Town Council

- TOWN COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL WORK SESSION AGENDA February 13, 2025 Starting at 7:00 PM I. Call to Order and Roll Call II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Informational discussion on the following: 1. Mayoral Spending Authority Increase Discussion 2. Board of Appeals Voting Issue 3. SHA Project Update 4. BES Tennis Courts Update 5. Crosswalk at BES Discussion 6. Return Activated Sledge Pump Replacement – Project Memo WRTP 7. Overflow Pump Station Flood Gate 8. Calvert County Program Open Space – FY 2026 Submission a. Railway trail expansion b. BES connected to the Railway trail c. Natural open space parcels 9. Richfield Station Paving 10. Utility Rates & EDU Audits IV. Closed Session - A motion to close the work session to go into closed session under the Statutory Authority of the Md. Annotated Code, pursuant to General Provisions Article, §3-305(b), subsection (7) “to consult with counsel to obtain legal advice.” V. Adjournment 8200 BAYSIDE ROAD, P.O. BOX 400 CHESAPEAKE BEACH, MARYLAND 20732 (410) 257-2230 (301) 855-8398  Introduced ____________ Passed ______________ Effective______________ ORDINANCE NO. O-25-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF CHESAPEAKE BEACH, AMENDING CHAPTER 290, ARTICLE VIII, “PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF APPEALS”, SECTION 290-32, “BOARD OF APPEALS,” TO ALLOW MEMBERS TO VOTE ON MATTERS AS TO WHICH THEY HAVE MISSED A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, Chesapeake Beach (the “Town”) is a municipal corporation of the State of Maryland, organized and operating in accordance with Article XI-E of the Constitution of Maryland; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Local Gov’t Art., § 5-213, the Town has the authority to provide reasonable zoning regulations subject to the referendum of the voters at regular or special elections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Md. Code Ann, Land Use Art, § 4-301 et seq., the Town has the authority and obligation to create and empower a Board of Appeals to hear and decide appeals related to administrative interpretations of the zoning ordinance, variances, and special exceptions; and WHEREAS, the Town has implemented the foregoing powers in Section C-501(56) of the Town Charter, and pursuant thereto enacted Chapter 290, “Zoning”, of the Town Code, including Article VII, “Planning Commission and Board of Appeals”, Section 290-32, “Board of Appeals,”; and WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the Town Council that certain proceedings of the Board of Appeals have been hampered by a provision in subsection (c)(4) of Section 290-32, which provides that “[a]ll actions or decisions of the Board shall be taken by resolution in which three members, present during the proceedings, must concur.”; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that the best interests of the Town and its residents require an amendment of Section 290-32 to allow members of the Board who have missed a certain portion of the proceedings concerning any matter committed to its quasi-judicial authority to vote thereon under certain circumstances; and WHEREAS, the Town Council, having proposed an amendment of the Town’s zoning ordinance to accomplish the foregoing objective, referred the proposed amendment to the Town Planning Commission for consideration; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission issued a report containing its recommendation on or about ___________, 2025; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has conducted a public hearing concerning the proposed change to the Zoning Ordinance, Section 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF CHESAPEAKE BEACH that Chapter 290, Article VIII, “Planning Commission and Board of Appeals”, Section 290-32, “Board of Appeals,” be and hereby is amended to read as follows: Sec 290-32. Board of Appeals. * * * C. Procedures, meetings, records, and decisions * * * UNDERLINED SMALL CAPS : signify matter added to existing law Asterisks * * * : signify matter remaining in existing law but omitted herein -2- (3) Records and decisions. The Board shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating such fact, and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the office of the Board and shall be a public record. All actions or decisions of the Board shall be taken by resolution in which three members, present during the proceedings, must concur. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING IN THIS SUBSECTION TO THE CONTRARY, A MEMBER OF THE BOARD WHO IS ABSENT DURING A PORTION OF PROCEEDINGS ON ANY QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER COMPRISING UP TO HALF OF THE TOTAL TIME MAY VOTE ON A DECISION PROVIDED THE MEMBER REVIEWS THE VIDEO OF THE MISSED PORTION OF THE PROCEEDINGS, ALONG WITH ANY DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED INTO EVIDENCE DURING SUCH PROCEEDINGS, AND SO AFFIRMS PRIOR TO PARTICIPATING IN THE VOTE ON THE DECISION. Each resolution shall contain a statement of the grounds and any findings forming the basis of such action or decision. The Board shall notify the Mayor and Town Council, Planning Commission, and Zoning Administrator of all decisions and resolutions. AS CERTIFIED by their signatures below, the members of the Town Council affirm that this Ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the Town Council on February ___, 2025 and considered for adoption at the regular Town Council meeting on the March ___, 2025. The vote of the Council was tallied and ____ votes of approval and ____ votes of disapproval were cast. The resulting majority of the Council approved the passage of this Ordinance this ____ day of ___________ 2025. If signed by the Mayor below, the Mayor approves this Ordinance pursuant to Section C-310 of the Charter this ____ day of __________ 2025, and this Ordinance shall UNDERLINED SMALL CAPS : signify matter added to existing law Asterisks * * * : signify matter remaining in existing law but omitted herein -3- become effective twenty days following its signature by the Mayor. CHESAPEAKE BEACH, MARYLAND ________________________________ Bruce A. Wahl, Mayor ________________________________ Kathleen Berault, Councilmember ________________________________ Laura Blackwelder, Councilmember \ ________________________________ Jonathan Evans, Councilmember ________________________________ Anthony Greene, Councilmember ________________________________ Eric Reinhardt, Councilmember ________________________________ Jamie Shuls, Council Vice-President UNDERLINED SMALL CAPS : signify matter added to existing law Asterisks * * * : signify matter remaining in existing law but omitted herein -4- To: Chesapeake Beach Town Council From: Josh Stinnett, Chesapeake Beach WRTP Superintendent Date: 2/3/2025 Re: Return Activated Sludge Pump Replacement Project 1.1 Project Description A project was started in early 2023 to replace the three existing Fairbanks-Morse pumps used for the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) process. The normal operation of RAS pumps would be to maintain roughly 50% of the influent flow rate into the plant and roughly two feet of sludge blanket1 depth in the clarifiers. This can be accomplished through Influent Flow2 Pacing with the Influent Flowmeter flow rate providing pump speed controls. The Plant influent flows range from 200 GPM up to 1200 GPM. The current RAS program has the capability for Influent Flow Pacing, but the pumps are unable to perform adequately for this control type. The lack of an influent-paced flow control results in difficulties with maintaining a blanket in the clarifiers. The current pumps are operated at a fixed 200 GPM each (400 GPM total), which at 50% for influent flow would equate to an influent rate of 800 GPM. Testing has shown that the pumps cannot operate effectively at speeds lower than 200 GPM. During normal daily operation and running at a total return rate of 400 GPM, it is not uncommon to see blankets less than six inches. On the other hand, during storm events or when the Plant is operating with one clarifier during maintenance processes, the blanket may rise as high as nine feet. A request was made for a pump proposal that could range from ~100 GPM to 600 GPM, to cover normal flows with one or two clarifiers (one or two pumps). Another factor that was to be considered, is frequent clogging experienced by the current “non-clog” pumps because of rags and debris that have found their way into the process, most significantly fallen leaves during the fall. A request for a proposal to include a “chopper” style pump impeller to better reduce the debris that is clogging the pumps and prevent excessive maintenance was issued in 2023. Proposals for pumps were received from Envirep Inc. Sherwood- Logan, and Ames Pumps. A portion of the process for the acquisition of the replacement pumps was for there to be a trial test of the proposed pumps during the late fall when pump clogging was the most significant. Ames Pumps was unable to provide a pump for a trial period and was removed from consideration. Due to unexpected emergency repair costs in late 2023, the project was delayed until FY 25. The pump from Sherwood-Logan (Flygt pump) was received in early October, and installation was performed in late October, with start-up completed on November 6, 2024. The pump trial period was to be for three months, ending in February 2025. The pump from Envirep (Hidrostal pump) was received at the end of October, and installation was performed in the first week of December. Start-up for the pump was completed on December 9, 2024 with the trial period of two months ending in February 2025. During the trial period, WRTP Staff assessed the following • pump flow rate (~100-600 GPM) • resistance to clogging • efficiency • maintenance requirements 1 The sludge blanket is the sludge that has settled to the bottom of the clarifiers. The clarifiers allow the sludge to settle to allow separation of the solids and final effluent. Solids are returned to the aeration basins as return activated sludge to continue the biological process or wasted out of the system to the solids handling process. 2 Influent Flow is the flow of wastewater received from the collections system in Town and entering the Treatment Plant.  • and routine labor requirements At the end of the trial, calculation of cost and ROI was determined and WRTP Staff were consulted for their final opinion of the preferred pump, at which time a recommendation for reward will be provided to the Council. The current project is budgeted in FY25 and currently is predicted to run under budget. 1.2 Project Parameters 1.2.1 Flow Range The ability of both pumps to operate in the desired flow range was assessed. Both pumps could operate from 150 GPM to 600 GPM as requested. Hidrostal pump as installed for trial Flygt pump as installed for trial 1.2.2 Clogging During the trial period, the access covers for both pumps were removed weekly to determine if the pump was accumulating rags in the impeller or volute. These inspections identified that the Hidrostal pump consistently accumulated rags in the impeller, which would require regular cleaning. View of Hidrostal pump access with accumulating rags Rags removed from pump  The Flygt pump did not show any accumulation of rags at the time of any inspections. View of Flygt pump access View of Flygt impeller 1.3 Efficiency The power efficiency of the two trial pumps was evaluated, and compared to the efficiency of the existing pumps. It was intended that the amperage readings from the pumps at consistent speeds, as measured in hertz (Hz) would be used to determine the pump efficiency and estimate power demand and cost. Following start-up it was determined that the trial pumps operated at a significantly lower speed than the existing pumps, and each other. It was determined that the pumps would be assessed at specific flow rates, with the speed (Hz) recorded for reference. An average of the amperage readings across the range of flow for each pump was calculated, and the known voltage of 460V was used to calculate the kilowatt (kW) used by each pump. This was calculated as: 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐴𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 (𝐴) × 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 (𝑉) 𝐾𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠 (𝑘𝑊) = 1000 The most current electrical rates from BG&E from the start of the trial were utilized, along with the variables for Peak, Intermediate, and Off-Peak and the seasonal hours that these are applied, to calculate the kW/h costs to operate the current pump and the two trial pumps. BGE Rates as of 10/28/2024 $/kWh Hours/day Summer (6/10/24 to 10/9/24) Peak 0.13521 10 Total days 121 Intermediate 0.09096 6 Off-Peak 0.07985 8 Non-Summer (10/10/24 to 6/9/24) Peak 0.07612 8 Total Days 242 Intermediate 0.06239 6 Off-Peak 0.05264 10  Non- Summer Daily Cost Summer Daily Cost Seasonal (Non- Seasonal Annual (Summer) Cost @ Summer) Cost @ Cost @ Amps @ Amps @ Amps @ Amps @ @ Current Current @ Current Current Current 150 GPM 200 GPM 400 GPM 600 GPM Voltage Watts Rates Rates Rates Rates Rates Fairbanks-Morse (Exisiting) 6.4 6.5 7.3 8.4 460.0 3289.0 $ 8.34 $1,009.51 $ 4.97 $1,201.63 $2,211.14 @ Pump Speed (Hz) 33.0 35.0 40.0 47.0 Flygt (Sherwood- Logan) 1.0 1.3 2.8 3.8 460.0 1023.5 $ 2.60 $ 314.15 $ 1.55 $ 373.93 $ 688.08 @ Pump Speed (Hz) 12.0 15.0 26.0 38.0 Hidrostal (Envirep) 4.4 4.5 5.2 6.6 460.0 2380.5 $ 6.04 $ 730.66 $ 3.59 $ 869.71 $1,600.37 @ Pump Speed (Hz) 26.0 29.0 38.0 49.0 The RAS pumps run 24 hours per day, which made calculating the daily, seasonal, and annual costs at current rates relatively easy. As a result, it was determined that the Flygt pump operated at approximately 31% of the current pumps' power cost, and the Hidrostal operated at approximately 72% of the current pumps' power cost. 1.4 Maintenance Requirements Both pumps were assessed for preventive maintenance requirements. The Hidrostal pump has multiple grease fittings for lubricating the pump and motor bearings. The Flygt pump, being a dry pit submersible is of a sealed design and does not require routine lubrication of the bearings. This minimizes the maintenance required. Due to the retrofit nature of this project to replace the existing pumps, some modifications were needed to align the inlet and discharges of the two pumps. The Hidrostal pump required the most substantial modifications. This required the pump to be further offset from the original location of the current pumps. This put the pump off center from the building overhead hoist, which would require a supplementary gantry system to lift the pump should it need to be replaced. The Flygt pump, being of a smaller size, was installed only slightly off-center of the overhead hoist. This combined with the smaller overall size of the pump, would allow the overhead hoist to be usable for the removal of the pump for replacement. A request was made to both vendors for the estimated costs for components and rebuild kits for the trial pumps. This data was received for the Flygt pump, and no data was received for the Hidrostal prior to the completion of this report. A cost assessment could not be completed for these items. As these are for items that would be ordered in the event of pump failure, these are not necessary for estimating normal pump operational costs. 1.5 Routine Labor Requirements As described in the Clogging section of this memo, both pumps were assessed for the quantity of accumulating rags during operation. To remove accumulating rags, the pump inspection plate would need to be removed to clear the rags. WRTP Staff assessed the ease of access for the removal of rags through the inspection plates. It was found that the Flygt pump had a larger inspection plate than the Hidrostal pump and would be much easier to access to clear the pump if needed. The Hidrostal pump inspection plate has a non-symmetrical cast ridge in the middle which coupled with the small size of the inspection plate, made clearing of the pump more difficult. Hidrostal pump Inspection Plate Flygt Pump Inspection Plate The current pumps require cleaning 3 times per week on average and take approximately 10 minutes for each cleaning. It is estimated that the Hidrostal pump would require 2 cleanings per week, and due to the difficulties stated above, it would take approximately 8 minutes for each cleaning. With no data for the need for cleaning of the Flygt pump generated in the trial, a liberal estimate of 1 cleaning every 2 weeks was calculated, with an estimate of 5 minutes per cleaning. Using this data and the median pay for WRTP Staff, an estimated labor cost per week was calculated for each pump. To keep pay rates private, the calculation will not be shown in this report. The Hidrostal pump was estimated at approximately 50% of the labor cost of the existing pump and the Flygt was estimated at 8% of the existing pump. Frequency Labor Cost of Hours Median Weekly % of Cleaning Each Pay for Labor Exisiting per Week Cleaning Staff Hours Pumps Fairbanks-Morse (Exisiting) 3 0.166 - 0.498 Flygt (Sherwood-Logan) 0.5 0.08 - 0.04 8.0% Hidrostal (Envirep) 2 0.125 - 0.25 50.2% 1.6 Conclusion Upon compiling and tabulation of data from the trial, along with conversations with WRTP Staff, the following determinations for each metric were determined: • Flow Range: Both pumps met this requirement • Resistance to Clogging: The Hidrostal showed an issue with rag accumulation, whereas there was no observed rag accumulation with the Flygt Pump.  • Efficiency: The Hidrostal operated at approximately 72% of the current pumps' power cost, and the Flygt pump operated at approximately 31% of the current pumps' power cost. • Maintenance Requirements: The Hidrostal will require periodic lubrication of the bearings, and the Flygt pump has no routine maintenance requirement. Additional costs for rebuild or other components were not assessed as requested data was not received from both vendors in the time alloted. • Labor Requirements: The Hidrostal will require more frequent labor to clear accumulating rags estimated at 67% of the current labor cost, and the Flygt pump (with a liberal estimated requirement) is estimated at 11% of current labor costs for the existing pump. Looking at the calculated cost estimates for power and labor, and comparative pump purchase costs, a return on investment was calculated. The Hidrostal was calculated at 6.64% ROI, and the Flygt pump was calculated at 13.64% ROI. Based on these findings and staff opinions, it was determined that the Flygt pump proposal from Sherwood-Logan will be chosen for a recommendation to the Town Council for purchase during the February 2025 Town Council meeting. Project Costs Engineering Costs (Develop RFP and Pump Spec) $915.00 Electrical Costs (Reconfigure electrical conduits) $6,200.00 Installation of Trial Pump: Hidrostal $12,300.50 Installation of Trial Pump: Flygt $6,667.22 Project Costs to Date $26,082.72 Project Finalization Costs3 Total Cost for Three (3) Flygt Pumps from Sherwood-Logan $59,724.00 Installation of two (2) Flygt pumps by DSI Inc. $23,782.804 Total Recommendation to Council: $83,506.80 We are requesting approval for the expenditure of funds not to exceed $65,0005 for the purchase of the three (3) Flygt pumps (to include the trial pump currently installed) as proposed by Sherwood-Logan. Funds to be expended from the FY25 CBWRTP Fund. Respectfully, Josh Stinnett Plant Superintendent Chesapeake Beach WRTP 3 It should be noted that the proposed cost for the installation of the two Flygt pumps by DSI Inc. may be substantially lower, as shown in the installation of the trial Flygt pump. This cost variance is due to unknown alignment issues that may be found with the existing piping. If the alignment of existing pumps is not an issue, total costs for pump installation may be reduced to ~$13,500.00. 4 Prior Town Council approved funding not to exceed $60,000 for pump installation services during the October 22, 2024 Town Council meeting. This was for trial and final installation work. 5 Shipping and freight costs are unknown at this time.  2140 Renard Court Annapolis, MD 21401 410.841.6810 www.sherwoodlogan.com January 14, 2025 To: Town of Chesapeake Beach Attn: Mr. Josh Stinnett Subject: Chesapeake Beach RAS Pump Replacement Mr. Stinnett We are pleased to provide you with the cost of ownership for the Flygt DP N100 that you are currently trialing. The pump comes with a 5 year warranty, and therefore we expect no cost accrued in that time frame. To push this out to year 10 we expect that the mechanical seal will need replaced at least once. The cost for this can be found in the basic repair kit which as the cartridge seal as well as the O-rings holding it in. This kit also includes bearings which we don’t expect needed in the first 10 years but when replacing the seal its easy to enough replace the bearings as well. The cost for the materials of this basic repair kit is $2000. The labor involved in replacing the seal is also shown in the attached quote from Flygt in addition the cost for a Flygt service technician to program the pump is one day and is listed in the Flygt quote attached. The price for the pump remains the same as originally quoted below: One (1) Flygt model DP N100, 7.5 HP pump, 460V, 3 phase $15,200.00 One (1) Flygt 8” suction elbow pump stand $2,650 One (1) Flygt model gateway $1,258. The price for these items would be: $19,108.00 Shipping can be estimated at the time of purchase. Thank you again for this opportunity. Regards, Patrick Foley, P.E. Vice President Sherwood-Logan & Associates pfoley@sherwoodlogan.com (410) 353-5406 Manufacturers’ Representative for Engineered Instrumentation, Process Equipment and Pumping Systems  Xylem Water Solutions USA, Inc. Flygt Products 2330 Yellow Springs Rd January 9, 2025 Malvern, PA 19355 Tel 610/408-6500 Fax 610/647-5563 TOWN OF CHESAPEAKE BEACH PO BOX 400 CHESAPEAKE BEACH MD 20732-0400 Quote # 2025-MAL-0030 Attn: Josh Stinnett Xylem Water Solutions USA, Inc. is pleased to provide a quote for the following Flygt equipment and labor necessary to rebuild the Flygt DP N100 Pump being tested currently as a RAS pump for the Chesapeake Beach WWTP. The quote includes both the parts and the labor necessary to repair the pump. The pump comes with a 5 year warranty. Beyond that we expect that the pump will require at least one seal replacement which is included in the basic repair kit. There is nothing more than this that we anticipate in a 10 year time frame. Rebuild Estimate Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Extended Price 1 810 97 00 KIT,REPAIR BASIC 6020 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 7 14-69 00 02A LABOR,SVC FLYGT,NO TAX $ 140.00 $ 980.00 Z3-TP MODELS: 3000,6000,7000,8000 1 14-69 00 21A ENV FEE 0-10HP NO TAX TP $ 58.00 $ 58.00 ENVIRONMENTAL FEE 1 14-69 00 24 SHOP SUPPLIES-SMALL $ 53.00 $ 53.00 PUMPS TP MISC SHOP SUPPLIES FOR REPAIR On-Site Programming Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Extended Price 5 14-69 00 06A LABOR,MOBILE FLYGT,NO $ 185.00 $ 925.00 TAXZ3-TP MODELS: 3000,7000,8000 Total Price $ 4,016.00 Terms & Conditions Page 1 of 4 This order is subject to the Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale – Xylem Americas effective on the date the order is accepted which terms are available at http://www.xyleminc.com/en-us/Pages/terms- conditions-of-sale.aspx and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of the agreement between the parties. As of October 14, 2024, all orders must meet a minimum dollar value of $1,200. Xylem reserves the right to refuse to process any order that does not meet the minimum order value requirement. Xylem will support order adjustments to meet the minimum order value threshold. Purchase Orders: Please make purchase orders out to: Xylem Water Solutions USA, Inc. Freight Terms: 3 DAP - Delivered At Place 08 - Jobsite (per IncoTerms 2020) See Freight Payment (Delivery Terms) below. Taxes: State, local and other applicable taxes are not included in this quotation. Back Charges: Buyer shall not make purchases nor shall Buyer incur any labor that would result in a back charge to Seller without prior written consent of an authorized employee of Seller. Tariff Changes: The prices quoted herein are based on the current tariff rates, duties, government charges, and trade regulations as of the date of this quote. If any new tariffs, duties, taxes, or similar charges are imposed, or any existing tariffs, duties, or charges are increased or modified by any government or regulatory authority (collectively, "Tariff Changes"), and such Tariff Changes result in an increase in the cost of goods, Xylem reserves the right to adjust the pricing of the affected goods to reflect the increased costs. Shortages: Xylem will not be responsible for apparent shipment shortages or damages incurred in shipment that are not reported within two weeks from delivery to the jobsite. Damages should be noted on the receiving slip and the truck driver advised of the damages. Please contact our office as soon as possible to report damages or shortages so that replacement items can be shipped and the appropriate claims made. Validity: This Quote is valid for thirty (30) days. Schedule: Delivery lead times are XX weeks after receipt of order acceptance. COVID 19: Stated lead-times are estimated at the time of quotation but may be impacted by the current COVID-19 virus pandemic including effects from supplier's raw material shortages and labor constraints as well as global transportation and logistics delays. Terms of Delivery: PP/Add Actual Surcharge Terms of Payment: 100% N30 after invoice date. Xylem’s payment shall not be dependent upon Purchaser being paid by any third party unless Owner denies payment due to reasons solely attributable to items related to the equipment being provided by FLYGT. Page 2 of 4 Thank you for the opportunity to provide this quotation. Please contact us if there are any questions. To place an order, please send a Purchase Order which includes Purchase Order Number, Billing and Shipping Address, any applicable Tax Exemption Certificates, and Contact Person and Phone Number. As an alternative, please complete, sign and return the Customer Acceptance Page attached. Sincerely, Chris Allen Sales Representative Cell: 704-577-9694 christopher.allen@xylem.com Page 3 of 4  Xylem Water Solutions USA, Inc. Flygt Products Customer Acceptance This order is subject to the Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale – Xylem Americas effective on the date the order is accepted which terms are available at http://www.xyleminc.com/en-us/Pages/terms- conditions-of-sale.aspx and incorporated herein by reference and made a part of the agreement between the parties. A signed copy of this Quote is acceptable as a binding contract. Purchase Orders: Please make purchase orders out to: Xylem Water Solutions USA, Inc. Quote #: 2025-MAL-0030 Customer Name: TOWN OF CHESAPEAKE BEACH Total Amount: $ 5,096.00 (excluding freight) Signature: _______________________________ Name:_______________________________________ (PLEASE PRINT) Company/Utility:___________________________ PO:_________________________________________ Address:_________________________________ Date:________________________________________ ________________________________________ Phone:_______________________________________ ________________________________________ Email:_______________________________________ ________________________________________ Fax:_________________________________________ Page 4 of 4 Introducing the Xylem Preventative Maintenance Agreement Don’t forget to protect your new assets Thank you for considering Xylem for your pumping equipment needs. We appreciate the significance of your purchase decision and want to ensure you get the most out of your investment. The most cost-effective way to do this is to sign-up for a preventative maintenance agreement (PMA) that we tailor to your specific requirements and budget. A Xylem PMA offers a proven method to extend your equipment life, prevent expensive repairs and minimize unplanned failures. It’s also ensures you remain in compliance with environmental, health and other government regulations – critical to maximizing operation uptime. Our Flygt Gold PMA Includes: • One scheduled preventative maintenance service visit with multi-point inspection, 12 months after purchase and discounted access to Xylem's rental fleet • An additional 12-month warranty when purchased with your new or replacement Flygt pump(s) • The option to renew annually or on a multi-year basis following the first service visit • Priority service on repairs and field service calls * Flat-Rate Pricing is available for new and replacement Flygt models 3069, 3085, 3102, 3127, 3153, 3171, 3202, 3301 & 3315 starting at $500 per pump. Multi-year PMA packages are available as well. Contact your Xylem Sales Representative today for more information. Visit our PMA site for more info  Calvert County FY 2025 Program Open Space Annual Program Adopted June 18, 2024  INTRODUCTION The Program Open Space Annual Program must be submitted to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the Maryland Department of Planning in order for local governments to be eligible for state funding for acquisition and development of recreation land. Upon review, the Annual Program becomes the basis for total allocations to each of the local governments. The State determines the amount of funding based upon a formula developed for the apportionment of the annual appropriations for Program Open Space. A municipality may submit its annual program through the county in which it is located. The Annual Program must be consistent with the county’s Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan. CALVERT COUNTY RECREATION PLANNING OBJECTIVES The Calvert County Comprehensive Plan, Calvert 2040, adopted in 2019 and amended in 2022, sets forth an overall goal and four broad objectives in the Parks and Recreation section. A few key actions in the 2019 plan are noted below as sub-bullets. These actions were in the prior Calvert County Comprehensive Plan as objectives. The objectives were updated and included in the 2019 plan as actions; there were no changes to them when the plan was amended in 2022. • Increase the amount of land area dedicated to recreation and natural resources. • Ensure that a wide selection of public recreational facilities and programs are provided to meet the interests and needs of all ages, incomes, and abilities. o Enhance the network of recreational sites and facilities, including hiker/biker and horseback riding trails, based on the unique natural, cultural, and historical features of the county. o Continue to improve and expand opportunities for public access to the Chesapeake Bay and the Patuxent River. o Provide safe access to parks and recreational facilities including, where feasible, pedestrian and bicycle access. • Increase the variety of uses of community facilities. • Expand community involvement in recreational programming. Calvert County’s most recent Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan was adopted in November 2022. The purpose of the plan is to maintain the county’s eligibility to participate in Maryland’s Program Open Space and to guide the county’s management and enhancement of its public parks, open spaces, and preserved land for the next five years. The Recreation, Parks, and Open Spaces chapter of the plan sets forth four goals and 19 recommendations. 2022 GOALS FOR RECREATION, PARKS, AND OPEN SPACE GOAL 1: Improve and enhance existing Calvert County Parks & Recreation facilities and amenities. Page 2  GOAL 2: Continue to improve programming and natural resource opportunities within all parks and recreation areas. GOAL 3: Continue to look for opportunities to develop new facilities and amenities. GOAL 4: Continue to improve and strategize organizational efficiencies. The Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan is available online http://www.calvertcountymd.gov/LPPRP. ANNUAL PROGRAM PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS Projects listed in the Annual Program are either taken directly from the Calvert County Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan or identified as potential acquisition or development projects by the Board of County Commissioners. They have not necessarily obtained final approval from the Board. Projects specifically requested by municipalities are also listed. For projects other than those already listed in the Calvert County Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan or requested by a municipality, the selection process begins when any individual or organization proposes a project for consideration. The proposal is forwarded to an in-house Open Space Committee composed of the Capital Projects Analyst and representatives from the Department of Parks & Recreation, the Department of General Services, the Department of Economic Development, and the Department of Planning & Zoning. The Open Space Committee makes preliminary findings of fact and determines whether the project is consistent with criteria listed in the Calvert County Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan. The committee presents its findings to the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners for action. Listing a project in the Annual Program is a first step toward implementing a project and is a requirement for using Program Open Space funding. Title 3, §3-205 of the Land Use Article of the Maryland Annotated Code specifies that certain types of projects may not be constructed or authorized in the local jurisdiction until approved by the planning commission as consistent with the plan (comprehensive plan) or geographic sections of the local jurisdiction. Types of public projects that must be reviewed include squares, parks, and open spaces. Each year, the Calvert County Planning Commission reviews such projects in the six-year Calvert County Capital Improvement Plan for consistency with the Calvert County Comprehensive Plan. Page 3  PROPOSED BUDGETED COUNTY PROJECTS FOR ACQUISITION SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR PROJECT NAME ACREAGE ANNUAL PROGRAM ONLY SPONSOR PROJECT DESCRIPTION ($) LOCAL STATE FEDERAL/ EXISTING ULTIMATE PROJECT TOTAL LOCAL SHARE SHARE OTHER POS POS A-24 CALVERT COUNTY LAND CALVERT PRESERVATION, PARKS AND RECREATION N/A N/A N/A 125,000 NA 125,000* PLAN A-31 SOLOMON TOWN CENTER PARK CALVERT 21.2 26.6 5.4 580,000 0 580,000 EXTENSION *Calvert County requests $25,000 annually over a 5-year span for LPPRP planning expenses. Our next LPPRP update will be 2027. APPROVED BUDGETED COUNTY PROJECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT SOURCE OF FUNDS ACREAGE (FOR ANNUAL PROGRAM ONLY) NAME OF RECREATION AREA $ SPONSOR TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT LOCAL STATE FEDERAL PROJECT TOTAL LOCAL SHARE SHARE /OTHER POS POS CALVERT D-2 HALLOWING POINT DISTRICT PARK – PAVED PATHWAYS AND LIGHTS 102 400,000 300,000 100,000 * D-4 COVE POINT DISTRICT PARK- PARK IMPROVEMENTS CALVERT 267 1,100,000 300,000 800,000 (PLAYGROUND) 500,000 D-16 BATTLE CREEK CYPRESS SWAMP NATURE CENTER-BUILDING AND (estimate CALVERT 100 750,000 200,500 75,000 EXHIBITS from fire insurance) CALVERT D-22 & D-27 KINGS LANDING PARK BOARDWALKS AND TRAILS 260 56,250 15,000 41,250 *Project D-4 is not included in the FY25 CIP but could be pulled forward in the early FY25 depending on fiscal stability. Page 4 Page 5  FY 2025 ACQUISITION PROJECTS A-24 Calvert County Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan The State of Maryland requires local governing bodies to prepare a local Land Preservation, Parks, and Recreation Plan (LPPRP) under the Maryland Natural Resources Code, Title 5 Forest and Parks. The State is requiring the LPPRP to be more detailed and statistically based. The LPPRP is to include a survey on the use of county parks and recreation facilities and programs and a level of service analysis that must include a Proximity Analysis and a Park Equity Analysis. The most recent LPPRP was completed in 2018. The next plan will be due in 2021 and is in the process of being completed. The next allocations will be encumbered for the LPPRP due in 2026 annually for the maximum amount of $25,000 each year. A-31 Solomons Town Center Park Extension The acquisition of the Dowell Road property would expand the current Solomons Town Center Park to include natural green space for unimproved paths and passive recreation in a park that does not currently offer that environment. It would also preserve forest canopy, protecting forested habitats from commercial development in the future. FY 2025 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS D-2 Hallowing Point District Park Hallowing Point Park is one of three district parks in the county. The county is in the process of updating the Hallowing Point Park master plan to continue developing and improving the park. In FY23, the restroom/snack stand complex was renovated to become a larger and more modern restroom complex. There are plans to add food truck locations in place of the snack stands. In FY24, new energy efficient LED lighting was installed around the tennis courts and Athletic Field 4, and the back parking lot and roadways were paved to accommodate a second entrance. In addition, a new dedicated pickleball facility is under construction and slated for completion in the fall of 2024. For FY25, the Hallowing Point Park pathways project may include a new asphalt path that encircles the park and connects current amenities, along with pathway lighting, signage, and needed crosswalks. Page 6 D-4 Cove Point District Park Cove Point District Park is one of three district parks in the county. Funding will be needed to implement the new master plan for the build- out of the park, adopted in late FY 2020. Cove Point Pool had the decking replaced in phases and this project was completed in FY23. Future planning includes tennis and basketball court repaving along with a full playground replacement. The Cove Point playground upgrades in consideration for FY25 may include a new tot lot for kids under 5, a large play structure for kids 5-12, swing sets, and one or more spinners, along with all new surfacing, benches, upgrades to the surrounding walking paths, and water fountains. D-16 Battle Creek Cypress Swamp Nature Center The Battle Creek Cypress Swamp Nature Center serves as the headquarters for the Natural Resources Division, as well as a Visitor Center for the Sanctuary In 2022, an electrical fire caused significant damage resulting in the gutting of the majority of the interior walls, electrical wiring, plumbing and HVAC systems. Expenses are currently being funded through LGIT, the county’s Insurance Program. Renovations are expected to take at a minimum 12 months. Other improvements include construction and renovations of the existing picnic pavilion, adding an outdoor classroom pavilion, and new animal display exhibits would provide significant improvements. New exhibits will entice and educate visitors as well as serve the many school groups that come to the facility. Plans for FY24/25 development include reinstall, renovation and upgrades of interior exhibits and ambassador animal facilities and exhibits. Exterior signage and trail improvements, including repairs to the boardwalk and development of an ADA compliant trail, will better serve the diverse audiences visiting the swamp. Stormwater repairs are also needed in the parking lot of this facility, currently included in ARPA funding. D-22 Shared Used, Natural Surface Trails County-wide • There is a need for shared use, natural surface trails to accommodate trail running, off-road bicycling, horseback riding, and/or hiking. Trail plans could be developed at existing facilities, such as Kings Landing Park, Flag Ponds Nature Park, Dominion Energy Regional Park and Ward Farm Recreation and Nature Park, as well as new locations for a trail connecting Prince Frederick to the Patuxent River. Plans for FY25 include development of a comprehensive plan for the current trail system at Kings Landing Park, and repairs and relocations to some worn sections of existing trails and boardwalks. D-27 Water Access-Boating, Fishing and Crabbing There is a need for adding, expanding and improving water access throughout the county. This project will pursue improvements for water access, including kayak/canoe launching, fishing and crabbing through repairs and renovation of existing facilities and installation and construction of new structures to increase opportunities for water-based activities and access to the Chesapeake Bay, Patuxent River and its tributaries. Potential projects targeted for FY25 include the installation of an ADA accessible kayak launch facility at the existing Kings Landing pier. Other improvements to this site could include improved access to onshore amenities. Page 7  FY 2025 Program Open Space Annual Program Projects: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Adopted June 18,2024 Recreation Objectives, Calvert County Comprehensive Plan (adopted 2019, Amended 2022): 1. Increase the amount of land area dedicated to recreation and natural resources. 2. Ensure that a wide selection of public recreational facilities and programs are provided to meet the interests and needs of all ages, incomes, and abilities. 3. Increase the variety of uses of community facilities. 4. Expand community involvement in recreational programming. Municipal projects are noted with an asterisk (*). Highlight indicates new project for the FY 2025 Annual Program. Project Number and Name County Notes Consistent with 2022 Calvert Objective(s) County Comprehensive Plan A-24 Calvert County Land 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, Development of the plan will assist with multiple Consistent Preservation, Parks and 9, 10, 11, 12 objectives Recreation Plan A-31 Solomons Town Center 1,3 Acquisition will expand and improve an existing Consistent Park Extension park D-2 Hallowing District Point 1, 3 Development will expand and improve an Consistent Park existing park D-4 Cove District Point Park 1, 2, 3, 4 Development will expand and improve an Consistent existing park D-16 Battle Creek Cypress 2, 3, 4 Renovation will enhance visitor experience and Consistent Swamp Nature Center provide space for staff and volunteers D-22 Shared Use Natural 2, 3 Renovation will improve the existing park Consistent Surface Trails amenities D-27 Water Access for Boating 2, 3, 4 Renovation will improve the existing park Consistent amenities, allow ADA access Page 1 of 1  Calvert County FY 2025 Program Open Space Annual Program Project Descriptions Adopted June 18, 2024 1 A-24 Calvert County Land Preservation, Parks and Recreation Plan The State of Maryland requires local governing bodies to prepare a local land preservation and recreation plan (LPPRP) under the Maryland Natural Resources Code, Title 5 Forest and Parks. The plan addresses parks and recreation, natural resource land conservation, and agricultural land preservation. The plan may include additional topics such as an economic analysis and discussion of cultural resource preservation, historic preservation, tourism, education, and environmental literacy, etc. The State is requiring the next plan to be more detailed and statistically based than previous plans. The plan is to include a survey on the use of county parks and recreation facilities and programs and a level of service analysis that must include a proximity analysis and a park equity analysis. The preparation of the Plan will help promote the State’s Planning Visions: #1 Quality of life and sustainability #2 Public participation #4 Community design #5 Infrastructure #8 Economic development #9 Environmental protection #10 Resource Conservation #11 Stewardship #12 Implementation (Refer to the last page for a list of the State of Maryland’s Planning Visions.) 2 A-31 Solomons Town Center Park Extension The acquisition of the Dowell Road property would expand the current Solomons Town Center Park, adding 5.4 acres to include natural green space for unimproved paths and passive recreation in a park that does not currently offer that environment. It would also preserve forest canopy, protecting forested habitats from commercial development in the future. This is consistent with the 2022 LPPRP in the following areas: Goal 1: Improve and enhance existing CCPR facilities, specifically 1.1A pertaining to increasing access to walking, running, hiking and nature opportunities. This is a priority for the Department of Parks and Recreation. Goal 2 B&C – Make open spaces a key consideration when procuring new properties and balance passive and active recreation opportunities. 3 D-2 Hallowing Point District Park Hallowing Point Park is located on MD 231 approximately six miles west of Prince Frederick. It is one of three district parks in the county and currently provides 18 playing fields, four tennis/pickleball courts, a basketball court, playground, picnic pavilion, and comfort stations. The purchase of the property and initial development more than 20 years ago were Program Open Space projects. Calvert County is in the process of updating the Hallowing Point Park master plan to continue developing and improving the park. Recent projects include upgrades to sports fields, tennis courts and the food concessions area, and new dedicated pickleball facility is under construction and slated for completion in the fall of 2024. For FY25, the Hallowing Point Park pathways project may include a new asphalt path that encircles the park and connects current amenities, along with pathway lighting, signage, or needed crosswalks. These improvements are consistent with Calvert County’s goal of expanding and improving existing sites. By developing this site efficiently, Calvert County is meeting Planning Vision #3, which calls for growth to be concentrated in existing population and business centers. 4 D-4 Cove Point District Park • Cove Point Park is in the 1st election district and contains approximately 80 acres. Facilities include a swimming pool complex, playing fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, a picnic shelter, and a playground. Funding will be needed to implement the new master plan for the build-out of the park, adopted in late FY 2020. Cove Point Pool had the decking replaced in phases and this project was completed in FY23. Future planned development projects include tennis court improvements and basketball court paving and upgrades along with a full playground replacement. The Cove Point playground upgrades in consideration for FY25 may include a new tot lot for kids under 5, a large play structure for kids 5-12, swing sets, or one or more spinners, along with all new surfacing, benches, upgrades to the surrounding walking paths, and water fountains. These improvements are consistent with Calvert County’s goal of expanding and improving existing sites. By developing this site efficiently, Calvert County is meeting Planning Vision #3, which calls for growth to be concentrated in existing population and business centers. 5 D-16 Battle Creek Cypress Swamp Nature Center The Battle Creek Cypress Swamp Nature Center serves as the headquarters for the Natural Resources Division, as well as a Visitor Center for the Sanctuary. In November of 2022 an electrical fire caused significant damage to the interior of the building. The majority of the electrical, data, HVAC and plumbing infrastructure will be replaced. The majority of the restoration will be covered through Calvert County’s insurance program (LGIT), although any upgrades and improvement will require outside funding. Plans for FY24/25 development include reinstall, renovation and upgrades of interior exhibits and ambassador animal facilities and exhibits. The existing exhibits need to be evaluated annually for replacement and/or renovation to maintain and further the mission of the Natural Resources Division. Construction of new live animal exhibits are planned due to damage from the fire. Existing interior and exterior exhibits will be renovated while new exhibits will be developed, including design, fabrication, and installation. The renovated and new exhibits will entice and educate visitors. The new exhibits will focus on the ecology of this unique habitat and reinforce the field trip lessons that school groups, including every Calvert County Public School 1st grade class, experience when they visit the Nature Center. A new ADA-compliant trail to the swamp would provide accessible interpretation of the cypress swamp. The project is consistent with the State’s Planning Vision #1 regarding quality of life and stewardship. 6 D-22 Shared Used, Natural Surface Trails County-wide There is a need for shared use, natural surface trails in Calvert County. These trails would allow for trail running, off-road bicycling, horseback riding, and/or hiking. Kings Landing Park and Biscoe Gray Heritage Farm have trails for hikers and horses. Chesapeake Bay Railway Trail is suitable for hikers and bicycling; otherwise, there are very few trails for bicycling off-road. Trail plans could be developed to accommodate bicycling at existing facilities. There is the potential to develop natural surface trails on public property. Potential FY25 projects for shared use, natural surface trails include: • Trails at Kings Landing Park: Plans for FY25 include development of a comprehensive plan for the current trail system at Kings Landing Park, and repairs and relocations to some worn sections of existing trails and boardwalks. This project is consistent with State Planning Vision #12: Implementation: strategies, policies, programs, and funding for growth and development, resource conservation, infrastructure, and transportation are integrated across the local, regional, state, and interstate levels to achieve these visions. 7 D-27 Water Access-Boating, Fishing, and Crabbing There is a need for adding, expanding, and improving water access throughout the county. This project will pursue improvements for water access, including kayak/canoe launching, fishing, and crabbing through repairs and renovation of existing facilities and installation and construction of new structures to increase opportunities for water-based activities. Potential projects targeted for FY25 include the installation of an ADA accessible kayak launch facility at the existing Kings Landing pier. Other improvements to this site could include improved access to onshore amenities. Canoeing and kayaking are low-impact recreational uses, which help promote the State’s Planning Vision #1 on quality of life and sustainability. 8 The Planning Visions Adopted by the State of Maryland in the 2009 Smart, Green, and Growing Act (SB 273/HB 294) 1. Quality of life and sustainability: a high quality of life is achieved through universal stewardship of the land, water, and air resulting in sustainable communities and protection of the environment; 2. Public participation: citizens are active partners in the planning and implementation of community initiatives and are sensitive to their responsibilities in achieving community goals; 3. Growth areas: growth is concentrated in existing population and business centers, growth areas adjacent to these centers, or strategically selected new centers; 4. Community Design: compact, mixed-use, walkable design consistent with existing community character and located near available or planned transit options is encouraged to ensure efficient use of land and transportation resources and preservation and enhancement of natural systems, open spaces, recreational areas, and historical, cultural, and archeological resources; 5. Infrastructure: growth areas have the water resources and infrastructure to accommodate population and business expansion in an orderly, efficient, and environmentally sustainable manner; 6. Transportation: a well-maintained, multimodal transportation system facilitates the safe, convenient, affordable, and efficient movement of people, goods, and services within and between population and business centers; 7. Housing: a range of housing densities, types, and sizes provides residential options for citizens of all ages and incomes; 8. Economic development: economic development and natural resources-based businesses that promote employment opportunities for all income levels within the capacity of the state’s natural resources, public services, and public facilities are encouraged; 9. Environmental protection: land and water resources, including the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays, are carefully managed to restore and maintain healthy air and water, natural systems, and living resources; 10. Resource conservation: waterways, forests, agricultural areas, open space, natural systems, and scenic areas are conserved; 11. Stewardship: government, business entities, and residents are responsible for the creation of sustainable communities by collaborating to balance efficient growth with resource protection; and 12. Implementation: strategies, policies, programs, and funding for growth and development, resource conservation, infrastructure, and transportation are integrated across the local, regional, state, and interstate levels to achieve these visions. 9 Town of Chesapeake Beach Priority Projects Spring 2019 By the: Town Walkable Community Advisory Group Town of Chesapeake Beach Walkable Community Advisory Group Spring 2019 Request for Proposals 2 Major Grant Projects 7 Urban Walkability Improvement Projects  10 Projects Walkable Community Advisory Group Priority Projects Identified for further Ranked from 1 to 10 Development in 2019 1. Multipurpose path from town center to Beach Elementary School 2. Crosswalk at intersection of 260/261 3. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) sidewalk phase II 4. Chesapeake Beach to North Beach connection east side MD Rt. 261 5. Bayfront Park extension with parking and safe crossing 6. Bay viewing sites and connecting wayfaring paths 7. Multipurpose path, gateway extension along MD Rt. 260 8. Bayfront Park wayfaring and sidewalk connection from Rod-n-Reel 9. North side wayfaring path to town center Chosen From “A Vision for a more Walkable Community” By the: Town Walkable Community Advisory Group 10. Sidewalk along Cox Road Priority Projects 1 and 7 New multipurpose path network is intended to support bicycle transportation throughout town and beyond for residents. It must also serve as an attractive recreational asset for tourists. Design plan should ensure that multipurpose path project will qualify for all types of bicycle grant funding available.  Priority 1 This multipurpose path link will serve as the core trail for an ever growing bicycle path network through the area’s most beautiful natural wetlands. The Chesapeake Beach town center will be a key starting point for this growing network. Great care must be taken to preserve the natural character of Fishing Creek and the surrounding wetlands where the path is outside of the town Including additional plans for proposed hiking loops adds value and function to the multipurpose path. center boundaries.  Priority 7 This multipurpose path length will serve as the gateway to town and must be an aesthetically pleasing focal point for those traveling on MD Rt. 260 into Chesapeake Beach. This path must be physically separated from the road using landscape and hardscape design. Safe and seamless bicycle crossing of MD Rt. 260 into town center should be considered. .  Unprioritized Links These path lengths are just a few of the potential additions to the multipurpose path network that Chesapeake Beach is considering for future projects. Our hope is that neighboring municipalities and county governments will continue to build on the multipurpose path network proposed, resulting in a truly amazing bicycle asset near the Chesapeake Bay. When fully implemented, this trail network should become a major point of interest in Maryland, and will rival networks found in other bike friendly states. . Priority Projects 2,3,4 Safety is the Walkable Community Advisory Group’s most important priority. Projects 2, 3, and 4 address safety concerns in areas of town most often traveled by pedestrians. Achieving pedestrian safety in these areas as soon as possible is the most important goal for these 3 projects Priority Project 2 Pedestrians often ignore this crosswalk which is not noticeable and does not offer protection as a result of its current placement. Gradually curved entrance into town is necessary for accommodating towed boats, making this intersection particularly challenging. Creative solutions such as artistic, colored, or 3D crosswalk markings in addition traffic signaling, and other safety improvements are welcomed. Priority Project 3 This area is heavily traveled by pedestrians traveling between North Beach and Chesapeake Beach. Plans for traditional sidewalks, boardwalks, or landscaped walks are all welcomed. Priority Project 4 This project will connect to the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) sidewalk currently being planned. Grant funding will likely be necessary in order to complete this project. Planning should be sufficient for SRTS grant application. A route physically separated by landscape and hardscape is preferred when possible. Priority Project 5 A major goal of this project is to alleviate overcrowding at our town park. Currently, cars overflow onto the road from the parking lot and there is not enough room for beach activities. At a minimum, Chesapeake Beach would like to add parking and to rebrand the park for use primarily as a nature center. Property acquisition through Open Space funding will be needed to fully implement this project. Plans for this project should be sufficient for a successful Open Space Grant application. Priority 5(a) Priority 5(b) Priority Projects 6,8,9,10 Projects 6, 8, 9 and 10 are intended encourage the walking tradition within our community. These projects should establish new and inviting wayfaring, pathway or sidewalk routes that bring pedestrians to desirable locations. These projects should be designed with a conservative budget in mind. Priority Project 6 These “Pocket Parks” linked by wayfaring paths through residential areas will serve as resting spots for recreational walkers who wish to take a short break while enjoying bay views. Designs for pocket park infrastructure and for wayfaring signs and markings are requested for this project. Priority Project 8 This project is intended to create pleasant walking options for pedestrians wishing to visit Bayfront Park from the Rod-n-Reel or the town center. Cost analysis for wayfaring path and for landscaped path and sidewalk should be separated. The Town may choose to implement plans on one or both of the routes suggested. Priority Project 9 A wayfaring route through this cottage filled residential area will provide recreational walkers with the opportunity to wander away from the busy beach traffic while on their daily walk. Plans for all of the routes suggested here are welcomed or choose the most ideal routes for providing a pleasant walk to and from desirable locations. Focal point areas with landscaping and attractive infrastructure elements are encouraged for this area. Priority Project 10 A sidewalk or stepping stone route in this area will facilitate quick pedestrian access to the town center for residents of the future These projects should be Heritage community designed with a and for residents of conservative Bayviewbudget Hills. in mind. Thank you for your creativity and expertise! Points of Contact Derek Favret: (210) 834-1841 dfavret@chesapeakebeachmd.gov Holly Wahl hwahl@Chesapeakebeachmd.gov Town Hall (301) 855-8398