Historic Preservation Commission
Regular MeetingBuena Vista, CO · February 2, 2023
Minutes
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TOWN OF BUENA VISTA, COLORADO
February 2, 2023 3:00 PM
In-person Meeting held at the Buena Vista Airport and via zoom.
I. CALL TO ORDER
John O’Brien called the meeting to order at 3:02 pm.
II. ROLL CALL
Jo Reese, John O’Brien, Dan Courtright, Katy Welter, and Suzy Kelly attended the meeting in
person. Mary Therese Anstey and Melanie Roth joined via Zoom. Lindsey Flewelling (History
Colorado CLG Coordinator) and Natalie Lord (Form + Works Design Architect) attended via
zoom. Joseph Teipel (Town Planner) attended as staff to the HPC.
III. AGENDA ADOPTION
John requested to add to the agenda a discussion about 113 N Railroad St. Suzy moved and Vic
seconded the motion to approve the agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – December 1, 2022
Nancy corrected that she was in attendance. Suzy moved and Jo second the motion to approve
minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously.
V. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was none.
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Commissioner Nominations and election for 2023
Suzy moved and Vic seconded a motion for Vic to step down change to an alternate, and Mary
Therese. Suzy moved and Katy seconded a motion to keep the current officers in place: John as
Chair, Jo as Vice-Chair, and Katy as Secretary of the Board. The motion carried unanimously.
B. McGinnis Gym Certificate of Appropriateness and partial demolition application review.
John introduced Natalie Lord of Form + Works, who is the lead architect on the McGinnis Gym
project.
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
Natalie presented on the plans to rehabilitate the McGinnis Gym, which includes demolition of
the non-historic locker room addition.
Suzy moved and Nancy seconded a motion to approve the McGinnis Gym demolition permit.
John and Katy, as Directors of Watershed Inc, recused themselves from voting on the COA. The
motion carried unanimously.
C. 2022 year in review and 2023 planning
Katy lead a discussion on past adopted goals and goals for 2023 and beyond, which is captured
by the table included with these minutes.
D. ADG next steps
Joseph shared an update that a new tracked changes version will be circulated to the whole HPC
or subcommittee to do a review, and open to our feedback about whether we should do
another public meeting or updated presentation to the BOT. And whether that should be before
or after HPC has adopted the revised code. We are holding room on the March 14 board agenda
for a public hearing to adopt the code changes, but that timing might be a little aggressive if we
want to do another public meeting. There is a recommendation that the height restriction
requirement be incorporated in the UDC rather than Section 19.
E. National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Chaffee County Courthouse complex
Katy shared that the Colorado Historic Review Board
F. Updates from related organizations and general discussion
Vic shared that the tunnels Section 106 review process has resulted in an in-depth assessment
of the historic significance of the tunnels and the County acquiring a ROW for the road. The
Granite bridge will also have historic signage.
Melanie shared that the Historic St. Elmo is working on the Morley Bridge and to expect more
updates in the near future.
G. 113 N Railroad St – preliminary discussion
Commissioners were encouraged to provide feedback on this project to John, who will
consolidate and share with Joseph.
VII. STAFF UPDATES
No staff updates.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
John adjourned the meeting at 5:13 pm.
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
Goal Description Time Responsible Parties Status/Progress
Frame
Adopted in previous years
Locally landmarking Ongoing Suzy, Jo, Nancy, Mary Completed: Locke House, Jail
additional properties. Therese, Melanie House, Book Nook, Courthouse.
Should we initiate as permitted
under the Section 19-6(a) of the
BV Muni Code? If so, priorities?
2/2/23:
Suzy – initiating applications may
be necessary for some property
owners, but shouldn’t be offered
for everyone.
John – These local landmarks draw
positive attention.
Melanie – We gain advocates
within the community when we
landmark.
Joseph – Town Hall & St Rose
could best be locally landmarked
with the help of HPC.
Implement ADG’s and related Short; Dan will lead; John will ADG’s adopted by the Town, and
procedures; be prepared to Longer support; Jo will listen adoption as regulatory is pending.
expand beyond MU-MS and learn; Katy will
help with procedures. 2/2/23:
Suzy and Melanie – this goal is still
very important.
John – looking ahead, small
buildings on Main Street and
beyond are vulnerable to
demolition. But expansion of
ADG’s might require outside
professional consultation.
Mary Therese – should explore
applying to all locally landmarked
properties; agrees that a
consultant could help facilitate the
process.
Dan – Agree with exploring
expansion, but should focus on
completing the initial goal before
expanding beyond MU-MS.
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
Katy – Would like to support
development of procedures.
Be open to new Ongoing John will lead, and it Accomplished when Mary Therese
commissioners, especially will be a regular (historian) joined. Still could use an
with preservation expertise discussion point. architect. Can put on the brakes.
Accomplish this goal indirectly
with marketing.
2/2/23:
Joseph – the HPC is at capacity,
but we could involve other
community members in an
informal role.
John – We should be aware and
open.
Public education/community Ongoing Coloring contest: Mary Coloring contest in May.
engagement about HPC & Therese leading Evaluating what worked and
preservation coloring contest; Jo, didn’t.
Nancy, and John will
help. Social media posts–should we
continue? Jo would like to create a
Social media: Jo will calendar for 2024.
lead. Suzy, John,
Melanie will support. Possible cooperation with BV
Library and Heritage and My-
Calendar: Jo and Nancy bv.com.
will explore and report
back at March 2 mtg. 2/2/23:
Mary Therese – possibly try to
have kids create the coloring sheet
for the contest.
Jo – Will continue to make low key
social media posts. Could use
some more photos.
Joseph – Would appreciate an HPC
member managing mybv.com.
John – Suggest exploring the
calendar and see where it goes.
Historic property surveys Short- Mary Therese currently Completed Phases 1-2, and 3 is
Mid leading under way.
2/2/23:
Will continue with this work and
revisit this goal after Phase 3 is
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
complete.
Mary Therese – would like to
explore surveying tourism-related
properties within and outside of
the Town via a thematic selective
survey.
Lindsey Flewelling – Cortez is
doing something similar with auto-
related tourism.
Preservation Training Ongoing Commissioner-driven Hosted History Colorado in 2022;
most commissioners attending
Saving Places 2021-23 and
occasional webinars. Used HPC
budget for scholarships.
HPC members have also presented
publicly on preservation topics.
2/2/23:
Define the value proposition Long Suzy, John, Katy Currently building trust and
of creating a local historic credibility with property owners,
district 75% of whom must approve
formation of a district. Explore
small districts?
2/2/23:
John – thinks it’s our most
important long-term goal and
elevates the status of the
community.
Joseph – If this is a very important
goal, then maybe consider
devoting resources to achieving it.
Mary Therese – each of us could
work with property owners on this
issue to build trust with a clear
goal of creating a district.
Dan – suggests revising the goal to
something more achievable, such
as “define potential local historic
district area.”
John – For both ADG’s and historic
district, including in Comp Plan
would be essential to their
success.
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
Town of BV Comprehensive Short Dan, John For discussion
Plan advocacy (2023) Joseph – timing is such that March
will be the best time for HPC to
begin giving input.
Dan – this needs to be a priority,
since this is the year for the Comp
Plan.
John O’Brien
HPC Chair
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
Agenda
AGENDA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TOWN OF BUENA VISTA, COLORADO
February 2, 2023 3:00 PM
In-person Meeting will be held at the Central Colorado Airport (2nd Floor Conference Room)
with alternate zoom link availability for the public to also attend virtually. To participate in
Public Comment and/or Public Hearings you must attend in-person or use the following link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84638379205?pwd=UmRSMWdPZ21MWW5ibnZLZjh3OW10Zz09
Meeting ID: 846 3837 9205 Passcode: 923915
Listen via phone at: +1 386 347 5053
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. AGENDA ADOPTION
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – December 1, 2022
V. PUBLIC COMMENT
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. Commissioner Nominations and election for 2023
B. McGinnis Gym Certificate of Appropriateness and partial demolition
application review.
C. 2022 year in review and 2023 planning
D. ADG next steps
E. National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Chaffee County
Courthouse complex
F. Updates from related organizations and general discussion
VII. STAFF UPDATES
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TOWN OF BUENA VISTA, COLORADO
December 1, 2022 3:00 PM
In-person Meeting held at the Buena Vista Community Center. No zoom option was made
available.
I. CALL TO ORDER
John O’Brien called the meeting to order at 3:06 pm.
II. ROLL CALL
Jo Reese, John O’Brien, Dan Courtright, Katy Welter, and Suzy Kelly attended the meeting in
person.
III. AGENDA ADOPTION
Katy requested to add the HPC budget to Agenda. Vic moved and Dan seconded the motion to
approve the agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – November 3, 2022
Melanie had previously identified a typo in item “G.” Suzy moved and Jo seconded the motion
to approve the minutes as corrected. The motion carried unanimously.
V. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was none.
VI. BUSINESS ITEMS
A. National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Chaffee County Courthouse
John explained that the purpose of the nomination is to expand the boundary to clearly include
the Chaffee County Courthouse, Jail, McGinnis Gym, and County Maintenance Garage. The HPC
discussed the nomination and will recommend to Joseph that the HPC and Town support the
nomination. An official vote was not taken due to the fact that Suzy Kelly and Vic Kuklin serve on
BV Heritage’s Board, and BV Heritage owns the Courthouse; also, Katy Welter and John O’Brien
serve on Watershed Inc’s Board, and Watershed Inc. owns the Gymnasium.
B. ADG update
Katy lead a review of the comments from the Town attorneys, and the HPC agreed to suggest
several additional changes, which will
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
C. 206 W Sterling Ave.
The owner of 206 W Sterling, Susan Stewart, along with her daughter, Mary McClurg, attended
the meeting to ask questions about what kinds of alterations might be allowed, and what kinds
of incentives are available.
C. McGinnis Gym update
Katy shared that the Gym design work is nearly complete, that the project was awarded
$250,000 from the State Historical Fund today, and that Watershed Inc. applied for an EPA
Brownfields grant last month to cover the costs of hazardous materials remediation and
replacement of the roof.
D. San Luis Valley conference discussion
Jo and Nancy gave an update on the conference. Among other things, she was surprised to learn
about the history of slavery in the valley. Jo and Nancy really enjoyed meeting many of the
experts and public employees. Jo had several suggestions for HPC to consider:
• She would like to come up with cool topics of human interest that Colorado PBS might want
to cover to create a documentary about.
• She would like to consider hosting a Saving Places Conference in our valley.
• She would like to create a historical wall calendar.
• She would to create more oral histories and share them with BV Heritage and the BV
Library.
HPC agreed to put these items on the agenda for our first planning meeting in 2023.
E. Commissioner nominations and election for 2023
The next meeting will be held the first week of February. John, Katy, and Jo will work on
materials for the HPC.
F. Saving Places scholarship application and HPC 2022 Budget
John will complete the February 2023 Saving Places scholarship applications by December 9, and
will ask Joseph if we can use the remaining balance of our budget to offset costs for
commissioners to attend the conference.
G. Updates from related organizations and general discussion
BV Heritage is hosting Christmas Opening on Saturday, December 3. The Town parade is at 5:30
and the annual meeting/Christmas party from 3 to 5 pm. The caboose interior has also been
painted thanks to a generous donation.
VII. STAFF UPDATES
No staff updates.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
John adjourned the meeting at 4:55 pm.
This Agenda may be Amended
Posted at Buena Vista Town Hall and www.buenavistaco.gov
Alteration/Demolition Permit – Staff Review for Potential Historical Significance
Section 19-7 of the Buena Vista Municipal Code regulates Historic Structures and Sites and is the basis for review for
eligibility for historic designation regarding alteration, demolition or relocation of non-designated properties as required
by Section 19-14 of the Buena Vista Municipal Code. Properties receiving historic designations shall be at least fifty (50)
years old, except as otherwise provided herein, and possess architectural, social, or geographical/environmental importance
by meeting at least one (1) or more of the following:
Criterion Applicable Not Applicable
a. Exemplifies specific elements of an architectural style or period;
b. Is an example of the work of an architect or builder who is recognized
for expertise nationally, statewide, regionally, or locally;
c. Demonstrates superior craftsmanship or high artistic value;
d. Represents an innovation in construction, materials, or design;
e. Represents a style particularly associated with the Buena Vista/Chaffee County area;
f. Represents a built environment of a group of people in an era of history;
g. Represents a pattern or grouping of elements representing at
least one (1) of the above criteria;
h. Is the site of a historic event that had an effect upon society;
i. Exemplifies cultural, political, economic, or social heritage of the community;
j. Represents an association with a notable person or the work of a notable person;
k. Represents a typical example/association with a particular ethnic group;
l. Represents a unique example of an event in Buena Vista's history;
m. Enhances sense of identity of the community;
n. Is an established and familiar natural setting or visual feature of the community;
o. Properties that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important
in history or prehistory; or
p. If the property is less than fifty (50) years old, must demonstrate
overwhelming historic significance.
Notes: The McGinnis Gym property is seeking to alter the existing structure located on the site as detailed in the
attached application and supplemental materials. While staff agrees with the applicant that the building is historically
significant, staff recommends that the HPC approve the requested partial demolition permit in light of the goal, intent,
and significant expertise of the applicant, owner, and development team.
Digitally signed by Joseph Teipel
Joseph Teipel DN: C=US, E=jteipel@buenavistaco.gov,
OU=Town of Buena Vista, CN=Joseph Teipel
Staff Reviewer:
Date: 2023.01.26 11:06:54-07'00'
1
Certificate of Appropriateness (CA)
Town of Buena Vista
Historic Preservation Commission
210 E. Main St.
Buena Vista, CO 81211
DATE: 12/14/22
___________
Watershed NP Inc.
Name of Applicant: __________________________________ CA ___________
HPC USE ONLY
18840 Mountain View Dr
Mailing Address: __________________________________
Buena Vista Co 81211
__________________________________
719-389-3317
Daytime Phone: _______________ welterkaty @gmail.com
Email: _______________________
Relationship of Applicant to Owner: Applicant is owner
__________________________________
Name of Owner: __________________________________ Please see the attached
Standards for Rehabilitation
Owner Address: __________________________________ provided by the Secretary of
__________________________________ the Interior for reference in
Owner Phone: _______________ completing this application.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 113 N Court St Unit 200 Buena Vista CO 81211
______________________________
______________________________
McGinnis Gym
Property Name (if applicable): ______________________________
HPC USE ONLY PROPOSED WORK:
Minor Alteration Please describe your proposed work simply and accurately. Attach extra sheets and
New Construction supplemental material as requested on the following page.
Addition Demolition of non historic locker room addition - see attached letters of recomendation
_________________________________________________________________
x Demolition Historic StructureSee enclosed narrative
Assesments, drawings and attached as Exhibit A
photos
_________________________________________________________________
Rehabilitation _________________________________________________________________
Other: ___________ _________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
2
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
Please attach as separate sheets the following information:
x Applicable site and floor plan drawings showing all proposed exterior alterations (if project is a new roof,
only specifications and material samples are needed).
x Specifications describing all proposed exterior alterations.
x Elevation drawings including materials, architectural design, and detail. (photos of examples are encouraged).
While plans do not need to be professionally done, they must be sufficiently detailed to determine if the project
meets the criteria. The Historic Preservation Commission may ask for additional information as the Commission
feels necessary.
PHOTOS
Please include current photos of EACH ELEVATION of EACH BUILDING and STRUCTURE on the property
affected by the project..
President, Watershed NP Inc. December 15, 2022
Signature of Applicant: _____________________________________ Date: __________
Signature of Owner: _____________________________________ Date: __________
IF NOT APPLICANT
Approval Process
1) Applicant completes an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness including plans and specifica-
tions showing all proposed exterior alterations, including their proposed exterior appearance, with texture,
materials, and architectural design and detail.
2) Applicant submits application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to Emily Katsimpalis, Assistant to the
Town Administrator.
3) Application processed by staff for Historic Preservation Commission including reviewing application and
preparing a staff memo to the Historic Preservation Commission.
4) A staff person and (2) randomly selected members of the Commission shall review all applications for
landmark alteration certificate of appropriateness to buildings or special features and shall determine within
seven (7) days after a complete application is filed whether or not the proposed work would have a signifi-
cant impact upon or be potentially detrimental to a landmark site or historic district.
A) No significant impact - If it is determined by both Commission designees that there would be
no significant impact or potential detriment, the Town shall issue a Certificate of
Appropriateness to the applicant and shall notify the Commission of such issuance.
B) Commission referral - If one of the Commission designees determines that the proposed work
would create a significant impact or potential detriment, they shall refer
the application to the Commission for a public meeting and begin the
legal notification process:
1) 15 days notice of Commission public hearing in newspaper.
2) Notice by mail to applicant and/or owner of property.
3) Historic Preservation Commission shall hold public hearing no more than 60 days after
application submitted. Commission will approve or deny the request.
4) Applicant may appeal decision to the Board of Trustees.
3
DEMOLITION INFORMATION
Important Information
Please note that in order for the HPC to consider a demolition request the proposal must meet at least one
of the four standards:
All demolition requests must meet at least one of the
demolition standards and it is the responsibility of the
applicant to prove their request meets one.
(a) The resource constitutes a hazard to the safety of the public or to the structures’ occupants.
(b) The resource is a deterrent to a major improvement program that will be a substantial benefit to
the community and the applicant proposing the work has obtained all necessary planning and zoning
approvals, financing, and environmental clearances.
(c) Retaining the resource will cause undue financial hardship to the owner when a governmental
action, an act of God, or other events beyond the owner’s control created the hardship, and all feasible
alternatives to eliminate the financial hardship, which may include offering the resource for sale at its
fair market value or moving the resource to a vacant site, have been attempted and exhausted by the
owner.
(d) Retaining the resource is not in the interest of the majority of the community.
THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATIONS
FOR DEMOLITION
1) Photograph(s) of the entire structure(s) in its present condition. Photos can be submitted in hardcopy
or electronic format. Current close-up photographs of areas of deterioration if pertinent to the argument
as well as full images of the structure. Each photograph should be labeled to indicate what is shown,
address, and date of photograph.
2) Clear narrative outlining which of the Demolition Criteria(s) applies to your request and a full
explanation, complete with factual data and information, of how your request meets that criteria(s) (see
page 1).
4
REQUIRED MATERIALS
Criteria A- applications arguing this Criteria must include:
1) A minimum of two reports from qualified professionals describing the current condition of the
structure with emphasis on structural matters rather than cosmetics.
a. For structures of over 750 square feet a minimum of two engineering reports from two
unassociated (different companies) will be required. These reports must include a full
professional analysis of the structure as well as the professionals credentials.
b. For structures under 750 square feet two standard reports for a qualified professionals
will suffice.
2) A minimum of two reports from qualified professionals outlining what it would take to stabilize
and save the structure. These reports can be combined as part of the condition reports outlined
under item 1.
3) Site plan, materials list, drawings and narrative explaining how the lot will be treated after the
building is removed. Will it seeded for grass?
Criteria B
1) Complete narrative describing the proposed improvement program/project.
a. Prove that the program/project is of substantial benefit to the Community and that the
Community is in support, the community being district and adjacent/immediate
neighborhood and neighbors.
b. The building is in the way of this program and no other means exist to remedy the
situation such as incorporating the building into the program, moving the building,
utilizing a different site for the program.
2) Provide evidence of financing and compliance with all City Code requirements.
3) Submit complete, scaled architectural drawings of the proposed program/project including site
plan, materials list, renderings in-sittu.
4) Timeline for beginning and completing the program/project. Typically the building if approved
for demolition, cannot be removed until work is ready to commence on the new project.
Criteria C
1) Narrative explaining: the hardship; how the hardship was not caused by the owner/applicant;
what has been done to remedy the hardship.
2) Disclosure of complete financial status as to prove a financial hardship if one exists.
a. Personal income; company income if applicable; assets both private and corporate; all
owned property and their value. Value of subject property; income generated from
owned property, etc.
Criteria D
1) Narrative providing clear evidence that the community is not interested in retaining the
resource. This is done through public support in person or via letter to at the HPC meeting and a
petition with signatures from the community but more heavily from the immediate neighborhood.
This needs to include both occupants and owners.
2) It is strongly recommended that applicants seek out the affected neighborhood association and
business groups that are affiliated with the neighborhood in question and meet with them prior to
submittal. Include evidence of this meeting and any outcomes as part of the application.
5
6HFUHWDU\RIWKH,QWHULRU¶V6WDQGDUGVIRU5HKDELOLWDWLRQ
1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change
to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive
materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property
will be avoided.
3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that
create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements
from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained
and preserved.
5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in
design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be
substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means
possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.
8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be
disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials,
features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be
differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale
and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that,
if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
environment would be unimpaired.
CHAFFEE COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
104 Crestone Ave., Room 125
P.O. Box 699
Salida, Colorado 81201
(719) 539-2124 FAX: (719) 530-9208
bdepartment@chaffeecounty.org
DEMOLITION/ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION- $50.00
113 N Court St - Unit 200 Buena Vista, CO 81211
Project address: __________________________________________
County ✔
Buena Vista Poncha Springs Salida *Zoning Sign-off Required
Type of structure Gym _______________________________________________________________
Owner Watershed NP Inc. t/a Watershed Inc.
Mailing address 18840 Mountain View Dr, Buena Vista Co. 81211 Phone 719-398-3317
Applicant/Contractor Watershed NP Inc Phone 719-398-3317
Description of Project McGinnis Gym preservation and restoration project ___________________________________
Checklist of required information for a Demolition Permit:
Completed Demolition/Abatement Permit Application from the Development Services Department.
Copy of Asbestos inspection report, State Issued Demolition Permit, and State Issued Asbestos
Abatement Permit (If Applicable).
Zoning Signoff from proper municipality if located within Salida, Poncha Springs or Buena Vista.
Approval of the appropriate Historical Society will also be required (if applicable). (See reverse side for
Zoning Official Sign-Off)
A scaled site plan indicating; the location of proposed structure(s) to be demolished, distance from the
property lines and from other structures, utilities, driveway, water features and easements.
Plans of the structure may be required if there is a possibility that adjoining property/structures may be
affected for safety and a plan review would be performed by this office. Depending on certain criteria
gathered at the time of this permit being issued, this department may request an evaluation to be
performed by a Colorado licensed professional engineer and/or architect.
Submit in writing a list of all hazardous materials on property including the method of disposal for the
materials resulting from the demolition. Materials must be removed from the property within 14-days of
the date of demolition. (*See Below.)
Utility providers notified. Service utility connections shall be discontinued and capped in accordance with
the approved rules and requirements of the utility provider. The utilities must be capped 5-feet from
property line if abandoned. THESE MUST BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO COVERING.
(See reverse side for Utility Provider Sign-Off)
*Proof of approved Chaffee County Demolition Permit, State Permit, asbestos results & a list
of materials removed will be required at the Chaffee County Landfill.
Updated 06-26-19
ATTENTION UTILITY PROVIDER:
Please sign the appropriate space below ONLY after you are satisfied that the utility service has been
disconnected and capped off to the satisfaction of your regulations.
UTILITY COMPANY DATE SIGNATURE
Water
Sanitation
Electric
Gas
Other
NOTE: If on private, individual well or On-Site Wastewater Treatment System, property owner indicates
“PRIVATE” in “COMPANY” box. If disconnecting an On-Site Wastewater Treatment System an
abandonment permit will be required.
ZONING APPROVAL: County Buena Vista Poncha Springs Salida
Zoning Approval Date
This permit is issued for the purpose of demolition or removal only and shall not be used for the purpose of new construction except
bracing, shoring, or temporary support for the building or structure which is being demolished or removed.
I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and
ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not
presume to give the authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state, federal, or local law regulating construction, the
performance of construction, zoning or sanitation requirements.
This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180-days of the date issued,
or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180-days at any time after work is commenced.
Applicant Signature Date
If using fillable application, digital signature required. Do not leave blank.
STAFF USE ONLY:
Payment Method: Check # Cash ____Credit Card_ Permit # ___________ Date_____________
Comments:
Building Department Approval Date
Updated 06-26-19
Exhibit A
McGinnis Gym Certificate of Appropriateness Narrative
Property Significance
Constructed in 1936 by the Buena Vista School District with Public Works Administration funds,
the McGinnis Gym is historically significant in the areas education, law, government and politics.
The 5,450 sf gym was constructed to provide indoor location for arts, school sports, and
community activities. of the need to be able to provide a new location for the Buena Vista
School District arts program and to provide an indoor location for school sports and activities.
The cost to build the building was $16,000 and it was named for Superintendent and County
Judge Harry L. McGinnis, who is one of the most respected individuals to have lived in Buena
Vista. Since 1979, the Gym has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places as part
of the Courthouse Complex.
Scope of Work and Specifications
Overall, this project will preserve, rehabilitate, and restore the entire exterior of the McGinnis
Gym and return it to recreational, performing arts, and assembly use by the Buena Vista School
District and broader community. For purposes of this Certificate of Appropriateness review, the
scope will include demolishing the 1960 non-historic locker room addition, underpinning the
north wall foundation, rehabilitating and repointing all brick and block walls, and structurally
reinforcing the existing block walls to meet the International Existing Building Code (IEBC). Also,
Watershed will rehabilitate and restore projecting steel windows; structurally improve the roof
structure as required by IEBC and install new standing seam and single ply roof; and replace
non-historic hollow metal doors, frames and block infill with recreated historic doors.
Locker room demolition. Demolishing the locker room is recommended by two Historic Structure
Assessments (HSA) completed by preservation architects and engineers with Darden
Architects, Form + Works Architects, and JVA Engineers.1
Building foundation. We will repair the failing foundation at the north end of the building.
Adjacent to the settled poured foundation wall, we will excavate down to a suitable subgrade
and underpin the existing footings with poured concrete. We will repair the cracked foundation
wall and backfill once the foundation repair is complete. We chose this method because it will
properly support the sinking foundation corner with structural concrete which will extend from
the bottom of the existing poured concrete footing down to an undisturbed subgrade with
sufficient bearing capacity. This method will not disturb or affect the load bearing brick wall
above and result in a foundation system which will last for the long-term future of the building
and leave no visual evidence of work being done.
Exterior masonry. Starting at the north end of the building, we will rehabilitate and restore the
brick and concrete block walls. We will de- and re-construct the failing, crumbling brick parapets
1
2017 and 2022 Historic Structure Assessments can be accessed here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19_LVySsZv7RcjEFfCitxs_LleG0BAK0Q?usp=sharing
using salvaged brick. We'll repair the large crack on the north brick wall by weaving in salvaged
brick to close the crack and the leaning northwest brick wall corner will be deconstructed and
reconstructed plumb. We'll repoint all brick mortar joints and replace missing or severely
damaged bricks with salvaged brick. Full width masonry wall reinforcement will be installed as
directed by the structural engineer. Mortar will be carefully selected by laboratory testing of the
existing mortar, block and brick in consultation with our masonry contractor and preservation
architect. Moving south, we will carefully repoint the block walls on the east and west side of the
building and the gambrel end walls on the north and south sides. A qualified team of restoration
masons, working from lifts and scaffolds, will fully grout the cells of the block walls noted on the
structural drawings. All mortar used will be designed by a testing lab after samples of the
existing mortar is analyzed for material composition and compressive strength.
We chose these masonry restoration strategies after careful review of the building exterior with
preservation architectural firm Form + Works, consultation with our structural engineers at JVA,
review of historic photographic evidence and review of the Secretary of Interior Standards for
Restoration, using the least intrusive methods possible. For the crack the loose brick and mortar
will be carefully removed and the brick salvaged. The crack will be repaired by “weaving in” the
salvaged brick to create a seamless repair. On the leaning section of wall, the existing brick wall
will be deconstructed and reconstructed and the large wood braces now holding the wall will be
removed. On the parapets the loose brick and mortar will be removed down to sound masonry
and then reconstructed using the salvaged brick. Mortar will be carefully selected to be more
vapor permeable and have a lower compressive strength than the existing historic mortar.
Exterior sash windows. Windows will be completely rehabilitated and restored. All scale and rust
will be mechanically cleaned to bare metal, any bent metal straightened, broken welds repaired,
and a new paint system installed. All existing hardware will be removed, cleaned, restored,
repaired or replaced if necessary and reinstalled. All windows will be reglazed and new operable
storm windows installed. We developed this strategy after a careful review of the existing
historic projecting windows, consultation with our design team and review of the NPS
preservation brief. This method was chosen because repairing in place is the least intrusive
method of restoration and yields the best result.
Roof. The overall goal of this critical component is to replace the current asphalt shingled roof
with historically appropriate standing seam roof on sloped sides and membrane on gambrel/flat
center, per the enclosed historic photo. First, we'll anchor the roof structure to the newly grouted
cells of the block which is described in section B. The mechanical fasteners specified on the
structural drawings will require a small portion of the 1x wood sheathing to be removed above
the block wall to access the steel truss bearing plates and wood joists where they are bearing or
pocked into the masonry wall. Steel fasteners will be anchored into the newly grouted block and
then fastened to the steel truss bearing plates and wood joists. Once the mechanical fasteners
are installed and inspected the removed 1x wood sheathing will be reinstalled and the entire
existing roof deck will be covered with new OSB sheathing as specified by the structural
drawings. As the roof deck is completed it will be covered with an ice and watershield
membrane. Upon completion of the ice and watershield membrane the 22 gauge standing seam
roofing system will be installed to match the original historic standing seam roof. Concurrent
with the roofing, the original exterior rafters will be cleaned, repaired, and repainted as
necessary. The strategy of the exterior roof work was developed in consultation with
preservation architects, structural engineers, and historic photographs, which clearly show that
the original steep sections of the gambrel roof were standing seam roofing.
Doors. The existing non-historic hollow metal doors, frames and hardware will be removed
along with the non-historic block infill. We'll install recreated historic doors and jambs with code-
compliant hardware. This strategy was developed with historic photographs, which clearly show
the original doors. Our design team will utilize these photos to recreate the doors. We chose this
method because it will return the building’s exterior doors to their original appearance.
Compliance with the Buena Vista Municipal Code
Section 19-13(d) of the BV Municipal Code governs the partial demolition of a designated
building. The criteria, and the project’s satisfaction of those criteria, are described below:
19-13(d) Review criteria for partial demolition:
(1) The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration, or rehabilitation of the
structure; and
As indicated in the 2017 and 2022 HAS’s, the shower room is non-historic and also
undermines the structural integrity of the Gym. The roof is also non-historic and no
longer up to code. Demolition of the shower room, replacement of the roof, and the rest
of the scope of work are necessary for the rehabilitation and reuse of the Gym.
(2) The applicant must mitigate, to the greatest extent possible:
a. Impacts on the historic importance or character defining features of the structures
located on the property.
The project plans were designed by preservation architects Form + Works, and the
plans conform with the Secretary of Interior Standards and Buena Vista Architectural
Design Guidelines. Architectural drawings are available here, and also include
photos. https://drive.google.com/file/d/18H5lFjokaLivlfiBJG_C9p0G0vWF3-
1V/view?usp=sharing
The plans follow the index below:
b. Impacts on the architectural integrity of the structures located on the property.
Removing the shower room, replacing the roof, and fulfilling the rest of the scope of
work will greatly enhance the architectural integrity of the Gym and the entire
Courthouse Complex. The standing seam replacement roof will not only match the
original roof, but will also match the roofs on the adjacent Courthouse and Jail &
Sheriff’s residence buildings. The Gym will no longer contain non-historic structures,
and the entire exterior will resemble its original appearance.
Photos
North Elevation of Locker room and Gym Above
East Elevation Above
West Elevation Above
Interior of Shower Room addition Above
Public Support
While not required under the code, we would like to share that this project has received
tremendous public support. As evidence, please see enclosed 11 letters from the following
organizations:
• Buena Vista School District Superintendent Lisa Yates
• Town of Buena Vista: Mayor Libby Fay, Historic Preservation Commission, Recreation
Department
• Chaffee County Commissioner Keith Baker
• Boys and Girls Club of Chaffee County
• Peak to Peak Pickleball
• High Country Fine Arts
• Walden Chamber Orchestra
• Chaffee Arts
• Buena Vista Event Cooperative
• Buena Vista Heritage
• Chaffee County Early Childhood Council
Historic Preservation Commission Goals
Summary of adopted and proposed goals in all previous planning meetings (2017-2022)
Goal Description Time Responsible Parties Status/Progress
Frame
Adopted in previous years
Locally landmarking additional Ongoing Suzy, Jo, Nancy, Should we initiate
properties. Melanie
Implement ADG’s and related Short Dan will lead, John will ADG’s adopted by the Town, and
procedures; expand to support adoption as regulatory is
residential / old town pending.
overlay.
Recruit new commissioner Short John will lead, and it Accomplished when Mary
will be a regular Therese (historian) joined. Still
discussion point. could use an architect. Can put
on the brakes. Accomplish this
goal indirectly with marketing.
Public education/community Ongoing Jo will lead. Suzy, John, Coloring contest in May.
engagement about HPC & Melanie will support. Evaluating what worked and
preservation Mary Therese leading didn’t. Social media posts–
coloring contest. should we continue? Jo would
like to create a calendar for
2024.
Possible cooperation with BV
Library and Heritage and My-
bv.com.
Historic property surveys Short- Mary Therese currently Completed Phases 1-2, and 3 is
Mid leading under way.
Preservation Training Ongoing Commissioner-driven Hosted History Colorado in 2022;
most commissioners attending
Saving Places 2021-23 and
occasional webinars. Used HPC
budget for scholarships.
Create local historic district Long Currently building trust and
credibility with property owners,
who must approve district.
Previously proposed for discussion
Town of BV Comprehensive Short John For discussion
Plan advocacy (2023)
Advise on residential Katy HPC role unclear; as CLG could
restoration projects review tax credit apps
Play a role in restoring the ? HPC role unclear
Pearl
Improve HPC review Katy
procedures
Host History Colorado or Can discuss with staff at next
Saving Places training in BV Saving Places
Host technical skills training Windows from “Crave” building
still stored at Watershed Ranch
Improve access to local Possibly coordinate with
history archives Library?
Locally landmark Town Hall
Newly Proposed
Develop database or Jo
repository for stories about
historic properties.
Get email alerts for Buena Vista
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.