Historic Preservation Commission

Regular Meeting

Winnetka, IL · May 4, 2026

Minutes

Adopted on June 1, 2026 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 MAY 4, 2026 MEETING MINUTES 3 4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman 5 Chris Enck 6 Beth Ann Papoutsis 7 Joseph Stuart 8 Patti Van Cleave 9 Paul Weaver 10 Anna Wisniewski 11 12 Members Absent: None 13 14 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers 15 16 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaransky 17 18 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner 19 20 Call to Order & Roll Call: 21 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members 22 present. 23 24 Public Comment: 25 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx corrected an error in the agenda packet re: 913 Cherry Street 26 and provided a copy of the correct information to the Commission. A gentleman in the audience also provided a 27 letter to the Commission relating to 913 Cherry Street. 28 29 Approval of Minutes: 30 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the April 6, 2026 31 meeting minutes. Ms. Papoutsis clarified her comment on page 2, line 36. A motion to approve the April 6, 2026 32 minutes, as amended, was made by Ms. Van Cleave and the motion was seconded. A vote was taken and the 33 motion unanimously passed, 7 to 0: 34 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski 35 NAYS: None 36 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 37 38 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks: 39 a. Case No. 25-11-HPC - 419 Sheridan Road: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 419 Sheridan 40 Road, a locally designated landmark. This item was continued from the March 2, 2026 Historic Preservation 41 Commission meeting. The Applicant is requesting this item be continued to the June 1, 2026 Historic 42 Preservation Commission meeting. 43 Mr. Marx informed the Commission the applicant asked for another continuation. 44 45 Demolition Permit Applications: 46 a. Case No. 26-07-HPC - 1010 Hubbard Place: Review of the demolition permit application submitted for 47 the single-family residency at 1010 Hubbard Place. 48 Mr. Marx identified the property owners, its location, size and zoning classification with a construction date of 49 1924 with subsequent alterations which he described. He stated the property does not appear on the Illinois 50 Historic Structures Listing. Mr. Marx stated the Historical Society indicated that the property has architectural 51 significance and noted no public comments were received. He then asked if there were any questions. No 52 questions were raised at this time. 53 May 4, 2026 Page 2 1 Jack Kruszewski of Foxwood Development Group and Ali Akbar, the property owner, introduced themselves to the 2 Commission. Mr. Kruszewski stated while the home is in good shape, it has had significant modifications over the 3 years and was designed by S.S. Beman. He stated they performed due diligence prior to the home’s purchase and 4 described the home’s interior which he stated is not architecturally significant. Mr. Kruszewski stated the home’s 5 exterior changed significantly with the home’s footprint doubling in size. 6 7 Chairman Coladarci asked if the home is unusable as is. Ms. Akbar stated there is significant water damage in the 8 basement with the tenant having to leave the home due to the number of problems. She stated modifying the 9 home would have presented a massive investment. Ms. Akbar stated she loved the Village and historic homes and 10 described the home as unrecognizable as an historic home. She stated the new home would fit in with the 11 neighborhood character and provided a rendering to the Commission and thanked the Commission for their role in 12 saving historic homes. Mr. Kruszewski referred to a statement from the architect with regard to the home. 13 14 Mr. Weaver stated he knew the prior owners and described the home as being in incredible shape although he was 15 not aware of water damage. He asked the applicant to find another home already in distress to tear down. Mr. 16 Myers questioned at what point does a home designed by a significant architect need to be saved when it had 17 undergone significant renovations. Ms. Wisniewski informed the Commission the home was featured on the 18 Historical Society walking tour in the fall and stated the home has Village significance. Mr. Stuart referred to 19 neighboring homes and the challenge to restore the home to its original state. He agreed with the suggestion to 20 find another home to tear down and stated the Village’s charm is vanishing. 21 22 Mr. Kruszewski stated while he agreed with the sentiment, the home’s layout is inefficient. Mr. Marx referred to 23 the additional materials provided by the applicant. Chairman Coladarci informed the applicant that old homes are 24 expected to have inefficiencies and referred to the number of similar applications presented to the Commission. 25 He asked the applicant to consider alternatives to demolition. Ms. Akbar explained the challenges the home 26 presented in detail as well as their plans to maintain the landscape. Mr. Enck asked Ms. Akbar if she considered 27 interior renovation as opposed to demolition. Ms. Akbar and Mr. Kruszewski explained how it would be 28 prohibitively expensive. Mr. Kruszewski then provided information with regard to his being required to have an 29 HAIS done on a home that was done by S.S. Beman’s son and stated they perform a significant amount of due 30 diligence to ensure they are not tearing down a significant home. 31 32 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any other questions. No questions were raised at this time. He then called 33 the matter in for discussion. Mr. Myers suggested the Commission consider their goal of protecting historic homes 34 as opposed to charming homes. Chairman Coladarci confirmed the Commission realized their goal is to protect 35 architecturally and historically significant homes. Mr. Marx informed the Commission as part of the Foxwood’s 36 representation of the property owner he mentioned, a short bio was commissioned of S.S. Beman’s son and other 37 properties documented on the North Shore. 38 39 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to require an HAIS. Mr. Weaver referred to the Historical Society’s 40 comments which identified the home as historic and moved to recommend an HAIS be done for 1010 Hubbard 41 place. Mr. Stuart seconded the motion. Chairman Coladarci questioned whether there was enough information to 42 include in the HAIS to warrant a demolition delay. Mr. Marx noted while most of the discussion related to the 43 home’s interior, their focus should be on the home’s exterior. Ms. Van Cleave referred to the amount of 44 information available on S.S. Beman and his son and stated she did not believe there was enough left of the 45 home’s design to require an HAIS. Mr. Marx explained the timeline in connection with the Commission’s request 46 and review of the HAIS and the 270 day delay. 47 48 A vote was taken and the motion passed, 5 to 2: 49 AYES: Enck, Papoutsis, Stuart, Weaver, Wisniewski 50 NAYS: Coladarci, Van Cleave 51 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 52 May 4, 2026 Page 3 1 b. Case No. 26-08-HPC - 913 Cherry Street: Review of the demolition permit application submitted for the 2 single-family residency at 913 Cherry Street. 3 Mr. Marx identified the property owners, its location, size and zoning classification with an approximate 4 construction date of 1904 with subsequent alterations. He stated the property does not appear on the Illinois 5 Historic Structures Listing. Mr. Marx stated the Historical Society indicated that the property did not have 6 architectural and historical significance and noted no public comments were received. Mr. Marx referred to the 7 corrected Attachment C which he summarized for the Commission and asked if there were any questions. 8 9 Chairman Coladarci also asked if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time. He then asked 10 for the applicant’s presentation. 11 12 Nick Detchev of RWA Homes stated the request is to allow demolition of the home without delay. He referred to 13 letters of support received from the neighbors and noted he initially considered renovation. Mr. Detchev stated 14 the home is not in good enough condition to save and referred to foundation issues with it being impractical to 15 bring the home up to modern day standards. He added the GFA bonus would not be practical in this instance and 16 referred to plans to document the home’s history and to consider deconstruction. Mr. Detchev described the 17 proposed home which would fit the neighborhood and asked if there were any questions. 18 19 Mr. Enck referred to the amount of teardowns in the neighborhood and the applicant’s intention to construct a 20 thoughtful home which included neighborhood feedback. The Commission Members thanked Mr. Detchev for 21 obtaining neighborhood input. 22 23 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any other questions. Ms. Papoutsis questioned the home’s style which Mr. 24 Detchev described for the Commission. Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to require an HAIS. No motion was 25 made. Chairman Coladarci then asked for a motion to permit demolition without delay. A motion to allow the 26 demolition of 913 Cherry Street without delay was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded by Ms. Papoutsis. A vote 27 was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 7 to 0: 28 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski 29 NAYS: None 30 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 31 32 Mr. Myers left the meeting at this time. 33 34 Other Business: 35 a. June 1, 2026 Meeting – Quorum Check. 36 The Commission Members discussed their availability. Mr. Marx identified the June agenda items which included 37 the consideration of preservation awards with only one submission received. 38 39 b. 2025 Preservation Awards – plaque update. 40 Ms. Van Cleave provided an update on the plaque status which she described for the Commission. She also 41 referred to potential copyright issues which Mr. Marx and the Commission Members discussed. The Commission 42 Members then discussed design alternatives in detail. Ms. Van Cleave stated she would ask for a revised sample to 43 be created and provide it to the Commission Members at the next meeting. Mr. Stuart offered to meet with the 44 design artist. 45 46 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision. 47 Ms. Papoutsis informed the Commission she would continue to work on the article with regard to architects and 48 contractors. Chairman Coladarci suggested the Commission Members get a space at the farmer’s market. Mr. Marx 49 informed the Commission the new staff person would be able to provide feedback in connection with how the 50 Commission can have a presence at the farmer’s market. The Commission Members discussed whether pamphlets 51 were still available. Mr. Marx referred to the shared cost of the trolley tour with the Historical Society in the past. 52 He also provided an update in connection with supplementary information with regard to the post office building 53 and whether an HAIS should be required and what it would produce. Chairman Coladarci asked the Commission May 4, 2026 Page 4 1 Members if Mr. Marx should pursue whether an HAIS should be done. Mr. Marx stated they already have a lot of 2 information in the Village files. 3 4 Mr. Marx stated an agenda item was created for the Commission to discuss an additional category for when the 5 preservation awards open next year relating to the existing or creating new categories. He then provided a copy of 6 the nomination form to the Commission Members. No additional new business was discussed. 7 8 Adjournment: 9 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Stuart and seconded by 10 Mr. Enck. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 7 to 0: 11 AYES: Coladarci, Enck, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver, Wisniewski 12 NAYS: None 13 NON-VOTING: Zaransky 14 The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Antionette Johnson 19 Recording Secretary 20

Agenda

Packet

Village of Winnetka Historic Preservation Commission Regular Meeting May 4, 2026 at 7:00 PM Winnetka Village Hall - 510 Green Bay Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Public Comments 3. Approval of Minutes a. Approval of April 6, 2026, Regular Meeting Minutes 4. Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks a. Case No. 25-11-HPC - 419 Sheridan Road: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 419 Sheridan Road, a locally designated landmark. This item was continued from the March 2, 2026, Historic Preservation Commission meeting. The Applicant is requesting this item be continued to the June 1, 2026, Historic Preservation Commission meeting. 5. Demolition Permit Applications a. Case No. 26-07-HPC - 1010 Hubbard Place: Review of the demolition permit application submitted for the single-family residency at 1010 Hubbard Place. b. Case No. 26-08-HPC - 913 Cherry Street: Review of the demolition permit application submitted for the single-family residency at 913 Cherry Street. 6. Other Business a. June 1, 2026, Regular Meeting Quorum Check b. 2025 Preservation Awards - Award Plaque Update c. Monthly Communications For HPC - Discussion and Content Decision d. HPC Programming Discussion 7. Adjournment NOTICE Public comment is permitted on all agenda items at the meeting. If you wish to provide testimony or comments prior to the meeting, you may provide them one of two ways: (1) by sending an email to planning@winnetka.org; or by sending a letter to Community Development, Village of Winnetka, 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, IL 60093. All agenda materials are available at www.villageofwinnetka.org/agendacenter. The Village of Winnetka, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities, who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe and/or participate in this meeting or have questions about the accessibility of the meeting or facilities contact the Village ADA Coordinator at 510 Green Bay Road, Winnetka, Illinois 60093, (Telephone (847) 716-3543; T.D.D. (847) 501-6041). Page 1 of 126 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2 APRIL 6, 2026 MEETING MINUTES 3 4 Members Present: Jack Coladarci, Chairman 5 Beth Ann Papoutsis 6 Joseph Stuart 7 Patti Van Cleave 8 Paul Weaver 9 10 Members Absent: Chris Enck 11 Anna Wisniewski 12 13 Non-Voting Members Present: Scott Myers 14 15 Junior Commissioner Present: Louis Zaransky 16 17 Village Staff: Christopher Marx, Associate Planner 18 Scott Mangum, Community Development Director 19 20 Call to Order & Roll Call: 21 Chairman Coladarci called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. Roll call was taken of the Commission Members 22 present. 23 24 Public Comment: 25 No public comment was made at this time. Mr. Marx confirmed no additional comments were received. 26 27 Approval of Minutes: 28 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any comments or corrections or for a motion to approve the March 2, 29 2026 meeting minutes. A motion to approve the March 2, 2026 minutes was made by Mr. Weaver and seconded 30 by Ms. Van Cleave. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 31 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 32 NAYS: None 33 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 34 35 Alterations to Locally Designated Landmarks: 36 a. Case No. 25-11-HPC - 419 Sheridan Road: Advisory review of proposed alterations to 419 Sheridan 37 Road, a locally designated landmark. This item was continued from the March 2, 2026 Historic Preservation 38 Commission meeting. The Applicant is requesting this item be continued to the May 4, 2026 Historic 39 Preservation Commission meeting. 40 Mr. Marx informed the Commission that the applicant requested another continuation of the item. 41 42 Demolition Permit Applications: 43 a. Case No. 26-06-HPC - 512 Chestnut Street: Review of the Demolition permit application submitted for 44 the Post Office building at 512 Chestnut Street. 45 Mr. Marx identified the Village as the property owner, the property’s location, size and zoning classification with a 46 construction date of 1958 and subsequent alterations. He stated the property does not appear on the Illinois 47 Historic Structures Listing. Mr. Marx stated the Historical Society indicated that the property did not have 48 architectural and historical significance and no public comments were received. He noted the Village has not 49 submitted a permit for the post demolition site with the Village’s Assistant Engineer, Obaid Khalid, providing 50 additional information relating to post demolition plans. Mr. Marx then asked if there were any questions. 51 52 Chairman Coladarci also asked if there were any questions. No questions were raised at this time. Obaid Khalid, 53 Assistant Village Engineer, summarized the request which included several options for the site and noted the Page 2 of 126 April 6, 2026 Page 2 1 existing building had environmental issues. He stated it was determined it would be best to demolish the building 2 and temporarily restore the site with a grass island and while the Village determines what to ultimately do with the 3 site. Mr. Khalid described the items which would be included on the temporary site restoration and estimated the 4 timeline for demolition, site restoration, and sod installation to occur by the summer. 5 6 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any other questions. Mr. Stuart questioned parking previously used by post 7 office employees. Mr. Khalid responded parking and the parking lot would remain unimpacted. No additional 8 questions were raised at this time. 9 10 Chairman Coladarci asked for public comment. No comments were made at this time. 11 12 Susan Benjamin was in attendance and questioned whether the property had any historical background. Chairman 13 Coladarci confirmed that the preliminary review did provide some history and community importance of the site. 14 Ms. Benjamin then described the 1950’s modern building which was part of an organization of structures including 15 the Village Hall. She commented the grouping is important and suggested an HAIS be done to document the 16 building and site. Mr. Weaver confirmed limited information was received in that the government specifications 17 for the post office dictated a lot of the building’s architecture and that it may not be worth looking into it more. 18 Ms. Benjamin responded that there was sufficient reason to further document the site and the structure. Mr. Marx 19 referred to the Historical Society’s findings on page nos. 15 and 16 which summarized their conclusions. Ms. 20 Benjamin provided additional information with regard to the decision to build the post office on this site in the 21 1950’s. 22 23 Chairman Coladarci stated the documentation on the site appeared to be complete. Ms. Van Cleave agreed with 24 Chairman Coladarci’s comments. No additional questions were raised and no additional public comment was made 25 at this time. Chairman Coladarci called the matter in for discussion. 26 27 Chairman Coladarci asked the Commission Members if they felt an HAIS is necessary. Ms. Papoutsis stated a 28 comprehensive report should be considered. Mr. Myers described the building as a warehouse on a slab and if 29 there is a desire to have a study done, it should be separate from the demolition request so as not to delay the 30 process. Chairman Coladarci stated the building’s history has been picked up by other means. The Commission 31 Members discussed various aspects of the building and site. Ms. Van Cleave stated it would not benefit the Village 32 for the process to be delayed and whether the community would benefit from a study is for the Commission to 33 decide. Mr. Marx informed the Commission that the Historical Society asked about availability in terms of 34 accessing the building and stated interior photos can be provided to them. 35 36 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to request an HAIS. Ms. Papoutsis stated the Commission should specify for 37 an HAIS to be done without demolition delay. Mr. Marx stated that while this issue came up before, the code is not 38 written to provide for that. Mr. Myers suggested the Commission ask the Historical Society to provide additional 39 documentation of the site to be kept in their records. Mr. Marx advised the Commission of the cost of a 40 preliminary review and stated he would discuss whether additional information can be obtained from Megan 41 McChesney. He also clarified the Commission’s request. 42 43 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to request a formal HAIS. No motion was made. Mr. Marx stated the 44 Commission has to allow for the demolition to proceed without delay with additional information to be obtained. 45 Chairman Coladarci then asked for a motion to approve the demolition permit without delay. A motion as stated 46 by Chairman Coladarci was made, Mr. Weaver moved Ms. Van Cleave second. A vote was taken and the motion 47 unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 48 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 49 NAYS: None 50 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 51 52 Historical Architectural Impact Studies (HAIS) Page 3 of 126 April 6, 2026 Page 3 1 a. Case No 2026-02-HPC - 1161 Pine Street: Review of the Historic Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) 2 attached to the Demolition permit for the single-family residence at 1161 Pine Street. 3 Mr. Marx stated an HAIS was received from Benjamin Historic Certifications and summarized the Commission’s 4 previous consideration of the matter. He noted one additional public comment was received and included in the 5 agenda packet. Mr. Marx stated the Historical Society’s findings determined that the HAIS is thorough and 6 complete and the property has historical significance. He then asked if there were any questions. No questions 7 were raised at this time. 8 9 Susan Benjamin identified the property’s location, photos and site plan. She described the landscape as 10 complimentary to the home. Ms. Benjamin provided information on William Brooks Molten and summarized his 11 contributions to the Village. She went on to summarize the report’s findings in detail including the home’s 12 occupants, the home’s interior and exterior detailing. Ms. Benjamin concluded it was a very pleasant home for 13 many families who made contributions to the Village and Chicago for which they should be celebrated. 14 15 Chairman Coladarci asked if there were any questions and described the report as fascinating. He then asked for 16 the applicant’s presentation. Mark Gent, the property owner, asked the Commission Members if they had any 17 questions. No questions were raised at this time. 18 19 Chairman Coladarci referred to the findings and asked the Commission Members if they found the HAIS complete. 20 The Commission Members found the HAIS to be complete. Chairman Coladarci then asked for a motion to find the 21 HAIS complete. A motion was made by Ms. Van Cleave to find the HAIS for 1161 Pine Street complete. Ms. 22 Papoutsis seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 23 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 24 NAYS: None 25 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 26 27 Chairman Coladarci read additional findings with regard to the building’s architectural or historical significance or 28 to delay demolition. He asked for a motion to delay demolition. No motion was made. Chairman Coladarci then 29 asked for a motion to find the building does not have sufficient architectural or historical significance and to grant 30 demolition without delay. A motion as stated by Chairman Coladarci was made by Ms. Van Cleave. Ms. Papoutsis 31 referred to the Historical Society’s findings that the home is significant. Ms. Van Cleave provided additional 32 commentary on the home which she described as being in good shape and that she would be sorry to see the 33 home torn down. Mr. Weaver stated there have been other homes that were deemed more significant and 34 warranted a demolition delay. Chairman Coladarci stated a demolition delay would not change the outcome. Mr. 35 Weaver then seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 36 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 37 NAYS: None 38 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 39 40 b. Case No. 26-05-HPC - 555 Walnut Street: Review of the Historic and Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) 41 attached to the Historically and Architecturally Significant Maximum Building Size Bonus application submitted 42 for the single-family residence at 555 Walnut Street. 43 Mr. Marx summarized the historical and architecturally significant maximum GFA bonus application submitted by 44 the property owners. He identified the property’s location, size and zoning classification with a construction date 45 of 1923 and subsequent alterations which he described. Mr. Marx stated the property does not appear on the 46 Illinois Historic Structures Listing with the Historical Society finding that the property has architectural and 47 historical significance as indicated on the findings included as Attachment B. He summarized the maximum GFA 48 allowed if the bonus is allowed. Mr. Marx stated no building permit has been submitted and no public comments 49 were received. He then asked if there were any questions. 50 51 Ms. Van Cleave asked how often similar applications have come before the Commission. Mr. Marx and the 52 Commission Members stated there have been four similar applications. No additional questions were raised at this 53 time. Page 4 of 126 April 6, 2026 Page 4 1 2 Jeanne Sylvester of Benjamin Historic Certifications summarized the HAIS for the Commission including identifying 3 the property ownership history, modifications, the architect, internal and external photos. She concluded by 4 describing the home as lovely, stately and beautifully maintained. Ms. Sylvester and the Commission Members 5 commented on the architect with whom they are not familiar. Ms. Van Cleave clarified the Winnetka 6 Congregational Church was founded in 1874. 7 8 Chairman Coladarci read the findings with regard to the maximum building size GFA bonus. He then asked for a 9 motion to find the HAIS complete. A motion to find the HAIS complete was made by Ms. Van Cleave and seconded 10 by Mr. Stuart. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 11 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 12 NAYS: None 13 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 14 15 Chairman Coladarci read additional findings with regard to the building’s architectural or historical significance and 16 the standards. He then referred to standards (a), (b), and (c) as found in the memo that the Commission Members 17 considered. Mr. Marx provided additional information with regard to the suggestions in the memo for features 18 identified as the home’s critical features in terms of the GFA bonus approval, and how they would affect future 19 modifications to the home. He also provided examples of the features which were identified in the previous GFA 20 bonus approvals. The Commission Members stated it would be helpful for the Commission to determine what the 21 applicants are attempting to do with their project. 22 23 Daniel O’Brien, the property owner, informed the Commission they are attempting to preserve the visual and 24 structural integrity of the central unit and keep with the Georgian Revival aesthetic. Mr. Marx referred to page 304 25 and the plat-of-survey as well as a photo of the front of the home in the HAIS report. Jeff Harting, the architect, 26 referred to an image and an area which would be stepped back and having matching French doors, as well as other 27 features he identified. He also described several other details of the work to be done to the home including the 28 home definitely having red brick. 29 30 The Commission Members discussed the features they deemed to be critical in detail. The Commission Members 31 determined the home’s critical features to be as follows in terms of limits on modifications: (1) side-gabled roof of 32 the typical Colonial-Georgian style house; (2) front entrance typical of the traditional Colonial-Georgian Revival 33 style house; and (3) red brick exterior façade. 34 35 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to approve the one-time bonus GFA application. A motion was made by Mr. 36 Stuart to approve the bonus application and seconded by Ms. Van Cleave. A vote was taken and the motion 37 unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 38 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 39 NAYS: None 40 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 41 42 Other Business: 43 a. May 4, 2026 Meeting – Quorum Check. 44 The Commission Members discussed their availability. Mr. Marx confirmed there would be two demolition permits 45 on the agenda. 46 47 b. 2025 Preservation Awards – Award Plaque Update. 48 Ms. Van Cleave stated she did not have an update at this time and she is still waiting on an updated template. 49 50 c. Monthly Communications for Historic Preservation Commission - Discussion and Content Decision. 51 Mr. Marx provided an update on the article regarding Crow Island School to be published in the quarterly report 52 which may be done by the May deadline. He asked if there were any items the Commission Members want to 53 include in the next quarterly report. Ms. Papoutsis suggested the 1207 Whitebridge Hill landmark nomination be Page 5 of 126 April 6, 2026 Page 5 1 included. Mr. Marx stated it may have been written about two years ago and the homeowner may have sought the 2 available tax freeze. He confirmed he would check with Josie with regard to publishing an update. Ms. Papoutsis 3 referred to mentioning homes which were restored by restoration architects. Mr. Marx asked Ms. Papoutsis to 4 provide a draft before the next meeting agenda is published. 5 6 d. HPC Programming Discussion. 7 Ms. Van Cleave provided an update on possible trolley tours and the centennial time capsule opening. She stated 8 there are walking tours planned which she suggested the Commission help promote. 9 10 Adjournment: 11 Chairman Coladarci asked for a motion to adjourn. A motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Weaver and seconded by 12 Ms. Van Cleave. A vote was taken and the motion unanimously passed, 5 to 0: 13 AYES: Coladarci, Papoutsis, Stuart, Van Cleave, Weaver 14 NAYS: None 15 NON-VOTING: Myers, Zaransky 16 The meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. 17 18 Respectfully submitted, 19 20 Antionette Johnson 21 Recording Secretary 22 Page 6 of 126 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FROM: CHRISTOPHER, MARX, AICP, ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: APRIL 30, 2026 SUBJECT: 1010 HUBBARD PLACE - DEMOLITION PERMIT (CASE NO. 26-07-HPC) INTRODUCTION Meeting Date May 4, 2026 Commission Action Preliminary historic and architectural review to determine if a Historic Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) is necessary or if demolition may proceed without delay. Property Address 1010 Hubbard Place (See Attachment A – Aerial Map) Property Owner 1010 Hubbard Place Trust Application Submitted by Foxwood Development Group, representing the property owner Mail Notice to Property Owners within 250 Completed feet Public Comments as of Date of Memo As of the date of this memo, staff has not received any written comments from the public for this application. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Size 0.82 acres Location Southwest corner of Hubbard Place and Old Green Bay Road Improvements Two-story single-family residence with attached garage Zoning R-3 Single-Family Residential Surrounding Zoning R-3 Single-Family Residential to the north, south, and west, R-2 Single-Family Residential to west on the other side of Old Green Bay Road PROPERTY HISTORY See Attachment B, Preliminary Property History Study; Attachment C, Winnetka Historical Society (WHS) Research Constructed 1924 Additional Construction Activity 1941 - Add to two-story frame single-family dwelling (garden tool house and porch), 1991 - New addition and remodeling of first and second floors, 1998 - Enclose a five by eight area, 2010 - Remodel two-story frame residence, 2021 - Sunroom addition Illinois Historic Structure Survey Listing No Winnetka Historical Society (WHS) WHS research indicates that the property has architectural significance. (See Attachment C - Historical Society Research) Page 1 Page 7 of 126 ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Other Permits for New Primary Structures None on Same Block (either side of Pine Street) Director’s 60-Day Delay - Construction Delay is not necessary to prevent undue congestion and Activity noise impacts in the neighborhood. New Construction or Site Restoration Plans No building permit application has been submitted for a Submitted new single-family home or site restoration at this time. DEMOLITION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION The Commission may order the issuance of a demolition delay of a historic or architecturally significant structure for up to but not exceeding 270 days from the date the Commission determines that an HAIS submission from the applicant is required for the structure that is applied to be demolished. Should the HPC request an HAIS for the subject property at the May 4, 2026, meeting, and after reviewing the HAIS at a future meeting, the HPC determines the structure is significant and issues a delay, the Commission may issue a demolition delay up to but not exceeding 270 days from May 4, 2026. COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission may consider the following motions: (1) Historical Architectural Impact Study Required or (2) Building and/or Property is Not Historic or Architecturally Significant. Historical Architectural Impact Study Required The Commission finds that based upon (1) the preliminary property history study, (2) the Winnetka Historical Society comments, and (3) other information, comments, or evidence received by the HPC during its preliminary review that the building and/or property is of sufficient historic or architectural merit to warrant conducting a Historical Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) prior to issuance of the demolition permit. The Commission reached its conclusion based upon the property meeting the following criteria: [The Commission must note which of the following criteria is met] 1. The property or structures have sufficient architectural or historical merit to warrant a full HAIS prior to issuance of a demolition permit; 2. The property or structures have been designated a landmark pursuant to Chapter 15.64 of the Village Code; (Subject Property is not a landmark) 3. The property or structures have been included in the most recent Illinois Historic Structure Survey conducted under the auspices of the Illinois Department of Conservation; and (Subject Property is not on the state survey) 4. The property or structures have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the Illinois Register of Historic Places. (Subject Property is not listed on either register) Building and/or Property Lacks Historic or Architectural Significance The Commission has determined, in accordance with Section 15.52.040 of the Village Code, that the building and/or property is not of sufficient historic or architectural merit to warrant a Historic Architectural Impact Study, and the demolition of the structure may proceed without delay. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: GIS Aerial Map Attachment B: Preliminary Property History Study Attachment C: Historical Society Research Attachment D: Application Materials Page 8 of 126 ATTACHMENT A Page 9 of 126 ATTACHMENT B MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: WINNETKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: APRIL 14, 2026 SUBJECT: CASE NO. 26-07-HPC: 1010 HUBBARD PLACE INTRODUCTION On May 4, 2026, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is scheduled to consider a request to demolish the residence at 1010 Hubbard Place. Please return any available information regarding the architectural and historical significance of the structure to Christopher Marx by the end of the day on Tuesday, April 28, 2026. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at cmarx@winnetka.org or (847) 716-3587. PRELIMINARY PROPERTY HISTORY STUDY/VILLAGE HALL RECORDS Building Permits Date Type Owner Architect 3-15-2026 Build two-story frame residence. A.C. Bastien S.S. Beman 5-28-1941 Add to two-story frame single- Mr. and Mrs. Alvin Bastien Not listed family dwelling (garden tool house and porch) 6-24-1991 New addition and remodeling of Mr. and Mrs. Held Stephen Guerrant first and second floors 3-12-1998 Enclose a five by eight area Mr. and Mrs. Held R. Scott & Associates, Ltd. 4-6-2010 Remodel two-story frame residence John and Yvonne Held R. Scott Javore & Associates 3-23-2021 Sunroom addition Mr. and Mrs. Held Omar Gutierrez Page 10 of 126 BOUNDARY SURVEY PLACE HUBBARD SC OLD GREEN BAY ROAD HN EID E R' LO S T S IVI 2 BD SU ION LOT 1 LOT A JAY SHEESLEY SUBDIVISION LOT B 3520 Page 11 of 126 Page 12 of 126 1010 Hubbard Place – March, 2026 Page 13 of 126 Page 14 of 126 ATTACHMENT C PROPERTY RESEARCH COVERSHEET Address: 1010 Hubbard Place Construction Details: Original construction date: 1924 Construction type: Frame Style: Colonial Revival OWNERSHIP HISTORY: OWNER/RESIDENT DATES INFORMATION SIGNIFICANCE NAME OCCUPIED ATTACHED Alvin E. Bastien 1924 – 1943 Building permit application, real estate listing, Chicago Tribune obituary Harvey Templeton and 1943 – 1990 1944 directory, 1987 Jessie Hosmer Brown directory, Cook County Recorder records, Chicago Tribune obituaries John and Yvonne Held 1991 – 2025 Building permit applications, Cook County Recorder records, Winnetka Talk article ARCHITECTS: ARCHITECT NAME DATE AND INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED PROJECT Spencer Solon Beman 1926 – build a two-story Select WHS file materials on frame residence Spencer Solon Beman Stephen Guerrant 1991 – new addition and Chicago Tribune articles remodeling of first and second floors R. Scott Javore & Associates 1998 – enclose a five by eight Javore “About Us” page area; 2010 – remodel two- story frame residence Omar Gutierrez 2021 – sunroom addition Gutierrez “About Me” page RESEARCH SOURCES USED: Winnetka Talk, Cook County Assessor records, Cook County Recorder records, historic phone books, WHS property files, WHS digital files, Ancestry.com, Chicago Tribune Page 15 of 126 Findings: Our research indicates that this property maintains architectural significance as a Colonial Revival design by Spencer Solon Beman. Beman was born in Chicago in 1887. Son of famed architect and Pullman designer Solon Spencer Beman, he followed in his father’s footsteps and became an architect at a young age. Beman practiced alongside his father until his death in 1914, after which he worked largely on his own. While Beman is perhaps best known for designing Christian Science buildings, he is also the architect of several notable North Shore homes. In Winnetka, for example, Beman designed the F.H. McNabb House at 950 Hill Road in 1927, which became a local Designated Landmark in 1995, and for remodeling the historic Academy Hall into Winnetka’s “Chateau” Fire Station in 1925. Notably, this structure was determined by Granacki Historic Consultants to be a potential contributing structure if the area were to be designated a historic district. As such, it warrants additional research by an architectural historian. Date of Research: 4/17/2026 Submitted by: Meagan McChesney, PhD Curator, Winnetka Historical Society Mary Trieschmann, MS Ed Executive Director, Winnetka Historical Society Page 16 of 126 Page 17 of 126 Page 18 of 126 Page 19 of 126 Page 20 of 126 Page 21 of 126 Page 22 of 126 Page 23 of 126 Page 24 of 126 Page 25 of 126 1944 directory 1987 directory Cook County Recorder records Page 26 of 126 Page 27 of 126 Spencer Solon Beman’s Buildings in Winnetka, IL • 440 Ridge [First Church of Christ], 1932 • 840 Tower, 1940 [demolished in 2008] • 740 Ash, 1924 • 60 Locust • 271 Linden, 1924 • 9 Indian Hill • 576 Willow • 609 Cherry • 680 Locust, 1923 • 38 Indian Hill, 1924 • 72 Fox Lane, 1927 • 460 Cedar, 1932 • 120 DeWindt, 1936 • 1077 Spruce, 1941 • 35 Brier, 1946 • 717 Willow, 1921 • 101 Birch, 1923 • 1065 Elm, 1924 • 849 Hill, 1924 • 1160 Chatfield, 1924 • 790 Ash, 1926 • 789 Humboldt • 614 Willow, 1926 • 597 Oak, 1927 • 950 Hill, 1927 • 576 Hill Terrace, 1927 • 607 Oak, 1928 • 800 Prospect, 1928 • 378 Walnut, 1931 • 147 Birch • 303 Sheridan, 1936 Page 28 of 126 Page 29 of 126 Page 30 of 126 Page 31 of 126 Page 32 of 126 Page 33 of 126 Page 34 of 126 Page 35 of 126 Page 36 of 126 Page 37 of 126 Page 38 of 126 Page 39 of 126 Page 40 of 126 Page 41 of 126 Page 42 of 126 Page 43 of 126 Page 44 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Fri, Apr 29, 1960 · Page 28 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/370832896/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 45 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Aug 29, 1982 · Page 45 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/387891295/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 46 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Wed, Sep 28, 1983 · Page 28 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/388013911/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 47 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Nov 27, 1988 · Page 222 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/388811765/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 48 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Nov 27, 1988 · Page 223 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/388811777/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 49 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Aug 7, 1994 · Page 32 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/170525691/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 50 of 126 https://www.javorearchitects.com/about About Us R. Scott Javore and Associates, Ltd. (RSJAL) formed in 1991 around a set of core values: providing the highest level of design integrity possible in residential architecture, while supplying the North Shore community with authentic and responsible historic preservation. Since that time, our Glencoe-based firm has expanded its scope to include new residential construction, interior design, as well as commercial, municipal, and religious architecture, and even house-moving, working throughout Chicago, northeastern Illinois, and in the state of Wisconsin. Services • Architectural Design • Interior Design • Historic Preservation • Custom New Construction Homes • Home Additions/Extensions • Energy Efficient Homes • Site Preparation • Spatial Planning • Structural Engineering • Sustainable Design • Home Remodeling • Kitchen Remodels • Bathroom Remodels • Basement Remodels • Laundry Room Remodels Process Page 51 of 126 Our design professionals are capable of providing a complete range of services including programming, architectural design, millwork design, and the selection of interior finishes and fixtures. We develop close work relationships with our clients and General Contractors providing them with detailed construction documents, coordination of bidding and negotiations, and construction administration. A successful project is one that develops a functional design, achieves appropriate aesthetics, and maintains an established budget. The quality of our service is assessed by means of open communication, frequent vigorous reviews, and well-documented decisions. Programming Determining the needs & objectives of the client. Review of appropriate government ordinances for codes & restrictions, site setbacks & height to floor ratio parameters. Schematic Design Site plan development including areas of construction with applicable setbacks. Preliminary Floor Plans & Exterior Elevations. Preliminary Interior Elevations with millwork & lighting design. Preliminary fixture & finish selection. Design Development Final development of Floor Plans & Exterior Elevations. Final development of Interior Elevations and millwork design. Final selections of finishes and fixtures. Construction Documents Preparation of Construction & Bid Documents including Site & Floor Construction Plans, Utility Plans, Door Window & Finish Schedules, Details, Sections & Elevations, & Specifications Bidding Coordinate and issue project bid packages to General Contractors. Assist in bid evaluations and contract awards. Construction Administration Provide construction administration services including field inspections, project meetings, payout review, & shop drawing analysis. Prepare final punch-list items. Team Page 52 of 126 We understand the importance of preservation, of maintaining a home's own unique history, while also updating it to provide a new level of comfort and sophistication. Our design philosophy is one of innovation, where we use classical theories of proportion and order to offer solutions to contemporary architectural issues. We strive to provide the highest level of design quality and dedicated professional service to our clients, while also adhering to agreed upon budgets and schedules. RSJAL professionals are capable of providing a complete range of services, from programming and architectural design to millwork design, fixture and finish selection, construction documents, bidding, and negotiation coordination, as well as construction administration. Scott Javore, Principal Architect Scott has known since the fourth grade that he wanted to be an architect. He went to the University of Illinois, where he earned his degree in Architecture and also earned a Master degree in Architectural History. Scott worked at Hague Richards when he graduated, followed by ten years at Otis Associates. In 1991 he started Javore Architects in Glencoe. Scott is truly dedicated to his hometown of Glencoe. In his spare time he is a member of the Glencoe Historical Society Board where he is Chairperson of the Frank Lloyd Wright Centennial Celebration, the North Shore Exchange Board of Directors and Chairperson of the Philanthropy Committee, a member of Glencoe Rotary Chamber of Commerce, a member of the North Shore United Methodist Church Board of Trustees, a member of the Village of Glencoe Sesquicentennial Committee, and a member of CPCG Northern Illinois. Page 53 of 126 https://www.ogutierrez.com/about Omar Gutiérrez ARCHITECT About Me Omar is a graduate of the Universidad Santo Tomás de Aquino’s Architecture school in Bucaramanga, Colombia, where he was born. He received an honorable mention for his graduation thesis Dignified Affordable Housing, which consisted of plans for an affordable housing development in Girón, Colombia. The development included homes of diverse sizes using a combination of traditional and contemporary building materials with the objective of achieving a long lasting, affordable and easy to maintain community of homes targeted for low income families. Omar moved to the United States in 2001 and joined Greystone Builders and Architects Inc, a design/build firm in Highland Park, as an Intern Architect. There, he worked on over 25 custom homes in Chicago’s North Shore. In 2005, Omar joined Becker Architects Ltd as a Project Architect and worked on numerous commercial and residential projects. In 2009, he became a freelance architectural designer and focused on taking the Architectural Registration Examination. Omar has been licensed since 2014 and continues to be an independent architect with a focus on residential and light commercial architecture. He lives in Evanston with his wife, Sarah, their daughter, Emerson, their son, Radley and their beloved cat, Lilibet. Page 54 of 126 Page 55 of 126 Page 56 of 126 Page 57 of 126 Page 58 of 126 Page 59 of 126 ATTACHMENT D Village of Winnetka DEMOLITION APPLICATION V I L L A G E O F W I N N E T K A, I L L I N O I S DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEMOLITION APPLICATION Permit No.___ __ _______________ Property Information 1010 Hubbard Place Site Address: _________________________________________________________________ _____ 05171170020000 Parcel Identification Number(s) (PIN): ____________________________________________________________ Single family home Description of all structures to be demolished: _____________________________________________________ Current Property Owner Information Applicant Information Legal Name: __________________________________ Legal Name: _____________________________ _____________________________________________ ________________________________________ Ali Akbar Primary Contact: _______________________________ Primary Contact: __________________________ Address: Address: Wilmette, IL 60091 City, State, Zip: ________________________________ Wilmette, IL 60091 City, State, Zip: ___________________________ Phone No. ____________________________________ Phone No. Email: Email: 09/16/2025 Date owner acquired property: ____________________ General Contractor Applicant’s relationship to current property owner: ________________________________________________ (As previously noted, if contract purchaser, attach copy of executed purchase agreement) Demolition Contractor Information (If known, otherwise indicate “not known at this time”) Legal Name: ____________________________________ Address: _______________________________________ City, State, ZIP: __________________________________ Phone No: ______________________________________ Email: __________________________________________ Page 3 of 4 Page 60 of 126 Village of Winnetka DEMOLITION APPLICATION Property Maintenance Requirements During processing of the demolition permit, the owner and contractor must maintain the property in accordance with the Village Property Maintenance Code to avoid generation of nuisances. Accordingly, the following minimum requirements shall be adhered to: ❑ Grass shall be mowed and maintained at a height not to exceed 8 inches. ❑ Garbage, yard waste, miscellaneous rubbish, mail, and debris shall be removed from the property and not allowed to accumulate. ❑ Building(s) shall be secured (doors and windows in working order, closed and locked). ❑ No demolition or removal of building components may commence until the demolition permit has been issued. Commencement of demolition prior to issuance of permit will result in a Stop Work Order and double permit fees for all subsequent permits ❑ Approved tree fencing protections must be installed as directed by Village Forester prior to commencement of demolition. Lack of tree fencing will result in Stop Work Order and fines. 3B Applicant/Owner Acknowledgments By execution of this application in the space provided below, the Applicant and Owner(s) do hereby certify, acknowledge, agree and affirm to the Village of Winnetka that: 1. The Village and its representatives have the right, and are hereby granted permission and license, to enter upon the property for purposes of conducting any inspections that may be necessary in connection with this application. 2. I (We) have carefully read this application, the applicable sections of the Winnetka Municipal Code and fully understand the applicable terms and provisions. 3. I (We) waive any rights to exemption from disclosure under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act of any and all documents and information submitted in connection with this application. 4. I/We hereby agree to demolish the above structure or portion thereof, in accordance with the information submitted herewith and in strict compliance with all provisions of the Building Code and other related ordinances and regulations of the Village of Winnetka, and I/We hereby consent to inspection of the work during demolition and to the responsibility of maintaining the subject site and adjacent public and private properties in a good, safe and clean condition, including but not limited to the “Property Maintenance Requirements” listed in the previous section. 5. I (We), in accordance with the requirements of the Annual Fee Resolution and the Winnetka Village Code agree to pay all applicable filing fees and be responsible for the payment of all reimbursable expenses associated with the processing of this application. 3/13/2026 | 11:16 AM CD Signature of Applicant: Date Jack Kruszewski General Contractor Print Name & Title: 3/13/2026 | 12:11 PM C Signatures of Property Owner(s): Date Ali Akbar 1010 Hubbard Place Print Name & Title: Property Address: **If more than one applicant or property owner, please copy this page and have additional applicants/property owners sign form. Page 4 of 4 Page 61 of 126 From: To: Christopher Marx Subject: Demolition Permit Application - 1010 Hubbard Place Date: Saturday, March 14, 2026 1:28:10 PM Attachments: 1010hubbard_demo_app.pdf SURVEY.pdf Final Letter.pdf trustee deed.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Chris, Hope you're doing well. I've attached the completed demolition permit application for 1010 Hubbard Place and included the demolition schedule below. Please let me know if you need anything further. Site preparation: June 22-26, 2026 Demolition: June 29 - July 9, 2026 Tree removal and site cleanup: June 22-26, 2026 Install construction fencing, privacy screening, and silt fencing: June 22-26, 2026 Pre-demolition Inspections: June 26, 2026 Demolition of existing home: June 29 - July 2, 2026 Debris and foundation removal: July 3-9, 2026 Thank you, Jack Foxwood Development Group Max: Jack: 8 Page 62 of 126 From: To: Christopher Marx Cc: Subject: Re: 1010 Hubbard - Preliminary Review Information Date: Thursday, April 23, 2026 1:19:17 PM Attachments: Additions to 1010 Hubbard.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Chris. I've attached: 1) photos of the interior showing that the home no longer represents its original condition but rather its 1990's gut renovation and additions; 2) an overhead view detailing the original footprint compared to the current footprint (please note that even the original footprint was modified and gutted); 3) a comparison of an older version of the home with the current one; and 4) layouts of the current home. Could you include them in the agenda packet sent to the commission? Thank you, Jack Page 63 of 126 Page 64 of 126 Page 65 of 126 Page 66 of 126 Page 67 of 126 Page 68 of 126 Page 69 of 126 Foxwood Development Group On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 1:50 PM Christopher Marx <CMarx@winnetka.org> wrote: Good afternoon. We received the information from the Winnetka Historical Society regarding their preliminary review of the property at 1010 Hubbard. They determined that the property maintains architectural significance as a Colonial Revival design by noted Chicago architect S.S. Beman. See attached. The report will be shared with the Commission ahead of their meeting on May 4th. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. -Chris Christopher Marx, AICP Page 70 of 126 MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FROM: CHRISTOPHER, MARX, AICP, ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: APRIL 30, 2026 SUBJECT: 913 CHERRY STREET - DEMOLITION PERMIT (CASE NO. 26-08-HPC) INTRODUCTION Meeting Date May 4, 2026 Commission Action Preliminary historic and architectural review to determine if a Historic Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) is necessary or if demolition may proceed without delay. Property Address 913 Cherry Street (See Attachment A – Aerial Map) Property Owner RWA Third Home, LLC. Application Submitted by Nick Detchev, representing the property owner Mail Notice to Property Owners within Completed 250 feet Public Comments as of Date of Memo As of the date of this memo, staff has not received any written comments from the public for this application. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Size 0.21 acres Location South side of Cherry Street between Provident Avenue and Birch Street Improvements Two-and-one-half-story single-family residence with detached garage Zoning R-5 Single-Family Residential Surrounding Zoning R-5 Single-Family Residential PROPERTY HISTORY See Attachment B, Preliminary Property History Study; Attachment C, Winnetka Historical Society (WHS) Research Constructed Approximately 1904, according to Winnetka Historical Society records Additional Construction Activity 1921 - Build one-story frame garage, 2018 - Roof residential. Illinois Historic Structure Survey Listing No Winnetka Historical Society (WHS) WHS research indicates that the property does not have historical or architectural significance. (See Attachment C - Historical Society Research) ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Other Permits for New Primary Building permit for a new single-family residence for the Structures on Same Block (either side of property at 889 Cheery was issued with a new home under Pine Street) construction. Page 1 Page 71 of 126 Director’s 60-Day Delay - Director will decide at the time of the building permit issuance if a Construction Activity 60-day delay is necessary or not. New Construction or Site No building permit application has been submitted for a new single- Restoration Plans Submitted family home or site restoration at this time. DEMOLITION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION The Commission may order the issuance of a demolition delay of a historic or architecturally significant structure for up to but not exceeding 270 days from the date the Commission determines that an HAIS submission from the applicant is required for the structure that is applied to be demolished. Should the HPC request an HAIS for the subject property at the May 4, 2026, meeting, and after reviewing the HAIS at a future meeting, the HPC determines the structure is significant and issues a delay, the Commission may issue a demolition delay up to but not exceeding 270 days from May 4, 2026. COMMISSION REVIEW The Commission may consider the following motions: (1) Historical Architectural Impact Study Required or (2) Building and/or Property is Not Historic or Architecturally Significant. Historical Architectural Impact Study Required The Commission finds that based upon (1) the preliminary property history study, (2) the Winnetka Historical Society comments, and (3) other information, comments, or evidence received by the HPC during its preliminary review that the building and/or property is of sufficient historic or architectural merit to warrant conducting a Historical Architectural Impact Study (HAIS) prior to issuance of the demolition permit. The Commission reached its conclusion based upon the property meeting the following criteria: [The Commission must note which of the following criteria is met] 1. The property or structures have sufficient architectural or historical merit to warrant a full HAIS prior to issuance of a demolition permit; 2. The property or structures have been designated a landmark pursuant to Chapter 15.64 of the Village Code; (Subject Property is not a landmark) 3. The property or structures have been included in the most recent Illinois Historic Structure Survey conducted under the auspices of the Illinois Department of Conservation; and (Subject Property is not on the state survey) 4. The property or structures have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the Illinois Register of Historic Places. (Subject Property is not listed on either register) Building and/or Property Lacks Historic or Architectural Significance The Commission has determined, in accordance with Section 15.52.040 of the Village Code, that the building and/or property is not of sufficient historic or architectural merit to warrant a Historic Architectural Impact Study, and the demolition of the structure may proceed without delay. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: GIS Aerial Map Attachment B: Preliminary Property History Study Attachment C: Historical Society Research Attachment D: Application Materials Page 72 of 126 ATTACHMENT A Page 73 of 126 ATTACHMENT B MEMORANDUM VILLAGE OF WINNETKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: WINNETKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FROM: CHRISTOPHER MARX, ASSOCIATE PLANNER DATE: APRIL 14, 2026 SUBJECT: CASE NO. 26-08-HPC: 913 CHERRY STREET INTRODUCTION On May 4, 2026, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is scheduled to consider a request to demolish the residence at 913 Cherry Street. Please return any available information regarding the architectural and historical significance of the structure to Christopher Marx by the end of the day on Tuesday, April 28, 2026. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at cmarx@winnetka.org or (847) 716-3587. PRELIMINARY PROPERTY HISTORY STUDY/VILLAGE HALL RECORDS Building Permits Date Type Owner Architect 9-23-1921 Build one-story frame garage. G.E. Osten Not listed 5-22-2018 Roof residential. Mary Deeley Not listed Page 74 of 126 Page 75 of 126 Page 76 of 126 913 Cherry – March, 2026 Page 77 of 126 Page 78 of 126 ATTACHMENT C PROPERTY RESEARCH COVERSHEET Address: 1010 Hubbard Place Construction Details: Original construction date: 1924 Construction type: Frame Style: Colonial Revival OWNERSHIP HISTORY: OWNER/RESIDENT DATES INFORMATION SIGNIFICANCE NAME OCCUPIED ATTACHED Alvin E. Bastien 1924 – 1943 Building permit application, real estate listing, Chicago Tribune obituary Harvey Templeton and 1943 – 1990 1944 directory, 1987 Jessie Hosmer Brown directory, Cook County Recorder records, Chicago Tribune obituaries John and Yvonne Held 1991 – 2025 Building permit applications, Cook County Recorder records, Winnetka Talk article ARCHITECTS: ARCHITECT NAME DATE AND INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED PROJECT Spencer Solon Beman 1926 – build a two-story Select WHS file materials on frame residence Spencer Solon Beman Stephen Guerrant 1991 – new addition and Chicago Tribune articles remodeling of first and second floors R. Scott Javore & Associates 1998 – enclose a five by eight Javore “About Us” page area; 2010 – remodel two- story frame residence Omar Gutierrez 2021 – sunroom addition Gutierrez “About Me” page RESEARCH SOURCES USED: Winnetka Talk, Cook County Assessor records, Cook County Recorder records, historic phone books, WHS property files, WHS digital files, Ancestry.com, Chicago Tribune Page 79 of 126 Findings: Our research indicates that this property maintains architectural significance as a Colonial Revival design by Spencer Solon Beman. Beman was born in Chicago in 1887. Son of famed architect and Pullman designer Solon Spencer Beman, he followed in his father’s footsteps and became an architect at a young age. Beman practiced alongside his father until his death in 1914, after which he worked largely on his own. While Beman is perhaps best known for designing Christian Science buildings, he is also the architect of several notable North Shore homes. In Winnetka, for example, Beman designed the F.H. McNabb House at 950 Hill Road in 1927, which became a local Designated Landmark in 1995, and for remodeling the historic Academy Hall into Winnetka’s “Chateau” Fire Station in 1925. Notably, this structure was determined by Granacki Historic Consultants to be a potential contributing structure if the area were to be designated a historic district. As such, it warrants additional research by an architectural historian. Date of Research: 4/17/2026 Submitted by: Meagan McChesney, PhD Curator, Winnetka Historical Society Mary Trieschmann, MS Ed Executive Director, Winnetka Historical Society Page 80 of 126 Page 81 of 126 Page 82 of 126 Page 83 of 126 Page 84 of 126 Page 85 of 126 Page 86 of 126 Page 87 of 126 Page 88 of 126 Page 89 of 126 1944 directory 1987 directory Cook County Recorder records Page 90 of 126 Page 91 of 126 Spencer Solon Beman’s Buildings in Winnetka, IL • 440 Ridge [First Church of Christ], 1932 • 840 Tower, 1940 [demolished in 2008] • 740 Ash, 1924 • 60 Locust • 271 Linden, 1924 • 9 Indian Hill • 576 Willow • 609 Cherry • 680 Locust, 1923 • 38 Indian Hill, 1924 • 72 Fox Lane, 1927 • 460 Cedar, 1932 • 120 DeWindt, 1936 • 1077 Spruce, 1941 • 35 Brier, 1946 • 717 Willow, 1921 • 101 Birch, 1923 • 1065 Elm, 1924 • 849 Hill, 1924 • 1160 Chatfield, 1924 • 790 Ash, 1926 • 789 Humboldt • 614 Willow, 1926 • 597 Oak, 1927 • 950 Hill, 1927 • 576 Hill Terrace, 1927 • 607 Oak, 1928 • 800 Prospect, 1928 • 378 Walnut, 1931 • 147 Birch • 303 Sheridan, 1936 Page 92 of 126 Page 93 of 126 Page 94 of 126 Page 95 of 126 Page 96 of 126 Page 97 of 126 Page 98 of 126 Page 99 of 126 Page 100 of 126 Page 101 of 126 Page 102 of 126 Page 103 of 126 Page 104 of 126 Page 105 of 126 Page 106 of 126 Page 107 of 126 Page 108 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Fri, Apr 29, 1960 · Page 28 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/370832896/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 109 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Aug 29, 1982 · Page 45 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/387891295/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 110 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Wed, Sep 28, 1983 · Page 28 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/388013911/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 111 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Nov 27, 1988 · Page 222 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/388811765/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 112 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Nov 27, 1988 · Page 223 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/388811777/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 113 of 126 Chicago Tribune (Chicago, Illinois) · Sun, Aug 7, 1994 · Page 32 Downloaded on Apr 16, 2026 https://www.newspapers.com/image/170525691/ Copyright © 2026 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved. Page 114 of 126 https://www.javorearchitects.com/about About Us R. Scott Javore and Associates, Ltd. (RSJAL) formed in 1991 around a set of core values: providing the highest level of design integrity possible in residential architecture, while supplying the North Shore community with authentic and responsible historic preservation. Since that time, our Glencoe-based firm has expanded its scope to include new residential construction, interior design, as well as commercial, municipal, and religious architecture, and even house-moving, working throughout Chicago, northeastern Illinois, and in the state of Wisconsin. Services • Architectural Design • Interior Design • Historic Preservation • Custom New Construction Homes • Home Additions/Extensions • Energy Efficient Homes • Site Preparation • Spatial Planning • Structural Engineering • Sustainable Design • Home Remodeling • Kitchen Remodels • Bathroom Remodels • Basement Remodels • Laundry Room Remodels Process Page 115 of 126 Our design professionals are capable of providing a complete range of services including programming, architectural design, millwork design, and the selection of interior finishes and fixtures. We develop close work relationships with our clients and General Contractors providing them with detailed construction documents, coordination of bidding and negotiations, and construction administration. A successful project is one that develops a functional design, achieves appropriate aesthetics, and maintains an established budget. The quality of our service is assessed by means of open communication, frequent vigorous reviews, and well-documented decisions. Programming Determining the needs & objectives of the client. Review of appropriate government ordinances for codes & restrictions, site setbacks & height to floor ratio parameters. Schematic Design Site plan development including areas of construction with applicable setbacks. Preliminary Floor Plans & Exterior Elevations. Preliminary Interior Elevations with millwork & lighting design. Preliminary fixture & finish selection. Design Development Final development of Floor Plans & Exterior Elevations. Final development of Interior Elevations and millwork design. Final selections of finishes and fixtures. Construction Documents Preparation of Construction & Bid Documents including Site & Floor Construction Plans, Utility Plans, Door Window & Finish Schedules, Details, Sections & Elevations, & Specifications Bidding Coordinate and issue project bid packages to General Contractors. Assist in bid evaluations and contract awards. Construction Administration Provide construction administration services including field inspections, project meetings, payout review, & shop drawing analysis. Prepare final punch-list items. Team Page 116 of 126 We understand the importance of preservation, of maintaining a home's own unique history, while also updating it to provide a new level of comfort and sophistication. Our design philosophy is one of innovation, where we use classical theories of proportion and order to offer solutions to contemporary architectural issues. We strive to provide the highest level of design quality and dedicated professional service to our clients, while also adhering to agreed upon budgets and schedules. RSJAL professionals are capable of providing a complete range of services, from programming and architectural design to millwork design, fixture and finish selection, construction documents, bidding, and negotiation coordination, as well as construction administration. Scott Javore, Principal Architect Scott has known since the fourth grade that he wanted to be an architect. He went to the University of Illinois, where he earned his degree in Architecture and also earned a Master degree in Architectural History. Scott worked at Hague Richards when he graduated, followed by ten years at Otis Associates. In 1991 he started Javore Architects in Glencoe. Scott is truly dedicated to his hometown of Glencoe. In his spare time he is a member of the Glencoe Historical Society Board where he is Chairperson of the Frank Lloyd Wright Centennial Celebration, the North Shore Exchange Board of Directors and Chairperson of the Philanthropy Committee, a member of Glencoe Rotary Chamber of Commerce, a member of the North Shore United Methodist Church Board of Trustees, a member of the Village of Glencoe Sesquicentennial Committee, and a member of CPCG Northern Illinois. Page 117 of 126 https://www.ogutierrez.com/about Omar Gutiérrez ARCHITECT About Me Omar is a graduate of the Universidad Santo Tomás de Aquino’s Architecture school in Bucaramanga, Colombia, where he was born. He received an honorable mention for his graduation thesis Dignified Affordable Housing, which consisted of plans for an affordable housing development in Girón, Colombia. The development included homes of diverse sizes using a combination of traditional and contemporary building materials with the objective of achieving a long lasting, affordable and easy to maintain community of homes targeted for low income families. Omar moved to the United States in 2001 and joined Greystone Builders and Architects Inc, a design/build firm in Highland Park, as an Intern Architect. There, he worked on over 25 custom homes in Chicago’s North Shore. In 2005, Omar joined Becker Architects Ltd as a Project Architect and worked on numerous commercial and residential projects. In 2009, he became a freelance architectural designer and focused on taking the Architectural Registration Examination. Omar has been licensed since 2014 and continues to be an independent architect with a focus on residential and light commercial architecture. He lives in Evanston with his wife, Sarah, their daughter, Emerson, their son, Radley and their beloved cat, Lilibet. Page 118 of 126 Page 119 of 126 Page 120 of 126 Page 121 of 126 Page 122 of 126 Page 123 of 126 ATTACHMENT D Z{Ë¦Ë^££®{Ë ! ! ! ! !! X¯6«¬¬/Ë 9U³ ÀË Áa V|«~ËG¤¯~|¯§¤ËS»¢}« ¬Ë VGS0Ë !Ë?Ë "Ë Ë ËOË Ë @¬Ë~Ë«¨Ë̄ Ë§¤Ë§Ë|Ë¬¯«»~¯»«¬Ë¯§Ë}Ë¢§¬1Ë ¶²Ë'5Ë #)ËË CHRÂË 7¡´ ! ! !! !! P|ËS|¢0Ë Y P|ËS|¢2Ë Ã¹Ë EË mmnnË lË V«¢|«¾Ë:§¤¯|~¯0ËhTlËÄiLidiBjklÅj[Ë V«¢|«¾Ë:§¤¯|~¯1Ë ÊbË º]Ë 6«¬¬1Ë 6«¬¬2Ë :¯¾Ë X¯|¯Ë `¨0Ë ·Ë ±g8Ë \Ë Ë :¯¾ËX¯|¯Ë `¨2Ë QËDJË fË¿ ªË V§¤ËS V§¤ËS A¢|0Ë A¢|0Ë @|¯Ë§¼¤«Ë|~©»«Ë¨«§¨«¯¾0Ë Ë &N¥Ë !!!! !! " !" "" " " " !"" " " " !!!"" " """ "" 6«3Ë ooooooopqrssoËtË :¯¾ËX¯|¯Ë `I V1Ë uoooooonvrrrËwË V§¤ËS§2Ë oonoopqr sooooËoË A¢|2Ë xrsooooopyyoonËzË V|Ë !§+Ë Page 124 of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age 125 of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age 126 of 126