General
Regular MeetingWinnetka, IL · July 13, 2023
Minutes
Minutes adopted 09.27.2023
1 WINNETKA PLAN COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
2 JULY 13, 2023
3
4 Members Present: Layla Danley, Chairperson
5 Matthew Bradley
6 Mamie Case
7 Chris Foley
8 John Golan
9 Liz Kunkle
10
11 Members Absent: Jonathan Alt
12
13 Non-Voting Members Present: Tina Dalman
14
15 Village Staff: David Schoon, Director of Community Development
16 Ann Klaassen, Assistant Director of Community
17 Development
18
19 Call to Order & Roll Call:
20 The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Danley at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Klaassen took roll call of the
21 Commission Members present.
22
23 Approval of April 26, 2023, Meeting Minutes:
24 Chairperson Danley asked for a motion to approve the April 26, 2023, meeting minutes. A motion to
25 approve the April 26, 2023, meeting minutes was made by Ms. Case and seconded by Mr. Foley. A vote
26 was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 6 to 0:
27 AYES: Bradley, Case, Danley, Foley, Golan, Kunkle
28 NAYS: None
29 NON-VOTING: Dalman
30
31 Public Comment:
32 No comments were made at this time.
33
34 Community Development Report:
35 Mr. Schoon stated that One Winnetka would be presented to the Planned Development Commission next
36 week and noted the DRB recommended approval of the project’s design. He also provided the
37 Commission with an update in connection with the ordinances the Village Council is considering regarding
38 the lakefront and provided the Commission with summaries of each ordinance. Mr. Schoon noted for the
39 bluff ordinance, any permit issued by July 6, 2023 could proceed. Trustee Dalman noted the ordinance as
40 presented may be reconsidered or adopted as is, and she referred to the number of homeowners
41 expressing serious concerns relating to a moratorium. Mr. Schoon also stated the Village is looking to hire
42 a third-party coastal engineer as a consultant to assist with the study of regulations. He advised the
43 Commission that there are three permits pending for work along the bluff.
44
45 New Applications:
46 a. Case No. 23-07-SU: 564 Lincoln Avenue - Compass Real Estate Office: An application seeking
47 approval of a Special Use Permit submitted by Compass Illinois, Inc., as the prospective lessee of the
48 property located at 564 Lincoln Avenue to allow a real estate office in the C-2 General Retail Commercial
July 13, 2023 Page 2
1 Overlay District. The property is currently owned by 562-72 Lincoln Avenue, LLC. The Village Council has
2 final jurisdiction on this request.
3 Ms. Klaassen stated the request is for a special use to occupy one of the commercial spaces in the
4 Winnetka Galleria building in the commercial overlay district. She stated the applicant would be relocating
5 into this space and identified the applicant’s previously occupied and currently occupied spaces as well as
6 the former tenant of the Subject Property. Ms. Klaassen then referred to illustrations of neighboring
7 spaces, the proposed floor plans and the number of staff and agent occupants of the proposed space. She
8 stated in terms of parking, there would be eight parking spaces on the lower level of the Subject Property
9 with the applicant indicating that their parking demand would be met with their overflow parking using
10 the public parking lot on Lincoln. Ms. Klaassen added the applicant indicated there would be a pop-up
11 retailer in the area identified in yellow in the illustration and identified the office’s area in the overlay
12 district.
13
14 Ms. Klaassen stated the Commission is to consider the special use standards and noted no public comment
15 has been received by staff. She stated following the applicant’s presentation and Commission discussion,
16 a Commission Member may wish to make a motion to recommend approval or denial as indicated on page
17 nos. 12 and 13 of the agenda packet. Ms. Klaassen then asked if there were any questions.
18
19 Mr. Golan asked if Coldwell Banker (the former tenant of the space) ever had pop-ups in this location and
20 questioned how the Village collected tax revenue. Ms. Klaassen responded that Coldwell Banker did have
21 pop-ups in the space. She explained that initially there was an issue with the pop-up space actually being
22 utilized so Village staff met with Coldwell Banker. Ms. Klaassen explained that after that meeting Coldwell
23 Banker did lease the space to pop-up retailers. She stated that tax revenue would be generated similar
24 to that of any other retailer. Chairperson Danley asked if there were any other questions. No additional
25 questions were raised at this time.
26
27 Chairperson Danley then swore in those speaking to this matter. Cal Bernstein, attorney for the applicant,
28 thanked the Commission for holding the special meeting and stated there was previously a Coldwell
29 Banker tenant in this location with their intent being to utilize half of that space. He referred to previous
30 experiences with pop-up retailers. He also referred to Pillar 2 of the Comprehensive Plan which would be
31 met with the proposal with the special use being desired and needed by the community. Mr. Bernstein
32 stated allowing Compass to move to this location would also help existing successful businesses.
33
34 Jonathan Satz, Compass’s Director of Corporate Real Estate, identified their history and how their offices
35 came to be combined in their current location with plans to look for a new long-term home. He stated the
36 new combined space would measure 4,500 square feet which would house 50 agents who work primarily
37 out of the office. Mr. Satz estimated there would be 5-10 people in the office at one time and stated their
38 desire is to have a strong footprint in the marketplace in a brick and mortar location. He also described
39 the office’s parking for employees and agents which would satisfy most of their parking needs. Mr. Satz
40 stated they planned to direct clients to street parking or the lot behind the building and described the
41 nature of virtual closings with limited visitor parking demand. He also described their planned
42 continuation for the pop-up retail space.
43
44 Mr. Bernstein addressed the standards noting the use would be less intensive and their plan to lease eight
45 parking spaces on-site which would satisfy the parking requirements and meet their needs. He stated the
46 use would also promote continuity and their continued use of pop-up retailers which would help existing
47 retailers. Mr. Bernstein stated granting the special use would allow existing business to do better and
48 provide economic benefit to the entire community. He then asked the Commission to recommend
July 13, 2023 Page 3
1 approval of the special use and asked if there were any questions.
2
3 Chairperson Danley asked if the landlord’s representative is present and how long the property has been
4 on the market. Mr. Bernstein responded the landlord is not present. Steve Hudson, 670 Ardsley,
5 responded Coldwell Banker left the office a year ago and the property has been vacant since then.
6 Chairperson Danley asked if there were any other questions. Mr. Golan stated the request met the
7 standards and referred to standard no. 7. He added the Village would like to see more foot traffic. Mr.
8 Bernstein referred to the number of agents accessing the space on a regular basis which would provide
9 the balance of foot traffic and benefit the overlay district while not putting too much burden on it. Mr.
10 Bradley questioned the mix of agents between the old Lincoln Avenue site and Spruce Street site. Mr. Satz
11 responded it would depend on the point in time noting there are not a lot of agents in the office for weekly
12 meetings which are hybrid. He added they did not previously use a lot of the retail parking spaces with
13 public parking being used for overflow.
14
15 Trustee Dalman stated the landlord would have been able to answer questions relating to the amount of
16 time the property was vacant, retail solicitation efforts and address problems relating to the prior real
17 estate tenant. Mr. Satz responded they would sell Compass merchandise along with items sold at other
18 stores and the website. Chairperson Danley suggested the space be broken up with agents in the rear of
19 the building and to have retail in the front. Mr. Satz referred to the building’s history in terms of retail
20 users. Ms. Case stated current uses which are not retailers were approved as special uses during a
21 different economic time and identified the standards which were not satisfied. Chairperson Danley also
22 stated she had questions for the landlord. Ms. Case referred to the regret of approving the Coldwell
23 Banker special use in 2018. Mr. Satz stated they understand the Commission’s concerns and that the
24 landlord would be present at the Village Council meeting to address the concerns raised.
25
26 Chairperson Danley then called the matter in for discussion. Ms. Case referred to the Valentina retail space
27 and the retail corridor on Lincoln with the proposed use breaking up the retail corridor. She suggested the
28 landlord find a more appropriate tenant and referred to the standards which were not met compared to
29 those which are. Ms. Case added 50 agents in the office on Mondays for meetings would park on the
30 street.
31
32 Mr. Bradley referred to special uses which are allowed by right and stated he agreed with efforts that the
33 landlord should attempt to obtain a retail tenant and referred to the amount of time the property was
34 marketed to such a tenant. He stated if the standards are met for a special use applicant, they should
35 consider that use. Mr. Bradley also stated he is less concerned with parking issues and they would not
36 have a lot of agents in the office. He stated this request is not similar to others such as Engel & Völkers
37 and referred to the amount of foot traffic generated by the use with him tending to be in support of the
38 request due to its location at the end of the overlay district.
39
40 Chairperson Danley stated if they are to reach a consensus, the Commission has to agree as to whether
41 the standards have been met. Mr. Bradley added the pop-up retailer would also help generate retail use.
42 Trustee Dalman reminded the Commission that they previously discussed in connection with the Coldwell
43 Banker approval, when the pop-up went dark, the Commission had no authority in that regard and
44 whether they should impose conditions that should be met. Mr. Schoon confirmed each application is to
45 be evaluated on its own merits whether it is for the same type of use or not. Ms. Case stated she is not
46 in favor of the request and the approval would be for a use that would be there forever. She added a real
47 estate office should not be in such a prominent location. Mr. Bradley referred to the Commission’s
48 previous discussions relating to similar uses in similar locations.
July 13, 2023 Page 4
1 Chairperson Danley stated she also is not in favor of the request and that standard nos. 7 and 8 have not
2 been met and the use would not bring vibrancy to the area in terms of it being a real estate use compared
3 to retail. Mr. Golan stated the request is different from the Valentina space, and the request is for a
4 location at the end of the retail corridor. He also questioned whether the residential real estate market is
5 so vibrant as to need 5,000 square feet of space for advertising. Mr. Bradley suggested there is a way for
6 the applicant to occupy the space in terms of reaching a compromise with the landlord and stated he
7 would be in favor of the request.
8
9 Mr. Foley stated he agreed with both sides of the argument and referred to the property’s history. He
10 then stated he is more cognizant of the vacant storefront and the request is consistent with the previous
11 use and would not be inconsistent with uses in the immediate vicinity. Mr. Foley also stated the
12 application is consistent with several of the standards and he is on fence in terms of recommending
13 approval.
14
15 Ms. Kunkle stated her initial reaction was that the request was consistent and after hearing the discussion,
16 she agreed the Commission should hear from the landlord before a decision is made and the comments
17 with regard to its location at the edge of the overlay district. She also agreed with the suggestion of having
18 the real estate space in the back of the building. The Commission Members discussed alternatives and
19 whether options were explored that did not require a special use. They also discussed whether conditions
20 should be placed on the recommendation.
21
22 Mr. Golan asked Mr. Bernstein to explain how the use would be a great addition for the community. Mr.
23 Bernstein responded the applicant is a thriving business and noted their current lease is expiring. He
24 referred to similar uses directly to the north and agreed with the suggestion to have the landlord present
25 to address the Commission’s concerns. He reiterated the space was formerly a real estate office and stated
26 they addressed parking as their main concern in their presentation. Mr. Bernstein also stated 4,500 square
27 feet is a large space for a retailer which would be problematic for a retail use as opposed to the space
28 remaining vacant compared to the applicant’s use.
29
30 Chairperson Danley informed the applicant the Commission is in favor of keeping the business here and
31 asked Mr. Bernstein if they looked at other spaces. Mr. Satz stated they have been looking for space since
32 2017 and described another potential space which would have had parking difficulties, as well as other
33 alternative locations. Chairperson Danley asked the applicant if they worked with the Village’s Economic
34 Development Coordinator. Mr. Satz responded they primarily worked with their own commercial brokers
35 and with Hoffmann and referred to the upfront capital costs for property conversion. He added they
36 preferred first floor space.
37
38 Chairperson Danley asked if there were any other questions. No additional questions were raised at this
39 time.
40
41 Ms. Kunkle disagreed with the characterization that the space would be a big billboard and stated they
42 need to bring people and customers in the Village. She also stated they may have learned from the
43 previous pop-up retail use, and that she is concerned with regard to the longevity of the special use nature
44 and not having control over it in the future. Ms. Kunkle stated the use would bring agents and additional
45 customers into the business district with there being sufficient parking.
46
47 Chairperson Danley asked the Commission Members if they were prepared to vote. Mr. Golan stated the
48 applicant has a good understanding of the issues they would face when they go to the Village Council.
July 13, 2023 Page 5
1 Chairperson Danley referred to the issues related to previous pop-up retailers. Mr. Foley stated he would
2 be less enamored with including conditions. Mr. Bradley referred to the difficulty of parking on Lincoln if
3 all of the spaces were retail and the issue is striking a balance between retail and non-retail uses. He also
4 questioned how pop-up retail would be policed.
5
6 Mr. Golan suggested a motion be made to recommend approval that the request met the criteria with
7 the exception of standard nos. 7 and 10. Chairperson Danley stated the motion should apply to all of the
8 standards. A straw poll of the Commission Members’ positions was taken.
9
10 Mr. Bradley moved to recommend approval of the special use to the Village Council as indicated on page
11 nos. 12 and 13 of the agenda packet. The motion was seconded by Ms. Kunkle. A vote was taken and the
12 motion passed, 4 to 2:
13 AYES: Bradley, Golan, Foley, Kunkle
14 NAYS: Case, Danley
15 NON-VOTING: Dalman
16
17 New Business.
18 a. July 26, 2023, Meeting – Quorum Check.
19 Mr. Schoon confirmed there are no agenda items for the July 2023 meeting. The Commission Members
20 discussed their availability in August.
21
22 Ms. Case referred to the height of a fence on Meadow Road. Mr. Schoon explained the fence height
23 requirements to the Commission. Ms. Case also asked for hard copies of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
24 Schoon responded hard copies can be provided for those who would like them.
25
26 Adjournment:
27 Chairperson Danley asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Kunkle and
28 seconded by several Commission Members. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 6 to
29 0:
30 AYES: Bradley, Case, Danley, Foley, Golan, Kunkle
31 NAYS: None
32 NON-VOTING: Dalman
33 The meeting was adjourned at 8:34 p.m.
34
35 Respectfully submitted,
36
37 Antionette Johnson
38 Recording Secretary
Agenda
Village of Winnetka
Plan Commission Special Meeting
July 13, 2023 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers
510 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order & Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes
a. April 26, 2023, Regular Meeting Minutes
3. Public Comments
4. Community Development Report
5. New Applications
a. Case No. 23-07-SU: 564 Lincoln Avenue - Compass Real Estate Office: An
application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit submitted by Compass
Illinois, Inc., as the prospective lessee of the property located at 564 Lincoln
Avenue to allow a real estate office in the C-2 General Retail Commercial
Overlay District. The property is currently owned by 562-72 Lincoln Avenue,
LLC. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request.
6. New Business
a. July 26, 2023, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
7. Adjournment
NOTICE
Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments
prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or
by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All
agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter.
The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay
Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).
Packet
Village of Winnetka
Plan Commission Special Meeting
July 13, 2023 at 7:00 PM
Winnetka Village Hall Council Chambers
510 Green Bay Road
AGENDA
1. Call to Order & Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes
a. April 26, 2023, Regular Meeting Minutes
3. Public Comments
4. Community Development Report
5. New Applications
a. Case No. 23-07-SU: 564 Lincoln Avenue - Compass Real Estate Office: An
application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit submitted by Compass
Illinois, Inc., as the prospective lessee of the property located at 564 Lincoln
Avenue to allow a real estate office in the C-2 General Retail Commercial
Overlay District. The property is currently owned by 562-72 Lincoln Avenue,
LLC. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request.
6. New Business
a. July 26, 2023, Regular Meeting - Quorum Check
7. Adjournment
NOTICE
Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments
prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or
by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All
agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter.
The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with
disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay
Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041).
Page 1 of 32
1 WINNETKA PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
2 APRIL 26, 2023
3
4 Members Present: Bridget Orsic, Chairperson
5 Jonathan Alt
6 Mamie Case
7 Layla Danley
8 John Golan
9 Chris Foley
10 Liz Kunkle
11
12 Members Absent: Matthew Bradley
13
14 Non-Voting Members Present: Tina Trustee Dalman
15
16 Village Staff: David Schoon, Director of Community Development
17 Ann Klaassen, Assistant Director of Community
18 Development
19
20 Call to Order & Roll Call:
21 The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Orsic at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Klaassen took roll call of the
22 Commission Members present.
23
24 Approval of Minutes:
25 a. March 22, 2023, Regular Meeting Minutes
26 Chairperson Orsic asked for a motion to approve the March 22, 2023, meeting minutes. A motion was
27 made by Ms. Case by to approve the March 22, 2023, meeting minutes. Mr. Golan seconded the motion.
28 A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 7 to 0:
29 AYES: Alt, Case, Danley, Foley, Golan, Kunkle, Orsic
30 NAYS: None
31 NON-VOTING: Dalman
32
33 Public Comments:
34 No comments were made at this time.
35
36 Community Development Report:
37 Mr. Schoon stated the Village Council approved the special use requests for North Shore Country Day
38 School and for Hubbard Woods School. He also stated the Village Council adopted the new Comprehensive
39 Plan with a copy being made available on the website, and he can provide hard copies upon request. Mr.
40 Schoon provided an update with regard to the One Winnetka proposal that was presented to the Design
41 Review Board (DRB) which provided architectural comments noting consideration was deferred until their
42 May meeting. He stated once the DRB makes a recommendation they will determine when the request
43 will be presented to the Planned Development Commission.
44
45 New Applications:
46 a. Case No. 23-04-SU: 564 Green Bay Road: An application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit
47 to allow off-street parking at street-level along the alley for a new four-story mixed-use building at 564
48 Green Bay Road. The Village Council has final jurisdiction on this request.
Page 2 of 32
April 26, 2023 Page 2
1 Ms. Klaassen stated in 2022, the applicant submitted an application to allow a three-story mixed-use
2 building, with a roof top deck, with the Village Council approving the request. She stated the applicant is
3 now asking for approval for a fourth story for an additional residential unit. Ms. Klaassen identified the
4 property’s location and zoning classification stating the proposed development of the site is consistent
5 with the newly adopted land use map in the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning designation.
6
7 Ms. Klaassen then identified photos of the site noting the existing building would be demolished. She also
8 referred to the proposed site plan with a rear yard setback of 3 feet which required approval of a zoning
9 variation. Ms. Klaassen described the commercial and residential units occupying the space noting Engel
10 & Völkers would occupy the commercial space on the first floor and lower level.
11
12 Ms. Klaassen identified the proposed first floor plan and two rear off-street parking spaces accessed from
13 the alley which required special use approval because the parking spaces are on the ground level. She
14 described the residential units, their sizes and the minimum parking space requirements noting on-site
15 parking is not required for the commercial use since it measured less than 2,500 square feet for parking
16 requirement perspectives. She also identified the 4th floor plan which changed as a result of the DRB
17 comments and eliminated the setback variation previously requested.
18
19 Ms. Klaassen also identified the proposed front and rear elevations, as well as a rendering provided by the
20 applicant. She explained the DRB comments regarding the project to the Commission and noted the DRB
21 voted to recommend approval of the request. She also noted that no public comment was received and
22 the Commission is to consider whether the special use request to allow parking at-street level met the
23 standards for granting a special use. Ms. Klaassen then stated after the presentation by the applicant,
24 and public comment, the Commission is to consider recommending approval or denial of the request with
25 a draft motion provided on page nos. 21-22. She then asked if there were any questions.
26
27 Chairperson Orsic asked for clarification with regard to the number of parking spaces the Commission Is
28 to consider for approval which Ms. Klaassen clarified for the Commission. Ms. Case asked if parking for
29 the 4th floor unit is to be considered. Ms. Klaassen responded the Zoning Ordinance did not recognize off-
30 site parking for residential uses with the variation being for three parking spaces when the applicant is
31 providing two parking spaces, whereas a minimum of 5 is required for the residential units. She noted the
32 Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) recommended approval with a vote of 4 to 1. Ms. Kunkle asked if the two
33 parking spaces would be for residential use only. Ms. Klaassen stated the applicant can respond to that
34 question. No additional questions were raised at this time.
35
36 Chairperson Orsic swore in those speaking to this matter. Cal Bernstein, the applicant’s attorney,
37 confirmed the approvals requested in the application are the same as were approved in 2022 with the
38 only change being one additional residential unit versus the roof top deck and explained the reasoning for
39 the change which related to economic considerations. He described the lot’s conditions which only
40 allowed for two parking spaces. Mr. Bernstein referred to the ZBA discussion relating to the number of
41 parking spaces and alternatives for the project and its proximity to surrounding parking uses. He then
42 stated the standards have been addressed in the application and asked if there were any questions.
43
44 Chairperson Orsic asked if the units would be apartments and Mr. Bernstein confirmed that is correct. Ms.
45 Danley questioned whether two spaces would be able to fit on the lot.
46
47 Chairperson Orsic then swore in Nate Kipnis, the project architect. Mr. Kipnis confirmed two parking
48 spaces would fit on the site. Mr. Golan referred to the narrow alley size. Mr. Kipnis responded a larger
Page 3 of 32
April 26, 2023 Page 3
1 vehicle may require a three-point turn. Mr. Bernstein then referred to the previous discussion that it
2 would be detrimental to have parking off of Green Bay Road. Mr. Golan asked if residential access would
3 be in the front and Mr. Kipnis identified the residential access points with the main entrance being on
4 Green Bay Road. Mr. Alt asked if underground parking was explored and Mr. Kipnis responded it would
5 not be feasible on a lot this size. Ms. Kunkle asked if the larger vehicle shown in the illustration is accurate
6 to size. Mr. Kipnis stated a large and small vehicle would fit in the garage.
7
8 Ms. Danley asked if financial feasibility studies were done to confirm they could finance the project.
9 Chairperson Orsic swore in Paul Lazarre, manager of 564 Green Bay LLC, who stated the previous proposal
10 would have only contained two residential units and was when interest rates were much lower. He went
11 on to explain how the interest rates have affected construction of the building and they need the fourth
12 story to make the project feasible.
13
14 Chairperson Orsic then asked if there were any public comments. No comments were made at this time.
15 She then called the matter in for discussion.
16
17 Chairperson Orsic informed the Commission she spoke with Mr. Bradley who provided a summary of the
18 ZBA’s discussion in that the location is unique and there would be no precedent and there is a desire for
19 this type of housing being needed with the market determining if apartments can be rented without
20 parking being provided. She then stated she was initially concerned and stated the request would not take
21 up street parking or overnight parking and described the request as an interesting experiment.
22 Chairperson Orsic stated underground parking is not an option and concluded the additional residential
23 unit would not impact surrounding uses.
24
25 Ms. Kunkle stated she was initially concerned as well because of the changes made although she
26 appreciated the project’s thoughtfulness being altered to make it fit. She stated an additional Pillar
27 relating to parking from the Comprehensive Plan should be addressed and referred to Goal 8.5 which this
28 application specifically related to. Ms. Kunkle stated they are asking for fewer spaces than are required.
29 Ms. Danley stated knowing the two parking spaces would be the Village standard and the request is
30 exactly the same as previously approved, she agreed with the project being a good experiment and stated
31 she is in favor of the request.
32
33 Mr. Foley agreed with the comments made and stated he would be in favor of the request in light of the
34 extensive Comprehensive Plan discussions and that the request met the standards. Mr. Golan stated the
35 Commission is not to address the setback issue which would be between the applicant and tenants. He
36 also stated the request met the criteria with regard to Pillar Nos. 1, 2 and 8 and the criteria for granting
37 special use permits, concluding he would be in favor of the request. Ms. Case agreed with the comments
38 made and stated she is in favor of the request. Mr. Alt stated while he also agreed with the comments
39 made, he referred to the challenge of going to the Village Council with a request for a four-story building
40 with two parking spaces and concluded he is in favor of the request.
41
42 Trustee Dalman stated they have consistently heard the need for more housing for empty nesters and
43 young professionals which the project would provide. She agreed the request would be a great
44 opportunity to see if a project like this would work and she would be in support of the request when it is
45 presented to the Village Council.
46
47 Chairperson Orsic then asked for a motion. Mr. Golan moved to recommend approval of the special use
48 to allow off-street parking on the street level accessed from the alley as outlined on page nos. 21 and 22
Page 4 of 32
April 26, 2023 Page 4
1 of the agenda packet and referred to the findings. Ms. Kunkle seconded the motion. A vote was taken and
2 the motion unanimously passed, 7 to 0:
3 AYES: Alt, Case, Danley, Foley, Golan, Kunkle, Orsic
4 NAYS: None
5 NON-VOTING: Dalman
6
7 New Business.
8 a. May 24, 2023, Meeting – Quorum check.
9 The Commission Members discussed their availability. Chairperson Orsic stated she would no longer be
10 the Commission’s Chair. Mr. Schoon indicated there may not be a May meeting. Ms. Kunkle informed the
11 Commission of the recently passed resolution relating to recognizing compost awareness week and
12 distributed information to the Commission. The Commission Members thanked Chairperson Orsic for her
13 service.
14
15 Adjournment:
16 Chairperson Orsic asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made and seconded by multiple
17 Commissioners. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 7 to 0:
18 AYES: Alt, Case, Danley, Foley, Golan, Kunkle, Orsic
19 NAYS: None
20 NON-VOTING: Dalman
21 The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
22
23 Respectfully submitted,
24
25 Antionette Johnson
26 Recording Secretary
Page 5 of 32
MEMORANDUM
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO: PLAN COMMISSION
FROM: ANN KLAASSEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
DATE: JULY 7, 2023
SUBJECT: 564 LINCOLN AVENUE – COMPASS REAL ESTATE OFFICE
SPECIAL USE PERMIT (CASE NO. 23-07-SU)
INTRODUCTION
On July 13, 2023, the Plan Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing to consider an application
submitted by Compass Illinois, Inc. (the “Applicant”), as the prospective lessee of the property located at 564
Lincoln Avenue (the “Subject Property”), to allow a real estate office to occupy the Subject Property. The
property is currently owned by 562-72 Lincoln Avenue, LLC.
The Applicant has filed an application seeking approval of a Special Use Permit in accordance with Chapter 17.56
[Special Uses] of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance to permit a real estate office in the C-2 General Retail
Commercial Overlay District at the Subject Property. The Applicant would be relocating its current real estate
office at 851 Spruce Street to the Subject Property.
In compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, a sign was posted on the Subject Property and a website notice
was posted on the Village website indicating the time and date of the Plan Commission (PC) public hearing
on June 28, 2023. A mailed notice was also sent to property owners within 500 feet of the Subject
Property informing them of the public hearing on June 28. Subsequent to the notice being mailed and
posted on site and on the Village website, Village staff learned that the Commission would not have a
quorum on June 28, therefore a special meeting of the PC was scheduled for July 13, 2023, to consider
the case. A notice informing the public that the June meeting was cancelled and the PC’s consideration
of this case would be held on July 13 was posted on the Subject Property, the Village website, and on the
doors of Village Hall, where the June meeting was to be held. In addition, a mail notice was sent to
property owners within 500 feet of the Subject Property informing them of the July 13 meeting. As of the
date of this memo, staff has not received any written comments from the public regarding this application.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is one of the commercial spaces located in the mixed-use building at 564-572 Lincoln
Avenue, often referred to as The Winnetka Galleria (“The Galleria”), located on the west side of Lincoln
Avenue between Elm and Pine Streets. The approximately 4,500 square foot space at 564 Lincoln Avenue
is currently unoccupied and is a portion of the 9,300 square foot space that was most recently occupied
by Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate (“Coldwell Banker”). The commercial space located
immediately south of the space the Applicant is proposing to occupy is currently vacant and was most
recently occupied by T. J. Cullen Jewelers. On the north side of the courtyard is The Beauty Lash. Other
neighboring businesses to the south of the Subject Property include Beat Street, a gift and toy store, and
Page 1
Page 6 of 32
a new restaurant Deep Purple/Fons Empanadas. There are residential condominiums on the second and
third floors of The Galleria.
Figures 2 through 4 below and on the following page identify the Subject Property and neighboring
businesses.
The Subject Property is located within the Village’s Commercial Overlay District, which allows non-retail
uses, such as real estate offices and professional uses; however, the Zoning Ordinance requires that they
be evaluated by the Plan Commission and Village Council as a special use.
Subject Property
Figure 1 – Subject Property – 564 Lincoln Avenue
Proposed Location of
Compass Real Estate Office
Figure 2 – Subject Property – 564 Lincoln Avenue
Page 2
Page 7 of 32
Proposed Location
of Compass
Figure 3 – Neighboring Businesses to South – Vacant Space and Beat Street
Proposed Location
of Compass
Figure 4 – Neighboring Business to North – The Beauty Lash
Page 3
Page 8 of 32
COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT BACKGROUND
The Overlay District was established in 1987 out of concern about the viability of the business districts as
a whole if non-retail occupancies were allowed to proliferate and occupy significant areas within retail
shopping districts. At the time of adoption there was a concern about the possible proliferation of real
estate offices and financial institutions.
The Village Zoning Ordinance describes the purpose of the Overlay District and its restrictions on non-
retail uses as being:
“to encourage retailing of comparison shopping goods and personal services compatible with such
retailing on ground floor in order to encourage a clustering of such uses, to provide for a wide variety of
retail shops and expose such shops to maximum foot traffic, while keeping such traffic in concentrated
(yet well distinguished) channels throughout the district.”
Since its adoption in 1987, the Overlay District has been revised on more than one occasion to alter district
boundaries, or to modify the types of uses which are permitted within each district. The most recent
amendment occurred on April 4, 2019 when the Village Council adopted MC-01-2019, amending the
Zoning Ordinance regarding uses and regulations in the three commercial districts, including amendments
to the Overlay District and the standards used to evaluate a special use.
ELM STREET BUSINESS DISTRICTS OVERLAY BOUNDARIES
A map depicting the zoning classifications of the Elm Street Business Districts is included below as Figure 5. The
Subject Property is highlighted yellow.
Gray areas indicate the underlying C-2 General Retail Commercial zoning, which permits by right a relatively
broad array of uses, including various retail uses, along with a number of non-retail uses such as professional
offices, financial service firms, medical offices and the like.
Red crosshatch areas represent those areas subject to the restrictions of the Commercial Overlay District. The
boundaries of the Overlay District are established along certain public streets and extend for a depth of 50 feet
from the front property line.
Subject
Property
Figure 5 – Elm Street Business Districts
Page 4
Page 9 of 32
PREVIOUS APPROVAL
As noted earlier in this report, Coldwell Banker was the previous tenant of the Subject Property. Initially,
Coldwell Banker occupied 8,000 square feet of The Galleria building, which was located at the rear of the
building, more than 50 feet from the front street line. Given that the space was located in the C2 District,
but outside of the Overlay District, the real estate office was allowed to occupy the space by right as a
permitted use. In August 2017, Coldwell Banker submitted a special use permit application to expand into
the additional 1,339 square feet of commercial space that is located within the Overlay District. On
October 11, 2017, the Plan Commission considered the request and by a vote of 6-4 recommended
approval of the request. Members who spoke in favor of the application noted that Coldwell Banker was
an existing use and the proposed 1,339 square foot expansion would not significantly increase employee
count or parking demand. Other members expressed concern regarding the difficulty with parking on
Lincoln Avenue and that real estate offices do not promote pedestrian activity that benefits nearby
businesses.
In November 2017, the Village Council reviewed an amended proposal by Coldwell Banker to incorporate
a “pop-up” retail sales area within its expanded space along the street frontage. Ultimately, on December
5, 2017, the Village Council adopted Ordinance M-10-2017, granting a special use permit to allow Coldwell
Banker to occupy the additional 1,339 square feet, which would include a pop-up retail area. For
reference, Ordinance M-10-2017 is included in this report as Attachment B.
Subsequently, on May 21, 2019, the Village Council reviewed the use of the space at 564 Lincoln Avenue
by Coldwell Banker, in particular the use of the “Pop-Up Retail Area”. Coldwell Banker was invited to the
Village Council meeting to explain how the use of the Pop-Up Retail Area complied with Ordnance M-10-
2017. Council members found that the Pop-Up Retail Area was not being operated in compliance with
the Ordinance and in the spirit of what was discussed when the Council approved the special use. The
Council discussed that it was key for Coldwell Banker to communicate with the Village. It was suggested
that Coldwell Banker work with one or two Trustees to brainstorm ideas on how to fill the space. Coldwell
Banker did follow-up with a meeting to explore ideas for the Pop-Up Retail Area with a former Village
Trustee and the Village’s Economic Development Coordinator. Eventually, the space was utilized by
various retailers over the last few years, at least one of which has permanently located elsewhere in the
Village.
DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT REQUEST
The Applicant is proposing to relocate from its current location at 851 Spruce Street into the Subject
Property. As explained by the Applicant in the attached application materials provided in Attachment A,
Compass previously occupied approximately 1,500 square feet of commercial space at 565 Lincoln
Avenue, in addition to its 3,000 square foot space at 851 Spruce Street. It has since combined the offices
at the Spruce Street location. The Applicant is now proposing to occupy the Subject Property, an
approximately 4,500 square foot space with approximately 23 feet of street frontage.
The proposed real estate office would be staffed with a receptionist and an office sales manager, Monday
through Friday, 9:00am to 5:00pm. In terms of the number of agents, Compass currently has 50 agents
who associate the Winnetka location as their “home office”. The Applicant anticipates 5-10 people
working in the office throughout day, with most agents coming to the office one or two times a week for
1-2 hours a day. The office tends to be busiest on Monday mornings between 9-10:00am as they have bi-
weekly sales meetings on Monday mornings.
According to the Applicant, clients rarely visit the office. On a typical day, there may be 1-2 clients in the
office, but rarely at the same time.
Page 5
Page 10 of 32
In regard to parking, the Applicant has provided information in terms of its operations and what they see
is their demand for parking. The Applicant has indicated that its lease agreement with the property owner
includes 8 parking spaces in the lower-level parking on the Subject Property. With 5-10 people working
in the office on a typical day and 8 parking spaces available in the parking garage on-site, the Applicant
has indicated that its typical employee/agent demand for parking would generally be met by these spaces.
When the Applicant’s employee/agent parking demand exceeds its 8 on-site spaces, it will use the public
parking lot north of the Subject Property on Lincoln Avenue. (Staff note: That lots does contain “A” permit
parking spaces for employees.) As noted previously, the Applicant intends to have a bi-weekly sales
meeting on Monday mornings at 9:00am, although the number of agents expected to attend the meeting
is not provided. The 1-2 clients that visit the office on a typical day are generally in the office for no more
than 1 hour and will be directed to utilize public parking.
The Applicant has indicated that it will seek pop-up retailers, similar to what Coldwell Banker did when it
occupied the Subject Property. When not being utilized by a pop-up retailer, the Applicant intends to
operate a “Compass Boutique” to sell Compass branded clothing and accessories
(https://boutique.compass.com).
The Applicant has provided a floor plan representing the layout of the space. The area highlighted yellow
below in Figure 6 would be the location of the pop-up area. The red line represents the general location
of the boundary of the Overlay District for the Subject Property, 50 feet back from the front property line.
Red Line Represents
General Location of
Boundary of Overlay District
Figure 6 – Excerpt of Proposed Floor Plan
Page 6
Page 11 of 32
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REVIEW
Any future changes to the exterior of the commercial space or the addition of signs or awnings to the front
of the space will require approval of a certificate of appropriateness by the Design Review Board.
STANDARDS FOR REVIEW / FINDINGS
The “Purpose” section of Chapter 17.56, Special Uses, states the following regarding special uses:
It is recognized that there are special types of uses which because of their specific characteristics
in relationship to uses permitted by right in a particular district, or the services which they provide,
cannot be properly permitted by right in a particular district without consideration, in each case,
of the impact of such uses upon neighboring land, or of the public need for such uses at a particular
location.
A land use classified as a special use is an allowed land use as long as the Applicant can demonstrate that
the proposed use in its proposed specific location meets the applicable standards for granting special use
approval.
Section 17.44 of the Zoning Ordinance provides a series of twelve (12) standards for the evaluation of
Special Use applications within the Commercial Overlay District, which provides a framework for
evaluation by the Plan Commission. The Applicant has supplied as part of their application materials a
narrative addressing how this proposal complies with the twelve (12) standards.
Following conclusion of public comment and Commission discussion, a Commission member may
choose to make the following motion:
I make the motion that:
The Plan Commission recommends approval [denial] of the requested special use to allow the
Applicant, Compass Illinois, Inc., to operate a real estate office at 564 Lincoln Avenue within the
C-2 Commercial Overlay District, based on the following findings of fact:
“The real estate office (the “Special Use”) is [is not] consistent with the Standards for granting of
Special Use Permits in the Commercial Overlay District, which are as follows:
1. The establishment, maintenance, and operation of the Special Use will not be detrimental to or
endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or general welfare;
2. The Special Use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property
in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right in the district or districts of concern, nor
substantially diminish or impair property values in the immediate vicinity;
3. The establishment of Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development or
improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity for uses permitted by right in the district
or districts of concern;
4. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress in a manner which
minimize pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in the public ways;
5. Adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities necessary to the
operation of the Special Use exists or are to be provided;
6. The Special Use in all other respects conforms to the applicable regulations of this and other
village ordinances and codes;
Page 7
Page 12 of 32
7. The proposed special use at the proposed location will encourage, facilitate and enhance the
continuity, concentration, and pedestrian nature of the area in a manner similar to that of retail
uses;
8. The location of the proposed special use along a block frontage shall provide for a minimum
interruption in the existing and potential continuity and concentration of the retail uses along the
block’s frontage;
9. The proposed special use at the proposed location will provide for display windows, facades,
signage and lighting similar in nature and compatible with that provided by retail uses;
10. If the proposed special use provides multi-use areas, such as retail merchandise areas, restaurant
dining areas, general office space, private offices, reception areas, or employee work areas, any
proposed retail merchandise area or restaurant dining area shall be concentrated and located
immediately adjacent to the sidewalk and clearly visible from the street in such a fashion as to invite
customers to browse or dine;
11. If a proposed new building contemplates a mix of retail, office and service type uses, the minimum
frontage for each retail use adjacent to the sidewalk shall be 20 feet with a minimum gross floor
area of 400 square feet. In addition, such retail space shall be devoted to active retail
merchandising which maintain typical and customary hours of operation; and
12. The proposed location and operation of the proposed special use shall not significantly
diminish the availability of parking for district clientele wishing to patronize existing retail
businesses.”
The Commission’s recommendation is subject to no conditions [the following conditions]:
1. [Insert conditions…]
As noted above, the Commission may also wish to consider if there are any additional conditions it may
want to place on the facility’s operation.
This request is subject to final approval by the Village Council.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Application Materials
Attachment B: Ordinance M-10-2017, adopted on December 5, 2017
Page 8
Page 13 of 32
ATTACHMENT A
Page 14 of 32
May 24, 2023
Ann Klaassen & David Schoon
510 Green Bay Rd
Winnetka, IL 60093
RE: 564 Lincoln Avenue, Winnetka, IL 60093, – Special Use Permit Application
Summary
Compass is a real estate brokerage that has historically operated out of two buildings in Winnetka - 851
Spruce Street (3,006 sq ft) and 565 Lincoln (1,513 sq ft). In 2022, due to market conditions and the
desire to relocate into a single, consolidated office, Compass temporarily combined these two offices at
the Spruce Street location. Now, Compass has leased ~4,500 sq ft of office at 564-568 Lincoln to
permanently combine these two offices (subject to contingencies related to a special use permit).
Operating Information
● What are the typical hours of operation each day of the week?
Monday through Friday 9:00-5:00 is when the office is typically staffed with a receptionist and an
office Sales Manager. These are the only full-time W-2 employees assigned to the office. Agents,
who are 1099 contractors, come in and out of the office on an ad-hoc basis as the majority of their
working hours are spent out with clients, networking, etc. For most agents, they come to the office 1-
2x/week for 1-2 hours a day. On average, we anticipate 5-10 people working at the office throughout
the day.
● Where will agents park on a typical day? Compass’s lease agreement provides for 8 underground
parking spaces. The majority of the time, this will satisfy the agent count in the office. If there are
more than 8 agents on-site, we will use the public lot adjacent to the office. Clients will be directed to
park in available public parking. Clients typically are at the office for no more than 1-hour at a time.
● Which day is the busiest day of the week? And what is the busiest 2-hour period on that day?
Mondays between 9-10am. is likely to be the busiest time as there will be a Sales Meeting at the
office on a bi-weekly basis. 'Sales Meetings' are times when agents get together to share what is going
on in the market. Compass will work with the Village and neighboring tenants on the best time to
schedule Sales Meetings at this new location.
● How many agents will be “stationed” at this location?
Currently, Compass has ~50 agents that associate with Winnetka as their home office.
● How many clients would actually be in the office at any time?
Clients rarely frequent the office now that closings can take place virtually. But, on a typical day,
there may be 1-2 clients in the office, and rarely at the same time. More than 90% of clients never
come to the office as agents meet with them at their homes, on tours, or virtually.
● How will Compass use the Retail Space?
Compass will seek ‘pop up’ retailers in the same manner as Coldwell Banker, specifically targeting
local/community organizations that would benefit from a storefront. When ‘pop ups’ are not
operating, Compass will set up a ‘Compass Boutique’ in the retail area replicating a point of sale
operation with Compass branded clothing and accessories.
Page 15 of 32
Comparison to previous Real Estate Operation
Coldwell Banker Operation: After approval of their SUP in 2017, Coldwell Banker occupied ~9,339
square feet of space at the Galleria (note, square footage is gathered from original SUP application Case
No. 17-22-SU). Their operation had over 100 agents associated with the office.
Compass Operation: Compass is proposing to occupy ~4,500 square feet in total, inclusive of the 1,339
square feet of retail space and 3,161 square feet of office space. Currently, Compass has ~50 agents that
associate with Winnetka as their home office. Therefore, both in square footage and agent count, the
Compass operation is less than half of the previous Coldwell Banker tenancy.
Floor Plans of the Coldwell Banker/ proposed Compass tenancies are below. Given that Compass’s
proposed total tenancy is materially smaller than Coldwell Banker’s we are working under the assumption
a traffic study is not required. Additionally, the proposed use of the retail space requiring the SUP is the
exact same as the previous use, which was a conference room area and ‘pop up’ retail for community
business. Therefore, the retail space should not generate any incremental parking demand to the previous
use and likely less than other retail on Lincoln such as restaurants or larger point of sale retail. Signage
will be the same as the previous use as shown below.
Coldwell Banker
● ~9,339 Sq ft
● Desk Count: ~64
2
Page 16 of 32
Compass
● ~4,500 Sq ft
● Desk Count: ~36
Portion of former Coldwell Space Occupied by Compass Shown in Grey
3
Page 17 of 32
Proposed Signage
4
Page 18 of 32
Image of Compass Boutique
5
Page 19 of 32
V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, I L L I N O I S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SPECIAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS
Explain in detail how the proposed special use meets the following standards.
Under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance, no Special Use Permit shall be granted
unless it is found:
1. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the special use will not
be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, morals, or
general welfare;
A Compass office will not be detrimental or endanger the public health, safety, comfort,
morals or general welfare of the Lincoln retail corridor as it is consistent with the
previous use of Coldwell Banker on site as well as the previous Compass office at 565
Lincoln that closed in December 2022.
2. That the special use will not be substantially injurious to the use and
enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity which are permitted by right
in the district or districts of concern, nor substantially diminish or impair property
values in the immediate vicinity;
A Compass office will not be detrimental to the use and enjoyment of neighboring
properties as it is less intensive than the previous Coldwell Banker use on site and is
consistent with the previous Compass office located across the street at 565 Lincoln. To
the best of applicants’ knowledge, there were no ongoing complaints from
retailers/residents regarding either Compass or Coldwell Bankers’ previous uses on
Lincoln. Thus, providing for a less intensive but consistent use will not impact property
values in the immediate vicinity.
3. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and
orderly development or improvement of other property in the immediate vicinity
for uses permitted by right in the district or districts of concern;
A Compass office will not impede normal and orderly development as it is consistent
with the previous use, there is no change to the footprint of the premises or the building,
and the use is less intensive than the previous operation.
6
Page 20 of 32
4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and
egress in a manner which minimize pedestrian and vehicular traffic congestion in
the public ways;
Compass will take care to minimize the impact on ingress/egress and the surrounding
parking areas by using both on-site and public lot areas. For the majority of the time, on-
site private parking will satisfy Compass’s parking requirements. Additionally, compared
to the previous use of Coldwell Banker, the parking requirement will be less impactful as
Compass is operating out of less than half of the square footage and agent count. Thus,
the proposed use will have less impact on the surrounding areas then the existing use.
5. That adequate parking, utilities, access roads, drainage, and other facilities
necessary to the operation of the special use exists or are to be provided.
Compass’s lease agreement provides for 8 underground parking spaces. The majority
of the time, this will satisfy the agent count in the office. If there are more than 8 agents
on-site, we will use the public lot adjacent to the office. Clients will be directed to park in
available public parking. Clients typically are at the office for no more than 1-hour at a
time. No incremental utility or other special accommodation is required for the use as it
is consistent with the previous Coldwell Banker operation on site.
6. That the special use in all other respects conforms to the applicable
regulations of this and other village ordinances and codes.
Compass recognizes that the Village recently adopted the Winnetka Futures 2040
Master Plan and we believe that the proposed use incorporates many of the goals set
forth in Pillar 2 – Vibrant Business Districts. Clearly, the Goals stated in Pillar 2, 2.2,
2.3, and 2.4 are met with this proposal. Compass operates a successful service
oriented business in Winnetka, and granting the special use will provide the resident
services that are both desired and needed. Granting the special use will achieve the
goal of retaining a successful existing business while helping attract new residents and
businesses to the Village.
In sum, the proposal includes a high quality designs and signage. The real estate
brokerage business serves at the gateway to the Village and allowing such businesses
to thrive in the Village’s commercial district promotes vibrancy and provides economic
benefit to the local businesses. Thus, this application conforms with the applicable
regulation of this and other village ordinances and codes.
7
Page 21 of 32
ADDITIONAL STANDARDS PER SECTION 17.44
1. The proposed special use at the proposed location will encourage,
facilitate and enhance the continuity, concentration, and pedestrian nature
of the area in a manner similar to that of retail uses
Based upon the existing use as a brokerage office, the proposed use creates
continuity. The activity generated by the special use will encourage and enhance
the pedestrian nature of the district and will complement the neighboring retail
uses. The site will operate very similarly to the previously approved special use
and similar to their former offices located in 565 Lincoln. Thus, will facility and
enhance the continuity of the area.
2. The location of the proposed special use along a block frontage shall
provide for a minimum interruption in the existing and potential continuity
and concentration of the retail uses along the block's frontage.
Again, based upon the existing use as a brokerage office but with a smaller
footprint, there will not be interruption in the existing and the potential
concentration of retail uses along the block’s frontage. The proposed use will
work seamlessly with the existing conditions and will enhance the overall nature
of the block.
3. The proposed special use at the proposed location will provide for active
display windows, facades, signage and lighting similar in nature and
compatible with that provided by retail uses.
As set forth in the above narrative, Compass will seek ‘pop up’ retailers in the
same manner as Coldwell Banker, specifically targeting local/community
organizations that would benefit from a storefront. When ‘pop ups’ are not
operating, Compass will set up a ‘Compass Boutique’ in the retail area replicating
a point of sale operation with Compass branded clothing and accessories.
4. If the proposed special use provides multi-use areas, such as retail
merchandise areas, restaurant dining areas, general office space, private
offices, reception areas, or employee work areas, any proposed retail
merchandise area or restaurant dining area shall be concentrated and
located immediately adjacent to the sidewalk and clearly visible from street
in such a fashion as to invite customers to browse or dine.
See 3 above. Compass has committed to locate their “pop up” or merchandise
uses in the storefront. Thus, the retail element will be immediately adjacent to
8
Page 22 of 32
the sidewalk and will clearly be visible to pedestrian traffic, thereby creating a
retail environment similar to other stores on the block.
5. If a proposed new building contemplates a mix of retail, office and service
type uses, the minimum frontage for each retail use adjacent to the
sidewalk shall be twenty (20) feet with a minimum gross floor area of four
hundred (400) square feet. In addition, such retail space shall be devoted to
active retail merchandising which maintains typical and customary hours
of operation.
The proposal does not include a new building.
6. The proposed location and operation of the proposed special use shall not
significantly diminish the availability of parking for district clientele
wishing to patronize existing retail businesses
Per the discussion above, Compass’s lease agreement provides for 8
underground parking spaces. The majority of the time, this will satisfy the agent
count in the office. If there are more than 8 agents on-site, we will use the public
lot adjacent to the office. Clients will be directed to park in available public
parking. Clients typically are at the office for no more than 1-hour at a time.
Thus, the proposed use will not significantly diminish the availability of parking in
the district.
9
Page 23 of 32
Page 24 of 32
1/16"=1'-0"
0 8' 16' 32' NORTH
9,339 SF ENTIRETY
PAGE
NJY22-6025-00
COMPASS
568 LINCOLN AVE.,
05/16/23 SP8
WINNETKA, IL 60093
Page 25 of 32
PANTRY/COPY
108
FILES
107
HUDDLE ROOM
112 RESTROOM
EXIST. JAN. EXIST. IT CONFERENCE
105
104 103 102
RETAIL
R
101
MAIL AREA
120
FILES
122
SALES
MANAGER RECEPTION
116 119
FILES OPEN OFFICE HUDDLE ROOM STORAGE CONFERENCE WELLNESS STORAGE
118 1/16"=1'-0"
124 111 113 114 115 117
0 8' 16' 32' NORTH
4,500 SF COMPASS
PAGE
NJY22-6025-00
COMPASS
568 LINCOLN AVE.,
05/16/23 SP9
WINNETKA, IL 60093
Page 26 of 32
EXIST. IT CONFERENCE
103 102
RETAIL
101
SALES
MANAGER RECEPTION
116 119
WELLNESS STORAGE
1/16"=1'-0"
117 118
0 8' 16' 32' NORTH
1,339 SF RETAIL
PAGE
NJY22-6025-00
COMPASS
568 LINCOLN AVE.,
05/16/23 SP10
WINNETKA, IL 60093
Page 27 of 32
ORDINANCE NO. M-10-2017
ATTACHMENT B
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE EXPANSION AND OPERATION OF A REAL
ESTATE OFFICE WITHIN THE C-2 RETAIL OVERLAY DISTRICT OF THE VILLAGE
(564 Lincoln Avenue)
WHEREAS, Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate, LLC, d/b/a Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage ( "Applicant" ), is the
lessee of: (i) the property commonly known as 566 – 568 Lincoln Avenue, at which it currently operates a real estate office ( “Existing
Property” ); and (ii) the property commonly known as 564 Lincoln Ave, Winnetka, Illinois, and legally described in Exhibit A (
“Subject Property” ) attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant desires to expand the existing real estate office located in Existing Property into the Subject Property (
“Expanded Office Area” ); and
WHEREAS, 562-72 Lincoln Avenue, LLC ( “Owner” ), is the record title owner of the Existing Property and the Subject Property,
and Owner consents to the expansion by the Applicant of the real estate office currently operated at the Existing Property into the
Subject Property and the operation by the Applicant of a real estate office at the Subject Property along with other retail operations as set
forth in this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located within the C-2 General Retail Commercial District and the C-2 Commercial Overlay
District of the Village (collectively, "C-2 Retail Overlay District" ); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 17.44.020 and the table of uses set forth in Section 17.46.010 of the Winnetka Zoning Ordinance (
"Zoning Ordinance" ), the operation of a real estate office, is not permitted within the C-2 Retail Overlay District without a special use
permit; and
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2017, the Applicant filed an application for a special use permit pursuant to Section 17.44.020.B and
Chapter 17.56 of the of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the operation of a real estate office at the Subject Property ( "Special Use
Permit" ); and
WHEREAS, the Owner of the Subject Property has consented to the application for the Special Use Permit filed by the Applicant; and
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2017, after due notice thereof, the Plan Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Special
Use Permit and, by a vote of six in favor and four opposed, recommended that the Village Council approve the Special Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant appeared before the Village Council on November 21, 2017, and amended its Special Use Permit request
to incorporate and provide for a portion of the Expanded Office Area to be used as a retail “pop-up” shop in the space at the front of the
building on the Subject Property ( “Pop-Up Retail Area” ); and
WHEREAS, the Village Council has determined that approval of the proposed Special Use Permit for the operation of a real estate at
the Subject Property, including the Pop-Up Retail Area, satisfies the standards for the approval of special use permits within the C-2
Retail Overlay District set forth in Chapter 17.56 and Section 17.44.020.B of the Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the
Village and its residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the Village of Winnetka does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this Section 1 as the findings of the Council of the
Village of Winnetka, as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2: SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Subject to, and contingent upon, the terms and conditions set forth in Section 3 of this
Ordinance, the Special Use Permit is hereby granted, pursuant to Chapter 17.56 and Section 17.44.020.B of the Zoning Ordinance and
the home rule powers of the Village, to allow the expansion and operation of a real estate office by the Applicant at the Subject Property
within the C-2 Retail Overlay District.
SECTION 3: CONDITIONS. The Special Use Permit granted by Section 2 of this Ordinance is subject to, and contingent upon,
compliance by the Applicant with the following conditions:
A. Commencement of Operation. The Applicant must commence operation of the proposed additional real estate office uses in the
Expanded Office Area no later than 12 months after the effective date of this Ordinance.
B. Pop-Up Retail Area.
Beginning on March 1, 2018, the Applicant shall provide a Pop-Up Retail Area, which shall be made available to third-parties retail
users (“Vendors”) to display goods for sale to the general public.
The Pop-Up Retail Area shall at a minimum consist of the northeast corner of the Subject Property and include display windows along
Lincoln Avenue as well as along the courtyard of the Galleria Building, identified as “Proposed Permanent Pop Up Space” on the floor
plan submitted by the Applicant, consisting of one sheet, a copy of which is attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this
Ordinance as Exhibit B ( “Floor Plan” ). The Pop-Up Retail Area shall be allowed, but is not obligated, to extend into the remainder of
the Subject Property identified as “Proposed Flex Space” on Floor Plan.
The Pop-Up Retail Area shall be used only for the display of retail goods which a customer can view and directly purchase while in the
Pop-Up Retail Area or view and order for delivery to their home or business. The Pop-Up Retail Area shall be occupied with goods
available for purchase at all times, except for periods of one week or less for the sole purpose of allowing one Vendor to remove its
display and another Vendor to set up its display. For those periods during which a Vendor is not occupying the Pop-Up Retail Area, the
Applicant shall maintain a display of smart home technology products or other luxury home related products available for purchase by
the general public.
Page 28 of 32
The Pop-Up Retail Area shall be open to the public, at a minimum, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, except for
holidays, and be staffed during business hours by the Vendor, or in the absence of the Vendor’s representative, by Applicant’s reception
staff.
The Applicant shall actively and continuously market the Pop-Up Retail Area to Vendors, and the Applicant must work with commercial
brokers, the Winnetka-Northfield and other Chambers of Commerce, and the Village to identify potential Vendors to use the Pop-Up
Retail Area.
The Applicant shall prepare a plan for review and approval by the Design Review Board. The plan must provide for window signage on
the Subject Property to identify Vendors. All signage must comply with the Village Sign Code. The Applicant will not install or allow to
be installed window signage on the Subject Property except in conformance with the plans approved by the Design Review Board.
Prior to the Applicant or first Vendor occupying the Pop-Up Retail Area, the Applicant must schedule an appointment with the Village’s
Fire Department and Community Development Department to review how the Pop-Up Retail Area will be used by Vendors and the
public to ensure that the use of the Pop-Up Retail Area complies with fire code, building egress, and other life safety requirements.
C. Compliance with Regulations. The development, use, and maintenance of the Subject Property, including the Pop-Up Retail Area,
must comply at all times with all applicable Village codes and ordinances, as they have been or may be amended over time.
D. Reimbursement of Village Costs. In addition to any other costs, payments, fees, charges, contributions, or dedications required under
applicable Village codes, ordinances, resolutions, rules, or regulations, the Applicant must pay to the Village, promptly upon presentation
of a written demand or demands therefor, of all fees, costs, and expenses incurred or accrued in connection with the review, negotiation,
preparation, consideration, and review of this Ordinance. Payment of all such fees, costs, and expenses for which demand has been made
shall be made by a certified or cashier's check. Further, the Applicant must pay upon demand all costs incurred by the Village for
publications and recordings required in connection with the aforesaid matters.
E. Compliance with Plans. The development, use, and maintenance of the real estate office at the Subject Property and the Pop-Up
Retail Area must be in strict accordance with the Floor Plan submitted by the Applicant, consisting of one sheet, a copy of which is
attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance as Exhibit B, except for minor changes and site work approved by the
Director of Community Development (within his permitting authority) in accordance with all applicable Village codes, ordinances, and
standards.
SECTION 4: RECORDATION; BINDING EFFECT. A copy of this Ordinance will be recorded with the Cook County Recorder
of Deeds. This Ordinance and the privileges, obligations, and provisions contained herein inure solely to the benefit of, and are binding
upon, the Applicant, the Owner, and each of their heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns.
SECTION 5: FAILURE TO COMPLY. Upon the failure or refusal of the Applicant or the Owner to comply with any or all of the
conditions, restrictions, or provisions of this Ordinance, in addition to all other remedies available to the Village, the Special Use Permit
granted in Section 2 of this Ordinance will, at the sole discretion of the Village Council, by ordinance duly adopted, be revoked and
become null and void; provided, however, that the Village Council may not so revoke the Special Use Permit granted in Section 2 of this
Ordinance unless it first provides the Applicant with two months advance written notice of the reasons for revocation and an opportunity
to be heard at a regular meeting of the Village Council. In the event of revocation, the development and use of the Subject Property will
be governed solely by the regulations of the applicable zoning district and the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, as the
same may be amended from time to time. Further, in the event of such revocation, the Village Manager and Village Attorney are hereby
authorized and directed to bring such zoning enforcement action as may be appropriate under the circumstances.
SECTION 6: AMENDMENT OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT. Any amendments to the Special Use Permit granted in Section 2 of
this Ordinance or the conditions set forth in Section 3 of this Ordinance that may be requested by the Applicant after the effective date of
this Ordinance may be granted only pursuant to the procedures, and subject to the standards and limitations, provided in the Zoning
Ordinance.
SECTION 7: EFFECTIVE DATE.
A. This Ordinance will be effective only upon the occurrence of all of the following events:
1. Passage by the Village Council in the manner required by law;
2. Publication in pamphlet form in the manner required by law; and
3. The filing by the Applicant and the Owner with the Village Clerk of an Unconditional Agreement and Consent in the form of
Exhibit C attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Ordinance, to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions,
and limitations set forth in this Ordinance and to indemnify the Village for any claims that may arise in connection with the approval of
this Ordinance.
B. In the event that the Applicant does not file with the Village Clerk a fully executed copy of the unconditional agreement and
consent described in Section 7.A.3 of this Ordinance within 60 days after the date of passage of this Ordinance by the Village Council,
the Village Council shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to declare this Ordinance null and void and of no force or effect.
PASSED this 5 th day of December, 2017, pursuant to the following roll call vote:
AYES: Trustees Cripe, Dearborn, Lanphier, Myers, Swierk and Ziv
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Page 29 of 32
Signed
s/Chris Rintz
Village President
Countersigned:
s/Robert M. Bahan
Village Clerk
Published by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Winnetka, Illinois, this 5th day of December, 2017.
Introduced: November 21, 2017
Passed and Approved: December 5, 2017
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
PARCEL 1:
UNITS C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4 AND C-8 IN THE WINNETKA GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM, AS DELINEATED ON A SURVEY OF
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL ESTATE:
LOT 1 IN CUMMINS WINNETKA GALLERIA CONSOLIDATION PLAT, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 6 IN LEWIS D.
WEBSTER’S RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 11 (EXCEPT THE NORTH 75.00 FEET THEREOF); ALSO PART OF LOT 11 AND 12
IN BLOCK 12 IN PARK ADDITION TO WINNETKA SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM H. CAIRNDUFF; ALSO PART OF LOT 15 IN
BLOCK 13 IN WINNETKA PARK BLUFFS, ALL IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, FORMERLY KNOWN AS. LOT 15 (EXCEPT THAT PART LYING WEST OF A LINE 50.00 FEET
NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH EASTERLY LINE OF CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD
COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY) IN BLOCK 13 IN WINNETKA PARK BLUFFS, BEING A SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM
CAIRNDUFF OF PARTS OF SECTIONS 16, 17, AND 20. TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN; AND LOT 11 (EXCEPT WESTERLY 50.00 FEET THEREOF) IN BLOCK 12 IN PARK ADDITION TO WINNETKA
SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM H. CAIRNDUFF OF PART OF SECTIONS 16, 17, AND 20. TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13,
EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; AND THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF LOT 6 IN LEWIS D. WEBSTER’S
RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 11 (EXCEPT THE NORTH 75.00 FEET THEREOF) AND OF LOTS 6, 8, 9 AND 10 IN BLOCK 12
IN PARK ADDITION TO WINNETKA AFORESAID, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND THAT PART OF
LOTS 11 AND 12 IN BLOCK 12 IN PARK ADDITION TO WINNETKA SUBDIVISION BY WILLIAM H. CAIRNDUFF; ALSO
PART OF LOT 15 IN BLOCK 13 IN WINNETKA PARK BLUFFS, BEING A STRIP OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND LYING SOUTHWESTERLY FROM A LINE 50.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF
AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-
OF-WAY AND LYING SOUTH OF THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF LOT 6
IN LEWIS D. WEBSTER’S SUBDIVISION AND NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 15 IN BLOCK 13 IN WINNETKA
PARK BLUFFS, ALL IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,
WHICH SURVEY IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT “A” TO THE DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM RECORDED SEPTEMBER
14, 2000 AS DOCUMENT 00717633, AS AMENDED BY FIRST AMENDMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 17, 2001 AS
DOCUMENT 0010964912 TOGETHER WITH ITS UNDIVIDED PERCENTAGE INTEREST IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS, ALL
IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
PARCEL 2:
THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO THE USE OF PARKING SPACES 3, 4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 AND 33, LIMITED
COMMON ELEMENTS AS DELINEATED ON THE SURVEY ATTACHED TO DECLARATION AFORESAID RECORDED AS
DOCUMENT 00717633.
PARCEL 3:
AN EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCELS 1 AND 2,
AS SET FORTH IN AN ACCESS AGREEMENT MADE BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF WINNETKA AND CUMMINS
WINNETKA GALLERIA, LLC., RECORDED OCTOBER 06, 2000 AS DOCUMENT 00784960.
Commonly known as: 562-572 Lincoln Ave., Winnetka, Illinois 60093
Pin: 05-20-203-043-1009; 05-20-203-043-1010; 05-20-203-043-1011; 05-20-203-043-1012;
05-20-203-043-1016
EXHIBIT B
FLOOR PLAN
(SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)
Expansion of Existing Real Estate Office
Page 30 of 32
EXHIBIT C
UNCONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND CONSENT
TO: The Village of Winnetka, Illinois ( "Village" ):
WHEREAS, Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate, LLC, d/b/a Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage ( "Applicant" ), desires to
operate a real estate office located at 564 Lincoln Avenue in the Village ( “Subject Property” ); and
WHEREAS, 562-72 Lincoln Avenue, LLC ( “Owner” ), is the record title owner of the Subject Property and consents to the operation
of a real estate office by Applicant at the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. M-10-2017, adopted by the Village Council on _________, 2017 ( "Ordinance" ), grants a special use
permit to the Applicant for the operation of a real estate office at the Subject Property within the C-2 General Retail Commercial District
and the C-2 Commercial Overlay District of the Village, subject to various terms and conditions; and
WHEREAS, Section 7 of the Ordinance provides, among other things, that the Ordinance will be of no force or effect unless and until
the Applicant and the Owner have filed, within 60 days following the passage of the Ordinance, their unconditional agreement and
consent to accept and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions, and limitations set forth in the Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Applicant and the Owner do hereby agree and covenant as follows:
The Applicant and the Owner do hereby unconditionally agree to accept, consent to, and abide by each and all of the terms, conditions,
limitations, restrictions, and provisions of the Ordinance.
The Applicant and the Owner acknowledge that public notices and hearings have been properly given and held with respect to the
adoption of the Ordinance, have considered the possibility of the revocation provided for in the Ordinance, and agree not to challenge
any such revocation on the grounds of any procedural infirmity or a denial of any procedural right.
The Applicant and the Owner acknowledge and agree that the Village is not and will not be, in any way, liable for any damages or
injuries that may be sustained as a result of the Village's grant of a special use permit for the Subject Property or its adoption of the
Ordinance, and that the Village's approvals do not, and will not, in any way, be deemed to insure the Applicant or the Owner against
damage or injury of any kind and at any time.
Page 31 of 32
The Applicant and the Owner do hereby agree to hold harmless and indemnify the Village, the Village's corporate authorities, and all
Village elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and attorneys, from any and all claims that may, at
any time, be asserted against any of such parties in connection with the Village's adoption of the Ordinance granting the special use
permit for the Subject Property.
The Applicant and the Owner hereby agree to pay all expenses incurred by the Village in defending itself with regard to any and all of
the claims mentioned in this Unconditional Agreement and Consent. These expenses will include all out-of-pocket expenses, such as
attorneys' and experts' fees, and will also include the reasonable value of any services rendered by any employees of the Village.
Dated: , 2017
COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL
ATTEST: ESTATE, LLC, D/B/A COLDWELL BANKER
RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE
By: By:
Its: Its:
562-72 LINCOLN AVENUE, LLC, an Illinois limited
ATTEST:
liability company
By: By:
Its: Its:
Page 32 of 32