City Council Meetings
Regular MeetingWichita, KS · January 7, 2020
Minutes
Page 1
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Wichita, Kansas, January 7, 2020
Tuesday, 09:00 AM
The City Council met in regular session with Jeff Longwell, Jeff Blubaugh, Bryan Frye, Brandon
Johnson, Cindy Claycomb, James Clendenin, and Becky Tuttle.
Staff Members Present: Bob Layton, City Manager, Jennifer Magana, City Attorney, and Karen Sublett,
City Clerk.
Mayor Longwell called the meeting to order at 9:01 a.m.
Approve the minutes of regular meeting of December 17, 2019.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to approve the minutes of regular meeting of December 17, 2019.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
I) PUBLIC AGENDA
1.) George Theoharris - Quality of life and term limits.
George Theoharris stated he and Richard Ruth met with Mayor Longwell the Monday before Christmas
and the City Manager stopped in to see what we had to say. Stated we were there to glean some safety
advice from an eight year City Councilman and a four year Mayor. Stated it was their intention to see how
best we could get our ideas and thoughts for a safer and less interrupted life here in Wichita working with
City government. Stated here are a few samplings of what is happening in neighborhoods near you: 1)
neighbors cars and property stolen and damaged in the Meadowlark neighborhood; 2) a dog wails all day
because it is lonely and left outside, disturbing the neighbors peace and tranquility in the Fairfax
neighborhood; 3) vehicles race down Clark Street crossing streets from Hillside to Grove in the Mead
neighborhood and asked for a stop sign several years ago; 4) a sidewalk four inches below the driveway
approach in the Grandview neighborhood, which is a true safety hazard for two years and 10 months; and
5) two and a half months ago, I turned in a rooster who crows and this morning he was still crowing,
which is illegal to have a rooster in the City of Wichita. Stated he spoke a month ago about four problems
and received one thanks from one Council Member. Stated it was talked about getting a third term voted
into the frame work of how we elect the Mayor and City Council but at the end of the day, if the Mayor
and City Council are doing the will of the people and answering and working their ideas to a successful
end; would not care if you have the Congress's term limits. Stated if one citizens such as his self comes
and speaks about four or 400 safety related items impacting our neighborhoods quality of life and public
safety and gets just one thanks from the seven most powerful people sitting in front of him; thinks your
term limits should be reduced from two terms to the end of business today. Stated he is not looking for
thanks but is looking for understanding and answers to the concerns he brings forward today.
Page 2
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
2.) Richard Ruth - The need to support a citizen’s right to respite on their own property and on shared,
public lands.
Richard Ruth stated quality of life is an important priority and if you want to grow our City and retain
professionals and encourage citizen engagement, then it has to be a high priority. Stated the City is not
going to have a big enough budget to solve all of these problems but some of these things the City has to
solve; we don't have the resources to put in a new sidewalk and we don't have the legal ability to put a
summons out or a seize and assist on a rooster. Stated the motivation is how long has this problem been
going on and if a problem is persistent for months and months, then something needs to happen and
nothing was done. Stated at its root, citizens need to respect the common good and respect our neighbors'
need for peace on their own property and when we come home at the end of the day, we should the
possibility of finding some respite. Stated there are laws that work for that and there are laws that work
against that and believes that citizens need to take the lead in solving some of these problems. Stated there
are some things that the City can do such as support the property maintenance pilot program; do not vote
against neighborhood plans and continue to seek out ways to keep citizens informed, especially those who
are homebound.
3.) Warren Carter - Wichita Transit System. (NO SHOW)
II) CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 1 THROUGH 17
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to approve consent agenda items 1 through 17 in accordance with the
recommended actions shown thereon.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
III) BOARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS
1) Report of Board of Bids and Contracts dated January 6, 2020.
Attachment: 01-06-2020 Board of Bids.pdf
Melinda Walker Purchasing Manager, reviewed the item.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to receive and file report, approve the contracts and authorize the necessary
signatures.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
IV) UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS
1.) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANT TO PASSAGEWAYS. (DEFERRED FROM
DECEMBER 3, 2019)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. IV-1.doc
Attachment: Passageways Letter.pdf
Page 3
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Scot Rigby Assistant City Manager stated at this time we are continuing to work with Wichita State's
Center for Economic Development and Business Research to finish up the opportunity cost analysis and
benefit cost analysis for Passageways and are asking Council to defer this item until January 21st
meeting.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to defer the grant consideration until the January 21, 2020 Council meeting.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
V) NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS
1.) PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE MULTI-SPORT STADIUM CID. (DISTRICTS IV AND VI)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-1.docx
Attachment: Ordinance 51-167
Scot Rigby Assistant City Manager reviewed the item.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh we had a property owner reach out to us on 535, 549 and 551 West Douglas about
being taken out of that and or having that allocated to themselves and asked staff if he knows anything
about that conversation.
Scot Rigby Assistant City Manager stated we have been contacted by a business owner and are having
discussions and if at some future date the Council wants to consider removing that, we can. Stated we
have an upcoming discussion regarding the development agreement (DA) with the Riverfront Partners
and if the Council decides to move forward with that DA that they will be coming forward and be added
into the CID at that time and if we want to remove such properties as mentioned we could do so at that
time.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh stated so we could go forward today.
Bob Layton City Manager stated staff is confusing this with another parcel. Stated there is a parcel that is
part of WaterWalk, west of the river that inadvertently was included and we are going to bring that to you
for amendment in February to remove that parcel. Stated what you are talking about is a letter that all of
us received last night, which is a separate issue and there are two issues and are not related to the CID but
are related to the DA which we will discuss later in the agenda.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh stated he doesn't want to hold anything up.
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard.
1) Celeste Racette asked how much in bonds are going to be issued in this CID.
Mayor Longwell stated it is pay as you go.
Celeste Racette stated nothing has been put out our expended.
Mayor Longwell stated it is pay as you go.
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Celeste Racette stated nothing from the general fund or for this development has been spent at this point.
Mayor Longwell stated we are building a baseball stadium so some of those funds are going to pay off
part of the baseball stadium so we have spent money.
Celeste Racette stated she is talking about CID bonds that are part of this agenda.
Mayor Longwell stated it is pay as you go, you can't spend it until you get it.
Celeste Racette stated with the CID, every property owner has to be in agreement so there is some
confusion about this agenda item but is guessing that this CID has had no disagreements with any
property owners in this proposed district.
Mayor Longwell stated the City Manager said the confusion is over the DA and not the CID.
2) Gary Plummer President and CEO of the Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce stated he is
representing the Riverfront Master Plan Coalition, which is made up of community organizations
including the Wichita Community Foundation, Visit Wichita, Wichita Downtown, and Greater Wichita
Partnership along with public partners, Sedgwick County and the City of Wichita. Stated we understand
the procedural necessity of bringing this CID up for approval today to be able to generate the revenues
that will support the exciting activities related to the ball park. Stated we look forward to future
developments along both sides of the river in 2020 and beyond and we are also excited to see how the
revenues generate and ultimately support the Riverfront Legacy vision for a world class performing arts
center, convention center and greenspace that will be welcoming to the whole community. Stated the
coalition appreciates comments that were made by Council Member Frye regarding the CID at the
December 17th City Council Meeting regarding the potential future utilization of funds on the east bank
as well and thank you for your efforts in making this a better community.
3) Craig Goebel stated we have 80 million dollars spent on a ball park and it has got to be financed
somehow and understands that. Stated he was here 18 years ago and spoke before the Council about
downtown development to propose a carnival, which got Shanghai by developers that own property in
Old Town. Stated WaterWalk was a failure because it never got the support that it needed and everything
was going into other areas. Stated the public supports you on what you are doing downtown and would
like to encourage you in the future to handle these projects differently. Stated if these people need six
million dollars to do a project, put it in a bill and not do it crazy and give land away for a dollar and they
go by $60,000 worth of land and you give them three million dollars; it makes you look bad. Stated he
wants to be a proponent for this Council. Stated these projects are over promised and underperformed
such as Exploration Place. Stated what we need is 3,000 good paying jobs and this is not going to do that.
4) Doug Ballard stated he is also concerned about obligating us to things that we are not too successful.
Stated he is worried about the aircraft industry and how it will affect this town. Stated can you tell me that
in 20 years from now that Beech, Cessna, Learjet and Boeing will still be here. Stated you cosigned bonds
for a building for Cessna and for Boeing and about a week later they start talking about layoffs. Stated he
is concerned that we are heading into a recession that will affect Wichita more than the rest of the
country. Stated he is also concerned about the businesses in this area that area already there and that have
stood the test of time and if they will be here five or six years from now.
Page 5
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Council Member Frye stated last month when this was brought up, he did express concerns about
allocating CID revenue from the east bank to the west bank projects, specifically at the Boathouse
property. Stated he has been assured that as we go forward with this, we can amend the district to create
an allowance for revenue from that to be used for performing arts and or convention center and or
greenspace on the east bank. Stated as we get further along, that would be his intent and hopefully can get
the rest of the Council to agree as well and we can do that going forward. Stated he knows that the east
bank is a very expensive proposition with multiple layers and facilities and we are not going to be able to
do that all at once, it is going to take years but we have to make sure that we are getting the west bank
project done success, open and paid for so that we can do those projects on the east bank and that is why
he is going to be supportive of this.
Mayor Longwell stated he thinks most of the Council is in agreement with that and does not think there is
any argument that we want to separate the two and make sure that the revenue for the east bank is there.
MOTION:
Vice Mayor Blubaugh moved to close the public hearing, pass the ordinance creating the Community
Improvement District on emergency first reading and authorize the necessary signatures.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
2.) PUBLIC HEARING FOR A PROJECT PLAN, TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR
THE UNION STATION PROJECT AREA 3 PLAN. (DISTRICT I)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-2
Attachment: Project Plan Union Station Phase 3 11-8-19.pdf
Attachment: Ordinance 51-168
Mark Elder, Office of Economic Development, reviewed the item.
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard.
1) Celeste Racette asked if the maturity of this TIF tag onto the maturity of the original TIF; do they
match.
Mayor Longwell stated he doesn't think we can.
Celeste Racette stated she doesn't think so either and wants to confirm that it is a 20 year addition to the
TIF.
Mayor Longwell stated that is his understanding but will find out for sure.
Celeste Racette asked why this wasn't just a special assessment. Stated that is another alternative to
raising money for landscaping, we could have just done a special assessment in this area.
Mayor Longwell stated that is a completely different tool and the TIF works better in this circumstance.
Bob Layton City Manager stated after we get all of the questions we can address those to the Council and
will let staff address the first question.
Page 6
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Mark Elder Office of Economic Development stated this does not reset the original timeframe of the
districts, this project does go for 20 years.
Bob Layton City Manager stated regarding the second question, we had multiple discussions with the
developer regarding the financing for the project and what would work and what was acceptable to the
lenders and as a result of that, is how we came to the TIF and the necessity for a TIF. Stated this is on a
pay as you go basis, the City is not incurring any debt.
Council Member Johnson stated development at Union Station has been a great boost for our downtown
and is looking forward to seeing what happens with the Ice House development.
MOTION:
Council Member Johnson moved to close the public hearing, place on first reading the ordinance
adopting the Union Station Project Area 3 Project Plan and authorize the necessary signatures.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
3.) PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH RIVERFRONT PARTNERS,
L.L.C. (DISTRICT IV)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-3.docx
Attachment: Development Agreement
Attachment: Resolution No. 20-001
Bob Layton City Manager reviewed the item.
Joe Norton with Gilmore and Bell reviewed the details of the Private Development Agreement.
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard.
1) Celeste Racette stated it was reported that we are going to pay $400,000 for the parking easement and
three million dollars for the 18 properties; where is this money coming from out of our funds.
Mayor Longwell stated we will answer all of your questions at the end.
Celeste Racette stated is it coming from the general fund.
Mayor Longwell asked Ms. Racette to give him all of her questions and we will go from there.
Celeste Racette stated she has five minutes and would like to go over her questions but will ask them
later. Stated parking is going to be a big problem and after reviewing the ball park contract, noticed that
according to the terms of the ball park contract, you have to provide one space for three seats of stadium
parking. Stated this is a 10,000 seat ball park so you are going to need to provide 3,333 parking spaces
within a half mile area and doesn't see how you can do that looking at the map she received from the City
Manager. Stated how are you going to meet the terms of the parking agreement.
Mayor Longwell stated we already have a parking plan that meets those terms.
Page 7
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Celeste Racette asked where the media will park and as part of the contract you are to provide for
television vans for broadcasting for media; has King of Freight agreed to give up their parking in Gander
Mountain for us to use; has Jack DeBoer agreed to give up his 99 year lease to allow parking in
WaterWalk; have we paid any incentives to Jack DeBoer to give up his 99 year lease rights to Gander
Mountain for these parking spots; have we given any incentives to King of Freight for giving up their
agreement to rent the building and parking garage from us because we are taking the parking garage from
them; how did we get just these developers for this work and did we bid this out to other developers.
Mayor Longwell stated we didn't get a bid because it is private development, they came to us.
Celeste Racette stated we are paying them.
Mayor Longwell stated that is because they are buying the property.
Celeste Racette asked if there is going to be profit for them for those 18 sites that we are paying three
million for that were appraised at one million for surface parking for the ball park.
Mayor Longwell stated we are paying fair market value.
Celeste Racette stated that came from the assessors out of Overland Park and not county assessors. Stated
our Star Bonds are going to be $40 million on this project, our TIF bonds are going to be $14 million, our
CID bonds are going to be $13 million and our government revenue bonds are going to be $16 million;
how much is going to be left of our bond debt service?
Mayor Longwell stated we will get the answer to that question.
Celeste Racette asked if the Council is aware that we are limited by KSA to the amount of debt we can
have in the City.
Mayor Longwell stated we are well under our debt limit.
Celeste Racette stated section 3.14 states there will be relocation restrictions on businesses in a two mile
radius but what is interesting is that the City will determine if Riverfront development property can invite
their own businesses to come in this development area and be part of this development. Stated you are
going to give approval to that list of businesses, which is an interesting side agreement and asked if
citizens can get a list of businesses that were approved by this private development.
Mayor Longwell stated if they are competing businesses out there they can't come into that two mile
radius.
Celeste Racette stated section 3.14 on page 14 of the agreement says that the developers will have the
right to enter into any legal obligation of the lease for another business within their property and you all
can reject or accept that and is asking if citizens can look at this approved or denied list of businesses
within the development area.
Mayor Longwell stated we will answer that at the end.
Celeste Racette asked who is going to be responsible for making sure this sign is posted showing there is
a two percent sales tax increase in this CID area.
Page 8
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Mayor Longwell stated that is something that we do by code which is required to be placed on the doors
of the businesses and will make sure and figure out who the responsible person is for posting those signs.
Celeste Racette asked who can she give her list of questions and this is the only opportunity she has to get
answers to her questions.
Mayor Longwell stated to give her list of questions to the City Manager.
Council Member Claycomb stated we had an almost two hour meeting with Ms. Racette on Saturday with
the City Manager and Council Member Frye, herself, County Commissioner O' Donnell and the
Riverfront partners and stayed as long as she had questions.
2) Vincent Hancock thanked staff for updating this agenda report and thanked staff and Council Members
for meeting with the stakeholders last Saturday. Stated he appreciates the Economic Development staff
for including the clawback provisions in the development agreement and have learned that past
developers may have dishonest predictions about things and if their word turns out to be no good, we
want to take that property back and do something with it. Stated regarding the purchase agreement, the
agenda item says that we are making an agreement with Riverfront partners, yet the purchase agreement
is with Town Street partners. Stated the staff report does not clearly delineate that these are both land
development doing business as other businesses and thinks it should be written in the staff report to be
acknowledged and feels it would be appropriate to split into two agenda items; one for a development
agreement and one for a purchase agreement because we are supposedly buying it from two different
entities. Stated the appraisal that we paid over $8,000 for contains significant inconsistencies. Stated the
appraiser says that the best use for this property is a multi-use development; does not feel that is
appropriate and questions why we are buying the southern appendage for $1.6 million dollars and thinks
we only need to buy the top half and not the bottom half. Stated why analyzing nearby educational
options, the appraiser included Butler County Community College which is not exactly nearby but in the
meantime as they are analyzing educational options they omitted Newman University which is just across
the road and omitted Friends University. Stated this appraiser doesn't know what they are talking about
and request the City referring from hiring them and any out of town appraiser in the future.
3) Craig Gabel stated a few years ago most of you weren't even on this Council and he offered to buy the
land where the apartments are now at the corner of McLean and Kellogg. Stated he offered $1.1 million
dollars and the request went nowhere because a couple of months later we gave that ground to developers
to build what was supposed to be a long-term hotel. Stated he was going to use that ground to put a year
round carnival and staff reported that there has been little or no development there but if we had the
carnival there drawing in thousands of people in there, there would have possibly been growth there.
Stated all of our downtown development has focused a lot on hotels, restaurants, and clubs and now
apartments. Stated since we have built so many hotels and subsidized quite a few of them, it is his
understanding that the average occupancy rate is closer to 40 than it is to 50%, which means every hotel
in this City is barely scraping by and is not sure we need to in another hotel. Stated you cannot run an
independent restaurant in this City for any length of time and be successful within three miles of Old
Town. Stated now we are working on developing apartments and you see a lot of vacancies, we need to
figure out a way to bring people into this town and not a way to cannibalize businesses and people's
retirements around the City.
4) Justin Strelow representing Douglas LLC thanked City staff, Council Members and Riverfront
properties for investing in our community and trying to grow us in a positive economic development
fashion. Stated after reading the agenda and speaking with the ownerships at this location, there a few
Page 9
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
items he wants to touch base on. Stated ownership has questions on the financing of the TIF and the CID.
Stated it is their understanding and was stated by Mr. Norton that it is going to be a private partnership
development for the infrastructure that is located both at Riverfront Partners site and also at the City-
owned properties. Stated their understanding of past projects is that the City's economic development
policy is that any economic incentive districts be established over and above sites that are located by the
applicant and in this case it seems that offsite TIF proceeds that are from people that are not directly
benefitting from are being used for both for City infrastructure and Riverfront infrastructure. Stated one
thing they have asked based off their previous comments is that there is significant infrastructure that
needs to be improved behind our site and in front of main lane sidewalk right of way improvements and
behind the property which is kind of a drain storm that needs improvements. Stated they are asking that
before any TIF funds are distributed to other parties, that the increment that is used off of particular
parcels be used to benefit the ground in those parcels and the adjacent land use that might be City owned.
Stated we have some parking easements at this location that we have communicated with Riverfront
Partners and are working with them to resolve that and support what they are doing for our community
and ask that a couple of these items be addressed.
5) Karl Peterjohn stated he would urge the Council to proceed cautiously today because with a new
Mayor coming on board that it would be appropriate to have the new Mayor involved in this tremendous
decision that you have before you today. Stated the discussion about the sales tax; 50% of the sales tax
revenue that comes up from this new district is going to be going to the private developers and knows that
the City in the past has been uncomfortable with the fact that the county-wide sales tax that the county
collects; 73% goes to cities and only 27% stays with counties. Stated if you are uncomfortable with that
73/27 ratio, thinks that the idea of the private sector would get 50 cents out of every dollar in sales tax
collected as part of the supplemental sales tax in this special district, ought to be a cautionary note. Stated
another cautionary note he would add is if you got three million dollars to acquire property, it is general
fund money that he understands normal circumstances for the City. Stated that is three million that cannot
be used for police, fire or streets. Stated that is going to come off the tax rolls if used for governmental
purposes and exemptions put in place. Stated there are consequences in the decision that is going to be
made by this Council that is going to have long-term consequences beyond today's meeting. Stated it is
not a decision to enter into lightly and is one that our next Mayor ought to be involved in.
6) County Commissioner Michael O' Donnell stated he wants to talk about how important this project is
for the district he represents. Stated he was fortunate enough to represent this area, Delano on three
different levels in the City Council, in the state legislature and now on the County Commission. Stated he
has been through every area of the Delano district and knows residents on every block and everybody is
extremely excited about this transformation and resurgence and you would be hard press to find another
area in town that has seen so much new growth as Delano has but many residents are very concerned
about the parking situation. Stated we have a ball park opening in 100 days, there is plenty of time and a
lot of legitimacy about the ball park and shares some of those concerns; however, we don't have time to
litigate that with the ball park coming up in 100 days. Stated we have to figure out parking solutions, we
have done our best and has attended more meetings than he can count and everyone shares the same
concerns, we have to move forward and we have to have this parking solution. Stated he is not in a
position to say where the County is going to be at the end regarding participating in this parking solution;
however, knows that today's vote gets us much closer to that because this is so important not just for the
City of Wichita but for the entire region. Stated yes there are legitimate concerns but that doesn't serve us
well and doesn't serve the Delano district. Stated he has not talked to one person in Delano who all share
the same concern, let's get the parking solution fixed, which gets us one step closer and encourages any of
you to reach out to him and he can put you in contact with people he knows. Stated it is a serious situation
we are in and looks forward to the opportunity to partner with the City at the County level both
Page 10
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
financially and through any other area we can coordinate. Stated he is ready to move forward and the
people he represents are ready to move forward.
Mayor Longwell stated the County has been an outstanding partner on all that we have been trying to do
in the City and we appreciate that.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh thanked Commissioner O'Donnell or all of his participation and appreciates
everything he has been contributing and knows you are going to continue to fight to make sure that the
County is going to help us out with parking as well.
Council Member Frye he has been friends with all four members of the Riverfront Partners Development
team for years, long before he was ever on the Council. Stated he and George Laham have been friends
since we were kids and yes, all four contributed to his election campaign. Stated none of that influenced
or clouded his judgement in relation to this project. Stated due to his knowledge of their individual
character, reputation and business successes, it gave him more comfort as a team that they can deliver on
their plan. Stated they pay as you go incentive tied to this project also gives him comfort as the City will
not be issuing any debt. Stated the parking easement at the church and the Town Street parking
acquisition are fair prices and help provide immediate additional parking solutions for the stadium and
Delano parking challenges. Stated it is a blessing to have local developers that have vision and ability to
create this catalyst site, creating new jobs, additional tax revenue, and significant public infrastructure and
entertainment opportunities for our citizens and all without taking on new debt, which is a strong yes vote
for him.
Mayor Longwell stated some of the answers to these questions may need to come from the developer,
knows we have heard from speakers who have said we don't need more parking and don't waste our
money on parking; we hear from people that say we don't have enough parking and asked the City
Manager to address the parking plan and how that meets what is required of the development agreement.
Bob Layton City Manager stated we had developed a parking plan for the stadium, we have talked to
private property owners as well as assessed public spaces are available. Stated in terms of what will be the
service area for the stadium, there are a little over 9,000 parking spaces that are available, many of those
are located on the east side of the river and as part of our parking plan shown a public transit option that
will allow those who do not want to walk, would access the stadium by using the Q-line and another
event shuttle that we have developed. Stated we feel confident that there are plenty of spaces to support
this facility, however, the concerns that were expressed by the public, we took to heart regarding having
spaces closer to the stadium and this development agreement recognizes that. Stated we purchased
property on the west side of Sycamore under this agreement, we picked up 175 spaces almost
immediately in that regard and then the parking easement provides us with another 100 spaces that in the
short-term will be surface spaces provided on the church property and long-term will be 100 spaces
located beside a parking structure to be constructed by the developer.
Mayor Longwell stated the federal government gave us $14.2 million dollars.
Bob Layton City Manager stated that is correct and is the last piece of this in that it will be over 500
spaces that will be available when that facility is completed so in really a short period of time over the last
few months, we have secured more than 800 additional spaces in the direct neighborhood of the baseball
stadium.
Page 11
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Mayor Longwell stated a question came up about Gander Mountain parking; does not believe the City
sold that.
Bob Layton City Manager stated we did not, we receive a fee from Gander Mountain for the use of that
parking garage, we retained ownership and spaces are not being realized by Gander Mountain, they are
available for the public regardless of whether it is stadium parking, event parking at WaterWalk or for
some other function.
Mayor Longwell stated it is still public parking.
Bob Layton City Manager stated that is correct.
Mayor Longwell stated it was mentioned the parking dollars are coming from where for the purchase of
the land, with $14.2 million of the parking dollars coming from federal grant.
Bob Layton City Manager stated the primary source would be tax increment financing and that is under
the district that you just approved recently in December, which is the reason we put that in place.
Mayor Longwell stated to see how much we could come with the funds from the expanded TIF.
Bob Layton City Manager stated that is correct.
Mayor Longwell stated in general our total debt limit even after all of this is done is approximately 50
percent.
Bob Layton City Manager stated we have more than sufficient and we have shared that with folks.
Mayor Longwell stated and we typically review that every budgetary season and share where our debt
limit is.
Bob Layton City Manager stated that is contained in the comprehensive annual financial report and we
must do it at least once a year but we keep an eye on that pretty closely. Stated we have never been close
to our debt capacity.
Mayor Longwell asked if there will be a list of businesses that are not allowed.
Joe Norton Gilmore & Bell stated the initial speaker is correct, 3.14 of the development agreement
provides a mechanism whereby the developer may bring to the City a request for a particular retailer or
restaurant to be allowed to be located. Stated the City has the absolute right to reject that and refuse that
request and if there is a pertinent reason to do so then the City could acknowledge and accept that request.
Stated there is no right other than to ask the question. Stated the second question raised by Mr. Hancock,
why didn't we reference Town Street development but the actual resolution that you are going to consider
that would approve the development agreement, the real estate purchase agreement, the parking easement
and all of the relevant documents, does specifically talk about that purchase agreement with Town Street
and in the affirmative action section of that, authorizes it to be executed, the real estate purchase contract
and all other documents, so it is specific in the resolution that you are going to consider if you take action
on this item. Stated Mr. Strelow raised a question about location of TIF funds and what they are going to
be used for, the section we talked about on the graph of the allocation of TIF and CID for the first 10
million, the next 30 and the 50-50 split is covered only from the TIF and CID revenue located on the
Page 12
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
developer's property. Stated all the other TIF and CID revenues that are in the district from outside of that
property location are available for discretion of the governing body as to how they are expended, a
primary source of that is debt service on the stadium but there should hopefully be extra revenues and like
the extra revenues that come from the initial 10 and the 50-50 split, those will be items that the Council
determines over time as to where they will be spent, they are not required to be spent on the developer's
property.
Council Member Claycomb stated there was a misunderstanding about sales tax and there was a comment
about a 50% sales tax from the district was going to be retained, it's on the sales tax exemption and asked
Mr. Norton to explain.
Joe Norton Gilmore & Bell stated on the industrial revenue bond the purpose of that issuance is to
provide an abatement for sales tax paid for with IRB proceeds, which is an approved standard exemption
you give. Stated since the City had originally planned to apply some of that sales tax money from the
construction to debt service on the stadium, the agreement was reached that from the first five million
dollars of exempt sales tax, the developers will rebate $2.5 million back to the City so that it would
become available for debt service or other permitted uses as the projects are incurred and as the savings
are realized from the construction exemption.
Bob Layton City Manager stated we are $833 million dollars under our state statutory debt limit.
Council Member Tuttle stated there was a question regarding who is going to be responsible for posting
the signs regarding the two percent CID.
Bob Layton City Manager stated our Economic Development staff is responsible annually to audit each of
the properties that collect CID.
Council Member Johnson referred back to slide 8. Stated he knows in agreements, compromise always
has folks who are slightly disappointed and he has a concern about this 10 year window of development.
Stated we are a little more restrictive on the baseball development, we require development with them
within 18 months and then there was another window of 18 months and also that development option on
another piece of land. Stated we had all of that timed out and knows that this group and the great work
they have done, will probably not let this sit vacant but what matters to him is what is in black and white
and this 10 year window is concerning to have that opportunity to be vacant. Stated he has struggled with
this and does not know if he can support a 10 year window on a development. Stated he has seen the work
that this group has done in various areas but a 10 year window bothers him because if that were to happen
and we approve this and we have this 10 year gap of no development on this site which is next to a world
class baseball stadium and part of what we are trying to do with the east and west bank in making that a
regional gathering space; at this point is struggling to support this agreement simply because of that.
Mayor Longwell asked if it would help if we had one of the developers come up and address that.
Council Member Johnson stated it would but we would still be voting on the black and white piece of
allowing this 10 year gap.
Mayor Longwell asked George Laham to come up to the podium and share. Stated that 10 years just
simply is a maximum and it is a pay as you go. Stated the biggest difference here that is more difficult to
put restrictions on is that it is private property. Stated we owned the property around the baseball and part
of the agreement in transferring that was the timelines. Stated we can't dictate private property, it literally
Page 13
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
could sit empty for 25 years. Stated we can encourage development and asked George Laham to try and
address that.
George Laham stated nobody is more motivated to develop this land than us as private developers. Stated
we are buying the land and we are very motivated to get this developed as soon as possible. Stated we
realize that there is revenue that will be generated from our property our development that funds much of
the ballpark and that was a decision that was made by this Council earlier this year and we respect that
decision. Stated we understand that your concern about the property not being developed sooner than 10
years but our concern is much greater than yours in the fact that we need to move through this. Stated
what we have done at Laham Development and what we do at Riverfront Partners is we will develop
market driven plans. Stated when we buy a piece of property, we put a conceptual plan together, which is
the general direction of where we think the market is and what people can support in this market. Stated
we start down the road in this direction but as we see what the needs are, who wants to be here and who
doesn't want to be here, is the direction we go. Stated quality takes time especially in downtown Wichita
and if the Council decides to pass this resolution today, all we are doing after three and a half years of
work is getting to the starting line, the work just begins and we have to go out to the market and see who
wants to be not only in Wichita but in downtown Wichita. Stated we have had many discussions about
who we are going to try and attract down here but we have our work cut out for us. Stated this is not
going to be easy and he doesn't pick projects that are easy. Stated we appreciate you working with us and
Bob Layton and members of his staff who have worked many hours and appreciate Council Members
Claycomb, Frye, Blubaugh and the Mayor for working with us through this program, we have a lot of
work ahead of us and we have more incentive than anyone to get this project going. Stated we have a
church that has been great working with us and we need to take care of their needs first and foremost as
promised and we need to work with them on their reconstruction, which we have committed to them to
do but while we are doing that, we are going to be out seeking users for this property and we are
committed to building you a beautiful City center for this community.
Council Member Johnson stated he appreciates that.
Council Member Claycomb she also knows these developers and thinks this made this negotiation more
difficult because she knew their tendencies and stuff but it also gave her great confidence to be able to
work with a group that we have seen in Wichita have produced. Stated she is pleased that we were able to
create a private development with the Riverfront Partners and as part of the negotiation team, it has been a
very long process that began when the partners presented an overview of their future development at a
City Council meeting on March 19, 2019. Stated these discussions took months and believes this
agreement is a benefit to the City of Wichita while being fair to the developers. Stated we heard from the
community and especially the Delano neighborhood and businesses that a parking plan was important and
today we have that parking plan, which takes into account new parking spaces that are part of today's
agreement with the purchase of land and a parking easement, the new federally funded Multi-Modal
Center and the identification of parking within walking or Q-line distance in the downtown area and as
City Manager Layton said, that is 9,000 parking spaces. Stated this agreement also ensures that we get a
development that fits with the Delano Neighborhood Plan by adhering to that plan and the Baseball
Village Master Plan, that public amenities are part of the development and that needed funds are
contributed to the stadium debt and thanked the development team, City staff, City Council colleagues
and looks forward to the new Riverfront Village and the vibrancy that it will bring to our riverfront.
Mayor Longwell stated he appreciates the work that all of you did, it has not been easy and has been a
fairly long process getting to this point but would guess that almost all of us up here know at least one or
all of these developers and has personally known some of them for a very long time and yes could be
Page 14
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
accused of guiding dollars and voting on something for my friends again but that is just the way things go
in a town this size. Stated this is going to be outstanding for the City, for Delano and for all of the things
we are trying to do to increase the quality of life in this community. Stated he has a lot of faith in these
developers and their willingness to do much of this as pay as you go, they are going to out lend a
tremendous amount of money just to purchase this property and is going to guess that they want to recoup
that investment as quickly as possible. Stated they are in business to make money and if they are going in
there to purchase some property that is currently not on the tax rolls and is exempt from everything; this
puts it on the tax rolls and is going to be not only good for what Wichita is trying to develop but good for
the long-term financing for the City of Wichita because that will stay on the books forever and move into
the City coffers for all kinds of opportunities. Stated you just can't keep taxing people and getting into
their pockets, you have to figure out how to promote growth to increase your tax revenues and this
exactly does that. Stated he is very supportive of this.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh stated he is very excited about this opportunity and when coming on to the Council
almost seven years ago, the feedback he was getting from his district is we are spending so much money
downtown and when do the folks out west and other people from the City start to feel that and thinks this
development that we are going to see west of the river is going to be some of the greatest development
that we have seen in Wichita. Stated these developers give 110 percent and will make sure that we have
something that all Wichita can be proud of.
MOTON:
Vice Mayor Blubaugh moved to close the Public Hearing, adopt the Resolution, which approves the
Development Agreement and related documents and authorize the necessary signatures.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
4.) NORTH INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR (NIC) GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SITE
PROJECT – MONITORING WELL SERVICES – PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACT. (DISTRICTS I, III AND VI)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-4.docx
Attachment: Contract.pdf
(Vice Mayor Blubaugh momentarily left the bench)
Don Henry Public Works & Utilities, reviewed the item.
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard, no one came forward.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to approve the contract with Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions,
Inc.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
Page 15
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
5.) AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE TITLE 11 GOVERNING COMMERCIAL TRUCK
ROUTES. (DISTRICT IV)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-5.doc
Attachment: Ordinance Delineated
Attachment: Ordinance 51-169
Gary Janzen Engineering Department, reviewed the item.
Council Member Frye asked staff to identify the definition of trucks; what size of trucks are we talking
about.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated he is drawing a blank on what the ordinance says but is
included in your agenda packet. Stated there is a class of trucks that is identified in the ordinance that are
above and beyond passenger vehicles.
Council Member Frye asked if that will be spelled out on the signage.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated it is and is referenced on the signage to the ordinance.
Council Member Frye stated the sign will be on display on the street.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated yes, those signs will reference the ordinance.
Mayor Longwell stated he would guess that most trucking firms are familiar with the ordinance.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated they are and we reference that too when we contact them by
letter.
Mayor Longwell stated it references the ordinance number for us but doesn't spell it out in here as part of
our agenda packet. Stated does the ordinance also go by the number of axles or is it simply weight.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated it is both and primarily the number of axles and also
references a class of vehicles, which are based on the number of axles.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh stated he hates that it has come to this but has been an issue for a long time with
the residents who are very upset and asked staff what kind of discussions he has had with the trucking
companies.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department we did not get much feedback. Stated we sent the letters out to all
of those companies asking them to stop using the residential streets and while those letters were being
distributed, we heard from a few representatives of the companies who seemed to acknowledge that they
knew what the concern was. Stated after talking to the neighbors, it seems like the use of trucks slowed
down but then went back to normal and is not sure what else to do at this point and thinks the makeup of
this neighborhood makes a lot of sense for us to consider these no truck routes and is the reason why the
ordinance is in place and an area like this is a perfect example of why we should do it.
Page 16
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Vice Mayor Blubaugh asked if we are land locking in anybody.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated no, we are talking about their trucks going an extra three or
four blocks is all this amounts to.
Vice Mayor Blubaugh stated regarding enforcement, hopefully we will have some kind of notification
versus police officers sitting by the new sign.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated what he plans to do as a follow up to this item today, pending
on your approval, is notifying the business again to let them know that the City Council has approved an
amendment of the ordinance that signage will be put into place at an estimated certain time and to let
them know that it will be enforced from there on out.
Council Member Tuttle asked what are the penalties and how punitive will it be for businesses.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated he can get that information to you.
Council Member Johnson asked why we would leave out west Dallas, Oneida, Casado, that part of 27th
Street and west Atlanta where trucks could still go through the neighborhood but then find out they
cannot go down those other streets; why would we just not deny all of it.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated that is a good question and probably ought to look at that.
Stated we watched to see what trucks did and talked to some of the neighborhoods and tried to determine
what made the most sense. Stated it probably makes sense while we are out there especially for no more
costs it would be that maybe we ought to consider doing that. Stated staff based on what they saw
happening with some of the traffic coming off of 27th Street, we never saw any trucks using Dallas or
Oneida because of what jog they would have to make and suppose it would make sense to add those to it.
Mayor Longwell stated he agrees that it maybe gets at least Dallas because then it would get too
confusing for trucks as they try and find alternate routes. Stated not only is it a safety hazard but is
guessing that most of our residential streets are not built to the same standards as arterial roads, so truck
traffic can deteriorate the residential streets more so than it does the arterial streets.
Gary Janzen Engineering Department stated that is correct and is a significant concern.
Jennifer Magana City Attorney stated in response to the question about the truck definition, the traffic
code of the City defines truck as any vehicle with a gross vehicle rate rating of over 14,000 pounds or a
vehicle required to register as a commercial vehicle. Stated the fine would be a standard fine under the
traffic code violation consistent with our municipal fine schedule.
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard, no one came forward.
Page 17
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
MOTION:
Vice Mayor Blubaugh moved to place the ordinance on first reading and authorize the necessary
signatures.
Council Member Tuttle asked if the other uses are going to be addressed in the motion.
Mayor Longwell stated between now and second reading, let's look at adding those other streets.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
6.) MEDIUM VOLTAGE VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE MAINTENANCE.
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-6.doc
Attachment: Contract.pdf
Don Henry Public Works & Utilities reviewed the item.
(Council Member Clendenin momentarily left the bench)
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard, no one came forward.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to approve the contract and authorize the necessary signatures.
Motion carried 6 to 0, (Absent: Clendenin).
7.) AGREEMENT WITH UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UPRR) FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO MT. VERNON FROM BROADWAY TO SOUTHEAST
BOULEVARD. (DISTRICT III)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-7.doc
Attachment: Agreement.pdf
Gary Janzen Engineering Department, reviewed the item.
Mayor Longwell inquired whether anyone from the audience wished to be heard, no one came forward.
MOTION:
Council Member Clendenin moved to approve the agreement and authorize the necessary signatures.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
COUNCIL BUSINESS SUBMITTED BY CITY AUTHORITIES
PLANNING AGENDA
Page 18
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
VI) NON-CONSENT PLANNING AGENDA
1.) DER2018-00012: SOUTH CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN. (DISTRICT III)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. VI-1 (revised)
Attachment: SC Plan MAPC.pdf
Attachment: Certification - SC Plan.docx
Attachment: MAPC Resolution
Attachment: DER2018-00012 MAPC Minutes Excerpt.docx
Attachment: DAB III Memorandum.doc
Attachment: Ordinance 51-170 (revised)
Matt Williams Planning Department, reviewed the item.
Adam Barlow-Thompson stated he is on the Neighborhood Association Board and co-founder of the
Neighboring Movement and shared some of the strategies of the South Central Neighborhood Plan.
Matt Williams Planning Department continued with his review of the item.
Council Member Claycomb stated she is very impressed with this plan. Stated on page 22 it was
referenced in slide 7 about community Development Corporation; in the plan it says what the City can do
is "activate" a CDC and asked if the City can actually do that. Stated the slide said "encourage" a CDC.
Matt Williams Planning Department stated that is what the RGB Planning and Design had written in here
and is not sure if the City can actually activate that. Stated if that is something we need to change from the
actual plan, would be happy to do that.
Council Member Claycomb stated yes, it implies that we can do something that maybe we can't.
Mayor Longwell asked Council Member Clendenin if he wants to waive City Council Policy #9 in order
for the public to speak on this item.
Council Member Clendenin stated we have one or two people here that would like to speak.
Jeff Longwell moved to waive the Policy #9 and allow public comment.
Motion carried 7 to 0
1) Janet Price stated in 2016 she became president of the South Central Neighborhood Association
(SCNA) and over the 34 years she has resided in the south central neighborhood, has watched this
neighborhood become more and more blighted from the lack of resources. Stated SCNA is very invested
in getting a new identity from our image of South Broadway to a more positive image such as old
highway 81. Stated the adoption and implementation of the new south central plan will help the neighbors
and the City of Wichita to make an investment in the goals and vision in the new plan. Stated this new
Page 19
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
positive action plan will help south central begin to address the needs and the image of the South Central
Neighborhood. South Central Neighborhood is looking forward to working with the City to see our goals
and visions come to fruition and thanked the Council in advance for their assistance, ideas, time and
efforts in helping to improve our neighborhoods in the City.
Council Member Clendenin stated there has been a very intentional plan put together and thinks this
neighborhood plan can be the gold standard of how every other neighborhood plan can be put together in
the City of Wichita. Stated one of the things he has noticed in our City when we talk about planning items
is that when everything goes to the MAPC they talk about whether or not a business or a residential
property fits into the current character of the neighborhood but neighborhoods don't have any way to
change the character of their neighborhood if they want to. Stated neighborhood plans like this are a way
to allow them to start to change the character of their neighborhoods and thinks we have a lot of looking
at how we do planning in the City of Wichita and how we can allow neighborhoods like this who have a
south Broadway, which is so well ingrained in the thought of the City and they have done an amazing job
at changing their neighborhood south Broadway and want to continue to change south Broadway into an
actual asset of the City and not something that drains the City by the way of crime and blight and other
things that drain resources. Stated this group is amazing and is doing just that and wants to encourage
everyone in the City that cares about their neighborhood to look at neighborhood plans and how they can
do that.
MOTION:
Council Member Clendenin moved to adopt the South Central Neighborhood Plan as an amendment to
The Wichita-Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan with four of seven votes and approve the ordinance.
An amended version of the South Central Neighborhood Plan may be adopted as an amendment to The
Wichita-Sedgwick County Comprehensive Plan with five of seven votes.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
HOUSING AGENDA
VII) NON-CONSENT HOUSING AGENDA - NONE
AIRPORT AGENDA
VIII) NON-CONSENT AIRPORT AGENDA - NONE
COUNCIL AGENDA
IX) COUNCIL MEMBER AGENDA - NONE
X) COUNCIL MEMBER APPOINTMENTS AND COMMENTS
1.) Board Appointments.
Mayor Longwell appointed Council Member Tuttle to the NBC Board.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to approve the appointment.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
Page 20
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Council Member Tuttle stated she had a meeting yesterday with the Wichita Public School
Superintendent and she reminded her of the great work that our City staff does specifically during the
holidays and when we have inclement weather and brought up how Public Works keeps our roads and
sidewalks safe and clean. Stated it made her think about all of the other departments who worked on the
Christmas holiday and Christmas day or New Year’s Day and thanked staff for all of their continued
efforts to make our City better.
Council Member Frye thanked Mayor Longwell for his years of service to this community, not only as
Mayor, Council Member, school board member; you will be very missed.
Mayor Longwell stated that is very kind and appreciates that and it has been his honor to be a part of this
governing body and work with all of you and truly appreciates it.
MOTION:
Mayor Longwell moved to adjourn.
Motion carried 7 to 0.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:18 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Sublett, MMC
City Clerk
***WORKSHOP FOLLOWED***
Page 21
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
ATTACHMENT 1 - CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 1 THROUGH 17
II) CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
1) APPLICATIONS FOR LICENSES FOR CEREAL MALT BEVERAGES:
a.) Applications for Licenses to Retail Cereal Malt Beverages:
Attachment: CMBs for January 7th
2) PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES:
a.) List of Preliminary Estimates.
Attachment: PEs for January 7th
3) STATEMENT OF COSTS:
a.) List of Statements of Cost.
Attachment: List of Statements of Cost for January 7th
Attachment: Statements_of_Cost_for_1-7-2020_CC.pdf
4) AGREEMENTS/CONTRACTS:
a.) Equus Wellfield Spurline Replacements.
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-4a.doc
Attachment: contract.pdf
5) PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS:
a.) Partial Acquisition of 761 North Beech for Sewer Easement. (District II)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-5a
Attachment: Supporting Documents.pdf
6) MINUTES OF ADVISORY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS:
Joint Investment Committee, October 3, 2019
Library Monthly Activity Report, November 2019
Board of Building Code Standards and Appeals, November 4, 2019
Joint Investment Committee, November 7, 2019
Board of Electrical Appeals, November 12, 2019
Board of Park Commissioners, November 18, 2019
Library Board of Directors, November 19, 2019
Page 22
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
7) SECOND READING ORDINANCES:
a.) Second Reading Ordinances. (first read December 17, 2019)
Attachment: List of Second Reading Ordinances 01-07-2019.docx
II) CONSENT PLANNING AGENDA ITEMS
8.) PUD2019-00014: CITY ZONE CHANGE TO CREATE MAKEICT PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD #70) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EAST MOUNT VERNON ROAD
AND EAST OF SOUTH EDGEMOOR DRIVE, 5920 EAST MOUNT VERNON ROAD.
(DISTRICT III)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. V-8.doc
Attachment: Supporting Document
Attachment: PUD2019-14 MAPC Excerpt Minutes November 21, 2019
Attachment: PUD2019-00014 Interoffice Memorandum.pdf
9.) PUD2019-00015: CITY ZONE CHANGE FROM SF-5 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TO CREATE TRU-BUILDING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD #71) ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF WEST MAPLE STREET AND EAST OF SOUTH JULIA STREET, 5929
WEST MAPLE STREET. (DISTRICT IV)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-9.doc
Attachment: Supporting Document
Attachment: PUD2019-15 MAPC Excerpt Minutes November 21, 2019
Attachment: DAB Report for MAPD on PUD2019-00015.pdf
10.) SUB2018-00009 -- PLAT OF SUNSET LANDING ADDITION LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF NORTH 183RD STREET WEST, ONE-HALF MILE NORTH OF WEST 21ST
STREET NORTH. (COUNTY)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-10.docx
Attachment: Supporting Documents
11.) SUB2019-00043 -- PLAT OF OLIVER ADDITION LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 800
FEET SOUTH OF EAST 29TH STREET NORTH, ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH
OLIVER AVENUE. (DISTRICT I)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-11
Page 23
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Attachment: Supporting Documents
12.) ZON2019-00040: CITY ZONE CHANGE FROM SF-5 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TO NR NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL WITH A PROTECTIVE OVERLAY TO ALLOW
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF EAST CENTRAL AVENUE AND ONE BLOCK EAST OF NORTH
EDGEMOOR DRIVE. (DISTRICT I)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-12.docx
Attachment: ZON2019-40 Excerpt MAPC Minutes November 21, 2019.docx
Attachment: Report for City Council on ZON2019-00040.doc
Attachment: Ordinance 51-171
13.) ZON2019-00044: CITY ZONE CHANGE FROM SF-5 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(SF-5) TO OW OFFICE WAREHOUSE (OW) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
NORTH OF EAST KELLOGG AVENUE AND EAST OF SOUTH ZELTA STREET.
(DISTRICT II)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-13.docx
Attachment: ZON2019-44 MAPC Excerpt Minutes November 21, 2019.docx
Attachment: 2019-12-09 DAB II Interoffice Memorandum ZON19-44.pdf
Attachment: Ordinance 51-172
14.) ZON2019-00045: CITY ZONE CHANGE FROM SF-5 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TO TF-3 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND FROM TF-3 TWO FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL TO SF-5 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO REVISE THE ZONING
DISTRICT LIMITS OF A PREVIOUS ZONE CHANGE APPROVAL ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH WEBB ROAD AND
APPROXIMATELY ONE-QUARTER MILE NORTH OF EAST PAWNEE ROAD.
(DISTRICT II)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-14.doc
Attachment: Ordinance 51-173
15.) ZON2019-00046: CITY ZONE CHANGE FROM SF-5 SINGLE FAMILY AND D-O
DELANO OVERLAY TO TF-3 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND D-O DELANO
OVERLAY TO CONSTRUCT A DUPLEX ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET SOUTH OF WEST DOUGLAS AVENUE AND ONE
BLOCK EAST OF SOUTH MERIDIAN AVENUE. (DISTRICT IV)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-15.doc
Page 24
CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
January 7, 2020
Attachment: Excerpt Dec 5 MAPC Minutes.docx
Attachment: ZON2019-46 Site Plan 2.pdf
Attachment: Ordinance 51-174
16.) ZON2019-00047: CITY ZONE CHANGE FROM SF-5 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TO TF-3 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; GENERALLY LOCATED ONE-HALF MILE
NORTH OF WEST PAWNEE, ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH 135TH STREET WEST.
(DISTRICT IV)
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-16.docx
Attachment: Excerpt Minutes of December 5th
Attachment: Ordinance 51-175
II) CONSENT HOUSING AGENDA ITEMS - NONE
II) CONSENT AIRPORT AGENDA ITEMS
17.) EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, D/B/A ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR, WICHITA DWIGHT D.
EISENHOWER NATIONAL AIRPORT.
Attachment: Agenda Report No. II-17.doc
Attachment: SA2.pdf