Zoning Board of Appeals
Regular MeetingBattle Creek, MI · August 12, 2014
Minutes
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING MINUTES
August 12, 2014
4:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Mr. John Stetler, Chairperson called meeting to order at 4:00 P.M.
ATTENDANCE:
Members Present: Deland Davis Carlyle Sims
Greg Dunn Becky Squires
James Moreno John Stetler
Members Excused: Rick Barnes
Staff Present: Marcel Stoetzel, Assistant City Attorney
Christine Zuzga, Planning Supervisor
Glenn Perian, Senior Planner
Leona Parrish, Admin. Assistant, Planning Dept.
ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: It was suggested that item “Old
Business” regarding By-Law Review on the agenda be moved to follow “New Business” so the
applicant for 5 Terrace Avenue may be presented first and not have to wait.
CORRESPONDANCE: Mr. Glenn Perian, Senior Planner stated he received an email on July 21,
2014 from Ms. Sharon Heisler stating her resignation as an alternate member of the Zoning Board of
Appeals due to personal reasons.
Mr. John Stetler, Chairperson stated the meeting procedure where everyone present may speak
either for or against an appeal and that he will ask for a staff report to be read and then open the
public hearing. At the public hearing persons may come forward and state their name and address
for the record as it is being recorded and then speak either for or against an appeal. The public
hearing will then be closed and the zoning board will discuss and make a decision. Mr. Stetler stated
if denied the petitioner may appeal to the Circuit Court.
NEW BUSINESS:
A) Zoning Use Variance Appeal #Z-02-14:
Petition from Mr. Gregory Lightfoot, 5 Terrace Avenue, Battle Creek, MI 49015. Request is for a
Dimensional Variance to allow an accessory building to be built 1.5 ft. from the side property line;
closer than 10 ft. from another building; and to build in a secondary front-yard on a corner lot for
property located at: 5 Terrace Avenue (Parcel #3720-00-014-0); application is requested pursuant
to Planning and Zoning Code, Chapter 1286.05 (a) (c-d).
Mr. Glenn Perian, Senior Planner, Planning Department outlined the report stating appeal #Z-02-14 is
a petition from Mr. Gregory Lightfoot seeking approval of a Dimensional Variance to construct a 12 ft.
x 15 ft. accessory building one-and a half feet from the front property line fronting Roe Street in an R-
2 zoning district. The applicant would also like to build the proposed building 1.5 ft. from the existing
1 of 4
Zoning Board of Appeals
August 12, 2014 Minutes
Page 2 of 4
12 x 18 garage. The existing lot has frontages on three streets and the ordinance requires a 25 ft.
setback for structures along each of those street frontages. Based on the application submitted,
Planning Staff is recommending denial of appeal #Z-02-14 based on the following findings and those
listed in the staff report.
A) Staff finds that practical difficulty does not exist as applied to this specific building project.
There is already a garage on the property and we think that to build 1.5 ft. from a street
frontage is unreasonable.
B) Staff does not believe that the practical difficulty is exceptional and peculiar to the subject
parcel and the conditions associated with the property generally exist throughout the city on
other corner lots. There is already a 12 x 18 foot garage on the property which could be used
for storage of personal property.
C) Staff believes that if the variance is granted the intent of the ordinance will be altered and we
are not convinced that the subject property is unique in any way for other corner lots located in
the City.
Mr. Perian stated for these reasons and those listed in the staff report, staff is recommending denial of
appeal Z-02-14
Mr. Gregory Lightfoot (owner), 5 Terrace Avenue, stated he believes this is a very unique parcel and
would like to build this building to store yard items, motorcycle, grille, etc. and be able to use his
current garage for his car. Stated there have been numerous thefts in his neighborhood and noted that
his current garage is 16 x 22 in size and not 12 x 18. Said he has lived in Battle Creek since 1975 and
at this location for the past seven years and have outgrown his space. Mr. Lightfoot said he has been
restoring his home and has the material and tools on his back porch and need to put them inside to do
the project and would like use his current garage for his car.
Mr. Greg Dunn asked Mr. Lightfoot if he was doing the work himself and not using a contractor and if
a permit was pulled for new structure. Mr. Lightfoot stated he did not use a contractor and was doing
the work himself and was not aware he needed a permit for a 160 sq. ft. structure. Mr. Lightfoot stated
it is not 1.5 ft. from the road as there is a hill in the rear and not at the edge of a curve; said he does not
believe the road would be widened in the future and does not understand why it would not be allowed.
Mr. John Stetler asked if there were any others here to speak for or against this variance, seeing
none he called this public hearing to a close and would entertain a motion.
MOTION WAS MADE BY MS. BECKY SQUIRES TO APPROVE THE
DIMENTIONAL VARIANCE REQUEST APPEAL #Z-02-14 FOR 5 TERRACE
AVENUE TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY BUILDING TO BE BUILT 1.5 FT. FROM A
SIDE PROPERTY LINE; CLOSER THAN 10 FT. FROM ANOTHER BUILDING AND
TO BUILD IN A SECONDARY FRONT-YARD ON A CORNER LOT FOR
PROPERTY ZONED “R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL” AS PRESENTED;
SUPPORTED BY MR. CARLYLE SIMS.
Discussion:
Zoning Board of Appeals
August 12, 2014 Minutes
Page 3 of 4
Mr. James Moreno asked Mr. Perian about the garage dimensions being different than what the owner
stated. Mr. Perian stated the City Assessors office show the size of record to be 12 ft. x 18 ft.
Mr. Greg Dunn asked Mr. Perian if he could build it to the side of his lot. Mr. Perian stated he would
still be required to get a zoning permit as it is less than 200 sq. ft. and would not require a building
permit and require approval of a front-yard variance for the placement.
Mr. Deland Davis stated the variance ordinance is intent to keep from encroachment to the street and
this would be a concern form him.
Ms. Becky Squires asked Mr. Glenn Perian if because of the uniqueness of the lot; if they had
approved variances similar to this one in the past. Mr. Glenn Perian stated he had not recalled one
where they already had a garage and the board allowed another building. Said based on the lot setting
the owner would still need a variance but might be able to place elsewhere on the lot with that
variance.
Mr. Carlyle Sims asked if it were not a permanent structure could he still put it there. Mr. Perian stated
yes, but would still need a variance.
Mr. Greg Dunn asked if it were a temporary building could he place it somewhere else on the lot. Mr.
Perian stated the required setback is not there for the rear-yard (Roe St.) off the road right-of-way and
from Terrace /Burnham road right-of-way would need a variance and he is not sure if he would meet
the 25 ft. setback.
Mr. Deland Davis asked if he would be required to have a 10 ft. space between buildings. Mr. Glenn
Perian stated he is not sure of the building code requirements.
Mr. Greg Dunn and Mr. James Moreno stated they were voting no based on the findings in the staff
report.
MR. JOHN STETLER ASKED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, SEEING
NONE A VOTE WAS TAKEN; NONE IN FAVOR; ALL OPPOSED, MOTION
FAILED.
Mr. Lightfoot stated he feels he has a unique lot and did not want to put the structure in front of his
window and is disappointed; thought what he was doing was correct.
Chairperson John Stetler stated the appeal has been denied and they may appeal to Circuit Court and
thanked Mr. Lightfoot for coming.
OLD BUSINESS:
Zoning Board of Appeals – By-Law Review Article VIII, Section 7
Mr. Glenn Perian referenced page 9 of 9, Section 7, Article VIII of document provided in today’s
meeting packet; said the original language has been stricken and new language written. Stated no vote
will be required at today’s meeting as this is the introduction of the new ordinance and that it will be
added to the next meeting agenda for approval.
Zoning Board of Appeals
August 12, 2014 Minutes
Page 4 of 4
Mr. John Stetler asked if there was any further discussion, seeing none he would entertain a
motion.
MOTION WAS MADE BY MR. GREG DUNN TO INTRODUCE THE REVISION TO
ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 7 OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BY-LAWS AS
PRESENTED.
Discussion:
Mr. Greg Dunn thinks a person should be allowed to bring back an appeal within 12 months; but does
see how the board feels based on the changes agreed upon by the group.
Mr. Deland Davis noted it meets his concerns and feels it was fine as it was previously before being
amended.
Mr. John Stetler agrees it is what has been decided upon by the board.
MR. JOHN STETLER ASKED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, SEEING
NONE A VOTE WAS TAKEN; ALL IN FAVOR; NONE OPPOSED, MOTION
CARRIED
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION: WAS MADE BY MR. JAMES MORENO TO APPROVE THE JULY 8, 2014
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES AS PRESENTED; SUPPORTED BY MR.
CARLYLE SIMS.
ALL IN FAVOR; NONE OPPOSED, MOTION CARRIED –MINUTES APPROVED.
COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC:
Mr. Karl J. Bell, 244 Calhoun Street, came forward and asked regarding his appeal that was denied
from last months meeting and if there had been a tie vote for his appeal; what would have been the
outcome. Mr. Glenn Perian stated for a dimensional variance you need to have 4 votes in favor no
matter the number of members voting.
COMMENTS BY THE MEMBERS / STAFF:
Mr. Carlyle Sims thanked the staff members for the meeting reports as they are helpful in making a
decision.
Mr. John Stetler commented regarding the by-laws that “insurable value” needs to be defined in the
ordinance as it is not described anywhere else. Mr. Marcel Stoetzel said they can review the definition
in the by-laws. Mr. Glenn Perian stated regarding non-conforming properties; everyone agrees it can
better be defined. Ms. Christine Zuzga stated they can review a definition for the city ordinance.
Mr. Greg Dunn wanted to thank Ms. Sharon Heisler for her time on the Zoning Board and asked that it
be acknowledged to her. It was stated a letter of thanks would be mailed to her.
ADJOURNMENT: Meeting was adjourned at 4:36 P.M.
Submitted by: Leona A. Parrish, Administrative Assistant, Planning Department
Get email alerts for Battle Creek
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.