Board of Commissioners Special
Special MeetingBowling Green, KY · March 30, 2015
Minutes
MINUTES of SPECIAL MEETING
of the BOARD of COMMISSIONERS
of the CITY of BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY
held MARCH 30, 2015
The Board of Commissioners of the City of Bowling Green, Kentucky met in special session in
the Commission Chamber of City Hall, Bowling Green, Kentucky at 1:00 p.m. on March 30, 2015.
Mayor Bruce Wilkerson called the meeting to order. Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Katie
Schaller called the roll, and the following members were present: Commissioner Joe W. Denning,
Commissioner Melinda M. Hill, Commissioner Sue Parrigin, Commissioner Rick Williams and
Mayor Bruce Wilkerson. Absent: none. There was a full quorum of the Board of Commissioners.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of Special Meeting March 12, 2015, Regular Meeting March 17, 2015 and Special Meeting
March 26, 2015
Minutes of the above-referenced meetings were distributed to the Board of Commissioners with
the Agenda for their review. Motion was made by Hill and seconded by Williams to approve said
minutes as written. Mayor Wilkerson asked for discussion, and with none, a roll call vote was taken.
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin, Williams and Wilkerson
Voting Nay: None
Motion to approve the minutes of the special meeting of March 12, 2015, regular meeting of
March 17, 2015 and special meeting of March 26, 2015 was approved by unanimous vote.
SPECIAL AGENDA
ORDINANCE NO. BG2015 – 6
(Second Reading As Amended)
ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLES 2 THROUGH 8 OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF BOWLING GREEN,
KENTUCKY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY-COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION
Title and summary of Ordinance No. BG2015 - 6 was read by the Assistant City Manager/City
Clerk. Motion was made by Hill and seconded by Denning for second reading of said Ordinance.
Mayor Wilkerson asked for discussion, and with none, a roll call vote was taken.
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin, Williams and Wilkerson
Voting Nay: None
Ordinance No. BG2015 - 6 as amended was adopted by unanimous vote.
MUNICIPAL ORDER NO. 2015 – 44
MUNICIPAL ORDER AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL AND
SUBMISSION OF FISCAL YEAR 2016 ANNUAL PLAN AND FIVE
*Note: Minutes are a summary of the discussions; a video recording of this entire meeting is maintained by the Office of City Clerk.
(Minutes-Board of Commissioners-March 30, 2015)
YEAR PLAN UPDATE FOR THE HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER
PROGRAM
Summary of Municipal Order No. 2015 - 44 was read by the Assistant City Manager/City
Clerk. Motion was made by Hill and seconded by Williams for consideration of said Municipal
Order. DeFebbo reviewed the requirement from the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) to complete the annual and five year plans. Mayor Wilkerson asked for additional discussion,
and with none, a roll call vote was taken.
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin, Williams and Wilkerson
Voting Nay: None
Municipal Order No. 2015 - 44 was approved by unanimous vote.
ORDINANCE NO. BG2015 – 7
(First Reading)
ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 (ADMINISTRATION),
SUBCHAPTER 2-2 (BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS) OF THE CITY
OF BOWLING GREEN CODE OF ORDINANCES TO REVISE THE
REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS
Title and summary of Ordinance No. BG2015 - 7 was read by the Assistant City Manager/City
Clerk. Motion was made by Hill and seconded by Parrigin for first reading of said Ordinance.
Commissioner Hill explained why the Board proposed changing the regular meeting schedule from
7:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. She also suggested that any items impacting more residents should be placed
at the end of the agenda to allow ample time for interested people to attend the meeting after work
hours. Commissioner Parrigin also mentioned the benefit to staff by having the meetings start earlier.
Mayor Wilkerson asked for additional discussion, and with none, a roll call vote was taken.
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin, Williams and Wilkerson
Voting Nay: None
First reading of Ordinance No. BG2015 - 7 was approved by unanimous vote.
MUNICIPAL ORDER NO. 2015 – 45
MUNICIPAL ORDER APPROVING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
(TIF) DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 2013 INCREMENTAL REVENUE
AND AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTIONS TO THE APPROPRIATE
RECIPIENTS
Summary of Municipal Order No. 2015 - 45 was read by the Assistant City Manager/City
Clerk. Motion was made by Hill and seconded by Denning for consideration of said Municipal
Order. DeFebbo indicated that for each year of the TIF District, the City has to go through the
process of calculating the incremental revenues collected in the designated downtown areas in
accordance with established agreements. Chief Financial Officer Jeff Meisel reviewed the collections
from the original and expanded areas totaling $466,372, with $373,098 (80%) being payable to the
2
(Minutes-Board of Commissioners-March 30, 2015)
Warren County Downtown Economic Development Authority and others. With no further discussion,
a roll call vote was taken.
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin, Williams and Wilkerson
Voting Nay: None
Municipal Order No. 2015 - 45 was approved by unanimous vote.
DISCUSSION OF TERMS REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF NEW
BONDS FOR PERMANENT FINANCING OF THE DOWNTOWN
TIF BLOCK 6 WRAP, INCLUDING A DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE
REVISIONS IN THE CURRENT REVENUE SHARING
AGREEMENT
At the request of the City Manager, Attorney Jim Parsons provided an overview of how a tax
increment financing (TIF) district program should work and how it was set up in Bowling Green. He
mentioned there were only five Signature TIF Projects in the State and only two of those have been
activated to date, including Bowling Green’s. He also stated that in most cases the base revenues
collected in any given block were never pledged toward the project, only the incremental growth in
revenues above the established base. Mr. Parsons indicated that the City’s issuance of General
Obligation (GO) bonds and backing of private debt was unique and unusual, as was the use of State
money returned to the project. He explained that State money was generally only used to pay for
public infrastructure costs associated with the project.
Mr. DeFebbo explained the purpose of this meeting was to have the principle parties involved
with the Block 6 Wrap development, namely Warren County and the Warren County Downtown
Economic Development Authority, publically discuss a possible resolution to the issues. He pointed
out the City had received a revised Term Sheet from Warren County as of March 28th and asked that
the parties go through the changes in the Term Sheet.
Attorney Scott Bachert, representing the Warren County Downtown Economic Development
Authority and speaking on behalf of Warren County, indicated he was not prepared to address each
individual element of the Term Sheet or have any discussions regarding pending negotiations or
litigation on this matter, but rather was needing to know if the general framework was acceptable by
the City. He felt it was premature to discuss the details and asked that the City allow the County to
negotiate with the other parties as long as there was no negative impact to the City. In response to a
question from Commissioner Denning, Mr. Bachert indicated negotiations would be conducted in the
best interest of the citizens and they were not looking for the City to renegotiate the terms. Mr.
Bachert reiterated his request for the City to agree to the framework of the Term Sheet so negotiations
could continue with all the parties. Commissioner Williams said he thought the City had already
agreed to negotiations with Jerry Katzoff through prior action of the Board. He further stated he
thought they were here today to nail down the details of the Term Sheet as the Board of
Commissioners had a fiduciary duty to its citizens.
As the discussion continued about the elements of the Term Sheet, Mr. DeFebbo inquired
about the request from Warren County for a GO Lease by the City and the structure the County would
use to back the indemnification of it. Mr. Bachert indicated he was not privy to those discussions.
Commissioner Denning pointed out that part of negotiations was to find a compromise we can all live
with and in the best interests of the citizens. He went on to say that we all want the same thing
3
(Minutes-Board of Commissioners-March 30, 2015)
somewhere down the line. Mr. Bachert agreed and also indicated not everyone was going to be happy
with the results. Commissioner Williams specified he wanted to come up with an agreement on the
terms and did not want it to keep bouncing back and forth. Mr. Bachert reiterated he needed to know
that the highpoints of the discussion were acceptable by the City. Commissioner Hill expressed
concern with the City giving approval today. She asked what the City’s recourse would be later if
additional elements were added or changed during the negotiations with the other parties. Mr. Bachert
confirmed if any highpoints were changed the deal would fall apart. He also added there would not be
any increase to the proposed $30 million bond issue by the County to be backed by the City with a GO
Lease.
While discussing the current structure of the Authority membership, Mayor Wilkerson noted
when the first proposal was made to get the City out of it altogether, it was acceptable to not continue
having representation on the Authority. However, with the City still having participation, he stated
not having equal representation was a problem. Mr. Bachert explained that as a County board, the
County needed to maintain control to be in compliance with State statutes. He advised the current
makeup of the Authority (5 members) would remain the same with two representatives from the City
and one of whom could be the Chief Financial Officer since there was no opposition to that proposal.
He remarked one of the current City appointments would simply need to be replaced.
Further discussion continued about other revised elements of the Term Sheet, including
designating funds for debt service (paragraph F). City Attorney Gene Harmon reported the County’s
financial advisor told him the funds would be used for Warren County TIF related purposes and not
just for debt. Mr. Parsons interjected that if approved as written, Warren County would get to
determine how the funds would be used and not give the City a role in the process which was a
fundamental shift to the City’s position on the issue where all TIF funds given up by the City should
be committed to debt service.
Commissioner Denning expressed frustration with still being in a position where the City could
not talk to anyone about these items. He felt strongly the Authority people needed to be here as part
of this discussion. Mr. Bachert commented Mr. Gorman was supposed to be here, but had an
emergency at the last minute. Chief Financial Officer Jeff Meisel advised clarifications were needed
on some of the revised language in paragraphs F, H and L. Mr. DeFebbo also remarked staff was
concerned about the indemnification language in paragraph B and the ability to hold Warren County
accountable through a legally enforceable agreement. Mr. Parsons reiterated the two most critical
issues for the City in the Term Sheet were the GO Lease and indemnification structure as well as the
debt provisions.
Mayor Wilkerson pointed out the City has been concerned about the Wrap project for over a
year. Commissioner Denning had previously mentioned the word on the street was that the City was
to blame for all the problems. Mr. Bachert asserted the City was not to be blamed for any of the
issues with the Wrap. Commissioner Williams reiterated his desire to get to a solution and the need to
know where to get the language to get this deal done, especially since the City had already doubled
down on this once and was now being asked to give up General Fund money and not just TIF
revenues, which impacts services provided by the City. Mr. Bachert proposed the Board vote on the
highpoints, allow staff to work through the details and then bring it back to the Board for final
approval.
4
(Minutes-Board of Commissioners-March 30, 2015)
Mayor Wilkerson read a prepared statement which outlined the TIF Project from inception to
where things stand today. He expressed his concerns about the potential misuse of bond funds related
to the Block 6 Wrap development and his desire to hold those involved accountable. He also
applauded his colleagues “for their determined focus on trying to address this situation with as little
exposure to the general fund as possible.” Mayor Wilkerson closed his remarks by stating he would
support the majority of the Board with its decision even if it differed from his own.
There was continued discussion to try and determine what the Board would actually be voting
on at this time. Commissioner Parrigin expressed concerns about not having more details about the
indemnification. Mr. Harmon recommended the Board not take a vote today since they did not have a
final document on which to vote.
In an effort to confirm the highlights of the Term Sheet with which the two parties agree,
Mayor Wilkerson had the Board go through each of the proposed language revisions. There was
general consensus voiced for the March 28th revised terms of paragraphs A, B, D, E, H and J. With
regard to paragraph F, Mr. Bachert clarified the intent of the changes was to have the City’s local TIF
revenues go to the debt service and have the City’s State TIF revenues go where the County wanted.
County Attorney Amy Milliken confirmed the County wanted the freedom to use the State TIF
revenues for maintenance or other things in Block 6 and not be dedicated to the debt. Mr. Harmon
also opined the language in paragraph L was too vague and the types of expenses to be recouped by
the County needed to be specified.
At approximately 2:50 p.m., the Board of Commissioners took a brief recess to allow staff
time to prepare an actionable item for the Board to consider based on the discussion up to this point.
After approximately 25 minutes, the Board reconvened the meeting. A motion was made by Denning
and seconded by Hill to add Municipal Order No. 2015 – 46 as prepared by staff to the agenda for
consideration. With no discussion, a roll call vote was taken.
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin, Williams and Wilkerson
Voting Nay: None
Motion to add Municipal Order No. 2015 - 46 to the agenda for consideration was approved by
unanimous vote.
MUNICIPAL ORDER NO. 2015 – 46
MUNICIPAL ORDER OF THE CITY OF BOWLING GREEN,
KENTUCKY APPROVING A CONCEPTUAL AGREEMENT
PRESENTED ON A TERM SHEET RELATED TO THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING BLOCK 6 WRAP PROJECT WITH
WARREN COUNTY
Summary of Municipal Order No. 2015 - 46 was read by the Assistant City Manager/City
Clerk. Motion was made by Hill and seconded by Williams for consideration of said Municipal
Order. Commissioner Williams pointed out they were approving a concept agreement and not the
actual Term Sheet. Mr. Bachert conveyed this was what they needed to proceed with the negotiations
with the other parties. With no other discussion, a roll call vote was taken.
5
(Minutes-Board of Commissioners-March 30, 2015)
ROLL CALL: Voting Yea: Denning, Hill, Parrigin and Williams
Voting Nay: Wilkerson
Municipal Order No. 2015 - 46 was approved by majority vote.
ADJOURNMENT
This being a special meeting and with no further business to come before the Board of
Commissioners, at approximately 3:25 p.m., Mayor Wilkerson declared this meeting adjourned.
ADOPTED: ______________________________________________
APPROVED: ______________________________________________
Mayor, Chairman of Board of Commissioners
ATTEST: ______________________________________________
City Clerk
Minutes prepared by Assistant City Manager/City Clerk Katie Schaller
6
Get email alerts for Bowling Green
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.