Historic Preservation Commission

City of Batavia Historic Preservation Commission Monday, February 9, 2026 at 5:00 PM 100 N. Island Ave, Batavia, IL 60510 in the City Council Chambers Questions and comments regarding agenda items can be submitted prior to 4 PM the day of the meeting by emailing Zach Ewoldt, Planner at zewoldt@bataviail.gov Page 1. Meeting Call to Order 2. Roll Call Jamie Saam, Chair Tom Connelly, Vice Chair Phil Bus William Mahler Mark Allen Jamie Koc 3. Approval of Minutes 3.1 January 12, 2026 3-9 Minutes 3.2 January 26, 2026 10 - 12 Minutes 4. Items Removed, Added or Changed 5. Matters from the Public: (For Items NOT on the Agenda) 6. Regular Agenda 6.1 Certificate of Appropriateness forBuilding Facade 13 - 21 Modifications at 101 South Batavia Avenue Alex Teipel, Applicant Staff Memo 6.2 Discussion: Certificate of Appropriateness Approval Matrix 22 - 28 Staff Memo 7. Updates Page 1 of 28  7.1 RFP: Exterior Building Condition Assessments for Historic District Properties 7.2 30 S Shumway "Old City Hall" New Property Owner 8. Other Business 9. Adjournment Individuals with disabilities should notify the City Administrator’s office at 630-454-2053 if they have a disability which will require special assistance or services and, if so, what services are required. This notification should occur as far as possible before the City-sponsored function, program, or meeting. Page 2 of 28  MINUTES January 12, 2026 Historic Preservation Commission City of Batavia PLEASE NOTE: These minutes are not a word-for-word transcription of the statements made at the meeting, nor intended to be a comprehensive review of all discussions. They are intended to make an official record of the actions taken by the Commission and to include some description of discussion points as understood by the minute-taker. They may not reference some of the individual attendees’ comments, nor the complete comments if referenced. 1. Meeting Called to Order: Chair Saam called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. 2. Roll Call: Members Present: Chair Saam, Vice Chair Connelly, Commissioner Bus, Commissioner Allen, Commissioner Mahler Members Absent: Commissioner Koc 3. Approval of Minutes November 24, 2025: Motion: To approve the minutes Maker: Bus Second: Connelly Voice Vote: Motion carried. 4. Items Removed, Added or Changed: None. 5. Matters from the Public for Items NOT on the agenda: None. 6. Regular Agenda 6.1. Certificate of Appropriateness for Roof Replacement at 101 S. Batavia Avenue A&J Roofing Corporation, Applicant Zach Ewoldt stated the property at 101 South Batavia Avenue recently sold. The new property owner is working with Staff on several improvements. The applicant would like to replace the cedar shaker shingles with black onyx asphalt shingles. They are also proposing to replace the black flat roof with a TPO white membrane, which would not be visible to the public. The existing empty sign cabinet Page 3 of 28 Historic Preservation Commission January 12, 2026, Page 2 will be removed. A sign application will be submitted in the future. The owner has intentions of relocating a dry-cleaning business to this location. Chair Saam confirmed this is a non-contributing structure. Commissioner Bus stated this building is in disrepair and needs significant repair. Ewoldt noted that while the exterior needs a lot of work, the interior of the building is where much of the work is occurring. Albertson confirmed that a permit application and review will be required for the full interior build out, which is necessary. Commissioner Allen inquired if the proposed dry-cleaner is owned by the operator across the street. Ewoldt confirmed the owner’s relationship with the current dry-cleaning business across the street. Commissioner Bus stated approximately two years ago, the Historic Preservation Commission began a review of the Full Moon Tavern, and requested cooperation as they removed the facade, if any historic items were located during the process. Commissioner Bus requested in a similar way that it be brought to the awareness of the Historic Preservation Commission as they move forward with the project. Albertson confirmed the ability to accommodate this request. Motion: To accept as read Maker: Commissioner Allen Second: Commissioner Mahler Roll Call Vote: AYE: Chair Saam, Commissioner Bus, Commissioner Allen, Vice Chair Connelly, Commissioner Mahler NAY: None ABSENT: Koc Motion approved. 6.2. Certificate of Appropriateness for a Wall Sign at 160 First Street Andy Miller of BEI, Applicant Zach Ewoldt stated that Andy from BEI is present on behalf of their tenant, Warehouse 55. Ewoldt noted that the sign was accidentally installed without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness or permit. The applicant is apologetic and has emphasized that this was not intentional, and was an error made during the relocation of their business from Aurora. The sign was repurposed from this location. Staff has reviewed the sign, which generally aligns with the Historic Preservation Commission guidelines. This is a non-illuminated wall sign drilled into the mortar and safely secured. The applicant is now seeking formal approval. Staff views this as an honest misunderstanding and an unfortunate oversight. Page 4 of 28 Historic Preservation Commission January 12, 2026, Page 3 Commissioner Allen reminded The Historic Preservation Commission that there used to be a go cart track at this location in the 1960’s. Commissioner Bus cautioned the property owner to be more careful to follow procedures and avoid putting The Historic Preservation Commission in this situation in the future. Motion: To approve the COA as submitted Maker: Vice Chair Connelly Second: Commissioner Mahler Roll Call Vote: AYE: Commissioner Bus, Commissioner Allen, Vice Chair Connelly, Commissioner Mahler, Chair Saam NAY: None ABSENT: Koc Motion approved. 6.3. Amendments to Title 12: Historic Preservation of the City Code City of Batavia, Applicant Ewoldt gave the staff report, stating that staff performed a comprehensive review of the items presented and proposed amendments including: updated language to reflect changes in title and terminology, proposed amendment to extend the length of Chair and Vice Chair, modifications for application requirements, modifications for Certificate of Appropriateness, establishment of meeting requirements in the event of lack of quorum for applicants to be heard at City Council, modifications to demolition process and review criteria for non-contributing structures, and updates to fees and penalties. Any motion would be a recommendation to the City Council who would make the final decision, with the Historic Preservation Commission serving as a recommending body on this item. Chair Saam inquired about the cancellation of two consecutive meetings, and the ability for members to phone into the meeting due to work. Ewoldt stated the City Council would need to adopt this as a policy, which has not yet been granted or extended to this commission. A quorum must be present in the room. The current BATV and Zoom process presents challenges for the Historic Preservation Commission. Vice Chair Connelly stated they believed the Open Meetings Act allows for a conference line if those attending can hear and speak. Ewoldt further explained the limitations of the current meeting room. Chair Saam requested future conversations occur with the Information Technology Department and the City Attorney. Ewoldt agreed to begin these discussions. Commissioner Allen inquired about language pertaining to landmark surveys in Title 12. Ewoldt explained there is one single historic district established and one landmark (The Campana building). He confirmed he will provide formal documentation and additional information including the Page 5 of 28 Historic Preservation Commission January 12, 2026, Page 4 boundary lines, as requested by Commissioner Allen. Albertson also stated the boundary information is on the city website. Commissioner Allen stated the Campana building needs attention. Albertson and Ewoldt agreed, explaining that there have been three property owners in the last five years. The current owners are focusing on major life safety issues first, which are the imminent and primary concerns, prior to addressing aesthetic issues. The current owner intends to make further improvements. Their current plan is to maintain a multitenant arrangement and bring in a fitness training facility working with high school athletes for weightlifting and endurance training. Albertson stated The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) typically manages the tax credits through the National Park Service. Commissioner Bus requested a definition of Minor Alternations or Other Changes under 12-6-1-B: APPLICABILITY. Ewoldt and Albertson noted this was the next item on the agenda. Commissioner Bus expressed support for the removal of the requirements for legal descriptions under Section 12-6-3, stating that the address and Parcel Identification Number were appropriate enough. Ewoldt informed staff that if an applicant did not have a survey available, the burden would be on the applicant to hire a surveyor, which comes with a time delay and additional costs. Commissioner Bus stated that is an unnecessary request of applicants. Commissioner Mahler noted discrepancies regarding fifteen days/forty-five days, and additional discrepancies in the overall language in the document and requested corrections. Ewoldt confirmed he will investigate and can adjust these discrepancies accordingly prior to City Council approval with a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission. A member of the public approached the Commission and identified themselves as Al Watts, Preservation Parters of the Fox Valley, 18 Deana Street St. Charles. Al began by referencing Section 12-2-6: MEETINGS and suggested reducing meetings to once per month instead of two, stating that over the last three years, the Historic Preservation Commission has not had twelve meetings in a year. With the proposed Staff Approval Process, it would reduce the overall load to the Historic Preservation Commission, further supporting a change to one meeting per month. Al also encouraged the meeting time changed from 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM, which may allow more members of the public to participate. Al requested a definition for the term Secondary Structure under 12-6-3-C: PROCEDURE. Al provided a sample definition according to AI as: something that is on the same property that serves as an incidental or supportive role to a principle or primary structure (garage, shed or barn). Ewoldt stated noncontributing buildings are being proposed to be removed from the expedited process, and the Zoning Code definition will be used to define this. Commissioner Bus requested that as the inventory is updated, attention is given to primary and secondary structure classification for accuracy. Al noted that other minor changes needed to be made in the language changing Community Development Committee to Community of the Whole. Commissioner Allen requested confirmation that 12-6-2: CRITERIA is standard language. Ewoldt confirmed the criteria for demolition is standard United States Secretary of Interior Standards of Rehabilitation. Page 6 of 28 Historic Preservation Commission January 12, 2026, Page 5 Vice Chair Connelly inquired about the timeline for the Administrative Review approval. Ewoldt explained the current structure: an application comes into the city and is reviewed by Albertson for a building review and Ewoldt reviews the application for Historic Preservation and Zoning, prior to being brought forth to the Historic Preservation Commission. Vice Chair Connelly requested confirmation that the Historic Preservation Commission is supposed to be presented with the application within fifteen days. Albertson and Ewoldt confirmed this is the intention, and more than a fifteen-day timeline would be unusual. Commissioner Allen inquired about grandfathered signs. Ewoldt stated these rights are granted by the zoning code and would not be a Historic Preservation Commission issue. Al stated that the Historic Preservation Commission could add a special meeting if needed, should the Historic Preservation Commission agree to reduce meetings to once per month. Commissioner Bus felt comfortable with the current meeting arrangement, and confirmed flexibility is an option, if required by a special need. Chair Saam encouraged the public to reach out by email if they cannot attend in person. Ewoldt believes it is the desire of Mayor Schielke to retain the current two meeting per month arrangement, but the time of the meetings can certainly be discussed. Motion: To recommend to City Council with comments as provided Maker: Commissioner Bus Second: Vice Chair Connelly Roll Call Vote: AYE: Commissioner Bus, Commissioner Allen, Commissioner Mahler, Vice Chair Connelly, Chair Saam NAY: None ABSENT: Koc Motion approved. Zach Ewoldt stated he will make the necessary updates and bring them to Community of the Whole and City Council. 6.4. Discussion: Certificate of Appropriateness Approval Matrix City of Batavia, Applicant Zach Ewoldt stated that historically there has been some discussion about what staff can and cannot administratively approve. The adoption of a detailed matrix would provide a clear guideline for Staff. The intention is for staff to not deny a Certificate of Appropriateness, rather to provide an expedited Page 7 of 28 Historic Preservation Commission January 12, 2026, Page 6 process for smaller projects within the Matrix. A denial would remain the right of the Historic Preservation Commission. Chair Saam requested confirmation that the exempt items are currently exempt, rather than new suggestions. Ewoldt confirmed most of them are currently exempt and highlighted one new recommended addition for the painting of unpainted materials. Commissioner Bus requested The Historic Preservation Commission allow the Matrix the discussion it deserves during a future meeting, after time to review. Commissioner Mahler had several initial items he wished to discuss. He requested the addition of “style and texture” to the language under Masonry Repointing. Ewoldt agreed to make this change. Commissioner Mahler requested clarification of Decorative Glass on Page 2. Albertson explained that items which do not require a permit are exempt. Ewoldt stated this exemption would be flagged for further discussion. Commissioner Mahler suggested flat roofs, which are not in public view, could be an Administrative Review. Commissioner Mahler further suggested a second line item for this, instead of a single line item. Commission Mahler inquired about the Mechanical and Electrical guidelines, and the relationship to the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. Ewoldt explained the code enables the Historic Preservation Commission the right to review most site improvements. However, in the case of the EV Chargers, City Council considered them a utility improvement, owned and operated by the electric utility. Al stated he will send a list of items directly to Ewoldt to be shared at the next discussion. Ewoldt stated the commission will need to decide how they wish to be notified of staff approvals, if the matrix is approved. Ewoldt inquired about the Historic Preservation Commission deadline for reviewing this item. Chair Saam suggested the first meeting in February. Chair Saam also requested that comments and feedback be sent to Zach Ewoldt. Commissioner Allen requested clarification on exempt work for chimney repair, parking lots and satellite dishes. Ewoldt explained that chimney work such as tuck pointing does not require a permit, making them exempt. Parking lots are not usually brought to the Historic Preservation Commission and some satellites have limitations. 7. Updates: Ewoldt stated the City has drafted the Request for Proposals for the exterior building conditions assessment of significant structures. The outside consultant will provide a report to Staff on what is deficient or in need of immediate and long-term repairs. The goal is to utilize this information to encourage property owners to make improvements. Commissioner Bus requested confirmation that the Historic Preservation Commission will be reviewing a draft report from the consultant. Ewoldt explained the consultant would provide these reports to Staff and Staff would likely be providing the reports to the Historic Preservation Commission. Commissioner Bus explained the Historic Preservation Commission has been very involved over the last ten to fifteen years reviewing the condition of existing structures and felt it is important for the Historic Preservation Commission to be involved in the future. Page 8 of 28 Historic Preservation Commission January 12, 2026, Page 7 8. Other Business: None 9. Adjournment: There being no other business to discuss, Chair Saam asked for a motion to adjourn the meeting; there was a first by Vice Chair Tom Connelly and a second by Commissioner Bus. By Voice Vote the motion carried, and the meeting was adjourned at 6:13 PM. The minutes were transcribed and respectfully submitted by Sarah Cowan, Recording Secretary. Page 9 of 28  MINUTES January 26, 2026 Historic Preservation Commission City of Batavia PLEASE NOTE: These minutes are not a word-for-word transcription of the statements made at the meeting, nor intended to be a comprehensive review of all discussions. They are intended to make an official record of the actions taken by the Commission and to include some description of discussion points as understood by the minute-taker. They may not reference some of the individual attendees’ comments, nor the complete comments if referenced. 1. Meeting Called to Order for the Historic Preservation Commission Chair Saam called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. 2. Roll Call: Members Present: Commissioner Allen, Commissioner Mahler, Vice Chair Connelly, Chair Saam Members Absent: Commissioner Bus, Commissioner Koc Also Present: Zach Ewoldt (Planner), Jeff Albertson (Building Commissioner), Sarah Cowan (Recording Secretary) 3. Items to be Removed, Added or Changed: None. 4. Matters From the Public (Not on the agenda): None. 5. Regular Agenda Items 5.1 Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign and the replacement of sign panels for the existing freestanding sign at 336 East Wilson Street. Batavia Patels 2 LLC, Applicant Zach Ewoldt provided a staff report for a signage review for Windmill Market, taking the place of the former 7-11 business at this location. Ewoldt stated this is a non-contributing structure. Ewoldt stated the proposed sign is in conformance with the zoning code and generally aligns with the Historic Preservation Commission guidelines and downtown district guidelines. Connelly believed the design is consistent with the previous design and supports the proposed sign. Allen noted the need to support small businesses, believes the sign is in good taste, and not obstructing traffic views. Saam appreciated the property owners having recently elevated the standards of appearance. Motion: To approve the COA as submitted Maker: Connelly Second: Mahler Roll Call Vote: 4:0 Page 10 of 28 Plan Commission January 21,2026, Page 2 5.2 Certificate of Appropriateness for a new wall sign at 160 First Street on North Building Elevation Aubrey Sign Company, Applicant Zach Ewoldt presented the staff report noting that this building is significant, primarily due to age and the native materials, such as limestone, used to construct the building. The proposed Warehouse 55 sign would replace the previous Hearth and Hammer sign, which was larger in size. Allen noted the history of the building, and stated that during the war, they made bomb cases and went to prison for overcharging the government. Paul from Aubrey Sign Company noted the applicant’s budget concerns contributed to the smaller size of the sign. The proposed sign is not backlit but would be illuminated from the existing gooseneck lights. Mahler inquired about the hours of the business, and it was determined that lighting is not critical due to the regular retail hours of the store. Allen inquired about name Mark Allen. Ewoldt noted that Mark Allen is one of two owners, from Aurora. Ewoldt stated they have a downtown Chicago location also, which is well established, providing antiques and home improvement items. Saam noted there are multiple vendors inside of this location. Ewoldt provided the dimensions of the Hearth and Hammer sign (36” x 342”) in comparison to the proposed sign for Warehouse 55 (24” x 120”). Saam supported the sign especially because it fits into the applicant’s budget, although a larger sign would have been preferred. Motion: To approve the COA as submitted Maker: Connelly Second: Mahler Roll Call Vote: 4:0 5.3 Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a wall sign at 40 North Island Avenue Aubrey Sign Company, Applicant Zach Ewoldt presented the staff report, noting one error in the memo regarding the square footage (8.5 square feet should replace the 16 square feet listed in the memo). Ewoldt stated the sign generally complies with the zoning code and the Historic Preservation Commission guidelines. The design guidelines recommend consistent design dimensions and materials for commercial multi-tenant buildings. The proposed sign is for non-illuminated, individual channel letters which generally aligns with the downtown plan. A street view image of the building was reviewed, indicating multiple iterations of font and style on the building already. Saam inquired about the relationship in size to the previous Ziggy’s sign. Ewoldt stated it is smaller but still proportionate to the tenant space. Paul from Aubrey Sign Company confirmed that the budgetary restrictions of the applicant prevented the illumination of the sign. The potential repurposing of the old, illuminated Ziggy’s sign was discussed with the customer, but was also outside of their budget. Saam inquired about the process of creating uniformity in design types on buildings in the future. Ewoldt stated the Trader Joe’s shopping center landlord has adopted more rigorous standards, in comparison to the Jewel shopping center. Ewoldt stated the zoning code does not necessarily regulate font, but ensures the signs are proportionate in size, placement is appropriate, and raceway color is consistent. Ewoldt noted the building is a non- contributing structure. Connelly expressed support for the proposed sign because it is a non- contributing building and the proposed sign is consistent with the previous nail salon. Page 11 of 28 Plan Commission January 21,2026, Page 3 Motion: To approve the COA as submitted Maker: Mahler Second: Connelly Roll Call Vote: 4:0 6. Updates: Zach Ewoldt reminded the commission that the discussion on the action matrix will occur during the February 4, 2026 meeting. Ewoldt also stated the Request for Proposals for the exterior building conditions assessment was issued, and there have been some interest from outside design firms and inspection firms. This will close on February 13, 2026. Ewoldt stated that the exterior survey will identify immediate and long-term deficiencies, allowing for positive recommendations and constructive criticism to property owners. Albertson noted this process was started several years ago. Ewoldt stated this is a necessary step to preserve these buildings. Commissioner Allen inquired about the remaining chimneys and their inspection status. Ewoldt noted that a request to address several deficiencies and have the chimney inspected was presented to the owner of the Challenge properties chimney. While smaller in size, this chimney is considered more ornamental. Ewoldt stated that this process was initiated in December with Spring deadlines, otherwise City Council has authorized enforcement from code enforcement and property maintenance. Allen inquired about the dam. Ewoldt noted that the river and the dam are not in the district. Mahler noted the base bid consists of seventy- five structures, with an alternate bid for fifty more contributing structures. Chair Saam inquired about the status of the Tin Shop. Ewoldt confirmed the building has been demolished, and Albertson noted backfill is the next step. Samm inquired about the Tin Shop sign, which Ewoldt confirmed was saved. Char Saam inquired about the status of Hubbard’s. Ewoldt noted that they have not gone to Community of the Whole yet. Ewoldt stated that staff engaged the City Attorney regarding the previous discussion of risk and liability, and it was determined that a hold harmless agreement would be adequately documented and addressed. Chair Saam asked about the status of the demolition permit for the other chimney. Albertson stated they are close to issuing the permit, after a few more details are addressed. Ewoldt mentioned the upcoming property designation reviews. The Historic Preservation Commission will review, and discuss any proposed changes at a later date, after all properties are reviewed. The change must be approved by City Council, and property owners would need to be notified. 7. Adjournment: There being no other business to discuss, Chair Saam asked for a motion to adjourn the meeting; there was a first by Commissioner Mahler and a second by Vice Chair Connelly. By voice vote the motion was carried and the meeting adjourned at 5:30 P.M. The minutes were transcribed and respectfully submitted by Sarah Cowan, Recording Secretary. Page 12 of 28  MEMO To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Zach Ewoldt AICP, Planner Date: February 6, 2026 Re: Certificate of Appropriateness for Building Facade Modifications at 101 South Batavia Avenue Alex Teipel, Applicant Summary: Alex Teipel, the architect for the property owner, has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) request for modifications to the building façade at 101 South Batavia Avenue. The proposal includes installing two (2) pairs of new windows on the eastern building elevation. Historic District Designation: Non-Contributing Structure Background: Marberry Aurora LLC purchased 101 South Batavia Avenue in late 2025 with the intent to establish a dry-cleaning facility at this location. According to Batavia Township records, the building was constructed in 1940 and has historically served as a Texaco gas station and later a liquor store. The structure has been vacant for approximately six (6) years, during which time it has deteriorated and now requires significant repair. In January, the Commission approved the replacement of both the mansard and flat roofs. The applicant now proposes removing three (3) stone panels on the eastern façade and installing two (2) pairs of dark bronze aluminum windows, each measuring six (6) feet eight (8) inches by seven (7) feet. According to the applicant, these windows will occupy the former service door openings from when the building’s use was a Texaco service station. The applicant also intends to repair the existing façade as needed, with in-kind siding replacement. The plans note that the façade will be painted, although no color selection has been provided, nor is it clear whether painting will occur on all elevations. While the painting of non-masonry siding does not require a COA, the Commission may still review and provide feedback. Historic Preservation Commissions Design Guidelines Conformance: Staff reviewed the Commission’s adopted design guidelines for windows and determined that the proposed materials and design meet the applicable criteria. The guidelines specifically allow painted or anodized aluminum windows. As this is a non-contributing structure, the proposed materials are consistent with previously approved window installations within the district. The window dimensions are also appropriate in relation to the building’s façade. Downtown Plan Conformance: Staff reviewed the Downtown Plan and finds the proposed windows consistent with the plan’s intent. The plan encourages the incorporation of large display windows in the downtown area where appropriate and compatible with surrounding buildings. If approved, the new Jeffery D. Schielke Government Center ● 100 N. Island Ave ● Batavia, IL 60510 ● 630-454-2000 ● www.BataviaIL.gov Page 13 of 28 windows will introduce natural light into the building and add architectural interest along the streetscape, contributing positively to the overall pedestrian environment. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 101 South Batavia Avenue as presented, for the modifications to the building façade at 101 South Batavia Avenue to install two (2) pairs of new windows on the eastern building elevation. Attachments: Application and Plans C: Mayor and City Council Department Heads Alex Teipel, Architect and Applicant Marberry Aurora LLC, Property and Business Owner Jeffery D. Schielke Government Center ● 100 N. Island Ave ● Batavia, IL 60510 ● 630-454-2000 ● www.BataviaIL.gov Page 14 of 28  REVISIONS BY: 1 TYP. A1 EXISTING MANSARD ROOF w/ SHAKE SHINGLES; EXAMINE & REPAIR & REPLACE AS REQUIRED W. Alex Teipel - Architect 1231 South 12th Street, St. Charles, Illinois 60174 DRYWALL 9'-0" PICK-UP DROP-OFF 6'-8" C W. Alex Teipel - Architect PANEL BY PANEL BY OTHERS OTHERS 4" VINYL BASE EXISTING WINDOW NO CHANGE EXISTING WINDOW & DOORS NO CHANGE 1 TYP. (630) 803-8377 wateipel3@gmail.com EXISTING SIDING NO CHANGE A1 DASHED LINES INDICATE O.H.DOOR OPENINGS TO BE CLOSED w/ 2x4 WD STUDS @16" O.C & 5/8" DRYWALL PICK-UP DROP-OFF PANEL PANEL 9'-2" 2'-6" 10'-3" 13'-0" 2'-9 1/2" 1'-6" 2'-7 1/2" EXISTING VERIFY DIMENSIONS OF PICK-UP & DROP-OFF PANELS w/ SUPPLIER 3/0x7/0 EXISTING STONE PANELS ELEVATION of NEW WALL A TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED w/ ALUM. FRAMED WINDOWS & SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING ON EXISTING MANSARD ROOF w/ SHAKE SHINGLES; EXAMINE & REPAIR & REPLACE AS REQUIRED MSD SHEATHING ON 2x4 WOOD STUDS @ 24" O.C. w/ 5/8" DRYWALL FINISH 2" PATCH SIDING ABOVE WINDOWS & WHERE STONE PANELS HAVE BEEN REMOVED w/ SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING 4 3/4' NEW ALUMINUM FRAMES & 1/2" INSULSTING GLASS EXISTING WINDOW & DOORS NO CHANGE 2" 1'-9" REMODELING for MARBERRY CLEANERS at 1 EAST ELEVATION TYP. Note: • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • •• • •• • • •• • • • •• • •• • • • • • •• ••• •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FRONT SET - STICK ASSEMBLY OUTSIDE GLAZED A2 (1/4" INFILL) APPROVED ALTERNATE MANUFACTURERS ALLOWED Existing Plan with Demolition & Floor Plan & Notes 1. Entire East Elevation will need to be painted, prep & 2 coats; verify color with owner. 1'-9" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2. Inspect existing flat roof and back side of Mansard 4'-6" roof and advise on repairs or new single ply membrane roof w/ insulation. 4" 101 South Batavia Avenue TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL 1 Batavia, Illinois NOT TO SCALE Date 01/19/26 Scale AS NOTED HOLD HARMLESS STATEMENT Drawn W.A.T. The Architect is not overseeing the construction of this building. The use of these drawings by any Contractor, Subcontractor, Builders, Mechanic, Job 26-3206 Tradesmen or Worker shall instigate a Hold Harmless Agreement between the drawing User and the Architect. The User shall in fact agree to hold Page 15 of 28 the Architect harmless for any responsibility in regard to construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures and for any safety precautions Sheet and programs in connection with the work and further shall hold the Architect A2 harmless for costs and problems arising from the negligence of Contractor, Subcontractor, Builders, Mechanic, Tradesmen or Workers. The use of these Drawings also implies that the Architect shall take no responsibility for the plan User's failure to carry out the work in accordance with the Drawing or Contract Documents. Of 3 Sheets Page 16 of 28 Page 17 of 28 Page 18 of 28 Page 19 of 28 Page 20 of 28 Page 21 of 28  MEMO To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Zach Ewoldt AICP, Planner Date: February 6, 2026 Re: Discussion: Certificate of Appropriateness Approval Matrix City of Batavia, Applicant Update: Staff provided an initial introduction of the Approval Matrix at the January 12, 2026 meeting. Following preliminary discussion, the Commission requested additional time for review and continued the item to the February 9, 2026 meeting. Since that meeting, one member of the public, Al Watts of Preservation Partners, contacted staff. He suggested that the Commission consider discussing the following items to determine whether administrative approval is appropriate, noting that changes in these areas could have potential negative impacts on the overall historic district or on adjacent contributing/significant structures: • Repair & Maintenance: Fencing, Accessory Structures • Alterations & New Construction: Architectural Features, Awnings, Gutters/Downspouts, Lighting, Shutters (new or replacement), Siding Trim (replacement of less than 10%) • Site: Landscape Structures, Lighting • Demolition: Accessory Building No revisions to the matrix have been made since the initial presentation. Summary: Staff has prepared a draft Certificate of Appropriateness Approval Matrix outlining which improvements may be administratively approved by staff and which require action by the Historic Preservation Commission. Background: Over the past several years, staff and the Historic Preservation Commission have discussed the expansion of administrative approvals to allow additional improvements to be approved by City staff. In recent months, staff has conducted a review of comparable communities and prepared a draft approval matrix. The matrix identifies each type of improvement and indicates whether it may be administratively approved or requires approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, based on the property’s designation as non-designated, noncontributing, contributing, or significant. The framework for the matrix is based on the City of Geneva’s approach, which has improved project timelines and provided clearer information to the public regarding the approval process. The proposed process aligns with an existing procedure under the Zoning Code and the Plan Commission, where staff may approve projects administratively when they meet established criteria and Jeffery D. Schielke Government Center ● 100 N. Island Ave ● Batavia, IL 60510 ● 630-454-2000 ● www.BataviaIL.gov Page 22 of 28 comply with all applicable codes and regulations. This process has been in place since 2010 and has been successfully implemented without issue. When a project proposes multiple improvements, does not align with adopted design guidelines, or may alter the character of the surrounding area, it is referred to the Plan Commission for review and action. Similarly, staff anticipates not issuing administrative denials under the proposed matrix and would refer any project raising questions or concerns to the Historic Preservation Commission for review. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission review and discuss the proposed approval matrix and provide feedback to staff. Should the Commission determine that additional time or modifications are necessary, the item may be continued to a date certain for further discussion or scheduled for formal action. Attachments: Approval Matrix C: Mayor and City Council Department Heads Jeffery D. Schielke Government Center ● 100 N. Island Ave ● Batavia, IL 60510 ● 630-454-2000 ● www.BataviaIL.gov Page 23 of 28  City of Batavia Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) Review Process Batavia Historic District or Designated Individual Landmarks The Historic Preservation Commission has adopted a list of improvements eligible for administrative review and approval by Community and Economic Development Department staff for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA). The Director may refer any administrative COA to the Historic Preservation Commission for action. Type of Work Proposed Exempt Minor Work Significant Work Work Administrative Review HPC Review Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Significant Significant Repair & Maintenance Building Architectural Features, repair of X X X X existing Siding / Trim, repair of original X X X X material including up to 10% replacement Chimney Repair and no material X replacement Masonry Repointing with X compatible mortar and no change in joint width or color (no material replacement) Painting of previously painted X surfaces (regardless of paint color) Roof cladding with like materials X X X X Site Access Drives X X X X Fences X X X X Landscape Structures (walls, X X X X pergolas, gazebos, etc.) Storage and/or Accessory X X X X Structures, repair or replacement of existing Walkways X X X X Page 24 of 28 Type of Work Proposed Exempt Minor Work Significant Work Work Administrative Review HPC Review Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Significant Significant Alterations and New Construction Building Access Ramps/Lifts, erection, X X X X alteration and/or removal (primary or street façade) Access Ramps/Lifts, erection, X X X X alteration and/or removal (facades not visible from public way) Architectural Features and Details, X X X X reconstruction or replication of original elements with like materials Architectural Features and Details, X X X X replacement or installation of new with substitute materials Awnings X X X X Additions at any location, X X X X horizontal or vertical Architectural Modification (minor), X X X X primary or street-facing facade Architectural Modification (minor), X X X X any facade not visible from public way Chimney Replacement, primary or X X X X street-acing façade, including material replacement Chimney Replacement, secondary X X X X or rear elevation, including material replacement Decorative Glass (colored, leaded X or beveled) Doors, except storm/screen doors X X X X Gutters / downspouts, attached X Gutters / downspouts, integral X Gutter Fascia Trim, installation of X X X X substitute material obscured by gutter Lighting, attached X X X X Page 25 of 28 Type of Work Proposed Exempt Minor Work Significant Work Work Administrative Review HPC Review Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Significant Significant Mailboxes X Masonry Repair/Repointing X X X X (including material replacement, infill of existing openings and/or insertion of new openings) Painting of unpainted material X X X X (including masonry, metals, and wood) Porches, decks, outdoor seating X X X X areas, raised terraces and attached steps (including enclosure of existing porches) Principal Structure, new X X X X Roof cladding, change in materials X X X X Roofs, change in roofline and/or X X X X pitch Satellite Dishes X Shutters, new X X X X Shutters, removal of existing X X X X Shutters, or replacement X X X X Siding / Trim, removal of synthetic X X X X materials Siding / Trim, repair of original X X X X material more than 10% replacement Siding / Trim, installation of X X X X substitute material at existing structure or new addition Signs, new (attached) X X X X Signs, replacement of existing face X X X X (attached) Storm/Screen Doors and Windows, X wood Storm/Screen Doors and Windows, X non-wood Window Repair or replacement, X X X X street-facing facade or visible from public way Page 26 of 28 Type of Work Proposed Exempt Minor Work Significant Work Work Administrative Review HPC Review Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Significant Significant Window Repair, any facade not X X X X visible from public way except at rear facades along public alleyway Window Replacement, any X X X X facade not visible from public way except at rear facades along public alleyway Site Accessory Buildings or Structures X X X X 100 sq. feet or more Access Drives, expansion or X modification Access Drives, replacement in- X kind Air Conditioner Condensing Units X X X X Fences, front or corner side X X X X setback Fences, side or rear setback X X X X Landscape Structures (walls, X X X X pergolas, gazebos, etc.) Lighting, General Building Facade X X X X Lighting, Landscape or site X X X X Mechanical and Electrical Service X X X X Equipment, at grade Mechanical and Electrical Service X X X X Equipment, thru wall Parking Lots X Patios, at grade X X X X Patios, raised X X X X Signs, new (free-standing) X X X X Signs, replacement of existing X X X X face Walkways, expansion or X X X X modification Walkways, replacement in-kind X X X X All Other Site Modifications X X X X Page 27 of 28 Type of Work Proposed Exempt Minor Work Significant Work Work Administrative Review HPC Review Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Non-Designated Non-Contributing Contributing Significant Significant Demolition, Removal and Relocation Accessory Buildings or Structures X X X X Chimney Removal X X X X Principal Structures X X X X Fences/Walls, non-historic X X X X Fences/Walls, historic X X X X Landscape Structures (walls, X X X X pergolas, gazebos, etc.) Page 28 of 28