Anoka City Council
Regular MeetingAnoka, MN · January 27, 2020
Minutes
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 1 of 9
WORKSESSION OF THE ANOKA CITY COUNCIL
ANOKA CITY HALL
CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION ROOM
JANUARY 27, 2020
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Rice called the worksession meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Present at roll call: Mayor Rice, Councilmembers Barnett, Freeburg, Skogquist, and
Wesp.
Staff present: City Manager Greg Lee; Community Development Director Doug
Borglund; Public Services Director Mark Anderson; Engineering Technician Ben Nelson;
City Planner Clark Palmer; HRA Manager Darin Berger.
Also present: Members of the Economic Development Commission, Housing and
Redevelopment Commission, and Planning Commission.
3. COUNCIL BUSINESS and/or DISCUSSION ITEMS
3.1 Discussion; Development at the Corner of 7th Avenue/Main Street.
Housing and Development Manager Darin Berger shared a staff report with background
information stating in July 2019, the City of Anoka Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (HRA) modified the South Central Business Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
District to include six additional parcels at the southwest corner of Main Street and 7th
Avenue. The HRA’s intention was to purchase property, demolish existing substandard
structures, clear and prepare the site in anticipation of providing a site for future
redevelopment. Financing for these purchases and site work has been obtained through
bonds provided by the City of Anoka. Bond funds are to be repaid with tax increment
generated by the development that occurs in the expanded district. Beginning in August
of last year, the HRA acquired 640, 650 and 658 E. Main Street. Removal of regulated
waste and demolition has been substantially completed on these properties. The HRA is
also in discussions with the owner of 1919 7th Avenue, working towards acquisition of
that property. If all four of these properties are purchased, the site will total 1.53 acres in
size.
Mr. Berger said staff is hoping for an open discussion to gain insight into what the HRA,
City Council, Economic Development Commission and Planning Commission envision
being built at this high visibility corner. He said this exercise would help ensure a shared
vision as we move toward an end use. Mr. Berger provided a map of the area outlining
the HRA owned parcels and potential future acquisition as well as a list of permitted uses
in the EM-2 Sub-District for review including brewery, condos, and others.
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 2 of 9
Councilmember Freeburg asked about issues if the Johnson property is not acquired. Mr.
Berger said they are looking to sell the business that creates geographical marker imprints
and that the owners have no interest in selling the property to anyone but the City.
Councilmember Wesp asked what would be a good fit for the property. Mr. Berger
reviewed the list, stating we would likely not want to see a rental project and said the
purpose of the discussion is to see what the group does not want to pursue.
Councilmember Wesp inquired about the former Gould Jeweler’s building across the
street. Mr. Berger said the building could accommodate various uses but parking in the
back is an issue and was unsure of the property’s status.
Councilmember Barnett asked for insight from brokers about being too close to some
similar uses in Coon Rapids. Mr. Berger said it would depend on the use, stating a big
box store could be a conflict or constructing another building for rent.
Commissioner Brewer asked about designs and height limitations.
Councilmember Skogquist said he saw this site as more commercial and said the site
could be a transitional spot with high grade residential above, adding he would be open to
being flexible instead of identifying something specific.
Commissioner Kjonaas asked about the possibility of a liquor store. City Manager Greg
Lee West said a study had been conducted but that this was not a recommended site as it
was too close to the East store.
Mayor Rice said a retail use would be good like a food court with 4-5 different restaurant
options but no other retail. He suggested a medical arts use or even hotel but was unsure
the site was large enough for that use.
An audience member suggested a professional office building for lawyers, CPA, or
insurance use. Mayor Rice said that was possible but noted the site offered limited
parking.
Commissioner Brewer said access would be a challenge similar to Walgreen’s and that
the business has to be successful.
Commissioner Bonthuis said she understood Edina Realty had an active contingency for
the former Gould’s Jeweler’s for a VA clinic.
Commissioner Kjonaas liked said he would prefer to see a list of ideas presented for
consideration. Councilmember Skogquist agreed a list would be best.
Mayor Rice confirmed there was no support for rental apartments and that a consultant
said, owner-occupied was likely not an option. Mr. Berger clarified the Council would
not support solely rental units unless part of a retail use below. He said 15 years ago the
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 3 of 9
City could not have sold a mixed-use building but that things have changed as this would
be an attractive product but the retail has to carry the building.
Commissioner Kjonaas said this concept works in downtown Minneapolis.
Councilmember Wesp cautioned the group to be more realistic and referred to similar
uses and what occurred in Elk River.
Council consensus was no fast food uses would be considered. Councilmember Barnett
said she would be open to a fast-casual restaurant use such as Erbert and Gerbert’s or
Chipotle but not fast food such as McDonald’s. She asked if whoever purchased the site
would meet the guidelines within M-2 and then know who to actively market to as the
City already had enough uses such as carwashes.
Commissioner Werdien confirmed the HRA had contracted with a broker to market the
site.
3.2 Discussion; David Weekley Homes Project/4th Avenue and Rum River Development
Site.
Community Development Director Doug Borglund provided an update to the City
Council on the David Weekley Homes development project proposed for the 4th Avenue
and Rum River City of Anoka owned development site. He said the desired use was
condos or townhomes and recalled how Council reviewed proposals from different
developers and selected David Weekley Homes. He highlighted discussions that
occurred at the time that involved many details including guest parking, stairs, and others
and how the Council toured their Maple Grove project and supported the project but that
recently there appeared to be a change in the City’s support. Mr. Borglund said
comments have been shared during marketing for this product that has confused the
developer about the City’s position that a younger demographic would not be interested
in this type of product in Anoka. He cautioned against being the community that changes
its mind and that David Weekley Homes has completed full submittals and done all
required work to date to move forward with their proposed project and that staff wanted
to confirm the Council’s direction before they continue with the approval process.
Mayor Rice said this was a national builder and that they will sell what they want to sell
and that the City is not the expert in housing types. He said the City preferred owner-
occupied products but understood the need for a balanced community and believed young
people would be interested in the product.
Councilmember Wesp asked who was against the product. Commissioner Brewer said
the Planning Commission felt they were talked into building something based on the
developer’s idea on Monroe Street which were not selling because it was a different
product in the end and that they did not want to see this happen again and were cautious.
She said this was a beautiful open area and did not fit but understood the developer just
wants clear direction.
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 4 of 9
Commissioner Kjonaas said the Commission knows they spent a lot of time on whether
or not to have stairs in this development but felt they had other good discussion on the
courtyard and that ultimately no one wants empty buildings.
Mayor Rice said while we want to be honest with the developer at the same time, we
should understand who we are talking to as they do not want empty buildings either.
One of the PC Commissioners stated that we need to be more cautious then referred to
the project on 2nd Avenue and Monroe Street that has not sold but were supposed to be
hugely successful. She said the concept drawings did not result and when this project
came about, we were cautious as this is Anoka and not Maple Grove and we do not have
the same amenities.
Commissioner Bonthuis said she did not think Lennar did enough research for their
project and shared while we get trains in this area it is not light rail.
Councilmember Freeburg said without density this project would not work.
Councilmember Skogquist said many of his friends moved within 6-8 blocks of
downtown because of the positive things we have and Lennar saw this as it was near the
Rum River, trails, and downtown Anoka and while this product would not be his ideal
home it could work and he would support it, adding the City should stay out of the details
once we have approved the general concept.
Commissioner Bonthuis suggested villas as a possible use. Mr. Borglund said the
Highland Park neighborhood will provide that opportunity for a villa-type product on the
golf course.
Mayor Rice said spoke about how Lennar was going to compromise on items such as
grade but did not and that the attractiveness is owner-occupied and not connected and
how the developer has to market the product.
Commissioner Youngquist agreed while the 2nd Avenue and Monroe Street project was
disappointing they have sold six units and that he agreed he did not like the architecture
or stairs but it was not up to the City to tell Lennar or David Weekley what type of
product to create.
Councilmember Wesp said Council approval was not unanimous vote based on the
Planning Commission’s concerns and for that reason changes were made. He said the
developer should know how to properly market their use and while it was a product, he
personally did not like we should continue with this plan.
Mr. Lee said this was a good discussion and stressed the need for a unified front as the
developer has better options than Anoka, such as Ramsey and other sites coming up with
Lennar south of City Hall. He suggested a similar discussion with them in order to
provide good direction to developers each time.
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 5 of 9
Mayor Rice spoke about street renewal and the desire for sidewalks and how they don’t
always result.
Commissioner Brewer said the City has a fiduciary duty to address vacant land and to
look forward 15 years to see if the result will be a quality product, especially because we
have limited land in the City. She said even though a product is attractive now we have
to look into the future to see if people stay and what potential resale value would be.
Councilmember Wesp spoke about the Coon Rapids development his parents lived in and
what will this look like in 30 years and did not want to be caught like before. He said he
liked that this was a homeowner’s association as it provided covenants.
Mayor Rice said Rum River Shores filled a need as well as this product and will result in
young families and commuters and should always be in demand because of the rail
station.
3.3. Discussion; Fred Moore Middle School Parking Related to a Proposed Expansion.
Associate Planner Clark Palmer shared a staff report with background information stating
the Anoka-Hennepin School District is proposing building additions and renovations to
the Anoka Middle School for the Arts, Fred Moore Campus, located at 1523 5th Avenue.
The additions will add capacity for approximately an additional 20 staff and 300 students.
The Planning Commission was provided an overview of the project at a work session
held on October 17, 2019. At the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed concerns
regarding the proposed parking plan, which showed no net increase in parking. Based on
feedback provided by the Planning Commission, the school district is currently exploring
options for additional parking. Staff provided an overview of the project and facilitate a
discussion on related parking concerns and possible options. He shared the proposed
plans, cafeteria and classroom conversions, and resulting loss of parking from 86 stalls to
56 stalls for a loss of 27 and the proposed parking lot expansion of the northern lot for an
additional 29 stalls. He shared the concept of parking on City lot and the real estate
transaction needed for a net gain of two stalls with a capacity of 166 staff and 1,500
students in the end. He spoke about possible encroachments and parking on City
property and access off of 5th Avenue as well as discussions with Zion Church for shared
parking options and if the school district needs land, they should purchase but if we
eliminate parking from the plan does Council suggest selling or encroachment.
Councilmember Wesp asked if the proposed area was currently a park where the skate
park was. Mr. Palmer said the area included a memorial and would result in loss of
significant trees and while no one wants tree loss should the project move forward
parking needed to be addressed.
Councilmember Skogquist said he would support selling the land for encroachment but
had no desire to see the rest turn into a parking lot as there already was a lot of parking
present with Zion Church and hoped they could reach a shared parking agreement
instead. He said certain places could make parking work while others could not and
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 6 of 9
would prefer Zion instead. He said he appreciated what they are doing for the school but
would not be pleased about losing stalls.
Mr. Palmer said the school district would be bringing forward an application for
consideration soon but that staff wanted to address parking first.
Mayor Rice said currently there were no empty spaces so to expand without a parking
plan would not be realistic. Mr. Palmer referred to the new access proposed as well that
would be ADA accessible.
Commissioner Nemec referred to the outcome of small stretch of Washington Street and
suggested making it available for additional parking.
Steve Anderson, Anoka-Hennepin School District, said they looked at this area and if
Washington Street could be vacated it would make sense but they would have to purchase
the property across street and there was no time to do it with the current construction
schedule. He said if the building maxed out at 1,500 students from its current 1,200
students, we do have empty parking now and their goal was to reach an agreement with
Zion Church as it makes the most sense. He spoke about parking needs increasing during
football games and funerals but with the 25 stalls that would meet the requirements if
student population reaches 1,700 students and that nothing more would be needed for the
next five years.
Councilmember Wesp asked about the net gain with Ramsey Elementary and Brookside.
Mr. Anderson said it depended on what Ramsey does with their development as they
thought there would be 750 students at Sunrise Elementary but they were now at 900
students. He spoke about 10-year projections with the improvements to Fred Moore and
maximum capacity and about staff moving from facility to facility during the day and
how the middle school population will remain flat with 1,200 students at Fred Moore.
Mayor Rice said the idea is to add stalls to have a +2 net with Zion. Mr. Palmer said if
done we would be very close to a 1:1 ratio but are looking at capacity.
Mayor Rice asked about progress on negotiations with the church. Mr. Anderson said
they were close but their goal was to review other solutions and make adjustments where
possible.
Councilmember Skogquist suggested the lot where the former service station exploded.
Mayor Rice said the cost was too high at $200,000.
Mr. Anderson said they would prefer not to have students cross the street at 5th Avenue.
Commissioner Brewer suggested including the number of part-time teachers in order to
help with negotiations with the church.
Commissioner Bonthuis suggested marked leased spaces.
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 7 of 9
Mr. Palmer confirmed the Council did not want to pursue an encroachment option but
sell that portion of the land.
Mr. Anderson asked about access and project timing. Mr. Lee said the City would grant
right of entry if needed.
Mr. Palmer said the right of entry could be done through the Planning Commission/City
Council process then outlined the process for sale with a potential for consideration at a
March meeting.
Mr. Anderson said they would construct a sidewalk if desired and thanked staff for
bringing this concern forward before the application to review concerns including water
runoff a concern.
Mr. Palmer confirmed Council consensus was to move forward with a property sale as
outlined to address the parking encroachment.
Commissioner Bonthuis spoke about parking during large funerals at Zion Church.
Councilmember Skogquist said street parking would be used in those instances as
neighbors anticipated that occasionally already.
3.4 Discussion; Transportation Update; MN Highway 47 (St. Francis Boulevard) Between
Anoka County Fairgrounds and Bunker Lake Boulevard.
Engineering Technician Ben Nelson shared a staff report with background information
stating in 2016, MnDOT began a study of the BNSF Railway crossing of MN Highway
47 to improve safety for motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and trains, as well as
improving regional mobility and emergency responder time. That study evaluated
elevating MN Highway 47 over the railroad. As part of that effort, roadway corridor
improvements were discussed between US Highway 10 and Bunker Lake Boulevard. A
public open house was held in June 2016 and again in February 2017. Many residents
attended to express concerns about corridor deficiencies north of the railroad. In response
to those concerns, the City began a study in partnership with MnDOT to study the
segment of MN Highway 47 (St. Francis Boulevard) north of the Anoka County Fair
Grounds to Bunker Lake Boulevard with a goal of improving access and safety for all
users while preserving or enhancing the community. The BNSF Railway crossing
feasibility study was completed in 2017 and an open house for Highway 47 is scheduled
on Thursday, February 20, 2020 at Green Haven Golf Course & Event Center.
Ross Tillman, Senior Transportation Project Engineer with Bolton Menk, presented
information for the open house and addressed questions from the Council. He reviewed
public input from the earlier open house that included traffic concerns, turn lanes,
expanding westbound right turn lane, updating previous work, lane widths less
narrowing, less property impacts, signal at McKinley, queuing impacts to neighborhoods
and ability to get out from their homes. He reviewed safety concerns with the 18,000
vehicles per day and the several driveway accesses in existence today then reviewed
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 8 of 9
dedicated lefts, right turn lanes, enhanced pedestrian accommodations, trail on the east
side of the roadway, curb/gutter, storm pipe, and tight footprint with a trail shift more to
the east and trees impacted within the public right-of-way.
Mayor Rice confirmed internal movements were considered.
Councilmember Wesp asked about surveys on right-of-way encroachment of property
versus others. Mr. Nelson said they have not been marked yet and that property owners
will likely be surprised and once they are onboard for a signal the surveys will be shared
to make it clear where the right-of-way was.
Mr. Lee said 30 feet on the east is under the control of Anoka and not MnDOT. Mr.
Nelson said they will have a 3D model available during the open house to help address
concerns and better demonstrate property impacts.
Mayor Rice spoke about the possibility of cityscape roadway and grass instead of
sidewalk and if that is plausible. Mr. Nelson said they put the sidewalk in the desired
location for input and would apply for regional solicitation grant to hopefully have some
type of trailway, noting this will be first time talking with the neighborhood about the
project.
Mayor Rice said the trailway is essential in this area.
Eric Johnson, Project Engineer with Bolton & Menk, shared tree locations and proposed
tree impacts with trail construction.
Councilmember Skogquist asked how ponding would work and if speed limits would be
similar. Mr. Johnson shared the tentative ponding location on Anoka County property.
Mr. Nelson said this would be a 2025 project as it cannot be done during the Highway 10
construction project but that staff wanted to discuss with the neighborhood now because
of the overlay project.
Mr. Johnson said speed limits were used to control speed through design and shared more
about the signal at McKinley, trail improvements, and how McCann and Dunham would
be cul-de-sacs with traffic counts being fairly low.
Mr. Johnson shared a rough schedule of the project and the worksession scheduled to
share public input with funding applications due in April. He said they would share the
proposed layouts through video and an interactive station and have dot rankings to
identify different aspects’ importance and quality of life improvements.
Mayor Rice asked if the trailway improvement plans would meet with Highway 47 and
not end at the trailway. Mr. Nelson said not at this time but it would go through the
fairgrounds.
January 27, 2020 (Worksession)
Page 9 of 9
4.1 Staff Update.
None.
4. COUNCILMEMBERS COMMENTS
None.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rice adjourned the Worksession at 7:20 p.m.
Submitted by: Cathy Sorensen, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Approval Attestation:
Amy T. Oehlers, City Clerk
Get email alerts for Anoka
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.