City Council Workshop
Regular MeetingBlaine, MN · February 1, 2021
Minutes
Blaine City Hall
City of Blaine 10801 Town Sq Dr NE
Blaine MN 55449
Anoka County, Minnesota
Minutes
City Council Workshop
While this is a public meeting where interested persons are
welcome to attend, it is a work session for City Council and
staff to discuss issues before them. It is not for the purpose of
receiving public input.
Members of the public can join the Zoom webinar at,
https://blainemn.zoom.us/j/94876749353
Questions? Email - communications@BlaineMN.gov
Monday, February 1, 2021 6:00 PM
Council Chambers and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, city
meetings will also be held as virtual meetings
NOTICE OF WORKSHOP MEETING
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sanders at 6:00PM. Due to the
COVID-19 pandemic this meeting was held both in person and virtually.
2 Roll Call
Quorum Present.
ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Michelle Wolfe; Community Development
Director Erik Thorvig; City Planner Lori Johnson; Public Works Director Jon
Haukaas; Deputy Police Chief Dan Szykulski; Finance Director Joe Huss; City
Attorney Chris Nelson; City Engineer Dan Schluender; Water Resources Manager
Rebecca Haug; Administrative Services Director Cassandra Tabor;
Communications Technician Roark Haver; Communications Manager Ben Hayle;
and City Clerk Catherine Sorensen.
Present: 7 - Councilmember Robertson, Councilmember Paul, Councilmember Hovland,
Massoglia, Smith, Sanders, and Councilmember Jeppson
3 New Business
3-1 ARTIS REIT FINANCIAL REQUEST PROPOSAL
Attachments: Site Map and Information
Blaine35 Active Prospects
TIF Policy
Community Development Director Thorvig stated this item was originally discussed
at the January 11, 2021 workshop and since that meeting staff has gathered
City of Blaine Page 1
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
additional information to assist the City Council in making an informed decision
regarding the proposal. At the January 23, 2021 City Council retreat, staff
provided background information on the mechanics of TIF, wetland credits and
other EDA funding sources. Staff provided further comment regarding the
project-specific information related to TIF and noted representatives from Artis
REIT were in attendance to provide the council with further information on the
project.
Dan Swartz, Commercial Real Estate Broker with CBRE, introduced himself and
noted he had extensive experience working in the City of Blaine. He discussed the
industrial real estate market and described how COVID has created a demand for
this space. He stated the Twin Cities had a 4.7% vacancy rate for industrial real
estate, while Blaine only has a 3% vacancy rate. He explained there was only one
vacancy in the community at this time. He commented on how Blaine has been
impacted by absorption over the past five years. He discussed the marketing that
has been done for the property in Blaine and noted he has six different groups
interested in the site. He reported he was trying to add more industrial space to
Blaine and stated space along the I-35W corridor was valuable.
Alex Rexroad, Artis REIT Financial, thanked the council for their time. He
discussed the $3.3 million financing gap and how this impacted the site. He stated
the 30 acre parcel of land was owned by Jerry Miller and Whitewater Properties.
He noted Mr. Miller has owned this parcel of land for over 20 years. Further
discussion ensued regarding the inherent barriers for this parcel which were the
wetlands, a FEMA ditch, the grades and fill necessary, along with the stormwater
requirements. He explained he was proposing to keep the highest quality wetlands
and would be filling the remainder of the wetlands with mitigation occurring on a 2:1
basis. He stated the public assistance being requested would assist with covering
the expense to address the barriers on this parcel.
Mr. Thorvig discussed the funding gap and explained staff developed four options
that would assist with financing the project through TIF and wetland credits. Staff
requested the council discuss the financing package and provide direction for staff
on how to proceed.
Councilmember Smith asked if wetland mitigation was typically on a 1:1 basis
versus a 2:1 basis. Mr. Thorvig reported wetland mitigation was done on a 2:1
basis which meant if an acre of wetland was being filled in, two acres of wetland
credits would have to be purchased.
Councilmember Robertson anticipated the property owner understood the
challenges with this property. She questioned if the cost for the land had been
negotiated to take into account these challenges. She stated $3.3 was a significant
City of Blaine Page 2
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
amount of money and she wanted to understand all of the measures that had been
taken. She asked if this would be the largest TIF district the city had ever created.
Mr. Thorvig commented on the city’s other TIF districts and reported this would be
a very large investment in this TIF district. Mr. Swartz stated the issues on the
parcel were discussed with the property owner and noted they were not fully aware
of the extent of costs to develop this parcel but were learning more about the
barriers for developing this property. He explained this led to a conversation with
the developer about the price for the property, along with financial gap
conversations with staff.
Councilmember Robertson stated she could support a hybrid option for financing
this development along with offering EDA wetland credits. She reiterated that $3.3
million was a significant amount of assistance for the city to offer compared to
recent TIF districts for Aveda of $1 million and Crown Iron Works for $1.2
million.
Councilmember Jeppson explained this was a significant project and she found the
TIF district attractive because this was a huge project. She stated while the size of
the TIF district was large, the percentage was in alignment with what has been done
in the past, given the size of the overall project. She shared concerns that if TIF was
not offered, the project would become more complex and patchworked in the
future. She reported it was attractive to have one developer working on this site
versus having several different companies working on the site in the future. She
indicated she would still have to further discuss the wetland credit options.
Councilmember Hovland stated he supported Option 2 of offering assistance
through TIF only.
Councilmember Paul agreed this was a huge project and that he understood other
developers have walked away from this property. He commented on the value of
this property being close to the I-35W corridor or industrial users then explained he
supported Option 1 because it provided both wetland credits and capital.
Councilmember Smith reported he supported moving forward with Option 1 that
included TIF and wetland credits. He indicated this would be a large TIF district,
but it would also be one of the largest projects completed in Blaine. He stated
Crown Iron Works was a tremendous project for Blaine and the proposed project
was three times that size. He stated this would be a very large project that he would
like to see move forward.
Councilmember Massoglia commented he would not support creating a TIF district
for this project. He stated property along I-35W would be in high demand moving
forward and Blaine was in a unique position. He said he did not believe land had to
City of Blaine Page 3
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
be incentivized at the taxpayer’s expense. He stated he appreciated Artis REIT’s
interest and would love to have this development in Blaine, however did not
support offering a $3.3 million incentive.
Mayor Sanders explained he appreciated the conversation and thoughts that were
being shared. He indicated he supported Option 3 as a combination of TIF and
wetland credits at a lesser amount moving forward for this project. He referred to
the but/for test and said without the city stepping in this property would not
develop. He commented this would be a significant development for Blaine that
would bring new jobs. He reported he would like to have more discussion about
the wetland credits. He supported staff moving forward with Option 3 and to
further negotiate the level of wetland credits offered to the developer.
Councilmember Hovland indicated he would be willing to allow staff to further
negotiate the wetland credits but did not want to have the city give them all away.
He stated offering this type of TIF was something to take into consideration,
however he believed in the end, this project would be a win-win for Blaine. While
he still preferred Option 2, he would support allowing staff to negotiate the wetland
credits.
Councilmember Robertson stated she understood the reward on the investment but
noted she would have a hard time being convinced to go with Option 2 or 3. She
supported the council moving forward with a more hybrid option.
Councilmember Jeppson asked what the impact of the proposed TIF district would
be on residents and taxpayers, versus the use of wetland credits. Mr. Thorvig
stated the impact to residents and taxpayers would be zero for both options. He
reported EDA wetland credits are available to assist with development and tax
dollars would not be taken from residents. He commented this was the same for
TIF dollars.
Mayor Sanders commented he was not willing to go to the full amount for the
wetland credits, and therefore supported the city moving forward with Option 3.
Council consensus was to provide TIF assistance under Option 3 with direction
to staff to further negotiate with developer regarding wetland credits.
3-2 10041 POLK STREET ZONING CODE ENFORCEMENT
Attachments: 10041 Polk
Air Photo
Mr. Thorvig stated the property at 10041 Polk Street has been the subject of
multiple zoning code violation complaints since 2009. The five-acre property
contains three industrial buildings that were built in the early 1970s and was part of
City of Blaine Page 4
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
an original farmstead that was built in 1915. The original home still exists on the
five-acre property immediately south however the properties are not under the
same ownership. The property is currently zoned I-1, Light Industrial and has had
this zoning classification since the 1970s. When the property was developed in the
early 1970s, very few uses existed in the area. The adjacent residential
development began in the early 1990s. The site is very non-conforming meaning it
does not meet current I-1, Light Industrial zoning requirements. For example, the
parking lot is not paved, setbacks are not met and proper screening has not been
established. Non-conforming properties are allowed to continue and there may be a
point in the future where improvements are required. In addition, the buildings are
not sprinkled and it’s likely the property owner will be required to do-so in the
future depending on the use. Staff explained there are currently two businesses
located at the property that have outstanding violations and provided the council
with further information on Camel Towing and KG Landscaping.
Mr. Thorvig commented typically, code enforcement matters are handled
administratively however given the impact on existing businesses staff felt it was
appropriate to inform the City Council of this unique circumstance and request
direction. Staff is seeking the direction on whether to proceed with a citation
process for Camel Towing. If an immediate citation is not issued the business would
need to relocate regardless however would be provided a period of time to do-so
and how long of a period of time to allow KG Landscaping to remain while they
find an alternative location.
Mark Dahl discussed the history of this property and noted his dad has owned this
property since 1971. He reported the site has always had outside storage, along
with the neighboring properties. He discussed the 1997 photo and described the
landscaping equipment that was onsite. He reported he hired Premier Commercial
Properties to replace Camel Towing. He indicated a lot of the tenants want a
reasonable amount of outside storage, and the lack of outdoor storage was making
the site unattractive to future tenants. He requested the city provide a reasonable
amount of outdoor storage.
John Dahl, owner of the property, described how properties developed around his
property over the past 50 years. He reported the homes came after his business
was well established. He indicated he did not object to the apartments or
townhouses surrounding his property but these properties were now objecting to
his operation. He requested the city staff and council work with him and allow
these businesses to remain in place.
Kent Glideon, KG Landscaping, stated his business has been in operation for the
past eight years and he has 25 employees, half of which live in Blaine. He explained
the majority of his landscaping and snow removal work occurred in Blaine. He
City of Blaine Page 5
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
commented how we wanted to remain in Blaine but noted there were not any other
viable options at this time. He requested the city work with him and his business in
order to allow him to stay in Blaine. He reported he could screen the property if this
would help the neighboring properties. He stated he was interested in reaching a
solution in order to move his business forward.
Mayor Sanders said he appreciated the small business owners in Blaine and all they
do for the city. He discussed how the council had to balance the city’s zoning code
with business owners and residents and how it was his hope the city and business
owners could arrive at a solution that would ensure these businesses continue to be
a part of the fabric of this community.
Councilmember Hovland asked if the City could purchase this site for future
redevelopment and offer up the land north of 105th Avenue and Radisson Road for
KG Landscaping. Mr. Thorvig stated staff has not had a conversation with the
property owner about purchasing the site, adding he did not know if the property
owners were willing sellers and the city did not want to encourage future outdoor
storage.
Councilmember Jeppson thanked the property owner and KG Landscaping for
being a part of this conversation. She appreciated the commitment both of these
parties had to the city. She stated she supported the city moving forward with a
citation for Camel Towing. She indicated she was also in favor of working out a
solution over the next year where we can best serve KG Landscaping through
March 2022. She believed this was a fair and reasonable timeline.
Councilmember Robertson supported Councilmember Jeppson’s recommendations
and moving forward with the citations for the towing company. She wanted KG
Landscaping to have enough time to relocate and suggested they have until March
2022 to find a new location in Blaine. She appreciated the fact that KG
Landscaping and the Dahl’s have been working with the city on this matter.
Councilmember Paul asked how many times the city had contacted Camel Towing
regarding the code enforcement violations. Mr. Thorvig stated he did not know the
exact number but reported they have not been responsive to the city. He reported
he has been working with the Dahls over the last 18 months and the property
owner does not want this use on the site any longer.
Councilmember Massoglia stated he would like to see the property grandfathered
in given the fact the city changed the zoning around this use. He explained the
property owner has owned this property since the 1970s and was concerned that it
would be very difficult for KG Landscaping to find another property in Blaine to
relocate. He questioned what the complaints were for the KG Landscaping site.
City of Blaine Page 6
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
He stated he understood KG Landscaping would be willing to install additional
screening on the property.
Council consensus was to support citation for towing company and allow until
spring 2022 for landscaping firm to relocate elsewhere in the city.
3-3 2021 BOARD/COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESS
Attachments: 2021 Interview Questions
Council Policy - Board and Commission Appointments
Board and Commissions List
Resolution 01-88
NRCB Policy
Adjunct Member Information
2021 Boards and Commission Workshop Presentation 020121
City Clerk Sorensen stated staff is suggesting virtual interviews be scheduled for
February 22, 23, and 24 with the interviews beginning at 6:00PM and taking 10
minutes per candidate. It was noted electronic copies of applications will be sent
prior to interviews. Questions were revised and will be forwarded to applicants
prior to interviews to assist with responses. She explained the Council policy on
appointments specified term limits - members who have served more than three
terms have been highlighted. Senior Advisory Board expires January 31 but
members have been informed that Council will make these appointments in
conjunction with the others.
Ms. Sorensen reported as two members of NRCB will not be renewing, staff is
recommending the Council consider reducing the number of members to 9. The
NRCB was established by Resolution in 2001 and included Board
structure/appointment process. The structure has evolved over time and the number
of members has ranged from 7 to 11 and is currently at 10. This may be the
opportunity to reduce the Board size to better facilitate meetings. The goal of the
Adjunct Member was to engage students (high school) in local government. With
the current Adjunct Member approaching grad school, staff would like to discuss
possible options for this program for 2021.
Councilmember Jeppson reported she would not be able to attend interviews on
the evening of February 23, 2021.
Councilmember Robertson supported the city extending the adjunct student
commission program because this was a great opportunity to engage young people
in city government.
Councilmember Hovland agreed and suggested the program be expanded to
include the three high schools represented in the community.
City of Blaine Page 7
City Council Workshop Minutes February 1, 2021
Mayor Sanders agreed the student commission program should continue and/or be
expanded.
Council consensus was to hold interviews as proposed and to continue or
extend the adjunct student commission program.
3-4 BLAINE WETLAND CREDIT SALES
Water Resources Manager Haug explained the city has two wetland banks in the
Blaine Wetland Sanctuary (BWS). The northern portion of the BWS has a bank
known as Site 7 for regulatory purposes and was set up as a funding source for the
city's open spaces and trails. Site 7 has the potential of creating 81 acres of wetland
credits when fully restored. The other bank is the central portion of the BWS and is
known as Branch 3 for regulatory purposes. This bank was established for the
Economic Development Authority as an incentive to developers. Branch 3 has
created 55 acres of wetland credits and the EDA has sold about half of the credits.
The city recently received a release of 5.724 acres of wetland credits for Site 7
bringing the balance to 14.1052 acres of credits available for sale. Of the 14.1052
credits, staff has agreed to hold 1.5074 credits for two proposed development
projects. This leaves the city with 12.5978 credits until the next release of credits
anticipated in January of 2022. Credit release amounts are determined by the
regulatory agencies yearly and are based on how the site restoration is performing.
Ms. Haug explained staff has received a request for a sale of 7.644 acres of
wetland credits for a proposed public road project in the City of Medina. The
applicant is requesting a price of $2.35/sq. ft. because it is a large purchase of
credits and it is for another municipality. The applicant is also willing to pay all
transaction fees. Prices for wetland credits are based on market demand. In
speaking with other wetland bank holders in the area, the average rate is currently
at about $2.50/sq. ft. The city has been selling credits for $2.50/sq. ft. with the
majority of the city's credit sales for small amounts less than 1 acre. Prices for
wetland credits do vary and fluctuate frequently. Staff commented further on the
proposed wetland credit sale and requested feedback from the council on how to
proceed.
Councilmember Smith thanked staff for the detailed staff support and stated he
supported the proposed sale of the wetland credits.
Council consensus was to support the wetland credit sale for $2.35 per square
foot.
ADJOURN
The Workshop was adjourned at 7:24PM.
Adjourned
City of Blaine Page 8
Agenda
Blaine City Hall
City of Blaine 10801 Town Sq Dr NE
Blaine MN 55449
Anoka County, Minnesota
Meeting Agenda - Final-revised
City Council Workshop
While this is a public meeting where interested persons are
welcome to attend, it is a work session for City Council and staff
to discuss issues before them. It is not for the purpose of
receiving public input.
To participate in the meeting remotely join the Zoom Webinar at:
https://blainemn.zoom.us/j/95650667201
Questions? Email - communications@BlaineMN.gov
Monday, February 1, 2021 6:00 PM Council Chambers and due to the COVID-19
pandemic, city meetings will also be held as
virtual meetings
NOTICE OF WORKSHOP MEETING
In accordance with the provisions of Section 3.01 of the Blaine City Charter, a Council
Workshop meeting is scheduled for the following purpose:
1 Call to Order
2 Roll Call
3 New Business
3-1 WS 21-12 ARTIS REIT FINANCIAL REQUEST PROPOSAL
Sponsors: Thorvig
Attachments: Site Map and Information
Blaine35 Active Prospects
TIF Policy
3-2 WS 21-13 10041 POLK STREET ZONING CODE ENFORCEMENT
Sponsors: Thorvig
Attachments: 10041 Polk
Air Photo
City of Blaine Page 1 Printed on 1/28/2021
City Council Workshop Meeting Agenda - Final-revised February 1, 2021
3-3 WS 21-14 2021 BOARD/COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESS
Sponsors: Sorensen
Attachments: 2021 Interview Questions
Council Policy - Board and Commission Appointments
Board and Commissions List
Resolution 01-88
NRCB Policy
Adjunct Member Information
2021 Boards and Commission Workshop Presentation 020121
3-4 WS 21-15 BLAINE WETLAND CREDIT SALES
Sponsors: Haug
ADJOURN
City of Blaine Page 2 Printed on 1/28/2021
Get email alerts for Blaine
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.