 2012 | Historic Preservation and Building Preparation of a multiple-property landmark Envelope Consultant and Preservation Architect designation report for mid-century modern housing providing Section 106 services as part of multi- in the Chatham neighborhood of Chicago, disciplinary team for LEED Silver rehabilitation of significant for its prominent African-American historic O’Rourke Building into regional architects and unique architectural styles. transportation hub seeking Federal Historic Tax Credits. Planning Now - Patio Theater Landmark Designation Report Chicago, IL 2015 | Preparation Chicago Transit Authority, Montrose Station ASAP of a landmark designation report for a rare, intact Renovation Chicago, IL 2023-present | example of historic "theater block" architecture. Architectural Designer on an engineering team implementing accessibility and circulation Metra Van Buren Street Station, Section 106 improvements for CTA's Montrose Blue Line station, Consulting Chicago, IL 2020-2023 | Prepared including new elevators, stairs, and other interior National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 renovations. documents for renovations to the station and surrounding pedestrian infrastructure. Illinois Neuropsychiatric Institute Building Envelope Restoration Chicago, IL 2020- Present | Preservation Chicago Transit Authority, Red/Purple Line Architect for building envelope system restoration Modernization Chicago, IL 2014-2020 | Historic including limestone, terra cotta, and brick masonry Preservation Consultant interfacing between NEPA walls, multiple roof levels, fenestration, and doors. study and design team to mitigate negative effects to five historic districts through which the train track Evanston History Center Evanston, IL 2010-present | passes. Provided design consultation for the Preservation Architect for the comprehensive replacement of four historic stations and relocation restoration of the 1890’s Charles Gates Dawes of one local landmark. Mansion and Coach House, a National Historic Landmark. Chicago Union Station, Preliminary Engineering Chicago, IL 2015-2018 | Historic Preservation 9401 S. Ewing Schlitz Tied House Envelope Consultant on a multi-disciplinary design team for Restoration Chicago, IL 2021-Present | nclosure the preliminary engineering of 13 projects focused assessment, cost estimate, zoning and code on operations, safety and accessibility. Prepared analysis to prepare construction documents for Historic Preservation Plan and advised on design select envelope repairs to rehabilitate the solutions impact on historic resources. abandoned bar and apartment building. Stakeholder Engagement Clarke-Forde House Museum Restoration Chicago, IL 2021-2023 | Preservation Architect for the exterior Saint Peter’s Episcopal Church Rehabilitation restoration of the oldest house in Chicago, Chicago, IL 2019-2021 | Orchestrated design including facility assessment and design of exterior workshops with parishioners to gather their envelope repairs, mechanical, engineering, and perspectives and input as part of the rehabilitation plumbing upgrades, and site accessibility and renovation plan for the church. *Winner of the improvements. 2021 Faith & Form Design Award for Adaptive Reuse Museum of Science and Industry Facade Positioning Pullman Ideas Workshop Chicago, IL Restoration Chicago, IL 2018-2022 | Preservation 2015 | Preservation Architect as part of the Architect for the envelope restoration project Collaborative Ideas Workshop for America’s ($16.3M) designed concurrently to complete the Newest National Monument charged with exterior restoration program. Restored limestone Programming Options for Historic Structures, facades, terra cotta domes, skylights, masonry Treatment of Vacant Sites, Interpretation of parapets, roof replacement, drainage Demolished Buildings, and Infill Design Guidelines. improvements, monumental granite and limestone DuPage County Forest Preserve - McKee House entrance stair replacement and modern kiosk Architectural Study Lombard, IL 2013 | Facilitated entrances rehabilitation. public meetings to gather input on the community's preferred reuse options as part of preparing a feasibility study to investigate opportunities for rehabilitation of the vacant historic residence. view more at altusworks.com Page 58 of 138  RÉSUMÉ Anney Grish | Cultural Resource Specialist, Planner Anney’s passion for historic preservation stems from her background in urban planning and interest in how preservation can contribute to great public spaces. Her skillset includes preparing Section 106 and HABS/HAER documentation, developing comprehensive plans, and performing field surveys, historic research, and GIS mapping. Anney’s experience bolsters the team’s expertise in historic preservation documentation and planning. Summary of experience 7 years working in architectural and historic preservation related fields. Education Secretary of the Interior’s Affiliations and Memberships Professional Qualifications Master of Urban Planning and Skyline Council of Landmarks Policy, University of Illinois at Architectural History Illinois Chicago, 2020 History Young Professionals in Transportation - Chicago Bachelor of Arts in Sociology, Roosevelt University, 2011 Rust Belt Coalition of Young Preservationists Project experience Experience and expertise across a range of preservation related projects. Historic Preservation Old Chicago Neighborhood Historic Resources Survey Rock Island, IL 2024-2025 | Conducted a Metra NEPA Master Agreement, Section 106 comprehensive historic resources survey of 250+ Consulting Chicago, IL 2021-present | Performing properties in a residential neighborhood, including historic research and preparing NHPA Section 106 field survey documentation, historical research, GIS documents identifying the eligibility and effects to mapping, and the development of preservation historic resources for multiple transportation and rail recommendations to support the town’s long-term improvement projects. planning and preservation goals. Metra 59th/60th Street Station, Section 106 HABS Report, Elliott Farmhouse Oswego, IL Consulting Chicago, IL 2021-present | Performing 2021-2022 | Performed historic research and historic research and preparing NHPA Section 106 prepared Historic American Buildings Survey documents identifying the NRHP eligibility of / documentation to record the architectural design potential project effects on historic resources for and history of an historic farmhouse. the replacement of an existing train station located within multiple historic districts. Chicago Landmark Designation Reports: Amtrak Chicago Union Station Mail Platform, • Morning Star Baptist Church (2024-2025) Section 106 Consulting Chicago, IL 2021-2024 | • Hyde Park Union Church (2023-2024) Performed historic research and prepared NHPA • St. Adalbert Complex (2022-2023) Section 106 documents identifying the NRHP • Clark-Netsch House (2022) eligibility of / potential project effects on historic Performed historic research and prepared resources for a project at Chicago Union Station. Landmark Designation reports and presentations The Field School, Historic Tax Credit Consulting for the proposed landmarking of architecturally Chicago, IL 2023-present | Performing historic and culturally significant buildings. research, reviewing plans, and preparing applications and documentation for federal historic tax credits for a National Register-listed school building. view more at altusworks.com Page 59 of 138  RÉSUMÉ Anney Grish Project experience continued Nuts & Bolts Brewing, Historic Tax Credit Consulting Facility Analysis, Planning, and Management and National Register Nomination South Holland, IL Chicago Park District Polling Place ADA Assessment 2023-present | Performing historic research and Chicago, IL 2023-2024 | Performed site assessments preparing the NRHP nomination report and federal of 28 polling place locations for future ADA historic tax credit application documents for one of accessibility upgrades per the Department of the oldest remaining buildings in South Holland, to Justice. be adapted into a brewery. Chicago Public Schools First Floor Usable ADA Connect Transit Bloomington, Section 106 Assessment Chicago, IL 2022 | Performed site Consulting Bloomington, IL 2022-2023 | Performed assessments of 30 schools for barriers to first floor NHPA Section 106 review process for the access and conceptual locations for future construction of the new Downtown Bloomington elevator service to multi-story facilities and Transit Center. Siite abuts the NRHP Bloomington provided the CPS capital planning team with a Central Business District encompassing over 100 scope report for each assessed school for future buildings dating from 1842. Performed archival accessibility upgrades. research and field surveys to catalog historic resources and assess potential adverse effects from Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Dolton, the proposed construction. Dolton, IL 2020 | Planner who performed historic HABS Report, Villa Santa Maria Tinley Park, IL research, data analysis, report writing, and graphic 2022-2023 | Quality Assurance review and edits for design in creating a long-range comprehensive the internally-produced Historic American Buildings plan for the Village. Winner 2020 APA-IL Project and Survey (HABS) report of a historic building owned Service Award, Student Award.* by the Cook County Forest Preserve. Grow Greater Englewood: Bontemps Campus Plan, Historic Buildings GIS Database Paris, TX 2021 | Built Chicago, IL 2020 | Planning Consultant who an ArcGIS geodatabase amalgamating multiple performed research, report writing, stakeholder years of historic resources survey data for the city of engagement, and graphic design to assist in Paris, Texas. Created shapefiles mapping over 1,000 creating an adaptive reuse plan for a nonprofit building parcels with associated data points, and urban agriculture organization. This plan focused historic and current photos for each, including on retrofitting a vacant elementary school building custom features for future changes. Designed and campus to accommodate an urban farm and interactive map content for the City’s website to community center.* detail interesting findings and encourage public participation.* Universal Mobility Sidewalk Analysis Chicago, IL 2020 | Analyzed data from local Stakeholder Engagement and Research transportation agencies using ArcGIS and Excel to Illinois Housing Development Authority Standards assess sidewalk network completeness and Updates Chicago, IL 2023 | Gathered feedback contributing factors for accessibility throughout the from developers, designers, and IHDA staff Chicagoland region. Created maps and reports to members engaged in multi-family housing projects summarize this data for potential legislative efforts.* and applied their input to reorganize IHDA’s Architectural Planning and Construction Standards *completed under previous employment Document for improved clarity and ease of use. view more at altusworks.com Page 60 of 138  GOVERNMENT Old Chicago Neighborhood Historic Resources Survey Rock Island, IL Historic Preservation Planning CLIENT: AltusWorks conducted a Historic Resources Survey of Rock Island’s oldest City of Rock Island, IL residential neighborhood, Old Chicago, which encompasses approximately 163 1528 Third Avenue Rock Island, Illinois 61201 acres and 469 parcels. We performed a pedestrian-level field survey to CLIENT REFERENCE: document and assess all properties, followed by comprehensive research to Tanner Osing evaluate each property’s potential eligibility for National Register and local Planning & Zoning Manager (309) 732-2901 landmark designation. In collaboration with Rock Island staff, we also osingtanner@rigov.org developed and applied a unique ranking criterion tailored to the City’s goals, prioritizing properties to help guide future planning and revitalization efforts. To organize and present the survey results, we integrated all field data and evaluations into a GIS database, linking survey findings and recommendations for each parcel to shapefiles. We then compiled a detailed survey report that provides local historic context, outlines the survey methodology, illustrates key findings through charts, tables, and maps, and offers customized preservation recommendations. These final deliverables equip the City with tools to pursue new historic designations, implement targeted preservation strategies, and plan for the future of the Old Chicago neighborhood. view more at altusworks.com Page 61 of 138  RESIDENTIAL Chicago Housing Authority Design Standards Facade & Historic Materials Specialist CLIENT/OWNER: As part of a comprehensive effort to standardize CHA's basis of design and define SMNG-A / Chicago Housing Authority owner performance requirements for all buildings systems, both new and renovated, AltusWorks prepared design standards and technical specifications to 60 E. Van Buren St. 13th Floor be used by approved Architects of Record through the system-wide Capital Chicago, IL 60605 Improvement Program. These standards guided the repair, renovation, and Richard Rothstein replacement of existing building envelope systems. Project Executive, Capital Construction, CHA Drawing on our in-depth knowledge of materials, detailing, and modes of failure, (312) 913-7380 we developed effective and technically sound standards while also integrating 2018–2020 state-of-the-art solutions. Our team paid particular attention to eliminating redundancies and inconsistencies in the historic materials and façade portions of the standards, producing a more user-friendly and consistent document that supports both preservation-sensitive design and ongoing capital improvements in residential developments. view more at altusworks.com Page 62 of 138  EDUCATION, K12 First Floor Usable Accessibility Assessments Title II Compliance Scope Development CLIENT/OWNER: AltusWorks provided accessibility consulting for Chicago Public Schools as part Chicago Public Schools of a city-wide assessment effort to identify barriers to first-floor access in over 42 W. Madison Street 200 schools. Over several months, we evaluated 30 neighborhood school Chicago, IL 60606 facilities for compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, considering both conceptual options for future vertical circulation and near- Mehernosh Mistry (312) 577-7400 term renovation priorities. AltusWorks prepared detailed scope-of-work mpmistry2@cps.edu recommendations addressing toilet rooms, main office areas, parking lots, and December 2021–December 2022 primary entrances. The project required consistent interpretation of design standards, comprehensive documentation of existing conditions, and the development of clear, actionable recommendations to guide capital planning and facility improvements. view more at altusworks.com Page 63 of 138  GOVERNMENT Chicago Park District, Polling Places Accessibility Improvements Accessibility Consultant and Architect OWNER: As part of a multi-disciplinary team, AltusWorks performed accessibility Chicago Park District assessments of 28 polling place locations within Chicago Park District CLIENT: fieldhouses and other facilities. Our work included documenting existing MoDE Architects 213 W. Institute Place, Suite 210 conditions, identifying barriers to accessibility, and developing Chicago, IL 60610 recommendations in alignment with the Chicago Public Schools design CLIENT REFERENCE: guidelines and the U.S. Department of Justice Consent Decree. Following this James Mo, Principal (312) 475-9918 assessment, AltusWorks designed and prepared construction documents for site jmo@modearchitectspc.com and building upgrades to achieve ADA compliance. The project required consistent application of design standards, clear documentation of findings, October 2023 - Present and the translation of technical requirements into practical construction solutions. view more at altusworks.com Page 64 of 138  GOVERNMENT Mayslake Peabody Estate - Facility Condition Assessment and Master Plan Adaptive Reuse and Rehabilitation CLIENT/OWNER: AltusWorks was engaged to prepare a Facility Condition Assessment and Reuse Forest Preserve District of DuPage County,Office of Planning Master Plan for the Mayslake Peabody Estate. Consisting of multiple structures on 87 acres of land, the formerly private property was purchased by the Forest 1717 31st Street Oak Brook, IL Preserve District of DuPage County in 1993 and subsequently listed in the National Register of Historic Places. CLIENT REFERENCE: Jessica Ortega Our team performed a detailed visual assessment of the structures on the estate Office of Planning (630) 871-6404 grounds, developed a prioritized restoration program, and assigned costs for jortega@dupageforest.com fiscal and capital planning. We then facilitated multiple community July 2023– Present engagement sessions to father feedback from stakeholders and the public to assist in developing the vision for the future of the estate. The final phase of the project, the Master Plan, consolidates data from the assessment and engagement processes to present reuse options that will inform fiscal planning and provide strategies to accommodate the collective vision for the future of public programming at Mayslake Peabody Estate. view more at altusworks.com Page 65 of 138  GOVERNMENT Chicago Engine Company Fire House Assessments and Master Plan Exterior Envelope Assessment and Historic Preservation Consulting CLIENT/OWNER: The City of Chicago has undertaken an assessment and design project to plan City of Chicago - Department of Assets, Information, and Services the modernization and standardization of its Engine Company Fire Station (AIS) Houses located across the city. As the Building Envelope and Historic Frances E. Rovituso-Strange Preservation Consultant on a multi-discipline team led by Wight & Co, Coordinating Architect Altusworks developed and is implementing a prioritized assessment system to City of Chicago, Department of AIS. quantify and rank systems and components, identify remaining life cycle, and establish costs for repair or replacement. (312) 744-5476 Frances.Rovituso-Strange@ cityofchicago.org In cooperation with McKinstry, who is evaluating the interior and building systems, AltusWorks is visiting all 102 engine companies over a 6 month period to September 2023 - April 2024 assess the exterior walls, roofs, windows, doors, foundations, and appurtenances which constitute the buildings’ enclosure systems. As the preservation ALTUSWORKS PROJECT TEAM: Ellen F. Stoner: Principal-in-Charge consultant, AltusWorks is identifying the historic firehouses within the portfolio Kesha Patel: Assessor, Preservation and advising during project’s planning efforts on the impact to those resources. Architect Marty Kelly: Assessor Upon delivery of the assessment report, AltusWorks will advise Wight & Co on renovations to the firehouses in compliance with the Secretary of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation. view more at altusworks.com Page 66 of 138 Approach AltusWorks is pleased to submit our interest and team’s qualifications for this exciting project. We recognize that the City of Rock Island is seeking to modernize and unify its historic design guidelines, providing both a practical resource for property owners and a reliable tool for staff and commissioners. This undertaking will involve careful integration of the City’s existing policies and the recommendations of the 2016 Heritage Resources Plan into a single, accessible framework. The result will be a set of guidelines that clearly communicate standards, reflect current preservation practices, and support the City’s ongoing commitment to protecting historic resources. By ensuring the guidelines are thorough, consistent, and user-friendly, we will empower property owners to make informed choices and help streamline the review process. AltusWorks believes that strong, effective management and communication are key to the success of every project. Ellen Stoner, Principal at AltusWorks, will oversee the project, providing her expertise and quality assurance and control to ensure all commitments are met by our staff. Anney Grish, Cultural Resource Specialist, will serve as the primary point of contact for all communications with City of Rock Island staff, and will manage and coordinate all in-house work. Our approach will begin with establishing a shared understanding of priorities and goals through an initial kickoff meeting with City staff. From there, our team will conduct a thorough review of the City’s current guidelines, the Heritage Resources Plan, and representative historic properties across Rock Island. This groundwork will help us identify gaps and opportunities, particularly related to commercial and industrial areas, mid-century resources, and emerging topics such as energy efficiency and alternative materials. With this foundation in place, we will develop a clear framework for the updated guidelines, organized by property type and architectural style, and illustrated with line drawings and photographs for clarity. Draft guidelines will be prepared in close coordination with staff, with multiple checkpoints built in to ensure feedback is incorporated efficiently. Throughout the process, our focus will remain on creating a document that is easy for staff and commissioners to apply consistently, while also serving as a practical, approachable reference for property owners. Page 67 of 138 Proposed Timeline The following is our proposed timeline detailing critical project activities. This schedule is based upon an estimated notice of contract award of 9/8/25 per the issued RFP, and is subject to change based on modification of this date. Phase 1 – Project Initiation (Sept 2025) • Kickoff meeting with City staff • Confirm scope, communication plan, and schedule • Define objectives and gather insight Phase 2 – Research & Analysis (Sept – Oct 2025) • Review existing guidelines and Heritage Resources Plan • Conduct field review of representative properties • Identify gaps and opportunities Phase 3 – Framework & Outline (Nov 2025) • Develop annotated outline of updated guidelines • Review outline with City staff and refine as needed Phase 4 – Draft Guidelines (Dec 2025 – Jan 2026) • Prepare first draft with narrative text, illustrations, and photos • Submit to City staff for review Phase 5 – Revised Guidelines (Jan – Feb 2026) • Incorporate City feedback • Resubmit to City staff for review Phase 6 – Final Guidelines & Adoption (Feb – Mar 2026) • Finalize document • Present to Preservation Commission for recommendation Overall Duration: 7 months (Sept 2025 – Mar 2026) Page 68 of 138 Proposed Budget For the scope of services outlined in the issued RFP, we propose the following fee: Service Fee Development of updated Historic $17,500 Design Guidelines Document Travel Expenses $500 TOTAL $18,000 Ms. Amissah-Mensah, I commit our resources as described in this proposal to the success of this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. We appreciate the opportunity to assist the City of Rock Island in their preservation goals. Respectfully, AltusWorks, Inc. Ellen F. Stoner, Principal Page 69 of 138 STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Description of Services AltusWorks, Inc. (“AltusWorks”) agrees to perform the base services (the “Base Services”) outlined in the Proposal for Services attached hereto (the “Proposal for Services”), dated 03/15/2024 , on behalf of Full Circle Communities(“Owner”) for the project described therein (the “Project”). Standard of Care In performing these services, AltusWorks will use the level of care and skill ordinarily used for similar projects by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same location. AltusWorks makes no guarantee or warranty, express or implied, by providing services under this Agreement. AltusWorks, Inc. will use reasonable care to comply with applicable codes and laws in effect at the time services are provided. Additional Services Services provided at the Owner’s request after the date hereof that are not part of the base services outlined in the Proposal for Services, which are agreed to in writing by AltusWorks, are considered to be additional services (“Additional Services”). AltusWorks will not proceed with Additional Services without the express written consent of the Owner. Fees and Expenses Fees for Services and Additional Services, if any, will be billed based on the portion of total services completed during the month as estimated by AltusWorks. The reimbursable expenses noted in the Fee Summary of the Proposal are in addition to the lump sum fee and will be billed accordingly. Owner will be invoiced monthly for Services, Additional Services, if any, and reimbursable expenses. All invoices are payable upon receipt regardless of the ability of the Owner to secure financing. Amounts unpaid 30 calendar days after the invoice date will be charged interest at a rate of one and a half percent (1.5%) per month from the invoice date until the date payment is received by AltusWorks. If interest is charged, all future payments will be applied to interest before applying to the base fee. Retainer A retainer in the amount of $2,000 __ is due upon acceptance of this Agreement. The retainer will be reduced by an amount equal to the amount of the last paid invoice and all other amounts then outstanding under this Agreement. In the event that any amount of the retainer is remaining after such setoff, the remaining amount, if any, will be promptly returned to Owner. In the event that this Agreement is terminated by the Owner through no fault of AltusWorks, the retainer will be forfeited and all outstanding invoices and fee incurred up to that day shall be paid in full. Owner Provided Information AltusWorks may rely on the accuracy and completeness of information provided by the Owner or Owner’s consultants or agents without verification of the information. Page 70 of 138  POAH Crestview Village Apartments, HUD GRRP Feasibility Letter Page 2 Contractor Contract Requirements: The following contract requirement shall be incorporated into the contract between the contractor and the owner. The Architect and the Architect’s Consultants shall be named as 'additional insured' on the Commercial General Liability policies of the Contractor and Subcontractors of all tiers. Coverage for the additional insureds shall be on a primary and non-contributory basis. Ownership of Documents and Copyright All materials prepared by AltusWorks pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service for use solely on this Project. AltusWorks is the original author and owner of the materials produced pursuant to this Agreement and retains all rights including, but not limited to, copyrights in and to such materials. The Owner shall not reuse or permit the reuse of such materials without the express written consent of AltusWorks. Certifications Any certification issued by AltusWorks is issued only for those contract documents prepared by AltusWorks. All certifications issued by AltusWorks are solely to its knowledge and only to such matters for which AltusWorks would have actual knowledge by the performance of its Base Services and Additional Services, if any, under this Agreement. Termination AltusWorks’ obligation to perform its Base Services and Additional Services, if any, hereunder may be terminated by either party upon not less than seven (7) calendar days prior written notification to the other party. The Owner agrees to pay AltusWorks for all Base Services and Additional Service, if any, performed and all reimbursable expenses incurred to the date notice of termination. Jobsite Safety The Owner agrees and acknowledges that AltusWorks shall neither have control over or charge of, nor be responsible for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, since these are solely the Contractor’s rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents. AltusWorks assumes no liability for workers or job site safety, error or omission by Contractor or its subcontractors. Hazardous Materials In consideration of the risks to AltusWorks in connection with the potential presence of hazardous materials, including but not limited to asbestos, mold, fungus, and PCBs at the Project Site, the Client agrees to make no claim and waives, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claim or cause or causes of action of any kind, including but not limited to negligence, breach of contract or warranty, either express or implied, strict liability or any other causes, against AltusWorks which may arise out of or may in any way be connected to the presence of such hazardous materials. The Client acknowledges that AltusWorks is not and shall not be required to be in any way an "arranger," "generator," "operator" or "transporter" of hazardous materials present at or near the Project site, as these terms are defined in applicable federal or state statutes. Page 71 of 138  POAH Crestview Village Apartments, HUD GRRP Feasibility Letter Page 3 Force Majeure If AltusWorks is hindered, delayed or prevented from performing its services under this Agreement due to (i) any act or neglect of Owner, or (ii) force majeure, the time for completion of its services shall be extended by the period of the resulting delay. Force majeure includes, but is not limited to, an act of God, war, terrorism, civil insurrection or unrest, strikes, labor stoppages, natural disasters, or the demands or requirements of government authorities. Indemnification and Mutual Waiver To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner shall indemnify, defend and hold AltusWorks harmless from and against any and all claims, causes of action, costs, losses, liability and damages (including reasonable attorney and consultant fees and costs) arising from or related to the Project other than those claims that arise solely from AltusWorks’ allegedly negligent conduct. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the parties waive against each other all claims for or entitlement to special, exemplary, incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising from or related to the Project. The parties also waive against each other all rights and claims otherwise covered by property insurance, by builder’s risk insurance or by all risk insurance, including but not limited to subrogation rights, irrespective of whether the claims arise during or post-construction and regardless of final payment to AltusWorks. Limitation of Liability Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, in no event shall the total aggregate liability of AltusWorks and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and consultants to the Owner for any claim, whether based on Contract, tort or any other theory, exceed the remaining limits of AltusWorks’ insurance coverage responding to a claim for the Services provided under this Agreement. Causes of actions between the parties to this Agreement pertaining to acts or failures to act shall be deemed to have accrued and the applicable statues of limitations shall commence to run not later than either the date of Substantial Completion for the acts or failures to act occurring prior to Substantial Completion, or the date of issuance of the final Certificate for Payment for acts or failures to act occurring after Substantial Completion. Design without Construction Administration It is understood and agreed that the Architect's Basic Services under this Agreement do not include project observation or review of the Contractor's performance or any other construction phase services. The Owner assumes all responsibility for interpretation of the Contract Documents and for construction observation and the Owner waives any claims against the Architect that may be in any way connected hereto. If the Owner authorizes any construction phase services, then those services shall be compensated for as Additional Services, unless negotiated otherwise. In addition, the Owner agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Architect, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, Architect) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs, arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of such services by other persons or entities and from any and all claims arising from modifications, clarifications, interpretations, adjustments or changes made to the Contract Documents to reflect changed field or other conditions, Page 72 of 138  POAH Crestview Village Apartments, HUD GRRP Feasibility Letter Page 4 except for claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Architect. Dispute Resolution The parties agree to submit all claims, disputes, or other matters in questions arising out of this Agreement or breach thereof to mediation. The demand for mediation shall be made in writing with the other party and within a reasonable time after such claim, dispute, or other matter arises. Third Party Beneficiary Liability Base Services and Additional Services, if any, provided by AltusWorks under this Agreement are being performed solely for the Owner’s benefit and no third parties are intended third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. Assignment Neither party shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Privacy/Confidentiality AltusWorks will not disclose nonpublic information with respect to the Owner, except as may be required by law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, AltusWorks reserves the right to use certain details of the Base Services and Additional Services, if any, provided under this Agreement, including the Project address, budget, scope and images, for marketing and educational purposes. Entire Agreement This Agreement embodies the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Project. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable unless in writing and signed by the parties. Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law thereof. Page 73 of 138  POAH Crestview Village Apartments, HUD GRRP Feasibility Letter Page 5 Project Name: Crestview Village Apartments Project Address: 200 Crest Lane, Kankakee, Illinois 60901 Agreed to and Accepted by: Owner AltusWorks, Inc. Signature Signature Ellen F Stoner Printed Name Printed Name Principal Title Title 211 N. Clinton St, Suite 3S Address Address Chicago, IL 60661 03/15/2024 Date Date Page 74 of 138  230 W. Huron St. Suite 510 Chicago, IL 60654 www.jlkarch.com 312-357-1221 Response to Request for Proposals Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island Due: August 21st, 2025 at 4:00pm Attention: Eunice Amissah-Mensah Urban Planner Community Development Department Page 75 of 138 August 21st, 2025 Eunice Amissah-Mensah Urban Planner Community Development Department RE: Response to Request for Proposals (RFP) Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island Dear Ms. Amissah-Mensah, I am proud to extend JLK Architects’ professional service proposal and qualifications to provide consulting services to the City of Rock Island to prepare Historic Design Guidelines. Our work with existing and historic buildings throughout Chicago and greater Illinois goes back to 1992, and we trust that our collaborative, research-driven approach and expertise in historic preservation are an ideal match for the City’s goals and objectives. Why JLK? We believe in being your partner in preservation and architecture. Our team brings together architecture and history. Technical preservation architects collaborate with talented architectural historians to guide the stewardship of historic resources throughout Illinois, from Art Moderne-style movie palaces and former industrial buildings in Rockford, to a large commercial department store building in Peoria and main street in Plainfield. We know historic preservation. Our Secretary of the Interior-qualified preservation architects and architectural historians are experienced with the treatment of historic buildings and structures. We have a strong portfolio, a dedicated and technically expert staff, and awards attesting to our strength and applied understanding of historic preservation treatment standards, architectural design excellence, and collaborative processes. From our experience developing designs for the rehabilitation of various types of buildings, we bring firsthand knowledge in the appropriate treatment of historic buildings. We know how to identify, assess, and preserve the materials and features of historic buildings that make them significant. Where necessary, we also know how to undertake sensitive interventions when necessary to make accessibility improvements, increase sustainability, and ensure that our historic places remain safe and functional for generations to come. We know that feasibility and cost are important factors when evaluating appropriate treatments. We know Illinois’ historic downtowns. We know the vitality and variety of the historic Main Streets found in communities like Rock Island throughout Illinois. We’ve worked successfully on numerous complex projects involving the rehabilitation of historic buildings in the heart of these citites, and we’ve seen the impacts that this work can have. In Plainfield, we are working closely with Village staff to develop comprehensive downtown design guidelines that enhance existing historic treatment guidelines with additional guidance related to new development, sustainability, and Modern architectural styles and types. In Peoria, we recently completed the rehabilitation of the former Schipper and Block department store, an A&P supermarket, and a mid-century parking garage into new headquarters for OSF Healthcare which brings hundreds of employees into downtown daily. In Rockford, the future rehabilitation of the historic Times Theater will bring a mid-size live performance venue and restaurants to a long-quiet corner in downtown. We are also designing the adaptive reuse of the former Rockford Gas, Light & Coke Company Fitting and Meter Shops building in an industrial area just west of downtown. We listen. We’re dedicated to building a positive and collaborative working relationship with all project stakeholders and staff at the City of Rock Island. We take pride in working together to achieve a common goal: thoughtful, comprehensive, and well-executed Historic Design Guidelines that support the city and the community. We’re ready! We’ve grown to an office of 22 architects, historians, and support staff with projects throughout Illinois and beyond. Our team is flexible and prepared to be readily available for in-person meetings and coordination with advance planning. We are committed to prioritizing this project and eager to bring our experience and enthusiasm to support the City of Rock Island in this important next step toward holistic stewardship of its historic resources. Please find our responses to the qualifications requirements and other requested information included herewith. Thank you for your time and consideration. Meg Kindelin, AIA President, Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects (WBE/DBE) www.jlkarch.com | 312.357.1221 Page 76 of 138  Cultural Resources Management Practice Area and Services Overview Since 1992, JLK has specialized in award-winning historic preservation architecture and design. Secretary of the Interior-qualified Architectural Historians and Historic Preservation Architects at JLK expertly guide public and private clients through all areas of cultural resources management. Historians, architects, preservationists, planners, and designers at JLK provide cultural resources consulting and planning services that help designers, owners, and agencies navigate environmental review, historic resource evaluation, and preservation design standards. Our expertise and services include: » Architectural History Reconnaissance and Intensive Field Surveys and Historic Contexts » Preservation Planning, Design Guidelines, and application of Secretary of the Interior Standards and Guidelines for the Treatment of Historic Properties » Nominations to the National Register of Historic Places and Local Landmark Designations » Financial Incentives including Historic Tax Credits » Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Section 707 of the Illinois State Agency Historic Resources Preservation Act » Historic Structure Reports » Heritage Documentation following National Park Service Standards and Guidelines, including HABS, HAER, and HALS » Interpretive display, historic marker, and plaque design and development Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects (WBE/DBE) www.jlkarch.com | 312.357.1221 Page 77 of 138 Consultant Qualifications JLK Architects is an established full-service historic preservation architecture firm located at 230 W. Huron Street, Suite 510 the RIver North neighborhood of Chicago, Illinois. Meg Kindelin, AIA is the President and Owner of JLK Architects, an S-Corporation in Illinois. JLK offers full architectural design and construction administration services as well as expanded services in both public and private sectors, transportation infrastructure, and historic preservation planning and cultural resources management. Founded in 1992, rigorous research, technical investigation, and thoughtful design have defined our approach to architecture and historic preservation since the firm’s inception. Under Meg’s leadership since 2014, the firm has grown significantly into a diverse and talented team of architects, designers, planners, and historians. Our architectural historians and historic preservation architects meet and exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOI)Professional Qualifications Standards for Historic Architecture and Architectural History, as shown in Appendix A as listed in the Certified Local Grants (CLG) Manual. JLK’s SOI qualified architectural historians and preservationists will utilize their expertise to ensure the new guidelines align with the objectives of the Illinois State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the SOI Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and incorporate contemporary best practices and material advancements. As preservation architects, our team brings firsthand, applied preservation experience to this work. In all our work, we adhere to preservation treatment standards and guide the rehabilitation of historic buildings of various sizes, types, and styles. Recently our office completed the adaptive reuse of the OSF HealthCare Ministry Headquarters which received a Richard H. Driehaus Foundation National Preservation Award (2023) from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Our team designed replacement terracotta spandrel panels which were no longer extant on the building. To meet project cost and durability, the new panels were manufactued out of compatible altnerative material, Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC), which replicated the historic design and glazed white finish of the historic terracotta. This project was featured in the National Park Service (NPS) Preservation Brief 16: The Use of Substitute Materials on Historic Building Exteriors (2023). KEY STAFF COMMITTED TO THE PROJECT The organizational chart below shows the proposed structure and key staff committed to this project. Community Development Department, Urban Planner Meg Kindelin, AIA President Principal in Charge Kelsey Kuehn Victoria Hill Project Manager, Architectural Architectural Historian Historian Page 78 of 138  Meg Kindelin, AIA President | Principal in Charge Meg is a Secretary of the Interior-qualified Historic Architect and Architectural Historian with over 26 years experience in historic preservation. Meg brings enthusiasm, passion, and creative problem solving to projects. Her actionable insights and hands-on, collaborative approach ensure projects and teams of myriad size and scope are delivered on time and within budget. Meg oversees all adaptive reuse and renovation projects, historic structure reports, heritage documentation projects (HABS/HAER), reuse feasibility studies, and condition assessments. As an established leader in the preservation field, she sits on committees for Landmarks Illinois and is former Chair of the Illinois Historic Sites Advisory Council with the State Historic Preservation Office. Education Relevant Experience Battledeck House Master of Architecture in Design Restoration University of Texas at Austin Village of Oak Park Highland Park, Illinois Historic Building Preservation Plan and Master of Science in Architectural History Rehabilitation Feasibility Assessment Ragdale House University of Texas at Austin Oak Park, Illinois Restoration Bachelor of Science in Anthropology Lake Forest, Illinois University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Village of Sheffield Village Hall Condition Assessment and Darlington Hotel Registrations Programming Adaptive Reuse Registered Architect in Sheffield, Illinois Chicago, Illinois States of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky OSF Healthcare Headquarters Village of Plainfield Qualifications Rehabilitation and Tax Credit Project Historic Barn Restoration SOI-Qualified Historic Architect and Architectural Historic Preservation Consultant Kane County, Illinois Historian, as codified 36 CFR Part 61 Peoria, Illinois Professional Affiliations Glenview Park District Times Theater Wagner Farm Barn and Out Building AIA Historic Resources Committee Historic Tax Credit Consulting and Stabilization Report Association for Preservation Technology HP Architecture Glenview, Illinois International Rockford, Illinois Illinois Historic Sites Advisory Council. Chair Glessner House 915 Cedar Wood Window, Door and Courtyard Landmarks Illinois, Easements Committee Historic Tax Credit Consulting and Restoration WB Griffen Society HP Architecture Chicago, Illinois Rockford, Illinois Society for Industrial Archaeology The Governor Duncan Mansion Construction History Society of America Barrington’s White House Cultural and and Park Chicago Architecture Foundation, Newhouse Community Center Historic Structures Report Curriculum Program Rehabilitation and Addition Jacksonville, Illinois Barrington, Illinois National Trust for Historic Preservation Martin Mitchell Mansion Society of Architectural Historians Essanay Film Studios Building Naper Settlement Historic Structure Report and Feasibility Naperville, Illinois WTS International, Women in Transportation Study World Heritage USA Member Chicago, Illinois Solomon Cottage Adaptive Reuse Park Ridge, Illinois Page 79 of 138  Kelsey Kuehn Associate | Architectural Historian Kelsey is a multidisciplinary Architectural Historian with over five years of experience in architectural studies, historic preservation, and cultural resources management. She exceeds the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications for Architectural History and is experienced with conducting archival research, surveying and evaluating historic buildings, and authoring various technical reports. Her previous project experience includes nominations to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), documentation for the Historic American and Illinois Buildings Surveys (HABS and HIBS), and consultation for Historic Tax Credits (HTCs). Having also contributed to Section 106 and Section 110 National Historic Preservation Act compliance efforts for diverse projects in 16 states, Kelsey is well-versed in successfully navigating these processes. Select Relevant Experience Rockford Gas, Light & Coke Company Meter and Fitting Shop, 915 Cedar Village of Oak Park Street Historic Building Preservation Plan and National Register Nomination and Rehabilitation Feasibility Assessment Historic Tax Credit Consultation Oak Park, Illinois Rockford, Illinois JLK is partnering with the Village of Oak JLK is supporting a local private Park to rehabilitate and modernize the development client in the adaptive reuse historic Village Hall and Municipal Campus, of the former Rockford Gas, Light & Education originally built in 1976 by architect Harry Coke Company Fitting and Meter Shops Master of Art History Weese. Buildings. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Bachelor of Science, Architectural Studies Working closely with the Facility Review Secretary of the Interior (SOI) qualified Art History and Criticism Minor Committee and Village staff, JLK developed Historic Preservation Architects and a Building Preservation Plan that identified Architectural Historians conducted archival University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee character-defining features and treatment research and field photography to list Qualifications zones throughout the building and site. the building in the National Register of SOI-Qualified Architectural Historian, as Historic Places (NRHP). JLK presented to the Times Theater Illinois Historic Sites Advisory Committee codified 36 CFR Part 61 Historic Tax Credit Consultation and in late winter 2024 and the building was HP Architecture successfully listed in the NRHP. Professional Affiliations Rockford, Illinois Docomomo US/Wisconsin JLK is currently providing Historic Tax Credit Founding Board Chapter Member JLK provided historic preservation Consultation Services and Full-service consulting services to the Art Moderne-style Historic Preservation Architectural Design Landmarks Illinois, Skyline Council Times Theater, built in 1938. Secretary 2024-2026 to ensure that rehabiliation of the building meets preservation standards and navigates Society for Industrial Archaeology, Big JLK’s Historic Preservation Studio worked the historic tax credit certifcation process Shoulders Chapter with the owner, contractor, engineers, smoothly. Founding Chapter Member and architects to identify the building’s character defining features and treatment City of Chicago Lectures & Talks options based on the Secretary of the Section 106 Review for HUD Grant- Preserving Modernism and the Spirit of Open Interior’s (SOI) Standards for Rehabilitation. Funded Programs Government: The Role of Preservation Planning JLK managed the State and Federal Chicago, Illinois and Advocacy in Securing the Future of Oak Historic Tax Credits (HTC) processes and Park’s Village Hall produced all documentation following State Chicago Park District Preserving the Recent Past Conference, Boston, Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and Various HUD Grant-funded MA, March 2025 National Park Service (NPS) standards. As Improvements Projects, Section 106 preservation architects, JLK analyzed existing Compliance Articles & Essays conditions and historic documentation Chicago, Illinois Sensitive, Contextual, Modern: Examining Works to inform the production of supporting by Alonzo Robinson, Wisconsin’s First Black narratives, drawings, and specifications DuPage Water Commission Architect following SOI Standards for Rehabilitation. Water Transmission Pipeline Extension Docomomo US Regional Spotlight Project, Section 106 Compliance Co-Authored with Paul Wellington, Spring 2021 DuPage, Will, and Kendall Counties, Illinois *Project completed prior to JLK Page 80 of 138  Victoria Hill Associate | Architectural Historian Victoria is a Secretary of the Interior-qualified Architectural Historian with four years of experience in historic preservation and cultural resources management. She is experienced in conducting archival research, surveying and documenting historic buildings, and authoring various technical reports. Her project experience includes NRHP nominations, documentation for Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS), Historic Tax Credit consultation, and Section 106 Historic Preservation Act compliance efforts for diverse projects in Illinois and is well-versed in successfully navigating these processes. Education Select Relevant Experience Master of Science in Historic Preservation School of the Art Institute of Chicago Rockford Gas, Light & Coke Company Historians developed a historic treatment plan Meter and Fitting Shop, 915 Cedar Street of the interior and exterior for the adaptive Bachelor of Arts in Art History, Criticism, and Conservation National Register Nomination and Historic reuse of the former Brewmaster’s House into a Stanford University Tax Credit Consultation commercial Rockford, Illinois Qualifications Village of Plainfield SOI-Qualified Architectural Historian, as codified 36 JLK is supporting a local private development Architectural Consulation Services and CFR Part 61 client in the adaptive reuse of the former Downtown Design Guidelines Professional Affiliations Rockford Gas, Light & Coke Company Fitting Plainfield, Illinois Association for Preservation Technology, Great Lakes and Meter Shops Buildings. Chapter City of Chicago Secretary of the Interior (SOI) qualified Historic Section 106 Review for HUD Grant- Funded Landmarks Illinois, Skyline Council Programs Preservation Architects and Architectural Society for Industrial Archaeology, Chicago Big Historians conducted archival research and Chicago, Illinois Shoulders Chapter field photography to list the building in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). JLK Chicago Park District presented to the Illinois Historic Sites Advisory Various HUD Grant-funded Improvements Committee in late winter 2024 and the Projects, Section 106 Compliance building was successfully listed in the NRHP. Chicago, Illinois JLK is currently providing Historic Tax Credit DuPage Water Commission Consultation Services and Full-service Historic Water Transmission Pipeline Extension Preservation Architectural Design to ensure Project, Section 106 Compliance that rehabiliation of the building meets DuPage, Will, and Kendall Counties, Illinois preservation standards and navigates the historic tax credit certifcation process smoothly. Brewmaster’s House, 500 N Madison Street Adaptive Reuse Historic Treatment Plan Rockford, Illinois JLK Preservation Architects and Architectural Page 81 of 138  Plainfield Downtown Design Guidelines Village of Plainfield Plainfield, Illinois DATES: Ongoing KEY STAFF: ROLE: Historic Preservation Architect Meg Kindelin, Principal in Charge Kelsey Kuehn, Project Manager Victoria Hill, Architectural Historian Aubrey Prestwich, Architectural Historian The Village of Plainfield is located 35 miles southwest of Chicago along the SERVICES DuPage River. Incorporated in 1834, the Village has a rich history and is one of the oldest communities in Will County and Kendall County. Its historic • Preservation Planning Main Street is defined by the character of its late nineteenth century and early twentieth century building stock and is a historic district listed in the National • Existing Documentation Review, Register of Historic Places. The Village engaged JLK to update existing historic Research, and Peer Guidelines and downtown design guidelines and create a comprehensive guidance Analysis document to guide future stewardship and new development. • Architectural Field Survey Secretary of the Interior (SOI) qualified Architectural Historians and • Public Coordination and Preservation Architects at JLK are working closely with the Planning Presentation Department and Historic Preservation Commission to develop comprehensive design guidelines for downtown Plainfield. The goal of the project is to incorporate and update existing guidance to create a single document that outlines historic preservation treatment guidelines, guidelines for new construction design, and information about contemporary best practices for maintenance, repair, and replacement. Page 82 of 138  Rehabilitation & Adaptive Reuse OSF HealthCare Headquarters Peoria, Illinois DATES: 2018-2023 KEY STAFF: ROLE: Historic Preservation Architect Meg Kindelin, Principal in Charge Katie McNamee, Preservation Architect PROJECT BUDGET: Confidential Kelsey Kuehn, Architectural Historian JLK is the Historic Preservation Architect for the restoration and reuse of the seven- SERVICES story former department store built in 1905. Peoria’s Downtown District is now the new headquarters for the nonprofit Order of Saint Francis (OSF) Healthcare System, the city’s • Comprehensive Space Planning, Interior Programming and Design largest employer. • Complete Architecture Services and The scope included programming, design, and construction for the adaptive reuse of Construction Documents the vacant historic building for modern use, including major demolition of the interior • Historic Research, Surveying and infrastructure and an exterior refurbishment. JLK directed the preservation work to ensure Coordination with SHPO all aspects of the project met the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and SELECT PROJECT AWARDS coordinated directly with the Illinois State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). JLK’s work • National Trust for Historic also included historic research, extensive surveying of historic materials and spaces in the Preservation Richard H. Driehaus building, and directing the team on all historic details, treatment, and strategies. Award for Rehabilitation, 2023 • Landmarks Illinois Driehaus JLK led Historic Tax Credit documentation and the client earned 45% of all project costs Foundation Preservation Award, through federal and state historic tax credits by completing the project in accordance with 2023 national preservation standards. • ALA Silver Award - Existing Building Mixed Use, 2022 The project benefits the surrounding community in multiple ways. All contractors employed on the renovation were local. And when fully operational, the new OSF headquarters will • AIA Prairie Chapter Restoration Award, 2022 bring about 700 people into Peoria’s downtown every day, helping reinvigorate the area • SEAOI Award of Merit - Best both socially and economically. Renovation/Retrofit/Preservation Project, 2022 Page 83 of 138  Preservation Planning and Rehabilitation Village of Oak Park Oak Park, Illinois DATES: 2023 - Ongoing CLIENT REFERENCE: KEY STAFF: ROLE: Historic Preservation Architect Rob Sproule Meg Kindelin, Principal in Charge Public Works Director Heidi Nickel, Project Manager PROJECT BUDGET: $100M Village of Oak Park Katie McNamee, Project Architect JLK FEE: $450K rsproule@oak-park.us Kelsey Kuehn, Architectural Historian SQUARE FOOTAGE: 70K SF Tatiana Guletsky, Project Designer JLK is partnering with the Village of Oak Park to rehabilitate and SERVICES modernize the historic Village Hall and Municipal Campus, originally built in 1976 by architect Harry Weese. The facility currently serves as • In-depth historic research office space for Village staff and houses the Village Police Department. • On-site field survey and study of The primary goal of the project is to improve the functionality of the interior finishes building to meet modern governance needs while preserving its historical • Feasibility analysis for proposed significance and the Village’s commitment to Open Government. interventions • Prepartion of Building The project began with a comprehensive building assessment Preservation Plan and feasibility study conducted by JLK. Preservation Architects and Architectural Historians from JLK carefully reviewed historic • Report compilation, formatting, documentation and previous studies to evaluate the building’s condition and presentation and potential for renovation. Working closely with the Facility Review Committee and Village staff, JLK developed a Building Preservation Plan that identified character-defining features and treatment zones throughout the building and site. The study also produced three conceptual design options, with one recommended scheme presented to the Village Board. Currently, JLK is leading the schematic design phase for the Oak Park Municipal Campus alongside a multidisciplinary team of architects, engineers, planners, and landscape architects. This phase focuses on designing the new Police Department facility on-site while planning the rehabilitation of the existing Village Hall. Page 84 of 138  Rehabilitation & Adaptive Reuse Historic Times Theater Rockford, Illinois The Art Moderne-style Times Theater was built in 1938. Noted theater architect SERVICES Edward P. Lewin and interior theater decorator Hanns R. Teichet designed this mixed-use commercial building and movie palace that is a contributing resource • Historic tax credit consultation, to the National Register-listed West Downtown Rockford Historic District. The including coordination with theater is also designated as a local landmark. The building has been vacant and SHPO and NPS not in use for over 10 years. The building is in a severe state of deterioration, but a local development team is working diligently to adapt the building as a live • Historic treatment consultation performance venue and commercial restaurant space. following SOI Standards for Rehabilitation Secretary of the Interior-qualified Preservation Architects and Architectural • Conditions documentation and Historians are working closely with the owner, contractor, engineers, and local assessment, including historic architect of record to catalogue and guide the treatment of the building’s interior research and analysis and exterior character-defining features. JLK is also preparing all documentation to achieve state and federal historic tax sredits (HTC) and coordinating with • Development of architectural the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and National Park Service narratives, drawings, and (NPS). As preservation architects, JLK analyzed existing conditions and historic specifications documentation to inform the production of supporting narratives, drawings, and specifications following SOI Standards for Rehabilitation. The project is currently in design development. A preliminary colorized rendering of the historic interior above shows the intent to restore historic lobby and theater finishes. www.jlkarch.com Page 85 of 138  Sheffield Village Hall Feasibility Study Village of Sheffield Sheffield, Illinois Sheffield Village Hall is a Classical Revival structure with Romanesque SERVICES Revival influences built in 1909 by the local contractor Patrick M. Ford. It was designed by George Franklin Barber, and was placed on the National • Condition Assessment Register for Historic Places in 2012. • Preservation Planning • Space Renderings Secretary of the Interior (SOI) Qualified Preservation Architects and Architectural Historians from JLK carefully reviewed historic • Cost estimating services documentation and previous studies to evaluate the building’s condition and potential for renovation. JLK completed a Conditions Assessment and Feasibility Study for the Sheffield Village Hall to reccomend preservation- minded repairs and create a clear vision for the prudent reuse of the structure. www.jlkarch.com Page 86 of 138 Bidders Understanding and Approach PROJECT UNDERSTANDING We understand that the City of Rock Island, Illinois, is seeking historic preservation consultant services to create a comprehensive set of city-wide design guidelines that reflect current practices and technologies in the treatment of historic properties of various types and styles. We reviewed the Rock Island Residential Design Guidelines (1993), the Rock Island Downtown Design Guidelines, and the Rock Island Heritage Resources Plan (2016) to develop a thorough understanding of the City’s existing guidelines. We understand the City’s objectives to consolidate and expand upon these existing guidelines to assist the Preservation Commission, property owners, and developers and to make preservation projects more approachable while also strengthening the City’s commitment to preservation through increased awareness and education. We understand the the City is a Certified Local Government (CLG) and that the Project is being funded with CLG funding grant dollars; as such, we understand that our project team and deliverables must adhere to the CLG program requirements. PROJECT APPROACH JLK Architects is proud and pleased to present our professional service proposal for Historic Preservation Services in response to the Request for Proposals (RFP) to create comprehensive Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island. We are proud of our 30-plus year reputation delivering quality design work and preservation excellence achieved by maintaining rigorous standards and highly engaged technical professionals. Our collaborative, hands-on, and research-driven approach defines our work. While our portfolio varies, our general approach to all preservation projects is consistent and proven. 1. Collaborative and Communicative. Through regularly scheduled progress meetings and frequent coordination, we ensure that all team members and project stakeholders are engaged and informed about every aspect of the process. We collaborate across disciplines to ensure all efforts and outcomes are aligned. 2. Research-driven and Hands-on. We believe in the approach to “know before you go.” Before we go into the field, we conduct thorough research and review existing reports and documentation to understand the history and existing conditions and develop a detailed plan for successful field assessment. Before we develop recommendations, we ensure that all stakeholders have the same level of understanding about project deliverables and expectations. 3. On-time Project Delivery. We understand that a rigorous quality control/quality assurance process and regular check-ins with the client and stakeholders are critical to successful deliverables and on-time delivery. We ensure that these processes are scheduled into all our projects. To create Historic Design Guidelines for the City of Rock Island, our approach builds on the general scope of services outlined in the RFP with additional detail based on our professional experience and anticipated collaboration with the City. 1 - Kick-off Meeting and Project Coordination As soon as we receive Notice to Proceed, we will organize a virtual kick-off meeting with the City Community Development Department, the City’s Urban Planner, and members of the City Council and Preservation Commission. This meeting will allow our teams to meet, get to know each other, and establish the major priorities and goals which will set the tone for this work. We will also discuss immediate next steps and the comprehensive schedule so that all work kicks off at a deliberate pace that will be maintained for the entire Project. With this meeting, it is our goal to establish a common understanding of the broader vision and open communication among the entire team. www.jlkarch.com Page 87 of 138 Throughout the duration of the Project, JLK will hold regular monthly virtual progress meetings with City staff, provide progress updates throughout the Project, and maintain consistent coordination via email and phone. In coordination with City staff, we will identify progress meetings at significant Project milestones for continued engagement and feedback from City staff, the Preservation Commission, and the City Council. During our Field Survey (described in detail in Section 3), JLK will schedule in-person meetings with City staff as needed for any information sharing or critical coordination. 2 - Existing Documentation Review and Research JLK will continue to reference the City’s existing Residential Design Guidelines, Downtown Design Guidelines, and the Heritage Resources Plan. In addition, JLK will gather and review relevant information from the following: 1. Certificates of Appropriateness (COA). In coordination with City staff, JLK will review past COAs to identify appropriate repair and rehabilitation projects that are good candidates for photo documentation and illustration in the Historic Design Guidelines. 2. Community Development Department Staff Feedback. JLK will schedule a meeting with City staff, and the Preservation Commission as appropriate, to gather feedback on the COA review process. We hope to identify specific gaps in guidance, beyond the stated lack of guidelines for commercial and industrial areas outside of downtown, that will facilitate COA reviews. We also aim to understand common questions received from historic property owners and identify targeted resources for the maintenance, repair, and adaptive reuse of various property types. 3. Peer Cities’ Historic Design Guidelines. JLK will review recently updated historic design guidelines of peer cities in Illinois. For instance, the City of Elgin recently adopted its Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts in March 2022. 4. Rock Island Historic Structures Inventory and Previous Surveys. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the City’s historic residential, commercial, and industrial, properties, JLK will review documentation related to existing historic structures, including local Landmarks, individual properties and historic districts listed in the National Register, and previous surveys and reports including the Rock Island’s Historic Residential Neighborhoods, 1835-1955: A Summary Report and information recorded by the Rock Island’s Most Significant Unprotected Structures Project. As SOI-qualified preservation architects and historians, JLK will also draw on our professional expertise in applying the SOI Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Our experience performing maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and restoration work on historic properties of various types, styles, and scales informs the approachable, realistic, and applied lens through which we practice historic preservation. 3 - Field Survey Prior to field survey, JLK will identify typical architectural typologies, forms, and styles throughout the City of Rock Island for survey. JLK will rely on the existing Residential Design Guidelines, Downtown Design Guidelines, Rock Island Historic Structures Inventory, Previous Surveys, and remote desktop review of existing conditions using Google StreetView. JLK will coordinate with the City to schedule one day of field survey and any in-person coordination meetings with staff. The purpose of the field survey is to complete the following: • Capture updated high-resolution photographic documentation of the following for use in illustrating the Historic Design Guidelines: » Typical architectural resource typologies and forms (commercial, residential, industrial). » Typical architectural styles and character-defining features of each style (examples of each research type in each style). » Examples of appropriate repairs, alterations, modifications, and replacement of historic materials, finishes, and features (to be coordinated with the City by review of previously approved COAs). Page 88 of 138 4 - Historic Design Guidelines Development Our team will synthesize the efforts of our existing documentation review, research and coordination, and field survey to develop a comprehensive set of design guidelines for the treatment of historic properties in the City of Rock Island. We will work closely with the City Community Development Department and Urban Planner during development, provide frequent updates, and seek regular feedback during scheduled working sessions and review meetings. Our approach is as follows: 1. We will produce a document with written narrative, bulleted summaries, and decision-making “Do’s and Don’ts” call-outs that incorporate all appropriate existing guidelines with the following: » Design guidance (massing, scale, material, siting, general compatibility, etc.) for additions to historic properties of various architectural types and styles. » Design guidance (massing, scale, material, siting, general compatibility, etc.) for the treatment of non- contributing resources and proposed new construction within historic districts. » General guidance on best-practices for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of significant historic materials, finishes, and features using appropriate methods and compatible alternative materials. » Specific guidance for the treatment of historic mid-century buildings, industrial buildings and complexes, and commercial properties. » Specific guidance on sensitive and compatible interventions to improve accessibility and sustainability at historic properties. 2. We will illustrate the guidelines with high-resolution photographs and line drawings that depict the following: » Typical historic architectural resource typologies and forms represented throughout Rock Island. » Typical historic architectural styles and character-defining features of each style represented throughout Rock Island. » Examples of appropriate and inappropriate repairs, alterations, modifications, and replacement of historic materials, finishes, and features. » Recommended and not recommended approaches to repairs, rehabilitation, and additions. 3. We will work closely with the City Community Development Department and Urban Planner to develop a final document for presentation to and approval by the City Preservation Commission and adoption by the City Council. Page 89 of 138 Proposed Project Timeline & Budget We understand that the RFP states that the Preservation Commission will make a recommendation on August 27, 2025 and that the City Council will award the contract for this work on September 8, 2025. We assume that notice to proceed (NTP) will be issued immediately and we are prepared to prioritize this work. Our proposed timeline to complete this work is approximately 20 weeks as outlined below with approximate dates in italics. Project Milestone/Activity Duration Kick-off Meeting 1 Day September 10, 2025 Existing Documentation Review 2 Weeks September 10 - September 24, 2025 Research Ongoing throughout Project Field Survey 1 Day September 24, 2025 Draft Guidelines 6 Weeks September 24 - November 5, 2025 City Review of Draft Guidelines 2 Weeks November 5 - 19, 2025 JLK Revise Guidelines 2 Weeks* November 19 - December 3, 2025* *Thanksgiving: November 27 City + JLK Final Review Meeting 1 Day December 3, 2025 Approval by December 11, 2025 Preservation Commission submittal deadline Preservation Commission Approval 1 Day Meeting on December 18, 2025 Adoption by City Council January 2026 Meeting PROPOSED PROJECT BUDGET JLK and our project team understand that all costs for this project are limited to a not-to-exceed (NTE). Based on this, we pro- pose the following breakdown of costs: Consultant Services to create Historic Design Guidelines $17,500 Estimated Reimbursables (Travel) $500 Total Fee $18,000 www.jlkarch.com Page 90 of 138 References Three (3) references for whom JLK has provided similiar services in the past five (5) years are listed below. Project: Oak Park Village Hall Preservation Plan and Rehabilitation Rob Sproule Public Works Director Village of Oak Park Phone: 708-358-5700 Email: rsproule@oak-park.us Project: Sheffield Village Hall Adaptive Reuse Feasibility Study Skip Moore Treasurer Sheffield Village Hall Alliance 239 S. Main Street Sheffield, IL 61361 Phone: 815-200-9847 Email: txwmoore@outlook.com Project(s): UIUC Historic Preservation & Architecture Retainer Contracts Dennis Craig Campus Historic Preservation Officer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Facilities & Services 1501 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Phone: 217-300-2077 Email: dlcraig@illinois.edu www.jlkarch.com Page 91 of 138  CHAPTER NAME CITY OF ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES August 21, 2025 DESIGNING LOCAL 1 Page 92 of 138  COVER LETTER Eunice Amissah-Mensah Urban Planner Community Development Department 1528 3rd Avenue Rock Island, IL 61201 RE : Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines Dear Eunice and Members of the Selection Committee: On behalf of Designing Local we would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Rock Island to update the Historic District Design Guidelines. We understand the importance of creating a resource that builds on the City's Heritage Resources Plan and not only assists in design review but also empowers property owners to maintain and enhance their historic properties. ​We create design guidelines with one main goal: to make sure residents and property owners of all experience levels can easily understand and use them. We bring national experience creating design guidelines. Designing Local is a certified woman-owned business with deep experience in historic preservation, planning, implementation, urban design, as well as place-based master plans. As an Ohio-based planning firm with national reach, our team has over eight years of experience providing historic preservation planning and are qualified under the Federal Historic Preservation Professional requirements as described in the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716). The proposed team regularly travels to projects in cities, towns, and villages across the country to provide specialized expertise. We position preservation design guidelines as a tool for growth and revitalization. We view a community’s built environment as the primary element which defines the community’s identity and formulates the experience of residents and visitors. We will take a balanced approach to this project that sets a clear path for new developments by leveraging existing assets to reinforce a sense of place. It will also provide clear, appropriate guidance to historic property owners and developers, encouraging revitalization and preservation in Rock Island. We create clear and usable guidelines supported by visualization tools. We believe that a document can only be successful if it is developed with a community driven approach. An inspiring vision is essential for a project's success. This vision must be communicated through strong and compelling tools, including clearly defined goals, a concise and easy-to-understand final document, and vibrant community-accepted visualizations. On behalf of our team, we appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal to you and your community partners who are committed to the historic preservation in Rock Island. Our team is excited about this opportunity, particularly based on our recent experience working in Moline. Projects steeped in history and community stories is where our firm comes alive! Sincerely, Josh Lapp Amanda Golden Principal & Co-Founder Managing Principal & Co-Founder josh@designinglocal.com | 614.607.1557 (Primary Contact) DESIGNING LOCAL 20 EAST BROAD STREET | COLUMBUS, OH 43215 | www.designinglocal.com Page 93 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS DESIGNING LOCAL FIRM OVERVIEW HISTORIC PRESERVATION, URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN, & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Designing Local is an award-winning, nationally recognized firm that has helped more than 60 US communities create vibrant, culturally rich, fun places. OVERVIEW FOUNDED Designing Local, Ltd. is an Ohio-based certified woman-owned 2014 business dedicated to helping communities connect people to place through culture. Our firm was born from the belief that design, art, LOCATION culture, historic preservation, and other important unique attributes of 20 E. Broad Street communities are often overlooked in the planning process. Columbus, Ohio 43215 EXPERTISE EMPLOYEES We believe that a document can only be successful if it is supported 15 by a community engagement-driven approach. We also believe that any project must have an inspiring vision to be successful. This vision CERTIFICATIONS must be communicated through strong and compelling tools including Women-owned Business clearly defined goals, a concise and easy to understand final document, Enterprise (WBE) and vibrant visualizations that are accepted by the community. Our State of Ohio team has over eight years of experience providing historic preservation planning, architectural history, and historic landscape architecture, and Certified Disadvantaged are also qualified under the Federal Historic Preservation Professional Business Enterprise (DBE) requirements as described in the United States Secretary of the Ohio Department of Interior’s Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR Transportation 44716). SERVICES APPROACH Historic Preservation We view a community’s built environment as the primary element which Community Engagement defines the community’s identity and formulates the experience of Urban Planning & Design residents and visitors. We will approach the Design Guidelines project Public Art Planning with a balanced approach that sets a clear path forward for new Arts & Culture Planning design while leveraging existing assets to reinforce the sense of place, Landscape Architecture provide clear and appropriate guidance to historic property owners, and encourage revitalization and preservation in the community. DESIGNING LOCAL 3 Page 94 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS FIRM’S CAPABILITY Designing Local is a certified woman-owned business with deep experience in historic preservation, planning and implementation, as well as place-based master plans. As an Ohio-based planning firm with national reach, our team has over ten years of experience providing historic preservation services and are qualified under the Federal Historic Preservation Professional requirements. Our team will provide all services from our only office in Columbus, Ohio. We have an in-house team of 15 planning, design, preservation, and administrative professionals that all work out of our office in Columbus, Ohio. We have extensive experience working with clients across the country and we are able to adjust our timing to fit within local business hours. We are very accustomed to facilitating, leading, and participating in meetings virtually with our clients and we do so frequently on our active projects in the Central Region of the United States. The proposed team regularly travels to projects in cities, towns, and villages across the country to provide specialized expertise. We have experience working with the Quad Cities and completed the Public Art & Placemaking Plan for nearby Moline, Illinois. We have carefully reviewed the proposed timeline and are confident in our ability to mobilize resources and complete all tasks within the stipulated timeframe. PROJECT 7 PROJECT 5 PROJECT 3 PROJECT 4 PROJECT 6 PROJECT 1 PROJECT 2 PROJECTS MOLINE PUBLIC ART & PLACEMAKING PLAN MOLINE, ILLINOIS The City of Moline, Illinois is a Quad City bordered by the Mississippi River. As the gateway to the East, the city understands the value of first impressions, which is why it set out to develop its first-ever Public Art Master Plan. The plan focused on downtown Moline and supported numerous other planning initiatives advancing redevelopment of the city center. Designing Local hosted a robust public engagement program despite the global pandemic. A series of stakeholder meetings and focus groups were held with various organizations and community leaders. Students from Augustana College and Black Hawk College participated in virtual public events called ‘Walkabout Talkabout Public Art’, during which they were asked to consider seven different types of sites and how public art could impact them. The Moline Public Art Master Plan was adopted in 2021 and continues to influence public art policy and programs in the city, including the transformational public art project coming soon at 1315 4th Avenue in Downtown Moline. 4 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 95 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS PROJECT TEAM Designing Local is able to perform this work in-house and does not anticipate the use of any subcontractor/partners to perform the scope of work indicated. Below is a project organization chart that illustrates the structure of the project team. The Client Group will consist of City A public engagement will be highly of Rock Island staff. This small group interactive in order to get in-depth feedback of critical people will be the primary to understand the wants and needs of the entity that will provide support. A community. representative designated by the Client Group will directly coordinate with Designing Local for all logistical considerations. Designing Local, a woman-owned business based in Columbus, Ohio, will lead this project. Megan Adornetto will serve as Project Manager and be your single point of contact for the duration of the project. Megan will oversee all aspects of the project lifecycle and has a proven track record of managing similar projects. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT CLIENT GROUP STAKEHOLDER COMMITTEE PROJECT LEAD HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT W/DBE CERTIFIED Engagement with the City of Rock Island leadership, the Preservation Commission, and potential state and local governmental agencies will occur to ensure robust and deep community connection. DESIGNING LOCAL 5 Page 96 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS JOSHUA LAPP, AICP PRINCIPAL | DESIGNING LOCAL PROJECT ROLE: PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE Josh is a Principal and Co-Founder of Designing Local. He has over twelve years of professional experience in urban planning on a variety of project types. Driven by the desire to create actionable plans with easy wins for clients and the community, Josh’s favorite projects are those that have a complex issue at the center. His broad knowledge of planning related issues have provided clients with well-rounded, highly researched recommendations to move cultural initiatives forward. At Designing Local, Josh oversees historic preservation tax credits, national register nominations, and historic preservation plans. He has worked on dozens of arts and culture planning initiatives across the country, developed broad public engagement opportunities for Public Art Master Plans and Cultural Plans, and has managed over 20 state and federal historic tax credits in Ohio amounting to over $70 million in investment in historic buildings in EDUCATION Central Ohio alone. Bachelor of Science in City & Regional Planning, The Ohio RELEVANT EXPERIENCE State University Moline Public Art & Placemaking Plan Moline, Illinois | Urban Planner ACCREDITATIONS Amherst Historic Design Guidelines Member, American Institute of Amherst, New Hampshire | Principal in Charge Certified Planners Old West End Design Guidelines APPOINTMENTS Toledo, Ohio | Principal in Charge Commissioner, Near East Area Commission Sandusky Preservation Design Guidelines Sandusky, Ohio | Preservation Planner Former Chair of Board, Transit Columbus Multi-Modal Frankfort Special Capital District Design Guidelines Advocacy Group Frankfort, Kentucky | Preservation Planner Former Commissioner, Create Columbus Commission Somerset Historic District Building Assessment Report Former Commissioner, Italian Somerset, Ohio | Principal in Charge Village Historic Review Commission Historic Caldwell Revitalization Plan Caldwell, Ohio | Placemaking & Preservation Lead Downtown Mansfield National Register Nomination Mansfield, Ohio | Project Manager Ohio and Erie Canal Southern District National Register Nomination Southern Ohio | Urban Planner 2019 Public Education and Awareness Award: Ohio History Connection Buckeye Hills Regional Council Downtown Revitalizations Workshops Southeast Ohio | Engagement Lead New Albany Design Guidelines Technical Training New Albany, Ohio | Project Manager 1505 E Main Street, National Register Nomination Columbus, Ohio | Project Manager 6 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 97 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS MEGAN ADORNETTO HISTORIC PRESERVATIONIST | DESIGNING LOCAL PROJECT ROLE: PROJECT MANAGER & HISTORIC PRESERVATIONIST Megan is a skilled designer and historic preservationist with a passion for preserving and studying the evolution of cultural heritage. Megan’s expertise includes Autodesk Revit, AutoCAD, SketchUP, and GIS. She has experience in laser scanning, building conditions assessments, and historic property research. ​Megan has also worked as a freelance designer, creating schematic design packages for clients, and as an intern at an architecture and construction company, where she worked on historic structure projects and created existing conditions models in Revit. With her strong background in design and preservation, Megan is dedicated to keeping tradition alive and ensuring the preservation of cultural heritage for future generations. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Amherst Historic Design Guidelines Master of Science in Historic Amherst, New Hampshire | Project Manager Preservation, Clemson University Old West End Design Guidelines Graduate Certificate in Toledo, Ohio | Project Manager Historic Preservation, Boston Architectural College Sunrise Historic District Survey Greeley, Colorado | Project Manager & Historic Preservationist Bachelor of Arts in Interior Design, Kent State University San Luis Historic Survey & Public Art Plan San Luis, Arizona | Project Manager & Historic Preservationist AFFILIATIONS Association for Preservation Powell Historic District Survey Technology, International Powell, Ohio | Project Manager & Historic Preservationist Society for Architectural Orem Historic District Survey Historians Orem, Utah | Project Manager & Historic Preservationist Somerset Historic District Building Assessment Somerset, Ohio | Project Manager & Historic Preservationist West Virginia Historic Preservation Consultant Services • Berkeley Springs Expert Visit • Parkersburg Design Charrette • Martinsburg Design Assistance • Charles Town Design Assistance West Virginia Statewide | Project Manager Cross Building Assessment Racine, Ohio | Project Manager Reimagining Columbus Columbus, Ohio | Historic Preservationist & Researcher Schroer Building Historic Tax Credit Mansfield, Ohio | Project Manager * Projects completed with a previous employer DESIGNING LOCAL 7 Page 98 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS AMANDA GOLDEN MANAGING PRINCIPAL & CO-FOUNDER | DESIGNING LOCAL PROJECT ROLE: ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIST Amanda Golden is the Managing Principal and Co-Founder of Designing Local, a cultural strategist, urban planner, curator, and creative placemaker with deep expertise in culturally responsive public art and equitable community engagement. Since 2014, she has championed the belief that public art must authentically reflect its community. Amanda is passionate about designing inclusive processes that amplify underrepresented voices and navigate complex cultural dialogues, ensuring projects are rooted in a shared vision defined by many. At Designing Local, Amanda spearheads the creation of public art and cultural plans for cities across the U.S. These plans are distinguished by their emphasis on equitable engagement, which informs every aspect of a project, from its initial vision to the final design. EDUCATION Amanda has overseen more than 50 public art and cultural plans in 22 Master of City & Regional different states, directed numerous complex public art commissions, Planning, The Ohio State and authored innovative funding policies that have been adopted as University city policy. Her leadership on the Mellon-funded Reimagining Columbus project, which navigated a complex public dialogue about the future of Bachelor of Science in City & the city's Christopher Columbus statue, stands out as a career-defining Regional Planning, The Ohio achievement and one of her most proud accomplishments. State University APPOINTMENTS RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Central Ohio APA, Immediate Moline Public Art & Placemaking Plan Past Chair Moline, Illinois | Project Manager State of Ohio APA, Former Board Member Fort Wayne Public Art Master Plan Fort Wayne, Indiana | Project Manager Development Commissioner, City of Columbus, Ohio Erie Public Art & Placemaking Plan Erie, Colorado | Principal in Charge Sandusky Public Art & Placemaking Plan Sandusky, Ohio | Project Manager The Point Public Art Plan Salt Lake City, Utah | Principal in Charge Park City / Summit County Arts & Culture Plan Park City / Summit County, Utah | Principal in Charge Howard County Arts & Culture Plan Howard County, Maryland | Principal in Charge Akron Cultural Plan Akron, Ohio | Project Manager Anaheim Public Art Master Plan & Implementation Anaheim, California | Project Manager Sullivant Bright Public Art and Parklet Project Columbus, Ohio | Principal in Charge 8 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 99 of 138 CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS ANDREW EBLE URBAN PLANNER | DESIGNING LOCAL PROJECT ROLE: URBAN PLANNER Andrew is a highly passionate urban planner that brings creativity, versatility, and collaboration to every project. He leverages advanced technical tools to produce impactful visualizations and strategic plans that clearly articulate project visions. His dedication to enhancing community identity and cultural vibrancy is consistently demonstrated through his significant contributions to projects across the country. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE EDUCATION Thornton Arts & Culture Plan Bachelor of Urban Planning, Thornton, Colorado | Urban Planner University of Cincinnati College of Design Burleson Public Art Plan Architecture, Art, and Burleson, Texas | Urban Planner Planning Roeland Park Public Art Plan ROLE Roeland Park, Kansas | Urban Planner Urban Planning & Design GIS Mapping New Braunfels Arts & Culture Plan Graphics & Visualizations New Braunfels, Texas | Urban Planner Stakeholder Engagement Community Engagement Warsaw Cultural District Plan Project Coordination Warsaw, Indiana | Urban Planner Greater Lafayette Region Arts & Culture Plan Benton, Carroll, Fountain, Tippecanoe, Warren, & White Counties, Indiana | Urban Planner Wabash River Region Arts & Culture Plan Clay, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion & Vigo Counties, Indiana | Urban Planner DESIGNING LOCAL 9 Page 100 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE WE’VE ASSISTED OUR CLIENTS IN ATTAINING OVER $70 MILLION IN FEDERAL AND STATE HISTORIC TAX CREDITS Designing Local is a registered Historic Preservation Consultant with the Ohio Historic Preservation Office and qualified under the Federal Historic Preservation Professional requirements as described in the United States Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716). Located in the historic Hayden Building across from the Statehouse in Downtown Columbus, Ohio Designing Local is dedicated to helping communities connect people to place through culture. Our firm was born from the belief that design, art, culture, historic preservation and other important unique attributes of communities are often overlooked in the planning process. We bring an authentic curiosity and passion to our work. 10 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 101 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE ADDITIONAL RELEVANT EXPERIENCE HISTORIC DESIGN HISTORIC TAX CREDIT Hayden Building Columbus, Ohio GUIDELINES APPLICATIONS LeVeque Tower Old West End Design Guidelines 1005 Madison Columbus, Ohio Toledo, Ohio Covington, Kentucky Louis Sullivan Bank Building Amherst Historic Design 1017 Madison Newark, Ohio Guidelines Covington, Kentucky Amherst, New Hampshire Madison’s Department Store The Ohio Building Columbus, Ohio Preservation Design Guidelines Sidney, Ohio Frankfort, Kentucky One East Gay Hotel Covington Columbus, Ohio Historic Preservation Design Covington, KY Guidelines Palace Theater 48 Parkwood Columbus, Ohio Sandusky, Ohio Columbus, OH White Haines Optical Factory HISTORIC PRESERVATION Mechanics Bank Columbus, Ohio PLANS Mansfield, OH Worthington Masonic Lodge Atlas of Columbus Landmarks & Pythian Theater Worthington, Ohio Urban Ideas Forum Columbus, OH Columbus, Ohio 777 N 4th Street NATIONAL REGISTER ASLA Ohio 2021 Honor Award, Columbus, OH OF HISTORIC PLACES Communications + Research 14-16 West Union Street NOMINATIONS Mansfield, Ohio Historic Athens, Ohio Preservation Plan Update 1505 E. Main St./McClure Mansfield, Ohio 14-16 North Park Place Nesbitt Motor Company Newark, Ohio Columbus, Ohio New Albany Design Guidelines Technical Training 46 Park Avenue West Astrup Company Building New Albany, Ohio Mansfield, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio 48 Parkwood Budd Dairy Building Ohio & Erie Canal Southern Columbus,Ohio Columbus, Ohio Descent Heritage Trail Southern Ohio 174 Columbus Avenue German Village Historic District (Columbus Candy Company) Amendment Downtown Caldwell Columbus, Ohio Columbus, Ohio Revitalization Plan Caldwell, Ohio 1223, 1233, & 1505 East Main Mansfield Downtown District Street Mansfield, Ohio HISTORIC RESOURCE Columbus, Ohio Ohio & Erie Canal Southern SURVEYS 1685 Oak Street Descent Sunrise Historic District Survey Columbus, Ohio Various Sites, Southern Ohio Greeley, Colorado Astrup Company Building (Pivot Ohio History Connection 2019 Center for Art, Dance, and Public Education and Awareness Somerset Historic District Award Building Assessment Expression) Somerset, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio Van Wert Downtown District Cleveland Restoration Society & Van Wert, Ohio Powell Historic District Survey AIA Cleveland 2021 Community Powell, Ohio Impact Award LOCAL HISTORIC REGISTER Orem Historic District Survey Budd Dairy Building NOMINATIONS Orem, Utah Columbus, Ohio Columbus 46 Park Avenue West Landmarks 2021 Recchie Award Mansfield, Ohio Finalist 1223 & 1233 East Main Street Columbus Dispatch Building Columbus, Ohio Columbus, Ohio Columbus Electrical Works Columbus, Ohio DESIGNING LOCAL 11 Page 102 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE AMHERST HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES AMHERST, NEW HAMPSHIRE These guidelines were created to provide clear direction for exterior CLIENT work on historic buildings within the Amherst Village Historic District. Town of Amherst, New The primary goal was to transition the existing, mostly textual guidelines Hampshire into a visual document as well as to ensure that the guidelines were DATE more easily digestible for everyday homeowners. 2025 This project was a collaborative effort, supported by the Town of Amherst and the Amherst Village Historic District Commission, with SERVICES partial funding from a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant. Historic Preservation Planning The final result was a comprehensive, practical resource that uses easy-to-read graphics and illustrations to describe historical context, prominent architectural styles, and specific instructions for various RELEVANCE building elements. This ensures all new work is sensitive to the village's ✓ Historic District historic fabric, preserving its unique character and appearance. ✓ Historic Design Guidelines ✓ Updated Previous Guidelines ✓ Community Engagement ✓ CLG Grant ✓ $20,000 or less CLICK HERE TO SEE THE FINAL PLAN 12 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 103 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE OLD WEST END HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES TOLEDO, OHIO The main goal of these design guidelines is to provide comprehensive CLIENT standards and guidance for exterior work on buildings within the City of Toledo, Ohio City of Toledo's Old West End Historic District. Its purpose is to COMPLETED preserve, protect, and enhance the built environment of this significant 2025 neighborhood. The guidelines serve as a "how-to" manual to assist owners, architects, and contractors in designing and executing exterior SERVICES projects. Historic Preservation The guidelines were developed with a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant and were created with input from various stakeholders, including residents, city staff, and historic preservationists. The document incorporates past planning efforts and national standards, such as the RELEVANCE Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. This process ✓ Historic District ensured that the guidelines are well-informed and align with established ✓ Historic Design Guidelines preservation principles. The guidelines also serve as the basis for ✓ Updated Previous Guidelines project review by the Old West End Historic District Commission and ✓ Community Engagement the Toledo-Lucas County Planning Commission. The final document ✓ CLG Grant provides detailed guidelines for a wide range of topics and addresses ✓ $20,000 or less common issues and building components. The outcome is a clear resource that promotes the retention of historic elements and helps to CLICK HERE TO SEE THE FINAL PLAN minimize the visual impact of modern systems, thereby ensuring the long-term preservation of the neighborhood's unique historic character. DESIGNING LOCAL 13 Page 104 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES SANDUSKY, OHIO The City of Sandusky is experiencing a boom in downtown CLIENT redevelopment, especially with updates to historic buildings. Since the City of Sandusky, Ohio existing Design Guidelines were created in 2007 and have received DATE minimal update since their adoption, a comprehensive review was 2023 needed to allow enhanced guidance for new developments. Preserving these structures, while allowing them to take on new life, will provide SERVICES direction for historic preservation in Sandusky which is an economic Historic Preservation Planning catalyst for the community and enhances its identity. The project team Community Engagement facilitated one-on-one discussions with various community stakeholders including historic preservation enthusiasts; building owners, architects and residents who had been through the design review process; city staff, members of Landmarks Commission and related commissions, RELEVANCE and leadership. These conversations formed the basis of the project ✓ Historic District team’s understanding of the status of the existing guidelines as well as ✓ Historic Design Guidelines general preservation and development issues throughout Sandusky. ✓ Updated Previous Guidelines The Design Guidelines includes a substantial revision to the format ✓ Community Engagement and organization of the 2007 guidelines document. This includes ✓ $20,000 or less diagrammatic graphics, a visual history of the City, and a reorganization of various items. CLICK HERE TO SEE THE FINAL PLAN 14 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 105 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE SPECIAL CAPITAL DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY The Special Capital District is one of the three City of Frankfort historic CLIENT districts, mostly focused on residential properties. The District exists to City of Frankfort, Kentucky help preserve historic buildings in the neighborhood to ensure that the COMPLETED history of Frankfort lives on well into the future. Establishing Downtown 2023 Historic District Design Guidelines will encourage the renovation, rehabilitation and preservation of older neighborhoods in Frankfort that SERVICES have special or unique features or important associations with the City’s Historic Preservation historical development. Community Engagement The team evaluated the existing historic buildings in the district and examined the needs and desires of residents and property owners through engagement sessions and public design workshops. Topics addressed included the renovation of historic properties, including RELEVANCE construction materials, as well as the design of newly constructed ✓ Historic District buildings. ✓ Historic Design Guidelines ✓ Updated Previous Guidelines The new design guidelines for the Special Capital District create ✓ Community Engagement cohesive guidelines with the other two historic districts in Frankfort and solidify continued preservation and investment in the community’s historic resources. CLICK HERE TO SEE THE FINAL PLAN DESIGNING LOCAL 15 Page 106 of 138 PRIOR EXPERIENCE SOMERSET HISTORIC DISTRICT BUILDING ASSESSMENT SOMERSET, OHIO As a cornerstone of the community, Somerset’s historic district holds CLIENT immense cultural and aesthetic value. By meticulously documenting Mayors’ Partnership for the district’s buildings, the Designing Local team worked to develop Progress a comprehensive review of the architectural gems nestled within this COMPLETED 170-acre area. The assessment report offers a captivating journey through time, revealing the stories embedded within its structures and 2024 will be a crucial step to preserve the unique character and rich history SERVICES of Somerset. Historic Preservation From identifying significant architectural features to assessing the Urban Planning & Design condition of each building, the report provides a detailed snapshot of the district’s current state. By uncovering the historical context of these structures, the report contributes to a deeper understanding RELEVANCE and appreciation of Somerset’s past. Ultimately, this comprehensive ✓ Historic District assessment empowers the community to make informed decisions ✓ Storefront Rehabilitation about the future preservation and revitalization of this treasured historic ✓ Signage Recommendations district. ✓ Material Preservation ✓ $20,000 or less CLICK HERE TO SEE THE FINAL PLAN 16 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 107 of 138 133PRIOR W.EXPERIENCE WASHINGTON STREET RESTORED WINDOWS VINYL MURALS BISTRO TABLES & CHAIRS PLANTERS WEST VIRGINIA HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTING WEST VIRGINIA STATEWIDE The West Virginia Department of Economic Development hired CLIENT Designing Local to act as a Historic Preservation Consultant to provide West Virginia Department of professional design and historic preservation services for downtown Economic Development commercial property owners in certified Main Street West Virginia and ON TRAC communities. ​ DATE 2024 - Ongoing ​The Designing Local team has provided a number of on-site consultations for several Main Street communities. Our work so far has SERVICES included the preparation of design solutions, building assessments, Historic Preservation technical advice, and recommendations for historic preservation. ​ Community Engagement Designing Local has completed multiple projects for Berkeley Springs as an expert/resource team, facade improvement suggestions, renderings, and building use charrette/community engagement. As part of this RELEVANCE project, our team has become familiar with the Secretary of Interior’s ✓ Historic District Standards for Rehabilitation and Main Street America’s Four-Point ✓ Storefront Rehabilitation approach to historic preservation design. ✓ Signage Recommendations ✓ Material Preservation ✓ Community Engagement ✓ $20,000 or less DESIGNING LOCAL 17 Page 108 of 138 REFERENCES LIST OF CLIENT REFERENCES Alexandra Elias, AICP President & CEO Renew Moline aelias@renewmoline.com 309.762.9194 Project: Moline Public Art & Placemaking Plan Jennifer Brennan West Virginia Main Street/ONTRAC Coordinator State of West Virginia jennifer.l.brennan@wv.gov 304-352-3971 Project: West Virginia Historic Preservation Consultant Contract Logan Stang Planning Director City of Powell, Ohio LStang@cityofpowell.us 614.885.5380, ext. 1030 Project: Powell Historic District Survey William (Bill) Harbert Associate Planner William.Harbert@toledo.oh.gov Project: Toledo Old West Historic Design Guidelines Nic Strong Formerly Village of Amherst nstrong@manchesternh.gov 603.792.6755 Project: Amherst Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Vicki Birenberg Historic Preservation Officer City of Frankfort, Kentucky vbirenberg@frankfort.ky.gov 502.892.8970 Project: Frankfort Special Capital District Design Guidelines Nancy Recchie Benjamin D. Rickey & Co. nrecchie@gmail.com 614.582.8268 Project: Multiple Historic Preservation Projects 18 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 109 of 138 METHODOLOGY & APPROACH PROPOSED BASE SCOPE OF WORK The proposed scope for the City of Rock Island Rock Island Historic District Design Guidelines is outlined on the following pages. The scope should be refined with input from staff. Please note that references to “Client Group” is the City of Rock Island-designated project manager and the “Team” is the Designing Local team members. TASK 1: MOBILIZATION 1.01: Discover Rock Island. Facilitate a tour of the Rock Island's designated Historic Districts and local landmarks with members of the Client Group and select stakeholders to understand the issues and architectural character of Rock Island. Discuss and review any existing historic design guidelines documents, goals and tasks, process, opportunities and constraints, code language, and establish key stakeholders. 1.02: Design a comprehensive project plan and detailed schedule of the overall timeline for the creation of the Historic Design Guidelines. This will address the role and responsibility of the Client Group and Team members with specific milestones to reach within the scope of the project including, but not limited to: timing of any project management meetings, stakeholder meetings, public meetings, and project presentations and reports. This will be refined and monitored by both the Client Group and the Team project manager. Task 1 Deliverables • Stakeholder list with contact information; • Project workplan and timeline. TASK 2: BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION 2.01: Background Research. Retrieve and review the 2016 Heritage Resources Plan and existing available documentary materials, and current design review guidelines and processes to become familiar with Rock Island's history, existing ordinances, and other adopted documents, and best practices to determine potential issues to address in the guidelines development process. 2.02: Site & Community Character Analysis. Review existing approved plans to understand opportunity areas and sites, architectural style, constraints, and other issues. Provide a written assessment of key findings. The Team will also develop a user-based understanding of the City through a detailed analysis of existing aesthetics, unique natural features, historical sites, and other elements. Exhibits will be created from this analysis will be utilized throughout the planning process to support engagement and discussion. 2.03: Guidelines Benchmark Research. Compile benchmark guidelines documents and images which are similar in context and key elements to this project and organize them by type. Provide historic preservation best practices and benchmarks/examples from other comparable communities to help guide discussions among City staff and the community about key issues of concern. Review neighboring, regional and national design guidelines for relevance and best practices. Consult with the Client Group for aspects they want to see included in the final document. These benchmarks will be used to generate ideas and communicate concepts to be tested and refined throughout the process. 2.04: Determine optimal method and process for public outreach. The Team will work with the Client Group to identify, describe, and implement a comprehensive strategy and methodology for conducting public meetings that encourage and engage input from the community. Task 2 Deliverables • Background research; • Base maps/site photos; • Public meeting event dates and type. DESIGNING LOCAL 19 Page 110 of 138 METHODOLOGY & APPROACH PROPOSED BASE SCOPE OF WORK, CONTINUED TASK 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 3.01: Determine existing attitudes and perceptions, opportunities and challenges to creating the Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines. The Team will meet with key stakeholders to listen and learn about Rock Island. Stakeholder meetings may take place in one-on-one or as focus group sessions and may include community members and other leaders of non-government entities. During this series of meetings, the Team will determine an internal vision and will discuss the plan for fulfilling the vision. 3.02: Public Meetings. At least one (1) in-person community meeting will be held to generate feedback and input for the development of the design guidelines. This will include elements such as map exercises, general discussion, and written comments on Rock Island history. The Team will work with the Client Group to develop the interactive activities in order to foster dialogue. Members of the Team will facilitate conversations with attendees and will collect verbal, video recorded, and written comments. • Create. The Team will work with the Client Group to design the specific details for each workshop, including specific engagement activities, necessary background research, and essential products. In addition to the engagement workshops, the team will develop a survey for the community to participate in. The survey will be distributed online through social media channels, the City’s website, and will be available in hard copy in City offices. • Market. The Team will assist with promoting the workshops, including developing the design of all marketing materials. The Team will utilize neighborhood organizations, and the City to promote the workshops within their networks. • Facilitate. The Team will lead the community engagement opportunities or educate local leaders to solicit input from as many people as possible ensuring the process reaches audiences of diverse backgrounds. • Report. The Team will prepare a detailed report that interprets the data and identifies key values, priorities, vision and goals. All findings will be presented based on community feedback and support and will be evaluated through a national best practice lens to key stakeholders and the City. Task 3 Deliverables • Meeting materials; • Engagement report including data from public and stakeholder meetings. TASK 4: PRELIMINARY DRAFTS 4.01: Draft Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines document format. Create a first draft of the guidelines document for review by the Client Group. This will include the text format, page layout, color scheme, table of contents, acknowledgments, etc. 4.02: Draft Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines text outline (Review #1-60% Draft). Develop an initial draft of the guidelines text for review. This will be provided to the Client Group for their comments and will supported by review by the public. 4.03: Draft preliminary Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines text (Review #2-95% Draft). Refine the draft guidelines for review by the Client Group and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Task 4 Deliverables • Submit and update drafts to SHPO for comment. • Present drafts to key stakeholders • Provide/Present Final Draft 20 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 111 of 138 METHODOLOGY & APPROACH PROPOSED BASE SCOPE OF WORK, CONTINUED TASK 5: FINAL HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES 5.01: Final Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines document. Produce a final Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines document which will include an introduction with a summary of the process, a brief history of Rock Island's historical development, public engagement, benchmark research, the guidelines text, and various supporting exhibits illustrating the treatment of existing historic properties, new developments, materials, and signage. A draft of this document will be circulated for review by the Client Group and any comments/feedback will be incorporated into the final version. • City Brand Guidelines & Visual Quality. Reference any existing branding guides to create consistency and clarity of communication with the public. The Team will strive to create a visually compelling document that will quickly and effectively communicate the intent and outcomes of the guidelines to the public. Diagrams, maps, and renderings will be utilized as prominent elements in the plan. • Document Production and Digital File Delivery. The document will be designed in an 8.5” x 11”, double- sided book format and will be produced in Adobe InDesign, similar to the example plans provided in ] this proposal, and exported to a PDF. The Team will deliver original, editable graphic and text files to the Client Group for future editing and updates. • Process Appendix. The Team will produce a separate appendix of all process oriented materials including meeting minutes, benchmark research, etc. 5.02: Final Guidelines Presentation. Present final draft of updated Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines to key stakeholders and City staff for approval. Task 5 Deliverables • Final Rock Island Historic Design Guidelines document. ASSUMPTIONS OF THE TEAM: ASSUMPTIONS OF THE CLIENT GROUP: • The Team will be prepared to have • This approach will be converted to work sessions and project updates at a detailed scope of work finalized in minimum, bi-weekly with staff. collaboration with the Client Group that • The Team will attend all meetings as will address coordination among the City needed and required and will prepare of Rock Island staff. meeting summaries for staff, including a • Client Group will assist in obtaining any monthly progress report as requested. documents and data. • The Team will prepare presentation • Client Group will act as a liaison with the materials in suitable formats for all public appropriate legislative bodies. meetings. • Client Group will coordinate document • The Team will take the lead on review and supply edits or approvals in a facilitating all public meetings. timely manner. • The Team will respond in a timely • Client Group will assist with securing manner to any and all questions from the locations for meetings, events, and public and staff. workshops. • The Team will serve as a liaison between • Client Group will assist in marketing the City and community stakeholders. public workshops to the public through • The Team will brief leadership on plan community channels and other local recommendations, as requested. opportunities. • The Team will provide all tools for data collection including but not limited to questionnaires, surveys, etc. DESIGNING LOCAL 21 Page 112 of 138 TIMELINE & BUDGET PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Designing Local anticipates that this project will require approximately six (6) months to complete. This will include two (2) in-person visits and bi-weekly virtual Client Group meetings. The process shown below is preliminary and we anticipate refinement of the schedule with input from the Client Group. TASKS MEETINGS MONTH 1 KICK-OFF MEETING TASK 1: MOBILIZATION COORDINATION MEETINGS Virtual bi-weekly calls for the TASK 2: duration of project. BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION MONTH 2 KEY STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS/INTERVIEWS TASK 3: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT MONTH 3 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT MONTH 4 DRAFT ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN TASK 4: PRELIMINARY GUIDELINES DRAFTS MONTH 5 REVISE DRAFT BASED ON COMMENTS TASK 5: MONTH 6 FINAL ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES FINAL ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES 22 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 113 of 138 ESTIMATED COSTS FEE PROPOSAL The following task and fee worksheet is based on the preceding project scope of work. The Team anticipates refinement of the scope of work, and subsequently, the task and fee worksheet. Billing will be performed on monthly intervals and includes travel, expenses, and two (2) in-person visits. ITEM DESCRIPTION FEE BASE SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1 MOBILIZATION $4,000 TASK 2 BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION $2,000 TASK 3 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT $3,000 TASK 4 DRAFT ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES $4,000 TASK 5 FINAL ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES $5,000 BASE SCOPE OF WORK TOTAL (NOT TO EXCEED) $18,000 IN-PERSON ENGAGEMENT SUNRISE HISTORIC DISTRICT SURVEY GREELEY, COLORADO Designing Local is currently working with the City of Greeley, Colorado to complete a historic resource survey of approximately 544 properties in the Sunrise neighborhood. ​ The Designing Local team is performing a file search, on- site fieldwork, and taking high-quality photography of the buildings, followed by a reconnaissance survey for 90% of the properties and an intensive survey for the remaining 10%. ​As part of the project we have facilitated one (1) public meeting, conducted four (4) oral history interviews, and translated outreach materials and the final survey report into Spanish. ​The survey must comply with History Colorado’s requirements and will be completed by December 31, 2025. ​ DESIGNING LOCAL 23 Page 114 of 138  WHY OUR TEAM? Whether a resident or visitor, we believe spending time in Cities should be enriching, enjoyable, and engaging. We strive toward this ideal with all of our projects through local creative engagement. WE ARE A CREATIVE, EXPERIENCED, & ENTHUSIASTIC TEAM We are a well-rounded team that will provide a broad range of expertise. Designing Local’s approach to planning and design that is created for the locals, by the locals, sets us apart from other firms. Our team approaches each project as a collective effort, with the creative and technical elements working harmoniously to form a cohesive and visually compelling document. Our team brings a youthful passion and curiosity to our work that will result in design guidelines that are tailored to Rock Island and are clear and concise. Our open, honest, and clear communication coupled with Principal-level service means the planning and design process will be straightforward, thoughtful, and successful. WE ARE EXPERTS AT CREATING VIBRANT, CULTURALLY RICH, FUN PLACES WHERE PEOPLE WANT TO BE Residents and visitors are drawn to distinct, interesting, culturally relevant places. Each community has a significant latent resource in the form of the creative energy of its residents. Our projects enable this energy to be focused toward building community pride, identity, and investment, and growing an environment that attracts all people. We don’t want the engagement process to feel like work, so we work to create an atmosphere that is convenient, fun, and fosters open and inclusive dialogue. Through robust and creative public engagement we help to extract the story of the place in which we are working. We take that story, as told by the community itself, and help translate that into a unique, interesting, and powerful deliverable that will bring people that visit Rock Island to experience joy and well-being. WE SEE HISTORIC PRESERVATION AS ESSENTIAL FOR THE GROWTH AND VITALITY OF A CITY We recognize that prosperity and economic development come from strategically planning and investing in our communities culture and unique assets. The result: better community relations, increased pride and ownership by stakeholders, and revered places that people and businesses naturally choose to be a part of. We seek to help communities grow their pride, realize their ability to influence the future, and create a prosperous community for all. 24 ROCK ISLAND HISTORIC DESIGN GUIDELINES Page 115 of 138 Page 116 of 138 Page 117 of 138 Page 118 of 138 Page 119 of 138 Page 120 of 138 Page 121 of 138 Page 122 of 138 Page 123 of 138 Page 124 of 138 Page 125 of 138 Page 126 of 138 Page 127 of 138 Page 128 of 138 Page 129 of 138 Page 130 of 138 Page 131 of 138 Page 132 of 138 Page 133 of 138 Page 134 of 138 Page 135 of 138 Page 136 of 138 Page 137 of 138 Page 138 of 138