Design Review Board
Regular MeetingWinnetka, IL · September 18, 2025
Minutes
Minutes Adopted October 16, 2025
1 Minutes Adopted September 18, 2025
2
3 Winnetka Design Review Board/Sign Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes
4 September 18, 2025
5
6 Members Present: Katie Moor, Chairperson
7 Chris Baggett
8 Wesley Barker
9 Fritz Duda
10 Peter Evanich
11 Heather Niehoff
12
13 Members Absent: Colin Kennedy
14
15 Village Staff: Davorka Kirincic, Building and Code Enforcement Manager
16
17 Call to Order & Roll Call:
18 Chairperson Moor called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Board Members present.
19
20 Public Comments:
21 No comments were made at this time.
22
23 Approval of Minutes:
24 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the July 17, 2025
25 meeting minutes. A motion to approve the July 17, 2025 meeting minutes was made by Mr. Barker and seconded
26 by Mr. Baggett. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
27 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
28 NAYS: None
29
30 New Applications:
31 a. Case No. 25-13-DR: 933 Green Bay Road - Visual Comfort & Co.: Sign Permit to allow a new wall and
32 double-faced projecting signs, all of which will be on the new building’s Green Bay Road elevation of the Subject
33 Property.
34 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning
35 classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines the Board is to
36 consider.
37 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any questions. Ms. Niehoff referred to the backlit lighting and questioned
38 how it would operate. Frank Lambert, representing the applicant from the design sign company, responded that it
39 would be halo or reverse backlit lighting. Ms. Niehoff also asked for the reasoning for the 18-inch size. Ms. Kirincic
40 explained in terms of the design guideline recommendations. Mr. Lambert explained the limitations of how the
41 letters are fabricated and noted the lower-case lettering would be smaller, with only a few letters measuring 18
42 inches. Ms. Niehoff described it as massive. Mr. Lambert estimated the smaller letter height to be 14 inches and
43 stated that samples were previously provided to the Board for their review. He also described the LED wattage
44 that would be used. Ms. Kirincic provided the Board with additional information.
45
46 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any other questions. She indicated the letter size appeared to be a
47 manufacturing issue. Ms. Niehoff commented that the letter size did not seem appropriate and referred to its scale
48 in relation to neighboring buildings. Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the application as submitted
49 or for the applicant to conduct further investigation to determine whether the sign could be scaled to meet the
50 design guidelines, along with an alternative method of backlighting. A Board Member commented the sign is nice,
51 but the Board Members are wrestling with the width. Another Board Member agreed with the comments made
52 and added that it would embrace the Hubbard Woods business district. Another Board Member agreed with the
53 comments made and that the size should be reduced.
Design Review Board September 16, 2025
Page 2
1
2 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request. A motion to approve the request was made by Mr.
3 Duda and seconded by Mr. Baggett. A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5 to 1:
4 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor
5 NAYS: Niehoff
6
7 b. Case No. 25-14-DR: 191 Linden Street - Saints Faith Hope & Charity Parish: Certificate of
8 Appropriateness to allow the replacement of the existing roof on the south wing of the school at the Subject
9 Property.
10 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning
11 classification. She stated the applicant also provided site plans and referred to the Certificate of Appropriateness
12 Standards and Village Design Guidelines recommendations for the Board’s consideration. Chairperson Moor asked
13 Board members if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time.
14
15 Chairperson Moor asked for the applicant’s presentation. Dennis Levin, the church’s general contractor,
16 introduced himself to the Board and explained the reasoning for not using clay tile for the roof replacement as
17 opposed to the metal roof used on other buildings in the surrounding area of the school campuses. Mr. Levin
18 explained the reasoning behind their selection, which included cost and the fact that the proposed roof would
19 match the other roof elements. Chairperson Moor asked if they had considered using different roofing materials.
20 Mr. Levin responded that they did and explained their choice, which included the length of time the roof would
21 last.
22
23 A Board Member asked if there is a history regarding other metal roofs. Ms. Kirincic explained that the special use
24 previously requested for the Parish Center included specifications for a metal sheet roof. Chairperson Moor
25 referred to a 2005 GIS image, which showed a metal roof for the church and gym buildings. Ms. Niehoff agreed
26 with Chairperson Moor that it would be better to use higher-quality materials, while acknowledging the complexity
27 and budget concerns. She then stated consistency would be provided on the campus. A Board Member asked if it
28 would be prefinished metal and for the warranty information. Mr. Levin confirmed that it is correct and that it
29 would have a 25-year warranty.
30
31 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request as presented. A motion to approve the request as
32 presented was made by Mr. Evanich and seconded by Ms. Niehoff. A vote was taken, and the motion was
33 unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
34 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
35 NAYS: None
36
37 c. Case No. 25-15-DR: 520 Green Bay Road - BMO Bank: Certificate of Appropriateness to allow exterior
38 building and landscaping alterations on the Subject Property.
39 Chairperson Moor noted that the applicant asked to withdraw. Ms. Kirincic confirmed that the applicant had
40 withdrawn the application and provided a summary of the request to the Board.
41
42 No vote was taken at this time.
43
44 d. Case No. 25-16-DR: 847 Elm Street - Little Elm: Sign Permit to install window and projecting signs, and
45 Certificate of Appropriateness to allow storefront improvements and removal of the existing awning and awning
46 valance sign from the previous business on the Subject Property.
47 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning
48 classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines that the Board is to
49 consider. Additionally, Ms. Kirincic brought to the Board’s attention that the PowerPoint Applicant submitted to be
50 present at the meeting includes additional door window signage, decal updates regarding (including a change of
51 the color), and a different entrance door color than submitted initially with their applications
52
Design Review Board September 16, 2025
Page 3
1 Chairperson Moor asked for the applicant’s presentation. Kittie Brandtner introduced herself to the Board and
2 stated that they planned to have one large windowpane instead of two aluminum windows. She also mentioned a
3 side divert near the front door, where the logo decal would be placed, making it visible from the sidewalk. Ms.
4 Brandtner noted that there would be no logo on the main window to elevate the space and add charm. A Board
5 Member asked if the blade sign was fixed or on chains. Ms. Brandtner confirmed the blade sign is fixed. He then
6 referred to the design guidelines, which recommend against swinging signage. A Board Member questioned the
7 material to be used. Ms. Brandtner provided a sample to the Board for their review. She also referred to the
8 limestone, which would remain with the brick above. Ms. Brandtner then confirmed that the door would change,
9 along with the quartz on the bottom.
10
11 Ms. Niehoff commented that it looked great. Chairperson Moor agreed with Ms. Niehoff’s comments. Chairperson
12 Moor suggested that the Board approve the request, conditional upon the applicant resubmitting it with the decal
13 positioned on the side, featuring new text at the door window, and a different text and door color.
14
15 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request with a condition. A motion was made by Mr. Baggett,
16 conditional upon the applicant's submission of a revised rendering that includes the decal and updates the
17 proposed signage materials with new text colors and door window signage, as presented in the meeting's
18 PowerPoint. Mr. Duda seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion was unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
19 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
20 NAYS: None
21
22 e. Case No. 25-17-DR: 555-557-559 Chestnut Street: Certificate of Appropriateness to enable the
23 sandblasting, tuckpointing, re-painting, and replacement of two existing windows on the alley elevation of the
24 Subject Property.
25 Chairperson Moor identified the property owner for the commercial building and stated the request is to allow
26 exterior repair and alterations to the existing structure and that the applicant is seeking approval to enable
27 sandblasting, tuckpointing, repainting, and replacement of two windows on the alley elevation. Ms. Kirincic
28 provided additional information to the Board.
29
30 Chairperson Moor stated that the two windows are shown on page 92. She then asked for a motion to approve the
31 request as presented. A motion to approve the request as presented was made by Mr. Baggett and seconded by
32 Mr. Barker. A vote was taken, and the motion was unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
33 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
34 NAYS: None
35
36 f. Case No. 25-18-DR: 914 Green Bay Road - Sante Integrated Health and Wellness: Sign Permit to install
37 door window and projecting signs at the first-floor entrance of the Subject Property.
38 Chairperson Moor stated the applicant is requesting that the Board consider a sign application as the commercial
39 space lessee as well as a proposed door window and projecting sign at the entrance.
40 Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and zoning
41 classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines that the Board is to
42 consider.
43
44 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request as presented. A motion to approve the request as
45 presented was made by Ms. Niehoff and seconded by Mr. Barker. A vote was taken, and the motion was
46 unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
47 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
48 NAYS: None
49
50 g. Case No. 25-19-DR: 560 Chestnut Street - Neapolitan: Certificate of Appropriateness requesting
51 approval to paint portions of the exterior storefront on the Subject Property.
52 Chairperson Moor stated the applicant is requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for recent storefront painting
53 changes. Ms. Kirincic summarized the application in detail for the Board, identifying the property’s location and
Design Review Board September 16, 2025
Page 4
1 zoning classification. She also referred to the Village’s Sign Code as well as to Village Design Guidelines that the
2 Board is to consider.
3
4
5 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any questions. Ms. Niehoff questioned the difference between the blush
6 and brighter pink colors. Ms. Kirincic explained to the Board and stated that the applicant was asked to provide
7 additional information. A Board Member noted that the rendering seemed to include more painted areas than the
8 current storefront photos, which reflect recent paint changes. Ms. Kirincic provided clarification to the Board.
9
10 Chairperson Moor asked for the applicant’s presentation. Kelly Golden, the owner, provided a paint sample to the
11 Board. She stated they intended to paint the metal, which she described as dark, along with the door entryway to
12 the pink color they use for their store branding. She referred to the attempts made regarding the paint having
13 different shades and asked if there were any questions.
14
15 Chairperson Moor described the color as very bright, and per the design guidelines, she read from the design
16 guidelines: “Colors shall be used with restraint. Excessive brightness should be avoided.” She commented that she
17 preferred the pale pink color, which would still complement the brand well. She noted that the elevation on the
18 rendering, which shows a pale/blush pink color, looks so beautiful and elegant. Ms. Niehoff asked if the color is
19 used throughout the store. Ms. Golden responded to the Board. She confirmed that the limestone and columns
20 would not be painted. Ms. Golden also stated that the color has been tested in terms of its appearance. The Board
21 Members then discussed the shade of pink colors and their intended uses in detail. They liked the pastel
22 pale/blush pink shade shown on the proposed renderings and directed the applicant to get as much of that shade
23 as they could on the storefront. Ms. Neihoff stated that with bright pink color and white limestone columns, the
24 overall appearance looks choppy. It was also concluded that board members would not mind all limestone
25 columns to be painted as shown on the rendering, as mentioned earlier, if the applicant can match that pale/blush
26 shade of pink. It would give a cohesive look to the storefront.
27
28 Ms. Niehoff suggested that if one bright shade of pink is vital to the applicant, it should only be done at the
29 entrance door and the recessed portion. She also stated it is essential to the building as a whole; a lighter
30 pale/blush pink color should be used in order to make it more contiguous. Chairperson Moor agreed with Ms.
31 Neihoff's suggestion and referred to several public comments she had received. Ms. Golden stated that she
32 appreciated the Board’s comments and is willing to return to the Board with a lighter pink color. The Chairperson
33 emphasized the importance of reviewing a paint sample before approval, noting that a photo of the paint does not
34 do justice. Mrs. Kirincic suggested that applicants can paint one smaller portion of the storefront to try to match
35 the preferred pastel pale/blush pink color and present it at the next DRB meeting for approval. The applicant
36 agreed to match the pale/blush pink color from the application material’s rendering as closely as possible.
37 However, she requested that the approval process be expedited to avoid a one-month delay in painting the
38 storefront. She is embarrassed by the storefront's current appearance and would like to paint it as soon as
39 possible. Members discussed how to expedite approval without waiting for next month's DRB meeting, while still
40 checking and approving a new shade of pale/blush pink that matches as closely as possible, as shown on the
41 application elevation rendering applied to the storefront.
42
43 It was decided that the Board will approve the application with the condition that a paint sample of the desired
44 pale/blush pink color be applied to a portion of the façade, in a couple of areas with different materials (limestone,
45 metal, fascia, and wood), to see how the paint takes to other materials. Also, it was concluded that staff will share
46 by e-mail a photo with a color paint sample applied on the storefront with Board members, get approval of the
47 color shade electronically (that way get back quickly to the Applicant and not postpone the project). After approval
48 of the specific color shade, the Applicant would be able to proceed with painting the whole storefront.
49
50 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request with a condition. Mr. Duda moved to approve the
51 Applicant application, conditioned on approval of the specific color by staff and committee, which will be
52 conducted electronically in some fashion. Mr. Barker seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion was
53 unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
Design Review Board September 16, 2025
Page 5
1 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
2 NAYS: None
3
4 Other Business.
5 a. October 16, 2025, Meeting – Quorum Check.
6 The Board Members discussed their availability.
7
8 Adjournment:
9 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Niehoff and seconded by
10 Mr. Duda. A vote was taken, and the motion was unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
11 AYES: Baggett, Barker, Duda, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
12 NAYS: None
13 The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m.
14
15 Respectfully submitted,
16
17 Antionette Johnson
18 Recording Secretary
Agenda
Village of Winnetka
Design Review Board/Sign Board of Appeals Regular
Meeting
September 18, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers
510 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Minutes
a. July 17, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes
4. New Applications
a. Case No. 25-13-DR: 933 Green Bay Road - Visual Comfort & Co.: Sign
Permit to allow a new wall and double-faced projecting signs, all of which will be
on the new building’s Green Bay Road elevation of the Subject Property.
b. Case No. 25-14-DR: 191 Linden Street - Saints Faith Hope & Charity
Parish: Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the replacement of the existing
roof on the south wing of the school at the Subject Property.
c. Case No. 25-15-DR: 520 Green Bay Road - BMO Bank: Certificate of
Appropriateness to allow exterior building and landscaping alterations on the
Subject Property.
d. Case No. 25-16-DR: 847 Elm Street - Little Elm: Sign Permit to install window
and projecting signs, and Certificate of Appropriateness to allow storefront
improvements and removal of the existing awning and awning valance sign from
the previous business on the Subject Property.
e. Case No. 25-17-DR: 555-557-559 Chestnut Street: Certificate of
Appropriateness to enable the sandblasting, tuckpointing, re-painting, and
replacement of two existing windows on the alley elevation of the Subject
Property.
f. Case No. 25-18-DR: 914 Green Bay Road - Sante Integrated Health and
Wellness: Sign Permit to install door window and projecting signs at the first-
floor entrance of the Subject Property.
g. Case No. 25-19-DR: 560 Chestnut Street - Neapolitan: Certificate of
Appropriateness requesting approval to paint portions of the exterior
storefront on the Subject Property.
5. Other Business
a. October 16, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
6. Adjournment
NOTICE
Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments
prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or
by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All
agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter.
The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay
Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).
Packet
Village of Winnetka
Design Review Board/Sign Board of Appeals Regular
Meeting
September 18, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers
510 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Minutes
a. July 17, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes
4. New Applications
a. Case No. 25-13-DR: 933 Green Bay Road - Visual Comfort & Co.: Sign
Permit to allow a new wall and double-faced projecting signs, all of which will be
on the new building’s Green Bay Road elevation of the Subject Property.
b. Case No. 25-14-DR: 191 Linden Street - Saints Faith Hope & Charity
Parish: Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the replacement of the existing
roof on the south wing of the school at the Subject Property.
c. Case No. 25-15-DR: 520 Green Bay Road - BMO Bank: Certificate of
Appropriateness to allow exterior building and landscaping alterations on the
Subject Property.
d. Case No. 25-16-DR: 847 Elm Street - Little Elm: Sign Permit to install window
and projecting signs, and Certificate of Appropriateness to allow storefront
improvements and removal of the existing awning and awning valance sign from
the previous business on the Subject Property.
e. Case No. 25-17-DR: 555-557-559 Chestnut Street: Certificate of
Appropriateness to enable the sandblasting, tuckpointing, re-painting, and
replacement of two existing windows on the alley elevation of the Subject
Property.
f. Case No. 25-18-DR: 914 Green Bay Road - Sante Integrated Health and
Wellness: Sign Permit to install door window and projecting signs at the first-
floor entrance of the Subject Property.
g. Case No. 25-19-DR: 560 Chestnut Street - Neapolitan: Certificate of
Appropriateness requesting approval to paint portions of the exterior
storefront on the Subject Property.
5. Other Business
a. October 16, 2025, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
6. Adjournment
Page 1 of 113
NOTICE
Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments
prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or
by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All
agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter.
The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay
Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).
Page 2 of 113
1 Winnetka Design Review Board/Sign Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes
2 July 17, 2025
3
4 Members Present: Katie Moor, Chairperson
5 Wesley Barker
6 Peter Evanich
7 Heather Niehoff
8
9 Members Absent: Chris Baggett
10 Fritz Duda
11 Colin Kennedy
12
13 Village Staff: Davorka Kirincic, Building and Code Enforcement Manager
14
15 Call to Order & Roll Call:
16 Chairperson Moor called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Board Members present.
17
18 Public Comments:
19 Chairperson Moor noted there are no audience members present to comment.
20
21 Approval of Minutes:
22 Chairperson Moor asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the June 19, 2025
23 meeting minutes. A motion to approve the June 19, 2025, meeting minutes was made by Ms. Niehoff and
24 seconded by Mr. Evanich. A vote was taken and the motion was unanimously passed, 4 to 0:
25 AYES: Barker, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
26 NAYS: None
27
28 Continued Applications:
29 a. Case No. 25-11-DR: Baird & Warner (594 Green Bay Road): An amended Sign Permit to allow
30 replacement of the existing wall sign, recovery of existing awning frames, and awning signs for Baird & Warner's
31 new brand identity. This item was continued from the June 19, 2025, Design Review Board Meeting.
32 Chairperson Moor summarized the request which was continued from the last meeting. Ms. Kirincic referred to a
33 PowerPoint presentation, summarizing the request for the proposed awning to be recovered in Sunbrella fabric
34 and describing the awning signs, colors, and text for the Board. She then referred to a comparison of the prior and
35 current wall sign proposal and asked if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time.
36
37 Ms. Niehoff commented that it looked great and blended better with the canopy. The Board Members agreed with
38 Ms. Niehoff’s comments.
39
40 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to approve the request as presented. A motion to approve the request was
41 made by Ms. Niehoff and seconded by Mr. Barker. A vote was taken and the motion was unanimously passed, 4 to
42 0:
43 AYES: Barker, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
44 NAYS: None
45
46 Other Business.
47 a. August 21, 2025, Meeting – Quorum Check.
48 The Board Members discussed their availability.
49
50 Adjournment:
51 Chairperson Moor asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Niehoff and seconded by
52 Mr. Barker. A vote was taken and the motion was unanimously passed, 4 to 0:
53 AYES: Barker, Evanich, Moor, Niehoff
Page 3 of 113
Design Review Board July 17, 2025
Page 2
1 NAYS: None
2 The meeting was adjourned at 7:08 p.m.
3
4 Respectfully submitted,
5
6 Antionette Johnson
7 Recording Secretary
8
Page 4 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 933 GREEN BAY ROAD – VISUAL COMFORT& CO. – SIGN PERMIT
(CASE NO. 25-13-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to consider a sign permit application
submitted by Visual Comfort & Co (the “Applicant”), as the future lessee of the portion of 1st floor
commercial space in the planned commercial building at 933 Green Bay Road, (the “Subject Property”),
to allow new wall and a double-faced projecting signs all of which will be on the new building’s Green Bay
Road elevation of the Subject Property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located on the east side of Green Bay Road between Gage Street and Tower Road
in the Hubbard Woods Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located within
the Commercial Overlay District. In a portion of the first floor of a new planned commercial building, the
Applicant will operate its retail lighting fixtures store. The other portion of the first-floor commercial space
will be occupied by another tenant. Figure 1 identifies the location of the Subject Property and the future
commercial building. Figure 2 shows the existing building with a storefront and the courtyard, which is
slated for demolition.
Location of 933 Green
Bay Road and Future
One Story Commercial
Building
Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map of 933 Green Bay Road Property
Page 5 of 113
a
Figure 2 – Subject Property – Green Bay Road view of the Subject Property with the existing building
CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant is seeking approval to install a new back-lit, illuminated wall sign and double-face projecting
sign, all of which would provide identification and promotion for their new business location. Signs will
feature logo, text, and colors of their businesses as shown in the illustrations below:
Proposed wall sign is:
• Mounted within the storefront’s band;
• Fabricated aluminum backlit channel letters;
• Backlit channel individual letters;
• LED illumination with 6500K white, containing the business name Visual Comfort & Co;
• The first letters of each word measuring 18 inches high, 3 inches thick,;
• Gray faces (Pantone 425C), white returns;
• Mounted approximately 15 feet and 6 inches above the sidewalk, and
• 28.26 square feet of sign area.
Subject Property – Proposed wall sign
Proposed projecting sign
• A new double-faced sign identifies a new business:
o projecting 24 inches from the building wall over the sidewalk
o bottom of the sign will be 96 inches from the finished grade;
• Proposed double-face nonilluminated sign 24 inches wide by 12 inches tall;
• Text max. 1 5/8 inches tall stating Visual Comfort & Co.;
• 1/8 inches aluminum sign with gray satin finish and clear acrylic push-thru graphics, and
• 2 square feet of sign area on each side.
Page 6 of 113
Subject Property – Proposed new double-face projecting sign
A copy of the Applicant’s application materials is included in Attachment A.
SIGN CODE ANALYSIS
Section 15.60.120 of the Village Sign Code establishes standards for wall signs and projecting signs in
commercial districts.
Wall sign standards
• Sign may only contain the business name, a three-word generic description of the types of
products or services offered, and the occupant’s logo or trademark;
• Sign may not exceed 70 square feet in area;
• Shall be placed substantially parallel to the surface of the wall;
• For a building that contains more than one type of sign (e.g., wall, window, awning, etc.), a sign
shall not exceed 15% of the street exposure.
The proposed sign meets all the above standards for wall signs.
Projecting sign standards
• One projecting sign per business;
• Extends no more than 2 feet from the building wall;
• No more than 3 feet high;
• Clearance between the bottom of the sign and the sidewalk is at least 8 feet; and
• Containing the name of the business and a maximum of three words containing a general
description of types of products or services, and the occupant logo or trademark.
The proposed projecting sign meets all the above standards for projecting signs.
Signage Street Exposure
Area Square Percentage
Foot
Street Exposure 916.50 -
Max Allowed per Sign Code 137.48 15%
(15% of the Street Exposure)
All Proposed Signs counted toward Street Exposure 30.26 3.30%
Page 7 of 113
The proposed signs comply with the maximum allowed sign area for street exposure, not exceeding 15%
of the street exposure at Green Bay Road elevation.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
When reviewing the design of any signs, the Board is to consider the following standards and criteria of
Section 15.60.150(F) of the Sign Code.
F. Standards and Criteria for Issuance. The following factors and characteristics
relating to the safety and appearance of signage shall govern the Board’s
evaluation of design submittals:
1. The sign area shall be in proportion and scale to the building or to other
buildings or signs in the surrounding area;
2. A signage package for a business establishment that includes a number
of signs and graphics shall have an overall plan that demonstrates the
compatibility of the design and colors of all the signs that are part of that
package;
3. The amount of text and graphics contained in or on any sign or group of
signs shall be limited so that it results in a clear and readable design;
4. Signs and graphics shall have a harmonious relationship with nearby
signs, buildings, and the neighborhood and shall be designed not to
adversely affect adjacent structures. In this respect, the sign shall relate
to its building, structure, and neighborhood in terms of size, shape,
material, color, texture, lettering, location, arrangement, lighting, and
the like;
5. Colors shall be used with restraint; excessive brightness shall be avoided;
and
6. The additional provisions of this chapter, as specified in this chapter, shall
be part of the criteria of the design review process.
The Board should also consider the Village Design Guidelines to approve proposed signage. See
Attachment B.
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed signs appropriate and compatible with the Design
Guidelines and approve the application as proposed. Should the DRB approve the proposed
improvements, the Applicant would first need to obtain the approved sign permit from the Community
Development Department prior to installing the subject signs.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt
Page 8 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION
V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, I L L I N O I S
ECEIVEn
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION n
Q . IIJL 2 8 2025 u
Tenant/Lessee BY·
Name of Business Primary contact name
Visual Comfort & Co. Lisa Gomez
Project Address
933 Green Bay Rd
City State Zip Code Email
Winnetka IL 60093 tax@visualcomfort.com
Sign Company
Name of Sign Company Primary contact name
Volkan Signs & Lighting Volkan Ozdemir
Street Address
602 Lunt Ave, Schaumburg, IL 60193
City State Zip Code Email
Schaumburg, IL 60193 vozdemir@volkansigns.com
Property Owner
Name of Company I Primary contact name I Phone No.
GW Properties Mitch Goltz (773) 382-0445
Street Address:
I I I
2211 N Elston Ave, Ste 304
City State Zip Code Email
Chicago IL 60614 mitch@gwproperties.com
Sign type(s): 0 window graphics � wall-mounted sign 0 ground-mounted sign
(check all that apply}
[i) projecting sign D other________________
Additional description of sign type and materials ______________________
Sign A-Wall Sign 8acl<-lit aluminum rnannel lellers. 18.17' x 223.9" (28.26 sq fl), mounled al -15'--6" A.F.F. lluminated v.;tt, 6500K 1-.tlile LEDs. Gray faces (Panlone 425 C), white relurns.
Sign B - Brade Sign Double-sided, non-illumlnated blade sign, 12" x 24" (2 sq ft), mounted at -8'-0' A.F.F. Aluminum with gray sa1in finish and dear acrylic PIJSh-thru graphics .
OFFICE USE ONLY .:;>j;,C. � �.P2, 5 -Bl6
SIGN FEE: $80 NON-ILLUMINATED PER SIGN TYPE s Bo.oo
$195 ILLUMINATED SIGN s 1<35.oo
STAFF REVIEW FEE: $70 WAIVE FEE s =ro.oa
TOTAL PERMIT FEE $,;M5�00
CONDITIONS OF APP-ROVAL: _______________________
Page 4 of 4
Page 9 of 113
� PERSONA TRIANGLE
FACILITY SERVICES I LIGHTING I SIGNAGE
Authorization to Permit/Install Signage
ID PROJECT NAME: Visual Comfort & Co.
STREET ADDRESS: 933 Greenbay Road
CITY, STATE, ZIP: Winnetka, IL 60093
DRAWING: 225796 R2
LANDLORD NAME:
CONTACT NAME:
CONTACT TITLE:
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE, ZIP:
To Whom It May Concern,
I, Mitch Goltz certify that I'm the duly authorized representative of the building at
the above referenced address. I also hereby certify that I am authorized to make decisions regarding
tenant changes to the referenced address.
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the referenced artwork and that I have granted approval for the
signage depicted on the attached artwork to be fabricated and installed at the referenced location.
Lastly, I do hereby authorize Persona Triangle and its subcontractor, Volkan Signs & Lighting, Inc., to
represent us in this matter and in the capacity file for and obtain a sign permit for this project. All permits
needed for the signage and installation of the signage are hereby authorized by the landlord.
z ______________
Authorized By (Print Name): _M_it_ch_G_o_t__
Title: Manager
Signature: ��
Date: 51151202s
700 21 st Street Watertown, SD 57201 I 800.843.9888 I 11 Azar Ct. Baltimore, MD 21227 I 410.247.5300
personatriangle.com
Page 10 of 113
PROJECT:
PROJECT SCHEDULE REVISIONS
SIGN TYPE/ DESCRIPTION: QTY.: PG. # DATE DB NOTES
A FABRICATED ALUM. BACK LIT CHANNEL LETTERS ONE (1) 3 R1 4.5.2025 JACK REMOVED DAY/NIGHT VINYL ON SIGN 'A'
R2 4.7.2025 SU PROVIDED BLADEA.F.F. OPTION.
B. D/S NON-ILLUMINATED BLADE SIGN ONE (1) 5 R3 6.5.2025 JACK CHANGED SIGN A TO BACK LITAND SIGN B TO
NON-ILLUM.
R4 7.28.2025 JACK DECREASED BLADE LENGTH TO 2'
V1suAL COMFORT & Co.
MAP
O Mino's
tti!i1nn STORE LOCATION
a,
�.,
C:
Hubbard Woods G)
Graete.-1s Ice Cream
Bowf 'Em Over
W11hkeCream
933 GREENBAY ROAD m 0
ii
.,:il Prlvaleffd
WINNETKA, IL 60093 p
w.
The ����1 �o:;; t,
Free Mea!n.-ement
GJ.
Lot10 P
\
t
��C>'
Tower Rd Tower Re
<a, PERSONA TRIANGLE
11 Azar Court • P.O. Box 24186 CLIENT & LOCATION LEAD NO. DATE REVIEW SHEET NO.
Baltimore, Maryland 21227
225796 R4 3.18.2025
1 of 6
T: 410-247-5300 • F: 410 247-1944
933 GREENBAY ROAD
Reproduction In Whole or Part
WINNETKA, IL 60093 V1suAL COMFORT & Co. SM/PM ARTIST SEG. NO.
FACILITY SERVICES I LIGHTING I SIGNAGE Prohibited without Express
ZF-FS JACK
Permission of PersonalTriangle © TSS
Page 11 of 113
CL
STOREFRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
0
~
DOORS
I II
II I II
I I I I I I I I / I I I I
I I I I I I J
/ I I I I
i i i i i
T T
T
i i
T
~18'-7 7/8"J
T
/ i i i
T T TL LT L TL / T T T
L L L L L L L L
0
w
RSUAl CON :Fo~/4 Co~-------------------_
II
,
~
IT T
J
---------~ - - - - - ±15'-6" A.F.F~
B.O. SIGN'A'
0
I IT IT w T- T - T- T- T TI TIT I T
.
- T •
L L L L L L L L L L
• I
T T T T T T I TI T T T T T T
I I I I I I I I I I
v-0
- I I I - I
T
I
I
I
I
. I
- EQ I 3J EQ
I
I I
l _J I
V
t
T I
L i L # 8'-0" A.F.F~
~
I
II I ----- - - - - - - B.O. SIG~B'
II I
I
, ,, '' II I
TIT I I
,, '' II I
L L
I
, ,, '' II I
I , '' II I
,,
I I ''
I I ,, '' II I
IT I I ,, '' II I
' I
L i I
I I I
'' ,,
I I
T T
I
I
# # I # ''
''
I
,, ,, # T
T T
# # I
I
T
~*
I
# # ?( ,
,,% # #
I
I
# '
' ' ' ,,
, #
I I I I I
0'-0"
J _J
FIN. FLOOR (VARiEsr-$"
I I
11 Azar Court • P.O. Box 24186 CLIENT & LOCATION LEAD NO. DATE REVIEW SHEET NO.
Baltimore, Maryland 21227
<@J PERSONA TRIANGLE T: 410-247-5300 • F: 410 247-1944
225796 R4 3.18.2025
Reproduction In Whole or Part
933 GREENBAY ROAD
WINNETKA, IL 60093
V1suAL COMFORT & Co. SM/PM ARTIST SEG. NO. 2 of 6
FACILITY SERVICES I LIGHTING I SIGNAGE Prohibited without Express
Permission of PersonalTriangle © TSS ZF - FS JACK
Page 12 of 113
FABRICATED ALUM. BACK LIT CHANNEL LETTERS
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'
QTY.: ONE (1)
AREA: 18.1r x 223.9" = 28.26' JZf
0
11/2"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18'-77/8" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , 3"
INTERIOR
f YliSUAl COMFORT & Coo
WIREWAY
FRONT e SIDE
e
FINISH SCHEDULE
l m~~TIN
11 Azar Court • P.O. Box 24186 CLIENT & LOCATION LEAD NO. DATE REVIEW SHEET NO.
Baltimore, Maryland 21227
<@J PERSONA TRIANGLE T: 410-247-5300 • F: 410 247-1944
225796 R4 3.18.2025
Reproduction In Whole or Part
933 GREENBAY ROAD
WINNETKA, IL 60093
V1suAL COMFORT & Co. SM/PM ARTIST SEG. NO. 3 of 6
FACILITY SERVICES I LIGHTING I SIGNAGE Prohibited without Express
Permission of PersonalTriangle © TSS ZF - FS JACK
Page 13 of 113
Page 14 of 113
Page 15 of 113
Page 16 of 113
ATTACHMENT B
d. Building Signage
Commercial signs should reflect the character of the building style, while expressing
each store’s individuality. There are several prominent sign styles that are appropriate to
Winnetka: surface mounted, pin-mounted, interior, decal and projecting blade signs.
Sign materials are limited to painted wood, canvas, architectural glass and metal. Sign
color must harmonize with the building upon which it is mounted and adjacent
structures. Lettering color can be unique to the image of the retailer/user. Metal sign
and plaque material such as brushed bronze, antique bronze, aluminum, stainless steel
and painted cast iron or similarly appearing materials are preferred. Highly reflective
metallic signs are not allowed. Signs should be lit by marquee or spot lighting; neon
lighting is not permitted. Spot lighting should be minimal and unobtrusive and, per the
Village Code, the source of illumination shall not be visible from any street, sidewalk or
dwelling. Simplified industrial light fixtures are not permitted. Contextual solutions are
recommended. The majority of the signs will be mounted within the building’s sign
band, defined as the wall area located above the ground floor storefront opening and
below the second floor windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” above grade and a
maximum of 15’-0” above grade. (MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023)
Signs must comply with the general provisions of the Winnetka Sign Ordinance as well
as design provisions contained within these Design Guidelines.
1. Surface mounted commercial signs are either fabricated from painted wood or cast
metal plaques and are to be mounted within the sign band or within the storefront
transom. The height of the sign is restricted to 75% of the area of the sign band or
14 inches - whichever is less. The sign band of a building consists of the area
located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the second floor
windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” and a maximum of 15’-0” above
grade. Refer to figures 28, 29, and 30 for location. Surface mounted or pin-
mounted signs are not permitted on secondary elevations without a defined sign
band.
2. Pin-mounted commercial signs consist of
reverse channel, cast metal and flat cut
metal letters mounted above the storefront
in the masonry sign band or suspended in
front of the storefront at the transom or
recessed entry. The size of the lettering is
restricted so that the height of the letters
does not exceed 75% of the height of the
sign band or 14 inches - whichever is less.
The length of the lettering is to be
Figure 38
contained within 75% of the length of the
sign band. (See figure 38)
19
Building & Architecture
Page 17 of 113
Village of Winnetka, Illinois
Figure 39 & 40
3. Projecting blade commercial signs can MC-01-2023, Removed, 01/17/2023
be round, square or vertical, mounted
from the face of the building at the
second floor level between the windows
or at the head of the storefront and are
oriented to pedestrian scale. The signs
are to be mounted on fixed hardware; no
swinging or chain-mounted signs are
allowed. The dimensions of the sign are
not to exceed 6 square feet (36”
high and 24” deep) (See figure 41). If
illuminated, the signs should be lit with
an unobtrusive light source. Figure 41
4. Incidental wall signs such as building management identification and directory
signs should be integrated into a single sign and be constructed of brushed bronze,
antique bronze or painted cast iron. Such signs should not be placed on the
prominent street front facade and should be directed to public residential entries
(MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023)
Design Guidelines 20
Page 18 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 191 LINDEN STREET (SAINTS, FAITH, HOPE AND CHARITY CHURCH)
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS (CASE NO. 25-14-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board is scheduled to consider an application submitted by
Saints, Faith, Hope and Charity Church (the “Applicant”), the owner of the property located at 191 Linden
Street (the “Subject Property”), for consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the
replacement of the existing roof on the south wing of the school at the Subject Property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located on the north side of Hill Road, between Linden Street and Ridge Road,
contains Saints Faith, Hope, and Charity Church and School, and is in the R-3 Single-Family Residential
District. Figure 1 below identifies the Subject Property, and Figure 2 on the following page identifies the
location of the roof replacement.
Subject Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map
Page 1
Page 19 of 113
General Location of Roof
Replacement
Figure 2 – Subject Property – Location of the portion of the roof replacement
CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant is seeking approval to replace the existing ceramic tile roof on the south wing of the school
with proposed metal tiles to match the three closest surrounding roofs at this end of the campus on
Subject Property, as shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5. The staff did not find DRB approval on file for the
mentioned three closest surrounding roofs, but GIS is showing the subject buildings with metal roofs back
in 2005.
Figure 3 – Subject Property –Existing metal roof on the Church
Page 2
Page 20 of 113
Figure 4 – Subject Property –Existing metal roof on the Parish Center
Figure 5 – Subject Property –Existing metal roof on the Gym
Page 3
Page 21 of 113
Proposed roof replacement
The Applicant has provided a site plan showing the location, design, and proposal to replace a portion of
the roof, all of which are included in the application materials included in Attachment A.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS
As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in
determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness:
“(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;”
“(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the
immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement
considerations;”
“(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
consistent with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be
adopted by the Board; and”
“(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the
immediate vicinity.”
The Board will need to determine if the proposed partial roof replacement complies with the above standards.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
The Village’s Design Guidelines provide general guidance on roof materials for commercial, mixed-use,
multiple-family, and institutional buildings. In terms of materials, the Guidelines recommend clay tiles,
Page 4
Page 22 of 113
cement tiles, shingles, and ceramic tiles that simulate natural materials. The architectural series of asphalt
shingles (3ply), wood shingles (fire-treated), slate, and real copper (no other metal roofs are allowed). The
Design Excerpt is included in Attachment B.
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed roof replacement appropriate and compatible with
the Design Guidelines and approve it as proposed. Should the DRB approve the Certificate of
Appropriateness, the Applicant would first need to obtain an approved Building Permit from the
Community Development Department before replacing the roof.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Attachment B: Design Excerpt
Page 5
Page 23 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
CE RTI FICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, I L L I N O I S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
Project Address: 191 Linden Street, Winnetka IL 60093
Name of Business(es : Saints Faith Hope & Charity
§
Application is hereby made for the following work (please check all that apply):
Sign
Awning
Sign Permit Application attached? LJ
Awning Permit Application attached? U
Other (general description) school south wing roof replacement
Please provide a detailed description of the proposed work (attach additional information such as material
specifications, photographs, etc.): replacement of 1940s roof on the south wing of the school which is
suffering water damage with every rainfall. the metal roof will match the 3 closest surrounding roofs at this end of the campus
I/We hereby certify that as Owner rep {Lessee/Owner) of the property located
at 180 Ridge (address), I am/we are authorized to submit plans for alterations of the subject
property. I/We agree to perform the subject work in accordance with the conditions of approval by the Winnetka
Design Review Board as well as all other applicable codes, rules, and regulations of the Village of Winnetka.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
SIGNED
COA applied for (date):
PRINTED NAME(S) -----------
DCJ1na Borman
ADDRESS 191 Linden Street Winnetka IL 60093 COA Case Number:
PHONE NO. 2 ______ COA Issued (date):
EMAIL dborman@faithhope.org
COAFee
fs $135
□
$575
PRIMARY DESIGN FIRM
CONTACT NAME
oece1ven
n JULO 8 2025 u
ADDRESS
PHONE NO.
EMAIL
BY:------
Page4of4
Page 24 of 113
Page 25 of 113
Anita Lichterman
From: eduard <eduard@landmarkdgi.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 2:18 PM
To: Anita Lichterman
Subject Good Faith Hope Roof Project
Attachments: G FH Arialjpg; roof pg 1.pdf; roof pg4.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Anita, I was asked to supply you with the area of work and some street level camera angles of the project that we are
contracted out to do, please see attached. Let me know if you need anything else. Also attached is the signed
portion of our contract with GFH.
Page 26 of 113
2
Page 27 of 113
3
Page 28 of 113
Sincerely,
Eduard Garcia
LFIN □ MRRK' 'I
(630) 323-5300 x1 I 1000 Hart Rd, Suite 300 I Barrington, IL 60010
eduard@landmarkdgi.com www.landmarkdgi.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying documenl(s} are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole
use of the addressee. If you receive this transmission in error. you are advised that any disclosure. copying, distribution. or the taking of any action 11
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact our fT Department at Is email
eduard@landmarkdgi.com
� Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
4
Page 29 of 113
Page 30 of 113
Page 31 of 113
Page 32 of 113
SNAP-ON STANDING
SEAM PANEL
MATERIALS
.032 aluminum 24 gauge steel*
SPECS
12”, 16", 18” or 20” O.C. 1” High
UL-90
SMOOTH
(STANDARD)
1"
12", 16", 18" or 20" O.C.**
PENCIL RIBS
(OPTIONAL) 1"
12", 16", 18" or 20" O.C.**
PRODUCT FEATURES ` 34 stocked colors (.032 aluminum) ASTM TESTS
` Galvalume Plus available ` ASTM E283/1680 tested
` Ideal for transition roofs
` Pencil ribs available UL CLASSIFICATION
` ASTM E331/1646 tested
` 35-year non-prorated finish warranty ` UL-580 Class 90 rated over solid FLORIDA BUILDING PRODUCT APPROVALS
substrate. (steel only - up to 18” O.C.)
` Panel lengths up to 35’ Please refer to pac-clad.com or your local
` UL-1897 wind uplift factory for specific product approval
MATERIAL ` UL-790 Class A fire rated numbers for Snap-On Panels.
` 48 stocked colors (24 gauge steel)
` UL-263 fire resistance rated
*12” and 18” 24 gauge steel Snap-On Standing Seam panels and 11” and 18” 24 gauge steel High Snap-On Standing Seam panels are UL-90 Classified over solid substrate. See roof deck construction in
Underwriter Laboratories roofing materials and systems directory.
A complete specification is available online at pac-clad.com.
800 PAC CLAD | PAC-CLAD.COM ©2024 Petersen Aluminum
Page 33 of 113
ATTACHMENT B
Village of Winnetka, Illinois
the EIFS must resemble exterior grade stucco of the historic English Tudor buildings in the
Village.
Acceptable Materials:
a. Primary Facade
Commercial, Mixed Use, Multiple-Family
and Institutional
Modular face brick (See figure 43)
Limestone (Limited to partial first
floor only. Limestone is to be
integrated with brick for multiple-
family residential) (See figure 44)
Cast stone, which clearly simulates
stone, is limited to accent pieces such
as belt courses, sills and shoes. (Split
face or rusticated are not permitted.)
Exterior grade stucco with wood trim
(See figure 45)
Wood siding (Multi family Residential Figure 43
only)
b. Secondary Facade
Commercial, Mixed Use, Multiple-Family
and Institutional
Modular face brick (See figure 43)
Modular common brick
Dressed limestone (Limited to first
floor only) (See figure 44)
Cast stone, which clearly simulates
stone, is limited to accent pieces such as
belt courses, sills and shoes. (Split face
or rusticated are not permitted.)
Exterior grade Stucco with wood trim
(See figure 45)
Figure 44
EIFS (upper floors only, troweled texture
to resemble stucco) (See figure 46)
c. Roof materials
Commercial, Mixed Use, Multiple-Family
and Institutional.
Clay Tiles (See figure 47)
Cement Tiles and Shingles
Ceramic Tiles that simulate natural
materials.
Figure 45
Design Guidelines 24
Page 34 of 113
Architectural Series of Asphalt Shingles
(3 ply) (See figure 49)
Wood Shingles (Fire treated)
Slate (See figure 48)
Real Copper (No other metal roofs are
allowed)
Figure 46
Institutional only
Flat roofs must be hidden by parapet
on primary / secondary facades.
Commercial and Multiple- Family
Flat roof must not be visible from
street, pedestrian, or open spaces.
d. Door and Window Materials:
Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional,
Multiple- Family Residential: Entry
doors should be wood or aluminum
stile and rail with varying degrees of
glass. Public entry doors should be Figure 47
fully glazed whereas private and semi-
private entries should be primarily
solid panel doors. Storefront window
units should be either paneled
aluminum or brass. Many original
storefronts, some with transom
windows, remain in the districts.
Efforts should be taken to
repair and renovate these systems
Figure 48
where feasible. Window frames should
be wood, steel or aluminum. Vinyl
windows are not acceptable. Muntin
divisions should be real divided glass
or simulated with spacer bars. Snap-in
muntins are not acceptable. Color
selection should be sympathetic with
the overall building color palette and
take into account the adjacent building
materials within the structure,
immediately adjacent structures,
structures within the same block and Figure 49
structures across the street.
Entry door hardware is to be exterior grade with weather-resistant finish. Hardware
design and finish is to be appropriate with facade articulation, color palette and
district character. Glazing should be clear glass without tint or film.
25
Building & Architecture
Page 35 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 520 GREEN BAY ROAD – BMO BANK – COA FOR BUILDING AND
LANDSCAPING ALTERATIONS (CASE NO. 2025-15-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to hold a public hearing on a
Certificate of Appropriateness Application submitted by BMO Bank (the “Applicant”) as the lessee of the
commercial space located at 520 Green Bay Road (the “Subject Property”). The Applicant is seeking
approval to replace windows on the 2nd and 3rd floors with those that are the same as existing, repairing
the landscaping retaining brick wall by the drive-thru, and replacing landscaping with new plantings on
the Subject Property.
The Subject Property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Green Bay Road and Elm
Street in the Elm Street Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located in the
Commercial Overlay District. The Subject Property is a traditional three-story building that houses BMO
Bank. Figure 1 below and Figure 2 on the following page identify the Subject Property.
Subject Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map
Page 36 of 113
Figure 2 – Subject Property – Building View/Green Bay Road and Elm Street Intersection
PREVIOUS APPROVALS
In 2018, DRB approved existing building signage. In 2019, DRB approved a Certificate of Appropriateness
for exterior building lighting. In 2023, staff administratively approved a Certificate of Appropriateness for
tuckpointing and repairing the landscaping retaining brick wall by the drive-thru at the Subject Property.
CURRENT REQUEST
As previously stated, the Applicant is seeking the replacement of existing windows on the 2nd and 3rd
floors, as they exist, the repair of the landscaping retaining brick wall by the drive-thru, and the
replacement of landscaping in the beds with new plantings at the Subject Property
Building Façade Window Replacement
• The Applicant is seeking approval to replace 98 existing windows on the 2nd and 3rd floors, which
will match exactly what is currently in place. Proposed windows are white Alside “Mezzo”
premium vinyl windows.
Repair the landscaping retaining brick wall by the drive-thru
• The Applicant is proposing to repair the existing landscaping retaining brick wall as it is,
maintaining the brick size and brick and mortar colors currently used.
Replace landscaping at the Subject Property with new plantings
• The Applicant is planning to replace landscaping in the beds both along the sidewalk on Green
Bay Road and along the drive-thru area, as proposed on the landscaping plan below.
2
Page 37 of 113
Proposed Landscaping Plan
Proposed Plantings
3
Page 38 of 113
Proposed plantings
A copy of the application materials is included in Attachment A.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS
As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in
determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness:
“(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;”
“(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the
immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement
considerations;”
“(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
consistent with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be
adopted by the Board; and”
“(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the
immediate vicinity.”
The Board will need to determine if the proposed exterior building and landscaping alterations comply with
the above standards.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
The window replacement and landscaping, retaining brick wall repair abide by the Village Design
Guidelines, as the applicant maintains the materials and colors currently on the building. The form of the
building will not be altered, as it is planned to use the existing window openings.
Even though the Village’s Design Guidelines do not directly guide landscaping plantings on private
commercial properties, staff reviewed proposed planting replacement and compared them with the
4
Page 39 of 113
recommendations of the Design Guidelines for pedestrian zone landscaping and noted that nine proposed
varieties specified in the plans and photos match the recommendations of the design guidelines (Village
Plant Palette, Appendix B). Of the nine varieties specified, two match the Village of Winnetka plant palette;
five are not on the Village of Winnetka plant palette, but a different variety than that specified; two are
not on the Village of Winnetka plant palette list. Details are provided below:
Palette Match
Koreanspice Viburnum
Bloodgood Japanese Maple
On Palette, but a Different Variety
Bobo Hydrangea
Bloomerang Lilac
Green Velvet Boxwood
Kit Kat Catmint
Darts Blue Vinca
Not on Palette
Summer Beauty Allium
Japanese Forest Grass
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed exterior building and landscaping alterations
appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve them as proposed. Should the DRB
approve the Certificate of Appropriateness, the Applicant would first need to obtain an approved Building
Permit from the Community Development Department prior to proposed exterior building and
landscaping alterations.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
5
Page 40 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
V ILL A G E O F W I NN E T K A, ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
Project Address: 520 Green Bay Road J ,)
Name of Business(es): BMO Bank/Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate
Application is hereby made for the following work (please check all that apply):
Sign Sign Permit Application attached? lJ
g Awning Awning Permit Application attached? U
Other (general description) Fix broken retaining planter by drive thru replace windows on 2/3 floors, revamp landscape
Please provide a detailed description of the proposed work (attach additional information such as material
specifications, photographs, etc.): We need to repair the damaged brick planter adjacent to drive thru that was hit by ear to with brick/mor1ar to match existing
We need to replace failing windows on the 2nd and 3rd floors (all windows proposed) with like kind; Replace tired landscaping with new plantings
I/We hereby certify that as Owner . (Lessee/Owner) of the property located
at 520 Green Bay Road (address), I am/we are authorized to submit plans for alterations of the subject
property. I/We agree to perform the subject work in accordance with the conditions of approval by the Winnetka
Design Review Board as well as all other applicable codes, rules, and regulations of the Village of Winnetka.
FOR -- - -- --
LESSEE/OWNERUSE·ONLY
SIGNED
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PRINTED NAME(S) Jen n_Ep_st_e_m___
_ _ _ ___
COA applied for (date):
ADDRESS 568 Lincoln Avenue COA Case Number:
PHONE NO. -(847)-512-3191
- - ----- COA Issued (date):
EMAIL jepstein@hoffmanncre.com
COAFee
□ $135
□ $575
PRIMARY DESIGN FIRM
CONTACT NAME
ADDRESS DECE
n AUG 2 2
PHONE NO.
EMAIL
BY:
Page4of4
Page 41 of 113
Davorka Kirincic
From: Jenn Epstein <jepstein@hoffmanncre.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2025 11:21 AM
To: Davorka Kirincic
Subject: 520 Green Bay Road
Attachments: 520 Green Bay (BMO) Site Plan R1.pdf; 520 Green Bay (BMO) Styling lmages.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Davorka,
We have a few projects in the works, and I wanted to heed your advice on what may need to go thru ORB, and what
can obtain administrative approval.
1. We need to fix the area where the planter bed next to BMO driveway got fixed. We would like to repair to
prior existing condition, I have a bid attached - let me know if we would need anything outside of a building
permit. We may explore putting in bollards to help protect it, as it has been hit at least 3 times in the past 2
years (and we've tuckpointed twice already).
2. We need to replace all windows on the 2nd/3rd floors at BMO. We have accepted a vendor to complete this
work, who I believe will be pulling the necessary permits. The proposed windows (I have a sample and spec
packet that I can provide), will match exactly what is currently in place.
3. We are planning to update the landscaping at BMO in the beds both along the sidewalk and along the
drivethru area - I do have a proposed landscape plan attached here. This I'm guessing will need to go
through the ORB.
Thank you! Happy to pop over to Village Hall if easier to discuss live.
Jenn Epstein
Senior Property Manager - North Shore
Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate
552 Lincoln Avenue Suite 202 I Winnetka, IL I 60093
T: 847-512-3191 I F: 847-512-3199
E: iepstein@hoffmanncre.com
HOFFMANN
COM?l.•fERCJAL Rl',\J EST,\TE
HOFFMANN FAMILY
OF COMPANIES
This email transmission does not constitute an offer or acceptance, and cannot result in a binding agreement. No
employee or agent of Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of
Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate, nor any entity for which Hoffmann Commerciai Real Estate se:ves as agent. Neither
Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate, nor any entity for which Hoffmann Commercial real Estate serves as an agent, will be
1
Page 42 of 113
/1
/ WINDOWS • DOORS • SIDING
ALL1STAR PRODUCTS
.,.."" ',
Of 1/IIRTlllRN IU/tliOS, UC.
WINDOW PROPOSAL-520
GREEN BAY ROAD HOFFMAN CRE
MAY09, 2025 520 Green Bay Rd
Winnetka, IL
The All Star treatment 60093
-
James Hardie Specialists
35+years Serving Chicagoland
dave@allstarwindowsiding.com
847-564-0780
Page 43 of 113
Hi Jenn,
Thank you for the opportunity to quote your window project. Please find your estimate below along with upgrade
options for potential improvements to your project, if applicable.
The following estimate is for:
1. Removal and disposal of your old windows
2. Supply and installation of the new Alside "Mezzo" premium vinyl windows following manufacturer
requirements
3. Clean up and haul away all job-related debris
4. All Star Products will complete an inspection and walk around with you when your project is completed to
ensure your complete satisfaction
5. Lifetime Material Warranties from manufacturers (see all manufacturers warranties for details)
6. 1 Year Labor - 5 Year Workmanship Warranty is included on this project.
Included at the end of your quote are personal informational brochures that pertain to your project. Any
other brochures are available upon request.
Throughout your improvement project our team will be inspecting your improvement project to make sure
everything is installed to our "preferred partners" installation standards. We are fully insured with over 1 million
dollars of liability insurance & WCB coverage for all employees & crews
If you have any questions, please give us a call. We always want to provide the best value to our clients. If we are
outside of your budget, please let us know and we will do our best to work within your budget.
Thank You,
David Donofrio
dave@allstarwindowsiding.com
Page 44 of 113
Scope of Work
• Supply & Install of 98 windows (various
sizes) to replace current windows (same
sizes)
• Tear out & dispose of existing windows
and exterior window wrap
• Properly seal and flash window openings
as per manufacturer specifications
(utilizing OSI foam, window tape (varies
by manufacturer) & OSI caulking
• Supply & install Alside "Mezzo" Premium
vinyl windows (White interior & exterior
colors to match current) matching current
grid configuration (GBG's - Grids between
the glass)
• Final walk and inspection to complete
customer satisfaction
*Includes repair of basic sill wood rot, if we
discover more than typical wood repair we will
work with our customer on a time and material
bases to repair excess rot
Page 45 of 113
*All Star will acquire required permitting,
permitting costs will be billed back to customer
(quoting is based on access to the building
during regular working hours, Monday thru
Saturday 8am thru 6pm daily)
Page 46 of 113
Davorka Kirincic
From: Jenn Epstein <jepstein@hoffmanncre.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2025 10:16 AM
To: Davorka Kirincic
Subject: Permit Application, 520 Green Bay Road
Attachments: Certificate-of-Appropriateness-Application-Packet-PDF.pdf; Scan_20250813 (3).pdf;
Masonry Building-Permit-Application-PDF.pdf; 520 Windows Building-Permit
Application-PDF.pdf; All Star Products of Northern Illinois, LLC Quote - Window
Proposal - 520 Green Bay Road_Jenn Epstein_520 Green Bay Rd.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Good Morning, Davorka,
Thanks for your time over the last few days. As we discussed, I've included here a certificate of appropriateness
and applicable building permits for the work we're looking to do at 520 Green Bay Road. The first is getting the
planter repaired to it's most recent state. The vendor of course will match the brick and mortar to existing. I will
reach out and confirm if he is already bonded with the Village to do work.
Additionally, we are looking to replace all of our 2 nd and 3rd floor windows as we're having issues with some
beginning to fail, and we are having issues with energy/heat efficiency leading to costly utilities and complaints.
These would be replaced with a like for like style, and would look exactly the same from the exterior before and
after. Each window will be custom sized to fit the exiting window openings. I have a sample window, and brochure
from the vendor that I'm happy to drop off to you over at the Village. Dave Donofrio with All Star Windows is the
contact for the building permit on this one, as I believe they plan to utilize lifts for less obstruction to the sidewalk
and ability to do smaller sections at a time, as a lot of the work can be completed from the inside. Any specific
questions here should be directed to him, and if he needs to get anything on file with the Village. Please advise any
further questions that I can have answered for you regarding this. The windows take 6-8 weeks to make, and plans
to install over 1-2 weeks. We know it's ambitious but we'd like to beat the weather this year, if possible, and an
administrative design approval would definitely make it reachable.
Lastly, we're looking to re-vamp the landscaping that is place at BMO. It's looking tired and lacks any kind of
variety/color. We provided a proposed layout for what we would like to put in. Unfortunately, we do not have plans
of what technically was approved the last time around, so I know you were going to look into that on our end to see
what was available.
Just let me know what else I can do at this time.
Thanks,
Jenn Epstein
Senior Property Manager - North Shore
Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate
552 Lincoln Avenue Suite 202 I Winnetka, IL I 60093
T: 847-512-3191 I F: 847-512-3199
E: iepstein@hoffmanncre.com
1
Page 47 of 113
Description Qty
Alside "Mezzo" Vinyl Windows
Mezzo, Double Hungs, 46x54 (3rd Floor) 10
White Exterior I White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen I Cam Action Locks
Mezzo, Double Hungs, 36x54 (3rd Floor) 28
White Exterior/ White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen/ Cam Action Locks
Mezzo, Double Hungs, 32x54 (3rd Floor) 8
White Exterior/ White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen/ Cam Action Locks
Mezzo, Awning, 32x35 (3rd Floor)
White Exterior/ White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen/ Cam Action Locks
Mezzo, Double Hungs, 32x64 (2nd Floor) 9
White Exterior/ White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen I Cam Action Locks
Mezzo, Double Hungs, 46x64 (2nd Floor) 41
White Exterior/ White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen/ Cam Action Locks
Mezzo, Double Hungs, 30x46 (2nd Floor)
White Exterior/ White Interior
Advanced Low-E Insulating Glass with Argon Gas
Full Screen/ Cam Action Locks
Supply & Install 98 various size "vinyl" replacements
Quote subtotal $113,000.00
Total $113,000.00
Page 48 of 113
Customer
Sales Person: Acknowledgement
Quote Date
®
5/12/2025
Date Ordered
Dealer Name:
Quote Not Ordered
035620 703 G ROUP OF IL DBAALL STAR
----.I
P-131-035620-0
�,B-iII_T_o_: IShipTo: !Job Info
703 GROUP OF IL DBA ALL STAR P SAME
7S626 CARRIAGE WAY COURT
NAPERVILLE IL 60540
Phone: (847) 564-0780 Fax: 847-564-9902
Order Notes: Delivery Notes: Quote Name: Project Name:
Hoffmann Real Estate Unassigned Project
QUOTE# RUSH STATUS PO#
5057842 No None
Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
1 10 46" X54" 100
3001-Mezzo Double Hung 46 x 54
Sash Split = Even
Operation I Venting = Double Hung, Model Number=
3001
Steel Reinforcement, Frame Option = Standard Block
Frame, Enhanced Cavity Foam Inserts
Frame Color = White
CLIMATECH P LU S, Glass Breakage Warranty
Full Screen
U-Factor = 0.28, CR= 60, SHGC = 0.27, VT = 0.48, CPD
= ASO -A-89-126064-00002
Total Frame UI = , Series= Mezzo, Product Type =
Double Hung, Shape= Rectangle, Base Product Type =
----- '46" --- Double Hung, Product Configuration = Standard, Tile
Display Name = 3001 - Double Hung
Contour, Colonial, White, 3V1H
Brickmould and Casing = No Brickmould, Frame Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
3rd Floor Large
Page 1 Of 5
Page 49 of 113
QUOTE# RUSH STATUS PO#
5057842 No None
Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
2 28 36" X54" 90
3001-Mezzo Double Hung 36 x'54
Sash Split = Even
Operation I Venting= Double Hung, Model Number =
3001
� r:-.>/:ri
;
Steel Reinforcement, Frame Option = Standard Block
�.-'""F•i.b--=-:-f Frame,Enhanced Cavity Foam Inserts
Frame Color = White
:2;L.!===#==:;;:=u CLIMATECH PLUS,Glass Breakage Warranty
i Full Screen
'):
U-Factor = 0.28,CR = 60, SHGC = 0.27,VT = 0.48, CPD
L I== = ASO-A-89-126064-00002
Total Frame UI =,Series= Mezzo,Product Type=
Double Hung, Shape = Rectangle, Base Product Type =
Double Hung, Product Configuration = Standard, Tile
Display Name = 3001 - Double Hung
Contour, Colonial, White, 2V1H
Brickmould and Casing = No Brickmould, Frame Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
3rd Floor Medium
Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
3 8 32" X54" 86
3001-Mezzo Double Hung 32 x 54
Sash Split = Even
Operation I Venting = Double Hung, Model Number =
3001
Steel Reinforcement, Frame Option = Standard Block
Frame,Enhanced Cavity Foam Inserts
Frame Color = White
CLIMATECH PLUS, Glass Breakage Warranty
-
Full Screen
U-Factor = 0.28,CR = 60, SHGC = 0.27,VT = 0.48,CPD
u = ASO-A-89-126064-00002
Total Frame UI = ,Series = Mezzo,Product Type =
Double Hung,Shape = Rectangle,Base Product Type =
Double Hung, Product Configuration = Standard,Tile
Display Name= 3001 - Double Hung
Contour, Colonial, White,2V1H
Brickmould and Casing= No Brickmould,Frame Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
3rd Floor Small
Page 2 Of 5
Page 50 of 113
QUOTE# RUSH STATUS PO#
5057842 No None
Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
4 9 32" X64" 96
3001-Mezzo Double Hung 32 x 64
Sash Split= Even
I
Operation / Venting = Double Hung,Model Number =
3001
r: Steel Reinforcement, Frame Option = Standard Block
Frame, Enhanced Cavity Foam Inserts
.?j Frame Color = White
I CLIMATECH PLUS, Glass Breakage Warranty
l Full Screen
_.r.... l Total Frame UI = , Series = Mezzo, Product Type =
ti7 ;a= Double Hung,Shape= Rectangle, Base Product Type =
Double Hung, Product Configuration= Standard, Tile
Display Name = 3001 - Double Hung
Contour, Colonial,White, 2V1 H
Brickmould and Casing = No Brickmould, Frame Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
2nd Floor Small
Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
5 41 46" X64" 110
3001-Mezzo Double Hung 46 x 64
Sash Split = Even
Operation / Venting = Double Hung, Model Number =
I 3001
If! Steel Reinforcement, Frame Option = Standard Block
t' Frame,Enhanced Cavity Foam Inserts
Frame Color= White
CLIMATECH PLUS, Glass Breakage Warranty
I Full Screen
f� Total Frame UI = ,Series = Mezzo, Product Type =
i' Double Hung, Shape= Rectangle, Base Product Type=
Double Hung, Product Configuration = Standard,Tile
Display Name = 3001 - Double Hung
Contour, Colonial, White, 3V1H
Brickmould and Casing = No Brickmould, Frame Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
2nd Floor Large
Page 3 Of 5
Page 51 of 113
QUOTE# RUSH STATUS PO#
5057842 No None
I Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
6 1 30" X 46" 76
l �. i!
3001-Mezzo Double Hung 30 x 46
Sash Split = Even
Operation/ Venting = Double Hung,Model Number =
3001
Steel Reinforcement,Frame Option = Standard Block
Frame, Enhanced Cavity Foam Inserts
Frame Color= White
� 1---.-;;;;;;..;;-===--,1 CLIMATECH PLUS, Glass Breakage Warranty
Full Screen
U-Factor = 0.28,CR = 60,SHGC = 0.27,VT = 0.48,CPD
= ASO-A-89-126064-00002
Total Frame UI = ,Series = Mezzo, Product Type =
Double Hung, Shape = Rectangle,Base Product Type =
t----- 3.0"' _______. Double Hung, Product Configuration = Standard, Tile
Display Name = 3001 - Double Hung
Contour, Colonial, White,2V1 H
Brickmould and Casing = No Brickmould, Frame Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
None Assigned
Line Item # Qty Width x Height UI Description
7 1 32" X 35" 67
l
0951-09 Series Vent 32 x 35
Operation I Venting= Vent, Model Number = 0951
Frame Color = White
CLIMATECH PLUS, Glass Breakage Warranty
Lock/ Keeper = Standard Lock/ Keeper
U-Factor = 0.27,CR = 61,SHGC = 0.26, VT = 0.45, CPD
= ASO-A-32-22628-00002
Total Frame UI = ,Series = 09 Series,Product Type =
Awning,Shape = Rectangle, Base Product Type =
j /. �-
Awning, Product Configuration = Standard, Tile Display
\ Name = 0951 -Awning
I \ Contour,Colonial, White, 2V2H
Foam Enhanced, Groove Filler = No Groove Filler, Frame
---32" Size
Line Item Notes:
Comment I Room:
None Assigned
Page 4 Of 5
Page 52 of 113
QUOTE# RUSH STATUS PO#
5057842 No None
Customer Notes: Total Unit Count 98
ATTENTION
Please note that all weights provided are estimates and subject to change based on actual order shipment.
For Informational Purposes: All windows are viewed from the outside looking in.
NOTICE: The rating information provided on this quote is based upon the NFRC ratings at the time of quote.
Such ratings are subject to changes in the standard by the applicable regulatory agencies and will be finalized at
the time of manufacturing. All ratings printed on the NFRC label will supersede the NFRC rating set forth in the
quote. Any changes made to an order after submission may also result in changes to the NFRC rating.
Customer shall be solely responsible for determining whether the product ordered meets their jurisdiction's
requirements.
In accordance with the state of California:
,&. WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm - www.p65Warnings.ca.gov
All sales of Associated Materials, LLC, its affiliates and subsidiaries, are subject to their respective Terms and
Conditions of Sale, which can be found here: https://www.associatedmaterials.com/terms/
By placing this order, I accept Associated Materials, LLC's Terms and Conditions of Sale
Want to see real-time status for window orders? Register here for the Associated Materials Customer Portal -
Portal.associatedmaterials.com/account/register
I have reviewed this order and certify that it is correct. I understand that this order is noncancellable,
nonreturnable, and nonrefundable.
By Authorized Representative
Page 5 Of 5
Page 53 of 113
Vinyl Window Options $773,000.00 Name: Jenn Epstein
Address: 520 Green Bay Rd, Winnetka, IL
Estimates valid for 45 days from date of estimate/ A 30% deposit is required before any project begins
Customer Comments/ Notes My Product Selections
Exterior Trim Color
White
Interior Trim Color
White
Hardware Color
White
Jenn Epstein: Date:
By signing this form I agree to and confirm the following: I certify that I am the registered owner of the above project property, or have the
legal permission to authorize the work as stated. I agree to pay the total project price and understand that this work will be completed in
accordance with industry best practices.
Page 54 of 113
You may cancel this contract from the day you enter into the contract until 3 days after you receive a copy of the
contract. You do not need a reason to cancel.
If you cancel this contract, the seller has 15 days to refund your money. You must then return any goods supplied. To
cancel, you must give notice of cancellation at the address in this contract. You must give notice of cancellation by a
method that will allow you to prove that you gave notice, including registered mail, fax, email or by personal delivery.
I understand that I must remove items from the interior walls of my home that may be damaged or fall due to
vibrations from the removal/installation of materials (if applicable), or installation of siding, windows & doors. All Star
Products of Northern IL. LLC. is not liable for such damages.
I understand that minor stucco damage may result when the windows are removed, especially where improperly
applied. All Star Products of Northern IL. LLC. is not liable for repairing said damage.
I understand that any warranty for material used during the project is provided by the material manufacturer. Unless
agreed upon otherwise, All Star Products of Northern IL. LLC. provides a 5-year Workmanship Warranty on portions of
the project in which All Star Products of Northern IL. LLC.fully replaced any existing products. Full warranty details
available by request.
I understand that, unless agreed upon. This does not apply to products, some of which may deteriorate more rapidly
(ie. sealants) and should be inspected on a regular basis, and am not responsible for material shortage and have no
claim to material surpluses.
I certify that I am the registered owner of the above project property, or have the legal permission to authorize All Star
Products of Northern IL. LLC. to perform the work as stated and agree to pay the total project price.
I understand that payment in full is due upon completion of work as stated in contract. All invoices not paid in full after
15 days will be subject to a 2% per month interest charge.
I acknowledge that I have read and understand this page. Initials:
Page 55 of 113
This document warrants that should a defect in workmanship, related to the work completed by All Star
Products of Northern IL. LLC. occur within 5 years of the project, All Star Products of Northern IL. LLC.will
complete repairs within the original project's scope of work at no charge to the customer. This warranty does
not cover normal wear and tear, hail damage, wind damage, sun damage, water damange, intentional or
accidental damage by any person, or acts of God that may or may not merit an insurance claim. This warranty
only applies to portions of the project in which All Star Products of Northern IL. LLC. fully replaced any existing
products, and does not cover repairs or service done to another contractor's work. Defects in the building
materials used to complete work do not fall under the scope of this workmanship warranty; any building
products installed will instead be covered by the product's original manufacturer warranty.
Customer
Jenn Epstein
Project address
520 Green Bay Rd, Winnetka, IL
Date Project Completed
Thank you again for choosing All Star Products of Northern IL. LLC. to complete work on your property. We
trust you had a great customer experience!
Page 56 of 113
Payment Schedule is as follows;
30% deposit due with completed contract
35% due at start of job
35% at completion of window installation
5% holdback on projects that require after project service due to manufacture supplied defects (re-ordering of
damaged materials/warranty items etc.)
Page 57 of 113
525 IE� Pllwy, lalre l111'1ctl, IL 60047
Ph.947.465.1160
PltOll!CT:
Hoffmann
Commercial
Real Estate
520 Green Bay Rd.
Winnetka, Illinois
darts blue pert.rtikl•c_.______
l<Wll:'•mlnor'dllmblw'
- • D
• SHHTTITL!:
Site Plan
• •
(1) bloodgood Japanese maple ISSUE DAT£:
A...,,,_.....,.,,� August.2025
REVISIONS:
(1) SCAU!1
reans==----�
1'8"=1'.0"
I
(55) Japanese rorest grass
I l!MOl!•eNl#m•cr.
0 8 16
116)QA!tll'l=!!:=:.--,f-----------'
.!:========;------lt-=��ea
L-- -------------��w�.:,.��Vbuml.m
-
NORTH
Page 58 of 113
Kit Kat Catmint Darts Blue Vinca
Summer Beauty Allium
Hoffman Commercial Real Estate I 520 Green Bay Road Groundcover & Perennial Images �
LI U
LANDSCAPING
Page 59 of 113
Bobo Hydrangea Bloomerang Lilac
Green Velvet Boxwood Bloodgood Japanese Maple
Hoffman Commercial Real Estate I 520 Green Bay Road Shrub & Tree Images
IEU
LANDSCAPING
Page 60 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 847 ELM STREET–LITTLE ELM – CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
FOR STOREFRONT AND DOOR REPLACEMENT AND WINDOW SIGN
PERMIT (CASE NO. 25-16-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to consider a sign permit and
Certificate of Appropriateness application submitted by Little Elm (the “Applicant”) as the current lessee
of the commercial space located at 847 Elm Street (the “Subject Property”), to allow installation of window
and projecting signs as well as approval storefront improvements, and removal of existing awning and
awning valance sign from previous business.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located on the west side of Elm Street between Birch Street and Chestnut Street in
the Elm Street Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial in the Commercial Overlay
District. Tenants of the building include the Applicant’s business (previously the Ellen’s on Elm space), in
addition to the Crystal Cleaners store and Botanic Nails & Spa. Figure 1 below identifies the location of the
Subject property. Figure 2 on the next page shows the entire building and the corresponding signage of
the other business tenants. Figure 3 shows that the Applicant’s storefront currently shows an awning and
awning valance sign with the previous business name, which will be all removed upon approval of proposed
signage and storefront improvements.
Location of the Subject
Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property- Location Map
Page 61 of 113
Location of the Little
Elm’s Storefront
Figure 2 – Subject Property - View of the Entire Building from Elm Street
Figure 3 – Subject Property - Little Elm existing storefront
CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant is seeking approval of a Sign Permit to allow the installation of window and projecting signs,
and a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the storefront and door, paint the door and trim in new
colors, and remove the existing awning and awning valance sign with the name of the previous business.
Page 62 of 113
Proposed Window Sign:
• Die-cut decal logo in white, 27 inches in height;
• Applied on the surface of the glass;
• Individual letters stating “little elm” in white, 8 inches in height;
• Located in the lower two-thirds of the window, and
• Sign area 7.54 square feet (9.7 square feet of the window area).
Projecting Sign
• Non-illuminated double-sided sign;
• Aluminum Face. No return;
• Black Digital Imprint on face;
• Iron bracket wall mount (black);
• Letters in white reading “little elm” and white logo on a black background;
• Projecting 22 inches from the building wall;
• 22 inches wide, 12 inches high;
• 1.83 square feet, and
• Located 8 feet above the finished grade.
Page 63 of 113
Proposed Exterior Storefront Changes
• New storefront glazing with non-combustible frame material;
• Storefront bottom panels built from “True Exterior” product, painted in white, and attached to the
existing brick, and
• Install a new door in green color and a white frame at the exact location (recessed).
Proposed
Projecting
Sign
A copy of the Applicant’s application materials is included in Attachment A.
SIGN CODE ANALYSIS
Section 15.60.120 of the Village Sign Code establishes standards for window and awning signs in
commercial districts.
Door/window signs that meet the following standards can be administratively approved by staff:
• Limited to 50% or less of the single-door/window pane;
• Limited letters and logos no taller than 8”, except one logo, and the first letter of each word may
be up to no taller than 24”; except store hours and contact information shall be limited to 2” in
height;
• Decal door window signs shall be die-cut and limited to individual letters and logos;
• Limited to two colors;
• Without reflective materials;
• No window/door sign should be illuminated;
• Shall not extend over or through architectural features/window muntin;
• Can be applied to the interior or exterior of the window; and
• Comply with the following: for each street exposure, the total area of all wall signs, window signs,
door signs and awning signs other than exempt signs and permitted directional and incidental signs
shall not exceed 15% of the street exposure.
Page 64 of 113
The proposed signs meet all of the above standards for window signs.
Projecting sign standards
• One projecting sign per business;
• Extends no more than 2 feet from the building wall;
• No more than 3 feet high;
• Clearance between the bottom of the sign and the sidewalk is at least 8 feet, and
• Containing the name of the business and a maximum of three words containing a general
description of types of products or services, and the occupant logo or trademark.
The proposed projecting sign meets all of the above standards for projecting signs.
Signage Street Exposure
The proposed signs comply with the maximum allowed sign area street exposure requirement.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
When reviewing the design of any signs, the Board is to consider the following standards and
criteria of Section 15.60.150(F) of the Sign Code.
F. Standards and Criteria for Issuance. The following factors and characteristics
relating to the safety and appearance of signage shall govern the Board’s
evaluation of design submittals:
1. The sign area shall be in proportion and scale to the building or to other
buildings or signs in the surrounding area;
2. A signage package for a business establishment that includes a number of
signs and graphics shall have an overall plan that demonstrates the
compatibility of the design and colors of all the signs that are part of that
package;
3. The amount of text and graphics contained in or on any sign or group of
signs shall be limited so that it results in a clear and readable design;
4. Signs and graphics shall have a harmonious relationship with nearby signs,
buildings, and the neighborhood and shall be designed not adversely to
affect adjacent structures. In this respect, the sign shall relate to its
building, structure, and neighborhood in terms of size, shape, material,
color, texture, lettering, location, arrangement, lighting, and the like;
5. Colors shall be used with restraint; excessive brightness shall be avoided;
and
6. The additional provisions of this chapter, as specified in this chapter, shall
be part of the criteria of the design review process.
The Board should also consider the Village Design Guidelines for the proposed signage. See Attachment
B.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS
As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in
determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness:
“(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;”
“(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
Page 65 of 113
appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the
immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement
considerations;”
“(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are consistent
with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be adopted by
the Board; and”
“(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the
immediate vicinity.”
The Board must determine if the recent storefront paint color complies with the above standards and the
following design guidelines. See Attachment B.
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB approve the proposed installation of window and projecting signs, as
well as the storefront improvements, and removal of the existing awning and awning valance sign as
appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines, and approve the application as proposed. Should
the DRB find the proposed improvements to be appropriate, the Applicant would first need to obtain the
approved permit from the Community Development Department prior to installing the signs and making
storefront improvements.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt
Page 66 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION
n u
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS
0ecE,vEn
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION AUG 2 8 2025
Tenant/lessee
BY; _____
Name of Bus iness Primary contact name
Little Elm Kitty Brandtner
Project Address
847 Elm St
City State Zip Code Email
Winnetka IL 60093 kitty@littleelmsho1;we.com
Sign Company
Name of Sign Comp any Primary contact name
Abbey Specialties Danny Khouri
St reet Address
7129 Austin ave
City State Zip Code Email
Niles IL 60714 Abbeyspecialties@gmail.com
Property owner
Name of Company Primary contact name
Helen James Familt LTD PTSHP Jim Nash
Street Address:
708 Church St #211
City State Zip Code
Evanston IL 60201
Sign type(s): l!I w indow graphics 0 wall-mounted sign D ground-mounted sign
(check all that apply)
Ii) projecting sign D other_______________
Additional descri ption of sign type and materials Die Cut Window Decal and Double Sided Blade Sign. Blade sign to include
"Little Elm" Logo. Window decal/sign to Include "Utile Elm" Logo applied to Interior of window.
OFFICE USE ONLY
SIGN FEE: $80 NON-ILLUMINATED PER SIGN TYPE
$195 ILLUMINATED SIGN
s !GO.OD
$ -
STAFF REVIEW FEE: $70 0 WAIVE FEE $ -=10.00
TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ 230,a:)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: _______________________
Page4of4
Page 67 of 113
Page 68 of 113
Page 69 of 113
Page 70 of 113
NOTE:
PROVIDE NE� KNOX BOX ON
EXISTING FRONT EXTERIOR
J'IIALL AND BETWEEN UNITS
841 AND 845 FRONT ENTRY
DOORS.
Tl EXISTIN6 FRONT ELEVATION
s �----EXISTING GAP/ GOPING TO REHAIN
(NO CHANGES)
"-----EXISTING MASONRY FINISH TO
REl'/.AIN (NO GHANGES)
,-----(OPTIONAU NEH ADDRESS NUMBERS
N/4
PER LOGAL GODE REQUIREMENT
HEIGHT AND FONT.
Tl EXISTING GONGRETE Sl�K
NE� (EXTERIOR) FINISH
BELOJl'f
STORE FRONT HINDO""5 PER
O�ER'S
APPROVED
SPEGIFIGATION(S).
@��ELEVATION SC.ALE: 1/4" = l'-0"
AD2520'7
DATE, oe/21/2025
Page 71 of 113
NOTE:
PROVIDE NEll'l KNOX BOX ON
EXISTING FRONT EXTERIOR
HALL AND BETWEEN UNITS
841 AND 845 FRONT ENlRY
DOORS.
Tl EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
s�
� - --- EXISTING CAP/ COPING TO REMAIN
(NO CHANGES)
EXISTING MASONRY FINISH TO
REMAIN (NO CHANGES)
I
'
(OPTIONAU NE� ADDRESS NL,t,!BERS
PER LOCAL CODE REG!UIREMENT
HEIGHT AND FONT.
I
,.
.... -
:----- I
I, 1847 �
-- ' NEW STOREFRONT GLAZII\IG WITH
-
I NON-GOMBUSTIBLE FRAME MA TERIA
I
!J -
I
I
NEH 3/0x1/0 HINGE LEFT / PUSH
OUTJ.'ll.ARD METAL DOOR FRAME
i II
I
I
-:.
WITH N� GLAZING AND NEW PANIC,
l�
er
� BAR HARDWARE PER DETAIL
ii NEW KNOX
i �
BOX
I , "'
-'.I I
' .,
·i1J
- Tl EXISTII\IG GONCRETE SIDEWALK
•-------2,-,'':_------------- NEH (EXTERIOR) FINISH
BELOJl'I
STORE FRONT WINDOWS PER
a,,.JNER'S
APPROVED
SPECIFICATION(S).
CD��ELEVATION SC-ALE, 1/4" = l'-0"
AD25201
DA1E, Oe/2V20"2'5
Page 72 of 113
'"g ABBEY
--------------
abbeyspecialties@gmail.com �SPECIALTIES
800 292-2239
--------------
6801 Howard St. - Niles, IL 60714
22"
little •elm 12"
little-elm Project address: 847 Elm St, Winnetka, IL 60093
SIGN SIZE: 22x12"
MATERIALS: White Aluminum Face. No return. Black Digital Imprint on face. double sided.
Iron bracket wall mount(black).
ILLUMINATION: None 08.20.2025
Page 73 of 113
Village of Winnetka
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, I L L I N O I S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
Project Address: 847 Elm St CJJA_LC> ¼ q L\
Name ofBusiness(es): Li tl:I Elm
Application is hereby made for the following worlc (please check all that apply):
Sign Sign P ermit Application attached? :
Awning Awning Permit Application attached?
Other (general description) 4-/)0,-n•,..._ '7i(.,\""' A"'Q p.oA-
Please provide a detailed description of the proposed work (attach additional information such as material
specifications , photographs, etc.): DemoMlion and replacement rl existing windows and door. removal of awning permanently.
Addition of a blade sign.
I/We hereby certify that as Little Elm {Lessee/Owner) of the property located
at 847 Elm St {address), I am/we are authorized to submit plans for alterations of the subject
property. I/We agree to perform the subject work in accordance with the conditions of approval by the Winnetka
D esign Review Board as well as all other applicable codes, rules, and regulations of the Village of Winnetka.
li'_OR OFFICE USE ONLY
SIGNED
COA applied for (date):
PRINTED NAME(S)
ADDRESS COA Case Number:
PHONE NO. COA Issued (date):
EMAIL COAFee
□ $135
□ $575
PRIMARY DESIGN FIRM Aspect Design Inc
CONTACT NAME Jeff Letzter
-----------
ADDRESS 26575 Commerce Drive Suite 607
Volo 1160073
PHONE NO. (847) 457-2500
-----------
EMA TL jletzter@aspectdesigninc.com
Page4of4
Page 74 of 113
NOTE:
FROVIDE NEV-: KNOX BOX ON
EXI STING FRONT EXTERIOR
HALL AND BETWEEN UNITS
134, AND 845 FRONT ENTRY
DOORS.
Tl EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
�......_......__EXISTIN0 GAP/ COPING TO REMAIN
(NO CHANGES)
----EXISTING MASONRY FINISH TO
REMAIN (NO C.HANGES)
�---(OPTIONAL) NE� ADDRESS NUMBERS
PER LOC.,AL C.,ODE REQUIREMENT
HEIGHT AND FONT.
7
__-}-----r--1·�=��
1
L:8•
:::.....:.,· ,;....L---+--NEH STOREFRONT GLAZING HITH
NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAME MATERIA
-
1
NE!r-1 3/0X,/O HINGE LEPT / PUSH
CUTHARD t4ET,A.L 000� FRAME
HITH NEH GLAZING AND NEH PANIC.,
;·:r • / ' BAR HARDHARE FER DETAIL
NEW KNOX
,-�;.., .. 'i� 57)1,L ,,....,,,
a�
�� BOX r7Pll. "'•"" Poat 'lz. J./
LJ J£
T/ EXISTING C.,ONGRETE SIDEHALK
------ --------- !r-
,� , . NE 1 (EXTERIOR) FINISH
p�,v,£U 8.,,c; rtvJ.,.. 7P..,i �•7f>t""- fµD..,c, BELOH
An,,.,.,1.0 To .,-,c.,.,-. OlWL f«.40£. STORE FRONT HINDOHS PER
O"'4NER'S
APFROVED
SPEGIFIGATION(S).
CD ��[.ELEVATION sc.ALE, 1/4" = 1'-0"
AD.25.201
DATE, Ol?>/21/2025
Page 75 of 113
8/21/25, 5:07 PM IMG_6752Jpg
https://mail.google.ccmhnalVu/O/Mnbox/KtbxLxgKKgFqfwgKCQGpHqQqlCMMtNHCg?projector=1
Page 76 of 113 1/1
- ---
TRIM PRODUCT DATA SHEET
1. Certificates and Listings
a. Cal Fire (WUI): CA SfM 12-7A-1 Listing No. 8140-2134:0101
b. Pre-consumer Recycled Content: SCS Global Certification-Miniml.m 70%
2. Properties
a. Density: ASTM C 1185, 40-50 lb/ft3
b. Flexural Strength: ASTM C 1185, > 1600 psi
c. Coefficent of Linear Expansion: ASTM D 6341 , < 0.000014 in / Qn"oF)
d. Impact Resistance: ASTM D 6110, > 50 in.
3. Performance
a. Fungi Rot: AWPA E1 0, Brown Rot-Negligble Loss, \Mlite Rot-Negfigible Loss
b. Termite Resistance: AWPA E1, > 9.0
c. Water Absorption: ASTM D 570, < 1.5%
d. Rarne Spread: ASTM E 84, < 200
4. Manufacturing Tolerences
a. Width: ± 1/16 in.
b. Thickness:± 1/16 in.
c. Length: +2.0 / -0.0 in.
Westlake SIDING & ACCESSORIES
TRIM & MOULDINGS
Royal Building Products111 ROOFING
STONE
WestlakeRoyalBuildingProducts.com
WINDOWS
0 2022 Westlake Roy.II Bulkln9 Prodl.lds OUTDOOR LIVING T30048341 2122
Page 77 of 113
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION
OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL
FIRE ENGINEERING & INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION
BUILDING MATERIALS LISTING PROGRAM
LISTING SERVICE
LISTING No.: 8140-2134:0105
CATEGORY: 8140 - EXTERIOR WAJ..l SIDING AND SHEATHING FOR WILDLAND URBAN
INTERFACE (W.U.1)
LISTEE: Baral Composites Inc. 200 Mansell Court East, Suite 305, Roswell, GA. 30076
Contact: Hathorn, Stan (313) 784-7284 (770) 645-2888
Email: shathom@westlake.com
DESIGN:
Boral TruExterior® Siding in profiles Channel Bevel. V-Rustic, Cove/Dutch, Shiplap and
Channel Shiplap. Widths range from 5.5"-11.5" with an actual thickness of 11/16". *Bevel
profile in width range of 5.S--9.25" and thicknesses of 3/4" and 1/2" that taper to 7/16"
and 3/16". Refer to the manufacturer's installation instructions and product data sheet
RATING:
12-7A-1
INSTALLATION:
In accadance with listee's printed installation instructions, applicable codes and
ordinances and a manner acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
MARKING:
Listee name, Model number, rating and SFM label.
APPROVAL:
Listed as siding material for use in Wildland Urban Interface areas.
NOTES:
*Rev 12-15-15 gt
This listing is based upon technical data submitted by the applicant OSFM Fire Engineering staff has reviewed the test
results and/or other data but does not make an independent verification of any claims. This listing is not an
endorsement or recommendation of the item listed. This listing should not be used to verify correct operational
requirements or installation criteria. Refer to listee's data sheet, installation instructions and/or other suitable
information sources.
Date Issued: 08/13/2024 U&tlng Expires: 06130/2025
Authorized By: David Castillo, Program Coordinator
Are Engineering & Investigations Division
Page 1 of 1
Page 78 of 113
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION
OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL
FIRE ENGINEERING & INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION
BUILDING MATERIALS LISTING PROGRAM
LISTING SERVICE
LISTING No.: 8160-2134:0101
CATEGORY: 8160-UNDER EAVE FOR WILOLAND URBAN INTERFACE (W.U.1)
USTEE: Boral Composites Inc. 2 00 Mansell Court East, Suite 305, Roswell, GA , 30076
Contact: Hathorn, Stan (313) 784-7284 ( 7 7 0) 645-2888
Email:shathom@westlake.com
DESIGN:
Boral TruExterior® Trim 5/8" to 1-1/2 "thick and widths ranging from 1-1/2" to *1 5 1/2"
actual dimensions. Refer to the manufacturer's installation instructions and product data
sheets.
RATING:
SFM 12-7A-3
INSTALLATION:
In accordance with listee's printed installation instructions, applicable codes and
ordinances and in a manner acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
. MA RKING:
listee name, Model number, rating and SFM label.
APP ROVAL:
Listed as under eave materials for use in the Wildland Urban Interface areas. Refer to
manufacturer's Installation Manual for detaHs.
NOTES:
*Rev 12-15-15 gt
):,S�,1;-�"-.,
This listing is based upon technical data submitted by the app licant OSFM Fire Engineering staff has reviewed the test
��-�3�\ results and/or other data but does not make an independent verification of any claims. This listing is not an
\.��'J endorsement or recommendation of the item listed. This fisting should not be used to �rify correct operational
11..,•.-v-=u requirements or installation criteria. Refer to listee's data sheet, installation instructions and/or other suitable
L information sources.
Date Issued: 08/13/2024 Listing Expires: 06/30/2025
Authorized By: David Castillo, Program Coordinator
Fire Engineering & lrwestigations Division
Page 1 of,
Page 79 of 113
-
CRAFTSMAN COLLECTION,.. SIDING PRODUCT DATA SHEEm
1. Certificates and Listings
a. IBC/IRC Codes: ICC-ES ACE89, CCRR 0300
b. Texas Department of Insurance {TOI): EC-92
c. Florida Bulclng Codes (FBC): 2020, FL17285
d. California Building Code (CBC): 2019
e. Wildlife Urban Interface (WUI): CA SFM 12-7A-1, 8140-2134:0105
f. Pre-consumer Recycled Content: SCS Global Certification, Minimum 70%
2. Properties
a. Density: ASTM C 1185, 40-50 lb,Jff:3
b. Flexural Strength: A'3TM C 1185, > 1600 psi
c. Coefficent of Linear Expansion: A'3TM D 6341, < 0.000014 in. / (in.*0F)
d. Impact Resistance: ASTM D 6110, > 50 in.
3.Perfonnance
a. Fungi Rot: AWPA E10, Brown Rot-Negligl:>le Loss, White Rot-Negfigible Loss
b. Tennite Resistance: AWPA E1, > 9.0
c. Water Absorption: A'3TM D 570, < 1.5%
d. Flame Spread Index: ASTM E 84, < 200
4. Manufacturing Tolerences
a. Width:± 1/16 in.
b. Thickness: ± 1/16 in.
c. Length: +2.0 / -0.0 in.
Westlake SIDING 6 ACCESSORIES
TRIM 6 MOUWNGS
Royal Building Products111 ROOFING
STONE
WesdakeRoyalSuildingProducts.com
WINDOWS
0 2022 Wes11ake Royal Building Procu:ts OUTDOOR LIVING T30048341 2/22
Page 80 of 113
Page 81 of 113
Page 82 of 113
ATTACHMENT B
d. Building Signage
Commercial signs should reflect the character of the building style, while expressing
each store’s individuality. There are several prominent sign styles that are appropriate to
Winnetka: surface mounted, pin-mounted, interior, decal and projecting blade signs.
Sign materials are limited to painted wood, canvas, architectural glass and metal. Sign
color must harmonize with the building upon which it is mounted and adjacent
structures. Lettering color can be unique to the image of the retailer/user. Metal sign
and plaque material such as brushed bronze, antique bronze, aluminum, stainless steel
and painted cast iron or similarly appearing materials are preferred. Highly reflective
metallic signs are not allowed. Signs should be lit by marquee or spot lighting; neon
lighting is not permitted. Spot lighting should be minimal and unobtrusive and, per the
Village Code, the source of illumination shall not be visible from any street, sidewalk or
dwelling. Simplified industrial light fixtures are not permitted. Contextual solutions are
recommended. The majority of the signs will be mounted within the building’s sign
band, defined as the wall area located above the ground floor storefront opening and
below the second floor windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” above grade and a
maximum of 15’-0” above grade. (MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023)
Signs must comply with the general provisions of the Winnetka Sign Ordinance as well
as design provisions contained within these Design Guidelines.
1. Surface mounted commercial signs are either fabricated from painted wood or cast
metal plaques and are to be mounted within the sign band or within the storefront
transom. The height of the sign is restricted to 75% of the area of the sign band or
14 inches - whichever is less. The sign band of a building consists of the area
located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the second floor
windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” and a maximum of 15’-0” above
grade. Refer to figures 28, 29, and 30 for location. Surface mounted or pin-
mounted signs are not permitted on secondary elevations without a defined sign
band.
2. Pin-mounted commercial signs consist of
reverse channel, cast metal and flat cut
metal letters mounted above the storefront
in the masonry sign band or suspended in
front of the storefront at the transom or
recessed entry. The size of the lettering is
restricted so that the height of the letters
does not exceed 75% of the height of the
sign band or 14 inches - whichever is less.
The length of the lettering is to be
Figure 38
contained within 75% of the length of the
sign band. (See figure 38)
19
Building & Architecture
Page 83 of 113
Village of Winnetka, Illinois
Figure 39 & 40
3. Projecting blade commercial signs can MC-01-2023, Removed, 01/17/2023
be round, square or vertical, mounted
from the face of the building at the
second floor level between the windows
or at the head of the storefront and are
oriented to pedestrian scale. The signs
are to be mounted on fixed hardware; no
swinging or chain-mounted signs are
allowed. The dimensions of the sign are
not to exceed 6 square feet (36”
high and 24” deep) (See figure 41). If
illuminated, the signs should be lit with
an unobtrusive light source. Figure 41
4. Incidental wall signs such as building management identification and directory
signs should be integrated into a single sign and be constructed of brushed bronze,
antique bronze or painted cast iron. Such signs should not be placed on the
prominent street front facade and should be directed to public residential entries
(MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023)
Design Guidelines 20
Page 84 of 113
Architectural Series of Asphalt Shingles
(3 ply) (See figure 49)
Wood Shingles (Fire treated)
Slate (See figure 48)
Real Copper (No other metal roofs are
allowed)
Figure 46
Institutional only
Flat roofs must be hidden by parapet
on primary / secondary facades.
Commercial and Multiple- Family
Flat roof must not be visible from
street, pedestrian, or open spaces.
d. Door and Window Materials:
Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional,
Multiple- Family Residential: Entry
doors should be wood or aluminum
stile and rail with varying degrees of
glass. Public entry doors should be Figure 47
fully glazed whereas private and semi-
private entries should be primarily
solid panel doors. Storefront window
units should be either paneled
aluminum or brass. Many original
storefronts, some with transom
windows, remain in the districts.
Efforts should be taken to
repair and renovate these systems
Figure 48
where feasible. Window frames should
be wood, steel or aluminum. Vinyl
windows are not acceptable. Muntin
divisions should be real divided glass
or simulated with spacer bars. Snap-in
muntins are not acceptable. Color
selection should be sympathetic with
the overall building color palette and
take into account the adjacent building
materials within the structure,
immediately adjacent structures,
structures within the same block and Figure 49
structures across the street.
Entry door hardware is to be exterior grade with weather-resistant finish. Hardware
design and finish is to be appropriate with facade articulation, color palette and
district character. Glazing should be clear glass without tint or film.
25
Building & Architecture
Page 85 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 555-557-559 CHESTNUT STREET - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
(CASE NO. 25-17-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board is scheduled to consider an application submitted by
Theron Wright (the “Applicant”), as the owner of the property located at 555-557-559 Chestnut Street, a
one-story commercial building (the “Subject Property”), to allow exterior repair and alterations of the
existing building. The Applicant is seeking approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness to enable the
sandblasting, tuckpointing, re-painting, and replacement of two existing windows on the alley elevation.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located on the east side of Chestnut Street between Spruce Street and Elm Street
in the Elm Street Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located in the
Commercial Retail Overlay District. The Subject Property is within the one-story commercial building
occupied by Bunny & Babe and Arch as the current tenants. Figure 1 below identifies the location of the
Subject Property. Figure 2 on the next page shows the front elevation of the Subject Property. Figure 3
and Figure 4 on the next page show the existing north alley and northeast elevations at the Subject
Property.
Subject Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map
Page 1
Page 86 of 113
Figure 2 – The front elevation of the Subject Property.
Figure 3 – The north alley elevation of the Subject Property.
Location of two windows to
be replaced with glass blocks
Figure 3 – The northeast alley elevation of the Subject Property.
PREVIOUS APPROVALS
Page 2
Page 87 of 113
The building features an older brick façade with some minor architectural accents, along with windows
and awnings on the other storefronts. In 2024, a COA was administratively approved for tuckpointing and
replacing damaged bricks at the front elevation of the building.
CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant is seeking approval to allow exterior building alterations on the north and northeast alley
elevations, including sandblasting, tuckpointing, repainting the brick facade in white, and replacing two
existing windows with glass block similar to the existing glass block windows on the same alley elevation.
The Applicant has provided a photo of the alley elevations showing the location of windows to be replaced
and a written explanation for sandblasting, tuckpointing, and replacement of two windows, all of which
are included in the application materials, Attachment A.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS
As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in
determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness:
“(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;”
“(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the
immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement
considerations;”
“(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
consistent with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be
adopted by the Board; and”
“(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the
immediate vicinity.”
The Board will need to determine if the proposed exterior alterations comply with the above standards.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
The Project abides by the Village Design Guidelines, as the applicant maintains the materials and colors
currently on the building. The form of the building will not be altered, as it is planned to use the existing
window openings.
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed exterior alterations appropriate and compatible
with the Design Guidelines and approve them as proposed. Should the DRB approve the Certificate of
Appropriateness, the Applicant would first need to obtain an approved Building Permit from the
Community Development Department prior to proposed exterior alterations of the alley elevations.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Page 3
Page 88 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA, ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
C,� 'L 2-.; -ci;�
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
I/We hereby certify that as ______________ (Lessee/Owner) of the property located
at __________(address), I am/we are authorized to submit plans for alterations of the subject
property. I/We agree lo perfom1 the subject work in accordance with the conditions of approval by the Winnetka
Design Review Board as well as all other applicable codes, rules, and regulations of the Village of Winnetka.
FOR LESSEE/OWNER USE ONLY
FOR OFFICEUSEONLY
SIGNED
COA applied for (date):
PRINTED NAME(S)
ADDRESS
COA Case Number:
PHONE NO. COA Issued (date):
EMAIL COA Fee
1ii:I $135
□ $575
PRJMARY DESIGN FIRM
CONTACT NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NO
EMAIL
�EC� IVE�
Page 4 of 4
BY-·-----
Page 89 of 113
Davorka Kirincic
From: Theron Wright <theron.w.wright@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 10:20 AM
To: Davorka Kirincic
Subject: Re: 555-557-559 Chestnut St/Tuckpointing
CAUTIOl\l· This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not dick links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Tuckpointing material used will be as is I spoke to the contractor Theron Wright
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2025, at 9:56 AM, Davorka Kirincic <DKirincic@winnetka.org> wrote:
Thank you for your e-mail. Please confirm that the same material for tuckpointing will be
used as it is.
Davorka I. Kirincic, AICP
Building and Code Enforcement Manager
Village of Winnetka Community Deveopment
847.716.3522 I dkirincic@winnetka.oro
From: Theron Wright <theron.w.wright@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:18 AM
To: Davorka Kirincic <DKirincic@Winnetka.org>
Subject: Re: 555-557-559 Chestnut St/Tuckpointing
CAUTION. This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unl ess you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
i
as requested per our conversation, I'll talk pointing on the back of 555 Chestnut bu lding
will be the same color as the build i ng already has. I spoke to the contracto r about it and he
he's going to keep the integrity matching the color to original across the back of the
building, where the tuckpo i nt ng is required thank you Theron Wright
i
Sent from my i P hone
On Aug 27, 2025, at 8:56 AM, Davorka Kirncic <DKirincic@winn.e1ka.filfP
wrote:
Good Morning,
1
Page 90 of 113
Wesley Corporation
9111 Chestnut Dr
Hickory Hills, IL 60457
Jerzy (847) 409-6809
basiaescapel@gmail.com
..,r::<
Wesley (773) 909-8037 Theron Wright
559 Chestnut St
Winnetka, IL
(847) 828-1517
Proposal
This proposal includes three office buildings: 555, 557, 559
-Lintels replacement (total of 33 feet) with flashing and dripatch installation
$7,600.00
-Old windows removal and 2 glassblocks installation
$1,650.00
-100% sand blasting (Chicago common brick)
$21,500.00
-100% tuckpointing and bricks replacement as needed (Chicago common brick)
$9,500.00
The price does not include the permit.
The full price is $40, 250.00
To start the job: $20,000 is needed in advance.
Half the job: $15,000
Remaining balance: $5,250 after job is completed.
Debris will be cleaned afterwards.
Jerzy Michalak Theron Wright
Wesley Niezgoda
Page 91 of 113
£�\�Tr� W/l<J]:x:)l).)'S 4 5°5".J- �1'/JUT
,o �NJ�e., ,o <;C-'°6"5 e1-c:eK.
3
Page 92 of 113
Page 93 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 914 GREEN BAY ROAD – SANTE INTEGRATED HEALTH AND WELLNESS
– SIGN PERMIT (CASE NO. 25-18-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to consider a Sign Permit application
submitted by Sante Integrated Health and Wellness (the “Applicant”) as the lessee of the commercial
space located on second floor at 914 Green Bay Road (the “Subject Property”), requesting approval of
proposed door window and projecting signs at first-floor entrance of the Subject Property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located west of Green Bay Road between Gage Street and Tower Road in the
Hubbard Woods Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located within the
Commercial Overlay District. On the second floor of the commercial building, the Applicant operates its
health and wellness business. The first-floor commercial space is occupied by Lana and by Eversee
Boutique Eyecare. Figure 1 below identifies the location of the Subject Property. Figure 2 on the next
page shows the entire front façade of the building and the location of the Applicant’s business.
Location of Subject Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map
Page 94 of 113
Location of the
Sante Integrated Health
and Wellness business Location of the
on the second floor Proposed projecting sign
Location of the
Figure 2 – Subject Property entrance door window sign
View of the entire building from Green Bay Road
PREVIOUS APPROVALS
The DRB approved the sign permit to install a wall sign for Lana Jewelry in March 2023 and storefront
window signs, door window sign, and projecting sign as well as approval of the storefront gold vinyl
border/ribbon around all windows in February 2024.
CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant is seeking approval of the Sign Permit to allow the installation of a business entrance door
window sign and a projecting sign next to the business front entrance on the first floor.
(see additional images below).
Page 95 of 113
Proposed Door Window Sign:
• Door Window
o White vinyl individual letters, 3” height, installed on clear glass;
o Sign area 0.375 square feet. Not exceeding 50% of the door window glass area, and
o Covers 21% of the door glass
Subject Property – Proposed storefront door window sign
Projecting Sign
• Double-sided sign;
• Vinyl letters in white reading “Sante” on black aluminum background;
• Located 8 feet and 9 inches above the finished grade;
• Projecting 24 inches from the building wall;
• 24 inches high
• 4.0 square feet, and
• Mounted on a hidden bracket
Subject Property – Proposed projecting sign at Subject Property
A copy of the Applicant’s application materials is included in Attachment A.
Page 96 of 113
SIGN CODE ANALYSIS
Section 15.60.120 of the Village Sign Code establishes commercial district window sign standards.
Window and door window signs that meet the following standards can be administratively approved by
staff:
• Limited to 10% or less of the single windowpane and 50% of the door glass pane;
• Limited letters and logos no taller than 8”, except one logo, and the first letter of each word may
be up to but no taller than 24”, except store hours and contact information shall be limited to 2”
in height;
• Height of the sign to not exceed 1/3 of the height of the glass area and 90% of the glass width;
• Decal window signs shall be die-cut and limited to individual letters and logos;
• Limited to two colors;
• Without reflective materials;
• No window sign should be illuminated;
• Located in the lower two-thirds of the window opening;
• Shall not extend over or through architectural features/window muntin;
• Comply with the following: for each street exposure, the total area of all wall signs, window signs,
and awning signs other than exempt signs and permitted directional and incidental signs shall not
exceed 15% of the street exposure.
The proposed sign meets all the above standards for door window signs,
Projecting sign standards
• One projecting sign per business;
• Extends no more than 2 feet from the building wall;
• No more than three feet high;
• Clearance between the bottom of the sign and the sidewalk is at least 8 feet;
• Containing the name of the business and a maximum of three words containing a general
description of types of products or services and the occupant logo or trademark, and
The proposed projecting sign meets all of the above standards for projecting signs.
Signage Street Exposure
The proposed signage complies with the maximum allowed sign area street exposure requirement.
Area Square Percentage
Foot
Street Exposure 1445 -
Max Allowed per Sign Code (15% of the Street Exposure) 216.75 15%
All Proposed Signs counted toward Street Exposure 7.75 0.54%
The proposed signage complies with the maximum allowed sign area street exposure requirement.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
When reviewing the design of any signs, the Board is to consider the following standards and criteria of
Section 15.60.150(F) of the Sign Code.
F. Standards and Criteria for Issuance. The following factors and characteristics relating to
the safety and appearance of signage shall govern the Board’s evaluation of design
submittals:
Page 97 of 113
1. The sign area shall be in proportion and scale to the building or to other buildings
or signs in the surrounding area;
2. A signage package for a business establishment that includes a number of signs
and graphics shall have an overall plan that demonstrates the compatibility of the
design and colors of all the signs that are part of that package;
3. The amount of text and graphics contained in or on any sign or group of signs shall
be limited so that it results in a clear and readable design;
4. Signs and graphics shall have a harmonious relationship with nearby signs,
buildings, and the neighborhood and shall be designed not adversely to affect
adjacent structures. In this respect, the sign shall relate to its building, structure,
and neighborhood in terms of size, shape, material, color, texture, lettering,
location, arrangement, lighting, and the like;
5. Colors shall be used with restraint; excessive brightness shall be avoided; and
6. The additional provisions of this chapter, as specified in this chapter, shall be part
of the criteria of the design review process.
The Board should also consider the Village Design Guidelines for the proposed signage. See Attachment
B.
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB find the proposed door window sign and projecting sign as
appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve the Sign Permit to install the
proposed signage.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt
Page 98 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
SIGN PERMT APPLICATION
VILLAGE OF WINNETK� ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENTOFCOMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
nece,ven
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION n AUG 2 8 2025 u
Tenant/Lessee
Name of Business Prinaiy contact name
1>� .J
Santa Integrated Health and Wellness Faris Murad
Project Address
914 Green Bay Road, Suite 201
City State Zip Code
Winnetka IL 60093
Sign Company
1-N ame ofSig ncom panv P rimarvcontact name Phone No.
-
Windy City Signs & Graphics ___.__Dick Reeves _ll
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____
Street Address
4904 t«>rth Elston Avenue
City State Zip Code Email
Chicago IL 60630 info@mywindysigns.com
Property Owner
Name of Company Primary contact name Phone No.
Wayland Real Estate Capital Marc Klutznick 312-339-8414
Street Address:
361 Park Avenue r-«>. 205
aty
Glencoe
State
IL
I Zip Code
60022 I Email
marc@waylandre.com
Sign type(s):
(checlc all that apply)
(iJ b�grapbics □ wall-mounted sign O ground-mounted sign
(iJ projecting sign D other _______________
Additional description of sign type and materials Onebacldll alllTlinllTI lettered wall sign. one white vinyl on er1rance door.
and one black alurrinllTI projecting sign near entrance door.
OFFICE USE ONLY
SIGN FEE: $80 NON-ILLUMINATED PER SIGN TYPE $ f)o.oO
$195 ILLUMINATED SIGN $--==----
STAFF REVIEW FEE: $70 0 WAIVE FEE $ =lo-oo
TOTAL PERMIT FEE $150.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ____
Page 99 of 113
914 Green Bay Road, Winnetka IL BETH EVELAND
2nd Floor DESIGN
FIXED PROJECTING
SIGN CENTERED ABOVE
EXISTING LANTERN
(SHO\M\I FLATTENED
�I
FOR CLARITY)
24"W
PROJECTING SIGN: 4 SQ. FT.
- 24'W x 24"H x 2" thick
MATERIALS:
- BLACK ALUMINUM W/ WHITE VINYL
LETTERING AND LOGO ON BOTH SIDES.
- MOUNTED ON HIDDEN BRACKET
BOTTOM OF
SI GN TO BE 105"
FROM SIDEWALK
VINYL SIGN: 0.375 SQ. FT.
-2.1% OF DOOR GLASS
MATERIALS:
- WHITE VINYL ON CLEAR GLASS
- INSTALLED ON INTERIOR FACE OF DOOR
VINYL SIGN CENTERED SIGNS FABRICATED
ON ENTRANCE DOOR. AND INSTALLED BY:
MOUNT ED 48" FROM SIDEWALK
TOTAL SIGN AREA:
VINYL SIGN: 0.375 SQ. FT.
PROJECTING SIGN: 4 SQ. FT.
STREET FRONTAGE AREA: 1445 SQ. FT.
- SEE PAGE 2 FOR OVERALL STREET VIEW
TOTAL SIGN PERCENTAGE OF FRONTAGE= 0.03%
Page 100 of 113
914 Green Bay Road, Winnetka IL BETH EVELAND
2nd Floor DESIGN
$ T/PARAPET
[EV 28-9'
$ T/MTL DECK
lfW r1&"lll • '"'1
ELEV. 25-1"
$ Fl1/t:Ull!;.�LAL
FV 14-!l
I
I
$illV
1/FND WALL tiEW
I
3-6
I
$ �01.C SLAB
-----
VSEEPG.1
V o·-o
50'WFACADE
SIGNS FABRICATED
AND INSTALLED BY:
Page 101 of 113
914 Green Bay Road, Winnetka IL BETH EVELAND
2nd Floor DESIGN
EXISTING BUILDING PHOTOS
SIGNS FABRICATED
AND INSTALLED BY:
NOTE:
Existing vinyl logo on door will be removed
Page 102 of 113
ATTACHMENT B
d. Building Signage
Commercial signs should reflect the character of the building style, while expressing
each store’s individuality. There are several prominent sign styles that are appropriate to
Winnetka: surface mounted, pin-mounted, interior, decal and projecting blade signs.
Sign materials are limited to painted wood, canvas, architectural glass and metal. Sign
color must harmonize with the building upon which it is mounted and adjacent
structures. Lettering color can be unique to the image of the retailer/user. Metal sign
and plaque material such as brushed bronze, antique bronze, aluminum, stainless steel
and painted cast iron or similarly appearing materials are preferred. Highly reflective
metallic signs are not allowed. Signs should be lit by marquee or spot lighting; neon
lighting is not permitted. Spot lighting should be minimal and unobtrusive and, per the
Village Code, the source of illumination shall not be visible from any street, sidewalk or
dwelling. Simplified industrial light fixtures are not permitted. Contextual solutions are
recommended. The majority of the signs will be mounted within the building’s sign
band, defined as the wall area located above the ground floor storefront opening and
below the second floor windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” above grade and a
maximum of 15’-0” above grade. (MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023)
Signs must comply with the general provisions of the Winnetka Sign Ordinance as well
as design provisions contained within these Design Guidelines.
1. Surface mounted commercial signs are either fabricated from painted wood or cast
metal plaques and are to be mounted within the sign band or within the storefront
transom. The height of the sign is restricted to 75% of the area of the sign band or
14 inches - whichever is less. The sign band of a building consists of the area
located above the ground floor storefront opening and below the second floor
windowsill, and is located a minimum of 8’-0” and a maximum of 15’-0” above
grade. Refer to figures 28, 29, and 30 for location. Surface mounted or pin-
mounted signs are not permitted on secondary elevations without a defined sign
band.
2. Pin-mounted commercial signs consist of
reverse channel, cast metal and flat cut
metal letters mounted above the storefront
in the masonry sign band or suspended in
front of the storefront at the transom or
recessed entry. The size of the lettering is
restricted so that the height of the letters
does not exceed 75% of the height of the
sign band or 14 inches - whichever is less.
The length of the lettering is to be
Figure 38
contained within 75% of the length of the
sign band. (See figure 38)
19
Building & Architecture
Page 103 of 113
Village of Winnetka, Illinois
Figure 39 & 40
3. Projecting blade commercial signs can MC-01-2023, Removed, 01/17/2023
be round, square or vertical, mounted
from the face of the building at the
second floor level between the windows
or at the head of the storefront and are
oriented to pedestrian scale. The signs
are to be mounted on fixed hardware; no
swinging or chain-mounted signs are
allowed. The dimensions of the sign are
not to exceed 6 square feet (36”
high and 24” deep) (See figure 41). If
illuminated, the signs should be lit with
an unobtrusive light source. Figure 41
4. Incidental wall signs such as building management identification and directory
signs should be integrated into a single sign and be constructed of brushed bronze,
antique bronze or painted cast iron. Such signs should not be placed on the
prominent street front facade and should be directed to public residential entries
(MC-01-2023, amended, 01/17/2023)
Design Guidelines 20
Page 104 of 113
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
FROM: DAVORKA KIRINCIC, AICP
BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
SUBJECT: 560 CHESTNUT STREET - NEAPOLITAN - CERTIFICATE OF
APPROPRIATENESS FOR RECENTLY STOREFRONT PAINTING
CHANGES (CASE NO. 25-19-DR)
INTRODUCTION
On September 18, 2025, the Design Review Board (DRB) is scheduled to consider a Certificate of
Appropriateness application submitted by Kelly Golden (the “Applicant”), the owner of Neapolitan, LLC
located at 560 Chestnut Street (the “Subject Property”), requesting approval to paint portions of the
exterior storefront.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located on the west side of Chestnut Street between Spruce Street and Elm Street
in the Elm Street Business District. It is zoned C-2 General Retail Commercial and is located in the
Commercial Overlay District. Figure 1 below identifies the location of the Subject property. On the next
page, Figure 2 shows the entire front façade of the building with the Applicant’s business, as recently
painted, and Figure 3 shows the Applicant’s business storefront prior to the recent painting.
Location of the
Subject Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property – Location Map
Page 105 of 113
Frontage of the 560 Chestnut Street - Neapolitan
Figure 2 – Subject Property – View of the entire building from Chestnut Street
Figure 3 - Subject property - Applicant’s business storefront before the recent storefront painting
changes
CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant requests approval to allow recent painting of the storefront, including painting the entrance
ceiling, limestone entrance walls, limestone front columns, door, door trim, windows trim, and transom,
in pink color as shown in Figure 3 below and Figure 4 on the following page:
Page 106 of 113
Figure 3 – Subject property – Storefront elevation with proposed paint changes
Figure 4 – Proposed paint for storefront
A copy of the application materials is included in Attachment A.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS CONSIDERATIONS
As established by the Village Code, the Design Review Board is to consider the following four (4) factors in
determining whether to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness:
“(1) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with the character of the immediate neighborhood;”
“(2) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
appropriate to and compatible with adopted Village plans for and improvements in the
Page 107 of 113
immediate neighborhood, and including both urban design and site arrangement
considerations;”
“(3) whether the proposed external architectural features and site improvements are
consistent with applicable Village design guidelines and such standards and criteria as may be
adopted by the Board; and”
“(4) the probable effect of the proposed external architectural features on the integrity of the
immediate vicinity.”
The Board must determine if the recent storefront paint color complies with the above standards and the
following design guidelines. See Attachment B.
DESIGN GUIDELINES ANALYSIS
The Village’s Design Guidelines provide general guidance on the design and appearance of exterior
façades on commercial buildings and additionally provide guidance on commercial storefront doors and
window material and color selection, recommending that the selection be sympathetic to the overall
building color palette and consider the adjacent building materials within the structure, immediately
adjacent structures, structures within the same block, and structures across the street.
SUMMARY
The Applicant requests that the DRB find the recent storefront paint color changes on the front façade to
be appropriate and compatible with the Design Guidelines and approve the Certificate of Appropriateness
application as submitted.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Attachment B: Design Guidelines Excerpt
Page 108 of 113
ATTACHMENT A
Village of Winnetka
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, I L L I N O I S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
C,OA 2..0-i..-S- -9 °}Q
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
Project Address: ______::;µ�',_o__ c_·�_h_�...... s.::;.-·...1..+.J..1...l..1-=0�1-
_________
t_-a_____,
§
Name of Business (es):___.__...._._�-'---f'--o
_____l_1_·...... -"'---------,.,r.a;;;;;,--:;a;�=-=-::--::c=:-=-
Application is hereby made for the following work (please check all that apply):
E IVE
Sign Sign Permit Application attached? c
SE p O 2 2025 �
Awning Awning Pennit App cation attached? lJ
� BY:_______
Other (general description) _-'r7 ;_;;_.f.�, l
._. 1
..._....._ l [
_,.__________ ________ _
/ l
Please provide a de�led description of the pro�sed �ork (attach additional info�ion such as material
spe i!!ca\ions, photograJ?hs, etc.): � .,1 I'\ l •
trtc;_ � ,
RI VV1 1 4 Do (S C{ htI
�111 rJ� 6 r' C(l-..
A
.1 (Yon1-
l/We hp�by certi� that "r5 �/ e_, I I'"'(
at
G � lt1
,t J t (Lessee/0wncx:Y of the property located
""\,? 0 C-n-fstt:ffi[ 1 (address), 1 am/we are authorized to submit plans for alterations of the subject
property. I/We agree to perform the subject work in accordance with the conditions of approval by the Winnetka
Design Review Board as well � all other applicable codes, rules, and regulations of the Village of Winnetka
FOR QFFICE USE ONLY
SIGNED
COA applied for (date):
c�
PRlNTED NAME(S)
. a
I I
ADDRESS COA Case Nwnber:
PHONE NO. , , • . • ..., I COA Issued (date):
EMAIL kJJ"!0 oe11pJ/4111 �hlr eeo( Pe�
�$135
□ $575
PRIMARY DESIGN FIRM
CONTACT NAME -�Pl
M��1
�,.+,,
U
_::.w:=�Ji: 1,:jjc;=-·=r-=/=o-=-(:.,2:=
ADDRESS
PHONENO.
EMAIL
Page 4 of4
Page 109 of 113
iC:.----c. ---'
�--'-c�
- , --' _
,__
---
- ·.- -- ,�
Page 110 of 113
n11p I it111
Page 111 of 113
Page 112 of 113
ATTACHMENT B
Architectural Series of Asphalt Shingles
(3 ply) (See figure 49)
Wood Shingles (Fire treated)
Slate (See figure 48)
Real Copper (No other metal roofs are
allowed)
Figure 46
Institutional only
Flat roofs must be hidden by parapet
on primary / secondary facades.
Commercial and Multiple- Family
Flat roof must not be visible from
street, pedestrian, or open spaces.
d. Door and Window Materials:
Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional,
Multiple- Family Residential: Entry
doors should be wood or aluminum
stile and rail with varying degrees of
glass. Public entry doors should be Figure 47
fully glazed whereas private and semi-
private entries should be primarily
solid panel doors. Storefront window
units should be either paneled
aluminum or brass. Many original
storefronts, some with transom
windows, remain in the districts.
Efforts should be taken to
repair and renovate these systems
Figure 48
where feasible. Window frames should
be wood, steel or aluminum. Vinyl
windows are not acceptable. Muntin
divisions should be real divided glass
or simulated with spacer bars. Snap-in
muntins are not acceptable. Color
selection should be sympathetic with
the overall building color palette and
take into account the adjacent building
materials within the structure,
immediately adjacent structures,
structures within the same block and Figure 49
structures across the street.
Entry door hardware is to be exterior grade with weather-resistant finish. Hardware
design and finish is to be appropriate with facade articulation, color palette and
district character. Glazing should be clear glass without tint or film.
25
Building & Architecture
Page 113 of 113