Park & Recreation Advisory Board
Regular MeetingAnoka, MN · September 19, 2023
Minutes
Public Services – Parks & Recreation
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
ANOKA PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
COUNCIL WORK SESSION ROOM OF ANOKA CITY HALL
2015 FIRST AVENUE, ANOKA MN
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Steve Nelson, Mark Beckenbach, Bob Erickson, Mary
Blankenship, Derek Sebesta, Don Rowell, Joe Anderla, and Kirk Schnitker
STAFF PRESENT: Lisa LaCasse, Public Services Administrator and Jon Holmes, Public
Services Supervisor
APPROVE MINUTES
There being no corrections to last meetings minutes. A motion was made by Schnitker,
seconded by Rowell to APPROVE THE August 15, 2023 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
OF THE PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD.
8 ayes – 0 nays. Motion carried.
OPEN FORUM
None.
NEW BUSINESS
Grey Ghost Field / ARAA Dome
In the packet is info from last night’s Council meeting. Staff also emailed a link prior to
the meeting to view the video discussion of council from the September 11th Council
work session meeting. LaCasse stated that if members had an opportunity to listen to
just the first 5 minutes of the meeting, they would have an understanding of where
Council is standing with this topic. At one-point Scott, Skogquist and Weaver stated “I
am all in” on selling Grey Ghost Field to Anoka Ramsey Athletic Association (ARAA) for
$1.00. ARAA has been working with the City of Ramsey for years on a building the US
largest dome facility. They had bought private land and had plans to build a dome larger
than the one they are proposing for Anoka, but there are issues with the city of Ramsey
Scott Baumgartner was asked to inquire about opportunities to work with the City of
Anoka and seek a location for a dome. A few sites were proposed and ARAA came
back with revised site plans for a dome at Grey Ghost Field.
The board has the opportunity to provide feedback, ask questions and identify any
areas of concern. ARAA is the primary user of Grey Ghost for lacrosse. There is some
usage from St. Stephens and Legacy Christian Academy only uses the soccer field.
This fall, Pact Charter had inquired about usage of the fields, but they were directed to
use Sunny Acres/Enloe because the lights and it fit their needs better since they are
holding practices mainly in the evening. ARAA has said that their intention is that during
Regular Meeting of the City of Anoka Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
September 19, 2023
Page 2
periods of non-use that this would be a facility open to the community, so like an open
gym setting or even some community programming.
Nelson spoke directly with Baumgartner prior to the meeting. Nelson commented that
Baumgartner seemed to have the parking situation nailed down, but the question is
when there’s another event at the high school, ice arena, and even castle field, what
would the impacts be then for parking. LaCasse said that the City does have a parking
agreement with the ice arena for using the grey ghost and castle field parking lots when
overflow parking is needed, and vise-versa if overflow parking is needed for grey ghost
or castle field that the ice arena lot can be utilized. Staff does agree that parking could
be an issue at points, LaCasse has been to enough youth sport activities to know that
when there are tournaments the parking fills up fast. LaCasse mentioned that the high
school has a newly constructed turf field behind the school and there are build out plans
that include stadium seating in the future.
Erickson made an argument that if there are multiple fields in the dome for tournaments
like pickleball and volleyball, then parking needs will increase due to having that many
more people in the facility. LaCasse directed the board to look at page 2 and 3 under
this item in the packet and find the proposed site plan draft. The way that the structure
is oriented there might be room on the north side of it for additional parking. The
structure also looks like it will be overlapping the trail that goes to the pedestrian bridge
across Bunker, which will need to be rerouted and will cost more money. There are also
power lines that will need to be moved or buried. LaCasse asked how the board felt
about the trail, is rerouting it something the city should be paying for or should it
required to be a part of ARAAs project. The board agreed that ARAA should be paying
for those expenses and not the city. Blankenship stated that ARAA should also pay
closing costs if any, the tax payers shouldn’t have to pay that either. Blankenship also
asked about community use and how that would all work out. LaCasse said that ARAA
would establish times for general public use. Sebesta asked about the expectations on
our end for general public use, like a required percentage of time per month required to
be open to the general public. He brought up how Delano made a similar agreement
with the high schools’ dome so that they have set general public use times, but every
year it gets worse and worse with times just being random and not functional and the
public hours are also the first ones to get booted for tournaments. Sebesta asked who
upkeeps the property right now. LaCasse said that the city mows, irrigates and fertilizes
it so there will be a cost/time savings for us there. ARAA does pay us to paint the lines
of the fields, but all other maintenance costs are on the city. The city will save the most
on the irrigation and staff time costs.
Schnitker stated that the board needs to be thorough in what they want addressed with
ARAA, whether that’s the trail, parking or stormwater. With his legal background he has
seen these kinds of projects fail so after the fact of it being built, what happens if the
organization fails 5 years from now because of pull tabs no longer being a thing or some
financial hardship with the organization, would the city want the land back. Those are
things that need to be addressed. The board had conversation about their concern if
pull tabs went to the wayside and ARAA still being able to pay their bills since pull tabs
and gambling is a huge source of revenue for them. Anderla asked if any Council
members are against this. LaCasse said the whole council is in favor of this facility.
Regular Meeting of the City of Anoka Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
September 19, 2023
Page 3
Council is asking for input from the board and any questions or concerns. This project
could spur economic development for the City because it could bring hotels and
additional restaurants into town on the corner of 7th Ave & Bunker Lake Blvd. This could
either be a really good cooperative programing opportunity for the benefit of the
community. The City of Andover and the YMCA have had a lot of battles regarding
membership and community use. Sebesta asked about the other 5% of organizations
that use the park, will there be other spaces in the city for them to play. LaCasse said
that staff would work with those organizations or schools to move them to other fields.
Nelson would love to see this work but has adversity due to the possible financial risk.
LaCasse said that there is money in athletics, which ebbs and flows with different types
of sports. Nelson mentioned that we also have no idea what sort of investors they have
in on this project.
General Summary of Conversation Provided to Council:
• The majority of members appeared to support the sale of field to ARAA for this project.
The board understands the need and desire for something like this in the community.
• A few members have concerns about the viability of the long term operation of a dome
… board members change, sport popularity changes/shifts, capital outlay for future
repairs, etc.
• Does ARAA’s have a business/operating plan for the dome? Do they have the ability to
be self-sustaining without gambling funds, etc., has the city inquired about this?
• What happens if the project fails – whether that is financial failure of ARAA to operate
the dome, to pay their bond payments, or the failure of dome due to a tragic weather
event and inability to repair? What is the financial liability for the city, if any?
• What is the timeline for construction? If construction is delayed, will ARAA maintain the
property/mow (or pay the City or a contractor for mowing) until they are able to break
ground? What is the use of the property in the future if construction is delayed?
• Does the park system have another location for the other users of Gray Ghost Field like
St. Stephens … it is staff’s opinion that Bonnell Field could be used for non-ARAA field
uses
• Staff would like to salvage the irrigation pump and heads, fencing, tall posts & over kick
netting, and the retaining wall blocks if grades are changed along Castle Field Blvd and
the wall is no longer needed.
1. Trail Relocation / Pedestrian Crossings:
a. Cost to relocate the pedestrian trail from the walk bridge to the west side of the dome
should be covered by ARAA and should re-align with the existing pedestrian crossing on
Castle Field Blvd
b. Increased traffic on Castle Field Boulevard may require upgrades to pedestrian crossings
and the addition of a crossing on the east side of the dome. City should determine if
signalized, flashing warning lights are needed at crossing points due to road grade and
future increased use.
c. Board was very clear that they do not think the city should pay for any trail relocation or
pedestrian upgrades needed due to the increase traffic created by the project. This
should be ARAA responsibility.
2. Parking Concerns:
a. Is there a determination on how much parking is needed for a facility the size based on
their typical planned use for sports training/practice? And tournament/events? Who
determines what is sufficient for parking? For example, what happens when the school
and dome have uses with large crowds expected and where is the overflow?
Regular Meeting of the City of Anoka Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
September 19, 2023
Page 4
b. Is ARAA planning to add parking on the north side of the facility or expanding the
existing gray ghost parking lot on the east side of the dome by the water treatment
building?
c. There is an existing shared use agreement in place for Ice Arena/Gray Ghost/Castle Field
lots. The use of the Ice Arena lot by Castle Field during the summer, and Castle Field and
Gray Ghost lots by the Ice Arena in the winter. Several members have experienced
attendance at these facilities where the lots were full and spilled over into the high
school parking lot. Peak usage for the dome will likely overlap with the Ice Arena…
October – April, 4pm – 11pm;
d. The board supports the need for the parking agreement with the High School. Is there
any planned expansion of parking by the high school with future plans of use of the new
turf field on the school property?
3. Closing costs, filing fees for lot splits, etc. if any, should be the responsibility of ARAA and not
the tax payer
4. Public Use – this has been mentioned as a desire of the project, but what is the expectation,
should this use be defined, who pays for the public use?
a. How does this realistically impact ARAA’s business plan and intended use for the facility.
b. Is the public charged a membership or daily fee or what is the city’s obligation for this
time allocation? For the sale price of $1….what is realistic for on-going use
c. Public use should be coordinated with the city and not dictated by ARAA. If ARAA is not
open to this then, perhaps land sale amount should be at market value.
d. Is it realistic to expect ‘public use’ for $1 land sale or is there going to be additional
financial contributions from the city required or anticipated to support this
project/operation?
5. Fireworks/ July 3
a. Non-negotiable, no competing fundraising event with Castle Field Association’s event from
4pm – 11pm on July 3
b. How far away does the fallout zone for the fireworks need to be from the dome to not cause
concern? How does that impact the use of high school property and event viewing
c. Maybe the city should pursue an agreement with the high school for this event to move
elsewhere on their property.
6. Storm water and pond location needs to be handled in a manner that makes sense with the
topography of the site
Update Tobacco Free Parks Policy to include Cannabis Use in Public Spaces
• Review & Discussion
The information in the packet is a precursor to next month’s discussion about this
topic and updating the existing policy which is very simplistic; it was adopted in
2004 prior to vaping. It was an outside organization that came to the city
regarding smoke free parks. LaCasse would like the board to read through the
information provided in the packet prior to next month and provide feedback if
there is specific information they feel should be included. LaCasse would like to
see the Aquatic Center have tighter restrictions than other parks. Staff will work
with Baumgartner to develop a new policy for review in October.
Regular Meeting of the City of Anoka Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
September 19, 2023
Page 5
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
River Walk / West Rum River Trail
LaCasse gave an update on the project. In the packet is the current alignment and on
the 4th page shows the full alignment. Originally the trail was going to come in close to
the amphitheater but now the trail will be started closer to the Walker on the River
property to make the grades easier to work with for ADA. In the preliminary design,
there was a stairway to make a short cut on the path, but that idea is being taken out
due to the need to create a retaining wall.
Staff is currently working through permitting and the cultural resource study has been
finalized. The current wait is on the State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO) to give
their approval. We are looking at sending the project out for bid before the end of the
year and then start the tree clearing. We need to start construction right away in the
spring because as we need this finished by June 30th, 2024 unless the DNR is able to
give us an extension on the grant deadline. During the next month or so, the consultant
will be collecting the tree inventory to determine what trees will be removed, creating the
landscaping plan and completing permitting requirements with the LRRWMO and
MNDOT. The trail will have similar site amenities to the Rum River Trail in Riverfront
Park so that the east and west side is cohesive when complete. It will feel segmented
until the next phase is completed. The project is moving slower than staff had hoped
because permitting has been an arduous process.
Nelson asked when the last time the pedestrian bridge was inspected. LaCasse said
that Ben Nelson, the cities Engineer gets it inspected when the Main Street Bridge is
inspected.
Doggie Bags in Parks
This topic was sparked from an email from Schnitker inquiring about making doggie
bags available in the parks. The board has talked about this topic in the past. Staff has
talked to the City of Ramsey about this, since they have dog bags in their parks.
Ramsey spends about $6000 a year on doggie bags, they have said people just take
them because the dispenser always gets emptied right away. Blankenship asked if
there has been a lot of complaints about dog waste. LaCasse said not necessarily,
there are some really good dog owners and some habitual offenders, we know one guy
would not use a bag even if we had them. Schnitker said that he had emailed LaCasse
asking about it because a Council member had brought it up to him. LaCasse said that
even in a dog park where bags are provided, some people don’t pick up after their pets.
LaCasse suggested that we could spend $1000 on a dog bag leash clips to giveaway at
one of our events and likely have better long term results.
Park Vandalism Update
There has still been a bit of graffiti happening around the city. The biggest situation
lately was that the door was left unlocked at Sorenson and 2 young kids got in there,
they trashed the place and destroyed a lot of the kindness rock garden stuff. The police
did catch the kids, they had granola bars and little bottles of paint on their persons. The
MN Kindness Alliance that organizes the rock garden has been working with the police
to see if these kids can come back and clean it up as part of their resolution.
Regular Meeting of the City of Anoka Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
September 19, 2023
Page 6
Nelson asked if the bench at the ANP has been replaced. LaCasse said that staff is
looking at finding a log to make a natural bench. Anderla asked if there are capabilities
for camera system at any of the parks. LaCasse said the cameras require WI-FI
connection to be worth anything. Akin does have cameras. Sunny Acres maybe an
option for a Wi-Fi camera system, updating the park lighting along the trail may also
help deter people from vandalizing the area.
Archery Hunting Update
Jenks provided handout with all the hunters’ information in the packet. There has
already been one deer harvested on opening weekend in Sunny Acres. Rowell said
there were lots of pictures of deer on his trail cam at Sunny. LaCasse said that Jenks is
working to get additional signage for the hunting areas.
COMMUNICATIONS
• The Council has requested staff to present information on the Skating Rink
Operations for their worksession on Sept 25. Park Board members are welcome
to attend.
• The flyer of upcoming events in the city has been provided to the board
• The MN Kindness Alliance is doing a ribbon cutting for the rock garden on
September 30th
• The Church of the Latter- Day Saints will be helping clean up the cemetery on
September 29th
• There is a Waterfowl for Warriors hunt on September 29th
• There is two weeks of the Farmers Market left
• Volunteers are needed for the Halloween pickleball and bean bags tournaments
(Schnitker volunteered to assist with the bags tournament)
ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Cannabis in parks
Skating Rinks (follow up to Council Discussion)
Adjournment
There being no further discussion, a motion was made by Schnitker, seconded by
Erickson, to ADJOURN THIS REGULAR MEETING. 8 – AYES, 0 – OPPOSED.
Motion carried.
Time of adjournment 9:07 pm
Respectfully Submitted,
Lisa LaCasse, Public Services Administrator
Get email alerts for Anoka
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.