Historic District Commission

1 of 67 AGENDA Historic District Commission Meeting Date: Monday, December 11, 2023 Time: 4:00 P.M. Where: City Hall, Room 301 1. Call to Order: 2. Attendance: 3. Additions or Deletions to Agenda: 4. Approval of minutes: November 13, 2023 5. Correspondence: 6. Old Business: 7. New Business: A. H12-23 (306 Capital Ave NE) A petition, filed by Heather Jordan, 306 Capital Ave. NE, for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of a 6’ tall wood-paneled dumpster enclosure. Parcel #3870-00-022-0. B. H13-23 (303 Capital Ave NE) A petition, filed by Safe Place, 303 Capital Ave. NE, for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed addition of residential units onto the detached garage. Parcel #1660-00-001-0. C. H14-23 (65 Wilkes St) A petition, filed by Fence Men Co. (Todd Mead) on behalf of Catherine Hoenecke, 65 Wilkes St., for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of a 6’ tall wood privacy fence in the side yard of the property. Parcel #8810-00-061-0. “PJ” Warren Commemorative Street Designation 8. Comments by the Public: 9. Comments from Commission members and Staff: 10. Adjournment: The City of Battle Creek will provide necessary reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hearing impaired and audio tapes of printed materials being considered in the meeting upon notice to the City of Battle Creek. Individuals with disabilities requiring auxiliary aides or services should contact the City of Battle Creek by writing or calling the following: Office of the City Clerk, P.O. Box 1717, 10 North Division – Suite 111, Battle Creek, MI 49016, (269)966-3348 (Voice), (269)966-3348 (TDD) Division Site 117 Battle Creek M Fax (269) 910 N. Di 10 N. DIVISION ST. P.O. BOX 1717 BATTLE CREEK MICHIGAN 49016-1717 PHONE (269) 966-3320 FAX (269) 966-3555 WWW.BATTLECREEKMI.GOV  2 of 67 CITY OF BATTLE CREEK HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 10 North Division, Battle Creek, MI 49014 Minutes for Monday, November 13, 2023 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER: By Chairperson Newman at 4:03 p.m. This meeting was held in-person. ATTENDANCE: A roll call was taken: Comm. Newman, Present Comm. Simpson, Present Comm. Drozdowski, Present Comm. Davis, Present Comm. Sallee, Absent Comm. Thornton, Absent Comm. Steinbrunner, Absent Staff Present: Travis Sullivan, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Melody Carlsen, Administrative Assistant, Marcel Stoetzel, Deputy City Attorney. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO AGENDA: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of October 9, 2023 meeting minutes. MOTION MADE BY COMM. SIMPSON TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 9, 2023. SECONDED BY COMM. DROZDOWSKI. A vote was taken and all those in favor to say “aye”: ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION APPROVED. CORRESPONDENCE: None. OLD BUSINESS: A. H10-23 (291 Champion St.) Petition for a Certificate of Appropriateness, filed by Mr. Jim Coughlin of Roach Home Improvement on behalf of Mr. David Ellis, 291 Champion St., is for the proposed application of 4” vinyl siding over the deteriorated existing 4” wood siding. Parcel #5020-00-047-0. Staff Presentation: Travis Sullivan presented the staff report for property located at 291 Champion St. Staff recommends approval of this item, as the proposed residing of the building meets the standards outlined in Chapter 1470.09 “Review of Application,” Chapter 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, as well as maintains consistency with previous siding jobs approved by the Historic District Commission. Applicant Presentation: Jim Coughlin of 901 Capital Ave NE was present to speak and answer questions by commissioners. Commissioner Questions: 1  3 of 67 Commissioner Davis inquired about the decorative pieces above the two front windows. She would like to see that stay or something done to preserve the historic feature. Commissioner Simpson asked if scraping the old paint and repainting was considered. Commissioner Newman commented to questions being answered in the staff report. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER DAVIS TO APPROVE THE ADDITION OF VINYL SIDING WITH THE CONDITION TO PRESERVE/DUPLICATE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE THE DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS ON THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE (GABLE AND ABOVE WINDOW), SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DROZDOWSKI. A roll vote was taken: ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION APPROVED. NEW BUSINESS: A. H11-23 (316 W VANBUREN ST) A petition, filed by Mills Siding and Roofing on behalf of Vince Pavone, 316 W Van Buren Street, is for the proposed replacement of the flat roofing section on the north end of the building with an EPDM material and not visible from the street. Parcel #0255-00-005-0. Staff Presentation: Travis Sullivan gave the staff report for 316 W VanBuren Street. Applicant is seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace a section of the roof. Staff recommends the approval of this item as it meets the standards outlined in Chapter 1470.09 “Review of Applications,” Chapter 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Applicant Presentation: Jarred Milich of Mills Siding and Roofing, 250 Monroe, Grand Rapids, MI. Was present to speak and answer questions from commissioners. Commissioner Comments: Commissioner Simpson asked if the building was separate from the Lakeview Ford building. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIMPSON TO APPROVE THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATNESS H11-23, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DROZDOWSKI. A roll vote was taken: ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION APPROVED. B. Administrative Approval Quarterly Report Travis Sullivan was present to give the quarterly report and answer questions by commissioners. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: None. COMMENTS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS AND STAFF: Commissioner Davis questioned the difference between staff approving some roofing project and the Commission approving others. 2  4 of 67 Travis Sullivan responded to Commissioner Davis’ question and suggested to the Body that staff can approve roofing projects that appear like for like instead of being approved by the Commission. Commissioners agreed to this suggestion. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Newman adjourned the meeting at 4:21 p.m. Submitted by: Melody Carlsen, Planning and Zoning Administrative Assistant 3  5 of 67 Battle Creek Historic District Commission Staff Report Staff Report 306 Capital Ave. NE Meeting: December 11, 2023 To: Historic District Commission From: Travis Sullivan, Planning and Zoning Administrator Date: December 4, 2023 Subject: The petition, filed by Heather Jordan, 306 Capital Ave. NE, is for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of a new 6’ tall wood dumpster enclosure in the parking lot at the rear of the building. Summary Staff recommends approval of the subject petition at 306 Capital Ave. NE, as the proposed 6’ tall wooden dumpster enclosure meets the standards outlined in Chapter 1470.09 “Review of Applications,” Chapter 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Figure 1: Red pin on aerial points to subject site (306 Capital Ave. NE) located within the local Old Maple Street Historic District. Photo courtesy of Google Maps.  6 of 67 Site & History The subject site is located at 306 Capital Ave. NE near the southwest corner of Capital Ave. NE and Poplar St. within the Old Maple Street local historic district. The site consists of an 8,376 sq. ft. commercial building constructed in 1949, with the majority of the building clad in brick masonry. Figure 2 below provides a view of the building from the street, captured in August 2023 by Google Street View. Figure 2: Street view of the subject site at 306 NE Capital Ave., August 2023. Photo courtesy of Google Street View. Summary of Request The applicant has filed the subject HDC Certificate of Appropriateness application for the construction of a new 6’ tall wooden dumpster enclosure in the side yard of the property (behind the building with relation to Capital Ave. NE). The purpose of the enclosure is to bring the property into compliance with Section 1260.02 (Fences), which states that “solid fences or walls are required to completely conceal and enclose dumpsters with a capacity of two yards or more, and must extend at least six inches above the height of the dumpster being concealed.” The proposed fence meets this and all other provisions of Section 1260.02 of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicable HDC Guidelines and Analysis for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a 6’ tall wooden dumpster enclosure in the side yard of the property. 2 of 6  7 of 67 This property is reviewed in accordance with City of Battle Creek Building and Housing Code Chapter 1470 "Historic Preservation", as amended, the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act, as amended, and the criteria for the National Register of Historic Places as outlined in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. Specifically, the Commission shall follow Section 1470.09 Review of Applications, as follows: (b) The Commission shall also consider all of the following: (1) The historic or architectural value and significance of the resource and its relationship to the historic value of the surrounding area. (2) The relationship of any architectural features of the resource to the rest of the resource and the surrounding area. (3) The general compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. (4) Other factors, such as aesthetic value that the Commission finds relevant. (c) The Historic District Commission shall review and act upon only exterior features of a resource and shall not review and act upon interior arrangements… And 1470.17 PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC FEATURES. (a) Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a resource which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure or site and its environment, or to use the resource for its originally intended purpose. Staff finds that the proposed dumpster enclosure will require no alteration of the building on the site. The enclosure of the dumpster in the side yard of the property would have no impact upon the site insofar as its use for its originally intended purpose (original use as a synagogue, new proposed use as a private club). The Commission may find this standard to be met. (b) The distinguishing original qualities or character of a resource and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features shall be avoided when possible. The proposed dumpster enclosure is not anticipated to destroy any distinguishing original qualities or character of the building or site, nor result in the removal of any historic material or distinctive architectural features. The Commission may find this standard to be met. 3 of 6  8 of 67 (c) All resources shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. The proposed construction of the dumpster enclosure would not create alterations which would result in an earlier appearance. The proposed enclosure would be constructed of traditional fencing material (treated wood) and would not alter the existing character of the building or property in a historically significant way. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (d) Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a resource and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. The proposed dumpster enclosure would not result in any alteration to changes in the building which may have acquired significance in their own right. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (e) Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a resource shall be treated with sensitivity. The proposed construction of a dumpster enclosure is intended to bring the property in compliance with Section 1260.02, which requires that all dumpsters with a capacity of two yards or more be concealed by a solid wall or fence. It is not anticipated that the enclosure’s construction will impact any stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which may characterize the resource. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (f) Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other resources. The proposed construction of the dumpster enclosure would not result in the repair or replacement of any deteriorated architectural features. The Commission may find this standard to be met. 4 of 6  9 of 67 (g) The surface cleaning of resources shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic materials shall not be undertaken. Intensive cleaning application such as sand blasting will not be necessary for the project. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (h) Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by or adjacent to any project. As is standard with any project that may require digging, staff would recommend that the Commission include as a condition of approval that any archaeological resources discovered during the construction process be preserved and reported to the City of Battle Creek. (i) Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing resources shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural or cultural material and when such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. The proposed wooden dumpster enclosure would be compatible in size, scale, color, material, and character of the property and with the neighborhood and the environment more generally. The enclosure is proposed to be constructed of traditional treated wood material, and would be compatible with other similar dumpster enclosures located within the general vicinity of the property, as well as meet the requirements of Section 1260.02. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (j) Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to resources shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the resource would not be impaired. If the proposed dumpster enclosure were to be removed in the future, it is not anticipated that the essential form and integrity of the building on the site would be impaired. The Commission may find this standard to be met. Recommendation The applicant’s proposed construction of a 6’ tall wooden dumpster enclosure intended to conceal a dumpster of two yards or more in capacity within the side yard of the property (at the rear of the building) seeks to meet the requirements of Section 1260.02. No alterations to the structure, which was constructed in 1949, are expected. Based upon staff’s analysis of the application and site 5 of 6  10 of 67 conditions, the proposal does comply with the standards outlined in Chapter 1470 Historic Preservation and is recommended for approval. As contained herein, staff does not find any conflict with Chapter 1470 Historic Preservation, the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act, or the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Therefore, planning staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of a 6’ tall wooden dumpster enclosure in the side yard at 306 Capital Ave. NE, as the request meets the standards outlined in Section 1470.09 “Review of Applications,” Section 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, as outlined in the staff report, with the following condition:  Any archaeological or historically significant resources discovered during the construction process be preserved and reported to the City of Battle Creek. Support Material Historic District Commission Application Fence Permit Application Supplemental Aerial Photo 6 of 6 11 of 67 12 of 67 13 of 67 14 of 67 15 of 67  16 of 67 Battle Creek Historic District Commission Staff Report Staff Report 303 Capital Ave. NE Meeting: December 11, 2023 To: Historic District Commission From: Travis Sullivan, Planning and Zoning Administrator Date: December 4, 2023 Subject: The petition, filed by Safe Place, 303 Capital Ave. NE, is for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a proposed addition to the existing carriage house (garage) to include multiple residential units, as well as a new privacy fence and dumpster enclosure on the site. Summary Staff recommends approval of the subject petition at 303 Capital Ave. NE, as the proposed addition to the existing carriage house (garage) attempts to replicate the features of the existing structure as closely as possible, and meets the standards outlined in Chapter 1470.09 “Review of Applications,” Chapter 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Figure 1: Red pin on aerial points to subject site (303 Capital Ave. NE) located within the local Old Maple Street Historic District. Photo courtesy of Google Maps.  17 of 67 Site & History The subject site is located at 303 Capital Ave. NE near the northwest corner of Capital Ave. NE and Orchard Pl. within the Old Maple Street local historic district. The site consists of an 8,615 sq. ft. multiple-family building constructed in 1890, with the majority of the building clad in brick and stone masonry. The detached carriage house (garage) near the rear of the property which is the subject of this application features a similar finish. Figure 2 below provides a view of the building from the street, captured in August 2023 by Google Street View. Figure 3 below displays a historical photo of the property (date unknown) from the Willard Library digital collection. Commissioners will want to note that the building appears to have been added onto at some point in its history, as an addition to the front of the building with an east to west sloping roofline is now present, which cannot be seen in the historical photo. Figure 2: Street view of the subject site at 303 NE Capital Ave., August 2023. The carriage house (garage) which is the subject of this application is visible in the photo at the back of the driveway. Photo courtesy of Goggle Street View. 2 of 9  18 of 67 Figure 3: Street view of the property courtesy of the Willard Library digital collection. Date of the photograph is unknown. Summary of Request The applicant has filed the subject Historic District Commission (HDC) Certificate of Appropriateness application for the construction of an addition onto the existing carriage house (garage) on the site. Improvements are set to include the addition of multiple residential units for the purpose of housing victims of abuse, as well as the construction of a wood privacy fence enclosing a rear common area and dumpster enclosure composed of PVC siding. The proposed dumpster enclosure would be located behind the main building and would not be visible from the street. The proposed addition seeks to preserve the existing carriage house, while adding an additional floor over the top, as well as extending the second floor to the east over the existing parking lot and supported by new structural posts. It is anticipated that the portion of the addition over the existing parking lot will be minimally (or not at all) visible from the street. The HDC will want to note that any potential approval of this Certificate of Appropriateness request does not constitute site plan or zoning approval. While generally compliant in both use and dimensional elements, minor revisions may be required of the applicant in order to account for setback requirements within the T-3 Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. Staff will work with the applicant and their architect in order to ensure that any approved plans are in compliance with all provisions of the City of Battle Creek zoning ordinance, as well as remain consistent with the general aesthetic and material design of any potential approval granted by the HDC. Applicable HDC Guidelines and Analysis for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of an addition to the carriage house and privacy fence on the subject property, as well as the construction of a new dumpster enclosure in the parking lot behind the main building. 3 of 9  19 of 67 This property is reviewed in accordance with City of Battle Creek Building and Housing Code Chapter 1470 "Historic Preservation", as amended, the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act, as amended, and the criteria for the National Register of Historic Places as outlined in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. Specifically, the Commission shall follow Section 1470.09 Review of Applications, as follows: (b) The Commission shall also consider all of the following: (1) The historic or architectural value and significance of the resource and its relationship to the historic value of the surrounding area. (2) The relationship of any architectural features of the resource to the rest of the resource and the surrounding area. (3) The general compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. (4) Other factors, such as aesthetic value that the Commission finds relevant. (c) The Historic District Commission shall review and act upon only exterior features of a resource and shall not review and act upon interior arrangements… And 1470.17 PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC FEATURES. (a) Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a resource which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure or site and its environment, or to use the resource for its originally intended purpose. Staff finds that the proposed building addition, privacy fence and dumpster enclosure will require alterations to existing carriage house on the site. The applicant is proposing the removal of the existing asphalt-shingled roof to allow for the addition of a second story residential unit, as well as additional residential studio units over the existing parking lot. Although the existing asphalt-shingled roof will be removed and replaced by a black standing seam metal roof, the applicant has attempted to replicate as closely as possible the aesthetic character of the existing roofline and peak, as well as with windows matching the circular window near the peak of the existing building. The applicant has proposed Countrylane Red Hardie Plank lap siding on the second story of the building in an attempt to match the color of the existing first floor brick masonry. The applicant is also proposing the removal of the two white overhead doors, with the openings to be replaced by Arctic White Hardie Plank lap siding with double sliding windows. The purpose of this design is to work within the existing openings covered by the overhead doors, while providing a Hardie Plank product which matches the color of the doors, while also allowing for traditional windows associated with a residential unit to be installed. 4 of 9  20 of 67 It is not anticipated that the new privacy fence or dumpster enclosure will require any alteration to the existing structure, although the HDC may wish to ask the applicant whether the proposed privacy fence will be attached to the building. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (b) The distinguishing original qualities or character of a resource and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features shall be avoided when possible. The proposed addition will result in the upper portion of the existing building being removed to allow for the addition of a second-story residential unit. The removal of this material is required in order to allow for the construction of new residential units which are needed in the furtherance of the mission of Safe Place, and the applicant has attempted treat this removal with sensitivity by seeking to replicate the aesthetic appearance of the existing roofline and window, while also matching the coloring of the new Hardie Plank lap siding to the existing brick masonry. The remainder of the addition will not impact any existing structure, and will continue to replicate the aesthetic character of the existing carriage house (the remainder of the addition will include two additional peaks featuring an identical front window and lap siding matching the original). The proposed privacy fence and dumpster enclosure are not anticipated to destroy any distinguishing original qualities or character of the building or site, nor result in the removal of any historic material or distinctive architectural features. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (c) All resources shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. In comparing the Willard Library photo with the 2023 Google Street View image, it is clear that the building which is the subject of this application has undergone alterations in its past. The applicant is attempting to add on a second story to the existing building while remaining sensitive to the existing roofline and aesthetic character of the portion of the building that has been previously altered. The proposed building will attempt to replicate the aesthetic qualities of the existing building while utilizing contemporary materials. The applicant is not proposing alterations which would have no historical basis or create an earlier appearance. The Commission may find this standard to be met. 5 of 9  21 of 67 (d) Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a resource and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. As has been discussed, the carriage house in its original form has been previously altered to add onto the front of the building, resulting in the roof in the front pitching from east to west, as well as the addition of two non-original overhead doors. The applicant has attempted to replicate the aesthetic nature of the existing building (with changes that have taken place in the course of time which may have acquired significance in their own right) while allowing for an addition to the building necessary in the furtherance of the organization’s mission. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (e) Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a resource shall be treated with sensitivity. As has been discussed, the carriage house in its original form has been previously altered to add onto the front of the building, resulting in the roof in the front pitching from east to west, as well as the addition of two non-original overhead doors. The proposed addition to the building which is the subject of this application attempts to create additional residential units which are vital to the mission of Safe Place, while preserving as best as possible the stylistic features and examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize the carriage house in its current form. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (f) Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other resources. The proposed addition does not involve the replacement of deteriorated architectural features, and is strictly intended to serve Safe Place in the furtherance of its mission to provide temporary housing for victims of abuse. The proposed addition of a second story to the existing building, as well as the expansion of the second story over the existing parking area supported by structural columns attempts to create an accurate duplication of the current 6 of 9  22 of 67 upper portion and roof design of the existing building, while utilizing contemporary building materials where exact replications are either not possible or practical. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (g) The surface cleaning of resources shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic materials shall not be undertaken. Intensive cleaning application such as sand blasting will not be necessary for the project. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (h) Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by or adjacent to any project. As is standard with any project that may require digging, staff would recommend that the Commission include as a condition of approval that any archaeological resources discovered during the construction process be preserved and reported to the City of Battle Creek. (i) Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing resources shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural or cultural material and when such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. The proposed alteration and addition to the existing resource attempts to replicate the aesthetic qualities of the existing carriage house as closely as possible, while utilizing contemporary materials and design elements where practical. The proposed addition to the existing building is expected to be compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood and environment. The proposed privacy fence and dumpster enclosure meet all provisions of Section 1260.02 (Fences), and are also compatible character and environment of the neighborhood. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (j) Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to resources shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the resource would not be impaired. If the proposed additions and alterations to the property were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the resource on the site would not 7 of 9  23 of 67 be impacted. In the opinion of staff, removal of the proposed addition could be accomplished while lowering the roof over the existing first story of the building, creating a single-story building replicating the existing aesthetic character of the carriage house as it exists currently. It is anticipated that the proposed privacy fence and dumpster enclosure could be removed in the future without impairing the essential form and integrity of the resource, although the HDC may wish to ask the applicant whether the privacy fence will be attached to the existing building or constructed in a freestanding nature. The Commission may find this standard to be met, provided it is satisfied with the nature of the privacy fence construction. Recommendation The applicant’s proposed addition to the existing carriage house is vital to the furtherance of its mission to provide temporary housing to victims of abuse. The proposed addition seeks to replicate as closely as possible (while utilizing contemporary building materials where practical) the aesthetic qualities of the original building, while raising the roof of the structure to allow for the addition of second story, as well as continued addition of the upper floor over the existing parking lot. Additionally, the applicant is proposing the construction of a privacy fence around the west side and rear of the carriage house, intended to provide for a common space for occupants of the building. Finally, the applicant proposes to construct a new PVC sided dumpster enclosure in an effort to satisfy the requirements of Section 1260.02 (Fences) of the zoning ordinance. Based upon staff’s analysis of the application and site conditions, the proposal does comply with the standards outlined in Chapter 1470 Historic Preservation and is recommended for approval. As contained herein, staff does not find any conflict with Chapter 1470 Historic Preservation, the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act, or the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Therefore, planning staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of an addition to the existing carriage house, including a second story over the existing building, as well as the extension of the second story over the existing parking lot supported by structural columns. Additionally, planning staff recommends approval of the new wood privacy fence (not to exceed 6’ in height, in accordance with Section 1260.02), as well as the proposed PVC sided dumpster enclosure meeting the requirements of Section 1260.02, as each request meets the standards outlined in Section 1470.09 “Review of Application,” Section 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, as outlined in the staff report, with the following conditions:  Any archaeological or historically significant resources discovered during the construction process be preserved and reported to the City of Battle Creek.  As a condition of approval, it is understood by the applicant and the Historic District Commission that some slight modifications to the current design of the building addition may be necessary in order to meet City of Battle Creek zoning requirements. Should modification of the project result in significant changes to the fundamental design and 8 of 9  24 of 67 character of the proposed addition, this item may require additional consideration and approval by the Historic District Commission. Support Material Historic District Commission Application Project Plans 9 of 9 25 of 67  26 of 67 Existing building and 27 of 67 28 of 67 29 of 67  30 of 67 Safe Place 303 Capital Ave NE, Battle Creek, MI 49017 269.965.6093 269.966.2503 kmcculloch@safeplaceshelter.org 303 Capital Ave NE, Battle Creek, MI 49017 Existing location for Safe Place Existing building and garage were built approximatley in the year 1890. The existing garage will have the roof removed. A new addition will be built above the garage and span over the existing parking lot with structural columns in between parking spaces to save all the existing parking spaces. The garage and additon would be used to house more victims temporarily.  31 of 67 Existing features will be represented as much as possible throughout the new addition. Existing features will be repaired as needed. No new features will be introduced. Asphalt Metal Double - sliding Brick and lap siding Fiber- cement lap siding matching brick color Concrete Concrete 32 of 67 33 of 67 34 of 67 35 of 67 36 of 67 37 of 67 38 of 67 39 of 67 40 of 67 41 of 67 42 of 67 43 of 67 44 of 67 45 of 67 46 of 67 47 of 67 48 of 67 49 of 67 50 of 67  51 of 67 Battle Creek Historic District Commission Staff Report Staff Report 65 Wilkes Street Meeting: December 11, 2023 To: Historic District Commission From: Travis Sullivan, Planning and Zoning Administrator Date: December 1, 2023 Subject: The petition, filed by Fence Men Co. (Todd Mead) on behalf of Catherine Hoenecke, 65 Wilkes St., is for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of a new 6’ tall wood privacy fence in the side yard of the property. Summary Staff recommends approval of the subject petition at 65 Wilkes St., as the proposed 6’ tall wood privacy fence construction meets the standards outlined in Chapter 1470.09 “Review of Applications,” Chapter 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Figure 1: Red pin on aerial points to subject site (65 Wilkes St.) located within the local Old Advent Town Historic District. Photo courtesy of Google Maps.  52 of 67 Site & History The subject site is located at 65 Wilkes St. between Seedorff St. to the north and Walter Ave. to the south within the Old Advent Town local historic district. The site consists of a 1,260 sq. ft. two story single-family home constructed in 2002. The home is clad in contemporary materials (vinyl siding). Figure 2 below provides a view of the home from the street, captured in June 2023 by Google Street View. Figure 2: Street view of the subject site at 65 Wilkes St., June 2023. Photo courtesy of Google Street View. Summary of Request The applicant has filed the subject HDC Certificate of Appropriateness application for the construction of a new 6’ tall wood privacy fence in the side yard (north side of the house) of the property. The fence is proposed to extend from the front and rear corners of the house 30’ to the north, fully enclosing the north side yard. While it is unclear from the application whether the fence will be attached to the house, it is important to remember that the home was constructed in 2002, and does not represent a resource of historical significance. Additionally, the proposed fence meets all provisions of Section 1260.02 (Fences) of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicable HDC Guidelines and Analysis for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a 6’ tall wood privacy fence in the side yard of the property. This property is reviewed in accordance with City of Battle Creek Building and Housing Code Chapter 1470 "Historic Preservation", as amended, the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act, as amended, and the criteria for the National Register of Historic Places as outlined in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. 2 of 6  53 of 67 Specifically, the Commission shall follow Section 1470.09 Review of Applications, as follows: (b) The Commission shall also consider all of the following: (1) The historic or architectural value and significance of the resource and its relationship to the historic value of the surrounding area. (2) The relationship of any architectural features of the resource to the rest of the resource and the surrounding area. (3) The general compatibility of the design, arrangement, texture, and materials proposed to be used. (4) Other factors, such as aesthetic value that the Commission finds relevant. (c) The Historic District Commission shall review and act upon only exterior features of a resource and shall not review and act upon interior arrangements… And 1470.17 PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC FEATURES. (a) Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a resource which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure or site and its environment, or to use the resource for its originally intended purpose. Staff finds that the proposed privacy fence will require little to no alteration of the home on the site. The enclosure of the side yard would have no impact upon the site insofar as its use for its originally intended purpose (single-family home). The Commission may find this standard to be met. (b) The distinguishing original qualities or character of a resource and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features shall be avoided when possible. The proposed privacy fence is not anticipated to destroy any distinguishing original qualities or character of the building or site, nor result in the removal of any historic material or distinctive architectural features. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (c) All resources shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 3 of 6  54 of 67 The proposed construction of the privacy fence would not create alterations which would result in an earlier appearance. The proposed fence would be constructed of traditional fencing material and would not alter the existing character of the home in a historically significant way. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (d) Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a resource and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected. The proposed construction of a privacy fence would not result in any alteration to changes in the building which may have acquired significance in their own right. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (e) Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a resource shall be treated with sensitivity. The proposed construction of a privacy fence is intended to allow for the private usage of the north side yard of the property by the owner and will not impact any stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which may characterize the resource. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (f) Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other resources. The proposed construction of a privacy fence would not result in the repair or replacement of any deteriorated architectural features. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (g) The surface cleaning of resources shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic materials shall not be undertaken. Intensive cleaning application such as sand blasting will not be necessary for the project. 4 of 6  55 of 67 The Commission may find this standard to be met. (h) Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by or adjacent to any project. As is standard with any project that may require digging, staff would recommend that the Commission include as a condition of approval that any archaeological resources discovered during the construction process be preserved and reported to the City of Battle Creek. (i) Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing resources shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural or cultural material and when such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. The proposed wood privacy fence would be compatible in size, scale, color, material, and character of the property and with the neighborhood and the environment more generally. The fence is proposed to be constructed of traditional wood material, and would be compatible with other similar fences located within the general vicinity of the property. The Commission may find this standard to be met. (j) Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to resources shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the resource would not be impaired. If the proposed privacy fence were to be removed in the future, it is not anticipated that the essential form and integrity of the house on the site would be impaired. The Commission may find this standard to be met. Recommendation The applicant’s proposed construction of a 6’ tall wood privacy fence enclosing the north side yard of the subject property seeks to allow for the safe and private usage of the yard. No alterations to the structure, which was constructed in 2002, are expected, provided that the fence is not attached to the house. Based upon staff’s analysis of the application and site conditions, the proposal does comply with the standards outlined in Chapter 1470 Historic Preservation and is recommended for approval. As contained herein, staff does not find any conflict with Chapter 1470 Historic Preservation, the Michigan Local Historic Districts Act, or the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. Therefore, planning staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed construction of a 6’ tall wood privacy fence enclosing the north side yard at 65 Wilkes St., as the request meets the standards outlined in Section 1470.09 “Review of Applications,” 5 of 6  56 of 67 Section 1470.17 “Preservation of Historic Features” and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines, as outlined in the staff report, with the following condition:  Any archaeological or historically significant resources discovered during the construction process be preserved and reported to the City of Battle Creek. Support Material Historic District Commission Application Letter of Agency Fence Permit Application 6 of 6 57 of 67 58 of 67 59 of 67 60 of 67 61 of 67  62 of 67 Battle Creek Historic District Commission Staff Report Staff Report Commemorative Street Designation Meeting: December 11, 2023 To: Historic District Commission From: Travis Sullivan, Planning and Zoning Administrator Date: December 1, 2023 Subject: Commemorative Designation of a Street Summary The City of Battle Creek allows for commemorative designation of a street or portion of a street under Chapter 220, Section 220.09 Commemorative Designation. This process does not change the name of the street but allows for the addition of a commemorative designation sign to the street signage. The requesting party pays for the signage and the Department of Public Works (DPW) specifies its design and completes the installation. Staff has submitted an application at the request of the City Commission to designate Harvard Street between Frelinghuysen Avenue to the south and Groveland Street to the north as “’PJ’ Warren Street.” The historical significance of this section of Harvard Street is that the location was the home of Paul Jerrell Warren, lovingly known as “PJ” or “Crack.” Mr. Warren was taken away from us unexpectedly on July 23, 2023. A requirement of the approval process is that the Historic District Commission review and comment on the request. No formal action is required of the Commission, and comments from Commissioners will be compiled by staff and forwarded to the City Commission for consideration at the December 19, 2023 meeting. Attached to this memo is a copy of the application and Section 220.09 Commemorative Designation, along with additional information on Mr. Warren’s life and contributions. Figure 1 below provides an illustration of the portion of Harvard Street which is the subject of this request.  63 of 67 Figure 1: Portion of Harvard Street proposed for commemorative naming, outlined in red. Support Material Commemorative Designation Application City Commission Notice Section 220.09 2 of 2  64 of 67 C it y o f B a t t l e C r e e k Community Services - Planning and Zoning Division City Hall • 10 N. Division Street, Ste. 117 • Battle Creek, Michigan 49014 Ph (269) 966-3320 • Fax (269) 966-3555 • www.battlecreekmi.gov Commemorative Designation of Street Section 220.09 Application Date Received: November 2, 2023 APPLICANT NAME: City of Battle Creek-Darcy Schmitt, Planning Supervisor- at the request of City Council. ADDRESS: 10 N. Division Street, Battle Creek, MI 49014 PHONE: 269-966-3406 ext.1507 EMAIL: dcschmitt@battlecreekmi.gov What is the nature or historical significance of the proposed commemorative name? The proposed name shall either be informative in nature or of historical significance, including a former street name determined to be of historical significance, or a memorial to an individual or family having national, state or local significance for notable community service. (Heritage Streets are not eligible for renaming) See Attached. What is the requested street for proposed commemorative designation? Harvard Street What is the requested name for the street? The proposed name shall not be similar or duplicative of a current street name in the Battle Creek metropolitan area. City staff will verify whether the name is similar or duplicative. "PJ" Warren Street What portion of the requested street is proposed for the commemorative designation? A commemorative designation is to be limited to that portion of the street or portion of the community where the designation is significant. Harvard Street between Frelinghuysen Avenue and Groveland Street Darcy Schmitt 11/6/2023 (Signature) Applicant Name (Print Name) Date The following City Departments will review and comment on the application: Fire, Police, Traffic Engineer, GIS, and BC Historic District Commission  65 of 67 Paul Warren was Raised in Battle Creek Michigan. He was born on January 26, 1983, to Diane Wilson and Paul Warren. Paul attended Battle Creek Public Schools. He later received his Diploma from Cornerstone Academy. PJ worked in the manufacturing industry, concrete construction, and industrial painting, but his true love was cooking. Not only manning the grill at family functions, PJ owned and operated a food truck for five years. He also worked as a chef at both the Griffin and Umami Ramen. Paul was known for his contagious smile, his wonderful sense of humor, lending a helping hand and being the life of the party. PJ was also a neighborhood hero on Harvard Street. Always looking out for his neighbors and community. PJ enjoyed spending time with his family and friends, barbequing, riding dirt bikes or 4 wheelers, fishing, playing bartender for family and friends, and cracking jokes. All around PJ embodied the “Pursuit of Happiness”. Paul Jerrell Warren, lovingly known as “PJ” or “Crack” was taken away from us unexpectedly on July 23, 2023. Paul leaves to cherish his memory his children; daughter, Ka’Nijah Warren and Son, Paul Warren Jr, of Battle Creek; his Mother Diane Wilson; his Brothers, Cory (Tonyeaka) Williams of Kalamazoo MI, Dewayne Shipp of Battle Creek & many other close friends and relatives that knew him well. Paul Will be missed dearly from his smile, love, advocacy for family, friends and everyone who he had contact with. May his soul rest in peace & name live forever. 10 N. DIVISION ST. P.O. BOX 1717 BATTLE CREEK MICHIGAN 49016-1717 PHONE (269) 966-3320 FAX (269) 966-3555 WWW.BATTLECREEKMI.GOV  66 of 67 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN Tuesday December 19, 2023 At 7:00 p.m., Room 301, City Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor of City Hall The Battle Creek City Commission will hold a public hearing to receive public comments regarding the commemorative designation of Harvard Street from Groveland Street to Frelinghuysen Avenue as “PJ” Warren Street. “Paul Warren was Raised in Battle Creek Michigan. He was born on January 26, 1983, to Diane Wilson and Paul Warren. Paul attended Battle Creek Public Schools. He later received his Diploma from Cornerstone Academy. PJ worked in the manufacturing industry, concrete construction, and industrial painting, but his true love was cooking. Not only manning the grill at family functions, PJ owned and operated a food truck for five years. He also worked as a chef at both the Griffin and Umami Ramen. Paul was known for his contagious smile, his wonderful sense of humor, lending a helping hand and being the life of the party. PJ was also a neighborhood hero on Harvard Street. Always looking out for his neighbors and community. PJ enjoyed spending time with his family and friends, barbequing, riding dirt bikes or 4 wheelers, fishing, playing bartender for family and friends, and cracking jokes. All around PJ embodied the “Pursuit of Happiness”. Paul Jerrell Warren, lovingly known as “PJ” or “Crack” was taken away from us unexpectedly on July 23, 2023. Paul leaves to cherish his memory his children; daughter, Ka’Nijah Warren and Son, Paul Warren Jr, of Battle Creek; his Mother Diane Wilson; his Brothers, Cory (Tonyeaka) Williams of Kalamazoo MI, Dewayne Shipp of Battle Creek & many other close friends and relatives that knew him well. Paul will be missed dearly from his smile, love, advocacy for family, friends and everyone who he had contact with. May his soul rest in peace & name live forever.” The official name of the street would continue to be Harvard Street, but would simply have the additional commemorative designation added to the street sign. This hearing is being held to receive comments on the request to commemoratively designate this portion of roadway at 7:00 P.M. on December 19, 2023 in the City Commission Chambers, City Hall, Room 301. Written comments concerning this item may be submitted in advance of the hearing to the City Clerk. The written comments are entered into the public hearing record. Any member of the public may appear at these hearings either in person or by representative. Written comments concerning these items may be submitted in advance of the hearing to the City of Battle Creek, Department of Planning, 10 N. Division Street, Ste. #117, Battle Creek, MI 49014 by Monday, December 19th at 12PM. These written comments will be entered into the public hearing record. Any member of the public may appear at these hearings either in person or represented by counsel. Any questions please call Planning Department at (269) 966-3320. The City of Battle Creek will provide necessary reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hearing impaired and audio tapes of printed materials being considered at this meeting, to individuals with disabilities at the meeting upon seven (7) day notice to the City of Battle Creek. Individuals with disabilities requiring aids or services should contact the City of Battle Creek by writing or calling the following: Planning Division, P.O. Box 1717, Battle Creek, Michigan 49016, Phone: 269-966-3320 / TDD: 269-966-3348 10 N. DIVISION ST. P.O. BOX 1717 BATTLE CREEK MICHIGAN 49016-1717 PHONE (269) 966-3320 FAX (269) 966-3555 WWW.BATTLECREEKMI.GOV  67 of 67 LOCATION MAP FOR A COMMEMORATIVE RENAMING REQUEST OF PART OF HARVARD STREET BETWEEN GROVELAND STREET AND FRELINGHUYSEN AVENUE TO PJ WARREN STREET GROVELAND STREET HARVARD STREET CALHOUN STREET UE E N AVEN YS INGHU FREL