HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

200 E. Wells Street City of Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 Meeting Minutes HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MATTHEW JAROSZ CHAIR Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, Vice-Chair Ald. Robert Bauman, Marion Clendenen-Acosta, Brad Hoeschen, Anna-Marie Opgenorth, and Blair Williams Staff Assistant, Chris Lee, 286-2232, Fax: 286-3456, clee@milwaukee.gov HPC Planners: Carlen Hatala, 286-5722, chatal@milwaukee.gov; Paul Jakubovich, 286-5712, pjakub@milwaukee.gov Monday, November 11, 2013 3:00 PM Room 301-A, Third Floor, City Hall Meeting convened at 3:01 p.m. Present: 4 - Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, Jarosz Excused: 3 - Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, Williams Individuals also present: Carlen Hatala, Historic Preservation Commission Staff Planner Paul Jakubovich, Historic Preservation Commission Staff Planner 1. Roll Call. 2. Approval of the Previous Minutes of October 14, 2013. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Clendenen-Acosta, of the minutes of October 14, 2013. There were no objections. 3. 130986 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the removal of an old addition and construction of a new one at 2045 N. 2nd Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Elf Stone, Inc. Sponsors: THE CHAIR Mr. Jabukovich gave an overview of the removal of an old addition and construction of a new one at 2045 N. 2nd St. in the Brewers’ Hill Historic District. The subject house is a simple old cottage built after the Civil War with a rear addition that was built around 1900. The applicant had constructed a new addition in the rear of the house in the place of the old addition. In addition, the applicant had removed substitute siding, installed new two over two wood windows with wood muntins, and restored wood siding and trim on the exterior of the house. The applicant is presently installing new porch decks at the front and side of the house where the exterior doors are located at. With the exception of the porches, all of the work done on the exterior of the house and rear addition were done without any permits or Certificates of City of Milwaukee Page 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION Appropriateness (COA) being issued. There is a clear break separating the rear addition and the house. Review of this project is after the fact, but staff finds that all the work done was acceptable and met preservation standards despite staff reservation about the longevity of the wood muntins. The porches are simple, will have newer posts, have standard two by two balusters, and will match each other with center match tongue and groove flooring. The porches are under staff approval requiring a separate COA, and staff has supplied to the owner a standard porch drawing to follow. Commissioners questioned staff why muntins on the front windows of this particular house were acceptable despite the Commission’s issue of not allowing muntins on front windows in the past? Commissioners asked why the owner did not obtain any permits and COA’s previous to doing the work? Commissioners also inquired why the red brick foundation was painted over? Mr. Jakubovich replied that two over two windows would have been the fashion after the Civil War. One over one windows were very unusual due to the high costs for large panes of glass at that time. In the 1860s, there were four over four windows. Dakin Emerson, Elf Stone, Inc., appeared and gave comments. The rear addition and house have different tax keys and were sold together to his nonprofit organization, which he serves as the president. The fence has been removed with the intention to include the yard with the house. The porch will be designed based on staff’s design. Four two over two original windows were given to a neighbor to save but were too rotted to be saved. With the exception of adding mullions to match the side windows, the three bay windows at the front of the house were exact replicas of the windows that were there already. His educational nonprofit organization bought the properties for the purposes of rehabbing and reselling the properties for a profit to fund its charity and school. Financing fell through due to the economy, the house was condemned, and fines were issued by the Department of Neighborhood Services (DNS). Due to further potential fines and the lack of responses from inspectors, he went ahead with the repairs after obtaining the necessary funding. An agreement was reached with DNS to waive all fines if permits for all the repairs could be obtained. The foundation of the properties were made of a variation of different colored brick and styles and looked terrible. He replaced the north side of the foundation wall and painted over all the brick. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Clendenen-Acosta, of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the removal of an old addition and construction of a new one at 2045 N. 2nd Street. There were no objections. A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Marion Clendenen-Acosta, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams 4. Presentation from the State Historic Preservation Office (Wisconsin Historic Society) Regarding Local Register. Rick Bernstein, a field services representative from the Wisconsin Historical Society (WHS) who has been advising commissions since 2002, appeared before the City of Milwaukee Page 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION commission and gave a presentation regarding the following historic preservation topics in Wisconsin: legal foundations, commissions, designations, inventories, types of historic properties, significance and integrity, defining historic districts, politics, grants, and training. Mr. Bernstein’s presentation can be found within Common Council File Number 130533 under the attachment entitled “WHS Presentation - In’s and Out’s of Designating Local Landmarks.” Mr. Bernstein responded to questions from commissioners. WHS inventories are available online, and searches for Wisconsin inventories can be made ; however, the survey process involves a number of paid consultants putting inventories together rather than software systems putting inventories together. Regarding the impact of WHS decisions on local decisions, each level of government do not have to jive completely. Decisions may differ, but some coordination or communication between local communities and WHS should be done. Regarding getting support and consensus of residents before district nominations, building a consensus or a majority viewpoint is important. It is recommended that there be more than a majority interested for a local designation. A majority can be up to two thirds, but it varies among communities. Regarding delisting buildings due to lost of integrity, WHS would de list buildings from the National Register only if the buildings were demolished or substantially lost but not due to a lost of integrity. In comparison to other mid size American cities, Wisconsin is somewhere in the middle regarding the number of CLG’s and historic preservation communities with ordinances . Ms. Hatala said that staff has identified 19 building and thematic topics that can be used for surveys locally. The last inventory for the City was in 1991 or 1992 regarding ethnic architecture. A portion of Sherman Park was surveyed last year, and staff will try to get a report online. Survey reports that have been done in the City are available for public access at the central library and at the libraries in the neighborhoods that were surveyed. Many of the early surveys done in the City were done before computers and are not online anywhere, but there can be future discussion to digitalize these surveys. Ms. Hatala added that there are some proposals for historic district designation in the works and may be forthcoming; however, these proposals are in the process or need meetings with residents. There are no proposals currently in the writing stage. 5. 130422 Communication relating to the establishment of an historic plaquing program. Sponsors: THE CHAIR Jim Owczarski, City Clerk, appeared and gave comments. Further research, information, concept designs, ideas, and suggestions have been forwarded to the Commission as requested from the last meeting. The Commission should deliberate and start to choose what it wants to see in a final plaquing program and what is administratively possible. The key decision is whether to choose an exclusive and limited program or a broader identification program. This decision will then predicate aesthetics, design, materials, costs, and supervision of the program. The desire from Ald. Terry Witkowski, 13th aldermanic district, is to allow non designees to be eligible under the program. The ordinance directs that a plaquing program be established, but it gives no guidance as to what the program shall be. Andrew VanNatta, Legislative Reference Bureau, said that he tried to address the Commission’s questions from the last meeting in the latest report . Information on City of Milwaukee Page 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION seven additional programs, different technology components, QR codes, and augmented reality were included in the report. Additional information on the number of designated buildings, plaques, and specific programs were added. The Milwaukee County Historical Society has expressed concern that services not be duplicated between the County’s current plaquing program and the City system . Mr. VanNatta responded to questions from commissioners. In terms of process and not size, the City of Houston is similar to Milwaukee. Most programs were administered or initiated by a historical society and not by a city. Houston’s plaquing program was a community based effort in which the city designed a charette and shifted the program to a historic society to administer for a number of years before bringing the program back under the city’s jurisdiction . Regarding costs of research and actual plaques, the costs were split in half by the most part. Owners were responsible to provide research information, but historical societies did research for an additional fee in a few case studies. Regarding those cities that plaqued designated properties, plaquing was open anytime for anyone willing to pay for the plaques. No information was found regarding cities having an award ceremony awarding only a select number of plaques. Concerns were discussed. Mr. Owczarski said that he was concerned with street naming issues, costs, and review criteria regarding a plaquing program. Ms. Opgenorth was concerned that more visibility would be given to those sites or structures of less historic significance than those that have historic designation. Also, plaquing sites of historic events or significance would duplicate the County’s plaquing program. Mr. Hoeschen was concerned that a broad program would cause capacity issues for staff and the Commission. Staff and the Commission would further be tasked with research, discussion, and review of plaquing proposals in addition to their current tasks. In addition, allowing non designated sites, structures, or places to be recognized without having to comply with all of the requirements of designation may dilute current historic designation in the City. Many may pursue recognition and prestige through plaques rather than designation, and designation may perhaps be viewed as only a process to obtain tax credits. Designation is an important brand that should be preserved. Ms. Hatala said that confusion may arise regarding legal designation if non designated sites or structures were plaqued. Program types, eligibility requirements, costs, implementation, administration, potential consequences, and plaques were deliberated. Mr. Owczarski said that an exclusive program could be done on an expedited basis. Applications, criteria, standards, and desirable plaques can be developed. Plaques can be granted by the Commission as part of an honorary program. Mr. Owczarski said that a broader program could be tied with Historic Milwaukee and other agencies to create a sense of historic identity for the City on a broader basis. Administration of a broader program would have to be determined. Such a program should have gentler criteria for people to take advantage of. There should be discussion with community stakeholders to gain leverage for a broader program. People should be open to get plaques themselves under this type of program. City of Milwaukee Page 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION Mr. Jarosz said that the program may be more valuable if information of buildings or sites can be made broadly available and if data can be organized through plaquing; however, a broad plaquing program would bear great costs. The program should be more exclusive with a finite number of plaques awarded to those sites or structures that are not historically designated and should tie into the Cream of Cream City Awards. The program should be open to historically designated sites or structures with no upper limit. Perhaps the program can be a pilot and brought back for reassessment. Historic and non historic districts can also be recognized with an ongoing category of one plaque given to a district each year. District plaques as opposed to plaques for single buildings may substantially encourage more property owners to remodel their properties properly. Plaques may encourage property owners to go beyond regular building maintenance and do restorations of their properties. Ms. Opgenorth said that the program should first plaque districts. Then the program should perhaps allow plaquing for designated sites and structures only. Plaques, instead of bricks, should be awarded to a select few within the Cream of Cream City Awards. The program may be considered as a fast track to designation requiring paperwork and research, and the applicant may later decide to apply for designation. Mr. Hoeschen said that he liked the idea of having a narrow award plaquing program coinciding with the Cream of Cream City Awards as a part of preservation awareness and to retain the importance of designation. The program should first be automatically available to designated sites, structures, or districts and then open to other sites, structures, or districts at an exclusive and competitive level once a year for up to 25 recipients that staff can manage. The exclusive level should be open to sites of preservation involving renovation and maintenance. Sites of historic significance or events can also be included in the competition. Perhaps designated districts should first be recognized with large, informative plates at the boundaries to promote historic preservation, education, and awareness. There should be no outside administration of the program. Recipients of plaques at the ceremony should not have to pay for their own plaques, and the costs should be paid by some other source. Mr. Jakubovich said that tying the program into the Cream of Cream City Awards was an intriguing idea since that event is the high point of the preservation year. However, Ald. Witkowski would like for plaques to be available all year round and for another source, not the City and property owners, to pay for the program and plaques. The concept of free standing plaques for historic sites, structures, or places that no longer exist would have to be considered, and these plaques would be more expensive. For commercial districts, business improvement districts (BID) could pay for plaques. Ms. Hatala said that not all recipients from the Cream of Cream City Awards have properties that were locally designated. She added that current plaque examples shown to the Commission are paid by the property owner. In addition, some BIDs would purchase plaques for buildings within the districts as a part of doing business. Mr. Owczarski said street naming had some issues in the past. The Commission has the authority to determine that the City bear the costs of plaques, perhaps on an annualized basis similar to the Cream of Cream City bricks. Plaques in the right of way would be complicated and problematic. The City seal is too intricate to be included on the plaques. Perhaps the program should be open for any designee willing to pay for a plaque at anytime with some honor given, and an annual plaquing award event can be made available at no cost to both designees and others with sufficient reasons. City of Milwaukee Page 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION Research and review criteria were discussed. Mr. Jarosz said that research can be done by others but would require oversight from staff. Research for historically designated sites or structures would have already been done, but the research of sites or structures that have not been historically designated would require vetting. Ms. Hatala said that she uses the designation criteria when doing her research. The designation criteria may not be broad enough to be used for a plaquing program. Mr. Jakubovich said that incorporating a minimum standard of meeting one of the designation criteria would address the concern about landmarking quality. This minimum standard would be guaranteed and prevent plaquing from being a significant departure from designation. Mr. Hoeschen said that he liked the minimum standard of review suggested by Mr. Jakubovich; however, staff may be tasked with doing too much research and reports if many people applied for plaques. The applicants should be the ones responsible to demonstrate that their properties meet the criteria. An appeal process was discussed. Ms. Hatala ask if those that were denied from being awarded a plaque should be able to appeal? Mr. Jarosz said that denied applicants should be able to reapply for the next opportunity. Plaques were further discussed. Mr. VanNatta said that the program could stipulate the removal of plaques , even if paid by the property owners, of non designated structures or sites due to improper maintenance or changes in circumstances. This stipulation might add more weight to the plaques. Mr. Jakubovich said that the plaque estimates forwarded to commissioners were from a Pennsylvania company that frequently deals with making plaques and is representative of plaque costs. Mr. Hoeschen said that plaques for the program should be made locally in Wisconsin . Mr. Owczarski said that QR targets appear to be out of the question due to costs and a bid process will have to be done for the plaques. Discussion was made on further action to develop a plaquing program. Mr. Owczarski said that commissioners appeared to have a consensus for the program to be more competitive rather than being wide open; have a finite number of plaques; be annualized rather than on a rolling basis for awarding plaques; have no scale back in review and research; have a minimum standard of meeting one of the designation critera; and give preference for designated sites, structures, and districts. Mr. Owczarski said that the Commission has the authority to develop the program offline, without Common Council approval, by its own resolution or more appropriately in its by laws. Based on commissioners’ feedback, his office will revise the City of Milwaukee Page 6 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION Commission’s by laws regarding the plaquing program and return to the Commission with a draft for review. The Commission may then come to a determination and forward its by laws on the program to Ald. Witkowski for his review before the Commission makes its final approval. He can build into the draft that preference is given to historically designated districts, sites, and structures while still opening the door to others. Also, some street naming exclusion can be incorporated into the draft. The issue of costs does not have to be dealt with initially. Dawn McCarthy, Milwaukee Preservation Alliance, appeared and inquired as to the public process regarding the plaquing program? She added that there is one historic neighborhood association concerned with the dilution of designation that plaquing might cause. Mr. Hoeschen said that the Commission should have a public hearing prior to a final vote on adopting a plaquing program. Mr. Owczarski said that a public meeting with public testimony was possible, and the City Clerk’s office could assist with that. He added that some documentation based on the outlines made today should be made available so people could understand the deliberations that were taking place. Mr. Jarosz said that a public meeting seemed logical, but he would contemplate on whether or not to schedule a public meeting. He added that putting a review online and getting comments from various groups should occur. 6. Discussion relating to the Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Schedule of 2014. Mr. Owczarski presented the proposed 2014 meeting dates and times: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 Monday, February 10, 2014 Monday, March 10, 2014 Tuesday, April 15, 2014 Monday, May 12, 2014 Monday, June 9, 2014 Tuesday, July 15, 2014 Monday, August 11, 2014 Monday, September 8, 2014 Monday, October 13, 2014 Monday, November 10, 2014 Tuesday, December 9, 2014 Mr. Owczarski said that those meetings scheduled for Tuesdays were the result of conflicts with other meetings. He added that the proposed meeting calendar would allow for consistent broadcasting of the meetings. Broadcasting of these meetings has been traditionally desired by the Commission. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Clendenen Acosta, of the Historic Preservation Commission meeting schedule of 2014, as presented. There were no objections. 7. Updates and Announcements. Mr. Jakubovich announced that Ald. Nik Kovac, 3rd aldermanic district, will send out survey cards to all owners and occupants in the Newberry Boulevard area and that a City of Milwaukee Page 7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION third meeting with neighbors was held regarding possible local historic district designation of the Newberry Boulevard. Mr. Jakubovich announced an informational meeting for possible local historic district designation of South 2nd Street for Tuesday, December 19, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. at Zach’s Café, 231 S. 2nd St., Milwaukee, on the mezzanine level. Mr. Jakubovich announced the staff approval of the complete replacement of all roof rafters for the building on the northwest corner of 33rd Street and State Street. The building twice suffered fire damage, and the owners agreed to restore the roof rafters to the architect’s original drawings on file with staff . Wood windows and muttons will be forthcoming. Mr. Jarosz announced that the first set of ongoing preservation symposiums occurred last Wednesday, November 6, 2013. The next symposium will occur in February or March 2014 regarding improving preservation, and it will have national panelists. Aldermanic awareness talks will occur prior to the next symposium. 8. The Following Files Represent Staff Approved Certificates of Appropriateness: Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Opgenorth, of the staff approved Certificates of Appropriateness. There were no objections. a. 130907 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for rebuilding the chimney and replacing the garage doors at 2209 N. Terrace Avenue in the North Point North Historic District for Charmaine and Kurt Gunderson. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams b. 130911 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for new roofing gutters and venting at 102 W. Vine Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Stephanie Dragovich. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams City of Milwaukee Page 8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION c. 130917 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of new exterior venting for a boiler at 2625 N. Wahl Avenue in the North Point North Historic District for Angela Kvidera. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams d. 130918 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for murals on the green boards over the windows at 4243 W. North Avenue in the North Sherman Boulevard Historic District for the City of Milwaukee. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams e. 130937 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new front porch deck and handrails on steps at 2735 W. State Street in the Concordia Historic District for Jason Parker. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams f. 130938 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new backyard garden shed at 2642 N. Summit Avenue in the North Point North Historic District for Sue Medford. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: City of Milwaukee Page 9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams g. 130939 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for front porch repairs at 3002 W. McKinley Blvd. in the Cold Spring Park Historic District for Brenda Bell-White. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams h. 130943 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for roofing and sidewall wood shingles at 2679 N. Lake Drive in the North Point North Historic District for Jeff Gallas. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams i. 130945 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for tuckpointing , gutters and repairs at 2671 N. Lake Drive in the North Point North Historic District for Sarah Greenberg. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams j. 130968 Resolution relating to a certificate of appropriateness for replacement windows at 612 N. Broadway in the East Side Commercial Historic City of Milwaukee Page 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION District for Roger Kriete. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams k. 130984 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for rear yard fencing at 2963 N. Lake Drive in the North Lake Drive Historic District for C. Frederick Geilfuss. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams l. 130985 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the removal of the front yard retaining wall and re-grading at 2624 E. Belleview Place in the North Point North Historic District for Donna J. Neal. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams m. 131013 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for porch repair and tuckpointing at 705-707 W. Historic Mitchell Street in the Mitchell Street Historic District for Frank and Mary Koutras. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Opgenorth, Hoeschen, Clendenen-Acosta, and Jarosz City of Milwaukee Page 11 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes November 11, 2013 COMMISSION No: 0 Excused: 3- Bauman, Pieper Eisenbrown, and Williams Meeting adjourned at 5:08 p.m. Chris Lee, Staff Assistant This meeting can be viewed in its entirety through the City's Legislative Research Center at http://milwaukee.legistar.com/calendar. City of Milwaukee Page 12