City Council
Regular MeetingAntioch, CA · February 21, 2006
Minutes
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL
ANTIOCH PLANNING COMMISSION
Study Session February 21, 2006
7:00 P.M. Police Department Community Room
Mayor Freitas called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M., and City Clerk Martin called the
roll.
Present: Council Members, Davis, Kalinowski, Simonsen, and Mayor Freitas
Absent: Council Member Conley
Present: Commissioners Brandt, Long, Henry, Travers, and Chairperson Azevedo
Absent: Commissioner Delgadillo
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Freitas led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
Councilmember Conley arrived at 7:08 P.M.
STUDY SESSION (#202-01)
1. “Raising the bar” for design standards and other standards for New
Development
Director of Community Development Brandt presented the staff report dated February
15, 2006 recommending the City Council and Planning Commission receive and file the
report.
Mayor Freitas encouraged the Planning Commission to be more independent of staff
and require developers to bring higher quality projects to the City. He requested new
residential standards address the following:
• Storage in residential units
• Garage electrical outlets
• Garage sinks
• Streetscapes
• Masonry Walls
Councilmember Conley stated he felt it was important new standards be date specific,
kept current and backed up by the City Council and Planning Commission. In addition,
he noted the City should abide by the new criteria once the standards were approved.
He further requested the new residential standards address the location and quantity of
hose bibs.
Antioch City Council/ February 21, 2006
Antioch Planning Commission Police Community Room
Study Session Page 2 of 6
Councilmember Simonsen stated he felt the Homebuilders Association should be
included in discussions related to implementing higher design standards. He suggested
consideration of a design theme for Antioch. He requested new residential standards
address the following:
• Updated list for landscaping trees
• Avoiding zero lot lines
• Varying layout designs
• Increasing standards for commercial development
Commissioner Delgadillo arrived at 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Freitas also directed staff to look at the current commercial development
standards and address the following standards:
• Parking
• Internal circulation
• Upgraded treatments
• Focus on Brown Fields
• Undergrounding of utilities
• Landscaping strips in sidewalks
Councilmember Simonsen suggested contacting other cities to see how they have
addressed design standards and suggested utilizing listserv.
Commissioner Henry encouraged developers to increase their contributions for
community benefits. He suggested the following standards be addressed:
• Provide variety for strip mall and residential design standards
• Improve single story plans
• Parking and encourage pedestrians in the Rivertown area
Mayor Freitas suggested the Planning Commission carefully consider land use tables to
determine which uses would be a benefit to Antioch.
Councilmember Kalinowski stated he felt it was important to understand the impacts
higher standards would have on staff time and costs. He suggested the City consider
addressing higher costs through increased developer fees.
Commissioner Long stated the General Plan was forward thinking and should be used
as a guiding document for implementing increased design standards. She requested
the following items be addressed:
• Traffic calming
Antioch City Council/ February 21, 2006
Antioch Planning Commission Police Community Room
Study Session Page 3 of 6
• Streetscape
• Seamless changes with upfront information provided to the developers with a
timeframe for implementation
• Information on projects approved by staff through developer agreements
provided to the Planning Commission
• Maintaining affordability
Councilmember Davis discussed the importance of code enforcement’s role in changing
the image of the community.
Commissioner Azevedo encouraged Planning Commissioners to work with staff to
assure projects coming forward represent a higher design standard for the City. He
encouraged developers to be innovative in the designing of projects.
Commissioner Brandt voiced her support of establishing a Design Standards
subcommittee, noting it would be an opportunity to develop standards for the fine details
of a project. She requested the following items addressed:
• Sufficient room for garbage cans
• Builder installed landscaping
• Consistency versus improving commercial/retail designs
In addition, she requested the City Council provide the Planning Commission with
direction regarding uses appropriate for Master Use Permit lists.
Mayor Freitas suggested reviewing the Planning Commission and Design Review Board
structure to determine if it was the most affective process.
Community Development Deputy Director Carniglia suggested the consideration of
acquiring architectural expertise at the staff level. He noted fiscal implications should be
considered and costs could be recovered through the review process.
City Manager Jakel stated the City would need the resources to back up the improved
standards. He summarized support from the City Council and Planning Commission for
a Design Standard Committee, with discussion regarding the structure of the process
and legal issues related to permitted uses. In addition, they supported Mayor Freitas
working with City Manager Jakel and staff regarding a phased report to come to the City
Council for review.
Mayor Freitas declared a recess at 8:31 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:37 P.M. with
all City Council and Planning Commissioners present.
2. Recent Trends in Single Family Development
Community Development Deputy Director Wehrmeister presented the staff report dated
February 16, 2006 recommending the City Council and Planning Commission discuss
this issue and provide feedback to staff.
Antioch City Council/ February 21, 2006
Antioch Planning Commission Police Community Room
Study Session Page 4 of 6
Councilmember Simonsen suggested basing impact-based developer fees on the
number of bedrooms per residence.
Mayor Freitas questioned how much authority the City had, as well as the legal issues
related to increasing impact fees for homes with a large number of optional bedrooms.
He expressed concern regarding the impacts to schools, parks and recreational
services and parking as well as adequate storage in the designs for these types of
residences.
Councilmember Kalinowski suggested the possibility of limiting the number of bedrooms
in tract homes.
Mayor Freitas suggested developers provide a profile of people purchasing these types
of residences.
City Attorney Nerland stated she felt increasing fees based on impacts would be legally
defensible.
Commissioner Henry stated any fee increases based on impacts should be clearly
articulated to the developers. He suggested clear legal guidance in determining the
definition of single and multi-family residences. He noted code enforcement played a
role in how neighborhoods were impacted by these types of developments. He
suggested a sliding scale of fees based on the number of bedrooms and stated he did
not support these types of residences as infill projects.
Mayor Freitas stated the impacts need to be considered and mitigation standards in
place prior to moving forward with these types of projects applications. He noted police
services should be included with the impacts to be considered.
City Attorney Nerland stated it would be appropriate to define “structure” of single-family
housing.
Assistant City Engineer Bernal gave a brief overview of the rental inspection ordinance
and rental business licensing tax noting additional information would be coming before
the Council in May 2006.
Mayor Freitas requested a report to council on those permitted uses in residential zones
legally beyond the City’s control such as Section 8, childcare and group homes.
Following discussion the City Council and Planning Commission requested staff
determine whether or not the City could limit the number of bedrooms per single-family
residence, and if not, provide mitigation options.
3. Status report on Future Urban Area 1
Community Development Deputy Director Carniglia gave a brief status report on Future
Urban Area 1.
Antioch City Council/ February 21, 2006
Antioch Planning Commission Police Community Room
Study Session Page 5 of 6
4. Status report on Rivertown Development
City Manager Jakel gave a brief status report on Rivertown Development. He informed
the Council a conference was scheduled for February 23, 2006 and he would be
providing Council with a draft of the development disposition agreement as soon as
possible.
5. Other Items for Future Action or Staff Direction
Councilmember Kalinowski requested the Council consider a policy to deny all liquor
store applications until the concentration has been reduced and is consistent with (ABC)
Alcoholic Beverage Control.
Councilmember Simonsen requested concentration of fast food stores be considered as
well as a discussion regarding landscape maintenance options for the city.
Councilmember Conley discussed the need for leveraging funds to improve areas of “A”
Street, East 18th and “L” Streets.
Mayor Freitas expressed concern the western portion of community did not have critical
services.
Jim Kyle, Antioch resident, stated he felt the homes on the east side of “A” Street should
be removed if businesses were expected to upgrade.
Commissioner Long requested a future discussion regarding transportation and a police
presentation regarding the areas of Antioch which appear to be unsafe.
Commissioner Henry requested a discussion on the expansion of redevelopment in key
corridors of the City.
Mayor Freitas stated the City Council and Planning Commission would reconvene in six
months for an update and continuation of this study session.
Ken Lee, Antioch resident, requested the City Council and Planning Commission
consider standards for bars, site posting of applications, shopping center directional
arrows and angled parking in retail projects.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Manny Soliz, Antioch resident, encouraged staff to ask the developer for supporting
data of a market for eight bedroom homes. He further suggested the City consider the
viability of using imminent domain for redevelopment. He requested a City Council
member, City Attorney and a member of the Bright group be invited to attend the
conference call meeting with Arcadis.
Antioch City Council/ February 21, 2006
Antioch Planning Commission Police Community Room
Study Session Page 6 of 6
COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATIONS - None
STAFF COMMUNICATION - None
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, Mayor Freitas adjourned the meeting at 9:58 P.M. to the next
regular Council meeting on February 28, 2006.
Respectfully Submitted:
L. JOLENE MARTIN, City Clerk
Approved:
DONALD P. FREITAS, Mayor
Attest:
L. JOLENE MARTIN, City Clerk
Agenda
Regular Meetings: Agenda prepared by:
2nd and 4th Tuesday L. Jolene Martin
of each month and City Clerk
adjourned regular meetings (925) 779-7009
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ANTIOCH CITY COUNCIL AND THE
ANTIOCH PLANNING COMMISSION
STUDY SESSION
Antioch Police Community Room
300 “L” Street
FEBRUARY 21, 2006
7:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL for City Council/Planning Commission
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS C Only unagendized issues will be discussed during this time
STUDY SESSION
1. “Raising the bar” for design standards and other standards for New Development Staff Report
Staff Report
2. Recent Trends in Single Family Development
3. Status report on Future Urban Area 1
4. Status report on Rivertown Development
5. Other Items for Future Action or Staff Direction
PUBLIC COMMENTS
COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATIONS
STAFF COMMUNICATION
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council meetings are accessible to those with disabilities. Auxiliary aides will be made available for
persons with hearing or vision disabilities upon request in advance at (925) 779-7009 or TDD (925) 779-7081.
Get email alerts for Antioch
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.