Board of Zoning Appeals
Regular MeetingAnderson, IN · September 6, 2006
Minutes
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES
June 21, 2006
MEMBERS PRESENT
Ms. Klungness asked whether it would be more
Connie Klungness, Chairperson, Harold Smith, appropriate to table the petition since the
Vice Chairperson, Kevin Guion, Rudy Williams petitioner, as of yet, doesn’t have a strong
and Michelle Weatherspoon prospective location in mind which Mr. Stires
agreed with.
MEMBERS ABSENT
Mr. Guion moved to table Petition 11-06. Mr.
None Williams seconded. Motion passed; 4 yes, 0 no.
OTHERS PRESENT PETITION #15-06 SUBMITTED BY BIBLE
HOLINESS CAMP FOR A SPECIAL
Michael Widing, Development Director EXCEPTION FOR A CHURCH AND PETITION
Dave Wilbur, Senior Zoning Administrator #15A-06 FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE
Amy Rhodes, Board Secretary; and SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT LOCATED AT
William C. Kreegar, Assistant City Attorney 2700 GREAT COMMISSION STREET.
ROLL CALL AND DECLARATION OF A Mr. Stires explained this petition needed
QUORUM continued.
Mrs. Klungness called the meeting to order at Mr. Williams asked for Petition #15-06 and
4:35 p.m. Ms. Rhodes took roll call and Petition #15A-06 to be continued until the July 5,
declared a quorum with four (4) members in 2006 meeting. Ms. Weatherspoon seconded.
attendance. All members were present, except Motion passed; 4 yes, 0 no.
Mr. Smith, who arrived at approximately 4:45pm.
PETITION #14-06 SUBMITTED BY PROJECT
Mr. Guion performed the invocation and the ECHO, ANDERSON CORPORATION FOR
Pledge of Allegiance was recited. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, CYNTHIA J.
BENNETT, LAWRENCE E. AND JOAN C.
MINUTES DOSZTAN, ERNEST N. AND JANET HITE,
ERIC Q. HITE AND RICHARD C. MORT FOR A
Mr. Williams moved to approve the May 3, 2006 SPECIAL EXCEPTION FOR AN I-3
minutes as received. Ms. Weatherspoon INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND
seconded. Motion passed unanimously; 4 yes, PETITION #14A-06 FOR A VARIANCE FROM
0 no. THE BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENT AND
PETITION #14B-06 FOR A VARIANCE FROM
BUSINESS THE NUMBER OF LOADING / UNLOADING
BERTHS (SHALL NOT FACE ON
PETITION #11-06 SUBMITTED BY CINGULAR BORDERING HIGHWAY) LOCATED AT 4300
WIRELESS C/O DOUBLE TAKE, LLC AND WEST 73RD STREET.
LEONARD DUMMITT FOR A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION FOR A RADIO OR TELEVISION Mr. Stires explained the details of this petition
TOWER (CELLULAR TOWER) LOCATED AT and its variances. He showed that all Figure 9
32 JACKSON STREET. (CONTINUED 5-3-06) requirements had been met and suggested
approval of this petition.
Mr. Stires explained that this petition was
continued at the May 3, 2006 meeting and that Mr. James Hale, a Civil Engineer for Project
the petitioner was still looking for the best Echo from the Stellar Group in Jacksonville,
possible location for their tower and thus Florida, came forward to answer questions and
required another continuance. provide further details on the project as a whole
1
and the reason for the special exception, approval of the proposed variance would not
waivers and variances for the petition. adversely affect the surrounding properties,
because it is in a zoned business area and has
Ms. Klungness asked for a clarification of the low visibility; the strict application of the terms of
site location, vicinity and directional attributes the zoning ordinance would result in practical
which Mr. Hale addressed. Ms. Klungness then difficulties in the use of the property, if the
opened the discussion up to others for questions proposed variance were denied because it
of Mr. Hale concerning the project or petition. would be inhibiting the growth of business and
employment to the community. Ms.
Mr. Williams asked about several aspects of the Weatherspoon seconded. Motion was passed; 5
project regarding the special exception and yes, 0 no.
variance for the taller than allowed building
height, and the variance for additional loading Mr. Williams moved to approve Petition #14A-06
and unloading berths including their location. based on the following findings of fact: the
approval of the proposed variance would not be
Mr. Hale explained the reasons for these injurious to the public health, safety, morals and
variances – the variance on height being for the general welfare of the community, because the
warehousing technique they plan to use and the variance would occur on their own property; the
automated technology to operate that and the approval of the proposed variance would not
variance for additional loading and unloading adversely affect the surrounding properties,
berths to accommodate current and future because it is located a fair distance from the
production with the location facing Interstate 69 highway with low visibility; and the strict
being the best business decision with application of the terms of the zoning ordinance
anticipation for future growth and possible would result in practical difficulties in the use of
directions of expansion. Mr. Hale also the property, if the proposed variances were
addressed the issues of lack of landscaping and denied because the business wouldn’t be able to
a rodent strip both of which are a means of operate effectively in our community. Mr. Guion
deterring pests from entering the plant. seconded. Motion was passed; 5 yes, 0 no.
Mr. Guion asked Mr. Hale about the Mr. Williams moved to approve Petition #14-06
adequateness of parking in regards to visitors with waivers on cross-access, sidewalks and
and shift sizes. curbing based on the following findings of fact:
the proposed special exception is in a proper
Mr. Hale stated that the planned parking areas zone district; the requirements for Figure 9 have
would not only accommodate predicted visitors been met or variances have been granted; the
and employees now, but was designed with proposed special exception will serve a public
future growth in mind. need and convenience, because of added jobs
to the community; the proposed special
Mr. Williams questioned Mr. Hale about the exception will not permanently injure the
waiver on cross access which Mr. Hale appropriate use of the surrounding properties,
explained was not conforming to the neighboring because it sits in a rural area; and the proposed
properties along with the sidewalks both of special exception is consistent with the spirit,
which would cause safety concerns for the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinances,
intended use of the property and facility. because it promotes the use of the business
park. Mr. Smith seconded. Motion was passed;
Mrs. Klungness asked if there were any further 5 yes, 0 no.
questions or discussion in favor or against these
issues. MISCELLANEOUS
Mr. Williams moved to approve Petition #14B-06 Mr. Stires provided an update on Madison Park.
based on the following findings of fact: the
approval of the proposed variance would not be Also, Mr. Stires made the Board aware of the
injurious to the public health, safety, morals and Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement Mr.
general welfare of the community, because it is Williams had provided the City in regards to his
located in a rural area and sits a good distance lawn service business. A motion was made and
from the highway here it isn’t as visible; the
2
seconded to approve the acceptance of the
statement. The motion passed; 5 yes, 0 no.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made for adjournment and
seconded. Meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
BY: ________________________________
Connie Klungness, Chairperson
ATTEST: ______________________________
Amy Rhodes, Board Secretary
3
Get email alerts for Anderson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.