Administrative Services Committee Meeting
Regular MeetingAugusta, GA · November 26, 2012
Agenda
Administrative Services Committee Commission Chamber- 11/26/2012- 1:05 PM
Meeting
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
1. Discuss item/items not being approved or receiving an affirmative Attachments
vote remaining in committee. (Requested by Commissioner
Guilfoyle)
2. Motion to approve the minutes of the Administrative Services Attachments
Committee held on October 29, 2012.
3. Consider proposed procedure for authorization of Attachments
Agreements/Contracts for the Housing and Community
Development Department for Program Years 2013, 2014, 2015,
and 2016.
4. Consider proposed procedure for authorization of Attachments
Agreements/Contracts for the LaneyWalker/Bethlehem
Redevelopment by the City Administrator and Mayor.
5. Consider proposed procedure for authorization of Attachments
Agreements/Contracts, for the Hyde Park Drainage Improvement
Project by the City Administrator and Mayor.
6. Update from the Deputy Administrator on Human Resources. Attachments
(Requested by the Deputy Administrator)
7. Approve the renewal of existing Master Services Agreement with Attachments
ADP to provide Health and Welfare services and Time and Labor
Management services for Augusta, GA employees. (Referred
from November 20 Commission meeting)
8. Discuss Augusta Youth Center Lease Agreement. (Requested by Attachments
Commissioner Matt Aitken) (Referred from October 29
Administrative Services Committee) (Referred from
November 20 Commission meeting)
www.augustaga.gov
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Agenda Items Remaining in Committee
Department: Clerk of Commission
Caption: Discuss item/items not being approved or receiving an affirmative
vote remaining in committee. (Requested by Commissioner
Guilfoyle)
Background:
Analysis:
Financial Impact:
Alternatives:
Recommendation:
Funds are Available
in the Following
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Cover Memo
Item # 1
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Minutes
Department: Clerk of Commission
Caption: Motion to approve the minutes of the Administrative Services
Committee held on October 29, 2012.
Background:
Analysis:
Financial Impact:
Alternatives:
Recommendation:
Funds are Available
in the Following
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Cover Memo
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3
Item # 2
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4
Item # 2
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Proposed Procedure for Authorization of Agreements/Contracts for the Housing and Community
Development Department for Program Years 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016
Department: Housing and Community Development Department (AHCDD)
Caption: Consider proposed procedure for authorization of
Agreements/Contracts for the Housing and Community
Development Department for Program Years 2013, 2014, 2015,
and 2016.
Background:
Each year the City receives Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), HOME
Investment Partnership (HOME), and Housing Opportunities for
Persons with AIDS (HOPWA), Neighborhood Stabilization
Program (NSP 1 and 3), and Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-
Housing Program (HPRP) funds from the U. S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development. These funds are used to fund
agencies and projects to assist low to moderate income persons
and revitalize low-income neighborhoods. The Housing and
Community Development Department (HCDD) annually solicits
proposals from agencies and develops CDBG, ESG, HOME and
HOPWA budgets which are incorporated into the City’s Annual
Action Plan that is presented to the Augusta Commission for
approval. To carry out the projects presented in the Action Plan,
HUD requires the City to have agreements with each agency that
is to be funded. If a project involves construction, a construction
contract and/or professional service contracts may also be
required. HUD regulations require grantees to meet a federally
mandated spend-down threshold (Timeliness Standard). It is
calculated by HUD each year at the end of October. In the past,
Augusta has been challenged with complying with this regulation
and has faced funding reductions for its failure to
comply. Unfortunately, Congress failure to approve a federal
budget in a timely manner for its entitlement communities to
receive grant agreements early in the year is not an acceptable
reason for failing to meet this expenditure requirement. As you
will note by Attachment 1 (Funding Approval/Agreement),
Augusta did not receive its approved agreement until mid-April of
this year (2012). Funds were not available until mid-May. On
October 5, 2012 we received an email from the Atlanta Director Coverof
Memo
HUD’s Office of Community Planning and Development
Item # 3
(Attachment 2), stating concerns that our rate of expending funds
would cause us to not meet the spend-down mandate. I am happy
to state that we “met” the spend-down mandate. This was due to
the contract/agreement approval process that was approved by the
Commission on July 10, 2007, see Attachment 3. To facilitate the
execution of agreements/contracts, we are proposing the following
Agreement/Contract Execution Procedure for the Housing and
Community Department for Program Years 2013, 2014, 2015, and
2016: Once the Consolidated Plan/Action Plan is approved by
Commission: Mayor will be given authorization to execute all
necessary Grant Agreements relative to the approved Consolidated
Plan/Annual Plan as required by HUD;The Mayor, City
Administrator and Director of HCDD will be given authorization
to execute all the necessary agency grant agreements and contracts
required to implement the Consolidated Plan/Annual Action Plan
as approved by the Commission. All documents other than Forms
HUD-7082 and HUD-40093 which require only the Mayor’s
signature, must require signatures of all (3) parties. All City of
Augusta Procurement Policies will be complied with and
acknowledgement given by the appropriate staff of the
Procurement Department.
Analysis: The current process has worked well. However, it is the
recommendation of Legal Counsel that the process should be
approved with the time frame specified as referenced (Program
Years 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016).
Financial Impact: Approval of the proposed procedure will facilitate the expenditure
of funds in a timely manner so as to comply with HUD’s
Timeliness Standard.
Alternatives: None recommended.
Recommendation: Approve Procedure for Authorization of Agreements/Contracts for
the Housing and Community Development Department.
Funds are Available
in the Following Funds are available in the respective HUD Program Accounts.
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Finance.
Law.
Administrator. Cover Memo
Clerk of Commission
Item # 3
Cover Memo
Item # 3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1
Item # 3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2
Item # 3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3
Item # 3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4
Item # 3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5
Item # 3
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6
Item # 3
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Proposed Procedure for Authorization of Agreements/Contracts for the Laney Walker/Bethlehem
Redevelopment by the City Administrator and Mayor
Department: Housing and Community Development Department (AHCDD)
Caption: Consider proposed procedure for authorization of
Agreements/Contracts for the LaneyWalker/Bethlehem
Redevelopment by the City Administrator and Mayor.
Background:
In 2008, the Augusta Commission passed legislation supporting
community development in Laney Walker/Bethlehem. Included in
this legislation was the formation of an Urban Redevelopment
Authority which ultimately issued bonds to provided financing for
the rehabilitation and redevelopment activities in the Laney
Walker/Bethlehem area. Augusta has provided oversight and
implemented the urban redevelopment plan, generally referred to
as the Laney Walker/Bethlehem Redevelopment Project. Since
that time, the Augusta Housing & Community Development
Department has developed a master plan and development
guidelines for the area, set up a financial incentives program for
developers and home buyers, selected a team of development
partners to focus on early-phase catalytic construction, and created
a marketing strategy to promote the overall effort. While still in
the early stages of a long term revitalization program, Laney
Walker/Bethlehem has already caught the eye of Harvard
University’s School of Design, which, in its Student Journal on
Real Estate, recently touted Augusta’s project as potentially a
“game-changing” national model for public-private partnerships.
This ambitious redevelopment project was the recent recipient of
Georgia Planning Association’s 2011 Outstanding Implementation
award and has been a showcase at national conferences ranging
from New Partners for Smart Growth to the American Planning
Association to the American Architectural Foundation.
The Housing and Community Development
Department, in conjunction with the City’s Purchasing Dept.,
issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for developers,
builders, architects, engineers, realtors, and marketing firms
(contractor) to support the Laney Walker/Bethlehem
Redevelopment Project. Through the RFQ process over 30 firms
responded and eighteen (18) firms were selected, on the basisCover
of Memo
qualifications and experience, as procured contractors. A process
Item # 4
has been established that allocates work to the procured firms on
the basis of issuing Task Orders to one, or more, of the firms
based on a combination of their project specific qualifications and
cost to provide the requested services. Each Task Order provides a
description of the requested services and requires the service
provider to respond with a detailed scope of work, time line to
provide the requested service, and cost to provide services. In
addition to the use of Task Orders to facilitate services required
for the Laney Walker/Bethlehem Redevelopment Project, there
are some services providers that have been procured through the
City’s Purchasing Dept. that may require contract extensions and
renewals based on their performance and changing project
requirements. The day to day management of
the Laney Walker/Bethlehem Redevelopment Project requires that
the Housing and Community Development Dept. (HCDD) have
the ability to make deliberate, but timely, decisions to keep this
project moving. See Attachment “A” for an example of a recent
sales contract for the purchase 1012 Spruce/1246 11th Street. The
execution of this contract occurred as a result of extensive
negotiation between the homebuyer, seller, and lender. The sales
contract expiration date is set to accommodate the preparation of
construction drawings, the timely execution of the construction
contract, and the construction of the new home. If the approval of
the construction contract required City Commission approval it
would be extremely difficult to meet the time line established by
the purchase agreement. In addition a City Commision approval
requirement would require public disclosure of the purchaser’s
name which could significantly chill sales. Failure to make
decisions on the selection of approved builders, architects,
engineer, etc. affects our ability to initiate the construction start of
new projects, impact the cost of construction interest on each
project during the construction period, and directly impacts our
ability to place new homes under contract and close on the sale of
homes in a timely manner. See Attachment “B” for an overview of
range of the types of contracts used, general descriptions of the
current process and procedures, and the adverse impact that would
be created if the contact/agreement process was expanded.
To facilitate the execution of
agreements/contracts/task orders with builders, developers,
architects, etc. that have been approved through the City’s
Purchasing Department, and with acknowledgement by the
appropriate staff of the Procurement Dept., we are proposing the
following Agreement/Contract/Task Order Execution Procedures
be used by the Housing and Community Development Dept. for
the calendar years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016: · * The Mayor,
City Administrator, and the Director of HCDD will be given the
authorization to execute all the necessary contracts, agreements,
and task orders required to effectively and efficiently manage the
Laney Walker/Bethlehem Redevelopment Project is within the
limits of the budget approved by the URA. All documents will Cover Memo
require the signature of all three parties; · * The HCDD will
Item # 4
provide an annual Financial Report of the Laney
Walker/Bethlehem Redevelopment Project inclusive of Policy and
Procedures, Tax Base Increase Analysis, Laney
Walker/Bethlehem Bond Funding Budget and Budget Breakdown,
and a Summary of Housing Construction Expenditures to the
Commission and the Urban Redevelopment Authority. A similar
report was provided the Commission in July 2012. The annual
report will be due no later than 60 days after December 31st of
each year commencing in December of 2013. Any interim reports
that may be requested and supplied to the URA will also be
provided to the Commission.
Analysis: The proposed procedure is similar to the current process utilized
by HCDD in implementing HUD grants and works well. The
process will enable the HCDD to serve both long time Laney
Walker/Bethlehem residents and new families moving into the
neighborhoods in an effective and timely manner. As evidenced
by the July 2012 Financial Report the process is transparent and
fully accountable.
Financial Impact: Approval of the proposed procedures will facilitate the
redevelopment of the Laney Walker/Bethlehem neighborhoods in
a timely manner that is responsive to market demands and fully
accountable to the City Commission and the Urban
Redevelopment Authority.
Alternatives: None Recommended
Recommendation: Approve Procedure for Authorization of
Agreements/Contracts/Task Orders for the Laney Walker
Redevelopment Program administered by the Housing and
Community Development Dept.
Funds are Available
Funds are available in the Laney Walker/Bethlehem Project
in the Following
Account.
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Finance.
Law.
Administrator.
Clerk of Commission
Cover Memo
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 4
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 5
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 6
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 7
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 8
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 9
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 10
Item # 4
Attachment number 1 \nPage 11
Item # 4
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Proposed Procedure for Authorization of Agreements/Contracts, for the Hyde Park Drainage
Improvement Project by the City Administrator and Mayor
Department: Housing and Community Development Department (AHCDD)
Caption: Consider proposed procedure for authorization of
Agreements/Contracts, for the Hyde Park Drainage Improvement
Project by the City Administrator and Mayor.
Background:
On October 18, 2011, the Commission approved the transfer of
SPLOST III and IV funds to the Hyde Park/Wilkerson Gardens
Drainage Improvements Project to fully-fund the design and initial
phases of property appraisals, land acquisition, and resident
relocations. The Housing and Community Development
Department, in conjunction with the City’s Engineering
Department, has been charged with Delivering original appraisals
(and review appraisals) to access the current values of all current
properties apart of this project, Using certified property
appraisals/review appraisals (of each existing Hyde Park property)
to offer the current property owners a fair and equitable amount
for each property in an effort to reach an agreement on a sales
price. Once an agreement has been met, Housing and Community
Development will move to, Relocate each displaced
homeowner/tenant to a replacement property using the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 as a basis. The appraisal process/services will be managed
by the staff of the Housing and Community Development
Department as well. Additionally, the acquisition process/services
will be managed by the staff of the Engineering Department. For
these services, the engineering Department will work with current
staff to coordinate and administer acquisition and related
activities, within the guidelines of local, state, federal laws and
Augusta-Richmond County’s policies and procedures.
Furthermore, the relocation process/services will be managed by
staff of the Housing and Community Development
Department. The relocation office will be located at 2024 Golden
Rode Street which is in the Hyde Park Neighborhood. In order to
fulfill the task required in the relocation process, three (3)
temporary employees (were hired per commission approval) to
assist families in their relocation to other housing. The day to Cover Memo
day management of the Hyde Park Drainage Improvement Project
Item # 5
requires that the Housing and Community Development Dept.
(HCDD) have the ability to make deliberate, but timely, decisions
to keep this project moving. See Attachment “A” for an
explanation of responsibilities associated with each service. Also,
see Attachment “B” for an example of a recent sales contract
(from another project) that required an extensive negotiation
period between the homebuyer, and seller. The execution of this
contract would have been further delayed, or possibly lost, if
additional approvals were required. Failure to make decisions
on the selection of approved homes for homeowners and rental
units for tenants affects our ability to initiate the construction start
of new projects, impacts our ability to place new homes under
contract and close on the sale of homes in a timely manner and
increases the risk of a desired rental unit being awarded to another
interested tenant. To facilitate the execution of
agreements/contracts, we are proposing the following
Agreement/Contract Execution Procedures for the Housing and
Community Development Dept. for the calendar years 2013,
2014, 2013, 2016: Once a purchase price (using certified property
appraisals/review appraisals (of each existing Hyde Park
property)) to offer the current property owner a fair and equitable
amount has been offered/accepted by the homeowner and each
existing homeowner/tenant relocated to a replacement property
using the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as a basis: · The Mayor,
City Administrator, and the Director of HCDD will be given the
authorization to execute all the necessary contracts, and
agreements required to effectively and efficiently manage the
Hyde Park Drainage Improvement Project. All documents will
require the signature of all three parties; · The HCDD will
provide an annual Financial Report of the Hyde Park Drainage
Improvement Project inclusive of Policy and Procedures, Hyde
Park Drainage Improvement Project Budget and Budget
Breakdown, and a Summary of Service (appraisal, acquisition and
relocation) Expenditures to the Commission. The annual report
will be due no later than 60 days after December 31st of each year
commencing in December of 2013.
Analysis: The Hyde Park Drainage Improvement Project currently doesn’t
have an agreement/contract approval process in place due to this
being a new undertaken. However, the process described within
this Agenda Item, has been battle tested and is working well as
part of similar projects (i.e. Laney Walker Bethlehem
Revitalization Project) associated with Housing and Community
Development.
Financial Impact: Approval of the proposed procedure will facilitate the expenditure
of funds in a timely and orderly manner.
Cover Memo
Item # 5
Alternatives: None Recommended.
Recommendation: Approve Procedure for Authorization of Agreements/Contracts for
the Hyde Park Drainage Improvement Project administered by the
Housing and Community Development Department and
Engineering Departments alike.
Funds are Available
in the Following Funds are available in the Hyde Park Drainage Project Account.
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Finance.
Law.
Administrator.
Clerk of Commission
Cover Memo
Item # 5
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1
Item # 5
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2
Item # 5
Attachment number 1 \nPage 3
Item # 5
Attachment number 2 \nPage 1
Item # 5
Attachment number 2 \nPage 2
Item # 5
Attachment number 2 \nPage 3
Item # 5
Attachment number 2 \nPage 4
Item # 5
Attachment number 2 \nPage 5
Item # 5
Attachment number 2 \nPage 6
Item # 5
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Human Resources
Department: Clerk of Commission
Caption: Update from the Deputy Administrator on Human Resources.
(Requested by the Deputy Administrator)
Background:
Analysis:
Financial Impact:
Alternatives:
Recommendation:
Funds are Available
in the Following
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Cover Memo
Item # 6
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
ADP Renewal of Master Services Agreement
Department: Human Resources
Caption: Approve the renewal of existing Master Services Agreement with
ADP to provide Health and Welfare services and Time and Labor
Management services for Augusta, GA employees. (Referred
from November 20 Commission meeting)
Background: ADP currently provides Health and Welfare services (automated
benefits services) and Time and Labor Management services
(automated time tracking) for Augusta, GA employees. On
October 2, 2012 Augusta received notice of renewal of the
contract to provide these services.
Analysis: There are no new services associated with this renewal - this is
simply a continuation of the existing services that are provided by
ADP. There is a 2.3% increase added to Health and Welfare
services for 2013. There is no increase for Time and Labor
Management services planned at this time. The total projected cost
for 2013 will be $519,300.
Financial Impact:
Alternatives: Do Not Approve ADP Renewal of Master Services Agreement
Recommendation: Approve ADP Renewal of Master Services Agreement
Funds are Available
in the Following This will be funded from 101015510 and 616015221 for 2013.
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Cover Memo
Item # 7
Attachment number 1 \nPage 1
Item # 7
Attachment number 1 \nPage 2
Item # 7
Administrative Services Committee Meeting
11/26/2012 1:05 PM
Augusta Youth Center
Department:
Caption: Discuss Augusta Youth Center Lease Agreement. (Requested by
Commissioner Matt Aitken) (Referred from October 29
Administrative Services Committee) (Referred from
November 20 Commission meeting)
Background:
Analysis:
Financial Impact:
Alternatives:
Recommendation:
Funds are Available
in the Following
Accounts:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Cover Memo
Item # 8
Get email alerts for Augusta
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.