Planning Commission Agendas

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Monday, December 9, 2024 – 6:30 p.m. Howard L. Brown Public Safety Building – 1100 SW Smith Street Council Chambers The meeting can be viewed live only on Blue Springs Channel 7, City of Blue Springs, MO YouTube Channel and www.bluespringsgov.com/CityMeetingsLive 1 CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - CONSENT AGENDA a) MINUTES November 25, 2024 2 PUBLIC HEARING / UDC TEXT AMENDMENT / UDCT-09-24-9411 / “Downtown Review Board, Downtown Development Code, Historic Preservation Commission, and Fences” / 903 W Main Street Exhibits: 1. Staff Report with attachments 2. Application from Applicant 3. Copy of Publication in The Examiner on November 23, 2024 4. Title IV, Land Use Section – Blue Springs Code of Ordinances (by reference) 5. 2014 Comprehensive Plan (by reference) 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORTS 4 ADJOURN The next scheduled meeting is Monday, December 23, 2024 If special accommodations are required for citizen participation in this meeting, PLEASE CALL 816-228-0207 (VOICE) OR 816-228-0250 (TDD) Agenda posted at the following locations: City Hall, 903 W. Main Street City’s website http://www.bluespringsgov.com/AgendaCenter December 5, 2024 A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance however no City Council votes will be taken. Public Hearing Comments: If you would like to make a public comment during a public hearing, we request that you submit a Speaker Appearance Form prior to 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. There will be hard copies of the 12.9.2024 Page 1 of 2 TB Speaker Appearance Form located at the entrance of the Multipurpose Room. After completion, the form is to be given to Recording Secretary, prior to the start of the meeting. The Chairperson will call upon you by announcing your First and Last Name. You will be sworn in by a Public Stenographer and asked to state your full name and address for the record before giving your testimony. Mike Mallon, Director of Community Development 12.9.2024 Page 2 of 2 TB  City of Blue Springs 903 Main Blue Springs, Missouri 64015 Planning Commission MINUTES Monday, November 25, 2024 Media Link: November 25, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Blue Springs was held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, November 25, 2024, in the Council Chambers of the Howard L. Brown Public Safety Building, located at 1100 SW Smith Street, Blue Springs. The meeting was also viewed live on Blue Springs Channel 7, City of Blue Springs, Mo YouTube Channel, and www.bluespringsgov.com/CityMeetingsLive. The following members, guests and staff were in attendance: ATTENDANCE Chris Henning, Chairperson Chad Sanderson Richard How, Vice-Chair Byron Craddolph Jared Pumphrey Jennifer Ritschel-Smith Susan Stokenbury Travis Graham STAFF PRESENT Dave McCumber, Development Review Manager Shantele Frie, Associate Planner James Newell, City Attorney Susan Culpepper, Councilmember, District 1, Mayor Pro Tempore Traci Breshears, Recording Secretary ABSENT Brian Ingersoll CALL TO ORDER Chairperson, Chris Henning, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with a request that everyone stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Chairperson Henning requested action on the Consent Agenda. APPROVAL Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 12, 2024, regular meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Stokenbury. With 8-0 approval the minutes passed. PC Minutes 11.25.2024 TB Page 1 of 4  Chris Henning—Aye Travis Graham—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Richard How—Aye Jennifer Ritschel-Smith—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Susan Stokenbury—Aye AGENDA ITEM 2 / PRELIMINARY Chairperson Henning requested Shantele Frie, Associate Planner, present the PLAT / PP-08-24- request for the revised Preliminary Plat / PP-08-24-9289 for The Links at Adams 9289 / “The Links at Pointe to Planning Commission. Adams Pointe” / 29607 E R. D. Mize Road QUESTIONS None. APPLICANT None. DISCUSSION None. MOTION / PRELIMINARY Commissioner How made the motion to approve revised Preliminary Plat / PP- PLAT/ PP-08-24-9289 08-24-9289 for The Links at Adams Pointe. / “The Links at Adams Pointe” / 29607 E R. D. Mize Road SECOND The motion was seconded by Commissioner Pumphrey. VOTE Richard How—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Travis Graham—Aye Jennifer Ritschel-Smith—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Susan Stokenbury—Aye APPROVED with 5 staff conditions (8-Aye, 0-No) STAFF CONDITIONS PC Minutes 11.25.2024 TB Page 2 of 4  1. Approval by the Planning Commission based on the representations of any drawings presented as part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC, unless otherwise approved through the PD Concept Plan. 2. Prior to approval of each Final Plat, the following must occur: a. A Planned Development Final Plan must be completed to ensure landscaping and buffering complies with the UDC. b. All open spaces amenities, landscaping, and buffers must be installed or financially guaranteed prior to approval of the Final Plat. c. Drafts of the proposed Declaration of Restrictions and the Homes Association Declaration documents shall be submitted to the City. The Declarations shall address the maintenance of all open space tracts and amenities and the minimum livable floor area classification. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following must occur: a. An approved Final Plat must be recorded at Jackson County. b. The Declarations of Restrictions and the Homes Association Declaration documents shall be recorded. 4. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following must occur: a. All required landscaping (45 plant units) plus two evergreen trees for lots along the golf course and street tree(s) shall be installed or financially guaranteed. b. Sidewalks adjacent to lot frontages are required to be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. The minimum livable floor area classification must be noted on the Final Plat. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Chairperson Henning explained what the Solid Waste Management Commission COMMISSION consists of, and then asked for nominations. LIAISON APPOINTMENT NOMINATION Commissioner Sanderson nominated Commissioner Craddolph to be the Solid Waste Management Commission Liaison. SECONDED The motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith. VOTE Richard How—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Travis Graham—Aye Jennifer Ritschel-Smith—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Susan Stokenbury—Aye APPROVED PC Minutes 11.25.2024 TB Page 3 of 4  (8-Aye, 0-No) MEETING ADJOURN Chairperson Henning asked for a motion for adjournment. Commissioner Stokenbury motioned to adjourn, which was seconded by Commissioner Graham, and with unanimous consent the meeting was adjourned at 6:42 pm. ___________________________________ Respectfully Submitted by Traci Breshears, Recording Secretary ________________________________ Chris Henning, Chairperson __________________________________ Date PC Minutes 11.25.2024 TB Page 4 of 4 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT Meeting Dates: Planning Commission: December 09, 2024 City Council: December 16, 2024 Project Name: UDC Text Amendments - Downtown Review Board Dissolution, Downtown Development Code, Historic Preservation Commission & Fence Amendments Project Request: UDC Text Amendments for the Dissolution of the Downtown Review Board (DRB) Section 402.060 – Downtown Review Board; UDC Text Amendments for modifying Section 404.240.M. – Downtown Development Code – Planned Zoning; UDC Text Amendments for Modifying Section 402.050.4.c. – Historic Preservation Commission – Duties and Powers UDC Text Amendments for the addition of Section 407.040.D.3.c.(5) – Other Fences Design Standards Applicant: City of Blue Springs/City Staff Staff Planner: Mike Mallon, Senior Director of City Development Project Description: The City Council has directed staff to make the proposed amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) to improve processes, decrease time, and make development in downtown Blue Springs easier. The amendments include the dissolution of the Downtown Review Board (402.060), which was originally created for the purpose of expediting the approval process for downtown projects. In recent years, the Downtown Review Board and its associated processes have shown to slow down the development process downtown, bringing into question the original intent. As a result of the dissolution of the Downtown Review Board, the Downtown Development Code’s Planned Zoning section of the UDC (404.240.M.) will see many amendments to remove much of the section that relates directly to the Downtown Review Boad, which by default shortens the process by allowing staff approvals of building permits. Rezoning downtown is simplified by making it the same process as projects outside of downtown. Finally, the Historic Overlay District Review process for projects downtown has been refined to specify the types of building permit required for review by the Historic Preservation Commission. The Historic Preservation Commission’s Duties and Powers section includes proposed amendments that like the previous section aims to specify the types of building permits that require review by the Commission. The amendments in this section will speed up processes by filtering permit types that are not substantial to the Historic and Conservation districts or landmarks as it pertains to preservation. Finally, an addition to the Other Fence Design Standards (407.040.D.3.c.) of subsection 5, which includes language to address fences that are proposed to be located within a Historic or Conservation District. The proposed language adds an additional design standard for corner lots. The language prevents privacy fences from being erected in front side yards, beyond the building line. The amendment will contribute to preserving the historic look and character of the districts. Page 1 of 5 UDCT Amendments UDCT-11-24-9411 DRB, DDC, HPC, and Fences Exhibit #1  Project: UDCT Amendments – DRB, DDC, HPC, and Fences Plan Case: UDCT-11-24-9411 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the UDC Text Amendments. Previous Actions: Date Review Body Action 11/18/1996 City Council Approved the Unified Development Code by Ordinance 2738 08/03/2015 City Council Approved an amended Unified Development Code by Ordinance 4558 Since 2015 City Council The Unified Development Code has been further amended since 2015 for maintenance purposes, as well as to respond to changing development patterns and keep up to date with current trends. The Development Advisory Commission recommended approval (3 aye, 0 no) of the associated UDC Text Amendments on November 15, 2024. The members of the Commission expressed their support to clean up the sections of the UDC to make processes for development within the downtown area more efficient. STAFF ANALYSIS Text amendments ensure that the generally applicable laws in this Development Code reflect the broad public interest and long-range planning goals of the community, as reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. The City may determine that it is necessary from time to time to revise and update this Development Code to implement the Comprehensive Plan. Section 403.020 of the UDC states a Text Amendment shall be reviewed according to the following criteria: Review Criteria. All review bodies shall use the following criteria for review, recommendations and decisions on text amendments: 1. Whether the change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, Design and Construction Manual, or any official plans or programs developed under the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan; 2. Whether such change is consistent with the purposes of this Development Code, and the intent or objectives of any Chapter or Subsection containing the change; 3. The areas that are most likely to be directly affected by the amendment and in what way they will be affected; 4. Whether the proposed amendment is made necessary because of changed or changing social values, new planning concepts or other social or economic conditions in the areas and zoning districts affected; and 5. The recommendations of professional staff. Staff finds that the proposed UDC amendments meet the above criteria and therefore recommends approval of the UDC Text Amendments. Page 2 of 5  Project: UDCT Amendments – DRB, DDC, HPC, and Fences Plan Case: UDCT-11-24-9411 PROPOSED UDC TEXT AMENDMENTS Language to be added to the UDC is UNDERLINED. Language to be deleted from the UDC is shown as STRICKEN. Section 402.060 – Downtown Review Board. This Section is to be removed from the Unified Development Code completely. Section 404.240 (M) – Downtown Development Code – Planned Zoning. M. Planned Zoning. Planned Zoning. 1. This is a Planned Zoning District. Structures within the district are subject to approval of the Downtown Review Board (DRB) before the structure can proceed to the building permit review process. City staff and the DRB shall work expeditiously to ensure that construction will proceed in a timely manner. The DRB shall meet on an as-needed basis, based upon the submission of applications. Determination by the DRB shall be within fourteen (14) days after the initial review by the DRB. 2. Procedures. (a) Process For Allowed Standards. Projects that meet the allowed standards established in this Section 404.240 shall utilize an expedited approval process as outlined in the following steps: (1) A completed application is submitted to Department of Community Development. (2) Application is reviewed by the DRB. (a) If application meets the allowed standards according to the DRB's review, then the application is approved and proceeds to the building permit (Chapter 500) stage. (b) If the application does not meet the allowed standards according to the DRB's review, then the application must be revised per the DRB's comments. (3) The applicant is allowed seven (7) days to revise its application. (4) The DRB shall review the completed revised application within seven (7) to verify that it meets the allowed standards. (a) If the application meets the standards, then it is approved according to Subsection (M)(2)(a)(2)(a). (b) If the application still does not meet the standards, then process set out in Subsection (M)(2)(a)(3) and (4) of this Section shall be followed until the submission is approved or it shall be deemed denied. (5) Appeal Of A Downtown Review Board Decision. [Ord. No. 4849, 9-4-2019] (a) The City Council shall serve as the appellate body for the Downtown Review Board. An appeal of a Downtown Review Board decision shall follow the same Page 3 of 5  Project: UDCT Amendments – DRB, DDC, HPC, and Fences Plan Case: UDCT-11-24-9411 appeals process as outlined in Section 403.010(A)(3)(f). (b) Process For Allowed By Conditional Use. Projects that utilize the allowed by conditional use standards shall utilize the following approval process: (1) A complete application is submitted to the Department of Community Development. (2) Application is reviewed by the DRB. The DRB shall have up to fourteen (14) days to issue a recommendation. (3) Further review shall be made pursuant to Section 403.060. (a)(c) Process For Projects Requiring Rezoning. Projects that require a rezoning shall utilize the following approval process (A rezoning must be to another zone regulated by the Downtown Development Code): (1) A complete application is submitted to the Department of Community Development. (2) Application is reviewed by the DRB. The DRB shall have up to fourteen (14) days to issue a recommendation. (3) Further review shall be made pursuant to Section 403.030. (4) If the required zoning is obtained, further review shall be pursuant to Subsection (M)(2)(a) or (b) above. (d) Process For Projects Requiring A Variance. Projects requiring a variance shall utilize the following approval process: (1) A complete application is submitted to the Department of Community Development. (2) Application is reviewed by the DRB. The DRB shall have up to fourteen (14) days to issue a recommendation. (3) Further review shall be made pursuant to Section 403.080. (4) If the required variance is obtained, further review shall be pursuant to Subsection (M)(2)(a) or (b) above. (b)(e) Historic Overlay District (H-O) Review. Projects involving a permit for new buildings or structures, excluding fences, uncovered decks, pools, sheds, or other similar structures as determined by the Community Development Director, or include altering a building or structure that is identified on the property’s Architectural/Historic Inventory Form as significant or as a contributing feature of the H-O within the Historic Overlay (H-O) Zoning District shall apply to the City pursuant to Sections 402.050 and 408.020 for review. prior to review by the DRB in conjunction with any of the processes noted in Subsection (M)(2)(a), (b), (c) and (d) above. Section 402.050 (A)(4)(c)(d)(e)(f)– Historic Preservation Commission – Duties and Powers. (c) To review applications for building permits for Historic Landmarks or within a Historic District, or within a Conservation District, that involve new buildings or structures, excluding fences, uncovered decks, pools, sheds, or other similar structures as determined by the Community Development Director, or include altering a building or structure that is identified on the property’s Architectural/Historic Inventory Form as Page 4 of 5  Project: UDCT Amendments – DRB, DDC, HPC, and Fences Plan Case: UDCT-11-24-9411 significant or as a contributing feature, and to make recommendations concerning such applications to the Director of Community Development. (d) To review proposed permanent changes to buildings, structures, street furniture, City parks, civic areas, public facilities or environmental features of a Historic Landmark or within a Historic District, or within a Conservation District, reporting its recommendations to the City Staff. (e) To review applications for demolition permits to demolish buildings or structures, excluding fences, uncovered decks, pools, sheds, or other similar structures as determined by the Community Development Director within a Historic District, or within a Conservation District, which are identified on the property’s Architectural/Historic Inventory Form as significant or as a contributing feature, and to make recommendations concerning such applications to the Director of Community Development. (f) To review applications for conditional use permits for a Historic Landmark or within a Historic District, or within a Conservation District, that include altering a building or structure, excluding fences, uncovered decks, pools, sheds, or other similar structures as determined by the Community Development Director, that is identified on the property’s Architectural/Historic Inventory Form as significant or as a contributing feature, and to make recommendations concerning such requests to the Planning Commission. Section 407.040(D)(3)(c)(5) – Other Fence Design Standards when located within a Historic or Conservation District: 5. Fences located within a Historic or Conservation District shall follow the standards listed in Section 407.040 (D)(3) except: a. Fences located on a corner lot, in the street side yard area, shall have transparency voids of at least thirty-three percent (33%). Page 5 of 5 UDCT Amendments UDCT-11-24-9411 DRB, DDC, HPC and Fences Exhibit #2  PUBLIC NOTICE Unified Development Code Text Amendments – Downtown Review Boad, Historic Preservation Commission, and Fences UDCT-11-24-9411 An Ordinance removing Section 402.060 – Downtown Review Board; amending Sections 404.240.M – Downtown Development Code – Planned Zoning; 402.050.4.c – Historic Preservation Commission – Duties and Powers; and 407.040.D.3.c.5 – Buffers, Screens and Fencing - Other Fence Design Standards; of the Unified Development Code, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Blue Springs to dissolve the Downtown Review Board, specify the Duties and Powers of the Historic Preservation Commission, and create new standards for fences in Historic or Conservation Districts. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission of the City of Blue Springs on Monday, December 9, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Howard L. Brown Public Safety Facility at 1100 SW Smith Street for the purpose of hearing interested parties and citizens on the requests by the City of Blue Springs to amend the Sections of the Unified Development Code noted above. Interested parties may view the application materials on file by contacting the Community Development Department via email at ComDevLegal@bluespringsgov.com or at City Hall at 903 W Main Street, Blue Springs, MO. CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS Planning Commission The City Council of the City of Blue Springs will also hold a public hearing on the above noted Sections of the Unified Development Code UDCT-11-24-9411, on Monday, December 16, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Howard L. Brown Public Safety Facility to consider the application and the recommendation of the Planning Commission. CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS City Council PUBLISH: Saturday, November 23, 2024 E-MAIL TO THE EXAMINER: legals@examiner.net 11/20/2024 Page 1 of 1 UDCT Amendment UDCT-11-24-9411 DRB, DDC, HPC and Fences Exhibit #3  MONTHLY REPORT October 2024 Building Permit Activity Type of Permit Oct 2024 Oct 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Single-Family Detached 27 12 154 110 Single-Family Attached 0 0 0 2 (4 units) Two-Family 0 0 3 (6 units) 2 (4 units) Multi-Family 0 0 7 (28 units) 8 (32 units) Total Dwelling Units 27 12 188 150 Miscellaneous Residential 16 17 181 174 (additions & alterations) Commercial—New 3 1 13 15 Commercial—Alterations 3 2 55 48 Total Building Permits* 120 79 1076 992 *Includes all the above permits plus non-structural permits (mechanical, plumbing, etc.) Building-Related Activity Oct 2024 Oct 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Total Square Feet 93,163 41,054 1,169,403 871,644 Total Construction Cost 4,331,959 $2,737,849 122,760,594 $41,527,709 Total Inspections 612 462 5,237 5,001 Single-Family Building Permits Code Enforcement Activity Code Reference Description Cases Opened 200-270 Public Health, Safety, and Welfare 119 300-390 Traffic Code 1 401-411 Zoning 17 500-520 (excl. 501) Building and Construction 33 501 Sign Code 0 600-655 Business and Occupation 0 700-715 Utilities 0 Total Cases 170 Total Code Cases Most Common Code Cases in October Code Reference Description Cases Opened 245.060 Nuisance Inspection—Citizen Complaint 64 245.130: A (11) Trash—Prohibited 22 245.330 High Weeds/Grass—Prohibited 13 Planning Activity Case Number Project Planning City Council Ordinance Commission PP-08-24-9261 Recommended Approved October PF-08-24-9262 Bump City 5371 SPDR-08-24-9260 Approval 9/23/24 7, 2024 PS Property Recommended Approved October CUP-08-24-9259 5372 Services Approval 9/23/24 7, 2024 RZ-08-24-9256 Recommended Approved October PDC-08-24-9257 Ironwood 5373 PP-08-24-9258 Approval 9/23/24 7, 2024 RZ-08-24-9290 Recommended BPOE Elks Approved October Approval October 5375 PDC-08-24-9291 Lodge 21, 2024 14, 2024 Approved October ASP-08-24-9285 Life Unlimited N/A N/A 14, 2024 RZ-08-24-9287 Recommended Scheduled for PDC-08-24-9288 The Links Approval October N/A 11/4/2024 28, 2024 PP-08-24-9289 Planning Activity Administrative Approvals Case Number Project Administrative Approval Community America Credit MSP-09-24-9301 October 14, 2024 Union James Walker Elementary ASPDR-08-24-9264 October 10, 2024 School Franklin Smith Elementary ASPDR-08-24-9265 October 1, 2024 School ASPDR-08-24-9273 Commerce Bank October 11, 2024 Final Plat Stonecreek Replat A MLLA-08-24-9286 October 17, 2024 1505 SW Rock Creek Drive Sign Permit Activity Type of Sign Permit Oct 2024 Oct 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Sign Face Replacement 4 2 34 43 Ground-Mounted Signs 0 1 0 16 Building-Mounted Signs 15 18 76 100 Temporary Signs 7 3 47 20 Other Signs (Flags, Paired- 0 0 4 2 Bracket, Mural, etc.) Total Signs Issued 26 25 175 181  MONTHLY REPORT November 2024 Building Permit Activity Type of Permit Nov 2024 Nov 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Single-Family Detached 7 13 161 123 Single-Family Attached 0 0 0 0 Two-Family 0 1 (2 units) 3 (6 units) 3 (6 units) Multi-Family 0 0 7 (28 units) 8 (32 units) Total Dwelling Units 7 15 195 161 Miscellaneous Residential 12 18 193 192 (additions & alterations) Commercial—New 1 0 14 15 Commercial—Alterations 5 0 60 48 Total Building Permits* 79 86 1,155 1,078 *Includes all the above permits plus non-structural permits (mechanical, plumbing, etc.) Building-Related Activity Nov 2024 Nov 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Total Square Feet 40,217 42,956 1,209,620 914,600 Total Construction Cost $3,516,484 $2,496,350 $126,277,078 $44,024,059 Total Inspections 576 549 5,813 5,550 Single-Family Building Permits Code Enforcement Activity Code Reference Description Cases Opened 200-270 Public Health, Safety, and Welfare 38 300-390 Traffic Code 0 401-411 Zoning 8 500-520 (excl. 501) Building and Construction 19 501 Sign Code 1 600-655 Business and Occupation 2 700-715 Utilities 0 Total Cases 68 Total Code Cases Most Common Code Cases in November Code Reference Description Cases Opened 245.060 Nuisance Inspection—Citizen Complaint 17 245.130: A (11) Trash—Prohibited 12 245.330 High Weeds/Grass—Prohibited 1 Planning Activity Case Number Project Planning City Council Ordinance Commission Recommended Approved RZ-09-24-9341 209 NW 11th St Approval 5380 11/18/2024 November 12, 2024 Recommended CUP-08-24-9283 Approved Home Depot Approval 5379 SPDR-8-24-9284 11/18/2024 November 12,2024 RZ-08-24-9287 Recommended Approved PDC-08-24-9288 The Links Approval October 5378 11/18/2024 28, 2024 PP-08-24-9289 The Links Approved PP-08-24-9289 (Revised November 25, N/A N/A Preliminary 2024 Planning Activity Administrative Approvals Case Number Project Administrative Approval MSP-10-24-009385 McDermed Place 11/14/2024 Sign Permit Activity Type of Sign Permit Nov 2024 Nov 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Sign Face Replacement 9 4 43 47 Ground-Mounted Signs 1 1 15 17 Building-Mounted Signs 10 6 86 106 Temporary Signs 1 0 48 20 Other Signs (Flags, Paired- 0 0 4 2 Bracket, Mural, etc.) Total Signs Issued 21 11 196 192