Common Council Regular Session
Regular MeetingBloomington, IN · April 4, 2023
Minutes
In the Council Chambers of the Showers City Hall, Bloomington, Indiana on COMMON COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 04, 2023 at 6:30pm, Council President Sue Sgambelluri REGULAR SESSION
presided over a Regular Session of the Common Council. April 04, 2023
Councilmembers present: Matt Flaherty, Isabel Piedmont-Smith, Kate ROLL CALL [6:30pm]
Rosenbarger, Susan Sandberg, Sue Sgambelluri, Jim Sims, Ron Smith, Stephen
Volan
Councilmembers present via Zoom: none
Councilmembers absent: Dave Rollo
Council President Sue Sgambelluri gave a land and labor acknowledgement AGENDA SUMMATION
and summarized the agenda. [6:30pm]
Piedmont-Smith moved and it was seconded to approve the minutes of June APPROVAL OF
02, 2021, as amended, April 06, 2022, and April 20, 2022. The motion was MINUTES [6:pm]
approved by a voice vote. • June 02, 2021
(Regular Session)
• April 06, 2021
(Regular Session)
• April 20, 2021
(Regular Session)
Piedmont-Smith mentioned her upcoming constituent meeting. She read a REPORTS [6:33pm]
poem titled, "Backwards," in honor of National Poetry Month, by Warsan Shire, • COUNCIL MEMBERS
a Somali British poet.
Rosenbarger invited the community to her upcoming constituent meeting.
Ryan Rohling, Planning Services Manager in the Planning and Transportation • The MAYOR AND
(PT) department, presented a report on the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose CITY OFFICES
of tracking data was to measure progress on the plan's goals that informed [6:36pm]
policies. He provided an overview of the Comprehensive Plan and noted
programs, outcome, and indicators. Specifically, he noted details pertaining to
community services and economics, culture and identity, the environment,
and the downtown. Some topics included real per capita personal income in
the city, and compared to Lafayette, Indiana, trends in sector employment,
demolition requests, cultural and arts institutions, square footage of green
roofs, an increase in assessed value for downtown properties, occupancy rates,
commuter data, and motor vehicle crash rates resulting in fatalities and
serious injuries in Monroe County.
Volan asked for clarification on data on downtown parking. Council questions:
Rohling clarified the data pertained to occupancy rate for downtown
commercial spaces and did not involve parking.
Volan asked if PT staff expected that rate and if there were plans to convert
unoccupied commercial space to residential.
Rohling said the rate was normal, and comparable to similar cities. There
were two requests for conversion to residential spaces in the immediate
downtown but demand was not an issue.
Sims praised Rosenbarger and other proponents of no-right-turn-on-red for
being ahead of the curve. He asked if the data on green roofs directly related to
concessions for affordable housing.
Rohling stated that it did not, the data was prior to the adoption of the
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
Sims asked about the downtown overlay and the reference to it being
"relatively diverse." Sims asked if that included racial and cultural diversity.
Rohling said that the diversity index was issued by the census and of the
forty four hundred residents in the downtown overlay, the percentage of
diverse residents, as noted by the census, was 48.5%. He said that the
p. 2 Meeting Date: 04-04-23
downtown was more diverse than Bloomington as a whole. Some of the factors • The MAYOR AND
included race, gender, and more. CITY OFFICES
(cont'd)
Piedmont-Smith thanked Rohling for the report. She asked for clarification on
the data on motor vehicle collisions in Monroe County.
Rohling said that all collisions were tallied, and then were broken out in
types such as collisions resulting in injury or fatalities.
Piedmont-Smith asked about the data on waste diverted from landfill and
the apparent decrease in diverted waste in 2022 compared to 2018, and if it
was only waste collected by Sanitation.
Rohling said it reflected all waste that was headed to the landfill. He noted
that the decrease was due to more residents eating at home during the
pandemic, and an annual increase of 15% in collection of solid and waste
recycling.
Flaherty moved and it was seconded to extend the time limit on Reports from
the Mayor and City Offices until 7:15pm. The motion was approved by a voice Vote to extend time
vote. limit [7:02pm]
Flaherty thanked Rohling for the presentation and asked if PT staff tracked
every indicator, annually.
Rohling said no and that staff picked twenty five indicators yearly, and
included ones selected before that had a baseline.
Flaherty asked about the interpretation of results and asked how to best use
the data to improve policy. He asked if it was not feasible to track every
indicator as well as how well equity outcomes were measured.
Rohling said that future updates on the Comprehensive Plan would involve
goals and objectives, rather than just indicators. A deeper dive on a particular
chapter would give better results to inform policy. He confirmed it was not
feasible to track every indicator. He noted that many indicators did not take
equity into account. Staff could certainly track equity better.
Flaherty asked if staff was open to reporting on indicators and outcomes
that was manageable for staff and would help drive more equitable policy
outcomes in a more intentional way.
Rohling said absolutely, yes.
Smith asked for more information on the demographic profile and the median
household income and the home values.
Rohling said that 93% of those residents were renters and the majority
were students or of student-age.
Sgambelluri asked for clarification on the dramatic change in some industries.
Rohling stated that he did not have additional information because the data
was compiled by the census bureau.
Volan asked if there was a way to separate non-student groups in the data.
Rohling believed that was not easily done since the data was not the city's.
Piedmont-Smith commented on occupancy rate in certain areas in the city and
asked if there was additional information on the low counts.
Rohling said that many students left during the pandemic, and the census
sent a mailer and if there was no response, then it was counted as unoccupied.
There were no reports from council committees. • COUNCIL
COMMITTEES
[7:13pm]
Terry Amsler commented on excerpts pertaining to public engagement. • PUBLIC [7:14pm]
• PUBLIC (cont'd)
Meeting Date: 04-04-23 p. 3
Chase Techentin discussed his experience with homelessness in the city. He
noted the correlation of affordability and homelessness. He urged council to
revisit zoning that restricted supplying more housing.
Eric Ost talked about improving neighborhood involvement with local
government, and talked about assessed property value in the city. He
appreciated everyone involved in the BeClear data portal.
Sims moved and it was seconded to appoint Emma Williams to seat C-1 on the APPOINTMENTS TO
Human Rights Commission. The motion was approved by a voice vote. BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS
[7:26pm]
LEGISLATION FOR
SECOND READING
AND RESOLUTIONS
[7:27pm]
Piedmont-Smith moved and it was seconded that Appropriation Ordinance 23- Appropriation
01 be introduced and read by title and synopsis only. The motion was Ordinance 23-01 - To
approved by a voice vote. Deputy Clerk Susan Stoll read the legislation by title Specially Appropriate
and synopsis. the Current Balance of
the Opioid Settlement
Piedmont-Smith moved and it was seconded to adopt Appropriation Fund to Help Address
Ordinance 23-01. the Impacts of the
Opioid Crisis on City
and County Residents
[7:27pm]
Piedmont-Smith moved and it was seconded to adopt Amendment 01 to Amendment O1 to
Appropriation Ordinance 23-01. Stephen Lucas, Council Attorney, presented Appropriation
Amendment 01. Ordinance 23-01
Amendment 01 Synopsis: A previous item oflegislation adopted on January
25, 2023 was numbered Appropriation Ordinance 23-01. This amendment
would assign a new number (23-03) to the present appropriation ordinance.
There were no council questions. Council questions:
There was no public comment. Public comment:
There were no council comments. Council comments:
The motion to adopt Amendment 01 to Appropriation Ordinance 23-01 Vote to adopt
received a roll call vote of Ayes: 8, Nays: 0, Abstain: 0. Amendment O1 to
Appropriation
Ordinance 23-01
[7:28pm]
Beth Cate, Corporation Counsel, presented Appropriation Ordinance 23-03
and reminded council of the appropriation of funds for the opioid crisis to be
managed by the Community and Family Resources (CFR) department. She
provided details on the city's participation on the opioid crisis settlement,
allowed uses of the funds, and other statutory information.
Beverly Calender-Anderson, Director of the CFR, discussed the appropriation
of the 2022 opioid settlement for the city totaling of $391,906. She explained
CFR's services and outreach, done in conjunction with community nonprofits,
to address things like homelessness and more. She noted other programs like
naloxone supply and education, and drug and syringe disposal units, and
education. She described city efforts in working with the county.
I
J
p. 4 Meeting Date: 04-04-23
Appropriation
Volan asked why 2022 funding was not appropriated the previous year. Ordinance 23-03
Calender-Anderson said that the request was being done that evening. (cont'd)
Sandberg asked about the partnerships for the use of matching funds, and Council questions:
funding for those seeking treatment.
Calender-Anderson explained that there was a partnership between the
city, the county, and the Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA). She
said that the city's portion focused on harm reduction. She said treatment
options would be forthcoming.
Eric Spoonmore discussed syringe exchange funding and services. It was not
an exchange program because only seven hundred and eight were collected
and two hundred and sixty four thousand were unaccounted for. Public comment:
Randy Cassidy spoke about his experience encountering syringes tossed in
places like construction sites and if those syringes could be tracked.
Forrest Gilmore commented in support of Appropriation Ordinance 23-03 and
said that the funding supported street outreach and assistance at Beacon. He
provided additional details and discussed homelessness which had been
steady since 2015.
Calender-Anderson reiterated that CFR's program would address proper
disposal of syringes, and medication, and was not an exchange program.
Volan asked if staff agreed with the data referenced by Gilmore and if council
could see it.
Calender-Anderson stated the information was collected annually via Point Council comments:
in Time counts gathered by the state, and explained how it was aggregated for
the city.
Smith asked how treatment for the incarcerated population worked.
Calender-Anderson said that treatment fell under the purview of the county,
who had also received funding.
Piedmont-Smith supported the programming, partnerships, and looked
forward to hearing about positive outcomes.
The motion to adopt Appropriation Ordinance 23-03 as amended received a
roll call vote of Ayes: 8, Nays: 0, Abstain: 0.
Vote to adopt
Appropriation
Ordinance 23-03 as
amended [7:53pm]
Piedmont-Smith moved and it was seconded that Appropriation Ordinance 23- Appropriation
02 be introduced and read by title and synopsis only. The motion was Ordinance 23-02 - To
approved by a voice vote. Stoll read the legislation by title and synopsis. Specially Appropriate
Funds from the
General Fund for
Construction of The
Trades District Tech
Center and Associated
Construction
Management Services
[7:53pm]
Piedmont-Smith moved and it was seconded that Appropriation Ordinance 23-
02 be adopted.
Meeting Date: 04-04-23 p. 5
Pat East, Executive Director, The Mill, presented the legislation and provided Appropriation
reasons in support. He gave an expansive history of The Mill, including its Ordinance 23-02
initiatives, successes, demographics, and goals as a startup and coworking (cont'd)
space.
John Fernandez, Senior Vice President for Innovation and Strategic
Partnerships, The Mill, described the proposed Trades District Tech Center. He
referenced the memo submitted to council and highlighted the team working
on the center. He described the purpose of the center, like closing wage gaps,
creating good-paying jobs, driving regional innovation, capitalizing assets, and
partnering with key industries. It would have a positive impact on community
members.
Pete Yonkman, President of Cook Group Medical, spoke about his involvement
with The Mill, and highlighted the important work and innovation done there.
It allowed he and his wife to interact with community members that he might
not have done so otherwise. He spoke about the successful work of the staff at
The Mill, and gave a summary of his experience with The Mill.
Valerie Pefia, Office of University Relations, Indiana University (IU), noted IU's
support of The Mill and provided reasons to continue to support the work
done there. She noted some partnerships that could be furthered between IU,
The Mill, and other organizations.
Volan welcomed back John Fernandez as a former mayor and former Council questions:
councilmember. He asked about the new jobs and the capacity of employees in
the building. He asked about other available office space in the city.
Fernandez explained that the total leasable space was twelve thousand five
hundred and seventy seven square feet, along with social spaces. He spoke
about the benefit of collocating and having quality space.
Ashley Thornberry, Studio Access, explained that building code allowed for
up to one hundred and fifty tenants at one time. The setup of the building
would allow for expansion within a particular startup.
Sandberg asked about recruiting plans.
Fernandez said that it was early in the planning process, but was being
discussed with established stakeholders. The quality of the space was essential
to attract talent and create a hub and there would be marketing efforts.
Piedmont-Smith asked if the Community Revitalization Enhancement District
(CRED) funds had always been considered as a source of funding.
Alex Crowley, Director of Economic and Sustainable Development (ESD)
department, said that there was an initial cost, but the construction design
gave greater accuracy of the actual costs. That was when CRED funds were
first considered.
Piedmont-Smith said the CRED funds were reverted to the general fund, and
asked if they were contained in a separate budget than what was adopted the
previous year. She asked how the remaining funds would be used.
Crowley would follow up regarding the CRED funds. The remaining CRED
funds did not have a specific plan.
Volan asked about potential tenants.
Fernandez said that there were requirements, including the construction of
the building, before going to the bidding process. Funding had to be officially
encumbered. There were not tenants currently lined up.
Smith asked about ongoing costs to the city.
Fernandez said the goal was to not have ongoing costs for the city and gave
additional details.
p. 6 Meeting Date: 04-04-23
Sims asked for additional information on the goals for broader diversity and Appropriation
income levels at The Mill. Ordinance 23-02
East described partnerships with organizations like the Boys and Girls Club (cont'd)
to educate on entrepreneurship, and more, with long term goals of working
with Kindergarten-12th grade students. There was a benefit of staying in Council questions:
Bloomington to improve the city. East gave additional information on diversity
and investments into the minority community.
Sandberg asked about the city's nonprofit, City of Bloomington Capital
Improvement (CBCI), and how it would interact with The Mill.
Fernandez said that CBCI would not focus on the Trades District.
Crowley added that the CBCI would not intervene with successful city
assets. He provided information on the current, successful management of the
Waldron Arts Center, and the Buskirk Chumley theater. He noted that CRED
funds were in the general fund and not in a specific line item.
Piedmont-Smith asked if there was no specific tracking for the CRED funds.
She asked for further information on the city's ongoing costs for the center.
Crowley explained that the CRED dollar spending was to be determined.
Fernandez said that the cost to the city would be for utilities and would be
covered in the future by tenant revenue.
Volan asked for clarification on job creation for those without a baccalaureate.
He was concerned with using CRED funds and noted Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) funding that could be used. He asked what the plans were for the
remaining CRED funds and if they would be spent in the downtown areas.
Crowley referenced the formation of the CRED and its intent. He explained
differences with types of CRED; site-specific versus a general downtown area.
The administration did not have specific plans for the remaining funds.
Volan gave reasons for the use of downtown CRED funds for infrastructure
in the downtown, like a trolley, or alley improvements.
Crowley explained that the proposed center tied in closely with community
enhancement, thus aligning with the original intent of the CRED.
Jennifer Pearl, President of the Bloomington Economic Development Public comment:
Corporation (BEDC), said that job creation was the primary goal for the local
community. Major local employers, like General Electric, had left the city, and
the pandemic had negatively impacted life sciences and other local industries.
Job diversity was necessary. The goal was to develop talent pipelines, such as a
partnership with Ivy Tech Community College. She said that the tech center
was more than just a building, that it was a hub to generate diverse jobs.
Steve Bryant, Ivy Tech and Cook Center for Entrepreneurship, spoke in favor
of the proposal and described his role in the process. He noted that some jobs
at the tech center would include two-year degrees and certifications, et cetera.
Jean Martin, chaired the first board of The Mill and spoke in favor of it and its
operations. She gave reasons in support of the tech center. Bloomington
needed a hub like the tech center to close gaps in the core economy. She
highlighted The Mill's efforts in supporting entrepreneurship for people of
color, women, and the youth.
Eric Spoonmore, Greater Bloomington Chamber of Commerce, believed that
the tech center was a good use for the CRED funds. He gave reasons in support.
Randy Cassidy, member of the Redevelopment Commission, and voted in
support of the tech center, spoke in support of the partnership for the Trades
District and gave reasons for his support.
Volan asked for further clarification on the jobs that would be created, that Council comments:
would require a four-year degree or higher.
Meeting Date: 04-04-23 p. 7
East spoke about upskilling and said staff focused on unemployed and Appropriation
underemployed community members for jobs like coding. The technological Ordinance 23-02
world was ever-evolving and companies were hiring employees trained (cont'd)
through certifications and bootcamps as opposed to having a four-year degree.
Volan moved and it was seconded to postpone adoption of Appropriation
Ordinance 23-02 until April 12, 2023.
There was brief discussion regarding the postponement of Appropriation
Ordinance 23-03 and the source of funding, including CRED and TIF funds.
Volan was concerned about the lack of estimate on new jobs that would not
require a four-year degree. He was also concerned with the use of CRED funds.
Smith concurred that further clarification justified postponement though he
believed the proposal was wonderful.
Volan asked if council could amend the appropriation to exclude CRED funds.
Lucas stated that appropriations needed to be initiated from the executive
branch of the city.
Sgambelluri agreed that it would be helpful to obtain more information,
though she believed it was a good proposal.
The motion to postpone adoption of Appropriation Ordinance 23-02 until Vote to postpone
April 12, 2023 received a roll call vote of Ayes: 8, Nays: 0, Abstain: 0. [9:39pm]
There was no legislation for first reading. LEGISLATION FOR
FIRST READING
[9:40pm]
Dave Askins commented on council processes, amendments, and first ADDITIONAL PUBLIC
readings. COMMENT [9:40pm]
Lucas reviewed the upcoming council schedule. COUNCIL SCHEDULE
[9:41pm]
Sgambelluri adjourned the meeting with no objections. ADJOURNMENT
[9:43pm]
APPROVED by the Common Council of the City of Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana upon this
_11_ day of January , 2024.
APPROVE: ATTEST:
J~¥
Isabel Piedmont-Smith, PRESIDENT Nicole Bolden, CLERK
Bloomington Common Council City of Bloomington
J
Agenda
CITY OF AGENDA AND NOTICE:
REGULAR SESSION
BLOOMINGTON TUESDAY | 6:30 PM
04 April 2023
COMMON COUNCIL
Council Chambers (#115), Showers Building, 401 N. Morton Street
The meeting may also be accessed at the following link:
https://bloomington.zoom.us/j/81485689356?pwd=YXY2Tm0zSDVWbHQ4WkJhZUxVeU84Zz09
I. ROLL CALL
II. AGENDA SUMMATION
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
A. June 2, 2021 – Regular Session
B. April 6, 2022 – Regular Session
C. April 20, 2022 – Regular Session
IV. REPORTS (A maximum of twenty minutes is set aside for each part of this section.)
A. Councilmembers
B. The Mayor and City Offices
i. 2023 Comprehensive Plan Tracking Report
C. Council Committees
D. Public*
V. APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
VI. LEGISLATION FOR SECOND READINGS AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Appropriation Ordinance 23-01 – To Specially Appropriate the Current Balance of the Opioid
Settlement Fund to Help Address the Impacts of the Opioid Crisis on City and County
Residents
B. Appropriation Ordinance 23-02 – To Specially Appropriate Funds from the General Fund for
Construction of The Trades District Tech Center and Associated Construction Management
Services
VII. LEGISLATION FOR FIRST READINGS
None
(over)
*Members of the public may speak on matters of community concern not listed on the agenda at one of the two
public comment opportunities. Individuals may speak at one of these periods, but not both. Speakers are allowed
five minutes; this time allotment may be reduced by the presiding officer if numerous people wish to speak.
To request an accommodation or for inquiries about accessibility, please call (812) 349-3409 or e-mail
council@bloomington.in.gov.
Posted: Friday, March 31, 2023
VIII. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT *
(A maximum of twenty-five minutes is set aside for this section.)
IX. COUNCIL SCHEDULE
X. ADJOURNMENT
*Members of the public may speak on matters of community concern not listed on the agenda at one of the two
public comment opportunities. Individuals may speak at one of these periods, but not both. Speakers are allowed
five minutes; this time allotment may be reduced by the presiding officer if numerous people wish to speak.
To request an accommodation or for inquiries about accessibility, please call (812) 349-3409 or e-mail
council@bloomington.in.gov.
Posted: Friday, March 31, 2023
Get email alerts for Bloomington
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.