Board of Architectural Review

Board Members Present: Alexander, Faust, Haselden (chair), Scott, White Staff present: Courtney, Dowd, Jordan (recorder) RESULTS BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW-LARGE January 24, 2018 4:30 P.M. 2 GEORGE STREET 1. Approval of minutes from the May 24, 2017 meeting. APP. NO. 181-24-1 MOTION: Approval MADE BY: White SECOND: Faust VOTE: FOR 5 AGAINST 0 2. 485 East Bay Street - - TMS # 459-13-04-022 APP. NO. 181-24-2 Request approval for demolition of existing two-story brick building with retention of existing cellular tower and support building. Not Rated (Mazyck-Wraggborough) c. 1951-55 Old and Historic District Owner: Mazyck Holdings, LLC Applicant: Strand Capital Group, LLC Deferred by Staff 3. 475 East Bay Street - - TMS # 459-13-04-041/023 APP. NO. 181-24-3 Request approval for demolition of existing one-story retail building. Not Rated (Mazyck-Wraggborough) c. post-1955/pre-1980 Old and Historic District Owner: Mazyck Holdings, LLC Applicant: Strand Capital Group, LLC Deferred by Staff 4. 475 East Bay Street APP. NO. 181-24-4 - - TMS # 459-13-04-041/022/023/026-029 Request conceptual approval for new construction of a 100-unit accommodations development. (Mazyck-Wraggborough) Old and Historic District Owner: Mazyck Holdings, LLC Applicant: Strand Capital Group, LLC Deferred by Staff 5. 82 Mary Street - - TMS # 450-12-02-096 APP. NO. 181-24-5 Request conceptual approval for new construction of mixed-use development to include structured parking, retail and office use with 9th story for architectural merit. (Cannon-Elliottborough) Old and Historic District Owner: Cobalt Property Group Applicant: Nathan J Schutte/ McMillan Pazdan Smith MOTION: Deferral in consideration of Board comments to reduce to eight (8) stories, restudy vehicular tunnel to avoid competing with the low line, to incorporate staff comments except #12, rejecting the request for the 9th floor based upon insufficient architectural merit and context with more sympathetic massing to the historic structure. MADE BY: White SECOND: Scott VOTE: FOR 5 AGAINST 0