Town Council
Regular MeetingChapel Hill, NC · July 12, 2019
Minutes
Town Hall
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL 405 Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard
Town Council Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Meeting Minutes - Final
Mayor Pam Hemminger Council Member Nancy Oates
Mayor pro tem Jessica Anderson Council Member Michael Parker
Council Member Donna Bell Council Member Rachel Schaevitz
Council Member Allen Buansi Council Member Karen Stegman
Council Member Hongbin Gu
Friday, July 12, 2019 9:00 AM RM 110 | Council Chamber
Roll Call
Present: 9 - Mayor Pam Hemminger, Mayor pro tem Jessica Anderson,
Council Member Donna Bell, Council Member Allen Buansi,
Council Member Hongbin Gu, Council Member Nancy Oates,
Council Member Michael Parker, Council Member Karen
Stegman, and Council Member Rachel Schaevitz
Other Attendees
Town Manager Maurice Jones, Deputy Town Manager Florentine Miller, Town Attorney Ralph
Karpinos, Police Officer Rick Fahrer, Communications Specialist Mark Losey, Transit Director Brian
Litchfield, Transit Development Manager Matthew Cecil, LUMO Project Manager Alisa Duffey Rogers,
Fire Marshal Tommy Gregory, Communications and Public Affairs Director and Town Clerk Sabrina
Oliver.
OPENING
Mayor Hemminger opened the meeting at 9:00 a.m. Council Members Stegman,
and Schaevitz arrived at 9:01 a.m. and 9:10 a.m., and Mayor pro tem Anderson
arrived at 9:03 a.m., respectively.
AGENDA ITEM
1. North South Bus Rapid Transit Station Design and Land Use [19-0663]
Development Community Engagement Event - July 12 - 15,
2019
Mayor Hemminger explained that the upcoming weekend of workshops
would focus on the Town's North-South Bus Rapid Transit (N-S BRT) plans.
The Town would submit a grant application for the 30 percent design
phase at the end of August, she said.
Transit Director Brian Litchfield gave a PowerPoint presentation that
provided context and background on the BRT project, which would run
through Town from the Eubanks Park & Ride in the north to the Southern
Page 1 of 5
Town Council Meeting Minutes - Final July 12, 2019
Village Park & Ride in the south. He said that the current transit system
was close to capacity, with approximately 4,500 rides per day. Planners
were envisioning a second BRT corridor between Highway 54 and Eastowne
Drive, he said, and he described other possible connections as well.
Mr. Litchfield said that the current development stage included addressing
environmental aspects, doing a traffic impact analysis (TIA), beginning to
integrate bike and pedestrian facilities, and discussing aspirations for
station areas. The 30 percent design and environmental analysis would
be completed by the end of the summer and that staff would ask the
Federal Transportation Authority (FTA) for a project rating at the end of
August, he said.
Mayor pro tem Anderson confirmed with Mr. Litchfield that guiding
principles for the project included meeting transit, economic development,
and overall mobility needs. Mr. Litchfield said that BRT would expand the
corridor's diverse ridership and improve access for riders.
Julia Suprock, representing AECOM, reviewed plans for the workshops,
gave an overview of BRT design work, and discussed the goals and
principles of a study on transit-supported development. She said that the
three major categories of the work plan were: to develop a typology
framework; to hold an urban design workshop; and to define an
implementation plan. She discussed a similar project that AECOM had
developed in Texas and said that Chapel Hill's implementation plan would
be developed over a few months.
Council Members confirmed with Ms. Suprock that the typical walking
distance from station areas would be a half mile to three miles and that
discussions regarding transitions to neighborhoods had already begun.
The half-mile radius around each station would be eligible for active FTA
funding, but anything beyond that would not, she said.
Mr. Litchfield said that staff would begin talking with the Metropolitan
Planning Organization and others about additional funding sources and
that he would provide more information on that as the project moved into
the 30 percent design phase.
Council Members verified that the Town's Mobility Plan was already being
integrated into the process. They emphasized the importance of
incorporating the Town's unique characteristics and values and of having a
people-friendly system that included green spaces and provided safe,
efficient, and accessible transportation for all. Council Member Buansi
stressed the importance of reaching out to include all residents in the
process and Council Member Gu asked to see hard numbers on the type
and amount of greenspace that would be in the corridor.
Page 2 of 5
Town Council Meeting Minutes - Final July 12, 2019
Council Member Schaevitz asked Ms. Suprock to elaborate on a proposed
fresh approach to parking, and Ms. Suprock said that part of the
implementation plan would be to address minimizing the visual impact of
parking at station areas. She said that tools for doing that included
having a maximum, allowing shared use; reducing overall supply;
designing in a less visually obtrusive way and having a signage system
that directs drivers to park somewhere else.
The Council confirmed with Mr. Litchfield that sustainability was a major
part of the project and would be emphasized as a Town goal. He said he
hoped to have a recommendation for an electric bus vendor in September
and would focus on other features, such as green spaces and options for
solar lighting as well. Council Members expressed enthusiasm over the
possible range of public spaces and the potential for displaying public art
at stations.
Mr. Litchfield said that there were 800 parking spaces in the corridor at
the current time and that 3,500 additional riders primarily walked to the
62 bus stops along the way.
Council Member Oates asked how the new approach to parking would fit
with developers' business models and parking requirements.
Mr. Litchfield replied that staff would recommend best practices, but the
Council would make the ultimate decisions regarding land use around
stations.
Council Member Oates confirmed that staff had invited business people
and land owners to participate in the weekend workshops and would hold
additional stakeholder meetings in future months. She stressed the
importance of including private equity developers who are accustomed to
the business model.
Mayor pro tem Anderson confirmed with Mr. Litchfield that staff would be
talking with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC DOT)
over the summer and fall about what would work in the corridor. NC DOT
appeared to be open to having the multi-use paths and understood the
Town's interest in having amenities such as stations, he said. He would
have a more definitive answer after the TIA had been completed and
discussed with NC DOT, said Mr. Litchfield.
Mayor Hemminger confirmed with Mr. Litchfield that there might be
funding to buy more property to expand the Eubanks Park & Ride lot later
on in the process. She asked him to look into the possibility of obtaining
property behind the Town Operations Center. She stressed the
importance of considering an art component at stations and emphasized
the need to inform citizens about the people-friendly nature of the
Page 3 of 5
Town Council Meeting Minutes - Final July 12, 2019
stations themselves.
Amy Groves, a principal with Dover, Kohl and Partners, described how
workshop presentations would help people visualize and think about
station area design. She reviewed the weekend schedule and described
the goal of reaching a common vision. She gave a PowerPoint
presentation that showed different scenarios for design and how station
areas might change over time.
Urban Designer Victor Dover continued the PowerPoint presentation,
showing maps that compared sample areas and designs. He said that he
planned to ask workshop participants the following questions: What
opportunities are you most excited about? What are your concerns?
What existing public realm features should remain in the long-term future,
and what uses are missing? Is it easy to walk or bike, and where are
better pedestrian, bike and vehicular connections needed near proposed
stations? What kinds of buildings and public spaces need to be created?
Mayor Hemminger said that Council Members were more interested in
converting the road than expanding it, but they realized that this may not
be possible everywhere. The Council did not want a big highway coming
into Town and wanted to reduce the Town's carbon footprint. Additionally,
they were more interested in moving people more effectively, she said.
Council Member Schaevitz left the meeting at 10:25 a.m.
Council Members stressed their interest in making the BRT an attractive
and enticing means of transportation. They emphasized the importance of
having a system that would be inclusive and accessible to all. There was
much discussion regarding the Town's desire for pleasant, welcoming
stations where people would want to be.
Council Member Stegman left the meeting at 10:30 a.m.
Council Member Parker expressed concern that the BRT would not be
well-connected to other bus routes. He also stressed the importance of
not having plans that are driven by NC DOT's tendency to focus on moving
cars rather than moving people.
Council Member Buansi said that a wide spectrum of people such as
students, renters, homeowners, and people who live in mobile home parks
might not be involved in the weekend workshops. He also raised concerns
about BRT lanes becoming crowded with non-approved vehicles.
Mr. Dover replied that there would need to be guidelines for when other
vehicles, such as private shuttles, would be allowed to use the lane.
Page 4 of 5
Town Council Meeting Minutes - Final July 12, 2019
The Council asked the consultants to return with information about other
communities that they had helped transition out of cars. They asked for
more information about the character of individual destinations and who
those destinations would be designed to attract. Council Members
stressed the importance of setting realistic expectations and about being
careful regarding how questions were framed. They discussed how the
BRT would be integrated with other Town plans and place-making goals.
Mayor Hemminger cautioned against showing the public pictures of trees
and green infrastructure and then delivering something that was all
concrete. She emphasized the need to pay attention to the corridor itself
and to show what would actually be delivered.
Mr. Dover pointed out that any transition would be gradual and that the
system would not appear all at once. He said that adding
transit-supported development would mean making choices. He confirmed
with Mayor Hemminger that in addition to trees and green space, historic
features, public access, and safety were important to people in Town.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:53 a.m.
Page 5 of 5
Agenda
Town Hall
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL 405 Martin Luther King Jr.
Boulevard
Town Council Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Meeting Agenda
Mayor Pam Hemminger Council Member Nancy Oates
Mayor pro tem Jessica Anderson Council Member Michael Parker
Council Member Donna Bell Council Member Rachel Schaevitz
Council Member Allen Buansi Council Member Karen Stegman
Council Member Hongbin Gu
Friday, July 12, 2019 9:00 AM RM 110 | Council Chamber
AGENDA ITEM
1. North South Bus Rapid Transit Station Design and [19-0663]
Land Use Development Community Engagement
Event - July 12 - 15, 2019
PRESENTER: Brian Litchfield, Transit Director
Representatives from Dover, Kohl & Partners & AECOM
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council provide initial feedback on
Transit Station Design and Transit Oriented Development along the
NSBRT corridor.
http://www.townofchapelhill.org Page 1 of 1 Printed on 7/11/2019
Get email alerts for Chapel Hill
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.