Advisory Planning Commission
Regular MeetingCollege Park, MD · August 4, 2022
Minutes
CITY OF COLLEGE PARK ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
7401 BALTIMORE AVENUE, COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND 20740
TELEPHONE: (240) 487-3538
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
Approved Minutes of Meeting
August 4, 2022
Members Present Absent
Stephanie Stullich, Chair x
Santosh Chelliah, Vice-Chair x
Daejauna Donahue x
Vernae Martin x
Kiersten Johnson x
Malaika Nji-Kerber x
Michael Meadow x
Also Present: Planning Staff – Miriam Bader and Theresheia Williams; Attorney – Suellen
Ferguson
I. Call to Order and Amendments to Agenda: Malika Nji-Kerber (serving as
meeting Chair due to the Chair, Stephanie Stullich and Vice-Chair, Santosh
Chelliah being absent) called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m.
II. Approval of the Agenda: Vernae Martin moved to approve the agenda as posted.
Michael Meadow seconded. Motion carried 5-0-0.
III. Approval of Minutes:
Kirsten Johnson moved to approve the minutes of June 2, 2022. Michael Meadow
seconded. Motion carried 5-0-0.
IV. Public Remarks on Non-Agenda Items: There were no Public Remarks on Non-
Agenda Items.
V. CPV-2022-03 Variance from the Prince George’s County Zoning
Ordinance to construct property improvements
Applicant: Willie Sellers
Location: 5004 Navahoe Street
Malaika Nji-Kerber explained the hearing procedures and placed witnesses under oath.
Miriam Bader summarized the staff report. The applicant is requesting three setback
variances for property improvements: A variance of 2-feet from the minimum front
yard setback of 25-feet for a porch, a variance of 9.3-feet from the minimum side yard
setback of 15-feet for an attached carport and a variance of 12-feet from the minimum
setback of 15-feet from a side lot line along a street for an accessory building. The
subject house was constructed in 1900, prior to zoning. The property has an area of
16,241 square feet and is improved with a 2-story, frame house and two accessory
structures. The property is a triangular-shaped, corner lot, with frontage along Navahoe
Street, Rhode Island Avenue, and an unimproved section of Potomac Avenue. The
existing front porch is set back 23 feet from the front property line.
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
August 4, 2022 – Page 2
An elderly person resides in the residence with the applicant. She currently uses a
walker and may need a wheelchair in the future, which would be accommodated with
the construction of an ADA ramp. One of the two accessory structures will be razed
and will be rebuilt as a den/office. The applicant would like to have the porch
extension and carport line up with the existing front porch for aesthetic and practical
reasons. The height of the accessory structure is proposed to be 19 feet which exceeds
the ordinance maximum of 15-feet. The Ordinance does not allow a height variance to
be granted for an accessory structure.
Staff recommends approval of a 2-foot front yard setback variance for a porch, a
9.3-foot street side yard setback variance for a carport, and a 12-foot street side yard
setback for an accessory structure subject to the following conditions:
1. The height of the accessory structure shall not exceed 15 feet.
2. Existing asphalt and gravel north of the carport shall be
removed.
Miriam Bader submitted the staff report, Exhibits 1-9, and the PowerPoint presentation
into the record.
Willie Sellers, applicant, testified that his main concern is the height of the accessory
structure. He would like to know if the calculation for the height will be measured from
the street level or the yard.
Miriam Bader stated that the County will calculate the height of the accessory structure
and make that determination. Whatever height is approved by the County, will be
accepted by the City. The county will not grant a height variance.
Kiersten Johnson asked if the property was being used as a multi-family residence. She
indicated that pictures of the property show multiple vehicles and trash/recycling bins.
She wanted to know if some specific questions or criteria should be addressed if the
property is being expanded for multi-family use.
Suellen Ferguson stated that this property is zoned as a single-family residence so only
the variance criteria are being used. The variance is addressed by the Advisory
Planning Commission. Code enforcement would address any issues of how many
families are living in the home.
Daejauna Donahue asked if the site plan included in the packet (Exhibit 2) is the
proposed or existing plan?
Miriam Bader stated that the site plan included with the packet is the proposed plan, but
it includes existing and proposed structures.
Malika Nji-Kerber asked if the accessory structure will be connected to the main
building?
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
August 4, 2022 – Page 3
Miriam Bader stated no, it’s not connected. An accessory structure has different
setbacks. Typically, an accessory structure only must be 2 feet from the rear property
line. If it is attached to the house, it would meet the same setbacks as the house, which
would be 25 feet.
Malika Nji-Kerber asked if the accessory addition will need other upgrades like water
and power?
Willie Sellers stated that the structure has always been separate from the main house
and his mother is currently living there. He stated that there is no plan to rent the
structure. The accessory addition will have water and power.
Miriam Bader stated that this structure won’t meet the definition of a dwelling unit
because it will not have a living room, bedroom or full kitchen.
Daejauna Donahue asked what is the setback for the right-of-way for the accessory
addition?
Miriam Bader stated that an accessory structure normally needs to be setback 2-feet
from the property line, but since it is a triangular side lot line along the right-of-way,
the requirement is 15 feet, and a variance of 12 feet is needed.
Malika Nji-Kerber asked what is the timeline for completing the project?
Willie Sellers stated that the proposed timeline depending on supply chains will be
approximately 7 months.
Malika Nji-Kerber asked if the City requested endorsements from the adjoining
property owners?
Miriam Bader stated that a notice is sent to all adjoining property owners to inform
them of the requested variance and the date and time of the public hearing. It is up to
them if they want to submit comments or join the meeting.
Eric Justh, 8207 Potomac Avenue, stated that he sees nothing objectionable about Mr.
Sellers' plan and that he would be glad to submit an endorsement if needed.
Maxine Gross testified that she supports Mr. Sellers' proposal to make the necessary
adjustments to his home to facilitate multi-generational living. She stated that it is an
asset to be able to keep neighbors in the community. There are very few homeowners
in the Lakeland community and she would hate to lose Mr. Sellers. She stated that she
can attest to the fact that Mr. Sellers is the current resident and she thinks he plans to
transition into one household once the necessary work is completed.
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
August 4, 2022 – Page 4
Kiersten Johnson asked what type of siding would be on the accessory building?
Willie Sellers stated that the siding would match the house.
Robert Thurston, President of Lakeland Civic Association, testified that he supports
Mr. Sellers' variance requests to make the requested modifications so that they can
remain residents in the community. The Livable Community Concept that is in place
within the City fosters the ability to allow residents to age-in-place. This is a perfect
example of supporting these exceptions to allow that to happen.
Malika Nji-Kerber asked Mr. Sellers how many years has he and his family lived in
College Park at this residence?
Willie Sellers stated that his parents have been in College Park since 1955 and have
lived in this residence since 1962.
Commissioners reviewed the criteria that need to be met before the variance can be
granted and determined that:
1) The property has an exceptional triangular shape and is a corner lot
with frontage on the Rhode Island right-of-way (both the Trolley
Trail and roadway). There is an extraordinary situation because the
house and accessory buildings were constructed prior to the
establishment of the Rhode Island Avenue right-of-way, which made
them nonconforming.
2) The strict application of the County Zoning Ordinance results in
peculiar and unusual practical difficulties for the Applicant by not
allowing a reasonable design for the construction of a porch extension
and carport to the existing house utilizing the existing setback. The
proposed improvements will provide protection from inclement
weather and aid accessibility for the occupants of the house.
3) Granting the setback variances will not substantially impair the intent,
purpose, and integrity of any applicable plans because the proposed
improvements build on existing construction and is not out of
character with nearby development. Decreasing the street side yard
setback will not negatively affect neighboring properties to the west
because Rhode Island Avenue has a wide right-of-way, the accessory
building abuts the trolley trail, and the adjoining property to the east
fronts on Navahoe Street and not Rhode Island Avenue.
Kierston Johnson moved to recommend approval of variance CPV-2022-03
based on staff recommendations and the criteria outlined in the staff report.
Daejauna Donahue seconded. Motion carried 5-0-0.
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
August 4, 2022 – Page 5
VI. Update on Development Activity – Miriam Bader reported on the following:
Caliber Collision – Proposed location is 9520 Baltimore Avenue (formerly the Piano
store). The developer will be filing a Special Exception for review to M-NCPPC to
turn the existing facility into an auto body paint and repair shop. A neighborhood
meeting was held on August 4th, which staff attended. They are proposing to use the
existing building to do car repair internally only. Cars that are being repaired will be
stored in a fenced area towards the rear.
Paint Branch Preserve – located at 9700 Autoville Drive. A Preliminary Plan of
Subdivision and Detailed site plan will be submitted to M-NCPPC for review. The
proposed development is for 131 single-family residential units at Cherry Hill Road and
Kiernan Dr. A neighborhood meeting will be held on August 31, 2022 at Mamma
Lucia at 4734 Cherry Hill Road.
City Council Meeting – On the September 6 Council worksesion agenda, there are two
development projects scheduled: EcoGrads Detailed Site Plan for 123 graduate student
apartments and the Preliminary Plan for RST Development located on Baltimore Ave.
between Cherokee and Delaware Streets. Three hotels are currently located on site -
Days Inn, Howard Johnson’s and Red Roof Inn. The proposal is to raze the hotels and
construct 331 dwelling units and 4,000 sf of retail.
Trader Joe’s – Staff went on a tour of the project. There is a tentative opening date for
the end of August or the beginning of September.
VII. Other Business: There was no other business.
VIII. Adjourn: There being no further business, Kiersten Johnson moved to adjourn the
meeting. Michael Meadow seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 9:28 p.m.
Minutes prepared by Theresheia Williams
Agenda
College Park Advisory Planning Commission
Hybrid Meeting
In-Person: City Hall Council Chambers
7401 Baltimore Avenue 2nd floor
or Via Zoom
August 4, 2022
7:30 p.m.
AGENDA
I. Call to Order and Amendments to the Agenda
II. Approval of the Agenda
III. Approval of Minutes (June 2, 2022)
IV. Public Remarks on Non-Agenda Items
V. CPV-2022-03 Variances from the Prince George’s County Zoning
Ordinance to construct property improvements
Applicant: Willie Sellers
Location: 5004 Navahoe Street
VI. Update on Development Activity
VII. Other Business
VIII. Adjourn
Join Zoom Meeting
https://zoom.us/j/93715596004?pwd=M0ZuOS9FNmVzMWF2dU1idk5XaWNxdz09
Meeting ID: 937 1559 6004
Passcode: 611845
One tap mobile
+13017158592,,93715596004#,,,,*611845# US (Washington DC)
+19292056099,,93715596004#,,,,*611845# US (New York)
You can also find the meeting link on the City’s website: www.collegeparkmd.gov (click on the
calendar)
Possible closed session pursuant to MD. Code Ann General Provisions
Article 33-305C(B)(7) to consult with Counsel to obtain legal advice.
Get email alerts for College Park
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.