District 3 Advisory Board
Regular MeetingWichita, KS · August 7, 2019
Minutes
District III Advisory Board
Minutes for August 7, 2019
DISTRICT III ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES
August 7, 2019
https://www.facebook.com/WichitaDistrict3/videos/391769364860053/
The District III Advisory Board meeting was held at 6:30 p.m. at the WATER Center, 101 E.
Pawnee, Wichita, KS 67211. Council Member James Clendenin, eleven DAB members, five City
staff, three presenters, and four members of the public were present.
Members Present Staff Present
Bruce Gass Lt. Mark Jordan, Station 22, Wichita Fire
Catherine Johnson Department
Cindy Miles Firefighter Nicholas Maddy, Station 22, WFD
Daisy Olivar Firefighter Judd Schroeder, Station 22, WFD
David Robbins Mark Manning, City Treasurer, Finance
Gerald Henry Maddy Campbell, Community Services
Jared Cerullo Representative, City Manager’s Office
Marco Alcocer
Michael Loop
Paul Davis
Ron Tracy
CM Clendenin
Members Absent
ORDER OF BUSINESS
At 6:30 p.m. CM Clendenin called the DAB meeting to order. The current Agenda was approved.
The Minutes from June 5 and July 3, 2019 were also approved.
STAFF REPORTS
1. Fire Department
Lt. Mark Jordan, Station 22 reported there were 28 fire alarms, 586 medical alarms, and 98
service alarms in District III for the month of July. He shared there was a significant fire at 1403 E.
Mt. Vernon on July 26 which resulted in almost a total loss of a duplex unit. The fire started in the
kitchen and extended into the garage causing approximately $80,000 in damage. En route crews
were advised people might be trapped in the home basement. Firefighters aggressively fought the
fire and rushed inside to rescue potential occupants. It was determined that there were no
remaining occupants and WFD personnel was able to vacate the structure and extinguish the fire
without injury. All nine residents of the duplex were able to safely leave the home prior to WFD
arriving on site, but unfortunately a pet dog perished in the incident. A cause of fire has not yet
been listed.
The following city-wide statistics were provided from the Fourth of July fireworks enforcement
effort:
Enforcement teams issued 59 citations this year (138 citations were issued in 2018).
There were 1,142 complaint calls made to the non-emergency line from July 1-6. This was
down from 1,437 last year; though last year the calls covered all of Sedgwick County and
this year they covered just the City of Wichita.
WFD distributed over 1,500 fliers and contacted over 100 residents in an outreach effort to
provide education about the fireworks ordinance.
1
District III Advisory Board
Minutes for August 7, 2019
There were 51 injuries reported by local medical facilities. The injured ranged from 6 months
old to 66 years old. Illegal fireworks (such as mortars, firecrackers, and roman candles) were
the most injury-producing items this year.
There were no reports of safety issues for enforcement teams this year.
DAB inquired about the legality of burning brush on private property and was informed that is not
permissible within city limits without a burn permit (as most brush fires exceed the maximum height
of an allowable fire).
2. Community Policing
There was no scheduled Wichita Police Department report this month.
Action Taken: Received and filed.
PUBLIC AGENDA
3. Scheduled Items
There were no scheduled Public Agenda items this month.
4. Off-agenda Items
No individuals spoke at this time.
Action Taken: Received and filed.
NEW BUSINESS
5. Public Art Funding
Phil Meyer (Design Council), Sharon Fearey (Design Council), and Arlen Hamilton—members
of an ad hoc group convened at the request of the City Manager—presented a draft ordinance
requesting to designate a percentage of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for public art.
Mark Manning (City Treasurer) was present to clarify budget and funding questions.
DAB members were generally supportive of the proposal. Many commented on the importance of
including art elements and aesthetics in City infrastructure and shared that public art is a vital
element to our city's future growth and quality of life. DAB members mentioned concerns about the
perception of the City spending further money on public art while areas such as public safety and
street maintenance appear to need significant additional funding. CM Clendenin, Manning, and the
presenters alleviated concerns by providing clarification on the City's various funding avenues
(general operating budget vs. CIP) and by shedding light on how the ordinance will essentially
provide structure and transparency to a process that is already happening.
DAB and members of the public asked and made the following summarized questions and
comments:
DAB: Do we currently have 1 percent dedicated to public art in the CIP?
A: No, that is why we are here. We have succeeded in incorporating art thus far, but an ordinance
would provide structure and transparency to that process and ensure it remains prioritized across
changing councils. An ordinance was written in1999 which established the Design Council. It is a
very short ordinance and we have been working for four years to build on it by looking at what the
other 350 cities with designated public art percentages are doing.
DAB: How are public art projects selected? What is the role of the Design Council?
2
District III Advisory Board
Minutes for August 7, 2019
A: The Design Council is a group of 11 members whom are appointed by City Council. The Design
Council sits down with City staff to look at the upcoming CIP to identify special projects. It is
common for subcommittees to be created to work with department heads on specific projects. We
look at opportunities to incorporate art in upcoming projects (such as fire stations, police stations,
parks, arterial improvements, etc.), and we make sure there is good distribution across all council
districts. We then make recommendations to City Council. Design Council does not pick which
projects get funding or how much funding individual projects get—City Council makes the final
decision on that. Once a project is selected and an artist is assigned, the artist will typically engage
the community for input on how to finish the product. Design Council’s role is to look at the bigger
picture and make sure that when we spend money it is at the right time, right location, and
appropriate to serve the whole community.
DAB: Does each individual project in the CIP have a small percentage dedicated to artistic value?
A: There is no current mechanism to determine how much money should be put into artistic
value/aesthetics for projects listed in the CIP. Currently, the Design Council reviews projects in the
CIP and makes a recommendation to the City Council on specific projects that should incorporate
dedicated artistic aspects. At the end of the day, we do not have a way to measure if we are
spending enough or too much money on public art or to see how we compare to other cities. Right
now we are doing very well, but you would not believe the amount of effort that goes into figuring it
out. The proposed ordinance would give us a mechanism to guide that process.
DAB: Are any of our public art projects grant funded?
A: The Horizontes mural project was grant funded.
DAB: Is it common to get public art funded through grants?
A: I would say we have a lot of grant funded or donated public art throughout the city, but typically
it is on organizations or private businesses rather than City infrastructure.
DAB: Are memorials considered public art? If someone wants to create a memorial, would the
Design Council get involved?
A: Almost all memorials have art components. If a proposed memorial is to be on public ground
and created with public funding, then the City would have the Design Council review it and make
recommendations.
CM Clendenin: Presently there is $50,000 dedicated for art maintenance. That is not a lot of
money. A dedicated amount needs to be allocated for maintenance of public art. This ordinance
will also be used to dictate that, so we can take care of what we have today and not just put money
toward new projects.
A: We have built a 20 page ordinance that helps clarify the role of City staff and the Design Council
and simplifies funding sources to make this process run smoothly rather than having every
decision be agonized about.
DAB: The City is working on a master plan for Clapp Park. Is that something Design Council will be
involved in?
A: Design Council weighs in once a specific project from a master plan is at the design/concept
phase. The uniquely designed splash pads from the Aquatics Master Plan are great examples.
DAB: Public art is great and fundamental to the success of our metropolitan community as a whole,
but how do we justify creating another significant funding source when basic City services are
seemingly underfunded (such as Animal Control or public safety)?
A: The City has a general operating budget and that is where funding for Animal Control and public
safety comes from. The general budget covers all City operating expenditures. This ordinance
targets the money the City allocates for planned capital projects in the Capital Improvement
3
District III Advisory Board
Minutes for August 7, 2019
Program, or the CIP. The CIP budget is flexible and varies from year to year. The ordinance does
not call for providing additional funding to the CIP, but rather designating that a percentage of the
CIP’s funding be spent toward public art.
A (CM Clendenin): Having a dedicated percentage helps us be more intentional with how we go
about doing our capital improvement projects. When we are more intentional we can build in costs
without making the project cost more money. The CIP budget has many different funding
mechanisms. It is partly paid for by cash and mostly paid for by utilizing our credit (debt). When it
comes to improvement projects, allocating 1 percent is not going to hurt or help the operating
budget—it is a net zero. It is not robbing Peter to pay Paul.
A (Manning): We are not taking money out of a fund that exists today. We are just clarifying in an
ordinance a process we are already doing.
DAB: How do you select artists for projects?
A: Once a project is selected for consideration, the City sends out an RFQ (Request for
Qualification). The City will select three applicants from the RFQ for interviews.
DAB: Is Century II considered iconic?
A: Century II is a great example of why we need aesthetic improvements and public art to be
incorporated into City infrastructure. What a great piece of architecture that has been! I will not
weigh in on if Century II should be preserved or torn down, but that project achieved Design
Council’s goal and Century II did its job.
DAB: Design Council had a role in recommending brick sidewalks that are being implemented in
Delano and other parts of the City. Those seem to be a maintenance nightmare with our freeze
cycles and weather.
A: There were maintenance and ADA considerations in choosing to go with the brick sidewalks.
The brick and concrete pavers hold their color. If we went out there and poured, stamped, and
painted concrete the wear and tear caused by vehicles would have City Maintenance telling you it
cost them more to deal with that than it does to deal with the occasional brick that pops up.
Anything we paint or stain does not last long because of the abuse it takes from traffic.
DAB: I am in support of an ordinance that designates a percentage for art in this community. I
struggle going to that 1.5 or 2 percent though. I see other cities doing fantastic with a dedicated 1
percent. If we cannot maintain what we already have, why are we designating so much for building
new?
A: The difficulty with these numbers is we are comparing apples to oranges and it is hard to
compare cities.
DAB: What are your thoughts about the percentages, Mark [Manning]?
A (Manning): It is not my place to say what the appropriate percentage would be, but I will echo
that this provides transparency and predictability.
Public: Did you have anything to do with Intrust Bank Arena? That thing looks like a boat from
Kellogg.
A: That was a County project. It did not go through Design Council.
Public: Maybe over time there will be an increase in sense of security in the community as people
go out to enjoy public art, such as the Keeper. When communities search for an identity,
community members are involved in that. Involving the local community should be considered with
projects. Your draft proposal should have a clarification about the involvement of the public in your
projects to give guidance on how we can be involved in those things.
DAB: Will a finalized ordinance be presented to the DAB’s before going to Council?
4
District III Advisory Board
Minutes for August 7, 2019
A: We will not return to the DAB’s for further discussion. We are taking notes which will be
compiled and discussed. The ordinance presented to City Council will reflect the feedback we
receive during this process.
Public: There are two neighborhoods that are historically significant in District III that would benefit
greatly and be partly revitalized from public art. I would love to see Planeview and Hilltop
considered more by the Design Council.
A (CM Clendenin): Planeview is getting one of the incredible splash pads presented in the Aquatics
Master Plan. Design Council had a large role in ensuring each splash pad was uniquely and
meticulously designed in a way that reflects their specific communities.
DAB: Are the percentages for peer cities listed on slide 9 current?
A: The ordinance was passed in year that is listed and those numbers have not changed since.
DAB: Wichita was dismal 35-40 years ago, and today is it lively and welcoming. Turning a corner
downtown is now pleasant with all of those planters. From murals to artistic service hole covers, it
is amazing. Thank you for your work.
Action Taken: DAB provided feedback and suggestions to the ad hoc group for them to move
forward with preparing the draft ordinance for presentation to the City Council.
Public Art Plan Presentation: https://www.wichita.gov/Council/DABAgendasMinutes/2019-08-
07%20DAB%20III%20Public%20Art%20Plan%20Presentation.pdf
BOARD AGENDA
6. Updates, Issues, Reports
The group discussed rules for operating electrical scooters in the city. Many do not feel safe riding
them in the streets but also do not want to see them operated on sidewalks. CM Clendenin urged
the group to be open-minded about the scooters as they are a popular amenity in many other
cities, and they can be a vital component (alternative to a personal vehicle) in a city’s
transportation system. He reported that WPD has been tasked with stopping and educating scooter
operators who are in violation of the law/rules, and he reported that WPD will continue to promote
education about scooters and will write tickets as needed.
CM Clendenin reported on the status of Clapp Park. He informed the group the park is open to the
public and encouraged them to utilize the paths for biking and walking and to enjoy the green
space. He emphasized that there are no plans to sell any of the land at Clapp and that the City will
soon start a master planning process for the former golf course. He also shared that he intends on
investing the $200,000 loaned to Starlite Drive-in from his Hyatt funds into Clapp Park once the
loan is repaid.
Catherine Johnson reminded the group that Neighborhood Night Out is on Tuesday, August 13.
She invited the group to attend the South Central NNO party at the WATER Center and informed
them tours of the plant would be provided that evening. She also requested a presentation about
the Riverfront Legacy Master Plan to provide the DAB and District III residents an opportunity to
give feedback. CM Clendenin reported he will host the topic at an upcoming District III Breakfast.
Action Taken: Received and filed.
5
District III Advisory Board
Minutes for August 7, 2019
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. The next District III Advisory Board meeting will be held at
6:30 p.m. on September 4, 2019 at the WATER Center, 101 E. Pawnee, Wichita, KS 67211.
Guests
Arlen Hamilton (public art ad hoc group)
Phil Myer (public art ad hoc group)
Sharon Fearey (public art ad hoc group)
Charles Myers
Richard Hill
Richard Ruth
Sheri Johnson
Respectfully submitted,
Maddy Campbell, Community Services Representative, District III
6
Agenda
District III Advisory Board
Agenda for August 7, 2019
DISTRICT III ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA (REVISED)
6:30 p.m. | August 7, 2019 | WATER Center, 101 E. Pawnee, Wichita, KS 67211
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Call to Order
Approval of Agenda for August 7, 2019
Approval of Minutes for June 5 and July 3, 2019
STAFF REPORTS
1. Fire Department
No scheduled WFD report this month.
2. Community Policing
No scheduled WPD report this month.
PUBLIC AGENDA
3. Scheduled Items
No scheduled public agenda items this month.
4. Off-agenda Items
Any individual present that did not request to speak on the public agenda prior to the meeting
may speak at this time.
Recommended Action: Receive and file.
NEW BUSINESS
5. Public Art Funding
Phil Meyer (Design Council), Sharon Fearey (Design Council), Arlen Hamilton, and staff
from the City’s Finance Department will present a request to designate a percentage of the
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for public art.
Approximately two and a half years ago the City Manager asked Patricia McDonnell, Director of
the Wichita Art Museum, to convene an Ad Hoc Group that included members of the Arts
Council, the City Manager’s Office, and the general public to explore what public art could and
should mean for Wichita. The committee decided to look at how public dollars are used for
beautification in Wichita and the best way to allocate these dollars. The goal was to assure that
they were being used equitably across all districts and neighborhoods to enhance quality of life
for Wichitans in areas such as, but not exclusive to, public pools and splash pads, public parks,
and neighborhood bike and walking trails. Public art is also an important tool in attracting new
workers, companies, and industries; and tourists to Wichita.
The City has a long commitment to incorporating public art and aesthetics in the CIP. Based on
design standards, certain aesthetic improvements are imbedded into projects. Additionally,
supplemental funding is included for public art. The proposed ordinance will formalize the
1
District III Advisory Board
Agenda for August 7, 2019
structure for public art funding. It will also identify a percentage for funding based on various
sources in the CIP with the final funding being a percentage between 1 percent of the entire CIP
and 2 percent of limited funding sources. Three proposals will be presented for the DAB’s input.
The inclusion of public art and aesthetics aligns with the City mission and goal of providing
conditions for living well. Design standards have been developed to guide certain aesthetic
features of City projects. Examples of these guidelines include black signal poles, brick
crosswalks, landscaping, median pavers, and other items. Funding for these items has long
been imbedded in project budgets.
In addition, the City partners with the Design Council to designate certain projects as having
“special considerations.” Those projects are then reviewed by the Design Council and
recommendations are provided on funding levels and how to include public art. In the past,
determining the funding level available for public art has been ad hoc. This has created
challenges both for the City in budgeting amounts for public art, and the Design Council in
recommending allocations for arts funding to special consideration projects.
In an effort to enhance the transparency of public art funding, we hope to include a specific,
easily calculated amount for public art in the 2019-2028 CIP. As funding amounts are
recommended by the Design Council, they will be imbedded in budgets for specific projects.
Recommended Action: Provide feedback and suggestions to the Ad Hoc group as they move
forward with preparing the draft ordinance for presentation to the City Council.
Public Art Plan Presentation: https://www.wichita.gov/Council/DABAgendasMinutes/2019-08-
07%20DAB%20III%20Public%20Art%20Plan%20Presentation.pdf
BOARD AGENDA
6. Updates, Issues, and Reports
Reports from Council Member Clendenin and the DAB on any activities, events, resources,
issues, or concerns in the neighborhoods, council district, and/or city.
Recommended Action: Receive and file.
ADJOURNMENT
The next District III Advisory Board meeting will be at 6:30 p.m. on September 4, 2019 at the
WATER Center, 101 E. Pawnee, Wichita, KS 67211.
2
PUBLIC ART Public art is art that is available to everyone
creating a sense of place which is unique to
PLAN the community.
“I See What You Mean”
Denver, CO Convention Center
Artist: Lawrence Argent
Example: Stand alone art
Public art supports our economy and entrepreneurial spirit. Artists are 3.5 times more likely than the total
workforce to be self-employed.
72% of Americans believe “the arts unify our communities regardless of age, race and ethnicity”.
Public art addresses public health by reducing stress, providing a sense of belonging, and addressing stigmas
towards those with mental health issues.
Why is PublicArt
important?
“Crown Fountain”
Millennium Park
Chicago, IL
Artist: Jaume Plensa
Example: Integrated art
Seventy percent (70%) of Americans believe that the “arts improve the image and identity” of their community.
Important tool in attracting new workers, companies, industries and tourists to Wichita.
Attachment and Cultural Identity. Public art directly influences how people see and connect with a place.
Aesthetics is one of the top three characteristics as to why residents attach themselves to a community.
Why is PublicArt
important?
West Douglas Park
Wichita, KS 16th Ave. Steps
Artist: Tina Murano San Francisco, CA
Example: Integrated art Artist: Aileen Barr &
Colette Crutcher
Example: Integrated art
Nomar Market
Wichita, KS
Artist: Conrad Snider
Example: Integrated art
Integrated public art enhances the built environment.
Public art fosters neighborhood and city pride.
Public art can emphasize regional, cultural and neighborhood identity.
Why is PublicArt
important?
Cattail Fence & Gates
Watson Park
Wichita, KS
Artist: Todd Whipple
Example: Integrated art
East Kellogg
Wichita, KS
Artist: Vicki Scuri
Example: Integrated art
Little Ark Pedestrian
Bridge & Water Line Lincoln Street Dam
Wichita, KS Wichita, KS
Artist: Kent Williams Artist: Kent Williams
Example: Integrated art Example: Integrated art
Integrated public art makes the functional inspiring and beautiful.
Integration of artistic elements into infrastructure adds little cost when integrated into the design process.
When done well, an integrated design process creates the exceptional out of the mundane.
Why is PublicArt
important?
Council Bluffs Gateway
Council Bluffs, IA
Artist: Ed Carpenter
Example: Gateway
“Aloft”
Eisenhower Airport
Wichita, KS
Artist: Ed Carpenter
Example: Integrated art
Public art can make a first impression to visitors to our community.
Public art also creates gateways to the city and our unique neighborhoods.
Public art tells the story of who we are, where we come from and what we hold dear.
Why is PublicArt
important?
“Troll / Keeper of the Drains”
Arkansas River
Wichita, KS
Artist: Connie Ernatt
Example: Discovery
“The Original Dream”
Grain Elevator
Wichita, KS Salina Municipal
Artist: Gleo/Horizontes Waterworks
Example: Mural Salina, KS
Artist: Kent Williams
Example: Education
Public art can enhance perceived negatives and forgotten places.
Thoughtful public art can stimulate imagination and storytelling and education.
From the largest mural in the world painted by a single artist to hidden gems, public art enhances everyone’s
experience of the community.
Why is PublicArt
important?
“Playground”
New Your, NY
Artist: Tom Otterness
“Cloud Gate” Example: Interactive
Millennium Park
Chicago, IL
Artist: Sir Anish Kapoor
Example: Interactive
“Bus”
Baltimore, Maryland
Artist: mmmm….
Example: Interactive
There are approximately 350 public art programs in the United States.
Nationally, 283 of the 350 public art programs are housed within government agencies.
Public art programs administer the development and management of public art in their communities.
In addition to creating new work, public art programs allocate money to maintaining the public art collection.
Percent for Art
Program
“Skydance”
Pedestrian Bridge
Oklahoma City, OK
Artist: Hans Butzer
Example: Integrated Art
“High Trestle”
Pedestrian Bridge
Des Moines, IA
Artist: Schuck Britson/Dalhquist
Studio
Example: Integrated Art
Peer Cities with Percent for Art Programs
Oklahoma City – 1% (2009) Chattanooga – 1% (2009) Pittsburgh - 1% (1977)
Des Moines – 1.5% (2001) Austin – 2% (1985) Nashville – 1% (2000)
Raleigh/Durham – 1% (2016) Boise – 1% (2010)
Percent for Art
Program
“LightRails”
Existing Bridge
Birmingham, AL
Artist: Bill FitzGibbons
Example: Integrated Art “Her Secret is Patience”
Phoenix, AR
Artist: Janet Echelman
Example: Gateway
Need for an Ordinance:
- Have been implementing public art for 20 years in an ad hoc fashion.
- Ordinance would codify the process and establish a transparent funding source and process.
- Establishes 20% of fund to be utilized for ongoing maintenance of existing and future public art.
Percent for Art
Ordinance
“Koi Pond”
“Check Your Baggage”
Boise, ID
Artist: Kelsey Hawes
Type: Utility
The methods used to build a public art program include:
- Clarifies duties/responsibilities of the Design Council and incorporates oversight of the program.
- Establishes a process for Design Council to designate eligible projects which require Public Art.
- Authorizes Design Council and Staff to recommend funding amounts for Public Art on eligible projects.
Percent for Art
Ordinance
“Hands”
Parking Garage
San Jose, CA
Artist: Christian Moeller
Example: Integrated Art Bill Graham Civic Auditorium
San Francisco, CA
Artist: Joseph Kosuth
Example: Integrated Art
The methods used to build a public art program include:
- Assure equitable distribution across districts and neighborhoods.
- Establishes guidelines for the selection of public artists and artist consultants
- Specifies responsibilities of City Staff and Design Council regarding maintenance of Public Art.
Percent for Art
Ordinance
“Mircrophone”
Nashville, TN
Artist: Franne Lee, Keith
Harmon, Mac Hill
Type: Functional
“Hoops Playing Hoops”
Raleigh, NC
Artist: Chris Fennell
Example: Whimsical
- Past 5 years-City Staff analysis shows an amount equal to 1.4% of entire CIP has been used for public art. Projected
forward this level of funding would be: $2,464.00.
- Future-City Staff proposes using a defined formula of 1.5% of 3 defined funding streams within the CIP. Projected forward
this would be $1,102,866.
- Our group recommends using 2% of these 3 defined funding streams within the CIP. Projected forward this would be
$1,469,716.
Percent for Art
Ordinance
Before After
“Art enables us to find ourselves and lose
ourselves at the same time” – Thomas Merton
QUESTIONS