HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

200 E. Wells Street City of Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 Meeting Minutes HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ANN PIEPER EISENBROWN, CHAIR Ald. Robert Bauman, Marion Clendenen-Acosta, Brad Hoeschen, Matt Jarosz, Anna-Marie Opgenorth, and Blair Williams Staff Assistant, Linda Elmer, 286-2231, Fax: 286-3456, lelmer@milwaukee.gov HPC Planners: Carlen Hatala, 286-5722, chatal@milwaukee.gov; Paul Jakubovich, 286-5712, pjakub@milwaukee.gov Monday, December 30, 2013 3:00 PM Room 301-B, Third Floor, City Hall Special Meeting convened at 3:00 p.m. Present: 5 - Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, Clendenen-Acosta Excused: 2 - Bauman, Williams Individual also present: Paul Jakubovich, Historic Preservation Commission Staff Planner 1. Roll Call. 2. Approval of the Previous Minutes of November 11, 2013. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Clendenen-Acosta, of the minutes of December 30, 2013. There were no objections. 3. 131159 Resolution relating to a certificate of appropriateness for replacement of terra cotta on Milwaukee City Hall, 200 E. Wells St., an individually designated building for the City of Milwaukee. Sponsors: THE CHAIR Mr. Jakubovich gave an overview on the proposal for the replacement of approximately 2200 terra cotta units that were previously installed on City Hall, during the restoration that began in 2003, that have since cracked. This number represents a significant portion but not all of the remaining terra cotta, which would not be touched. Work would be limited to the upper portions of the building. Gables and coping stones would be replaced and include roll caps on top to shelter the joints and prevent moisture from soaking in. The roll caps were not installed previously on the replacement pieces. Cornices and portions of gutters would be replaced with new terra cotta. Balustrades would also be replaced. The overall appearance and design City of Milwaukee Page 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION of the exterior of the building would not be altered. The Department of Public Works (DPW) had reviewed three options. DPW has chosen the option of replacing 2200 terra cotta units and requiring periodic inspection. The manner of how the material is to be installed would change by not using grout. The proposal is to use type O of standard pre mixed bag mortars. Type O mortar has a decent amount of lime and give to it. Use of expansion joints would be a new feature, and the joints will be added at select locations where movement could take place. The expansion joints would be filled with a sealant or caulk and would not be visible from a distance. Mr. Jakubovich, on behalf of Commission staff, recommended approval with the condition that a sample of terra cotta and mortar be reviewed and approved by staff. In addition, expansion joints should not be used further in the future for repairs. Instead, a richer lime mortar should be considered as opposed to the mortar presently being proposed. Ghassan Korban of DPW and Edward Gerns of Wiss, Jannery, Elstner Associates, Inc. appeared. Mr. Korban said that his department is in agreement to change the mortar type from N to O. Mr. Hoeschen said that DPW would have to come back to the Commission regarding future work on the exterior of the building, and the Commission will have the right to inquire about expansion joints and richer lime mortar. Commissioners further had questions regarding a review by the National Park Service of the proposal, appropriateness for the Commission to consider mortar hardness specifications, visibility of the expansion joints, and status of the canopy. Mr. Jakubovich replied. The National Park Service has left discretion over review of the proposal to the Commission and that it would be more interested in the proposal if the City had applied for national historic landmark funds. Mortar hardness has been reviewed by staff at local, state, and federal levels. It is vital to the preservation of buildings. Mr. Gerns replied. Existing head and bed joints that are in the configuration of the terra cotta and not conventional expansion joints would be added. Expansion joints would be installed only in areas where whole bands of terra cotta would be replaced. Nothing is going into existing materials. To reduce visibility, sand would be broadcasted into the sealant to blend better with mortar joints. All expansion joint installations are reversible. The need for the canopy would go away. Mr. Korban stated that the canopy would be removed by the time of completion in late November 2014. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Opgenorth, of a Certificate of Appropriateness for replacement of terra cotta on Milwaukee City Hall, 200 E. Wells St. There were no objections. A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 City of Milwaukee Page 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams 4. 131200 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for major landscaping at 3474 N. Lake Drive in the North Lake Drive Estates Historic District for William and Catherine Perez. Sponsors: THE CHAIR Mr. Jakubovich gave an overview on the proposal for major landscaping at the Stanley Stone house, a French Chateau Revival style house built in 1928, at 3474 N. Lake Dr. along the shore of Lake Michigan. A deep ravine currently surrounds the entire property on at least two sides. The existing granite and limestone driveway will be removed and replaced with all salvaged granite paving stones in the same footprint. The formal garden off to the side of the house would not have any major changes except the removal of some trees and additions of some new plantings and an apple orchard. There would be a new seat wall and patio built. Old bushes would be removed and replaced with new bushes. The rear yard, which presently drops off very quickly towards the lake, would be enlarged to involve a bump out, a little re grading of the existing slope, new shrubbery, and leveling off of an existing pathway to the lake. Erosion has been an issue along the lakefront. Windows and ironwork mentioned in the application would be staff approved. Mr. Jakubovich, on behalf of the Commission staff, recommended approval but was concerned with the proposed change in grading and the masonry materials of the seat wall and patio. Barbara Rosborough, Rosborough Partners, Inc., appeared and gave comments. The pathway at the rear does not go all the way to the lake, which is 350 feet away from the slope at the rear. The back lawn would need to be regarded, more terraced as opposed to a continual slope. This would lessen the erosion of the yard and the grade will be held in place by a vigorous collection of plantings adaptable to slope retention and not a retaining wall. A civil engineer has not been consulted regarding the proposal to change the grade. Center plantings would be replaced in the garden, trees in front of the home are existing, and the curb cut would remain the same. Contractors for all the work would be local and from Chicago. Mr. Hoeschen said that he was concerned with the ravine, fallen trees in the ravine, and integrity of the bluff at the rear towards the lake. The change in grading should be reviewed by a civil engineer. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Clendenen Acosta, of a Certificate of Appropriateness for major landscaping at 3474 N. Lake Drive in the North Lake Drive Estates Historic District with the exception that any change in grade require receipt of a report from a civil engineer showing no compromises to the bluff and requiring that masonry materials of the seat wall and patio be approved by staff. There were no objections. A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Marion Clendenen-Acosta, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 City of Milwaukee Page 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams 5. 130422 Communication relating to the establishment of an historic plaquing program. Sponsors: THE CHAIR Mr. Jakubovich said that before the Commission today was a discussion draft of by laws regarding the plaquing program, which was generated for the Commission’s review, approval, and comment in regards to creating specific language for the ordinance on how a program would be administered and who would be eligible for it. Subsequent Common Council review may occur after review and approval by the Commission. Details of this draft can be found within the file, CCFN 130422, under “HPC Bylaws Basic (Discussion Draft) 12 30 13”. Mr. Jakubovich proceeded to give an overview of the by laws draft regarding eligibility and administration. One criteria presently listed in the City’s historic preservation ordinance would have to be met, and there should be no negative connotations associated with the buildings, structures, or sites being considered. Non designees may apply for plaques followed by staff review and recommendation before being forwarded for determination by the Commission. There would be no cost to the City as requesters and applicants would be responsible for payment of all charges for landmark plaques. Commissioners inquired about plaque placement and types, the eligibility of designated and non designated structures, commission review, limiting the number of plaques given, administrative costs, marketing of the program, alternatives to a plaquing program, and staff input. They asked for more information about other cities that were most similar to Milwaukee, the amount of applications that other cities would receive under a plaquing program, and an expanded table comparing plaquing programs among cities, states, and counties. Andrew VanNatta, Legislative Reference Bureau, was present and responded to commissioners regarding their questions and the draft of the by laws under consideration. The draft includes some input from Ald. Terry Witkowski, 13th aldermanic office, and the alderman supports the draft. Ald. Witkowski expressed to him that non designated buildings, structures, and sites be eligible for plaques, but the alderman did not mention anything to him about limiting the number of plaques given out. The main idea would be to have plaques be on a building and then designated in some way on a post, wall, or structure. Plaques should not be on a street sign. The Commission should determine the type and placement of plaques. Designated structures would be automatically eligible for a plaque. Both applicants of designated and non designated structures would pay for all costs, and all applications would be reviewed by staff and the Commission. Covington, Kentucky was looked at as being most similar to Milwaukee due to having its own municipal plaquing program. There is no outside historic society to administer the program. The application process is a two part process with the first part consisting of determining whether or not undesignated structures would meet the required criteria and the second part consisting of determining the technical aspects City of Milwaukee Page 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION of a plaque such as wording, design, and placement. Applicants could write down what they wanted on a plaque. Approval by Covington’s commission is a fairly detailed process. Visuals of plaques were looked at. The Commission should direct what it wants in an application process. Information regarding the amount of applications for plaques in other cities could not be found. For the most part, other programs in other cities were applicant driven, especially ones promoted by historic societies. Administrative cost is to be determined by the City or the Commission. Information regarding the cost of plaques is available under page 18 and 19 of the “LRB Report Oct. 2013,” which can be found within the file, CCFN 130422. There is a copy of a table comparing city, county, and state plaquing programs. It has not been finalized but can be provided. Mr. Jakubovich said that both designees and non designees would come before the commission for a plaque. Communication about the program can be made simply by public announcement or through press release. Through experience, sending letters to owners of designated structures would not be very effective and would yield little return. Many people would not pay attention to these letters. He does not know how many people would be interested in plaques. He had received two calls during the past year about city plaquing, but none were interested in a plaque if they had to pay for its costs. Anyone can put up their own plaques presently as long as zoning requirements are met. People would only come to the Commission for a plaque to get official recognition as to the significance of their buildings, structures, or sites. There has been a separate or alternative movement to have districts identified with street signs on top of existing street signs. This separate district naming idea came out of the plaquing program discussion and has passed through the Common Council. Neighborhoods would have to pay for the signs. Concerns were discussed. Ms. Pieper Eisenbrown was concerned with who would be responsible to do and provide the research information for staff to review and determine if a criterion has been met. Mr. Hoeschen said that he was concerned with increased workload put on staff, the dilution of existing designations, and protecting the Commission’s main roles of designating and protecting historic buildings, structures, and sites. As currently drafted, it is not clear who would be responsible to provide the research. Staff may find themselves with the burden of doing the research. By having no limits to the amount of plaques that can be given, allowing plaques to be issued throughout the year, and having lesser criteria requirements and restrictions as opposed to the criteria and restrictions for historic designations, the plaquing program as currently drafted may perhaps influence owners or applicants to seek plaques instead of historic designation in regards to their properties. Historic designation may only be desirable for tax credit purposes. Dawn McCarthy of the Milwaukee Preservation Alliance appeared and provided her concerns. Allowing eligibility for non designated buildings, structures, or sites would cause unnecessary problems, have costs to the City, not support the role of the Commission, not protect historic properties, increase staff and commission responsibilities, not prevent anyone from putting up their own plaques, and be a disservice for those willing to have the restrictions under designation. Another concern would be having an appeal process for denied applicants, which has not City of Milwaukee Page 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION been addressed. Eliminating eligibility for non designees would solve a lot of the problems under discussion. Gail Finch appeared and shared her concerns. Current designees and future applicants may be discouraged. They may bail out of the designation program and seek the plaquing instead. The plaquing program and by laws were further deliberated. Mr. Jakubovich said that plaques could perhaps be awarded throughout the year as applications come in and then formally recognized in mass at the preservation awards. Regarding the burden of research, staff can have an application form calling out for required information. The form can be made online and in hardcopy form. The hope is for the applicant to do the legwork, and staff can direct them on where to go to find information. Mr. Jarosz said that it appears that the application process would be a two step process consisting of determining the criteria and then commission review and determination. Eligibility would be wide open. Issuing plaques throughout the year as applications come in and then recognizing awardees in mass at the annual preservation awards seemed logical. The Commission should err on the side of encouraging recognition, providing more information regarding historic structures, implementing the program as drafted, and revisit the program in a year. Generation of a form requesting research information would not be burdensome to staff. Applicants should be responsible to provide thorough research information and photographs, and the by laws should be expanded to make this requirement very clear. The responsibility of applicants to bear the administrative and plaque costs would limit the amount of those who would be interested and actually pursue a plaque, and it would seem that there would not be numerous applications for plaques as a result. Ms. Pieper Eisenbrown said that the burden of doing research should be on the applicant and not on the staff. The program should be on a first come first serve basis in terms of applications coming in. To alleviate the problem of potentially reviewing many applications, there could be a staggered roll out of the program allowing for a certain time period for applications to be accepted. As the program extends into future, the time period may be expanded gradually each year. To protect historic properties, plaques issued by the Commission could have a trademark or specific approval language on the plaques. Ms. Opgenorth said that despite concerns there must be a plaquing program. The Commission should take advantage of the program to build communities and increase understanding of local historic designation. Perhaps marketing of the program could be done electronically to all those with designated buildings, structures, or sites. County programs in most cases have societies to provide the placement and maintenance of plaques. Mr. Hoeschen said that the by laws should be moved forward to include language to clearly indicate that an applicant is responsible to provide information to show compliance with the criteria of the program. Staff should be tasked with making a recommendation and not be responsible to conduct the research. Based on LRB research, the vast majority of other cities have twenty or fewer plaques issued per year. As a result, there is some assurance that a program for the City may entail a fairly small number of applications and plaques. Despite the concerns that were City of Milwaukee Page 6 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION expressed, the Commission must create a plaquing program as directed. The Commission should find a balance in an appropriate manner without damaging of diluting historic designation and historic properties. The balance could be achieved through by having a narrowly tailored and prestigious program, similar to the Cream of Cream City Awards, that would limit the number of plaques awarded each year and the period that plaques would be issued. Applications may be submitted throughout the year, but there should be a submittal deadline. The Commission has the ability to cap the amount of applications accepted and the amount of awardees chosen. For example, the program could entail the acceptance of only the first one hundred applications the selection of up to twenty five awardees for a year. The Commission should hear further input from alderpersons and from fellow commissioner, Ald. Robert Bauman. Mr. Jarosz requested for LRB to do the following: provide more information regarding the plaquing program application process and visuals of plaques of Covington, Kentucky; amount of applications received by other cities with plaquing programs; change the by law draft to add language requiring that the applicant be responsible to do research and provide information for staff to review as suggested by commissioners; and change the by law draft to add language stating that the number of applications accepted and plaques issued each year be limited to a certain number as suggested by commissioners. Concluding remarks were made by Mr. Jarosz. He had further questions and wanted more time for the Commission to consider and review the plaquing program before makingfinal decisions. He would like to revisit the matter with Alds. Witkowski, Kovac, and Bauman regarding the concerns expressed, to obtain input from them, and to revisit the basic intent of the program. The matter may be taken up again at the next meeting. Mr. Lee is to provide bullet points of the discussion made today. 6. Updates and Announcements. Mr. Jakubovich announced that the Cream of the Cream City Awards would be held in May and for commissioners to start thinking about nominations. Applications should be put out by February, and the selection process should conclude by April . 7. The Following Files Represent Staff Approved Certificates of Appropriateness: Mr. Hoeschen moved for separate consideration and his abstention of item "m." There were no objections. Mr. Hoeschen moved approval, seconded by Ms. Pieper Eisenbrown, of the staff approved Certificates of Appriateness, excluding item "m." There were no objections. Ms. Opgenorth moved approval, seconded by Ms. Clendenen-Acosta, of item "m." Mr. Hoeschen abstained. There were no objections. a. 131027 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a central air conditioning unit on the roof and sidewall venting, both on the coach house at 2659 N. Lake Drive in the North Point North Historic District for Ingmar and Bridget Viohl. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, City of Milwaukee Page 7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams b. 131048 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of venting for HVAC equipment at 1003-1005 N. 33rd Street in the Concordia Historic District for Greenfire Management Services, LLC. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams c. 131053 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the repair of sheet metal cornice and roofs at 2607 N. Downer Avenue in the Downer Avenue Historic District for CLM Midwest. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams d. 131054 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for masonry work at 2025 N. Lake Drive in the North Point South Historic District for Stefan Schnitzer. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta City of Milwaukee Page 8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams e. 131060 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the coach house repairs at 2659 N. Lake Drive in the North Point North Historic District for Ingmar and Bridget Viohl. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams f. 131062 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for a lawn sign at 6840 N. 107th Street near the historic Salem Lutheran Church for Salem Ev. Lutheran Church. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams g. 131070 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a rooftop air conditioning unit at 711 W. Historic Mitchell Street in the Mitchell Street Historic District for Hunter Investments, LLC. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams City of Milwaukee Page 9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION h. 131125 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for installation of new HVAC equipment at 1840 N. 1st Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Barbara Wyatt-Sibley. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams i. 131148 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of fencing on the rear addition roof to protect mechanical equipment at 2722 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive at the Hrobsky-Berg Building, an individually designated building for Yusaf Dahl. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams j. 131149 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for stucco repairs and tuckpointing at 2504 N. Sherman Blvd. in the Sherman Blvd. Historic District for Ms. Ramsey. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams k. 131151 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for installation of new all-wood front doors at 2029-2031 N. 1st Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Sarah Zirbel Nowak. City of Milwaukee Page 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams l. 131187 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for installation of new signage at 1229 E. Brady Street in the East Brady Street Historic District for Kayhan Zia. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams m. 131191 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness to re-lay the antique brick pavers around the Pryor Avenue Iron well, an individually-designated site at 1710 E. Pryor Avenue for the Milwaukee Water Works. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Anna-Marie Opgenorth, seconded by Marion Clendenen-Acosta, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 4- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams Abstain: 1- Hoeschen n. 131198 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness to install sidewall venting for a new furnace at 1933 N. 2nd Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Adam Franson. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following City of Milwaukee Page 11 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams o. 131279 Resolution relating to a certificate of appropriateness for installation of permanent snow guards on the north slope of Old St. Mary's Roman Catholic Church at 836 N. Broadway, an individually-designated building, for Old St. Mary's Church. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams p. 131282 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for brick repairs at 2670 N. Lake Drive in the North Point North Historic District for Richard Palchak. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams q. 131283 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for a new roof and tuckpointing of the chimney at 2140 N. Sherman Blvd. in the North Sherman Blvd. Historic District for Benjamin Rogers. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 City of Milwaukee Page 12 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams r. 131291 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for a new side porch at 2045 N. 2nd Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Elf Stone, Inc. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams s. 131292 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for a new front porch at 2045 N. 2nd Street in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Elf Stone, Inc. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams t. 131293 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for construction of a new front porch at 839 N. 29th Street in the Concordia Historic District for the City of Milwaukee. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams u. 131296 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for installation of sidewall venting at 209 W. Lloyd St. in the Brewers Hill Historic District for Georgia Ann Odie. City of Milwaukee Page 13 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meeting Minutes December 30, 2013 COMMISSION Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams v. 131301 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for masonry repairs at 210 E. Michigan Street in the East Side Commercial Historic District for the Grand Avenue Club. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams w. 131309 Resolution relating to a Certificate of Appropriateness for the exterior venting of a new furnace at 2837 N. Sherman Blvd. in the Sherman Blvd. Historic District for Adolph J. Schrager. Sponsors: THE CHAIR A motion was made by Brad Hoeschen, seconded by Ann Pieper Eisenbrown, that this Resolution be ADOPTED. This motion PREVAILED by the following vote: Aye: 5- Pieper Eisenbrown, Jarosz, Hoeschen, Opgenorth, and Clendenen-Acosta No: 0 Excused: 2- Bauman, and Williams Meeting adjourned at 4:34 p.m. Chris Lee, Staff Assistant City of Milwaukee Page 14