Plan Commission
Regular MeetingAnderson, IN · January 27, 2009
Minutes
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES
January 27, 2009
MEMBERS PRESENT: MINUTES:
Mark Lamey, Pro-Temp President Mr. Spencer made a motion to approve the
Greg Spencer, Member December 9, 2008 minutes as submitted.
Willie Rayford, Member Mr. Rayford seconded. Motion passed, 6 yes,
Darin Foltz, Member 0 no. Mr. Yates was not present yet.
Mike Dauss, Member
Michael Spyers, Member ELECTION AND APPOINTMENTS
Gene Yates, Member
Mr. Widing stated that the members could go
MEMBERS ABSENT: forward with elections of officers or they could
continue to next month when a full board is
Deborah Nelson, Vice-President present.
Joseph Newman, Member
Mr. Spencer made a motion to continue the
OTHERS PRESENT: election of officers to next month’s scheduled
meeting. Mr. Spyers seconded. Motion
Michael Widing, Development Director passed unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no. Mr. Yates
Tim Stires, Assistant Development Director was not yet present.
Stephanie George, Zoning Administrator
Amber Lewis, Board Secretary; and Mr. Spyers made a motion to approve the
William Kreegar, Assistant City Attorney legal services contract with Mr. Kreegar.
Mr. Spencer seconded. Motion passed
ROLL CALL AND DECLARATION OF A unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no. Mr. Yates was not
QUORUM: yet present.
Mr. Spyers made a motion to appoint Mr. Mr. Spyers made a motion to appoint Mr.
Lamey to chair the meeting. Mr. Dauss Widing Director of Municipal Development
seconded the motion. Motion passed and Planning. Mr. Foltz seconded. Motion
unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no. passed unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no. Mr. Yates
was not yet present.
Mr. Lamey called the meeting to order at
4:33 p.m. Ms. Lewis took roll call and Mr. Spencer made a motion to appoint Ms.
declared a quorum with six (6) members in Lewis as secretary. Mr. Foltz seconded.
attendance. Motion passed unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no.
Mr. Yates was not yet present.
Mr. Rayford arrived during roll call at 4:35 pm
to make six (6) members in attendance. BUSINESS:
Mr. Yates arrived after roll call at 4:49 p.m. to REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
make seven (7) members in attendance.
PETITION #02-09 SUBMITTED BY BILL
Mr. Spencer performed the invocation and the RUNION FOR A ZONE MAP CHANGE
Pledge of Allegiance was recited. FROM R-2 TO R-4 LOCATED AT 1721
EAST 10TH STREET.
1
Mr. Stires stated that Mr. Runion called the 3200 block of West 67th Street on the north
stating that he was obtaining counsel. Mr. side. This property contains five (5) acres and
Austin, attorney for Mr. Runion, requested a has a split zoning of R-2 Residential and I-3
continuance so he could have more time to Industrial Reserved. All utilities are available
review the file and would be ready to proceed to the site including electricity, gas, water,
at the next scheduled meeting. storm and sanitary sewer.
Mr. Spencer made a motion to continue Mr. Stires stated the petitioner is seeking
Petition #2-09 to the next scheduled meeting. primary plat approval to create a single lot
Mr. Rayford seconded. Motion passed subdivision to be known as Water Tower
unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no. Mr. Yates was not Addition. The proposed single lot has been
yet present. earmarked for a 125 ft. high municipal water
tower for the Anderson Water Department.
PETITION #03-09 SUBMITTED BY The primary plat shows a 75 ft. front building
HOOSIER PARK RACING AND CASINO setback line as the lot fronts West 67th Street
AND BEAM, LONGEST AND NEFF FOR and Park Road. The plat shows the required
A SECONDARY PLAT FOR A 15 ft. drainage, utility and communication
SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS easement around the perimeter of the lot.
HOOSIER PARK LOCATED AT 4500 DAN
PATCH CIRCLE. Mr. Stires stated there is a 50 ft. wide
dedication of right-of-way along the east side
Mr. Stires stated there are some issues with of Park Road, and 60 ft. dedication of right-of-
the street vacation and the petitioners were way along the north side of West 67th Street.
requesting a continuance to next scheduled
meeting. Mr. Stires stated the plat was reviewed by the
Plat Review Committee on Tuesday, January
Mr. Spyers made a motion to continue Petition 6, 2009. Some minor revisions were suggested
#03-09 until the next scheduled meeting. and completed.
Mr. Spencer seconded. Motion passed
unanimously, 6 yes, 0 no. Mr. Yates was not Mr. Stires stated the City’s Comprehensive
yet present. Plan classifies this property as Medium
Density Residential which is defined as
REQUEST FOR ACTION primarily single family housing, and can be
distinguished from Low Density Residential
PETITION #01-09 SUBMITTED BY CITY area by the smaller lot sizes and setbacks,
OF ANDERSON AND TOM BREWER, higher density and possibly smaller home
ANDERSON WATER SUPERINTENDENT sizes. Since the petitioner is proposing a
FOR A PRIMARY PLAT FOR A municipal water tower, this plat should be
SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS considered in conflict with the City’s
WATER TOWER ADDITION LOCATED Comprehensive Plan. Staff would note the
IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF PARK ROAD ON Comprehensive Plan is a guide for future
THE EAST SIDE AND THE 3200 BLOCK development, but is always subject to possible
OF WEST 67TH STREET ON THE NORTH change as potential new development occurs.
SIDE.
Mr. Stires stated the staff is recommending
Mr. Stires stated Petition #01-09 submitted by the Plan Commission approve the primary
City of Anderson and Tom Brewer, Water plat for the Water Tower Addition because it
Superintendent for a primary plat for a meets the requirements of the Subdivision
subdivision to be known as Water Tower Control Ordinance. If approved, this plat
Addition. should not be forwarded to any other
governmental unit.
Mr. Stires stated the property is located in the
6600 block of Park Road on the east side and
2
Mr. Spencer asked if this petition would come
before the Board of Zoning Appeals? Mr. Mr. Rayford made a motion to approve
Widing stated that it would come before the Petition #01-09 for a primary plat for a one lot
Board of Zoning Appeals as a special subdivision to be known as Water Tower
exception. Addition. This plat, if approved, is not to be
forwarded to any other governmental unit.
Mr. Spencer asked as a follow up does this Mr. Spyers seconded the motion. Motion
have to go before the City Council? passed unanimously, 7 yes and 0 no.
Mr. Widing stated that no it does not.
PETITION #04-09 SUBMITTED BY
Mr. Steve Servies, Rayl Engineering, stated SECURE STORAGE OF INDIANA, LLC,
they plan on being at the next Board of Zoning CHARLES CAMPBELL AND HIGHLAND
Appeals meeting for a special exception. INVESTMENTS OF DALTON, LLC FOR A
REPLAT OF A SUBDIVISION TO BE
Karen Beechboard, 3206 West 67th Street, KNOWN AS A REPLAT OF OUTLOT “D-
asked if they were putting an addition in or 1” IN MIDSTATE DEVELOPMENT,
just a water tower? Mr. Brewer stated a SECTION TWO LOCATED AT 1813 EAST
water tower. 53RD STREET.
Mrs. Beechboard asked if they would have to Mr. Stires stated Petition #04-09 submitted by
tie into the City water? Mr. Brewer stated Secure Storage of Indiana, LLC, Charles
they could continue to use private wells. Campbell and Highland Investments, LLC of
Dalton for a replat for a subdivision to be
Mr. Spencer asked since Mr. Brewer stated known as a replat of Outlot “D-1” in Midstate
this water tower is to help Nestle, then why do Development, Section Two.
we need this water tower? Mr. Brewer stated
that this is not only for Nestle, but for the Mr. Stires stated this property is located in
citizens because they will suffer water the 1800 block of East 53rd Street on the south
pressure problems without the tower. side. It contains 1.642 acres, is zoned I-1
Light Industrial and is a vacant parking lot,
Mr. Lamey asked if this would help for future which formerly served the former Furrow’s
economic development of that area? Store (now Secured Storage). This property
Mr. Brewer stated that it would help in future received replat approval from the Plan
economic development. Commission on May 23, 2006.
Mr. Spencer asked how is the project funded? Mr. Stires stated the petitioner is seeking
Mr. Brewer stated with a bond fund that is replat approval for a second time to subdivide
already in the bank waiting to pay for the the former parking lot (Outlot D-1) into a two
project. (2) lot replat to be known as a Replat of Outlot
D-1 in Midstate Development, Section Two.
Mr. Spencer asked if he anticipated any rate The two proposed lots (D-3 and D-4) will range
increases to water utility customers because of in size from .706 to .938 of an acre. This
the project? Mr. Brewer stated no, because replat shows Outlots D-3 and D-4 with a 30 ft.
that was already figured in the last rate front building setback line as the lots front
increase. East 53rd Street and the cross access easement
to the east.
Mr. Spencer asked if this money was approved
by the Indiana Utility Regulator Commission? Mr. Stires stated the proposed replat shows
Mr. Brewer stated yes and that was part of various existing drainage, utility,
the rate study. maintenance, communication, sanitary and
ingress / egress easements around the
Mr. Spencer asked if this was approved by perimeter of the proposed replat. These
City Council? Mr. Brewer stated yes. easements range from 7.5 ft. to 24 ft. wide. A
3
5 ft. wide non-access easement is noted along seconded the motion. Motion passed
the north property line of both lots in order to unanimously, 7 yes and 0 no.
prevent the creation of any new access drive
onto East 53rd Street. MISCELLANEOUS
Mr. Stires stated a 5 ft. wide concrete Mr. Widing stated Ordinance #15-06
sidewalk was constructed along the north side regarding Exit #22 for Interstate Signage was
of both proposed lots by the owner in 2006, recommended to City Council and was
thus meeting the Subdivision Control adopted. The Ordinance allows four (4)
Ordinance platting requirement for sidewalks interstate signs within 1500 ft. of the center of
along a right-of-way. Staff adds there are no the intersection of Interstate 69 and Dr.
infrastructure improvements involved with Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
this proposed replat; therefore, no Engineer’s
estimate or bond is required. Mr. Widing stated the parameters for
interstate signs are a freestanding on-premise
Mr. Stires stated the City Comprehensive pole sign in a B-1, B-2, B-3, or B-4 zone
Plan has defined this property as Regional district not exceeding 420 square feet per side
Commercial which provides commercial on a double-sided sign with a height of not
services that draw people from outside the more than 85 feet. The sign shall have a
immediate area. Some of the services found in minimum clearance of ten feet between the
Regional Commercial areas include large bottom of the sign and the grade or sidewalk
chain stores, restaurants, hotels, gas stations, level. Permitted signs shall be located within
retail outlets and entertainment. The a radius of 1500 feet from the geographical
petitioner is proposing to construct a Sonic center of such intersection. No more than four
Restaurant on a portion of this replat; interstate signs shall be permitted at this
therefore, this replat is not in conflict with the intersection. A minimum distance of 20 feet
City’s Comprehensive Plan. shall be required for front, rear and side yard
setbacks. Only one other pole or pylon sign
Mr. Stires stated the staff is recommending shall be permitted on the same parcel as an
approval of the proposed replat because it interstate sign. No readerboards or flashing
meets the requirements of the Subdivision lights shall be permitted on an interstate sign.
Control Ordinance, and creates two) An interstate sign owner may lease sign space
commercial lots for potential businesses. to off-site businesses that are located within
3000 feet of the geographical center of Exit 22.
Steve Servies, Rayl Engineering, stated that Once an interstate sign becomes inactive for a
these two (2) outlets do have access to the period of one year, the pole and sign shall be
traffic signal adjacent to National City Bank. removed. An Improvement Location Permit
There is also an existing driveway that is a shall be obtained prior to placement of an
cross access easement between the bank, interstate sign, and shall require the payment
Pizza Hut and Target. of a fee in the amount of $500.00 at the time of
the application. Finally, this ordinance
Mr. Spencer asked what does ingress and expires after three years after the date of
egress mean? Mr. Widing stated ingress adoption.
means traffic in and egress means traffic out.
Mr. Servies stated that it serves the purpose Mr. Widing stated this ordinance was adopted
as cross access. in March 2006 and will expire in March of
2009. The purpose in adding the last clause
Mr. Spyers made a motion to approve Petition was because the previous administration
#04-09 for the replat of Outlot D-1 in Midstate thought this would spur economic
Development, Section Two and to forward it to development activity at Exit #22. Our office
the Board of Works for the acceptance of the only issued one Improvement Location Permit
replat, covenants and easements. Mr. Rayford for an interstate sign to Skyline Chili. No
other economic development activity took
4
place because of this interstate sign Mr. Foltz made a motion to adjourn the
ordinance. meeting at 5:25 p.m. Mr. Spyers seconded the
motion.
Mr. Widing stated he still feels that this is a
good ordinance, because there is a need for
interstate signs. Many communities have BY: ______________________________
interstate sign ordinances. He stated he is Mark Lamey, Pro-Temp President
recommending and asking the Plan
Commission to recommend to the City Council ATTEST: ___________________________
that we keep all the standards in place, but Amber Lewis, Board Secretary
just remove the time limit.
Mr. Spencer asked why was the time limit put
on there to begin with? Mr. Widing stated the
previous administration thought by putting a
time limit on there it would cause businesses
to think they had to hurry to get out there in
order to get an interstate sign.
Mr. Spencer asked has that happened in the
past? Mr. Widing stated no, but that was
their thinking.
Mr. Widing stated whatever ordinance you
recommend to the City Council and if they do
not like it, they have to send it back to the
Plan Commission.
Mr. Spencer made a motion to recommend to
the City Council that they readopt Ordinance
#15-06 without the three (3) year expiration
time line. Mr. Rayford seconded the motion.
Motion passed unanimously, 7 yes and 0 no.
CITY COUNCIL UPDATES
Approved 3rd reading of a Zone Map
Change from B-3 to B-1 for 2725
Enterprise Drive (ModernSkin/Validus
Academy).
Denied Zone Map Change from R-3 to
I-1 for the 2300 block of Forkner
Street (Tim White).
Approved 1st, 2nd and 3rd readings of a
street vacation (dead end of East 17th
Street/north of Long John Silver’s
Restaurant).
ADJOURMENT
5
Get email alerts for Anderson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.